$ 200,446.52

$ 582,377.26

25,000,000

In granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the company met “its considerable burden” of demonstrating it was likely to win its lawsuit against Mr. Farley and AMC. Specifically, the Court found it was “reasonably probable” Mr. Farley had unlawfully issued the 25 million shares without proper authorization, Mr. Farley had breached his duty of loyalty to the company, Mr. Farley was unlikely to prove the stock issuance was procedurally or substantively “fair” to the company, and Mr. Farley had fraudulently transferred 20 million of the shares to AMC. Finally, the Court ruled because Farley and AMC’s 25 million shares represented one eighth of the company’s outstanding ownership, the injunction was necessary to protect the company’s capital structure, ability to attract new investors, ability to raise new capital and continue deployment of its plans now underway to revitalize its business.

Additional cash deposited

$ 55,446.52

Additional cash deposited

80,301.86

Additional cash deposited

$ 10,500,000

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Details Narrative) - USD ($)										3 Months Ended
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	Jan. 29, 2019	Jan. 23, 2019	Oct. 24, 2018	Oct. 16, 2018	Aug. 30, 2018	Aug. 23, 2018	Aug. 21, 2018	Aug. 14, 2018	Jul. 03, 2018	Mar. 31, 2019
Cash deposited								$ 200,446.52
Additional cash deposited			$ 185,301.86			$ 55,446.52
Collateral For The Surety Agreement [Member]
Cash deposited							$ 200,446.52
Additional cash deposited	$ 582,377.26
Mr. Farley and AMC [Member]
Number of shares issued in transaction		25,000,000							25,000,000
Additional cash deposited				$ 185,301.86
Description of preliminary injunction										In granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the company met “its considerable burden” of demonstrating it was likely to win its lawsuit against Mr. Farley and AMC. Specifically, the Court found it was “reasonably probable” Mr. Farley had unlawfully issued the 25 million shares without proper authorization, Mr. Farley had breached his duty of loyalty to the company, Mr. Farley was unlikely to prove the stock issuance was procedurally or substantively “fair” to the company, and Mr. Farley had fraudulently transferred 20 million of the shares to AMC. Finally, the Court ruled because Farley and AMC’s 25 million shares represented one eighth of the company’s outstanding ownership, the injunction was necessary to protect the company’s capital structure, ability to attract new investors, ability to raise new capital and continue deployment of its plans now underway to revitalize its business.
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company [Member] \| Collateral For The Surety Agreement [Member]
Additional cash deposited					$ 55,446.52
AMC [Member]
Additional cash deposited				80,301.86
Mr. Farley [Member]
Additional cash deposited				$ 10,500,000