XML 38 R6.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Oct. 01, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract] 
Fair Value Measurements

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements

Financial assets and liabilities are to be measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value hierarchy. Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Zebra uses a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as consider counterparty credit risk in the assessment of fair value.

Included in our investment portfolio are two auction rate security instruments. These instruments are classified as available-for-sale securities and are reflected at fair value. Due to events in credit markets, however, the auction events for the instruments held by Zebra as of October 1, 2011, are failed. Therefore, the fair values of these securities are estimated utilizing broker quotations, discounted cash flow analysis or other types of valuation adjustment methodologies at October 1, 2011. These analyses consider, among other items, the collateral underlying the security instruments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, estimates of the next time the security is expected to have a successful auction, and Zebra's intent and ability to hold such securities until credit markets improve. These securities were also compared, when possible, to other securities with similar characteristics. In June 2010, one of the four auction rate securities held at the end of the first quarter of 2010 was called by the issuer and redeemed at par value. In May 2011, one of the three auction rate securities held at the end of the first quarter of 2011 was converted to actively traded securities in the amount of $2,550,000. The remaining $450,000 was sold during the second quarter of 2011 at a loss of $36,000.

 

Of the two auction rate security instruments still owned as of October 1, 2011, Zebra deemed one to be other than temporarily impaired and recorded the estimated value decline in 2008, and further reduced the remaining carrying value of $326,000 to zero in the third quarter of 2011. The decline in the market value of the other security is considered temporary and has been recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on Zebra's balance sheet. Since Zebra has the intent and ability to hold these securities until they are sold at auction, redeemed at carrying value or reach maturity, we have classified them as long-term investments on the balance sheet.

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of October 1, 2011, are classified below (in thousands):

                 
     Nine Months Ended  
     October 1, 2011     October 2, 2010  

Balance at beginning of the year

   $ 5,597      $ 7,047   

Transfers to Level 3

     —          —     

Total losses (realized or unrealized):

                

Included in earnings

     (362     —     

Included in other comprehensive income (loss)

     317        200   

Purchases and settlements (net)

     (2,964     (1,650
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 2,588      $ 5,597   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total gains and (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized losses relating to assets still held at end of period

   $ —        $ —