mpb-10q_20190630.htm

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files) Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of August 7, 2019, the registrant had 8,475,815 shares of common stock outstanding.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Mid Penn”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated wholly-owned banking subsidiary.

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	33,177		$	24,600
Interest-bearing balances with other financial institutions		4,623			4,572
Federal funds sold		10,345			10,893
Total cash and cash equivalents		48,145			40,065

Investment securities available for sale, at fair value		83,404			111,923
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value $162,863 and $166,582)		160,182			168,370
Loans held for sale, at fair value		8,139			1,702
Loans and leases, net of unearned interest		1,688,173			1,624,067
Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses		(8,771	)		(8,397	)
Net loans and leases		1,679,402			1,615,670

Bank premises and equipment, net		23,583			25,303
Bank premises and equipment held for sale		1,274			—
Operating lease right of use asset		10,834			—
Finance lease right of use asset		3,537			—
Cash surrender value of life insurance		16,725			16,691
Restricted investment in bank stocks		6,480			6,646
Accrued interest receivable		8,883			8,244
Deferred income taxes		3,917			4,696
Goodwill		62,840			62,840
Core deposit and other intangibles, net		6,464			7,221
Foreclosed assets held for sale		390			1,017
Other assets		11,923			7,593
Total Assets	$	2,136,122		$	2,077,981

LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	287,183		$	269,870
Interest-bearing demand		404,651			384,834
Money Market		451,667			375,648
Savings		183,019			209,345
Time		451,881			486,329
Total Deposits		1,778,401			1,726,026

Short-term borrowings		13,000			43,100
Long-term debt		65,035			48,024
Subordinated debt		27,070			27,082
Operating lease liability		11,983			—
Accrued interest payable		2,696			2,262
Other liabilities		6,675			8,278
Total Liabilities		1,904,860			1,854,772

Shareholders' Equity:
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 8,465,178 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019; 10,000,000 shares authorized, 8,459,918 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018		8,465			8,460
Additional paid-in capital		177,850			177,565
Retained earnings		44,721			39,562
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		226			(2,378	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		231,262			223,209
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity	$	2,136,122		$	2,077,981

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2019		2018		2019		2018
INTEREST INCOME
Interest and fees on loans and leases	$	22,214	$	12,073	$	43,292	$	23,410
Interest on interest-bearing balances		27		17		57		26
Interest on federal funds sold		130		153		198		321
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		839		884		1,732		1,636
State and political subdivision obligations, tax-exempt		584		517		1,203		1,059
Other securities		204		76		382		248
Total Interest Income		23,998		13,720		46,864		26,700
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on deposits		5,276		1,997		9,862		3,777
Interest on short-term borrowings		157		—		389		12
Interest on long-term and subordinated debt		795		309		1,537		619
Total Interest Expense		6,228		2,306		11,788		4,408
Net Interest Income		17,770		11,414		35,076		22,292
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES		465		—		590		125
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan and Lease Losses		17,305		11,414		34,486		22,167
NONINTEREST INCOME
Income from fiduciary activities		347		286		706		526
Service charges on deposits		218		222		435		425
ATM debit card interchange income		380		326		714		591
Mortgage banking income		1,077		205		1,514		361
Net gain on sales of SBA loans		233		152		435		409
Merchant services income		104		93		189		171
Earnings from cash surrender value of life insurance		79		65		157		129
Net gain on sales of investment securities		17		4		24		102
Other income		419		560		749		846
Total Noninterest Income		2,874		1,913		4,923		3,560
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and employee benefits		7,786		4,832		15,545		9,896
Occupancy expense, net		1,344		870		2,745		1,667
Equipment expense		658		544		1,285		952
Pennsylvania bank shares tax expense		245		171		381		342
FDIC Assessment		314		93		673		321
Legal and professional fees		471		256		893		480
Marketing and advertising expense		226		230		405		419
Software licensing and utilization		1,111		861		2,132		1,684
Telephone expense		161		156		315		303
Loss on sale or write-down of foreclosed assets		18		1		14		3
Intangible amortization		360		248		723		496
Merger and acquisition expense		—		222		—		1,916
Other expenses		2,102		1,612		3,988		2,800
Total Noninterest Expense		14,796		10,096		29,099		21,279
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES		5,383		3,231		10,310		4,448
Provision for income taxes		980		452		1,830		665
NET INCOME	$	4,403	$	2,779	$	8,480	$	3,783

PER COMMON SHARE DATA:
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Common Share	$	0.52	$	0.45	$	1.00	$	0.63
Cash Dividends Paid	$	0.18	$	0.15	$	0.43	$	0.40

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(Dollars in thousands)								Accumulated
			Additional					Other			Total
	Common		Paid-in		Retained			Comprehensive			Shareholders'
	Stock		Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Equity
Balance, January 1, 2019	$	8,460	$	177,565	$	39,562		$	(2,378	)	$	223,209
Impact of adoption of new accounting standard (a)		—		—		316			—			316
Balance at January 1, 2019, adjusted		8,460		177,565		39,878			(2,378	)		223,525
Net income		—		—		4,077			—			4,077
Total other comprehensive income, net of taxes		—		—		—			1,807			1,807
Common stock dividends declared		—		—		(2,113	)		—			(2,113	)
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1,152 shares)		1		27		—			—			28
Director Stock Purchase Plan (1,361 shares)		1		32		—			—			33
Restricted stock activity		—		80		—			—			80
Balance, March 31, 2019	$	8,462	$	177,704	$	41,842		$	(571	)	$	227,437

Net income		—		—		4,403			—			4,403
Total other comprehensive income, net of taxes		—		—		—			797			797
Common stock dividends declared		—		—		(1,524	)		—			(1,524	)
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1,411 shares)		2		34		—			—			36
Director Stock Purchase Plan (1,336 shares)		1		32		—			—			33
Restricted stock activity		—		80		—			—			80
Balance, June 30, 2019	$	8,465	$	177,850	$	44,721		$	226		$	231,262


Balance, January 1, 2018	$	4,242	$	40,970	$	32,565		$	(2,074	)	$	75,703
Impact of adoption of new accounting standard (b)		—		—		(44	)		35			(9	)
Balance at January 1, 2018, adjusted		4,242		40,970		32,521			(2,039	)		75,694
Net income		—		—		1,004			—			1,004
Total other comprehensive loss, net of taxes		—		—		—			(1,867	)		(1,867	)
Common stock issued to Scottdale shareholders (1,878,827 shares) (c)		1,879		62,302		—			—			64,181
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (736 shares)		1		23		—			—			24
Director Stock Purchase Plan (938 shares)		1		29		—			—			30
Common stock dividends declared		—		—		—			—			—
Restricted stock activity		—		58		—			—			58
Balance, March 31, 2018	$	6,123	$	103,382	$	33,525		$	(3,906	)	$	139,124

Net income		—		—		2,779			—			2,779
Total other comprehensive income, net of taxes		—		—		—			672			672
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (919 shares)		1		31		—			—			32
Director Stock Purchase Plan (881 shares)		1		30		—			—			31
Common stock dividends declared		—		—		(918	)		—			(918	)
Restricted stock activity		—		55		—			—			55
Balance, June 30, 2018	$	6,125	$	103,498	$	35,386		$	(3,234	)	$	141,775

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(Dollars in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30,
		2019			2018
Operating Activities:
Net Income	$	8,480		$	3,783
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan and lease losses		590			125
Depreciation		1,398			1,000
Amortization of intangibles		723			496
Net amortization of security discounts/premiums		196			451
Amortization of operating lease right of use assets		826			—
Amortization of finance lease right of use asset		60			—
Gain on sales of investment securities		(24	)		(102	)
Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance		(174	)		(129	)
Mortgage loans originated for sale		(65,989	)		(22,596	)
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans originated for sale		61,066			22,812
Gain on sale of mortgage loans		(1,514	)		(361	)
SBA loans originated for sale		(7,109	)		(5,056	)
Proceeds from sales of SBA loans originated for sale		7,544			5,465
Gain on sale of SBA loans		(435	)		(409	)
Loss on write-down or disposal of property, plant, and equipment		163			64
Loss on sale or write-down of foreclosed assets		14			3
Stock compensation expense		160			113
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(388	)		1,981
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable		(639	)		181
Increase in other assets		(4,296	)		(1,242	)
Increase in accrued interest payable		434			525
Net change in operating lease liability		(883	)		—
Decrease in other liabilities		(81	)		(2,186	)
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities		122			4,918

Investing Activities:
Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities		40,455			102,816
Proceeds from the maturity or call of available-for-sale securities		3,436			5,654
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(11,556	)		(21,533	)
Proceeds from the maturity or call of held-to-maturity securities		10,968			11,625
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities		(2,997	)		(57,850	)
Net cash received from acquisitions		—			65,025
Redemptions of restricted investment in bank stock		166			1,716
Net increase in loans and leases		(64,616	)		(55,732	)
Proceeds from bank owned life insurance		140			—
Purchases of bank premises and equipment		(1,115	)		(7,305	)
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed assets		907			169
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Investing Activities		(24,212	)		44,585

Financing Activities:
Net increase in deposits		52,375			2,969
Net decrease in short-term borrowings		(30,100	)		(34,611	)
Common stock dividends paid		(3,637	)		(1,978	)
Employee Stock Purchase Plan		63			56
Director Stock Purchase Plan		67			61
Net change in finance lease liability		(6	)		—
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt		13,500			—
Long-term debt repayment		(92	)		(107	)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities		32,170			(33,610	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		8,080			15,893
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		40,065			23,514
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	48,145		$	39,407

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (“Mid Penn” or the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mid Penn Bank (the “Bank”). All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain information and disclosures normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Mid Penn believes the information presented is not misleading and the disclosures are adequate. For comparative purposes, the June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2018 balances have been reclassified, when necessary, to conform to the 2019 presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operating results expected for the full year. Except for adjustments made related to the adoption of new accounting standards, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation of the periods presented have been reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The comparability of the financial condition and results of operations as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, in general, have been materially impacted by the acquisitions of First Priority Financial Corp. (“First Priority”) on July 31, 2018 and the acquisition of The Scottdale Bank & Trust Company (“Scottdale”) on January 8, 2018. Refer to Note 3, Acquisition of First Priority Financial Corp,. and Note 4, Acquisition of The Scottdale Bank & Trust Company, for additional information.

Mid Penn has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of June 30, 2019, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements.

The accounting and reporting policies of Mid Penn conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and to general practice within the financial industry. The following is a description of the more significant accounting policies.

Securities to be held for indefinite periods, but not intended to be held to maturity, are classified as available for sale and carried at fair value. Securities held for indefinite periods include securities that management intends to use as part of its asset and liability management strategy and that may be sold in response to liquidity needs, changes in interest rates, resultant prepayment risk, pledging requirements, and other factors related to effective portfolio management. Securities to be held to maturity are carried at amortized cost.

For available-for-sale debt securities, realized gains and losses on dispositions are based on the difference between net proceeds and the amortized cost of the securities sold, using the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses on debt securities are based on the difference between the amortized cost and fair value of each security as of the respective reporting date. Unrealized gains and losses are credited or charged to other comprehensive income, whereas realized gains and losses flow through Mid Penn’s consolidated statement of income for the respective period.

ASC Topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities, clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must assess, in addition to the credit condition of the underlying issuer, whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before assessing whether the Company will recover the cost basis of the investment.

In instances when a determination is made that other-than-temporary impairment exists but the Company does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, this guidance changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income statement. The other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.

As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities on January 1, 2018, Mid Penn reports its equity securities with readily determinable fair values at fair value within other assets on the balance sheet, with realized and unrealized gains and losses reported in other expense on the income statement. Prior to January 1, 2018, equity securities were stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018 resulted in net unrealized losses of $44,000 being reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss and into retained earnings as reflected on the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the period ended June 30, 2018.

As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, Mid Penn’s equity securities consisted of Community Reinvestment Act funds totaling $506,000 and $492,000, respectively. No equity securities were sold during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 or June 30, 2018.

Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of an allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield (interest income) of the related loans, generally being amortized over the contractual life of the loan. Premiums and discounts on purchased loans are amortized as adjustments to interest income using the effective yield method.

The loan portfolio is segmented into commercial and consumer loans. Commercial loans consist of the following classes: commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, commercial real estate-construction and lease financing. Consumer loans consist of the following classes: residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and other consumer loans.

For all classes of loans, the accrual of interest generally is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days or more past due, or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest even though the loan is currently performing. A loan past due 90 days or more may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest is credited to income. Interest received on nonaccrual loans, including impaired loans, is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Nonaccrual loans may be restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (generally, at least nine consecutive months) and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. The past due status of all classes of loans receivable is determined based on contractual due dates for loan payments.

Mid Penn originates commercial and industrial loans. Most of the Bank’s commercial and industrial loans have been extended to finance local and regional businesses and include short-term loans to finance machinery and equipment purchases, inventory, and accounts receivable. Commercial loans also involve the extension of revolving credit for a combination of equipment acquisitions and working capital in expanding companies.

The maximum term for loans extended on machinery and equipment is based on the projected useful life of such machinery and equipment. Generally, the maximum term on non-mortgage lines of credit is one year. The loan-to-value ratio on such loans and lines of credit generally may not exceed 80 percent of the value of the collateral securing the loan. The Bank’s commercial business lending policy includes credit file documentation and analysis of the borrower’s character, capacity to repay the loan, the adequacy of the borrower’s capital and collateral, as well as an evaluation of conditions affecting the borrower. Analysis of the borrower’s past, present, and future cash flows is also an important aspect of the Bank’s current credit analysis. Nonetheless, such loans are believed to carry higher credit risk than other extensions of credit.

Commercial and industrial loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself, which, in turn, is likely to be dependent upon the general economic environment. Mid Penn’s commercial and industrial loans are usually, but not always, secured by business assets and personal guarantees. However, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.

Commercial real estate and commercial real estate construction loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by one-to-four family residences. This greater risk is due to several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the effect of general economic conditions on income producing properties, and the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. In addition, the repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the related real estate project. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired.

Mid Penn offers a wide array of residential mortgage loans for both permanent structures and those under construction. The Bank’s residential mortgage originations are secured primarily by properties located in its primary market and surrounding areas. Residential mortgage loans have terms up to a maximum of 30 years and with loan-to-value ratios up to 100 percent of the lesser of the appraised value of the security property or the contract price. Private mortgage insurance is generally required in an amount sufficient to reduce the Bank’s exposure to at or below the 85 percent loan to value level. Residential mortgage loans generally do not include prepayment penalties.

In underwriting residential mortgage loans, the Bank evaluates both the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments and the value of the property securing the loan. Most properties securing real estate loans made by Mid Penn are appraised by independent fee appraisers. The Bank generally requires borrowers to obtain title insurance and fire and property insurance (including flood insurance, if necessary) in an amount not less than the amount of the loan. Real estate loans originated by the Bank generally contain a “due on sale” clause allowing the Bank to declare the unpaid principal balance due and payable upon the sale of the security property.

The Bank underwrites residential mortgage loans to the standards established by the secondary mortgage market, i.e., Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae, Freddie Mac, Federal Home Loan Bank, or Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency standards, with the intention of selling the majority of residential mortgages originated into the secondary market. In the event that the facts and circumstances surrounding a residential mortgage application do not meet the required underwriting conditions of the secondary mortgage market, the Bank will evaluate the failed conditions and evaluate the potential risk of holding the residential mortgage in the Bank’s portfolio rather than rejecting the loan request. In the event that the loan is funded and held in the Bank’s portfolio, the interest rate on the residential mortgage would be increased to compensate for the added portfolio risk.

Mid Penn offers a variety of secured consumer loans, including home equity, automobile, and deposit secured loans. In addition, the Bank offers other secured and unsecured consumer loans. Most consumer loans are originated in Mid Penn’s primary market and surrounding areas.

The largest component of Mid Penn’s consumer loan portfolio consists of fixed rate home equity loans and variable rate home equity lines of credit. Substantially all home equity loans and lines of credit are secured by junior lien mortgages on principal residences. The Bank will lend amounts, which, together with all prior liens, typically may be up to 85 percent of the appraised value of the property securing the loan. Home equity term loans may have maximum terms up to 20 years, while home equity lines of credit generally have maximum terms of five years.

Consumer loan terms vary according to the type and value of collateral, length of contract and creditworthiness of the borrower. The underwriting standards employed by the Bank for consumer loans include an application, a determination of the applicant’s payment history on other debts, and an assessment of ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although creditworthiness of the applicant is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral, if any, in relation to the proposed loan amount.

Consumer loans may entail greater credit risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured or are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles or recreational equipment. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.

Junior liens inherently have more credit risk by virtue of the fact that another financial institution may have a higher security position in the case of foreclosure liquidation of collateral to extinguish the debt. Generally, foreclosure actions could become more prevalent if the real estate market weakens and property values deteriorate.

The allowance for credit losses (“allowance”) consists of (i) the allowance for loan and lease losses, and (ii) the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. The allowance for loan and lease losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The reserve for unfunded lending commitments represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in its unfunded loan commitments and is recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The reserve for unfunded lending commitments was $137,000 at June 30, 2019 and $159,000 at December 31, 2018.

The allowance is increased by the provision for loan and lease losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Non-residential consumer loans are generally charged off no later than 120 days past due on a contractual basis, or earlier in the event of either bankruptcy or if there is an amount deemed uncollectible. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.

The allowance is maintained at a level considered by management to be adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a monthly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on Mid Penn’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value, or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.

The general component covers pools of loans by loan class including commercial loans not considered impaired, as well as smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate, home equity and other consumer loans. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These qualitative risk factors include changes in economic conditions, fluctuations in loan quality measures, changes in collateral values, changes in the experience of the lending staff and loan review systems, changes in lending policies and procedures (including underwriting standards), changes in the mix and volume of loans originated, the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the existing loan portfolio, shifting industry or portfolio concentrations, and other relevant factors.

Each factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on management’s best judgment using relevant information available at the time of the evaluation. Adjustments to the factors are supported through documentation of changes in conditions in relevant analyses and a narrative accompanying the allowance for loan loss calculation.

The unallocated component of the allowance for loan and lease losses covers several considerations that are not specifically measureable through either the specific and general components. For example, at times Mid Penn could face increasing credit risks and uncertainties, not yet reflected in recent historical losses or qualitative factor assessments, associated with unpredictable changes in economic growth or business conditions in our markets or for certain industries in which we have commercial loan borrowers, or unanticipated stresses to the values of real estate held as collateral. Any or all of these additional issues can adversely affect our borrowers’ ability to timely repay their loans. Additionally, we have experienced continued strong commercial loan growth, including growth in newer markets where we have less of a loss history. Also, the unallocated component allocation recognizes the inherent imprecision in our allowance for loan and lease loss methodology, or any alternative methodology, for estimating specific and general loan losses, including the unpredictable timing and amounts of charge-offs, the fact that historical loss averages don’t necessarily correlate to future loss trends, and unexpected changes to specific-credit or general portfolio future cash flows and collateral values which could negatively impact unimpaired portfolio loss factors.

Mid Penn generally considers a commercial loan (consisting of commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, commercial real estate-construction, and lease financing loan classes) to be impaired when it becomes 90 days or more past due and not in the process of collection, or sooner when it is probable that Mid Penn will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest due. This methodology assumes the borrower cannot or will not continue to make additional payments. At that time, the loan would generally be considered collateral dependent as the discounted cash flow method would generally indicate no operating income available for evaluating the collateral position; therefore, most impaired loans are deemed to be collateral dependent.

In addition, Mid Penn’s rating system assumes any loans classified as nonaccrual, included in the substandard rating, to be impaired, and most of these loans are considered collateral dependent; therefore, most of Mid Penn’s impaired loans, whether reporting a specific allocation or not, are considered collateral dependent.

Mid Penn evaluates loans for charge-off on a monthly basis. Policies that govern the recommendation for charge-off are unique to the type of loan being considered. Commercial loans classified as substandard nonaccrual, doubtful, having probable loss will first have a collateral evaluation completed in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. Once the collateral evaluation has been completed, a specific allocation of allowance is made based upon the results of the evaluation. The remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). In the event the loan is unsecured, the loan would have been charged-off at the recognition of impairment. Commercial real estate loans determined to be impaired will also have an initial collateral evaluation completed in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. An updated real estate valuation is ordered and the collateral evaluation is modified to reflect any variations in value. A specific allocation of allowance is made for any anticipated collateral shortfall. The remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). The process of charging off a residential mortgage loan begins when a loan becomes delinquent for 90 days and is not in the process of collection. The existing appraisal is reviewed and a lien search is obtained to determine lien position and any instances of intervening liens. A new appraisal of the property will be ordered if deemed necessary by management and a collateral evaluation is completed. The loan will then be charged down to the value indicated in the evaluation. Non-residential consumer loans are generally charged off no later than 120 days past due on a contractual basis, or earlier in the event of either bankruptcy or if there is an amount deemed uncollectible. The collateral shortfall of the consumer loan is recommended for charge-off at this point.

As noted above, Mid Penn assesses a specific allocation for commercial loans and commercial real estate loans. The remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). In addition, Mid Penn takes a preemptive step when any commercial loan becomes classified under its internal classification system. A preliminary collateral evaluation, in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans, is prepared using the existing collateral information in the loan file. This process allows Mid Penn to review both the credit and documentation files to determine the status of the information needed to make a collateral evaluation. This collateral evaluation is preliminary, but allows Mid Penn to determine if any potential collateral shortfalls exist.

It is Mid Penn’s policy to obtain updated third party collateral valuations on all impaired loans secured by real estate as soon as practically possible following the credit being classified as substandard nonaccrual. Prior to receipt of the updated real estate valuation, Mid Penn will use any existing real estate valuation to determine any potential allowance issues; however, no allowance recommendation will be made until such time Mid Penn is in receipt of the updated valuation. The Asset Recovery department employs an electronic tracking system to monitor the receipt of and need for updated appraisals. To date, there have been no material time lapses noted with the above processes.

In some instances Mid Penn is not holding real estate as collateral and is relying on business assets (personal property) for repayment. In these circumstances, a collateral inspection is performed by Mid Penn personnel to determine an estimated value. The value is based on net book value, as provided by the financial statements, and discounted accordingly based on determinations made by management. Occasionally, Mid Penn will employ an outside service to provide a fair estimate of value based on auction sales or private sales. Management reviews the estimates of these third parties and discounts them accordingly based on management’s judgment, if deemed necessary.

For impaired loans with no valuation allowance required, the independent third party market valuations on the subject property obtained by Mid Penn as soon as practically possible following the credit being placed on nonaccrual status sometimes indicates that the loan-to-value ratio is sufficient to obviate the need for a specific allocation in spite of significant deterioration in real estate values in Mid Penn’s primary market area. These circumstances are determined on a case by case analysis of the impaired loans.

Mid Penn actively monitors the values of collateral on impaired loans. This monitoring may require the modification of collateral values over time or changing circumstances by some factor, either positive or negative, from the original values. All collateral values will be assessed by management at least every 12 months for possible revaluation by an independent third party.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, Mid Penn does not separately identify individual residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and other consumer loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a troubled debt restructuring agreement.

Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings if the borrowers have been granted concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a troubled debt restructuring generally involve a temporary reduction in interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date. Nonaccrual troubled debt restructurings are restored to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for nine consecutive months after modification. Loans classified as troubled debt restructurings are designated as impaired.

The allowance calculation methodology includes segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors, and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for commercial loans or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss. Loans criticized as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Any loans not classified as noted above are rated pass.

In addition, federal and state regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance and may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.

Loans that Mid Penn acquires in connection with business combinations are recorded at fair value with no carryover of the acquired entity’s related allowance for loan losses. The fair value of the acquired loans involves estimating the amount and timing of principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at a market rate of interest.

The excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable discount and is recognized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as the nonaccretable discount. These loans are accounted for under ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality. The nonaccretable discount includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will require Mid Penn to evaluate the need for an additional allowance. Subsequent improvement in expected cash flows will result in the reversal of a corresponding amount of the nonaccretable discount which Mid Penn will then reclassify as accretable discount that will be recognized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan.

Loans acquired through business combinations that meet the specific criteria of ASC 310-30 are individually evaluated each period to analyze expected cash flows. To the extent that the expected cash flows of a loan have decreased due to credit deterioration, Mid Penn establishes an allowance.

Loans acquired through business combinations that do not meet the specific criteria of ASC 310-30 are accounted for under ASC 310-20. These loans are initially recorded at fair value, and include credit and interest rate marks associated with acquisition accounting adjustments. Purchase premiums or discounts are subsequently amortized as an adjustment to yield over the estimated contractual lives of the loans. There is no allowance for loan losses established at the acquisition date for acquired performing loans. An allowance for loan losses is recorded for any credit deterioration in these loans subsequent to acquisition.

Acquired loans that met the criteria for impaired or nonaccrual of interest prior to the acquisition may be considered performing upon acquisition, regardless of whether the customer is contractually delinquent, if Mid Penn expects to fully collect the new carrying value (i.e. fair value) of the loans. As such, Mid Penn may no longer consider the loan to be nonaccrual or nonperforming at the date of acquisition and may accrue interest on these loans, including the impact of any accretable discount. In addition, charge-offs on such loans would be first applied to the nonaccretable difference portion of the fair value adjustment.

Foreclosed assets held for sale consist primarily of real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure in settlement of debt, and are recorded at fair value less the selling costs at the date of transfer, establishing a new cost basis. Any valuation adjustments required at the date of transfer are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent to acquisition, foreclosed assets are carried at fair value less estimated costs of disposal, based upon periodic evaluations that consider changes in market conditions and development and disposal costs. Operating results from assets acquired in satisfaction of debt, including rental income less operating costs and gains or losses on the sale of, or the periodic evaluation of foreclosed assets, are recorded in noninterest expense. As of June 30, 2019, Mid Penn had $247,000 of residential real estate held in other real estate owned and $868,000 in loans for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process. As of December 31, 2018, Mid Penn had $844,000 of residential real estate held in other real estate owned and $211,000 in loans for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.

Mid Penn leases certain premises and equipment, and as of January 1, 2019 for all leases in effect upon adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, “Leases” (Topic 842) as well as any leases commencing thereafter, Mid Penn has recognized a right-of-use asset and a related lease liability for each distinct lease agreement. The lease right-of-use asset consists of the amount of the initial measurement of the lease liability, adjusted for (i) any lease payments made to the lessor at or before the commencement date, minus any lease incentives received, and (ii) any initial direct costs incurred by the lessee (defined as costs of a lease that would not have been incurred had the lease not been executed). The related lease liability is equal to the present value of the future lease payments, discounted using the rate implicit in the lease (or if that rate cannot be readily determined, the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate). Given that the rate implicit in the lease is rarely available, all lease liability amounts were calculated using Mid Penn’s incremental borrowing rate at lease inception, on a collateralized basis, for a similar term. For operating leases existing prior to January 1, 2019, the rate for the remaining lease term as of January 1, 2019 was used.

Operating lease expense, recognized as a component of occupancy expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income, consists of a single lease cost calculated so that the remaining cost of the lease is allocated over the remaining lease term on a straight-line basis. Operating lease expense also includes variable lease payments not included in the lease liability, and any impairment of the right-of-use asset. Finance lease expense consists of the amortization of the right-of-use asset, recognized as a component of occupancy expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income, and interest expense on the lease liability, which is recorded as a component of other interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

In assessing whether a contract contains a lease, Mid Penn reviews third-party agreements to determine if the contract conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant, or equipment (defined as an identified asset by Topic 842) for a period of time in exchange for consideration, and grants Mid Penn the right to both (i) obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the identified asset’s use, and (ii) direct the use of the identified asset throughout the term of the agreement.

Upon identification that a lease agreement exists, Mid Penn performs an assessment of the consideration to be paid related to the identified asset and quantifies both the (i) lease components, consisting of consideration paid to transfer a good or service to Mid Penn, and (ii) non-lease components, consisting of consideration paid for distinct elements of the contract that are not related to securing the use of the leased asset, such as property taxes, common area maintenance, utilities, and insurance. Mid Penn has made an accounting policy election to segregate lease and non-lease components in the determination of lease consideration used in the calculation of the right-of-use asset and liability for leases of property.

Many of Mid Penn’s lease agreements include options to extend or renew contracts subsequent to the expiration of the initial lease term. These renewal and extension options were not included in the calculation of the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities as Mid Penn is not reasonably certain that these renewals and extensions will be utilized. Additionally, for leases that contain escalation clauses related to consumer or other price indices, Mid Penn includes the known lease payment amount as of the commencement date in the calculation of right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities. Subsequent increases in rental payments over the known amount at the commencement date due to increase in the indices will be expensed as incurred.

None of Mid Penn’s lease agreements include residual value guarantees or material variable lease payments. Mid Penn does not have material restrictions or covenants imposed by leases that would impact Mid Penn’s ability to pay dividends or cause Mid Penn to incur additional financial obligations.

Mid Penn is a limited partner in a partnership that provides low-income housing in Enola, Pennsylvania. The carrying value of Mid Penn’s investment in the limited partnership was $211,000 at June 30, 2019, and $233,000 at December 31, 2018, net of amortization, using the straight-line method. The investment in this limited partnership is reported in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and Mid Penn’s maximum exposure to loss is limited to the carrying value of the investment.

During the second quarter of 2018, Mid Penn entered into a commitment to purchase an additional limited partnership interest in a low-income housing project to construct thirty-seven apartments and common amenities in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania. All of the units are intended to qualify for Federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTCs”) as provided for in Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Mid Penn’s limited partner capital contribution commitment is $7,579,000, which will be paid in installments over the course of construction of the low-income housing facilities. Each installment payment is conditional upon both Mid Penn’s review and approval of the installment payment certificate and continued compliance with the terms of the original partnership agreement. The investment in the limited partnership will be reported in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and will be amortized over a ten year period once the facilities become operational and begin to be occupied. The project has been conditionally awarded $861,000 in annual LIHTCs by the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, with a total anticipated LIHTC amount of $8,613,000 to be awarded to Mid Penn over the ten year amortization period. Mid Penn’s commitment to initiate investments in the limited partnership interest was conditional upon (i) the review and approval of all closing documents, (ii) an opinion letter for tax counsel to the Partnership that the project qualifies for the LIHTCs, and (iii) review and approval by Mid Penn of other documents it deemed necessary. All such initial conditions were satisfied and Mid Penn began funding the investment during 2018. The total investment in this limited partnership was $4,356,000 and $1,710,000 on June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, and was included in the reported balance of other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Core deposit intangible is a measure of the value of consumer demand and savings deposits acquired in business combinations accounted for as purchases. The carrying amount of core deposit intangible was $6,198,000 and $6,893,000 at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Amortization expense is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income in intangible amortization and was $695,000 and $488,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The amount of amortization expense was $347,000 and $243,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The core deposit intangible for each respective acquisition (Phoenix in March 2015; Scottdale in January 2018; and First Priority in July 2018) is being amortized over a ten-year period starting at the respective acquisition date and using a sum-of-the-year’s digits basis. Core deposit intangible assets are subject to impairment testing whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the need for such evaluation.

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired in connection with past business acquisitions. The goodwill balance was the same at both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and was comprised of (i) $39,744,000 related to the July 31, 2018 First Priority acquisition, (ii) $19,178,000 related to the January 8, 2018 Scottdale acquisition and (iii) $3,918,000 recorded as a result of the Phoenix acquisition in 2015. Goodwill is evaluated annually for impairment; however, if certain events occur which indicate goodwill might be impaired between annual tests, goodwill would be tested for impairment when such events occur. In making a potential impairment assessment of goodwill, Mid Penn considers a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, current market data, stock price, etc. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and Mid Penn’s judgment in applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment. Mid Penn did not identify any impairment on its outstanding goodwill from its most recent evaluation, which was performed as of October 31, 2018 using a qualitative analysis. Changes in economic and operating conditions could result in goodwill impairment in future periods.

Mid Penn recognizes revenues when earned based upon (i) contractual terms as transactions occur, or (ii) as related services are provided and collectability is reasonably assured. The largest source of revenue for Mid Penn is interest income, which is primarily recognized on an accrual basis according to a written contract, such as loan and lease agreements or investment securities contracts. Mid Penn earns noninterest income through a variety of financial and transactional services such as trust and wealth management services, deposit account transaction fees, ATM debit card fees, and mortgage banking fees. Revenue is recorded for noninterest income based on the contractual terms for the service or transaction performed. In certain circumstances, noninterest income is reported net of associated expenses.

On January 1, 2018, Mid Penn adopted FASB ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This ASU establishes principles for reporting information about the nature, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from the entity’s contracts to provide goods and services to customers. Topic 606 applies primarily to transactional-based non-interest income revenue streams and excludes mortgage banking income, earnings from cash surrender value of life insurance, and gains on SBA loans.

Mid Penn’s non-interest income revenue streams of income from fiduciary activities, service charges on deposits, ATM debit card interchange income, merchant service fees and certain components of other income are within the scope of Topic 606 and are discussed in greater detail below.

Income from fiduciary activities consist of trust and investment management fee income, brokerage transaction fee income, and estate fee income. Trust and investment management fee income consists of advisory fees that are typically based on market values of clients’ managed portfolios and transaction fees for fiduciary services performed, both of which are recognized as earned. Brokerage transaction fee income includes advisory fees, which are recognized as earned on a monthly basis and transaction fees that are recognized when transactions occur. Payment is typically received in the following month. Estate fee income is recognized as services are performed over the service period, generally eighteen months.

Service charges on deposits consist of cash management, overdraft, non-sufficient fund fees and other service charges on deposit accounts. Revenue is primarily transactional and recognized when earned, which is at the time the respective initiating transaction occurs and the related service charge is subsequently processed. Payment for service charges on deposit accounts is primarily received immediately or in the following month through a direct charge to the customers’ accounts.

ATM debit card interchange income consists interchange fees earned when Mid Penn’s debit cards are processed through card payments networks. The interchange fee is calculated as a percentage of the total electronic funds transfer (EFT) transaction plus a per-transaction fee, which varies based on the type of card used, the method used to process the EFT transaction, and the type of business at which the transaction was processed. Revenue is recognized daily as transactions occur and interchange fees are subsequently processed. Payment for most interchange activity is received daily, while some fees are aggregated and payment is received in the following month.

Merchant services income is processed through sthird party providers with whom Mid Penn has partnered to provide merchant services to its business customers. Fees are charged to merchants to process their debit card transactions, cash advance services, and other related products. Mid Penn receives a percentage of the revenue generated from each joint customer relationship after the respective third party provider has collected the fee income from the merchant. Payment is primarily received in the following month.

Certain aspects of other income, such as credit card royalties, check orders, and letter of credit fees, are within the scope of Topic 606. These fees are primarily transactional, and revenue is recognized when transactions occur and the related services are subsequently processed. Payment is primarily received immediately or in the following month.

Mid Penn does not exercise significant judgements in the recognition of income, as typically income is not recognized until the performance obligation has been satisfied. Mid Penn has not recognized any assets from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with customers for revenue streams that fall within the guidance of Topic 606.

Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes changes in unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale arising during the period and reclassification adjustments for realized gains and losses on securities available for sale included in net income. Mid Penn also recognizes other comprehensive income (loss) from an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit plan for directors and other postretirement benefit plans covering full-time employees. These plans utilize assumptions and methods to calculate the fair value of plan assets and Mid Penn recognizes the overfunded and underfunded status of the plans on its consolidated balance sheet. Gains and losses, prior service costs and credits are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, until they are amortized, or immediately upon curtailment.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, are as follows:

Earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each of the periods presented. The following data show the amounts used in computing earnings per common share.

Weighted average shares outstanding increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 when compared to the same periods in 2018 primarily as a result of the issuance of 2,320,800 shares of Mid Penn common stock on July 31, 2018 in connection with the First Priority acquisition. There were no dilutive securities impacting the calculation of earnings per share for the periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

On July 31, 2018, Mid Penn completed its acquisition of First Priority Financial Corp. (“First Priority”), through the merger of First Priority with and into Mid Penn. In connection with this acquisition, First Priority’s wholly-owned bank subsidiary was merged with and into Mid Penn Bank.

Pursuant to the merger agreement between Mid Penn and First Priority, the common shareholders of First Priority received 0.3481 shares of Mid Penn common stock for each share of First Priority common stock owned. Additionally, outstanding options to purchase First Priority common stock at the time of the merger were converted into the right to receive cash at a per-option value of $11.07 less the applicable exercise price, without interest. As a result of the acquisition, Mid Penn’s fulfillment of the merger consideration requirements resulted in (i) the issuance of 2,320,800 shares of Mid Penn common stock with an acquisition date fair value of approximately $76,122,000 based on the closing stock price of Mid Penn’s common stock of $32.80 on July 31, 2018, (ii) the payment of $3,801,000 related to cashing out the First Priority stock options, (iii) cash paid of $6,000 in lieu of fractional shares, and (iv) the issuance of 3,404 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D totaling $3,404,000 in replacement of similarly valued preferred shares previously issued by First Priority. Aggregately, the combined fair value of total consideration paid by Mid Penn to acquire First Priority was $79,929,000.

The assets and liabilities of First Priority were recorded on the consolidated balance sheet of the Company at their estimated fair value as of July 31, 2018, and their impact on the results of operations have been included in the consolidated income statement of the Company since such date. First Priority has been fully integrated into Mid Penn; therefore, the amount of revenue and earnings of First Priority included in the consolidated income statement since the acquisition date is impracticable to provide.

The acquisition of First Priority resulted in the recognition and recording of intangible assets including $39,744,000 of goodwill, a core deposit intangible of $2,832,000, and a trade name intangible of $205,000. The core deposit intangible will be amortized over a ten-year period using a sum of the years’ digits basis. The goodwill will not be amortized, but will be measured annually for impairment or more frequently if circumstances require.

The following table summarizes the final estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities and equity assumed in the First Priority transaction.

In general, factors contributing to goodwill recognized as a result of the First Priority acquisition include expected cost savings from combined operations, opportunities to expand into several new markets, and growth and profitability potential from the repositioning of certain investments into higher-yielding loans. The goodwill acquired as a result of the First Priority acquisition is not tax deductible.

The fair value of the financial assets acquired included loans receivable with a net amortized cost basis of $511,623,000. The table below illustrates the fair value adjustments made to the amortized cost basis in order to present a fair value of the loans acquired.

The market rate adjustment represents the movement in market interest rates, irrespective of credit adjustments, compared to the contractual rates of the acquired loans. The credit adjustment made on pools of homogeneous loans represents the changes in credit quality of the underlying borrowers from loan inception to the acquisition date. The credit adjustment on impaired loans is derived in accordance with ASC 310-30-30 and represents the portion of the loan balance that has been deemed uncollectible based on our expectations of future cash flows for each respective loan.

The information about the acquired First Priority impaired loan portfolio as of July 31, 2018 is as follows:

The following table presents pro forma information as if the merger between Mid Penn and First Priority had been completed on January 1, 2018. The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have occurred had Mid Penn merged with First Priority at the beginning of 2018. The supplemental pro forma earnings for 2018 exclude $654,000 of merger related costs related to the First Priority acquisition, of which $517,000 was not deductible for federal income tax purposes. The pro forma financial information does not include the impact of possible business model changes, nor does it consider any potential impacts of current market conditions or revenues, expense efficiencies, or other factors.

On January 8, 2018, The Scottdale Bank & Trust Company (“Scottdale”) merged with and into Mid Penn Bank, with Mid Penn Bank continuing as the surviving entity.

Pursuant to the merger agreement, each share of Scottdale common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to January 8, 2018 converted into the right to receive (i) $1,166 in cash without interest or (ii) 38.88 shares of Mid Penn common stock. As a result, Mid Penn issued 1,878,827 shares of Mid Penn common stock with an acquisition date fair value of approximately $64,181,000, based on the closing stock price of Mid Penn’s common stock on January 8, 2018 of $34.16, and cash of $2,792,000. Including an insignificant amount of cash paid in lieu of fractional shares, the fair value of total consideration paid was $66,973,000.

The assets and liabilities of Scottdale were recorded on the consolidated balance sheet of the Company at their estimated fair value as of January 8, 2018, and their impact on the results of operations have been included in the consolidated income statement of the Company since such date. Scottdale has been fully integrated into Mid Penn; therefore, the amount of revenue and earnings of Scottdale included in the consolidated income statement since the acquisition date is impracticable to provide.

The acquisition of Scottdale resulted in the recognition and recording of intangible assets including goodwill of $19,178,000 and a core deposit intangible of $4,940,000. The core deposit intangible will be amortized over a ten-year period using a sum of the years’ digits basis. The goodwill will not be amortized, but will be measured annually for impairment or more frequently if circumstances require.

The following table summarizes the final estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities and equity assumed in the Scottdale transaction.

In general, factors contributing to goodwill recognized as a result of the Scottdale acquisition include expected cost savings from combined operations, opportunities to expand into several new markets, and growth and profitability potential from the repositioning of short-term investments into higher-yielding loans. The goodwill acquired as a result of the Scottdale acquisition is not tax deductible.

The fair value of the financial assets acquired included loans receivable with a net amortized cost basis of $70,769,000. The table below illustrates the fair value adjustments made to the amortized cost basis in order to present a fair value of the loans acquired.

The information about the acquired Scottdale impaired loan portfolio as of January 8, 2018 is as follows:

The following table presents pro forma measures as if the merger between Mid Penn Bank and Scottdale had been completed on January 1, 2018. The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have occurred had Mid Penn Bank merged with Scottdale at the beginning of 2018. The supplemental pro forma earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2018 exclude both (i) adjustments to estimate the eight day impact of Scottdale due to immateriality and impracticality and (ii) $1,262,000 of merger- related costs incurred in 2018 related to the Scottdale acquisition, of which $173,000 was not deductible for federal income tax purposes. Merger-related costs in 2018 included approximately $518,000 of severance and retention bonus expenses. The pro forma financial information does not include the impact of possible business model changes, nor does it consider any potential impacts of current market conditions or revenues, expense efficiencies, or other factors.

The majority of the investment portfolio is comprised of securities issued by U.S. government agencies and state and political subdivision obligations. The amortized cost, fair value, and unrealized gains and losses on investment securities at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
June 30, 2019
Available-for-sale debt securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies	$	44,699	$	23	$	196	$	44,526
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies		21,530		15		187		21,358
State and political subdivision obligations		14,240		19		73		14,186
Corporate debt securities		3,269		65		—		3,334
Total available-for-sale debt securities		83,738		122		456		83,404
Held-to-maturity debt securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies		15,505		38		16		15,527
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies		59,377		441		206		59,612
State and political subdivision obligations		83,769		2,433		1		86,201
Corporate debt securities		1,531		1		9		1,523
Total held-to-maturity debt securities		160,182		2,913		232		162,863
Total	$	243,920	$	3,035	$	688	$	246,267

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
December 31, 2018
Available-for-sale debt securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies	$	43,270	$	10	$	1,708	$	41,572
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies		39,865		—		1,016		38,849
State and political subdivision obligations		30,642		11		1,397		29,256
Corporate debt securities		2,250		—		4		2,246
Total available-for-sale debt securities		116,027		21		4,125		111,923
Held-to-maturity debt securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies		16,985		14		143		16,856
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies		65,812		46		1,310		64,548
State and political subdivision obligations		84,034		457		842		83,649
Corporate debt securities		1,539		—		10		1,529
Total held-to-maturity debt securities		168,370		517		2,305		166,582
Total	$	284,397	$	538	$	6,430	$	278,505

Estimated fair values of debt securities are based on quoted market prices, where applicable. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments, adjusted for differences between the quoted instruments and the instruments being valued. Please refer to Note 9, Fair Value Measurement, for more information on the fair value of investment securities.

Investment securities having a fair value of $114,113,000 at June 30, 2019 and $214,239,000 at December 31, 2018 were pledged to secure public deposits, some trust account holdings, and certain other borrowings. Mid Penn also obtains letters of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) to secure certain public deposits. These FHLB letter of credit commitments totaled $141,225,000 as of June 30, 2019 and $36,850,000 as of December 31, 2018.

The following tables present gross unrealized losses and fair value of debt security investments aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

(Dollars in thousands)	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Number					Number					Number
	of	Fair		Unrealized		of	Fair		Unrealized		of	Fair		Unrealized
June 30, 2019	Securities	Value		Losses		Securities	Value		Losses		Securities	Value		Losses
Available-for-sale debt securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies	2	$	4,473	$	19	15	$	25,443	$	177	17	$	29,916	$	196
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies	0		—		—	15		12,541		187	15		12,541		187
State and political subdivision obligations	0		—		—	16		8,518		73	16		8,518		73
Corporate debt securities	0		—		—	0		—		—	0		—		—
Total temporarily impaired available-for-sale debt securities	2		4,473		19	46		46,502		437	48		50,975		456

Held-to-maturity debt securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies	0	$	—	$	—	2	$	6,002	$	16	2	$	6,002	$	16
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies	0		—		—	29		32,464		206	29		32,464		206
State and political subdivision obligations	0		—		—	1		503		1	1		503		1
Corporate debt securities	1		1,522		9	0		—		—	1		1,522		9
Total temporarily impaired held-to-maturity debt securities	1	$	1,522	$	9	32	$	38,969	$	223	33	$	40,491	$	232
Total	3	$	5,995	$	28	78	$	85,471	$	660	81	$	91,466	$	688

(Dollars in thousands)	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More						Total
	Number					Number						Number
	of	Fair		Unrealized		of	Fair		Unrealized			of	Fair		Unrealized
December 31, 2018	Securities	Value		Losses		Securities	Value		Losses			Securities	Value		Losses
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies	0	$	—	$	—	21	$	38,386		$	1,708	21	$	38,386	$	1,708
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies	11		16,740		163	19		22,093			853	30		38,833		1,016
State and political subdivision obligations	3		1,751		23	51		24,520			1,374	54		26,271		1,397
Corporate debt securities	2		1,996		4	0		—			—	2		1,996		4
Total temporarily impaired available-for-sale securities	16	$	20,487	$	190	91	$	84,999		$	3,935	107	$	105,486	$	4,125

Held-to-maturity securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies	1	$	1,985	$	10	3	$	8,852		$	133	4	$	10,837	$	143
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies	10		16,165		79	35		42,431			1,231	45		58,596		1,310
State and political subdivision obligations	26		11,321		111	77		29,460			731	103		40,781		842
Corporate debt securities	1		1,529		10	0		—			—	1		1,529		10
Total temporarily impaired held to maturity securities	38	$	31,000	$	210	115	$	80,743		$	2,095	153	$	111,743	$	2,305
Total	54	$	51,487	$	400	206	$	165,742		$	6,030	260	$	217,229	$	6,430

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such additional evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value of the security has been less than amortized cost, as well as the overall financial condition of the issuer. In addition, for debt securities, Mid Penn considers (a) whether management has the intent to sell the security, (b) it is more likely than not that management will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery, and (c) whether management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis. At both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the majority of available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities in an unrealized loss position were mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies, obligations of state and political subdivisions, and U.S. Treasury and agency securities.

Mid Penn had no securities considered by management to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2019, December 31, 2018, or June 30, 2018, and did not record any securities impairment charges in the respective periods ended on these dates. Mid Penn does not consider the securities with unrealized losses on the respective dates to be other-than-temporarily impaired as the unrealized losses were deemed to be temporary changes in value related to market movements in interest yields at various periods similar to the maturity dates of holdings in the investment portfolio, and not reflective of an erosion of credit quality.

Gross realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale debt securities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are shown in the table below.

The table below illustrates the maturity distribution of investment securities at amortized cost and fair value as of June 30, 2019.

The types of loans in Mid Penn’s portfolio, summarized by those rated as “pass” (net of deferred fees and costs of $898,000 as of June 30, 2019 and $647,000 as of December 31, 2018), and the loans classified as “special mention” and “substandard” within Mid Penn’s internal risk rating system as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, are as follows:

Mid Penn had no loans classified as doubtful as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2019						December 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		2,236		2,584		—		2,007		2,276		—
Commercial real estate - construction		40		—		—		—		—		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		897		991		—		657		811		—
Home equity		28		29		—		30		106		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

With no related allowance recorded and acquired with credit deterioration:
Commercial and industrial	$	29	$	29	$	—	$	28	$	28	$	—
Commercial real estate		1,616		1,616		—		1,563		1,563		—
Commercial real estate - construction		—		—		—		—		—		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		1,234		1,234		—		1,208		1,208		—
Home equity		4		4		—		4		4		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	76	$	281	$	13	$	4,527	$	4,635	$	500
Commercial real estate		509		509		243		721		721		204
Commercial real estate - construction		—		23		—		367		370		38
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		—		—		—		—		—		—
Home equity		—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	105	$	310	$	13	$	4,555	$	4,663	$	500
Commercial real estate		4,361		4,709		243		4,291		4,560		204
Commercial real estate - construction		40		23		—		367		370		38
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		2,131		2,225		—		1,865		2,019		—
Home equity		32		33		—		34		110		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—

The average recorded investment of impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2019				June 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		2,273		—		2,650		3
Commercial real estate - construction		40		—		—		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		880		7		699		7
Home equity		29		—		95		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—

With no related allowance recorded and acquired with credit deterioration:
Commercial and industrial	$	29	$	—	$	23	$	—
Commercial real estate		1,602		—		1,455		7
Commercial real estate - construction		—		—		—		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		1,222		—		639		—
Home equity		4		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	140	$	—	$	4,349	$	—
Commercial real estate		513		—		1,029		—
Commercial real estate - construction		183		—		367		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		—		—		—		—
Home equity		—		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—

Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	169	$	—	$	4,372	$	—
Commercial real estate		4,388		—		5,134		10
Commercial real estate - construction		223		—		367		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		2,102		7		1,338		7
Home equity		33		—		95		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2019				June 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		2,289		—		2,306		3
Commercial real estate - construction		27		—		17		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		857		14		796		14
Home equity		29		—		208		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—

With no related allowance recorded and acquired with credit deterioration:
Commercial and industrial	$	29	$	—	$	20	$	—
Commercial real estate		1,589		—		2,001		14
Commercial real estate - construction		—		—		—		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		1,219		—		1,086		—
Home equity		4		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial	$	1,603	$	3	$	3,519	$	—
Commercial real estate		477		—		1,367		—
Commercial real estate - construction		245		—		366		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		—		—		—		—
Home equity		—		—		—		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—

Total Impaired Loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	1,632	$	3	$	3,539	$	—
Commercial real estate		4,355		—		5,674		17
Commercial real estate - construction		272		—		383		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		2,076		14		1,882		14
Home equity		33		—		208		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—

Nonaccrual loans by loan portfolio class, including loans acquired with credit deterioration, as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are summarized as follows:

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are summarized as follows:

													Loans
(Dollars in thousands)	30-59		60-89		Greater								Receivable >
	Days Past		Days Past		than 90		Total Past						90 Days and
June 30, 2019	Due		Due		Days		Due		Current		Total Loans		Accruing
Commercial and industrial	$	277	$	—	$	76	$	353	$	300,889	$	301,242	$	—
Commercial real estate		225		635		1,953		2,813		878,888		881,701		—
Commercial real estate - construction		—		—		40		40		173,860		173,900		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		87		—		380		467		247,413		247,880		—
Home equity		18		10		—		28		70,410		70,438		—
Consumer		5		3		—		8		10,121		10,129		—
Loans acquired with credit deterioration:
Commercial and industrial		—		24		5		29		—		29		—
Commercial real estate		—		—		1,050		1,050		566		1,616		—
Commercial real estate - construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		17		70		832		919		315		1,234		—
Home equity		—		—		—		—		4		4		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	629	$	742	$	4,336	$	5,707	$	1,682,466	$	1,688,173	$	—

													Loans
(Dollars in thousands)	30-59		60-89		Greater								Receivable >
	Days Past		Days Past		than 90		Total Past						90 Days and
December 31, 2018	Due		Due		Days		Due		Current		Total Loans		Accruing
Commercial and industrial	$	17	$	—	$	4,527	$	4,544	$	281,946	$	286,490	$	—
Commercial real estate		685		—		458		1,143		858,663		859,806		—
Commercial real estate - construction		—		—		367		367		141,806		142,173		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		53		53		—
Residential mortgage		461		—		277		738		251,597		252,335		—
Home equity		166		22		25		213		69,879		70,092		—
Consumer		57		5		—		62		10,253		10,315		—
Loans acquired with credit deterioration:
Commercial and industrial		23		5		—		28		—		28		—
Commercial real estate		29		—		1,534		1,563		—		1,563		—
Commercial real estate - construction		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Lease financing		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		19		57		913		989		219		1,208		—
Home equity		—		—		4		4		—		4		—
Consumer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,457	$	89	$	8,105	$	9,651	$	1,614,416	$	1,624,067	$	—

The following tables summarize the allowance and recorded investments in loans receivable.

(Dollars in thousands)
As of, and for the three months ended, June 30, 2019	Commercial and industrial			Commercial real estate			Commercial real estate - construction			Lease financing		Residential mortgage			Home equity			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Beginning balance,
April 1, 2019	$	2,443		$	5,031		$	81		$	—	$	477		$	450		$	6		$	14		$	8,502
Charge-offs		(205	)		—			(20	)		—		—			—			(38	)		—			(263	)
Recoveries		42			15			—			—		—			1			9			—			67
Provisions		168			266			(16	)		—		(1	)		31			30			(13	)		465
Ending balance,
June 30, 2019	$	2,448		$	5,312		$	45		$	—	$	476		$	482		$	7		$	1		$	8,771

(Dollars in thousands)
As of, and for the six months ended, June 30, 2019	Commercial and industrial			Commercial real estate			Commercial real estate - construction			Lease financing		Residential mortgage			Home equity			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Beginning balance,
January 1, 2019	$	2,391		$	4,703		$	75		$	—	$	453		$	528		$	7		$	240		$	8,397
Charge-offs		(205	)		(12	)		(40	)		—		—			—			(47	)		—			(304	)
Recoveries		43			33			—			—		—			1			11			—			88
Provisions		219			588			10			—		23			(47	)		36			(239	)		590
Ending balance,
June 30, 2019		2,448			5,312			45			—		476			482			7			1			8,771
Individually evaluated for impairment		13			243			—			—		—			—			—			—			256
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,435		$	5,069		$	45		$	—	$	476		$	482		$	7		$	1		$	8,515

Loans receivables:
Ending balance	$	301,271		$	883,317		$	173,900		$	—	$	249,114		$	70,442		$	10,129		$	—		$	1,688,173
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		76			2,745			40			—		897			28			—			—			3,786
Ending balance: acquired with credit deterioration		29			1,616			—			—		1,234			4			—			—			2,883
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	301,166		$	878,956		$	173,860		$	—	$	246,983		$	70,410		$	10,129		$	—		$	1,681,504

(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2018	Commercial and industrial		Commercial real estate		Commercial real estate - construction		Lease financing		Residential mortgage		Home equity		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Ending balance	$	2,391	$	4,703	$	75	$	—	$	453	$	528	$	7	$	240	$	8,397
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		500		204		38		—		—		—		—		—		742
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,891	$	4,499	$	37	$	—	$	453	$	528	$	7	$	240	$	7,655

Loans receivable:
Ending balance	$	286,518	$	861,369	$	142,173	$	53	$	253,543	$	70,096	$	10,315	$	—	$	1,624,067
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		4,527		2,728		367		—		811		30		—		—		8,463
Ending balance: acquired with credit deterioration		28		1,563		—		—		1,208		4		—		—		2,803
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	281,963	$	857,078	$	141,806	$	53	$	251,524	$	70,062	$	10,315	$	—	$	1,612,801

(Dollars in thousands)
As of, and for the three months ended, June 30, 2018	Commercial and industrial			Commercial real estate			Commercial real estate - construction			Lease financing		Residential mortgage			Home equity			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Beginning balance,
April 1, 2018	$	1,977		$	4,653		$	183		$	—	$	452		$	391		$	4		$	6		$	7,666
Charge-offs		(129	)		—			(40	)		—		(3	)		(91	)		(4	)		—			(267	)
Recoveries		—			788			—			—		—			—			2			—			790
Provisions		272			(718	)		3			—		(8	)		120			2			329			—
Ending balance,
June 30, 2018	$	2,120		$	4,723		$	146		$	—	$	441		$	420		$	4		$	335		$	8,189

(Dollars in thousands)
As of, and for the six months ended, June 30, 2018	Commercial and industrial			Commercial real estate			Commercial real estate - construction			Lease financing		Residential mortgage			Home equity			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Beginning balance,
January 1, 2018		1,795			4,435			178			—		428			423			3			344		$	7,606
Charge-offs		(129	)		—			(40	)		—		(5	)		(167	)		(10	)		—			(351	)
Recoveries		—			805			—			—		—			—			4			—			809
Provisions		454			(517	)		8			—		18			164			7			(9	)		125
Ending balance,
June 30, 2018		2,120			4,723			146			—		441			420			4			335			8,189
Individually evaluated for impairment		282			238			54			—		—			—			—			—			574
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,838		$	4,485		$	92		$	—	$	441		$	420		$	4		$	335		$	7,615

Loans receivables:
Ending balance	$	204,724		$	575,956		$	82,690		$	153	$	120,260		$	47,815		$	4,881		$	—		$	1,036,479
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment		4,324			2,261			367			—		728			8			—			—			7,688
Ending balance: acquired with credit deterioration		23			1,466			—			—		493			—			—			—			1,982
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	200,377		$	572,229		$	82,323		$	153	$	119,039		$	47,807		$	4,881		$	—		$	1,026,809

The recorded investments in troubled debt restructured loans at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as follows:

Mid Penn entered into forbearance or modification agreements on all loans currently classified as troubled debt restructures and all of these agreements have resulted in additional principal repayment. The terms of these forbearance agreements vary and generally involve modifications from the original loan agreements including either a reduction in the amount of principal payments for certain or extended periods, interest rate reductions, and/or the intent for the loan to be repaid as collateral is sold.

Mid Penn’s troubled debt restructured loans at June 30, 2019 totaled $2,665,000 and included $2,162,000 of troubled debt restructurings attributable to nine loans among four relationships which were classified as nonaccrual impaired based upon a collateral evaluation in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. One large relationship accounted for $1,423,000 of the total $2,162,000 of these nonaccrual impaired troubled debt restructured loans. The remaining troubled debt restructurings were three loans totaling $503,000 representing accruing impaired residential mortgage loans to unrelated borrowers in compliance with the terms of the modification.

Mid Penn’s troubled debt restructured loans at December 31, 2018 totaled $7,020,000, and included $6,503,000 of troubled debt restructurings attributable to ten loans among five relationships which were classified as nonaccrual impaired based upon a collateral evaluation in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. Two large relationships accounted for $5,463,000 of the total $6,503,000 in nonaccrual impaired troubled debt restructured loans. The remaining four loans totaling $517,000 represented accruing impaired loans to unrelated borrowers in compliance with the terms of the modification, with three loans being accruing impaired residential mortgages to unrelated borrowers totaling $516,000 and one loan being an accruing impaired home equity loan of $1,000. As of December 31, 2018, there were no defaulted troubled debt restructured loans, as all troubled debt restructured loans were current with respect to their associated forbearance agreements. There were also no defaults on troubled debt restructured loans within twelve months of restructure during 2018.

The decrease in the troubled debt restructured loan balance when compared to the December 31, 2018 amount was due to the successful workout of one nonaccrual troubled debt restructured loan totaling $4,302,000 during the first quarter of 2019. There were no troubled debt restructured loans added during the three or six months ended June 30, 2019 or 2018. As a result of management evaluations at June 30, 2019, June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2018, any necessary specific allocations or charge-offs have been taken as appropriate. There were no charge-offs associated with existing troubled debt restructured loan relationships for the three or six months ended June 30, 2019 or 2018. There were no troubled debt restructured loans that defaulted within twelve months of restructure during the three or six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

The following tables provide activity for the accretable yield of acquired impaired loans from the Phoenix Bancorp, Inc. (March 2015), Scottdale (January 2018), and First Priority (July 2018) acquisitions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019.

As of June 30, 2019, bank premises and equipment held for sale totaled $1,274,000 and consisted of the land and facility for one full service retail banking property. These assets were classified as held for sale due to both (i) Mid Penn’s intent to sell the existing retail office building and land upon relocation of the full service branch staff and operations to a nearby leased facility, and (ii) satisfaction of all the criteria for held-for-sale presentation as stated in ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. An impairment charge of $163,000 was recorded as of June 30, 2019, to adjust the carrying value of the property to reflect the lower of cost or market value. The impairment charge is included in other expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Bank has executed an agreement to sell the property with settlement to occur prior to September 30, 2019.

On January 1, 2019, Mid Penn adopted ASU No. 2016-02 “Leases” (Topic 842), and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 842, which primarily affected the accounting treatment for operating lease agreements in which Mid Penn is the lessee. As of the January 1, 2019 adoption date, Mid Penn leased twenty-four branch locations under non-cancelable operating leases, which expire at various dates through the year ending December 31, 2035. Three of Mid Penn’s operating leases are with related parties. Subsequent to the adoption of Topic 842, Mid Penn entered into a lease agreement for one facility under a non-cancelable finance lease, which commenced March 1, 2019 and expires February 28, 2039.

In 2016, Mid Penn entered into two subleasing agreements with unrelated parties on one of its properties under an operating lease. Both subleases included escalation clauses. The first sublease agreement began on April 1, 2016, while the second sublease began on July 1, 2016. One sublease was terminated during the first quarter of 2019 due to the bankruptcy of the tenant. The remaining sublease ends on March 31, 2021.

Operating and finance lease right-of-use assets, as well as operating lease liabilities, are presented as separate line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, while finance lease liabilities are classified as a component of long term debt. Mid Penn has elected not to include short-term leases (i.e., leases with initial terms of twelve months or less) or equipment leases (deemed immaterial) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

There were no sale and leaseback transactions, leveraged leases, or leases that had not commenced as of June 30, 2019.

Below is a summary of the operating and finance lease right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities, as well as the weighted average lease term (in years) and weighted average discount rate for each of the lease classifications as of June 30, 2019.

A summary of lease costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 are presented below. Interest expense on finance lease liabilities is included in other interest expense, while all other lease costs are included in occupancy expense on Mid Penn’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

A summary of cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities is presented below.

A maturity analysis of operating and finance lease liabilities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to the total operating and finance lease liability amounts is presented below.

The following summary reflects the future minimum rental payments by year under Mid Penn’s operating leases as of December 31, 2018, including a breakdown of the sublease rental income and future minimum payments owned to related parties.

Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. This guidance provides additional information on determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. The guidance also includes information on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.

Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with the fair value measurement and disclosure guidance.

This guidance clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. The guidance provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.

Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in measuring the fair value of an asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity’s own belief about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based upon the best information available in the circumstances. Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. An asset’s or liability’s placement in the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement or disclosure. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2 Inputs - Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3 Inputs - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.

There were no transfers of assets between fair value Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2019 or 2018.

The following tables illustrate the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by hierarchy fair value levels.

Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).

The following tables illustrate the assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis segregated by hierarchy fair value levels.

The following tables present additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which Mid Penn has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine the fair value.

Mid Penn uses the following methodologies and assumptions to estimate the fair value of certain assets and liabilities.

The fair value of securities classified as available for sale is determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities, but rather, relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

Impaired Loans (included in “Net Loans and Leases” in the following tables):

All performing troubled debt restructured loans and loans classified as nonaccrual are deemed to be impaired, and all of these loans are considered collateral dependent; therefore, all of Mid Penn’s impaired loans, whether reporting a specific allowance allocation or not, are considered collateral dependent.

It is Mid Penn’s policy to obtain updated third party valuations on all impaired loans collateralized by real estate within 30 days of the credit being classified as substandard nonaccrual. Prior to receipt of the updated real estate valuation, Mid Penn will use existing real estate valuations to determine any potential allowance for loan loss issues, and will update the allowance impact calculation upon receipt of the updated real estate valuation.

In some instances Mid Penn is not holding real estate as collateral and is relying on business assets (personal property) for repayment. In these circumstances a collateral inspection is performed by Mid Penn personnel to determine an estimated value. The value is based on net book value, as provided by the financial statements, and discounted accordingly based on determinations made by management. Occasionally, Mid Penn will employ an outside service to provide a fair estimate of value based on auction sales or private sales. Management reviews the estimates of these third parties and discounts them accordingly based on management’s judgment, if deemed necessary. Mid Penn considers the estimates used in its impairment analysis to be Level 3 inputs.

Mid Penn actively monitors the values of collateral on impaired loans. This monitoring may require the modification of collateral values, either in a positive or negative way, due to the passage of time or some other change in one or more valuation inputs. Collateral values for impaired loans will be reassessed by management at least every 12 months for possible revaluation by an independent third party.

Certain assets included in foreclosed assets held for sale are carried at fair value and accordingly is presented as measured on a non-recurring basis. Values are estimated using Level 3 inputs, based on appraisals that consider the sales prices of property in the proximate vicinity.

The following table summarizes the carrying value and fair value of financial instruments at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value		Value		Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	48,145	$	48,145	$	40,065	$	40,065
Available-for-sale investment securities		83,404		83,404		111,923		111,923
Held-to-maturity investment securities		160,182		162,863		168,370		166,582
Equity securities		506		506		492		492
Loans held for sale		8,139		8,139		1,702		1,702
Net loans and leases		1,679,402		1,703,362		1,615,670		1,622,287
Restricted investment in bank stocks		6,480		6,480		6,646		6,646
Accrued interest receivable		8,883		8,883		8,244		8,244
Mortgage servicing rights		92		92		101		101

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	1,778,401		1,780,014	$	1,726,026	$	1,725,674
Short-term borrowings		13,000		13,000		43,100		43,100
Long-term debt (a)		61,444		62,542		48,024		44,585
Subordinated debt		27,070		25,450		27,082		24,881
Accrued interest payable		2,696		2,696		2,262		2,262

The Bank’s outstanding and unfunded credit commitments and financial standby letters of credit were deemed to have no significant fair value as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

The following tables present the carrying amount, fair value, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of Mid Penn’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Carrying values approximate fair values for cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing time balances with other financial institutions, loans held for sale, restricted investment in bank stocks, mortgage servicing rights, accrued interest receivable and payable, and short-term borrowings. Other than cash and cash equivalents, which are considered Level 1 Inputs and mortgage servicing rights, which are Level 3 Inputs, these instruments are Level 2 Inputs. These tables exclude financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value, not previously disclosed.

					Fair Value Measurements
					Quoted Prices
					in Active Markets				Significant
(Dollars in thousands)					for Identical Assets		Significant Other		Unobservable
	Carrying				or Liabilities		Observable Inputs		Inputs
June 30, 2019	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial instruments - assets
Held-to-maturity investment securities	$	160,182	$	162,863	$	—	$	162,863	$	—
Net loans and leases		1,679,402		1,703,362		—		—		1,703,362

Financial instruments - liabilities
Deposits	$	1,778,401	$	1,780,014	$	—	$	1,780,014	$	—
Long-term debt (a)		61,444		62,542		—		62,542		—
Subordinated debt		27,070		25,450		—		25,450		—

					Fair Value Measurements
					Quoted Prices
					in Active Markets				Significant
(Dollars in thousands)					for Identical Assets		Significant Other		Unobservable
	Carrying				or Liabilities		Observable Inputs		Inputs
December 31, 2018	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial instruments - assets
Held-to-maturity investment securities	$	168,370	$	166,582	$	—	$	166,582	$	—
Net loans and leases		1,615,670		1,622,287		—		—		1,622,287

Financial instruments - liabilities
Deposits	$	1,726,026	$	1,725,674	$	—	$	1,725,674	$	—
Long-term debt		48,024		44,585		—		44,585		—
Subordinated debt		27,082		24,881		—		24,881		—

In the normal course of business, Mid Penn makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The commitments include various guarantees and commitments to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Mid Penn evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional commitments to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Mid Penn had $29,797,000 and $20,839,000 of standby letters of credit outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. Mid Penn does not anticipate any losses because of these transactions. The amount of the liability as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 for payment under standby letters of credit issued was not material.

In a letter dated January 24, 2019, notification was received from the FDIC indicating that Mid Penn was eligible for small bank assessment credits. In general, banks that did not pay surcharges during the credit calculation period, defined as the third quarter of 2016 through the third quarter of 2018, are eligible for small bank assessment credits. Small banks with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion were awarded assessment credits for the portion of their assessments that contributed to the growth in the reserve ratio from 1.15 percent to 1.35 percent. Each individual bank’s credit share is calculated as the product of the apportioned share of credits to an individual eligible institution multiplied by the total aggregate credits, and the FDIC’s preliminary estimate of Mid Penn’s total assessment credit is $492,000. Mid Penn and other banks ability to apply and record the small bank assessment credits are contingent on the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund reserve ratio reaching at least 1.38 percent, which had not occurred as of June 30, 2019. The credit can only be applied against future assessments, is not refundable in cash, and cannot be sold.

On July 31, 2018, Mid Penn completed its acquisition of First Priority and assumed $9,500,000 of Subordinated Notes (the “First Priority Notes”). In accordance with purchase accounting principles, the First Priority Notes were assigned a fair value premium of $247,000, which is amortized through interest expense until the maturity date of November 30, 2025. The notes are intended to be treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory reporting purposes.

The First Priority Notes agreements were entered into by First Priority, on November 13, 2015, with five accredited investors pursuant to which First Priority issued subordinated notes totaling $9,500,000. The First Priority Notes have a maturity date of November 30, 2025, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.00% per annum. The Notes are non-callable for an initial period of five years and include provisions for redemption pricing between 101.5% and 100.5% of the liquidation value if called after five years but prior to the stated maturity date.

On December 19, 2017, Mid Penn entered into agreements with investors to purchase $10,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Subordinated Notes due 2028 (the “2017 Notes”). The 2017 Notes are intended to be treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The offering closed in December 2017.

The 2017 Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.25% per year for the first five years and then float at the Wall Street Journal’s Prime Rate plus 0.50%, provided that the interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal balance will at no times be less than 5.0%. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2018, for the first five years after issuance and will be payable quarterly in arrears thereafter on January 15, April 15, July 15, and October 15. The 2017 Notes will mature on January 1, 2028 and are redeemable in whole or in part, without premium or penalty, at any time on or after December 21, 2022, and prior to January 1, 2028. Additionally, Mid Penn may redeem the 2017 Notes in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, upon at least 30 days’ notice if: (i) a change or prospective change in law occurs that could prevent Mid Penn from deducting interest payable on the 2017 Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (ii) an event occurs that precludes the 2017 Notes from being recognized as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes; or (iii) Mid Penn becomes required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. In the event of a redemption described in the previous sentence, Mid Penn will redeem the 2017 Notes at 100% of the principal amount of the 2017 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to but excluding the date of redemption.

Holders of the 2017 Notes may not accelerate the maturity of the 2017 Notes, except upon the bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, receivership or similar event of Mid Penn or Mid Penn Bank, its principal banking subsidiary.

On December 9, 2015, Mid Penn sold $7,500,000 aggregate principal amount of Subordinated Debt (the “2015 Notes”) due 2025. The 2015 Notes are treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes.

The 2015 Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.15% per year for the first five years and then float at the Wall Street Journal’s Prime Rate plus 0.50%, provided that the interest rate applicable to the outstanding principal balance will at no time be less than 4.0%. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2016. The 2015 Notes will mature on December 9, 2025 and are redeemable in whole or in part, without premium or penalty, at any time on or after December 9, 2020, and prior to December 9, 2025. Additionally, Mid Penn may redeem the 2015 Notes in whole at any time, or in part from time to time, upon at least 30 days’ notice if: (i) a change or prospective change in law occurs that could prevent Mid Penn from deducting interest payable on the 2015 Notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (ii) an event occurs that precludes the 2015 Notes from being recognized as Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital purposes; or (iii) Mid Penn becomes required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, in each case at 100% of the principal amount of the 2015 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to but excluding the date of redemption.

Holders of the 2015 Notes may not accelerate the maturity of the 2015 Notes, except upon Mid Penn’s or Mid Penn Bank’s bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, receivership or similar event.

ASC Subtopic 835-30, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, requires that debt issuance costs be reported in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the face amount of the related liability. The unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the 2015 Notes and the 2017 Notes were collectively $129,000 at June 30, 2019 and $143,000 at December 31, 2018.

Mid Penn has an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan for directors. The plan provides defined benefits based on years of service. Mid Penn also sponsors a defined benefit health care plan that provides post-retirement medical benefits and life insurance to qualifying full-time employees. These health care and life insurance plans are noncontributory and each plan uses a December 31 measurement date.

As a result of the acquisition of Scottdale, Mid Penn has assumed a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering certain former employees of Scottdale. Mid Penn estimates that it will contribute $600,000 to the defined benefit pension plan in 2019. A December 31 measurement date for the plan is used.

The components of net periodic benefit costs from these defined benefit plans are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2019			2018			2019			2018
Service cost	$	36		$	153		$	1		$	1
Interest cost		65			205			4			5
Expected return on plan assets		(63	)		(211	)		—			—
Amortization (accretion) of prior service cost		—			4			(5	)		(5	)
Amortization of net (gain) or loss		(15	)		—			(1	)		—
Settlement gain		(37	)		(380	)		—			—
Net periodic benefit (income) expense	$	(14	)	$	(229	)	$	(1	)	$	1



	Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2019			2018			2019			2018
Service cost	$	72		$	161		$	2		$	2
Interest cost		129			215			8			9
Expected return on plan assets		(127	)		(211	)		—			—
Amortization (accretion) of prior service cost		—			8			(10	)		(10	)
Amortization of net (gain) or loss		(30	)		—			(2	)		—
Settlement gain		(37	)		(380	)		—			—
Net periodic benefit expense (income)	$	7		$	(207	)	$	(2	)	$	1

Service costs are reported as a component of salaries and employee benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Income, while interest costs, expected return on plan assets, amortization (accretion) of prior service cost, and amortization of (gain) loss are reported as a component of other income.

In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 16, 2018 between Mid Penn and First Priority (the “Merger Agreement”), each share of First Priority Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (the “First Priority Preferred Stock”) outstanding as of July 31, 2018 was converted into the right to receive one share of Mid Penn Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series D, having a $1,000 liquidation preference per share (the “Mid Penn Preferred Stock”). In connection with the Merger, Mid Penn issued 3,404 shares of Mid Penn Preferred Stock totaling $3,404,000.

The terms of the Mid Penn Preferred Stock were no less favorable than those of the First Priority Preferred Stock as in effect immediately prior to the Merger. Dividends were payable quarterly on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year. The dividend rate on the Mid Penn Preferred Stock was fixed at 9%.

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the Federal Reserve Bank approved Mid Penn’s request to redeem all 3,404 shares of the Mid Penn Preferred Stock at the $1,000 liquidation value. The redemption of the $3,404,000 of the Mid Penn Preferred Stock was completed and final dividend payment made on December 14, 2018. Accordingly, no preferred stock was outstanding at either December 31, 2018 or June 30, 2019, and no preferred stock dividends were paid during the first six months of 2019.

On May 6, 2014, Mid Penn shareholders approved the 2014 Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”), which authorizes the issuance of awards that shall not exceed, in the aggregate, 100,000 shares of common stock. Awards under the Plan are limited to employees and directors of the Company, and the recipients are selected by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, to advance the best interest of Mid Penn and its shareholders.

Share-based compensation expense relating to restricted stock is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods of the awards and is a component of salaries and benefits expense. As of June 30, 2019, a total of 39,205 restricted shares were granted under the Plan, of which 2,346 shares were forfeited and available for reissuance, 16,633 shares were vested, and the remaining 20,226 shares were unvested. No shares were forfeited during the six months ended June 30, 2019, while 490 shares were forfeited due to a voluntary termination of an employee during the six months ended June 30, 2018. The Plan shares granted and vested resulted in $80,000 in share-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019, while $55,000 of share-based compensation expense was recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Compensation expense related to the Plan was $160,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, and $113,000 for the same period in 2018.

The new leases standard applies a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record, for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months, an asset representing its right to use the underlying asset and a liability to make lease payments. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a practical expedient is available whereby a lessee may elect, by class of underlying asset, not to recognize an ROU asset or lease liability. At inception, lessees must classify all leases as either finance or operating based on five criteria. Balance sheet recognition of finance and operating leases is similar, but the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement, as well as the effect on the statement of cash flows, differs depending on the lease classification.

The new leases standard requires a lessor to classify leases as either sales-type, direct financing or operating, similar to existing U.S. GAAP. Classification depends on the same five criteria used by lessees plus certain additional factors. The subsequent accounting treatment for all three lease types is substantially equivalent to existing U.S. GAAP for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases. However, the new standard updates certain aspects of the lessor accounting model to align it with the new lessee accounting model, as well as with the new revenue standard under Topic 606.

Lessees and lessors are required to provide certain qualitative and quantitative disclosures to enable users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The new leases standard addresses other considerations including identification of a lease, separating lease and non-lease components of a contract, sale and leaseback transactions, modifications, combining contracts, reassessment of the lease term, and re-measurement of lease payments. It also contains comprehensive implementation guidance with practical examples.

On July 30, 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which provides an option to apply the transition provisions of the new standard at the adoption date instead of the earliest comparative period presented. Additionally, the ASU

provides a practical expedient permitting lessors to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component if certain conditions are met.

The amendments for both ASUs are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Specific transition requirements apply.

Mid Penn adopted this standard in the first quarter of 2019 using the option to apply the transition provisions of the new standard at the adoption date instead of the earliest period presented as provided in ASU 2018-11. Additionally, Mid Penn elected to apply all practical expedients as provided in ASU 2016-02, with the exception of the hindsight practical expedient, which was not elected. As a result of the adoption of this standard, effective January 1, 2019, Mid Penn recognized (i) an operating lease ROU asset of $11,661,000, (ii) an operating lease liability of $12,866,000, and (iii) an opening adjustment to retaining earnings of $316,000 to eliminate the remaining balance of the deferred sale/leaseback gain on two retail branch locations which had originally been recorded in 2016. The operating lease liability represents the present value of future payments on twenty-four leased properties within the Mid Penn footprint as of the January 1, 2019 adoption date, while the ROU asset reflects the lease liability, adjusted for deferred/accrued rent balances and the balance of acquisition accounting fair value adjustments of the respective properties as of the adoption date of January 1, 2019.

Subsequent to the adoption of Topic 842, Mid Penn entered into a lease agreement for one facility under a non-cancelable finance lease, which commenced March 1, 2019. As a result of this lease agreement, Mid Penn recognized (i) a finance lease ROU asset of $3,582,000 and (ii) a finance lease liability of $3,601,000 included in the reported amount of long-term debt.

The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income or the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow. See Note 8 - Leases for more information.

In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-01, “Leases: Codification Improvements.” This ASU (1) states that for lessors that are not manufacturers or dealers, the fair value of the underlying asset is its cost, less any volume or trade discounts, as long as there is not a significant amount of time between acquisition of the asset and lease commencement; (2) clarifies that lessors in the scope of ASC 842 (such as the Company) must classify principal payments received from sales-type and direct financing leases in investing activities in the statement of cash flows; and (3) clarifies the transition guidance related to certain interim disclosures provided in the year of adoption. To coincide with the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, the Company elected to early adopt ASU 2019-01 on January 1, 2019. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2018-07: The FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting

The ASU makes certain changes to the accounting for nonemployee awards to align the accounting for share-based payment awards issued to employees and nonemployees. The changes require that the compensation expense associated with nonemployee equity awards with performance conditions be recognized when the achievement of the performance condition is probable, rather than upon achievement of the performance condition. Additionally, the new ASU requires that equity-classified share-based payment awards issued to nonemployees be measured on the grant date, versus the previous GAAP requirement to re-measure the awards through the performance completion date. The current requirement to reassess the classification (equity or liability) for the nonemployee awards upon vesting will be eliminated.

The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including interim periods.

Mid Penn currently issues restricted stock awards to nonemployee directors through the 2014 Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”) as more fully described in Note 14. The single performance condition of the award is that the individual remain a director of Mid Penn through the duration of the vesting period. Mid Penn adopted this standard on January 1, 2019 and the adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements as the compensation expense related to nonemployee equity awards is immaterial to Mid Penn’s overall financial condition.

ASU 2016-13: The FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.

The ASU requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model). Under this model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument (considering estimated prepayments, but not expected extensions or modifications unless reasonable expectation of a troubled debt restructuring exists) from the date of initial recognition of that instrument.

The ASU also replaces the current accounting model for purchased credit impaired loans and debt securities. The allowance for purchased financial assets with a more-than insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination (“PCD assets”) should be determined in a similar manner to other financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis. However, upon initial recognition, the allowance is added to the purchase price (“gross up approach”) to determine the initial amortized cost basis. The subsequent accounting for PCD assets is the same expected loss model described above.

Further, the ASU made certain targeted amendments to the existing impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities. For an AFS debt security for which there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-not requirement to sell, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis. Certain incremental disclosures are required.

In May 2019, FASB issued ASU 2019-05, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief, which provides transition relief for ASU 2016-13 by providing entities with an alternative to irrevocably elect the fair value option for eligible financial assets measured at amortized cost upon adoption of the new credit losses standard. For those entities that have not yet adopted ASU 2016-13, the effective dates for adoption of ASU 2019-05 is the same as those in ASU 2016-13.

ASU 2016-03 has tiered effective dates, with early adoption permitted for all entities as of the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018. For public business entities that are SEC filers, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, including not-for-profit entities and employee benefit plans within the scope of Topics 960 through 965 on plan accounting, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021.

In July 2019, FASB voted to propose a delay in the implementation date of ASU 2016-13 for smaller reporting companies (SRCs) until January 1, 2023. The effective date for larger SEC filers would remain unchanged at January 1, 2020. As of the date of this filing, the full proposal was pending release and will be subject to a 30-day comment period. Mid Penn is considered a SRC as of the most recent measurement date of June 30, 2019; therefore, if the delay is implemented by the FASB as proposed, this would result in Mid Penn delaying the implementation of ASU 2016-13 by three years from January 1, 2020 to January 1, 2023.

Mid Penn is currently evaluating the details of this ASU and the impact the guidance will have on Mid Penn’s consolidated financial statements. Mid Penn expects that it is possible that the ASU may result in an increase in the allowance for credit losses resulting from the change to expected losses for the estimated life of the financial asset, including an allowance for debt securities. The amount of the change in the allowance for credit losses, if any, resulting from the new guidance will be impacted by the portfolio composition and asset quality at the adoption date, as well as economic conditions and forecasts at the time of adoption. Mid Penn has selected a software vendor to support both the implementation of ASU 2016-13 and the ongoing compliance requirements. We have provided our core data to the vendor and completed an assessment of the information to see what, if any, additional data elements may need to be collected to perform the calculation. After all required data elements are collected and loaded into the software, Mid Penn plans to run one quarter of reports based on our current methodology to validate the data flow, and intends to run two quarters under the CECL methodology prior to the adoption of the standard on January 1, 2020.

ASU 2018-13: The FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement

This ASU, issued as part of the FASB’s disclosure framework project to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in financial statements, amends the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements by removing, modifying, and adding certain disclosures.

The ASU is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.

As a result of this ASU, several disclosures were removed from Topic 820, including: (i) disclosure of the valuation process for Level 3 fair value measurements, and (ii) amounts of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. However, some additional disclosures will be required as a result of this ASU, including the requirement to disclose the changes in unrealized gains and losses included in other comprehensive income for the period related to Level 3 recurring fair value measurements, as well as the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. Mid Penn is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on our current disclosures. The adoption of this standard will result in disclosure changes only and will not impact Mid Penn’s overall financial condition.

ASU 2018-14: The FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans

This ASU, issued as part of the FASB’s disclosure framework project to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in financial statements, amends the disclosure requirements related to defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans by removing and adding certain disclosures.

The ASU is effective for public business entities for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted.

As a result of this ASU, several disclosures were removed from Topic 715, including: (i) disclosures of the amounts in accumulated comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year, and (ii) the effects of a one-percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates on the aggregate of service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement health care benefit costs. However, some additional disclosures will be required as a result of this ASU, including the requirement to disclose an explanation for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period. Mid Penn is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on our current disclosures. The adoption of this standard will result in disclosure changes only and will not impact Mid Penn’s overall financial condition.

ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition as of June 30, 2019, compared to year-end 2018, and the Results of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same periods in 2018. For comparative purposes, the June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2018 balances have been reclassified when, and if necessary, to conform to the 2019 presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial tables, statistics, and the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “2018 Annual Report”). The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of operating results expected for the full year.

Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although Mid Penn generally does not make forward-looking statements unless Mid Penn’s management believes its management has a reasonable basis for doing so, Mid Penn cannot guarantee the accuracy of any forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements due to a number of uncertainties and risks, including the risks described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the 2018 Annual Report, and other unforeseen risks. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, even if subsequently made available by us on Mid Penn’s website or otherwise, and Mid Penn undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Certain of the matters discussed in this document and in documents incorporated by reference herein, including matters discussed under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as such may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Mid Penn to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words “expect”, “anticipates”, “intend”, “plan”, “believe”, “estimate”, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Mid Penn’s actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation:

The above list of factors that may affect future performance is illustrative, but by no means exhaustive. Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with this understanding of inherent uncertainty.

Mid Penn’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and conform to general practices within the banking industry. Application of these principles involves significant judgments and estimates by management that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. The judgments and estimates that we used are also based on historical experiences and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and estimates that we have made, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates, which could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the results of our operations. Management of the Company considers the accounting judgments relating to the allowance, the evaluation of the Company’s investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment, the valuation of the Company’s goodwill and other merger-related intangible assets for impairment, and the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, to be the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments.

The allowance represents management’s estimate of probable incurred credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan and lease portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet. Throughout the remainder of this report, the terms “loan” or “loans” refers to both loans and leases.

Valuations for the investment portfolio are determined using quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, investment valuation is based on pricing models, quotes for similar investment securities, and observable yield curves and spreads. In addition to securities valuation, management must assess whether there are any declines in value below the carrying value of the investments that should be considered other than temporary or otherwise require an adjustment in carrying value and recognition of the loss in the consolidated statement of income.

Certain intangible assets generated in connection with acquisitions are periodically assessed for impairment. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment, and if certain events occur which indicate goodwill might be impaired between annual tests, goodwill must be tested when such events occur. In making this assessment, Mid Penn considers a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, current market data, stock price, etc. Similarly, the amortized basis of the core deposit intangible asset and trade name intangible are periodically assessed for impairment. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and Mid Penn’s judgment in applying them to the analysis of core deposit intangible, trade name intangible, and goodwill impairment. Changes in economic and operating conditions could result in goodwill or core deposit intangible or trade name intangible impairment in future periods.

Valuations of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations are measured at fair value as of the acquisition date. In many cases, determining the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires Mid Penn to estimate cash flows expected to result from these assets and liabilities and to discount these cash flows at appropriate rates of interest, which require the utilization of significant estimates and judgment in accounting for the acquisition.

Net income available to common shareholders was $4,403,000 or $0.52 per common share, for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, compared to net income of $2,779,000 or $0.45 per common share for the quarter ended June 30, 2018. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, net income was $8,480,000 or $1.00 per common share, versus $3,783,000 or $0.63 per common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Net income as a percent of average assets (return on average assets, or “ROA”) and net income as a percentage of shareholders' equity (return on average equity, or “ROE”) were as follows (calculated and reported on an annualized basis):

The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 were materially impacted by the acquisitions of Scottdale and First Priority. Please refer to Notes 3 and 4 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 1 for more information on Mid Penn’s completed acquisitions of Scottdale and First Priority.

Net interest income, Mid Penn’s primary source of revenue, is the amount by which interest income on loans and investments exceeds interest incurred on deposits and borrowings. The amount of net interest income is affected by changes in interest rates and changes in the volume and mix of interest-sensitive assets and liabilities. Net interest income and corresponding yields are presented in the analysis below on a taxable-equivalent basis. Income from tax-exempt assets, primarily loans to or securities issued by state and local governments, is adjusted by an amount equivalent to the federal income taxes which would have been paid if the income received on these assets was taxable at the statutory rate of 21 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

The following tables include average balances, amounts, and rates of interest income and expense, interest rate spread, and net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Average Balances, Income and Interest Rates on a Taxable Equivalent Basis
	For the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019									June 30, 2018
	Average						Average			Average						Average
	Balance		Interest				Rates			Balance		Interest				Rates
ASSETS:
Interest Bearing Balances	$	5,030	$	27				2.15	%	$	4,755	$	17				1.43	%
Investment Securities:
Taxable		159,252		938				2.36	%		163,248		913				2.24	%
Tax-Exempt		101,088		739		(a)		2.93	%		95,868		695		(a)		2.91	%
Total Securities		260,340		1,677				2.58	%		259,116		1,608				2.49	%

Federal Funds Sold		21,554		130				2.42	%		34,137		153				1.80	%
Loans and Leases, Net		1,665,568		22,292		(b)		5.37	%		1,017,666		12,137		(b)		4.78	%
Restricted Investment in Bank Stocks		5,996		105				7.02	%		2,825		47				6.67	%
Total Earning Assets		1,958,488		24,231				4.96	%		1,318,499		13,962				4.25	%

Cash and Due from Banks		27,202									23,112
Other Assets		148,054									70,354
Total Assets	$	2,133,744								$	1,411,965

LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Interest-bearing Demand	$	399,187		984				0.99	%	$	358,192		527				0.59	%
Money Market		429,180		1,897				1.77	%		275,320		587				0.86	%
Savings		190,031		161				0.34	%		172,815		75				0.17	%
Time		471,025		2,234				1.90	%		223,744		808				1.45	%
Total Interest-bearing Deposits		1,489,423		5,276				1.42	%		1,030,071		1,997				0.78	%

Short-term Borrowings		21,320		157				2.95	%		—		—				0.00	%
Long-term Debt		56,153		407				2.91	%		12,269		74				2.42	%
Subordinated Debt		27,074		388				5.75	%		17,339		235				5.44	%
Total Interest-bearing Liabilities		1,593,970		6,228				1.57	%		1,059,679		2,306				0.87	%

Noninterest-bearing Demand		288,268									199,299
Other Liabilities		22,625									13,353
Shareholders' Equity		228,881									139,634
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity	$	2,133,744								$	1,411,965

Net Interest Income (taxable equivalent basis)			$	18,003								$	11,656
Taxable Equivalent Adjustment				(233	)								(242	)
Net Interest Income			$	17,770								$	11,414

Total Yield on Earning Assets								4.96	%								4.25	%
Rate on Supporting Liabilities								1.57	%								0.87	%
Average Interest Spread								3.40	%								3.37	%
Net Interest Margin								3.69	%								3.55	%

	Three months ended
	June 30, 2019 vs. 2018
(Dollars in thousands on a Taxable Equivalent Basis)	Increase (decrease)
	Volume			Rate		Net
INTEREST INCOME:
Interest Bearing Balances	$	1		$	9	$	10
Investment Securities:
Taxable		(22	)		47		25
Tax-Exempt		38			6		44
Total Securities		16			53		69

Federal Funds Sold		(56	)		33		(23	)
Loans and Leases, Net		7,727			2,428		10,155
Restricted Investment Bank Stocks		53			5		58
Total Interest Income		7,741			2,528		10,269

INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest Bearing Deposits:
Interest Bearing Demand		60			397		457
Money Market		328			982		1,310
Savings		7			79		86
Time		893			533		1,426
Total Interest Bearing Deposits		1,288			1,991		3,279

Short-term Borrowings		157			—		157
Long-term Debt		265			68		333
Subordinated Debt		132			21		153
Total Interest Expense		1,842			2,080		3,922

NET INTEREST INCOME	$	5,899		$	448	$	6,347

Taxable-equivalent net interest income was $18,003,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $6,347,000 or 56 percent compared to the three months ended June 30, 2018. Net interest income in the first six months of 2019 was positively impacted by the loans and investment securities acquired during the First Priority transaction.

For the three months ended June 30, 2019, Mid Penn’s tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.69% compared to 3.55% for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as year-over-year increases in yields on interest-earning assets and growth in noninterest-bearing deposits more than offset the impact of both (i) the rising cost of both deposit and borrowed funds as a result of the FOMC rate increases in 2018, and (ii) the higher volume of wholesale funding sources, including the assumption of some higher-cost brokered time deposits and subordinated debt in the First Priority acquisition, and certain short-term borrowings added since June 30, 2018 to fund anticipated near-term loan growth, and to support liquidity and interest rate management.

The following tables include average balances, amounts, and rates of interest income and expense, interest rate spread, and net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Average Balances, Income and Interest Rates on a Taxable Equivalent Basis
	For the Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019									June 30, 2018
	Average						Average			Average						Average
	Balance		Interest				Rates			Balance		Interest				Rates
ASSETS:
Interest Bearing Balances	$	5,592	$	57				2.06	%	$	4,273	$	26				1.23	%
Investment Securities:
Taxable		162,339		1,927				2.39	%		158,381		1,751				2.23	%
Tax-Exempt		104,385		1,523		(a)		2.94	%		95,644		1,341		(a)		2.83	%
Total Securities		266,724		3,450				2.61	%		254,025		3,092				2.45	%

Federal Funds Sold		16,452		198				2.43	%		39,284		321				1.65	%
Loans and Leases, Net		1,647,624		43,454		(b)		5.32	%		997,749		23,534		(b)		4.76	%
Restricted Investment in Bank Stocks		5,992		187				6.29	%		2,875		133				9.33	%
Total Earning Assets		1,942,384		47,346				4.92	%		1,298,206		27,106				4.21	%

Cash and Due from Banks		27,687									28,916
Other Assets		143,124									68,424
Total Assets	$	2,113,195								$	1,395,546

LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Interest-bearing Demand	$	390,879		1,837				0.95	%	$	360,768		1,020				0.57	%
Money Market		408,468		3,360				1.66	%		265,208		1,081				0.82	%
Savings		195,343		337				0.35	%		170,589		150				0.18	%
Time		479,250		4,328				1.82	%		215,651		1,526				1.43	%
Total Interest-bearing Deposits		1,473,940		9,862				1.35	%		1,012,216		3,777				0.75	%

Short-term Borrowings		27,869		389				2.81	%		1,518		12				1.59	%
Long-term Debt		52,161		761				2.94	%		12,297		149				2.44	%
Subordinated Debt		27,077		776				5.78	%		17,337		470				5.47	%
Total Interest-bearing Liabilities		1,581,047		11,788				1.50	%		1,043,368		4,408				0.85	%

Noninterest-bearing Demand		282,503									195,597
Other Liabilities		22,740									13,599
Shareholders' Equity		226,905									142,982
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity	$	2,113,195								$	1,395,546

Net Interest Income (taxable equivalent basis)			$	35,558								$	22,698
Taxable Equivalent Adjustment				(482	)								(406	)
Net Interest Income			$	35,076								$	22,292

Total Yield on Earning Assets								4.92	%								4.21	%
Rate on Supporting Liabilities								1.50	%								0.85	%
Average Interest Spread								3.41	%								3.35	%
Net Interest Margin								3.69	%								3.53	%

	Six months ended
	June 30, 2019 vs. 2018
(Dollars in thousands on a Taxable Equivalent Basis)	Increase (decrease)
	Volume			Rate			Net
INTEREST INCOME:
Interest Bearing Balances	$	8		$	23		$	31
Investment Securities:
Taxable		44			132			176
Tax-Exempt		123			59			182
Total Securities		167			191			358

Federal Funds Sold		(187	)		64			(123	)
Loans and Leases, Net		15,329			4,591			19,920
Restricted Investment Bank Stocks		144			(90	)		54
Total Interest Income		15,461			4,779			20,240

INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest Bearing Deposits:
Interest Bearing Demand		85			732			817
Money Market		584			1,695			2,279
Savings		22			165			187
Time		1,865			937			2,802
Total Interest Bearing Deposits		2,556			3,529			6,085

Short-term Borrowings		208			169			377
Long-term Debt		483			129			612
Subordinated Debt		264			42			306
Total Interest Expense		3,511			3,869			7,380

NET INTEREST INCOME	$	11,950		$	910		$	12,860

Taxable-equivalent net interest income was $35,558,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $12,860,000 or 57 percent compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018. Net interest income in the first quarter of 2019 was positively impacted by the loans and investment securities acquired during the First Priority transaction.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, Mid Penn’s tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.69% versus 3.53% for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Year-over-year increases in yields on interest-earning assets and growth in noninterest-bearing deposits more than offset the impact of both (i) the rising cost of both deposit and borrowed funds as a result of the FOMC rate increases in 2018, and (ii) the higher volume of wholesale funding sources, including brokered time deposits and subordinated debt assumed in the First Priority acquisition, and other short-term borrowings added since June 30, 2018 to support liquidity and interest rate management while also partially funding loan growth.

Although the effective interest rate impact on earning assets and funding sources can be reasonably estimated at current interest rate levels, the interest-bearing product and pricing options selected by customers, and the future mix of the loan, investment, and deposit products in the Bank's portfolios, may significantly change the estimates used in Mid Penn’s asset and liability management and related interest rate risk simulation models. In addition, our net interest income may be impacted by further interest rate actions of FOMC.

The provision for loan and lease losses is the expense necessary to maintain the allowance at a level adequate to absorb management’s estimate of probable losses in the loan and lease portfolio. Mid Penn’s provision for loan and lease losses is based upon management’s monthly review of the loan portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans and leases, analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan and lease growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the markets Mid Penn serves.

Mid Penn has maintained the allowance in accordance with Mid Penn’s assessment process, which takes into consideration, among other relevant factors, the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, the growth in the loan portfolio during the first six months of 2019, and shifting collateral values from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019.

Management performs a monthly evaluation of the adequacy of the loan and lease loss allowance and based on this evaluation, a loan loss provision of $465,000 was recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2019. No loan loss provision was recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2018. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the provision for loan and lease losses was $590,000 compared to $125,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans was 0.52% at both June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, and 0.79% at June 30, 2018. This ratio reflects the impact of the entire portfolio of First Priority loans being added after June 30, 2018 at fair value with no accompanying loan and lease loss allowance in accordance with purchase accounting GAAP. For further discussion of factors affecting the provision for loan and lease losses, please see Credit Quality, Credit Risk, and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses in the Financial Condition section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

During the three months ended June 30, 2019, noninterest income totaled $2,874,000, an increase of $961,000 or 50 percent, compared to noninterest income of $1,913,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, noninterest income totaled $4,923,000, an increase of $1,363,000 or 38 percent, compared to noninterest income of $3,560,000 for the same period in 2018.

Income from fiduciary activities was $706,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $180,000 or 34 percent, compared to fiduciary income of $526,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. These additional revenues were attributed to continued growth in trust assets under management, and increased sales of retail investment products, as a result of successful business development efforts by Mid Penn’s trust and wealth management team.

ATM debit card interchange income was $714,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $123,000 or 21 percent compared to interchange income of $591,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The increase resulted from increasing card-transaction usage across our customer base, as well as the added volume from demand deposit accounts assumed in the First Priority acquisition.

Mortgage banking income was $1,514,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $1,153,000 or over 300 percent compared to mortgage banking income for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Longer-term mortgage interest rates have declined significantly in the first six months of 2019, resulting in a higher level of mortgage originations and secondary-market loan sales during the first six months of 2019 when compared to the same period in 2018. Additionally, Mid Penn expanded its team of residential mortgage originators in southeastern Pennsylvania during the first quarter of 2019, contributing to the larger volume of mortgage loans originated and sold in the six months ended June 30, 2019.

Other income was $749,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, a decrease of $97,000 compared to other income of $846,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Although wire transfer and other fees increased in 2019, these were more than offset by a decline in pension settlement gain income year over year. During the first half of 2018, Mid Penn recognized $290,000 of defined benefit pension plan settlement gains from certain plan participants receiving lump sum benefit payouts (the plan and related liabilities were assumed as a result of the Scottdale acquisition). During the first half of 2019, a lower amount of pension plan lump sum payouts occurred, with related settlement gains totaling $37,000.

Net gains on sales of securities were $24,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, a decrease of $78,000 compared to net gains on sales of securities of $102,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. During the first half of 2018, some investment securities acquired from Scottdale were subsequently sold at gains to ensure that the overall portfolio was in alignment with Mid Penn’s investment management objectives. The volume of investment sales, and realized gains, were less during the first six months of 2019, with such sales related to interest rate and liquidity management.

Noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019 totaled $14,796,000, an increase of $4,700,000 or 47 percent compared to noninterest expenses of $10,096,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018. For the six months ended June 30, 2019, noninterest expense totaled $29,099,000, an increase of $7,820,000 or 37 percent, compared to noninterest expense of $21,279,000 for the same period in 2018. The significant increase in noninterest expense was driven by continued franchise expansion which occurred in the twelve months following June 30, 2018, including (i) the acquisition of First Priority in July 2018 and the associated staff, facilities, and technology licensing costs, and (ii) the expansion of Mid Penn’s mortgage banking division in the southeastern Pennsylvania market.

The changes were primarily a result of the following components of noninterest expense, which had significant variances when comparing results for periods ending in 2019 versus the corresponding period in 2018:

Salaries and employee benefits expenses were $15,545,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $5,649,000 or 57 percent, versus the same period in 2018, with the increase primarily attributable to (i) the retail staff additions at the eight retail locations added through the First Priority acquisition, effective July 31, 2018, (ii) the back-office and loan originator staff additions as a result of the expansion of the mortgage banking division, and (iii) the addition of commercial lending and credit administration personnel and other staff additions in alignment with Mid Penn’s core banking growth.

Occupancy expenses increased $1,078,000 or 65 percent during the first six months of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. Similarly, equipment expense increased $333,000 or 35 percent during the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2018. These increases related to the incremental facilities operating costs including rent, utilities, and depreciation expense for the buildings and equipment associated with (i) the acquisition of the First Priority retail offices, and (ii) an investment in a corporate administrative facility to promote long-term operational and processing efficiencies by centralizing several back-office functions supporting the broader franchise.

FDIC assessment expense was $673,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $352,000 or 110 percent compared to $321,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The increase in assessment expense generally reflects the larger total asset profile (from both acquisition and organic growth activity) upon which the assessment is based.

Legal and professional fees for the six months ended June 30, 2019 increased by $413,000 or 86 percent compared to the same period in 2018 due to increased use of third-party providers for audit and risk assessment activities, information technology support, and human resources services.

Software licensing and utilization costs were $2,132,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $448,000 or 27 percent compared to $1,684,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The increase is a result of additional costs to license (i) the locations and staff for the First Priority offices, the Pillow branch, and the expanded mortgage banking division, all of which were added after June 30, 2018; (ii) upgrades to internal systems to enhance data management and storage capabilities given the larger company profile; and (iii) increases in certain core processing fees as our customer base and account/transaction volumes continue to grow.

Intangible amortization increased from $496,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2018 to $723,000 during the same period in 2019 due to the core deposit intangible asset added from the First Priority acquisition in July 2018 which, similar to previously recorded core deposit intangibles, is being amortized using the sum of the years’ digit method over a ten-year period starting on date of acquisition.

Other expenses were $3,988,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $1,188,000 or 42 percent compared to other expense of $2,800,000 for the same period in 2018. As the First Priority acquisition and organic growth have increased the organization’s geographic profile and employee base, several categories within other expense experienced increases, including insurance costs, charitable donations, stationary and supplies, printing, loan collection costs, and directors’ fees.

No merger expenses were recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2019. During the first six months of 2018, merger and acquisition expenses totaling $1,916,000 were recorded including investment banking fees, merger-related legal and professional fees, severance costs, and information technology conversion/termination costs incurred for the acquisitions of First Priority and Scottdale.

The provision for income taxes was $980,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $452,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was 18.2 percent compared to 14.0 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2018. The provision for income taxes was $1,830,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared to $665,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was 17.8 percent compared to 15.0 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2018.

Generally, Mid Penn’s effective tax rate is below the statutory rate due to earnings on tax-exempt loans, investments, and earnings from the cash surrender value of life insurance, as well as the impact of tax credits. The realization of Mid Penn’s deferred tax assets is dependent on future earnings. Mid Penn currently anticipates that future earnings will be adequate to fully realize the currently recorded deferred tax assets.

Mid Penn’s total assets were $2,136,122,000 as of June 30, 2019, reflecting an increase of $58,141,000 or 3 percent compared to total assets of $2,077,981,000 as of December 31, 2018. Asset growth during the first six months of 2019 was primarily attributable to (i) net organic loan growth, (ii) an increase in liquid assets primarily from demand deposit growth, and (iii) the recording of operating and finance lease right of use assets as a result of Mid Penn’s adoption of Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 842 – Leases effective January 1, 2019, which required adopting entities to record a right of use asset and related liability for leases of property or equipment.

Total loans at June 30, 2019 were $1,688,173,000 compared to $1,624,067,000 at December 31, 2018, an increase of $64,106,000 or 4 percent since year-end 2018. The majority of the growth was commercial and industrial financing, and commercial real estate credits.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, Mid Penn had net loan charge-offs of $216,000 compared to net recoveries of $458,000 during the same period in 2018. The net charge-off position in 2019 was primarily due to a $205,000 charge-off taken on one relationship during the second quarter of 2019. The favorable net recovery position during the second quarter of 2018 was driven by the recovery of $777,000 of principal from the successful workout of a commercial real estate relationship that originally had a large partial charge-off in 2009.

Loans charged off during the first six months of 2019 totaled $304,000 and included one commercial and industrial loan for $205,000, two commercial real estate (construction) loans for $40,000, one commercial real estate loan for $12,000, two consumer loans for $29,000, and $18,000 in deposit account charge-offs. Mid Penn may need to make future adjustments to the allowance and the provision for loan and lease losses if economic conditions or loan credit quality differs substantially from the assumptions used in making Mid Penn’s evaluation of the level of the allowance for loan losses as compared to the balance of outstanding loans.

Changes in the allowance for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are summarized as follows:

Other than as described herein, Mid Penn does not believe there are any trends or events at this time that are reasonably expected to have a material impact on future results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. Further, based on known information, Mid Penn believes that the effects of current and past economic conditions and other unfavorable business conditions may influence certain borrowers’ abilities to comply with their repayment terms. Mid Penn continues to monitor closely the financial strength of these borrowers. Mid Penn does not engage in practices which may be used to artificially shield certain borrowers from the negative economic or business cycle effects that may compromise their ability to repay. Mid Penn does not normally structure construction loans with interest reserve components. Mid Penn has not in the past performed any commercial real estate or other type of loan workouts whereby an existing loan was restructured into multiple new loans. Also, Mid Penn does not extend loans at maturity solely due to the existence of guarantees, without recognizing the credit as impaired. While the existence of a guarantee may be a mitigating factor in determining the proper level of allowance once impairment has been identified, the guarantee does not affect the impairment analysis.

The following table presents the change in nonperforming asset categories as of June 30, 2019, December 31, 2018, and June 30, 2018.

(Dollars in thousands)
	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			June 30, 2018
Nonperforming Assets:
Nonaccrual loans	$	6,165		$	10,749		$	8,612
Accruing troubled debt restructured loans		503			517			531
Total nonperforming loans		6,668			11,266			9,143

Foreclosed real estate		390			1,017			912
Total non-performing assets		7,058			12,283			10,055

Accruing loans 90 days or more past due		—			—			—
Total risk elements	$	7,058		$	12,283		$	10,055

Nonperforming loans as a % of total
loans outstanding		0.39	%		0.69	%		0.88	%

Nonperforming assets as a % of total
loans outstanding and other real estate		0.42	%		0.76	%		0.97	%

Ratio of allowance for loan losses
to nonperforming loans		131.54	%		74.53	%		89.57	%

In the table above, troubled debt restructured loans that are no longer accruing interest are included in nonaccrual loans. The decrease was primarily due to the successful workout and repayment of a nonaccrual commercial credit relationship totaling $4,302,000 during the first quarter of 2019.

One loan relationship, which accounts for $1,423,000 of the non-performing loan balance as of June 30, 2019, was comprised of four loans collateralized primarily by commercial real estate, as well as certain machinery and equipment. As part of the workout process, the loans in this relationship were modified as troubled debt restructured loans during 2017. During the second quarter of 2018, certain commercial real estate collateral was sold resulting in the principal payoff of three loans within this loan relationship totaling $1,393,000. Given that the fair value of the remaining collateral exceeds the outstanding principal balance, no specific allowance allocation has been assigned to this relationship. Management expects to recover the remaining outstanding balance through the sale of real estate collateral pledged in support of the loans.

The decrease in foreclosed real estate from $1,017,000 at December 31, 2018 to $390,000 at June 30, 2019 was primarily driven by the sale of seven foreclosed real estate properties with proceeds totaling $907,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2019. These sales were offset by the transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate of $294,000.

Mid Penn assesses a specific allocation for both commercial loans and commercial real estate loans prior to charging down or charging off the loan. Once the charge down is taken, the remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact and is not treated as a restructured credit. The following table provides additional analysis of partially charged-off loans.

Mid Penn considers a commercial loan or commercial real estate loan to be impaired when it becomes 90 days or more past due and not well-secured or otherwise not probable for collection. This methodology assumes the borrower cannot or will not continue to make additional payments. At that time the loan would be considered collateral dependent as the discounted cash flow method indicates no operating income is available for evaluating the collateral position; therefore, most impaired loans are deemed to be collateral dependent.

Mid Penn evaluates loans for charge-off on a monthly basis. Policies that govern the recommendation for charge-off are unique to the type of loan being considered. Commercial loans rated as nonaccrual or lower will first have a collateral evaluation completed in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. Once the collateral evaluation has been completed, a specific allocation of allowance is made based upon the results of the evaluation. The balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). In the event the loan is unsecured, the loan would have been charged-off at the recognition of impairment. Commercial real estate loans rated as impaired will also have an initial collateral evaluation completed in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. An updated real estate valuation is ordered and the collateral evaluation is modified to reflect any variation in value. A specific allocation of allowance is made for any anticipated collateral shortfall. The balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). The process of charge-off for residential mortgage loans begins upon a loan becoming delinquent for 90 days and not in the process of collection. The existing appraisal is reviewed and a lien search is obtained to determine lien position and any instances of intervening liens. A new appraisal of the property will be ordered if deemed necessary by management and a collateral evaluation is completed. The loan will then be charged down to the value indicated in the evaluation. Consumer loans are recommended for charge-off after reaching delinquency of 90 days and the loan is not well-secured or otherwise not probable for collection. The collateral shortfall of the consumer loan is recommended for charge-off at this point.

As noted above, Mid Penn assesses a specific allocation for both commercial loans and commercial real estate loans. The balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). In addition, Mid Penn takes a preemptive step when any commercial loan or commercial real estate loan becomes classified under its internal classification system. A preliminary collateral evaluation in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans is prepared using the existing collateral information in the loan file. This process allows Mid Penn to review both the credit and documentation files to determine the status of the information needed to make a collateral evaluation. This collateral evaluation is preliminary, but allows Mid Penn to determine if any potential collateral shortfalls exist.

Larger groups of small-balance loans, such as residential mortgages and consumer installment loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, individual consumer and residential loans are not separately identified for impairment disclosures unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.

Mid Penn’s rating system assumes any loans classified as substandard nonaccrual to be impaired, and most of these loans are considered collateral dependent; therefore, most of Mid Penn’s impaired loans, whether reporting a specific allocation or not, are considered collateral dependent.

It is Mid Penn’s policy to obtain updated third party valuations on all impaired loans collateralized by real estate as soon as practically possible following the credit being classified as substandard nonaccrual. Prior to receipt of the updated real estate valuation Mid Penn will use any existing real estate valuation to determine any potential allowance issues; however, no allowance recommendation will be made until such time Mid Penn is in receipt of the updated valuation. The Asset Recovery department employs an electronic tracking system to monitor the receipt of and need for updated appraisals. To date, there have been no material time lapses noted with the above processes.

In some instances Mid Penn is not holding real estate as collateral and is relying on business assets (personal property) for repayment. In these circumstances a collateral inspection is performed by Mid Penn personnel to determine an estimated value. The value is based on net book value, as provided by the financial statements, and discounted accordingly based on determinations made by management. Occasionally, Mid Penn will employ an outside service to provide a fair estimate of value based on auction or private sales. Management reviews the estimates of these third parties and discounts them accordingly based on management’s judgment, if deemed necessary.

For impaired loans with no valuation allowance required, Mid Penn’s practice of obtaining independent third party market valuations on the subject property as soon as practically possible of being placed on nonaccrual status sometimes indicates that the loan to value ratio is sufficient to obviate the need for a specific allocation in spite of significant deterioration in real estate values in Mid Penn’s primary market area. These circumstances are determined on a case by case analysis of the impaired loans.

Mid Penn had loans with an aggregate balance of $6,669,000 deemed impaired at June 30, 2019. Excluding $2,883,000 in loans acquired with credit deterioration in connection with the closing of the Phoenix Bancorp, Inc. (“Phoenix”) acquisition in 2015, and the Scottdale and First Priority acquisitions in 2018, Mid Penn had several loan relationships deemed impaired with an aggregate carrying balance of $3,786,000. This pool of impaired loans was further broken down into a group of loans with an aggregate carrying balance of $585,000, for which specific allocations totaling $256,000 were included within the loan loss reserve for these loans. The remaining $3,201,000 of loans required no specific allocation within the loan loss reserve. Of the $3,786,000 of impaired loan relationships, excluding the loans acquired with credit deterioration from the Phoenix, Scottdale, and First Priority acquisitions, $2,745,000 were commercial real estate relationships, $897,000 were residential relationships, $76,000 were commercial and industrial relationships, $40,000 were commercial real estate – construction relationships, and $28,000 were home equity relationships. There were specific loan loss reserve allocations of $243,000 against the commercial real estate relationships and $13,000 against the commercial and industrial relationships. Management currently believes that the specific reserves are adequate to cover probable future losses related to these relationships.

The allowance is a reserve established in the form of a provision expense for loan and lease losses and is reduced by loan charge-offs net of recoveries. In conjunction with an internal loan review function that operates independently of the lending function, management monitors the loan portfolio to identify risk on a monthly basis so that an appropriate allowance is maintained. Based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, management presents a monthly review of the allowance to the Board of Directors, indicating any changes in the allowance since the last review. In making the evaluation, management considers the results of recent regulatory examinations, which typically include a review of the allowance as an integral part of the examination process. As part of the examination process, federal or state regulatory agencies may require Mid Penn to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management.

In establishing the allowance, management evaluates on a quantitative basis individual classified loans and nonaccrual loans, and determines an aggregate reserve for those loans based on that review. In addition, an allowance for the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio is determined based on historical loss experience within certain components of the portfolio. These allocations may be modified if current conditions indicate that loan and lease losses may differ from historical experience.

In addition, a portion of the allowance is established for losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio which have not been identified by the quantitative processes described above. This determination inherently involves a higher degree of subjectivity, and considers risk factors that may not have yet manifested themselves in historical loss experience. These factors include:

While the allowance is maintained at a level believed to be adequate by management to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio, determination of the allowance is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The unallocated component of the allowance for loan and lease losses covers several considerations that are not specifically measurable through either the specific or general components. For example, we believe that we could face increasing credit risks and uncertainties, not yet reflected in recent historical losses or qualitative factor assessments, associated with unpredictable changes in economic growth or business conditions in our markets or for certain industries in which we have commercial loan borrowers, or unanticipated stresses to the values of real estate held as collateral. Any or all of these additional issues can adversely affect our borrowers’ ability to timely repay their loans. Additionally, we have experienced continued strong commercial loan growth, including growth in newer markets where we have less of a loss history. Also, the unallocated component allocation recognizes the inherent imprecision in our allowance for loan and lease loss methodology, or any alternative methodology, for estimating specific and general loan losses, including the unpredictable timing and amounts of charge-offs, the fact that historical loss averages don’t necessarily correlate to future loss trends, and unexpected changes to specific-credit or general portfolio future cash flows and collateral values which could negatively impact unimpaired portfolio loss factors. Changes from these various other uncertainties and considerations may impact the provisions charged to expense in future periods.

Management believes, based on information currently available, that the allowance of $8,771,000 is adequate as of June 30, 2019 to cover specifically identifiable loan losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable.

Mid Penn’s objective is to maintain adequate liquidity to meet funding needs at a reasonable cost and to provide contingency plans to meet unanticipated funding needs or a loss of funding sources, while minimizing interest rate risk. Adequate liquidity provides resources for credit needs of borrowers, for depositor withdrawals, and for funding corporate operations. Sources of liquidity are as follows:

The major sources of cash received in the first six months of 2019 were from the $52,375,000 net increase in deposits and $40,455,000 proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities.

Major uses of cash in the first six months of 2019 were $65,989,000 to fund mortgage loans originated for sale and $64,616,000 to fund portfolio loan growth (primarily commercial loans).

Mid Penn believes its core deposits are generally stable even in periods of changing interest rates. Liquidity is measured and monitored daily, allowing management to better understand and react to balance sheet trends. These measurements indicate that liquidity generally remains stable and exceeds our minimum defined levels of adequacy. Other than the trends of continued competitive pressures and volatile interest rates, there are no known demands, commitments, events, or uncertainties that will result in, or that are reasonably likely to result in, liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way.

On at least a quarterly basis, a comprehensive liquidity analysis is reviewed by the Asset Liability Committee and Board of Directors. The analysis provides a summary of the current liquidity measurements, projections, and future liquidity positions given various levels of liquidity stress. Management also maintains a detailed Contingency Funding Plan designed to respond to overall stress in the financial condition of the banking industry or a liquidity problem specific to Mid Penn.

On July 31, 2018, Mid Penn completed its acquisition of First Priority and assumed $9,500,000 of Subordinated Notes (the “First Priority Notes”). In accordance with purchase accounting principles, the First Priority Notes were assigned a fair value premium of $247,000 which is being amortized through interest expense until the maturity date of November 30, 2025. The notes are intended to be treated as Tier 2 capital for regulatory reporting purposes.

The First Priority Notes agreements were entered into by First Priority on November 13, 2015 with five accredited investors, pursuant to which First Priority issued subordinated notes totaling $9,500,000. The First Priority Notes have a maturity date of November 30, 2025, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.00% per annum. The Notes are non-callable for an initial period of five years and include provisions for redemption pricing between 101.5% and 100.5% of the liquidation value, if called after five years but prior to the stated maturity date.

Holders of the 2015 Notes may not accelerate the maturity of the 2015 Notes, except upon Mid Penn’s or Mid Penn Bank’s bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, receivership or similar event.

In July 2013, the federal banking agencies issued final rules to implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The phase-in period for community banking organizations began January 1, 2016. The final rules implemented higher minimum capital requirements, added a new common equity Tier 1 capital requirement, and established criteria that instruments must meet to be considered common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital or Tier 2 capital. Under the new rules, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity Tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements, which amount (when fully phased in) must be greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets at January 1, 2019. The phase-in period for the capital conservation and countercyclical capital buffers for all banking organizations began on January 1, 2016 at the initial rate of 0.625%.

A summary of the payout restrictions based on the capital conservation buffer is as follows:

Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to common equity Tier 1 capital began on January 1, 2016 and were phased-in over a three-year period. The final rules called for the following minimum capital requirements to be considered “well-capitalized” (which include the impact of the capital conservation buffer that was effective January 1, 2016):

The final rules allowed community banks to make a one-time election not to include the additional components of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) in regulatory capital and instead use the existing treatment under the general risk-based capital rules that excludes most AOCI components from regulatory capital. Mid Penn made the election not to include the additional components of AOCI in regulatory capital.

The final rules permanently grandfathered non-qualifying capital instruments (such as trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock) issued before May 19, 2010 for inclusion in the Tier 1 capital of banking organizations with total consolidated assets less than $15 billion as of December 31, 2009 and banking organizations that were mutual holding companies as of May 19, 2010.

Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act, the new rules replaced the ratings-based approach to securitization exposures, which is based on external credit ratings, with the simplified supervisory formula approach in order to determine the appropriate risk weights for these exposures. Alternatively, banking organizations may use the existing gross-ups approach to assign securitization exposures to a risk weight category or choose to assign such exposures a 1,250% risk weight.

Under the new rules, mortgage servicing assets (“MSAs”) and certain deferred tax assets (“DTAs”) are subject to stricter limitations than those applicable under the current general risk-based capital rule. The new rules also increase the risk weights for past-due loans, certain risk weights and credit conversion factors.

Mid Penn has implemented these changes in determining and reporting the regulatory ratios of Mid Penn and the Bank, and has concluded that the new rules do not have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition.

Shareholders' equity, or capital, is evaluated in relation to total assets and the risk associated with those assets. The greater a corporation’s capital resources, the more likely it is to meet its cash obligations and absorb unforeseen losses. Too much capital, however, indicates that not enough of the corporation’s earnings have been invested in the continued growth of the business or paid to shareholders. An excess capital position may make it difficult for a corporation to offer a competitive return on the shareholders’ capital going forward. For these reasons capital adequacy and capital management have been, and will continue to be, of paramount importance.

Shareholders’ equity increased by $8,053,000 or 4 percent from $223,209,000 as of December 31, 2018 to $231,262,000 as of June 30, 2019. The increase in shareholders’ equity reflects both (i) the growth in retained earnings through year-to-date net income, net of dividends paid, through the first six months of 2019, and (ii) the year-to-date accumulated other comprehensive income from the after-tax appreciation in the market value of the available-for-sale investment portfolio. Regulatory capital ratios for both Mid Penn and its banking subsidiary exceeded regulatory “well-capitalized” levels at both June 30, 2019 and 2018.

Banks are evaluated for capital adequacy based on the ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets and total assets. The minimum capital to risk-weighted assets requirements, including the capital conservation buffers, which became effective for Mid Penn and the Bank on January 1, 2016 are illustrated below. At June 30, 2019, regulatory capital ratios for both Mid Penn and the Bank met the definition of a “well-capitalized” institution under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, and exceeded the minimum capital requirements under Basel III.

Mid Penn and Mid Penn Bank maintained the following regulatory capital levels, leverage ratios, and risk-based capital ratios as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	Capital Adequacy
											To Be Well-Capitalized
(Dollars in thousands)											Under Prompt
						Minimum Capital					Corrective
	Actual:					Required:					Action Provisions:
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
As of June 30, 2019:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	160,616		7.8	%	$	82,592		4.0	%	N/A		N/A
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		160,616		9.8	%		115,159		7.0	%	N/A		N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		160,616		9.8	%		139,836		8.5	%	N/A		N/A
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		196,594		12.0	%		172,739		10.5	%	N/A		N/A

Mid Penn Bank
As of June 30, 2019:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	177,429		8.3	%	$	85,397		4.0	%	$	106,746		5.0	%
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		177,429		10.8	%		115,140		7.0	%		106,916		6.5	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		177,429		10.8	%		139,813		8.5	%		131,589		8.0	%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		195,837		11.9	%		172,711		10.5	%		164,486		10.0	%

Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
As of December 31, 2018:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	155,662		8.0	%	$	77,499		4.000	%	N/A		N/A
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		155,662		10.0	%		98,977		6.375	%	N/A		N/A
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		155,662		10.0	%		122,265		7.875	%	N/A		N/A
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		191,300		12.3	%		153,317		9.875	%	N/A		N/A

Mid Penn Bank
As of December 31, 2018:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	171,776		8.9	%	$	77,230		4.000	%	$	96,537		5.0	%
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		171,776		11.1	%		98,963		6.375	%		100,903		6.5	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		171,776		11.1	%		122,248		7.875	%		124,189		8.0	%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		180,332		11.6	%		153,295		9.875	%		155,236		10.0	%

(a) The minimum amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2019 include the fourth year phase in of the capital conservation buffer of 2.5 percent required by the Basel III framework. At December 31, 2018, the minimum amounts and ratios included the third year phase in of the capital conservation buffer of 1.875 percent required by the Basel III framework.

As a financial institution, Mid Penn’s primary source of market risk is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the exposure to fluctuations in Mid Penn’s future earnings (earnings at risk) resulting from changes in interest rates. This exposure or sensitivity is a function of the repricing characteristics of Mid Penn's portfolio of assets and liabilities. Each asset and liability reprices either at maturity or during the life of the instrument. Interest rate sensitivity is measured as the difference between the volume of assets and liabilities that are subject to repricing in a future period of time.

The principal purpose of asset-liability management is to maximize current and future net interest income within acceptable levels of interest rate risk while satisfying liquidity and capital requirements. Net interest income is increased by increasing the net interest margin and by volume growth. Thus, the goal of interest rate risk management is to maintain a balance between risk and reward such that net interest income is maximized while risk is maintained at an acceptable level.

Mid Penn utilizes an asset-liability management model to measure the impact of interest rate movements on its interest rate sensitivity position. Mid Penn’s management also reviews the traditional maturity gap analysis regularly. Mid Penn does not always attempt to achieve an exact match between interest sensitive assets and liabilities because it believes that an actively managed amount of interest rate risk is inherent and appropriate in the management of Mid Penn’s profitability.

Modeling techniques and simulation analysis involve assumptions and estimates that inherently cannot be measured with complete precision. Key assumptions in the analyses include maturity and repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities, prepayments on amortizing assets, non-maturing deposit sensitivity, and loan and deposit pricing. These assumptions are inherently uncertain due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of rate changes and changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors. However, the analyses are useful in quantifying risk and provide a relative gauge of Mid Penn’s interest rate risk position over time.

Management reviews interest rate risk on a quarterly basis. This analysis includes earnings scenarios whereby interest rates are increased and decreased by 100, 200, and 300 basis points. These scenarios, detailed in the table below, indicate that Mid Penn would experience enhanced net interest income over a one-year time frame due to upward interest rate changes, while a reduction in interest rates would result in a decline in net interest income over a one-year time frame; however, actual results could vary significantly from the calculations prepared by management. At June 30, 2019, all interest rate risk levels according to the model were within the tolerance limits of the Board-approved policy.

Mid Penn maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that Mid Penn files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based upon their evaluation of those controls and procedures as of June 30, 2019, Mid Penn’s management, with the participation of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.

There were no changes in Mid Penn’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, Mid Penn’s internal control over financial reporting during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019.

Based on information currently available, management is not aware of any litigation that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of Mid Penn or its subsidiaries taken as a whole. There are no proceedings pending other than ordinary routine litigation occurring in the normal course of business. In addition, management does not know of any material proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities against Mid Penn or any of its properties.

Management has reviewed the risk factors that were previously disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, to determine if there were material changes applicable to the six months ended June 30, 2019. There are no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Pennsylvania		25-1666413
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

349 Union Street Millersburg, Pennsylvania		17061
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)


Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☒	Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☒	Emerging growth company ☐

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION			3

	Item 1 – Financial Statements		3

		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (Unaudited)	3

		Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)	4

		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)	5

		Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)	6

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 (Unaudited)	7

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	9

	Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		47

	Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		63

	Item 4 – Controls and Procedures		63

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION			64

	Item 1 – Legal Proceedings		64

	Item 1A – Risk Factors		64

	Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		64

	Item 3 – Defaults upon Senior Securities		64

	Item 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures		64

	Item 5 – Other Information		64

	Item 6 – Exhibits		64

	Signatures		65

(Dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018

Net income	$	4,403		$	2,779

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Unrealized income (losses) arising during the period on available-for-sale
securities, net of income taxes of $313 and ($98), respectively		1,179			(368	)

Reclassification adjustment for net gain on sales of available-for-sale securities
included in net income, net of income taxes of ($4) and ($1), respectively (a)		(14	)		(3	)

Change in defined benefit plans, net of income taxes of ($90) and $357, respectively (b)		(339	)		1,343

Reclassification adjustment for settlement gains on benefit plans, net of income taxes
of ($8) and ($80), respectively (c)		(29	)		(300	)

Total other comprehensive income		797			672

Total comprehensive income	$	5,200		$	3,451

(Dollars in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019			2018

Net income	$	8,480		$	3,783

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Unrealized income (losses) arising during the period on available-for-sale
securities, net of income taxes of $796 and ($564), respectively		2,998			(2,156	)

Reclassification adjustment for net gain on sales of available-for-sale securities
included in net income, net of income taxes of ($5) and $(21), respectively (a)		(19	)		(81	)

Change in defined benefit plans, net of income tax impact of ($91) and $357, respectively (b)		(346	)		1,342

Reclassification adjustment for settlement gains on benefit plans, net of income taxes
of ($8) and ($80), respectively (c)		(29	)		(300	)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)		2,604			(1,195	)

Total comprehensive income	$	11,084		$	2,588

Assets, Liabilities, and Equity in Connection with Merger (a):

(Dollars in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30,
		2019		2018
Assets Acquired:
Securities	$	—	$	114,039
Loans		—		70,769
Restricted stock		—		97
Property and equipment		—		1,496
Foreclosed assets		—		11
Deferred income taxes		—		1,050
Accrued interest receivable		—		989
Core deposit intangible		—		4,940
Cash surrender value of life insurance		—		—
Other assets		—		266
	$	—	$	193,657

Liabilities Assumed:
Deposits	$	—	$	209,981
Borrowings		—		—
Accrued interest payable		—		16
Other liabilities		—		3,693
	$	—	$	213,690

(Dollars in thousands)	Unrealized Loss on Securities			Defined Benefit Plans		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance - June 30, 2019	$	(263	)	$	489	$	226

Balance - December 31, 2018	$	(3,242	)	$	864	$	(2,378	)

(Dollars in thousands)

Total purchase price (consideration paid)	$	79,929

Net assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents		11,398
Investment securities		62,977
Restricted stock		2,237
Loans		511,623
Core deposit intangible		2,832
Trade name intangible		205
Premises and equipment		1,147
Foreclosed assets		125
Deferred income taxes		3,140
Accrued interest receivable		2,293
Other assets		4,197
Deposits		(504,946	)
Borrowings		(49,939	)
Accrued interest payable		(1,073	)
Other liabilities		(2,627	)
Preferred stock		(3,404	)
		40,185
Goodwill	$	39,744

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross amortized cost basis at July 31, 2018	$	521,644
Market rate adjustment		(3,023	)
Credit fair value adjustment on pools of homogeneous loans		(6,742	)
Credit fair value adjustment on impaired loans		(256	)
Fair value of purchased loans at July 31, 2018	$	511,623

(Dollars in thousands)

Contractually required principal and interest at acquisition	$	1,855
Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable discount)		(858	)
Expected cash flows at acquisition		997
Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable discount)		(125	)
Fair value of acquired loans	$	872

(Dollars in thousands)

Total purchase price (consideration paid)	$	66,973

Net assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents		67,817
Investment securities		114,039
Restricted stock		97
Loans		70,769
Core deposit intangible		4,940
Premises and equipment		1,496
Foreclosed assets		11
Deferred income taxes		1,050
Accrued interest receivable		989
Other assets		266
Deposits		(209,981	)
Accrued interest payable		(16	)
Other liabilities		(3,682	)
		47,795
Goodwill	$	19,178

(Dollars in thousands)

Gross amortized cost basis at January 8, 2018	$	71,809
Market rate adjustment		601
Credit fair value adjustment on pools of homogeneous loans		(995	)
Credit fair value adjustment on impaired loans		(646	)
Fair value of purchased loans at January 8, 2018	$	70,769

(Dollars in thousands)

Contractually required principal and interest at acquisition	$	2,586
Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable discount)		(1,010	)
Expected cash flows at acquisition		1,576
Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable discount)		(305	)
Fair value of acquired loans	$	1,271

(Dollars in thousands)	Available-for-sale				Held-to-maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
June 30, 2019	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Due in 1 year or less	$	—	$	—	$	4,983	$	4,981
Due after 1 year but within 5 years		19,562		19,445		15,989		16,153
Due after 5 years but within 10 years		39,391		39,392		79,833		82,117
Due after 10 years		3,255		3,209		—		—
		62,208		62,046		100,805		103,251

Mortgage-backed securities		21,530		21,358		59,377		59,612
	$	83,738	$	83,404	$	160,182	$	162,863

(Dollars in thousands)			Special
June 30, 2019	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	288,672	$	2,845	$	9,754	$	301,271
Commercial real estate		871,633		2,672		9,012		883,317
Commercial real estate - construction		173,860		—		40		173,900
Lease financing		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage		246,651		144		2,319		249,114
Home equity		70,373		—		69		70,442
Consumer		10,129		—		—		10,129
	$	1,661,318	$	5,661	$	21,194	$	1,688,173



MID PENN BANCORP, INC.



MID PENN BANCORP, INC.


MID PENN BANCORP, INC.

(Dollars in thousands)	Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
June 30, 2019	Outstanding Recorded Investment		Outstanding Recorded Investment		Recorded Investment
Commercial real estate	$	2,940	$	2,841	$	2,162
Residential mortgage		677		675		503
	$	3,617	$	3,516	$	2,665

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019
	Operating Leases			Finance Lease
Right of use asset	$	10,834		$	3,537
Lease liability	$	11,983		$	3,591
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)		9.26			19.67
Weighted average discount rate		3.43	%		3.81	%

(Dollars in thousands)
	Lease Obligation		Sublease Rental Income		Net Rental Expense
2019		2,171		81		2,090
2020		1,970		81		1,889
2021		1,603		20		1,583
2022		1,464		—		1,464
2023		1,245		—		1,245
thereafter		6,691		—		6,691
	$	15,144	$	182	$	14,962

			Fair value measurements at June 30, 2019 using:
(Dollars in thousands)	Total carrying value at		Quoted prices in active markets		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable inputs
Assets:	June 30, 2019		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies	$	44,526	$	—	$	44,526	$	—
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies		21,358		—		21,358		—
State and political subdivision obligations		14,186		—		14,186		—
Corporate debt securities		3,334		—		3,334		—
Other assets:
Equity securities		506		506		—		—
Total	$	83,910	$	506	$	83,404	$	—

			Fair value measurements at December 31, 2018 using:
(Dollars in thousands)	Total carrying value at		Quoted prices in active markets		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable inputs
Assets:	December 31, 2018		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies	$	41,572	$	—	$	41,572	$	—
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies		38,849		—		38,849		—
State and political subdivision obligations		29,256		—		29,256		—
Corporate debt securities		2,246		—		2,246		—
Other assets:
Equity securities		492		492		—		—
Total	$	112,415	$	492	$	111,923	$	—

Capital Conservation Buffer (as a % of risk-weighted assets)		Maximum Payout (as a % of eligible retained income)
> 2.5%		No payout limitation applies
≤2.5% and >1.875%		60%
≤1.875% and >1.25%		40%
≤1.25% and >0.625%		20%
≤0.625%		0%

	As of January 1,
		2016			2017			2018			2019
Minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio			4.5	%		4.5	%		4.5	%		4.5	%
Common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer			0.625	%		1.25	%		1.875	%		2.5	%
Minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio plus capital conservation buffer			5.125	%		5.75	%		6.375	%		7.0	%
Phase-in of most deductions from common equity Tier 1 capital			60	%		80	%		100	%		100	%
Minimum Tier 1 capital ratio			6.0	%		6.0	%		6.0	%		6.0	%
Minimum Tier 1 capital ratio plus capital conservation buffer			6.625	%		7.25	%		7.875	%		8.5	%
Minimum total capital ratio			8.0	%		8.0	%		8.0	%		8.0	%
Minimum total capital ratio plus capital conservation buffer			8.625	%		9.25	%		9.875	%		10.5	%

June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
	% Change in			% Change in
Change in	Net Interest	Policy	Change in	Net Interest	Policy
Basis Points	Income	Risk Limit	Basis Points	Income	Risk Limit
300	9.08%	≥ -20%	300	8.09%	≥ -20%
200	6.03%	≥ -15%	200	5.38%	≥ -15%
100	2.99%	≥ -10%	100	2.66%	≥ -10%
0			0
(100)	-2.87%	≥ -10%	(100)	-2.01%	≥ -10%
(200)	-4.86%	≥ -15%	(200)	-3.49%	≥ -15%
(300)	-7.75%	≥ -20%	(300)	-6.43%	≥ -20%

		Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (Registrant)

By:		/s/ Rory G. Ritrievi
		Rory G. Ritrievi
		President and CEO
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:		August 7, 2019



By:		/s/ Michael D. Peduzzi, CPA
		Michael D. Peduzzi, CPA
		Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 7, 2019