8-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_______________

Form 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934

Date of report (date of earliest event reported):
February 18, 2011

Unify Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	001-11807	94-2710559
(State or other jurisdiction	(Commission File No.)	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation)		Identification No.)

1420 Rocky Ridge Drive
Roseville, California 95661
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(916) 218-4700

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

[ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a -12)

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d -2(b))

[ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e -4(c))

Item 4.02(a). Non-Reliance on Previously Issued Financial Statements or a Related Audit Report or Completed Interim Review.

On February 15, 2011, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Unify Corporation (the “Company”), after consultation with Company management and the Company’s auditors, Grant Thornton LLP, concluded that the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended April 30, 2010, and each of the unaudited financial statements for the interim periods ended July 31, 2009, October 31, 2009, January 31, 2010, July 31, 2010 and October 31, 2010, did not properly account for the following items and, as a result, should not be relied upon. The Company is in the process of finalizing the quantification of the impact of the accounting errors on the Company’s previously reported financial statements, but preliminary estimates of the impact are provided in the following discussion.

1. Classification and recognition of certain warrants in accordance with ASC 815-40-15-5.

The Audit Committee determined that FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 815-40-15-5, “Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” (“ASC 815-40”), should have been adopted by the Company as of May 1, 2009, which would have resulted in the Company classifying and recognizing certain warrants previously issued by the Company as a liability rather than as stockholders’ equity, and that adopting ASC 815-40 as of May 1, 2009 had a material impact on the Company’s previously issued financial statements, including the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended April 30, 2010, and each of the unaudited financial statements for the interim periods ended July 31, 2009, October 31, 2009, January 31, 2010, July 31, 2010 and October 31, 2010. The Audit Committee reached this conclusion after Company management informed the Audit Committee that ASC 815-40 applies to certain warrants previously issued by the Company. Company management initially became aware of the possible applicability of ASC 815-40 as a result of an SEC comment letter related to the SEC’s review of the Company’s 10-K filing for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010. ASC 815-40 applies to warrants that contain anti-dilution provisions that adjust the exercise price of the warrants in the event additional shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock are issued by the Company at a price less than the then applicable exercise price of the warrants. In the case of any such warrants, ASC 815-40 provides that such warrants are to be treated as a liability (rather than stockholders’ equity) at fair value, with the calculated increase or decrease in fair value being recognized in the Statement of Operations. Company management prepared a full assessment of the Company’s warrants and concluded that previously issued warrants to purchase 1,344,986 shares of the Company’ ;s common stock were within the scope of ASC 815-40 due to the anti-dilution provisions contained in the warrants. Accordingly, the Company has concluded that ASC 815-40 should have been adopted as of May 1, 2009 and that such warrants should have been classified as a liability measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the Statement of Operations.

The estimated impact of the proper application of ASC 815-40 on a pre-tax basis as of and for the year ended April 30, 2010 is to increase current liabilities by approximately $1.0 million, to decrease stockholders’ equity by approximately $1.0 million and to increase pre-tax net loss by approximately $0.2 million.

In addition to the impact noted as of and for the year ended April 30, 2010, the estimated impact on a pre-tax basis of the proper application of ASC 815-40 as of and for the six months ended October 31, 2010, is to increase current liabilities by approximately $0.4 million, to increase notes payable, net by approximately $1.0 million, to decrease stockholders’ equity by approximately $1.4 million and to decrease the pre-tax net loss by approximately $0.8 million.

2. Accounting for Contingent Consideration in Business Combinations in accordance with ASC 805.

The Audit Committee determined that FASB ASC 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”), was not properly applied in accounting for the Company’s June 30, 2009 acquisition of AXS-One Inc. and such misapplication had a material impact on the Company’s previously issued unaudited financial statements for the interim periods ended January 31, 2010 and on the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended April 30, 2010. The Audit Committee reached this conclusion after Company management informed the Audit Committee ASC 805 had been misapplied. Company management initially became aware of the misapplication of ASC 805 as part of discussions with its independent registered public accounting firm regarding the accounting for its acquisition of AXS-One Inc. In applying ASC 805 the Company had calculated the fair market value of contingent consideration related to net license revenue on a quarterly bas is and recorded any change in the calculated amount as an adjustment to goodwill.

However, in accordance with ASC 805 such changes in the fair market value should have been recorded as adjustments to the income of the Company in the Statement of Operations.

The impact of the proper application of ASC 805 as of and for the year ended April 30, 2010 is to increase goodwill by approximately $2.1 million, to increase stockholders’ equity by approximately $2.1 million and to decrease the pre-tax net loss by approximately $2.1 million. ASC 805 had no error correction impact on the financial statements as and for the six months ended October 31, 2010.

Combined Impact of ASC 815-40 and ASC 805 Adjustments:

Restatements by the Company will reflect certain adjustments to non-cash items in the Company’s financial statements as a result of the adoption of ASC 815-40 regarding accounting for warrants and the correct application of ASC 805 regarding accounting for the AXS-One Inc. contingent consideration. The preliminary estimates of the combined impact of the errors on the Statement of Operations are as follows:

				Impact of			Impact of
	Previously			ASC 815-40			ASC 805
	Reported			Adjustment			Adjustment		As Restated
				(unaudited)			(unaudited)		(unaudited)
For the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2010
Loss before income taxes	$	(1,908,000	)	$	(192,000	)	$	2,093,000	$	(7,000	)
For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2010
Loss before income taxes (unaudited)	$	(1,217,000	)	$	753,000		$	-	$	(464,000	)

The preliminary estimates of the combined impact on a pre-tax basis of the errors on the Company’s Balance Sheet as of April 30, 2010 is to increase goodwill by approximately $2.1 million, to increase current liabilities by approximately $1.0 million and to increase stockholders’ equity by approximately $1.1 million. As noted in Item 2. above, ASC 805 had no error correction impact on the Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2010 so the change for this period would be the same as described in Item 1. above for ASC 815-40.

The restatements do not impact the Company’s previously reported total revenues, cash, cash equivalents or cash flows.

The Company, including the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, has discussed the foregoing matters with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Grant Thornton LLP. The Audit Committee has authorized and directed the officers of the Company to take the appropriate and necessary actions to restate its audited financial statements included in the Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2010 and the unaudited financial statements included in the Form 10-Q filings for the quarters ended July 31, 2009, October 31, 2009, January 2010, July 31, 2010 and October 31, 2010 by filing amendments as soon as practicable.

Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.

On February 18, 2011, the Company issued a press release announcing its upcoming restatement of financial statements. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as exhibit 99.1, the contents of which are furnished in its entirety.

The information in Item 7.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the exhibit, is deemed to be “furnished” and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(d)	Exhibits
	99.1   Press Release dated February 18, 2011: Unify to Restate Previously Issued Financial Statements

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 18, 2011
By:	/s/ Steven Bonham
	Steven Bonham
	Vice President and CFO
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-99.1

News Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

For more information, contact:

Company:	Investors:
Deb Thornton	Todd Kehrli or Charles Messman
Unify Corp.	MKR Group, Inc.
(916) 218-4779	(323) 468-2300
deb@unify.com	unfy@mkr-group.com

UNIFY TO RESTATE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ROSEVILLE, Calif., – Feb. 18, 2011 – Unify Corp. (NASDAQ: UNFY), an information management and eDiscovery company, today announced it will restate previously filed financial statements to revise the accounting treatment regarding certain warrant issuances and contingent consideration related to a 2009 acquisition. The Company detailed the basis for the restatement in Form 8-K filed today with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and accordingly, certain previously issued financial statements should not be reli ed upon.

The purpose of the restated reports is to correct errors to non-cash items related to certain of the Company’s financing and acquisition activities. The preliminary estimates of the combined impact of the proper accounting treatment on Unify’s Statement of Operations on a pre-tax basis are as follows:

				Warrant			Contingent
	Previously			Issuance			Consideration
	Reported			Adjustment			Adjustment		As Restated
				(unaudited)			(unaudited)		(unaudited)
For the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2010
Loss before income taxes	$	(1,908,000	)	$	(192,000	)	$	2,093,000	$	(7,000	)
For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2010
Loss before income taxes (unaudited)	$	(1,217,000	)	$	753,000		$	-	$	(464,000	)

The preliminary estimates of the combined impact on the Company’s balance sheet as of April 30, 2010 is to increase goodwill by approximately $2.1 million, to increase current liabilities by approximately $1.0 million and to increase stockholders’ equity by approximately $1.1 million. The restatements do not impact the Company's previously reported total revenues, cash, cash equivalents or cash flows.

The Company expects to file its amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending April 30, 2010 and amended quarterly reports on Form 10-Q/A for the periods ending, July 31, 2009, October 31, 2009, January 31, 2010, July 31, 2010 and October 31, 2010 by mid-March 2011.

About Unify

Unify is a software and services company with industry-leading solutions for eDiscovery, archiving, application development and migration, and data management. Unify is headquartered in Roseville, CA, with offices in San Francisco, CA, Rutherford, NJ, London, Munich, Calgary, Paris, Sao Paulo and Sydney. Visit www.unify.com or email info@unify.com. Follow Unify on Twitter at www.twitter.com/GoUnify. Follow http://www.daegis.com/dochunterDaegis at www.daegis.com or www.twitter/daegis.

Some of the information in this press release may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or the future financial performance of the Company. We wish to caution you that these statements involve risks and uncertainties and actual events or results may differ materially. When the words “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates” and similar expressions are used, they identify forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current beliefs and assumptions and information currently available to management and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.  Among the important factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are general market and economic conditions, our ability to execute our business strategy and integrate acquired businesses, the effectiveness of our sales team and approach, our ability to target, analyze and forecast the revenue to be derived from a client and the costs associated with providing services to that client, the date during the course of a fiscal year that a new client is acquired, the length of the integration cycle for new clients and the timing of revenues and costs associated therewith, our client concentration given that the Company is currently dependent on a few large client relationships, potential competition in the marketplace, the ability to retain and attract employees, market acceptance of our service programs and pricing options, our ability to maintain our existing technology platform and to deploy new technology, our ability to sign new clients and control expenses, the possibility of the discontinuation of some client relationships, the financial condition of our clients' business and other factors detailed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

# # #