Note 16 - Taxable REIT Subsidiaries ("TRS")

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

16. Taxable REIT Subsidiaries (“TRS”)

The Company is subject to federal, state and local income taxes on the income from its TRS activities, which include Kimco Realty Services ("KRS"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, the consolidated entities of FNC Realty Corporation (“FNC”) and Blue Ridge Real Estate Company/Big Boulder Corporation.  The Company is also subject to local non-U.S. taxes on certain investments located outside the U.S.

Income taxes have been provided for on the asset and liability method as required by the FASB’s Income Taxes guidance.  Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the taxable assets and liabilities.

The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the caption Other assets and Other liabilities on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, were as follows (in thousands):

	March 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
Deferred tax assets:
Tax/GAAP basis differences	$	69,838		$	68,623
Net operating losses		39,531			43,483
Related party deferred loss		6,214			6,214
Tax credit carryforwards		3,815			3,815
Capital loss carryforwards		647			647
Charitable contribution carryforward		3			3
Non-U.S. tax/GAAP basis differences		63,733			62,548
Valuation allowance – U.S.		(33,783	)		(33,783	)
Valuation allowance – Non-U.S.		(37,091	)		(38,129	)
Total deferred tax assets		112,907			113,421
Deferred tax liabilities – U.S.		(19,089	)		(9,933	)
Deferred tax liabilities – Non-U.S.		(15,345	)		(13,263	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	78,473		$	90,225

As of March 31, 2013, the Company had net deferred tax assets of $78.5 million comprised of (i) $59.6 million primarily related to KRS, (ii) $11.3 million related to its foreign investments and (iii) $7.6 million related to FNC. The Company determined that no additional valuation allowance was needed against this net deferred tax asset as future earnings are anticipated to be sufficient to more likely than not realize these net deferred tax assets.  The Company based its determination on an analysis of both positive and negative evidence.  If future income projections do not occur as forecasted and there is not sufficient future taxable earnings, the Company will reevaluate the need for an additional valuation allowance.

Uncertain Tax Positions:

The Company is subject to income tax in certain jurisdictions outside the U.S., principally Canada and Mexico.  The statute of limitations on assessment of tax varies from three to seven years depending on the jurisdiction and tax issue. Tax returns filed in each jurisdiction are subject to examination by local tax authorities.  The Company is currently under audit by the Canadian Revenue Agency, Mexican Tax Authority and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).  In October 2011, the IRS issued a notice of proposed adjustment, which proposes pursuant to Section 482 of the Code, to disallow a capital loss claimed by KRS on the disposition of common shares of Valad Property Ltd., an Australian publicly listed company.  Because the adjustment is being made pursuant to Section 482 of the Code, the IRS may assert a 100 percent “penalty” tax pursuant to Section 857(b)(7) of the Code in lieu of disallowing the capital loss deduction. The notice of proposed adjustment indicates the IRS’ intention to impose the 100 percent penalty tax on the Company in the amount of $40.9 million and disallowing the capital loss claimed by KRS.  The Company strongly disagrees with the IRS’ position on the application of Section 482 of the Code to the disposition of the shares, the imposition of the 100 percent penalty tax and the simultaneous assertion of the penalty tax and disallowance of the capital loss deduction. The Company received a Notice of Proposed Assessment and filed a written protest and requested an IRS Appeals Office conference, which has yet to be scheduled.  The Company intends to vigorously defend its position in this matter and believes it will prevail. Resolutions of these audits are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.