XML 40 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Significant Accounting Policies (Policy)
12 Months Ended
Mar. 26, 2016
Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Background

Background



Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Monro Service Corporation and Car-X, LLC (together, “Monro”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”), are engaged principally in providing automotive undercar repair and tire services in the United States.  Monro had 1,029 Company-operated stores, 135 franchised locations and 14 dealer-operated automotive repair centers located in 25 states as of March 26, 2016.  Monro’s operations are organized and managed in one operating segment.

Accounting estimates

Accounting estimates



The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with such principles requires the use of estimates by management during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fiscal year

Fiscal year



Monro reports its results on a 52/53 week fiscal year ending on the last Saturday of March of each year.  The following are the dates represented by each fiscal period:



“Year ended Fiscal March 2016”: March 29, 2015 – March 26, 2016 (52 weeks)

“Year ended Fiscal March 2015”: March 30, 2014 – March 28, 2015 (52 weeks)

“Year ended Fiscal March 2014”: March 31, 2013 – March 29, 2014 (52 weeks)

Consolidation

Consolidation



The Consolidated Financial Statements include Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Monro Service Corporation and Car-X, LLC, after the elimination of intercompany transactions and balances.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications



Certain amounts in these financial statements have been reclassified to maintain comparability among the periods presented.

Revenue recognition

Revenue recognition



Sales are recorded upon completion of automotive undercar repair and tire services provided to customers.  The following was Monro’s sales mix for fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended Fiscal March

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Brakes

 

15 

%

 

15 

%

 

15 

%

Exhaust

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steering

 

10 

 

 

10 

 

 

 

Tires

 

45 

 

 

44 

 

 

44 

 

Maintenance

 

27 

 

 

28 

 

 

28 

 

Total

 

100 

%

 

100 

%

 

100 

%



Revenue from the sale of tire road hazard warranty agreements is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period or other method when costs are not incurred ratably.

Cash equivalents

Cash equivalents



We consider all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Inventories

Inventories



Our inventories consist of automotive parts and tires.  Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

Barter credits

Barter credits



We value barter credits at the fair market value of the inventory exchanged, as determined by reference to price lists for buying groups and jobber pricing.  We use these credits primarily to pay vendors for purchases (mainly inventory vendors for the purchase of parts and tires) or to purchase other goods or services from the barter company such as advertising and travel.

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment



Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost.  Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is provided on a straight-line basis.  Buildings and improvements related to owned locations are depreciated over lives varying from 10 to 39 years; machinery, fixtures and equipment over lives varying from 3 to 15 years; and vehicles over lives varying from 4 to 10 years.  Computer hardware and software is depreciated over lives varying from 3 to 7 years.  Buildings and improvements related to leased locations are depreciated over the shorter of the asset’s useful life or the reasonably assured lease term, as defined in the accounting guidance on leases.  When property is sold or retired, the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and a gain or loss is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.  (See Note 4.)

Long-lived assets

Long-lived assets



We evaluate the ability to recover long-lived assets whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable.  In the event assets are impaired, losses are recognized to the extent the carrying value exceeds the fair value.  In addition, we report assets to be disposed of at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair market value less costs to sell.

Store opening and closing costs

Store opening and closing costs



New store opening costs are charged to expense in the fiscal year when incurred.  When we close a store, the estimated unrecoverable costs, including the remaining lease obligation net of sublease income, if any, are charged to expense.

Leases

Leases



Financing Obligations –



We are often involved in the construction of leased stores.  In some cases, we are responsible for construction cost overruns or non-standard tenant improvements.  As a result of this involvement, we are deemed the “owner” for accounting purposes during the construction period, requiring us to capitalize the construction costs on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  Upon completion of the project, we perform a sale-leaseback analysis pursuant to guidance on accounting for leases to determine if we can remove the assets from our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  For some of these leases, we are considered to have “continuing involvement”, which precludes us from derecognizing the assets from our Consolidated Balance Sheet when construction is complete (“failed sale-leaseback”).  In conjunction with these leases, we capitalize the construction costs on our Consolidated Balance Sheet and also record financing obligations representing payments owed to the landlord.  We do not report rent expense for the properties which are owned for accounting purposes.  Rather, rental payments under the lease are recognized as a reduction of the financing obligation and as interest expense.



Additionally, since we often assume leases in acquisition transactions, the accounting for a seller who was involved in the construction of leased stores passes to us.



Capital Leases –



Some of our property is held under capital leases.  These assets are included in property, plant and equipment and depreciated over the term of the lease.  We do not report rent expense for capital leases.  Rather, rental payments under the lease are recognized as a reduction of the capital lease obligation and interest expense.



Operating Leases –



All other leases are considered operating leases.  Rent expense, including rent escalations, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the reasonably assured lease term, as defined in the accounting guidance on leases.  Generally, the lease term is the base lease term plus certain renewal option periods for which renewal is reasonably assured.

Goodwill and intangible assets

Goodwill and intangible assets



We have a history of growth through acquisitions.  Assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the date of acquisition.  Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying net assets of acquired businesses.  The carrying value of goodwill is subject to annual impairment reviews in accordance with accounting guidance on goodwill, which we typically perform in the third quarter of the fiscal year.  Impairment reviews may also be triggered by any significant events or changes in circumstances affecting our business.



We have one reporting unit which encompasses all operations including new acquisitions. The goodwill impairment test consists of a two-step process, if necessary. We perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value of goodwill.  The qualitative assessment includes a review of business changes, economic outlook, financial trends and forecasts, growth rates, industry data, market capitalization and other relevant qualitative factors. If the qualitative factors are triggered, we perform the two-step process.  The first step is to compare the fair value of our reporting unit to the book value of our reporting unit. If the fair value is less than its carrying value, the second step of the impairment test must be performed in order to determine the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill.  If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.  The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. 



Intangible assets primarily represent allocations of purchase price to identifiable intangible assets of acquired businesses and are amortized over their estimated useful lives.  All intangibles and other long-lived assets are reviewed when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable.  If such indicators are present, it is determined whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to such assets is less than their carrying amounts.  No such indicators were present in fiscal 2016, 2015 or 2014.



A deterioration of macroeconomic conditions may not only negatively impact the estimated operating cash flows used in our cash flow models, but may also negatively impact other assumptions used in our analyses, including, but not limited to, the estimated cost of capital and/or discount rates.  Additionally, as discussed above, in accordance with accounting guidance, we are required to ensure that assumptions used to determine fair value in our analyses are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical market participant would use.  As a result, the cost of capital and/or discount rates used in our analyses may increase or decrease based on market conditions and trends, regardless of whether our actual cost of capital has changed.  Therefore, we may recognize an impairment of an intangible asset or assets even though realized actual cash flows are approximately equal to or greater than its previously forecasted amounts.



As a result of our annual qualitative assessment performed in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, there were no impairments.  There have been no triggering events during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

Self-insurance reserves

Self-insurance reserves



We are largely self-insured with respect to workers’ compensation, general liability and employee medical claims.  In order to reduce our risk and better manage our overall loss exposure, we purchase stop-loss insurance that covers individual claims in excess of the deductible amounts, and caps total losses in a fiscal year.  We maintain an accrual for the estimated cost to settle open claims as well as an estimate of the cost of claims that have been incurred but not reported.  These estimates take into consideration the historical average claim volume, the average cost for settled claims, current trends in claim costs, changes in our business and workforce, and general economic factors.  These accruals are reviewed on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if factors dictate a more frequent review is warranted.  For more complex reserve calculations, such as workers’ compensation, we use the services of an actuary on an annual basis to assist in determining the required reserve for open claims.

Warranty

Warranty



We provide an accrual for estimated future warranty costs for parts that we install based upon the historical relationship of warranty costs to sales.  Warranty expense related to all product warranties at and for the years ended March 2016, 2015 and 2014 was not material to our financial position or results of operations.  See additional discussion of tire road hazard warranty agreements under the “Revenue recognition” section of this footnote.

Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income



As it relates to Monro, comprehensive income is defined as net earnings as adjusted for pension liability adjustments and is reported net of related taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity.

Income taxes

Income taxes



Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using tax rates based on currently enacted rules and legislation and anticipated rates that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The accounting guidance for uncertainties in income tax prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns.  Monro recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits and a consideration of the relevant taxing authority's administrative practices and precedents.  (See Note 7.)

Treasury stock

Treasury stock



Treasury stock is accounted for using the par value method.  During the year ended March 26, 2016, Monro’s Chief Executive Officer surrendered 32,000 shares of Monro’s Common Stock at fair market value to pay the exercise price and the related taxes on the exercise of 89,000 stock options.  Additionally, Monro’s Executive Chairman surrendered 100,000 shares of Common Stock at fair market value to pay the exercise price and to satisfy tax withholding obligations on the exercise of 150,000 stock options.  During the year ended March 28, 2015, Monro’s Chief Executive Officer surrendered 77,000 shares of Monro’s Common Stock at fair market value to pay the exercise price on the exercise of 113,000 stock options.  There was no activity for the Chief Executive Officer or Executive Chairman during the year ended March 29, 2014.

Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation



We measure compensation cost arising from the grant of share-based payments to an employee at fair value, and recognize such cost in income over the period during which the employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period.  Forfeitures are estimated on the grant date and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.



We recognize compensation expense related to stock options using the straight-line approach.  Option awards generally vest equally over the service period established in the award, typically four years.  We estimate fair value using the Black-Scholes valuation model.  Assumptions used to estimate the compensation expense are determined as follows:



·

Expected life of an award is based on historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards granted to employees;



·

Expected volatility is measured using historical changes in the market price of Monro’s Common Stock;



·

Risk-free interest rate is equivalent to the implied yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bonds with a remaining maturity equal to the expected term of the awards;



·

Forfeitures are based substantially on the history of cancellations of similar awards granted by Monro in prior years; and



·

Dividend yield is based on historical experience and expected future changes.



The weighted average fair value of options granted during fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $13.10,  $11.27 and $10.10, respectively.  The fair values of the options granted were estimated on the date of their grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended Fiscal March

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Risk-free interest rate

 

1.25 

%

 

1.23 

%

 

.86

%

Expected life, in years

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected volatility

 

27.2 

%

 

27.7 

%

 

29.7 

%

Expected dividend yield

 

.96

%

 

.99

%

 

.97

%



Total stock-based compensation expense included in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses in Monro’s Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended March 26, 2016, March 28, 2015 and March 29, 2014 was $2.8 million, $3.3 million and $3.6 million, respectively.  The related income tax benefit was $1.0 million, $1.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively. 

Earnings per share

Earnings per share



Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income less preferred stock dividends by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the year.  Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and equivalents outstanding during the year.  Common Stock equivalents represent shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options.  (See Note 10.)

Advertising

Advertising



We expense the production costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place, except for direct response advertising which is capitalized and amortized over its expected period of future benefits.



Direct response advertising consists primarily of coupons for Monro’s services.  The capitalized costs of this advertising are amortized over the period of the coupon’s validity, which is typically two months.



Prepaid advertising at March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015, and advertising expense for the years ended March 2016, 2015 and 2014, were not material to these financial statements.

Vendor rebates and cooperative advertising credits

Vendor rebates and cooperative advertising credits



We account for vendor rebates and cooperative advertising credits as a reduction of the cost of products purchased, except where the rebate or credit is a reimbursement of costs incurred to sell the vendor’s product, in which case it is offset against the costs incurred. 

Guarantees

Guarantees



At the time we issue a guarantee, we recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligation we assume under that guarantee.  Monro has guaranteed certain lease payments, primarily related to franchisees, amounting to $10.4 million.  This amount represents the maximum potential amount of future payments under the guarantees as of March 26, 2016.  The leases are guaranteed through April 2020.  In the event of default by the franchise owner, Monro generally retains the right to assume the lease of the related store, enabling Monro to re-franchise the location or to operate that location as a Company-operated store.  As of March 26, 2016, and in conjunction with purchase accounting, we have recorded a liability of $.7 million related to anticipated defaults under the foregoing leases.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements



In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance for the reporting of revenue from contracts with customers.  This guidance provides guidelines a company will apply to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized.  In March 2016, the FASB finalized its amendments to this guidance on assessing whether an entity is a principal or an agent in a revenue transaction.   The amendment provides clarification on principal versus agent considerations by providing indicators that suggest control.   The guidance impacts whether an entity records revenue on a gross versus net basis.  In August 2015, the FASB delayed the effective date of the guidance to fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017.  Early adoption is permitted, but not before the original effective date for public entities.  We are currently evaluating the potential effect of the adoption of this guidance on our Consolidated Financial Statements.



In April 2015, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the presentation of debt issuance costs.  This guidance requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented on the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability rather than as an asset.  These costs will continue to be amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method.  This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years and for interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015.  Retrospective adoption is required.  In September 2015, the FASB issued guidance clarifying that debt issuance costs related to revolver and line of credit arrangements can be recorded as an asset and amortized over the term of the arrangement, which is consistent with Monro’s current presentation.  This guidance did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.



In April 2015, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the measurement date of an employer's defined benefit obligation and plan assets.  This guidance permits a reporting entity with a fiscal year-end that does not coincide with a month-end to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity's fiscal year-end and apply that practical expedient consistently from year to year. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The new guidance is consistent with Monro’s current presentation.  This guidance did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.



In July 2015, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for the reporting of inventory.  This guidance requires that inventory within the scope of the guidance be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.  We have elected early adoption of this guidance during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.



In September 2015, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that is intended to simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments.  This guidance requires an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the amount recorded in current period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years and for interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015.  We have adopted this guidance during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.  Adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.



In November 2015, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to the balance sheet classification of deferred taxes.  This guidance will require that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.  We have elected early adoption of this guidance during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, utilizing retrospective application as permitted.  As a result, we have presented all net deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on our consolidated balance sheet as of March 26, 2016 and March 28, 2015.  For the classified balance sheet as of March 28, 2015, we have reclassified current deferred tax assets of $13,942,000 as noncurrent deferred tax assets. 



In February 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to leases.   This guidance establishes a right of use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than twelve months.  Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition.   The standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years.   A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.  Early adoption is permitted.   We are currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of this guidance on our Consolidated Financial Statements.



In March 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for share-based payments and their presentation in the financial statements. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016.   Early adoption is permitted.  We are currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this guidance on our Consolidated Financial Statements.



Other recent authoritative guidance issued by the FASB (including technical corrections to the Accounting Standards Codification) and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not, or are not expected to have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.