Contingencies	3 Months Ended
Apr. 29, 2017
CONTINGENCIES [Abstract]
Contingencies	CONTINGENCIES On February 21, 2017, Kiss Nail Products, Inc. (Plaintiff) sued Parlux and Roraj Trade, LLC (the licensor of Rihanna’s intellectual property), ("Defendants"), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging both federal and state law trademark infringement and unfair competition arising out of Parlux’s sale and distribution of the “Kiss by Rihanna” fragrance. Plaintiff alleges that such sale and distribution infringes its “Kiss” mark on nail care and other beauty products. Plaintiff seeks, inter alia, to enjoin Defendants’ distribution and sales of the alleged offending products and seeks unspecified money damages as well as treble damages, attorneys’ fees, punitive damages and interest. Pursuant to an agreement between Parlux and Roraj, Parlux has agreed to defend and indemnify Roraj in this case. On April 19, 2017, the Defendants filed an Answer in the nature of a general denial along with Counterclaims seeking a declaratory judgment that Plaintiff has abandoned the mark with regard to perfume, fragrance, cologne and related fragrance products. Defendants are also seeking a declaration that they have not infringed any of Plaintiff’s marks. The Court has set a schedule which calls for the conclusion of fact and expert discovery on or about December 20, 2017, with dispositive motion practice likely to follow. The Court has also referred the case to a Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference. In August 2015, the Company was named as a defendant in a class action filed in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Ventura. The plaintiff, a former employee of Perfumania, sought to represent all current and former sales associates at California Perfumania stores. The complaint alleged various violations of California law related to wages, meal periods and wage statements, among other things. In October 2016, the parties agreed in principle on a settlement which has been submitted to the Court. The settlement proceeds will be deposited with the settlement administrator when the court provides its final approval, which is expected sometime in 2017. The Company accrued the estimated settlement of approximately $0.5 million during the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2016. In November 2015, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. The complaint, and thereafter an amended complaint, alleged that the Company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") by sending unsolicited facsimiles which advertised goods and/or services offered by the Company. The plaintiff sought to represent a nationwide class of all recipients of such unsolicited faxes for the period November 3, 2011 to the present. Plaintiff sought statutory damages of at least $500 per violative fax, plus other non-monetary relief. The parties agreed to mediate the matter, which resulted in a settlement in principle. A formal settlement agreement, on a class wide basis, was entered into in late November 2016. Defendants will obtain a release, on a class wide basis, from all members of the settlement class who do not opt out, back to January 2011. The settlement has been preliminarily approved by the Court and notice has been disseminated to potential class members, who had the opportunity to opt out of the class or to object to the settlement on or before March 31, 2017. No objections have been received, but there have been four opt-outs and various claims. The settlement will be presented to the Court for final approval at a hearing currently scheduled for June 29, 2017. Assuming final approval, claims will be submitted, reviewed, and paid as appropriate. It is expected that this process will be concluded during calendar 2017. The Company accrued the estimated settlement of approximately $0.5 million during the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2016. The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Management cannot presently predict the outcome of these matters, although management believes, based in part on the advice of counsel, that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See also the discussion of litigation with licensor in Note 11 of this Form 10-Q.

CONTINGENCIES

On February 21, 2017, Kiss Nail Products, Inc. (Plaintiff) sued Parlux and Roraj Trade, LLC (the licensor of Rihanna’s intellectual property), ("Defendants"), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging both federal and state law trademark infringement and unfair competition arising out of Parlux’s sale and distribution of the “Kiss by Rihanna” fragrance. Plaintiff alleges that such sale and distribution infringes its “Kiss” mark on nail care and other beauty products. Plaintiff seeks, inter alia, to enjoin Defendants’ distribution and sales of the alleged offending products and seeks unspecified money damages as well as treble damages, attorneys’ fees, punitive damages and interest. Pursuant to an agreement between Parlux and Roraj, Parlux has agreed to defend and indemnify Roraj in this case. On April 19, 2017, the Defendants filed an Answer in the nature of a general denial along with Counterclaims seeking a declaratory judgment that Plaintiff has abandoned the mark with regard to perfume, fragrance, cologne and related fragrance products. Defendants are also seeking a declaration that they have not infringed any of Plaintiff’s marks. The Court has set a schedule which calls for the conclusion of fact and expert discovery on or about December 20, 2017, with dispositive motion practice likely to follow. The Court has also referred the case to a Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference.

In August 2015, the Company was named as a defendant in a class action filed in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Ventura. The plaintiff, a former employee of Perfumania, sought to represent all current and former sales associates at California Perfumania stores. The complaint alleged various violations of California law related to wages, meal periods and wage statements, among other things. In October 2016, the parties agreed in principle on a settlement which has been submitted to the Court. The settlement proceeds will be deposited with the settlement administrator when the court provides its final approval, which is expected sometime in 2017. The Company accrued the estimated settlement of approximately $0.5 million during the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2016.

In November 2015, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. The complaint, and thereafter an amended complaint, alleged that the Company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") by sending unsolicited facsimiles which advertised goods and/or services offered by the Company. The plaintiff sought to represent a nationwide class of all recipients of such unsolicited faxes for the period November 3, 2011 to the present. Plaintiff sought statutory damages of at least $500 per violative fax, plus other non-monetary relief. The parties agreed to mediate the matter, which resulted in a settlement in principle. A formal settlement agreement, on a class wide basis, was entered into in late November 2016. Defendants will obtain a release, on a class wide basis, from all members of the settlement class who do not opt out, back to January 2011. The settlement has been preliminarily approved by the Court and notice has been disseminated to potential class members, who had the opportunity to opt out of the class or to object to the settlement on or before March 31, 2017. No objections have been received, but there have been four opt-outs and various claims. The settlement will be presented to the Court for final approval at a hearing currently scheduled for June 29, 2017. Assuming final approval, claims will be submitted, reviewed, and paid as appropriate. It is expected that this process will be concluded during calendar 2017. The Company accrued the estimated settlement of approximately $0.5 million during the thirteen weeks ended October 29, 2016.

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Management cannot presently predict the outcome of these matters, although management believes, based in part on the advice of counsel, that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See also the discussion of litigation with licensor in Note 11 of this Form 10-Q.