XML 73 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Apr. 30, 2013
The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Company And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

The Company

 

Daegis Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a global provider of eDiscovery, application development, data management, migration, and archiving software. Our eDiscovery solutions include hosted software and professional services that address the full spectrum of eDiscovery needs for corporate counsel and law firms.  Our eDiscovery platform, Daegis Edge, delivers a comprehensive solution that enables clients to efficiently address all phases of the eDiscovery lifecycle from information management through search and analysis to review and production.  Our database, archive, and migration business includes application development, data management and application modernization. Our tools and database software help companies to maximize value and reduce cost in the development, deployment, management and retention of business applications and data.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Such financial statements include our accounts and those of our subsidiaries that we control due to ownership of a controlling interest. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is their local currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates. Income and expense accounts are translated at average rates of exchange in effect during the reporting period. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses are included in other income (expense), net. Foreign currency adjustments resulting from the translation process are excluded from net income and recorded in other comprehensive income (loss).

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include revenue recognition and the assessment of the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets, valuation allowance for deferred taxes, valuation of common stock warrant liabilities, estimates of stock based compensation, and the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

Cash Equivalents

 

Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased and are stated at cost. Cash equivalents consist primarily of demand deposits with banks and money market funds.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The fair values of the Company's long term borrowings are estimated based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Such values approximate the carrying value of the borrowings as of fiscal year end.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Credit Evaluations

 

Financial instruments potentially subjecting the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents primarily with three financial institutions which at times may exceed federally insured levels.

 

The Company licenses its products principally to companies in the United States, Europe, Canada, Latin America, Russia, Japan, Singapore and Australia. For the year ended April 30, 2013, we had one customer that accounted for 21% of consolidated revenues. The customer constituted 16% of consolidated accounts receivable at April 30, 2013.  The customer is in the eDiscovery segment. For the year ended April 30, 2012, the same customer accounted for 23% of consolidated revenues. The customer constituted 24% of consolidated accounts receivable at April 30, 2012. For the year ended April 30, 2011, the same customer accounted for 15% of consolidated revenues and another customer accounted for 14% of consolidated revenues. Those customers constituted 28% and 5%, respectively, of consolidated accounts receivable at April 30, 2011.  Both customers are in the eDiscovery segment. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. Allowances are maintained for potential credit losses. International revenues include all our software license and service revenues from customers located outside the United States. International revenues accounted for 32%, 32%, and 28% of total revenues in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 

 

An allowance for doubtful accounts is established to ensure trade receivables are not overstated due to uncollectability. Bad-debt reserves are maintained for all customers based on a variety of factors, including the length of time receivables are past due, significant one-time events and historical experience. Additional reserves for individual accounts are recorded when the Company becomes aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position. If circumstances related to customers change, estimates of the recoverability of receivables would be further adjusted. The following is a schedule that details activity for the allowance for doubtful accounts and the allowance for long-term accounts receivable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at

 

Beginning

 

(credits) to

 

 

 

Balance at

 

 

beginning

 

balance from

 

operating

 

Write-offs

 

end of

 

 

of year

 

acquisition

 

expenses

 

 of accounts

 

year

 

 

(In thousands)

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended April 30, 2011

$

262

$

207

$

160

$

(126)

$

503

Year ended April 30, 2012

 

503

 

-

 

(14)

 

(144)

 

345

Year ended April 30, 2013

 

345

 

-

 

130

 

(197)

 

278

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for long-term accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

receivable – reflected in other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended April 30, 2011

$

82

$

-

$

9

$

-

$

91

Year ended April 30, 2012

 

91

 

-

 

8

 

(99)

 

-

Year ended April 30, 2013

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease term.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capitalized Software

 

Under the criteria set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance on accounting for the costs of computer software to be sold, leased or otherwise marketed, capitalization of software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility of the product. With respect to the Company’s software development process, technological feasibility is established upon completion of a working model. To date, the Company’s products have been released shortly after reaching technological feasibility. Therefore, development costs incurred after completion of a working model and prior to general release have not been significant. Accordingly, no software development costs have been capitalized to date.

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets or intangibles may be in excess of fair value or not recoverable. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

 

The Company periodically reevaluates the original assumptions and rationale utilized in the establishment of the carrying value and estimated useful lives of the long-lived assets. The criteria used for these evaluations include management’s estimate of the asset’s continuing ability to generate income from operations and positive cash flows in future periods.

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill is the excess of cost of an acquired entity over the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of April 30, and between annual tests if indicators of potential impairment exist, using a fair-value-based approach.

 

Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit. We evaluate the recoverability of intangible assets periodically and take into account events or circumstances that warrant revised estimates of useful lives or that indicate that impairment exists. All of our intangible assets are subject to amortization.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

We generate revenue from software license sales and related services, including maintenance and support, hosting, and consulting and implementation services. The Company licenses its products to end-user customers, including corporate legal and IT departments, law firms, independent software vendors (“ISVs”), international distributors and value-added resellers (“VARs”). The Company’s products are generally sold with a perpetual license. The Company’s contracts with ISVs, VARs and international distributors do not include special considerations such as rights of return, stock rotation, price protection or special acceptance. We exercises judgment in connection with the determination of the amount of revenue to be recognized in each accounting period. The nature of each contractual arrangement determines how revenues and related costs are recognized.     

    

For software license arrangements that do not require significant modification or customization of the underlying software, revenue is recognized when the software product or service has been shipped or electronically delivered, the license fees are fixed and determinable, uncertainties regarding customer acceptance are resolved, collectability is probable and persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists.     

    

For fixed price arrangements that require significant modification or customization of software, we use the percentage-of-completion method for revenue recognition. Under the percentage-of-completion method, progress towards completion is generally measured by labor hours.   Included in accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets at April 30, 2013 and 2012, was $1.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of unbilled accounts receivable resulting from fixed price arrangements.

    

The Company considers a signed non-cancelable license agreement, a customer purchase order, a customer purchase requisition, or a sales quotation signed by an authorized purchaser of the customer to be persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists such that revenue can be recognized.     

    

 

 

Our customer contracts may include multiple-element arrangements that include a delivered element (a software license) and undelivered elements (such as maintenance and support and/or consulting). The value allocated to the undelivered elements is unbundled from the delivered element based on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value of the maintenance and support and/or consulting, regardless of any separate prices stated within the contract. VSOE of fair value is defined as: (i) the price charged when the same element is sold separately, or (ii) if the element has not yet been sold separately, the price for the element established by management having the relevant authority when it is probable that the price will not change before the introduction of the element into the marketplace. We then allocate the remaining balance to the delivered element (a software license), regardless of any separate prices stated within the contract, using the residual method as the VSOE of fair value of all undelivered elements is determinable.    

 

We defer revenue for any undelivered elements, and recognize revenue for delivered elements only when the VSOE of fair value of undelivered elements is known, uncertainties regarding customer acceptance have been resolved, and there are no customer-negotiated refund or return rights affecting the revenue recognized for delivered elements. If we cannot objectively determine the fair value of any undelivered element included in bundled software and service arrangements, we defer revenue until all elements are delivered and services have been performed, or until fair value can objectively be determined for any remaining undelivered elements.

 

An assessment of the ability of the Company’s customers to pay is another consideration that affects revenue recognition. In some cases, the Company sells to undercapitalized customers. In those circumstances, revenue recognition is deferred until cash is received, the customer has established a history of making timely payments or the customer’s financial condition has improved. Furthermore, once revenue has been recognized, the Company evaluates the related accounts receivable balance at each period end for amounts that we believe may no longer be collectible. This evaluation is largely done based on a review of the financial condition via credit agencies and historical experience with the customer. Any deterioration in credit worthiness of a customer may impact the Company’s evaluation of accounts receivable in any given period.     

    

Revenue from support and maintenance activities, which consist of fees for ongoing support and unspecified product updates, are recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance contract, typically one year, and the associated costs are expensed as incurred. Consulting and implementation services are performed on a “best efforts” basis and may be billed under time-and-materials or fixed price arrangements. Revenues and expenses relating to providing consulting services are generally recognized as the services are performed. Revenue from hosting activities, which consist of fees for storing customer data, are recognized as the services are performed, and the associated costs are expensed as incurred.    

    

Taxes collected from customers and remitted to the government are presented on a gross basis on the consolidated balance sheet and are not included in revenue on the consolidated statement of operations.  At April 30, 2013 and April 30, 2012 we had $36,000 and $48,000 of sales taxes payable.

    

Warranties and Indemnification

 

We offer a limited warranty for product and service sales that generally provide the customer a sixty-day warranty period against defects. To date, the Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of such warranties and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

 

The Company’s license agreements generally include certain provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if its product or services infringe upon a third-party’s intellectual property rights. To date, the Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of such indemnifications and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

Share-based compensation expense includes the estimated fair value for share-based awards. Share-based compensation expenses are recognized over the vesting period of the awards, net of estimated forfeitures. 

 

We estimate the fair value of our share-based awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model incorporates various assumptions including expected term, interest rates and expected volatility. Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates and ultimately how much we recognize as stock-based compensation expense. The fair values of our stock options are estimated at the date of grant. The weighted-average input assumptions used and resulting fair values for years ended April 30, 2013, 2012, and 2011, were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

April 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Expected term (in years)

 

4.0 

 

4.0 

 

4.0 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

0.5 

%

1.1 

%

1.3 

%

Volatility

 

77 

%

89 

%

84 

%

Dividend yield

 

 -

 

 -

 

 -

 

Weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the year

$

1.01 

$

2.38 

$

3.38 

 

 

The Company bases its expected term assumption on its historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards it grants to employees. The risk-free interest rate is based upon United States treasury interest rates appropriate for the expected term of the awards. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected term of the Company’s stock options. The Company did not pay cash dividends to common stockholders in fiscal 2013, 2012, or 2011, and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, an expected dividend yield of zero is used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

 

We recognize expense only for the stock-based awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Therefore, the Company has developed an estimate of the number of awards expected to be forfeited prior to vesting (“forfeiture rate”). The Company uses a forfeiture rate that is estimated based on historical forfeiture experience, and is applied to all stock-based awards. The forfeiture rate used for fiscal years 2013, 2012, and 2011 is 20%. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation cost as an expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

 

Fair Value of Common Stock Warrant Liability

 

We value our warrants based on open form option pricing models which, based on the relevant inputs, render the fair value estimate Level 3 (see Note 7). The Company bases its estimates of fair value for liabilities on the amount it would pay a third-party market participant to transfer the liability and incorporates inputs such as equity prices, historical and implied volatilities, dividend rates and prices of convertible securities issued by comparable companies maximizing the use of observable inputs when available. Changes in the fair value of the warrants are reflected in the consolidated statement of operations as “Gain from change in fair value of common stock warrant liability.”

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company uses the asset and liability method, under which deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwards are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be reversed. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is additionally dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets when uncertainty regarding their realizability exists.

 

We record an unrecognized tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. The Company includes interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within our provision for income taxes. To the extent accrued interest and penalties do not ultimately become payable, amounts accrued are reduced in the period that such determination is made and are reflected as a reduction of the overall income tax provision.

 

It is the intention of the Company to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiary in its operations. See Note 12 for further discussion.

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Share 

 

Earnings per share guidance requires a dual presentation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock (e.g. convertible preferred stock, warrants, and common stock options) were exercised or converted into common stock. For fiscal years 2012 and 2011, because of our net loss available to shareholders, potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the per share computations due to their anti-dilutive effect.

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss) 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and gains and (losses) on foreign currency translation.

 

Segment Reporting

 

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer. We have evaluated our approach for making operating decisions and assessing the performance of our business and, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, we have determined that we have two reportable segments: (i) eDiscovery and (ii) database, archive, and migration. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1. We evaluate performance based on income from operations (total revenues less operating costs). We do not allocate certain corporate costs to each segment and therefore disclose these amounts separately in our segment table included in Note 17.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated statement of operations to conform to the current period presentation.  These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In June 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the presentation of other comprehensive income.  Under the new guidance, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  The new guidance became effective for Daegis beginning May 1, 2012.  The Company has elected to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements.  The adoption of this guidance did not a have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This guidance clarifies the application of fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. The new guidance became effective for Daegis beginning May 1, 2012. The adoption of this guidance did not a have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the disclosure of offsetting assets and liabilities. Under the new guidance, entities are required to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The new guidance will be effective for Daegis beginning May 1, 2013. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.