10-K 1 kjune13.txt FORM 10-K FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) X ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to ________ __________ Commission file number 0-6658 _______ SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. _________________________________________ (Exact Name of Registrant in Its Charter) Delaware 04-2217279 _______________________________ ___________________ (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 70 Orville Drive, Bohemia, New York 11716 ________________________________________ __________ (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (631) 567-4700 ______________ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered None None ___________________ _________________________________________ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, par value $.05 per share ______________________________________ (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [ x ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [ x ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes[ x ] No[ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (ss 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ x ] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (ss 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ x ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ x ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yes [ ] No [ x ] The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of August 31, 2013 is $1,986,400. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, par value $.05 per share ("Common Stock") as of August 31, 2013 is 1,337,663 shares. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE None. 2 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. Table of Contents PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS 4 ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 8 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES 11 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 11 ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS 11 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 11 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 12 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 13 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 14 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 14 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION 15 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 15 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 16 ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 20 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 21 ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 22 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 23 SIGNATURES 29 EXHIBIT 31.0 CERTIFICATION 30 EXHIBIT 32.0 CERTIFICATION 32 3 Forward Looking Statements. The Company and its representatives may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements with respect to the Company's annual or long-term goals, including statements contained in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in its reports to stockholders. The words or phrases "will likely result," "will be," "will," "are expected to," "will continue to," "is anticipated," "estimate," "project" or similar expressions identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. PART I Item 1. Business. General. Incorporated in 1954, Scientific Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (which along with its subsidiaries, the "Company") is engaged in the design, manufacture, and marketing of standard benchtop laboratory equipment ("Benchtop Laboratory Equipment"), and customized catalyst research instruments ("Catalyst Research Instruments"), under its wholly-owned subsidiary, Altamira Instruments, Inc., and through its subsidiary, Scientific Bioprocessing, Inc., ("SBI"), the design and development of bioprocessing systems and products ("Bioprocessing Systems"). The Company's products are used primarily for research purposes by universities, pharmaceutical companies, national laboratories, medical device manufacturers, petrochemical companies and other industries performing laboratory-scale research. Operating Segments. The Company views its operations as three segments: the manufacture and marketing of standard Benchtop Laboratory Equipment for research in university and industrial laboratories sold primarily through laboratory equipment distributors, the manufacture and marketing of custom-made Catalyst Research Instruments for universities, government laboratories, and chemical and petrochemical companies, and the production, marketing and sublicensing of bioprocessing systems and products for research in university and industrial laboratories. For certain financial information regarding the Company's operating segments, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8. Products. Benchtop Laboratory Equipment. The Company's Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products consist of mixers and shakers, rotators/ rockers, refrigerated and shaking incubators, and magnetic stirrers. Sales of the Company's principal product, the Vortex-Genie(R) 2 Mixer, excluding accessories, represented approximately 42% of the Company's total net revenues for each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013 ("fiscal 2013") and June 30, 2012 ("fiscal 2012"), and 67% and 63%, of the segment's sales for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively. The vortex mixer is used to mix the contents of test tubes, beakers, and other various containers by placing such containers on a rotating cup or other attachments which cause the contents to be mixed at varying speeds. The Company's additional mixers and shakers include a high speed touch mixer; a mixer with an integral timer, a patented cell disruptor; microplate mixers, two vortex mixers incorporating digital control and display; a large capacity multi-vessel vortex mixer and shaker, and a large capacity orbital shaker. 4 The Company also offers various benchtop multi-purpose rotators and rockers, designed to rotate and rock a wide variety of containers, and a refrigerated incubator and an incubator shaker, both of which are multi-functional benchtop environmental chambers designed to perform various shaking and stirring functions under controlled environmental conditions. Its line of magnetic stirrers include a patented high/low programmable magnetic stirrer; a four-place high/low programmable magnetic stirrer; a large volume magnetic stirrer available in analog and digital versions; and a four-place general purpose stirrer also available in analog and digital versions. Catalyst Research Instruments. The Catalyst Research Instrument products are offered through the Company's subsidiary, Altamira. Its flagship product is the AMI-200(TM), which is used to perform traditional catalyst characterization experiments on an unattended basis. The product also features a stand-alone personal computer to control the instrument and incorporates proprietary LabVIEW(R)-based software. The Company's AMI-300(TM) Catalyst Characterization Instrument incorporates a sophisticated data handling package and is designed to perform dynamic temperature-programmed catalyst characterization experiments. All AMI model instruments are designed or adapted to a customer's individual requirements. Its other Catalyst Research Instrument products include reactor systems, high throughput systems and micro-activity reactors, including the Company's BenchCAT(TM) custom reactor systems. They are available with single and multiple reactor paths and with reactor temperatures up to 1200 degrees Celsius. The systems feature multiple gas flows, are available in gas and gas/liquid configurations, and feature one or more stand-alone personal computers with the LabVIEW(R)-based control software. Bioprocessing Systems. The Company, through SBI, is engaged in the design and development of bioprocessing systems, principally microreactor systems using disposable sensors for vessels with volumes ranging from 250 milliliter to five liters, for future sale or licensing. In addition, the Company sublicenses the patents and technology it holds exclusively under a license with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, ("UMBC"), for which it receives royalties. Product Development. The Company designs and develops substantially all of its products. Company personnel formulate plans and concepts for new products and improvements or modifications of existing products. The Company engages outside consultants to augment its capabilities in areas such as industrial and electronics design. Major Customer. Sales, principally of the Vortex-Genie 2 Mixer, to one customer, which is one of the two major distributors of laboratory equipment, represented for fiscal 2013, 6.8% of total revenues, and 10.9% of Benchtop Laboratory Equipment product sales. For fiscal 2012, sales to the customer accounted for 7.1% of total revenues and 10.5% of the segment's sales. Sales of Catalyst Research Instrument products are generally pursuant to a few large orders amounting on average to over $100,000 to a limited number of customers. In fiscal 2013, sales to two customers, which represented at least 10% of that segment's sales for each, accounted for an aggregate of 32% of the segment's sales (11% of the total revenues). In fiscal 2012, sales to three different customers accounted for an aggregate of 44% of the segment's sales (14% of total revenues). Marketing. Benchtop Laboratory Equipment. The Company's Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products are generally distributed and marketed through an established network of domestic and overseas laboratory equipment distributors who sell the Company's products through printed catalogs, websites and sales force. See "Major Customer". The Company also markets products through attendance at industry trade shows, trade publication advertising, brochures and catalogs, the Company's website, one sales manager in the U.S., and a consultant in Europe. 5 In general, due to the reliance on sales through the catalog distribution system, it takes two to three years for a new benchtop laboratory equipment product to begin generating meaningful sales. Catalyst Research Instruments. The Company's Catalyst Research Instruments are sold directly worldwide to universities, government laboratories, and chemical and petrochemical companies through its sales personnel and independent representatives engaged on a commission basis. Its marketing efforts include attendance at various trade shows, Altamira's website, outside sales representatives, and printed materials. Bioprocessing Systems. The Company's Bioprocessing Systems products, are currently under development and will be offered both directly and through distribution worldwide to university, industrial, and government laboratories. It is anticipated that the related marketing efforts will mainly comprise attendance at various trade shows, publications, website, and dealer-related activities. Assembly and Production. The Company has an operating facility in Bohemia, New York from which its Benchtop Laboratory Equipment Operations are conducted and one in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from which its Catalyst Research Instruments Operations are conducted. The Company's production operations principally involve assembly of components supplied by various domestic and international independent suppliers. The Company has not commenced production of bioprocessing products, but anticipates that its current facilities will be adequate for such purpose. Patents, Trademarks, and Licenses. The Company holds several United States patents relating to its products, including a patent which expires in September 2015 for the TurboMix(R), an accessory to the Vortex-Genie 2 Mixer, a patent which expires in July 2016 on the Roto-Shake Genie(R); a patent which expires in November 2022 on the MagStir Genie(R), MultiMagStir Genie(R), and Enviro-Genie(R), and a patent which expires in January 2023 on a biocompatible bag with integral sensors. The Company does not anticipate, although it cannot provide assurance, any material adverse effect on its operations following the expiration of the foregoing patents. The Company has various proprietary marks, including AMI(TM), BenchCAT(TM), BioGenie(R), Cellphase(R), Cellstation(R), Disruptor Beads(TM), Disruptor Genie(R), Enviro-Genie(R), Genie(TM), Incubator Genie(TM), MagStir Genie(R), MegaMag Genie(R), MicroPlate Genie(R), MultiMagStir Genie(R), Multi-MicroPlate Genie(R), Orbital-Genie(R), QuadMag Genie(R), Rotator Genie(R), Roto-Shake Genie(R), TurboMix(TM), and Vortex-Genie(R), each of which it considers important to the success of the related product. The Company also has several trademark applications pending. No representation can be made that any application will be granted or as to the protection that any existing or future trademark may provide. The Company has several licensing agreements for technology and patents used in the Company's business, including an exclusive license from UMBC with respect to rights and know-how under a patent held by UMBC related to non-disposable sensor technology, which the Company further sublicenses on an exclusive basis to a German company except for non-exclusive rights held by the Company as it relates to the use of the technology with vessels of sizes ranging from 250 milliliters to 5 liters, and to applications in sub-milliliter volumes licensed to a third party. The Company also holds a license as to the technology related to its patent for the Roto-Shake Genie, and a patent related to its TurboMix attachment for the Vortex-Genie and Disruptor Genie. Total license fees paid by the Company under all its licenses for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 amounted to $117,100 and $87,300, respectively. Foreign Sales. The Company's sales to overseas customers, principally in Asia and Europe, accounted for approximately 58% and 55% of the Company's net revenues for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively. Payments are in United States dollars and are therefore not subject to risks of currency fluctuation, foreign duties and customs. Seasonality. The Company does not consider its business to be seasonal. 6 Backlog. The amount of backlog for Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products is not a significant factor because this line of products is comprised of standard catalog items requiring lead times which usually are not longer than two weeks. There is no backlog for Bioprocessing Systems. The backlog for Catalyst Research Instrument products as of June 30, 2013 was $336,800, all of which is expected to be filled by June 30, 2014, as compared to a backlog of $303,200 as of June 30, 2012, all of which was filled in fiscal 2013. Competition. Most of the Company's principal competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial, production and marketing resources than the Company. Competition is generally based upon technical specifications, price, and product recognition and acceptance. The Company's main competition for its Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products derives from private label brand mixers offered by laboratory equipment distributors in the United States and Europe. However, the Company believes that despite its smaller size, it is a major market participant in the global vortex mixer market. The Company's major competitors for its Benchtop Laboratory Equipment are Henry Troemner, Inc. (a private label supplier to the two largest laboratory equipment distributors in the U.S. and Europe), IKA-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, a German company, Benchmark Scientific, Inc., (a United States importer of China- produced products), and Heidolph Instruments GmbH, a German company. The primary competition for the Company's Catalyst Research Instrument products is in the form of instruments produced internally by research laboratory staffs of potential customers. Major competitors in the United States include Quantachrome Instruments, and Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, each a privately-held company. The potential major competitors for the Company's Bioprocessing Systems are Applikon Biotechnology, B.V. (Netherlands), DASGIP Technology GmbH (Germany), and PreSens - Precision Sensing GmbH (Germany). Research and Development. The Company incurred research and development expenses, the majority of which related to its new Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products, of $450,500 during fiscal 2013 compared to $375,900 during fiscal 2012. The Company expects research and development expenditures in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014 will be at approximately the same level as those in fiscal 2013. Government and Environmental Regulation. The Company's products and claims with respect thereto have not required approval of the Food and Drug Administration or any other government approval. The Company's manufacturing operations, like those of the industry in general, are subject to numerous existing and proposed, if adopted, federal, state, and local regulations to protect the environment, establish occupational safety and health standards and cover other matters. The Company believes that its operations are in compliance with existing laws and regulations and the cost to comply is not significant to the Company. Employees. As of August 31, 2013, the Company employed 26 persons (17 for the Benchtop Laboratory Equipment Operations and 9 for the Catalyst Research Instruments Operations) of whom 24 were full-time, including its three executive officers. All activities of the Bioprocessing Systems Operations are being performed by employees of the other two operations and consultants. None of the Company's employees are represented by any union. 7 Available Information. The Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for fiscal 2013, includes its Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Annual Report will be mailed to security holders together with the Company's proxy material and solicitation as it relates to the Company's 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All the Company's reports, including Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other information filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC" or the "Commission"), including amendments to such reports, are available on the SEC's website that contains such reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding companies that file electronically with the Commission. This information is available at www.sec.gov. In addition, all the Company's public filings can be accessed through the Company's website at http://scientificindustries.com/secfilings.html. Item 1A. Risk Factors. In connection with the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, important risk factors are identified below that could affect the Company's financial performance and could cause the Company's actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to such future periods in any current statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking announcements to reflect future events or circumstances. Dependence on Major Customers Sales to one customer, a major laboratory equipment distributor in the United States, represented 10.9% and 10.5% of the segment's sales for fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. Sales to another customer, an overseas laboratory equipment distributor accounted for 11.5% and 12.1% of the segment's sales for fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively. No representation can be made that the Company will be successful in continuing to retain either or both customers, or not suffer a material reduction in sales either which could have an adverse effect on future operating results of the Company. One Benchtop Laboratory Equipment Product Accounts for a Substantial Portion of Revenues The Company has a limited number of Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products with one product, the Vortex-Genie 2 Mixer, accounting for approximately 67% and 63% of Benchtop Laboratory Equipment sales, for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively, and 42% of total revenues for each of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012. The Company is a Small Participant in Each of the Industries in Which It Operates The Benchtop Laboratory Equipment industry is a highly competitive mature industry. Although the Vortex-Genie 2 Mixer has been widely accepted, the annual sales of the Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products ($4,466,000 for fiscal 2013 and $4,160,500 for fiscal 2012) are significantly lower than the annual sales of many of its competitors in the industry. The principal competitors are substantially larger with much greater financial, production and marketing resources than the Company. There are constant new entrants into the vortex mixer market, including those offering products imported from China, which the Company is unable to compete on price. The production and sale of Catalyst Research Instruments products is highly competitive. Altamira's competitors include several companies with greater resources and many laboratories which produce their own instruments. The Company's Bioprocessing Systems operation is a participant in the fast-growing laboratory-scale sector of the larger bioprocessing products industry, which is dominated by several large companies with much greater resources than the Company. 8 The Company's Ability to Grow and Compete Effectively Depends In Part on Its Ability to Develop and Effectively Market New Products Over the past ten years, the Company has continuously invested in the development and marketing of new Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products with a view to increasing revenues and reducing the Company's dependence on the Vortex-Genie 2 Mixer. Gross revenues derived from such other Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products amounted to $1,468,300 for fiscal 2013 and $1,545,400, for fiscal 2012. The segment's ability to compete will depend upon the Company's success in continuing to develop and market new laboratory equipment as to which no assurance can be given. The Company relies primarily on distributors and their catalogs to market its Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products, as is customary in the industry. Accordingly, sales of new products are heavily dependent on the distributors' decision to include and retain a new product in the distributors' catalogs and on their websites. It may be at least 24 to 36 months between the completion of development of a product and the distribution of the catalog in which it is first offered; furthermore, not all distributors feature the Company's products in their catalogs. The Company's line of Catalyst Research Instruments consists of only a few products. The ability of the Company to compete in this segment and expand the line will depend on its ability to make engineering improvements to existing products and develop and add new products incorporating more current technology. Over the last two fiscal years the Company has introduced two new catalyst research products to increase its product offerings and has continuously sought to expand its outside sales force. The success of the Company's new Bioprocessing Systems operation will be heavily dependent on its ability to develop and market new products. New products are being or are to be developed by the Company's employees and outside consultants. Such products are of a complex nature of which the Company has limited or no prior experience and are taking longer to develop than previously anticipated. In addition, they will be subject to beta testing by end users, which could result in design and/or production changes which could further delay development time. The sale and marketing of the products, at least initially, will be through the Company's attendance at trade shows, website, and a few select distributors. No assurance can be given that the amounts allocated by the Company for its new product development and sales and marketing programs will be sufficient to develop additional commercially feasible products which will be accepted by the marketplace, or that any distributor will include or retain any particular product in its catalogs and websites. The Company May Be Subject to General Economic, Political, and Social Factors Orders for the Company's products, particularly its Catalyst Research Instruments products, depend in part, on the customer's ability to secure funds to finance purchases, especially government funding. Availability of funds can be affected by budgetary constraints. Factors including a general economic recession, such as the one which commenced in fiscal 2009 and negatively affected the Company in fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2012, the European crisis, or a major terrorist attack would likely have a negative impact on the availability of funding including government or academic grants to potential customers. The Company's ability to secure new Catalyst Research Instruments orders can also be affected by changes in domestic and international policies pertaining to energy and the environment, which could affect funding of potential customers. 9 The Company is Heavily Dependent on Outside Suppliers for the Components of Its Products The Company purchases all its components from outside suppliers and relies on a few single suppliers for some crucial Benchtop Laboratory Equipment components, mostly due to cost considerations. Many of the Company's suppliers, including United States vendors, produce the components directly or indirectly in overseas factories, and orders are subject to long lead times and potential other risks related to production in a foreign country. To minimize the risk of supply shortages, the Company keeps more than normal quantities on hand of the critical components that cannot easily be procured or, where feasible and cost effective, purchases are made from more than one supplier. However, a shortage of such components could halt production and have a material negative effect on the Company's operations. The Company's Ability to Compete Depends in Part on Its Ability To Secure and Maintain Proprietary Rights to its Products The Company has no patent protection for its principal Benchtop Laboratory Equipment product, the Vortex-Genie 2 Mixer, or for its Catalyst Research products and limited patent protection on a few other Benchtop Laboratory Equipment products. There are several competitive products available in the marketplace possessing similar technical specifications and design. As part of the asset purchase by SBI during fiscal 2012, the Company acquired the rights to various patents for bioprocessing products which it licenses from UMBC. There can be no assurance that any patent issued, licensed or sublicensed to the Company provides or will provide the Company with competitive advantages or will not be challenged by third parties. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others will not independently develop similar products or design around the patents. Any of the foregoing activities could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Moreover, the enforcement by the Company of its patent or license rights may require substantial litigation costs. The Company Has Limited Management Resources The loss of the services of any of Ms. Helena Santos, the Company's Chief Executive and Financial Officer and President, Mr. Robert Nichols, the Company's Executive Vice President and Mr. Brookman March, President of Altamira, or any material expansion of the Company's operations could place a significant additional strain on the Company's limited management resources and could be materially adverse to the Company's operating results and financial condition. The Common Stock of the Company is Thinly Traded and is Subject to Volatility As of August 31, 2013, there were only 1,337,663 shares of Common Stock of the Company outstanding, of which 339,223 shares (25.4%) were held by the directors and officers of the Company. The Common Stock of the Company is traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board and, historically, has been thinly traded. There have been a number of trading days during fiscal 2013 on which no trades of the Company's Common Stock were reported. Accordingly, the market price for the Common Stock is subject to great volatility. 10 Item 2. Properties. The Company's executive offices and principal manufacturing facility for its Benchtop Laboratory Equipment Operations comprise approximately 25,000 square feet, are located in Bohemia, New York and held pursuant to a lease expiring in January 2015. The Company's Catalyst Research Instruments Operations are conducted from an approximately 9,000 square foot facility in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania under a lease expiring in November 2017. The Bioprocessing Systems operation does not occupy a separate physical location. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements in Item 8. The leased facilities are suitable and adequate for each of the Company's operations. In the opinion of management, all properties are adequately covered by insurance. Item 3. Legal Proceedings. The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. The Company's Common Stock is traded in the over-the- counter market. The following table sets forth the low and high bid quotations for each quarter of fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013, as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Electronic Bulletin Board. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark- down or commission and may not represent actual transactions: For Fiscal Quarter Ended: Low Bid High Bid 09/30/11 2.30 3.26 12/31/11 2.26 3.25 03/31/12 1.49 2.76 06/30/12 1.95 2.25 09/30/12 1.51 2.00 12/31/12 1.62 2.10 03/31/13 1.88 2.68 06/30/13 2.55 3.06 (a) As of August 31, 2013, there were 403 record holders of the Company's Common Stock. (b) On November 1, 2012, the Company paid a cash dividend of $.03 per share to stockholders of record on October 1, 2012. On November 13, 2011, the Company paid a cash dividend of $.05 per share to stockholders of record on September 26, 2011. The Company is not subject to any agreement which prohibits or restricts the Company from paying dividends on its Common Stock. 11 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Forward-Looking statements. Certain statements contained in this report are not based on historical facts, but are forward-looking statements that are based upon various assumptions about future conditions. Actual events in the future could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking information. Numerous unknown factors and future events could cause such differences, including but not limited to, product demand, market acceptance, success of marketing strategy, success of expansion efforts, impact of competition, adverse economic conditions, and other factors affecting the Company's business that are beyond the Company's control, which are discussed elsewhere in this report. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. Overview. Income before income taxes increased to $520,800 for fiscal 2013 from $61,900 for fiscal 2012, primarily as a result of the increased income of the Benchtop Laboratory Operations due to higher sales and lower expenses, and the Catalyst Research Instruments Operations' income of $151,400 for fiscal 2013 compared to a loss of $190,400 for fiscal 2012 due to higher overseas sales and improved gross margins. The Bioprocessing Systems Operations reflected a loss of $169,900 compared to a loss of $111,200 last year due to the higher amortization expense and product development costs. Results of Operations. Net sales for fiscal 2013 increased $931,900 (15.0%) to $7,134,500 from $6,202,600 for fiscal 2012, reflecting increases of $600,600 (30.9%) in net sales of catalyst research instruments, and $305,500 (7.3%) in benchtop laboratory equipment sales, and a $25,800 increase in revenues by the Bioprocessing Systems Operations. Sales of catalyst research instruments are comprised of a small number of large orders, typically averaging more than $100,000 each. As of June 30, 2013, the order backlog for these products was $336,800 compared to $303,200 as of June 30, 2012. The higher sales of catalyst research instruments resulted from increased sales to overseas customers in active markets such as China and Brazil. Revenues derived from the new Bioprocessing Systems Operations consist primarily of net royalties received from sublicensees. The Company expects that such Operations will also generate future revenues from products currently under development, although no assurance can be given. The gross profit percentage for fiscal 2013 was 41.5% compared to 38.0% for fiscal 2012 due mainly to higher margins in the catalyst research instruments sales. General and administrative expenses for fiscal 2013 increased $47,100 (3.8%) to $1,277,700 compared to $1,230,600 for fiscal 2012, primarily due to increases in such expenses for the Bioprocessing Systems Operations, and the Catalyst Research Instruments Operations. Selling expenses for fiscal 2013 increased only slightly, $8,900 (1.2%) to $723,100 from $714,200 for fiscal 2012. 12 Research and development expenses increased by $74,600 (19.8%) to $450,500 compared to $375,900 for fiscal 2012, primarily the result of increased new product development costs by the Benchtop Laboratory Equipment Operations, and the new product development costs incurred by the Bioprocessing Systems Operations. Total other income decreased by $11,800 (46.8%) to $13,400 for fiscal 2013 from $25,200 for fiscal 2012, mainly due to lower interest income and other income items. Income tax expense for fiscal 2013 was $124,400 compared to a tax benefit of $4,200 last year primarily due to the increased current period income. As a result of the foregoing, net income for fiscal 2013 was $396,400, a $330,300 (499.7%) increase from $66,100 for fiscal 2012. Liquidity and Capital Resources. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $158,000 to $927,300 as of June 30, 2013 from $769,300 as of June 30, 2012. Net cash provided by operating activities was $564,400 for fiscal 2013 as compared to $331,800 for fiscal 2012, primarily due to the higher income for fiscal 2013. Cash used in investing activities decreased to $253,700 for fiscal 2013 compared to $350,300 for fiscal 2012, primarily due to the cash used in the asset purchase by SBI in fiscal 2012. Net cash used in financing activities increased to $152,700 for fiscal 2013 compared to $120,000 in fiscal 2012 mainly due to the additional payments under the Note Payable related to the SBI asset acquisition. The Company's working capital was $3,825,100 as of June 30, 2013 compared to $3,417,200 as of June 30, 2012, primarily as a result of the higher income for fiscal 2013. The Company has a line of credit with its bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. which provides for maximum borrowings of up to $700,000, bearing interest at 3.05 percentage points above the LIBOR Index, which was approximately 3.25% at June 30, 2013 and is to be secured by a pledge of collateral consisting of the inventory, accounts, chattel paper, equipment and general intangibles of the Company. Outstanding amounts are due and payable by June 14, 2014 with a requirement that the Company is to reduce the outstanding principal balance to zero during the 30 day period ending on the anniversary date of the promissory note. As of August 31, 2013, no borrowings under the line are outstanding. On September 20, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $.08 per share of Common Stock payable on November 4, 2013 to holders of record as of the close of business on October 11, 2013. Management believes that the Company will be able to meet, absent a material capital expenditure not currently anticipated, its cash flow needs during the 12 months ending June 30, 2014 from its available financial resources including its cash and investment securities, and operations. Capital Expenditures. During fiscal 2013, the Company incurred $37,500 in capital expenditures. The Company expects that based on its current operations, its capital expenditures will not be materially higher for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. None. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The Financial Statements required by this item are attached hereto on pages F1-F25. 13 Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. Not applicable. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, based on an evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company has concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the applicable time periods specified by the SEC's rules and forms. The Company also concluded that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Company's financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The Company's internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013 based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework. Based on the assessment of the Company's Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, it was concluded that as of June 30, 2013, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting were effective based on these criteria. This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal controls over financial reporting. Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls. The Company's management, including its Chief Executive and Financial Officer, believes that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, management does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, 14 have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Item 9B. Other Information. Not applicable. PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. Directors The Company has the following five Directors: Joseph G. Cremonese (age 77), a Director since November 2002 and Chairman of the Board since February 2006, has been, through his affiliate, a marketing consultant to the Company since 1996. Mr. Cremonese has been since 1991, President of his affiliate, Laboratory Innovation Company, Ltd., which is a vehicle for technology transfer and consulting services for companies, engaged in the production and sale of products for science and biotechnology. Since March 2003, he has been a director of Proteomics, Inc., a producer of recombinant proteins for medical research. Prior to 1991, he had been employed by Fisher Scientific, the largest U.S. distributor of laboratory equipment. Roger B. Knowles (age 88), a Director since 1965, has been retired for the last five years. Grace S. Morin (age 65), a Director since December 4, 2006, had been President, Director and principal stockholder of Altamira Instruments, Inc. from December 2003 until its acquisition in November 2006 by the Company. Ms. Morin had been employed by Altamira to supervise its administrative functions at the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania facility as a full-time employee through March 31, 2009 and since that date as a part-time consultant. Prior to December 2003, she was a general business consultant for two years, and prior thereto a member of senior management of a designer of gas flow environmental engineered products for approximately four years. Helena R. Santos (age 49), a Director since 2009, has been employed by the Company since 1994, and has served since August 2002 as its President, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer. She had served as Vice President, Controller from 1997 and as Secretary from May 2001. Ms. Santos was an internal auditor with a major defense contractor from March 1991 to April 1994. She had been previously employed in public accounting. James S. Segasture (age 77), a Director since 1991, has been retired for the last five years. The Directors are elected to three-year staggered terms. The current terms of the Directors expire at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company following: the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 - one Director (Ms. Morin, Class B), the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014 - two Directors (Messers. Cremonese and Knowles, Class C), and the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015 - two directors (Ms. Santos and Mr. Segasture, Class A). 15 Board Committees The Company's Stock Option Committee administers the Company's 2012 Stock Option Plan. The members of the committee are non-management Directors of the Company - James S. Segasture and Joseph G. Cremonese. The members of the Committee serve at the discretion of the Board. During fiscal 2013 the Stock Option Committee did not hold any meetings. Grace S. Morin, and James S. Segasture are the current members of the Company's Compensation Committee serving at the discretion of the Board. The Committee administers the Company's compensation policies. During fiscal 2013, the Compensation Committee held one meeting. The Board of Directors acts as the Company's Audit Committee, which in its function as the Committee, held four meetings during fiscal 2013. Ms. Santos, who is not "independent" and Ms. Morin are "financial experts" as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Executive Officers See above for the employment history of Ms. Santos. Robert P. Nichols (age 52), employed by the Company since February 1998, has served since August 2002 as Executive Vice President. Previously, he had been since May 2001 Vice President, Engineering. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Nichols was an Engineer Manager with Bay Side Motion Group, a precision motion equipment manufacturer from January 1996 to February 1998. Brookman P. March (age 68) has been Director of Sales and Marketing of Altamira, which has conducted the Catalyst Research Instruments operation since November 30, 2006 and its President since July 2008. He had been Vice President and a Director of Altamira from December 2003 until it was acquired by the Company. Mr. March is the husband of Ms. Morin, a Director. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance The Company believes that, for fiscal 2013, its officers, directors and 10% stockholders timely complied with all filing requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Code of Ethics The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Executive Officers and Directors. A copy of the code of ethics can be found on the Company's website at www.scientificindustries.com. Item 11. Executive Compensation. Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The Compensation Committee reviews and recommends to the Board of Directors the compensation to be paid to each executive officer. Executive compensation, in all instances except for the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), is based on recommendations from the CEO. The CEO makes a determination by comparing the performance of each executive being reviewed with objectives established at the beginning of each fiscal year and with objectives established during the business year with regard to the success of the achievement of such objectives and the successful execution of management targets and goals. With respect to the compensation of the CEO, the Committee considers performance criteria, 50% of which is related to the direction, by the CEO, of the reporting executives, the establishment of executive objectives as components for the successful achievement of Company goals and the 16 successful completion of programs leading to the successful completion of the Business Plan for the Company and 50% is based on the achievement by the Company of its financial and personnel goals tempered by the amount of the income of the Company during the fiscal year. The compensation at times includes grants of options under its stock option plan to the named executives. Each officer is employed pursuant to a long-term employment agreement, containing terms proposed by the Committee and approved as reasonable by the Board of Directors. The Board is cognizant that as a relatively small company, the Company has limited resources and opportunities with respect to recruiting and retaining key executives. Accordingly, the Company has relied upon long-term employment agreements and grants of stock options to retain qualified personnel. Compensation for each of its executive officers provided by their employment agreements were based on the foregoing factors and the operating and financial results of the segments under their management. The following table summarizes all compensation paid by the Company to each of its executive officers for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE _____________________________________________________________________ Non- Non- Equity Qualified Incentive Deferred Name Plan Comp- and Stock Option Comp- ensation Principal Fiscal Salary Bonus Awards Awards ensation Earnings Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) _____________________________________________________________________ Helena R. 2013 141,000 10,000(1)0 0 0 0 Santos, 2012 138,000 0 0 0 0 0 CEO, President, CFO _____________________________________________________________________ Robert P. 2013 129,100 5,000(1) 0 0 0 0 Nichols, 2012 126,300 0 0 0 0 0 Exec. V.P. _____________________________________________________________________ Brookman 2013 131,000 5,000(1) 0 1,900(3) 0 0 P. March, 2012 128,000 0 0 200(3) 0 0 Director of Sales and Marketing, and President of Altamira _____________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE (CONTINUED) _____________________________________________________________________ Changes in Pension Value and Non- Qualified All Name Deferred Other and Comp- Comp- Principal Fiscal ensation ensation Total Position Year Earnings ($) ($) (a) (b) (i) (j) _____________________________________________________________________ Helena R. 2013 0 4,200(2) 155,200 Santos, 2012 0 2,800(2) 140,800 CEO, President, CFO _____________________________________________________________________ Robert P. 2013 0 3,900(2) 138,000 Nichols, 2012 0 2,500(2) 128,800 Exec. V.P. _____________________________________________________________________ Brookman 2013 0 5,200(2) 143,100 P. March, 2012 0 5,100(2) 133,300 Director of Sales and Marketing, and President of Altamira _____________________________________________________________________ (1) Represents amounts earned for fiscal 2013. (2) The amounts represent the Company's matching contribution under the Company's 401(k) Plans. (3) The amounts represent compensation expense for stock options granted valued utilizing the Black-Scholes-Merton options pricing model, disregarding estimates of forfeitures related to service- based vesting considerations. The fiscal 2012 option was valued at a total of $5,700 of which $1,900 was expensed as stock based compensation in fiscal 2013, and $200 in fiscal 2012. 17 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 There were no options granted to officers during fiscal 2013. OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END ______________________________________________________________ Option Awards ______________________________________________________________ Number Equity Number of Incentive of Securities Plan Awards: Securities Under- Number of Under- lying Securities lying Un- Unexercised Underlying Option exercised Options(#) Unexercised Exercise Option Options(#) Unexerci- Unearned Price Expiration Name Exercisable sable Options(#) ($) Date (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) _____________________________________________________________________ Brookman P. 8,167 3,333 0 3.07 5/2022 March _____________________________________________________________________ OPTION EXERCISES IN FISCAL 2013 ______________________________________________________________________ Number of Shares Acquired on Value Realized Name Exercise (#) on Exercise ($) (a) (b) (c) _______________________________________________________ Robert P. Nichols 5,000 4,000 _______________________________________________________ Employment Agreements In May 2013, The Company entered into new employment agreements with Ms. Helena R. Santos and Robert P. Nichols extending their terms of employment to June 30, 2015. The new agreements increased the annual base salaries for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2015, for Ms. Santos from $141,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 to $150,000 and $154,000 respectively; and for Mr. Nichols from $129,100 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 to $135,000 and $139,000 respectively. Bonuses, if any, are to be awarded at the discretion of the Board of Directors for each of the fiscal years. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 bonuses of $10,000 and $5,000, for Ms. Santos and Mr. Nichols, respectively, were authorized. No bonuses were awarded for fiscal 2012. 18 In May 2012, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. March extending the term through June 30, 2014, which may be further extended by mutual consent for an additional 12 month period. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of $131,000 and $135,000 for each of the fiscal years ending June 30, 2013 and 2014. Bonuses, if any, may be awarded at the discretion of the Board of Directors. A bonus of $5,000 was awarded to Mr. March for fiscal 2013. No bonus was awarded for fiscal 2012. Mr. March is the husband of Grace S. Morin, a Director of the Company and of Altamira and a former principal stockholder of Altamira. Each of the foregoing employment agreements contains confidentiality and non-competition covenants. The employment agreements for Ms. Santos and Mr. March contain termination provisions stipulating that if the Company terminates the employment other than for death, disability, or cause (defined as (i) conviction of a felony or (ii) gross neglect or gross misconduct (including conflict of interest), the Company shall pay severance payments equal to one year's salary at the rate of the compensation at the time of termination, and continue to pay the regular benefits provided by the Company for a period of two years from termination. Directors' Compensation and Options DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION For the Year Ended June 30, 2013 _________________________________________________________________ Non- Equity Fees Incentive Earned Plan or Paid Stock Option Comp- in Cash Awards Awards ensation Name ($) ($) ($) ($) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) __________________________________________________________________ Joseph G. Cremonese 26,400 0 5,000(1) 0 Roger B. Knowles 12,000 0 0 0 Grace S. Morin 12,000 0 0 0 James S. Segasture 12,000 0 0 0 ___________________________________________________________________ DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION (CONTINUED) Changes in Pension Value and Non- Non- qualified qualified Deferred Deferred All Compens- Comp- Other ation ensation Comp- Earnings Earnings ensation Total Name ($) ($) ($) ($) (a) (f) (g) (h) (i) ____________________________________________________________________ Joseph G. Cremonese 0 0 39,600(2) 71,000 Roger B. Knowles 0 0 0 12,000 Grace S. Morin 0 0 6,100(3) 18,100 James S. Segasture 0 0 0 12,000 ____________________________________________________________________ (1) The amount represents consulting expense recorded in fiscal 2013 for stock options granted in fiscal 2012 utilizing the Black-Scholes-Merton options pricing model (see Items 12 and 13). (2) Represents amount paid to his affiliate pursuant to a marketing consulting agreement (see Items 12 and 13). (3) Represents compensation received for her administrative services as a consultant for Altamira (see Items 12 and 13). 19 The Company pays each Director who is not an employee of the Company or a subsidiary a quarterly retainer fee of $1,800 and $1,200 for each meeting attended. In addition, the Company reimburses each Director for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board meetings in the amount of $50 or the Director's itemized expenses, whichever is greater. Mr. Cremonese, as Chairman of the Board receives an additional fee of $1,200 per month. During fiscal 2013, total director compensation to non-employee Directors aggregated $113,100, including the consulting fees paid to Mr. Cremonese's affiliate, and to Ms. Morin. Under the Company's 2002 Stock Option Plan, none of the Directors existing at the time of the adoption of the plan were eligible to receive option grants thereunder. However, Mr. Joseph G. Cremonese who was elected a Director for the first time at the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, was granted ten-year options on December 1, 2003 to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at the exercise price of $1.35 per share; ten-year options on February 20, 2007 to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at the exercise price of $3.10 per share; five-year options on September 17, 2009 to purchase 10,000 shares at the exercise price of $1.88 per share, and five-year options on January 12, 2012 to purchase 10,000 shares at the exercise price of $3.45 per share. The fiscal 2012 option had a total fair value (as determined by the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model) of $10,000 of which $5,000 was recognized as consulting expense in 2012 and $5,000 in 2013. None of the options have been exercised to date. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2013, the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by (i) each person known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each named executive officer of the Company, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Shares not outstanding but deemed beneficially owned by virtue of the right of any individual to acquire shares within 60 days are treated as outstanding only when determining the amount of and percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock owned by such individual. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown, except as noted. Except as indicated in the table, the address for each of the following is c/o Scientific Industries, Inc., 70 Orville Drive, Bohemia, New York 11716. Amount and Name Nature of Beneficial Ownership % of Class ___________________________________________________________________ Lowell A. Kleiman 139,581 (1) 9.6% 16 Walnut Street Glen Head, NY 11545 Spectrum Laboratories, Inc. 127,986 (2) 10.4% 18617 Broadwick Street Rancho Dominquez, CA 90220 Joseph G. Cremonese 98,597 (3) 7.2% Roger B. Knowles - - Grace S. Morin 94,450 (4) 7.0% James S. Segasture 163,500 (5) 12.2% Helena R. Santos 15,779 1.2% Robert P. Nichols 18,397 1.4% Brookman P. March 94,450 (6) 7.0% All directors and executive officers as a group (5 persons) 390,723 (7) 28.1% 20 (1) Based on information reported in his Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 30, 2002. (2) Based on information reported on Form 3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2011. (3) 51,597 shares are owned jointly with his wife, 7,000 shares are owned by his wife, and 40,000 shares are issuable upon exercise of options. (4) Includes 11,500 shares issuable upon exercise of options held by her husband, Mr. March. (5) Shares owned jointly with his wife. (6) Represents 82,950 shares owned by Ms. Morin, his wife and 11,500 shares issuable upon exercise of options. (7) Includes 51,500 shares issuable upon exercise of options. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION The following table sets forth information with respect to Company options, warrants and rights as of June 30, 2013. _________________________________________________________________ Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Weighted-Average Exercise of Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights Warrants and Rights ($) Plan Category (a) (b) _________________________________________________________________ Equity Compensation plans approved by security holders 55,000 2.86 Equity Compensation plans not approved by security holders N/A N/A _________________________________________________________________ Total 55,000 2.86 _________________________________________________________________ EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION (CONTINUED) _________________________________________________________________ Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a) Plan Category (c) _________________________________________________________________ Equity Compensation plans approved by security holders 93,000 Equity Compensation plans not approved by security holders N/A _________________________________________________________________ Total 93,000 _________________________________________________________________ Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. Mr. Joseph G. Cremonese, a Director since November 2002, through his affiliate, Laboratory Innovation Company, Ltd., has been providing independent marketing consulting services to the Company for over ten years. The services have been rendered since January 1, 2003 pursuant to a consulting agreement expiring December 31, 2013. The agreement currently provides that Mr. Cremonese and his affiliate shall render, at the request of the Company, marketing consulting services for a monthly payment of $3,300. The agreement contains confidentiality and non competition covenants. The Company paid fees of $39,600 pursuant to the agreement for each of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012. 21 Ms. Grace S. Morin, was elected a Director in December 2006 upon the sale of her 90.36% ownership interest in Altamira to the Company in November 2006. Up until March 31, 2009, Ms. Morin had been employed by Altamira as an administrative employee. Since April 1, 2009, she has provided consulting services on a part-time basis pursuant to an agreement expiring March 31, 2014 at the rate of $85 per hour, resulting in payments of $6,100 and $5,100 for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively. The agreement contains confidentiality and non-competition covenants. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services. The following is a description of the fees incurred by the Company for services by the firm of Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow, LLP (the "Firm") during Fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012. The Company incurred for the services of the Firm fees of approximately $62,000 and $61,000 for fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively, in connection with the audit of the Company's annual financial statements and quarterly reviews; and $5,000 for each fiscal year for the preparation of the Company's corporate tax returns. There were no other audit related fees or other fees paid to the Firm for the two fiscal years. In approving the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit and non-audit services, the Board of Directors as the Company?s audit committee evaluates the scope and cost of each of the services to be performed including a determination that the performance of the non-audit services will not affect the independence of the firm in the performance of the audit services. 22 Part IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. Financial Statements. The required financial statements of the Company are attached hereto on pages F1-F25. Exhibits. The following Exhibits are filed as part of this report on Form 10-K: Exhibit Number Exhibit ______________ _________ 3 Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws: 3(a) Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as amended. (filed as Exhibit 1(a-1) to the Company's General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10 dated February 14, 1973 and incorporated by reference thereto.) 3(b) Certificate of Amendment of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as filed on January 28, 1985 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1985 and incorporated by reference thereto.) 3(c) By-Laws of the Company, as restated and amended. (filed as Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2003 and Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2007 and incorporated by reference thereto). 4 Instruments defining the rights of security holders: 4(a) 2002 Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 99-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 25, 2002 and incorporated by reference thereto). 4(b) 2012 Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2012 and incorporated by reference thereto). 10 Material Contracts: 10(a) Lease between Registrant and AIP Associates, predecessor-in-interest of current lessor, dated October, 1989 with respect to Company's offices and facilities in Bohemia, New York. (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on September 28, 2005 and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(a)-1 Amendment to lease between Registrant and REP A10 LLC, successor in interest of AIP Associates, dated September 1, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 2, 2004, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(a)-2 Second amendment to lease between Registrant and REP A10 LLC dated November 5, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2007, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(b) Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2003, by and between the Company and Ms. Santos (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2003, and incorporated by reference thereto). 23 10(b)-1 Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2004, by and between the Company and Ms. Santos (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 1, 2004, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(b)-2 Employment Agreement dated December 29, 2006, by and between the Company and Ms. Santos (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2006, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(b)-3 Employment Agreement dated July 31, 2009 by a nd between the Company and Ms. Santos (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2009, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(b)-4 Employment Agreement dated May 14, 2010 by and between the Company and Ms. Santos (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2010, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(b)-5 Employment Agreement dated September 13, 2011 by and between the Company and Ms. Santos. (filed as exhibit 10(b)-5 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(b)-6 Amended Employment Agreement dated May 20, 2013 by and between the Company and Ms. Santos (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2013, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(c) Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2003, by and between the Company and Mr. Robert P. Nichols (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2003, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(c)-1 Employment Agreement dated September 1, 2004, by and between the Company and Mr. Nichols (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 1, 2004, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(c)-2 Employment Agreement dated December 29, 2006, by and between the Company and Mr. Nichols (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 29, 2006, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(c)-3 Employment Agreement dated July 31, 2009 by and between the Company and Mr. Nichols (filed as Exhibit 10A-2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2009, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(c)-4 Employment Agreement dated May 14, 2010 by and between the Company and Mr. Nichols (filed as Exhibit 10A-2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 18, 2010, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(c)-5 Employment Agreement dated September 13, 2011 by and between the Company and Mr. Nichols. (filed as Exhibit 10(c)-5 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(c)-6 Amended Employment Agreement dated May 20, 2013 by and between the Company and Mr. Nichols (filed as Exhibit 10A-2 to the Company's current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2013, and incorporated by reference thereto). 24 10(d) Consulting Agreement dated January 1, 2003 by and between the Company and Mr. Cremonese and his affiliate, Laboratory Innovation Company, Ltd., (filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2003, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(d)-1 Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement dated March 22, 2005, by and between the Company and Mr. Cremonese and Laboratory Innovation Company, Ltd., (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 23, 2005, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(d)-2 Second Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement dated March 15, 2007, by and between the Company and Mr. Cremonese and Laboratory Innovation Company Ltd., (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(d)-3 Third Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement dated September 23, 2009, by and between the Company and Mr. Cremonese and Laboratory Innovation Company, Ltd., (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K field on September 24, 2009, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(d)-4 Fourth Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement dated January 7, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 18, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(d)-5 Fifth Amendment and Restated Consulting Agreement dated January 20, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2012, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(d)-6 Agreement extension dated November 29, 2012 to Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 4, 2012, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(e) Sublicense from Fluorometrix Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10(a)1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2006, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(f) Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2006, by and among the Company and Grace Morin, Heather H. Haught and William D. Chandler (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2006, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(g) Escrow Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2006, by and among the Company and Grace Morin, Heather H. Haught and William D. Chandler (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2006, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(h) Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2006, by and among the Company and Grace Morin, Heather H. Haught and William D. Chandler (filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2006, and incorporated by reference thereto). 25 10(i) Employment Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2006, between Altamira Instruments, Inc. and Brookman P. March (filed as Exhibit 10(c) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 5, 2006, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(i)-1 Employment Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2008, between Altamira Instruments, Inc. and Brookman P. March (filed as Exhibit 10A-2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2008, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(i)-2 Employment Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2010, between Altamira Instruments, Inc., and Brookman P. March (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 13, 2010, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(i)-3 Employment Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2012 between Altamira Instruments, Inc. and Brookman P. March (filed as Exhibit 10(i)-3 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on September 27, 2012, and incorporated by reference thereto.) 10(j) Indemnity Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2007 by and among the Company and Grace Morin, Heather H. Haught and William D. Chandler (filed as Exhibit 10(j) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on September 28, 2007 and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(k) Lease between Altamira Instruments, Inc. and Allegheny Homes, LLC, with respect to the Company's Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania facilities (filed as Exhibit 10(k) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on September 28, 2007 and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(k)-1 Lease between Altamira Instruments, Inc. and Allegheny Homes, LLC, with respect to the Company's Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania facilities (filed as Exhibit 10(k)-1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 14, 2013, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(l) Line of Credit Agreements dated October 30, 2008, by and among the Company and Capital One, N.A. (filed as Exhibits 10-A1(a) through (f) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2008, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(l)-1 Restated Promissory Note Agreement dated January 20, 2010 by and among the Company and Capital One N.A. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 20, 2010, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(I)-2 Restated Promissory Note Agreement dated January 5, 2011 by and among the Company and Capital One N.A. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(m) Consulting Agreement dated April 1, 2009 by and between the Company and Grace Morin (filed as Exhibit 10A-1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2009, and incorporated by reference thereto). 26 10(n) Line of Credit Agreements dated June 14, 2011, by and among the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibits 99.1 through 99.3 (to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(n)-1 Promissory Note dated June 5, 2013 by and among the Company and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 99 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2013, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(o) Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2011, by and among the Company, Scientific Bioprocessing, Inc., and Fluorometrix Corporation (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 17, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(p) Escrow Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2011, by and among the Company, Scientific Bioprocessing, Inc., and Fluorometrix Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10(A) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 17, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(q) Research and Development Agreement dated as of November 14, 2011, by and between Scientific Bioprocessing, Inc. and Biodox R&D Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10(B) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 17, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(q)-1 Notice of termination of Research and Development Agreement dated June 12, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 99 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 27, 2013, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(r) Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2011, by and among the Company, Scientific Bioprocessing, Inc., and Joseph E. Qualitz (filed as Exhibit 10(D) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 17, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(s) Promissory Note, dated as of November 14, 2011, by and between the Company and the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (filed as Exhibit 10(c) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 17, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 10(t) License Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2001 by and between University of Maryland, Baltimore County and Fluorometrix Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10(E) to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2011, and incorporated by reference thereto). 14 Code of Ethics (filed as Exhibit 14 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on September 28, 2007 and incorporated by reference thereto). 21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant Scientific Packaging Industries, Inc., a New York corporation, is a wholly-owned inactive subsidiary of the Company. Altamira Instruments, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. 27 Scientific Bioprocessing, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company since November 2011. 31.01 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.01 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 28 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. ___________________________ (Registrant) /s/ Helena R. Santos ____________________________ Helena R. Santos President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer Date: September 27, 2013 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Name Title Date _______________________ __________________________ _________________ /s/ Helena R. Santos President and Treasurer (Chief September 27, 2013 Helena R. Santos Executive Officer and Financial Officer) and Director /s/ Joseph G. Cremonese Chairman of the Board September 27, 2013 Joseph G. Cremonese /s/ Roger B. Knowles Director September 27, 2013 Roger B. Knowles /s/ Grace S. Morin Director September 27, 2013 Grace S. Morin /s/ James S. Segasture Director September 27, 2013 James S. Segasture 29 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 CONTENTS Page ---- Report of independent registered public accounting firm F-1 Consolidated financial statements: Balance sheets F-2 Statements of income F-3 Statements of comprehensive income F-4 Statements of shareholders' equity F-5 Statements of cash flows F-6 - F-7 Notes to financial statements F-8 - F-25 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Board of Directors and Shareholders Scientific Industries, Inc. Bohemia, New York We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Scientific Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Scientific Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow, LLP ___________________________________________ Nussbaum Yates Berg Klein & Wolpow, LLP Melville, New York September 27, 2013 F-1 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIDARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 ASSETS 2013 2012 _________ _________ Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 927,300 $ 769,300 Investment securities 908,400 718,300 Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $11,600 in 2013 and 2012 815,900 623,500 Inventories 1,705,600 1,613,700 Prepaid and other current assets 59,000 167,800 Deferred taxes 86,600 70,200 __________ __________ Total current assets 4,502,800 3,962,800 Property and equipment, net 156,500 180,500 Intangible assets, net 773,500 877,300 Goodwill 589,900 589,900 Other assets 24,100 25,700 Deferred taxes 106,200 136,000 __________ __________ Total assets $6,153,000 $5,772,200 ========== ========== LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 156,800 $ 114,800 Customer advances 15,900 98,500 Accrued expenses and taxes 407,700 237,500 Contingent consideration, current 19,000 19,000 Notes payable, current portion 78,300 75,800 __________ __________ Total current liabilities 677,700 545,600 Contingent consideration payable, less current portion 51,600 88,400 Notes payable, less current portion 26,700 105,000 __________ __________ Total liabilities 756,000 739,000 __________ __________ Shareholders' equity: Common stock, $.05 par value; authorized 7,000,000 shares; issued 1,357,465 shares in 2013 and 1,355,514 in 2012 67,900 67,800 Additional paid-in capital 1,977,100 1,968,700 Accumulated other comprehensive loss, unrealized holding loss on investment securities (13,600) (12,600) Retained earnings 3,418,000 3,061,700 __________ __________ 5,449,400 5,085,600 Less common stock held in treasury at cost, 19,802 shares 52,400 52,400 __________ __________ Total shareholders' equity 5,397,000 5,033,200 __________ __________ Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $6,153,000 $5,772,200 ========== ========== See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-2 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIDARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 2013 2012 __________ ____________ Revenues $7,134,500 $6,202,600 Cost of sales 4,175,800 3,845,200 __________ __________ Gross profit 2,958,700 2,357,400 __________ __________ Operating expenses: General and administrative 1,277,700 1,230,600 Selling 723,100 714,200 Research and development 450,500 375,900 __________ __________ Total operating expenses 2,451,300 2,320,700 __________ __________ Income from operations 507,400 36,700 __________ __________ Other income (expense): Interest income 6,800 12,800 Other income 11,400 17,000 Interest expense (4,800) (4,600) __________ __________ Total other income 13,400 25,200 __________ __________ Income before income tax expense (benefit) 520,800 61,900 __________ __________ Income tax expense (benefit): Current 106,800 15,500 Deferred 17,600 (19,700) __________ __________ Total income tax expense (benefit) 124,400 (4,200) __________ __________ Net income $ 396,400 $ 66,100 ========== ========== Basic earnings per common share $ .30 $ .05 ===== ===== Diluted earnings per common share $ .30 $ .05 ===== ===== Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic 1,337,048 1,283,118 ========= ========= Weighted average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution 1,342,212 1,293,589 ========= ========= See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-3 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIDARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 2013 2012 __________ __________ Net income $ 396,400 $ 66,100 Other comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during period, net of tax (1,000) 8,900 __________ __________ Comprehensive income $ 395,400 $ 75,000 ========== ========== See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-4 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 Common Stock Additional Accumulated ______________ Paid-in Other Compr- Shares Amount Capital ehensive Loss _______ _______ __________ _____________ Balance, July 1, 2011 1,216,379 $60,800 $1,558,500 $ (21,500) Net income - - - - Unrealized holding gain on investment securities, net of tax - - - 8,900 Exercise of stock options 4,000 200 9,400 - Issuance of common stock 135,135 6,800 393,200 - Stock-based compensation - - 7,000 - Income tax benefit of stock options exercised - - 600 - Cash dividend declared and paid, $.05 per share - - - - _________ _______ _________ ___________ Balance, June 30, 2012 1,355,514 67,800 1,968,700 (12,600) Net income - - - - Unrealized holding loss on investment securities, net of tax - - - (1,000) Exercise of stock options 5,000 250 ( 250) - Tender of common stock (3,049) ( 150) 150 - Stock-based compensation - - 8,500 - Cash dividend declared and paid, $.03 per share - - - - _________ _______ __________ ___________ Balance, June 30, 2013 1,357,465 $67,900 $1,977,100 $ (13,600) ========= ======= ========== =========== See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-5 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED) YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 Retained Treasury Stock Shareholders' ______________ Earnings Shares Amount Equity __________ ______ _______ ____________ Balance, July 1, 2011 $3,055,400 19,802 $52,400 $4,600,800 Net income 66,100 - - 66,100 Unrealized holding gain on investment securities, net of tax - - - 8,900 Exercise of stock options - - - 9,600 Issuance of common stock - - - 400,000 Stock-based compensation - - - 7,000 Income tax benefit of stock options exercised - - - 600 Cash dividend declared and paid, $.05 per share (59,800) - - (59,800) __________ _______ _______ ___________ Balance, June 30, 2012 3,061,700 19,802 52,400 5,033,200 Net income 396,400 - - 396,400 Unrealized holding loss on investment securities, net of tax - - - (1,000) Exercise of stock options - - - - Tender of common stock - - - - Stock-based compensation - - - 8,500 Cash dividend paid, $.03 per share (40,100) - - (40,100) __________ _______ ________ ___________ Balance, June 30, 2013 $3,418,000 19,802 $52,400 $5,397,000 ========== ======= ======= =========== See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-5 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 2013 2012 __________ __________ Operating activities: Net income $ 396,400 $ 66,100 __________ __________ Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 178,800 185,900 Deferred income tax expense (benefit) 17,600 (19,700) Income tax benefit of stock options exercised - 600 Loss on sale of investment securities 7,600 1,000 Stock-based compensation 8,500 7,000 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Trade accounts receivable (192,400) (3,500) Inventories (91,900) 26,100 Prepaid and other current assets 108,800 29,900 Other assets 1,600 - Accounts payable 42,000 (13,300) Customer advances (82,600) 98,500 Accrued expenses and taxes 170,000 (46,800) __________ __________ Total adjustments 168,000 265,700 __________ __________ Net cash provided by operating activities 564,400 331,800 __________ __________ Investing activities: Payment for intangible assets acquired in acquisition (Note 2) - (260,000) Purchase of investment securities, available for sale (920,500) (10,900) Redemption of investment securities, available for sale 717,600 800 Capital expenditures (37,500) (75,300) Purchase of other intangible assets (13,300) (4,900) _________ _________ Net cash used in investing activities (253,700) (350,300) _________ _________ Financing activities: Line of credit proceeds - 60,000 Line of credit repayments - (60,000) Payment of contingent consideration (36,800) (20,600) Proceeds from exercise of stock options - 9,600 Cash dividend declared and paid (40,100) (59,800) Principal payments on note payable (75,800) (49,200) __________ _________ Net cash used in financing activities (152,700) (120,000) __________ _________ F-6 2013 2012 __________ __________ Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 158,000 (138,500) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 769,300 907,800 _________ __________ Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 927,300 $ 769,300 ========= ========== Supplemental disclosures: Cash paid during the period for: Income taxes $ - $ 3,200 Interest 4,800 4,600 Non-cash investing and financing activities (Note 2) See notes to consolidated financial statements. F-7 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Nature of Operations Scientific Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") design, manufacture, and market a variety of benchtop laboratory equipment, bioprocessing products and catalyst research instruments. The Company is headquartered in Bohemia, New York where it produces benchtop laboratory equipment for research and has another location in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where it produces a variety of custom-made catalyst research instruments and designs bioprocessing products. The equipment sold by the Company includes mixers, shakers, stirrers, refrigerated incubators, catalyst characterization instruments, reactor systems and high throughput systems. The Company also collects royalties under license agreements. Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Scientific Industries, Inc., Scientific Packaging Industries, Inc., an inactive wholly-owned subsidiary, Altamira Instruments, Inc. ("Altamira"), a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary, and Scientific Bioprocessing, Inc. ("SBI"), a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary, (all collectively referred to as the "Company"). All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Revenue Recognition Revenue from product sales is recognized when all the following criteria are met: * Receipt of a written purchase order agreement which is binding on the customer. * Goods are shipped and title passes. * Prices are fixed. * Collectability is reasonably assured. * All material obligations under the agreement have been substantially performed. Substantially all orders are F.O.B. shipping point, all sales are final without right of return or payment contingencies, and there are no special sales arrangements or agreements with any customers. Royalty revenue received under the Company's sublicenses is recorded net of payments due to its licensors. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. At times, cash balances may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insurance limit. As of June 30, 2013, $256,200 of cash balances were in excess of such limit. F-8 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Accounts Receivable In order to record the Company's accounts receivable at their net realizable value, the Company must assess their collectability. A considerable amount of judgment is required in order to make this assessment, including an analysis of historical bad debts and other adjustments, a review of the aging of the Company's receivables, and the current creditworthiness of the Company's customers. The Company has recorded allowances for receivables which it considered uncollectible, including amounts for the resolution of potential credit and other collection issues such as disputed invoices, customer satisfaction claims and pricing discrepancies. However, depending on how such potential issues are resolved, or if the financial condition of any of the Company's customers was to deteriorate and its ability to make required payments became impaired, increases in these allowances may be required. The Company actively manages its accounts receivable to minimize credit risk. The Company does not obtain collateral for its accounts receivable. Customer Advances In the ordinary course of business, customers may make advance payments for purchase orders. Such amounts, when received, are categorized as liabilities under the caption customer advances. Investment Securities Securities available for sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in a separate component of shareholders' equity. Realized gains or losses are determined based on the specific identification method. Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market value, and have been reduced by an allowance for excess and obsolete inventories. The estimate is based on management's review of inventories on hand compared to estimated future usage and sales. Cost of work-in-process and finished goods inventories include material, labor and manufacturing overhead. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided for primarily by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized by the straight-line method over the term of the related lease or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter. F-9 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Intangible Assets Intangible assets consist primarily of acquired technology, customer relationships, non-compete agreements, patents, licenses, trademarks and trade names. All intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, generally 5 to 10 years, except for customer relationships which are amortized on an accelerated (declining- balance) basis over their estimated useful lives. The Company continually evaluates the remaining estimated useful lives of intangible assets that are being amortized to determine whether events or circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization. Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill and long-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of ASC No. 350, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other" ("ASC No. 350"). ASC No. 350 requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets and liabilities to reporting units, assignment of goodwill to reporting units, and determination of the fair value of each reporting unit. The Company tests goodwill and long-lived assets annually as of June 30, the last day of its fiscal year, unless an event occurs that would cause the Company to believe the value is impaired at an interim date. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company follows the provisions of ASC No. 360-10, "Property, Plant and Equipment - Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets ("ASC No. 360-10"). ASC No. 360-10 requires evaluation of the need for an impairment charge relating to long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If an evaluation for impairment is required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset would be compared to the asset's carrying amount to determine if a write down to a new depreciable basis is required. If required, an impairment charge is recorded based on an estimate of future discounted cash flows. No impairment change has been recorded for the years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. F-10 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Income Taxes The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. The Company provides for federal, and state income taxes currently payable, as well as for those deferred due to timing differences between reporting income and expenses for financial statement purposes versus tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted income tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in income tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. Advertising Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense amounted to $30,000 and $26,700 for the years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Shipping and Handling The Company classifies costs associated with shipping and handling fees as a component of cost of goods sold. Stock Compensation Plan The Company has a ten-year stock option plan (the "2012 Plan") which provides for the grant of options to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.05 per share ("Common Stock"), plus 57,000 shares under options previously granted under the 2002 Stock Option Plan of the Company (the "Prior Plan"). The 2012 Plan provides for the granting of incentive or non-incentive stock options as defined in the 2012 Plan and options under the 2012 Plan may be granted until 2022. Incentive stock options may be granted to employees at an exercise price equal to 100% (or 110% if the optionee owns directly or indirectly more than 10% of the outstanding voting stock) of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the date of the grant which shall not be less than the book value per share of Common Stock as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter. Non-incentive stock options shall not be granted at less than the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the date of grant, and the per share book value. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, 93,000 shares of Common Stock were available for grant under the 2012 Plan and the Prior Plan. F-12 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Stock Compensation Plan (Continued) Stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with ASC No. 718 "Compensation-Stock Compensation" ("ASC No. 718") which requires compensation costs related to stock-based payment transactions to be recognized. With limited exceptions, the amount of compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards are measured at each reporting period. Compensation costs are recognized over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Company granted 15,000 options to employees and consultants that had a fair value of $15,700. The fair value of the options granted during fiscal year 2012 was determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used for fiscal 2012, was an expected life of 7 years; risk free interest rate of 1.00%; volatility of 69%, and dividend yield of 1.54%. The weighted-average value per share of the options granted in 2012 was $1.04, and stock-based compensation costs were $7,000 for the year ended June 30, 2012. Stock-based compensation costs related to nonvested awards to be recognized in the future are $3,700 and $11,900 as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially from management's estimates. Earnings Per Common Share Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive effect of stock options. F-12 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) New Accounting Pronouncements In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Boad ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("ASU 2013-02"), to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in the same reporting period. An entity is required to cross- reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. ASU 2013-02 became effective for the Company during this reporting period; however the adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have an impact on the reporting of the Company's financial statements. In July 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02, "Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment" ("ASU 2012-02"), which allows entities to use a qualitative approach to test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. ASU 2012- 02 permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the indefinite- lived intangible asset is less than its currently prescribed quantitative impairment test. Otherwise, the quantitative impairment test in not required. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, and early adoption is permitted. The Company elected to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2012-02, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. 2. Acquisition On November 14, 2011 the Company through SBI, acquired substantially all of the assets of a privately owned company consisting principally of a license and sublicenses under patents held by the University of Maryland, Baltimore County ("UMBC") with respect to the design, development and production of bioprocessing methods, systems and products. The acquisition was pursuant to an asset purchase agreement whereby the Company paid to the seller $260,000 in cash, issued 135,135 shares of Common Stock valued at $400,000, issued to UMBC a $230,000 36-month note payable, and agreed to make additional cash payments equal to 30% of net royalties received under the acquired license and sublicenses, to the sellers estimated at a present value of $128,000 on the date of acquisition. F-13 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 2. Acquisition (Continued) SBI's revenues are derived from royalties received by SBI under the various sublicense agreements, net of royalty payments due to UMBC, and revenues from future sales of certain products being developed under its existing license. University, government, and industrial laboratories working primarily in the biotechnology industry worldwide are its targeted customers. Management of the Company allocated the purchase price based on its valuation of the assets acquired, all of which are intangible, as follows: Technology, trademarks, and in-process research & development ("IPR&D") $ 500,000 Sublicense agreements 294,000 Engineering drawings and software 64,000 Non-competition agreements 18,000 Goodwill* 142,000 __________ Total Purchase Price $1,018,000 ========== *See Note 7, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". The amounts allocated to Technology, Trademarks, and IPRD and Sublicense Agreements are deemed to have a useful life of 10 years, and to the remaining intangible assets to have a useful life of 5 years, all of which are being amortized on a straight- line basis, except for goodwill. In connection with the acquisition, SBI entered into a research and development agreement providing for the seller to perform services with respect to the research and development of bioprocessing methods, systems, and products pursuant to programs set forth in the agreement, at a fee of $14,000 per month plus all related expenses. The agreement was terminated in June 2013 as a result of the death of the seller's chief operating officer. F-14 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 2. Acquisition (Continued) Pro forma results The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information in the table below summarizes the consolidated results of operations of Scientific, Altamira, and SBI on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been consolidated as of the beginning of the year ended June 30, 2012. The unaudited pro forma condensed financial information presented below is for informational purposes only and is not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of the operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had been completed as of the commencement of the fiscal year presented. The information presented is based on management's best judgment and the effects of the acquisition including amortization and interest expenses excluding total acquisition related costs incurred of $78,500 for the year ended June 30, 2012: 2012 ___________ Net sales $ 6,352,700 Net loss $ (48,200) Net loss per share - basic $ (.04) Net loss per share - diluted $ (.04) 3. Segment Information and Concentrations The Company views its operations as three segments: the manufacture and marketing of standard benchtop laboratory equipment for research in university, hospital and industrial laboratories sold primarily through laboratory equipment distributors ("Benchtop Laboratory Equipment Operations"), the manufacture and marketing of custom-made catalyst research instruments for universities, government laboratories, and chemical and petrochemical companies sold on a direct basis ("Catalyst Research Instruments Operations") and the design of bioprocessing systems and products and related royalty income ("Bioprocessing Systems"). F-15 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 3. Segment Information and Concentrations (Continued) Segment information is reported as follows: Benchtop Catalyst Bio- Corporate Laboratory Research processing and Conso- Equipment Instruments Systems Other lidated __________ ___________ __________ _________ __________ June 30, 2013: Revenues $4,466,000 $2,541,500 $ 127,000 $ - $7,134,500 Foreign Sales 2,549,100 1,603,800 - - 4,152,900 Income (Loss) From Operations 525,900 151,400 ( 169,900) - 507,400 Assets 2,501,600 1,646,600 903,600 1,101,200 6,153,000 Long-Lived Asset Expenditures 18,300 23,300 9,200 - 50,800 Depreciation and Amortization 43,300 35,300 100,200 - 178,800 Benchtop Catalyst Bio- Corporate Laboratory Research processing and Conso- Equipment Instruments Systems Other lidated __________ ___________ __________ _________ __________ June 30, 2012: Revenues $4,160,500 $1,940,900 $ 101,200 $ - $6,202,600 Foreign Sales 2,505,300 884,000 3,600 - 3,392,900 Income (Loss) From Operations 416,800 ( 190,400) ( 111,200) ( 78,500) 36,700 Assets 2,366,100 1,083,400 822,800 1,499,900 5,772,200 Long-Lived Asset Expenditures 30,700 49,500 1,018,000 - 1,098,200 Depreciation and Amortization 49,300 76,700 59,900 - 185,900 F-17 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Financial Accounting Standards Board defines the fair value of financial instruments as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. The accounting guidance also expands the disclosure requirements around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three evels, which is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are described below: Level 1 Inputs that are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 Prices or valuation that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company's financial assets that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2013 and 2012 according to the valuation techniques the Company used to determine their fair values: Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as Assets: Fair Value at June 30, 2013 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 ______________ __________ _______ ________ Cash and cash equivalents $ 927,300 $ 927,300 $ - $ - Available for sale securities 908,400 908,400 - - __________ __________ _______ ________ Total $1,835,700 $1,835,700 $ - $ - ========== ========== ======= ======== Liabilities: Contingent consideration $ 70,600 $ - $ - $ 70,600 ========== ========== ======= ======== Fair Value Measurements Using Inputs Considered as Assets: Fair Value at June 30, 2012 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 ______________ __________ _______ ________ Cash and cash equivalents $ 769,300 $ 769,300 $ - $ - Available for sale securities 718,300 718,300 - - __________ __________ _______ ________ Total $1,487,600 $1,487,600 $ - $ - ========== ========== ======= ======== Liabilities: Contingent consideration $ 107,400 $ - $ - $107,400 ========== ========== ======= ======== F-17 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued) Investments in marketable securities classified as available-for-sale by security type at June 30, 2013 and 2012 consisted of the following: Unrealized Fair Holding Gain Cost Value (Loss) ____________ _________ ____________ At June 30, 2013: Available for sale: Equity securities $ 29,300 $ 33,200 $ 3,900 Mutual funds 892,700 875,200 (17,500) __________ _________ __________ $ 922,000 $ 908,400 $ (13,600) ========== ========= ========== Unrealized Fair Holding Gain Cost Value (Loss) ____________ _________ ____________ At June 30, 2012: Available for sale: Equity securities $ 5,900 $ 16,000 $ 10,100 Mutual funds 725,000 702,300 (22,700) __________ _________ __________ $ 730,900 $ 718,300 $ (12,600) ========== ========= ========== 5. Inventories 2013 2012 __________ __________ Raw materials $1,336,800 $1,146,800 Work-in-process 254,000 221,900 Finished goods 114,800 245,000 __________ __________ $1,705,600 $1,613,700 ========== ========== F-18 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 6. Property and Equipment Useful Lives (Years) 2013 2012 ____________ __________ __________ Automobiles 5 $ 14,900 $ 14,900 Computer equipment 3-5 132,100 125,600 Machinery and equipment 3-7 627,500 602,500 Furniture and fixtures 4-10 181,000 183,200 Leasehold improvements 3-5 71,700 66,900 _________ _________ 1,027,200 993,100 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 870,700 812,600 _________ _________ $ 156,500 $ 180,500 ========= ========= Depreciation expense was $61,700 and $70,000 for the years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in connection with the Company's acquisition of Altamira and SBI's acquisition of assets. Goodwill amounted to $589,900 at June 30, 2013 and 2012, all of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. F-19 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Continued) The components of other intangible assets are as follows: Useful Accumulated Lives Cost Amortization Net ______ ________ ____________ _________ At June 30, 2013: Technology, trademarks 5/10 yrs. $ 865,400 $ 402,100 $ 463,300 Customer relationships 10 yrs. 237,000 203,200 33,800 Sublicense agreements 10 yrs. 294,000 47,800 246,200 Non-compete agreements 5 yrs. 114,000 105,900 8,100 Other intangible assets 5 yrs. 156,000 133,900 22,100 __________ _________ _________ $1,666,400 $ 892,900 $ 773,500 ========== ========= ========= Useful Accumulated Lives Cost Amortization Net ______ ________ ____________ _________ At June 30, 2012: Technology, trademarks 5/10 yrs. $ 864,000 $ 339,300 $ 524,700 Customer relationships 10 yrs. 237,000 192,100 44,900 Sublicense agreements 10 yrs. 294,000 18,400 275,600 Non-compete agreements 5 yrs. 120,000 104,300 15,700 Other intangible assets 5 yrs. 143,900 127,500 16,400 __________ _________ _________ $1,658,900 $ 781,600 $ 877,300 ========== ========= ========= Total amortization expense was $117,100 and $115,900 in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets is as follows: Fiscal Years ____________ 2014 $ 110,800 2015 106,600 2016 110,800 2017 95,600 2018 81,100 Thereafter 268,600 _______________ $ 773,500 =============== F-20 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 8. Loan Payable, Bank The Company has a line of credit with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the "Bank"), which provides for maximum borrowings of up to $700,000, bearing interest at 3.05 percentage points above a defined LIBOR Index (3.25% at June 30, 2013), and secured by a pledge of collateral consisting of the inventory, accounts, chattel paper, equipment and general intangibles of the Company. Outstanding amounts are due and payable by June 14, 2014 with a requirement that the Company is to reduce the outstanding principal balance to zero during the 30 day period ending on the anniversary date of the Note. The Company did not have any amounts outstanding under the line at June 30, 2013 and 2012. 9. Employee Benefit Plans During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, the Company adopted a single 401(k) profit sharing plan covering all its employees, which provides for voluntary employee salary contributions not to exceed the statutory limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code. The plan provides for Company matching contribution equal to 100% of employee's deferral up to 3% of pay, plus 50% of employee's deferral over 3% of pay up to 5%. Previously, the Company had two separate plans. Total matching contributions amounted to $42,800 and $34,800 for the years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 10. Commitments and Contingencies The Company is obligated through January 2015 under a noncancelable operating lease for its Bohemia, New York premises, which requires minimum annual rental payments plus other expenses, including real estate taxes and insurance. The future minimum annual rental expense, computed on a straight-line basis, is approximately $209,400 under the terms of the lease. Rental expense for the Bohemia facility amounted to approximately $233,500 in 2013 and $233,600 in 2012. Accrued rent, payable in future years, amounted to $44,200 and $59,800 at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company was also obligated under an operating lease for its facility in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, through November 2017, which requires monthly minimum rental payments through November 2017, plus common area expenses. Total rental expenses for the Pittsburgh facility was $77,200 and $56,000 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The Company's approximate future minimum rental payments under all operating leases are as follows: Fiscal Years ____________ 2014 $ 299,800 2015 217,800 2016 82,000 2017 85,400 2018 36,000 ___________ $ 721,000 =========== F-21 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 10. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) The Company has two year employment contracts with its President providing for an annual base salary of $154,000 and $150,000 for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015 and 2014, which extended then existing employment contracts which provided for an annual base salary of $141,000 and $138,000 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The Company also has two year employment contracts with its Executive Vice President providing for an annual base salary of $139,000 and $135,000 for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2015 and 2014, which also extended then existing employment contracts which provided for an annual base salary of $129,000 and $126,300 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Both contracts also provide for discretionary performance bonuses. Bonuses of $10,000 and $5,000 were awarded to the President and Executive Vice President, respectively, for the year ended June 30, 2013. No bonuses were awarded for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 to either executive. The Company has an employment contract with the President of Altamira through June 30, 2014, which may be extended by mutual consent for an additional year. The contract provides for an annual base salary of $131,000 and $135,000 for each of the fiscal years ending June 30, 2013 and 2014, respectively, plus discretionary bonuses. A bonus of $5,000 was awarded for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. No bonus was awarded for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, except for a stock option granted during the year ended June 30, 2012 in connection with his services provided with respect to the new subsidiary, SBI, valued at $5,600 using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The Company has a consulting agreement which expires on December 31, 2013 with an affiliate of the Chairman of the Board of Directors for marketing consulting services. The agreement provides that the consultant be paid a monthly fee of $3,300 for a certain number of consulting days as defined in the agreement. Stock options were granted to the Chairman of the Board of Directors valued at $10,000 during the year ended June 30, 2012. Consulting expense related to this agreement amounted to $44,600 and $42,800 for the years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company has a consulting agreement which expires March 31, 2014 with another member of its Board of Directors for administrative services providing that the consultant be paid at the rate of $85 per hour. Consulting expense related to this agreement amounted to $6,100 and $5,100 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company is occasionally involved in claims and disputes arising in the ordinary course of business. It is management's opinion that any liabilities resulting from the actions would not have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. F-22 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 11. Income Taxes The reconciliation of the provision for income taxes at the federal statutory rate of 35% to the actual tax expense for the applicable fiscal year was as follows: 2013 2012 __________________ _________________ % of % of Pre-tax Pre-tax Amount Income Amount Income _________ _______ _________ _______ Computed "expected" income tax $182,300 35.0% $ 21,700 35.0% Surtax exemption - - (12,400) (20.0) Research and development credits (30,700) (5.9) (11,300) (18.3) Other, net (27,200) (5.2) ( 2,200) ( 3.5) _________ _______ __________ ______ Income tax expense (benefit) $124,400 23.9% $( 4,200) ( 6.8%) ========= ======= ========== ====== Deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following: 2013 2012 __________ __________ Deferred tax assets: Amortization of intangibles $ 146,100 $ 149,700 Various accruals 49,600 44,800 Other 53,400 55,100 _________ _________ 249,100 249,600 Deferred tax liability: Depreciation of property and amortization of goodwill (56,300) (43,400) __________ __________ Net deferred tax assets $ 192,800 $ 206,200 ========== ========== The breakdown between current and long-term deferred tax assets and liabilities is as follows: 2013 2012 __________ __________ Current deferred tax assets $ 86,600 $ 70,200 _________ _________ Long-term deferred tax assets 162,500 179,400 Long-term deferred tax liabilities (56,300) (43,400) __________ __________ Net long-term deferred tax asset 106,200 136,000 __________ __________ Net deferred tax assets $ 192,800 $ 206,200 ========== ========== F-23 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 11. Income Taxes (Continued) ASC No. 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC No. 740 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax matters. The Company's policy is to recognize interest and penalties on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. The Company does not have any accrued interest or penalties associated with any unrecognized tax benefits. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as various state jurisdictions. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the federal and state jurisdictions for the years ending June 30, 2010 through 2012. The Company does not anticipate any material amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months. 12. Stock Options Option activity is summarized as follows: Fiscal 2013 Fiscal 2012 _________________ __________________ Weighted- Weighted- Average Average Exercise Exercise Shares Price Shares Price _______ _______ _______ ________ Shares under option: Outstanding, beginning of year 60,000 $ 2.73 57,000 $ 2.45 Granted - - 15,000 3.54 Exercised (5,000) 1.25 (4,000) 2.40 Forfeited - - (8,000) 2.40 ________ ________ Outstanding, end of year 55,000 2.86 60,000 2.73 ________ _______ ________ ________ Options exercisable at year-end 51,000 $ 2.81 52,833 $ 2.62 ________ _______ ________ ________ Weighted average fair value per share of options granted during fiscal 2012 $ 1.04 ======= F-24 SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND 2012 12. Stock Options (Continued) As of June 30, 2013 As of June 30, 2013 Options Outstanding Exercisable _______________________________________________ ______________________ Weighted- Average Weighted- Weighted- Range Remaining Average Average Exercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise Prices Outstanding Life (Years) Price Outstanding Price _________ ___________ ____________ _________ ___________ _________ $1.35-$1.88 15,000 .94 $ 1.70 15,000 $ 1.70 $3.07-$3.71 40,000 3.72 $ 3.30 36,000 $ 3.27 ________ ________ 55,000 51,000 ________ ________ As of June 30, 2012 As of June 30, 2012 Options Outstanding Exercisable _______________________________________________ ______________________ Weighted- Average Weighted- Weighted- Range Remaining Average Average Exercise Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise Prices Outstanding Life (Years) Price Outstanding Price _________ ___________ ____________ _________ ___________ _________ $1.25-$1.88 20,000 1.54 $ 1.59 20,000 $ 1.59 $3.07-$3.71 40,000 4.72 $ 3.30 32,833 $ 3.25 ________ ________ 60,000 52,833 ________ ________ 13. Earnings Per Common Share Earnings per common share data was computed as follows: 2013 2012 __________ __________ Net income $ 396,400 $ 66,100 __________ __________ Weighted average common shares outstanding 1,337,048 1,283,118 Effect of dilutive securities 5,164 10,471 __________ __________ Weighted average dilutive common shares outstanding 1,342,212 1,293,589 __________ __________ Basic earnings per common share $ .30 $ .05 ========== ========== Diluted earnings per common share $ .30 $ .05 ========== ========== F-25