Note 15 - Fair Value Disclosure of Financial Instruments

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2013

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

15.  Fair Value Disclosure of Financial Instruments:

All financial instruments of the Company are reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at amounts which, in management’s estimation based upon an interpretation of available market information and valuation methodologies, reasonably approximate their fair values, except those listed below, for which fair values are disclosed. The fair values for marketable securities are based on published or securities dealers’ estimated market values. Such fair value estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized upon disposition.

As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the FASB’s Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

The following are financial instruments for which the Company’s estimate of fair value differs from the carrying amounts (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2013				2012
	Carrying Amounts		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amounts		Estimated Fair Value
Marketable Securities (1)	$	62,766	$	62,824	$	36,541	$	36,825
Notes Payable (2)	$	3,186,047	$	3,333,614	$	3,192,127	$	3,408,632
Mortgages Payable (3)	$	1,035,354	$	1,083,801	$	1,003,190	$	1,068,616

(1) As of December 31, 2013, $59.7 million of these assets’ estimated fair value were classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and the remaining $3.1 million were classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

(2) The Company determined that its valuation of these Notes payable was classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. 

(3) The Company determined that its valuation of these liabilities was classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. 

The Company has available for sale securities that must be measured under the FASB’s Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures guidance. The Company currently does not have non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The Company from time to time has used interest rate swaps to manage its interest rate risk. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts).  The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.  Based on these inputs, the Company has determined that interest rate swap valuations are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company did not have any interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2013.

The table below presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

	Balance at December 31, 2013		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Marketable equity securities	$	59,723	$	59,723	$	-	$	-

	Balance at December 31, 2012		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Marketable equity securities	$	33,428	$	33,428	$	-	$	-

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):

	Balance at December 31, 2013		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Real estate	$	217,529	$	-	$	-	$	217,529
Joint venture investments	$	59,693	$	-	$	-	$	59,693
Other real estate investments	$	2,050	$	-	$	-	$	2,050
Cost method investment	$	4,670	$	-	$	-	$	4,670

	Balance at December 31, 2012		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Real estate	$	52,505	$	-	$	-	$	52,505

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized impairment charges of $190.2 million, of which $98.8 million, before income taxes, is included in discontinued operations. These impairment charges consist of (i) $175.6 million related to adjustments to property carrying values, (ii) $10.4 million related to a cost method investment, (iii) $1.0 million related to certain joint venture investments and (iv) $3.2 million related to a preferred equity investment. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recognized impairment charges related to adjustments to property carrying values of $59.6 million, of which $49.3 million, before income taxes and noncontrolling interests, is included in discontinued operations.

The Company’s estimated fair values for the year ended December 31, 2013, were primarily based upon (i) estimated sales prices from third party offers based on signed contracts relating to property carrying values and joint venture investments and (ii) a discounted cash flow model relating to the Company’s cost method investment. The Company does not have access to the unobservable inputs used by the third parties to determine these estimated fair values.  The discounted cash flows model includes all estimated cash inflows and outflows over a specified holding period. These cash flows were comprised of unobservable inputs which include forecasted revenues and expenses based upon market conditions and expectations for growth. The capitalization rate of 6.0% and discount rate of 9.5% which were utilized in this model were based upon observable rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates for the respective investments.

The Company’s estimated fair values for the year ended December 31, 2012, relating to the real estate assets measured on a non-recurring basis, which were non-retail assets, were based upon estimated sales prices from third party offers and comparable sales values ranging from $1.1 million to $42.0 million. The Company does not have access to certain unobservable inputs used by these third parties to determine these estimated fair values (see footnote 6 for additional discussion related to these assets).  

Based on these inputs the Company determined that its valuation of these investments was classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The property carrying value impairment charges resulted from the Company’s efforts to market certain assets and management’s assessment as to the likelihood and timing of such potential transactions.