10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2011

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 0-21714

CSB Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio	34-1687530
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

91 North Clay, P.O. Box 232, Millersburg, Ohio 44654

(Address of principal executive offices)

(330) 674-9015

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common stock, $6.25 par value	Outstanding at November 14, 2011:
	2,734,799 common shares

CSB BANCORP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

QUARTER ENDED September 30, 2011

Table of Contents

	Page
Part I – Financial Information
ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
Consolidated Statements of Income		4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity		5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements		7
ITEM  2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		24
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		30
ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		31
Part II – Other Information
ITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings		32
ITEM 1A – Risk Factors		32
ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		32
ITEM 3 – Defaults upon Senior Securities		32
ITEM 4 – Removed and Reserved		32
ITEM 5 – Other Information		32
ITEM 6 – Exhibits		33
Signatures		34

2

CSB BANCORP, INC.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
ASSETS	2011			2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and due from banks	$	9,893		$	9,798
Interest-earning deposits in other banks		30,965			38,497
Federal funds sold		—			65
Total cash and cash equivalents		40,858			48,360
Securities
Available-for-sale, at fair value		85,262			75,204
Restricted stock, at cost		5,463			5,463
Total securities		90,725			80,667
Loans held for sale		136			—
Loans		313,980			315,647
Less allowance for loan losses		4,116			4,031
Net loans		309,864			311,616
Premises and equipment, net		7,740			7,878
Core deposit intangible		360			406
Goodwill		1,725			1,725
Bank-owned life insurance		3,042			2,961
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		3,399			3,443
TOTAL ASSETS	$	457,849		$	457,056
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	71,140		$	69,151
Interest-bearing		283,716			284,340
Total deposits		354,856			353,491
Short-term borrowings		32,527			32,018
Other borrowings		19,333			22,909
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		1,942			1,484
Total liabilities		408,658			409,902
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $6.25 par value. Authorized 9,000,000 shares; issued 2,980,602 shares; outstanding 2,734,799 shares in 2011 and 2010		18,629			18,629
Additional paid-in capital		9,994			9,994
Retained earnings		24,063			22,673
Treasury stock at cost – 245,803 shares in 2011 and 2010		(5,015	)		(5,015	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,520			873
Total shareholders’ equity		49,191			47,154
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	457,849		$	457,056

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

CSB BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2011			2010		2011			2010
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
Loans, including fees	$	4,233		$	4,384	$	12,745		$	12,971
Taxable securities		601			665		1,809			2,063
Nontaxable securities		110			91		310			258
Other		14			19		42			52
Total interest and dividend income		4,958			5,159		14,906			15,344
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		663			889		2,154			2,641
Other borrowings		198			313		625			1,032
Total interest expense		861			1,202		2,779			3,673
NET INTEREST INCOME		4,097			3,957		12,127			11,671
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		240			238		710			996
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		3,857			3,719		11,417			10,675
NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts		286			296		810			851
Trust services		154			135		504			401
Debit card interchange fees		154			131		444			365
Gain on sale of loans, net		54			62		153			153
Securities gains, net		237			—		237			148
Other income		159			156		441			459
Total noninterest income		1,044			780		2,589			2,377
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits		1,856			1,751		5,412			5,100
Occupancy expense		208			197		631			609
Equipment expense		127			124		370			375
Professional fees		200			133		536			457
Franchise tax expense		135			135		405			405
Software expense		66			64		192			190
Marketing and public relations		83			76		215			232
FDIC deposit insurance		36			109		254			417
Debit card expense		70			61		196			171
Gain on sale of other real estate owned, net		(51	)		—		(51	)		(23	)
Amortization of intangible assets		15			15		46			47
Other expenses		713			550		1,655			1,403
Total noninterest expenses		3,458			3,215		9,861			9,383
Income before income taxes		1,443			1,284		4,145			3,669
FEDERAL INCOME TAX PROVISION		444			402		1,278			1,129
NET INCOME	$	999		$	882	$	2,867		$	2,540
Basic and diluted net income per share	$	0.37		$	0.32	$	1.05		$	0.93

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

CSB BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	48,538		$	46,776		$	47,154		$	45,822
Comprehensive income:
Net income		999			882			2,867			2,540
Change in net unrealized gain, net of reclassification adjustments and related income taxes of $75, $23, $333, and $167, respectively		146			45			646			325
Total comprehensive income		1,145			927			3,513			2,865
Cash dividends declared:
$0.18 and $0.54 per share for the quarter and nine month periods ended, repectively		(492	)		(492	)		(1,476	)		(1,476	)
Balance at end of period	$	49,191		$	47,211		$	49,191		$	47,211

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

CSB BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2011			2010
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	3,857		$	3,486
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITES
Securities available-for-sale:
Proceeds from maturities and repayments		27,928			36,211
Purchases		(40,159	)		(36,375	)
Proceeds from sale of securities		3,244			3,359
Loan originations, net of repayments		248			(4,452	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate		347			342
Property, equipment, and software acquisitions		(311	)		(98	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,703	)		(1,013	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in deposits		1,396			11,874
Net change in short-term borrowings		509			770
Repayments of other borrowings		(3,576	)		(13,181	)
Cash dividends paid		(985	)		(985	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,656	)		(1,522	)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(7,502	)		951
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		48,360			42,661
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	40,858		$	43,612
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	2,868		$	3,978
Income taxes		1,100			850
Noncash investing activities:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned		764			331

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CSB Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Commercial and Savings Bank (the “Bank”) and CSB Investment Services, LLC (together referred to as the “Company” or “CSB”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position at September 30, 2011, and the results of operations and changes in cash flows for the periods presented have been made.

Certain information and footnote disclosures typically included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) have been omitted. The Annual Report for CSB for the year ended December 31, 2010, contains consolidated financial statements and related footnote disclosures, which should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the periods ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year or any future interim period.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The amendments in this Update provide additional guidance or clarification to help creditors in determining whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this Update are effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company has provided the necessary disclosures in Note 3.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. The main objective in developing this Update is to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements (repos) and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The amendments in this Update remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities, both public and nonpublic. The amendments affect all entities that enter into agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and obligate the transferor to repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The guidance in this Update is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

7

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this Update result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments in this Update are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this Update improve the comparability, clarity, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. To increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of U.S. GAAP and IFRS, the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. All entities that report items of comprehensive income, in any period presented, will be affected by the changes in this Update. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively, and early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other Topics (Topic 350), Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The objective of this update is to simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. The amendments in the Update permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities, both public and nonpublic, that have goodwill reported in their financial statements and are effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

8

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES

Securities consist of the following at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	Amortized		Gross unrealized		Gross unrealized		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	cost		gains		losses		value
September 30, 2011
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies		21,982		83		—		22,065
Mortgage-backed securites in government sponsored entities		45,043		1,604		2		46,645
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		13,263		699		—		13,962
Corporate bonds		2,503		—		75		2,428
Total debt securities		82,891		2,386		77		85,200
Equity securities in financial institutions		68		3		9		62
Total available-for-sale		82,959		2,389		86		85,262
Restricted stock		5,463		—		—		5,463
Total securities	$	88,422	$	2,389	$	86	$	90,725
December 31, 2010
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies		20,009		8		306		19,711
Mortgage-backed securites in government sponsored entities		41,005		1,374		28		42,351
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		11,699		341		46		11,994
Corporate bonds		1,000		—		8		992
Total debt securities		73,813		1,723		388		75,148
Equity securities in financial institutions		69		3		16		56
Total available-for-sale		73,882		1,726		404		75,204
Restricted stock		5,463		—		—		5,463
Total securities	$	79,345	$	1,726	$	404	$	80,667

9

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES (CONTINUED)

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized cost		Fair value
Available-for-sale:
Due in one year or less	$	1,540	$	1,543
Due after one through five years		8,009		8,179
Due after five through ten years		20,759		21,400
Due after ten years		52,583		54,078
Total debt securities available-for-sale	$	82,891	$	85,200

Realized Gains and Losses

The following table shows the proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities and the gross realized gains and losses on the sales of those securities that have been included in earnings as a result of the sales. Gains or losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities are recognized upon sale and are determined by the specific identification method.

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Proceeds	$	3,244	$	—	$	3,244	$	3,359
Realized gains	$	237	$	—	$	237	$	148
Realized losses		—		—		—		—
Impairment losses		—		—		—		—
Net securities (losses) gains	$	237	$	—	$	237	$	148

At least quarterly, the Company conducts a comprehensive security-level impairment assessment. The assessments are based on the nature of the securities, the extent and duration of the securities, the extent and duration of the loss and management’s intent to sell or if it is more likely than not that management will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity. Management believes the Company will fully recover the cost of these securities and it does not intend to sell these securities and likely will not be required to sell them before the anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis, which may be maturity. As a result, management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2011 and has recognized the total amount of the impairment in other comprehensive income, net of tax.

10

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES (CONTINUED)

The following table presents gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	Securities in a continuous unrealized loss position
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
September 30, 2011
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	261	$	2	$	261
Corporate bonds		10		990		65		435		75		1,425
Total debt securities		10		990		67		696		77		1,686
Equity securities in financial institutions		—		—		9		44		9		44
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	10	$	990	$	76	$	740	$	86	$	1,730
December 31, 2010
Obligations of U.S. Corporations and agencies	$	306	$	12,686	$	—	$	—	$	306	$	12,686
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities		14		4,032		14		493		28		4,525
Obligations of state & political subdivisions		46		2,561		—		—		46		2,561
Corporate bonds		8		492		—		—		8		492
Total debt securities		374		19,771		14		493		388		20,264
Equity securities in financial institutions		—		—		16		38		16		38
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	374	$	19,771	$	30	$	531	$	404	$	20,302

There were seven (7) securities in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011, four (4) of which were in a continuous loss position for twelve months or more. There were twenty-two (22) securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2010, three (3) of which were in a continuous loss position for twelve months or more.

11

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS

The Company grants commercial, commercial real estate, residential and consumer loans primarily to customers in Holmes, Tuscarawas, Wayne, Stark and contiguous counties in north central Ohio.

Loans consist of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	85,675	$	78,540
Commercial real estate		102,999		104,829
Residential real estate		102,244		108,832
Consumer		6,429		6,715
Construction & Land Development		16,416		16,515
Total loans before deferred costs		313,763		315,431
Deferred loan costs		217		216
Total Loans	$	313,980	$	315,647

Loan Origination/Risk Management

The Company has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and non-performing and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.

Commercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower’s ability to operate profitably and prudently expand its business. Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional banking. The Company’s management examines current and occasionally projected cash flows to determine the ability of the borrower to repay their obligations. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and usually incorporate the personal guarantees of business owners; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.

Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type which helps reduce the Company’s exposure to adverse economic events that affect any single market or industry. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans. At September 30, 2011 approximately 87% of the outstanding principal balances of the Company’s commercial real estate loans were secured by owner-occupied properties.

12

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (CONTINUED)

With respect to loans to developers and builders that are secured by non-owner occupied properties, the Company generally requires the borrower to have had an existing relationship with the Company and have a proven financial record. Construction loans are underwritten utilizing independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the completed project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources or repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from the Company or other approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

The Company originates consumer loans utilizing a judgmental underwriting process. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified, as needed, jointly by lenders and loan support personnel. This activity, coupled with relatively small loan amounts spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk.

The Company utilizes an independent loan review vendor that reviews and validates the credit risk program on a periodic basis. Results of these reviews are presented to management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as the Company’s policies and procedures.

Concentrations of Credit

Nearly all of the Company’s lending activity occurs within the State of Ohio, including the four counties of Holmes, Stark, Tuscarawas and Wayne, as well as other markets. The majority of the Company’s loan portfolio consists of owner occupied commercial real estate and commercial loans. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no concentrations of loans related to any single industry in excess of 6.7% and 6.2% respectively, of total loans.

The following table represents a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Beginning balance	$	4,054		$	4,608		$	4,031		$	4,060
Provision for loan losses		240			238			710			996
Loans charged-off		(192	)		(459	)		(686	)		(768	)
Recoveries		14			20			61			119
Ending balance	$	4,116		$	4,407		$	4,116		$	4,407

13

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (CONTINUED)

The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.

(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Construction & Land Development			Unallocated		Total
September 30, 2011
Beginning balance, January 1, 2011	$	1,179		$	1,183		$	1,057		$	80		$	213		$	319	$	4,031
Provision for possible loan losses		120			359			98			36			63			34		710
Charge-offs		(343	)		(68	)		(156	)		(78	)		(41	)		—		(686	)
Recoveries		12			—			9			40			—			—		61
Net charge-offs		(331	)		(68	)		(147	)		(38	)		(41	)		—		(625	)
Ending balance	$	968		$	1,474		$	1,008		$	78		$	235		$	353	$	4,116

14

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 3 – Loans (CONTINUED)

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the ending loan balances by portfolio segment and based on the impairment method as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Commercial Real Estate		Residential Real  Estate		Consumer		Construction & Land Development		Unallocated		Total
September 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balances attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	179	$	326	$	53	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	558
Collectively evaluated for impairment		789		1,148		955		78		235		353		3,558
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total ending allowance balance	$	968	$	1,474	$	1,008	$	78	$	235	$	353	$	4,116
Loans:
Loans indvidually evaluated for impairment	$	4,461	$	2,761	$	182	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	7,404
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		81,214		100,238		102,062		6,429		16,416		—		306,359
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total ending loans balance	$	85,675	$	102,999	$	102,244	$	6,429	$	16,416	$	—	$	313,763
December 31, 2010
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balances attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	106	$	132	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	238
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,073		1,051		1,057		80		121		319		3,701
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		92		—		92
Total ending allowance balance	$	1,179	$	1,183	$	1,057	$	80	$	213	$	319	$	4,031
Loans:
Loans indvidually evaluated for impairment	$	621	$	886	$	299	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,806
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		77,919		103,943		108,533		6,715		16,075		—		313,185
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		440		—		440
Total ending loans balance	$	78,540	$	104,829	$	108,832	$	6,715	$	16,515	$	—	$	315,431

15

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 3 – Loans (CONTINUED)

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(Dollars in thousands)	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment with no Allowance		Recorded Investment with Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	4,509	$	—	$	4,463	$	4,463	$	179	$	2,011
Commercial real estate		3,326		266		2,495		2,761		326		2,395
Residential real estate		—		—		—		—		—		—
Construction & land development		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total impaired loans	$	7,835	$	266	$	6,958	$	7,224	$	505	$	4,406
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	644	$	51	$	571	$	622	$	106	$	571
Commercial real estate		1,047		109		777		886		132		1,631
Residential real estate		590		298		—		298		—		97
Construction & land development		683		—		440		440		92		483
Total impaired loans	$	2,964	$	458	$	1,788	$	2,246	$	330	$	2,782

The following table presents the aging of past due and nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 by class of loans:

(Dollars in thousands)	Current		30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 Days + Past Due		Total Past Due and Accruing		Non- Accrual		Total Loans
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	85,407	$	147	$	19	$	—	$	166	$	102	$	85,675
Commercial real estate		100,933		49		325		—		374		1,692		102,999
Residential real estate		99,465		1,223		94		57		1,374		1,405		102,244
Consumer		6,234		110		26		59		195		—		6,429
Construction & land development		16,236		—		—		—		—		180		16,416
Total Loans	$	308,275	$	1,529	$	464	$	116	$	2,109	$	3,379	$	313,763
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	78,235	$	63	$	160	$	58	$	281	$	24	$	78,540
Commercial real estate		100,914		2,156		114		26		2,296		1,619		104,829
Residential real estate		105,593		574		253		601		1,428		1,811		108,832
Consumer		6,580		69		66		—		135		—		6,715
Construction & land development		16,061		3		—		—		3		451		16,515
Total Loans	$	307,383	$	2,865	$	593	$	685	$	4,143	$	3,905	$	315,431

16

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 3 – Loans (CONTINUED)

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company has troubled debt restructurings of $8.6 million as of September 30, 2011, and $4.1 million as of December 31, 2010, with $525 thousand and $22 thousand of specific reserves allocated as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings. At September 30, 2011 $7.7 million of the loans classified as troubled debt restructurings were performing to modified terms. The remaining $900 thousand were on nonaccrual status.

Loan modifications that are considered troubled debt restructurings completed during the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 were as follows:

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)	Number of loans restructured		Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial		—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		1		298		298
Residential		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—
Total Restructured Loans		1	$	298	$	298
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Commercial		2	$	4,440	$	4,445
Commercial real estate		—		—		—
Residential		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—
Total Restructured Loans		2	$	4,440	$	4,445

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes commercial loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes commercial loans with an outstanding balance greater than $275 thousand and is performed on an annual basis.

The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass. Loans classified as pass (Acceptable, Low Acceptable or Pass Watch) may exhibit a wide array of characteristics but at minimum represent an acceptable risk to the Bank. Borrowers in this rating may have leveraged but acceptable balance sheet positions, satisfactory asset quality, and stable to favorable sales and earnings trends, acceptable liquidity and adequate cash flow. Loans are considered fully collectible and require an average amount of administration. While generally adhering to credit policy, these loans may exhibit occasional exceptions that do not result in undue risk to the Bank. Borrowers are generally capable of absorbing setbacks, financial and otherwise, without the threat of failure.

17

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 3 – Loans (CONTINUED)

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have material weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan at some future date.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans that do not meet the criteria for special mention, substandard or doubtful classification, when analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Not Rated		Total
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	71,305	$	7,347	$	6,981	$	—	$	42	$	85,675
Commercial real estate		83,422		8,615		4,707		—		6,255		102,999
Residential real estate		1,165				62		—		101,017		102,244
Consumer		—		—		—		—		6,429		6,429
Construction & land development		7,647		4,463		2,638		—		1,668		16,416
Total	$	163,539	$	20,425	$	14,388	$	—	$	115,411	$	313,763
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	65,371	$	3,843	$	9,252	$	—	$	74	$	78,540
Commercial real estate		78,191		9,982		8,188		—		8,468		104,829
Residential real estate		1,153		—		365		—		107,314		108,832
Consumer		—		—		2		—		6,713		6,715
Construction & land development		11,626		2,905		591		—		1,393		16,515
Total	$	156,341	$	16,730	$	18,398	$	—	$	123,962	$	315,431

18

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – LOANS (CONTINUED)

Loans listed as not rated are either less than $275 thousand or are included in groups of homogeneous loans. The following table presents loans that are not rated by class of loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Non-performing loans include loans past due 90 days and greater and loans on nonaccrual of interest.

(Dollars in thousands)	Performing		Non-Performing		Total
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	42	$	—	$	42
Commercial real estate		6,255		—		6,255
Residential real estate		99,617		1,400		101,017
Consumer		6,370		59		6,429
Construction & land development		1,659		9		1,668
Total	$	113,943	$	1,468	$	115,411
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	74	$	—	$	74
Commercial real estate		8,468		—		8,468
Residential real estate		105,201		2,113		107,314
Consumer		6,713		—		6,713
Construction & land development		1,383		10		1,393
Total	$	121,839	$	2,123	$	123,962

Loans serviced for others approximated $49.6 million and $45.1 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company provides disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value. The framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three broad levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level I:	Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.
Level II:	Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by corroborated or other means. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level II input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level III:	Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition at their fair value as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, by level within the fair value hierarchy. No liabilities are carried at fair value. As required by the applicable accounting standards, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Equity securities and U.S. Treasury Notes are valued at the closing price reported on

19

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)

the active market on which the individual securities are traded. Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies, mortgage-backed securities and obligations of states and political subdivisions are valued at observable market data for similar assets.

(Dollars in thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
	September 30, 2011
Assets:
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Teasury security	$	100	$		$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies				22,065		—		22,065
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities				46,645		—		46,645
Obligations of states and political subdivisions				13,962		—		13,962
Corporate bonds				2,428		—		2,428
Total debt securities		100		85,100		—		85,200
Equity securities in financial institutions		62		—		—		62
Total available-for-sale securities	$	162	$	85,100	$	—	$	85,262
	December 31, 2010
Assets:
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Teasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		—		19,711		—		19,711
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities		—		42,351		—		42,351
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		11,994		—		11,994
Corporate bonds		—		992		—		992
Total debt securities		100		75,048		—		75,148
Equity securities in financial institutions		56		—		—		56
Total available-for-sale securities	$	156	$	75,048	$	—	$	75,204

The following table presents the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis on the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Impaired loans and other real estate that are collateral dependent are written down to fair value through the establishment of specific reserves. Premises include a building currently used for storage that has been written down to appraised value. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions based on management’s best judgment that are significant inputs to the discounting calculations. As a result, these rights are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are classified within level III of the fair value hierarchy. Techniques used to value the collateral that secure the impaired loans include: quoted market prices for identical assets classified as Level I inputs: and observable inputs employed by certified appraisers for similar assets classified as Level II inputs. In cases where valuation techniques included inputs that are unobservable and are based on estimates and assumptions developed by management based on the best information available under each circumstance, the asset valuation is classified as Level III inputs.

20

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
	September 30, 2011
Assets measured on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	6,719	$	6,719
Other real estate owned		—		—		505		505
Premises		—		—		177		177
Mortgage servicing rights		—		—		157		157
	December 31, 2010
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	1,916	$	1,916
Other real estate owned		—		—		36		36
Premises		—		—		200		200
Mortgage servicing rights		—		—		155		155

NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The estimated fair values of recognized financial instruments as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

	2011				2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	40,858	$	40,858	$	48,360	$	48,360
Securities		90,725		90,725		80,667		80,667
Loans, net		309,864		315,086		311,616		316,474
Accrued interest receivable		1,258		1,258		1,215		1,215
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	354,856	$	356,703	$	353,491	$	355,589
Short-term borrowings		32,527		32,527		32,018		32,018
Other borrowings		19,333		20,127		22,909		23,042
Accrued interest payable		155		155		213		213

21

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)

For purposes of the above disclosures of estimated fair value, the following assumptions are used:

Cash and cash equivalents; Accrued interest receivable; Short term borrowings, Accrued interest payable

The fair value of the above instruments is considered to be carrying value.

Securities

The fair value of securities available-for-sale which are measured on a recurring basis are determined primarily by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on securities’ relationship to other similar securities.

Loans, net

The fair value for loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current market inputs at which loans with similar terms and qualities would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality. Where quoted market prices were available, primarily for certain residential mortgage loans, such market rates were utilized as estimates for fair value. Fair value of non-accrual loans is based on carrying value.

Deposits and Other Borrowed Funds

The fair values of certificates of deposit and other borrowed funds are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates are estimated using market rates currently offered for similar instruments with similar remaining maturities. Demand, savings, and money market deposit accounts are valued at the amount payable on demand as of quarter end.

The Company also has unrecognized financial instruments at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These financial instruments relate to commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. The aggregated contract amount of such financial instruments was approximately $89 million at September 30, 2011 and $76 million at December 31, 2010. Such amounts are also considered to be the estimated fair values.

The fair value estimates of financial instruments are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular financial instrument over the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Since no ready market exists for a significant portion of the financial instruments, fair value estimates are largely based on judgments after considering such factors as future expected credit losses, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

22

CSB BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6 – BRANCH ACQUISITION

Effective as of the close of business on October 14, 2011, the Bank completed the branch purchase and assumption of liabilities of two branches of Premier Bank & Trust, National Association, (“Premier”) located in Wooster, Ohio pursuant to the terms of the Office Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated as of June 23, 2011, (the “Purchase Agreement”). Under the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement, the Bank acquired the leasehold and owned real estate and fixed assets located at Premier’s two Wooster branches, $9 million in loans, and assumed total deposits of approximately $74 million. The Bank paid a 5% premium on all deposit accounts. As a result of this purchase, the two full-service banking offices of Premier located at 305 West Liberty Street and 3562 Commerce Parkway in Wooster, Ohio, became full-service banking offices of the Bank.

The following table summarizes the book values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the branch acquisition. Fair market value adjustments will be made as additional information becomes available.

(dollars in thousands)	October 14, 2011 (Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	60,890
Loans		9,002
Premises and equipment		736
Other assets		27
Total assets acquired	$	70,655
Liabilities
Deposits	$	74,322
Other liabilities		53
Total liabilities assumed		74,375
Net liabilities assumed	$	3,720

23

CSB BANCORP, INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following management’s discussion and analysis focuses on the consolidated financial condition of the Company at September 30, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010, and the consolidated results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010. The purpose of this discussion is to provide the reader with a more thorough understanding of the consolidated financial statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the interim consolidated financial statements and related footnotes.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report are not historical facts but rather are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. When used herein, the terms “anticipates”, “plans”, “expects”, “believes”, and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or its management are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company’s actual results, performance or achievements may materially differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause or contribute to such material differences include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, interest rate environment, competitive conditions in the financial services industry, changes in law, governmental policies and regulations, and rapidly changing technology affecting financial services. Other factors not currently anticipated may also materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial position. There can be no assurance that future results will meet expectations. While the Company believes that the forward-looking statements in this report are reasonable, the reader should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement.

The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as may be required by applicable law.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Total assets were $457.8 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $457.1 million at December 31, 2010, representing an increase of $0.7 million, or 0.2%. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $7.5 million, or 15.5%, during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, primarily as a result of increases in securities. Securities increased $10.1 million, or 12.5%, during the first nine months of 2011 as purchases were made within the US government agency portfolio, mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored agencies and tax free political subdivisions. Net loans decreased $1.8 million, or 0.6%, while deposits increased $1.4 million, or 0.4%, during the nine-month period. Short-term borrowings of securities sold under repurchase agreement increased $508 thousand and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances decreased $3.6 million, during the period as advances matured and required amortized payments were made on outstanding advances at the FHLB.

Net loans decreased $1.8 million, or 0.6%, during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011. Commercial loans including commercial real estate loans increased $5.4 million, or 2.7%, and home equity lines increased $2.4 million, or 7.0%, over December 31, 2010. Decreases were recognized in real estate mortgage loans of $9.7 million, or 12.8% and consumer installment loans of $328 thousand, or 4.7%. Consumers continued to refinance their mortgage loans for lower long-term rates offered in the secondary market.

24

CSB BANCORP, INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.31% at September 30, 2011, an increase from 1.28% at December 31, 2010. Outstanding loan balances decreased 0.5% to $314 million at September 30, 2011 while net charge-offs of $625 thousand were offset by a provision of $710 thousand to the allowance for loan losses for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011. Non-performing loans decreased $1.1 million or 24% from December 31, 2010, with improvement in both the past-due 90 days and still accruing and the non accrual loan categories.

	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2010
Non-performing loans	$	3,495		$	4,589		$	5,246
Other real estate		505			36			163
Allowance for loan losses		4,116			4,031			4,407
Total loans		313,980			315,647			316,909
Allowance: loans		1.31	%		1.28	%		1.39	%
Allowance: non-performing loans		1.2	x		0.9	x		0.8	x

The ratio of gross loans to deposits was 88.5% at September 30, 2011, compared to 89.3% at December 31, 2010. The decrease in this ratio is the result of decreases in loan volume and increases in deposits during the nine-months ended September 30, 2011.

The Company had net unrealized gains of $2.3 million within its securities portfolio at September 30, 2011, compared to net unrealized gains of $1.3 million at December 31, 2010. The Company has no exposure to government-sponsored enterprise preferred stocks, collateralized debt obligations or trust preferred securities. The Company holds two issues of nonagency collateralized mortgage obligations that have paid down to $782 thousand outstanding from an original face value of $5.5 million. The Company has the ability and intent to hold the securities until the recovery of their cost and there is no significant evidence to support an adverse change in expected cash flows. Management has considered industry analyst reports, sector credit reports and the volatility within the bond market in concluding that the gross unrealized losses of $86 thousand within the total portfolio as of September 30, 2011, were primarily the result of customary and expected fluctuations in the bond market and not necessarily the expected cash flows of the individual securities. As a result, all security impairments detailed above on September 30, 2011, are considered temporary and no impairment loss relating to these securities has been recognized.

Short-term borrowings increased $509 thousand from December 31, 2010 and other borrowings decreased $3.6 million as the Company used cash from interest-earning deposits in other banks to repay required maturities and monthly payments on advances from the FHLB.

Deposits increased $1.4 million, or 0.4% from December 31, 2010 with non-interest bearing deposits increasing $2.0 million and interest-bearing deposit accounts decreasing $0.6 million. By deposit type, increases were recognized in statement savings and passbooks and money market savings accounts for the period ended September 30, 2011.

Total shareholders’ equity amounted to $49.2 million, or 10.7% of total assets, at September 30, 2011, compared to $47.2 million, or 10.3% of total assets, at December 31, 2010. The increase in shareholders’ equity during the nine-months ended September 30, 2011 was due to net income of $2.9 million and an increase in other comprehensive income of $646 thousand. Dividends declared of $1.5 million partially offset the above increases. The Company and its subsidiary bank met all regulatory capital requirements at September 30, 2011.

25

CSB BANCORP, INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded net income of $999 thousand or $0.37 per share, as compared to net income of $882 thousand, or $0.32 per share for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. The $116 thousand increase in net income for the quarter was a result of securities gains of $237 thousand and net interest income increasing $140 thousand. These gains were partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense of $294 thousand and an increase in the federal income tax provision of $43 thousand. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.87% and 8.04%, respectively, for the three-month period of 2011, compared to 0.78% and 7.41%, respectively for 2010.

Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Margin Analysis

	For the three months ended September 30,
	2011					2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Average balance		Average rate			Average balance		Average rate
ASSETS
Due from banks-interest bearing	$	28,194		0.21	%	$	28,266		0.26	%
Federal funds sold		101		0.03			251		0.13
Taxable securities		74,486		3.20			68,216		3.87
Tax-exempt securities		12,740		5.15			11,503		4.77
Loans		315,750		5.33			315,355		5.53
Total earning assets		431,271		4.62	%		423,591		4.89	%
Other assets		23,414					22,508
TOTAL ASSETS	$	454,685				$	446,099
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	52,662		0.08	%	$	50,252		0.08	%
Savings deposits		84,903		0.24			74,377		0.32
Time deposits		144,326		1.65			151,199		2.15
Other borrowed funds		53,088		1.47			61,266		2.02
Total interest bearing liabilities		334,979		1.02	%		337,094		1.41	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		68,686					60,261
Other liabilities		1,755					1,531
Shareholders’ Equity		49,265					47,213
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	454,685				$	446,099
Taxable equivalent net interest spread				3.60	%				3.48	%
Taxable equivalent net interest margin				3.83	%				3.76	%

Interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, was $5.0 million representing a $201 thousand decrease, or a 3.9% decline, compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease was primarily due to average loan yields declining by 0.20% to 5.33% from 5.53% for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the third quarter 2010. Additionally, taxable investment yield declined 0.67% to 3.20% for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as compared to a taxable investment yield of 3.87% for the third quarter ended September 30, 2010. Interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 was $861 thousand, a decrease of $341 thousand or 28%, from the same period in 2010. The decrease in interest expense occurred primarily due to a decrease of 0.36% in interest rates paid on interest-bearing deposits which decreased from 1.28% in 2010 to 0.92% in 2011.

26

CSB BANCORP, INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 was $240 thousand, compared to a $238 thousand provision for the same quarter in 2010. The provision for loan losses is determined based on management’s calculation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, which includes provisions for classified loans as well as for the remainder of the portfolio based on historical data, including past charge-offs and current economic trends.

Non-interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, was $1.0 million, an increase of $264 thousand, or 33.8%, compared to the same quarter in 2010. Net securities gains increased $237 thousand for third quarter 2011 as compared to the same quarter in 2010. Fees from trust and brokerage services increased $19 thousand to $154 thousand for third quarter 2011 as compared to the same quarter in 2010. Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $10 thousand or 3.5%, as consumers decreased their usage of overdraft products and maintained higher average deposit balances. Debit card interchange income rose $23 thousand, or 17.6%, as consumers increased their usage of the product. The gain on the sale of mortgage loans to the secondary market decreased to $54 thousand for the three month period ended September 30, 2011, from $62 thousand in the three-month period ended September 30, 2010. Refinancing activity increased during third quarter 2011, as fixed interest rates for loans sold on the secondary market reached new lows for the year.

Non-interest expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 increased $243 thousand, or 7.6%, compared to the third quarter of 2010. Salaries and employee benefits increased $105 thousand, or 6.0%. Occupancy and equipment expenses increased $14 thousand in 2011 over the third quarter of 2010. Other expenses rose $163 thousand, or 11%, compared to the third quarter 2010. Included in other expense are branch acquisition costs of $237 thousand that did not occur in 2010 and a reduction in FDIC deposit premium expense for the quarter of $73 thousand to account for the reduction in bank assessments based on total assets less tangible capital.

Federal income tax expense increased $42 thousand, or 10%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the third quarter of 2010. The provision for income taxes was $444 thousand (effective rate of 30.8%) for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to $402 thousand (effective rate of 31.3%) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. The increase in the expense resulted from improved income.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Nine-months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Net income for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, was $2.9 million or $1.05 per share, as compared to $2.5 million or $0.93 per share during the same period in 2010. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.85% and 7.92%, respectively, for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, compared to 0.77% and 7.25%, respectively for 2010.

Net interest income improved to $12.1 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $456 thousand or 4% from the same period last year. The provision for loan losses decreased $286 thousand, or 29%, during the same comparative period. These improvements were partially offset by higher noninterest expenses for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to 2010.

Interest income on loans decreased $226 thousand, or 1.7%, for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease was primarily due to an interest rate decrease of 20 basis points for the comparable nine-month periods. Interest income on securities decreased $202 thousand, or 9%, as the yield on taxable securities decreased 76 basis points due to the sale of mortgage-backed securities at a gain in 2010, accelerated payments within the mortgage-backed

27

CSB BANCORP, INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

securities portfolio and calls within the agency portfolio. Average investment balances increased by $7.7 million. Interest income on fed funds sold and interest bearing deposits decreased $10 thousand for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011 as the average fed funds sold volume decreased $4.9 million, compared to the same period in 2010.

Average Balance Sheet and Net Interest Margin Analysis

	For the nine-months ended September 30,
	2011					2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Average balance		Average rate			Average balance		Average rate
ASSETS
Due from banks-interest bearing	$	23,531		0.24	%	$	28,290		0.24	%
Federal funds sold		93		0.06			240		0.13
Taxable securities		74,050		3.26			68,577		4.02
Tax-exempt securities		12,209		5.14			10,026		5.19
Loans		318,420		5.36			312,943		5.56
Total earning assets		428,303		4.71	%		420,076		4.94	%
Other assets		23,220					22,514
TOTAL ASSETS	$	451,523				$	442,590
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	52,541		0.08	%	$	51,819		0.08	%
Savings deposits		84,014		0.25			73,061		0.39
Time deposits		146,661		1.79			149,504		2.16
Other borrowed funds		52,020		1.61			64,206		2.15
Total interest bearing liabilities		335,236		1.11	%		338,590		1.45	%
Non-interest bearing demand deposits		66,374					55,677
Other liabilities		1,542					1,486
Shareholders’ Equity		48,371					46,837
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	451,523				$	442,590
Taxable equivalent net interest spread				3.60	%				3.49	%
Taxable equivalent net interest margin				3.85	%				3.77	%

Interest expense decreased $894 thousand to $2.8 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the nine-months ended September 30, 2010. Interest expense on deposits decreased $487 thousand, or 18%, from the same period as last year, while interest expense on other borrowings decreased $407 thousand, or 39%. The decrease in interest expense has been caused by lower interest rates being paid across the board on interest-bearing deposit accounts and borrowings. Additionally, during the comparable nine month periods, the Company grew non-interest bearing deposits in 2011. Time deposits continue to renew at lower interest rates, and some depositors have moved monies to savings instruments anticipating higher rate time deposits. Competition for deposits appears to be decreasing from a year ago with larger money center banks reducing the premium paid for term deposits. The net interest margin increased by 8 basis points for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, to 3.85%, from 3.77% for the same period in 2010.

The provision for loan losses was $710 thousand during the first nine months of 2011, compared to $996 thousand in the same nine-month period of 2010. The provision or credit for loan losses is determined based on management’s calculation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, which includes provisions for classified loans as well as for the remainder of the portfolio based on historical data including past charge-offs and current economic trends.

28

CSB BANCORP, INC.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Non-interest income increased $212 thousand, or 8.9%, during the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in non-interest income was primarily due to increases in trust fees which reflected increases in market values of the custodial assets, as well as increases in brokerage fee commissions in 2011. Debit card interchange income increased $79 thousand, or 22%, a result of increased card usage in 2011. Service charges on deposits decreased $41 thousand from the same period in 2010 as deposit customers curtailed their use of overdraft privilege products in 2011, and have maintained higher average deposit balances offsetting monthly service fees.

Gains on mortgage loans sold in the secondary market remained steady for the first nine months of 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010 as refinance activity and new housing sales remained extremely slow in 2011.

Non-interest expenses increased $478 thousand, or 5%, for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010. The bank’s FDIC deposit premium decreased $163 thousand from $417 thousand reflecting a decrease in rate and accrual for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to 2010. Salaries and employee benefits increased $312 thousand, or 6%, primarily the result of merit increases and benefit accruals. Professional fees increased $79 thousand, or 17%. Occupancy and equipment expense increased slightly during the first nine-months of 2011, as compared with 2010 increasing $17 thousand or under 2%. Increases were recognized in other expenses, primarily the result of branch acquisition costs of $237 thousand that did not occur in 2010.

The provision for income taxes was $1.3 million (effective rate of 30.8%) for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $1.1 million (effective rate of 30.8%) for the nine-months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in the tax rate resulted from improved income.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) has established risk-based capital guidelines that must be observed by financial holding companies and banks. Failure to meet specified minimum capital requirements could result in regulatory actions by the Federal Reserve or Ohio Division of Financial Institutions that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Management believes there were no material changes to capital resources as presented in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and as of September 30, 2011 the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity refers to the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash to fund current loan demand, meet deposit withdrawals, pay operating expenses and meet other obligations. The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, which totaled $40.9 million at September 30, 2011, a decrease of $7.5 million from $48.4 million at December 31, 2010. Net income, securities available-for-sale, and loan repayments also serve as sources of liquidity. Cash and cash equivalents and estimated principal cash flow and maturities on investments maturing within one year represent 11.8% of total assets as of September 30, 2011 compared to 15.0% of total assets at year-end 2010. Other sources of liquidity include, but are not limited to, purchase of federal funds, advances from the FHLB, adjustments of interest rates to attract deposits, and borrowing at the Federal Reserve discount window. Management believes that its sources of liquidity are adequate to meet cash flow obligations for the foreseeable future.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as such term is defined in applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) rules) that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

29

CSB BANCORP, INC.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks as of September 30, 2011, from that presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Management performs a quarterly analysis of the Company’s interest rate risk. All positions are currently within the Company’s board-approved policy.

The following table presents an analysis of the estimated sensitivity of the Company’s annual net interest income to sudden and sustained 100 through 400 basis point changes, in 100 basis point changes, in market interest rates at September 30, 2011 and 100 and 200 basis point changes in market interest rates at December 31, 2010. Due to the current low interest rate environment, particularly for short-term rates, the decreasing change is not calculated.

(Dollars in thousands)
September 30, 2011
	Change in interest rates (basis points)		Net interest income		Dollar change		Percentage change
+		400		16,533	$	570		3.6
+		300		16,297		334		2.1
+		200		16,116		153		1.0
+		100		15,990		27		0.2
		0		15,963		—		—
-		100		N/A		N/A		N/A
-		200		N/A		N/A		N/A

December 31, 2010
	Change in interest rates (basis points)		Net interest income		Dollar change		Percentage change
+		200		16,073	$	241		1.5
+		100		15,906		74		0.5
		0		15,832		—		—
-		100		N/A		N/A		N/A

30

CSB BANCORP, INC.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 4T – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

With the participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that:

(a) information required to be disclosed by the Company in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q would be accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure;

(b) information required to be disclosed by the Company in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q would be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and

(c) the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiary is made known to them, particularly during the period for which the Company’s periodic reports, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are being prepared.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

31

CSB BANCORP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

Quarter ended September 30, 2011

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

In the opinion of management there are no outstanding legal actions that will have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS.

There have been no material changes to the Company’s risk factors from those disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

On July 7, 2005 CSB Bancorp, Inc. filed Form 8-k with the Securities and Exchange Commission announcing that its Board of Directors approved a Stock Repurchase Program authorizing the repurchase of up to 10% of the Company’s common shares then outstanding. Repurchases will be made from time to time as market and business conditions warrant, in the open market, through block purchases and in negotiated private transactions.

ITEM 3 – DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 4 – (REMOVED AND RESERVED).

ITEM 5 – OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.

32

CSB BANCORP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

Quarter ended September 30, 2011

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6 – Exhibits:

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
3.1	Amended Articles of Incorporation of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994).
3.1.1	Amended form of Article Fourth of Amended Articles of Incorporation, as effective April 9, 1998 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
3.2	Code of Regulations of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-SB).
3.2.1	Amended Article VIII Code of Regulations of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form DEF 14a for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008).
4.0	Specimen stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 10-SB).
11	Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings (reference is hereby made to Consolidated Statements of Income on page 4 hereof).
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CEO’s Certification (filed herewith).
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CFO’s Certification (filed herewith).
32.1	Section 1350 CEO’s Certification (filed herewith).
32.2	Section 1350 CFO’s Certification (filed herewith).
101	The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets: (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income: (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity: (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

33

CSB BANCORP, INC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CSB BANCORP, INC.

(Registrant)

Date: November 14, 2011	/s/ Eddie L. Steiner
	Eddie L. Steiner
	President
	Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2011	/s/ Paula J. Meiler
	Paula J. Meiler
	Senior Vice President
	Chief Financial Officer

34

CSB BANCORP, INC.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
3.1	Amended Articles of Incorporation of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994).
3.1.1	Amended form of Article Fourth of Amended Articles of Incorporation, as effective April 9, 1998 (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
3.2	Code of Regulations of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-SB).
3.2.1	Amended Article VIII Code of Regulations of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form DEF 14a for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008).
4.0	Specimen stock certificate (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-SB).
11	Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings (reference is hereby made to Consolidated Statements of Income on page 4 hereof).
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CEO’s Certification (filed herewith).
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CFO’s Certification (filed herewith).
32.1	Section 1350 CEO’s Certification (filed herewith).
32.2	Section 1350 CFO’s Certification (filed herewith).
101	The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets: (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income: (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity: (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

35

EX-11

CSB BANCORP, INC.

EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Basic Earnings Per Share
Net income	$	999	$	882	$	2,867	$	2,540
Weighted average common shares		2,734,799		2,734,799		2,734,799		2,734,799
Basice Earnings Per Share	$	0.37	$	0.32	$	1.05	$	0.93
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Net income	$	997	$	882	$	2,867	$	2,540
Weighted average common shares		2,734,799		2,734,799		2,734,799		2,734,799
Weighted average effect of assumed stock options		—		—		—		—
Total		2,734,799		2,734,799		2,734,799		2,734,799
Diluted Earnings Per Share	$	0.37	$	0.32	$	1.05	$	0.93

EX-31.1

CSB BANCORP, INC.

EXHIBIT 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

President and Chief Executive Officer

I, Eddie L. Steiner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2011

/s/ Eddie L. Steiner                            

Eddie L. Steiner

President and

Chief Executive Officer

.

EX-31.2

CSB BANCORP, INC.

EXHIBIT 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

I, Paula J. Meiler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2011

/s/ Paula J. Meiler                            

Paula J. Meiler

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

CSB BANCORP, INC.

EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the “Report”), I, Eddie L. Steiner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2011

/s/ Eddie L. Steiner                            

Eddie L. Steiner

President and

Chief Executive Officer

* This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.

EX-32.2

CSB BANCORP, INC.

EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of CSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the “Report”), I, Paula J. Meiler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2011

/s/ Paula J. Meiler                            

Paula J. Meiler

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

* This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock, Par Value	$ 6.25	$ 6.25
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	9,000,000	9,000,000
Common Stock, Shares Issued	2,980,602	2,980,602
Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	2,734,799	2,734,799
Treasury Stock, At Shares	245,803	245,803

XML

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
Loans, including fees	$ 4,233	$ 4,384	$ 12,745	$ 12,971
Taxable securities	601	665	1,809	2,063
Nontaxable securities	110	91	310	258
Other	14	19	42	52
Total interest and dividend income	4,958	5,159	14,906	15,344
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits	663	889	2,154	2,641
Other borrowings	198	313	625	1,032
Total interest expense	861	1,202	2,779	3,673
NET INTEREST INCOME	4,097	3,957	12,127	11,671
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	240	238	710	996
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	3,857	3,719	11,417	10,675
NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts	286	296	810	851
Trust services	154	135	504	401
Debit card interchange fees	154	131	444	365
Gain on sale of loans, net	54	62	153	153
Securities gains, net	237		237	148
Other income	159	156	441	459
Total noninterest income	1,044	780	2,589	2,377
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits	1,856	1,751	5,412	5,100
Occupancy expense	208	197	631	609
Equipment expense	127	124	370	375
Professional fees	200	133	536	457
Franchise tax expense	135	135	405	405
Software expense	66	64	192	190
Marketing and public relations	83	76	215	232
FDIC deposit insurance	36	109	254	417
Debit card expense	70	61	196	171
Gain on sale of other real estate owned, net	(51)		(51)	(23)
Amortization of intangible assets	15	15	46	47
Other expenses	713	550	1,655	1,403
Total noninterest expenses	3,458	3,215	9,861	9,383
Income before income taxes	1,443	1,284	4,145	3,669
FEDERAL INCOME TAX PROVISION	444	402	1,278	1,129
NET INCOME	$ 999	$ 882	$ 2,867	$ 2,540
Basic and diluted net income per share	$ 0.37	$ 0.32	$ 1.05	$ 0.93

XML

Document and Entity Information (USD $) In Millions, except Share data	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Nov. 14, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	CSB BANCORP INC /OH
Entity Central Index Key	0000880417
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2011
Amendment Flag	false
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Public Float			$ 39.8
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		2,734,799

XML

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Fair Values of Financial Instruments [Abstract]

FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 5 – FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The estimated fair values of recognized financial instruments as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

	2011				2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	40,858	$	40,858	$	48,360	$	48,360
Securities		90,725		90,725		80,667		80,667
Loans, net		309,864		315,086		311,616		316,474
Accrued interest receivable		1,258		1,258		1,215		1,215
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	354,856	$	356,703	$	353,491	$	355,589
Short-term borrowings		32,527		32,527		32,018		32,018
Other borrowings		19,333		20,127		22,909		23,042
Accrued interest payable		155		155		213		213

For purposes of the above disclosures of estimated fair value, the following assumptions are used:

Cash and cash equivalents; Accrued interest receivable; Short term borrowings, Accrued interest payable

The fair value of the above instruments is considered to be carrying value.

Securities

The fair value of securities available-for-sale which are measured on a recurring basis are determined primarily by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on securities’ relationship to other similar securities.

Loans, net

The fair value for loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current market inputs at which loans with similar terms and qualities would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality. Where quoted market prices were available, primarily for certain residential mortgage loans, such market rates were utilized as estimates for fair value. Fair value of non-accrual loans is based on carrying value.

Deposits and Other Borrowed Funds

The fair values of certificates of deposit and other borrowed funds are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates are estimated using market rates currently offered for similar instruments with similar remaining maturities. Demand, savings, and money market deposit accounts are valued at the amount payable on demand as of quarter end.

The Company also has unrecognized financial instruments at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These financial instruments relate to commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. The aggregated contract amount of such financial instruments was approximately $89 million at September 30, 2011 and $76 million at December 31, 2010. Such amounts are also considered to be the estimated fair values.

The fair value estimates of financial instruments are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular financial instrument over the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Since no ready market exists for a significant portion of the financial instruments, fair value estimates are largely based on judgments after considering such factors as future expected credit losses, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CSB Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Commercial and Savings Bank (the “Bank”) and CSB Investment Services, LLC (together referred to as the “Company” or “CSB”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position at September 30, 2011, and the results of operations and changes in cash flows for the periods presented have been made.

Certain information and footnote disclosures typically included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) have been omitted. The Annual Report for CSB for the year ended December 31, 2010, contains consolidated financial statements and related footnote disclosures, which should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the periods ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year or any future interim period.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The amendments in this Update provide additional guidance or clarification to help creditors in determining whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this Update are effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company has provided the necessary disclosures in Note 3.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. The main objective in developing this Update is to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements (repos) and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The amendments in this Update remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities, both public and nonpublic. The amendments affect all entities that enter into agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and obligate the transferor to repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The guidance in this Update is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this Update result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments in this Update are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this Update improve the comparability, clarity, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. To increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of U.S. GAAP and IFRS, the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. All entities that report items of comprehensive income, in any period presented, will be affected by the changes in this Update. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively, and early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other Topics (Topic 350), Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The objective of this update is to simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. The amendments in the Update permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities, both public and nonpublic, that have goodwill reported in their financial statements and are effective for interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

XML

Branch Acquisition

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Branch Acquisition [Abstract]

BRANCH ACQUISITION

NOTE 6 – BRANCH ACQUISITION

Effective as of the close of business on October 14, 2011, the Bank completed the branch purchase and assumption of liabilities of two branches of Premier Bank & Trust, National Association, (“Premier”) located in Wooster, Ohio pursuant to the terms of the Office Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated as of June 23, 2011, (the “Purchase Agreement”). Under the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement, the Bank acquired the leasehold and owned real estate and fixed assets located at Premier’s two Wooster branches, $9 million in loans, and assumed total deposits of approximately $74 million. The Bank paid a 5% premium on all deposit accounts. As a result of this purchase, the two full-service banking offices of Premier located at 305 West Liberty Street and 3562 Commerce Parkway in Wooster, Ohio, became full-service banking offices of the Bank.

The following table summarizes the book values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the branch acquisition. Fair market value adjustments will be made as additional information becomes available.

(dollars in thousands)	October 14, 2011 (Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	60,890
Loans		9,002
Premises and equipment		736
Other assets		27
Total assets acquired	$	70,655
Liabilities
Deposits	$	74,322
Other liabilities		53
Total liabilities assumed		74,375
Net liabilities assumed	$	3,720

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity [Abstract]
Income taxes on change in unrealized gain	$ 75	$ 23	$ 333	$ 167
Cash dividends declared per share	$ 0.18	$ 0.18	$ 0.54	$ 0.54

XML

Securities

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Securities [Abstract]

SECURITIES

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES

Securities consist of the following at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	Amortized		Gross unrealized		Gross unrealized		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	cost		gains		losses		value
September 30, 2011
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies		21,982		83		—		22,065
Mortgage-backed securites in government sponsored entities		45,043		1,604		2		46,645
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		13,263		699		—		13,962
Corporate bonds		2,503		—		75		2,428
Total debt securities		82,891		2,386		77		85,200
Equity securities in financial institutions		68		3		9		62
Total available-for-sale		82,959		2,389		86		85,262
Restricted stock		5,463		—		—		5,463
Total securities	$	88,422	$	2,389	$	86	$	90,725
December 31, 2010
Available-for-sale:
U.S. Treasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies		20,009		8		306		19,711
Mortgage-backed securites in government sponsored entities		41,005		1,374		28		42,351
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		11,699		341		46		11,994
Corporate bonds		1,000		—		8		992
Total debt securities		73,813		1,723		388		75,148
Equity securities in financial institutions		69		3		16		56
Total available-for-sale		73,882		1,726		404		75,204
Restricted stock		5,463		—		—		5,463
Total securities	$	79,345	$	1,726	$	404	$	80,667

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized cost		Fair value
Available-for-sale:
Due in one year or less	$	1,540	$	1,543
Due after one through five years		8,009		8,179
Due after five through ten years		20,759		21,400
Due after ten years		52,583		54,078
Total debt securities available-for-sale	$	82,891	$	85,200

Realized Gains and Losses

The following table shows the proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities and the gross realized gains and losses on the sales of those securities that have been included in earnings as a result of the sales. Gains or losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities are recognized upon sale and are determined by the specific identification method.

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Proceeds	$	3,244	$	—	$	3,244	$	3,359
Realized gains	$	237	$	—	$	237	$	148
Realized losses		—		—		—		—
Impairment losses		—		—		—		—
Net securities (losses) gains	$	237	$	—	$	237	$	148

At least quarterly, the Company conducts a comprehensive security-level impairment assessment. The assessments are based on the nature of the securities, the extent and duration of the securities, the extent and duration of the loss and management’s intent to sell or if it is more likely than not that management will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity. Management believes the Company will fully recover the cost of these securities and it does not intend to sell these securities and likely will not be required to sell them before the anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis, which may be maturity. As a result, management concluded that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2011 and has recognized the total amount of the impairment in other comprehensive income, net of tax.

The following table presents gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	Securities in a continuous unrealized loss position
	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
September 30, 2011
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities	$	—	$	—	$	2	$	261	$	2	$	261
Corporate bonds		10		990		65		435		75		1,425
Total debt securities		10		990		67		696		77		1,686
Equity securities in financial institutions		—		—		9		44		9		44
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	10	$	990	$	76	$	740	$	86	$	1,730
December 31, 2010
Obligations of U.S. Corporations and agencies	$	306	$	12,686	$	—	$	—	$	306	$	12,686
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities		14		4,032		14		493		28		4,525
Obligations of state & political subdivisions		46		2,561		—		—		46		2,561
Corporate bonds		8		492		—		—		8		492
Total debt securities		374		19,771		14		493		388		20,264
Equity securities in financial institutions		—		—		16		38		16		38
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	374	$	19,771	$	30	$	531	$	404	$	20,302

There were seven (7) securities in an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011, four (4) of which were in a continuous loss position for twelve months or more. There were twenty-two (22) securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2010, three (3) of which were in a continuous loss position for twelve months or more.

XML

Loans

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Loans [Abstract]

LOANS

NOTE 3 – LOANS

The Company grants commercial, commercial real estate, residential and consumer loans primarily to customers in Holmes, Tuscarawas, Wayne, Stark and contiguous counties in north central Ohio.

Loans consist of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	85,675	$	78,540
Commercial real estate		102,999		104,829
Residential real estate		102,244		108,832
Consumer		6,429		6,715
Construction & Land Development		16,416		16,515
Total loans before deferred costs		313,763		315,431
Deferred loan costs		217		216
Total Loans	$	313,980	$	315,647

Loan Origination/Risk Management

The Company has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and non-performing and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.

Commercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrower’s ability to operate profitably and prudently expand its business. Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional banking. The Company’s management examines current and occasionally projected cash flows to determine the ability of the borrower to repay their obligations. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and usually incorporate the personal guarantees of business owners; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.

Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type which helps reduce the Company’s exposure to adverse economic events that affect any single market or industry. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans. At September 30, 2011 approximately 87% of the outstanding principal balances of the Company’s commercial real estate loans were secured by owner-occupied properties.

With respect to loans to developers and builders that are secured by non-owner occupied properties, the Company generally requires the borrower to have had an existing relationship with the Company and have a proven financial record. Construction loans are underwritten utilizing independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the completed project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources or repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from the Company or other approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

The Company originates consumer loans utilizing a judgmental underwriting process. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified, as needed, jointly by lenders and loan support personnel. This activity, coupled with relatively small loan amounts spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk.

The Company utilizes an independent loan review vendor that reviews and validates the credit risk program on a periodic basis. Results of these reviews are presented to management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as the Company’s policies and procedures.

Concentrations of Credit

Nearly all of the Company’s lending activity occurs within the State of Ohio, including the four counties of Holmes, Stark, Tuscarawas and Wayne, as well as other markets. The majority of the Company’s loan portfolio consists of owner occupied commercial real estate and commercial loans. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no concentrations of loans related to any single industry in excess of 6.7% and 6.2% respectively, of total loans.

The following table represents a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Beginning balance	$	4,054		$	4,608		$	4,031		$	4,060
Provision for loan losses		240			238			710			996
Loans charged-off		(192	)		(459	)		(686	)		(768	)
Recoveries		14			20			61			119
Ending balance	$	4,116		$	4,407		$	4,116		$	4,407

The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.

(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Construction & Land Development			Unallocated		Total
September 30, 2011
Beginning balance, January 1, 2011	$	1,179		$	1,183		$	1,057		$	80		$	213		$	319	$	4,031
Provision for possible loan losses		120			359			98			36			63			34		710
Charge-offs		(343	)		(68	)		(156	)		(78	)		(41	)		—		(686	)
Recoveries		12			—			9			40			—			—		61
Net charge-offs		(331	)		(68	)		(147	)		(38	)		(41	)		—		(625	)
Ending balance	$	968		$	1,474		$	1,008		$	78		$	235		$	353	$	4,116

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the ending loan balances by portfolio segment and based on the impairment method as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Commercial Real Estate		Residential Real  Estate		Consumer		Construction & Land Development		Unallocated		Total
September 30, 2011
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balances attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	179	$	326	$	53	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	558
Collectively evaluated for impairment		789		1,148		955		78		235		353		3,558
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total ending allowance balance	$	968	$	1,474	$	1,008	$	78	$	235	$	353	$	4,116
Loans:
Loans indvidually evaluated for impairment	$	4,461	$	2,761	$	182	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	7,404
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		81,214		100,238		102,062		6,429		16,416		—		306,359
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total ending loans balance	$	85,675	$	102,999	$	102,244	$	6,429	$	16,416	$	—	$	313,763
December 31, 2010
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending allowance balances attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	106	$	132	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	238
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,073		1,051		1,057		80		121		319		3,701
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		92		—		92
Total ending allowance balance	$	1,179	$	1,183	$	1,057	$	80	$	213	$	319	$	4,031
Loans:
Loans indvidually evaluated for impairment	$	621	$	886	$	299	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,806
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		77,919		103,943		108,533		6,715		16,075		—		313,185
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality		—		—		—		—		440		—		440
Total ending loans balance	$	78,540	$	104,829	$	108,832	$	6,715	$	16,515	$	—	$	315,431

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

(Dollars in thousands)	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment with no Allowance		Recorded Investment with Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	4,509	$	—	$	4,463	$	4,463	$	179	$	2,011
Commercial real estate		3,326		266		2,495		2,761		326		2,395
Residential real estate		—		—		—		—		—		—
Construction & land development		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total impaired loans	$	7,835	$	266	$	6,958	$	7,224	$	505	$	4,406
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	644	$	51	$	571	$	622	$	106	$	571
Commercial real estate		1,047		109		777		886		132		1,631
Residential real estate		590		298		—		298		—		97
Construction & land development		683		—		440		440		92		483
Total impaired loans	$	2,964	$	458	$	1,788	$	2,246	$	330	$	2,782

The following table presents the aging of past due and nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 by class of loans:

(Dollars in thousands)	Current		30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 Days + Past Due		Total Past Due and Accruing		Non- Accrual		Total Loans
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	85,407	$	147	$	19	$	—	$	166	$	102	$	85,675
Commercial real estate		100,933		49		325		—		374		1,692		102,999
Residential real estate		99,465		1,223		94		57		1,374		1,405		102,244
Consumer		6,234		110		26		59		195		—		6,429
Construction & land development		16,236		—		—		—		—		180		16,416
Total Loans	$	308,275	$	1,529	$	464	$	116	$	2,109	$	3,379	$	313,763
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	78,235	$	63	$	160	$	58	$	281	$	24	$	78,540
Commercial real estate		100,914		2,156		114		26		2,296		1,619		104,829
Residential real estate		105,593		574		253		601		1,428		1,811		108,832
Consumer		6,580		69		66		—		135		—		6,715
Construction & land development		16,061		3		—		—		3		451		16,515
Total Loans	$	307,383	$	2,865	$	593	$	685	$	4,143	$	3,905	$	315,431

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The Company has troubled debt restructurings of $8.6 million as of September 30, 2011, and $4.1 million as of December 31, 2010, with $525 thousand and $22 thousand of specific reserves allocated as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings. At September 30, 2011 $7.7 million of the loans classified as troubled debt restructurings were performing to modified terms. The remaining $900 thousand were on nonaccrual status.

Loan modifications that are considered troubled debt restructurings completed during the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 were as follows:

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)	Number of loans restructured		Pre-Modification Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Recorded Investment
Commercial		—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		1		298		298
Residential		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—
Total Restructured Loans		1	$	298	$	298
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Commercial		2	$	4,440	$	4,445
Commercial real estate		—		—		—
Residential		—		—		—
Construction		—		—		—
Total Restructured Loans		2	$	4,440	$	4,445

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes commercial loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes commercial loans with an outstanding balance greater than $275 thousand and is performed on an annual basis.

The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass. Loans classified as pass (Acceptable, Low Acceptable or Pass Watch) may exhibit a wide array of characteristics but at minimum represent an acceptable risk to the Bank. Borrowers in this rating may have leveraged but acceptable balance sheet positions, satisfactory asset quality, and stable to favorable sales and earnings trends, acceptable liquidity and adequate cash flow. Loans are considered fully collectible and require an average amount of administration. While generally adhering to credit policy, these loans may exhibit occasional exceptions that do not result in undue risk to the Bank. Borrowers are generally capable of absorbing setbacks, financial and otherwise, without the threat of failure.

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have material weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan at some future date.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans that do not meet the criteria for special mention, substandard or doubtful classification, when analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Not Rated		Total
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	71,305	$	7,347	$	6,981	$	—	$	42	$	85,675
Commercial real estate		83,422		8,615		4,707		—		6,255		102,999
Residential real estate		1,165				62		—		101,017		102,244
Consumer		—		—		—		—		6,429		6,429
Construction & land development		7,647		4,463		2,638		—		1,668		16,416
Total	$	163,539	$	20,425	$	14,388	$	—	$	115,411	$	313,763
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	65,371	$	3,843	$	9,252	$	—	$	74	$	78,540
Commercial real estate		78,191		9,982		8,188		—		8,468		104,829
Residential real estate		1,153		—		365		—		107,314		108,832
Consumer		—		—		2		—		6,713		6,715
Construction & land development		11,626		2,905		591		—		1,393		16,515
Total	$	156,341	$	16,730	$	18,398	$	—	$	123,962	$	315,431

Loans listed as not rated are either less than $275 thousand or are included in groups of homogeneous loans. The following table presents loans that are not rated by class of loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Non-performing loans include loans past due 90 days and greater and loans on nonaccrual of interest.

(Dollars in thousands)	Performing		Non-Performing		Total
September 30, 2011
Commercial	$	42	$	—	$	42
Commercial real estate		6,255		—		6,255
Residential real estate		99,617		1,400		101,017
Consumer		6,370		59		6,429
Construction & land development		1,659		9		1,668
Total	$	113,943	$	1,468	$	115,411
December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	74	$	—	$	74
Commercial real estate		8,468		—		8,468
Residential real estate		105,201		2,113		107,314
Consumer		6,713		—		6,713
Construction & land development		1,383		10		1,393
Total	$	121,839	$	2,123	$	123,962

Loans serviced for others approximated $49.6 million and $45.1 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

XML

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company provides disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value. The framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three broad levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level I:	Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.
Level II:	Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by corroborated or other means. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level II input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level III:	Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated statements of financial condition at their fair value as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, by level within the fair value hierarchy. No liabilities are carried at fair value. As required by the applicable accounting standards, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Equity securities and U.S. Treasury Notes are valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded. Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies, mortgage-backed securities and obligations of states and political subdivisions are valued at observable market data for similar assets.

(Dollars in thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
	September 30, 2011
Assets:
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Teasury security	$	100	$		$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies				22,065		—		22,065
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities				46,645		—		46,645
Obligations of states and political subdivisions				13,962		—		13,962
Corporate bonds				2,428		—		2,428
Total debt securities		100		85,100		—		85,200
Equity securities in financial institutions		62		—		—		62
Total available-for-sale securities	$	162	$	85,100	$	—	$	85,262
	December 31, 2010
Assets:
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Teasury security	$	100	$	—	$	—	$	100
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies		—		19,711		—		19,711
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored entities		—		42,351		—		42,351
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		11,994		—		11,994
Corporate bonds		—		992		—		992
Total debt securities		100		75,048		—		75,148
Equity securities in financial institutions		56		—		—		56
Total available-for-sale securities	$	156	$	75,048	$	—	$	75,204

The following table presents the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis on the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value as of September 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Impaired loans and other real estate that are collateral dependent are written down to fair value through the establishment of specific reserves. Premises include a building currently used for storage that has been written down to appraised value. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions based on management’s best judgment that are significant inputs to the discounting calculations. As a result, these rights are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are classified within level III of the fair value hierarchy. Techniques used to value the collateral that secure the impaired loans include: quoted market prices for identical assets classified as Level I inputs: and observable inputs employed by certified appraisers for similar assets classified as Level II inputs. In cases where valuation techniques included inputs that are unobservable and are based on estimates and assumptions developed by management based on the best information available under each circumstance, the asset valuation is classified as Level III inputs.

(Dollars in thousands)	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
	September 30, 2011
Assets measured on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	6,719	$	6,719
Other real estate owned		—		—		505		505
Premises		—		—		177		177
Mortgage servicing rights		—		—		157		157
	December 31, 2010
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	1,916	$	1,916
Other real estate owned		—		—		36		36
Premises		—		—		200		200
Mortgage servicing rights		—		—		155		155

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity [Abstract]
Balance at beginning of period	$ 48,538	$ 46,776	$ 47,154	$ 45,822
Comprehensive income:
Net income	999	882	2,867	2,540
Change in net unrealized gain, net of reclassification adjustments and related income taxes of $75, $23, $333, and $167, respectively	146	45	646	325
Total comprehensive income	1,145	927	3,513	2,865
Cash dividends declared $0.18 and $0.54 per share for the quarter and nine month periods ended, respectively	(492)	(492)	(1,476)	(1,476)
Balance at end of period	$ 49,191	$ 47,211	$ 49,191	$ 47,211

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows [Abstract]
NET CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$ 3,857	$ 3,486
Securities available-for-sale:
Proceeds from maturities and repayments	27,928	36,211
Purchases	(40,159)	(36,375)
Proceeds from sale of securities	3,244	3,359
Loan originations, net of repayments	248	(4,452)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate	347	342
Property, equipment, and software acquisitions	(311)	(98)
Net cash used in investing activities	(8,703)	(1,013)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net change in deposits	1,396	11,874
Net change in short-term borrowings	509	770
Repayments of other borrowings	(3,576)	(13,181)
Cash dividends paid	(985)	(985)
Net cash used in financing activities	(2,656)	(1,522)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(7,502)	951
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD	48,360	42,661
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	40,858	43,612
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	2,868	3,978
Income taxes	1,100	850
Noncash investing activities:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	$ 764	$ 331

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and due from banks	$ 9,893	$ 9,798
Interest-earning deposits in other banks	30,965	38,497
Federal funds sold	0	65
Total cash and cash equivalents	40,858	48,360
Securities
Available-for-sale, at fair value	85,262	75,204
Restricted stock, at cost	5,463	5,463
Total securities	90,725	80,667
Loans held for sale	136	0
Loans	313,980	315,647
Less allowance for loan losses	4,116	4,031
Net loans	309,864	311,616
Premises and equipment, net	7,740	7,878
Core deposit intangible	360	406
Goodwill	1,725	1,725
Bank-owned life insurance	3,042	2,961
Accrued interest receivable and other assets	3,399	3,443
TOTAL ASSETS	457,849	457,056
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	71,140	69,151
Interest-bearing	283,716	284,340
Total deposits	354,856	353,491
Short-term borrowings	32,527	32,018
Other borrowings	19,333	22,909
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities	1,942	1,484
Total liabilities	408,658	409,902
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, $6.25 par value. Authorized 9,000,000 shares; issued 2,980,602 shares; outstanding 2,734,799 shares in 2011 and 2010	18,629	18,629
Additional paid-in capital	9,994	9,994
Retained earnings	24,063	22,673
Treasury stock at cost - 245,803 shares in 2011 and 2010	(5,015)	(5,015)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	1,520	873
Total shareholders' equity	49,191	47,154
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$ 457,849	$ 457,056