XML 34 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS  
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, which has been determined to be as of December 31 of each fiscal year. The Company also tests goodwill between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying value.

The Company employs both qualitative and quantitative tests of its goodwill. During 2015, the Company performed a qualitative assessment on goodwill to determine whether a quantitative assessment was necessary and determined there were no indicators of potential impairment. In 2014, the Company performed a qualitative assessment for some of the Company’s reporting units and determined there were no indicators of impairment.  For the other reporting units in 2014, goodwill was evaluated using a quantitative model.  The quantitative test for goodwill impairment is determined using a two‑step process. The first step involves a comparison of the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. In performing the first step, the Company determines the fair value of a reporting unit using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) analysis. Determining fair value requires the exercise of significant judgment, including judgments about appropriate discount rates, perpetual growth rates, and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. Discount rates are based on a weighted‑average cost of capital (“WACC”), which represents the average rate a business must pay its providers of debt and equity. The cash flows employed in the DCF analysis were derived from internal earnings and forecasts and external market forecasts. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step of the goodwill impairment test must be performed.

The second step of our quantitative test for goodwill impairment compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with its carrying amount of goodwill to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, whereby the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

The Company performed its annual impairment assessments of its goodwill as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2015 and determined that no impairment charges were required, as the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its book value. Accordingly, there were no changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill during these years.

Telecommunications Licenses

The Company tests those telecommunications licenses that are indefinite lived for impairment on an annual basis, which has been determined to be as of December 31st of each fiscal year. The Company also tests telecommunication licenses that are indefinite lived between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying value.

     The Company performed a qualitative assessment for its annual impairment assessment of substantially all of its indefinite lived telecommunications licenses as of December 31, 2014 and 2015 and determined that there were no indications of potential impairments.

The changes in the carrying amount of the Company’s telecommunications licenses, by operating segment, for the three years ended December 31, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

U.S.

    

U.S.

    

Island

    

 

 

 

 

 

Wireless

 

Wireline

 

Wireless

 

Consolidated

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

19,888

 

$

31

 

$

19,768

 

$

39,687

 

Acquired licenses

 

 

5,025

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

5,025

 

Amortization

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(622)

 

 

(622)

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

24,913

 

$

31

 

$

19,146

 

$

44,090

 

Amortization

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(622)

 

 

(622)

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

24,913

 

$

31

 

$

18,524

 

$

43,468

 

The licenses acquired during 2014 were acquired in all cash transactions from various parties and related to licenses expected to be available for use into perpetuity. The Company’s Island Wireless segment is amortizing one of its telecommunications licenses through its expiration date of June 2020.

Customer Relationships

The customer relationships, all of which are included in the Island Wireless segment, are being amortized on an accelerated basis, over the expected period during which their economic benefits are to be realized. The Company recorded $0.4 million of amortization related to customer relationships during each of the three years ended December 31, 2015.

Future amortization of customer relationships, in our Island Wireless segment, is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Future Amortization

 

2016

 

$

309

 

2017

 

 

276

 

2018

 

 

200

 

2019

 

 

145

 

2020

 

 

111

 

Thereafter

 

 

40

 

Total

 

$

1,081