Form 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 0-20100
BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
34-1686642
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 800
Houston, Texas 77002
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (713) 659-3500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant
to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate with a check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o
No þ
As of February 28, 2011, Belden & Blake Corporation had outstanding 1,534 shares of common
stock, no par value, which is its only class of stock. The common stock of Belden & Blake
Corporation is not traded on any exchange and, therefore, its aggregate market value and the value
of shares held by non-affiliates cannot be determined as of the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
None.
References in this Annual report on Form 10-K to Belden & Blake, the Company, we,
ours, us or like terms refer to Belden & Blake Corporation and its subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains forwardlooking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act (each a forwardlooking
statement). These forwardlooking statements relate to, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
our future financial and operating performance and results; |
|
|
|
|
our business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
our estimated net proved reserves and standardized measure; |
|
|
|
|
market prices; |
|
|
|
|
our future derivative activities; and |
|
|
|
|
our plans and forecasts. |
We have based these forwardlooking statements on our current assumptions, expectations and
projections about future events.
The words anticipate, believe, ensure, expect, if, intend, estimate, project,
forecasts, predict, outlook, aim, will, could, should, would, may, likely and
similar expressions, and the negative thereof, are intended to identify forwardlooking
statements. These statements discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of
operations or of financial condition or state other forwardlooking information. We do not
undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly any forwardlooking statements, except as
required by law. These statements also involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual
results or financial condition to materially differ from our expectations in this Form 10-K
including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
fluctuations in prices of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
significant disruptions in the financial markets; |
|
|
|
|
future capital requirements and availability of financing; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainty inherent in estimating our reserves; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with drilling and operating wells; |
|
|
|
|
discovery, acquisition, development and replacement of oil and natural gas reserves; |
|
|
|
|
cash flows and liquidity; |
|
|
|
|
timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
availability of drilling and production equipment; |
|
|
|
|
marketing of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
developments in oil and natural gas producing countries; |
1
|
|
|
competition; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulations; |
|
|
|
|
receipt of amounts owed to us by purchasers of our production and
counterparties to our derivative financial instrument contracts; |
|
|
|
|
hedging decisions, including whether or not to enter into derivative financial instruments; |
|
|
|
|
events similar to those of September 11, 2001; |
|
|
|
|
actions of third party coowners of interest in properties in which we also own an interest; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates and the value of the U.S. dollar in international currency markets; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to effectively integrate companies and properties that we acquire. |
All of our forwardlooking information is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from the results expected. Although it is not possible to
identify all factors, these risks and uncertainties include the risk factors and the timing of any
of those risk factors identified in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A.
Our revenues, operating results, financial condition and ability to borrow funds or obtain
additional capital depend substantially on prevailing prices for oil and natural gas. Declines in
oil or natural gas prices may materially adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity,
ability to obtain financing and operating results. Lower oil or natural gas prices also may reduce
the amount of oil or natural gas that we can produce economically. A decline in oil and/or natural
gas prices could have a material adverse effect on the estimated value and estimated quantities of
our oil and natural gas reserves, our ability to fund our operations and our financial condition,
cash flows, results of operations and access to capital. Historically, oil and natural gas prices
and markets have been volatile, with prices fluctuating widely, and they are likely to continue to
be volatile.
2
GLOSSARY OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS TERMS
Bbl. One stock tank barrel or 42 U.S. gallons liquid volume.
Bcf. One billion cubic feet.
Bcfe. One billion cubic feet equivalent, determined using a ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to one
Bbl of oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
Btu. A British thermal unit is a measurement of the heat generating capacity of natural gas. One
Btu is the heat required to raise the temperature of a onepound mass of pure liquid water one
degree Fahrenheit at the temperature at which water has its greatest density (39 degrees
Fahrenheit).
Completion. Installation of permanent equipment for production of oil or gas, or, in the case of a
dry well, to reporting to the appropriate authority that the well has been abandoned.
Condensate. A mixture of hydrocarbons that exists in the gaseous phase at original reservoir
temperature and pressure, but that, when produced, is in the liquid phase at surface pressure and
temperature.
Developed oil and gas reserves. Reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:
|
|
|
through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost
of the required equipment is relatively minor compared with the cost of a new well, and |
|
|
|
through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the
reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well. |
Development costs. Costs incurred to obtain access to proved reserves and to provide facilities for
extracting, treating, gathering and storing the oil and gas. More specifically, development costs,
including depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and facilities and other
costs of development activities, are costs incurred to:
|
|
|
gain access to and prepare well locations for drilling, including surveying well
locations for the purpose of determining specific development drilling sites, clearing
ground, draining, road building, and relocating public roads, gas lines, and power lines, to
the extent necessary in developing the proved reserves; |
|
|
|
drill and equip development wells, development-type stratigraphic test wells, and service
wells, including the costs of platforms and of well equipment such as casing, tubing,
pumping equipment, and the wellhead assembly; |
|
|
|
acquire, construct, and install production facilities such as lease flow lines,
separators, treaters, heaters, manifolds, measuring devices, and production storage tanks,
natural gas cycling and processing plants, and central utility and waste disposal systems;
and |
|
|
|
provide improved recovery systems. |
Development well. A well drilled within the proved area of an oil or natural gas reservoir to the
depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
Developed acres. Acres spaced or assigned to productive wells.
Dry hole or well. A well found to be incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities
such that proceeds from the sale of such production would exceed production expenses and taxes.
Exploratory well. A well drilled to find and produce oil or gas in an unproved area, to find a new
reservoir in a field previously found to be productive in another reservoir, or to extend a known
reservoir.
3
Field. An area consisting of a single reservoir or multiple reservoirs all grouped on or related to
the same individual geological structural feature and/or stratigraphic condition.
Gross acres or gross wells. The total acres or wells, as the case may be, in which a working
interest is owned.
MBbl. One thousand barrels of oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.
Mcf. One thousand cubic feet.
Mcfe. One thousand cubic feet equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to
one Bbl of oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
MMBbl. One million barrels.
MMBtu. One million British thermal units.
MMcf. One million cubic feet.
MMcfe. One million cubic feet equivalent, determined using the ratio of six Mcf of natural gas to
one Bbl of oil, condensate or natural gas liquids.
Natural gas liquids. The hydrocarbon liquids contained within natural gas.
Net acres or net wells. The sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross acres or gross
wells, as the case may be.
NYMEX. The New York Mercantile Exchange.
Oil. Crude oil and condensate.
Production costs. Costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and
facilities, including depreciation and applicable operating costs of support equipment and
facilities and other costs of operating and maintaining those wells and related equipment and
facilities. They become part of the cost of oil and gas produced. Examples of production costs
(sometimes called lifting costs) are:
|
|
|
costs of labor to operate the wells and related equipment and facilities; |
|
|
|
repairs and maintenance; |
|
|
|
materials, supplies, and fuel consumed and supplies utilized in operating the wells and
related equipment and facilities; |
|
|
|
property taxes and insurance applicable to proved properties and wells and related
equipment and facilities; and |
Productive well. A well that is found to be capable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient
quantities such that proceeds from the sale of such production exceeds production expenses and
taxes.
Proved reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by
analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be
economically producible from a given date forward from known reservoirs, and under existing
economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations prior to the time at which
contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is
reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the
estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be
reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.
Recompletion. The completion for production of an existing wellbore in another formation from that
which the well has been previously completed.
4
Reserves. Estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be
economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known
accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there
will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of
delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to
implement the project.
Reservoir. A porous and permeable underground formation containing a natural accumulation of
produceable oil and/or natural gas that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is
individual and separate from other reservoirs.
Standardized measure. Standardized measure is the present value of estimated future net revenues
(after income taxes) to be generated from the production of proved reserves, determined in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission without giving
effect to nonproperty related expenses such as certain general and administrative expenses and
debt service or to depreciation, depletion and amortization and discounted using an annual discount
rate of 10%.
Successful well. A well capable of producing oil and/or natural gas in commercial quantities.
Undeveloped acreage. Lease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point
that would permit the production of commercial quantities of natural gas and oil regardless of
whether such acreage contains proved reserves.
Working interest. The operating interest that gives the owner the right to drill, produce and
conduct operating activities on the property and a share of production.
Workover. Operations on a producing well to restore or increase production.
5
PART I
Items 1 and 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
GENERAL
Belden & Blake Corporation, an Ohio corporation, was formed on June 14, 1991 and is wholly
owned by Capital C Energy Operations, LP (Capital C), a Delaware limited partnership. Capital C
acquired us pursuant to a merger completed on July 7, 2004 (the Merger). On August 16, 2005,
Capital C was acquired (the Transaction) by institutional funds managed by EnerVest, Ltd.
(EnerVest).
We are an independent energy company engaged in the exploitation, development, production,
operation and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties. Our operations are focused in the
Appalachian Basin in Ohio, Pennsylvania and New York and in the Antrim Shale Formation in the
Michigan Basin.
We maintain our corporate offices at 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77002-6707.
Our telephone number at that location is (713) 659-3500.
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS
Credit Agreement
In 2005, we amended and restated our then existing credit agreement, by entering into a First
Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement (Credit Agreement) by and among us and BNP
Paribas, as sole lead arranger, sole book runner, syndication agent and administrative agent. The
Credit Agreement provides for loans and other extensions of credit to be made to us.
On March 23, 2010, we entered into the Sixth Amendment to the Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement was amended to (1) add a maximum senior secured leverage ratio of 2.00 : 1.00, (2)
eliminate the maximum leverage ratio beginning December 31, 2009, (3) amend the minimum interest
coverage ratio to 1.75 : 1.0 and (4) make certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.
On August 25, 2010, we entered into the Seventh Amendment to the Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement was amended to (1) extend the termination date to April 14, 2012, (2) extend the hedge
letter of credit termination date to April 14, 2012, (3) decrease the aggregate amount of the
revolving commitments to $90 million, (4) decrease the borrowing base to $55 million and (5) make
certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Overview
In the fourth quarter of 2010, our average net production was approximately 32.6 MMcfe per day
consisting of 28.3 MMcf of natural gas and 726 Bbls of oil per day. At December 31, 2010, we owned
interests in 4,368 gross (3,463 net) productive oil and gas wells in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York
and Michigan with estimated proved reserves totaling 202.4 Bcfe consisting of 171.6 Bcf of natural
gas and 5.1 MMBbl of oil. The estimated future net cash flows from these reserves had a
standardized measure of approximately $199.6 million at December 31, 2010. The 12-month weighted
average prices used to estimate proved reserves at December 31, 2010 were $4.76 per Mcf for natural
gas and $74.63 per Bbl for oil.
We have an operating agreement with EnerVest Operating, L.L.C. (EnerVest Operating). Under
this operating agreement, EnerVest Operating acts as operator of the oil and gas wells, the related
gathering systems and production facilities where our interest entitles us to control the
appointment of the operator. As operator, EnerVest Operating manages the drilling and completion
of wells and the day to day operating and maintenance activities for our assets. At December 31,
2010, EnerVest Operating operated approximately 3,833 wells, or 88% of our gross wells representing
approximately 97% of the value of our estimated proved developed reserves based on their
standardized measure. At December 31, 2010, we owned leases on 1,110,796 gross (415,953 net)
acres, including 591,959 gross (261,456 net) undeveloped acres.
6
We own approximately 1,600 miles of natural gas gathering lines in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New
York and Michigan, which are connected directly to various intrastate and interstate natural gas
transmission systems. The interconnections with these pipelines afford us marketing access to
numerous gas markets, including those in the northeastern United States. The proximity of our
properties in the Appalachian and Michigan Basins to large commercial and industrial natural gas
markets along with the favorable Btu content of our gas has generally resulted in premium wellhead
gas prices compared with the NYMEX price for gas delivered at the Henry Hub in Louisiana. During
2010, our average per unit gas prices (excluding the effects of hedging) in Appalachia and Michigan
were $0.24 and $0.20, respectively, higher than the average NYMEX monthly settle price for 2010.
Oil and Gas Reserves
The following table presents our estimated net proved oil and natural gas reserves at December
31, 2010. These estimates were prepared by Wright & Company, Inc. independent petroleum
consultants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas Reserves |
|
|
|
Oil (MMBbl) |
|
|
Gas (Bcf) |
|
|
Bcfe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
157.2 |
|
|
|
181.7 |
|
Undeveloped |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
171.6 |
|
|
|
202.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above represents estimates only. Reserves estimates are based upon various
assumptions, including assumptions required by the SEC relating to oil and natural gas prices,
drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds. The process
of estimating reserves is complex. This process requires significant decisions and assumptions in
the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data for each
reservoir. Furthermore, different reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserves and
cash flow based on the same available data and these differences may be significant. Therefore,
these estimates are not precise. Actual future production, oil and natural gas prices, revenues,
taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable oil and natural
gas reserves will likely vary from those estimated. In addition, we may adjust estimates of proved
reserves to reflect production history, results of exploration and development, prevailing oil and
natural gas prices and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Proved developed
reserves are reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing
equipment and operating methods. Proved undeveloped reserves are proved reserves that are expected
to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively
major expenditure is required for recompletion. Additionally, the SEC amended the definition of
proved reserves applicable to our 2009 and 2010 reserves. As a result, our December 31, 2009 and
2010 reserves may not be comparable to those of prior periods. See Glossary of Oil and Natural
Gas Terms.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, as specified by the SEC, the prices for oil, natural gas and
natural gas liquids used in this calculation were the average prices during 2010 and 2009,
respectively, determined using the price on the first day of each month, except for volumes subject
to fixed price contracts. At December 31, 2008, as specified by the SEC, the prices of oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids used in this calculation were regional cash price quotes on the
last day of the year, except for volumes subject to fixed price contracts.
The following table sets forth the average prices for oil and gas used in determining our
estimated proved reserves. We do not include our natural gas and crude oil derivative financial
instruments, consisting of natural gas and crude oil swaps and natural gas basis differential
swaps, in the determination of our oil and gas reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
4.76 |
|
|
$ |
4.34 |
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
74.63 |
|
|
|
56.33 |
|
|
|
41.00 |
|
7
We annually review all proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs) to ensure an appropriate plan for
development exists. All proved undeveloped locations conform to the SEC rules defining proved
undeveloped locations. None of our proved undeveloped reserves as of December 31, 2010 have
remained undeveloped for more than five years. We had 20.7 Bcfe of PUDs at December 31,
2010, compared with 17.0 Bcfe of PUDs at December 31, 2009. During 2010, we converted 1.7 Bcfe, or
approximately 9.8% of our PUDs at December 31, 2009 to proved developed reserves.
See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information regarding
our oil and gas reserves.
The standardized measure of our estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2010 was $199.6
million. Standardized measure is the present value of estimated future net revenues
(after income taxes) to be generated from the production of proved reserves, determined in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, without giving effect to nonproperty
related expenses such as certain general and administrative expenses and debt service or to
depreciation, depletion and amortization and discounted using an annual discount rate of 10%.
Standardized measure does not give effect to derivative transactions. The standardized measure
shown should not be construed as the current market value of the reserves. The 10% discount
factor, which is required by Financial Accounting Standards Board pronouncements, is not
necessarily the most appropriate discount rate. The present value, no matter what discount rate is
used, is materially affected by assumptions as to timing of future production, which may prove to
be inaccurate.
Controls Over Reserve Estimates
Our policies and practices regarding internal controls over the recording of reserves is
structured to objectively and accurately estimate our oil and gas reserves quantities and present
values in compliance with the SECs regulations and GAAP. Compliance in reserves bookings is the
responsibility of our Manager of Reservoir Engineering, who is also our principal engineer. Our
principal engineer has over 6 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, including over 5
years as either a reserve evaluator, trainer or manager and is a qualified reserves estimator
(QRE), as defined by the Society of Petroleum Engineers standards. Further professional
qualifications include a degree in petroleum engineering, extensive internal and external reserve
training, and asset evaluation and management. In addition, the principal engineer is an active
participant in industry reserve seminars, professional industry groups and has been a member of the
Society of Petroleum Engineers for over 6 years. Our principal engineer is an employee of EnerVest
who provides all of our operating, administrative and technical services.
Our controls over reserve estimates included retaining Wright & Company, Inc. as our
independent petroleum and geological firm. We provided information about our oil and gas
properties, including production profiles, prices and costs, to Wright & Company and they prepare
their own estimates of the reserves attributable to our properties. All of the information
regarding reserves in this annual report is derived from the report of Wright & Company. The
report of Wright & Company is included as an Exhibit to this annual report. The principal
engineer at Wright & Company responsible for preparing our reserve estimates is D. Randall Wright,
President of Wright & Company. Mr. Wright is a licensed professional engineer with over 33 years
of experience in petroleum engineering.
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors meets annually with management, including the
Manager of Reservoir Engineering, to discuss matters and policies related to reserves.
Appalachian Basin Conventional Properties
The Appalachian Basin is the oldest and geographically one of the largest oil and gas
producing regions in the United States. Although the Appalachian Basin has sedimentary formations
to depths of 15,000 feet or more, oil and natural gas has, until recently, primarily been produced
from shallow, highly developed formations at depths of 1,000 to 6,500 feet. Our drilling completion
rates and those of others drilling in these shallow, highly developed formations have historically
exceeded 90%, with production generally lasting longer than 20 years.
We currently own working interests in 3,152 gross (2,828 net) wells in the Appalachian Basin
which currently produce approximately 18.3 MMcfe net per day. Most of our production in the
Appalachian Basin is derived from the shallow (1,000 to 6,500 feet) Medina, Clinton and Clarendon
Formations, predominately in Pennsylvania and Ohio.
8
During 2010, we drilled 39 gross (39.0 net) development wells and 6 gross (1.5 net)
exploratory wells of which 38 gross (38.0 net) development wells and 4 gross (1.0 net) exploratory
wells were completed as producing wells. The anticipated 2011 focus will be primarily in the
following three areas: Knox exploration in Ohio and operational reworks and enhancement projects
throughout our operating area. We will continue to evaluate our development drilling opportunities
in our traditional areas such as the Medina and Clarendon formations in Pennsylvania and the
Clinton Formation in Ohio.
Michigan Basin Properties
The Michigan Basin has operational similarities to the Appalachian Basin, including geographic
proximity to natural gas markets, which has generally resulted in premium wellhead prices as
compared to NYMEX prices. We own working interests in 1,216 gross (635 net) wells in the Michigan
Basin which currently produce approximately 14.3 MMcfe net per day.
Most of our production in the Michigan Basin is derived from the shallow (700 to 2,000 feet)
Antrim Shale Formation. Completion rates for companies drilling to this formation have exceeded
90%, with production often lasting 20 years or more. Because the production rate from Antrim Shale
wells is relatively low, cost containment is a crucial aspect of our operations. Our operations in
the Michigan Basin are more capital intensive than our Appalachian Basin operations because of the
low natural reservoir pressures and the high initial water content of the Antrim Shale Formation.
During 2010, we drilled no wells to the Antrim Shale Formation. We do not plan to drill any
wells in the Antrim Shale Formation in 2011.
Oil and Gas Operations and Production
Operations. EnerVest Operating operates 88% of our gross wells in which we hold working
interests. They maintain production field offices in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan. Through
these offices, EnerVest Operating reviews our properties to determine what action can be taken to
control operating costs and/or improve production.
We own approximately 1,600 miles of natural gas gathering lines in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New
York and Michigan, which are connected directly to various intrastate and interstate natural gas
transmission systems. The interconnections with these pipelines afford us marketing access to
numerous gas markets.
9
Production, Sales Prices and Costs. The following table sets forth certain information
regarding our net oil and natural gas production, revenues and unit expenses for the years
indicated. The average prices shown in the table include the effects of our qualified effective
hedging activities. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (MMcf) |
|
|
10,109 |
|
|
|
12,034 |
|
|
|
13,217 |
|
Oil (MBbl) |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Total production (MMcfe) |
|
|
11,742 |
|
|
|
13,977 |
|
|
|
15,221 |
|
Average sales price (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
3.61 |
|
|
$ |
8.62 |
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
73.92 |
|
|
|
56.49 |
|
|
|
94.40 |
|
Per Mcfe |
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
9.55 |
|
Average costs (per Mcfe) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production expense |
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Depletion |
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average prices presented above include non-cash amounts related to our derivatives as
a result of purchase accounting for the Merger and the Transaction. Excluding these non-cash
amounts from oil and gas sales revenues would result in the following average sales prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
4.61 |
|
|
$ |
4.27 |
|
|
$ |
9.31 |
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
73.92 |
|
|
|
56.49 |
|
|
|
94.40 |
|
Per Mcfe |
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
Exploration and Development
Our activities include development and exploratory drilling in both the low risk formations
and the less developed formations of the Appalachian and Michigan Basins.
In 2010, we spent approximately $18.0 million on development and exploratory drilling and
other capital expenditures including exploratory dry hole costs. We drilled 39 gross (39.0 net)
development wells and 6 gross (1.5 net) exploratory wells in 2010.
In 2011, we expect to spend approximately $17.5 million on development and exploratory
drilling and other capital expenditures. The anticipated 2011 focus primarily will be in the
following areas: Knox exploration in Ohio and operational reworks and enhancement projects
throughout our operating area. We will continue to evaluate our development drilling opportunities
in our traditional areas such as the Antrim play in Michigan, the Medina and Clarendon plays in
Pennsylvania and the Clinton play in Ohio.
Additionally, we have also tested the Niagaran Carbonate, Onondaga Limestone, Oriskany
Sandstone, Utica Shale, Marcellus Shale and Trenton Black River Formations. In the future, we may
allocate a portion of our drilling budget to drill wells in these and other deeper or less
developed formations.
10
Typical characteristics of our drilling programs in the formations we target are described
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Average |
|
|
|
|
Drilling and |
|
|
|
|
Completion Costs per |
|
|
Range of Well Depths |
|
Well |
|
|
(in feet) |
|
(in thousands) |
Ohio: |
|
|
|
|
Clinton |
|
3,500 - 5,750 |
|
$280 - 320 |
Knox |
|
4,000 - 8,500 |
|
550 - 800 |
Pennsylvania: |
|
|
|
|
Clarendon |
|
1,100 - 2,100 |
|
100 - 120 |
Medina |
|
5,300 - 6,200 |
|
325 - 350 |
Michigan: |
|
|
|
|
Antrim |
|
1,300 - 2,100 |
|
275 - 325 |
Drilling Results. The following table sets forth drilling results from continuing operations
with respect to wells drilled by us during the past three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development Wells |
|
|
Exploratory Wells |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Productive: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net |
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Dry: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Producing Well Data
As of December 31, 2010, we owned interests in 4,368 gross (3,463 net) producing oil and gas
wells of which approximately 3,833 wells were operated by EnerVest Operating. In the fourth
quarter of 2010, our average net production was approximately 32.6 MMcfe per day consisting of 28.3
MMcf of natural gas and 726 Bbls of oil per day.
The following table summarizes by state our productive wells at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Wells |
|
|
Oil Wells |
|
|
Total |
|
State |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
Ohio |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
New York |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
4,368 |
|
|
|
3,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Acreage Data
The following table summarizes by state our gross and net developed and undeveloped acreage at
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed Acreage |
|
|
Undeveloped Acreage |
|
|
Total Acreage |
|
State |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
Ohio |
|
|
404,898 |
|
|
|
58,592 |
|
|
|
391,844 |
|
|
|
90,849 |
|
|
|
796,742 |
|
|
|
149,441 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
40,676 |
|
|
|
30,372 |
|
|
|
175,093 |
|
|
|
147,624 |
|
|
|
215,769 |
|
|
|
177,996 |
|
New York |
|
|
2,845 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
12,696 |
|
|
|
12,117 |
|
|
|
15,541 |
|
|
|
12,725 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
70,418 |
|
|
|
64,925 |
|
|
|
12,326 |
|
|
|
10,866 |
|
|
|
82,744 |
|
|
|
75,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518,837 |
|
|
|
154,497 |
|
|
|
591,959 |
|
|
|
261,456 |
|
|
|
1,110,796 |
|
|
|
415,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes by state our undeveloped acreage as of December 31, 2010
that is subject to expiration absent drilling activity during the three years ended December 31,
2013 and thereafter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped Acreage Subject to Expiration in the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
State |
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
Ohio |
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
4,212 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
3,941 |
|
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
8,375 |
|
|
|
4,664 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
3,769 |
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,129 |
|
|
|
8,671 |
|
|
|
4,199 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
7,747 |
|
|
|
5,505 |
|
|
|
9,345 |
|
|
|
5,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposition of Assets
In July 2010, we sold a 75% interest in certain undeveloped acreage in Ohio for $6.1 million.
In June 2010, we sold undeveloped acreage in Pennsylvania for $30.6 million.
In November 2009, we sold undeveloped acreage in Bradford County, Pennsylvania for $35.8
million.
In July 2009, we sold our coalbed methane properties in Pennsylvania for $16.7 million.
In March 2008, we sold a 50-70% option interest in certain deep rights on approximately
201,000 net acres in Ohio and Pennsylvania for $3.0 million.
Acquisition of Producing Properties
In the fourth quarter of 2010, we acquired additional working interest in our wells in
Michigan for approximately $4.4 million.
12
Employees
As of February 28, 2011, we had no employees. On March 15, 2006, we entered into a joint
operating agreement with EnerVest Operating L.L.C. (EnerVest Operating), a subsidiary of
EnerVest. All of our operating, administrative and technical services are provided by employees of
EnerVest or other third parties.
Competition
The oil and gas industry is highly competitive. Competition is particularly intense with
respect to the acquisition of producing properties and undeveloped acreage and the sale of oil and
gas production. There is competition among oil and gas producers as well as with other industries
in supplying energy and fuel to end-users.
Our competitors in oil and gas exploration, development and production include major
integrated oil and gas companies as well as numerous independent oil and gas companies, individual
proprietors, natural gas pipeline companies and their affiliates. Many of these competitors
possess and employ financial and personnel resources substantially in excess of those available to
us. Such competitors may be able to pay more for desirable prospects or producing properties and
to evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties or prospects than our financial or
personnel resources will permit. Our ability to add to our reserves in the future will depend on
the availability of capital, the ability to exploit our current developed and undeveloped lease
holdings and the ability to select and acquire suitable producing properties and prospects for
future exploration and development.
We are also affected by competition for drilling rigs and the availability of related
equipment. In the past, the oil and natural gas industry has experienced shortages of drilling
rigs, equipment, pipe and personnel, which have delayed development drilling and other exploitation
activities and have caused significant price increases. We are unable to predict when, or if, such
shortages may occur or how they would affect our development and exploitation program.
Principal Customers
The market for our oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids production depends on
factors beyond our control, including the extent of domestic production and imports of oil, natural
gas and natural gas liquids, the proximity and capacity of natural gas pipelines and other
transportation facilities, the demand for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids, the marketing
of competitive fuels and the effect of state and federal regulation. The oil and natural gas
industry also competes with other industries in supplying the energy and fuel requirements of
industrial, commercial and individual consumers.
Our oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids production is sold to a variety of purchasers.
The terms of sale under the majority of existing contracts are shortterm, usually one year or
less in duration. The prices received for oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids sales are
generally tied to monthly or daily indices as quoted in industry publications.
Each of the following customers accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated revenues during
2010: American Refining Group, Inc., National Fuel Resources, Inc. and Sequent Energy. We believe
that the loss of a major customer would have a temporary effect on our revenues but that over time,
we would be able to replace our major customers.
Title to Properties
As is customary in the oil and natural gas industry, we initially conduct only a cursory
review of the title to our properties on which we do not have proved reserves. Prior to the
commencement of drilling operations on those properties, we conduct a thorough title examination
and perform curative work with respect to significant defects. To the extent title opinions or
other investigations reflect title defects on those properties, we are typically responsible for
curing any title defects at our expense. We generally will not commence drilling operations on a
property until we have cured any material title defects on such property. Prior to completing an
acquisition of producing natural gas leases, we perform title reviews on the most significant
leases and, depending on the materiality of the properties, we may obtain a title opinion or review
previously obtained title opinions. As a result, we have obtained title opinions on a significant
portion of our natural gas properties and believe that we have satisfactory title to our producing
properties in accordance with standards generally accepted in the natural gas and oil industry.
Our properties are subject to customary royalty and other interests, liens for current taxes and
other burdens that we believe do not materially interfere with the use of or affect our carrying
value of the properties.
13
Regulation
Regulation of Drilling and Production. Statutes, rules and regulations affecting
exploration and production undergo constant review and often are amended, expanded and
reinterpreted, making the prediction of future costs or the impact of regulatory compliance to new
laws and statutes difficult. The regulatory burden on the oil and natural gas industry increases
its cost of doing business and, consequently, affects its profitability. Our operations are subject
to various types of regulation at the federal, state and local levels. These types of regulation
include requiring permits for the drilling of wells, drilling bonds and reports concerning
operations. Most states and some counties and municipalities in which we operate also regulate one
or more of the following:
|
|
the method of drilling and casing wells; |
|
|
the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled; |
|
|
the plugging and abandoning of wells; and |
|
|
notice to surface owners and other third parties. |
State and federal regulations are generally intended to prevent waste of oil and natural gas,
protect correlative rights to produce oil and natural gas between owners in a common reservoir or
formation, control the amount of oil and natural gas produced by assigning allowable rates of
production and control contamination of the environment. Pipelines and natural gas plants operated
by other companies that provide midstream services to us are also subject to the jurisdiction of
various federal, state and county/municipal agencies, which can affect our operations. State laws
also regulate the size and shape of drilling and spacing units or proration units governing the
pooling of oil and natural gas properties. States in the Appalachian Basin have taken up
consideration of forced pooling. Other states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases.
States generally impose a production, ad valorem or severance tax with respect to the
production and sale of oil and natural gas within its jurisdiction. States do not generally
regulate wellhead prices or engage in other, similar direct economic regulation, but there can be
no assurance they will not do so in the future.
In addition, 11 states have enacted surface damage statutes (SDAs). These laws are designed
to compensate for damage caused by mineral development. Most SDAs contain entry notification and
negotiation requirements to facilitate contact between operators and surface owners/users. Most
also contain bonding requirements and specific expenses for exploration and producing activities.
Costs and delays associated with SDAs could impair operational effectiveness and increase
development costs.
We do not control the availability of transportation and processing facilities used in the
marketing of our production. For example, we may have to shutin a productive natural gas well
because of a lack of available natural gas gathering or transportation facilities.
If we conduct operations on federal, state or Indian oil and natural gas leases, these
operations must comply with numerous regulatory restrictions, including various nondiscrimination
statutes, royalty and related valuation requirements, and certain of these operations must be
conducted pursuant to certain on-site security regulations and other appropriate permits issued by
the Bureau of Land Management or other appropriate federal or state
agencies.
Federal Regulation of Sales and Transportation of Natural Gas. The availability, terms and
cost of transportation significantly affect sales of natural gas. The interstate transportation and
sale for resale of natural gas are subject to federal regulation, including regulation of the
terms, conditions and rates for interstate transportation, storage and various other matters,
primarily by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Federal and state regulations
govern the price and terms for access to natural gas pipeline transportation. FERCs regulations
for interstate natural gas transmission in some circumstances may also affect the intrastate
transportation of natural gas. FERC regulates the rates, terms and conditions
14
applicable to the interstate transportation of natural gas by pipelines under the Natural Gas
Act as well as under Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act.
Since 1985, FERC has implemented regulations intended to increase competition within the
natural gas industry by making natural gas transportation more accessible to natural gas buyers and
sellers on an open-access, nondiscriminatory basis. FERC has announced several important
transportation related policy statements and rule changes, including a statement of policy and
final rule issued February 25, 2000, concerning alternatives to its traditional cost-of-service
rate-making methodology to establish the rates interstate pipelines may charge for their services.
The final rule revises FERCs pricing policy and current regulatory framework to improve the
efficiency of the market and further enhance competition in natural gas markets.
FERC has also issued several other generally procompetitive policy statements and
initiatives affecting rates and other aspects of pipeline transportation of natural gas. On May 31,
2005, FERC generally reaffirmed its policy of allowing interstate pipelines to selectively discount
their rates in order to meet competition from other interstate pipelines. On June 15, 2006, the
FERC issued an order in which it declined to establish uniform standards for natural gas quality
and interchangeability, opting instead for a pipelinebypipeline approach. On June 19, 2006, in
order to facilitate development of new storage capacity, FERC established criteria to allow
providers to charge marketbased (i.e. negotiated) rates for storage services. On June 19, 2008,
the FERC removed the rate ceiling on shortterm releases by shippers of interstate pipeline
transportation capacity.
Although natural gas prices are currently unregulated, Congress historically has been active
in the area of natural gas regulation. We cannot predict whether new legislation to regulate
natural gas might be proposed, what proposals, if any, might actually be enacted by Congress or the
various state legislatures, and what effect, if any, the proposals might have on the operations of
the underlying properties. Sales of condensate and natural gas liquids are not currently regulated
and are made at market prices.
State Natural Gas Regulation. Various states regulate the drilling for, and the production,
gathering and sale of, natural gas, including imposing severance taxes and requirements for
obtaining drilling permits. States also regulate the method of developing new fields, the spacing
and operation of wells and the prevention of waste of natural gas resources. States may regulate
rates of production and may establish maximum daily production allowables from natural gas wells
based on market demand or resource conservation, or both. States do not regulate wellhead prices or
engage in other similar direct economic regulation, but there can be no assurance that they will
not do so in the future. The effect of these regulations may be to limit the amounts of natural gas
that may be produced from our wells and to limit the number of wells or locations we can drill.
Other Regulation. In addition to the regulation of oil and natural gas pipeline
transportation rates, the oil and natural gas industry generally is subject to compliance with
various other federal, state and local regulations and laws. Some of those laws relate to
occupational safety, resource conservation and equal employment opportunity. We do not believe that
compliance with these laws will have a material adverse effect upon our unitholders.
Federal Regulation of Sales and Transportation of Crude Oil. Our sales of crude oil and
condensate are not currently regulated and are made at market prices. In a number of instances,
however, the ability to transport and sell such products is dependent on pipelines whose rates,
terms and conditions of service are subject to FERC jurisdiction under the Interstate Commerce Act.
Certain regulations implemented by the FERC in recent years could result in an increase in the
cost of pipeline transportation service. We do not believe, however, that these regulations affect
us any differently than other producers.
Environmental Regulations. Our oil and natural gas exploration, development, production and
pipeline operations are subject to stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental
protection. Numerous federal, state and local governmental agencies, such as the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, also referred to as the U.S. EPA, issue regulations to implement
and enforce such laws, which often require difficult and costly compliance measures that carry
substantial administrative, civil and criminal penalties or may result in injunctive relief if we
fail to comply. These laws and regulations may require the acquisition of a permit or other
approval before drilling commences, restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various
substances that can be released into the environment in connection with drilling and production
activities, limit or prohibit construction or drilling activities on certain lands lying within
wilderness, wetlands, ecologically sensitive and other protected areas, require the installation of
pollution control equipment, restrict materials used in our operations, require bonds to be posted
for the
15
anticipated costs of plugging and abandoning wells, and can require remedial action to address
pollution from former operations, such as plugging abandoned wells or closing pits, and impose
substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our operations. Failure or delay in
obtaining such permits or approvals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to develop
our properties, and receipt of permits or approvals with onerous conditions could increase our
compliance costs.
The regulatory burden on the oil and natural gas industry increases the cost of doing business
and consequently may affect our profitability. Changes in environmental laws and regulations occur
frequently, and any changes that result in more stringent and costly regulation could materially
adversely affect our operations and financial position, as well as those of the oil and gas
industry in general. While we have not yet experienced any material adverse effect from compliance
or noncompliance with these environmental requirements, there is no assurance that this trend will
continue in the future.
Under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA), also known as the Superfund law, and comparable state laws, liability generally is
joint and several for costs of investigation and remediation of contaminated sites and for
associated natural resource damages, without regard to fault or the legality of the original
conduct, on certain classes of persons with respect to the release into the environment of
substances designated under CERCLA as hazardous substances (Hazardous Substances). These classes
of persons, or so-called potentially responsible parties (PRPs), include current and certain past
owners and operators of a facility where there has been a release or threat of release of a
Hazardous Substance and persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of the Hazardous
Substances found at such a facility. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA and, in some cases, third
parties to take actions in response to threats to the public health or the environment and to seek
to recover from the PRPs the costs of such action. Although CERCLA generally exempts petroleum
from the definition of Hazardous Substance, in the course of its operations, we have generated and
will generate wastes that fall within CERCLAs definition of Hazardous Substances and may have
disposed of those wastes at disposal sites owned and operated by others. We may also be an owner or
operator of facilities on which Hazardous Substances have been released. We may be responsible
under CERCLA for all or part of the costs to clean up facilities at which such substances have been
released and for natural resource damages, as a past or present owner or operator or as an
arranger. To our knowledge, we have not been named a PRP under CERCLA nor have any prior owners or
operators of our properties been named as PRPs related to their ownership or operation of such
property. In the event contamination is discovered at a site on which we are or have been an
owner or operator or to which we have sent Hazardous Substances, we could be liable for the costs
of investigation and remediation and for natural resource damages.
Although oil and gas wastes generally are exempt from regulation as hazardous wastes
(Hazardous Wastes) under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and
comparable state statutes, it is possible some wastes we generate presently or in the future may
be subject to regulation under RCRA and state analogs. The U.S. EPA and various state agencies
have limited the disposal options for certain wastes, including hazardous wastes and there is no
guarantee that more stringent requirements will not be adopted in the future. Moreover, ordinary
industrial wastes, such as paint wastes, waste solvents, laboratory wastes, and waste compressor
oils, may be regulated as hazardous waste. Although the costs of managing these wastes generated
by us may be significant, we do not expect to experience more burdensome costs than similarly
situated companies involved in oil and gas exploration and production.
We currently own, operate or lease, and have in the past owned, operated or leased, numerous
properties that for many years have been used for the exploration and production of oil and gas.
Hydrocarbons or other wastes may have been disposed of or released on or under the properties
owned, operated or leased by us or on or under other locations where such wastes have been taken
for disposal. In addition, many of these properties have been operated by third parties whose
treatment and disposal or release of hydrocarbons or other wastes were not under our control.
These properties and the wastes disposed thereon may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA, and analogous
state laws. Under such laws, we could be required to remove or remediate previously disposed wastes
or property contamination (including wastes or contamination attributable to others), or to perform
remedial plugging or pit closure operations to prevent future contamination.
The federal Clean Air Act and analogous state laws restricts the emission of air pollutants
from many sources, including equipment we use such as compressors to transport natural gas in
our pipelines. Federal and state laws generally require new and modified sources of air
pollutants to obtain permits prior to commencing construction, which may require, among other
things, stringent, technical controls. Major sources of air pollutants are subject to more
stringent requirements, including additional permitting requirements. Other federal and state
laws designed to control hazardous (or toxic) air pollutants, might require installation of
additional controls. Governmental agencies (and in the case of civil suits, private parties in
certain circumstances) can bring actions for failure to strictly comply with air pollution
regulations or permits and generally enforce compliance through administrative, civil or
criminal enforcement actions, resulting in fines, injunctive relief (which could include
requiring us to forego construction, modification or operation of sources of air
16
pollutants) and imprisonment.
More stringent laws and regulations relating to climate change and greenhouse gases (GHGs) may
be adopted in the future and could cause us to incur material expenses in complying with them. The
EPA has been moving forward to regulate GHS as pollutants under the CAA. By adopting rules
regulating GHG emissions from motor vehicles, EPA triggered requirements to permit GHG emissions
from stationary sources under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V
permitting programs. EPA has implemented the so-call Tailoring Rule requiring that the largest
sources to first obtain permits for GHG emissions. There is still the possibility that federal
legislation will be adopted to change the GHG permitting program put in place by EPA, but to date,
efforts at a comprehensive GHG legislative package (such as a cap and trade program) appear not to
be moving forward in Congress. Some members of Congress, however, continue to publicly indicate an
intention to promote legislation to curb EPAs authority to regulate GHGs. Additionally, some
states, regions and localities have adopted or are considering programs to address GHGs. We may
incur significant costs to control our emissions and comply with regulatory requirements associated
with GHG permitting. In addition, EPA has adopted a mandatory GHG emissions reporting program
which imposes reporting and monitoring requirements on various industries. In November 2010, EPA
expanded this GHG reporting rule to include onshore and offshore oil and natural gas production
facilities and onshore oil and natural gas processing, transmission, storage and distribution
facilities. Should we be required to report GHG emissions, it could require us to incur costs to
monitor, keep records of, and report emissions of GHGs.
Because of the lack of any comprehensive legislative program addressing GHGs, there is a great
deal of uncertainty regarding the regulation of GHGs at the federal level. In addition to possible
federal regulation, a number of states, individually and regionally, also are considering or have
implemented GHG regulatory programs. These potential regional and state initiatives may result in
socalled capandtrade programs, under which overall GHG emissions are limited and GHG
emissions are then allocated and sold, and possibly other regulatory requirements, that could
result in our incurring material expenses to comply, e.g., by being required to purchase or to
surrender allowances for GHGs resulting from our operations or otherwise being required to control
or reduce emissions. The federal, regional and local regulatory initiatives also could adversely
affect the marketability of the oil and natural gas we produce. The impact of such future programs
cannot be predicted, but we do not expect our operations to be affected any differently than other
similarly situated domestic competitors.
Our operations involve discharges to surface waters of fluids associated with the production
of oil and gas. The federal Clean Water Act and analogous state laws impose restrictions and
strict controls regarding the discharge of these fluids from oil and gas operations into state
waters or waters of the United States, a term broadly defined, prohibiting discharge, except in
accord with the terms of a permit issued by U.S. EPA or the state. Our facilities in Michigan use
injection wells to dispose of wastewater that is produced as a byproduct of oil and gas production.
These injection wells are subject to stringent regulation and permitting requirements under the
Safe Drinking Water Act and analogous state programs. At our oil and gas wells in Ohio and
Pennsylvania, wastewater is collected in aboveground tanks and collected by third-party contractors
for disposal off-site. The Clean Water Act also prohibits certain activity (including the
discharge of dredged or fill materials) in wetlands unless authorized by a permit issued by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The U.S. EPA also has adopted regulations requiring certain oil and
gas exploration and production facilities to obtain permits for storm water discharges under
certain circumstances. Sanctions for failure to comply with Clean Water Act requirements,
including permit requirements, include administrative, civil and criminal penalties, as well as
injunctive relief.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (the SWDA) regulates, among other things, underground injection
operations. Recent legislative activity has occurred which, if successful, would impose additional
regulation under the SDWA upon the use of hydraulic fracturing fluids. Currently, most hydraulic
fracturing activities are regulated at the state level, as the SDWA exempts most hydraulic
fracturing activities. Congress is considering two companion bills entitled the Fracturing
Responsibility and Chemical Awareness Act of 2009 (the FRAC Act). If enacted, the legislation
would impose on our hydraulic fracturing operations permit and financial assurance requirements,
requirements that we adhere to construction specifications, fulfill monitoring, reporting and
recordkeeping obligations, and meet plugging and abandonment requirements. In addition to
subjecting the injection of hydraulic fracturing to the SDWA regulatory and permitting
requirements, the proposed legislation would require the disclosure of the chemicals within the
hydraulic fluids, which could make it easier for third parties opposing hydraulic fracturing to
initiate legal proceedings based on allegations that specific chemicals used in the process could
adversely affect ground water. Neither piece of legislation has been passed. In addition, many
states and other local regulatory authorities have enacted or are considering regulations on
hydraulic fracturing including regulations that could restrict hydraulic fracturing in certain
circumstances. In addition, EPA has commenced a study of the potential environmental impacts of
hydraulic fracturing activities. Further, a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives is
conducting an investigation of certain hydraulic fracturing activities. If new laws or regulations
impose
17
significant restrictions or conditions on hydraulic fracturing activities, we could incur
substantial compliance costs and the requirements could negatively impact our ability to conduct
fracturing activities on our assets.
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as amended, also known as the OPA, pertains to the
prevention of and response to spills or discharges of oil into navigable waters of the United
States. The OPA imposes strict, joint and several liability on liable responsible parties for
oil removal costs and a variety of public and private damages, including natural resource
damages. A liable responsible party includes the owner or operator of a facility, vessel or
pipeline that is a source of an oil discharge or that poses the substantial threat of discharge
or, in the case of offshore facilities, the lessee or permittee of the area in which a
discharging facility is located. Regulations under the OPA and the Clean Water Act also require
certain owners and operators of facilities that store or otherwise handle oil, such as ours, to
prepare and implement spill prevention, control, and countermeasure, or SPCC, plans and spill
response plans relating to possible discharges of oil into surface waters. Our SPCC plans have
been updated to comply with the current regulations. We continue to monitor rapid changes in
rules and requirements at both the federal and state level regarding spill prevention. We cannot
assure you that costs that may be necessary for compliance with these SPCC and comparable state
requirements will not be material.
The federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and comparable state statutes impose
requirements related to disclosure and organization of certain information related to hazardous
materials. The OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations
under Title III of CERCLA and similar state statutes may require us to organize and/or disclose
information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations.
Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities on or pipeline crossing of federal
lands may be subject to the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA, which requires federal
agencies, including the Department of Interior, to evaluate major agency actions having the
potential to significantly impact the environment. In the course of such evaluations, an agency
will prepare an Environmental Assessment that assesses the potential direct, indirect and
cumulative impacts of a proposed project and, if necessary, will prepare a more detailed
Environmental Impact Statement that may be made available for public review and comment. All of our
current exploration and production activities, as well as proposed exploration and development
plans, on federal lands require governmental permits that are subject to the requirements of NEPA.
This process has the potential to delay or impose additional conditions upon the development of oil
and natural gas projects.
In an interpretative guidance on climate change disclosures, the SEC indicates that climate
change could have an effect on the severity of weather (including hurricanes and floods), sea
levels, the arability of farmland, and water availability and quality. If such effects were to
occur, our exploration and production operations have the potential to be adversely affected.
Potential adverse effects could include damages to our facilities from powerful winds or rising
waters in low lying areas, disruption of our production activities either because of climate
related damages to our facilities in our costs of operation potentially arising from such climatic
effects, less efficient or non routine operating practices necessitated by climate effects or
increased costs for insurance coverages in the aftermath of such effects. Significant physical
effects of climate change could also have an indirect affect on our financing and operations by
disrupting the transportation or process related services provided by midstream companies, service
companies or suppliers with whom we have a business relationship. We may not be able to recover
through insurance some or any of the damages, losses or costs that may result from potential
physical effects of climate change.
Our business activities are subject to significant hazards and risks, including those
described below. If any of these events should occur, our business, financial condition, liquidity
or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Additional risks not presently
known to us or which we consider immaterial based on information currently available to us may also
materially adversely affect us. Please also refer to the cautionary note under Forward-Looking
Statements on page 1 of this Annual Report.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Hedging transactions may limit our potential gains or expose us to loss.
To manage our exposure to price risks in the marketing of our natural gas, we enter into
natural gas fixed-price physical delivery contracts as well as commodity price swap and collar
contracts from time to time with respect to a portion of our current or future production. In
connection with the Merger, we became a party to a long-term hedging program with J. Aron. We
anticipate the hedges will cover approximately 66% of the expected 2011 through 2013 production
from our current estimated proved reserves. These transactions may limit our potential gains if
natural gas and crude oil prices were to
18
rise substantially over the prices specified in the hedge agreement. In addition, such
transactions may expose us to the risk of financial loss in certain circumstances, including
instances in which:
|
|
|
our production is less than expected; |
|
|
|
there is a narrowing of price differentials between delivery points for our
production and the delivery points assumed in the hedge arrangements; |
|
|
|
there is a failure of a hedge counterparty to perform under the Hedge Agreement or
other hedge transactions which risk has increased with the current economic and
financial crisis; or |
|
|
|
a sudden, unexpected event materially impacts natural gas and crude oil prices. |
While we believe J. Aron to be a strong and creditworthy counterparty, disruptions occurring
in the financial markets could lead to sudden changes in a counterpartys liquidity, which could
impair their ability to perform under the terms of the hedging contract. We are unable to predict
sudden changes in a counterpartys creditworthiness or ability to perform. Even if we do accurately
predict sudden changes, our ability to negate the risk may be limited depending upon market
conditions.
Our operations require large amounts of capital that may not be recovered or raised.
If our revenues were to decrease due to lower oil and natural gas prices, decreased production
or other reasons, and if we could not obtain capital through our credit facilities or otherwise,
our ability to execute our development plans, replace our reserves or maintain our production
levels could be greatly limited. Our current development plans will require us to make large
capital expenditures for the exploitation and development of our natural gas properties.
Historically, we have funded our capital expenditures through a combination of funds generated
internally from sales of production or properties, the issuance of equity, long-term debt financing
and short-term financing arrangements. We cannot assure you, however, that our business will
generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us
under our Credit Agreement in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness, including
the Senior Secured Notes or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a
portion of our indebtedness, including the Senior Secured Notes on or before maturity. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including our Credit
Agreement and the Senior Secured Notes, on commercially reasonable terms or at all, especially
given the current economic and financial market crisis. Future cash flows and the availability of
financing will be subject to a number of variables, such as:
|
|
|
the success of our projects in the Appalachian and Michigan basins; |
|
|
|
our success in locating and producing new reserves; |
|
|
|
the level of production from existing wells; and |
|
|
|
prices of oil and natural gas. |
In addition, debt financing could lead to a diversion of cash flow to satisfy debt servicing
obligations and to restrictions on our operations.
Oil and natural gas prices are volatile, and an extended decline in prices would hurt our
profitability and financial condition.
While we have entered into long-term hedges covering most of our production in an effort to
mitigate the risk of a decline in prices for oil and gas, a portion of our production remains
unhedged. We expect that the markets for oil and gas will continue to be volatile. Any
substantial or extended decline in the price of oil or gas would negatively affect our financial
condition and results of operations. Our revenues, operating results, profitability, future rate
of growth and the carrying value of our oil and gas properties depend heavily on prevailing market
prices for oil and gas. If gas prices decreased $0.50 per Mcf, our gas sales revenues would
decrease by approximately $5.1 million. If the price of crude oil decreased $10.00 per Bbl, our
oil sales revenues would decrease by approximately $2.7 million. The impact of these price
decreases on our cash flows would be significantly less than these amounts due to our oil and gas
derivatives. Price decreases of $0.50 per Mcf and $10.00 per Bbl would decrease cash flows from the
sale of oil and gas by approximately $1.6 million after considering the effects of the derivative
contracts in place during 2010. This sensitivity analysis is based on our 2010 oil and gas sales
volumes. A material decline could reduce our cash flow and borrowing capacity, as well as the
value and the amount of our natural gas reserves. Approximately 85% of our proved reserves are
natural gas. Therefore, we are more directly impacted by volatility in the price of natural gas.
For example, as of December 31, 2010, a 10% reduction in the
19
price of oil and natural gas would have reduced our future net cash flow from proved reserves,
discounted at 10%, by $49 million. Various factors beyond our control can affect prices of oil and
natural gas. These factors include: North American supplies of oil and gas; political instability
or armed conflict in oil or gas producing regions; the price and level of foreign imports;
worldwide economic conditions, including recovery from the recent recession; marketability of
production; the level of consumer demand; the price, availability and acceptance of alternative
fuels; the availability of pipeline capacity; weather conditions; economic conditions; and actions
of federal, foreign, state, and local authorities.
These external factors and the volatile nature of the energy markets make it difficult to
estimate future commodity prices.
If oil and natural gas prices decrease or our drilling efforts are unsuccessful, we may be required
to write down the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties.
There is a risk that we will be required to write down the carrying value of our oil and gas
properties, which would reduce our earnings and stockholders equity. A write down could occur
when oil and gas prices are low or if we have substantial downward adjustments to our estimated
proved reserves, increases in our estimates of development costs or deterioration in our drilling
results.
We account for our natural gas and crude oil exploration and development activities using the
successful efforts method of accounting. Under this method, costs of productive exploratory wells,
developmental dry holes and productive wells and undeveloped leases are capitalized. Oil and gas
lease acquisition costs are also capitalized. Exploration costs, including personnel costs,
certain geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals for oil and gas leases, are charged
to expense as incurred. Exploratory drilling costs are initially capitalized, but charged to
expense if and when the well is determined not to have found reserves in commercial quantities.
The capitalized costs of our oil and gas properties may not exceed the estimated future net cash
flows from our properties. If capitalized costs exceed future net revenues, we write down the
costs of the properties to our estimate of fair market value. Any such charge will not affect our
cash flow from operating activities, but it will reduce our earnings and stockholders equity.
The application of the successful efforts method of accounting requires managerial judgment to
determine the proper classification of wells designated as developmental or exploratory, which will
ultimately determine the proper accounting treatment of the costs incurred. The results from a
drilling operation can take considerable time to analyze and the determination that commercial
reserves have been discovered requires both judgment and industry experience. Wells may be
completed that are assumed to be productive but may actually deliver oil and gas in quantities
insufficient to be economic, which may result in the abandonment of the wells at a later date.
Wells are drilled that have targeted geologic structures that are both developmental and
exploratory in nature and an allocation of costs is required to properly account for the results.
The evaluation of oil and gas leasehold acquisition costs requires judgment to estimate the fair
value of these costs with reference to drilling activity in a given area.
We review our oil and gas properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate
a decline in the recoverability of their carrying value. Once incurred, a write down of oil and
gas properties is not reversible at a later date even if gas or oil prices increase. Given the
complexities associated with oil and gas reserve estimates and the history of price volatility in
the oil and gas markets, events may arise that would require us to record an impairment of the
recorded book values associated with oil and gas properties. In 2010 and 2009, we recorded
impairments to our oil and natural gas properties of $1.6 million and $30.4 million, respectively.
Information concerning our reserves and future net revenues is uncertain.
This Annual Report and our other SEC filings contain estimates of our estimated proved oil and
natural gas reserves and the estimated future net revenues from such reserves. Actual results will
most likely vary from amounts estimated, and any significant variance could have a material adverse
effect on our future results of operations.
Reserve estimates are based upon various assumptions, including assumptions required by the
SEC relating to oil and natural gas prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures,
taxes and availability of funds. The process of estimating reserves is complex. This process
requires significant decisions and assumptions in the evaluation of available geological,
geophysical, engineering and economic data for each reservoir. Furthermore, different reserve
engineers may make different estimates of reserves and cash flow based on the same available data
and these differences may be significant. Therefore, these estimates are not precise.
Actual future production, oil and natural gas prices, revenues, taxes, development
expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves will
most likely vary from those estimated. Any significant variance could materially affect the
estimated quantities and present value of reserves disclosed by us. In addition, we may
20
adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect production history, results of exploration and
development, prevailing oil and natural gas prices and other factors, many of which are beyond our
control.
At December 31, 2010, approximately 10% of our estimated proved reserves were proved
undeveloped. Estimation of proved undeveloped reserves and proved developed non-producing reserves
is nearly always based on analogy to existing wells rather than the performance data used to
estimate producing reserves. Recovery of proved undeveloped reserves requires significant capital
expenditures and successful drilling operations. Production revenues from estimated proved
developed non-producing reserves will not be realized until some time in the future. The reserve
data assumes that we will make significant capital expenditures to develop our reserves. Although
we have prepared estimates of our reserves and the costs associated with these reserves in
accordance with industry standards, these estimated costs may not be accurate, development may not
occur as scheduled and actual results may not be as estimated.
The SEC amended the definition of proved reserves for all reserves estimated included in
filings after January 1, 2010. As a result, our estimates of proved reserves filed in reports
prior to January 1, 2010 may not be comparable to reports filed after that date, including those in
this annual report.
Analysts and investors should not construe the present value of future net reserves, or PV-10
or the standardized measure, as the current market value of the estimated oil and natural gas
reserves attributable to our properties. We have based the estimated discounted future net cash
flows from estimated proved reserves on prices and costs as of the date of the estimate, in
accordance with applicable regulations, whereas actual future prices and costs may be materially
higher or lower. Many factors will affect actual future net cash flows, including:
|
|
|
the amount and timing of actual production; |
|
|
|
supply and demand for natural gas; |
|
|
|
curtailments or increases in consumption by natural gas purchasers; and |
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or taxation. |
The timing of the production of oil and natural gas and of the related expenses affect the
timing of actual future net cash flows from estimated proved reserves and, thus, their actual
present value. In addition, the 10% discount factor, which we are required to use to calculate
Standardized Measure for reporting purposes, is not necessarily the most appropriate discount
factor given actual interest rates and risks to which our business or the oil and natural gas
industry in general are subject.
Our exploitation and development drilling activities may not be successful.
Our future drilling activities may not be successful, and we cannot assure you that our
overall drilling success rate or our drilling success rate for activity within a particular area
will not decline. In addition, the wells that we drill may not recover all or any portion of our
capital investment in the wells, infrastructure, or the underlying leaseholds. Unsuccessful
drilling activities could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition. The
cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is often uncertain, and a number of factors can
delay or prevent drilling operations, including:
|
|
|
unexpected drilling conditions; |
|
|
|
pressure or irregularities in formations; |
|
|
|
equipment failures or accidents; |
|
|
|
ability to hire and train personnel for drilling and completion services; |
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions; |
|
|
|
compliance with governmental requirements; and |
|
|
|
shortages or delays in the availability of drilling rig services and the delivery of
equipment. |
In addition, we may not be able to obtain any options or lease rights in potential drilling
locations that we identify. There is no guarantee that the potential drilling locations that we
have identified will ever produce oil or natural gas.
If our development drilling activities are not successful, we may not be able to replace or
grow our reserves.
21
We face strong competition in the oil and natural gas industry, and the resources of many of our
competitors are greater than ours.
We operate in a highly competitive industry. We compete with major oil companies, independent
producers and institutional and individual investors, who are actively seeking oil and natural gas
properties throughout the world, along with the equipment, labor and materials required to operate
properties. Many of our competitors have financial and technological resources vastly exceeding
those available to us. Many oil and natural gas properties are sold in a competitive bidding
process in which we may lack technological information or expertise available to other bidders. We
cannot assure you that we will be successful in acquiring and developing profitable properties in
the face of this competition. We are also affected by competition for drilling rigs and the
availability of related equipment. In the past, the oil and natural gas industry has experienced
shortages of drilling rigs, equipment, pipe and personnel, which have delayed development drilling
and other exploitation activities and have caused significant price increases.
Our operations are subject to the business and financial risk of oil and natural gas exploration.
The business of exploring for and, to a lesser extent, developing oil and natural gas
properties is an activity that involves a high degree of business and financial risk. Property
acquisition decisions generally are based on various assumptions and subjective judgments that are
speculative. It is impossible to predict accurately the ultimate production potential, if any, of
a particular property or well. Moreover, the successful completion of an oil or natural gas well
does not insure a profit on investment. A variety of factors, both geological and market-related,
can cause a well to become uneconomic or marginally economic.
Our business is subject to operating hazards that could result in substantial losses.
The oil and natural gas business involves operating hazards such as well blowouts, craterings,
explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, fires, formations with
abnormal pressures, pipeline ruptures or spills, pollution, releases of toxic gas and other
environmental hazards and risks, any of which could cause us a substantial loss. In addition, we
may be held liable for environmental damage caused by previous owners of property that we own or
lease. As a result, we may face substantial liabilities to third parties or governmental entities,
which could reduce or eliminate funds available for operation, development, production or
acquisitions or cause us to incur losses. An event that is not fully covered by insurance (for
example losses resulting from pollution and environmental risks, which are not fully insurable)
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We must comply with complex federal, state and local laws and regulations.
Federal, state, and local authorities extensively regulate the oil and natural gas industry.
Noncompliance with these statutes and regulations may lead to substantial penalties, and the
overall regulatory burden on the industry increases the cost of doing business and, in turn,
decreases profitability. Regulations affect various aspects of oil and natural gas drilling and
production activities, including the pricing and marketing of oil and natural gas production, the
drilling of wells (through permit and bonding requirements), the positioning of wells, the
unitization or pooling of oil and natural gas properties, environmental matters, safety standards,
the sharing of markets, production limitations, plugging and abandonment, and restoration. These
laws and regulations are under constant review for amendment or expansion.
We may incur substantial costs to comply with stringent environmental regulations and these
regulations may adversely affect the manner or feasibility of conducting our operations.
Our operations are subject to stringent and constantly changing environmental laws and
regulations adopted by federal, state, and local governmental authorities. We could be forced to
expend significant resources to comply with new laws or regulations, or changes to current
requirements or to obtain permits and authorizations to conduct our operations. We will continue
to be subject to uncertainty associated with new regulatory interpretations and inconsistent
interpretations between governmental environmental agencies. We could face significant
liabilities to the government and third parties for discharges of oil, natural gas or other
pollutants into the air, soil or water, and we could have to spend substantial amounts on
investigations, litigation and remediation, as well as our efforts to prevent future spills.
Moreover, our failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of
administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of investigatory and remedial
obligations and the issuance of injunctions that restrict or prohibit the performance of
operations. See Items 1 and 2 Business and Properties Regulation.
Climate Change Legislation or regulations restricting emissions of greenhouse gasses
could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the oil and gas we
produce.
The EPA has been moving forward to regulate GHS as pollutants under the CAA. By adopting
rules regulating GHG
22
emissions from motor vehicles, EPA triggered requirements to permit GHG emissions from
stationary sources under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V permitting
programs. EPA has implemented the so-called Tailoring Rule requiring that the largest sources to
first obtain permits for GHG emissions. There is still the possibility that federal legislation
will be adopted to change the GHG permitting program put in place by EPA, but to date, efforts at a
comprehensive GHG legislative package (such as a cap and trade program) appear not to be moving
forward in Congress. Some members of Congress, however, continue to publicly indicate an intention
to promote legislation to curb EPAs authority to regulate GHGs. Additionally, some states,
regions and localities have adopted or are considering programs to address GHGs. The adoption and
implementation of any regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or limiting emissions of
greenhouse gases from, our equipment and operations could require us to incur costs to reduce
emissions of greenhouse gases associated with our operations or could adversely affect demand for
the oil and natural gas that we produce.
In addition, EPA has adopted a mandatory GHG emissions reporting program which imposes
reporting and monitoring requirements on various industries. In November 2010, EPA expanded this
GHG reporting rule to include onshore and offshore oil and natural gas production facilities and
onshore oil and natural gas processing, transmission, storage and distribution facilities. Should
we be required to report GHG emissions, it could require us to incur costs to monitor, keep records
of, and report emissions of GHGs.
Because of the lack of any comprehensive legislative program addressing GHGs, there is a great
deal of uncertainty regarding the regulation of GHGs at the federal level. In addition to possible
federal regulation, a number of states, individually and regionally, also are considering or have
implemented GHG regulatory programs. These potential regional and state initiatives may result in
socalled capandtrade programs, under which overall GHG emissions are limited and GHG
emissions are then allocated and sold, and possibly other regulatory requirements, that could
result in our incurring material expenses to comply, e.g., by being required to purchase or to
surrender allowances for GHGs resulting from our operations or otherwise being required to control
or reduce emissions. The federal, regional and local regulatory initiatives also could adversely
affect the marketability of the oil and natural gas we produce.
Significant physical effects of climatic change have the potential to damage our facilities,
disrupt our production activities and cause us to incur significant costs in preparing for or
responding to those effects.
In an interpretative guidance on climate change disclosures, the SEC indicates that climate
change could have an effect on the severity of weather (including hurricanes and floods), sea
levels, the arability of farmland, and water availability and quality. If such effects were to
occur, our exploration and production operations have the potential to be adversely affected.
Potential adverse effects could include damages to our facilities from powerful winds or rising
waters in low-lying areas, disruption of our production activities either because of
climate-related damages to our facilities in our costs of operations potentially arising from such
climatic effects, less efficient or non-routine operating practices necessitated by climate effects
or increased costs for insurance coverages in the aftermath of such effects. Significant physical
effects of climate change could also have an indirect affect on our financing and operations by
disrupting the transportation or process-related services provided by midstream companies, service
companies or suppliers with whom we have a business relationship. We may not be able to recover
through insurance some or any of the damages, losses or costs that may result from potential
physical effects of climate change.
Federal legislation and state legislative and regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic
fracturing could result in increased costs and additional operating restrictions or delays.
The U.S. Senate and House of Representatives are currently considering bills entitled, the
Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act, or the FRAC Act, that would amend the
federal Safe Drinking Water Act, or the SDWA, to repeal an exemption from regulation for most
hydraulic fracturing. If enacted, the FRAC Act would amend the definition of underground
injection in the SDWA to encompass hydraulic fracturing activities. If enacted, such a provision
could require hydraulic fracturing operations to meet permitting and financial assurance
requirements, adhere to certain construction specifications, fulfill monitoring, reporting, and
recordkeeping obligations, and meet plugging and abandonment requirements. The FRAC Act also
proposes to require the reporting and public disclosure of chemicals used in the fracturing
process, which could make it easier for third parties opposing the hydraulic fracturing process to
initiate legal proceedings based on allegations that specific chemicals used in the fracturing
process could adversely affect groundwater. EPA has initiated a study of the environmental impacts
of hydraulic fracturing and a committee of the U.S. Congress is investigating certain hydraulic
fracturing practices. Further, many states and other regulatory authorities have adopted or are
proposing additional regulations on hydraulic fracturing. The adoption of any future federal or
state laws or implementing regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or otherwise limiting,
the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to complete natural gas wells and
increase our costs of compliance and doing business.
23
Our business depends on gathering and transportation facilities owned by others.
The marketability of our natural gas production depends in part on the availability, proximity
and capacity of gathering and pipeline systems owned by third parties, and changes in our contracts
with these third parties could materially affect our operations.
In addition, federal, state, and local regulation of oil and natural gas production and
transportation, tax and energy policies, changes in supply and demand, pipeline pressures, and
general economic conditions could adversely affect our ability to gather or transport our oil and
natural gas. See Items 1 and 2 Business and Properties Regulation.
The adoption of derivatives legislation or regulations related to derivative contracts could have
an adverse impact on our ability to hedge risks associated with our business.
On July 21, 2010, the President signed into law the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the Act). Among other things, the Act requires the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission and the SEC to enact regulations affecting derivative contracts, including the
derivative contracts we use to hedge our exposure to price volatility within 360 days from the date
of enactment. We cannot predict the content of these regulations or the effect that these
regulations will have on our hedging activities. Of particular concern, the Act does not
explicitly exempt end users (such as us) from the requirements to use exchanges, which would
require us to post margin in connection with hedging activities. Even if we qualify for an
exception, there are other aspects of the Act that may make it more expensive for other parties to
offer these hedges to us. The full effects of the Act will not be known until the regulations have
been enacted and the market for these hedges has adjusted. It is possible the hedges will become
more expensive, uneconomic or unavailable, which could lead to increased costs or commodity price
volatility or a combination of both.
The distressed financial conditions of customers could have an adverse impact on us in the event
these customers are unable to pay us for the products or services we provide.
Some of our customers may experience, in the future, severe financial problems that have had
or may have a significant impact on their creditworthiness. We cannot provide assurance that one
or more of our financially distressed customers will not default on their obligations to us or that
such a default or defaults will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
position, future results of operations or future cash flows. Furthermore, the bankruptcy of one or
more of our customers, or some other similar proceeding or liquidity constraint, might make it
unlikely that we would be able to collect all or a significant portion of amounts owed by the
distressed entity or entities. In addition, such events might force such customers to reduce or
curtail their future use of our products and services, which could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations and financial condition.
All of our common stock is owned by one controlling shareholder whose interests may differ from
those of the holders of our Senior Secured Notes.
We are a wholly owned subsidiary of Capital C. As a result of this ownership, Capital C is
able to direct the election of our Board of Directors and therefore, direct our management and
policies. Capital C may unilaterally approve mergers and other fundamental corporate changes
involving us, which require shareholder approval. The interests of Capital C as shareholder may
differ from the interests of holders of our Senior Secured Notes. See Item 13 Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions.
Our structure may present conflicts of interest.
Our sole shareholder, Capital C, is owned by institutional funds managed by EnerVest. Messrs.
Houser and Vanderhider are executive officers of EnerVest. EnerVest manages other funds that own
interests in oil and gas properties in our area of operations. Mr. Mariani is an executive officer
of EnerVest Operating, an affiliate of EnerVest. EnerVest Operating controls the operations of our
wells and the wells owned by other EnerVest managed funds. We can give no assurance that conflicts
of interest will not arise with respect to corporate opportunities. Also, we can give no assurance
that conflicts will not arise with respect to the time and attention devoted to us by Messrs.
Houser, Vanderhider and Mariani.
24
The terms of our Credit Agreement, as well as the J. Aron Swap and the indenture relating to the
Senior Secured Notes, restrict our current and future operations, particularly our ability to
respond to industry or economic changes or to take certain actions.
At December 31, 2010, we had a Credit Agreement comprised of a $90 million revolving facility
with a borrowing base of $55 million, of which $23.9 million was outstanding, and a five year $40
million letter of credit facility that may be used only to provide credit support for our
obligations under the hedge agreement and other hedge transactions. This facility is for working
capital requirements and general corporate purposes, including the issuance of letters of credit.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest (i) at the greater of the prime rate, an
adjusted federal funds rate or an adjusted Eurodollar rate, plus an applicable margin ranging from
1.0% to 2.0% based on the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Credit Agreement, or,
(ii) at our option, the Eurodollar base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 2.5% to 3.50%
based on the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Credit Agreement. The full amount
borrowed under the Credit Agreement will mature on April 14, 2012.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a first lien security interest in
substantially all of our assets. The obligations under the Credit Agreement are further secured by
a pledge of 100% of our capital stock held by Capital C, our parent.
The Credit Agreement contains covenants that will limit or prohibit our ability to, among
other things, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; create liens; pay dividends on or
repurchase stock; pay principal and interest on certain subordinated debt; make certain types of
investments; sell assets or merge with another entity; pledge or otherwise encumber our capital
stock; or enter into transactions with affiliates. The Credit Agreement also requires compliance
with customary financial covenants, including a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum senior
secured leverage ratio and a minimum current ratio. In 2010, we amended certain of these
covenants. At December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with our covenants under the Credit
Agreement. Our senior secured leverage ratio was 0.80 : 1.0 and the interest coverage ratio was
1.78 : 1.0. For additional information on our Credit Agreement, see Note 8.
In addition, our existing debt agreements and any new debt agreements may impose financial
restrictions and other covenants on us that may be more restrictive than those applicable to the
Senior Secured Notes.
Our Credit Agreement and the Hedge Agreement contain, and any future refinancing of our Credit
Agreement likely would contain, a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating
and financial restrictions on us. Our Credit Agreement and, to some extent, the Hedge Agreement
include covenants restricting, among other things, our ability to:
|
|
|
pay dividends and make investments, loans or advances; |
|
|
|
incur capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
use the proceeds from sales of assets and capital stock; |
|
|
|
enter into sale and leaseback transactions; |
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
transfer all or substantially all of our assets; and |
|
|
|
enter into merger or consolidation transactions. |
Our Credit Agreement also includes financial covenants, including requirements that we
maintain:
|
|
|
a minimum interest coverage ratio; |
|
|
|
a maximum senior secured leverage ratio; and |
|
|
|
a minimum current ratio. |
The indenture relating to the Senior Secured Notes also contains covenants including, among
other things, restrictions on our ability to:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions on stock, redeem stock or redeem
subordinated obligations; |
25
|
|
|
create liens or other encumbrances; and |
|
|
|
sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets, or merge or
consolidate with another entity. |
If we refinance our indebtedness, we may call the Senior Secured Notes. Following the redemption of the notes, the note holders
will no longer have an investment in our debt securities and we will no longer be required to make
filings with the SEC.
|
|
|
Item 1B. |
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are involved in several lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe
that the result of such proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
(Removed and Reserved) |
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
There is no established public trading market for our equity securities.
All of our equity securities at March 5, 2011, were held by Capital C.
Dividends
We paid no cash dividends in 2010 and 2009 and paid cash dividends of $2.5 million in 2008.
26
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The Selected Financial Data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements at Item 15(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the year ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Continuing Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
66,380 |
|
|
$ |
68,624 |
|
|
$ |
158,426 |
|
|
$ |
125,140 |
|
|
$ |
158,774 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
29,368 |
|
|
|
37,046 |
|
|
|
35,560 |
|
|
|
36,087 |
|
|
|
38,074 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
30,445 |
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
40,146 |
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
(28,944 |
) |
|
|
(35,322 |
) |
|
|
52,199 |
|
Balance sheet data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (deficit) from continuing
operations |
|
|
13,611 |
|
|
|
28,179 |
|
|
|
(16,806 |
) |
|
|
(14,224 |
) |
|
|
(11,635 |
) |
Oil and gas properties and gathering systems, net |
|
|
524,538 |
|
|
|
536,237 |
|
|
|
613,834 |
|
|
|
627,556 |
|
|
|
641,879 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
579,022 |
|
|
|
608,078 |
|
|
|
669,464 |
|
|
|
774,225 |
|
|
|
777,023 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
197,822 |
|
|
|
236,707 |
|
|
|
265,863 |
|
|
|
291,118 |
|
|
|
285,560 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
147,882 |
|
|
|
104,141 |
|
|
|
76,551 |
|
|
|
102,223 |
|
|
|
143,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Overview
We are an Ohio corporation wholly owned by Capital C. Capital C acquired us pursuant to a
merger completed on July 7, 2004. On August 16, 2005, Capital C was acquired by institutional
funds managed by EnerVest, Ltd, a Houston-based privately held oil and gas operator and
institutional funds manager.
We are an independent energy company engaged in the exploitation, development, production,
operation and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties. Our operations are focused in the
Appalachian Basin in Ohio, Pennsylvania and New York and in the Antrim Shale Formation in the
Michigan Basin.
At December 31, 2010, our total estimated proved reserves were 202.4 Bcfe. Natural gas
comprised approximately 85% of our estimated proved reserves, and 90% of our estimated proved
reserves were classified as proved developed. Substantially all of our reserves are located in
shallow, highly developed formations with long-lived, stable production profiles. At December 31,
2010, our Appalachian properties accounted for 57% of our estimated proved reserves, while the
Michigan properties accounted for 43% of proved reserves.
During the periods discussed, we earned revenue through the production and sale of oil and
natural gas and, to a lesser extent, from gas gathering and marketing.
Our financial results and cash flows can be significantly impacted as commodity prices
fluctuate in response to changing market conditions. Oil and natural gas prices are expected to be
volatile in the future. Factors affecting the price of oil include worldwide economic conditions,
geopolitical activities, worldwide supply disruptions, weather conditions, actions taken by the
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and the value of the U.S. dollar in international
currency markets. Factors affecting the price of natural gas include the discovery of substantial
accumulations of natural gas in unconventional reservoirs due to technological advancements
necessary to commercially produce these unconventional reserves, North American weather conditions,
industrial and consumer demand for natural gas, storage levels of natural gas and the availability
and accessibility of natural gas deposits in North America. As discussed above, we use derivative
financial instruments on a significant portion of our oil and natural gas production to reduce the
volatility of oil and natural gas prices and to protect cash flow available for our development
drilling program. In connection with the acquisition by Capital C, at the effective time of the
Merger, we became a party to a long-term hedging program (the Hedges) with J. Aron under a master
agreement and related confirmations and documentation (collectively, the Hedge Agreement) as
required by the Credit Agreement and the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes, we will
maintain such Hedges with J. Aron or its successor permitted assigns. We anticipate that the
Hedges will cover approximately 66% of the expected 2011 through 2013 production from our current
estimated proved reserves and will range from 62% to 72% of such expected production in any
year.
The average price realized for our natural gas, inclusive of hedges that previously
qualified as effective hedges, decreased from $8.62 per Mcf in 2008 to $3.61 per Mcf in 2009 and
then increased to $4.00 per Mcf in 2010. The monthly average settle for natural gas trading on the
NYMEX decreased from $9.04 per MMbtu in 2008 to $3.99 per MMbtu in 2009 and then increased to $4.39
per MMbtu in 2010. Our selling price of natural gas is generally higher than the NYMEX price due
to the proximity of our operations to natural gas markets along with a favorable Btu content of our
gas. During 2010, our average per unit gas prices (excluding the effects of hedging) in Appalachia
and Michigan were $0.24 and $0.20, respectively, higher than the average NYMEX monthly settle price
for 2010. The remainder of the difference is primarily due to our qualified hedging activities
during these periods. Our average realized price for oil decreased from $94.40 per Bbl in 2008 to
$56.49 per Bbl in 2009 and increased to $73.92 per Bbl in 2010.
We recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $90.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2008
due to the significant decline in oil and gas prices. There was no goodwill as of December 31,
2010 or 2009.
Current market conditions also elevate concerns about cash and cash equivalent investments,
which at December 31, 2010 totaled $35.9 million. We have reviewed the creditworthiness of the
banks and financial institutions with which we maintain investments, each of whom we believe to be
creditworthy, as well as the securities underlying these investments.
We have also reviewed the creditworthiness of our hedge counterparties and believe that they
are creditworthy.
28
Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and SEC guidance. See the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 15(a). Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for a
more comprehensive discussion of our significant accounting policies. GAAP requires information in
financial statements about the accounting principles and methods used and the risks and
uncertainties inherent in significant estimates including choices between acceptable methods.
Following is a discussion of our most critical accounting policies:
Successful Efforts Method of Accounting
We account for our oil and natural gas properties using the successful efforts method of
accounting. Under this method, costs of productive exploratory wells, development dry holes and
productive wells and undeveloped leases are capitalized. Oil and natural gas lease acquisition
costs are also capitalized. Exploration costs, including personnel costs, certain geological and
geophysical expenses and delay rentals for oil and natural gas leases, are charged to expense
during the period the costs are incurred. Exploratory drilling costs are initially capitalized,
but charged to expense if and when the well is determined not to have found reserves in commercial
quantities.
No gains or losses are recognized upon the disposition of oil and natural gas properties
except in transactions such as the significant disposition of an amortizable base that
significantly affects the unitofproduction amortization rate. Sales proceeds are credited to
the carrying value of the properties.
The application of the successful efforts method of accounting requires managerial judgment to
determine the proper classification of wells designated as development or exploratory which will
ultimately determine the proper accounting treatment of the costs incurred. The results from a
drilling operation can take considerable time to analyze and the determination that commercial
reserves have been discovered requires both judgment and industry experience. Wells may be
completed that are assumed to be productive and actually deliver oil and natural gas in quantities
insufficient to be economic, which may result in the abandonment of the wells at a later date.
Wells are drilled that have targeted geologic structures that are both developmental and
exploratory in nature, and an allocation of costs is required to properly account for the results.
Delineation seismic incurred to select development locations within an oil and natural gas field is
typically considered a development cost and capitalized, but often these seismic programs extend
beyond the reserve area considered proved and management must estimate the portion of the seismic
costs to expense. The evaluation of oil and natural gas leasehold acquisition costs requires
managerial judgment to estimate the fair value of these costs with reference to drilling activity
in a given area. Drilling activities in an area by other companies may also effectively condemn
leasehold positions.
The major difference between the successful efforts method of accounting and the full cost
method is under the full cost method of accounting, such exploration costs and expenses are
capitalized as assets, pooled with the costs of successful wells and charged against the net income
(loss) of future periods as a component of depletion expense.
Oil and Gas Reserves
On December 31, 2009, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 201003, Extractive
Activities Oil and Gas (Topic 932), which conforms the definition of proved reserves with the
SEC Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting rules, which were issued by the SEC in December 2008.
ASU No. 201003 requires that we use the average of the first day of the month price during the 12
month period preceding the end of the year, rather than the year end price, when estimating reserve
quantities and standardized measure. The new rules permit the use of reliable technologies to
determine proved reserves, if those technologies have been demonstrated to result in reliable
conclusions about reserves volumes. Prior year data are presented in accordance with the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) oil and natural gas disclosure requirements effective during
those periods.
Our estimated proved developed and estimated proved undeveloped reserves are all located
within the Appalachian and Michigan basins in the United States. There are many uncertainties
inherent in estimating proved reserve quantities and in projecting future production rates and the
timing of development expenditures. In addition, estimates of new discoveries are more imprecise
than those of properties with a production history. Accordingly, these estimates are expected to
change as future information becomes available. Material revisions of reserve estimates may occur
in the future, development and
29
production of the oil and gas reserves may not occur in the periods assumed and actual prices
realized and actual costs incurred may vary significantly from assumptions used. Estimated proved
reserves represent estimated quantities of natural gas and oil that geological and engineering data
demonstrate, with reasonable certainty, to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs
under economic and operating conditions existing at the time the estimates were made. Estimated
proved developed reserves are estimated proved reserves expected to be recovered through wells and
equipment in place and under operating methods being used at the time the estimates were made. The
accuracy of a reserve estimate is a function of:
|
|
|
the quality and quantity of available data; |
|
|
|
the interpretation of that data; |
|
|
|
the accuracy of various mandated economic assumptions; and |
|
|
|
the judgment of the persons preparing the estimate. |
Our estimated proved reserve information for all periods included in this Annual Report is
based on estimates prepared by independent petroleum consultants. Estimates prepared by others may
be higher or lower than these estimates.
Capitalization, Depreciation, Depletion and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The capitalized costs of our producing oil and natural gas properties are depreciated and
depleted by the unitsofproduction method based on the ratio of current production to estimated
total net proved oil and natural gas reserves as estimated by independent petroleum engineers.
Proved developed reserves are used in computing unit rates for drilling and development costs and
total proved reserves are used for depletion rates of leasehold, platform, and pipeline costs. No
gains or losses are recognized upon the disposition of oil and natural gas properties except in
transactions such as the significant disposition of an amortizable base that significantly affects
the unitofproduction amortization rate. Sales proceeds are credited to the carrying value of
the properties. Maintenance and repairs are expensed, and expenditures which enhance the value of
properties are capitalized.
Unproved oil and gas properties are stated at cost and consist of undeveloped leases. These
costs are assessed periodically to determine whether their value has been impaired, and if
impairment is indicated, the costs are charged to expense. We recorded no impairment to unproved
oil and gas properties in 2010 and recorded impairments $3.6 million and $783,000 in 2009 and 2008,
respectively, which reduced the book value of unproved oil and gas properties to their estimated
fair value.
Gas gathering systems are stated at cost. Depreciation expense is computed using the
straight-line method over 15 years.
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of non-oil and gas properties is
computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets ranging from 3 to 15
years for machinery and equipment and 30 to 40 years for buildings. When assets other than oil and
gas properties are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation
are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income for the
period. The cost of maintenance and repairs is expensed as incurred, and significant renewals and
betterments are capitalized.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future
undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a loss is recognized for the
difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the asset. In performing the reviews
for long-lived asset recoverability, we recorded impairments of $1.6 million, $26.8 million and
$3.1 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which reduced the book value of proved
properties to their estimated fair value. Fair value was based on estimated future cash flows to
be generated by the assets, discounted at a market rate of interest.
FASB accounting guidance requires that intangible assets with indefinite lives, including
goodwill, be evaluated on an annual basis for impairment or more frequently if an event occurs or
circumstances change could potentially result in impairment.
The impairment test requires the allocation of goodwill and all other assets and liabilities
to reporting units. As we have only one reporting unit, the reporting unit used for testing will be
the entire company. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined and compared to the book
value of that reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting unit is based on estimates of future
net cash flows from proved reserves and from future exploration for and development of unproved
reserves. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $90.1 million
due to the significant
30
drop in oil and gas prices resulting in part from the global economic and market crisis. No
goodwill was recorded at December 31, 2009 or 2010
Derivatives and Hedging
Our financial results and cash flows can be significantly impacted as commodity prices
fluctuate widely in response to changing market conditions. Under the provisions of FASB
accounting guidance, we recognize all derivative financial instruments as either assets or
liabilities at fair value. None of our derivative financial instruments are designated as cash
flow hedges. The changes in fair value of our derivative instruments are reported in expense in
the consolidated statements of operations as derivative fair value (gain) loss.
From time to time we may enter into a combination of futures contracts, commodity derivatives
and fixed-price physical contracts to manage our exposure to natural gas price, crude oil price or
interest rate volatility and to support our capital expenditure plans. Our derivative financial
instruments primarily take the form of swaps or collars. At December 31, 2010, our derivative
contracts were comprised of natural gas swaps, natural gas basis differential swaps, crude oil
swaps and interest rate swaps, which were placed with major financial institutions that we believe
have a minimal credit risk.
We use NYMEX-based commodity derivative contracts to hedge natural gas, because our natural
gas production is sold pursuant to NYMEX-based sales contracts. Beginning July 7, 2004, we had
ineffectiveness on the natural gas swaps due to purchase accounting, which created non-zero value
derivatives at the time of the Merger. Our NYMEX crude oil swaps were highly effective and were
designated as cash flow hedges through August 16, 2005. At August 16, 2005, our oil swaps no
longer qualified for cash flow hedge accounting because the assessment of effectiveness indicated
that they may not be highly effective on an on-going basis. This occurred due to the application
of purchase accounting to the derivatives, which created non-zero value derivatives at the time of
the Transaction. The changes in fair value of the oil swaps subsequent to August 15, 2005 and the
ineffective portion of the natural gas swaps from July 7, 2004 through June 30, 2006 are recorded
as Derivative fair value gain or loss. As of July 1, 2006, we determined that our gas swaps were
no longer highly effective and, therefore, could no longer be designated as cash flow hedges.
Changes in the fair value of the gas derivatives from that date forward are recorded in derivative
fair value gain/loss. Previously deferred gains or losses on these gas derivatives are recognized
as increases or decreases to gas sales revenues during the same periods in which the underlying
forecasted transactions impact earnings.
Revenue Recognition
Oil and natural gas revenues are recognized when production is sold to a purchaser
at fixed or determinable prices, when delivery has occurred and title has transferred and
collectability of the revenue is reasonably assured. We follow the sales method of accounting for
natural gas revenues. Under this method of accounting, revenues are recognized based on volumes
sold, which may differ from the volume to which we are entitled based on our working interest. An
imbalance is recognized as a liability only when the estimated remaining reserves will not be
sufficient to enable the underproduced owner(s) to recoup its entitled share through future
production. Under the sales method, no receivables are recorded where we have taken less than our
share of production. There were no material gas imbalances at December 31, 2010 or 2009. Oil and
gas marketing revenues are recognized when title passes.
Asset Retirement Obligations
We follow FASB accounting guidance which requires us to recognize a liability for the fair
value of our asset retirement obligations associated with its tangible, long-lived assets. The
majority of our asset retirement obligations recorded relate to the plugging and abandonment
(excluding salvage value) of our oil and gas properties.
There has been no significant current period activity with respect to additional retirement
obligations, settled obligations, accretion expense and revisions of estimated cash flows. The
asset retirement obligations increased as a result of additional wells having been drilled and
accretion expense.
At December 31, 2010, there were no assets legally restricted for purposes of settling asset
retirement obligations.
31
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth financial data for the periods indicated. Dollars are stated
in thousands and percentages are stated as a percentage of total revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales |
|
$ |
60,601 |
|
|
|
91.3 |
% |
|
$ |
61,761 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
% |
|
$ |
145,398 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
% |
Gas gathering and marketing |
|
|
5,223 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
5,894 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
12,254 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,380 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
68,624 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
158,426 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production expense |
|
|
20,528 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
20,955 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
26,342 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Gas gathering and marketing |
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
5,492 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
10,252 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Exploration expense |
|
|
2,635 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
6,805 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
8,188 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
29,368 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
37,046 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
35,560 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,076 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
Inpairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
30,445 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Gain on asset sales |
|
|
(33,644 |
) |
|
|
(50.7 |
) |
|
|
(34,929 |
) |
|
|
(50.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value gain |
|
|
(32,768 |
) |
|
|
(49.4 |
) |
|
|
(29,631 |
) |
|
|
(43.2 |
) |
|
|
(55,940 |
) |
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
43,490 |
|
|
|
63.4 |
|
|
|
125,411 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
64,437 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
25,134 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
33,015 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
Other expense (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
19,006 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
20,612 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
22,818 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
46,529 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
4,653 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
10,692 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,383 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
39,636 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
40,146 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(28,944 |
) |
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is based on the results of operations
from continuing operations, unless otherwise noted.
Production, Sales Prices and Costs
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our net oil and natural gas
production, revenues and expenses for the years indicated. This table includes continuing
operations only. The average prices shown in the table include the effects of our qualified
effective hedging activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (MMcf) |
|
|
10,109 |
|
|
|
12,034 |
|
|
|
13,217 |
|
Oil (MBbl) |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Total production (MMcfe) |
|
|
11,742 |
|
|
|
13,977 |
|
|
|
15,221 |
|
Average sales price (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
3.61 |
|
|
$ |
8.62 |
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
73.92 |
|
|
|
56.49 |
|
|
|
94.40 |
|
Per Mcfe |
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
9.55 |
|
Average costs (per Mcfe) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production expense |
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Depletion |
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average prices presented above include non-cash amounts related to our derivatives as
a result of purchase accounting for the Merger and the Transaction. Excluding these non-cash
amounts from oil and gas sales revenues would result in the following average sales prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
4.61 |
|
|
$ |
4.27 |
|
|
$ |
9.31 |
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
73.92 |
|
|
|
56.49 |
|
|
|
94.40 |
|
Per Mcfe |
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
2010 Compared to 2009
Revenues
Net operating revenues decreased $2.2 million from $68.6 million in 2009 to $66.4 million in
2010. The decrease was primarily due to lower gas sales revenues of $3.0 million and lower gas
gathering and marketing revenues of $671,000 partially offset by higher oil sales revenues of $1.8
million.
Gas volumes sold decreased 1.9 Bcf (16%) from 12.0 Bcf in 2009 to 10.1 Bcf in 2010 resulting
in a decrease in gas sales revenues of approximately $7.0 million. Oil volumes sold decreased
approximately 52,000 Bbls (16%) from 324,000 Bbls in 2009 to 272,000 Bbls in 2010 resulting in a
decrease in oil sales revenues of approximately $2.9 million. The lower oil and gas sales volumes
are due to normal production declines and the sale of our coalbed methane properties in July 2009,
which were partially offset by production from new wells drilled in 2010 and operational projects,
which increased production for some existing wells.
33
The average price realized for our natural gas increased $0.39 per Mcf to $4.00 per Mcf in
2010 compared to $3.61 per Mcf in 2009, which increased gas sales revenues by approximately $4.0
million. As a result of our previously qualified effective hedging activities, gas sales revenues
were lower by $6.1 million ($0.61 per Mcf) in 2010 and lower by $7.9 million
($0.66 per Mcf) in 2009 than if our gas was not hedged. The average price realized for our oil
increased from $56.49 per Bbl in 2009 to $73.92 per Bbl in 2010, which increased oil sales revenues
by approximately $4.7 million.
The decrease in gas gathering and marketing revenues was due to a $518,000 decrease in gas
marketing revenues and a $153,000 decrease in gas gathering revenues. The lower gas gathering and
marketing revenues were primarily the result of lower gas sales volumes.
Costs and Expenses
Production expense decreased $427,000 from $21.0 million in 2009 to $20.5 million in 2010.
The decrease was primarily due to the sale of our coalbed methane assets in Pennsylvania in July
2009 partially offset by higher ad valorem taxes in 2010. The average production cost increased
from $1.50 per Mcfe in 2009 to $1.75 per Mcfe in 2010 due to the lower oil and gas sales volumes.
Production taxes were $1.1 million in 2009 and 2010. Average per unit production taxes
increased from $0.08 per Mcfe in 2009 to $0.10 per Mcfe in 2010.
Gathering and marketing expense decreased $504,000 from $5.5 million in 2009 to $5.0 million
in 2010 primarily due to lower gas sales volumes in 2010.
Exploration expense decreased $1.3 million from $3.9 million in 2009 to $2.6 million in 2010.
The decrease was primarily due to lower expired lease expense, delay rentals and seismic costs in
2010 partially offset by higher exploratory dry hole expenses.
General and administrative expense decreased $1.0 million from $7.8 million in 2009 to $6.8
million in 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in overhead fees paid to EverVest as
a result of the sale of our coalbed methane assets in Pennsylvania in July 2009 and lower insurance
costs in 2010.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased $7.6 million from $37.0 million in 2009 to
$29.4 million in 2010. Depletion expense decreased $7.6 million due to the lower production
volumes and a lower depletion rate per Mcfe. Depletion per Mcfe decreased from $2.62 in 2009 to
$2.48 in 2010 primarily due to higher proved reserves as a result of higher oil and gas prices in
2010.
Impairment of oil and gas properties decreased from $30.4 million in 2009 to $1.6 million in
2010 due to the write-downs of our investment in properties in the coalbed methane and Marcellus
formation in Pennsylvania during 2009 as a result of lower oil and gas prices and unfavorable
development results in the Marcellus formation.
Gain on sale of assets was $33.6 million in 2010 and $34.9 million in 2009 due to the sale of
undeveloped acreage in Ohio and Pennsylvania in 2010 and the sale of undeveloped acreage in
Pennsylvania in 2009.
Derivative fair value gain/loss was a gain of $32.8 million in 2010 and $29.6 million in 2009.
The derivative fair value gain/loss reflects the changes in fair value of certain derivative
instruments that are not designated or do not qualify as cash flow hedges.
Gain on early extinguishment of debt was $1.0 million in 2010 as a result of our repurchase of
$20 million of our senior secured notes at a discount.
Interest expense decreased $1.6 million from $20.6 million in 2009 to $19.0 million in 2010.
This decrease was primarily due to lower outstanding debt in 2010.
Income tax expense increased from $1.9 million in 2009 to $6.4 million in 2010. The increase
in income tax expense was primarily due to an increase in net income before income taxes in 2010.
This was partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate due to the reduction of the state tax
valuation allowance. The valuation allowance was reduced upon the realization of state tax
net operating loss carryforwards, which resulted from taxable gains on asset sales.
The decrease in the effective tax rate was also due to the elimination of the state of Ohio
corporate income tax. The Ohio corporate income tax was replaced with a Commercial Activity
Tax which is not considered an income tax.
34
2009 Compared to 2008
Revenues
Net operating revenues decreased $89.8 million from $158.4 million in 2008 to $68.6 million in
2009. The decrease was primarily due to lower gas sales revenues of $70.4 million, lower oil sales
revenue of $13.2 million and lower gas gathering and marketing revenues of $6.4 million.
Gas volumes sold decreased 1,183 MMcf (9%) from 13.2 Bcf in 2008 to 12.0 Bcf in 2009 resulting
in a decrease in gas sales revenues of approximately $10.2 million. Oil volumes sold decreased
approximately 10,000 Bbls (3%) from 334,000 Bbls in 2008 to 324,000 Bbls in 2009 resulting in a
decrease in oil sales revenues of approximately $950,000. The lower oil and gas sales volumes are
due to normal production declines and the sale of our coalbed methane properties in July 2009,
which were partially offset by production from new wells drilled in 2009 and operational projects,
which increased production for some existing wells.
The average price realized for our natural gas decreased $5.01 per Mcf to $3.61 per Mcf in
2009 compared to $8.62 per Mcf in 2008, which decreased gas sales revenues by approximately $60.2
million. As a result of our previously qualified effective hedging activities, gas sales revenues
were lower by $7.9 million ($0.66 per Mcf) in 2009 and lower by $9.2 million ($0.69 per Mcf) in
2008 than if our gas was not hedged. The average price realized for our oil decreased from $94.40
per Bbl in 2008 to $56.49 per Bbl in 2009, which decreased oil sales revenues by approximately
$12.3 million.
The decrease in gas gathering and marketing revenues was due to a $5.0 million decrease in gas
marketing revenues and a $1.4 million decrease in gas gathering revenues. The lower marketing
revenues were primarily the result of lower gas prices. The decrease in gas gathering revenues was
primarily due to an decrease in third party gathering volumes on gathering systems in Pennsylvania
and lower gas prices.
Costs and Expenses
Production expense decreased $5.3 million from $26.3 million in 2008 to $21.0 million in 2009.
The decrease was primarily due to decreases in labor costs, decreases in gas processing fees and
decreased workover expense, the sale of the coalbed methane assets in Pennsylvania and general
decreases in third party costs. The average production cost decreased from $1.73 per Mcfe in 2008
to $1.50 per Mcfe in 2009 due to these cost decreases.
Production taxes decreased $2.0 million from $3.1 million in 2008 to $1.1 million in 2009,
primarily due to lower gas prices in Michigan in 2009, where production taxes are based on a
percentage of revenues, excluding the effects of hedging. Average per unit production taxes
decreased from $0.20 per Mcfe in 2008 to $0.08 per Mcfe in 2009.
Gathering and marketing expense decreased $4.8 million from $10.3 million in 2008 to $5.5
million in 2009 primarily due to lower gas prices in 2009.
Exploration expense increased $1.4 million from $2.5 million in 2008 to $3.9 million in 2009.
The increase was primarily due to an increase in expired lease expense in 2009.
General and administrative expense decreased $403,000 from $8.2 million in 2008 to $7.8
million in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in overhead fees paid to EnerVest.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased by $1.4 million from $35.6 million in 2008
to $37.0 million in 2009. Depletion expense increased $1.5 million from 2008 to 2009 due primarily
to a higher depletion rate per Mcfe. Depletion per Mcfe increased from $2.31 in 2008 to $2.62 in
2009 due to lower proved reserves as a result of lower oil and gas prices in 2009.
Impairment of goodwill was $90.1 million in 2008 due to the significant drop in oil and gas
prices resulting in part from the global economic and market crisis. We did not have an impairment
of goodwill in 2009.
35
Impairment of oil and gas properties increased $26.5 million from $3.9 million in 2008 to
$30.4 million in 2009 due to the write-downs of our investment in properties in the coalbed methane
and Marcellus formation in Pennsylvania as a result of lower oil and gas prices and unfavorable
development results in the Marcellus formation.
Derivative fair value gain/loss was a gain of $29.6 million in 2009 and $55.9 million in 2008.
The derivative fair value gain/loss reflects the changes in fair value of certain derivative
instruments that are not designated or do not qualify as cash flow hedges.
Gain on sale of assets was $34.9 million in 2009 due to the sale of undeveloped Marcellus
acreage in Pennsylvania. There was no gain on the sale of assets in 2008.
Interest expense decreased $2.2 million from $22.8 million in 2008 to $20.6 million in 2009.
This decrease was primarily due to lower outstanding debt in 2009.
Income tax expense decreased from $39.6 million in 2008 to $1.9 million in 2009. The decrease
in income tax expense was primarily due to a decrease in the net income before income taxes in 2009
and a decrease in the effective tax rate due to the impairment of goodwill in 2008 which is not an
allowable expense in the calculation of taxable income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
We expect that our primary sources of cash in 2011 will be from funds generated from
operations and the sale of non-strategic assets. Based on our current level of operations, we
believe our cash flow from operations, available cash and available borrowings under our Credit
Agreement, will be adequate to meet our short-term liquidity needs for 2011.
The primary sources of cash in the year ended December 31, 2010 were funds generated from
operations and the sale of non-strategic assets. Funds used during this period were primarily used
for operations, exploration and development expenditures, the repayment of debt, the settlement of
derivatives and interest expense. Our liquidity and capital resources are closely related to and
dependent upon the current prices paid for our oil and natural gas.
36
The following table summarizes the net cash flow for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
(5.2 |
) |
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
Cash flows (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(49.4 |
) |
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
$ |
(10.8 |
) |
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
(34.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating activities provided cash flows of $18.7 million during 2010 compared to
$23.9 million in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a $2.9 million decrease in oil and gas
sales, excluding the effects of hedging and a $3.2 million decrease in the change in operating
assets, which was partially offset by a $980,000 decrease in general and administrative expense.
Cash flows provided by investing activities were $19.9 million in 2010 compared to cash flows
used in investing activities of $38.9 million in 2009. This decrease was due to a decrease of
$16.5 million in proceeds from property and equipment sales and an increase of $2.7 million in
property and equipment additions.
Cash flows used in financing activities in 2010 were $49.4 million compared to $38.9 million
in 2009. This increase was primarily due to the $20.0 million decrease in capital contributions,
the $19.2 million repurchase of Senior Secured Notes in 2010 and the $8.3 million increase in the
settlement of derivative liabilities which were partially offset by the $36.0 million decrease in
debt repayments.
During 2010, our working capital decreased $14.5 million from a surplus of $28.2 million at
December 31, 2009 to a surplus of $13.7 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily
due to a decrease in cash of $10.8 million, a $7.2 million increase in accounts payable and accrued
expenses and a $1.9 million decrease in accounts receivable, partially offset by a $9.0 million decrease in
the current fair value of derivatives liability.
Capital Expenditures
The table below sets forth our total capital expenditures for each of the years ending
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling including exploratory
dry hole expense |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
Field improvements |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Leasehold acreage |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, we spent approximately $18.0 million, including exploratory dry hole
expense, on our drilling and other capital expenditures. In 2010, we drilled 39 gross (39.0 net)
development wells and 6 gross (1.5 net) exploratory wells of which 38 gross (38.0 net) development
wells and 4 gross (1.0 net) exploratory wells were completed as producing wells.
37
We plan to spend approximately $17.5 million during 2011 on our drilling activities and other
capital expenditures. We intend to finance our planned capital expenditures through our cash on
hand, available cash flow and, to a lesser extent, the sale of non-strategic assets. The level of
our future cash flow will depend on a number of factors including the demand
for and price levels of oil and gas, worldwide economic conditions, including the effects of the
recovery from the recent recession, the scope and success of our drilling activities and our
ability to acquire additional producing properties.
Financing and Credit Facilities
Senior Secured Notes due 2012
We have $139.5 million of our Senior Secured Notes outstanding as of December 31, 2010. As a
result of the application of purchase accounting, the notes were recorded as a liability based on
the estimated fair value of $200.7 million on the Transaction date. In June 2006, we repurchased a
portion of the outstanding Senior Secured Notes. The repurchased notes had a face value of $33.025
million and were repurchased at 102.750%. A gain of $436,000 was recorded in 2006 in connection
with the transaction. In September 2010, we repurchased additional notes. The notes repurchased in
2010 had a face value of $20.0 million and were repurchased at 95.875%, which resulted in a gain of
approximately $1.0 million. The notes mature July 15, 2012. Interest is payable semi-annually on
January 15 and July 15 of each year at 8.75% based on the face amount of $139.5 million (for an
effective rate of 7.946% based on the fair value on the Transaction date.) The notes are secured on
a second-priority lien on the same assets subject to the liens securing our obligations under the
Credit Agreement. The Senior Secured Notes are subject to redemption at our option at specific
redemption prices.
|
|
|
|
|
July 15, 2010 and thereafter |
|
|
100.000 |
% |
The Senior Secured Notes are governed by an indenture (the Indenture), which
contains certain covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness and issue stock,
pay dividends, make distributions, make investments, make certain other restricted payments, enter
into certain transactions with affiliates, dispose of certain assets, incur liens securing
indebtedness of any kind other than permitted liens and engage in mergers and consolidations.
Credit Agreement
In 2005, we amended and restated our then existing credit agreement, by entering into a First
Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement by and among us and BNP Paribas, as sole lead
arranger, sole book runner, syndication agent and administrative agent. The Credit Agreement
provides for loans and other extensions of credit to be made to us.
On March 23, 2010, we entered into the Sixth Amendment to the Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement was amended to (1) add a maximum senior secured leverage ratio of 2.00 : 1.00, (2)
eliminate the maximum leverage ratio beginning December 31, 2009, (3) amend the minimum interest
coverage ratio to 1.75 : 1.0 and (4) make certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.
On August 25, 2010, we entered into the Seventh Amendment to the Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement was amended to (1) extend the termination date to April 14, 2012, (2) extend the hedge
letter of credit termination date to April 14, 2012, (3) decrease the aggregate amount of the
revolving commitments to $90 million, (4) decrease the borrowing base to $55 million and (5) make
certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.
At December 31, 2010, we had a Credit Agreement comprised of a $90 million revolving facility
with a borrowing base of $55 million, of which $23.9 million was outstanding at December 31, 2010,
and a five year $40 million letter of credit facility that may be used only to provide credit
support for our obligations under the hedge agreement and other hedge transactions. This facility
is for working capital requirements and general corporate purposes, including the issuance of
letters of credit. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest (i) at the greater of the
prime rate, an adjusted federal funds rate or an adjusted Eurodollar rate, plus an applicable
margin ranging from 1.0% to 2.0% based on the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the
Credit Agreement, or, (ii) at our option, the Eurodollar base rate plus an applicable margin
ranging from 2.5% to 3.50% based on the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Credit
Agreement. The full amount borrowed under the Credit Agreement will mature on April 14, 2012. We
are considering a refinancing of our Credit Agreement and may in connection therewith retire our Senior Secured Notes,
before they come due in 2012. If we refinance our debt and call the
Senior Secured Notes, then we will no longer have any notes outstanding and the note holders will
no longer
38
have an investment in us. We can provide no assurances that our lenders will agree to
refinance our Credit Agreement, or, if available, that the terms of any such refinancing will be
acceptable to us.
At December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with such financial covenants under the Credit
Agreement. Our senior secured leverage ratio was 0.80 : 1.0 and the interest coverage ratio was
1.78 : 1.0.
Borrowings under the revolving credit line will be used by us for general corporate purposes.
In accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement, letters of credit issued under the hedge
letter of credit commitment and any related borrowings are to be used solely to secure payment of
our obligations under the J. Aron Swap (defined hereinafter).
In connection with our entry into the Credit Agreement, we executed a Subordinated Promissory
Note in favor of Capital C in the maximum principal amount of $94 million. Under the Subordinated
Note, Capital C loaned $25 million to us on August 16, 2005. The Subordinated Note accrues interest
at a rate of 10% per annum and matures on August 16, 2012. We received a fairness opinion from an
unrelated financial services firm with respect to the terms of the Subordinated Note made on August
16, 2005. Interest payments on the Subordinated Note are due quarterly. In lieu of cash payments,
we have the option to make interest payments on the Subordinated Note by borrowing additional
amounts against the Subordinated Note. The interest payments in the first three quarters of 2008
were paid in cash. Interest payments for the fourth quarter of 2008 and all of 2009 were made by
additional borrowings against the Subordinated Note. In 2010, the first quarter interest payment
was paid in cash and interest payments for the last three quarters were made by additional
borrowings against the Subordinated Note. As of December 31, 2010, $32.8 million was outstanding
against the Subordinated Note. The Subordinated Note has no prepayment penalty or premium and may
be prepaid in whole or in part at any time. Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to our credit
agreement future cash payments for principal or interest on the Subordinated Note are prohibited.
The Subordinated Note is subordinate to our senior debt, which includes obligations under the
Credit Agreement, the J. Aron Swap and the Senior Secured Notes.
ISDA Master Agreement
In connection with the Transaction, we amended and restated the Schedule and Credit Support
Annex to our ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2004, by and between us and J. Aron &
Company (J. Aron Swap), pursuant to which we have agreed, from time to time, to enter into
cash-settled hedge transactions with J. Aron & Company, as hedge counterparty, in connection with
various gas and oil commodity derivatives transactions. The amendments to the J. Aron Swap conform
the terms of the Schedule and Credit Support Annex to the terms of the Credit Agreement, change
certain covenants and reduce the maximum amount of the letter of credit securing the hedge
obligations from $55 million to $40 million.
From time to time, we may enter into interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate exposure
associated with the credit facility, whereby a portion of our floating rate exposure is exchanged
for a fixed interest rate. At December 31, 2010, we had interest rate swaps in place covering
$23.5 million of our outstanding debt under the revolving credit facility that mature on September
30, 2013.
At December 31, 2010, the aggregate long-term debt maturing in the next five years is as
follows: $10,000 (2011); $196.2 million (2012); $12,000 (2013); $13,000 (2014) and $7,000 (2015 and
thereafter).
Derivative Instruments
The Hedges
To manage our exposure to natural gas or oil price volatility, we may partially hedge our
physical gas or oil sales prices by selling futures contracts on the NYMEX or by selling
NYMEX-based commodity derivative contracts which are placed with major financial institutions that
we believe are minimal credit risks. The contracts may take the form of futures contracts, swaps,
collars or options. None of our contracts currently qualify for hedge accounting.
On July 7, 2004, the date of the Merger, we became a party to long-term commodity hedges (the
Hedges) with J. Aron pursuant to a master agreement and related confirmations and documentation
(collectively, the Hedge Agreement.) We anticipate that the Hedges will cover approximately 66%
of the expected 2011 through 2013 production from our current estimated proved reserves and will
range from 62% to 72% of such expected production in any year. The Hedges primarily
39
take the form
of monthly settled fixed price swaps in respect of the settlement prices for the market standard
NYMEX futures contracts on crude oil and natural gas. Under such transactions, we pay NYMEX-based
floating price per MMbtu, in the case of Hedges on natural gas, and we pay a NYMEX-based floating
price per Bbl, in the case of Hedges on crude oil, for each month during the term of the Hedges and
receive a fixed price per MMbtu or Bbl (as the case may be) according to a monthly
schedule of fixed prices that we established upon completion of the Merger. The transactions will
be settled on a net basis. The notional amounts of the Hedges were designed to provide sufficient
hedged cash flow to cover operating expenditures, general and administrative expenses, interest
expenses and the majority of capital expenditures needed to develop proved reserves.
We are required to cause the Hedge Agreement to remain in effect for so long as any portion of
the Senior Secured Notes remains outstanding. The Hedges are documented under a standard
International Swap Dealers Association (ISDA) agreement with customized credit terms, designed to
mitigate the liquidity pressures in a high commodity price environment. The initial collateral
requirements and ongoing margin requirements (based on market movements) are satisfied by letters
of credit issued under the Credit Agreement, with an aggregate capitalization of $40 million. To
support any exposure in excess of amounts supported by the letters of credit, we have granted J.
Aron a second lien on the same assets that secure the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured
Notes and, to the extent our obligations exceed such letters of credit, such obligations are
secured by a second-priority lien on the same assets securing the Credit Agreement and the Senior
Secured Notes. We may enter into crude oil and natural gas hedges with parties other than J. Aron,
which hedges may be secured by the letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement and by a
second-priority lien on the same assets securing the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured
Notes.
Our financial results and cash flows can be significantly impacted as commodity prices
fluctuate widely in response to changing market conditions. Accordingly, we may modify our fixed
price contract and financial derivative positions by entering into new transactions. The following
tables reflect the natural gas and crude oil volumes and the weighted average prices under
financial derivatives at December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Swaps |
|
|
Crude Oil Swaps |
|
|
Natural Gas Basis Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis |
|
Year Ending |
|
Bbtu |
|
|
MMbtu |
|
|
MBbls |
|
|
Bbl |
|
|
Bbtu |
|
|
Differential |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
8,231 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
28.77 |
|
|
|
5,110 |
|
|
|
0.252 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
28.70 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
0.110 |
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
6,528 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
28.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, the fair value of futures contracts covering 2011 through 2013 oil
and gas production represented an unrealized loss of $39.7 million.
At December 31, 2010, we had interest rate swaps in place covering $23.5 million of our
outstanding debt under the revolving credit facility that mature on September 30, 2013. The swaps
provide 1-month LIBOR fixed rates of 4.10%, plus the applicable margin. The fair value of these
interest rate swaps was an unrealized loss of $1.8 million at December 31, 2010.
Inflation and Changes in Prices
The average price realized for our natural gas decreased from $8.62 per Mcf in 2008 to $3.61
per Mcf in 2009 and then increased to $4.00 per Mcf in 2010. The average price realized for our
oil decreased from $94.40 per Bbl in 2008 to $56.49 per Bbl in 2009 and then increased to $73.92
per Bbl in 2010. These prices include the effect of certain derivatives which were previously
qualified effective oil and gas hedges.
The price of oil and natural gas has a significant impact on our results of operations. Oil
and natural gas prices fluctuate based on market conditions and, accordingly, cannot be predicted.
Costs to drill, complete and service wells can fluctuate based on demand for these services which
is generally influenced by high or low commodity prices. Our costs and expenses may be subject to
inflationary pressures if oil and gas prices are favorable.
40
A large portion of our natural gas is sold subject to market sensitive contracts. Natural gas
price risk is mitigated (hedged) by the utilization of over-the-counter NYMEX swaps, options or
collars. Natural gas price hedging decisions are made in the context of our strategic objectives,
taking into account the changing fundamentals of the natural gas marketplace.
Contractual Obligations
We have various commitments primarily related to leases for office space, vehicles, natural
gas compressors and computer equipment. We expect to fund these commitments with cash generated
from operations.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
Contractual Obligations at |
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
1 - 3 Years |
|
|
4 - 5 Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
196,250 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
196,233 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
24,701 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
19,661 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
41,501 |
|
|
|
11,347 |
|
|
|
30,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on debt (1) |
|
|
26,958 |
|
|
|
17,683 |
|
|
|
9,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash
obligations |
|
$ |
289,658 |
|
|
$ |
29,383 |
|
|
$ |
239,815 |
|
|
$ |
799 |
|
|
$ |
19,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts represent the expected cash payments for interest based on the debt outstanding and the effective interest
rate as of December 31, 2010. Such amounts do not include the effects of our interest rate swaps. |
In addition to the items above, we have entered into joint operating agreements, area of
mutual interest agreements and joint venture agreements with other companies. These agreements may
include drilling commitments or other obligations in the normal course of business.
The following table summarizes our commercial commitments at December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period |
|
Commercial Commitments at |
|
Amounts |
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 5 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Committed |
|
|
Year |
|
|
1 - 3 Years |
|
|
4 - 5 Years |
|
|
years |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Standby Letters of Credit |
|
$ |
40,792 |
|
|
$ |
40,792 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Commitments |
|
$ |
40,792 |
|
|
$ |
40,792 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the normal course of business, we have performance obligations which are supported by
surety bonds or letters of credit. These obligations are primarily site restoration and
dismantlement, royalty payments and exploration programs where governmental organizations require
such support. We also have letters of credit with our hedging counterparty to satisfy ongoing
margin requirements related to our hedges.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have $40.8 million in letters of credit as described above.
41
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 201003, Extractive
Activities Oil and Gas (Topic 932), to align the oil and natural gas reserve estimation and
disclosure requirements of Topic 932 with the Securities and Exchange Commissions final rule,
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting. ASU No. 201003 was effective for annual reporting
periods ending on or after December 31, 2009. We adopted the provisions of ASU 201003 in our
consolidated financial statements beginning in the year ended December 31, 2009.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 201006, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820), which provides amendments to Topic 820 and requires new disclosures for (i) transfers
between Levels 1, 2 and 3 and the reasons for such transfers and (ii) activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements to show separate information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements.
In addition, ASU 201006 amends Topic 820 to clarify existing disclosures around the
disaggregation level of fair value measurements and disclosures for the valuation techniques and
inputs utilized (for Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements). The provisions in ASU 201006
are applicable to interim and annual reporting periods beginning subsequent to December 15, 2009,
with the exception of Level 3 disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, which
will be required in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU
201006 did not impact our operating results, financial position or cash flows, but did impact our
disclosures on fair value measurements.
No other new accounting pronouncements issued or effective during the year ended December 31,
2010 have had or are expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Item 7A. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Among other risks, we are exposed to interest rate and commodity price risks.
The interest rate risk relates to existing debt under our revolving credit facility as well as
any new debt financing needed to fund capital requirements. We may manage our interest rate risk
through the use of interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate exposure associated with the
credit agreement, whereby a portion of our floating rate exposure is exchanged for a fixed interest
rate. A portion of our long-term debt consists of senior secured notes where the interest
component is fixed. At December 31, 2010, we had an interest rate swap in place on $23.5 million
of our outstanding debt under the revolving credit facility through September 30, 2013. The swap
provides a 1-month LIBOR fixed rates at 4.10%, plus the applicable margin, on $23.5 million through
September 2013. These interest rate swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting, therefore, all cash
settles and changes in the fair value of these swaps are recorded in derivative fair value
gain/loss. If market interest rates for short-term borrowings increased 1%, the increase in our
annual interest expense would be approximately $239,000. The impact of this rate increases on our
cash flows would be significantly less than these amounts due to our interest rate swaps. If
market interest rates increased 1%, the decrease in our cash flow would be approximately $4,000.
This sensitivity analysis is based on our financial structure at December 31, 2010.
The commodity price risk relates to our natural gas and crude oil produced, held in storage
and marketed. Our financial results can be significantly impacted as commodity prices fluctuate
widely in response to changing market forces. From time to time we may enter into a combination of
futures contracts, commodity derivatives and fixed-price physical contracts to manage our exposure
to commodity price volatility. The fixed-price physical contracts generally have terms of a year
or more. We employ a policy of hedging oil and gas production by selling NYMEX-based commodity
derivative contracts which are placed with major financial institutions that we believe are minimal
credit risks. The contracts may take the form of futures contracts, swaps or options. At December
31, 2010, we had derivatives covering a portion of our oil and gas production from 2011 through
2013. Our oil and gas sales revenues included a net pre-tax loss of $7.9 million in 2009 and a net
pre-tax loss of $6.1 million in 2010 on certain derivatives which were previously qualified as
effective oil and gas hedges.
We determined that as of August 15, 2005, our oil derivatives no longer qualify for cash flow
hedge accounting and as of July 1, 2006, our gas derivatives no longer qualify for cash flow hedge
accounting. From those dates forward, changes in the fair value of the oil and gas derivatives are
recorded in derivative fair value gain/loss. Deferred gains or losses on the gas derivatives are
recognized as increases or decreases to gas sales revenues during the same periods in which the
underlying forecasted transactions impact earnings. If gas prices decreased $0.50 per Mcf, our gas
sales revenues would decrease by approximately $5.1 million. If the price of crude oil decreased
$10.00 per Bbl, our oil sales revenues would decrease by approximately $2.7 million. The impact of
these price decreases on our cash flows would be significantly less than these amounts due to our
oil and gas derivatives. Price decreases of $0.50 per Mcf and $10.00 per Bbl would decrease
42
cash
flows from the sale of oil and gas by approximately $1.6 million after considering the effects of
the derivative contracts in place during 2010. This sensitivity analysis is based on our 2010 oil
and gas sales volumes.
|
|
|
Item 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
The Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules on page F-1 sets forth the
financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and their location herein.
Schedules have been omitted as not required or not applicable because the information required to
be presented is included in the financial statements and related notes.
|
|
|
Item 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting or financial
disclosures during the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009.
43
|
|
|
Item 9A. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as
of December 31, 2010 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in
our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under
the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Managements Annual Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Our
internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our Management and
Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting based on the Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management
concluded that Belden & Blake Corporations internal control over financial reporting was effective
as of December 31, 2010.
Pursuant to the requirements of Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, the Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting has been signed below by the
following person on behalf and in the capacities indicated below.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark A. Houser
Mark A. Houser
|
|
/s/ James M. Vanderhider
James M. Vanderhider
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the
|
|
President, Chief Financial Officer and Director |
|
|
Board of Directors and Director |
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX
March 28, 2011
44
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the year ended December 31, 2010 that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to
materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the companys registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by the companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only managements report
in this annual report.
|
|
|
Item 9B. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
Not applicable.
45
PART III
|
|
|
Item 10. |
|
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Our executive officers and directors and their respective positions and ages of as of March 5,
2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
|
Position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Houser
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James M. Vanderhider
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
President, Chief Financial Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth Mariani
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick J. Stair
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Vice President of Accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barry K. Lay
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Vice President of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles Goodin
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Vice President of Land and Legal and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Coeny
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Director |
All of our executive officers serve at the pleasure of our Board of Directors. None of our
executive officers is related to any other executive officer or director. The Board of Directors
consists of four members, each of whom are chosen by our Parent. The business experience of each
executive officer and director is summarized below.
Mark A. Houser. On August 16, 2005, Mr. Houser was appointed our Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. Since 2006, Mr. Houser has served as EV
Management, LLCs President, COO and Director. EV Management is the general partner of the general
partner of EV Energy Partners, LP. Since 1999, Mr. Houser has been the Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of EnerVest, Ltd. Prior to that, Mr. Houser was Vice President,
United States Exploration and Production, for Occidental Petroleum Corporation, or Oxy, where he
helped lead Oxys reorganization of its domestic reserve base. Mr. Houser began his career as an
engineer with KerrMcGee Corporation. He holds a petroleum engineering degree from Texas A&M
University and an MBA from Southern Methodist University.
James M. Vanderhider. Mr. Vanderhider is our President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to
that he served as President and Chief Operating Officer since his appointment on August 16, 2005.
Mr. Vanderhider has been a director since August 16, 2005. He also serves as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of EnerVest and has been with EnerVest since March 1996.
Prior to joining EnerVest, Mr. Vanderhider was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Torch Energy and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nuevo Energy. Prior to
such time, Mr. Vanderhider was a management member of the Internal Audit department of The Coastal
Corporation, now a subsidiary of El Paso Corporation. He also held the position of Chief Financial
Officer of Walker Energy Partners, a master limited partnership which he helped form. Mr.
Vanderhider began his career with Deloitte and Touche in the audit department focusing on the
energy industry.
Mr. Vanderhider received a B.B.A. degree in Accounting from Texas A&M University where he
graduated summa cum laude. He is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Vanderhider is a native
Houstonian and is actively involved with several industry and social organizations. He is a member
of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, Houston Producers Forum, Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants, Houston
Energy Finance Group, and Houston Acquisitions and Divestitures Organization. He serves on the
Board of Trustees of Goodwill Industries of Houston and on the Board of Directors of the Houston
Center Club, a social and athletic club.
Kenneth Mariani. On October 3, 2005, Mr. Mariani was appointed Senior Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer. He has been a director since August 16, 2005. Mr. Mariani is also Senior
Vice President, Eastern Division, for
46
EnerVest and Executive Vice President of CGAS Exploration, Inc., a privately-held oil and gas
company owned by certain institutional funds managed by EnerVest. Prior to joining EnerVest in
2000, he served as Vice President of Operations for Energy Corporation of America.
Mr. Mariani holds a degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh,
graduating cum laude with a Petroleum option. He received his MBA degree from the University of
Texas and is a Certified Professional Engineer. Mr. Mariani is an active member of the Independent
Oil and Gas Association of West Virginia, recently serving on the Board of Directors, Commerce
Committee and Safety Committee. In 2003, he was acting Vice President and Program Chair of this
organization. He is past Chairman of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and a member of IPAA.
Currently, Mr. Mariani serves on the Board of Directors for the Michigan Oil and Gas Association
and the Ohio Oil and Gas Association. He is also active in the Independent Oil and Gas Association
of Pennsylvania, the Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York and the Kentucky Oil and Gas
Association.
Frederick J. Stair. Mr. Stair is Vice President of Accounting and has been our Vice President
since January 2003. He previously served as our Corporate Controller from 1997 to 2005 and as
Controller of the Exploration and Production Division from 1991 to 1997. Mr. Stair joined us in
1981 and has 30 years of accounting experience in the oil and gas industry. Mr. Stair is also Vice
President of Accounting Eastern Division for EnerVest. He graduated from the University of
Akron where he received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting. Mr. Stair is a member of the
Council of Petroleum Accountants Societies of Appalachia and the Independent Oil and Gas
Association of West Virginia.
Barry K. Lay. Mr. Lay was appointed as Vice President of Operations effective August 10,
2007. Mr. Lay served as Vice President of Land and Secretary from October 16, 2006 until August
10, 2007. Prior to that he served as Vice President and General Manager of our Pennsylvania/New
York District. Prior to joining us in 2002, Mr. Lay was Vice President of Engineering for Waco Oil
and Gas Company. He also serves as Vice President of Operations Eastern Division for EnerVest.
Mr. Lay has 30 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. Mr. Lay graduated from West
Virginia University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering. He serves as
Chairman for numerous State oil and gas regulatory boards including the West Virginia Oil and Gas
Conservation Commission, West Virginia Coal Bed Methane Review Board and the West Virginia Shallow
Gas Well Review Board. Mr. Lay is a registered Professional Engineer and a licensed Land Surveyor
in the State of West Virginia.
Charles Goodin. Mr. Goodin joined EnerVest in October of 2009 as Vice President of Land/Legal
for the Eastern Division. Mr. Goodin has a Juris Doctorate of Law from the University of Denver
and a Bachelor of Science in Business-Marketing from the University of Colorado. He has previously
worked as Director of Land & Legal and General Counsel for Petrogulf Corporation in Denver, Co., Of
Counsel with the law firm of Poulson, Odell & Peterson, Vice President of Land and Corporate
Attorney for Eastern American Energy Corporation in Charleston, WV and District Landman with BP
Exploration, Inc. in Colorado and Texas.
Mr. Goodin is licensed to Practice Law in Colorado, Texas and West Virginia; is a Member of
the Colorado, Texas and WV Bar Associations; and is a member of the AAPL and DAPL. Mr. Goodin is
Founder and past President of the new Denver Petroleum Club and has served on the Board of
Directors of Junior Achievement as well as many other civic organizations.
Matthew Coeny. On August 16, 2005, Mr. Coeny was elected to our Board of Directors. Mr.
Coeny is a Director of Citi Private Equity (CPE). CPE is a business unit of Citigroup Inc.
(Citigroup) and is responsible for private equity investments on behalf of certain Citigroup
affiliates. Since joining CPE in 2000, he has participated in the evaluation, due diligence and
execution of investments in a variety of industries. Prior to joining CPE, Mr. Coeny worked in
Citigroups Investment Banking Division where he participated in numerous advisory and capital
raising transactions. Prior to joining Citigroup in 1996, he was a Senior Consultant in KPMGs
Corporate Transactions practice. Mr. Coeny received a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance and
Accounting from New York University.
47
Audit Committee
Our full Board of Directors serves as our Audit Committee. Additionally, since we are wholly
owned by Capital C, we have not determined that any of our directors is an audit committee
financial expert.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Vice President of Accounting and any person performing similar
functions. It is available without charge upon oral or written request, by contacting:
Belden & Blake Corporation
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 800
Houston, Texas 77002
Attention: James M. Vanderhider, President
Telephone: (713) 659-3500
48
|
|
|
Item 11. |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
All of our executive officers are full-time employees of EnerVest and its subsidiaries. We
have entered into an operating agreement with a subsidiary of EnerVest (described in Item 13).
Pursuant to the operating agreement, we pay EnerVest a fee to operate our business, and EnerVest
provides us the services of its employees, including our executive officers, to operate our
business. The fee we pay to EnerVest does not include any direct reimbursement for the salaries,
bonuses or other compensation paid by EnerVest to the EnerVest employees which act as our executive
officers. Therefore, no executive officers of Belden & Blake received any remuneration from Belden
& Blake Corporation during 2010.
Compensation of Directors
Our directors are not compensated. We have no independent directors, as independence is
defined by the New York Stock Exchange.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
We do not have a compensation committee. As of December 31, 2010, none of our officers are
compensated by us.
49
|
|
|
Item 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS,
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 5, 2011 regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person who beneficially owns more than five
percent of our outstanding common stock, each director, the Chief Executive Officer and the four
other most highly compensated executive officers and by all of our directors and executive
officers, as a group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
Five Percent Shareholders |
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
Capital C Energy Operations, LP (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1001 Fanin Street, Suite 800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, Texas 77002 |
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Subsidiaries of EnerVest, Ltd., are the general partners of the limited
partnership that owns Capital C Energy Operations, L.P. EnerVest, therefore, also may be deemed to
be a beneficial owner of the 1,534 shares (100%) of our Common Stock. The address of EnerVest,
Ltd., is 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77002. EnerVest is a Texas limited
partnership. Messrs. John B. Walker, Jon Rex Jones and A.V. Jones by virtue of their direct and
indirect ownership of the limited liability company that acts as EnerVests general partner, may be
deemed to beneficially own the Common Stock beneficially owned by EnerVest. Messrs. Walker, Jon
Rex Jones and A.V. Jones disclaim beneficial ownership of such Common Stock. The addresses for
Messrs. Walker, Jon Rex Jones and A.V. Jones are the same as for EnerVest. |
Equity Compensation Plan Information:
As of March 5, 2011, we do not have any outstanding stock options or plans to grant any
options.
50
|
|
|
Item 13. |
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
On March 15, 2006, we entered into a joint operating agreement with EnerVest Operating L.L.C.
(EnerVest Operating), a subsidiary of EnerVest. In 2009, amounts paid to EnerVest Operating
under the terms of the agreement were $6.1 million for overhead fees, $5.9 million for field labor,
vehicles and district office expense, $82,000 for drilling overhead fees and $1.1 million for
drilling labor costs. In 2010, we paid $5.5 million for overhead fees, $5.8 million for field
labor, vehicles and district office expense, $98,000 for drilling overhead fees and $886,000 for
drilling labor costs.
As of December 31, 2010, we owed EnerVest Operating $634,000 and owed EnerVest $845,000.
In connection with the Transaction, we executed a subordinated promissory note in favor of our
parent, Capital C in the maximum amount of $94 million. Under the note, Capital C loaned $25
million to us on August 16, 2005 in connection with the Transaction. The note accrues interest at
10% per year and matures on August 16, 2012. We received a fairness opinion from an unrelated
financial services firm with respect to the terms of the note made on August 16, 2005. Interest
payments on the note are due quarterly. In lieu of cash payments, we have the option to make
interest payments on the note by borrowing additional amounts against the note. The amount due
under the note at December 31, 2010 was $32.8 million. We borrowed an additional $2.4 million for
interest payments against the note in 2010.
Messrs. Houser, Vanderhider and Mariani our officers and directors and they are officers and
equity owners of EnerVest. The institutional funds that are managed by EnerVest and own our direct
parent, Capital C, also hold other investments in oil and gas assets and operations. We can give
no assurance that conflicts of interest will not arise for corporate opportunities. Also, we can
give no assurance that conflicts will not arise with respect to the time and attention devoted to
us by Messrs. Houser, Vanderhider and Mariani.
51
|
|
|
Item 14. |
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
The audit committee of Belden & Blake Corporation selected Deloitte & Touche LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2010. The audit committees charter requires the audit committee to
approve in advance all audit and nonaudit services to be provided by our independent registered
public accounting firm. All services reported in the audit, auditrelated, tax and all other fees
categories below with respect to this Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31,
2010 were approved by the audit committee.
Fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Audit fees (1) |
|
$ |
361,000 |
|
|
$ |
352,000 |
|
Audit-related fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
361,000 |
|
|
$ |
352,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents fees for professional services provided in connection with the
audit of our annual financial statements and review of our quarterly financial statements. |
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires advance approval of all audit,
audit-related, and other services performed by the independent auditor or other public accounting
firms. The policy provides for pre-approval by the Audit Committee of specifically defined audit
and non-audit services. Unless the specific service has been previously pre-approved with respect
to that year, the Audit Committee must approve the permitted service before the independent auditor
or public accounting firm is engaged to perform it. The Audit Committee has delegated to the
Chairman of the Audit Committee authority to approve permitted services up to $75,000 per year
provided that the Chairman reports any decisions to the committee at its next scheduled meeting.
All services of $75,000 or more are required to be approved by a majority of the committee members.
PART IV
|
|
|
Item 15. |
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) Documents filed as a part of this report:
1. Financial Statements
The financial statements listed in the accompanying Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
and Schedules are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
No financial statement schedules are required to be filed as part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
52
3. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 15, 2004, by and among Capital C Energy
Operations, LP, Capital C Ohio, Inc. and Belden & Blake Corporation, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.1 to Belden & Blake Corporations Form 8-K dated July 7, 2004 (as amended). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Belden & Blake Corporation (fka Belden &
Blake Energy Corporation), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Belden & Blake
Corporations Form 8-K dated November 29, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of Belden & Blake Corporation, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No.
333-119194). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Indenture, dated as of July 7, 2004, by and among Belden & Blake Corporation, The Canton Oil
& Gas Company, Ward Lake Drilling, Inc. and BNY Midwest Trust Company, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Belden & Blake Corporations Form 8-K dated July 7, 2004 (as
amended). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2004, between Capital C Ohio, Inc. and J. Aron &
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Belden & Blake Corporations Form 8-K
dated July 7, 2004 (as amended). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
First Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2005, by and
among Belden & Blake Corporation, as borrower, certain subsidiaries of Belden & Blake
Corporation, as guarantors, various lenders signatory thereto, and BNP Paribas., as sole lead
arranger, sole bookrunner, syndication agent and administrative agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Belden & Blake Corporations Form 8-K dated August 22, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Collateral Trust Agreement, dated as of July 7, 2004, among Belden & Blake Corporation, the
other Pledgors party from time to time thereto, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as
Administrative Agent under the Credit Agreement, J. Aron & Company, as Hedge Counterparty
under the Hedge Agreement, BNY Midwest Trust Company, as Trustee under the Indenture, and
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Collateral Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
Belden & Blake Corporations Form 8-K dated July 7, 2004 (as amended). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2004 and amended and restated as
of August 16, 2005, by and between J. Aron & Company and Belden & Blake Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Belden & Blake Corporations 8- K filed on
August 22, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Credit Support Annex to the Schedule to the ISDA Master Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2004
and amended and restated as of August 16, 2005, by and between J. Aron & Company and Belden &
Blake Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Belden & Blake Corporations
8-K filed on August 22, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
Subordinated Promissory Note, dated August 16, 2005, between Capital C Energy Operations, LP
and Belden & Blake Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Belden & Blake
Corporations 8-K filed on August 22, 2005). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2005, by and among Belden &
Blake Corporation and BNP Paribas, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Belden &
Blake Corporations annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
Operating Agreement dated October 1, 2005, by and between Belden & Blake Corporation and
EnerVest Operating L.L.C. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Belden & Blake
Corporations annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. |
53
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
Fourth Amendment, Waiver and Agreement to the First Amended and Restated Credit and Guarantee
Agreement dated as of August 16, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Belden &
Blake Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
Fifth Amendment and Agreement to the First Amended and Restated Credit and Guarantee
Agreement dated as of August 16, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Belden &
Blake Corporations 8-K filed on October 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
Sixth Amendment and Agreement to the First Amended and Restated Credit and Guarantee
Agreement dated as of August 16, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Belden &
Blake Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
Seventh Amendment and Agreement to the First Amended and Restated Credit and Guarantee
Agreement dated as of August 16, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Belden &
Blake Corporations 8-K filed on August 26, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to
Belden & Blake Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
* |
|
Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineering Consultants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
* |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
* |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
* |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
* |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
* |
|
Wright & Company, Inc. Reserve Report |
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2011
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Mark A. Houser |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Houser, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of the Board of Directors and Director |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark A. Houser |
|
Chief Executive Officer Chairman
of |
|
March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
the Board
of Directors and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James M. Vanderhider |
|
President, Chief Financial Officer
and Director |
|
March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frederick J. Stair |
|
Vice President of Accounting |
|
March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kenneth Mariani |
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Operating
Officer |
|
March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
and Director
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Matthew Coeny |
|
Director |
|
March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
55
BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
Item 15(a) (1) and (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All financial statement schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present
in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is
included in the financial statements.
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Belden & Blake Corporation
Houston, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Belden & Blake Corporation and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Belden & Blake Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and
2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
changed its method of accounting during 2009 for oil and natural gas reserves and disclosures.
/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, TX
March 28, 2011
F-2
BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
35,941 |
|
|
$ |
46,740 |
|
Accounts receivable (less accumulated provision for doubtful accounts: |
|
|
9,913 |
|
|
|
11,821 |
|
December 31, 2010 - $452; December 31, 2009 - $393) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,266 |
|
|
|
8,272 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
51,955 |
|
|
|
68,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method) |
|
|
701,790 |
|
|
|
684,787 |
|
Gas gathering systems |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
Land, buildings, machinery and equipment |
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
2,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705,450 |
|
|
|
688,628 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
179,947 |
|
|
|
151,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
525,503 |
|
|
|
537,420 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
579,022 |
|
|
$ |
608,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
Accounts payable related party |
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
22,417 |
|
|
|
16,136 |
|
Current portion of long-term liabilities |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
12,141 |
|
|
|
21,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
38,344 |
|
|
|
40,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank and other long-term debt |
|
|
23,919 |
|
|
|
43,929 |
|
Senior secured notes |
|
|
141,056 |
|
|
|
162,287 |
|
Subordinated promissory note related party |
|
|
32,846 |
|
|
|
30,491 |
|
Asset retirement obligations and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
24,637 |
|
|
|
22,990 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
30,201 |
|
|
|
66,876 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
140,137 |
|
|
|
137,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
392,796 |
|
|
|
463,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: without par value; 3,000 shares authorized; 1,534 shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
142,500 |
|
|
|
142,500 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
10,168 |
|
|
|
(29,978 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(4,786 |
) |
|
|
(8,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
147,882 |
|
|
|
104,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
579,022 |
|
|
$ |
608,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-3
BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales |
|
$ |
60,601 |
|
|
$ |
61,761 |
|
|
$ |
145,398 |
|
Gas gathering and marketing |
|
|
5,223 |
|
|
|
5,894 |
|
|
|
12,254 |
|
Other |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,380 |
|
|
|
68,624 |
|
|
|
158,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production expense |
|
|
20,528 |
|
|
|
20,955 |
|
|
|
26,342 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
Gas gathering and marketing |
|
|
4,988 |
|
|
|
5,492 |
|
|
|
10,252 |
|
Exploration expense |
|
|
2,635 |
|
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
6,805 |
|
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
|
8,188 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
29,368 |
|
|
|
37,046 |
|
|
|
35,560 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,076 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
30,445 |
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(33,644 |
) |
|
|
(34,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value gain |
|
|
(32,768 |
) |
|
|
(29,631 |
) |
|
|
(55,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
43,490 |
|
|
|
125,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
64,437 |
|
|
|
25,134 |
|
|
|
33,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
19,006 |
|
|
|
20,612 |
|
|
|
22,818 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
46,529 |
|
|
|
4,653 |
|
|
|
10,692 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,383 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
39,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
40,146 |
|
|
$ |
2,776 |
|
|
$ |
(28,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
(Accumulated Deficit) |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Equity |
|
January 1, 2008 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
(3,810 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,967 |
) |
|
$ |
102,223 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,944 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in derivative fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
(409 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for derivative
(gain) loss
reclassified into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,181 |
|
|
|
6,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,172 |
) |
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,500 |
|
|
$ |
(32,754 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,195 |
) |
|
$ |
76,551 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,776 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for derivative
(gain) loss reclassified into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,814 |
|
|
|
4,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,590 |
|
Contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
142,500 |
|
|
$ |
(29,978 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,381 |
) |
|
$ |
104,141 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,146 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for derivative
(gain) loss
reclassified into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
142,500 |
|
|
$ |
10,168 |
|
|
$ |
(4,786 |
) |
|
$ |
147,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year |
|
|
For the Year |
|
|
For the Year |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
40,146 |
|
|
$ |
2,776 |
|
|
$ |
(28,944 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income
to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
29,368 |
|
|
|
37,046 |
|
|
|
35,560 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,076 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
30,445 |
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
(33,644 |
) |
|
|
(34,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of derivatives and other noncash derivative activities |
|
|
(29,721 |
) |
|
|
(24,387 |
) |
|
|
(46,064 |
) |
Exploration expense |
|
|
2,494 |
|
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
39,636 |
|
Other non-cash expense |
|
|
2,093 |
|
|
|
3,197 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of
effects of acquisition and disposition of businesses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and other current assets |
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
7,572 |
|
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2,624 |
) |
|
|
(630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
18,726 |
|
|
|
23,947 |
|
|
|
96,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from property and equipment disposals |
|
|
36,688 |
|
|
|
53,175 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
Exploration expense |
|
|
(2,494 |
) |
|
|
(2,666 |
) |
|
|
(1,974 |
) |
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(14,234 |
) |
|
|
(11,574 |
) |
|
|
(28,620 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
19,893 |
|
|
|
38,884 |
|
|
|
(27,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt redetermination costs |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(1,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment to shareholder or dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
Capital contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of derivative liabilities recorded in purchase accounting |
|
|
(9,664 |
) |
|
|
(1,358 |
) |
|
|
(59,901 |
) |
Repayment of Senior Secured Notes |
|
|
(19,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of revolving line of credit |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
(56,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt and other obligations |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(49,418 |
) |
|
|
(38,907 |
) |
|
|
(62,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(10,799 |
) |
|
|
23,924 |
|
|
|
6,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
46,740 |
|
|
|
22,816 |
|
|
|
16,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
35,941 |
|
|
$ |
46,740 |
|
|
$ |
22,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-6
BELDEN & BLAKE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Transaction and Merger
Unless the context requires otherwise or unless otherwise noted, when we use the terms Belden
& Blake, we, us, our or the Company, we are referring to Belden & Blake Corporation. On
August 16, 2005, the former partners of the direct parent of Belden & Blake Corporation (the
Company), Capital C Energy Operations, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (Capital C),
completed the sale of all of the partnership interests in Capital C to certain institutional funds
managed by EnerVest, Ltd. (EnerVest), a Houston-based privately held oil and gas operator and
institutional funds manager (the Transaction).
On July 7, 2004, the Company, Capital C and Capital C Ohio, Inc., an Ohio corporation and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Capital C (Merger Sub), completed a merger pursuant to which Merger
Sub was merged with and into the Company (the Merger), with the Company surviving the Merger as a
wholly owned subsidiary of Capital C. The Merger resulted in a change in control of the Company.
The general partner of Capital C was controlled by Carlyle/Riverstone Global Energy and Power Fund
II, L.P. and Capital C Energy Partners, L.P. until the Transaction on August 16, 2005.
The Transaction and Merger were each accounted for as a purchase effective August 16, 2005 and
July 7, 2004, respectively. The Transaction and Merger resulted in a new basis of accounting
reflecting estimated fair values for assets and liabilities at that date.
(2) Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Business
We operate in the oil and gas industry. Our principal business is the exploitation,
development, production, operation and acquisition of oil and gas properties. Sales of oil are
ultimately made to refineries. Sales of natural gas are ultimately made to gas utilities and
industrial consumers in Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania and New York. The price of oil and natural
gas has a significant impact on our working capital and results of operations.
Principles of Consolidation and Financial Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial statements
of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates in the Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts. Significant estimates used in the preparation of our financial
statements which could be subject to significant revision in the near term include estimated oil
and gas reserves.
F-7
Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, cash equivalents are defined as all
highly liquid investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Credit limits, ongoing credit evaluation and account monitoring procedures are used to
minimize the risk of loss. Collateral is generally not required. Expected losses are provided for
currently and actual losses have been within managements expectations.
Inventories
Inventories of material, pipe and supplies are valued at average cost. Crude oil
and natural gas inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market.
Property and Equipment
We use the successful efforts method of accounting for our oil and gas properties.
Under this method, property acquisition and development costs and certain productive exploration
costs are capitalized while non-productive exploration costs, which include certain geological and
geophysical costs, exploratory dry holes and costs of carrying and retaining undeveloped
properties, are expensed as incurred. The costs of carrying and retaining undeveloped properties
include delay rental payments made on new and existing leases, ad valorem taxes on existing leases
and the cost of previously capitalized leases which are written off because the leases were dropped
or expired. Exploratory dry hole costs include the costs associated with drilling an exploratory
well that has been determined to be a dry hole. The capitalized costs of our producing oil and
natural gas properties are depreciated and depleted by the unitsofproduction method based on
the ratio of current production to estimated total net proved oil and natural gas reserves as
estimated by independent petroleum engineers. Proved developed reserves are used in computing unit
rates for drilling and development costs and total proved reserves are used for depletion rates of
leasehold, platform, and pipeline costs. No gains or losses are recognized upon the disposition of
oil and natural gas properties except in transactions such as the significant disposition of an
amortizable base that significantly affects the unitofproduction amortization rate. Sales
proceeds are credited to the carrying value of the properties. Maintenance and repairs are
expensed, and expenditures which enhance the value of properties are capitalized.
Unproved oil and gas properties are stated at cost and consist of undeveloped leases. These
costs are assessed periodically to determine whether their value has been impaired, and if
impairment is indicated, the costs are charged to expense. We recorded no impairment to unproved
oil and gas properties in 2010 and recorded impairments $3.6 million and $783,000 in 2009 and 2008,
respectively, which reduced the book value of certain unproved oil and gas properties to their estimated
fair value.
Gas gathering systems are stated at cost. Depreciation expense is computed using the
straight-line method over 15 years.
Land, buildings, machinery and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of non-oil and gas
properties is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets ranging
from 3 to 15 years for machinery and equipment and 30 to 40 years for buildings. When assets other
than oil and gas properties are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income
for the period. The cost of maintenance and repairs is expensed as incurred, and significant
renewals and betterments are capitalized.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future
undiscounted
F-8
cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a loss is recognized for the difference
between the fair value and the carrying amount of the asset. In performing the reviews for
long-lived asset recoverability, we recorded impairments of $1.6 million, $26.8 million and $3.1
million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which reduced the book value of certain proved properties to
their estimated fair value. Fair value was based on estimated future cash flows to be generated by
the assets, discounted at a market rate of interest.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Under FASB accounting guidance, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are
not amortized but are reviewed for impairment annually or if certain impairment indicators arise.
Separately identifiable intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite life will
continue to be amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life).
As described in Note 1, we recorded goodwill associated with the Transaction which resulted in
goodwill of $90.1 million at December 31, 2007. In accordance with FASB accounting guidance,
goodwill is not amortized to earnings, but is assessed for impairment whenever events or
circumstances indicate that impairment of the carrying value of goodwill is likely, but no less
often than annually. If the carrying value of goodwill is determined to be impaired, it is reduced
for the impaired value with a corresponding charge to pretax earnings in the period in which it is
determined to be impaired. During the third quarter of 2008, we performed our annual assessment of
impairment of the goodwill and determined that there was no impairment. In the fourth quarter of
2008, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $90.1 million due to the significant drop in oil
and gas prices. There is no Goodwill as of December 31, 2010, or 2009.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $762,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, of deferred
debt issuance costs. Deferred debt issuance costs are being amortized over their respective terms.
Amortization expense related to deferred debt issuance costs was $761,000 in 2010, $936,000 in
2009 and $424,000 in 2008. At December 31, 2010, the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
in the next five years is as follows: $569,000 in 2011, $193,000 in 2012 and none in 2013, 2014 or
2015.
Revenue Recognition
Oil and natural gas revenues are recognized when production is sold to a purchaser
at fixed or determinable prices, when delivery has occurred and title has transferred and
collectability of the revenue is reasonably assured. We follow the sales method of accounting for
natural gas revenues. Under this method of accounting, revenues are recognized based on volumes
sold, which may differ from the volume to which we are entitled based on our working interest. An
imbalance is recognized as a liability only when the estimated remaining reserves will not be
sufficient to enable the underproduced owner(s) to recoup its entitled share through future
production. Under the sales method, no receivables are recorded where we have taken less than our
share of production. There were no material gas imbalances at December 31, 2010 or 2009. Oil and
gas marketing revenues are recognized when title passes.
Income Taxes
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under FASB
accounting guidance. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used
for income tax purposes. Deferred income taxes also are recognized for operating losses that are
available to offset future taxable income and tax credits that are available to offset future
federal income taxes. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if it is
more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized.
F-9
Derivatives and Hedging
In accordance with FASB accounting guidance, we recognize all derivative financial
instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value. Derivative instruments that do not
qualify or are not designated as cash flow hedges are adjusted to fair value through net income
(loss). Under FASB accounting guidance, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that
are cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until such time as the
hedged items are recognized in net income (loss). Ineffective portions of a derivative
instruments change in fair value are immediately recognized in net income (loss). Deferred gains
and losses on terminated commodity hedges will be recognized as increases or decreases to oil and
gas revenues during the same periods in which the underlying forecasted transactions impact
earnings. If there is a discontinuance of a cash flow hedge because it is probable that the
original forecasted transaction will not occur, deferred gains or losses are recognized in earnings
immediately. See Note 6.
The relationship between the hedging instruments and the hedged items must be highly effective
in achieving the offset of changes in fair values or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk,
both at the inception of the contract and on an ongoing basis. Hedge accounting is discontinued
prospectively if we determine that a derivative is no longer highly effective as a hedge or if we
decide to discontinue the hedging relationship.
Asset Retirement Obligations
We follow FASB accounting guidance which requires us to recognize a liability for the fair
value of its asset retirement obligations associated with our tangible, long-lived assets. The
majority of our asset retirement obligations relate to the plugging and abandonment (excluding
salvage value) of our oil and gas properties. There has been no significant current period
activity with respect to additional retirement obligations, settled obligations, accretion expense
and revisions of estimated cash flows.
F-10
A reconciliation of our liability for plugging and abandonment costs for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Beginning asset retirement obligations |
|
$ |
23,083 |
|
|
$ |
23,885 |
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(2,115 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
Revisions in
estimated cash
flows |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending asset retirement obligations |
|
$ |
24,701 |
|
|
$ |
23,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, $133,000 and $229,000, respectively, of our ARO liability is
classified as current.
(3) New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 201003, Extractive
Activities Oil and Gas (Topic 932), to align the oil and natural gas reserve estimation and
disclosure requirements of Topic 932 with the Securities and Exchange Commissions final rule,
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting. ASU No. 201003 was effective for annual reporting
periods ending on or after December 31, 2009. We adopted the provisions of ASU 201003 in our
consolidated financial statements beginning in the year ended December 31, 2009.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 201006, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820), which provides amendments to Topic 820 and requires new disclosures for (i) transfers
between Levels 1, 2 and 3 and the reasons for such transfers and (ii) activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements to show separate information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements.
In addition, ASU 201006 amends Topic 820 to clarify existing disclosures around the
disaggregation level of fair value measurements and disclosures for the valuation techniques and
inputs utilized (for Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements). The provisions in ASU 201006
are applicable to interim and annual reporting periods beginning subsequent to December 15, 2009,
with the exception of Level 3 disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, which
will be required in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU
201006 did not impact our operating results, financial position or cash flows, but did impact our
disclosures on fair value measurements.
No other new accounting pronouncements issued or effective during the year ended December 31,
2010 have had or are expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
F-11
(4) Acquisitions
In the fourth quarter of 2010, we acquired additional working interest in our wells in
Michigan for approximately $4.4 million.
(5) Dispositions
On July 1, 2010, we sold a 50% 75% interest in certain unproved undeveloped acreage in Ohio
for $6.1 million and recorded a gain on the sale of $5.3 million.
On June 14, 2010, we sold certain developed and undeveloped oil and gas properties in
Pennsylvania for $30.6 million and recorded a gain on the sale of $28.5 million.
In November 2009, we sold undeveloped acreage in Bradford County, Pennsylvania for $35.8
million. We recorded a gain of $34.9 million on the sale.
In July 2009, we sold our coalbed methane properties in Pennsylvania for $16.7 million.
In March, 2008, we sold a 50% 70% option interest in certain deep rights on approximately
201,000 net acres in Ohio and Pennsylvania for $3.0 million.
(6) Derivatives and Hedging
From time to time, we may enter into a combination of futures contracts, commodity derivatives
and fixed-price physical contracts to manage our exposure to natural gas price, crude oil price or
interest rate volatility and to support our capital expenditure plans. Our derivative financial
instruments take the form of swaps or collars. At December 31, 2010, our derivative contracts were
comprised of natural gas swaps, natural gas basis differential swaps, crude oil swaps and interest
rate swaps, which were placed with major financial institutions that we believe are a minimal
credit risk. Qualifying derivative financial instruments are designated as cash flow hedges. The
effective portion of changes in fair value of the derivative instruments that are cash flow hedges
are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) until such time the hedged items impact
earnings. The changes in fair value of non-qualifying derivative contracts will be reported in the
consolidated statements of operations as derivative fair value (gain) loss. As of December 31,
2010 and 2009, all derivatives were accounted for as mark to market.
We use NYMEX-based commodity derivative contracts to hedge natural gas, because our natural
gas production is sold pursuant to NYMEX-based sales contracts. Beginning July 7, 2004, we had
ineffectiveness on the natural gas swaps due to purchase accounting, which created non-zero value
derivatives at the time of the Merger. Our NYMEX crude oil swaps were highly effective and were
designated as cash flow hedges through August 16, 2005. At August 16, 2005, our oil swaps no
longer qualified for cash flow hedge accounting because the assessment of effectiveness indicated
that they may not be highly effective on an on-going basis. This occurred due to the application
of purchase accounting to the derivatives, which created non-zero value derivatives at the time of
the Transaction. The changes in fair value of the oil swaps subsequent to August 15, 2005 and the
ineffective portion of the natural gas swaps from July 7, 2004 through June 30, 2006 are recorded
as Derivative fair value gain or loss. As of July 1, 2006, we determined that our gas swaps were
no longer highly effective and, therefore, could no longer be designated as cash flow hedges.
Changes in the fair value of the gas derivatives from that date forward are recorded in derivative
fair value gain/loss. Previously deferred gains or losses on these gas derivatives are recognized
as increases or decreases to gas sales revenues during the same periods in which the underlying
forecasted transactions impact earnings.
F-12
During 2010 and 2009, net losses of $6.1 million ($3.6 million after tax) and $7.9 million
($4.8 million after tax), respectively, were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income to earnings. At December 31, 2010, the estimated net loss in accumulated other
comprehensive income that is expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months is
approximately $2.4 million after tax. At December 31, 2010, we have partially reduced our exposure
to the variability in future cash flows through December 2013.
The following table reflects the natural gas and crude oil volumes and the weighted average
prices under financial derivatives (including settled contracts) at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Swaps |
|
|
Crude Oil Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX |
|
|
Natural Gas Basis Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis |
|
Year Ending |
|
Bbtu |
|
|
MMbtu |
|
|
MBbls |
|
|
Bbl |
|
|
Bbtu |
|
|
Differential |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
8,231 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
28.77 |
|
|
|
5,110 |
|
|
|
0.252 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
28.70 |
|
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
0.110 |
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
6,528 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
28.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, we had interest rate swaps in place on $23.5 million of our outstanding
debt under the revolving credit facility through September 30, 2013. The swaps provide 1-month
LIBOR fixed rates at 4.10% on $23.5 million through September 2013, plus the applicable margin.
These interest rate swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting, therefore, all changes in the fair
value of these swaps are recorded in derivative fair value gain/loss. At December 31, 2010, the
fair value of the interest rate swap represented an unrealized loss of $1.8 million.
At December 31, 2010, the fair value of these derivatives was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Oil and natural gas commodity contracts |
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
$ |
864 |
|
|
$ |
(40,560 |
) |
|
$ |
(85,593 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(1,782 |
) |
|
|
(2,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value |
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
$ |
(42,342 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of derivatives in our consolidated balance
sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative asset |
|
$ |
794 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Longterm derivative asset |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,141 |
) |
|
|
(21,098 |
) |
Longterm derivative liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,201 |
) |
|
|
(66,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
$ |
(42,342 |
) |
|
$ |
(87,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net amount due under these derivative contracts may become due and payable if our
Credit Agreement or our senior secured notes become due and payable due to an event of default.
F-13
The following table presents the impact of derivatives and their location within the statements of
operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
The following amounts are recorded in Oil and gas sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas commodity
contracts reclassified into earnings |
|
$ |
(6,129 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,893 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following amounts are recorded in Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are recorded in Derivative fair value (gain) loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gains) losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas commodity contracts |
|
$ |
(44,858 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,437 |
) |
|
$ |
(118,210 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(45,429 |
) |
|
|
(33,626 |
) |
|
|
(115,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized (gains) losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas commodity contracts |
|
|
9,318 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
58,956 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
3,343 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,661 |
|
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
59,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative fair value gain |
|
$ |
(32,768 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,631 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
(7) Details of Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
2,470 |
|
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
Oil and gas production receivable |
|
|
7,895 |
|
|
|
9,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,913 |
|
|
$ |
11,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
$ |
606 |
|
|
$ |
602 |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material, pipe and supplies |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, gross
oil and gas properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Producing properties |
|
$ |
645,415 |
|
|
$ |
622,941 |
|
Non-producing properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
48,899 |
|
|
|
52,428 |
|
Unproved |
|
|
7,476 |
|
|
|
9,418 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
701,790 |
|
|
$ |
684,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, buildings, machinery and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, buildings and improvements |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
$ |
837 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
|
$ |
2,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest expense |
|
$ |
5,557 |
|
|
$ |
6,397 |
|
Accrued other expenses |
|
|
3,186 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
Accrued general and administrative
expense |
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
Accrued lease operating expense |
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
Accrued drilling and completion costs |
|
|
7,608 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ad valorem and other taxes |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
702 |
|
Undistributed production revenue |
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,417 |
|
|
$ |
16,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
(8) Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Senior secured notes |
|
$ |
139,475 |
|
|
$ |
159,475 |
|
Bank revolving credit facility |
|
|
23,876 |
|
|
|
43,876 |
|
Subordinated promissory note (related party) |
|
|
32,846 |
|
|
|
30,491 |
|
Other |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,250 |
|
|
|
233,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
196,240 |
|
|
|
233,895 |
|
Fair value adjustment senior secured notes |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
197,821 |
|
|
$ |
236,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Notes due 2012
We had $139.5 million and $159.5 million of our Senior Secured Notes outstanding as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. On September 2, 2010, we repurchased a portion of the
outstanding senior secured notes. The repurchased notes had a face value of $20.0 million and were
repurchased at 95.875. A gain of $1.0 million was recorded in connection with the transaction. As
a result of the application of purchase accounting, the Senior Secured Notes were recorded as a
liability based on the estimated fair value of $200.7 million on the Transaction date. Subsequent
accretion of the premium and repurchase of bonds reduced this amount to $141.1 million at December
31, 2010.
The fair value adjustment of $1.6 million is shown separately in the table above. The accretion of
$1.0 million was recorded as a reduction of interest expense in 2009 and 2010. The Senior Secured
Notes mature July 15, 2012. Interest is payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each
year at 8.75% based on the face amount of $139.5 million (for an effective rate of 7.946% based on
the fair value on the Transaction date). The Senior Secured Notes are secured on a second-priority
lien on the same assets subject to the liens securing our obligations under the Credit Agreement.
The Senior Secured Notes are subject to redemption at our option at specific redemption prices.
|
|
|
|
|
July 15, 2010 and thereafter |
|
|
100.000 |
% |
The Senior Secured Notes are governed by an indenture (the Indenture), which
contains certain covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness and issue stock,
pay dividends, make distributions, make investments, make certain other restricted payments, enter
into certain transactions with affiliates, dispose of certain assets, incur liens securing
indebtedness of any kind other than permitted liens and engage in mergers and consolidations.
Credit Agreement
In 2005, we amended and restated our then existing credit agreement, by entering into a First
Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement (Credit Agreement) by and among the Company
and BNP Paribas, as sole lead arranger, sole book runner, syndication agent and administrative
agent. The Credit Agreement provides for loans and other extensions of credit to be made to us. The
F-16
obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of our assets. J.P.
Morgan Chase and Amegy Bank were added to the bank group in September 2005.
The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit line in the aggregate principal amount of
$90 million and a hedge letter of credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of $40 million.
At December 31, 2010, the borrowing base was $55 million. The outstanding balance at December 31,
2010 was $23.9 million. The full amount borrowed under the Credit Agreement will mature on April
14, 2012.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a first lien security interest in
substantially all of our assets. The obligations under the Credit Agreement are further secured by
a pledge of 100% of our capital stock held by Capital C, our parent.
The Credit Agreement contains covenants that will limit our ability to, among other things,
incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; create liens; pay dividends on or repurchase our stock;
pay principal and interest on certain subordinated debt; make certain types of investments; sell
assets or merge with another entity; pledge or otherwise encumber our capital stock; or enter into
transactions with affiliates. The Credit Agreement also requires compliance with customary
financial covenants, including a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum senior secured leverage
ratio and a minimum current ratio.
On March 23, 2010, we entered into the Sixth Amendment to the Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement was amended to (1) add a maximum senior secured leverage ratio of 2.00 : 1.00, (2)
eliminate the maximum leverage ratio beginning December 31, 2009, (3) amend the minimum interest
coverage ratio to 1.75 : 1.0 and (4) make certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.
On August 25, 2010, we entered into the Seventh Amendment to the Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement was amended to (1) extend the termination date to April 14, 2012, (2) extend the hedge
letter of credit termination date to April 14, 2012, (3) decrease the aggregate amount of the
revolving commitments to $90 million, (4) decrease the borrowing base to $55 million and (5) make
certain other amendments to the Credit Agreement.
At December 31, 2010, we had a Credit Agreement comprised of a $90 million revolving facility
with a borrowing base of $55 million, of which $23.9 million was outstanding at December 31, 2010,
and a five year $40 million letter of credit facility that may be used only to provide credit
support for our obligations under the hedge agreement and other hedge transactions. This facility
is for working capital requirements and general corporate purposes, including the issuance of
letters of credit. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest (i) at the greater of the
prime rate, an adjusted federal funds rate or an adjusted Eurodollar rate, plus an applicable
margin ranging from 1.0% to 2.0% based on the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the
Credit Agreement, or, (ii) at our option, the Eurodollar base rate plus an applicable margin
ranging from 2.5% to 3.50% based on the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the Credit
Agreement. The full amount borrowed under the Credit Agreement will mature on April 14, 2012.
At December 31, 2010, we were in compliance with such financial covenants under the Credit
Agreement. Our senior secured leverage ratio was 0.80 : 1.0 and the interest coverage ratio was
1.78 : 1.0.
Borrowings under the revolving credit line will be used by us for general corporate purposes.
In accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement, letters of credit issued under the hedge
letter of credit commitment and any related borrowings are to be used solely to secure payment of
our obligations under the J. Aron Swap (defined hereinafter).
F-17
In connection with our entry into the Credit Agreement, we executed a Subordinated Promissory
Note (Subordinated Note) in favor of Capital C in the maximum principal amount of $94 million.
Under the Subordinated Note, Capital C loaned $25 million to us on August 16, 2005. The
Subordinated Note accrues interest at a rate of 10% per annum and matures on August 16, 2012. We
received a fairness opinion from an unrelated financial services firm with respect to the terms of
the Subordinated Note made on August 16, 2005. Interest payments on the Subordinated Note are due
quarterly. In lieu of cash payments, we have the option to make interest payments on the
Subordinated Note by borrowing additional amounts against the Subordinated Note. We made cash
payments of $2.0 million and borrowed an additional $677,000 against the Subordinated Note for
interest payments in 2008. We made no cash payments in 2009 and borrowed an additional $2.9
million against the Subordinated Note. In 2010, we made cash interest payments of $752,000 and
borrowed an additional $2.4 million against the Subordinated Note. The Subordinated Note has no
prepayment penalty or premium and may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time. Pursuant to the
Fourth Amendment to our credit agreement, future cash payments for principal or interest on the
Subordinated Note are prohibited. The Subordinated Note is subordinate to our senior debt, which
includes obligations under the Credit Agreement, the J. Aron Swap and the Senior Secured Notes.
ISDA Master Agreement
We amended and restated the Schedule and Credit Support Annex to our ISDA Master Agreement,
dated as of June 30, 2004, by and between us and J. Aron & Company (J. Aron Swap), pursuant to
which we have agreed, from time to time, to enter into cash-settled hedge transactions with J. Aron
& Company, as hedge counterparty, in connection with various gas and oil commodity derivatives
transactions. The amendments to the J. Aron Swap conform the terms of the Schedule and Credit
Support Annex to the terms of the Credit Agreement, change certain covenants and reduce the maximum
amount of the letter of credit securing the hedge obligations from $55 million to $40 million.
At December 31, 2010, the aggregate long-term debt maturing in the next five years is as
follows: $10,000 (2011); $196.2 million (2012); $12,000 (2013); $13,000 (2014) and $7,000 (2015 and
thereafter).
F-18
(9) Leases
We lease natural gas compressors under noncancelable agreements with lease periods of one to
five years. Rent expense amounted to $2.8 million in 2010, $3.0 million in 2009 and $3.8 million
in 2008.
Future minimum commitments under leasing arrangements as of December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
|
Leases |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
210 |
|
2012 |
|
|
38 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
2015 and thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum rental payments |
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
(10) Goodwill
FASB accounting guidance requires that intangible assets with indefinite lives, including
goodwill, be evaluated on an annual basis for impairment or more frequently if an event occurs or
circumstances change which could potentially result in an impairment.
The impairment test requires the allocation of goodwill and all other assets and liabilities
to reporting units. As we have only one reporting unit, the reporting unit used for testing will be
the entire company. The fair value of the reporting unit is determined and compared to the book
value of that reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting unit is based on estimates of future
net cash flows from proved reserves and from future exploration for and development of unproved
reserves. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $90.1 million
due to the significant drop in oil and gas prices. There was no goodwill as of December 31,
2010, 2009 or 2008.
(11) Impairment of Proved Oil and Gas Properties
For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we reviewed our oil and gas properties for
impairment as prescribed by FASB accounting guidance. In 2010, a result of this evaluation, an
impairment of $1.6 million was recorded to proved properties in the Oriskany formation in
Pennsylvania. In 2009, as a result of this evaluation, an impairment of $26.8 million was recorded
to proved properties in the coalbed methane formation in Pennsylvania and the Marcellus shale
formation in Pennsylvania. We recorded an impairment of $2.0 million during 2008 to proved
properties in the Utica Shale formation in Ohio.
F-19
(12) Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes on income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle includes the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year |
|
|
For the year |
|
|
For the year |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
State |
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
15,637 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
35,076 |
|
State |
|
|
(11,401 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
39,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,383 |
|
|
$ |
1,877 |
|
|
$ |
39,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate for income from continuing operations differs from the U.S.
federal statutory tax rate as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year |
|
|
For the year |
|
|
For the year |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Increases (reductions) in taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Permanent differences related to goodwill
impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333.1 |
|
Reduction in valuation allowance (1) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in state tax rate (2) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate for the period |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
|
370.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The decrease was due to a reduction of the state tax valuation allowance.
The valuation allowance was reduced upon the realization of state tax net operating loss carryforwards,
which resulted from taxable gains on asset sales. |
|
|
(2) |
|
The decrease in the state tax rate was due to the elimination of the state of Ohio corporate income tax. The Ohio
corporate income tax was replaced with a Commercial Activity Tax which is not considered an income tax. |
Changes in the effective state tax rate due to changes in the state apportionment rates
are included in state income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit.
F-20
Significant components of deferred income tax liabilities and assets are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
183,949 |
|
|
$ |
190,088 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax
liabilities |
|
|
184,225 |
|
|
|
192,820 |
|
Deferred income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
9,529 |
|
|
|
9,098 |
|
Fair value of derivatives |
|
|
26,072 |
|
|
|
43,420 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
8,308 |
|
|
|
15,444 |
|
Senior Secured Notes |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
Tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(2,359 |
) |
|
|
(11,476 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax assets |
|
|
48,354 |
|
|
|
63,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liability |
|
$ |
135,871 |
|
|
$ |
129,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liability |
|
$ |
140,137 |
|
|
$ |
137,286 |
|
Current asset |
|
|
(4,266 |
) |
|
|
(8,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liability |
|
$ |
135,871 |
|
|
$ |
129,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, we had approximately $17.0 million of net operating loss
carryforwards available for federal income tax reporting purposes. These net operating loss
carryforwards, if unused, will expire in 2019 through 2025. We also had state net operating losses
aggregating $36.3 million, which expire between 2010 and 2025. The net operating losses are
subject to annual limitations due to IRC Section 382 as a result of the Merger in 2004 and the
Transaction in 2005. FASB accounting guidance requires a valuation allowance to be recorded when
it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We do
not believe the application of Section 382 hinders our ability to utilize the federal net operating
losses and, accordingly, no valuation allowance has been recorded. The valuation allowance of $2.4
million relates to certain state net operating loss carryforwards which we estimate would expire
before they could be used. We have alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of approximately
$3.0 million, which have no expiration date.
FASB accounting guidance requires us to evaluate whether any material tax position we have
taken will more likely than not be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority.
As we believe that all such material tax positions taken by us are supportable by existing laws and
related interpretations, there are no material uncertain tax positions to consider in accordance
with FASB accounting guidance.
(13) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved in several lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. The
Company believes that the result of such proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will not
have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
F-21
(14) Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year |
|
|
For the year |
|
|
For the year |
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
17,784 |
|
|
$ |
17,909 |
|
|
$ |
22,764 |
|
Income taxes, net of refunds |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash additions to property and
equipment |
|
|
(7,608 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
Non-cash additions to debt |
|
|
(2,355 |
) |
|
|
(2,868 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
(15) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the financial instruments disclosed herein is not representative of the
amount that could be realized or settled, nor does the fair value amount consider the tax
consequences, if any, of realization or settlement. The amounts in the financial statements for
cash equivalents and accounts receivable approximate fair value due to the short maturities of
these instruments. The recorded amounts of outstanding bank and other long-term debt approximate
fair value because interest rates are based on LIBOR or the prime rate or due to the short
maturities. The $139.5 million (face amount) of our Senior Secured Notes due 2012 had an
approximate fair value of $135.3 million at December 31, 2010 based on quoted market prices.
From time to time, we may enter into a combination of futures contracts, commodity derivatives
and fixed-price physical contracts to manage our exposure to natural gas or oil price volatility.
We employ a policy of hedging gas production sold under NYMEX-based contracts by selling
NYMEX-based commodity derivative contracts. Our NYMEX crude oil swaps are sold locally at posted
price which is different from the NYMEX price. Historically there has been a high correlation
between the posted price and NYMEX. The contracts may take the form of futures contracts, swaps,
collars or options which are placed with major financial institutions that we believe are minimal
credit risks. At December 31, 2008, our derivative contracts consisted of natural gas swaps,
natural gas basis differential swaps, crude oil swaps and interest rate swaps. At December 31,
2010, the fair value of futures contracts covering 2011 through 2013 oil and gas production
represented an unrealized loss of $39.7 million. At December 31, 2010, the fair value of our
interest rate futures contracts covering 2011 through September 2013 represented an unrealized loss
of $1.8 million.
F-22
(16) Fair Value Measurements
Recurring Basis
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy table for our assets and liabilities that are
required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
Total Carrying Value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
At December 31,
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
$ |
(39,719 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(39,719 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(1,782 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(1,782 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
(41,501 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(41,501 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
At December 31,
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
$ |
(84,729 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(84,729 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(2,354 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(2,354 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Total derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
(87,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(87,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Our derivative instruments consist of overthecounter (OTC) contracts which are not
traded on a public exchange. These derivative instruments are indexed to active trading hubs for
the underlying commodity, and are OTC contracts commonly used in the energy industry and offered by
a number of financial institutions and large energy companies.
As the fair value of these derivatives is based on inputs using market prices obtained from
independent brokers or determined using quantitative models that use as their basis readily
observable market parameters that are actively quoted and can be validated through external
sources, including third party pricing services, brokers and market transactions, we have
categorized these derivatives as Level 2. We value these derivatives based on observable market
data for similar instruments. This observable data includes the forward curve for commodity prices
based on quoted market prices and prospective volatility factors related to changes in the forward
curves and yield curves based on money market rates and interest rate swap data. Our estimates of
fair value have been determined at discrete points in time based on relevant market data. These
estimates involve uncertainty and cannot be determined with precision. There were no changes in
valuation techniques or related inputs in the year ended December 31, 2010.
Nonrecurring Basis
Proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $45.5 million were written down to
their fair value of $18.7 million, resulting in a pretax impairment charge of $26.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009. In 2010, proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of
$2.2 million were written down to their fair value of $615,000, resulting in a pretax impairment
charge of $1.6 million. Significant Level 3 assumptions associated with the calculation of
discontinued cash flows used in the impairment analysis include our estimate of future gas and oil
prices, production costs, development expenditures, anticipated production of proved reserves,
appropriate risk adjusted discount rates and other relevant data.
F-23
(17) Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Activities
(Unaudited)
The following disclosures of costs incurred related to oil and gas activities from continuing
operations are presented in accordance with FASB accounting guidance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Acquisition costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties |
|
$ |
4,349 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,504 |
|
Unproved
properties |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
Developmental costs |
|
|
16,386 |
|
|
|
8,357 |
|
|
|
26,845 |
|
Exploratory costs |
|
|
2,635 |
|
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,004 |
|
|
$ |
13,564 |
|
|
$ |
31,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized costs relating to oil and natural gas producing activities are as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Proved oil and natural gas properties |
|
$ |
694,314 |
|
|
$ |
675,371 |
|
Unproved oil and natural gas properties |
|
|
7,476 |
|
|
|
9,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701,790 |
|
|
|
684,789 |
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization |
|
|
(178,057 |
) |
|
|
(149,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs |
|
$ |
523,733 |
|
|
$ |
535,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (Unaudited)
Our estimated proved developed and estimated proved undeveloped reserves are all located
within the United States. We caution that there are many uncertainties inherent in estimating
proved reserve quantities and in projecting future production rates and the timing of development
expenditures. In addition, estimates of new discoveries are more imprecise than those of
properties with a production history. Accordingly, these estimates are expected to change as
future information becomes available. Material revisions of reserve estimates may occur in the
future, development and production of the oil and gas reserves may not occur in the periods
assumed, and actual prices realized and actual costs incurred may vary significantly from those
used. Proved reserves represent estimated quantities of natural gas, crude oil and condensate that
geological and engineering data demonstrate, with reasonable certainty, to be recoverable in future
years from known reservoirs under economic and operating conditions existing at the time the
estimates were made. Estimated proved developed reserves are estimated proved reserves expected to
be recovered through wells and equipment in place and under operating methods being used at the
time the estimates were made. The estimates of proved reserves as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008 have been prepared by Wright & Company, Inc., independent petroleum consultants.
F-24
The following table sets forth changes in estimated proved and estimated proved developed
reserves for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBbl) |
|
|
(MMcf) |
|
|
MMcfe |
|
January 1, 2008 |
|
|
5,149 |
|
|
|
227,200 |
|
|
|
258,094 |
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
6,883 |
|
Purchase of reserves in place |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
(1,082 |
) |
|
|
(20,625 |
) |
|
|
(27,117 |
) |
Production |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(13,217 |
) |
|
|
(15,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
3,833 |
|
|
|
199,834 |
|
|
|
222,832 |
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
3,112 |
|
Purchase of reserves in place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestiture of reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,753 |
) |
|
|
(17,753 |
) |
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
(9,314 |
) |
|
|
(4,550 |
) |
Production |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
(12,034 |
) |
|
|
(13,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
162,975 |
|
|
|
189,663 |
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
|
4,338 |
|
Purchase of reserves in place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
Divestiture of reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
10,872 |
|
|
|
15,678 |
|
Production |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(10,109 |
) |
|
|
(11,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
5,132 |
|
|
|
171,586 |
|
|
|
202,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
176,340 |
|
|
|
197,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,438 |
|
|
|
151,995 |
|
|
|
172,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
157,150 |
|
|
|
181,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
(Unaudited)
The following tables present a standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows and
changes therein relating to estimated proved oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves. In
computing this data, assumptions other than those required by the SEC could produce different
results. Accordingly, the data should not be construed as representative of the fair market value
of our estimated proved oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves. The following
assumptions have been made:
|
|
|
Future cash inflows were based on prices used in estimating our proved oil, natural gas
and natural gas liquids reserves. Future price changes were included only to the extent
provided by existing contractual agreements. |
|
|
|
Future development and production costs were computed using year end costs assuming no
change in present economic conditions. |
F-25
|
|
|
Future net cash flows were discounted at an annual rate of 10%. |
|
|
|
Future income taxes were computed using the approximate statutory tax rate and giving
effect to available net operating losses, tax credits and statutory depletion. |
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to estimated proved oil
and gas reserves is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Estimated future cash inflows (outflows) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from the sale of oil and
gas |
|
$ |
1,200,350 |
|
|
$ |
958,416 |
|
|
$ |
1,431,631 |
|
Production costs |
|
|
(414,615 |
) |
|
|
(388,247 |
) |
|
|
(534,167 |
) |
Development costs |
|
|
(57,102 |
) |
|
|
(47,016 |
) |
|
|
(57,491 |
) |
Future income taxes |
|
|
(236,479 |
) |
|
|
(148,529 |
) |
|
|
(262,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future net cash flows |
|
|
492,154 |
|
|
|
374,624 |
|
|
|
577,108 |
|
10% timing discount |
|
|
(292,549 |
) |
|
|
(207,813 |
) |
|
|
(324,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows |
|
$ |
199,605 |
|
|
$ |
166,811 |
|
|
$ |
252,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, as specified by the SEC, the prices for oil, natural gas
and natural gas liquids used in this calculation were the average prices during 2010 and 2009,
respectively, determined using the price on the first day of each month, except for volumes subject
to fixed price contracts. At December 31, 2008, as specified by the SEC, the prices of oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids used in this calculation were regional cash price quotes on the
last day of the year, except for volumes subject to fixed price contracts.
The following table sets forth the weighted average prices for oil and gas used in determining
our estimated proved reserves. We do not include our natural gas and crude oil derivative
financial instruments, consisting of natural gas and crude oil swaps and natural gas basis
differential swaps in the determination of our oil and gas reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Gas (per Mcf) |
|
$ |
4.76 |
|
|
$ |
4.34 |
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
Oil (per Bbl) |
|
|
74.63 |
|
|
|
56.33 |
|
|
|
41.00 |
|
F-26
The principal sources of changes in the standardized measure of future net cash flows are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning of year |
|
$ |
166,811 |
|
|
$ |
252,675 |
|
|
$ |
388,886 |
|
Sale of oil and gas, net of production costs |
|
|
(45,069 |
) |
|
|
(47,601 |
) |
|
|
(125,165 |
) |
Extensions and discoveries, less related
estimated
future development and production costs |
|
|
10,261 |
|
|
|
3,797 |
|
|
|
9,514 |
|
Previously estimated development costs
incurred
during the period |
|
|
3,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,845 |
|
Purchase of reserves in place less
estimated future production costs |
|
|
5,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
643 |
|
Sale of reserves in place less
estimated future production costs |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(19,988 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in estimated future development costs |
|
|
5,404 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
31,949 |
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates |
|
|
24,138 |
|
|
|
(7,374 |
) |
|
|
(47,442 |
) |
Net changes in prices and production costs |
|
|
77,748 |
|
|
|
(79,091 |
) |
|
|
(195,400 |
) |
Change in income taxes |
|
|
(51,285 |
) |
|
|
47,752 |
|
|
|
101,046 |
|
Accretion of 10% timing discount |
|
|
19,366 |
|
|
|
31,253 |
|
|
|
38,889 |
|
Changes in production rates (timing) and other |
|
|
(17,294 |
) |
|
|
(15,363 |
) |
|
|
22,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
199,605 |
|
|
$ |
166,811 |
|
|
$ |
252,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18) Industry Segment Financial Information
We operate in one reportable segment, as an independent energy company engaged in producing
oil and natural gas; exploring for and developing oil and gas reserves; acquiring and enhancing the
economic performance of producing oil and gas properties; and marketing and gathering natural gas
for delivery to intrastate and interstate gas transmission pipelines. Our operations are conducted
entirely in the United States.
Major Customers
During 2010, we had three customers that each accounted for 10% or more of
consolidated revenues with sales of $14.9 million, $11.1 million and $10.9 million, respectively.
During 2009, we had three customers that each accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenues
with sales of $14.4 million, $14.3 million and $13.3 million, respectively. During 2008, we had
three customers that each accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenues with sales of $32.3
million, $30.7 million and $22.9 million, respectively. We believe that the loss of a major
customer would have a temporary effect on our revenues but that over time, we would be able to
replace our major customers.
F-27
(19) Quarterly Results of Operations
(Unaudited)
The results of operations for the four quarters of 2010 and 2009 are shown below (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
17,417 |
|
|
$ |
17,034 |
|
|
$ |
16,599 |
|
|
$ |
15,331 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
(820 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
19,100 |
|
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
8,150 |
|
|
|
(2,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
17,110 |
|
|
$ |
17,367 |
|
|
$ |
17,022 |
|
|
$ |
17,125 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
(2,202 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
13,242 |
|
|
|
(26,366 |
) |
|
|
(3,616 |
) |
|
|
19,516 |
|
(20) Related Party Transactions
On March 15, 2006, we entered into a joint operating agreement with EnerVest Operating, L.L.C.
(EnerVest Operating), a subsidiary of EnerVest. The joint operating agreement was effective
October 1, 2005 and resulted in expense to us of $6.6 million in 2008, $6.1 million in 2009 and
$5.5 million in 2010 for overhead fees. We also paid $7.1 million in 2008, $5.9 million in 2009
and $5.8 million in 2010 for field labor, vehicles and district office expense; $265,000 in 2008,
$82,000 in 2009 and $98,000 in 2010 for drilling overhead fees and $1.0 million in 2008, $1.2
million in 2009 and $886,000 in 2010 for drilling labor costs related to this agreement.
As of December 31, 2010, we owed EnerVest Operating $634,000 and owed EnerVest $845,000.
In connection with the Transaction, we executed a subordinated promissory note in favor of our
parent, Capital C in the maximum amount of $94 million. Under the note, Capital C loaned $25
million to us on August 16, 2005 in connection with the Transaction. The note accrues interest at
10% per year and matures on August 16, 2012. We received a fairness opinion from an unrelated
financial services firm with respect to the terms of the note made on August 16, 2005. Interest
payments on the note are due quarterly. In lieu of cash payments, we have the option to make
interest payments on the note by borrowing additional amounts against the note. The amount due
under the note at December 31, 2010 was $32.8 million. In 2008, we made cash payments of $2.0
million and borrowed and additional $677,000 against the note for interest payments. In 2009, we
borrowed $2.9 million against the note for interest payments. In 2010, we made cash interest
payments of $752,000 and borrowed an additional $2.4 million against the note.
Messrs. Houser, Vanderhider and Mariani are officers and directors of the Company and they are
officers and equity owners of EnerVest and EnerVest Operating. The institutional funds that are
managed by EnerVest and own our direct parent, Capital C, also hold other investments in oil and
gas assets and operations. We can give no assurance that conflicts of interest will not arise for
corporate opportunities. Also, we can give no assurance that conflicts will not arise with respect
to the time and attention devoted to us by Messrs. Houser, Vanderhider and Mariani.
F-28
(21) Subsequent Events
The company has determined that there are no subsequent events which require recognition
or disclosure in these consolidated financial statements through the date the statements were
issued.
F-29