SUB-ITEM 77E

                   INVESCO QUALITY MUNICIPAL INVESTMENT TRUST

                               LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

SETTLED REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AND INVESTIGATIONS RELATED TO MARKET
TIMING

     On October 8, 2004, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (Invesco), successor by merger
to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc. and INVESCO Funds Group, Inc. (IFG), both former
investment advisers, along with Invesco Aim Distributors, n/k/a Invesco
Distributors, Inc. (Invesco Distributors) reached final settlements with certain
regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the New York
Attorney General and the Colorado Attorney General, to resolve civil enforcement
actions and/or investigations related to market timing and related activity in
the AIM Funds (n/k/a the Invesco Funds), including those formerly advised by
IFG.  As part of the settlements, a $325 million fair fund ($110 million of
which is civil penalties) was created to compensate shareholders harmed by
market timing and related activity in funds formerly advised by IFG.
Additionally, Invesco and Invesco Distributors created a $50 million fair fund
($30 million of which is civil penalties) to compensate shareholders harmed by
market timing and related activity in funds advised by Invesco, which was done
pursuant to the terms of the settlement.  The methodology of the fair funds
distributions was determined by Invesco's independent distribution consultant
(IDC Plan), in consultation with Invesco and the independent trustees of the
Invesco Funds, and approved by the SEC on May 23, 2008.

     The IDC Plan provides for distribution to all eligible investors for the
periods spanning January 1, 2000 through July 31, 2003 (for the IFG Fair Fund)
and January 1, 2001 through September 30, 2003 (for the AIM Fair Fund), their
proportionate share of the applicable Fair Fund to compensate such investors for
injury they may have suffered as a result of market timing in the affected
funds.  The IDC Plan includes a provision for any residual amounts in the Fair
Funds to be distributed in the future to the affected funds.  Further details
regarding the IDC Plan and distributions thereunder are available on Invesco's
Web site, available at http://www.invesco.com/us.

PENDING REGULATORY ACTION ALLEGING MARKET TIMING

     On August 30, 2005, the West Virginia Office of the State Auditor -
Securities Commission (WVASC) issued a Summary Order to Cease and Desist and
Notice of Right to Hearing to Invesco and Invesco Distributors (collectively,
Invesco) (Order No. 05-1318).  The WVASC made findings of fact that Invesco
allegedly entered into certain arrangements permitting market timing of the
Invesco Funds and failed to disclose these arrangements in the prospectuses for
such Funds, and conclusions of law to the effect that Invesco violated the West
Virginia securities laws.  The WVASC ordered Invesco to cease any further
violations and sought to impose monetary sanctions, including restitution to
affected investors, disgorgement of fees, reimbursement of investigatory,
administrative and legal costs and an "administrative assessment" to be
determined by the Commissioner.  Invesco is not aware of any further efforts by
WVASC to pursue the prosecution of this matter.  Invesco settled all other
regulatory investigations related to market timing, resulting in: 1) affected
shareholders receiving restitution; 2) Invesco paying disgorgement and civil
penalties; and 3) Invesco taking remedial actions to prevent market timing.
Accordingly, Invesco considers this matter resolved.

OTHER ACTIONS INVOLVING INVESCO QUALITY MUNICIPAL INVESTMENT TRUST

The Trust received a shareholder demand letter dated September 1, 2010, from one
of the Trust's shareholders alleging that the former board and the officers of
the Trust breached their fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty and wasted Trust
assets by causing the Trust to redeem Auction Rate Preferred Securities (ARPS)
at their liquidation value.  Specifically, the shareholders claim that the board
and officers had no obligation to provide liquidity to the ARPS shareholders,
the redemptions were improperly motivated to benefit the prior adviser by
preserving business relationships with the ARPS holders, i.e., institutional
investors, and the market value and fair value of the ARPS were less than par at
the time they were redeemed. The letter alleges that the redemption of the ARPS
occurred at the expense of the Trust and

                                       1



                                                                    SUB-ITEM 77E

its common shareholders. The letter demands that: 1) the Board take action
against the prior adviser and trustees/officers to recover damages; 2) the Board
refrain from authorizing further redemptions or repurchases of ARPS by the Trust
at prices in excess of fair value or market value at the time of the
transaction; and 3) if the Trust does not commence appropriate action, the
shareholder will commence a shareholder derivative action on behalf of the
Trust. The Board has formed a Special Litigation Committee to investigate these
claims and make a recommendation to the Board regarding whether maintenance of
these claims is in the best interests of the Trust. After reviewing the findings
of the SLC's evaluation of the claims, the Board announced on July 12, 2011,
that it adopted the SLC's recommendation and voted to reject the demands.

At the present time, management of Invesco and the Invesco Funds are unable to
estimate the impact, if any, that the outcome of the regulatory inquiries and
any potential pending litigation described herein may have on Invesco, Invesco
Distributors or the Invesco Funds.

                                       2