XML 22 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value

5. Fair Value

The Company held certain assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These assets and liabilities include available for sale securities classified as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and contingent consideration. ASC 820-10 (“Fair Value Measurement Disclosure”) requires the valuation using a three-tiered approach, which requires that fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of three tiers. These tiers are: Level 1, defined as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as valuations based on observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable input data; and Level 3, defined as valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants.

For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, it is the Company’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements, in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where there exists limited or no observable market data and therefore, are based primarily upon estimates, are often calculated based on the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other factors. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values. The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures.

As prescribed by U.S. GAAP, the Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. An adjustment to the pricing method used within either Level 1 or Level 2 inputs could generate a fair value measurement that effectively falls in a lower level in the hierarchy.

The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures and based on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from period to period. However, the Company expects changes in classifications between levels will be rare.

The carrying values of accounts receivable, inventories, interest receivable, accounts payable, and certain accrued expenses at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these items. The Company’s notes payable balance also approximates fair value as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, as they were modified in the third quarter of 2015.

The following are the major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

 

June 30, 2016

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

Description

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 

 

Total

 

Assets measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

64,609

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

64,609

 

Restricted cash

 

 

289

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

289

 

Total Assets measured at fair value

 

$

64,898

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

64,898

 

Liabilities measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

25,300

 

 

$

25,300

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

25,300

 

 

$

25,300

 

5. Fair Value (Continued)

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Description

 

Quoted Prices in

Active Markets for

Identical Assets

(Level 1)

 

 

Significant Other

Observable Inputs

(Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable Inputs

(Level 3)

 

 

Total

 

Assets measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

38,449

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

38,449

 

Total Assets measured at fair value

 

$

38,449

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

38,449

 

Liabilities measured at fair value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

23,500

 

 

$

23,500

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

23,500

 

 

$

23,500

 

 

The Company’s financial liabilities consisted of contingent consideration potentially payable to SOFAR related to the ALF-X acquisition in September 2015 (Note 3). This liability is reported as Level 3 as estimated fair value of the contingent consideration related to the acquisition requires significant management judgment or estimation and is calculated using the income approach, using various revenue and cost assumptions and applying a probability to each outcome. The change in fair value of the contingent consideration of $1,800,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily due to the effect of the passage of time on the fair value measurement and the impact of foreign currency exchange rates. Adjustments associated with the change in fair value of contingent consideration are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The following table presents quantitative information about the inputs and valuation methodologies used for the Company’s fair value measurements classified in Level 3 as of September 21, 2015, December 31, 2015, and June 30, 2016:

 

 

 

Valuation

Methodology

 

Significant

Unobservable Input

 

Weighted Average

(range, if

applicable)

Contingent  consideration

 

Probability weighted

income approach

 

Milestone dates

 

2016 to 2017

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

Probability of occurrence

 

7.5% to 9.0%

100%

 

The following table summarizes the change in fair value, as determined by Level 3 inputs, for all assets and liabilities using unobservable Level 3 inputs for the six months ended June 30, 2016:

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement at

Reporting Date (Level 3)

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

23,500

 

Change in fair value

 

 

1,800

 

Balance at June 30, 2016

 

$

25,300

 

Current portion

 

 

12,500

 

Long-term portion

 

 

12,800

 

Balance at June 30, 2016

 

$

25,300