XML 62 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 2 - Operating Property Activities
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Business Combination Disclosure [Text Block]
2. Operating Property Activities

Acquisitions -

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company acquired the following properties, in separate transactions (in thousands):

       
Purchase Price
 
Property Name
Location
Month
Acquired
 
Cash
    Debt Assumed    
Other
   
Total
    GLA*  
Santee Trolley Square(1)
Santee, CA
Jan-13
  $ 26,863     $ 48,456     $ 22,681     $ 98,000       311  
Shops at Kildeer (2)
Kildeer, IL
Jan-13
    -       32,724       -       32,724       168  
Village Commons S.C.
Tallahassee, FL
Jan-13
    7,100       -       -       7,100       125  
Putty Hill Plaza (3)
Baltimore, MD
Jan-13
    4,592       9,115       489       14,196       91  
Columbia Crossing II S.C.
Columbia, MD
Jan-13
    21,800               -       21,800       101  
Roseville Plaza (Parcel)
Roseville, MN
Jan-13
    5,143               -       5,143       80  
Wilton River Park (4)
Wilton, CT
Mar-13
    777       36,000       5,223       42,000       187  
        $ 66,275     $ 126,295     $ 28,393     $ 220,963       1,063  

* Gross leasable area ("GLA")

(1)   This property was acquired from a joint venture in which the Company had a 45% noncontrolling interest.  The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recognized a gain of $22.7 million, before income tax, from the fair value adjustment associated with the Company’s original ownership due to a change in control, which is reflected in the purchase price above in Other.

(2)   This property was acquired from a joint venture in which the Company had a 19% noncontrolling interest.  The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance.  This transaction resulted in a change in control with no gain or loss recognized.

(3)   The Company acquired the remaining 80% interest in an operating property from an unconsolidated joint venture in which the Company had a 20% noncontrolling interest.  The Company evaluated this transaction pursuant to the FASB’s Consolidation guidance and as such recognized a gain of $0.5 million from the fair value adjustment associated with the Company’s original ownership due to a change in control, which is reflected in the purchase price above in Other.

(4)   The acquisition of this property included the issuance of $5.2 million of redeemable units, which are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year and earn a yield of 6% per annum, which is included in the purchase price above in Other.  In connection with this transaction, the Company provided the sellers a $5.2 million loan at a rate of 6.5%, which is secured by the redeemable units.

The aggregate purchase price of the properties acquired during the three months ended March 31, 2013 has been allocated as follows (in thousands):

Land
 
$
71,797
 
Buildings
   
106,554
 
Above Market Rents
   
6,300
 
Below Market Rents
   
(7,134
)
In-Place Leases
   
11,309
 
Building Improvements
   
28,161
 
Tenant Improvements
   
5,892
 
Mortgage Fair Value Adjustment
   
(2,237
)
Other Assets
   
1,054
 
Other Liabilities
   
(733)
 
   
$
220,963
 

Dispositions –

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company disposed of two operating properties, in separate transactions, for an aggregate sales price of $10.3 million. These transactions, which are included in Discontinued Operations, resulted in an aggregate gain of $2.5 million.

Impairment Charges -

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $2.8 million relating to its investment in two operating properties, which is included in Impairment charges under Operating expenses on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.  The aggregate book value of these properties was $17.5 million. The estimated fair value of these properties is based upon purchase price offers aggregating $14.7 million.  These impairment charges resulted from the Company’s efforts to market certain assets and management’s assessment as to the likelihood and timing of such potential transactions (see Footnote 12).