XML 22 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Aug. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of our financial assets and liabilities at August 31, 2016 (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Total Fair
Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
8,536

 
$
8,536

 
$

 
$

State and municipal bond obligations
34,532

 

 
34,532

 

U.S. treasury bonds
6,534

 

 
6,534

 

U.S. government agency bonds
522

 

 
522

 

Corporate bonds
3,012

 

 
3,012

 

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange derivatives
$
(5,166
)
 
$

 
$
(5,166
)
 
$


The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of our financial assets and liabilities at November 30, 2015 (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Total Fair
Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
26,138

 
$
26,138

 
$

 
$

State and municipal bond obligations
20,417

 

 
20,417

 

U.S. treasury bonds
3,094

 

 
3,094

 

U.S. government agency bonds
1,641

 

 
1,641

 

Corporate bonds
3,748

 

 
3,748

 

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange derivatives
$
(4,021
)
 
$

 
$
(4,021
)
 
$



When developing fair value estimates, we maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When available, we use quoted market prices to measure fair value. The valuation technique used to measure fair value for our Level 1 and Level 2 assets is a market approach, using prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets. If market prices are not available, the fair value measurement is based on models that use primarily market based parameters including yield curves, volatilities, credit ratings and currency rates. In certain cases where market rate assumptions are not available, we are required to make judgments about assumptions market participants would use to estimate the fair value of a financial instrument.

The following table reflects the activity for our liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs, which relate to a contingent consideration obligation in connection with a prior acquisition, for each period presented (in thousands):

 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
August 31,
2016
 
August 31,
2015
 
August 31,
2016
 
August 31,
2015
Balance, beginning of period
$

 
$
295

 
$

 
$
1,717

Changes in fair value of contingent consideration obligation

 
(295
)
 

 
(1,508
)
Transfer to Level 2 fair value measurement

 

 

 
(209
)
Balance, end of period
$

 
$

 
$

 
$



We recorded credits of approximately $0.3 million and $1.5 million during the three and nine months ended August 31, 2015, respectively, due to the change in fair value of a contingent consideration obligation in connection with a prior acquisition, which is included in acquisition-related expenses in our condensed consolidated statement of operations. The contingent consideration obligation was reduced to $0 during the fiscal year ended November 30, 2015.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

During the third quarter of fiscal year 2016, certain assets have been measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). Based on the fair value measurement, we recorded a $5.1 million asset impairment charge as of August 31, 2016, which was applicable to the intangible assets obtained in connection with our acquisition of Modulus during the second quarter of fiscal year 2014 (Note 5).

The following table presents nonrecurring fair value measurements as of August 31, 2016 (in thousands):

 
Total Fair Value
 
Total Losses
Intangible assets
$

 
$
5,051



The fair value measurement was determined using an income-based valuation methodology, which incorporates unobservable inputs, including expected cash flows over the remaining estimated useful life of the technology, thereby classifying the fair value as a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The expected cash flows include subscription fees to be collected from existing customers using the platform, offset by hosting fees and compensation related costs to be incurred over the remaining estimated useful life.