UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

________________________________________

FORM 6-K

________________________________________

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of March, 2021

Commission File Number 1-10928

________________________________________

INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP INC.

________________________________________

9999 Cavendish Blvd., Suite 200, Ville St. Laurent, Québec, Canada, H4M 2X5

________________________________________

    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

Form 20-F  x            Form 40-F  ¨

    Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):  ¨

    Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):  ¨

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP INC.
March 26, 2021	By:	/s/ Jeffrey Crystal
		Jeffrey Crystal, Chief Financial Officer

INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TAKE NOTICE that an Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) of INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP INC. (the “Company”) will be held as a virtual only meeting on Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. (EST) to:

1. receive and consider the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and the auditor’s report thereon;

2. elect directors of the Company to hold office until the close of the next annual meeting;

3. appoint the auditor and authorize the directors to fix its remuneration;

4. consider, and if deemed advisable, adopt a resolution in the form annexed as Schedule A to the accompanying Management Information Circular (the “Circular”) "say on pay", accepting, in an advisory, non-binding capacity, the Company’s approach to executive compensation disclosed under “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Circular; and

5. transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting.

The accompanying Circular provides detailed information relating to the matters to be dealt with at the Meeting and forms part of this notice.

In an effort to safeguard the health and safety of all stakeholders and the broader community associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has opted to proceed with a virtual only format enabling shareholders to attend and vote at the Meeting via live audio webcast. Registered shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders will have the opportunity to attend the Meeting online, submit questions, and vote in real time through a web-based platform instead of attending the Meeting in person. Non-registered or beneficial shareholders who have not appointed themselves as proxyholders will be able to attend the Meeting as guests, but will not be able to vote or ask questions. Shareholders will not be able to attend the Meeting in person. See Appendix A of the Circular for more details.

Shareholders and other interested parties can attend the Meeting virtually by going to https://web.lumiagm.com/474339464and using the following password: intertape2021 (case sensitive).

The Company has elected to use the notice-and-access rules (“Notice-and-Access”) under National Instrument 54-101 - Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer of the Canadian Securities Administrators for distribution of the materials for the Meeting to shareholders of the Company who do not own their shares in their own names as registered shareholders (“Beneficial Shareholders”). Notice-and-Access is a set of rules that allows issuers to post electronic versions of their proxy-related materials on SEDAR and on one additional website, rather than mailing paper copies to shareholders.

Notice-and-Access is more environmentally friendly as it helps reduce paper use; it also reduces the Company’s printing and mailing costs. Further information about Notice-and-Access is contained in the Circular; Beneficial Shareholders may also contact the Company toll free at 866-202-4713 for information regarding Notice-and-Access. The Company will not be using Notice-and-Access for delivery to shareholders who hold their shares directly in their respective names (“Registered Shareholders”).

Shareholders are strongly encouraged to express their vote in advance by completing the form of proxy or voting instruction form that were provided to them. Detailed instructions on how to complete and return proxies and the voting instruction form by mail, fax or e-mail are provided starting on page 4 of the Circular. To be effective, the completed form of proxy or voting instruction form must be deposited with our transfer agent and registrar, AST Trust Company (Canada), P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario M1S 0A1, at any time prior to 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021.

1

In order to vote at the Meeting, follow the steps described below:

1. Log in to the Meeting online at https://web.lumiagm.com/474339464

2. If you are a registered shareholder: Select the “I have a control number” icon and enter your 13-digit control number as indicated on the form of proxy that you received from AST, followed by the following password: intertape2021 (case sensitive).

Note: In the event that you use your control number to log in to the Meeting, any vote you cast will thereby revoke any proxy you previously submitted. If you do not wish to revoke a proxy that you previously submitted, you should refrain from voting during the Meeting.

3. If you are a duly appointed proxyholder: Select the “I have a control number” icon then enter your 13-digit control number, followed by the following password: intertape2021 (case sensitive). Proxyholders who have been duly appointed and registered with AST in accordance with the following instructions will receive a control number via e-mail from AST after the proxy voting deadline has passed:

Shareholders or their duly appointed proxyholder must complete the online form available at https://lp.astfinancial.com/ControlNumber or call AST at 866-751-6315 (toll free in Canada and the United States) or 212-235-5754 (other countries) by 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021 and provide AST with the required proxyholder contact information and AST will provide the proxyholder with a Control Number via e-mail.

4. If you are a guest: Select the “I am a Guest” icon and complete the online form.

For additional instructions regarding the virtual platform and the navigation thereof, consult the "Virtual Annual General Meeting 2021 - LUMI Guide" on the Company's website at https://www.itape.com/annualmeetingmaterials.

Shareholders may also vote their shares by internet or telephone in advance using the procedures described in the enclosed form of proxy.

The Company may utilize the Broadridge QuickVote™ service to assist Beneficial Shareholders with voting over the telephone. Alternatively, Kingsdale Advisors may contact such Beneficial Shareholders to assist them with conveniently voting directly over the phone..

Shareholders registered at the close of business on March 26, 2021 will be entitled to receive notice of and vote at the Meeting.

Shareholders who have any questions should contact Intertape Polymer Group Inc.’s strategic shareholder advisor and proxy solicitation agent, Kingsdale Advisors, at 855-682-9437 (toll-free within North America) or 416-867-2272 (collect call outside North America) or by e-mail at contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com.

DATED at Sarasota, Florida

March 26, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

(signed) Randi M. Booth

Secretary

2

INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TAKE NOTICE that an Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) of INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP INC. (the “Company”) will be held as a virtual only meeting on Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. (EST) to:

1. receive and consider the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and the auditor’s report thereon;

2. elect directors of the Company to hold office until the close of the next annual meeting;

3. appoint the auditor and authorize the directors to fix its remuneration;

4. consider, and if deemed advisable, adopt a resolution in the form annexed as Schedule A to the accompanying Management Information Circular (the “Circular”) "say on pay", accepting, in an advisory, non-binding capacity, the Company’s approach to executive compensation disclosed under “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Circular; and

5. transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting.

Additional information on the above matters can be found in the Circular under the heading “Business of the Meeting”.

Notice-and-Access

The Company has elected to use the notice-and-access rules (“Notice-and-Access”) under National Instrument 54-101 – Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer of the Canadian Securities Administrators for distribution of the materials for the Meeting to shareholders of the Company who do not own their shares in their own names as registered shareholders (“Beneficial Shareholders”). Notice-and-Access is a set of rules that allows issuers to post electronic versions of their proxy-related materials on SEDAR and on one additional website, rather than mailing paper copies to shareholders. Notice-and-Access is more environmentally friendly as it helps reduce paper use; it also reduces the Company’s printing and mailing costs. Beneficial Shareholders may obtain further information about Notice-and-Access by contacting the Company toll free at 866-202-4713.

The Company will not be using Notice-and-Access for delivery to shareholders who hold their shares directly in their respective names (“Registered Shareholders”); they will receive paper copies of the Circular and related materials via prepaid mail.

Websites Where Materials are Posted

The Circular, this notice of meeting, the form of proxy, voting instruction form and the Company’s 2020 annual report containing the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis (collectively, the “Meeting Materials”) are available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com and under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com (Canada) and at www.sec.gov (United States). All shareholders are reminded to review the Circular and other Meeting Materials before voting.

1

How to Obtain Paper Copies of Meeting Materials

Beneficial Shareholders may obtain paper copies free of charge of the Circular, other Meeting Materials and the Company’s 2020 annual report by contacting the Company toll free at 866-202-4713 or by email at Itp$info@itape.com. Any request for paper copies should be received by the Company by 5:00 p.m. (eastern time) on April 28, 2021 in order to allow sufficient time for a Beneficial Shareholder to receive the paper copy and return the voting instruction form by its due date.

Voting

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 26, 2021 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

If you are a Beneficial Shareholder, accompanying this notice of meeting are a voting instruction form and a supplemental mailing list return card for use by shareholders who wish to receive the Company’s interim financial statements for the 2021 fiscal year. If you receive these materials through your broker or another intermediary, please complete, sign and return the materials in accordance with the instructions provided to you by such broker or other intermediary.

Registered Shareholders are encouraged to express their vote in advance by completing the form of proxy. Detailed instructions on how to complete and return proxies by mail, fax or email are provided starting on page 4 of the accompanying Circular. To be effective, the completed form of proxy must be deposited with the Company’s transfer agent and registrar, AST Trust Company (Canada), P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario M1S 0A1, at any time prior to 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021 or with the Chair of the Meeting before the commencement of the Meeting or at any adjournment thereof. Registered Shareholders may also vote their shares by internet or telephone using the procedures described in the enclosed form of proxy.

Shareholders who have any questions should contact Intertape Polymer Group Inc.’s strategic shareholder advisor and proxy solicitation agent, Kingsdale Advisors, at 855-682-9437 (toll-free within North America) or 416-867-2272 (collect call outside North America) or by e-mail at contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com.

Dated this 26th day of March, 2021.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

(signed) Randi M. Booth

Secretary

2

Management Information Circular

Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting

to be held on May 12, 2021

CHAIR'S LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

Dear fellow shareholders: On behalf on the Board, please join us virtually at our annual meeting of shareholders of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (“IPG”) to be held on May 12, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. (eastern time). After the formal proceedings, management will provide an update of our corporate progress and our growth plans. Society and commerce were faced with unprecedented challenges during the past year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. No training or management practice could adequately prepare an organization for the challenges we each faced in our own unique way. At IPG, our long-established culture of health and safety within our daily operations at the plant level underpinned our ability to not only maintain operations in the face of the pandemic, but to flourish due to the essential nature of our products in the end markets we serve.

These market dynamics combined with the investments we have made over the past five years created a structural change in the business. We reported Company records for revenue of $1.2 billion and Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $211 million in fiscal 2020. This performance led to a material lift in our Adjusted EBITDA margin(1) to 17% and continued strong generation of free cash flow(1) of $134 million.

(1) Non-GAAP financial measure. For definitions and reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, see Appendix B.

The end markets where we saw the strongest growth this year are the same ones in which we have made recent capital investments and strategic acquisitions. Specifically, the growth in the e-commerce market where we supply water-activated tape, protective packaging, dispensing equipment and films, and the growth in the building and construction market which uses our woven products and certain industrial and retail tapes. Capital allocation is a key element of successful business strategy and our capital investments in Midland, NC and India, and our acquisitions of Polyair and Maiweave, have strengthened our product bundle and our competitive position in these end markets.

Looking ahead, we believe our customers and end users will increasingly pursue sustainable solutions and practices in their choice of packaging and protective solutions suppliers. We are committed to embracing sustainability and during 2020 we made it one of the four strategic pillars by which we manage the business for the long term. As part of this commitment, we established the Environmental, Social & Governance ("ESG") Committee of the Board of Directors and we are increasing our public disclosures so our customers and other important stakeholders can keep abreast of progress and new developments in order to make informed decisions. In July 2020, we published our second annual sustainability report, titled ‘We Package, We

Protect AND We Sustain.’ We are very proud of this year’s report as we significantly expanded the scope to discuss how we manage for sustainability in the operations of the business.

We have invested in a world-class, low cost manufacturing base that we believe is competitively positioned to perform regardless of the market cycle. Just as importantly, we have an executive team and an employee base that has clearly demonstrated their resiliency and resourcefulness during 2020 and into 2021. Their emphasis on working safely and servicing our customers has ensured an uninterrupted supply of the essential products we produce. Operating facilities safely and efficiently, growing with our existing customers and acquiring new ones, and maintaining our high standard of customer service are core capabilities of our team. Our world-class asset base and dedicated team members fortify our ability to manufacture high-quality tapes, films, protective packaging, woven products and machine systems. Once the history of this period is written, I believe 2020 will be recognized as an inflection point for IPG in building a global leader in sustainable packaging and protective solutions. We look forward to further updating you on our progress at the annual meeting.

The Management Information Circular attached to this letter provides information on the compensation for directors and executive management, our governance practices, directors to be elected at the meeting and certain other items to be voted upon as set out in the notice of meeting.

If you are unable to attend the virtual meeting, we encourage you to exercise your right to vote by completing the proxy, or if applicable, the voting instruction form and return it within the deadline indicated to ensure your vote is counted as part of the process. If you require any assistance or have questions please contact IPG’s strategic shareholder advisor and proxy solicitation agent, Kingsdale Advisors, by telephone at 855-682-9437 (toll-free within North America) or 416-867-2272 (collect call outside North America) or by email at contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com.

On behalf of the Board and the entire organization we appreciate your continued support and we invite you to share your feedback with us by email at jpanteli@itape.com or by writing to the attention of the Chair of the Board at the following address: 800 Place Victoria, Suite 3700, Montréal, Québec H4Z 1E9, c/o Fasken Martineau Dumoulin LLP.

Sincerely,

James Pantelidis

Chair of the Board

Intertape Polymer Group Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Solicitation of Proxies by Management	4
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials	4
Appointment and Revocation of Proxies	5
Beneficial Shareholders	6
Exercise of Discretion by Proxies	7
Voting Shares	7
Principal Shareholders	7
Business of the Meeting	8
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation	10
Election of Directors	11
Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance	33
Executive Compensation	34
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans	66
Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers	73
Interest of Informed Persons in Material Transactions	73
Shareholder Proposals	73
Environmental, Social & Governance Practices	73
Statement of Corporate Governance Practices	78
Audit Committee Information	85
Additional Information	85
Authorization	86
Schedule A — Shareholders’ Advisory, Non-Binding Resolution — Executive Compensation	87
Appendix A — Virtual Meeting — Code of Procedure	88
Appendix B — Non GAAP Financial Measures and Key Performance Indicators	89

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES BY MANAGEMENT

This Management Information Circular (the “Circular”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the management of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. ("IPG" or the “Company”) of proxies to be used at the annual meeting of shareholders (the “Meeting”) of the Company to be held at the time and place and for the purposes set out in the Notice of Meeting and all adjournments thereof. Except as otherwise stated, the information contained herein is given as of March 26, 2021 and all dollar amounts in this Circular are in US dollars. The solicitation of proxies by management will be made primarily by mail. However, directors, officers and employees of the Company may also solicit proxies by telephone, telecopier, e-mail or in person. The total cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. The Company has also engaged Kingsdale Advisors (“Kingsdale”) as its strategic shareholder advisor and proxy solicitation agent, and will pay fees of approximately $44,100 to Kingsdale for the advisory and proxy solicitation services in addition to certain out-of-pocket expenses. Kingsdale can be reached by telephone, toll-free in North America at 855-682-9437 or at 416-867-2272 outside of North America (collect call) or by e-mail at contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com.

INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

Notice-and-Access

The Company has again this year elected to use “notice-and-access” rules (“Notice-and-Access”) under National Instrument 54-101 Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer (“NI 54-101”) for distribution of Proxy-Related Materials (as defined below) to shareholders who do not hold common shares of the Company (“Shares”) in their own names (referred to herein as “Beneficial Shareholders”). Notice-and-Access is a set of rules that allows issuers to post electronic versions of proxy-related materials on SEDAR and on one additional website, rather than mailing paper copies. “Proxy-Related Materials” refers to this Circular, the Notice of Meeting, a voting instruction form ("VIF") and the Company’s 2020 annual report containing the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

The use of Notice-and-Access is more environmentally friendly as it helps reduce paper use. It also reduces the Company’s printing and mailing costs. Beneficial Shareholders may obtain further information about Notice-and-Access by contacting AST Trust Company (Canada) toll free at 800-387-0825 (within North America) or 416-682-3860 (outside North America).

The Company is not using Notice-and-Access for delivery to shareholders who hold their Shares directly in their respective names (referred to herein as “Registered Shareholders”). Registered Shareholders will receive paper copies of this Circular and related materials via prepaid mail.

Websites Where Proxy-Related Materials are Posted

The Proxy-Related Materials are available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com and under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com (Canada) and at www.sec.gov (United States). All shareholders are reminded to review the Proxy-Related Materials, including this Circular, before voting.

Notice Package

Although the Proxy-Related Materials have been posted on-line as noted above, Beneficial Shareholders will receive paper copies of a notice package (“Notice Package”) via prepaid mail containing information prescribed by NI 54-101 such as the date, time and location of the Meeting, the website addresses where the Proxy-Related Materials are posted and a VIF.

How to Obtain Paper Copies of Proxy-Related Materials

Beneficial Shareholders may obtain paper copies of this Circular, the Company’s 2020 annual report and other Proxy-Related Materials free of charge by contacting the Company toll free at 866-202-4713 or by email at Itp$info@itape.com. Any request for paper copies which are required in advance of the Meeting should be sent so that the request is received by the Company by 5:00 p.m. (eastern time) on April 28, 2021 in order to allow sufficient time for Beneficial Shareholders to receive their paper copies and to return their VIF by its due date.

4

APPOINTMENT AND REVOCATION OF PROXIES

General

As mentioned above, shareholders may be “Registered Shareholders” or “Beneficial Shareholders”. If Shares are registered in the name of an intermediary and not registered in the shareholder’s name, they are said to be owned by a “Beneficial Shareholder”. An intermediary is usually a bank, trust company, securities dealer or broker, or a clearing agency in which an intermediary participates. The instructions provided below set out the different procedures for voting Shares at the Meeting to be followed by Registered Shareholders and Beneficial Shareholders.

The persons named in the enclosed instrument appointing a proxyholder are officers or directors of the Company. Each shareholder has the right to appoint a person or company (who need not be a shareholder) to attend and act for him at the Meeting other than the persons designated in the enclosed form of proxy by inserting such other person’s name in the blank space provided in the form of proxy and signing the form of proxy or by completing and signing another proper form of proxy. Shareholders who have given a proxy also have the right to revoke it insofar as it has not been exercised. The right to appoint an alternate proxyholder and the right to revoke a proxy may be exercised by following the procedures set out below under “Registered Shareholders” or “Beneficial Shareholders”, as applicable.

If any shareholder receives more than one proxy or VIF, it is because that shareholder’s Shares are registered in more than one form. In such cases, shareholders should sign and submit all proxies or VIFs received by them in accordance with the instructions provided.

Registered Shareholders

Registered Shareholders have two methods by which they can vote their Shares; namely during the virtual Meeting or by proxy. To assure representation at the Meeting, Registered Shareholders are encouraged to return the proxy included with this Circular. Sending in a proxy will not prevent a Registered Shareholder from voting during the virtual Meeting. The vote will be taken and counted at the Meeting. Registered Shareholders who do not plan to attend the Meeting or do not wish to vote during the virtual Meeting can vote by proxy.

To be valid, the duly completed form of proxy must be deposited at the offices of AST Trust Company (Canada), P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario M1S 0A1 prior to 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021 or with the Chair of the Meeting before the commencement of the Meeting or any adjournment thereof. A Registered Shareholder may return the completed proxy as follows:

(a)by mail in the enclosed envelope;

(b)by the internet by accessing the following internet site: www.astvotemyproxy.com and entering the personalized 13-digit e-voting control number printed on the form of proxy and following the instructions on the website;

(c)by fax to 416-368-2502 or toll free in Canada and the United States to 866-781-3111;

(d)by telephone by calling 888-489-7352 as described on the enclosed proxy;

(e)by email by scanning the proxy and emailing it to proxyvote@astfinancial.com; or

(f)by registered mail, by hand or by courier to the attention of AST Trust Company (Canada), 1 Toronto Street, Suite 1200 Toronto, Ontario M5C2V6.

To exercise the right to appoint a person or company to attend and act for a Registered Shareholder at the Meeting, such shareholder must strike out the names of the persons designated on the enclosed instrument appointing a proxy and insert the name of the alternate appointee in the blank space provided for that purpose. The instrument appointing a proxyholder must be executed by the shareholder or by his attorney authorized in writing or, if the shareholder is a corporate body, by its authorized officer or officers.

In addition, the shareholder or their duly appointed proxyholder must complete the online form available at https://lp.astfinancial.com/ControlNumber or call AST at 866-751-6315 (toll free in Canada and the United States) or 212-235-5754 (other countries) prior to 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021 and provide AST with the required proxyholder contact information and AST will provide the proxyholder with a Control Number via email.

5

To exercise the right to revoke a proxy, in addition to any other manner permitted by law, a shareholder who has given a proxy may revoke it by instrument in writing, executed by the shareholder or his attorney authorized in writing, or if the shareholder is a corporation, by a duly authorized officer or attorney thereof, and deposited: (i) with AST Trust Company (Canada), P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario M1S 0A1 at any time up to and including prior to 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021, or (ii) with the Chair of the Meeting on the date of the Meeting, or at any adjournment thereof, and upon either of such deposits the proxy is revoked.

Shareholders who have any questions should contact Intertape Polymer Group Inc.’s strategic shareholder advisor and proxy solicitation agent, Kingsdale Advisors, at 855-682-9437 (toll-free within North America) or 416-867-2272 (collect call outside North America) or by e-mail at contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com.

BENEFICIAL SHAREHOLDERS

Beneficial Shareholders who have not objected to their intermediary disclosing certain ownership information about themselves to the Company are referred to as “NOBOs”. Beneficial Shareholders who have objected to their intermediary disclosing the ownership information about themselves to the Company are referred to as “OBOs”.

As mentioned above, the Company is using Notice-and-Access to provide Proxy-Related Materials to Beneficial Shareholders. Therefore, a Notice Package will be sent indirectly to all NOBOs and OBOs through intermediaries; the Company is assuming the cost of such delivery to OBOs.Therefore, a Notice Package will be sent indirectly to all NOBOs and OBOs through their intermediaries; the Company is assuming the cost of such delivery to OBOs.

Beneficial Shareholders may vote in the following ways:

a)by the internetby going to the website at www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions on the screen. The Shareholder's voting instructions are then conveyed electronically over the internet. The Shareholder will need the 16 digit Control Number found on his or her VIF;

b)by telephoneby calling the number located on such Shareholder's VIF. The Shareholder will need the 16 digit Control Number found on his or her VIF; or

c)by mailby completing the VIF as directed and returning it in the business reply envelope provided by the Shareholder's nominee's cut-off date and time.

Although a Beneficial Shareholder may not be recognized directly at the Meeting for the purposes of voting Shares registered in the name of his or her broker, a Beneficial Shareholder may attend the Meeting as proxyholder for the Registered Shareholder and vote the Shares in that capacity. Beneficial Shareholders who wish to attend the Meeting and indirectly vote their Shares as proxyholder for the Registered Shareholder should follow the instructions found on the VIF.

The Company may utilize the Broadridge QuickVote™ service to assist Beneficial Shareholders with voting their Shares over the telephone. Alternatively, Kingsdale Advisors may contact such Beneficial Shareholders to assist them with conveniently voting their Shares directly over the phone. Shareholders who have any questions should contact Intertape Polymer Group Inc.’s strategic shareholder advisor and proxy solicitation agent, Kingsdale Advisors, at 855-682-9437 (toll-free within North America) or 416-867-2272 (collect call outside North America) or by e-mail at contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com.

Meeting Materials Received by OBOs from Intermediaries

The Company has distributed copies of the Notice Package to intermediaries for distribution to OBOs. Intermediaries are required to deliver the Notice Package to all OBOs of the Company who have not waived their right to receive these materials, and to seek instructions as to how to vote Shares. Often, intermediaries will use a service company (such as, for example, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.) to forward the Notice Package to OBOs.

OBOs who receive the Notice Package will typically be given the ability to provide voting instructions in one of two ways:

(a)Generally, an OBO will be given a VIF which must be completed and signed by the OBO in accordance with the instructions provided by the intermediary. In this case, the mechanisms described above for Registered Shareholders cannot be used and the instructions provided by the intermediary must be followed.

(b)Occasionally, an OBO may be given a proxy that has already been signed by the intermediary. This form of proxy is restricted to the number of Shares owned by the OBO but is otherwise not completed. This form of proxy need not be

6

signed by the OBO but must be completed by the OBO and returned to AST Trust Company (Canada) in the manner described above for Registered Shareholders.

The purpose of these procedures is to allow OBOs to direct the proxy voting of the Shares that they own but that are not registered in their name. Should an OBO who receives either a form of proxy or a VIF wish to attend and vote at the virtual Meeting (or have another person attend and vote on its behalf), the OBO should strike out the persons named in the form of proxy as the proxyholder and insert the OBO’s (or such other person’s) name in the blank space provided or, in the case of a VIF, follow the corresponding instructions provided by the intermediary. In either case, OBOs who received a Notice Package from their intermediary should carefully follow the instructions provided by the intermediary.

To exercise the right to revoke a proxy, an OBO who has completed a proxy (or a VIF, as applicable) should carefully follow the instructions provided by the intermediary.

Proxies returned by intermediaries as “non-votes” because the intermediary has not received instructions from the OBO with respect to the voting of certain Shares or, under applicable stock exchange or other rules, the intermediary does not have the discretion to vote those Shares on one or more of the matters that come before the Meeting, will be treated as not entitled to vote on any such matter and will not be counted as having been voted in respect of any such matter. Shares represented by such “non-votes” will, however, be counted in determining whether there is a quorum at the Meeting.

EXERCISE OF DISCRETION BY PROXIES

Where a choice is specified, the Shares represented by proxy will be voted for, withheld from voting or voted against, as directed, on any poll or ballot that may be called. Where no choice is specified, the proxy will confer discretionary authority and will be voted in favour of all matters referred to on the form of proxy. Accordingly, in the absence of any direction to the contrary, Shares represented by properly-executed proxies in favour of the persons designated in the enclosed form of proxy will be voted FOR the: (i) election of directors, (ii) appointment of the auditor and authorization of the directors to fix its remuneration, and (iii) resolution accepting, in an advisory, non-binding capacity, the Company’s approach to executive compensation disclosed in the Circular, the whole as stated under such headings in this Circular.

The proxy also confers discretionary authority to vote for, withhold from voting or vote against amendments or variations to the matters identified in the Notice of Meeting and with respect to other matters not specifically mentioned in the Notice of Meeting but which may properly come before the Meeting. Management has no present knowledge of any amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting or any business that will be presented at the Meeting other than that referred to in the Notice of Meeting. However, if any other matters not known to management should properly come before the Meeting, the accompanying form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the persons named therein and, in such case, it is their intention to vote in accordance with the recommendations of management of the Company.

VOTING SHARES

As of March 26, 2021, there were 59,027,047 Shares issued and outstanding. Each Share entitles the holder thereof to one vote. The Company has fixed March 26, 2021 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the purpose of determining shareholders entitled to receive notice of the Meeting. Pursuant to the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “CBCA”), the Company is required to prepare, no later than ten days after the Record Date, an alphabetical list of shareholders entitled to vote as of the Record Date that shows the number of Shares held by each shareholder. A shareholder whose name appears on the list referred to above is entitled to vote the Shares shown opposite the shareholder’s name at the Meeting. The list of shareholders is available for inspection during usual business hours at the registered office of the Company, 800 Place Victoria, Suite 3700, Montreal, Québec H4Z 1E9 and at the Meeting.

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

As of March 26, 2021, to the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Company, no person beneficially owned, or exercised control or direction over, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares.

7

BUSINESS OF THE MEETING

The purposes of the Meeting are to:

1. receive and consider the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and the auditor’s report thereon;

2. elect directors of the Company to hold office until the close of the next annual meeting;

3. appoint the auditor and authorize the directors to fix its remuneration;

4. consider, and if deemed advisable, adopt a resolution in the form annexed as Schedule A to the accompanying Management Information Circular (the “Circular”) "say on pay", accepting, in an advisory, non-binding capacity, the Company’s approach to executive compensation disclosed under “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Circular; and

5. transact such other business as may properly be brought before the Meeting.

Receiving the Financial Statements

The audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 and the Auditor’s Report thereon will be placed before the Meeting. These audited consolidated financial statements may be obtained from the Company upon request and will be available at the Meeting. The audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 are available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com under “Investor Relations”. They have also been filed with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities as well as the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and are available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com (Canada) and at www.sec.gov (United States).

Election of Directors

The Company’s Articles of Amalgamation provide that the Company shall have a minimum of three and a maximum of eleven directors. Eleven directors have been nominated for election to the Board of Directors for the year to come. Each director elected at the Meeting will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until the election of his successor, unless the director’s seat on the Board of Directors becomes vacant for any reason.

Unless authority to do so is withheld, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote FOR the election of the eleven nominees whose names appear on pages 11 to 21 hereof. Management does not expect that any of the nominees will be unable to serve as a director.

Appointment of Auditor

Management and the Board of Directors propose that Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP be appointed as the Company’s auditor until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders. Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP has been the Company’s auditor for more than five years.

The Audit Committee has a policy that restricts the services that may be provided by, and the fees paid to, the auditor. All services provided by the auditor must be permitted by law and by the Audit Committee policy and be pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the policy. Fees paid to the auditor for the past two fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 are set out below:

8

	2020	2019
	(CDN$)	(CDN$)
Audit Fees	993,500	961,000
Audit-Related Fees	125,325	117,900
Tax Fees	45,893	278,828
All Other Fees	—	—
Total	1,164,718	1,357,728

The nature of each category of fees is described below.

Audit Fees. Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, assisting its Audit Committee in discharging its responsibilities for the review of the Company’s interim unaudited consolidated financial statements and services that generally only the independent auditor can reasonably provide, such as consent letters and assistance and review of documents filed with the SEC and Canadian securities regulatory authorities.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees were for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated interim unaudited financial statements and are not reported under the caption “Audit Fees” above. These services included consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards as well as services related to business acquisitions.

Tax Fees. Tax fees were for the preparation of the Canadian subsidiaries’ income tax returns and assistance with questions in 2020 and 2019. In addition, tax fees in 2019 were for tax advice and tax planning which included assistance with questions regarding tax audits from the various taxation authorities in Canada and tax planning relating to common forms of domestic and international taxation.

All Other Fees. The Company paid no other fees for services provided other than audit fees, audit-related fees and tax fees in 2020 and 2019 as described above.

The Audit Committee charter provides for the required pre-approvals of services to be rendered by the external auditors. The pre-approval process takes place annually and is presented by the Company’s internal accountants and the external auditors for planned activity including audit, tax and non-audit services and includes reasonable detail with respect to the services covered. The pre-approval of all non-audit services allows the Audit Committee to consider the effect of such services on the independence of the external auditor. Any such services that may arise in addition to the pre-approved plan must be presented separately to the Audit Committee for pre-approval. The charter states that this responsibility cannot be delegated to management of the Company in any way whatsoever.

Except where authorization to vote with respect to the appointment of the auditor is withheld, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote FOR the appointment of Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP as the auditor of the Company until the next annual meeting of shareholders, at remuneration to be determined by the Board of Directors.

Advisory “Say on Pay” Vote on Executive Compensation

At the Meeting, Shareholders will be asked to consider and, if deemed advisable adopt an advisory, non-binding or “Say on Pay” resolution in the form annexed as Schedule A to the Circular, accepting the Company’s approach to executive compensation as disclosed in this Circular. See section entitled “Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation” below for information regarding the advisory, non-binding vote. The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote in favour of the resolution accepting, in an advisory, non-binding capacity, the Company’s approach to executive compensation disclosed in the Circular. Unless authority to do so is withheld, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote FOR the foregoing advisory, non-binding resolution.

Other Matters

Management has no present knowledge of any amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting or any business that will be presented at the Meeting other than that referred to in the Notice of Meeting. However, if any other matters not known to management should properly come before the Meeting, the accompanying form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the persons named therein and, in such case it is their intention to vote in accordance with the recommendations of management of the Company.

9

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

At the Meeting, as part of the Company’s commitment to strong corporate governance practices, shareholders will have an opportunity to cast an advisory “Say on Pay” vote on the Board of Directors’ approach to executive compensation. The Company held a “Say on Pay” vote at the 2019 and 2020 annual meetings and intends to continue to hold an advisory “Say on Pay” vote at each annual meeting as part of its process of shareholder engagement. The shareholder engagement process is described in more detail in the section entitled "Shareholder Engagement" starting on page 82 of this Circular. At the 2020 annual meeting, shareholders adopted a resolution accepting, in an advisory, non-binding capacity, the Company’s approach to executive compensation as disclosed in the Company’s 2020 management information circular, with 36,775,395 Shares voted in favour of the “Say on Pay” resolution (92.0%) and 3,192,855 Shares voted against (8.0%).

The purpose of an advisory “Say on Pay” vote is to provide shareholders with an opportunity to indicate their acceptance of the Board of Directors’ overall approach to executive compensation. The Board of Directors, through its Human Resources and Compensation Committee, remains fully responsible for compensation decisions and is not relieved of these responsibilities by either a positive or negative advisory vote by shareholders. The vote by shareholders is advisory only and non-binding on the Board of Directors and the Company. However, the Board of Directors and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote as part of an ongoing review of the executive compensation program of the Company together with feedback received from shareholders in the course of regular communications.

The Board of Directors diligently reviews the Company’s executive compensation plans and consults third-party experts to design the terms of these plans relative to the current marketplace. To fully understand the objectives, philosophy and principles the Board of Directors has used in its approach to executive compensation decisions, shareholders should carefully read the section of the Circular entitled “Executive Compensation” starting on page 34 of this Circular.

That section describes the Company’s compensation philosophy, the objectives and elements of the program, the measurement and assessment process used by the Company and why a large portion of the Company’s executive compensation is linked to business performance and earned over the longer term, thereby aligning the interests of the Company’s executives with those of its shareholders.

The year 2020 was extraordinary and required immediate and ongoing action to maintain essential operations in the COVID-19 environment, notwithstanding significant uncertainty and macroeconomic disruption. The Company ended the year with strong results, including Company records for revenue, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flows financial metrics, and outstanding shareholder value creation. The Board of Directors and Human Resources and Compensation Committee took management and Company performance into consideration while making compensation decisions. The Committee has aligned the Company's compensation outcomes directly with the experience of shareholders and key company accomplishments, as further discussed in the "Executive Compensation" section later in this Circular.

Shareholders are encouraged, prior to casting their votes at the Meeting, to provide any specific feedback, questions or concerns they may have regarding executive compensation directly to the Board of Directors by writing to the attention of the Chair of the Board at the following address: 800 Place Victoria, Suite 3700, Montréal, Québec H4Z 1E9, c/o Fasken Martineau Dumoulin LLP.

The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the advisory, non-binding resolution accepting the Company’s approach to executive compensation. Unless otherwise specified, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy or VIF intend to vote FOR the advisory, non-binding resolution accepting the Company’s approach to executive compensation. The text of the resolution accepting the Company’s approach to executive compensation is annexed as Schedule A to this Circular.

10

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Number of Directors

The Board of Directors currently consists of eleven directors. The persons named in the enclosed form of proxy intend to vote for the election of the eleven nominees whose names are set out below. Each director will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until the election of his or her successor, unless the director’s seat on the Board of Directors becomes vacant for any reason.

The Nominated Directors

The following are profiles of each of the eleven persons proposed to be nominated for election as a director. Information in this Circular regarding the number of Shares held or over which control or direction is exercised by each director was provided to the Company by the respective directors.

	Robert M. Beil			Areas of Expertise:
	Bob Beil worked for The Dow Chemical Company for 32 years, until September 2006. Mr. Beil held numerous positions in Sales, Marketing, Business and Executive Management at Dow Chemical, including serving as the North American Commercial Vice President for Dow’s Plastics Business. In this role, he was responsible for sales and marketing of more than $2 billion of polyethylene, polypropylene and polystyrene resins to Dow Chemical’s customers in all market segments in the United States, Canada and Mexico. In addition, he spent a portion of his career working in Dow’s Human Resources function, which was responsible for compensation design for Dow, a Fortune 500 company. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Beil was Corporate Vice President with functional oversight for all of Sales and Marketing at Dow Chemical. Principal occupation(1): Corporate Director.			Strategy/Leading Growth Risk Management Mergers & Acquisitions Manufacturing/Operations Marketing/Sales   Human Resources/Compensation   International Markets Packaging Industry
Phoenix, Arizona, USA   Current position with the Company:   Director   Director since: September 2007   Age: 68   Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors   Human Resources and Compensation Committee (chair)   Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (member)
Shares & Deferred Share Units Held
Minimum level of ownership (2)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (3)	Total Market Value (4)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (5)
$325,000	43,885	48,076	$2,107,746	Yes

(1)Mr. Beil has held this occupation for the last five years.

(2)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee.

(3)Includes related dividend amounts.

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and deferred share units ("DSUs") under the Deferred Share Unit Plan (the "DSU Plan") held on March 12, 2021.

(5)DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation".

11

	Chris R. Cawston, CPA			Areas of Expertise:
	Chris Cawston founded The Cawston Group, an advisory group delivering financial, strategic and operational advisory services and interim executive management with a focus on rapid growth, building leadership teams, and corporate clients who are in transition mainly in the technology, automotive and B2B segments. He was the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Cawston Group from July 2010 to March 2015 and again at present since February 2020. Mr. Cawston was the President of Sym-Tech, a leading provider of finance and insurance solutions to automobile dealers and original equipment manufacturers, from March 2015 to January 2020. He was also a member of the board of AutoServe1 from 2014 until the sale of the business in 2019. His prior roles include, President and Chief Executive Officer of SCI Marketview, Co-Founder and President of Premier Salons & Magicuts, and Director Internal Audit, Mitel Corporation. Mr. Cawston began his career with Coopers & Lybrand, now PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Cawston is a Canadian Chartered Professional Accountant.   Principal occupation(1): Chief Executive Officer, The Cawston Group			Strategy/Leading Growth Finance/Accounting Risk Management CEO/COO Experience Mergers & Acquisitions Manufacturing/Operations Information Technology Governance
Toronto, Ontario, Canada   Current position with the Company:   Director   Director since: October 2020   Age: 62   Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors   Audit Committee (member)
Shares & DSUs Held
Minimum level of ownership (2)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (3)	Total Market Value (4)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (5)
$325,000	6,300	4,135	$239,170	Pending

(1)Mr. Cawston was previously President, Sym-Tech Dealer Services from March 2015 through January 2020 and Chief Executive Officer, Cawston Group Inc. from July 2010 through March 2015, and February 2020 to present.

(2)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee.

(3)Includes related dividend amounts.

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and DSUs held on March 12, 2021.

(5)DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation". Mr. Cawston was appointed to the Board of Directors on October 15, 2020 and has until October 15, 2025 to comply with the minimum share ownership requirement.

12

	Jane Craighead, PhD, CPA, CA			Areas of Expertise:
	Jane Craighead was a Senior Vice President in Global Human Resources at Scotiabank from February 2011 until her retirement in May 2019. Her corporate experience also includes similar roles at Alcan and Rio Tinto plc, a large UK based mining conglomerate, from 2007 to 2010. Ms. Craighead has a professional background with over 30 years in business, accounting and finance. She is a Chartered Accountant and Chartered Professional Accountant and worked for many years in practice and in consulting as an Eastern Canada Business Leader at Mercer Human Resource Consulting. She holds a PhD in Management from McGill University, and has published research on executive compensation and corporate governance. Ms. Craighead was a member of the board of Clearwater Seafoods from 2015 until it was sold and taken private in January 2021. While on the board of Clearwater Seafoods, she served as the chair of the Human Resources and Development Committee and was a member of the Finance Committee. She has been a director of Jarislowsky Fraser Limited, one of Canada's leading independent investment firms, since 2018. She also sits on various investment advisory boards including the Scotiabank pension plan, Mount Allison University endowment and a private holding company. She is Vice Chair of the Board of Regents of Mount Allison University and Co-Vice Chair of the McGill University Health Centre Foundation. She has also been awarded one of Canada’s Top 100 Most Powerful Women by the Women’s Executive Network.   Principal occupation(1): Corporate Director.			Strategy/Leading Growth Capital Markets Finance/Accounting Risk Management Mergers & Acquisitions Human Resources/Compensation Information Technology Governance International Markets Environmental & Social
Elizabethtown, Ontario, Canada   Current position with the Company:   Director   Director since: October 2020   Age: 61   Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors Human Resources and Compensation Committee (member) ESG Committee (member)(2)
Shares & DSUs Held
Minimum level of ownership (3)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (5)	Total Market Value (5)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (6)
$325,000	7,000	4,123	$254,939	Pending

(1)Ms. Craighead was previously Senior Vice President Global Human Resources, Scotiabank, Toronto from February 2011 through April 2019.

(2)The ESG Committee was established on November 11, 2020.

(3)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee.

(4)Includes related dividend amounts.

(5)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and DSUs held on March 12, 2021.

(6)DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation". Ms. Craighead was appointed to the Board of Directors on October 15, 2020 and has until October 15, 2025 to comply with the minimum share ownership requirement.

13

	Frank Di Tomaso, FCPA, FCA, ICD.D			Areas of Expertise:
	Frank Di Tomaso has been a Canadian Chartered Professional Accountant since 1972, and an ICD.D since 2009. He was a Partner and Advisory Partner at Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP from 1981 until 2012 where he held the position of Managing Partner Audit – Public Companies. He is currently serving on the boards of ADF Group Inc., Birks Group Inc., and Laurentian Pilotage Authority and has also served on the boards of National Bank Trust, National Bank Life Assurance Company, Redline Communications Inc., Yorbeau Resources Inc., Ordre des comptables agréés du Québec, Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton and Grant Thornton. Mr. Di Tomaso is engaged both in the business and the social community while being a member of many business associations and not-for-profit organizations. In that regard, he received the Award of Distinction from the John Molson School of Business – Concordia University, Montreal, Québec in 2004, in recognition of his outstanding contribution to the World of Business and the community. Principal occupation(1): Corporate Director.			Strategy/Leading Growth Finance/Accounting   Risk Management   Mergers & Acquisitions   Human Resources/Compensation Governance Auditing Restructuring
Montreal, Québec, Canada   Current position with the Company:   Director   Director since: August 2014   Age: 74   Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors   Audit Committee (chair)   Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (member)		ADF Group Inc.   Birks Group Inc.	Audit Committee (chair)   Audit Committee (chair)
Shares & DSUs Held
Minimum level of ownership (2)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (3)	Total Market Value (4)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (5)
$325,000	10,000	41,502	$1,180,426	Yes

(1)Mr. Di Tomaso has held this occupation for the last five years.

(2)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee.

(3)Includes related dividend amounts.

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and DSUs held on March 12, 2021.

(5)DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation".

14

	Robert J. Foster			Areas of Expertise:
	Robert J. Foster, B.A., M.A. (Economics), C.F.A., is Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Capital Canada Limited, an independent investment banking firm providing financial services to entrepreneurs and companies. Capital Canada provides negotiating and structuring for mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financing, as well as valuation and fairness opinion services. Mr. Foster focuses on the aviation, media, entertainment and sports sectors. Mr. Foster has served on the boards of CHC Helicopters, Golf Town, Cargojet, Canada 3000 and Canadian Airlines Regional in addition to currently serving on a number of private company boards. Robert Foster has served as Chair on a broad range of not-for-profit organizations over the years including arts and culture, education and the political arena. He is currently Chair of the TO Live Theatre Board, Chair of Business for the Arts and is on the board of the Harbourfront Foundation. Notably, Mr. Foster served as Chair of Toronto’s Artscape and Lead Co-Chair for the Creative Capital Gains Report for the City of Toronto in 2011, a guiding document for Toronto’s cultural growth over the next decade. Principal occupation(1): Chief Executive Officer and President, Capital Canada Limited (investment banking firm).			Strategy/Leading Growth Capital Markets Finance/Accounting   Risk Management CEO/COO Experience    Mergers & Acquisitions   Human Resources/Compensation   Information Technology Governance Restructuring
Toronto, Ontario, Canada   Current position with the Company:   Director   Director since: June 2010   Age: 78   Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors   Executive Committee (member)   Audit Committee (member)   Human Resources and Compensation Committee (member)
Shares & DSUs Held
Minimum level of ownership (2)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (3)	Total Market Value (4)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (5)
$325,000	60,100	69,894	$2,979,462	Yes

(1)Mr. Foster has held this occupation for the last five years.

(2)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee.

(3)Includes related dividend amounts.

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and DSUs held on March 12, 2021.

(5)DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation".

15

	Dahra Granovsky			Areas of Expertise:
	Dahra Granovsky is the Chief Executive Officer of Beresford Accurate Folding Cartons, a folding carton packaging company and the Managing Director of Chem-Ecol, a lubricant company. Ms. Granovsky also serves on the Board of Directors of Hammond Power Solutions, Velan Inc. and Atlantic Packaging Product Ltd. Ms. Granovsky formerly served as a director of Redknee Solutions and as the President of Atlantic Packaging Products, a manufacturer of corrugated packaging and paper bags with paper mills and recycling services.   Principal occupation(1): Chief Executive Officer, Beresford Accurate Folding Cartons and Managing Director, Chem-Ecol.			Strategy/Leading Growth Finance/Accounting Risk Management CEO/COO Experience    Mergers & Acquisitions Manufacturing/Operations Marketing/Sales Human Resources/Compensation Governance Packaging Industry Environmental & Social
Toronto, Ontario, Canada   Current position with the Company:   Director   Director since: June 2019   Age: 50   Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors Human Resources and Compensation Committee (member) ESG Committee (member)(2)		Hammond Power Solutions	Corporate Governance Committee (chair); Audit and Compensation Committee (member)
			Velan Inc.	Corporate Governance and Human Resources Committee (chair); Audit Committee (member)
Shares & DSUs Held
Minimum level of ownership (3)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (4)	Total Market Value (5)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (6)
$325,000	6,929	17,854	$568,026	Yes

(1)Ms. Granovsky has held this occupation for the last five years.

(2)The ESG Committee was established on November 11, 2020.

(3)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee.

(4)Includes related dividend amounts.

(5)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and DSUs held on March 12, 2021.

(6)DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation".

16

	James Pantelidis			Areas of Expertise:
	James Pantelidis has more than 30 years of experience in the petroleum industry. He is Chair of the Board and Chair of the Supply and Development Committee of Parkland Corporation (marketer of petroleum products) and has served as a director thereof since 1999. Mr. Pantelidis served as a director and Chair of the Board of EnerCare Inc. from 2002 to 2018. He previously served on the Board of RONA Inc. (Chair of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee) and Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. (Chair of the Investment Committee and member of Human Resources and Compensation Committee). From 2008 to 2011, Mr. Pantelidis served as a Non-Executive Director of Equinox Minerals Ltd. (Chair of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee). From 2002 to 2006, Mr. Pantelidis was on the board of FisherCast Global Company and served as Chair and Chief Executive Officer from 2004 to 2006. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Pantelidis was President of J.P. & Associates, a strategic consulting group. Between 1999 and 2001, Mr. Pantelidis served as Chair and Chief Executive Officer for the Bata International Organization. Mr. Pantelidis has a Bachelor of Science degree and a Master of Business Administration degree, both from McGill University, Montreal, Québec.  Principal occupation(1): Corporate Director.			Strategy/Leading Growth Capital Markets Finance/Accounting Risk Management   Mergers & Acquisitions Manufacturing/Operations Marketing/Sales   Human Resources/Compensation   Information Technology Governance   International Markets Restructuring
Toronto, Ontario, Canada   Current position with the Company:   Chair of the Board of Directors   Director since: May 2012   Age: 75   Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors (chair)   Executive Committee (member) Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (chair)		Parkland Corporation	Supply and Development Committee (chair)
Shares & DSUs Held
Minimum level of ownership (2)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (3)	Total Market Value (4)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (5)
$325,000	57,510	41,534	$2,270,088	Yes

(1)Mr. Pantelidis has held this occupation for the last five years.

(2)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee. This excludes the added retainer fee for the Chair position.

(3)Includes related dividend amounts.

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and DSUs held on March 12, 2021.

(5)DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation".

17

	Jorge N. Quintas			Areas of Expertise:
	Jorge Quintas started in 1970 as a Director in the cable industry and since 2002 has been the President of Nelson Quintas SGPS, SA, a holding company for the manufacturing of electrical and telecommunication cables, hazardous waste treatment plants, a telecommunications network in Brazil and real estate. Mr. Quintas has and continues to serve in executive capacities and/or as a director of various other private companies, most of which are based in Portugal. The companies with which Mr. Quintas serves as an executive are involved in a range of industrial activities, including the distribution and/or manufacture of natural gas, energy and telecommunications cables, fiber-optic cables, cables for the automotive industry and other types of cables. Principal occupation(2): President, Nelson Quintas SGPS, SA (holding company for manufacturer of electrical and telecommunication cables).			Strategy/Leading Growth Finance/Accounting Risk Management   CEO/COO Experience Manufacturing/Operations   Marketing/Sales Human Resources/Compensation International Markets Packaging Industry
Porto, Portugal   Current position with the Company:   Director(1)   Director since: June 2009   Age: 74   Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors   Human Resources and Compensation Committee (member)
Shares & DSUs Held
Minimum level of ownership (3)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (4)	Total Market Value (5)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (6)
$325,000	59,608	73,155	$3,042,928	Yes

(1)Mr. Quintas was also a director of the Company from May 2005 to June 2006.

(2)Mr. Quintas has held this occupation for the last five years.

(3)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee.

(4)Includes related dividend amounts.

(5)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and DSUs held on March 12, 2021.

(6)DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation".

18

	Mary Pat Salomone			Areas of Expertise:
	Mary Pat Salomone is a corporate director. From 2010 to 2013, she was Senior Vice President & Chief Operating Officer of Babcock & Wilcox Company (“B&W”), with more than 23,000 employees and 30 locations worldwide. Prior to that, Ms. Salomone held several senior positions with B&W, including Manager of Business Development and Manager of Strategic Acquisitions. From 1998 through 2007, Ms. Salomone was an officer of Marine Mechanical Company, which B&W acquired in 2007, including serving as President and Chief Executive Officer from 2001 through 2007.   Ms. Salomone is currently on the Board of Directors of TC Energy Corporation (formerly TransCanada Corporation), where she is the chairperson of the Health, Safety, Sustainability and Environment Committee as well as a member of the Governance Committee. Ms. Salomone has served as a director of Herc Holdings, Inc since 2016 and is a member of the Audit and Finance Committees. She also formerly served as a trustee of the Youngstown State University Foundation.   Ms. Salomone has a Bachelor of Engineering in Civil Engineering from Youngstown State University in Youngstown, Ohio and a Master of Business Administration from Baldwin Wallace College in Berea, Ohio. She completed the Advanced Management Program at Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business in 2011.   Principal occupation(1): Corporate Director.			Strategy/Leading Growth Finance/Accounting Risk Management CEO/COO Experience Mergers & Acquisitions Manufacturing/Operations    Human Resources/Compensation Information Technology Governance   International Markets Environmental & Social Engineering Restructuring   Energy/Utilities
Naples, Florida, USA   Current position with the Company:   Director   Director since: November 2015   Age: 60   Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors ESG Committee (chair)(2) Audit Committee (member) Human Resources and Compensation Committee (member)(3)		TC Energy Corporation	Health, Safety, Sustainability & Environment Committee (chair); Governance Committee (member)
			TransCanada PipeLines Limited
			Herc Holdings, Inc.	Audit Committee (member); Finance Committee (member)
Shares & DSUs Held
Minimum level of ownership (4)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (5)	Total Market Value (6)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (7)
$325,000	—	36,239	$830,598	Yes

(1)Ms. Salomone has held this occupation for the last five years.

(2)The ESG Committee was established on November 11, 2020.

(3)Ms. Salomone is no longer a member of the committee effective January 1, 2021.

(4)    Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee.

(5)    Includes related dividend amounts.

(6)    Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and DSUs held on March 12, 2021.

(7)    DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation".

19

	Melbourne F. Yull			Areas of Expertise:
	Melbourne F. Yull has been an entrepreneur for most of his business career. He founded the Company in 1981 and by 2006 had grown it to approximately CDN $1 billion in revenue. He was Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of the Company until his retirement in 2006. Prior to starting the Company, he was an original partner in a major Canadian paper converter and founded a plastic company that was the first to develop and commercialize the transition to plastic bags from paper in the retail market. Mr. Yull was Québec’s Entrepreneur of the Year in 1995 and serves on numerous private company boards.   Principal occupation(2): President, Samanna Properties LLC and Affinity Kitchen & Bath LLC.			Strategy/Leading Growth Capital Markets Finance/Accounting Risk Management CEO/COO Experience Mergers & Acquisitions Manufacturing/Operations Marketing/Sales Governance International Markets   Packaging Industry
Sarasota, Florida, USA   Current position with the Company:   Director   Director since: June 2007(1)   Age: 80   Non-Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company		Other Public Companies Currently Serving
			Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors   Executive Committee (chair)
Shares & DSUs Held
Minimum level of ownership (3)	Number of Common Shares	Number of DSUs (4)	Total Market Value (5)	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement (6)
$325,000	1,734,629	50,029	$40,904,361	Yes

(1)Mr. Yull was also a director of the Company from its incorporation on December 22, 1989 to June 14, 2006 (when he retired as Chair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Office of the Company) and, prior thereto, a director of a predecessor company from 1981. He served as Executive Director of the Company from June 28, 2007 to June 8, 2010.

(2)Mr. Yull has held this occupation for the last five years.

(3)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times the annual board member retainer fee.

(4)Includes related dividend amounts.

(5)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92), shares and DSUs held on March 12, 2021.

(6)DSUs are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Director Compensation".

20

	Gregory A.C. Yull		Areas of Expertise:
	Gregory Yull was named President and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of the Company in June 2010 and was appointed to the Board of Directors in August 2010. Prior to his current position, Mr. Yull was President of the Tapes and Films Division of the Company from October 2005, where he was responsible for the North American and European operations spanning 15 locations and providing leadership for a 1,500-person workforce. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President of the Industrial Business Unit for Tapes & Films of the Company from November 2004 and prior thereto was President, Film Products of the Company from June 1999. He has also held various positions at the Company in Sales and Product Management and had extensive functional responsibilities supporting the Fibope business division. Mr. Yull has been with the Company since 1991.   Principal occupation(1): President and CEO of the Company.		Strategy/Leading Growth Finance/Accounting Risk Management CEO/COO Experience Mergers & Acquisitions Manufacturing/Operations   Marketing/Sales   Human Resources/Compensation   International Markets Packaging Industry Restructuring
Sarasota, Florida, USA   Current position with the Company:   President and Chief Executive Officer   Director   Director since: August 2010   Age: 54   Non-Independent
	Board/ Committee Memberships  with the Company	Other Public Companies Currently Serving
		Directorships	Committees
	Board of Directors   Executive Committee (member)

(1)Mr. Yull has held this occupation for the last five years.

21

Director Information

Board Membership

The following table sets out information regarding the eleven current members of the Board of Directors, each of whom is proposed to be nominated for election as a director at the Meeting.

Name	Director Since	Audit  Committee	Executive  Committee	ESG Committee(1)	Human  Resources and  Compensation Committee	Corporate  Governance and Nominating Committee
Robert M. Beil	2007				Chair	Member
Chris R. Cawston	2020	Member
Jane Craighead	2020			Member	Member
Frank Di Tomaso	2014	Chair				Member
Robert J. Foster	2010	Member	Member		Member
Dahra Granovsky	2019			Member	Member
James Pantelidis	2012		Member			Chair
Jorge N. Quintas	2009				Member
Mary Pat Salomone	2015	Member		Chair	Member(2)
Gregory A.C. Yull	2010		Member
Melbourne F. Yull	2007		Chair

(1)The ESG Committee was established on November 11, 2020.

(2)Ms. Salomone is no longer a member of the committee effective January 1, 2021.

22

Board and Committee Attendance

During the 2020 fiscal year, there were seven meetings of the Board of Directors, six meetings of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (“HRCC”), two meetings of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (“CGNC”), four meetings of the Audit Committee and two meetings of the Executive Committee. The ESG Committee was established on November 11, 2020 and did not have a meeting in 2020. The following table sets out attendance of the members of the Board of Directors at meetings held during 2020.

Director	Board	Audit Committee	HRCC	CGNC	Executive Committee	Overall Attendance
Robert M. Beil	7/7 (100%)		6/6 (100%)	2/2 (100%)		15/15 (100%)
Chris R. Cawston	2/2(1) (100%)	1/1(1) (100%)				3/3(1) (100%)
Jane Craighead	2/2(2) (100%)		1/1(2) (100%)			3/3(2) (100%)
Frank Di Tomaso	7/7 (100%)	4/4 (100%)		2/2 (100%)		13/13 (100%)
Robert J. Foster	7/7 (100%)	4/4 (100%)	6/6 (100%)		2/2 (100%)	19/19 (100%)
Dahra Granovsky	7/7 (100%)		6/6 (100%)			13/13 (100%)
James Pantelidis	7/7 (100%)			2/2 (100%)	2/2 (100%)	11/11 (100%)
Jorge N. Quintas	6/7(3)(86%)		4/6(3)(67%)			10/13(3) (77%)
Mary Pat Salomone	7/7 (100%)	4/4 (100%)	6/6 (100%)			17/17 (100%)
Gregory A.C. Yull	7/7 (100%)				2/2 (100%)	9/9 (100%)
Melbourne F. Yull	6/7(4)(86%)				2/2 (100%)	8/9(4) (89%)

(1)    Mr. Cawston attended all Board and Audit Committee meetings that occurred following his appointment to the Board of Directors and Audit Committee on October 15, 2020.

(2)    Ms. Craighead attended all Board and HRCC meetings that occurred following her appointment to the Board of Directors and HRCC on October 15, 2020.

(3)    Mr. Quintas was unable to attend one Board meeting and two HRCC meetings due to illness.

(4)    Mr. Yull was unable to attend one Board meeting due to illness.

In Camera Meetings

It is the practice of the Board of Directors to hold, on a regular basis following in-person meetings of the Board of Directors, in camera sessions at which only independent directors are in attendance. In 2020, the Company held in camera sessions for six board meetings as well as all four audit committee meetings for a total of ten in camera sessions.

23

About Nominated Directors

Age average67years	Tenure average 7.64 years

Director Independence

The following table sets out the independence status of the directors, as defined in National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees:

Director	Independent	Reason for non-independence
Robert M. Beil	Yes
Chris R. Cawston	Yes
Jane Craighead	Yes
Frank Di Tomaso	Yes
Robert J. Foster	Yes
Dahra Granovsky	Yes
James Pantelidis	Yes
Jorge N. Quintas	Yes
Mary Pat Salomone	Yes
Gregory A.C. Yull	No	President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Melbourne F. Yull	No	Immediate family member of the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company

24

Directors’ Skills Matrix

The following table sets out the range of skills the Board of Directors perceives to be most important for the Company and indicates the extent to which they are met by current Board members:

	Directors
Skills	Robert M. Beil	Chris R. Cawston	Jane Craighead	Frank Di Tomaso	Robert J. Foster	Dahra Granovsky	James Pantelidis	Jorge N. Quintas	Mary Pat Salomone	Gregory A.C. Yull	Melbourne F. Yull
Strategy / Leading Growth	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Capital Markets			ü	ü	ü		ü				ü
Finance / Accounting		ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Risk Management	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
CEO / COO Experience		ü			ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Mergers & Acquisitions	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü		ü	ü	ü
Manufacturing / Operations	ü	ü		ü		ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Marketing / Sales	ü					ü	ü	ü		ü	ü
Human Resources / Compensation	ü		ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Information Technology		ü	ü	ü	ü		ü		ü
Governance		ü	ü	ü	ü	ü	ü		ü		ü
International Markets	ü		ü				ü	ü	ü	ü	ü
Packaging Industry	ü					ü		ü		ü	ü
Environmental & Social			ü			ü			ü

25

Expertise and skills
Number of directors with expert or strong knowledge of:
11	strategy/leading growth, risk management
(100%)
10	finance/accounting, mergers & acquisitions
9	manufacturing/operations, human resources/compensation
8	CEO/COO experience, governance
7	international markets
6	marketing/sales, information technology
5	capital markets, packaging industry
3	environmental & social

Serving Together on Other Boards of Directors

The approach of the Board of Directors to “board interlocks” is that no more than two of the Company’s directors may sit on the same board of directors of a public company (other than the Company). The Board of Directors has determined that there are at present, among the Company’s directors, no common memberships on boards of directors of public companies.

Minimum Share Ownership Requirement

The minimum share ownership requirement for directors who are not executive officers of the Company is to own a minimum of Shares or DSUs under the DSU Plan equivalent to five times the annual board member retainer fee within five years of joining the Board of Directors. If a director has satisfied the minimum share ownership requirement, he or she will continue to satisfy the minimum requirement notwithstanding a subsequent decrease in the market value of Shares. As of March 12, 2021, eight of the ten directors who are not executive officers of the Company are in compliance with the minimum share ownership requirement. Mr. Cawston and Ms. Craighead have until October 15, 2025 to comply with the minimum share ownership requirement.

Cease-Trade Orders, Penalties and Sanctions

To the knowledge of the Company, none of the foregoing nominees for election as director of the Company:

(a)is, or within the last ten years has been, a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any company that:

(i)was subject to a cease trade order, an order similar to a cease trade order, or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under applicable securities legislation, and which in all cases was in effect for a period of more than 30 consecutive days (an “Order”), which Order was issued while the proposed director was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of such company; or

26

(ii)was subject to an Order that was issued after the proposed director ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of such company.

(b)is, or within the last ten years has been, a director or executive officer of any company that, while the proposed director was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or

(c)has, within the last ten years, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his assets.

None of the foregoing nominees for election as director of the Company has been subject to:

(a)any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority; or

(b)any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable security holder in deciding whether to vote for a proposed director.

Majority Voting for Directors

The Company has a majority voting policy for the election of members of the Board of Directors. Under this policy, in an uncontested election of directors, any nominee proposed for election as a director who receives a greater number of “withheld” votes than “for” votes is expected, to promptly following the date of the shareholders’ meeting at which the election occurred, tender his or her resignation to the Chair of the Board of Directors for consideration by the CGNC, with the resignation to take effect upon acceptance by the Board of Directors. This policy applies only to “uncontested elections”, that is elections in which the number of nominees for director is equal to the number of directors to be elected.

The Board of Directors will act on the CGNC’s recommendation within 90 days following the date of the shareholders’ meeting at which the election occurred. Following the Board of Directors’ decision on the CGNC’s recommendation, the Board of Directors will promptly disclose, by way of a press release, the Board of Directors’ decision whether or not to accept the director’s resignation offer, together with an explanation of the process by which the decision was made and, if applicable, the Board of Directors’ reason or reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.

The CGNC will be expected to accept the resignation except in situations where extenuating circumstances would warrant the applicable director continuing to serve on the Board of Directors. In considering whether or not to accept the resignation, the CGNC will consider all factors deemed relevant by the CGNC including, without limitation, the stated reason or reasons why shareholders “withheld” votes from the election of that nominee, the length of service and the qualifications of the director whose resignation has been tendered (including, for example, the impact the director’s resignation would have on the Company’s compliance with the requirements of applicable corporate and securities laws and the rules of any stock exchange on which the Company’s securities are listed or posted for trading), such director’s contributions to the Company, and whether the director’s resignation from the Board of Directors would be in the best interests of the Company.

The CGNC will also consider a range of possible alternatives concerning the director’s tendered resignation as the Committee deems appropriate including, without limitation, acceptance of the resignation, rejection of the resignation, or rejection of the resignation coupled with a commitment to seek to address and cure the underlying reasons reasonably believed by the CGNC to have substantially resulted in the “withheld” votes.

A director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate in any meetings to consider whether the resignation will be accepted.

Shareholders should note that, as a result of the majority voting policy, a ‘‘withhold’’ vote is effectively the same as a vote against a director nominee in an uncontested election.

27

Election of Directors - 2020

At the annual meeting of shareholders of the Company held on May 13, 2020, all candidates proposed as directors were duly elected to the Board of Directors of the Company by a majority of the votes cast by shareholders present or represented by proxy at such meeting, as follows:

Name of Nominee	Votes for	%	Votes Withheld	%
Robert M. Beil	38,288,132	95.80	1,680,618	4.20
Frank Di Tomaso	39,192,466	98.06	776,284	1.94
Robert J. Foster	39,433,224	98.66	535,526	1.34
James Pantelidis	38,748,390	96.95	1,220,360	3.05
Dahra Granovsky	39,874,145	99.76	94,605	0.24
Jorge N. Quintas	39,431,854	98.66	536,896	1.34
Mary Pat Salomone	39,877,816	99.77	90,934	0.23
Gregory A.C. Yull	39,469,213	98.75	499,437	1.25
Melbourne F. Yull	39,467,043	98.74	501,707	1.26

Chris R. Cawston and Jane Craighead were appointed to the Board on October 15, 2020.

Director Compensation

Compensation of directors is established in order to allow the Company to attract and retain highly-qualified directors with varied and relevant experience, taking into account a wide variety of functional activities in which the Company engages, and to align the interests of the directors with those of the shareholders.

Directors participate in the DSU Plan, the purpose of which is to provide participants with a form of compensation which promotes greater alignment of the interests of the participants and the shareholders of the Company in creating long-term shareholder value. See section entitled “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans” below for a description of the DSU Plan.

28

Directors receive annual fees for their service which are paid semi-annually. The following table presents the different components of the compensation the directors may be entitled to receive, with the exception of Gregory A. C. Yull, who does not receive any compensation for serving as director as he is an executive of the Company.

Type of Compensation	Annual Fee
Annual Amount	($)
Chair of the Board of Directors	140,000
Member of the Board of Directors	65,000
Chair of the Audit Committee	20,000
Member of the Audit Committee	8,000
Chair of the HRCC	15,000
Member of the HRCC	7,000
Chair of the CGNC	9,000
Member of the CGNC	5,000
Chair of the Executive Committee	9,000
Member of the Executive Committee	5,000
Chair of the ESG Committee(1)	9,000
Member of the ESG Committee(1)	5,000
Other Compensation
DSUs	95,000

(1)The ESG Committee was established on November 11, 2020 and did not have a meeting in 2020 resulting in no annual fees paid to the members.

There were no changes to annual fees in 2020 from 2019, which were based on a benchmarking pay study conducted in 2019 to assess market competitiveness. The Company does not pay meeting fees. Directors are reimbursed for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred for attending Board of Directors and Committee meetings.

The Company does not have a retirement plan for directors who are not employees or former employees of the Company.

29

Summary of Director Compensation

The Company paid its directors an aggregate of $1,612,013 for their services as directors in respect of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The following table presents the details of all compensation and fees paid to the directors of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (except for Gregory A. C. Yull, who is an executive of the Company and who did not receive any fees as a director).

Director	Fees earned(1) ($)	Allocation of Annual Fees		Share-based awards (DSUs)(2) ($)		Total ($)
		DSUs ($)	Cash ($)
Robert M. Beil	85,000	—	85,000	95,000		180,000
Chris R. Cawston	15,110	15,110	—	55,000	(3)	70,110
Jane Craighead	14,903	14,903	—	55,000	(3)	69,903
Frank Di Tomaso	90,000	—	90,000	95,000		185,000
Robert J. Foster	85,000	—	85,000	95,000		180,000
Dahra Granovsky	72,000	—	72,000	95,000		167,000
James Pantelidis	154,000	—	154,000	95,000		249,000
Jorge N. Quintas	72,000	72,000	—	95,000		167,000
Mary Pat Salomone	80,000	—	80,000	95,000		175,000
Melbourne F. Yull	74,000	—	74,000	95,000		169,000
Total	742,013	102,013	640,000	870,000		1,612,013

(1)Represents total compensation for Board and Committee services, which includes both cash payments and the value of DSUs elected in lieu of cash for such fees.

(2)The amount shown for each share-based award is the grant date fair value of the DSUs that were granted to the director under the DSU Plan for the specified financial year which is calculated as the volume weighted average price ("VWAP") of the Shares on the TSX for the five trading days preceding the date on which the DSU value is determined. Amounts presented do not include DSUs elected in lieu of cash for semi-annual directors’ fees. For more information on the DSU Plan and amendments thereto, see the section entitled “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans”.

(3)The fees paid to Mr. Cawston and Ms. Craighead are proportionate to the time they will have served as a director as of the date of the Meeting.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, there were no option-based awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, pension awards, plans that provide for the payment of pension plan benefits, or other compensation paid, payable, awarded, granted or given to the directors of the Company in their capacity as directors. Gregory A. C. Yull received this compensation in his role as CEO of the Company, and Melbourne Yull, received an annual benefit payment made in connection with a retirement plan established when he was an employee of the Company. For more information, see the section entitled "Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans".

The following table presents the breakdown of fees earned by each director for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (except for Gregory A. C. Yull, who is an executive of the Company and who did not receive any fees as a director).

Director	Board Retainer Fee ($)	Committee Retainer Fee ($)	Committee Chair Retainer Fee ($)	Total Fees Earned ($)
Robert M. Beil	65,000	5,000	15,000	85,000
Chris R. Cawston	13,454	1,656	—	15,110	(1)
Jane Craighead	13,454	1,449	—	14,903	(1)
Frank Di Tomaso	65,000	5,000	20,000	90,000
Robert J. Foster	65,000	20,000	—	85,000
Dahra Granovsky	65,000	7,000	—	72,000
James Pantelidis	140,000	5,000	9,000	154,000
Jorge N. Quintas	65,000	7,000	—	72,000
Mary Pat Salomone	65,000	15,000	—	80,000
Melbourne F. Yull	65,000	—	9,000	74,000
Total	621,908	67,105	53,000	742,013

(1)The fees paid to Mr. Cawston and Ms. Craighead are proportionate to the time they will have served as a director as of the date of the Meeting.

30

Incentive Plan Awards - Outstanding Director Option-Based Awards

At the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, there were no outstanding option-based awards held by non-management directors.

Incentive Plan Awards - Outstanding and Share-Based Awards

The following table presents for each director all outstanding share-based awards at the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (except for Gregory A.C. Yull, who is an executive of the Company. For Gregory A.C. Yull, see the heading “Executive Compensation — Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers — Incentive Plan Awards — Outstanding Share-Based Awards and Option-Based Awards”).

	DSUs
Name	Number of Vested DSUs Outstanding(1)(2) (#)	Value of Vested DSUs Outstanding(3) ($)
Robert M. Beil	48,076	909,117
Chris R. Cawston	4,135	78,193
Jane Craighead	4,123	77,966
Frank Di Tomaso	41,502	784,803
Robert J. Foster	69,894	1,321,696
Dahra Granovsky	17,854	337,619
James Pantelidis	41,534	785,408
Jorge N. Quintas	73,155	1,383,361
Mary Pat Salomone	36,239	685,279
Melbourne F. Yull	50,029	946,048

(1)All outstanding DSUs were 100% vested for directors as of December 31, 2020 and as such, no unvested amounts are shown in the table above.

(2)Includes related dividend amounts.

(3)The value of the DSUs is calculated based on the five-day VWAP of Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2020 (CDN$ 24.28, USD$18.91). Actual value upon the settlement of awards will depend on the value of the Shares on the date of settlement. The actual value received on settlement will be different depending on variations in the price of the Shares. For more information on the DSU Plan, see the section entitled “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.”

31

Incentive Plan Awards – Value Vested or Earned During the Year

The following table sets out for each director (except for Gregory A. C. Yull, who is an NEO), the value of option-based awards and share-based awards which vested during the year ended December 31, 2020 and the value of non-equity incentive plan compensation earned during the year ended December 31, 2020. For Gregory A.C. Yull, see “Executive Compensation — Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers — Incentive Plan Awards — Outstanding Share-Based Awards and Option-Based Awards”.

Name	Option-Based Awards – Value Vested During the Year(1) ($)	Share-Based Awards – Value Vested During the Year(2) ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation – Value Earned During  the Year ($)
Robert M. Beil	—	121,528	—
Chris R. Cawston	—	70,950	—
Jane Craighead	—	70,724	—
Frank Di Tomaso	—	117,699	—
Robert J. Foster	—	134,200	—
Dahra Granovsky	—	103,974	—
James Pantelidis	—	117,726	—
Jorge N. Quintas	—	206,634	—
Mary Pat Salomone	—	114,656	—
Melbourne F. Yull	—	122,664	—

(1)There were no stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and as such, nil is shown in the table above.

(2)The value is calculated as if the DSUs were settled on the vesting date of each relevant grant. The DSU value is based on the five-day VWAP of Shares on the TSX on the vesting date, which is the same as the grant date. Included in the table above are DSUs elected in lieu of cash for semi-annual directors’ fees earned and granted during 2020. Includes related dividend amounts.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans

The following table sets out the entitlements of each of Melbourne F. Yull and Gregory A. C. Yull under the defined benefit plans that provide for payments or benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement (all figures were calculated using the accounting methods and assumptions disclosed in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020).

Name	Number of Years Credited Service (#)	Annual Benefits Payable		Opening Present Value of Defined Benefit Obligation ($)	Compensatory Change ($)	Non- Compensatory Change ($)	Closing Present Value of Defined Benefit Obligation ($)
		At Year End ($)	At Age 65 ($)
Melbourne F. Yull	25	260,935	N/A	2,148,454	(260,935)	210,024	2,097,543
Gregory A.C. Yull	30	600,000	600,000	6,888,982	—	1,357,162	8,246,144

Melbourne F. Yull was Chair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from January 11, 1995 to June 14, 2006. Prior thereto, Mr. Yull was the President and a director of the Company or a predecessor thereof, from 1981. The former employment agreement entered into between the Company and Mr. Yull provides that Mr. Yull receives from the Company a defined benefit supplementary pension annually for life in an amount equal to 2% of the average of Mr. Yull’s annual gross salary for the final five years of his employment with the Company, multiplied by his years of service with the Company to retirement. Accordingly, Mr. Yull receives a pension from the Company in an amount of $260,935 per year.

Gregory A. C. Yull is President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. Pursuant to the terms of the Yull Agreement, unless terminated by the Company for Cause (as defined in the Yull Agreement), he shall receive a defined benefit supplementary pension annually for life equal to the lesser of: (i) $600,000 if he separates from service at age 65 or older, $570,000 at age 64, $540,000 at age 63, $510,000 at age 62, $480,000 at age 61, or $450,000 at age 60 or younger with such payments to begin at age 60; and (ii) two percent of the average of his total cash compensation (base salary and performance

32

bonus) for the highest five years of his employment during the prior ten years as of the time of separation, multiplied by his years of service with the Company. In the event of Mr. Yull’s death, his surviving spouse would receive 50% of the annual supplement pension benefit that was being paid to Mr. Yull at the time of his death or that would have been paid to Mr. Yull if he had retired on the date of his death, within ninety days of his death and continuing annually during her lifetime. The retirement benefits set forth above were vested upon the completion of five years of service. As of December 31, 2020, Mr. Yull’s accumulated benefit was an amount of $600,000 per year.

DIRECTORS’ AND OFFICERS’ INSURANCE

The Company maintains directors’ and officers’ liability insurance covering liability, including defense costs, of directors and officers of the Company incurred as a result of acting in such capacity, provided that they acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company. The current limit of the insurance is $60 million. An annual premium of $453,200 was paid by the Company with respect to the period from December 1, 2020 to December 1, 2021. Claims payable to the Company are subject to retention or a deductible of up to $1,000,000 per occurrence.

33

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

HRCC CHAIR'S LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

Dear Fellow Shareholders, The challenges we all faced in 2020 were unprecedented. As a manufacturer of packaging and protective solutions, our business was designated as essential for sustaining life on a day-to-day basis during the COVID-19 pandemic. The fundamental nature of how we relate to our employees and their contribution to the business became paramount. The health and safety of every individual moved to the forefront. Our employees responded to the challenge, and their commitment and flexibility was the key element in our success this year. They showed up, worked safely, and improvised as needed, and the results speak for themselves. The Board is extremely proud of all that our employees accomplished, particularly this year in the face of the pandemic.

Our Board's attention to diversity and inclusion became a critical point of emphasis. Our awareness and involvement increased greatly in all societal aspects of how we govern and manage our business, to the ultimate benefit of our stakeholders - our shareholders, customers, employees, the communities where we operate, and the planet where we all live.

Our compensation policies and programs are a key component of how we attract, retain and motivate our employees. They are reviewed annually to ensure that they are competitive, linked to performance, appropriately manage risk, and align with shareholders’ interests. This letter and the compensation discussion and analysis ("CD&A") provide an overview of:

•The Company’s compensation programs and 2020 compensation outcomes for the CEO and other named executive officers ("NEO's").

•The alignment of 2020 compensation outcomes with the Company’s performance, consistent with our pay-for- performance philosophy.

Our Approach to Compensation during the Pandemic

At the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic we were confronted with critical questions about overall business conditions and how to manage our organization going forward. Our decisions and actions were centered around keeping our workforce safe andpreserving our customer and supplier relationships.In addition, cost reduction measures were adopted in the second quarter to ensure the sustainability of the business amid the uncertainty of end market demand.

Compensation targets are usually approved by the HRCC in the March time frame for the upcoming year.As is normal course, annual and long term incentive targets were discussed at length by management and the HRCC in February and March 2020.However, given the uncertainty due to the pandemic at that time, the HRCC recommended and the Board approved a delay in setting 2020 compensation targets. At that time, we needed greater understanding of the duration of the pandemic, the Company’s ability to ensure manufacturing assets remained staffed and operational, and the impact on end market demand. The decision to delay was taken with the advice of our independent third-party compensation consultants, and based on our business circumstances.

As we progressed further into the fiscal year, the HRCC discussed and approved the use of discretion if necessary, including the establishment of principles to guide our decision making. Ultimately, the resiliency of our people and the excellent performance of our manufacturing assets, coupled with strong market demand,rendered discretion unnecessary, and we returned to and approved the pre-pandemic annual incentive targets and performance criteria for performance share units ("PSUs") discussed in March 2020. These targets required year over year Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and Compensation Cash Flows growth of approximately 5% each to obtain a target annual incentive award and 11% and 9%, respectively, to obtain a maximum annual incentive award.

The Company’s 2020 Performance

The Company's achievements in 2020 include:

•Our North American and European manufacturing operations remained open and producing throughout the COVID-19 related lockdowns as a result of the essential nature of the end markets we serve. Our four Indian manufacturing operations adhered to regional lockdowns for a short period in March and April and re-opened when permitted by each of their local jurisdictions.

34

•We implemented urgent and immediate measures to maintain essential operations while prioritizing the safety of our employees in the COVID-19 environment.

•Adjusted EBITDA grew 23% from $172.2 million in 2019 to $211.1 million in 2020 and cash flows from operating activities grew 33% from $135.0 million in 2019 to $179.6 million in 2020. In addition, free cash flows grew by close to 54% from $86.8 million in 2019 to $133.8 million in 2020.

•We solidified sustainability as one of the strategic pillars by which we manage our business through various initiatives, including the formation of the ESG Committee of the Board of Directors, the issuance of the annual sustainability report enhancing our public disclosures and the Cradle to Cradle certification of four additional products.

•We increased our dividend to shareholders by 6.8% on an annualized basis to $0.63 per common share.

•Strong cash flow allowed us to pay down debt and drop our total leverage ratio to 2.2 times.

Our Key Compensation Decisions for 2020

The Company is focused on a pay-for-performance approach to compensation for all team members. Our executive compensation policies and programs are designed to ensure our executive talent are fully motivated to achieve our financial goals and to grow sustainable long-term value for shareholders. Our long-term, at-risk, equity-based compensation, which represents 39% of 2020 compensation for our CEO, is aligned with the shareholder experience and our pay-for-performance philosophy. We recognize that long-term growth and value creation requires taking an acceptable level of risk. We ensure our compensation policies and practices reward executives for both short- and long-term decision making and do not encourage unnecessary risk taking or result in excessive compensation levels. We are committed to ensuring there is a strong link between shareholder value, financial results and executive compensation outcomes.

Base Salary

Salaries are reviewed annually and adjusted to reflect increases in responsibilities and market trends. Consideration is also given to experience, scope of the role, sustained performance, and internal equity. In 2020, NEO salary increases were delayed until December due to economic uncertainties and expense management initiatives put into place as a result of COVID-19. In December, aggregate NEO salaries increased by 2.3% over 2019 levels to provide our NEOs with market competitive and reasonable compensation.

Annual Incentive Awards

The Company's annual incentive plan is focused on critical financial performance measures: Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and Compensation Cash Flows (defined in the section entitled "Annual Incentive Plan Awards – Bonuses"). As described above, the targets for these awards were the pre-COVID-19 targets presented to the HRCC in March 2020.

Long-Term Incentive Awards

The Company has a balanced long-term incentive plan that includes stock options, performance share units ("PSUs") and restricted share units ("RSUs").

In 2020, long-term incentives were awarded in the form of 50% PSUs, 25% stock options and 25% RSUs, at market competitive levels for each NEO. We believe that this “portfolio approach” to long-term incentive compensation provides strong alignment with shareholder value creation, as 100% of the long-term incentive program is driven by the share price, the 50% in PSUs is contingent on absolute and relative share price performance and the 25% in stock options delivers value only to the extent our shareholders benefit through increased share price. Our programs are designed to promote retention, reward exceptional performance, and align with shareholder value creation.

Between the annual and the long-term incentive programs, the Company uses a multi-dimensional approach covering earnings, balance sheet, and cash flows, as well as market performance, providing the HRCC a robust and comprehensive view of performance.

In addition to the Company's achievements in 2020, share price performance during 2020 was extremely strong, which we believe can be attributed to the effectiveness of our management team, the commitment of our employees, and the significant capital investments made in the e-commerce market over the last few years.

CEO Compensation

In 2020, the CEO's total compensation increased 12.4% from the prior year. Achieving "reach" targets of adjusted EBITDA and cash flows from operating activities with growth of 23% and 33% from prior year, respectively, under the annual incentive plan resulted in payouts at 200% of target. In addition, the Company's one-year and three-year total shareholder return was in

35

the top quartile versus the Peer Group which is reflective of a more than 200% increase in share price between March and year end 2020. This alignment between shareholder value and compensation is demonstrated in the section entitled "Performance Graph and CEO Compensation Look Back".

We regularly monitor pay levels and trends in executive compensation and corporate governance and are confident that our current compensation structure is competitive and meets the objectives of our compensation philosophy. The responsibility for executive compensation rests with the Board, and we consider the longer term implications of the compensation decisions we make. We remain committed to compensation policies and programs that drive and support results that deliver value to you, our shareholders.

Sincerely,

Robert Beil
Chair of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee

36

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This discussion describes the Company’s compensation program for the NEOs, that is, each person who acted as the CEO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the three most highly-compensated executive officers other than the CEO and CFO, and whose total compensation was more than $150,000 in the Company’s last financial year. It addresses the Company’s philosophy and objectives and provides a review of the process that the HRCC follows in deciding how to compensate the NEOs. This section also provides discussion and analysis of the HRCC’s specific decisions regarding the compensation of the NEOs for the financial year ended December 31, 2020.

Executive Summary

Our Compensation Philosophy	The Company’s executive compensation philosophy and program objectives are directed primarily by two guiding principles. First, the program is intended to provide competitive levels of compensation, at expected levels of performance, in order to attract, motivate and retain talented executives. Second, the program is intended to create an alignment of interest between the Company’s executives, performance objectives, and shareholders, so that a significant portion of each executive’s compensation is linked to creating long-term shareholder value. These two objectives are managed within the context of consideration of risk and governance best practices.
Our Pay Practices	What we do:	What we don't do:
	☑ Pay for Performance - 100% of the long-term incentive program is linked to share price performance ☑ Multi-dimensional assessment of performance including earnings, balance sheet, cash flows and market performance ☑ Use a similarly sized peer group of companies for market pay level benchmarking ☑ Target pay opportunities to be within reasonable range of median ☑ Require compliance with stock ownership requirements ☑ Engage an independent consultant ☑ Maintain the ability to clawback compensation in connection with financial restatement	☒ Hedging ☒ Encourage excessive risk taking ☒ Re-price options ☒ Discount options ☒ Offer excessive perquisites

37

Our Performance

•Management put effective measures in place to ensure the safety of our workforce and the continuity of our essential production in response to the uncertainty caused by COVID-19, including: social distancing, face covering requirements, health interviews prior to entry to facilities, increased frequency of cleaning and sanitization, enhanced health care coverage for COVID-19 testing and treatment, support for remote work arrangements, proactive cost reduction and cash conservation initiatives, supply chain risk mitigation, and production of personal protective equipment, like medical gowns, in addition to the Company's essential products. •Adjusted EBITDA grew 23% from $172.2 million in 2019 to $211.1 million in 2020. •Material increase in adjusted EBITDA margin to 17.4% in 2020 from 14.9% in 2019. •Cash flows from operating activities grew 33% from $135.0 million in 2019 to $179.6 million in 2020. •Continued strong generation of free cash flows of $133.8 million in 2020 from $86.8 million in 2019. •Prioritization of debt reduction resulted in net repayments of $23.9 million and drop in total leverage ratio to 2.2 in 2020. •One-year and three-year total shareholder return ranking relative to the Peer Group was in the 94th percentile and 78th percentile, respectively. •Experienced strong growth in the e-commerce market where the Company supplies water-activated tape, protective packaging, dispensers and films and the growth in the building & construction market which uses the Company's woven products and tapes. •The dividend was increased 6.8% on an annualized basis to $0.63 per common share. •Embracing sustainability was formally added to the Company's long-term strategic pillars and the ESG Committee was formed strengthening its commitment to sustainability. •Four additional products achieved Cradle to Cradle CertifiedTM status as part of the ongoing sustainability strategic initiatives.

Compensation of NEOs

•Annual incentive award targets required Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and Compensation Cash Flows growth of approximately 5% each from 2019 results. •NEOs received annual incentive awards at 200% of their targets, given outstanding performance. •PSU awards granted in 2017 were settled in 2020 at 0% of the value granted based on the TSR for the three-year performance period ending on March 20, 2020. •Long-term incentive awards represented, on average, 25% of the NEOs 2020 total compensation, 72% of which were in the form of performance-based awards. •On average, base salaries for NEOs were increased in 2020 by 2.3% to provide them with market competitive and reasonable compensation.

Executive Compensation Program Principles

In support of the Company's compensation philosophy, the executive compensation program is designed to reward performance that is directly relevant to the Company’s short-term and long-term success. The Company provides both short-term and long-term incentive compensation that varies based on corporate and individual performance.

Three primary components comprise the Company’s compensation program: base salary, annual performance-based incentive plan award and a long-term incentive plan award comprised of PSUs and RSUs pursuant to the Amended and Restated Performance and Restricted Share Unit Plan (the "PRSU Plan"), and stock options pursuant to the 2019 Executive Stock Option Plan (the "2019 ESOP").

Each element of compensation fulfills a different, but important, role in attracting, retaining and motivating qualified executives and employees. The Company provides a balanced compensation program with both short-term (salary and annual incentive plan award) and long-term (PSUs, RSUs and stock options) compensation. The following describes the Company’s executive

38

compensation program by component of compensation and discusses how each component relates to the Company’s overall executive compensation objective.

Compensation Element	Purpose
Annual base salary	To provide a base level of annual compensation for the Company’s NEOs generally set at a level that is within a competitive range of the median of companies that compete with the Company for business and executive talent (the "Compensation Peer Group")
Annual incentive plan award	To encourage and reward performance over the financial year (typically, compared to predefined goals and objectives) and reflect progress toward predetermined company-wide and individual objectives - further details on page 48
Long-term incentives / Equity	To reinforce shareholder alignment, retention, and long-term performance orientation - further details by award on page 51

The base salaries of the NEOs are reviewed annually and adjusted periodically to take into account the following factors: market and economic conditions; levels of responsibility, scope of the role and accountability of each NEO; skills, experience and competencies of each NEO; retention considerations; and sustained performance.

In 2020, the Company issued PSUs and RSUs under the PRSU Plan and stock options under the 2019 ESOP. Annual incentive plan awards are typically based on predetermined performance goals and may form a greater or lesser part of the entire compensation package in any given year, depending on performance.

Purpose

The Company’s executive compensation program has been designed to accomplish the following long-term objectives:

Human Resources and Compensation Committee

The HRCC is composed of five directors: Robert M. Beil (chair), Jane Craighead, Robert J. Foster, Dahra Granovsky and Jorge N. Quintas (Mary Pat Salomone was a member but is no longer effective January 1, 2021), none of whom is or has been at any previous time an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and all of whom are considered independent within the meaning of National Instrument 52 – 110 Audit Committees. The HRCC annually reviews the performance of the executives and ensures that the compensation and incentive programs are market competitive and aligned with good compensation governance practices. The members of the HRCC collectively have the knowledge, experience and background to fulfill their mandate, and each of the members of the HRCC has direct experience relevant to their responsibilities regarding executive

39

compensation. Each of the members of the HRCC is an experienced senior executive. In particular, Messrs. Foster and Quintas and Ms. Granovsky are presidents of their respective companies. Mr. Beil has extensive experience with the design and implementation of executive compensation packages based on his experience in the human resources function at Dow Chemical. Ms. Craighead is a retired senior executive who has significant experience in executive compensation and corporate governance, including global responsibility for compensation design for large publicly traded companies and has served as the Chair of the HR Committee of a publicly traded company. Ms. Salomone was Chief Operating Officer of a publicly-traded company and was the Chair of the compensation committee of another publicly traded company for four years. These collective skills and extensive experience enable the HRCC to make decisions on the suitability of the Company’s compensation policies and practices.

Named Executive Officer Profiles

The following are profiles of each of the Company’s NEOs. The NEOs for 2020 are: Gregory A.C. Yull, Jeffrey Crystal, Douglas Nalette, Shawn Nelson and Joseph Tocci. The profiles include details of their respective compensation for 2020 and the two previous fiscal years, their respective ownership as of December 31, 2020 of Shares and outstanding awards of stock options, PSUs and RSUs pursuant to the Company’s 2019 ESOP and PRSU Plan, respectively, and whether each is in compliance with the Company’s minimum share ownership requirement.

40

	Gregory A.C. Yull Chief Executive Officer and President   Gregory Yull was named President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in June 2010 and was appointed to the Board of Directors in August 2010. Prior to his current position, Mr. Yull was President of the Tapes and Films Division of the Company from October 2005, where he was responsible for the North American and European operations spanning 15 locations and providing leadership for a 1,500-person workforce. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President of the Industrial Business Unit for Tapes & Films of the Company from November 2004 and prior thereto was President, Film Products of the Company from June 1999. He has also held various positions at the Company in Sales and Product Management and had extensive functional responsibilities supporting the Fibope business division. Mr. Yull has been with the Company since 1991.
Compensation(1) (as of December 31)	2020	2019	2018
Short-term incentive
Base salary	$868,400	$828,335	$799,575
Annual incentive plan award	$1,736,800	$1,115,204	$757,417
Long-term incentive
Share-based awards	$1,313,501	$1,424,029	$1,475,410
Option-based awards	$334,107	$425,112	$462,916
Pension value	$15,675	$15,400	$9,900
All other compensation	$54,034	$37,135	$36,513
Total compensation	$4,322,517	$3,845,215	$3,541,731
Change from previous year	12.4%	8.6%	22.8%

2020 Pay Mix	Shares & Awards Held (2)
	Minimum level of ownership (3)	$	4,258,500
	Number of Shares Held	732,204
	Number of RSUs Held	138,200
	Number of PSUs Held	138,200
	Total Market Value (4)	$	23,117,192
	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement	Yes

(1)See “Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers” starting on page 58 for additional details.

(2)RSUs and PSUs outstanding are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. Number of PSUs held and included represents 50% of Target Shares rather than total outstanding. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans".

(3)Minimum level of ownership is equal to five times Mr. Yull's annual base salary. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement".

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92) and shares and awards held on March 12, 2021.

41

	Jeffrey Crystal, CPA, CA Chief Financial Officer   Jeffrey Crystal was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company in May 2014. Mr. Crystal is a Canadian Chartered Professional Accountant who, since 2002, has been in senior finance roles overseeing administrative functions both within and outside the traditional finance areas. His most significant positions prior to joining the Company included Chief Financial Officer of American Iron & Metal, Vice-President of Finance of Optimal Payments and Audit Manager at Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP, Chartered Accountants. Mr. Crystal holds a Diploma of Accountancy and Bachelor of Commerce degree from Concordia University, Montreal, Québec.
Compensation(1) (as of December 31)	2020	2019	2018
Short-term incentive
Base salary	$477,672	$457,341	$445,678
Annual incentive plan award	$716,508	$460,072	$316,082
Long-term incentive
Share-based awards	$301,749	$327,148	$338,948
Option-based awards	$83,288	$98,027	$106,237
Pension value	$15,675	$15,400	$9,900
All other compensation	—	$9,633	$8,824
Total compensation	$1,594,892	$1,367,621	$1,225,669
Change from previous year	16.6%	11.6%	20.2%

2020 Pay Mix	Shares & Awards Held (2)
	Minimum level of ownership (3)	$	936,972
	Number of Shares Held	40,829
	Number of RSUs Held	31,749
	Number of PSUs Held	31,749
	Total Market Value (4)	$	2,391,163
	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement	Yes

(1)See “Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers” starting on page 58 for additional details.

(2)RSUs and PSUs outstanding are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. Number of PSUs held and included represents 50% of Target Shares rather than total outstanding. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans".

(3)Minimum level of ownership is equal to two times Mr. Crystal's annual base salary. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement".

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92) and shares and awards held on March 12, 2021.

42

	Douglas Nalette Senior Vice-President, Operations   Douglas Nalette was appointed Senior Vice-President Operations of the Company in 2006. From 2004, he had been Director of Carton Sealing Manufacturing of the Company. Prior to joining the Company through an acquisition in 1999, Mr. Nalette was the Director of Manufacturing Pressure Sensitive Tape for Central Products Company. Mr. Nalette has more than 40 years of industry experience in plant operations and management, including companies such as the Company, Arkwright Advanced Coating and Venture Tape. Mr. Nalette holds a Bachelor’s degree in Chemistry from the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts, North Adams, Massachusetts, and a Master’s degree in Business from Western New England University, Springfield, Massachusetts.
Compensation(1) (as of December 31)	2020	2019	2018
Short-term incentive
Base salary	$407,809	$389,551	$379,561
Annual incentive plan award	$407,809	$261,856	$175,987
Long-term incentive
Share-based awards	$159,752	$173,191	$179,452
Option-based awards	$44,093	$51,898	$56,243
Pension value	$15,675	$15,400	$9,900
All other compensation	—	—	—
Total compensation	$1,035,138	$891,896	$801,143
Change from previous year	16.1%	11.3%	11.5%

2020 Pay Mix	Shares & Awards Held (2)
	Minimum level of ownership (3)	$	799,934
	Number of Shares Held	140,571
	Number of RSUs Held	16,808
	Number of PSUs Held	16,809
	Total Market Value (4)	$	3,992,378
	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement	Yes

(1)See “Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers” starting on page 58 for additional details.

(2)RSUs and PSUs outstanding are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. Number of PSUs held and included represents 50% of Target Shares rather than total outstanding. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans".

(3)Minimum level of ownership is equal to two times Mr. Nalette's annual base salary. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement".

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92) and shares and awards held on March 12, 2021.

43

	Shawn Nelson Senior Vice-President, Sales   Shawn Nelson was appointed Senior Vice-President Sales of the Company in 2010. Prior thereto, he served as Senior Vice-President Industrial Channel of the Company from 2006. Mr. Nelson began his career at the Company in 1995, holding several management positions within the sales organization. Before joining the Company, Mr. Nelson was Regional Sales Manager of Polychem. Mr. Nelson holds a Bachelor’s degree in Marketing and Business Administration from The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, and completed the Darden Executive Program at the University of Virginia as well as the Executive Program at The University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
Compensation(1) (as of December 31)	2020	2019	2018
Short-term incentive
Base salary	$379,314	$364,193	$361,396
Annual incentive plan award	$379,314	$243,199	$167,534
Long-term incentive
Share-based awards	$159,752	$173,191	$179,452
Option-based awards	$44,093	$51,898	$56,243
Pension value	$15,675	$15,400	$9,900
All other compensation	—	—	—
Total compensation	$978,148	$847,881	$774,525
Change from previous year	15.4%	9.5%	11.7%

2020 Pay Mix	Shares & Awards Held (2)
	Minimum level of ownership (3)	$	757,506
	Number of Shares Held	145,022
	Number of RSUs Held	16,808
	Number of PSUs Held	16,809
	Total Market Value (4)	$	4,094,394
	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement	Yes

(1)See “Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers” starting on page 58 for additional details.

(2)RSUs and PSUs outstanding are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. Number of PSUs held and included represents 50% of Target Shares rather than total outstanding. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans".

(3)Minimum level of ownership is equal to two times Mr. Nelson's annual base salary. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement".

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92) and shares and awards held on March 12, 2021.

44

	Joseph Tocci Senior Vice-President, Global Sourcing and Supply Chain   Joseph Tocci was appointed Senior Vice-President of the Company in 2008. He is currently responsible for Supply Chain, Logistics, Purchasing and Global Sourcing. He joined the Company in 2005 as Vice-President of Supply Chain. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Tocci was Vice-President of Distribution at Polo Ralph Lauren, Senior Director of Supply Chain with The Home Depot, Vice President of Supply Chain at Atari and Director of Supply Chain for Nabisco. Mr. Tocci holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania.
Compensation(1) (as of December 31)	2020	2019	2018
Short-term incentive
Base salary	$362,765	$347,031	$338,154
Annual incentive plan award	$362,765	$232,933	$156,550
Long-term incentive
Share-based awards	$159,752	$173,191	$179,452
Option-based awards	$44,093	$51,898	$56,243
Pension value	$15,675	$15,400	$9,900
All other compensation	—	—	—
Total compensation	$945,050	$820,453	$740,299
Change from previous year	15.2%	10.8%	14.3%

2020 Pay Mix	Shares & Awards Held (2)
	Minimum level of ownership (3)	$	711,578
	Number of Shares Held	65,502
	Number of RSUs Held	16,808
	Number of PSUs Held	16,809
	Total Market Value (4)	$	2,271,796
	Compliance with minimum share ownership requirement	Yes

(1)See “Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers” starting on page 58 for additional details.

(2)RSUs and PSUs outstanding are included in determining whether the minimum share ownership requirements have been satisfied. Number of PSUs held and included represents 50% of Target Shares rather than total outstanding. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement" and "Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans".

(3)Minimum level of ownership is equal to two times Mr. Tocci's annual base salary. For more information see sections entitled "Minimum Share Ownership Requirement".

(4)Value calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the TSX (being CDN$28.80, USD$22.92) and shares and awards held on March 12, 2021.

45

Compensation Process

The HRCC administers the Company’s compensation program in accordance with the mandate set out in the HRCC’s charter, which has been adopted by the Board of Directors. Part of the mandate is to evaluate and recommend to the Board of Directors compensation policies and programs for the Company’s directors, executive officers and senior management, including stock option grants under the 2019 ESOP, and awards of PSUs and RSUs under the PRSU Plan, as described below. The HRCC also has the mandate to recommend to the Board of Directors grants under the DSU Plan.

Annually, the CEO makes recommendations to the HRCC as to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, other than himself. The HRCC annually reviews the compensation levels for the executive officers and certain other members of senior management, and the recommendations of the CEO. The HRCC makes recommendations to the Board of Directors as to the compensation of the CEO and the other NEOs for approval.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the HRCC reviewed information it received from the CEO. Based on the recommendation of the CEO, the HRCC recommended to the Board of Directors share unit and stock option grants for executive officers and other members of senior management. The HRCC also recommended to the Board of Directors share unit and stock option grants for the CEO.

Independent Executive Compensation Advisor

The HRCC has the authority to retain compensation consultants to assist in the evaluation of director, CEO and senior executive compensation. Since 2017, the Company has retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC ("Meridian") to provide independent advice to the HRCC on: (i) the establishment of peer groups for compensation and performance comparisons; (ii) the competitiveness and appropriateness of the compensation programs of the Company for the CEO and other key executives; (iii) base salaries, short-term, medium-term and long-term incentive program design, target setting and assessment of performance against target; (iv) employment and change of control terms; (v) compensation risk; and (vi) compensation trends, regulatory developments, and legislative updates relevant to executive compensation. In connection with these services, Meridian may review the Company’s compensation policies; the relationship between compensation and performance, performance measures; and the design of the programs and the levels of compensation compared to market. Meridian may make observations and recommendations regarding amendments where appropriate. Based on the information provided by Meridian to the HRCC, the HRCC determined that Meridian is independent of management. Meridian provides no advice or services to management.

Executive compensation-related fees consist of fees for professional services billed by each consultant or advisor, or any of its affiliates, that are related to determining compensation for any of the Company’s directors and executive officers. For services rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company paid to its independent compensation consultants the following fees:

	2020	2019
	($)	($)
Meridian Compensation Partners	79,853	124,171
Percentage of work provided to the HRCC	100%	100%

Although the HRCC may rely on information and advice obtained from consultants, all final decisions with respect to executive compensation are made by the Board of Directors upon recommendation of the HRCC and may reflect factors and considerations that differ from information and recommendations provided by such consultants, such as merit and the need to retain high-performing executives. Accordingly, the Board of Directors may exercise discretion to reduce or increase the size of any award or payout to one or more NEOs. During 2020, Meridian met regularly with the HRCC Chair and attended relevant portions of HRCC meetings, as necessary. Additionally, Meridian coordinated with members of management, including the CEO, as appropriate, to develop and finalize materials to discuss with the HRCC.

46

Compensation Peer Group

In arriving at its decisions, the HRCC reviewed the compensation data of the Compensation Peer Group, a group of companies in similar businesses to the Company, which generally ranged from one third to three times the Company's size based on revenue, with the Company positioned at approximately the revenue median of the group. The HRCC uses this compensation data as a reference point in determining the compensation for the Company's executive officers, and generally aligns executive compensation within a competitive range of the median of the Compensation Peer Group. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the Compensation Peer Group was comprised of the following companies:

Company	Industry
Balchem Corporation	Specialty Chemicals
Clearwater Paper Corporation	Paper Products
Ferro Corporation	Specialty Chemicals
H.B. Fuller Company	Specialty Chemicals
Innospec Inc.	Specialty Chemicals
IPL Plastics Inc.	Paper Products
Koppers Holdings Inc.	Commodity Chemicals
Kraton Corporation	Specialty Chemicals
Minerals Technologies Inc.	Specialty Chemicals
Myers Industries, Inc.	Metal and Glass Containers
Neenah, Inc.	Paper Products
P.H. Glatfelter Company	Paper Products
Quaker Chemical Corporation	Specialty Chemicals
Rogers Corporation	Electronic Components
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc.	Paper Products
Sensient Technologies Corporation	Specialty Chemicals
Stepan Company	Specialty Chemicals
Tredegar Corporation	Commodity Chemicals
Winpak Ltd	Metal and Glass Containers

The following additions to the Compensation Peer Group in 2020 were made in order to preserve a reasonable number of companies in the peer group while taking into account removals resulting from mergers and acquisitions activity.

Additions in 2020
Clearwater Paper Corporation	Paper Products
H.B. Fuller Company	Specialty Chemicals
Koppers Holdings Inc.	Commodity Chemicals
Sensient Technologies Corporation	Specialty Chemicals

Removals in 2020
Innophos Holdings, Inc.	Specialty Chemicals
Multi-Color Corporation	Commercial Printing
OMNOVA Solutions Inc.	Specialty Chemicals

47

The following depicts how the Company stacks up against the Compensation Peer Group in terms of revenue and market cap as of January 1, 2020:

Annual Incentive Plan Awards – Bonuses

The HRCC’s philosophy with respect to executive officer bonuses is to align the payouts with the performance of the Company, based on predefined goals and objectives established by the HRCC.

Each of the NEOs received a cash performance bonus for 2020. Bonuses are typically paid based on the level of achievement of pre-defined financial objectives of the Company. The Company attributes to each executive, depending on his or her management level, a bonus target level set as a percentage of his or her salary, representing the amount that will be paid if all objectives are achieved according to the targets set. Actual bonuses may vary between zero and 200% of the target bonus, based on the level of achievement of the predetermined objectives. The objectives and weight attached thereto are re-evaluated on an annual basis by the HRCC. The HRCC has discretion to adjust bonus payments upwards or downwards to ensure that payouts are aligned with the Company's performance and reflect the level of risk and responsibility undertaken to achieve results.

48

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, at the HRCC’s recommendation, the Board of Directors elected to determine bonuses based on the Company achieving target levels of Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and Compensation Cash Flows. These measures adjust for certain expenses and charges expected (at the time of the Board’s election) to be incurred by the Company during the year (e.g., M&A Costs and manufacturing facility closures, restructuring and other related charges), which are determined to be in the long term interest of the Company. Accordingly, the HRCC determined that such amounts should not impact the ability of senior management to achieve the performance bonus targets for the year ended December 31, 2020. Compensation Adjusted EBITDA and Compensation Cash Flows are non-GAAP financial measures. See Appendix B for definitions and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the incentive parameters that were used were as follows:

The criteria to be used for determination of annual incentive plan amounts are typically reviewed by the HRCC in March. In March of 2020, the HRCC considered whether there should, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, be alternative performance objectives included in the annual incentive plan and therefore delayed setting the relevant goals given the uncertainty of the economic environment at the time. Ultimately, and with more information regarding the Company's performance and results, the determination was made to have the annual incentive plan payouts be based on the original, pre-COVID-19 financial objectives presented in March.

The target amount for Compensation Adjusted EBITDA for 2020 was $187.5 million (the “Compensation Adjusted EBITDA Target”) and the target amount for Compensation Cash Flows for 2020 was $148.4 million (the “Compensation Cash Flows Target”). The Compensation Adjusted EBITDA for 2020 used for the purposes of determining bonuses was $220.4 million, which was 117.5% of the Compensation Adjusted EBITDA Target. The Compensation Cash Flows for 2020 was $182.0 million, which was 122.6% of the Compensation Cash Flow Target.

Each NEO's target incentive plan award as a percentage of salary is set out below:

	Gregory A.C. Yull		Jeffrey Crystal		Douglas Nalette		Shawn Nelson		Joseph Tocci
Incentive plan award as a percentage of salary:
Minimum	0	%	0	%	0	%	0	%	0	%
Threshold	50	%	38	%	25	%	25	%	25	%
Target	100	%	75	%	50	%	50	%	50	%
Maximum	200	%	150	%	100	%	100	%	100	%

49

The following table presents the financial objectives for 2020 included in the annual incentive plan and the results achieved by the Company:

	Bonus Payout Percentage	Compensation Adjusted EBITDA		Compensation Cash Flows
Threshold ($)	50%	177,300,000		141,900,000
Target ($)	100%	187,500,000		148,400,000
Maximum ($)	200%	198,000,000		154,900,000
Actual ($)	200%	220,369,950		181,957,530
Evaluation of Performance to Target (%)		117.5	%	122.6	%
Company Performance Factor (%)		200.0	%	200.0	%

For performance achievement between threshold and target, the company performance factor represents the straight-line interpolation between 50% and 100% where 100% represents the target bonus. For performance achievement greater than target, the company performance factor represents the straight-line interpolation between 100% and 200% where 200% represents the maximum bonus.

Weighted Company Performance Factor 200.0 %

The following table presents, for each target objective, the bonus amount earned by the NEOs for 2020:

	Gregory A.C. Yull ($)	Jeffrey Crystal ($)	Douglas Nalette ($)	Shawn Nelson ($)	Joseph Tocci ($)
2020 Annual Eligible Salary	868,400	477,672	407,809	379,314	362,765
Target Amount	868,400	358,254	203,905	189,657	181,383
Weighted Company Performance Factor x Target Amount	1,736,800	716,508	407,809	379,314	362,765

Clawback Policy

In April 2014, the Board of Directors adopted a “clawback” policy, pursuant to which the Company may recoup from executive officers or employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, as the case may be, annual incentive plan awards, special bonuses, other incentive compensation and equity-based awards, whether vested or unvested, paid, issued or granted to them, in the event of fraud, restatement of the Company’s financial results, material errors or omissions in the Company’s financial statements, or other events as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion. To-date, the Company has not been required to apply the "clawback" policy.

50

Long-Term Incentive Awards

Long-Term Incentive Mix	Long-Term Incentive Award	Time Period	Purpose
	PSUs	Three Years	To reward the achievement of financial returns, through a return on invested capital measure, as well as strong performance relative to peer companies, through a relative total shareholder return measure.
	RSUs	Three Years	To provide alignment with shareholders through participation in share price movement and add retention value to the long-term incentive plan.
	Stock Options	Three Years(1)	To provide a strong incentive linked directly to share price improvement and only deliver value when share price increases above the exercise price.

(1)    Vesting occurs over three years and options expire after five years (ten years for options issued to the CEO). Based on historical exercise experience, the expected life of the options is approximately five years (six years for the CEO).

Executive Stock Option Plan

The Executive Stock Option Plan which lapsed on June 4, 2018 (the "ESOP") and the 2019 ESOP are described in detail below in the section entitled “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans”.

The HRCC recommends the granting of stock options from time to time based on its assessment of the appropriateness of doing so in light of the long-term strategic objectives of the Company, its current stage of development, the need to retain or attract particular key personnel, the number of stock options already outstanding and overall market conditions. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the HRCC recommended the granting of an aggregate of 1,245,618 stock options to the NEOs which will vest one-third on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant pursuant to the 2019 ESOP.

Performance and Restricted Share Unit Plan

The purpose of the PRSU Plan is to provide executive officers and employees with a proprietary interest in the Company through the granting of PSUs and RSUs. The PRSU Plan is also intended to increase the interest in the Company’s welfare of those executive officers and employees who share primary responsibility for the management, growth and protection of the business of the Company, to furnish an incentive to such executive officers and employees to continue their services for the Company and its subsidiaries and to provide a means through which the Company and its subsidiaries may attract able persons to accept employment.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 the HRCC recommended the granting of an aggregate of 242,841 PSUs to the NEOs.

These PSU grants vest from 0% to 175% of the Target Shares ("Target Shares" reflects 100% of the PSUs granted) as determined by multiplying the number of PSUs awarded by the adjustment factors as follows:

•25% based on the Company's total shareholder return ("TSR") ranking relative to a custom peer group of companies ("Peer Group") over the three-year performance measurement period as set out on the table below.

•25% based on the Company's TSR ranking relative to the S&P North America SmallCap Materials (Industry Group) Index ("Index Group") over the three-year performance measurement period as set out on the table below.

•50% based on the Company's average return on invested capital over the three-year performance measurement period as compared to internally developed thresholds ("ROIC Performance") as set out on the table below.

51

The relative TSR performance adjustment factor is determined as follows:

TSR Ranking Relative to the Peer Group and Index Group	Percent of Target Shares Vested (%)
Less than the 25th percentile	0
25th percentile	50
50th percentile	100
75th percentile	150
90th percentile or higher	200

The ROIC Performance adjustment factor is determined as follows:

ROIC Performance	Percent of Target Shares Vested (%)
1st Tier	0
2nd Tier	50
3rd Tier	100
4th Tier	150

TSR is measured as the five-day VWAP as of the end of the performance measurement period as divided by the five-day VWAP at the start of the performance measurement period. The TSR measures are estimated based on the conventional method, which considers the reinvestment of any potential dividends in the Company’s stock.

The TSR performance and ROIC Performance adjustment factors between the numbers set out in the two tables above is interpolated on a straight-line basis.

For PSUs granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the Peer Group used to derive the TSR ranking is comprised of the following companies, which were selected based on business similarity to and historical share price correlation with the Company:

52

Company	Industry
3M Company	Industrial Conglomerates
AptarGroup, Inc.	Metal and Glass Containers
Avery Dennison Corporation	Paper Packaging
Ball Corporation	Metal and Glass Containers
Berry Global Group, Inc.	Metal and Glass Containers
CCL Industries Inc.	Metal and Glass Containers
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund	Commodity Chemicals
Crown Holdings, Inc.	Metal and Glass Containers
Graphic Packaging Holding Company	Paper Packaging
Greif, Inc.	Metal and Glass Containers
Interfor Corporation	Forest Products
International Paper Company	Paper Packaging
Owens-Illinois, Inc.	Metal and Glass Containers
Packaging Corporation of America	Paper Packaging
PolyOne Corporation	Specialty Chemicals
RPM International Inc.	Specialty Chemicals
Sealed Air Corporation	Paper Packaging
Silgan Holdings Inc.	Metal and Glass Containers
Sonoco Products Company	Paper Packaging
Stella-Jones Inc.	Forest Products
Tupperware Brands Corporation	Housewares and Specialties
Western Forest Products Inc.	Forest Products
WestRock Company	Paper Packaging
Winpak Ltd.	Metal and Glass Containers

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 the HRCC recommended the granting of an aggregate of 121,421 RSUs to the NEOs. All RSUs granted and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 will vest on the 15th day of February in the year of the third anniversary of the award grant date.

For more information on the PRSU Plan, see the section entitled “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans”.

Group Benefits/Perquisites

The HRCC believes that the perquisites for NEOs should be limited in scope and value and market competitive. The perquisites, including property or other personal benefits provided to an NEO that are not generally available to all employees in the year ended December 31, 2020, did not exceed in any case the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the NEO’s total salary. See “Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers” starting on page 58 for additional details.

Assessment of Risk Associated with the Company’s Compensation Policies and Practices

The HRCC has assessed the Company’s compensation plans and programs for its executive officers, with advice from its independent compensation adviser, to ensure alignment with the Company’s business plan and to evaluate the potential risks associated with those plans and programs. The HRCC has concluded that the compensation policies and practices do not create any risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The HRCC considers the risks associated with executive compensation and corporate incentive plans when designing and reviewing such plans and programs.

53

Hedging Prohibition

Neither NEOs nor directors are permitted to purchase financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, or units of exchange funds) or otherwise engage in transactions that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of equity securities of the Company granted as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by the NEO or director.

Minimum Share Ownership Requirement

The Company has the following minimum share ownership requirements that apply to the CEO, CFO and other NEOs as identified in the Company’s management information circular:

Executive	Share Ownership Requirement as a multiple of base salary
CEO	5x
CFO and other NEOs	2x

Executives have five years to meet their share ownership requirement, which may be met through ownership of Shares, outstanding RSUs and outstanding PSUs at threshold performance levels (50% of Target Shares). If an executive has satisfied the minimum share ownership requirement, he or she will continue to satisfy the minimum requirement notwithstanding a subsequent decrease in the value of Shares. The HRCC annually reviews NEO's compliance with the minimum share ownership requirements and reviews the required ownership levels every three years.

As of March 12, 2021 all NEOs are in compliance with the minimum share ownership requirement.

Performance Graph and CEO Compensation Look Back

The HRCC does not establish compensation or incentive levels based solely on the market value of the Company's Shares. The HRCC believes that there are a variety of factors that have an impact on the market value of the Shares that are not reflective of the direct underlying performance of the NEOs, including general market volatility. However, realized and realizable pay are strongly aligned with share price performance over longer periods of time due to the share price and performance linked features of stock options, PSUs and RSUs, which comprise the Company's long-term incentives. The HRCC balances focus on market value, through the use of share-based incentives and relative total shareholder return comparisons, with financial performance covering earnings, balance sheet, and cash flows.

54

The following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return provided to shareholders on the Company’s Shares ("5 Yr TSR"), based on the Company's trading on the TSX, relative to the cumulative total returns of the Standard & Poor's/TSX Composite Total Return Index (the “Index”). An investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in the Company’s Shares and in the Index on December 31, 2015 and their relative performance is tracked through December 31, 2020.

The Company's cumulative share price performance over the past five years is aligned with that of the Index as is the CEOs aggregate realized pay, shown by individual year in the CEO Compensation Look Back table below. During the five-year period a shareholder would have realized 159% of their $100 initial investment in the Company's Shares, the CEO's realized and realizable compensation(1) was 189% of his target total compensation(1) on an aggregate basis mainly due to favorable realizable compensation associated with 2020 stock options and PSU award grants as discussed below.

(1)    Refer to CEO Compensation Look Back table below for definitions.

55

The following CEO Compensation Look Back table compares target total compensation(1) awarded to the CEO in each of the last five years to realized(2) and realizable compensation(3) as at December 31, 2020 as well as the one-year return provided to shareholders on the Company’s Shares relative to the Peer Group ("One-Year TSR Ranking").

Year	Target total compensation (1) ($)	Realized compensation (2) ($)	Realizable compensation (3) ($)	Realized and realizable compensation ($)	Realized and realizable compensation as a factor of target total compensation	One-Year TSR Ranking (Percentile)
2016	3,159,322	1,776,522	—	1,776,522	0.6	91st
2017	3,064,136	1,414,550	—	1,414,550	0.5	<25th
2018	3,594,314	1,603,405	2,629,766	4,233,171	1.2	70th
2019	3,565,011	1,996,074	3,457,228	5,453,302	1.5	31st
2020	3,454,117	2,674,909	16,310,979	18,985,888	5.5	94th

(1)Target total compensation includes salary, the grant date fair value of share-based and option-based awards, pension value and all other compensation as presented in the table in the section entitled “Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers.” Also included is the target annual incentive plan award as presented in the table in the section entitled "Annual Incentive Plan Awards – Bonuses" in each respective year.

(2)Realized compensation includes salary, pension value and perquisites as presented in the table in the section entitled “Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers”, and the actual annual incentive plan award achieved as presented in the table in the section entitled "Annual Incentive Plan Awards – Bonuses" in each respective year. Realized compensation also includes the actual value received at the time of settlement or exercise of share-based and option-based awards granted in each respective year. For 2016 and 2017 share-based award grants, the realized compensation at settlement was $0. For 2018-2020, share-based and option-based awards granted in those years have not been settled or exercised as of December 31, 2020 and the estimated value as of December 31, 2020 is instead included in realizable compensation.

(3)Realizable compensation derived from option-based awards are based on in-the-money unexercised, outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2020, calculated based on the difference between the closing price of the Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2020 (being $18.91) and the exercise price of the stock options. Realizable compensation derived from outstanding PSUs (at 155.7%, 138.2%, and 168.7% of 2018, 2019, and 2020 Target Shares, respectively, based on the Company's performance at December 31, 2020) and RSUs are based on the five-day VWAP of Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2020 (being $18.91), including related dividend amounts. The actual value received on exercise or settlement, if any, will be different and could also be nil, depending on variations in the price of the Shares.

(4)One-Year TSR Ranking percentile is in reference to the one-year period ending December 31st of each year presented (i.e December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2020).

In 2016, the Company’s One-Year TSR Ranking was in the 91st percentile and the CEO's realized compensation was 0.6 times his target total compensation primarily due to the underperformance of the Company's stock during the three-year performance period applicable to 2016 PSU awards resulting in settlement at nil in March 2019.

In 2017, the Company's One-Year TSR Ranking was less than the 25th percentile and the CEO's realized compensation was 0.5 times his target total compensation primarily due to the underperformance of the Company's Shares during the three-year performance period applicable to 2017 PSU awards resulting in settlement at nil in March 2020.

Option-based awards were not granted as part of the long-term incentive program from 2015 through 2017. They were re-introduced along with RSUs in 2018.

In 2018, the Company's One-Year TSR Ranking was in the 70th percentile and the CEO's realized and realizable compensation was 1.2 times his target total compensation, primarily due to the Company's three-year TSR ranking in the 78th percentile relative to the Peer Group resulting in favorable realizable compensation from 2018 PSU awards.

In 2019, the Company's One-Year TSR Ranking was in the 31st percentile and the CEO's realized and realizable compensation was 1.5 times his target total compensation primarily due to the subsequent recovery of share price performance by the end of 2020 resulting in favorable realizable compensation.

In 2020, the Company's One-Year TSR Ranking was in the 94th percentile and the CEO's realized and realizable compensation was 5.5 times his target total compensation primarily due to an increase of over 200% in the Company's share price since the time of grant. The strong Share and financial performance resulted in favorable realizable compensation from option- and share-based awards and achievement of the annual incentive award at 200% of target. The actual value received on exercise or settlement, if any, will be different and could also be nil, depending on variations in the price of the Shares.

The following chart compares the realized and realizable compensation for each of the last five years by the CEO and the five-year total return of a $100 investment (dividend reinvested) in Company Shares (based on the Company's trading on the TSX

56

(rounded to the nearest dollar)) ("5 Yr TSR"). The chart illustrates the alignment of realized and realizable compensation with share price and TSR performance over time.

Cost of Management Ratio

The following cost of management ratio expresses total compensation for NEOs, as presented in the table in the section entitled “Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers”, as a percentage of revenue. This table illustrates that the cost of management ratio has remained stable over time.

	2016			2017			2018			2019			2020
Total compensation of NEOs (millions)	$	7.0		$	5.9		$	7.1		$	7.8		$	8.9
Revenue (millions)	$	808.8		$	898.1		$	1,053.0		$	1,158.5		$	1,213.0
Cost of management ratio	0.9		%	0.7		%	0.7		%	0.7		%	0.7		%

57

Summary of the Compensation of the Named Executive Officers

The following table provides information for the financial years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 regarding compensation paid to or earned by the NEOs.

Summary Compensation Table

Name	Year	Salary(1) ($)	Share-Based Awards		Option-Based Awards(4) ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(5) ($)	Pension Value(6) ($)	All Other Compensation(7) ($)	Total Compensation ($)
			PSUs(2) ($)	RSUs(3) ($)
Gregory A.C. Yull	2020	868,400	851,301	462,200	334,107	1,736,800	15,675	54,034	4,322,517
	2019	828,335	961,472	462,557	425,112	1,115,204	15,400	37,135	3,845,215
	2018	799,575	1,012,937	462,473	462,916	757,417	9,900	36,513	3,541,731
Jeffrey Crystal	2020	477,672	195,566	106,183	83,288	716,508	15,675	—	1,594,892
	2019	457,341	220,883	106,265	98,027	460,072	15,400	9,633	1,367,621
	2018	445,678	232,705	106,243	106,237	316,082	9,900	8,824	1,225,669
Douglas Nalette	2020	407,809	103,538	56,214	44,093	407,809	15,675	—	1,035,138
	2019	389,551	116,939	56,252	51,898	261,856	15,400	—	891,896
	2018	379,561	123,203	56,249	56,243	175,987	9,900	—	801,143
Shawn Nelson	2020	379,314	103,538	56,214	44,093	379,314	15,675	—	978,148
	2019	364,193	116,939	56,252	51,898	243,199	15,400	—	847,881
	2018	361,396	123,203	56,249	56,243	167,534	9,900	—	774,525
Joseph Tocci	2020	362,765	103,538	56,214	44,093	362,765	15,675	—	945,050
	2019	347,031	116,939	56,252	51,898	232,933	15,400	—	820,453
	2018	338,154	123,203	56,249	56,243	156,550	9,900	—	740,299

(1)Represents amounts included in each executive’s W-2, rather than the base salary amount.

(2)The amount shown for each PSU award is the grant date fair value of PSUs that were granted to the NEO under the PRSU Plan during the specified financial year. The actual value received, if any, could be different and could also be nil, depending on the level of attainment of the performance objectives of the plan. For more information on the PRSU Plan, see the section entitled “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans”.

For PSU awards granted in 2018 and 2019, the number of PSUs which will be eligible to vest can range from 0 to175% of the grant amount, based on entity performance criteria, specifically the TSR ranking versus the Peer Group and the Company's ROIC Performance over a three year measurement period. For PSU awards granted in 2020, the number of PSUs which will be eligible to vest can range from 0 to175% of the grant amount, based on entity performance criteria, specifically the TSR ranking versus the Peer Group, the TSR ranking versus the Index Group, and the Company's ROIC Performance over a three year measurement period. The base value (or grant date fair value) of a PSU is based 50% on the five-day VWAP of the Shares on the TSX at the grant date (2020: CDN$ 8.63, USD$ 6.07; 2019: CDN$ 18.31, USD$ 13.74; 2018: CDN$ 21.22, USD$ 16.29) and 50% on an estimated value derived using the Monte Carlo simulation model implemented in a risk-neutral framework considering the following assumptions:

PSU Grant Date	March 23, 2020	March 21, 2019	March 21, 2018
Grant recipient	All NEOs above	All NEOs above	All NEOs above
Performance period starting price	CDN$16.25	CDN$16.36	CDN$21.13
Valuation date stock price	CDN$7.24	CDN$18.06	CDN$20.59
Estimated dividend yield	0%	0%	0%
US risk-free interest rate	0.30%	2.36%	2.43%
Canadian risk-free interest rate	0.59%	1.60%	1.96%
Estimated volatility	36%	25%	30%
Term	3 years	3 years	3 years
Result	CDN$7.33	CDN$19.79	CDN$25.36
	(USD$5.10)	(USD$14.82)	(USD$19.39)

(3)The amount shown for each RSU award is the grant date fair value of RSUs that were granted to the NEO under the PRSU Plan during the specified financial year which is calculated as the VWAP of the Shares on the TSX for the five trading days preceding the date. The actual value received, if any, could be different and could also be nil, depending on the value of the Shares on the date of settlement. RSU awards granted will vest on the

58

15th day of February in the year of the third anniversary of the award grant date. For more information on the PRSU Plan, see the section entitled “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans”.

(4)The amount shown for each option-based award is the grant date fair value of stock options that were granted to the NEO under the 2019 ESOP during 2020 and 2019 and ESOP during 2018. The actual value received, if any, could be different and could also be nil, depending on the value of the Shares on the date of exercise. The grant date fair value of awards is estimated at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

Stock Option Grant Date	March 25, 2020	March 25, 2020	March 28, 2019	March 28, 2019
Grant recipient	All NEOs above except Gregory A.C. Yull	Gregory A. C. Yull	All NEOs above except Gregory A.C. Yull	Gregory A. C. Yull
Stock price at grant date	CDN$7.94	CDN$7.94	CDN$17.54	CDN$17.54
Exercise price of awards	CDN$7.94	CDN$7.94	CDN$17.54	CDN$17.54
Expected dividends	10.8%	10.8%	4.3%	4.3%
Canadian risk-free interest rate	0.74%	0.76%	1.44%	1.45%
Estimated volatility	34%	34%	29%	31%
Expected life	5 years	6 years	4 years	6 years
Foreign exchange rate USD to CDN	1.4526	1.4526	1.3380	1.3380
Grant date fair value	CDN$0.67	CDN$0.62	CDN$2.75	CDN$3.22
	(USD$0.46)	(USD$0.43)	(USD$2.05)	(USD$2.41)

Stock Option Grant Date	March 13, 2018	March 13, 2018
Grant recipient	All NEOs above except Gregory A.C. Yull	Gregory A. C. Yull
Stock price at grant date	CDN$21.76	CDN$21.76
Exercise price of awards	CDN$21.76	CDN$21.76
Expected dividends	3.3%	3.3%
Canadian risk-free interest rate	2.01%	2.10%
Estimated volatility	31%	33%
Expected life	4 years	5.6 years
Foreign exchange rate USD to CDN	1.2809	1.2809
Grant date fair value	CDN$4.33	CDN$5.06
	(USD$3.38)	(USD$3.95)

(5)The amounts shown for annual incentive plans represent amounts awarded under the Company’s senior management bonus plan. Award amounts are based on the level of achievement of financial objectives of the Company. See the section above entitled “Annual Incentive Plan Awards – Bonuses” for additional information.

(6)Represents the Company’s contribution to its defined contribution pension plan, which qualifies as a deferred salary arrangement under section 401(k) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. See section below entitled "Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans" for additional information.

(7)Except as otherwise indicated, the value of perquisites received by each of the NEOs, including property or other personal benefits provided to the NEOs that are not generally available to all employees, were not in the aggregate greater than the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the NEO’s total salary for the financial year. Amounts presented are related to an auto allowance and club membership pursuant to the terms of Mr. Yull’s employment agreement and a club membership, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Crystal's employment agreement.

The Company does not have any non-equity, long-term incentive plans.

59

US Deferred Compensation

In the US, the Company provides a deferred compensation plan to certain employees, including the members of senior management. Earnings and losses on the deferral and amounts due to the participants are payable based on participant elections. Assets are held in a Rabbi trust and are composed of corporate owned life insurance policies. Participant investment selections are used to direct the allocation of funds underlying the corporate owned life insurance policies. The following table sets out the eligible compensation deferred in 2020 and the accumulated value as of December 31, 2020 for each NEO.

Name	Compensation Deferred in 2020 ($)	Accumulated Value at Year End ($)
Gregory A.C. Yull	152,453	1,067,266
Jeffrey Crystal	132,489	720,383
Douglas Nalette	—	—
Shawn Nelson	—	—
Joseph Tocci	75,000	531,192

Incentive Plan Awards - Outstanding Option-Based Awards

The following table sets out the details of option-based incentive plan awards outstanding for the NEOs at December 31, 2020, the end of the most recently-completed financial year of the Company.

Name	Number of Unexercised Stock Options (#)	Stock Option Exercise Price (CDN$)	Stock Option Expiration Date	Value of  Unexercised In- the-Money Stock Options(1) (CDN$)
Gregory A.C. Yull	160,000	12.04	6/5/2023	1,936,000
	160,000	12.55	3/17/2024	1,854,400
	117,194	21.76	3/13/2028	278,922
	176,395	17.54	3/28/2029	1,164,207
	776,993	7.94	3/25/2030	12,587,287
Jeffrey Crystal	31,431	21.76	3/13/2023	74,806
	47,818	17.54	3/28/2024	315,599
	181,060	7.94	3/25/2025	2,933,172
Douglas Nalette	16,640	21.76	3/13/2023	39,603
	25,316	17.54	3/28/2024	167,086
	95,855	7.94	3/25/2025	1,552,851
Shawn Nelson	16,640	21.76	3/13/2023	39,603
	25,316	17.54	3/28/2024	167,086
	95,855	7.94	3/25/2025	1,552,851
Joseph Tocci	16,640	21.76	3/13/2023	39,603
	25,316	17.54	3/28/2024	167,086
	95,855	7.94	3/25/2025	1,552,851

(1)This column contains the aggregate value of in-the-money unexercised stock options as of December 31, 2020, calculated based on the difference between the closing price of the Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2020 (being CDN$ 24.14)and the exercise price of the stock options. Actual gains, if any, on exercise will depend on the value of the Shares on the date of exercise. There is no guarantee that gains will be realized.

60

Incentive Plan Awards - Outstanding Share-Based Awards

The following table sets out the details of the share-based incentive plan awards outstanding for the NEOs at December 31, 2020, the end of the most recently-completed financial year of the Company.

	PSUs		RSUs
	Number of PSUs Outstanding(1) (#)	Value of PSUs Outstanding(2) ($)	Number of RSUs Outstanding (#)	Value of RSUs Outstanding(2) ($)
Name	Unvested	Unvested	Unvested	Unvested
Gregory A.C. Yull	276,399	5,226,705	138,200	2,613,362
Jeffrey Crystal	63,497	1,200,728	31,749	600,374
Douglas Nalette	33,617	635,697	16,808	317,839
Shawn Nelson	33,617	635,697	16,808	317,839
Joseph Tocci	33,617	635,697	16,808	317,839

(1)The final number of PSUs that vest will range from 0% to 175% of the initial number awarded based on predetermined performance criteria. Based on the Company’s performance as of December 31, 2020, the number of PSUs earned if all of the outstanding awards were to be settled at December 31, 2020, would be as follows:

Grant Date	Performance Period End Date	Performance
March 21, 2018	December 31, 2020	155.7	%
March 21, 2019	December 31, 2021	138.2	%
March 23, 2020	December 31, 2022	168.7	%

(2)The fair value of the PSUs and RSUs is based on the five-day VWAP of Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2020 (CDN$ 24.28, USD$18.91). Actual gains, if any, on the settlement of awards will depend on the value of the Shares on the date of settlement. There is no guarantee that gains will be realized. The actual value received on settlement, if any, will be different and could also be nil, depending on variations in the price of the Shares.

Incentive Plan Awards – Value Vested, Settled, Realized or Earned During the Year

The following table sets out, for each NEO, the value of option-based awards and share-based awards which vested or settled during the year ended December 31, 2020 and the value of non-equity incentive plan compensation earned during the year ended December 31, 2020. No RSUs were vested during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Name	Option-Based Awards – Value Vested During the Year(1) ($)	Share-Based Awards –  Value Vested During the Year ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Award – Value Earned During the Year(4) ($)
		PSUs - settled(2)(3)
Gregory A.C. Yull	—	—	1,736,800
Jeffrey Crystal	—	—	716,508
Douglas Nalette	—	—	407,809
Shawn Nelson	—	—	379,314
Joseph Tocci	—	—	362,765

(1)The value is calculated as if the stock options were exercised on the vesting date of each relevant grant. The value is equal to the difference between the closing price of the Shares on the vesting date and the exercise price on the vesting date. Actual gains, if any, on exercise will depend on the value of the Shares on the date of exercise. There is no guarantee that gains will be realized. Stock options that vested during the year were not in-the-money as of the vesting date and therefore, the value is nil.

61

(2)For settled PSUs, the value is calculated as the number of PSUs on settlement date multiplied by the performance adjustment factor and the VWAP of Shares on the TSX for the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of settlement. The following table provides the performance adjustments to the Target Shares for the PSUs settled in 2020:

Grant Date	Date Settled	Performance
March 20, 2017	March 20, 2020	0	%

    For more information on the PRSU Plan, see the section entitled “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans”.

(3)Includes a cash payment made to each NEO in an amount equal to the product that results from multiplying the number of settled PSUs by the amount of cash dividends per Share declared and paid by the Company from the date of grant of the PSUs to the settlement date. For more information on the PRSU Plan, see the section entitled “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans”.

(4)The amounts shown for annual incentive plans represent amounts awarded under the Company’s senior management bonus plan. Award amounts are based on the level of achievement of financial objectives of the Company. See the section above entitled “Annual Incentive Plan Awards – Bonuses” for additional information.

The following table sets out, for each NEO, the value realized from option-based awards upon exercise during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Name	Number of Options Exercised (#)	Gains Realized(1) ($)
Gregory A.C. Yull	—	—
Jeffrey Crystal	—	—
Douglas Nalette	—	—
Shawn Nelson	—	—
Joseph Tocci	—	—

(1)The gain realized is equal to the difference between the market value of the Shares on the TSX at exercise and the exercise price multiplied by the number of options exercised and converted to USD based on the exchange rate on the date of exercise. There were no options exercised during the year and therefore, the values in the table are nil.

Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

The Company maintains defined contribution pension plans in the United States and Canada. Each NEO participates in the Intertape Polymer Corp. USA Employees’ Stock Ownership and Retirement Savings Plan (the “US Plan”). The US Plan is a defined contribution pension plan and qualifies as a deferred salary arrangement under section 401(k) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. Under the US Plan, employees who have been employed for at least 90 days may defer a portion of their pre-tax earnings subject to statutory limitations. The Company may make discretionary contributions for the benefit of eligible employees. The US Plan permits eligible employees to choose how their account balances are invested on their behalf within a range of investment options provided by third-party fund managers. The following table sets out the Company’s contributions to the US Plan and the accumulated value as of December 31, 2020 for each NEO.

Name	Accumulated Value at Start of Year ($)	Compensatory(1) ($)	Accumulated Value at Year End ($)
Gregory A.C. Yull	1,880,220	15,675	2,942,758
Jeffrey Crystal	181,872	15,675	456,483
Douglas Nalette	846,496	15,675	1,414,514
Shawn Nelson	1,377,238	15,675	1,768,532
Joseph Tocci	1,090,937	15,675	1,254,945

(1)The Company’s contribution for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 was funded in 2021.

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

The following agreements between the Company and NEOs were in effect at the end of the Company’s most recently-completed financial year.

The Company entered into “change of control, non-interference and confidentiality” agreements as of January 28, 2001 and amended October 24, 2019 with Shawn Nelson, as of October 28, 2004 and amended November 21, 2019 with Douglas Nalette, and as of September 8, 2006 and amended October 24, 2019 with Joseph Tocci. These agreements include provisions regarding confidentiality, non-interference and non-solicitation covenants, and ownership of intellectual property, among other things. The non-interference and non-solicitation covenants survive for 12 months following the employee's

62

voluntary termination of employment, provided however that if the employee resigns within six months after a Change of Control (as defined in such agreements), such covenants shall be null and void.

The “change of control, non-interference and confidentiality” agreements provide also that if, within a period of six months after a Change of Control of the Company: (a) the executive terminates his employment with the Company for Good Reason; or (b) the Company terminates the executive’s employment without cause, such executive will be entitled to (i) severance equal to 12 months of such executive’s base salary at the effective date of such termination, (ii) reimbursement of the employer subsidy portion of the health insurance premiums paid by the executive for health insurance coverage under the Company's plan for up to 12 months after the executive's termination, and (iii) accelerated vesting of any unvested stock options and continued exercisability of all stock options. For this purpose, in summary, "Good Reason" means one or more of the following: (i) reduction of the executive's salary by more than 10% (other than a general reduction affecting comparable employees), (ii) a 50 mile or more relocation of the executive's place of work, or (iii) a material diminution of the executive's duties, authority or responsibility.

On August 2, 2010, the Company entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Gregory A.C. Yull, as amended to date (the "Yull Agreement"). The Yull Agreement includes provisions regarding base salary, annual bonuses, benefits, confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-compete covenants, and ownership of intellectual property, among other things. The non-compete and non-solicitation covenants survive for 12 months following termination of employment, provided however that in the event of a termination other than for cause or resignation for Good Reason, as described below, the covenants survive for 24 months following termination of employment. For this purpose, in summary, "Good Reason" means one or more of the following: (i) a material adverse change in Mr. Yull's position, duties, authority, responsibilities or title, (ii) a reduction in Mr. Yull's remuneration except as permitted under the Yull Agreement, (iii) relocation of Mr. Yull's principal place of work by more than 30 miles, (iv) any breach by the Company of any material provision of the Yull Agreement, or (v) a purported termination by the Company or Mr. Yull's employment other than as permitted by the Yull Agreement.

In the event the Company terminates Mr. Yull’s employment without Cause, or Mr. Yull terminates his employment for Good Reason (except as otherwise summarized in the next paragraph), Mr. Yull shall be entitled to receive a pro-rated performance bonus in respect of the fiscal year in which the termination occurred, based upon the average performance bonus paid to Mr. Yull in the last two fiscal years and severance pay in an amount equal to two times the sum of his annual base salary and the average performance bonus paid to Mr. Yull in the last two fiscal years ending on the date prior to his date of termination. In addition, all unvested stock options that would otherwise vest during the 24 months following the date of termination shall be immediately vested and remain exercisable for a period of 12 months. Mr. Yull shall also be entitled to participate, at active employee rates, in the benefits under the Company's medical and dental benefit program for 24 months and will receive disability and life insurance benefits pursuant to any benefit plans and programs then provided by the Company generally to its executives for a period of 18 months following the date of termination. Lastly, the defined benefit supplemental pension summarized below shall vest.

In the event that the Company terminates Mr. Yull’s employment without Cause or Mr. Yull terminates his employment for Good Reason within two years of a Change of Control, then he shall be entitled to receive a pro-rated performance bonus in respect of the fiscal year in which the termination occurred, based upon the average performance bonus paid to Mr. Yull in the last two fiscal years and severance pay in an amount equal to three times the sum of his annual base salary and the average performance bonus paid in the last two fiscal years immediately preceding the date of termination. In addition, all unvested stock options held by Mr. Yull that would otherwise vest during the 36 months following the date of termination shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for a period of 36 months following the date of termination. Mr. Yull shall also be entitled to participate, at active employee rates, in the Company’s medical and dental benefit program for 36 months (or, if earlier, until such time as he reaches the age of eligibility for coverage under Medicare) and will receive disability and life insurance benefits pursuant to any benefit plans and programs then provided by the Company generally to its executives for a period of 36 months following the date of termination. Lastly, the defined benefit supplemental pension summarized below shall vest. For any future Chief Executive Officer, it is the HRCC's intention to recommend that the severance multiple referred to above be reduced to two times the sum of his or her annual base salary and the period of the benefits would be reduced to 24 months.

Under the Yull Agreement, in the event that Mr. Yull’s employment is terminated as a result of his Permanent Disability, as defined in the Yull Agreement, or death, he shall be entitled to receive a pro-rated performance bonus that he would have received in respect of the fiscal year in which the termination occurred and all unvested stock options held by Mr. Yull shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for a period of nine months following the date of termination for Permanent Disability or death.

63

Pursuant to a retirement agreement, dated August 10, 2017 amending and restating certain retirement benefit provisions in the Yull Agreement, unless terminated by the Company for Cause (as defined in the Yull Agreement), he shall receive a monthly defined benefit supplemental pension for life in annual amount equal to the lesser of: (i) $600,000 if he separates from service at age 65 or older, $570,000 at age 64, $540,000 at age 63, $510,000 at age 62, $480,000 at age 61, or $450,000 at age 60 or younger; and (ii) two percent of the average of his total cash compensation (base salary and performance bonus) for the highest five years of his employment during the prior ten years as of the time of separation, multiplied by his years of service with the Company, with such payments to begin at the later of retirement or age 60. In the event of Mr. Yull’s death, his surviving spouse would receive 50% of the annual supplemental pension benefit that was being paid to Mr. Yull at the time of his death or that would have been paid to Mr. Yull if he had retired on the date of his death. The retirement benefits set forth above were vested upon the completion of five years of service.

    On May 5, 2017, the Company entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Jeffrey Crystal, which was amended on November 21, 2019 (the "Crystal Agreement"). The Crystal Agreement includes provisions regarding base salary, annual bonuses, benefits, confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition covenants, and ownership of intellectual property, among other things. The non-competition and non-solicitation covenants survive for 24 months following termination of employment.

    In the event that Mr. Crystal’s employment is terminated by the Company other than for cause or in connection with a Change of Control (as defined in the Crystal Agreement), then he shall be entitled to receive a pro-rated performance bonus in respect of the fiscal year in which the termination occurred, based upon the average performance bonus paid to Mr. Crystal in the last two fiscal years and severance pay in an amount equal to one and a half times the sum of his annual base salary and the average performance bonus paid in the last two fiscal years immediately preceding the date of termination.

    Alternatively, if Mr. Crystal is involuntarily terminated or terminates his employment for Good Reason within six months of a Change of Control, then he shall be entitled to receive a pro-rated performance bonus in respect of the fiscal year in which the termination occurred, based upon the average performance bonus paid to Mr. Crystal in the last two fiscal years and severance pay in an amount equal to two times the sum of his annual base salary and the average performance bonus paid in the last two fiscal years immediately preceding the date of termination. In addition, in such case, all of Mr. Crystal's vested stock options shall remain exercisable for the remainder of their respective terms and unvested equity awards then held by Mr. Crystal shall vest in full. For this purpose, in summary, "Good Reason" means one or more of the following: (i) the Company's failure to perform its obligations under the Crystal Agreement other than an isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent failure not occurring in bad faith; (ii) a material decrease in Mr. Crystal's salary, benefits, authority, responsibilities, staff support, or a material negative and unreasonable change to Mr. Crystal's job conditions, subject to certain exceptions; or (iii) the Company's failure to obtain assumption of the Crystal Agreement by a successor or assignee of the Company,

    If Mr. Crystal is entitled to severance payments and elects continuation coverage of any Company medical insurance benefits, the Company will pay premiums to the plan(s) on Mr. Crystal's behalf for the duration of the period in which he is receiving severance payments.

Under the Crystal Agreement, in the event that Mr. Crystal’s employment is terminated as a result of his death or disability, he or his estate shall be entitled to receive a pro-rated performance bonus that he would have received in respect of the fiscal year in which the termination occurred, based upon the average performance bonus paid to Mr. Crystal in the last two fiscal years.

Refer to the section set out below under “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” for termination clauses applicable to the Performance and Restricted Share Unit Plan and the Executive Stock Option Plan.

Estimated Termination Payments

The table below reflects incremental amounts or values, in addition to salary and performance bonuses that have already been earned, that would have been payable to or received by each NEO if his employment had been terminated on December 31, 2020 based on the terms described above:

64

		Severance	RSUs(1)	PSUs(1)	Stock Options(2)	Other Payments(3)	Total
Name	Event	$	$	$	$	$	$
Gregory A.C. Yull	Termination by the Company other than for cause or Resignation for good reason	3,576,021	—	—	7,255,711	52,399	10,884,131
	Termination by the Company other than for cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a Change of Control	5,364,032	2,736,631	5,473,241	10,543,091	87,904	24,204,899
	No assumption of awards upon a Change of Control (4)	—	2,736,631	5,473,241	10,470,245	—	18,680,117
	Offer for all or a portion of the Company's Shares (no termination required)(5)	—	—	—	72,846	—	72,846
	Retirement	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Permanent disability	—	2,736,631	5,473,241	10,543,091	—	18,752,963
	Death	—	2,736,631	5,473,241	10,543,091	—	18,752,963
Jeffrey Crystal	Termination by the Company other than for cause	1,284,845	—	—	—	35,947	1,320,792
	Termination by the Company other than for cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a Change of Control	1,713,126	628,693	1,257,365	2,482,527	47,930	6,129,641
	No assumption of awards upon a Change of Control (4)	—	628,693	1,257,365	2,462,990	—	4,349,048
	Offer for all or a portion of the Company's Shares (no termination required)(5)	—	—	—	19,537	—	19,537
	Retirement	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Permanent disability	—	628,693	1,257,365	2,462,990	—	4,349,048
	Death	—	628,693	1,257,365	2,462,990	—	4,349,048
Douglas Nalette	Termination by the Company other than for cause	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Termination by the Company other than for cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a Change of Control	399,967	332,831	665,682	1,314,275	18,024	2,730,779
	No assumption of awards upon a Change of Control (4)	—	332,831	665,682	1,303,931	—	2,302,444
	Offer for all or a portion of the Company's Shares (no termination required)(5)	—	—	—	10,344	—	10,344
	Retirement	—	153,515	307,050	1,303,931	—	1,764,496
	Permanent disability	—	332,831	665,682	1,303,931	—	2,302,444
	Death	—	332,831	665,682	1,303,931	—	2,302,444
Shawn Nelson	Termination by the Company other than for cause	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Termination by the Company other than for cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a Change of Control	378,753	332,831	665,682	1,314,275	28,588	2,720,129
	No assumption of awards upon a Change of Control (4)	—	332,831	665,682	1,303,931	—	2,302,444
	Offer for all or a portion of the Company's Shares (no termination required)(5)	—	—	—	10,344	—	10,344
	Retirement	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Permanent disability	—	332,831	665,682	1,303,931	—	2,302,444
	Death	—	332,831	665,682	1,303,931	—	2,302,444
Joseph Tocci	Termination by the Company other than for cause	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Termination by the Company other than for cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a Change of Control	355,789	332,831	665,682	1,314,275	27,884	2,696,461
	No assumption of awards upon a Change of Control (4)	—	332,831	665,682	1,303,931	—	2,302,444
	Offer for all or a portion of the Company's Shares (no termination required)(5)	—	—	—	10,344	—	10,344
	Retirement	—	—	—	—	—	—
	Permanent disability	—	332,831	665,682	1,303,931	—	2,302,444
	Death	—	332,831	665,682	1,303,931	—	2,302,444

65

(1)    The value of the PSUs and RSUs is based on the five-day VWAP of Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2020 (being CDN$ 24.28, USD$ 18.91). Includes dividend equivalent amounts. Actual value will depend on the value of the Shares on the date of award settlement.

(2)    The value of the stock options is calculated based on the difference between the closing price of the Shares on the TSX on December 31, 2020 (being CDN$ 24.14, USD$ 18.91)and the exercise price of the stock options. Actual gains, if any, on exercise will depend on the value of the Shares on the date of exercise. There is no guarantee that gains will be realized.

(3)    Represents continuation of benefits, including medical, dental and other insurance benefits.

(4)    For stock options, the same amount would be payable in the event stock options are assumed in connection with a Change of Control by a company whose stock is not publicly traded on a North American stock exchange.

(5)    Amount shown assumes an offer to purchase all of the Company's Shares and the option holder's agreement to tender all of the option holder's Shares.

There would be nil incremental amounts payable to each NEO if his employment had been terminated for cause on December 31, 2020.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets out certain details as of December 31, 2020 with respect to equity awards granted under the Company's plans.

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options, warrants and rights (#) (a)	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options, warrants and rights (CDN$) (b)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (#) (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
ESOP	553,057	16.28	—	(1)
2019 ESOP	1,896,165	9.78	4,006,540
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	2,449,222	11.25	4,006,540	(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	—	—	—
Total	2,449,222	11.25	4,006,540	(2)

(1)    In accordance with the TSX rules, no further grants of stock options can be made under the ESOP since June 4, 2018, the date on which the ESOP lapsed.

(2)    Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options represents 4.1 percent of outstanding Shares as of December 31, 2020.

The annual burn rate of the ESOP and 2019 ESOP is calculated by dividing the number of stock options granted under the respective plan during the fiscal year by the weighted average number of Shares outstanding during the fiscal year.

ESOP	2018
Stock options granted	242,918
Burn rate	0.4	%

2019 ESOP	2019		2020
Stock options granted	392,986		1,533,183
Burn rate	0.7	%	2.6	%

66

ESOP

The Company adopted the ESOP in 1992, which was amended on several occasions before lapsing on June 4, 2018. The 553,057 Shares issuable upon the exercise of the stock options outstanding under the ESOP as of December 31, 2020, remain subject to the terms and conditions of the ESOP. The following is a description of certain features of the ESOP:

a.stock options expire not later than ten years after the date of grant and, unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, all vested stock options under a particular grant expire 24 months after the vesting date of the last tranche of such grant;

b.if a stock option is to expire during a period when the optionee is prohibited by the Company from trading in the Shares pursuant to the policies of the Company (a “Blackout Period”), or within ten business days of the expiry of such Blackout Period, the term of such stock option will be automatically extended for a period of ten business days immediately following the end of the Blackout Period;

c.stock options that are granted to directors who are not executive officers of the Company vest as to 25% on the date of grant, with another 25% vesting on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant;

d.all other stock options granted vest as to one-fourth on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant for stock options granted prior to June 11, 2014 and vest as to one-third on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant for stock options granted on or after June 11, 2014;

e.stock options granted under the ESOP may not at any time be repriced;

f.stock options granted under the ESOP may not be assigned;

g.in the event that a bona fide offer to purchase all or part of the outstanding Shares is made to all shareholders, notice thereof must be given by the Company to all optionees and all stock options will become immediately exercisable, but only to the extent necessary to enable an optionee to tender his or her Shares should the optionee so desire; and

h.the ESOP does not provide for financial assistance from the Company to optionees.

2019 ESOP

On March 12, 2019, the Board of Directors adopted the 2019 ESOP, which was approved by Shareholders on June 6, 2019.

The purpose of the 2019 ESOP is to promote a proprietary interest in the Company among the executives, key employees and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries, in order to both encourage such persons to further the development of the Company and assist the Company in attracting and retaining key personnel necessary for the Company’s long-term success. The Board of Directors designates from time-to-time those persons to whom stock options are to be granted and determines the number of common shares subject to such stock options. Generally, participation is limited to persons holding positions that can have an impact on the Company’s long-term results.

The following is a description of certain features of the 2019 ESOP. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the actual text of the 2019 ESOP.

The 2019 ESOP allows for the grant of stock options to the employees and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries. The 2019 ESOP does not allow for the grant of stock options to non-employee members of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is responsible for administering the 2019 ESOP, and the HRCC makes recommendations to the Board of Directors in respect of matters relating to the 2019 ESOP.

The Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, from time to time designates the employees or consultants to whom stock options shall be granted, the number of Shares to be covered by each stock option granted and the terms and conditions of such stock option.

The maximum number of Shares issuable under the 2019 ESOP shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding Shares, as calculated on the date of grant of each stock option. The foregoing maximum does not include the stock options previously granted pursuant to the ESOP. All of the Shares covered by exercised, expired, cancelled or forfeited stock options granted

67

under the 2019 ESOP shall become available Shares for the purposes of stock options that may be subsequently granted under the 2019 ESOP.

Any holder, at the time of the granting of the stock option, may hold more than one stock option. However, no holder will be able to hold stock options under the 2019 ESOP to purchase Shares exceeding 5% of the number of Shares issued and outstanding from time to time. The number of Shares issuable to insiders of the Company, at any time, under the 2019 ESOP or any other security based compensation arrangement of the Company cannot exceed 10% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding Shares. In addition, the number of Shares issued to insiders of the Company, within any one year period, under the 2019 ESOP or any other security based compensation arrangement of the Company cannot exceed 10% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding Shares.

The exercise price for each Share covered by a stock option shall be established by the Board at the time of grant, but shall not be less than the closing market price of the Shares on the TSX on the trading day immediately preceding the date of grant of the stock option. The Board of Directors has the discretion to determine the vesting schedule of the stock option and the Board shall have the full power and authority to accelerate the vesting or exercisability of all or any portion of any stock option. All stock options that have been granted under the 2019 ESOP vest one-third on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.

A stock option shall be exercisable after satisfaction of the vesting conditions, if any, established by the Board and shall terminate not later than ten years after the date of the granting of the stock option. The 2019 ESOP provides that the exercise period shall automatically be extended if the date on which it is scheduled to terminate shall fall during a blackout period or within ten business days after the last day of a blackout period. In such cases, the extended exercise period shall terminate ten business days after the last day of the blackout period, provided that the stock option shall terminate earlier on the scheduled termination date if necessary for compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

The 2019 ESOP also provides that equitable adjustments, if any, will be made by the Board of Directors in connection with any reorganization, change in the number of issued and outstanding Shares by reason of stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, combination or exchange of shares or other similar corporate change, including adjustments to the kind of shares issuable under the 2019 ESOP, exercise price and/or the number or kind of shares to which a holder is entitled upon exercise of stock options.

The following table generally describes the impact of certain events upon the rights of holders of stock options under the 2019 ESOP. For purposes of the table below, in summary, "Good Reason" means one or more of the following: (i) material diminution of the optionee's duties, authority or responsibility, (ii) a 5% or greater reduction in the optionee's base salary, target bonus and target long-term incentive, or (iii) a 35 mile or more change in the geographic location of optionee's primary work facility or location.

68

Event	Provisions
Resignation without Good Reason	Forfeiture of all unvested stock options Exercise vested stock options before the earlier of (i) 90 days after termination, or (ii) the expiration of the stock option period (or as otherwise expressly provided in an employment or consultant contract)
Termination for fraud or other serious misconduct	Immediate forfeiture of all vested and unvested stock options
Death, Retirement or permanent disability	Immediate vesting of all unvested stock options Exercise vested stock options before the earlier of (i) 365 days after event, or (ii) the expiration of the stock option period
Involuntary termination (other than for fraud or other serious misconduct) or Resignation for Good Reason(as defined in the 2019 ESOP), in each case, within 2 years of a Change of Control	Immediate vesting of all unvested stock options
Change of Control (as defined in the 2019 ESOP)	As determined by the Company in its sole discretion: (i) continuation of the stock option in accordance with its terms; (ii) equitable assumption, conversion or exchange of stock options into or for stock options, rights or other securities in any entity participating in or resulting from a Change of Control; (iii) cancellation or deemed exercise of stock options (whether vested or unvested) with fully vested payment to the holder of an amount per cancelled or deemed exercised stock option share (whether vested or unvested) equal to the positive difference between the per share Change of Control price and the applicable exercise price and taxes; and/or (iv) cancellation without payment to the holder (with possibility to exercise all vested and unvested stock options for fully vested shares within 21 days prior to the Change of Control or such other reasonable period under the circumstances). To the extent that (i) and/or (ii) applies to a stock option and such stock option will cease to cover securities listed on a North American stock exchange, the holder can exercise all vested and unvested stock options for fully vested shares within 21 days prior to the Change of Control or such other reasonable period under the circumstances.

The Board of Directors may amend the 2019 ESOP or any stock option at any time without the consent of the holders of stock options provided that such amendment shall (i) not adversely alter or impair any stock option previously granted except as permitted by the terms of the 2019 ESOP, (ii) be subject to any required approval of any securities regulatory authority or the TSX, and (iii) be subject to shareholder approval where required by law or the requirements of the TSX.

The Board of Directors shall generally be required to obtain shareholder approval to make the following amendments:

•a reduction in the exercise price of stock options or a cancellation and reissuance of stock options or other entitlements;

•an extension of the maximum exercise period of a stock option beyond the maximum original expiry date established for such stock option at the time of grant (subject to the extension applicable in the event of a blackout period);

•any amendment to remove or to exceed the limits on holdings by insiders;

•an increase to the maximum number of Shares issuable under the 2019 ESOP;

•any amendment to expand the definition of “Optionee” provided in the 2019 ESOP;

•any amendment that would extend the term of a stock option granted to an insider for the purposes of the TSX Company Manual;

69

•any amendment which would permit stock options granted under the 2019 ESOP to be transferable or assignable other than for normal estate settlement purposes; and

•any amendment to the amendment provisions of the 2019 ESOP.

Stock options granted under the 2019 ESOP are not assignable or transferable other than by will or under the law of succession.

As of December 31, 2020, there were 1,896,165 stock options outstanding under the 2019 ESOP. Under the 2019 ESOP, there were 4,006,540 options available for grant, representing 6.8% of the issued and outstanding Shares as of March 12, 2021.

Performance and Restricted Share Unit Plan

The purpose of the PRSU Plan (formerly known as the Performance Share Unit Plan) is to provide executive officers and employees with a proprietary interest in the Company through the granting of PSUs and RSUs. The PRSU Plan is also intended to increase the interest in the Company’s welfare of those executive officers and employees who share primary responsibility for the management, growth and protection of the business of the Company, to furnish an incentive to such executive officers and employees to continue their service to the Company and its subsidiaries, and to provide a means through which the Company and its subsidiaries may attract able persons to accept employment.

On May 9, 2016, the Board of Directors amended the Performance Share Unit Plan (“PSU Plan”) to provide for accelerated vesting of PSUs on retirement of an executive officer or employee, subject to certain conditions, and upon the death or disability (as defined in the PSU plan) of the executive officer or employee, and to provide for the possibility of settling PSUs in cash, at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Under the policies of the TSX and the terms of the PSU Plan, the amendment was not subject to shareholder approval.

On November 10, 2016, the Board of Directors adopted a “Supplement for US Participants” to the PSU Plan for participants in the PSU Plan who are residents of the United States for tax purposes. The “Supplement for US Participants” was not subject to shareholder approval.

On February 17, 2017, the Board of Directors again amended the PSU Plan, to provide for cash only settlement of PSUs. Under the policies of the TSX and the terms of the PSU Plan, the amendment was not subject to shareholder approval.All of the foregoing amendments to the PSU Plan were approved by the TSX.

On March 7, 2018, the Board of Directors approved the addition of RSUs as an available award type, thus renaming the plan the Amended and Restated Performance and Restricted Share Unit Plan.

On November 8, 2019, the Board of Directors again amended the PRSU Plan to require a one-year minimum vesting period for PSU and RSU awards granted thereunder, subject to certain exceptions.

The following is a summary of the material terms of the PRSU Plan and is subject to, and qualified by, the full text of the PRSU Plan.

The Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may from time to time approve the grant of PSUs and RSUs to one or more executive officers or employees in respect of future services, the number of PSUs and RSUs to be granted and the terms and conditions of such PSUs and RSUs. Each grant will be evidenced by a grant letter from the Company addressed to the executive officer or employee, setting out the date of grant, the number of units granted, the performance objective(s) which must be attained in order for PSUs to be earned, any applicable reduction or increase in the number of PSUs depending on the level of attainment of the relevant performance objective(s), the vesting conditions, the settlement period, and any other terms and conditions applicable to such PSUs and RSUs.

For PSUs granted in March 2018 and 2019, the number of PSUs that will be eligible to vest can range from 0% to 175% of the Target Shares as determined by multiplying the number of PSUs awarded by the adjustment factors as follows:

•50% based on the Company's TSR relative to the Peer Group over the three-year performance measurement period as set out on the table below.

•50% based on the Company's ROIC Performance over the three-year performance measurement period as set out on the table below.

70

For PSUs granted in March 2020, the number of PSUs that will be eligible to vest can range from 0% to 175% of the Target Shares as determined by multiplying the number of PSUs awarded by the adjustment factors as follows:

•25% based on the Company's TSR relative to the Peer Group over the three-year performance measurement period as set out on the table below.

•25% based on the Company's TSR ranking relative to the Index Group over the three-year performance measurement period as set out on the table below.

•50% based on the Company's ROIC Performance over the three-year performance measurement period as set out on the table below.

The relative TSR performance adjustment factor is determined as follows:

TSR Ranking Relative to the Peer Group	Percent of Target Shares Vested (%)
Less than the 25th percentile	0
25th percentile	50
50th percentile	100
75th percentile	150
90th percentile or higher	200

The ROIC Performance adjustment factor is determined as follows:

ROIC Performance	Percent of Target Shares Vested (%)
1st Tier	0
2nd Tier	50
3rd Tier	100
4th Tier	150

The TSR performance and ROIC Performance adjustment factors between the numbers set out in the two tables above is interpolated on a straight-line basis.

The level of attainment of the performance objective(s) and the number of PSUs earned and eligible to vest will be determined by the Board of Directors from time to time. Upon such determination by the Board, the Company will deliver to the executive officer or employee a letter confirming the number of PSUs earned by the executive officer or employee. Any PSUs not earned in accordance with the foregoing will expire and the executive officer or employee will not have any rights or entitlements whatsoever in respect of any such PSUs.

Each grant of RSUs shall be evidenced by a Grant Letter from the Company addressed to the Participant setting out the date of grant, the number of RSUs granted, the vesting conditions, and any other terms and conditions applicable to such RSUs. The vesting of RSUs is determined by the Board of Directors from time to time.

Once a PSU or RSU is earned and has vested in accordance with the grant letter and the PRSU Plan, it shall be settled during a period established by the Board of Directors in accordance with the grant letter (generally in the third calendar year following the calendar year of grant, subject to certain exceptions).

The Company will settle the PSUs or RSUs by delivering to the executive officer or employee an amount in cash equal to the value of the number of settled PSUs or RSUs based on a five-day VWAP of the Shares on the TSX, subject to statutory withholdings by the Company.

Additionally, upon settlement, the Company or a subsidiary will make a lump-sum cash payment to an executive officer or employee, net of any withholdings, in an amount equal to the product that results from multiplying the number of settled PSUs and RSUs by the amount of cash dividends per Share declared and paid by the Company from the date of grant of the PSUs and RSUs to such executive officer or employee to the settlement date.

In the event of a “Change of Control” of the Company, as that term is defined in the PRSU Plan, all unvested PSUs and RSUs shall (i) either be assumed or continued by the successor entity or shall be replaced by or substituted for a new plan and new PSUs and RSUs of the successor entity with identical terms and conditions, subject to an equitable adjustment as set forth in the PRSU Plan, or (ii) if not assumed, continued, replaced, or substituted as contemplated in clause (i), the Board shall accelerate

71

vesting of all unvested PSUs and RSUs, with effect as of the “Change of Control”, with, in the case of PSUs, the deemed attainment of 100% of the relevant performance objective(s) or such higher level of deemed attainment as is determined by the Board in its discretion. In the event a holder of PSUs or RSUs ceases to be an executive officer or employee of the Company or one of its subsidiaries as a result of termination without cause within one year following a “Change of Control”, all unvested PSUs and RSUs shall vest on the date that is his or her last day of work for the Company or a Subsidiary, with deemed attainment of 100% of the relevant performance objective(s) in the case of PSUs.

For awards granted after May 9, 2016, if an executive officer or employee ceases to be an executive officer or employee by reason of death or disability (as defined in the PRSU Plan), all unvested PSUs or RSUs held by the executive officer or employee as of his or her last working day, as defined by the PRSU Plan, shall automatically vest (with PSUs vesting at deemed goal achievement of 100%). Furthermore, if an executive officer or employee ceases to be an executive officer or employee by reason of retirement at age 59 and  1⁄2 or older and has completed at least five years of service with the Company or one of its subsidiaries, all unvested PSUs or RSUs which the executive officer or employee has held for at least one year as of the executive officer’s or employee’s last working day shall automatically vest, subject to the achievement of the applicable performance conditions in the case of PSUs. If, prior to the vesting date, a holder of PSUs or RSUs ceases to be an executive officer or employee of the Company or one of its subsidiaries for any other reason, including, without limitation, retirement (other than noted above), resignation, voluntarily departure, termination for cause or termination without cause (other than noted above regarding “Change of Control”), all unvested PSUs and RSUs shall be cancelled and be of no further force or effect whatsoever.

PSUs and RSUs may not be assigned or transferred, other than by will or the laws of succession.

As of December 31, 2020, there were 1,223,053 PSUs and 497,287 RSUs outstanding.

Deferred Share Unit Plan

On April 22, 2014, the Board of Directors adopted the DSU Plan. The purpose of the DSU Plan is to provide participants with a form of compensation which promotes greater alignment of the interests of the participants and the shareholders of the Company in creating long-term shareholder value. The DSU Plan is administered by the HRCC and authorizes the Company to award DSUs to any member of the Board of Directors of the Company who is not an executive officer or employee of the Company. Under the DSU Plan, each director may receive DSUs as a result of a grant and/or in lieu of cash for semi-annual directors’ fees. DSUs are settled, in cash only, when the director ceases to be a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.

The Board of Directors amended the DSU Plan on September 10, 2018 in order to provide that the participants in the DSU Plan be also entitled to a dividend equivalent payment, payable in additional DSUs equal to the amount of dividends paid on Shares to which the DSUs held by them relate. The Board of Directors again amended the DSU Plan on November 8, 2019 in order to, among other changes, change the grant date for annual grants of DSUs from June to immediately following the Meeting. Most recently, the Board of Directors amended the DSU Plan on December 7, 2020 to (i) align the annual grant date of DSUs with the grant date of annual equity awards to the Company's executive officers, (ii) provide for annual meeting to annual meeting vesting of future DSU grants (with acceleration in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the DSU Plan)), and (iii) allow participants to elect to receive settlement of their DSUs in the calendar year that their services end or in the following calendar year in accordance with, and to extent permitted by, applicable tax rules.

As of December 31, 2020, there were 386,541 DSUs outstanding.

72

INDEBTEDNESS OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Aggregate Indebtedness

None of the executive officers, directors, employees or former executive officers, directors and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries as of March 26, 2021, owe any indebtedness to the Company and its subsidiaries, and no indebtedness of such persons to other entities was the subject of a guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar arrangement or understanding provided by the Company or any subsidiary thereof.

Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers under Securities Purchase and Other Programs

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, and as of the date of this Circular, none of the directors, executive officers, employees (or previous directors, executive officers or employees of the Company) or proposed nominees for election as a director of the Company (or any associate of a director, executive officer or proposed nominee) was or is indebted to the Company with respect to the purchase of securities of the Company and for any other reason pursuant to a loan.

INTEREST OF INFORMED PERSONS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

For the purposes of this Circular, “informed person” means: (i) a director or executive officer of the Company; (ii) a director or executive officer of a person or Company that is itself an informed person or subsidiary of the Company; (iii) any person or Company who beneficially owns, or exercises control or direction over, directly or indirectly, voting securities of the Company or a combination of both, carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all outstanding voting securities of the Company, other than voting securities held by the person or Company as underwriter in the course of a distribution; and (iv) the Company if it has purchased, redeemed or otherwise acquired any of its own securities, for so long as it holds any of its securities.

To the best of the Company’s knowledge, no informed person or proposed director of the Company, and no associate or affiliate of the foregoing persons, at any time since the beginning of its last completed financial year, has or had any material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in any transaction since the beginning of its last completed financial year that has materially affected the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or in any proposed transaction that could materially affect the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or in any matter to be acted upon at this Meeting.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

The CBCA provides that a Registered Shareholder or a Beneficial Shareholder that is entitled to vote at an annual meeting of the Company may submit to the Company notice of any matter that the person proposes to raise at the meeting (referred to as a “Proposal”) and discuss at the meeting any matter in respect of which the person would have been entitled to submit a Proposal. The CBCA further provides that the Company must set out the Proposal in its management proxy circular along with, if so requested by the person who makes the Proposal, a statement in support of the Proposal by such person. However, the Company will not be required to set out the Proposal in its management proxy circular or include a supporting statement if, among other things, the Proposal is not submitted to the Company at least 90 days before the anniversary date of the notice of meeting that was sent to the shareholders in connection with the previous annual meeting of shareholders of the Company. As the notice in connection with the Meeting is dated March 26, 2021, the deadline for submitting a Proposal to the Company in connection with the next annual meeting of shareholders is January 25, 2022.

The foregoing is a summary only. Shareholders should carefully review the provisions of the CBCA relating to Proposals and consult with a legal advisor.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL & GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

Sustainability

The values of a safe work environment, environmental stewardship, efficiency in raw material and energy usage, and good corporate citizenship are a key part of the Company's culture, values and focus. The Company has been embracing sustainability as a strategy to help it perform better for its customers, business partners, employees, investors and shareholders, and the communities in which it operates. In 2020, the Board of Directors formed the ESG Committee and the Company

73

established a formal sustainability department within the Company that is overseen by the CFO who reports directly to the CEO. The sustainability department has developed teams throughout the Company, called the Sustainable Value Network ("SVN"), to establish a framework to ensure a focus on sustainability throughout our business.

The core SVN teams are as follows:

•Product and material innovation

•Circular economy solutions

•Operational footprint

•People and communities

The Company's dedicated SVN teams are responsible for establishing benchmarks, setting targets and developing data collection to measure the Company's progress.

The Company published its Corporate Environmental Policy on its website at www.itape.com/sustainability. The policy applies to the organization's activities, products and services worldwide. Leadership at the Company has committed to being environmental leader by fulfilling the Company's compliance obligations, enhancing environmental performance through continual improvement activities, prevention of pollution and meeting commitments made with organizations with which the Company engages. It is the responsibility of the Company's employees to demonstrate excellence in environmental stewardship. Through the awareness, commitment and capability of its employees, the Company expects to successfully meet its stated environmental objectives.

On July 9, 2020, the Company issued its annual sustainability report "We Package, We Protect & We Sustain" (the "Sustainability Report"), which provides an overview of the Company's sustainability approach, its product and material innovation, the circular economy, its operational footprint and its progress in 2019 on sustainability initiatives as well as sustainability opportunities in the years ahead. The complete report is available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com/sustainability. Additional Company achievements in 2020 include:

•Achieved Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Silver level for Exlfilmplus® Shrink Film, StretchFLEX® and SuperFLEX® Stretch Film

•Achieved Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Bronze level for Water Activated Tape and NovaShield® Structure Membrane

•Certified the recyclability of non-reinforced water-activated tape through the Western Michigan Old Corrugated Cardboard Equivalency protocol

•Qualified reinforced water-activated tape as recyclable through internal testing based on normal recyclability yields and protocols

•Awarded the 2020 ENERGY STAR® Partner of the Year - Sustained Excellence designation(1)

•Committed to the Association of Plastic Recyclers to be a Demand Champion in 2021 by reporting the Company’s impact on the demand for post-consumer resin

•Proud initial donor to the University of Florida’s “Waste-to-Syngas” initiative

(1)     ENERGY STAR® is the U.S. government-backed symbol for energy efficiency, providing information that consumers and businesses rely on to make well-informed decisions. Industrial, commercial, utility, state, and local organizations partner with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to deliver cost-saving energy efficiency solutions that improve air quality and protect the climate. The ENERGY STAR Partner of the Year Award distinguishes corporate energy management programs. It is the highest level of EPA recognition. Partners must perform at a superior level of energy management and meet the following criteria: demonstrate best practices across the organization; prove organization-wide energy savings; and participate actively and communicate the benefits of ENERGY STAR. The ENERGY STAR Sustained Excellence Award recognizes organizations that have consistently earned Partner of the Year for several years in a row. Annual achievements must continue to surpass those in previous years. Sustained Excellence is presented to a partner at the EPA’s discretion.

Human Capital Management

The Sustainability Report also provides an overview of the Company's commitment to (i) its employees and stakeholders, including to worker safety, education, training and development, diversity and inclusion, employee retention, and human rights, (ii) its communities, including to corporate philanthropy, stakeholder engagement and partnerships, collaborations and memberships, and (iii) governance.

74

Worker Safety

At the heart of the Company's corporate values is its commitment to people. Providing a safe work environment is one of its top priorities, and each employee shares the responsibility for maintaining a safe and healthy workplace.

With respect to COVID-19, the Company has implemented measures to prioritize the health and safety of its employees while protecting its assets, customers, suppliers, shareholders and other stakeholders. The following is an overview of the status of the Company's worker safety and well-being efforts during the year ended December 31, 2020:

•The Company's facilities are open and operating, having qualified as essential under the applicable government orders and guidelines.

•Management has put measures in place to enable employees to work safely according to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization guidelines and other applicable state and local guidelines, including requiring employees to practice social distancing, to wear protective face coverings provided by the Company while in its manufacturing facilities and to complete health interviews prior to entry on a regular basis. The Company has significantly increased the frequency of cleaning and sanitizing equipment and facilities in the context of COVID-19 and the Company continues to support remote work arrangements for approximately 20% of its workforce in North America. The remote work arrangements have not had any significant effect on the Company's ability to conduct its day-to-day operations.

•Employee health coverage has been enhanced to include the cost of COVID-19 testing and treatment at no additional cost to employees, and the higher risk workforce or those experiencing illness of any kind are strongly encouraged to stay at home or shelter in place.

Ethical Business Conduct and Human Rights Policy

The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics ("Code of Conduct") applies to each of the Company’s directors, officers and employees. A copy of the Code of Conduct is available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

All directors, officers and employees of the Company are strongly encouraged to discuss all issues with appropriate personnel at the Company in cases in which they suspect that a potential breach of the Code of Conduct may have occurred. Any material waiver of a provision of the Code of Conduct for executive officers or directors of the Company may be made only by the Board of Directors or a committee thereof and will be promptly disclosed as required by law or by the regulations of the TSX. To the knowledge of the directors and officers of the Company, there has not been any material instance of departure from the Code of Conduct within the last twelve months. Persons who violate the standards set out in the Code of Conduct may be subject to disciplinary action. No requests for waivers with respect to the Code of Conduct were brought to the Board of Directors during the last fiscal year. Therefore, no material change report pertaining to any conduct of a director or executive that constitutes a departure from the Code of Conduct was filed.

The Code of Conduct is provided to each employee of the Company at the time of his or her commencement of employment, as well as to each director and officer of the Company at the time of his or her election or appointment. The Code of Conduct covers a variety of subject matters that are related to proper business conduct and ethics, including conflicts of interest, discrimination and harassment in the work place, the health and safety of employees, confidentiality obligations and insider-trading prohibitions. Compliance with these subject matters is ultimately monitored by the Board of Directors in different ways depending on the specific matter in question.

The Company follows regular trading black-out periods each financial quarter, as set out in the Company's Insider Trading Policy, and communicates the start and end of each period to the Company's personnel in writing at the designated time. Members of the Board of Directors may be involved when a decision has to be made as to whether an additional trading black-out period is warranted in the event that certain material information may be accessible by the Company’s personnel prior to its disclosure to the public.

The Company’s supervisors and managers are responsible for regularly monitoring matters such as discrimination and harassment and the health and safety of employees. These managers prepare written reports dealing with such matters on a regular basis. The reports are then reviewed by members of senior management, who are responsible for bringing any specific concerns to the attention of the Board of Directors.

75

The Code of Conduct sets out that employees are to discuss any compliance matters or concerns with a supervisor or manager, human resources, the Company's legal department, or through the IPG Business Conduct and Ethics Hotline. The Company’s supervisors, managers and internal and external legal counsel have access to the Board of Directors as may be appropriate or required.

Under the CBCA, the Company’s governing statute, a director or officer of the Company must disclose to the Company, in writing or by requesting that it be entered in the minutes of meetings of the Board of Directors, the nature and extent of any interest that he or she has in a material contract or material transaction, whether made or proposed, with the Company, if the director or officer: (a) is a party to the contract or transaction; (b) is a director or an officer, or an individual acting in a similar capacity, of a party to the contract or transaction; or (c) has a material interest in a party to the contract or transaction. Subject to limited exceptions set out in the CBCA, the director cannot vote on any resolution to approve the contract or transaction.

Further, it is the policy of the Company that an interested director or officer recuse himself or herself from the decision-making process pertaining to a contract or transaction in which he or she has an interest.

The Code of Conduct contains the “Whistle Blower Policy and Procedures”, the purpose of which is to provide an anonymous method for employees to report any violations of securities and other laws to which the Company is subject, improprieties and fraudulent acts relating to the Company's business practices, including its corporate disclosure and reporting, financial statements, accounting systems and internal controls as well as violations of the Company's Code of Conduct, without fear of retaliation against good-faith whistleblowers. Herein, the Company has set out the responsibility of the Audit Committee to investigate and act on complaints and concerns of wrong doing.

The Company also has in place a Human Rights Policy which outlines the Company`s principles with respect to rights of workers, equality of opportunity, relationships with indigenous peoples and other matters. The Human Rights Policy is available on the Company`s website in the Investor Relations section under the heading "Corporate Governance – Governance Documents".

Diversity

Policies Regarding the Representation of Women on the Board

On August 10, 2018, the Board of Directors adopted a written Diversity Policy (the “Diversity Policy”), which sets forth the Company’s approach to achieving and maintaining diversity on the Board of Directors. The Company recognizes the value of diversity in its Board of Directors and executive team in terms not only of gender but the general background of candidates, and maintains merit and qualifications as the main criteria for selection, the background of candidates and the goal of having diverse perspectives is taken into account in recruiting and hiring efforts. The Company is committed to a merit-based system for Board composition within a diverse and inclusive culture, which solicits multiple perspectives and views and is free of conscious or unconscious bias and discrimination.

The complete text of the Board Diversity Policy is available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com under “Investor Relations - Corporate Governance - Governance Documents”.

The Company believes in diversity and values the benefits that diversity can bring to its Board of Directors. Diversity includes, but is not limited to, business experience, geography, age, gender, ethnicity, disability and aboriginal status. When assessing Board composition or identifying suitable candidates for appointment or re-election to the Board of Directors, the Company considers candidates on merit against objective criteria having due regard to the benefits of diversity and the needs of the Board of Directors, in accordance with the current Diversity Policy. The Company periodically assesses the expertise, experience, skills and backgrounds of its directors, including the extent to which the current composition of the Board of Directors reflects a diverse mix of knowledge, experience, skills and backgrounds, including an appropriate number of women. The Company has adopted a target for women in Board positions and has a goal of attaining a Board composition in which at least 30% of the directors are women by December 31, 2022.

Any search firm engaged to assist the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors in identifying candidates for appointment as director will be specifically directed to include diverse candidates generally, and multiple women candidates in particular.

The Board of Directors reviews the Diversity Policy annually and assesses its effectiveness in promoting a diverse Board which includes an appropriate number of directors that are women.

76

Consideration of the Representation of Women in the Director Identification and Selection Process and Executive Officer Appointments

When the Board of Directors and management select candidates for director and executive officer positions, respectively, they consider not only the qualifications, personal qualities, business background and experience of the candidates, they also consider the composition of the group of nominees, to best bring together a selection of candidates allowing the Board of Directors and the Company's management team to perform efficiently and act in the best interest of the Company and its stakeholders. The Company is aware of the benefits of diversity both on the Board and at the executive level, and therefore the level of representation of women is one factor taken into consideration during the search process to fill director positions and leadership roles within the Company.

Targets Regarding the Representation of Women on the Board and in Executive Officer Positions

The Company has adopted a target for women in Board positions and has a goal of attaining a Board composition in which at least 30% of the directors are women by December 31, 2022.

Number of Women on the Board and in Executive Officer Positions

In 2020 and as of March 26, 2021, there are three (27.3%) women on the Board of Directors of the Company and two (25.0%) women serving as executive officers of the Company, including its major subsidiaries, as defined in National Instrument 58-101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices.

Policies Regarding the Representation of Minorities on the Board and in Executive Officer Positions

The Company recognizes the value of diversity in its Board of Directors and executive team in terms not only of gender but the general background of candidates. While the Company has not, to date, adopted specific policies regarding visible minorities, persons with disabilities and aboriginal persons in executive officer positions or as members of the Board of Directors, and maintains merit and qualifications as the main criteria for selection, the background of candidates and the goal of having diverse perspectives is taken into account in recruiting and hiring efforts. To this regard, search firms engaged are specifically directed to include diverse candidates in general, and multiple women candidates specifically. The Company currently has no visible minorities, aboriginal persons or persons with disabilities on the Board of Directors or acting as executive officers of the Company.

The complete text of the Board Diversity Policy is available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com under “Investor Relations - Corporate Governance - Governance Documents”.

ESG Committee

The Board of Directors typically reviews and discusses environmental and safety topics at each board meeting. On November 11, 2020, the Board of Directors formed the ESG Committee with a mandate to provide governance and oversight with respect to ESG matters including: health, safety, environmental, social, sustainability, climate-related matters, corporate governance and other human capital matters. The members of the ESG Committee for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 were Mary Pat Salomone (chair), Jane Craighead and Dahra Granovsky.

The charter of the ESG Committee is available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com under “Investor Relations - Corporate Governance - Committee Charters” and states that the committee will inter alia:

(i)Oversee management in setting the Company’s general strategy with respect to ESG matters;

(ii)Review and provide guidance on the Company’s sustainability program and goals and the progress in achieving such goals;

(iii)Provide oversight on the Company’s public disclosure of ESG matters, including any sustainability reports;

(iv)Monitor risks and trends in respect of ESG matters that could significantly impact the Company’s ability to create long-term value;

(v)Oversee management in reviewing and complying with any applicable legislation, regulatory rules and regulatory guidance changes with respect to ESG matters;

77

(vi)Review and monitor actions and initiatives taken to prevent, mitigate and manage risks related to ESG matters, which may have a materially adverse impact on the Company or is otherwise pertinent to its stakeholders;

(vii)Review and monitor health and safety prevention strategies as well as safety incidents on a quarterly basis;

(viii)Review and monitor the Company’s environmental compliance programs;

(ix)Review and monitor any significant examination or audit by external auditors, regulatory and key ESG rating agencies on ESG matters;

(x)Review and monitor the Company’s corporate governance practices and monitor the Company's corporate governance policies and suggest any changes necessary to the Board on an annual basis, including but not limited to, oversight of the Directors’ skills matrix;

(xi)Provide oversight of the Company’s engagement efforts with stockholders and other key stakeholders (including non-governmental organizations and key ESG rating agencies) related to ESG matters;

(xii)Review the Company's human capital initiatives such as commitment to diversity and any goals related thereto as well as employee engagement initiatives;

(xiii)Review annual charitable contributions, political contributions and social investments of the Company;

(xiv)Oversee any policies and processes related to director education and director onboarding; and

(xv)Report the results or findings of the Committee’s reviews and assessments on ESG matters to the Board.

STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

The Board of Directors and management of the Company believe that a focus on corporate governance is essential in the effective management of the Company as well as in the Company’s ability to build sustainable worth for its customers, business partners, employees and investors. The Board of Directors is committed to maintaining a high standard of corporate governance, and regularly reviews and updates its corporate governance systems in light of changing practices, expectations and legal requirements.

The Company is a Canadian reporting issuer and the Shares are listed and posted for trading on the TSX. The Company’s corporate governance practices reflect applicable rules and guidelines adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators as set out in National Policy 58-201 Corporate Governance Guidelines and National Instrument 58-101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (collectively, the “CSA Guidelines”). Further, the Company’s governance practices also comply with the governance rules of the SEC applicable to foreign issuers and those mandated by the United States Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The CSA Guidelines set out a series of guidelines for effective corporate governance. The guidelines address matters such as the composition and independence of corporate boards, the functions to be performed by boards and their committees, and the effectiveness and education of board members. The Company’s corporate governance practices are substantially in alignment with the CSA Guidelines. In accordance with the CSA Guidelines, the Company discloses, on an annual basis and in prescribed form, the corporate governance practices that it has adopted.

Pursuant to its mandate, the Board of Directors supervises the management of the business and affairs of the Company, including the development of major policy and strategy and the identification of the risks of the Company’s business and implementation of the appropriate systems to manage these risks. The Board of Directors has explicitly assumed responsibility for the stewardship of the Company and has adopted a formal mandate setting out its stewardship responsibilities. The Board of Directors discharges its responsibilities either directly or through its committees.

In regards to the identification and management of risk, the Board of Directors receives reports from management of the Company on a regular basis with respect to risks which the Company encounters in its business. Among others, the Board considers and discusses risks such as: trends in the costs of raw materials and commodities; fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates; environmental and safety issues; cyber security; availability of capital; tax implications; execution by the Company of its capital expenditure projects; business continuity; and integration of businesses acquired by the Company. Many of the risks considered and discussed by the Board are set out in the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis

78

for the 2020 fiscal year and in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, both of which are available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

The Board of Directors has established five committees, namely the Audit Committee, HRCC, CGNC, Executive Committee and ESG Committee to facilitate the carrying out of its duties and responsibilities and to meet applicable statutory requirements. The Board of Directors has adopted a formal mandate for each committee. The Board of Directors has developed a description of the role and responsibilities for each of the Chair of the Board, the Lead Director, where applicable, the Chair of each committee of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer.

The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct and Business Ethics to which all directors, management personnel and employees of the Company are expected to adhere. A copy of the Code of Conduct and Business Ethics is available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

The following discloses the Company’s current governance practices in accordance with the CSA Guidelines.

Board of Directors

The Company complies with the CSA Guidelines which set out that a majority of the directors of the Company must be independent.

According to section 1.4 of National Instrument 52 – 110 Audit Committees, a director is independent if he or she has no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company, which includes a relationship which could, in the view of the Board of Directors, reasonably interfere with the exercise of the director’s independent judgment. After having examined the role and relationships of each of the directors and based on information provided by the directors as to their individual circumstances, the Board of Directors has established that nine of the eleven directors proposed as nominees by the Company for election as directors, meaning 82%, are independent of the Company, as of the date hereof, namely:

•Robert M. Beil

•Chris R. Cawston

•Jane Craighead

•Frank Di Tomaso

•Robert J. Foster

•Dahra Granovsky

•James Pantelidis

•Jorge N. Quintas

•Mary Pat Salomone

This determination was made based on all relevant factors including the following, whether:

(i)the director is, or has been within the last three years, an employee or executive officer of the Company or a subsidiary, or an immediate family member of the director is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of the Company or a subsidiary;

(ii)the director is a current partner or employee of a firm that is the Company’s internal or external auditor, or was within the last three years, a partner or employee of that firm and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time;

(iii)an immediate family member of the director is a current partner of a firm that is the Company’s internal or external auditor, or is a current employee of that firm and participates in its audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice, or was, within the last three years a partner or employee of that firm and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time;

(iv)the director, or an immediate family member of the director, is or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of an entity on which any of the Company’s current executive officers serve or served at that time on the entity’s compensation committee; or

(v)the director or an immediate family member of the director who is employed as an executive officer of the Company has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $75,000 in direct compensation from the Company, other than (a) director and committee fees, (b) pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service provided that such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service, and (c) compensation

79

for previously acting as an interim chief executive officer of the Company or previously acting as a Chair of the Board of Directors on a part-time basis.

An “immediate family member” includes a person’s spouse, parents, children, stepchildren, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares the person’s home.

After having examined the role and relationships of each director, the CGNC has established that, of the eleven directors proposed by management to sit on the Board of Directors, the following two directors are not independent from the Company, namely:

•Gregory A. C. Yull, who is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company; and

•Melbourne F. Yull, whose “immediate family member” (Gregory A. C. Yull) is Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

In addition, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, all of the members of each of the Audit Committee, HRCC, CGNC and ESG Committee were independent directors. At December 31, 2020, the members of the Audit Committee were: Frank Di Tomaso (chair), Chris Cawston, Robert J. Foster, and Mary Pat Salomone; the members of the HRCC were: Robert M. Beil (chair), Jane Craighead, Robert J. Foster, Dahra Granovsky, Jorge N. Quintas and Mary Pat Salomone; the members of the CGNC were: James Pantelidis (chair), Robert M. Beil and Frank Di Tomaso; and the members of the ESG Committee were Mary Pat Salomone (chair), Dahra Granovsky and Jane Craighead. If necessary, the independent members of the Board of Directors can meet without the presence of the non-independent directors.

The following directors are currently directors of other issuers that are reporting issuers (or the equivalent) in a jurisdiction of Canada or a foreign jurisdiction:

Name of Director	Issuer
Frank Di Tomaso	ADF Group Inc.
	Birks Group Inc.
Dahra Granovsky	Hammond Power Solutions
	Velan Inc.
James Pantelidis	Parkland Corporation
Mary Pat Salomone	TC Energy Corporation
	TransCanada Pipelines Limited
	Herc Holdings, Inc.

James Pantelidis, Chair of the Board of Directors, is an independent director. The positions of Chair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer are split. The Board of Directors believes that separating the roles of Chair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer allows the Board of Directors to more effectively oversee management, enhance accountability and avoid potential conflicts of interest.

The Board of Directors uses electronic board books. This allows information to be disseminated effectively and allows the Board of Directors to conduct its business efficiently. The use of electronic board books also reduces the use of paper by the Board of Directors, which also has the corollary benefit of reducing costs and is consistent with the Company’s dedication to be an environmental leader.

Board Mandate

The Board of Directors has approved its written mandate. The mandate of the Board of Directors is to supervise the management of the business and affairs of the Company, including the development of major policies and strategies and the identification of the risks of the Company’s business and the implementation of the appropriate systems to manage these risks. The complete text of the mandate of the Board of Directors is available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com under “Investor Relations - Corporate Governance - Governance Documents”.

80

Position Descriptions

The Board of Directors has developed a description of the role and responsibilities of the Chair of the Board of Directors, the Chair of each committee of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer.

The description of the role and responsibilities of the Chair of the Board of Directors was approved by the Board of Directors. The description of the role and responsibilities of the Chair of the Board of Directors establishes that the Chair of the Board of Directors provides leadership and develops guiding principles for the Board of Directors and represents the Board of Directors with the shareholders at the annual meeting of shareholders. The Chair of the Board of Directors also sets the agenda for meetings of the Board of Directors, chairs meetings of the Board of Directors, oversees its effectiveness and ensuring that it meets its obligations and responsibilities, and ensures that board members receive clear information on a timely basis and ensures that the performance of the Board of Directors is assessed on a regular basis. In addition, the Chair of the Board of Directors supervises the chairs of the committees.

Descriptions of the role and responsibilities of the chairs of the Audit Committee, the HRCC, the CGNC and the ESG Committee were approved by the Board of Directors. They provide, among other things, that the chair of each committee sets the agenda and chairs committee meetings and reports regularly to the Board of Directors.

A description of the role and responsibilities of the Chief Executive Officer was approved by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors also determines with the Chief Executive Officer his or her priorities and responsibilities. The description provides that the Chief Executive Officer is ultimately responsible for directing the business and affairs of the Company, setting objectives and providing strategic directions to the management of the Company so that the Company may achieve expected results. He or she is responsible for: (i) directing the objectives, policies and operating plans consistent with the Board of Directors’ mandate, (ii) fostering a corporate culture that promotes integrity and ethical conduct and responsibility, (iii) monitoring the Company’s compliance with current regulatory and disclosure rules, (iv) evaluating performance of senior management and developing and retaining personnel in order to provide for the future management of the Company, and (v) building the Company’s profile with the public and with investor communities and ensuring that the appropriate information and disclosure are being provided to the shareholders of the Company.

The position descriptions of the Chair of the Board of Directors and of the Chief Executive Officer are available on the Company’s website.

Executive Succession Planning

The Board reviews and discusses succession plans for the CEO and other executive management positions on an annual basis. This process includes a presentation of each NEO position and potential successors, successor level of readiness and development plans, a discussion on short, medium and long term plans, including contingency plans, to address any gaps that are identified in this process, and other succession planning activity updates. Leadership development may or may not follow an individualized approach and is made available to executive management through various vehicles including third party programs, executive coaching, and 360 degree feedback and talent review processes. Leadership development updates are presented to the HRCC throughout the year. Additionally, throughout the year, the Board engages with key talent through formal board presentations and informal events.

Orientation and Continuing Education

The Board recognizes the importance of ongoing education for directors. Directors are encouraged to attend seminars, conferences and other continuing education programs to help ensure that they stay current on relevant issues such as corporate governance, financial and accounting practices and corporate ethics. The Company encourages directors to attend appropriate continuing education programs and will contribute to the cost of attending such programs. As well, written materials likely to be of interest to directors that have been published in periodicals, newspapers or by legal or accounting firms are routinely forwarded to directors. Furthermore, the Company also believes that serving on other corporate and not for profit boards is a valuable source of ongoing education.

Upon a director’s election or appointment to the Board of Directors, the director receives all of the various corporate governance documents that have been adopted by the Company. Additionally, the director participates in meetings with members of management of the Company, is given a tour of certain of the Company’s operational facilities and is briefed on the strategic policies and strategic direction of the Company, all of which is designed with a view to familiarize new directors with the Company, its management structures and operations, and key legal, financial and operational issues.

81

New directors are also provided with information regarding corporate governance and structure and procedures of the Board of Directors and any committee on which the director will serve.

Upon joining the Board of Directors, a new director will have multiple one-on-one sessions with the Chair and Chief Executive Officer to discuss the function of the Board of Directors and the nature of the Company’s business activities. Individual meetings will also be scheduled with executive management to educate new directors in more detail with respect to the Company’s operations. A secure website is also available to directors, where they have access to important Board of Directors’ materials, including board books, charters, guidelines and codes.

The Company has developed an education program for new directors. The main objective of the education program is to offer for each new director the opportunity to learn the business of the Company and for each director to better understand the challenges to which the Company is exposed. This education program is addressed, inter alia, to new directors to inform them as to the role of the Board of Directors, its committees and its directors, the nature and functioning of the Company, and the operations and management of the Company. Each director receives a Director Information Handbook that is regularly updated. The Director Information Handbook contains material pertinent to the affairs of the Company, including the mandate of the Board of Directors and its committees, descriptions of the role and responsibilities of each committee chair and of the Chair of the Board of Directors, details of directors’ compensation, details regarding the directors’ liability insurance, the role and responsibilities of the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s Code of Conduct and its policies.

The Company relies on the fact that each director has had considerable prior corporate experience and that each director has the necessary expertise to serve as an effective director of the Company. Various members of senior management of the Company report to the Board of Directors on an informal and formal basis regularly in order to keep the directors up-to-date on various matters concerning the business and affairs of the Company. Counsel to the Company in both the United States and Canada are also available to advise the Board of Directors on new developments in relevant areas of the law.

Shareholder Engagement

The Board believes in the importance of open and constructive dialogue with shareholders.

On an annual basis, the Company holds an advisory vote on executive compensation as a way to engage regularly with shareholders on this important matter.

The CEO and CFO regularly communicate with shareholders through investor presentations, road shows and direct calls that occur throughout the year and foster open dialogue (in a Regulation FD-compliant manner) about business strategy, sustainability efforts and other matters. The CEO and CFO share feedback received in these forums with the Board and together with the outcome of future say on pay advisory votes consider the feedback received when evaluating their approach to corporate governance and compensation decisions.

In 2020, the Chair of the Board and the HRCC Chair met with shareholders, including the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance, on board engagement, compensation, sustainability, diversity and other governance topics. The Canadian Coalition for Good Governance made certain recommendations to enhance disclosure on these topics which have been implemented throughout this document, including content under the heading "Environmental, Social and Governance Practices", as well as in Appendix B.

The Board is willing to engage with Shareholders directly and encourages Shareholders, employees and others to communicate directly with the Board by contacting the Chair of the Board:

Attention: Chair of the Board

800 Place Victoria, Suite 3700

Montréal, Québec H4Z 1E9

c/o Fasken Martineau Dumoulin LLP

email: jpanteli@itape.com

cc: rbooth@itape.com

The Chair of the Board will always try to respond in a timely manner with support from the Corporate Secretary, and will review all meeting requests and consult with the CEO and Corporate Secretary as appropriate. Any meetings with shareholders or other stakeholders must respect the terms of our disclosure policy, which is Regulation FD compliant.

82

Nomination of Directors

The CGNC regularly considers the composition of the Board of Directors. The key considerations are to balance the need for board refreshment to bring in new perspectives and the belief that longer-tenure directors possess institutional knowledge, each of which is critical to the success of our Board and the long-term interests of our shareholders. As a result, in November 2018, the Company formalized its board tenure policy. See section entitled “Board Tenure Policy” below.

The CGNC identifies and recommends to the Board of Directors, when appropriate, skill sets and individuals who could add value to the Board of Directors. If the Board of Directors determines that new candidates for Board nomination are advisable, the process by which the Board of Directors identifies new candidates for Board nomination will begin with the approval by the Board of Directors of an outline of the skill-set and background which are desired in a new candidate. Board members and management will have an opportunity to suggest candidates for consideration. A search firm may be employed. Prospective candidates will be interviewed by the Chair and other members of the Board of Directors on an ad hoc basis. An invitation to join the Board of Directors will be extended only after the Board of Directors has reached a consensus on the appropriateness of the candidate.

The members of the CGNC are James Pantelidis (chair), Robert M. Beil and Frank Di Tomaso. The CGNC is composed entirely of independent directors, as is a majority of the members of the Board of Directors, ensuring any candidate recommended to the Board of Directors by the CGNC is approved by independent members of the CGNC and a majority of independent members of the Board of Directors.

The members of the CGNC are appointed by the Board of Directors annually. The charter of the CGNC is available on the Company’s website and states that the committee will inter alia:

(i)develop and recommend to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company;

(ii)monitor corporate governance issues, trends and proposed, new or amended regulatory requirements and, as appropriate, make recommendations to the Board of Directors;

(iii)advise the Board of Directors with respect to the charters, structure and operations of the various committees of the Board of Directors and qualifications for membership thereon;

(iv)in consultation with the Chair of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, make recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding which directors should serve on the various committees of the Board of Directors;

(v)authorize any waiver of the compliance by an executive officer or a director with the Company’s Code of Conduct, oversee the investigation of any alleged breach of the Code of Conduct and make recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding any measures to be taken by the Board of Directors with respect thereto;

(vi)exercise oversight of the policies and processes adopted by it or the Board of Directors relating to director orientation and continuing education;

(vii) exercise oversight of the processes adopted by the Board of Directors for evaluating (a) the overall performance and workings of the Board of Directors as a whole, and (b) the performances of individual directors;

(viii)establish a process for determining the “independence” of directors, the identification of “financial experts”, and the “financial literacy” of directors, as those terms are defined from time to time under the requirements or guidelines for board service under applicable securities laws and the rules of any stock exchange on which the Company’s securities are listed for trading; and

(ix)review the size and composition of the Board of Directors.

As a result of the formation of the ESG Committee, various committee charters were re-aligned in March 2021 including certain governance responsibilities of the CGNC and HRCC, and formally changing the name of the CGNC to the Nominating Committee. All committee charters are available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com under “Investor Relations - Corporate Governance - Governance Documents” and attached as exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

83

Compensation

The Board of Directors has given the HRCC a mandate to examine the compensation of executive officers and make recommendations with respect thereto.

The Board of Directors has established a HRCC that is composed entirely of independent directors within the meaning of National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees. The members of the HRCC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 were Robert M. Beil (chair), Jane Craighead, Robert J. Foster, Dahra Granovsky, Jorge N. Quintas and Mary Pat Salomone. Ms. Salomone is no longer a member of the committee effective January 1, 2021.

The mandate of the HRCC is described above under the heading “Compensation of Execution Officers and Directors —Named Executive Officer Profiles”. The charter of the HRCC is available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com under “Investor Relations - Corporate Governance - Committee Charters”.

In determining executive compensation, the Board of Directors retains the services of compensation consultants from time to time.

For more detailed information with respect to the compensation of the Company’s officers, see section entitled “Executive Compensation” above.

Other Committees of the Board of Directors

The only committee of the Board of Directors other than the Audit Committee, HRCC, CGNC and ESG Committee is the Executive Committee, which is comprised of James Pantelidis, Robert J. Foster, Gregory A. C. Yull and Melbourne F. Yull (chair). The function of the Executive Committee is to provide strategic direction for the Company. The charter of the Executive Committee is available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com under “Investor Relations - Corporate Governance - Committee Charters”.

Assessments

Annually all directors are required to complete a director’s questionnaire designed to assist the Board of Directors in assessing the Board of Directors as a whole, and each committee of the Board of Directors. The results of these assessments are discussed at a meeting of the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee follows a similar procedure to assist members of the Audit Committee in assessing the Committee.

Board Tenure Policy

On November 27, 2018, the Board adopted a policy to ensure appropriate and ongoing renewal of the Board in order to sustain Board performance and maintain Board expertise (the “Board Tenure Policy”). Pursuant to the Board Tenure Policy, the Board will seek to maintain an average tenure of ten years or less for its independent non-management directors. The Board believes that this approach is more advisable than establishing a specific limit for the overall length of time an independent director, because it will allow directors who have served on the Board for an extended period to continue to provide valuable insight into the operations and future of the Company based on their experience with, and understanding of, the Company’s history, policies, and objectives. As such, the Company does not have a retirement age policy for its directors. The Company endeavours to have an appropriate onboarding period before an existing member retires to ensure appropriate continuity.

Furthermore, in determining whether to recommend a director for re-election every year, the CGNC considers the director’s participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board and past meeting attendance.

The complete text of the Board Tenure Policy is available on the Company’s website at www.itape.com under “Investor Relations - Corporate Governance - Governance Documents”.

Related Party Transactions

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding related party transactions. Related party transactions include those between the Company and key management personnel or a person or entity that has control, joint control or significant influence over the Company. A Board-approved policy is in place governing the authorization limits applicable to all types of contractual arrangements whether related party or not, and the Company's Code of Conduct and Ethics includes concepts relevant to related party transactions and prohibits certain transactions unless approved by the Board. In this regard, procedures are in place to identify, track and report transactions with related parties.

84

AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION

Reference is made to the subsection entitled “Audit Committee” under Item 6C in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 for required disclosure relating to the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee Charter which is available as a schedule to the Annual Report. The Annual Report on Form 20-F is available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com (Canada) and www.sec.gov (United States) and can be obtained by contacting the Company at 9999 Cavendish Blvd., Suite 200, Ville-St-Laurent, Québec H4M 2X5, telephone (514) 731-7591.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Financial information about the Company is contained in its Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, and additional information about the Company is available under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com (Canada) and www.sec.gov (United States).

The Company periodically holds investor meetings at its various plant locations and expects to continue to do so in the future.

If you would like to obtain, at no cost to you, a copy of any of the following documents:

(a)the latest Form 20-F filed in lieu of an Annual Information Form of the Company together with any document, or the pertinent pages of any document, incorporated by reference therein;

(b)the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020, together with the accompanying Auditor’s Report thereon and any interim financial statements of the Company for periods subsequent to December 31, 2020 and Management’s Discussion and Analysis with respect thereto; and

(c)this Circular,

please send your request to:

Attention: Kim Peens

Intertape Polymer Group Inc.

9999 Cavendish Blvd.

Suite 200

Saint-Laurent, Québec H4M 2X5

telephone: (514) 731-7591

telecopier: (514) 731-5039

85

AUTHORIZATION

The contents and the mailing of this Circular have been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company.

(signed) Randi M. Booth

Secretary

Sarasota, Florida

March 26, 2021

86

SCHEDULE A

SHAREHOLDERS’ ADVISORY, NON-BINDING RESOLUTION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

BE AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED:

THAT, on an advisory basis, and not to diminish the role and responsibilities of the Board of Directors, the shareholders of the Company accept the approach to executive compensation set out in the sections entitled “Director Compensation" and "Executive Compensation” of the Management Information Circular of the Company dated March 26, 2021.

87

APPENDIX A

VIRTUAL MEETING - CODE OF PROCEDURE

1. Application

This Code shall govern the conduct of virtual annual meetings of shareholders (each, a "Meeting") of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the “Company”). It is a complement to the provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act, including the regulations or guidelines thereunder, (the “Act”), and to the Company's General By-Laws (the "By-Laws"). In case of conflict, the prevailing authorities shall be as follows: the Act, then the Bylaws and then this Code.

In order to facilitate a fair and productive Meeting, we ask your cooperation in observing the following procedures:

2. Business of the Meeting

The business to be conducted at the Meeting is set forth in the Notice of Meeting and Management Proxy Circular (the "Circular"). We will strictly follow the agenda of Meeting as set out in the Circular.

3. Registered Shareholders and Non-Registered Shareholders

Only persons shown on the register of shareholders at the close of business on March 26, 2021 and duly appointed proxyholders (including non-registered shareholders who have duly appointed themselves as proxyholders), will be entitled to vote at the Meeting. Please follow the instructions provided in the Circular to participate at the Meeting. If you have voted your shares prior to the start of the Meeting, and your vote has been received by the Company’s scrutineers, then there is no need to vote those shares during the Meeting, unless you wish to revoke or change your vote.

Shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders entitled to vote at the Meeting may vote by proxy in advance of the Meeting. Non-registered shareholders who have not duly appointed themselves as proxyholders will be able to attend the Meeting as guests. Guests are able to attend the Meeting but are not able to submit questions or vote their shares (if any).

4. Questions

Shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders may submit questions during the Meeting using the "Ask a Question" field provided in the web portal. Questions may be submitted at any point during the Meeting but must be submitted prior to the commencement of voting on the matter to which they relate. Subject to this Code, all questions relating to a matter subject to a vote at the Meeting that are deemed to be appropriate and directly related to such matter will be addressed prior to the closing of voting on such matter.

Following termination of the formal business of the Meeting and time permitting, the Company will address any appropriate general questions received from shareholders and duly appointed proxyholders regarding the Company.

5. Pertinence and Good Order

In order to facilitate a respectful and effective Meeting, only questions of general interest to all shareholders will be answered.

6. Specific Questions

If there are any matters of individual concern to a shareholder and not of general concern to all shareholders, or if a question posed was not otherwise answered, such matters may be raised separately after the meeting by contacting the Company’s Investor Relations by sending an e-mail to ross.marshall@loderockadvisors.com.

7. Discretions

To ensure the Meeting is conducted in a manner that is fair to all shareholders, the Chair of the Meeting may exercise broad discretion in responding to questions, including the order in which the questions are answered, the grouping or editing of the questions and the amount of time devoted to any question.

8. Recording

Any recording of the Meeting is prohibited.

88

APPENDIX B

NON GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES AND KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

The Company measures the success of the business using a number of key performance indicators, many of which are in accordance with GAAP. The Company also uses certain non-GAAP financial measures and key performance metrics as defined under applicable securities legislation, including EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, Compensation Adjusted EBITDA, Compensation Cash Flows and free cash flows. In determining these measures, the Company excludes certain items which are otherwise included in determining the comparable GAAP financial measures. The Company believes such non-GAAP financial measures are key performance indicators that improve the period-to-period comparability of the Company’s results and provide investors with more insight into, and an additional tool to understand and assess, the performance of the Company's ongoing core business operations. As required by applicable securities legislation, the Company has provided definitions of those measures and reconciliations of those measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. Investors and other readers are encouraged to review the related GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures set forth below and should consider non-GAAP financial measures and key performance indicators only as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for or as a superior measure to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Summations in the tables presented are based on unrounded numbers.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA Margin and Compensation Adjusted EBITDA

A reconciliation of the Company’s EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, to net earnings (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, is set out in the EBITDA reconciliation table below. EBITDA should not be construed as earnings (loss) before income taxes, net earnings (loss) or cash flows from operating activities as determined by GAAP. The Company defines EBITDA as net earnings (loss) before (i) interest and other finance costs (income); (ii) income tax expense (benefit); (iii) amortization of intangible assets; and (iv) depreciation of property, plant and equipment. The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA before (i) manufacturing facility closures, restructuring and other related charges (recoveries); (ii) advisory fees and other costs associated with mergers and acquisitions activity, including due diligence, integration and certain non-cash purchase price accounting adjustments ("M&A Costs"); (iii) share-based compensation expense (benefit); (iv) impairment of goodwill; (v) impairment (reversal of impairment) of long-lived assets and other assets; (vi) write-down on assets classified as held-for-sale; (vii) (gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment; and (viii) other discrete items as shown in the table below. Adjusted EBITDA margin is defined as adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue. Compensation Adjusted EBITDA is defined by the HRCC as Adjusted EBITDA excluding performance bonus expense. The terms "EBITDA", "adjusted EBITDA", "adjusted EBITDA margin" and "Compensation Adjusted EBITDA" do not have any standardized meanings prescribed by GAAP and are therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin and Compensation Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to cash flows from operating activities or as alternatives to net earnings (loss) as indicators of the Company’s operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. The Company has included these non-GAAP financial measures because it believes that they allow investors to make a more meaningful comparison between periods of the Company’s performance, underlying business trends and the Company’s ongoing operations. The Company further believes these measures may be useful in comparing its operating performance with the performance of other companies that may have different financing and capital structures, and tax rates. Adjusted EBITDA and Compensation Adjusted EBITDA exclude costs that are not considered by management to be representative of the Company’s underlying core operating performance, including certain non-operating expenses, non-cash expenses and, where indicated, non-recurring expenses. In addition, EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin and Compensation Adjusted EBITDA are used by management to set targets and are metrics that, among others, can be used by the Company’s HRCC to establish performance bonus metrics and payout, and by the Company’s lenders and investors to evaluate the Company’s performance and ability to service its debt, finance capital expenditures and acquisitions, and provide for the payment of dividends to shareholders.

89

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Compensation Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation to Net Earnings

(In millions of USD)

(Unaudited)

	Year ended December 31,
	2020
	$
Net earnings	73.5
Interest and other finance costs	23.2
Income tax expense	19.1
Depreciation and amortization	63.8
EBITDA	179.6
Manufacturing facility closures, restructuring and other related charges	4.3
M&A Costs	3.5
Share-based compensation expense	22.9
Impairment of long-lived assets and other assets	0.6
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment	0.3
Adjusted EBITDA	211.1
Performance bonus expense	9.2
Compensation Adjusted EBITDA	220.4

Compensation Cash Flows

Compensation Cash Flows is defined by HRCC as cash flows from operating activities excluding M&A Costs paid in the current year excluding certain costs associated with planned acquisition integration activities and the income tax effect of these items. The term "Compensation Cash Flows" does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Compensation Cash Flows is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to cash flows from operating activities as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance or any other measures of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. The Company has included this non-GAAP financial measure because it is used by management to set targets and is a metric that, among others, can be used by the Company’s HRCC to establish performance bonus metrics and payout.

Compensation Cash Flows Reconciliation to Cash Flows From Operating Activities

(In millions of USD)

(Unaudited)

	Year ended December 31,
	2020
	$
Cash flows from operating activities	179.6
M&A Costs	2.7
Income tax effect of these items	(0.4)
Compensation Cash Flows	182.0

Free Cash Flows

Free cash flows is defined by the Company as cash flows from operating activities less purchases of property, plant and equipment. The Company is reporting free cash flows, a non-GAAP financial measure, because it is used by management and investors in evaluating the Company’s performance and liquidity. Free cash flows does not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Free cash flows should not be interpreted to represent the total cash movement for the period as described in the Company's financial statements, or to represent residual cash flow available for discretionary purposes, as it excludes other mandatory expenditures

90

such as debt service. The Company experiences normal business seasonality that typically results in cash flows from operating activities and free cash flows that are negative in the first quarter and progressively increase each quarter throughout the year with the majority being generated in the fourth quarter in line with required working capital investments. A reconciliation of free cash flows to cash flows from operating activities, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, is set forth below.

Free Cash Flows Reconciliation to Cash Flows from Operating Activities

(In millions of USD)

(Unaudited)

	Year ended December 31,
	2020
	$
Cash flows from operating activities	179.6
Less purchases of property, plant and equipment	(45.8)
Free cash flows	133.8

91

QUESTIONS?

NEED HELP

VOTING?

CONTACT US

North American Toll Free Phone

855.682.9437

@	E-mail: contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com
	Fax: 416.867.2271
	Toll Free Facsimile: 866.545.5580
	Outside North America, Banks & Brokers
	Call Collect: 416.867.2272

92

Appointment of Proxyholder

I/We, being holder(s) of Common Shares of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the “Company”), hereby appoint: appoint: Gregory A. C. Yull, Chief Executive Officer, OR, failing him, Randi M. Booth, Corporate Secretary OR failing her, any director of the Company, OR

Print the name of the person you are appointing if this person is someone other than the individuals listed above

as proxy of the undersigned, to attend, act and vote on behalf of the undersigned in accordance with the below directions (or if no directions have been given, as the proxy sees fit) on all the following matters and any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the "Meeting") to be conducted via live webcast at 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on Wednesday, May 12, 2021at https://web.lumiagm.com/474339464 and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof in the same manner, to the same extent and with the same powers as if the undersigned were personally present, with full power of substitution.

To participate, interact, ask questions or vote at the Meeting, participants (other than guests) will need a Control Number (see Control Number set forth on this Proxy Form for registered shareholders) and the following password: intertape2021 (case sensitive). If you appoint a proxyholder other than the proxyholders listed above, YOU MUST return your proxy by mail, fax, email or Internet to AST and YOU MUST ALSO complete the online form available athttps://lp.astfinancial.com/ControlNumber or call AST at 866-751-6315 (toll free in Canada and the United States) or 212-235-5754 (other countries) by 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021 to properly register your proxyholder, so that AST may provide such proxyholder with a 13-digit proxyholder control number via email. Such 13-digit proxyholder control number will differ from the Control Number set forth on this Proxy Form. Without a 13-digit proxyholder control number, your proxyholder will not be able to participate, interact, ask questions or vote at the Meeting, but will be able to attend as a guest.

Under Canadian securities law, you are entitled to receive certain investor documents. If you wish to receive such materials, please tick the applicable boxes below. You may also go to AST Trust Company (Canada)'s website https://ca.astfinancial.com/financialstatementsand input code 3320A

¨    I would like to receive quarterly financial statements

¨    I would like to receive annual financial statements

Management recommends voting FOR the following Resolutions. Please use dark black pencil or pen.

	FOR	WITHHOLD
1. Election of Directors
1. Robert M. Beil	o	o
2. Chris R. Cawston	o	o
3. Jane Craighead	o	o
4. Frank Di Tomaso	o	o
5. Robert J. Foster	o	o
6. Dahra Granovsky	o	o
7. James Pantelidis	o	o
8. Jorge N. Quintas	o	o
9. Mary Pat Salomone	o	o
10. Gregory A.C. Yull	o	o
11. Melbourne F. Yull	o	o

	FOR	WITHHOLD
2. Appointment of Auditor
Appointment of Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP as Auditor	o	o
	FOR	AGAINST
3. "Say on Pay" Vote
A resolution in the form annexed as Schedule A to the Management Information Circular of the Company dated March 26, 2021 (the “Circular”) accepting, in an advisory, non-binding capacity, the Company’s approach to executive compensation disclosed under “Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors - Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Circular	o	o

I/We authorize you to act in accordance with my/our instructions set out above. I/We hereby revoke any proxy previously given with respect to the Meeting. If no voting instructions are indicated above, this Proxy will be voted FOR a matter by Management’s appointees or, if you appoint another proxyholder, as that other proxyholder sees fit. On any amendments or variations proposed or any new business properly submitted before the Meeting, I/We authorize you to vote as you see fit.

Signature(s) Date

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on this proxy. Please see reverse for additional instructions. All proxies must be received by 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021.

Proxy Form - Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. to be held on May 12, 2021 (the "Meeting")

Notes to Proxy

1. This proxy must be signed by a holder or his or her attorney duly authorized in writing. If you are an individual, please sign exactly as your name appears on this proxy. If the holder is a Company, a duly-authorized officer or attorney of the Company must sign this proxy, and if the Company has a corporate seal, its corporate seal should be affixed.

2. If the securities are registered in the name of an executor, administrator or trustee, please sign exactly as your name appears on this proxy. If the securities are registered in the name of a deceased or other holder, the proxy must be signed by the legal representative with his or her name printed below his or her signature, and evidence of authority to sign on behalf of the deceased or other holder must be attached to this proxy.

3. Some holders may own securities as both a registered and a beneficial holder; in which case you may receive more than one Circular and will need to vote separately as a registered and beneficial holder. Beneficial holders may be forwarded either a form of proxy already signed by the intermediary or a voting instruction form to allow them to direct the voting of securities they beneficially own. Beneficial holders should follow instructions for voting conveyed to them by their intermediaries.

4. If a security is held by two or more individuals, any one of them present or represented by proxy at the Meeting may, in the absence of the other or others, vote at the Meeting. However, if one or more of them are present or represented by proxy, they must vote together the number of securities indicated on the proxy.

All holders should refer to the Circular for further information regarding completion and use of this proxy and other information pertaining to the Meeting.

This proxy is solicited by and on behalf of Management of the Company.

How to Vote

INTERNET -Go to www.astvotemyproxy.com -Cast your vote online -View Meeting documents	TELEPHONE Use any touch-tone phone, call toll free in Canada and United States 888-489-7352 and follow the voice instructions
To vote by Internet or telephone, you will need your control number.  If you vote by Internet or telephone, do not return this proxy.
MAIL, FAX OR EMAIL -Complete and return your signed proxy in the envelope provided or send to: AST Trust Company  (Canada) P.O. Box 721 Agincourt, ON  M1S 0A1 -You may alternatively fax your proxy to 416-368-2502 or toll free in Canada and the United States to 866-781-3111 or scan and email to proxyvote@astfinancial.com. An undated proxy is deemed to bear the date on which it is mailed by Management to you. If you wish to receive investor documents electronically in the future, please visit https://ca.astfinancial.com/edelivery to enroll.

All proxies must be received by 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021.

Appointment

I/We, being holder(s) of Common Shares of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. (the “Company”), hereby appoint: Gregory A. C. Yull, Chief Executive Officer, OR, failing him, Randi M. Booth, Corporate Secretary OR failing her, any director of the Company, OR

Print the name of the person you are appointing if this person is someone other than the individuals listed above

as proxy of the undersigned, to attend, act and vote on behalf of the undersigned in accordance with the below directions (or if no directions have been given, as the proxy sees fit) on all the following matters and any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the "Meeting") to be conducted via live webcast at 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at https://web.lumiagm.com/474339464 and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof in the same manner, to the same extent and with the same powers as if the undersigned were personally present, with full power of substitution.

As you are a non-registered shareholder, if you want to participate and vote at the Meeting or appoint an appointee other than the proxyholders listed above to participate and vote at the Meeting on your behalf, you will need a 13-digit proxyholder control number and the following password: intertape2021 (case sensitive). If you appoint a proxyholder other than the proxyholders listed above, YOU MUST return your VIF by mail, fax, email or Internet to AST and YOU MUST ALSO complete the online form available at https://lp.astfinancial.com/ControlNumber or call AST at 866-751-6315 (toll free in Canada and the United States) or 212-235-5754 (other countries) by 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021 to properly register yourself or your proxyholder, so that AST may provide you or your proxyholder with a 13-digit proxyholder control number via email. Such 13-digit proxyholder control number will differ from the Control Number set forth on this VIF. Without a 13-digit proxyholder control number, you or your proxyholder will not be able to participate, interact, ask questions or vote at the Meeting, but will be able to attend as a guest.

Under Canadian securities law, you are entitled to receive certain investor documents. If you wish to receive such materials, please tick the applicable boxes below. You may also go to AST Trust Company (Canada)'s website https://ca.astfinancial.com/financialstatementsand input code 3320A

¨    I would like to receive quarterly financial statements

¨    I would like to receive annual financial statements

Management recommends voting FOR the following Resolutions. Please use dark black pencil or pen.

	FOR	WITHHOLD
1. Election of Directors
1. Robert M. Beil	o	o
2. Chris R. Cawston	o	o
3. Jane Craighead	o	o
4. Frank Di Tomaso	o	o
5. Robert J. Foster	o	o
6. Dahra Granovsky	o	o
7. James Pantelidis	o	o
8. Jorge N. Quintas	o	o
9. Mary Pat Salomone	o	o
10. Gregory A.C. Yull	o	o
11. Melbourne F. Yull	o	o

	FOR	WITHHOLD
2. Appointment of Auditor
Appointment of Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP as Auditor	o	o
	FOR	AGAINST
3. "Say on Pay" Vote
A resolution in the form annexed as Schedule A to the Management Information Circular of the Company dated March 26, 2021 (the “Circular”) accepting, in an advisory, non-binding capacity, the Company’s approach to executive compensation disclosed under “Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors - Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Circular	o	o

I/We authorize you to act in accordance with my/our instructions set out above. If no voting instructions are indicated above, this Voting Instruction Form ("VIF") will be voted FOR a matter by Management’s appointees or, if you appoint another proxyholder, as that other proxyholder sees fit. On any amendments or variations proposed or any new business properly submitted before the Meeting, I/We authorize you to vote as you see fit.

Signature(s) Date

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on this VIF. Please see reverse for additional instructions. All VIFs must be received by 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021.

VIF - Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. to be held on May 12, 2021 (the "Meeting")

1. We are sending to you the enclosed proxy-related materials that relate to a Meeting of the holders of the series or class of securities that are held on your behalf by the intermediary identified above. Unless you attend the Meeting and vote in person, your securities can be voted only by management, as proxy holder of the registered holder, in accordance with your instructions.

2. We are prohibited from voting these securities on any of the matters to be acted upon at the Meeting without your specific voting instructions. In order for these securities to be voted at the Meeting, it will be necessary for us to have your specific voting instructions. Please complete and return the information requested in this VIF to provide your voting instructions to us promptly.

3. If you want to attend the Meeting and vote in person, please write your name in the place provided for that purpose in this form. You can also write the name of someone else whom you wish to attend the Meeting and vote on your behalf. Unless prohibited by law, the person whose name is written in the space provided will have full authority to present matters to the Meeting and vote on all matters that are presented at the Meeting, even if those matters are not set out in this form or the Circular. Consult a legal advisor if you wish to modify the authority of that person in any way. If you require help, please contact the Registered Representative who services your account.

4. This VIF should be signed by you in the exact manner as your name appears on the VIF. If these voting instructions are given on behalf of a body corporate set out the full legal name of the body corporate, the name and position of the person giving voting instructions on behalf of the body corporate and the address for service of the body corporate.

5. If this VIF is not dated, it will be deemed to bear the date on which it is mailed by management to you.

6. When properly signed and delivered, securities represented by this VIF will be voted as directed by you, however, if such a direction is not made in respect of any matter, the VIF will direct the voting of the securities to be made as recommended in the documentation provided by Management for the Meeting.

7. This VIF confers discretionary authority on the appointee to vote as the appointee sees fit in respect of amendments or variations to matters identified in the notice of Meeting or other matters as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

8. Your voting instructions will be recorded on receipt of the VIF.

9. By providing voting instructions as requested, you are acknowledging that you are the beneficial owner of, and are entitled to instruct us with respect to the voting of, these securities.

10. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed documents, please contact the Registered Representative who services your account.

11. This VIF should be read in conjunction with the Circular and other proxy materials provided by Management.

How to Vote

INTERNET -Go to www.astvotemyproxy.com -Cast your vote online -View Meeting documents	TELEPHONE Use any touch-tone phone, call toll free 888-489-7352 and follow the voice instructions
To vote by Internet or telephone, you will need your control number.  If you vote by Internet or telephone, do not return this VIF.
MAIL, FAX OR EMAIL -Complete and return your signed VIF in the envelope provided or send to: AST Trust Company  (Canada) P.O. Box 721 Agincourt, ON  M1S 0A1 -You may alternatively fax your VIF to 416-368-2502 or toll free in Canada and the United States to 866-781-3111 or scan and email to proxyvote@astfinancial.com.

All VIFs must be received by 12:00 p.m. (eastern time) on May 10, 2021.