-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, MByrebBXNRM7Gz1+NtiHIE3rPrYhNQOpm4pLv7oB60p+mW/7juIyFiyxAK4asbQc RkuvO1/Jnb4ID2qTKnDebg== 0001116502-04-002786.txt : 20041122 0001116502-04-002786.hdr.sgml : 20041122 20041122144244 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001116502-04-002786 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10KSB PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 4 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20031231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20041122 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20041122 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000875622 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS [2834] IRS NUMBER: 113054851 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10KSB SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-19879 FILM NUMBER: 041160387 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 35 WILBUR ST CITY: LYNBROOK STATE: NY ZIP: 11563 BUSINESS PHONE: 5165937000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 35 WILBUR STREET CITY: LYNBROOK STATE: NY ZIP: 11563 10KSB 1 biospecifics-10ksb.txt ANNUAL REPORT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-KSB (Mark One) [x] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 ------------------ [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________ to______________ Commission file number 0-19879 BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. ------------------------------- (Name of small business issuer in its charter) Delaware 11-3054851 -------- ---------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 35 Wilbur Street, Lynbrook, New York 11563 - -------------------------------------- ------------ (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (516) 593-7000 ---------------- Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $.001 ----------------------------- Check whether the Issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X] Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ] Issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year were approximately $3,240,000. The aggregate market value of common voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Issuer was $5,264,510 computed by reference to the last sale price at which the stock was sold on November 1, 2004 as reported by the OTC Pink Sheets. As of November 1, 2004, 5,326,341 shares of common stock were outstanding. PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS OF BIOSPECIFICS The entire discussion in this report, as well as any other management discussion of the Company's goals and expectations, contains Forward-Looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. The words believe, expect, intend, anticipate, variations of such words and similar expressions identify Forward-Looking statements, but their absence does not mean that the statement is not Forward-Looking. These statements are not guaranties of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this Item 1 Business of BioSpecifics, including without limitation, Risk Factors, and Item 6 Management's Discussion and Analysis, as well as those discussed in any documents incorporated by reference herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these Forward-Looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. BioSpecifics undertakes no obligation to update any Forward-Looking statement to reflect new information, events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. When used in this annual report, the terms BioSpecifics, Company, we, our, ours and us refer to BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries. OVERVIEW Biospecifics Technologies Corp., was incorporated in Delaware in 1990 Since that time the Company and its subsidiaries have not entered into bankruptcy, receivership, or any similar proceedings, and have not had any material reclassifications, merger, consolidation or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of business. We have been engaged in the business of manufacturing and licensing for sale a fermentation derived enzyme named Collagenase ABC (the "enzyme" or the "product"), approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") for debriding chronic dermal ulcers and severely burned areas. This product is by prescription only in the United States and is applied topically. We are also developing additional products derived from this enzyme for potential use as pharmaceuticals. On June 3, 2004 we signed a development and licensing agreement with Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc ("the Auxilium Agreement") that covers all potential uses of the enzyme in an injectable form other than for wound healing (see subsequent events for more detail). We derive most of our net sales of the product, (historically, approximately 90%) and all royalty revenues, from one customer in the United States, Abbott Laboratories and its subsidiaries ("Abbott") who, pursuant to an exclusive licensing agreement (the "Agreement"), compounds the product into Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment ("Santyl(R)" or "ointment"), a topical prescription drug used to treat dermal ulcers and burns. The royalty revenues from Abbott were earned on North American sales of Santyl(R) to distributors by Smith & Nephew, Inc. ("S&N") through December 31, 2003. On June 30, 2003 a sub-license agreement under which S&N marketed Santyl(R) ointment terminated. Effective January 1, 2004, the Ross Products Division of Abbott Laboratories Inc. assumed United States marketing responsibility for Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment. During 2003, the Abbott Agreement automatically renewed for an additional 10-year period, to August 2013. Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment is sold primarily to long-term care centers. 2 In June 2004, we entered into a development and license agreement with Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("the Auxilium Agreement"). Under the agreement, we have granted Auxilium the rights to develop products containing our enzyme ("AA4500") for the treatment of Peyronie's and Dupuytren's disease. We have granted Auxilium the exclusive world-wide license to any products developed under the agreement other than dermal formulations labeled for topcial administration. We also granted Auxilium the option to develop and license the technology for use in other indications other than dermal formulations labeled for topical administration. The agreement extends, on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, for the longer of the patent life, the expiration of any regulatory exclsivity period or 12 years. Auxilium may terminate the agreement with 90 days written notice. Auxilium is obligated to pay all clinical and regulatory development costs on an on-going basis, to purchase commercial inventory from us and to pay royalties based on product sales. In addition, Auxilium is obligated to make milestone payments for contract initiation, receipt of technical data, manufacturing process development, the one-year anniversary date, filing of regulatory applications and receipt of regulatory approval. In June 2004, we received an up-front payment under the agreement totalling $2,500,000. In August 2004, we received an additional $2,500,000 for delivery of all in-process research and development material product data relating to Dupuytren's and Peyronie's disease. We may also receive up to $10,500,000 of contingent milestone payments under this agreement if all existing conditions are met. Additional milestone obligations may be due if Auxilium exercises an option to develop and license our enzyme for additional medical indications. Prior to the signing of the Auxilium Agreement, we funded operations by (1) modification of the terms of two loans, principally, by deferring a balloon payment of $364,000 due in November 2003 to November 2004; and deferring the payment of $100,000 principal due on a promissory note from March 2004 to March 2005; (2) receiving a $250,000 advance of royalties from Abbott Laboratories, our major customer, in January 2004 and a $500,000 royalty advance at the end of March 2004, both of which are to be repaid from royalties to be earned from distribution of Santyl(R) Ointment during 2004 (of which $94,000 and $130,000 were repaid from royalties earned during the respective quarters ended March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004); (3) our chairman's deferred salary of $100,000 during the three months ended June 2003 has been applied against the chairman note receivable in March 2004 and (4) deferring or making partial payments to creditors. Due to manufacturing problems encountered in 2003, we will be able to supply Abbott with only limited quantities of our enzyme throughout 2004 and will continue to incur significant operating losses exclusive of the income received from the Auxilium Agreement. As a result of payments received under the Auxilium Agreement, we generated positive cash flow during both the second and third quarters of 2004. In March 2003 we changed our fiscal year end from January 31 to December 31. Our first fiscal year using this new basis is the twelve months ending December 31, 2003 similarly in this report we compare the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 ("calendar year 2003") to the twelve months ended January 31, 2003 ("fiscal year 2003"). The year ended January 31, 2003 is not materially different to the eleven month period, therefore the eleven months ended December 31, 2002 is not presented.. The eleven months period ended December 31, 2003 is also presented. 3 THE COMPANY'S PRODUCT AND MARKETS Collagenase ABC - --------------- Our principal drug product, Collagenase ABC, is an enzyme that digests collagen, the body's principal connective tissue. The drug is approved by the FDA for topical enzymatic debridement of dermal ulcers (wounds), such as pressure ulcers (also known as "bed sores") and second and third degree burns. In general, necrotic (i.e., dead or devitalized) tissue must be debrided (removed) from a dermal ulcer either surgically, by enzyme, or by autolysis (the much slower natural process) before proper healing can take place. Necrotic tissue is largely collagen and is anchored to dermal ulcers by strands of collagen. The unique ability of collagenase to digest collagen in necrotic tissue and thereby effect the debridement of a wound is an important part of the healing process associated with dermal ulcers and helps provide a healthy base for the growth of new tissue. Collagenase ABC does not attack collagen in healthy tissue or in newly formed granulation tissue. Manufacture, Sale and Distribution of Collagenase ABC - ----------------------------------------------------- Our collagenase ABC enzyme powder is the active pharmaceutical ingredient of a topical ointment, known as Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment (Santyl(R)) in the United States. We do not directly market the product to end-users. We manufacture and supply the product in powder form, primarily to Abbott, and to a lesser extent, pharmaceutical companies in Brazil and India, which compound the product into ointment that is then marketed to end-users. In 1999, as a result of inspectional observations made by the FDA, on Form 483, of deficiencies in our compliance with FDA good manufacturing practices and policies ("GMP") regulations at our Lynbrook and Curacao facilities, and at Abbott Laboratories, (hereinafter referred to as "our Subcontractor"), the FDA advised us in a letter (the "FDA letter") that it would revoke our license to manufacture the enzyme and ointment unless we could immediately provide satisfactory assurance to the FDA (including submitting a comprehensive plan of corrective action) addressing the FDA's observations and demonstrate compliance with the applicable GMP regulations. We submitted such a plan in 1999. Pursuant to this plan, we voluntarily suspended manufacture of the product in March 2000 to allow for major renovations at our manufacturing facilities in Curacao and Lynbrook. Beginning March 2000, we supplied Abbott with the product from inventory built up in anticipation of the upgrade. This built up inventory was depleted in July 2002. The FDA notified us on July 28, 2003 that our request to supplement our biologics license for collagenase ABC was approved ("FDA approval"). The supplement included major renovations to the manufacturing facility, utility systems, and process equipment at our Curacao facility. The FDA notification acknowledged our written commitments to provide additional information regarding ongoing studies and when to submit this information to our biologics license for review. As a result of the FDA approval, enzyme product manufactured at the Curacao facility is now being distributed to Abbott. Regardless of this FDA approval, the FDA letter will remain in effect until we demonstrate compliance with the applicable federal standards and regulations, which we understand to be two "satisfactory annual GMP inspections" of our Lynbrook and Curacao manufacturing facilities. We believe that we have made progress in complying 4 with the applicable federal standards and regulations, although there can be no assurances as to when the FDA letter will be rescinded, if at all. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the FDA completed an inspection of our Lynbrook facility. We are hopeful that after the next FDA inspection is completed at our Lynbrook facility, we will be eligible to have the FDA letter rescinded. In May 2004, the FDA inspected the facility of our Subcontractor. To the best of our knowledge, the FDA has not commented on the inspection, nor is the FDA obligated to do so. The FDA has not conducted an inspection of our Curacao facility since July 2002. Prior to the FDA approval, the renovated Curacao facility went into limited production of quarantine inventory during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002. However, FDA approval was required before Santyl(R) could be made from inventory manufactured at the renovated Curacao facility. With FDA approval, deliveries of finished inventory of the product manufactured at the renovated Curacao facility were subsequently resumed. There have been no studies made to determine how substantial the impact of prior manufacturing delays have been on the market for Santyl(R) Ointment. Abbott Agreement and Sublicense - ------------------------------- In March 2001, Abbott Laboratories acquired Knoll Pharmaceutical Company ("KPC", collectively, "Abbott"), our original licensee for product applications relating to the treatment of skin ulcers and burns. Since 1972, we have sold Collagenase ABC, our only commercial product to date, principally in the United States through exclusive license agreements with Abbott, under which we supply Abbott with the product, monitor the production of Santyl(R) by Abbott, and collect a royalty on the distribution of Santyl(R) (the "Abbott Agreement" or the "Agreement"). KPC marketed the ointment under its registered trademark, Collagenase Santyl(R), in the United States from 1972 to January 2000, and in Canada from 1994 to January 2000. Commencing February 2000, S&N began marketing Collagenase Santyl(R) under a sublicensing agreement made with KPC, which Abbott assumed. The January 2000 sub-license agreement under which S&N marketed Santyl(R) ointment terminated on June 30, 2003 but S&N agreed to continue to market Collagenase Santyl(R) through the end of 2003. The Ross Products Division of Abbott Laboratories Inc. assumed United States marketing responsibility for Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment effective January 1, 2004. During calendar 2003, the Abbott Agreement automatically renewed for an additional 10-year period, to August 2013. It is our belief that we will be able continue providing Abbott with quantities of the enzyme they require on a going forward basis. The Abbott Agreement provides that Abbott is our exclusive licensee to market Collagenase Santyl(R) ("Santyl(R)") in the United States and Canada so long as Abbott uses its best efforts to increase sales. Abbott pays us for the product, at a price that is subject to annual adjustment based upon increases in our actual manufacturing costs, not to exceed increases in the consumer price index for certain items. Abbott also pays us a royalty based upon net Santyl(R) sales. Royalties for the calendar year ended December 31, 2003 and the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003 were approximately $1,684,000 and $2,141,000, respectively. As part of the Abbott Agreement, KPC and its U.S. affiliates, and its successor Abbott, (i) agreed not to seek, or become a party to, any license or other agreement for the production or purchase of collagenase powder or collagenase ointment from any source other than us, (ii) will make no efforts to achieve registration with the FDA for collagenase powder manufactured by parties other than us, and (iii) will not collaborate with any third party attempting to achieve a registration. 5 Abbott accounted for approximately $3,093,000 and $3,196,000 of our product sales and royalties for the calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, respectively. These amounts were approximately 95% and 78% of our revenues during the calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, respectively. At December 31, 2003, we had approximately $1.6 million of firm booked orders with Abbott for the product. We will not be able to fulfill all these orders in a timely manner due to the time required to manufacture our product. Both parties have agreed on a manufacturing and delivery timetable for future deliveries of product and manufacture of Santyl(R). Our product is approved in two other countries, Brazil and India, and sold to commercial customers in those countries, who compound the product into ointment. During the calendar year ended December 31, 2003 and the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003, sales to the customer in Brazil represented approximately 0% and 19% of total revenues, respectively, and sales to the customer in India represented approximately 5% and 3% of total revenues, respectively. We have a license agreement with the customer in India. There is no license and supply agreement with the customer in Brazil, and we will only make limited deliveries of the product to either our Brazilian or Indian customers at least through 2004, as we are currently devoting all of our manufacturing to Abbott's requirements. The product and purified collagenase are also sold for non-sponsored research purposes. Other Agreements for the Distribution of Collagenase ABC - -------------------------------------------------------- In 1994, we entered into a 10-year license and supply agreement with a Swiss pharmaceutical company to market an ointment containing the product in two European countries and several Middle Eastern countries. In June 1994, we entered into a multi-year license with an Italian pharmaceutical company that had agreed to market an ointment containing the product in Italy subject to the receipt of requisite Italian governmental approval. The Company is no longer pursuing these agreements as the enzyme has not received approval in any of these countries. In 1996, we entered into an agreement to license the product for sale as an ointment in Germany to the German subsidiary of an international pharmaceutical company. The agreement called for an initial payment on signing and further payments if, and when, the German health authority grants marketing approval of Collagenase ABC ointment. During fiscal 1997, we recognized $20,000 in license fees and deferred revenue of $45,000 from this agreement. We submitted collagenase ointment to the German health authority for marketing aproval in 1997, whose final decision remains pending. Proposed Products and Uses - -------------------------- We expect that a substantial portion of our business activities in the future will be the research and development ("R&D"), followed by manufacturing and licensing, of various proposed injectable Collagenase ABC products and their uses. It is anticipated that the terms of the Auxilium Agreement will provide us with sufficient funds to continue such research and development and provide us with the necessary funding to set up a manufacturing facility for the injectable. Injectable Collagenase ABC - -------------------------- We have developed a proprietary process to further purify Collagenase ABC. We have investigated using this purified form of collagenase as an injectable to remove collagen that interferes with normal bodily functioning or is unsightly. 6 We, our affiliates, and individual investigators are clinically testing in the United States injectable collagenase for treatment of Dupuytren's disease, Peyronie's disease, frozen shoulder, and lipolysis. See "Investigational New Drug Applications ("IND's") for Injectable Collagenase ABC". We produced purified collagenase for injection at our facility in Lynbrook, N.Y. that has been, and will be, used in U.S. clinical trials. Effective with the signing of the agreement with Auxilium, Auxilium will be responsible for completion of any Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical studies for all potential uses they elect to pursue. We will still be responsible for all Phase 1 clinical studies. We sell small amounts of purified collagenase for non-human research in the United States and other countries. Investigational New Drug Applications ("INDs") for Injectable Collagenase ABC - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- We, our affiliates, or individual investigators have filed INDs with the FDA, and are in the clinical testing process, for additional products using injectable Collagenase ABC. The INDs permit testing our drug candidates on humans. None of these products have completed testing. Dupuytren's Disease - ------------------- Dupuytren's disease is a deforming condition of the hand in which one or more fingers, commonly the ring and little fingers, contract toward the palm, often resulting in functional disability. We were granted a United States patent for the use of our collagenase enzyme to treat this condition in July 2000. The use of collagenase for the treatment of Dupuytren's disease has received "orphan drug" designation from the FDA. Orphan drug designation is based on the provisions of the Orphan Drug Act. The designation is given to products used to treat a specified rare disease or condition defined as affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the United States. Orphan drug designation imparts certain benefits including a seven year period of exclusivity after approval for marketing, the ability to apply for clinical research grant funds, tax credits for costs of clinical trials performed in the U.S., assistance from FDA in protocol development, and possible waivers from "user fees" charged by the FDA after drug approval. A dose response study was successfully completed at Stanford University and at State University at Stony Brook Hospital and Medical Center ("Stony Brook"). The results were submitted to the FDA in support of concluding Phase 2. An end of Phase 2 meeting was held in August 2001 with the FDA to discuss how to proceed with Phase 3 studies. The investigators at Stony Brook received a grant from the FDA in September 2002 to conduct Phase 3 clinical trials to determine safety and efficacy of collagenase for this use. The clinical trials on Dupuytren's disease are summarized in an article in the September 2002 issue of the Journal of Hand Surgery. As part of the agreement with Auxilium, Auxilium is responsible for all Phase 3 clinical trials, along with the related expenses. Peyronie's Disease - ------------------ We are seeking to develop a product for the treatment of Peyronie's disease, a condition in which collagen plaques form on the shaft of the penis and interfere with erection and sexual intercourse. Initial tests on approximately 200 men have shown favorable results in dissolving the plaques by injecting purified collagenase directly into such plaques. We cannot assure you that this treatment will be proven effective. We were awarded a patent for this use in March 2000 and received "orphan drug" designation from the FDA in March 1996. A study to optimize this treatment was completed at Devine-Tidewater Urology, Norfolk, Virginia, the largest United States center for the study and treatment of 7 Peyronie's disease. In August 1999, the trial's investigator reported on 22 patients who were treated in an open label trial. The investigator reported encouraging results. A new clinical trial was initiated in January 2004 and the study is continuing. As part of the agreement with Auxilium, Auxilium is responsible for all further clinical trials with the related expenses. Frozen Shoulder - --------------- Frozen shoulder is a clinical syndrome of pain and severely decreased motion in the shoulder joint. This syndrome afflicts up to 2 million patients annually. A double blind randomized placebo controlled dose response study is being conducted at Stony Brook using collagenase injection for treatment of adhesive capsulitis, better known as "frozen shoulder. Positive clinical results were presented at the March 2004 meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society in San Francisco. Lipolysis - --------- Lipomas are benign fatty tumors that occur as bulges under the skin. A clinical investigation is currently being performed with collagenase injection in the treatment of skin lipomas. . The concept of using collagenase for removal of fat is discussed in a European Patent Application issued June 2002. OTHER PROPOSED PRODUCTS AND USES Treatment of Burns - ------------------ Collagenase Santyl(R) has received FDA approval for the treatment of burns. A number of studies have been conducted, which compared the efficacy of Collagenase Santyl(R) to standard treatment (silver sulfadiazine), for deep second degree burns. The results of these studies have been favorable showing faster cleaning and healing, as well as economic benefits. We are considering the development of other dosage forms for the treatment of burns. Collagenase for Wound Healing - ----------------------------- In vitro studies conducted at Tufts University Medical School showed that collagenase treatment of skin cells significantly enhances cell migration and growth after injury. Clinical and laboratory investigations further profiling the potential role of collagenase and its pharmacological activity in wound healing are being pursued. We have been assigned two patents awarded to Tufts University relating to this discovery. Pre-clinical experiments have been conducted. Additionally, clinical experiments to confirm the observations made at Tufts are being planned. Glaucoma and Treatment of Other Eye Disorders - --------------------------------------------- We collaborated with Bausch & Lomb in a clinical investigation to confirm previous studies on the use of our collagenase to treat glaucoma. The collagenase treatment reduced IOP (intraocular pressure) in open angle glaucoma patients for at least three months post treatment with no vision-threatening complications. The results of the clinical investigation were published in May 2002 in the Archives of Ophthalmology. 8 PRODUCT LIABILITY The sale of the product, as well as the development of any additional products of ours, exposes us to potential product liability claims, both directly from patients using the product or potential products, as well as from our agreement to indemnify certain distributors of the products for claims made against such distributors. We have limited product liability insurance for the use of Collagenase Santyl(R) and clinical experiments in the United States for its additional product candidates. To date, no product liability claims have been made against us. COMPETITION The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapidly evolving technology and intense competition. Many companies of all sizes, including major pharmaceutical companies and specialized biotechnology companies, are engaged in activities similar to ours. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources, larger research and development staffs, and significantly greater experience in regulatory approval procedures. We do not have comparable resources, and do not intend to compete with, major pharmaceutical companies in drug marketing, except in possible niche marketing, for one or more of the products, if feasible. Our debriding ointment product, Collagenase Santyl(R), competes primarily with other available enzymatic debridement products in the United States. Those currently available are manufactured or marketed by Healthpoint Ltd. and the Dow B. Hickam division of Marion Labs. Since January 2004, S&N has been marketing a non-collagenase enzymatic debriding ointment in the United States. A potential debridement agent was known to be under development by Genzyme Tissue Repair Division, and other large drug companies may also have debridement products under development. Debriding products also compete with surgical debridement and mechanical debridement using hydrotherapy. We believe enzymatic debridement is superior to surgical and mechanical debridement, because those procedures are painful, labor intensive, and remove viable tissue along with necrotic tissue. In December 1994, the Federal Agency for Health Care Policy and Research ("AHCPR") issued Clinical Practice Guideline Number 15 entitled "Treatment of Pressure Ulcers". Collagenase is the only product suggested for enzymatic treatment of pressure ulcers by the guideline. Unlike the other available enzymatic debriding products, ours is collagen specific. Approximately 75% of skin is collagen, making this enzyme particularly appropriate for the debridement of necrotic tissue. In Europe, Knoll AG ("KAG") markets an ointment substantially similar to our Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment under the trade name "Iruxol(R)". In January 2000, Smith & Nephew plc acquired worldwide marketing rights to Iruxol(R) excluding the United States and Canada, as that ointment is not FDA approved for sale in the United States or Canada. KAG, which, as part of the global pharmaceutical business of BASF, was acquired by Abbott in March 2001. Colleges, universities, governmental agencies and other public and private research organizations continue to conduct research, and are becoming more active in, seeking patent protection and licensing arrangements to collect royalties for use of technology that they have developed, some of which may be directly competitive with our products. We expect competition to intensify as technological advances occur in the development of pharmaceutical products of biologic origin. 9 MARKETING We do not have our own sales staff and instead rely on licensees who have recognition and acceptance in the marketplace. During the quarter ended December 31, 2003, we decided to liquidate our German subsidiary, Biospecifics Pharma GmbH, which was established in November 1995. Its purpose was to identify additional licensees, assist us in achieving the clinical and scientific data necessary to obtain product approvals in the EU, and assist licensees in registration of products, which objectives were not realized. See "Employees". We may decide to directly market certain products under development, particularly if the market is well defined, the number of specialists who address the targeted indication is small, and we have the financial resources at that time to engage in those activities. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Since inception (1957 and 1976 for the New York and Curacao subsidiaries, respectively), we have expended over $27.2 million in research on collagenase and other products. We incurred approximately $885,000 and $1,069,000 in research and development activities during calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, respectively. GOVERNMENT REGULATION Regulation in the United States - ------------------------------- All pharmaceutical manufacturers in the U.S. are subject to extensive regulation by the federal government, principally the FDA, and, to a lesser extent, by state governments. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Service Act, and other federal statutes and regulations govern or influence the testing, approval, manufacture, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping, advertising, promotion, sale and distribution of products. Non-compliance with applicable requirements can result in fines, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production and/or distribution, refusal of the government to enter into supply contracts or to approve new drug applications, and criminal prosecution. The FDA also has the authority to revoke drug approvals previously granted. Our products in development will require regulatory clearance prior to commercialization. The nature and extent of regulation may differ with respect to different products. In order to test, produce, and market certain therapeutic products in the United States, mandatory procedures and safety standards, approval processes, and manufacturing and marketing practices, established by the FDA, must be satisfied. Obtaining FDA approval has historically been a costly and time-consuming process. We are also licensed by, registered with, and subject to,4 2 regulation and periodic inspection by the New York State Department of Health and the New York State Board of Pharmacy, pursuant to federal and state legislation relating to drugs and narcotics. In 1999, as a result of inspectional observations made by the FDA, on Form 483, of deficiencies in our compliance with FDA good manufacturing practices and policies ("GMP") regulations at our Lynbrook and Curacao facilities, and at Abbott Laboratories, (hereinafter referred to as "our Subcontractor"), the FDA advised us in a letter (the "FDA letter") that it would revoke our license to manufacture the enzyme and ointment unless we could immediately provide satisfactory assurance to the FDA (including submitting a comprehensive plan of corrective action) addressing the FDA's observations and demonstrate compliance with the applicable GMP regulations. We submitted such a plan in 1999. 10 Pursuant to this plan, we voluntarily suspended manufacture of the product in March 2000 to allow for major renovations at our manufacturing facilities in Curacao and Lynbrook. Beginning March 2000, we supplied Abbott with the product from inventory built up in anticipation of the upgrade. This built up inventory was depleted in July 2002 The FDA notified us on July 28, 2003 that our request to supplement our biologics license for collagenase ABC was approved ("FDA approval"). The supplement included major renovations to the manufacturing facility, utility systems, and process equipment at our Curacao facility. The FDA notification acknowledged our written commitments to provide additional information regarding ongoing studies and when to submit this information to our biologics license for review. As a result of the FDA approval, enzyme product manufactured at the Curacao facility is now being distributed to Abbott. Regardless of this FDA approval, the FDA letter will remain in effect until we demonstrate compliance with the applicable federal standards and regulations, which we understand to be two "satisfactory annual GMP inspections" of our Lynbrook and Curacao manufacturing facilities. We believe that we have made progress in complying with the applicable federal standards and regulations, although there can be no assurances as to when the FDA letter will be rescinded, if at all. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the FDA completed an inspection of our Lynbrook facility. We are hopeful that after the next FDA inspection is completed at our Lynbrook facility, we will be eligible to have the FDA letter rescinded. In May 2004, the FDA inspected the facility of our Subcontractor. To the best of our knowledge, the FDA has not commented on the inspection, nor is the FDA obligated to do so. The FDA has yet to conduct an inspection of our Curacao facility. Foreign Regulation of Pharmaceutical Products - --------------------------------------------- The marketing of pharmaceutical products outside the United States is subject to the regulatory requirements of the country in which the product is marketed. These requirements may vary widely from country to country. Approval in foreign countries is required regardless of whether FDA approval has been obtained in the United States. Nevertheless, the time required to obtain such approval may be longer or shorter than required to obtain FDA approval, and there can be no guarantees that such approvals will be granted. Our subsidiary in Curacao has produced the pharmaceutical substance "Collagenase ABC (Sterile)" for incorporation into ointment. As this product is not a pharmaceutical end product, it need not be officially registered with the Bureau of Pharmaceutical Affairs of the Netherlands Antilles (the "Pharmaceutical Bureau"). However, the plant in which the product has been produced and the production process are subject to inspection by the Pharmaceutical Bureau under the laws and regulations of the Netherlands Antilles. Production was suspended during the upgrade, as discussed above in "Regulation in the United States". Production restarted during the third quarter of 2003. PATENT AND TRADEMARK PROTECTION Patents - ------- We are the assignee or licensee of nine U.S. and one European patent. We are not able to ascertain whether these patents will provide any value. We are the assignee of additional U.S. patent rights that have expired as well as certain 11 foreign patent rights corresponding to certain of the foregoing patents. We have other patents under application. There can be no assurances when, if ever, such patents will be issued, or that such patents, if issued, will be of any value to us. Trademarks - ---------- We have registered the name Salutyl(R) for our collagenase ointment in a number of countries other than the United States. Trademarks for other countries are protected for varying periods of time. We use the trademarked name "Cordase" for the injectable collagenase being developed for the treatment of Dupuytren's disease. EMPLOYEES We have 39 full-time employees, of which 23 are located at the Lynbrook facility and 16 are at the Curacao facility. There are also 5 part-time employees in Lynbrook and 1 in Curacao. None of these employees are represented by a union. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good. We have entered into confidentiality agreements with most of our employees. Pursuant to such agreements, each employee in Lynbrook agrees to keep all of our proprietary and other information secret and confidential and to return all property to us upon termination. These employees further agree not to divulge any trade secrets during their respective terms of employment and thereafter without our prior written consent and further to assign to us all inventions, discoveries, and improvements which they make during the term of employment, within one year thereafter, or utilizing any of our trade secrets. The agreement executed by Curacao employees provides that they will not divulge any data connected with the production process in Curacao. There can be no assurance that any particular court would enforce any, or all, of the terms of any such agreements. We have ceased operations in Germany and are in the process of liquidating our subsidiary in Germany, Bio Pharma, which was managed by Rainer Friedel, MD., and Ph.D. Dr. Friedel was a member of our board of directors until his resignation on April 30, 2004. RISK FACTORS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS Substantial debt levels - ----------------------- In November 2001, ABC-Curacao borrowed a non-amortizing loan of $455,000 at 6.5% interest due in November 2003 from Korpodeko, a Netherlands Antilles agency. In connection with this loan, ABC-Curacao agreed to pledge as collateral substantially all of the assets owned by ABC-Curacao, including the upgraded facility's manufacturing assets with a book value of approximately $4.7 million at December 31, 2003. BioSpecifics has also guaranteed the Korpodeko loan. In September 2003, Korpodeko agreed to modify the terms of the loan. Korpodeko permitted us to repay 20%, or $91,000 of the loan principal, which we did in December 2003, and pay the remaining principal, or $364,000 in November 2004. In return, we agreed to an interest rate increase from 6.5% to 7.5% from November 2003 to the new maturity in November 2004. 12 On March 11, 2003, we borrowed $100,000 from an unaffiliated individual lender, evidenced by a one-year promissory note, bearing interest of 8% per annum. We also granted to the lender warrants to purchase up to 10,000 common shares of BioSpecifics at $1.18, the closing price on that day, until March 11, 2008. The cost associated with these warrants, based on Black-Scholes methodology, is $5,000 and was recorded as interest expense during the calendar year ended December 31, 2003. Our chairman has personally guaranteed this loan. On March 8, 2004, the lender agreed to extend the promissory note for one year, or until March 11, 2005. On June 19, 2003, the Company entered into a financing transaction with Bio Partners LP, a private investor group, pursuant to which the Company sold to Bio Partners in a private placement (i) a $1.575 million convertible note, (the "Note") issued at face value, and (ii) 295,312 shares of Company common stock, issued at par value, or $.001 per share. The net proceeds to the Company were approximately $890,000, after the payment of expenses and repayment of $500,000 previously advanced to the Company by a principal of Bio Partners. The Note matures on June 19, 2005 and bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum with an effective interest rate of 36%. Interest-only payments under the Note are payable monthly in arrears and the entire principal amount is payable at maturity. At the time the agreement was made, up to $1,141,875 aggregate principal amount of the Note is convertible into the Company's common stock at any time, at a conversion price of $2.50 per share, subject to customary adjustments. The Note also contains restrictions on the Company's ability to incur debt as long as the Note is outstanding. The Note is secured by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of the Company and the Company's New York subsidiary, Advance Biofactures Corporation ("ABC"). In addition, ABC has guaranteed the obligations of the Company under the Note and our chairman, Edwin H. Wegman, has personally guaranteed 50% of the obligations of the Company under the Note. The loan discount of $281,000 and loan costs of $258,000 on the Note are being amortized over two years, the expected life of the Note. Reliance on a Single Product for Revenues - ----------------------------------------- Collagenase ABC enzyme is our sole source of revenues from the sale of product. Commencing with the second quarter of 2004, we began receiving payments under the terms of the Auxilium Agreement. Uncertainty of Government Regulatory Requirements and Future Manufacture of the - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Enzyme - ------ The manufacture and marketing of Collagenase ABC enzyme is subject to regulation in the United States by the federal government, principally the FDA. As previously discussed, we stopped manufacturing the enzyme and began upgrading the Curacao facility in March 2000. In May 2001 we completed the upgrade and went back into limited manufacturing. In April 2002 we filed with the FDA a "Prior Approval Supplement" ("PAS") for the Curacao facility upgrade. In July 2002, the FDA completed a Pre-Approval Inspection of this facility. At the conclusion of the inspection, the FDA inspectors provided us with a list of observations on FDA Form 483 and in August 2002, FDA issued a "Complete Response" letter with respect to the Pre-Approval Inspection. We responded to the FDA letter in November 2002 with a plan that is aimed at addressing issues raised in the "Complete Response" letter. The FDA notified us on July 28, 2003 that our request to supplement our biologics license for collagenase ABC was approved ("FDA approval"). The supplement included major renovations to the manufacturing facility, utility systems, and process equipment at our Curacao facility. The FDA notification acknowledged our written commitments to provide additional information regarding ongoing studies and when to submit this information to our biologics license for 13 review. As a result of the FDA approval, enzyme product manufactured at the Curacao facility is now being distributed to Abbott. Regardless of this FDA approval, the FDA letter will remain in effect until we demonstrate compliance with the applicable federal standards and regulations, which we understand to be two "satisfactory annual GMP inspections" of our Lynbrook and Curacao manufacturing facilities. We believe that we have made progress in complying with the applicable federal standards and regulations, although there can be no assurances as to when the FDA letter will be rescinded, if at all. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the FDA completed an inspection of our Lynbrook facility. We are hopeful that after the next FDA inspection is completed at our Lynbrook facility, we will be eligible to have the FDA letter rescinded. In May 2004, the FDA inspected the facility of our subcontractor. The FDA has not conducted an inspection of our Curacao facility since July 2002. Dependence on Abbott Laboratories - --------------------------------- We derive most of our net sales and all of our royalty revenue from the topical ointment business, through an exclusive license agreement, which expires in August 2013, with a pharmaceutical company in the United States, Abbott Laboratories, which in March 2001 acquired Knoll Pharmaceutical Company ("KPC", collectively, "Abbott"), the Company's original licensee. Revenues are derived from two sources: i.) sales of Collagenase ABC enzyme in powder form (the "product" or the "enzyme") to Abbott and to a lesser extent foreign pharmaceutical companies, and ii.) royalties paid by Abbott on its U.S. sales of Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment, which contains the product, to distributors. Delisting of Common Stock from The Nasdaq Stock Market - ------------------------------------------------------ In December 2003, Nasdaq had informed us that we were not in compliance with the independent directors and audit committee composition requirements. Nasdaq changed our symbol from "BSTC" to BSTCC" because of this noncompliance but allowed us 90 days to comply with this requirement. In late February 2004, we added Michael Schamroth to our board of directors, on a temporary basis, subject to vote at the next shareholders meeting, and informed Nasdaq of this appointment. By doing so, we satisfied the minimum requirement of three independent directors. However, when we informed Nasdaq of the director appointment, we also informed it that at December 31, 2003 we were no longer in compliance with the $2.5 million minimum stockholders' equity requirement. On March 3, 2004 Nasdaq invited us to make a written submission with respect to the minimum stockholders' equity deficiency, which we submitted on March 10, 2004. On March 22, 2004 the Nasdaq Listings Qualifications Panel (the "Panel") informed us in writing of its determination to delist our common stock from The NASDAQ SmallCap Market effective with the open of business on March 24, 2004. The Nasdaq notice stated that the Panel's determination was based on our failure to satisfy the $2.5 million shareholders' equity requirement as of December 31, 2003. Our common stock was immediately eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board effective with the open of business on March 24, 2004. The OTC Bulletin Board symbol assigned to us is BSTC. No application was required to be filed for inclusion on the OTC Bulletin Board. Our Common Stock traded on The NASDAQ SmallCap Market tier of the Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol "BSTCC" until March 23, 2004. On March 24, 2004, our common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol BSTC. Effective May 2004, our stock was moved from the OTC Bulletin Board to the 14 Pink Sheets due to our failure to file our financial reports on a timely basis with the SEC. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In June 2004, we entered into a development and license agreement with Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("the Auxilium Agreement"). Under the agreement, we have granted Auxilium the rights to develop products containing our enzyme ("AA4500") for the treatment of Peyronie's and Dupuytren's disease. We have granted Auxilium the exclusive world-wide license to any products developed under the agreement other than dermal formulations labeled for topical administration. We also granted Auxilium the option to develop and license the technology for use in other indications other than dermal formulations labeled for topical administration. The agreement extends, on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, for the longer of the patent life, the expiration of any regulatory exclusivity period or 12 years. Auxilium may terminate the agreement with 90 days written notice. Auxilium is obligated to pay all clinical and regulatory development costs on an on-going basis, to purchase commercial inventory from us and to pay royalties based on product sales. In addition, Auxilium is obligated to make milestone payments for contract initiation, receipt of technical data, manufacturing process development, the one-year anniversary date, filing of regulatory applications and receipt of regulatory approval. In June 2004, we received an up-front payment under the agreement totalling $2,500,000. In August 2004, we received an additional $2,500,000 for delivery of all in-process research and development material product data relating to Dupuytren's and Peyronie's disease. We may also receive up to $10,500,000 of contingent milestone payments under this agreement if all existing conditions are met. Additional milestone obligations may be due if Auxilium exercises an option to develop and license our enzyme for additional medical indications. On March 8, 2004, the holder of a one-year promissory note, bearing interest of 8% per annum which was due March 11, 2004 extended the note for one year. In March 2004, our chairman's deferred salary of $100,000 has been applied against the chairman note receivable. On March 22, 2004 the Nasdaq Listings Qualifications Panel (the "Panel") informed us in writing of its determination to delist our common stock from The NASDAQ SmallCap Market effective with the open of business on March 24, 2004. The Nasdaq notice stated that the Panel's determination was based on our failure to satisfy the $2.5 million shareholders' equity requirement as of December 31, 2003. Our common stock was immediately eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board effective with the open of business on March 24, 2004. The OTC Bulletin Board symbol assigned to us is BSTC. No application was required to be filed for inclusion on the OTC Bulletin Board. Our Common Stock traded on The NASDAQ SmallCap Market tier of the Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol "BSTCC" until March 23, 2004. On March 24, 2004, our common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol BSTC. Effective May 2004, our stock was moved from the OTC Bulletin Board to the Pink Sheets due to our failure to file our financial reports on a timely basis with the SEC. 15 We have ceased operations in Germany and are in the process of liquidating our subsidiary in Germany, Bio Pharma, which was managed by Rainer Friedel, MD., and Ph.D. Dr. Friedel was a member of our board of directors until his resignation on April 30, 2004. Michael Schamroth became an interim director as of February 24, 2004 and was elected by the Board of Directors in a special meeting. His term will expire at the next annual meeting where he can stand for re-election to the Board. ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. We lease two facilities, one in Lynbrook, New York and one in Curacao, Netherlands Antilles. The New York facility, also our administrative headquarters, contains 3,500 square feet of office space and 11,500 square feet of laboratory, production, and storage facilities. We lease this facility from the Wilbur Street Corporation ("WSC"), which is owned by The S.J. Wegman Company, the principal stockholder of the Company and an affiliate of Edwin H. Wegman, President of the Company. On January 30, 1998, WSC and the Company entered into a triple net lease agreement, which provides for an annual rent starting at $125,000, which can increase annually by the amount of annual increase in the Consumer Price Index for the greater New York metropolitan region. The lease term is 7 years, expiring January 31, 2005. During each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, we paid rent and real estate taxes of $125,000 (approximately $8.33 per square foot) relating to this lease agreement. We believe that the terms of this lease are reasonable and the rent charged is no greater than that which would be charged by an unaffiliated landlord for comparable facilities, based on appraisals of the property. We also lease a building in Brievengat, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles from an unrelated company wholly owned by the Insular Territory of Curacao. This building is our principal manufacturing facility, and is licensed by the FDA to produce Collagenase ABC. The facility has approximately 15,750 square feet of usable space. The lease, which was originally entered into with the Insular Territory of Curacao on January 1, 1977, is automatically renewable upon the same terms every five years, unless either party gives notice of termination three months prior to the expiration of the five-year period. The lessor is entitled to revalue the rent for each successive five-year period, and the lease has been automatically renewed through March 1, 2006. The current rent is approximately $37,000 per year. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. None ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. None to date. The next annual meeting will include a vote to elect interim board of director member Michael Schamroth as a full director of the Company 16 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. In December 2003, Nasdaq had informed us that we were not in compliance with the independent directors and audit committee composition requirements. Nasdaq changed our symbol from "BSTC" to BSTCC" because of this noncompliance but allowed us 90 days to comply with this requirement. In late February 2004, Michael Schamroth was added to our board of directors in a special meeting, on a interim basis, subject to vote at the next shareholders meeting, and informed Nasdaq of this appointment. By doing so, we satisfied the minimum requirement of three independent directors. However, when we informed Nasdaq of the director appointment, we also informed it that at December 31, 2003 we were no longer in compliance with the $2.5 million minimum stockholders' equity requirement. On March 3, 2004 Nasdaq invited us to make a written submission with respect to the minimum stockholders' equity deficiency, which we submitted on March 10, 2004. As described above, on March 24, 2004, our common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol BSTC. Effective May 2004, our stock was moved from the OTC Bulletin Board to the Pink Sheets due to our failure to file our financial reports on a timely basis with the SEC. As we currently meet the NASDAQ independent audit committee guidelines and expect to meet the $2.5 million shareholders equity requirement, we anticipate reapplying to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market upon filing all of our overdue financial reports. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in reapplying to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. On November 1, 2004, the closing price for our Common Stock was $2.00. The table below sets forth the high and low sale prices for our Common Stock for the period February 1, 2002 through December 31, 2003, as reported by Nasdaq. QUARTER ENDED HIGH LOW - ------------- ---- --- December 31, 2003 $1.99 $1.05 September 30, 2003 $2.00 $0.79 June 30, 2003 $1.59 $0.60 March 31, 2003 $2.15 $1.06 January 31, 2003 $3.96 $0.66 October 31, 2002 $1.95 $0.60 July 31, 2002 $2.34 $1.13 April 30, 2002 $2.45 $1.56 On July 14, 2004, there were 113 stockholders of record of our Common Stock It is our current policy to retain earnings to finance the growth and development of our business and not pay dividends. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will depend upon our financial condition, capital requirements and earnings as well as such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. Our Board of Directors authorized two buyback programs for the repurchase of a total of 600,000 shares of common stock. Through July 1999, a total of 361,380 shares were repurchased at an average price of $5.29 per share. We have not repurchased shares since that time and have suspended the buyback for the foreseeable future. 17 ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Information provided by us or statements contained in this report or made by our employees, if not historical, are forward looking information, which involve uncertainties and risks. We caution readers that important factors may affect our actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Such factors include, but are not limited to, changing market conditions, the impact of competitive products and pricing, the timely development and approval by the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and foreign health authorities of potential products, market acceptance of our potential products, and other risks detailed herein and in other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Additionally there can be no assurance that our agreement with Auxilium will provide us with new products in the future. Further, any forward looking statement or statements speak only as of the date on which such statements were made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement or statements were made. Summary - ------- We are a biopharmaceutical company focusing on wound healing and tissue remodeling. We manufacture Collagenase ABC enzyme, (the "enzyme") which is the active ingredient in the prescription drug Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment sold by Abbott Laboratories in the United States and indicated for debriding chronic dermal ulcers and second and third degree burns. As previosuly mentioned, in June 2004, we signed a development and license agreement with Auxilium Pharmaceuticals to develop an injectable form of our enzyme (AA4500) for treating Dupuytren's disease, Peyronie's disease, frozen shoulder, lipomas, and other conditions, except for dermal formulations labeled for topical administration. We have initiated Phase 3 clinical trials for Dupuytren's disease. A clinical trial for Peyronie's disease began in January 2004. A Phase 2 trial for frozen shoulder is ongoing. Effective with the signing of the Auxilium Agreement, they are now responsible for certain of these clinical trials, including the trials already commenced for Dupuytren's and Peyronie's disease. We derive most of our sales revenues, (historically, approximately 90%) and all of our royalty revenues, from one customer in the United States, Abbott Laboratories ("Abbott") who, pursuant to an exclusive licensing agreement (the "Agreement"), compounds the product into Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment ("Santyl(R)" or "ointment"), a topical prescription drug used to treat dermal ulcers and burns. The royalty revenues from Abbott were earned on North American sales of Santyl(R) to distributors by Smith & Nephew, Inc. ("S&N") through December 31, 2003. The January 2000 sub-license agreement under which S&N marketed Santyl(R) ointment terminated on June 30, 2003 but it was agreed they would continue to market through the end of 2003. The Ross Products Division of Abbott Laboratories Inc. assumed United States marketing responsibility for Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment effective January 1, 2004. During 2003, the Abbott Agreement automatically renewed for an additional 10-year period, to August 2013. Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment is sold primarily to long-term care centers, where it is believed that Abbott's Ross Products Division has built a strong market position and reputation. 18 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe the following accounting policies are the most critical to us. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Research and development expenses ("R&D") include internal costs, such as salaries and benefits, costs of materials, and facility costs. R&D also consists of third party costs, such as medical professional fees, contract manufacturing costs for material used in clinical trials, and costs associated with clinical study R&D arrangements. We fund R&D at medical research institutions under agreements that are generally cancelable. All of these costs are charged to R&D as incurred, which may be measured by percentage of completion, contract milestones, patient enrollment, or the passage of time. At the initiation of clinical study R&D contracts, we make an estimate of the duration and expected completion date of the contract, which may require a change due to accelerations, delays or other adjustments to the contract period or work performed. Changes in these estimates could have a significant effect on the amount of R&D costs that we realize in a specific period. Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. - --------------------------------------------------------------- SFAS No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" requires judgments regarding future operating or disposition plans for marginally performing assets. The application of both of these policies has affected the amount and timing of charges to operating results that have been significant in recent years. We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment on an annual basis, or whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, including our business judgment of when to close underperforming operations. These impairment evaluations require an estimation of fair value based on recent negotiations to sell certain assets. Should the carrying amount not be deemed to be recoverable, we write the assets down to their fair value. For the year ended December 31,2003, we did not take any impairment charges. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS In March 2003 we changed our fiscal year end from January 31 to December 31. Our first fiscal year using this new basis is the twelve months ending December 31, 2003. In this report we compare the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 ("calendar year 2003") to the twelve months ended January 31, 2003 ("fiscal year 2003") , because it is not practical to recast the prior comparative periods ended December 31, 2002. The eleven months period ended December 31, 2003 is also presented. Net sales include the sales of Collagenase ABC enzyme recognized at the time it is shipped to customers, primarily Abbott. Net sales also include fees we charge Abbott for testing Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment it contract manufactures with the enzyme. 19 As a result of the FDA approval, we may now distribute to Abbott enzyme manufactured at our renovated Curacao facility. In September 2003, we delivered the first available enzyme manufactured at the renovated Curacao facility to Abbott. Net sales recorded for fiscal 2003 were from delivery of stockpiled enzyme inventory to Abbott. We depleted that stockpiled enzyme inventory during fiscal 2003. During calendar 2003, we sold limited amounts of enzyme produced at the renovated facility in Curacao to an international customer. International sales have historically represented approximately 10% of total revenues; however, we expect minimal sales to international customers at least through 2004. Net sales were $1,555,625 and $1,938,706 for the calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, respectively, a decrease in calendar 2003 of $383,081 or 20% from fiscal 2003. Enzyme shipments to Abbott in calendar 2003 were from enzyme manufactured at the renovated Curacao facility. Enzyme shipments to Abbott in fiscal 2003 were from enzyme that had been stockpiled prior to the renovation, which began in March 2000. We delivered less enzyme during calendar 2003 because we did not achieve our 2002 and 2003 enzyme manufacturing and inventory level goals due to delays caused by manufacturing and personnel issues associated with the renovated plant. We believe we have solved most of the manufacturing and personnel issues and have achieved increases in manufacturing in 2004. However, due to thes problems encountered in calendar 2003, we will be able to supply Abbott with only limited quantities of our enzyme throughout 2004 and will continue to incur significant operating losses, exclusive of the revenue received from the Auxilium Agreement. Royalties earned on Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment sales by S&N were $1,683,915 and $2,140,534 for the calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, respectively, representing a decrease in calendar 2003 of $456,619 or 21%. Santyl(R) sales during calendar 2003 were significantly lower than fiscal 2003 levels because of lack of sufficient enzyme available to manufacture Santyl(R). As previously described, Abbott's inventory of Santyl(R) ointment, which it has supplied to S&N for distribution and on which we earn royalties, was depleted by the end of July 2003, and only replenished in November 2003, with the first delivery of enzyme we made in September 2003. There was no distribution of Santyl during the three months August through October 2003; therefore, no royalties were earned during that period. We expect Santyl(R) sales to continue to be negatively impacted in 2004, because we did not achieve our 2003 enzyme manufacturing and inventory level goals. We are on target to meet our production objectives in 2004. The sub-license agreement under which Smith & Nephew marketed Santyl(R) ointment terminated on June 30, 2003 but they continued to market it through the end of 2003. The Ross Products Division of Abbott Laboratories Inc. assumed United States marketing responsibility for Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment effective January 1, 2004. Cost of sales was $2,843,921 and $3,205,235, respectively, during calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, a decrease in calendar 2003 of $361,314 or 11%. We had a negative gross profit margin in both calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003 due to delays and manufacturing and personnel issues associated with the renovated plant. General and administrative expenses ("G&A") were $2,615,007 and $3,045,319 respectively, during calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, a decrease in calendar 2003 of $430,312, or 14%. During fiscal 2003, our production and regulatory personnel spent a significant portion of their time preparing for the FDA inspection of the Curacao facility, which took place in July 2002, the cost of which was allocated to G&A in fiscal 2003. 20 Research and development expenses ("R&D") were $884,685 and $1,069,045 respectively, during calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, a decrease in calendar 2003 of $184,360 or 17%. Development efforts have been curtailed in our attempt to conserve cash. Other expense, net was $184,940 and $23,094 respectively, during calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, an increase in other expense, net of $161,846. The increase is due to interest expense on the 12% Senior Secured Convertible Note borrowed in June 2003 and the March 2003 promissory note, and amortization of the 12% Note's discount. The interest and discount amortization on these debt instruments approximated $180,000 during calendar 2003. Interest expense in both periods also includes interest on the two-year, 6.5% non-amortizing loan from Korpodeko, a Curacao development corporation established to develop industry on the island of Curacao. In September 2003, Korpodeko agreed to modify the terms of the loan, by permitting us to repay 20%, or $91,000 of the loan principal in November 2003, and pay the remaining principal, or $364,000 in November 2004. In return, the Company agreed to an interest rate increase from 6.5% to 7.5% from November 2003 to the new maturity in November 2004. In December 2003, we repaid the $91,000 of loan principal. The (expense) benefit for income taxes was ($13,000) and $260,464 respectively during calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003. The net benefit in fiscal 2003 relates to US federal and state refunds of approximately $425,000 due by carrying back most of the fiscal 2003 net operating loss to tax payments made in prior taxable fiscal years, net of write-off of deferred tax assets. Due to a change in the US tax law, we can only carryback net operating losses 2 years. We recorded no income tax benefit for calendar 2003 because of uncertainties with respect to the timing of future utilization of net operating loss benefit. Also, the difference between the United States Federal statutory tax rate of 34% and the effective tax rate in fiscal 2003 is due to the tax effect of foreign sourced losses for which no benefit can be taken. Since 1976, our Curacao subsidiary has had a 2% profit tax rate granted to it by the Curacao government (the "2% tax holiday"). In November 2000, the Curacao government retroactively extended the 2% tax holiday for another 15 years We have ceased operations in Germany and are in the process of liquidating our subsidiary in Germany, Bio Pharma, which was managed by Rainer Friedel, MD., and Ph.D. LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION Our primary source of working capital is from operations, which includes sales of product, testing fees, royalties, periodic license fees, and borrowings. At December 31, 2003, we had a working capital deficit of approximately $824,000. The principal use of cash during the year ended December 31, 2003 was approximately $1.6 million for operating activities. Sources of cash included approximately $481,000 of repayments by our chairman of his notes, an increase of $100,000 in short term debt, and proceeds from a $1,575,000 two year senior secured convertible note bearing 12% interest, described below. As previously mentioned, under the terms of the Auxilium Agreement we received, in June 2004 and August 2004, payments totalling $5,000,000. We may also receive $10,500,000 of contingent milestone payments under this agreement if all existing conditions are met. Additional milestone obligations may be due if Auxilium exercises an option to develop and license our enzyme for additional medical indications. 21 Prior to the signing of the Auxilium Agreement, we funded operations by (1) modification of the terms of two loans, principally, by deferring a balloon payment of $364,000 due in November 2003 to November 2004; and deferring the payment of $100,000 principal due on a promissory note from March 2004 to March 2005; (2) receiving a $250,000 advance of royalties from Abbott Laboratories, our major customer, in January 2004 and a $500,000 royalty advance at the end of March 2004, both of which are to be repaid from royalties to be earned from distribution of Santyl(R) Ointment during 2004 (of which $94,000 and $130,000 were repaid from royalties earned during the respective quarters ended March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004); (3) our chairman's deferred salary of $100,000 during the three months ended June 2003 has been applied against the chairman note receivable in March 2004, and (4) deferring or making partial payments to creditors. Due to manufacturing problems encountered in 2003, we will be able to supply Abbott with only limited quantities of our enzyme throughout 2004 and will continue to incur significant operating losses exclusive of the income received from the Auxilium agreement. As a result of payments due under the Auxilium Agreement, we generated positive cash flow during the second quarter of 2004. On June 19, 2003, the Company entered into a financing transaction with Bio Partners LP, a private investor group, pursuant to which the Company sold to Bio Partners in a private placement (i) a $1.575 million convertible note, (the "Note") issued at face value, and (ii) 295,312 shares of Company common stock, issued at par value, or $.001 per share. The net proceeds to the Company were approximately $890,000, after the payment of expenses and repayment of $500,000 previously advanced to the Company by a principal of Bio Partners. The Note matures on June 19, 2005 and bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum with an effective interest rate of 36%. Interest-only payments under the Note are payable monthly in arrears and the entire principal amount is payable at maturity. At the time the agreement was made, up to $1,141,875 aggregate principal amount of the Note is convertible into the Company's common stock, at a conversion price of $2.50 per share, subject to customary adjustments. The Note also contains restrictions on the Company's ability to incur debt as long as the Note is outstanding. The Note is secured by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of the Company and the Company's New York subsidiary, Advance Biofactures Corporation ("ABC"). In addition, ABC has guaranteed the obligations of the Company under the Note and our chairman, Edwin H. Wegman, has personally guaranteed 50% of the obligations of the Company under the Note. The loan discount of $281,000 and loan costs of $258,000 on the Note are being amortized over two years, the expected life of the Note. In November 2001, ABC-Curacao borrowed a non-amortizing loan of $455,000 at 6.5% interest due in November 2003 from Korpodeko. In connection with this loan, ABC-Curacao agreed to pledge as collateral substantially all of the assets owned by ABC-Curacao, including the upgraded facility's manufacturing assets with a book value of approximately $4.7 million at December 31, 2003. BioSpecifics has also guaranteed the Korpodeko loan. In September 2003, Korpodeko agreed to modify the terms of the loan. Korpodeko permitted us to repay 20%, or $91,000 of the loan principal, which it did in December 2003, and pay the remaining principal, or $364,000 in November 2004. In return, we agreed to an interest rate increase from 6.5% to 7.5% from November 2003 to the new maturity in November 2004. On the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003, short-term liabilities include the remaining $364,000 due November 2004. Long-term obligations at December 31, 2003 include operating leases of approximately $159,000 annually through December 2004. 22 On March 22, 2004 the Nasdaq Listings Qualifications Panel (the "Panel") informed us in writing of its determination to delist our common stock from The NASDAQ SmallCap Market effective with the open of business on March 24, 2004. The Nasdaq notice stated that the Panel's determination was based on our failure to satisfy the $2.5 million shareholders' equity requirement as of December 31, 2003. Our common stock was immediately eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board effective with the open of business on March 24, 2004. The OTC Bulletin Board symbol assigned to us is BSTC. No application was required to be filed for inclusion on the OTC Bulletin Board. BioSpecifics had the right to request that the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council (the "Listing Council") review this decision. The request for review had to be made in writing and received within 15 days from the date of the Nasdaq decision. We did not request the Nasdaq Listing Council to review the delisting decision. The Listing Council had the option, on its own motion, to determine to review any Panel decision within 45 calendar days after issuance of the written decision, or until May 6, 2004. If the Listing Council had determined to review this decision, it could have affirmed, modified, reversed, dismissed or remanded the decision of the Panel. We would have been notified in the event the Listing Council determined that this matter would have been called for review. No such review was requested by us nor did the Listing Council opt to review the Panel decision. Our Common Stock traded on The NASDAQ SmallCap Market tier of the Nasdaq Stock Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol "BSTCC" until March 23, 2004. On March 24, 2004, our common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol BSTC. Effective May 2004, our stock was moved from the OTC Bulletin Board to the Pink Sheets due to our failure to file our financial reports on a timely basis with the SEC. As we currently meet the NASDAQ independent audit committee guidelines and expect to meet the $2.5 million shareholders equity requirement, we anticipate reapplying to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market upon our filing of all overdue financial reports. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in reapplying to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PAGE ---- Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm .............. F-1 Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2003 ..................... F-2 Consolidated Statements of Operations for Calendar Year ended December 31, 2003, Fiscal Year ended January 31, 2003, and eleven months ended December 31, 2003 ...................................... F-3 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Loss for Calendar Year ended December 31, 2003 and Fiscal Year ended January 31, 2003 .................................................... F-4 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Calendar Year ended December 31, 2003 and Fiscal Year ended January 31, 2003, and eleven months ended December 31, 2003 ................. F-5 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ............................. F-6 ITEM 8. CHANGES IN, AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS, ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. None. 23 ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Evaluation of Disclosure Controls Disclosure controls are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information that we are required to disclose in the reports we file pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported. We have evaluated the effectiveness of such controls. Limitation on the Effectiveness of Controls Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated can provide only reasonable, but not absolute assurance that the objectives of a control system are met. Further, any control system reflects limitations on resources and the benefits of a control system must be considered relative to its costs. These limitations also include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management overrule of a control. A design of a control system is also based upon certain assumptions about potential future conditions over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected. Conclusions There were no changes in our internal controls that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls. ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION NONE PART III ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS, COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. The Board of Directors is divided into three classes, each of which serves for a term of three years, with only one class of directors being elected in each year. The term of office of the first class of directors, presently consisting of Thomas L. Wegman and Dr. Paul A. Gitman will expire at the Annual Meeting in 2006, the term of office of the second class of directors, presently consisting of Henry Morgan and Michael Schamroth will expire on the date of the Annual Meeting in 2004, and the third class of directors, consisting of Edwin H. Wegman will expire on the date of the Annual Meeting in 2005. Dr Friedel resigned as a Director and the Managing Director of Biospecifics Pharma GmbH on April 30, 2004. We do not anticipate replacing Dr. Friedel on the Board. In each case, barring death, resignation or removal, each director serves from the date of his election until the end of his term and until his successor is elected and qualified. 24 The directors have the positions with the Company and principal occupations set forth in the table below.
AGE AT MAY POSITION WITH THE COMPANY TERM NAME 15, 2004 AND PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION DIRECTOR SINCE EXPIRES - ---- -------- ------------------------ -------------- ------- Edwin H. Wegman 84 Chairman of the Board and President 1990 2005 Thomas L. Wegman 49 Director, Executive Vice President 1994 2006 Dr. Paul A. Gitman 63 Director; Director, Quality and Resource 1990 2006 Management, Long Island Jewish Medical Center Henry Morgan 83 Director; Senior partner of the law firm 1990 2004 Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski Michael Schamroth 64 Director, owner of M. Schamroth & Sons 2004 2004
Edwin H. Wegman has had the principal occupation and positions with the Company set forth in the table above for the past five years, and has held similar positions with the Company's subsidiaries, Advance Biofactures Corporation ("ABC-New York") and Advance Biofactures of Curacao ("ABC-Curacao"), for the past five years. Thomas L. Wegman was Secretary and Treasurer of the Company from inception to July 1997, at which time he assumed his current position. In addition, he has held, for the past five years, similar positions with the Company's subsidiaries, ABC-New York and ABC-Curacao. Dr. Gitman is Medical Director at Long Island Jewish Medical Center since January 1, 1995 and prior thereto was an independent physician engaged in the practice of internal medicine with Spellman Mykoff & Gitman, MD, P.C. Henry Morgan has had the principal occupation set forth in the table above for the past five years. For personal reasons, Mr. Morgan resigned from the board on May 16, 2003 and rejoined the board on July 10, 2003. Michael Schamroth became an interim director as of February 24, 2004. Mr. Schamroth's appointment to the Board will be ratified at the Company's next stockholders' meeting, which should take place near the end of 2004. Mr. Schamroth, who runs a fourth generation family owned business, has in excess of twenty years of experience as a Board Member of a major Long Island based health system. His many roles have included Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Compensation Board and Member of the Finance Committee. 25 To the Company's knowledge, based solely on its review of the copies of Forms 4 and 5 furnished to it, the Company believes that all Section 16(a) reporting requirements were complied with during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS In addition to the executive officers named above, the Company employed Albert Horcher as its Secretary, Treasurer, and Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Horcher, 44, is a certified public accountant and served in these positions from July 1997 to April 2004, when he resigned from the Company. From February 1991 to July 1997, he served as the Company's Controller and Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer. In addition, he held for the past five years similar positions with the Company's subsidiaries, ABC-New York and ABC-Curacao. Executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES During the last fiscal year that ended December 31, 2003, the Board of Directors met 5 times. All incumbent directors, with the exception of Mr. Schamroth who joined the board in 2004, attended at least 80% of board meetings. Audit Committee. The Board has an Audit Committee consisting of Dr. Paul A. Gitman, and Henry Morgan. The function of the Audit Committee is to recommend selection of the Company's independent accountants, review with the independent accountants the results of their audits, review with the independent accountants and management the Company's financial reporting and operating controls and the scope of audits, review all budgets of the Company and its subsidiaries and make recommendations concerning the Company's financial reporting, accounting practices and policies and financial, accounting and operating controls and safeguards and review matters relating to the relationship between the Company and its auditors. The audit committee met 4 times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 Stock Option Committee. The stock option committee consists of Dr. Paul A Gitman and Henry Morgan. The function of the Stock Option Committee is to administer the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan (the "1993 Plan") which expired July 2004, the Company's 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan"), and the Company's 2001 Stock Option Plan (the "2001 Plan"). The stock option committee did not meet during the last fiscal year. Executive Committee. The executive committee consists of Edwin H. Wegman and Thomas L. Wegman. The function of the Executive Committee is, except for certain matters reserved to the full Board, to exercise all of the powers of the Board in the management of the business of the Company during intervals between Board meetings, if necessary. The executive committee held numerous meetings during the last fiscal year. The Board does not have nominating or compensation committees. Family Relationships - -------------------- Edwin Wegman, our Chief Executive Officer, is the father of Thomas Wegman, who is our Executive Vice President. 26 Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings - ---------------------------------------- None of our directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons has been involved in any of the following events during the past five years: 1. any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; 2. any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); 3. being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, or any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or 4. being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated. Audit Committee Financial Expert Our Board of Directors has determined that it does not have a member of its audit committee that qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in Item 401(e) of Regulation S-B, and is "independent" as the term is used in Tem 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an "audit committee financial expert" would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our current circumstances. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company's officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of the Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These reporting persons also are required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Code of Ethics Our company's board of directors does not currently have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics but will be adopting one during the current calendar year that will apply to, among other persons, members of our Board of Directors, our company's officers including our president (being our principal officer) and our company's chief financial officer (being our principal financial and accounting officer), contractors, consultants and advisors. As adopted, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will set forth written standards that are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote: 1. honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; 2. full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by us; 27 3. compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; 4. the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; and 5. accountability for adherence to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. ITEM 10. - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The following table sets forth information concerning compensation for services rendered in all capacities awarded to, or earned by, certain of the Company's executive officers for the fiscal years indicated. There are no other officers who earned an aggregate salary and bonus in excess of $100,000 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. These executive officers also serve in the same capacities in ABC-New York, and ABC-Curacao, except for Dr. Friedel. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Annual Long-Term Compensation Compensation (no other (no restricted compensation stock grants were applicable) issued) - --------------------------- -------------- ------------------- ----------------- Edwin H. Wegman 12/31/03 297,402(1) - President 1/31/03 405,169 39,000 1/31/02 405,169 100,000 - --------------------------- -------------- ------------------- ----------------- Thomas L. Wegman 12/31/03 193,147 - Executive 1/31/03 205,895 45,000 Vice President 1/31/02 205,895 50,000 - --------------------------- -------------- ------------------- ----------------- Rainer Friedel 12/31/03 192,500 - Managing Director 1/31/03 192,500 20,000 1/31/02 192,500 50,000 - --------------------------- -------------- ------------------- ----------------- Albert Horcher 12/31/03 118,469 - Secretary and 1/31/03 120,692 20,000 Treasurer 1/31/02 120,692 20,000 - --------------------------- -------------- ------------------- ----------------- (1) Mr. Edwin H. Wegman's salary for the three months ended June 30, 2003 for approximately $100,000 was deferred and subsequently, in March 2004, applied to, the chairman note receivable with the Company. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION The Company has no specific policy for compensating directors. In past fiscal years, directors, who were not employees, were compensated for meetings attended in person at the Company's headquarters, at a rate of $1,500 per meeting. They were also granted stock options. However, during the year ended December 31, 2003, none of the incumbent directors, and none of the former directors, were paid for any meetings attended in person, and no accruals were made. 28 ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT. To the Company's knowledge, the table that follows sets forth the beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock as of July 14, 2004 of (i) those persons or groups known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the Common Stock, (ii) each director and nominee of the Company, (iii) each executive officer whose compensation exceeded $100,000 (each, a "named executive officer") in the calendar year ended December 31, 2003 (calendar 2003"), and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. The information is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), based on information furnished by the persons listed or contained in filings made by them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Unless indicated below, the stockholders listed possess sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares and the business address of each stockholder is c/o BioSpecifics Technologies Corp., 35 Wilbur St., Lynbrook, New York 11563.
NUMBER OF SHARES NAME AND ADDRESS OF OF COMMON STOCK PERCENT OF BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIALLY OWNED CLASS - ---------------- ------------------ ----- Edwin H. Wegman (1)(5) 2,235,192 39.4% Thomas L. Wegman (2)(5) 240,544 4.2 Paul A. Gitman, MD. (3)(5) 72,925 1.3 Henry Morgan (5) 35,425 * Michael Schamroth (4)(5) 110,000 1.9 Bio Partners LP (5) 295,312 5.5 Directors and executive officers as a 2,694,086 46.8% group (5 persons)
- ------------------------------------ (*) Less than 1%. (1) Includes 1,843,327 shares of Common Stock owned by The S.J. Wegman Company, a partnership of which Edwin H. Wegman is the sole general partner. Includes 120,000 shares beneficially owned by The Isabel H. Wegman Rev. Trust. The sole trustee of this trust is the estate of Mr. Wegman's brother. Includes options to purchase 66,750 shares of Common Stock that are currently exercisable. Does not include options to purchase 79,250 shares of Common Stock that are not currently exercisable. Edwin H. Wegman is the father of Thomas L. Wegman. (2) Includes 7,300 shares of Common Stock held by Thomas L. Wegman's wife and child. Includes options to purchase 205,800 shares of Common Stock that are currently exercisable. Thomas L. Wegman is a son of Edwin H. Wegman. (3) Includes 16,500 shares of Common Stock held by Dr. Gitman's wife and children. Includes options to purchase 35,425 shares of Common Stock that are currently exercisable. Dr. Gitman's business address is c/o Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave., New Hyde Park, New York 11040. 29 (4) Includes 100,000 shares owned by M. Schamroth & Sons and options to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock, which are currently exercisable. (5) Listed address is 35 Wilbur Street, Lynbrook, New York 11563 Equity Compensation Plan Information We maintain three equity compensation plans, the 1993 stock option plan (which expired July 2004), the 1997 stock option plan and the 2001 stock option plan. In July 1994, the Company's stockholders approved a stock option plan (the "1993 plan") for eligible key employees, directors, independent agents, and consultants who make a significant contribution toward the Company's success and development and to attract and retain qualified employees. Under the 1993 plan, qualified incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may be granted to purchase up to an aggregate of 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions. The exercise price per share of common stock may not be less than 100% (110% for qualified incentive stock options granted to stockholders owning at least 10% of common shares) of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. In general, the options vest and become exercisable in four equal annual installments following the date of grant, although the Board of Directors, at its discretion, may provide for different vesting schedules, and expire ten years (five years for qualified incentive stock options granted to stockholders owning at least 10% of common shares) after such date. In accordance with terms of the 1993 plan, no option shall be granted under the plan subsequent to ten years after its effective date, or July 2004. In July 1997, the Company's stockholders approved a stock option plan (the "1997 plan") with terms identical to the 1993 plan. The 1997 plan authorizes the granting of awards of up to an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions. In August 2001, the Company's stockholders approved a stock option plan (the "2001 plan"), with terms similar to the 1997 plan. The 2001 plan authorized the granting of awards of up to an aggregate of 750,000 shares of the Company's common stock, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions. On December 16, 2003, stockholders approved an amendment to the 2001 stock option plan which increased the number of shares authorized for grant from 750,000 shares to 1,750,000 shares, an increase of 1,000,000 shares. A total of 1,750,000 shares of common stock are now authorized for issuance under the amended 2001 plan. The following table sets forth information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2003.
- ------------------------------ --------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------- Number of securities Number of securities to Weighted average remaining available for be issued upon exercise exercise price of future issuance under of outstanding options outstanding options equity compensation plans - ------------------------------ --------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------- Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1,350,625 $1.77 1,018,650 - ------------------------------ --------------------------- --------------------- ----------------------------
30 EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTION GRANT TABLE
- -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------------- Executive Total Options Issued Number Exercisable Exercisable and under $1.47 - -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------------- Edwin Wegman 139,000 66,750 13,250 - -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------------- Thomas Wegman 205,800 205,800 115,000 - -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------------- Paul Gitman, M.D. 35,425 35,425 15,425 - -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------------- Henry Morgan 35,425 30,000 10,000 - -------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- --------------------------------
There were no grants of options to the executives of the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and no officer or director exercised any option during the year ended December 31, 2003. ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. The S.J. Wegman Company owns Wilbur Street Corporation ("WSC"), which has leased to ABC-New York a building serving as a manufacturing facility and headquarters in Lynbrook, New York for over 30 years. The building also serves as the Company's administrative headquarters. Edwin H. Wegman, the Company's Chairman of the Board and President, is the President of WSC and the sole general partner of The S.J. Wegman Company, a limited partnership. In January 1998, WSC and the Company entered into a triple net lease agreement that provides for an annual rent starting at $125,000, which can increase annually by the amount of annual increase in the Consumer Price Index for the greater New York metropolitan region. The lease term is 7 years, expiring January 31, 2005. The Company believes that the terms of this lease are reasonable and the rent charged is no greater than that which would be charged by an unaffiliated landlord for comparable facilities, based on appraisals of the property The Company has two outstanding loans to the Company's chairman. One loan, whose principal balance at December 31, 2003 is $494,302 is a demand promissory note, bears interest at 9% per annum, and is collateralized by approximately 1,800,000 shares of the Company's stock. Another loan, whose principal balance at December 31, 2003 is $56,820 is a demand promissory note, bears interest at 9% per annum, and is uncollateralized. The Company also has two loans with Wilbur St. Corporation ("WSC"), an affiliate of the chairman. One loan is a non-amortizing mortgage from WSC in the amount of $82,606 and bears interest at 9% per annum; the other is for advances to WSC in the amount of $15,647. For financial statement purposes, all these loans, which aggregate $649,375 of principal, are classified as components of stockholders' equity in the balance sheet and appear as "Notes due from chairman and other related party". During calendar 2003, the Chairman repaid net principal of $375,935 on these loans. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to collect on these notes. Interest income accrued for these loans but not recognized for financial statement purposes aggregated approximately $42,000 and $101,000 for the calendar year 2003 and fiscal 2003, respectively. ABC-New York has notes payable to a former director of the Company and to a partner of the S.J. Wegman Company, an affiliate, amounting to $15,010 at December 31, 2003. The notes, which bear interest at 9% per annum, are payable on demand. 31 ITEM 13. EXHIBITS, LISTS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. (A) EXHIBITS FILED Exhibit 3.1 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, as amended. (Previously filed with Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-18 "Registration Statement" and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 3.2 Registrant's by-laws as amended. (Previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 and 3.2(a) to Registrant's Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 3.3 Registrant's by-laws as amended [Note: section 1.15 deleted in its entirety]* Exhibit 4.1 Copy of Promissory Note executed by Edwin H. Wegman in favor of Advance Biofactures Corporation. (Previously filed as Exhibit 28.1 to Registrant's Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 4.2 Copy of Promissory Note executed by Advance Biofactures Corporation in favor of Sherman C. Vogel and Clarification of Loan executed by Advance Biofactures Corporation and Sherman C. Vogel, and. (Previously filed as Exhibit 28.2 to Registrant's Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 4.3 Copy of Promissory Note executed by Advance Biofactures Corporation in favor of Myron E. Wegman. (Previously filed as Exhibit 28.3 to Registrant's Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.1 Form of 1991 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.2 Form of 1993 Stock Option Plan of Registrant. (Previously filed on the Registrant's Form S-8 Registration No. 33-95116 dated July 28, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.3 Copy of Agreement between Advance Biofactures Corporation and Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, without exhibits. (Previously filed as exhibit 10.3 to Registrant's 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.4 Copy of Lease between Advance Biofactures Corporation and the Wilbur Street Corporation. (Previously filed as exhibit 10.4 to Registrant's 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.5 Copy of Lease between the Curacao Industrial and International Trade Development Company (Curinde) N.V. and Advance Biofactures Corporation of Curacao, N.V. (English translation). (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant's Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.) 32 Exhibit 10.6 Copy of Agreement between Bio-Specifics N.V. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Advance Biofactures of Curacao, N.V.) and Sheldon R. Pinnell, MD. (Previously filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Registrant's Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.7 Copy of Employment Agreement with Dr. Rainer Friedel (English summary attached). (Previously filed as exhibit 10.18 to Registrant's 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.8 Copy of Collagenase ABC license agreement between Advance Biofactures of Curacao, N.V. and a Swiss company, without exhibits. (Previously filed as exhibit 29.2 to Registrant's 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.9 Form of 1997 Stock Option Plan of Registrant. (Previously filed on the Registrant's Form S-8 Registration No. 333-36485 dated September 26, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.10 Regulatory Compliance Agreement between Advance Biofactures Corp., Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, and Smith and Nephew, Inc. (Previously filed on the Registrant's Form 8-K dated March 3, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.11 Allocation of Responsibilities Agreement between Advance Biofactures Corp., Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, and Smith and Nephew, Inc. (Previously filed on the Registrant's Form 8-K dated March 3, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.12 Adverse Event ("AE") Agreement between Advance Biofactures Corp., Knoll Pharmaceutical Company, and Smith and Nephew, Inc. (Previously filed on the Registrant's Form 8-K dated March 3, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.13 Recourse Secured Demand Note between BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and Edwin H. Wegman Exhibit 10.14 Stock Pledge Agreement between BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and Edwin H. Wegman Exhibit 10.15 Form of 2001 Stock Option Plan of Registrant Exhibit 10.16 Loan agreement between Advance Biofactures of Curacao, NV and Korpodeko Curacao Development Corporation dated August 6, 2001 and Letter of Intent dated May 15, 2001. 33 Exhibit 10.17 Promissory note loan and warrant agreement between BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and David Geller dated March 11, 2003 Exhibit 10.20 12% Senior Secured Convertible Note dated June 19, 2003 between BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and Bio Partners LP. (Previously filed on the Registrant's Form 8-K dated June 19, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.21 Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 19, 2003 between BioSpecifics Technologies Corp., Advance Biofactures Corporation, and Bio Partners LP. (Previously filed on the Registrant's Form 8-K dated June 19, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 10.22 Investor Rights Agreement dated June 19, 2003 between BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and Bio Partners LP. (Previously filed on the Registrant's Form 8-K dated June 19, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 22 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. (Previously filed as exhibit 22 to Registrant's 10-KSB for the year ended January 31, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference.) Exhibit 23.1 Consent of BDO Seidman LLP.* Exhibit 24 Development and Licensing Agreement dated June 3, 2004 between BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 31.1 Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* ----------------------------- * Filed herewith (B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K Form 8-K dated March 22, 2004 Form 8-K dated June 10, 2004 Form 8-K dated June 10, 2004 34 ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Our principal accountants for each of the past two years has been BDO Seidman, LLP. Audit Fees The aggregate audit fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for the audit of our annual financial statements included in our report on form 10-KSB and review of our quarterly financial statements included in our Reports on Form 10-QSB were $80,000 and $86,000 in the year ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, respectively. Audit Related Fees For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, there were no aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services by BDO Seidman, LLP relating to the performance of the audit of our financial statements, which are not reported under the caption "Audit Fees" above. Tax Fees The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $26,000 and $38,500 in fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, respectively. These services included, in each fiscal year reported, preparation of our corporate income tax returns, tax planning advice related to our tax returns and tax advice relating to contemplated corporate transactions. All Other Fees Other than the fees described above, we have not incurred any fees for any services rendered by our principal accounting firm. Pre-approval Policies and Procedures It is our policy that, before we engage our principal accountants for any audit or non-audit services, the engagement is approved by our audit committee. Our audit committee has delegated to Henry Morgan, its Audit Committee Chairman, and an independent director, the authority to grant such pre-approval during periods when the audit committee is not in session and a meeting cannot be readily convened. A decision by Mr. Morgan to pre-approve an audit or non-audit service must be presented to the full audit committee at it next scheduled meeting. All fees paid to, and or billed by, our principal accountants were approved in accordance with the policy described above beginning May 6, 2003. 35 SIGNATURES In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (Registrant) Date: November 2, 2004 By: /s/ Edwin H. Wegman ---------------------------------------- Edwin H. Wegman, Chairman and President In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. /s/ Edwin H. Wegman Chairman of the Board, President and November 2, 2004 - --------------------- Director (Principal Executive Officer), Edwin H. Wegman and Interim Principal Accounting Officer November 2, 2004 /s/ Thomas L. Wegman Executive Vice President and Director - --------------------- Thomas L. Wegman November 2, 2004 /s/ Paul A. Gitman, Director - --------------------- M.D. Paul A. Gitman, M.D. /s/ Michael Schamroth Director November 2, 2004 - --------------------- Michael Schamroth /s/ Henry Morgan Director November 2, 2004 - --------------------- Henry Morgan
36 BDO SEIDMAN, LLP INTERNAL PUBLICATION Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of Directors and Stockholders of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, and the eleven months ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, and the eleven months ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP Melville, New York March 22, 2004, except for Note 15, as to Which the date is June 3, 2004 F-1 BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Balance Sheet December 31, 2003 ----------------- Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 268,998 Marketable securities 3,026 Accounts receivable, net 306,786 Inventories, net 880,452 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 47,151 ----------- Total current assets 1,506,413 Other assets - loan costs 203,457 Property, plant and equipment, net 3,845,102 ----------- 5,554,972 =========== Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 1,806,850 Notes payable to related parties 15,010 Deferred revenue 45,000 Short-term debt - Korpodeko 364,000 Short-term debt - promissory note 100,000 ----------- Total current liabilities 2,330,860 Minority interest in subsidiaries 89,728 Senior secured convertible 12% note, net of discount . 1,364,591 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' equity: Series A Preferred stock, $.50 par value, 700,000 shares authorized; none outstanding -- Common stock, $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 5,249,528 shares issued 5,249 Additional paid-in capital 4,144,207 Retained earnings 180,949 Treasury stock, 361,380 shares at cost (1,911,237) Notes receivable from chairman and other related party (649,375) ----------- Total stockholders' equity 1,769,793 ----------- $ 5,554,972 =========== See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. F-2 BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Operations
Year ended Eleven months December 31, January 31, ended December 31, 2003 2003 2003 ----------- ----------- ----------- Revenues: Net sales $ 1,555,625 $ 1,938,706 $ 1,332,762 Royalties 1,683,915 2,140,534 1,515,931 ----------- ----------- ----------- 3,239,540 4,079,240 2,848,693 Costs and expenses: Cost of sales 2,843,921 3,205,235 2,571,780 General and administrative 2,615,007 3,045,319 2,317,739 Research and development 884,685 1,069,045 806,312 ----------- ----------- ----------- 6,343,613 7,319,599 5,695,831 ----------- ----------- ----------- Loss from operations (3,104,073) (3,240,359) (2,847,138) ----------- ----------- ----------- Other income (expense): Investment income 22,794 23,462 19,740 Interest expense (207,734) (46,556) (225,629) ----------- ----------- ----------- (184,940) (23,094) (205,889) Loss before benefit (expense) for income taxes and minority interest (3,289,013) (3,263,453) (3,053,027) Income tax benefit (expense) (13,000) 260,464 (13,000) ----------- ----------- ----------- Loss before minority interest (3,302,013) (3,002,989) (3,066,027) Minority interest in loss of subsidiaries 77,413 78,220 70,730 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net loss ($3,224,600) ($2,924,769) ($2,995,297) =========== =========== =========== Basic and diluted net loss per share ($ 0.68) ($ 0.64) ($ 0.63) =========== =========== =========== Weighted-average common shares outstanding 4,734,867 4,564,336 4,734,867 =========== =========== ===========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements F-3 BioSpecifics Technologies Corp Consolodated Statments of Stockholders' Equity
Common Stock Preferred Stock Retained Shares Amount APIC Shares Amount Earnings ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balances - 31 Jan 2002 4,912,216 $ 4,912 $ 3,800,104 0 0 $ 6,101,015 =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== Foreign currency translation -- -- -- -- -- -- Consultant option grants -- -- 7,600 -- -- -- Options exercised 27,000 27 26,973 -- -- -- Proceeds from Chairman -- -- -- -- -- -- Net (loss) -- -- -- -- -- (2,924,769) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balances - 31 Jan 2003 4,939,216 4,939 3,834,677 0 0 3,176,246 =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== Less: Jan 2003 activity na na na na na 229,303 Balances - 31 Dec 2002 4,939,216 4,939 3,834,677 0 0 3,405,549 Foreign currency translation -- -- -- -- -- -- Consultant option grants - IS 15,000 15 14,985 -- -- -- BioPartners loan/discount 295,312 295 280,546 -- -- -- Geller warrants, Garut options -- -- 14,000 -- -- -- Proceeds from Chairman -- -- -- -- -- -- Net (loss) -- -- -- -- -- (3,224,600) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balances - 31 Dec 2003 5,249,528 $ 5,249 $ 4,144,208 0 0 $ 180,949 =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== [RESTUBBED- Treas Due from Currency Stkholder Eq Comprehen stock Chairman Transl Total inc (loss) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balances - 31 Jan 2002 ($1,911,237) ($1,116,378) $ 15,811 $ 6,894,227 ($ 259,656) =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== Foreign currency translation -- -- (6,823) (6,823) (6,823) Consultant option grants -- -- -- 7,600 Options exercised -- -- -- 27,000 Proceeds from Chairman -- 91,069 -- 91,069 Net (loss) -- -- -- (2,924,769) (2,924,769) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balances - 31 Jan 2003 (1,911,237) (1,025,309) 8,988 4,088,304 (2,931,592) =========== =========== =========== =========== =========== Less: Jan 2003 activity na (105,000) na 124,303 na Balances - 31 Dec 2002 (1,911,237) (1,130,309) 8,988 4,212,607 -- Foreign currency translation -- -- (8,988) (8,988) (8,988) Consultant option grants - IS -- -- -- 15,000 -- BioPartners loan/discount -- -- -- 280,841 -- Geller warrants, Garut options -- -- -- 14,000 -- Proceeds from Chairman -- 480,934 -- 480,934 -- Net (loss) -- -- -- (3,224,600) (3,224,600) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balances - 31 Dec 2003 ($1,911,237) ($ 649,375) $ 0 $ 1,769,794 ($3,233,588) =========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
F-4 BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Twelve months ended Eleven months December 31, January 31, ended December 31, 2003 2003 2003 ----------- ----------- -------------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss ($3,224,600) ($2,924,769) ($2,995,297) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 699,129 636,657 650,011 Options and warrants issued for services 14,000 7,600 14,000 Issuance of stock for services 15,000 -- 15,000 Amortization of loan discount 70,137 -- 70,137 Minority interest in loss of subsidiaries (77,413) (78,220) (70,730) Deferred taxes -- 164,536 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 562,024 1,616,574 683,056 Inventories (231,572) 105,258 (201,546) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (13,003) (21,270) (13,003) Accounts payable and accrued expenses 150,302 192,110 (65,894) Income taxes 417,000 (425,000) 425,000 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash used in operating activities (1,618,996) (726,524) (1,489,266) Cash flows from investing activities: Net paydown of notes receivable from chairman 480,934 91,069 375,934 Expenditures for property, plant and equipment (16,189) (52,268) (16,189) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by investing activities 464,745 38,801 359,745 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash flows from financing activities: Interest accrued on notes payable to related parties 500 500 500 Exercise of stock options -- 27,000 -- Increase in short-term debt 100,000 -- 100,000 Decrease in short-term debt (91,000) -- (91,000) Proceeds from senior secured convertible debt 1,575,000 -- 1,575,000 Proceeds from issuance of common stock 295 -- 295 Deferred loan costs, net (203,457) -- (203,457) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by financing activities 1,381,338 27,500 1,381,338 ----------- ----------- ----------- Effect of exchange rates on cash and equivalents (8,988) (6,823) (8,988) Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 218,099 (667,046) 242,829 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 50,899 693,215 26,169 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 268,998 $ 26,169 $ 268,998 =========== =========== =========== Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for: Interest 157,599 46,555 157,599 =========== =========== =========== Income taxes 0 14,050 0 =========== =========== ===========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements F-5 BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003 Organization and Description of Business BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. ("the Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1990. The Company produces a fermentation-derived enzyme named Collagenase ABC (the "product" or "enzyme") that is licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA"). The Company operates production facilities in Lynbrook, New York (the "Lynbrook Plant or Facility") and in Curacao, Netherlands Antilles (the "Curacao Plant or Facility"). The Company is also researching and developing additional products derived from this enzyme for potential use as pharmaceuticals. Historically, the Company's revenues have been from one customer in the United States, Abbott Laboratories ("Abbott") who, pursuant to an exclusive licensing agreement (the "Abbott Agreement", or the "Agreement"), compounds the product into Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment ("Santyl(R)" or "Ointment"), a prescription drug used to treat a variety of skin wounds (the "topical ointment business"). The Company also earns royalties on the sale of Santyl(R) to distributors by Abbott. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries, Advance Biofactures Corp. ("ABC - New York") and Advance Biofactures of Curacao N.V. ("ABC - Curacao") and its wholly owned subsidiary, Biospecifics Pharma GmbH ("Bio Pharma") of Germany. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. We have ceased operations in Germany and are in the process of liquidating Bio Pharma of Germany. Change in Fiscal Year In March 2003 we changed our fiscal year end from January 31 to December 31. Our first fiscal year using this new basis is the twelve months ending December 31, 2003 similarly in this report we compare the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 ("calendar year 2003") to the twelve months ended January 31, 2003 ("fiscal year 2003"). The year ended January 31, 2003 is not materially different to the eleven month period therefore the eleven months ended December 31, 2002 is not presented.. The eleven months period ended December 31, 2003 is also presented. As a result of the signing of the Auxilium Agreement in June 2004, the Company now has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations (See Note 15). F-6 Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all temporary investments and time deposits with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Marketable Securities Marketable securities principally consist of investments in common and preferred stocks. These investments are classified as trading securities and are adjusted to market value at the end of each accounting period. Unrealized holding gains and losses on trading securities are included in investment and other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first-in, first-out basis) or market. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and autos are depreciated on the straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 5 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are being amortized over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the life of the lease which is approximately 8 to 10 years. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company evaluates the net realizable value of its property and equipment and other assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS 144"), relying on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, economic projections and anticipated future cash flows. SFAS 144 requires recognition of impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets or the business to which such intangible assets relate. The Company recorded no impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003. Income Taxes The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes, as set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under this method, deferred income taxes, when required, are provided on the basis of the difference between the financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities at the statutory rates enacted for future periods. Cumulative Translation Adjustment The assets and liabilities of ABC Curacao are denominated in U.S. dollars. ABC-Curacao conducts local transactions in local currency, which is translated using average exchange rates for the period. The local currency in Curacao is pegged to the US dollar; therefore gains and losses resulting from translation are minimal and not included in stockholders' equity as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. F-7 Gains and losses resulting from translation of the Euro, the functional currency of Bio Pharma GmbH had been included in stockholders' equity as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Revenue Recognition Net sales include the sales of Collagenase ABC enzyme that are recognized at the time the product is shipped to customers. Net sales also include nominal fees the Company charges Abbott for testing Santyl(R) Ointment products manufactured by Abbott. Net sales from testing are recognized when Santyl(R) is released by the FDA for distribution. The Company also earns royalties on Santyl(R) sales in the United States pursuant to its licensing agreement with Abbott. Royalties are recognized during the period in which the Ointment is delivered to distributors in the United States, as reported to the Company by Abbott. The royalty revenues from Abbott for both periods presented were earned on North American sales of Santyl(R) to distributors by Smith & Nephew, Inc. ("S&N") through December 31, 2003. From time to time, the Company enters into licensing agreements with pharmaceutical companies regarding the sale of the Company's approved product and potential products. License fees and milestone payments for potential products are recognized when earned and the item is delivered under the guidance of EITF No. 00-21 "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables". The Company did not recognize any license fee revenue during the periods ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003. Research and Development The Company conducts various research and development activities for the approved product and for potential products. Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred. These costs amounted to $ 884,685 and $1,069,045 in the calendar 2003 and fiscal 2003, respectively. Net Loss Per Share Net loss per share is presented under SFAS No. 128 "Earnings per Share". In accordance with SFAS No. 128, basic and diluted net loss per share has been calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if common stock equivalents were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. Potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation for the years ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, as their effect is antidilutive For the years ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, potential dilutive securities representing 1,350,625 and 1,358,325 options outstanding are not included as their effect would be antidilutive. Furthermore, for the year ended December 31, 2003 the Company also has 456,750 shares that would be issued assuming $1,141,875 aggregate principal amount of the convertible Note were converted into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $2.50 per share, subject to customary adjustments. These potentially dilutive securities are not included since their effect would be anti-dilutive because of the net loss incurred. F-8 Stock Based Compensation The Company has three stock-based employee compensation plans in effect which are described more fully in Note 10. The Company accounts for all transactions under which employees receive shares of stock or other equity instruments in the Company based on the price of its stock in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." No stock-based employee compensation cost for stock options is reflected in net loss, as all options granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an expense of $14,000 and $7,600 during calendar 2003 and fiscal 2003, respectively, for options granted to consultants. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation".
- ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- Year ended December 31, 2003 January 31, 2003 Eleven Months Ended December 31, 2003 - ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- Net loss as reported ($3,224,600) ($2,924,769) ($2,995,297) - ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net effect of minority interest (221,361) (280,297) (196,800) - ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- Proforma net loss (3,445,961) (3,205,066) (3,192,097) - ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- Basic and diluted net loss per share: - ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- As reported ($0.68) ($0.64) ($0.63) - ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------ -------------------- Proforma SFAS 123 $(0.73) $(0.70) ($0.67) - ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------------ --------------------
The fair value for each option granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, one of the allowable valuation methods under SFAS 123, with the following assumptions:
- ---------------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -------------------- Year Ended December 31, 2003 January 31, 2003 Eleven Months Ended December 31, 2003 - ---------------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -------------------- Average risk free interest rates 4.75% 4.50% 4.75% - ---------------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -------------------- Average expected life (in years) 5.00 5.00 5.00 - ---------------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- -------------------- Volatility 82% 82% 82% - ---------------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------------- --------------------
The weighted-average fair value of the options granted during the calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003 was estimated to be $0.95 and $0.69, respectively, for options granted at market value. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions in determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. F-9 Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. It is impractical to determine the fair value of notes receivable due from the chairman and other related party. Concentration of Credit Risk The Company's financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high quality credit institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the FDIC or SIPC insurance limit. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risks. Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of trade accounts receivable, as the Company does not require collateral or other securities to support customer receivables. (see Note 9.) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements FIN No. 46 "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" was effective immediately upon its issuance during fiscal 2003 for all enterprises with interests in variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. In December 2003, FASB issued FIN No. 46 (R) that changes the effective dates for the recording of interests in variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 beginning with the first interim reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. If an entity is determined to be a variable interest entity, it must be consolidated by the enterprise that absorbs the majority of the entity's expected losses if they occur, or receives a majority of the entity's expected residual returns if they occur, or both. Where it is reasonably possible that the enterprise will consolidate or disclose information about a variable interest entity, the enterprise must disclose the nature, purpose, size and activity of the variable interest entity and the enterprise's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the variable interest entity in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. A determination has been made that although the lessor of its operating facility is a variable interest entity, the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Under FIN 46 the lessor will not be consolidated in the Company's consolidated balance sheet. The adoption of this interpretation in 2004 is not expected to have an effect on the Company's financial statements. 3. Marketable Securities Marketable securities at December 31, 2003 consist of common and preferred stock, with a cost basis of $245,713 unrealized holding losses of $242,687, and fair market value of $3,026. Fair values are based upon quoted market prices. F-10 4. Inventories, net Inventories, net at December 31, 2003 consist of: Raw materials $ 65,166 Work-in-process 815,286 -------- $880,452 ======== 5. Property, Plant and Equipment, net Property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2003 consist of: Machinery and equipment $2,379,795 Furniture and fixtures 371,917 Leasehold improvements 4,079,120 ---------- 6,830,832 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (2,985,730) ---------- $3,845,102 ========== Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $699,129 and $636,657 for calendar 2003 and fiscal year 2003, respectively. 6. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses Accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2003 consist of the following: Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 984,509 Accrued legal and other professional fees 542,036 Accrued payroll and related costs 280,305 ---------- $1,806,850 ========== 7. Income Taxes The (expense) benefit for income taxes consist of the following: Year ended December 31, January 31, 2003 2003 --------- --------- Current: Federal $ (13,000) $ 425,000 State -- -- $ (13,000) $ 425,000 --------- --------- Deferred: Federal -- (148,783) State -- (15,753) --------- --------- -- (164,536) --------- --------- Total $ (13,000) $ 260,464 --------- --------- The effective income tax rate of the Company differs from the federal statutory tax rate of 34% in calendar 2003 and fiscal 2003 as a result of the effect of the following items: F-11 Year ended December 31, January 31, 2003 2003 ----------- ----------- Computed tax benefit at statutory rate $ 1,118,264 $ 1,109,574 Tax effect of foreign sourced loss (506,511) (307,645) State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit -- (10,397) Non-deductible expenses (4,116) (4,143) Orphan drug and other tax credits -- 20,000 Increase in valuation allowance (620,637) (546,925) ----------- ----------- $ (13,000) $ 260,464 =========== =========== The components of the Company's deferred tax assets, pursuant to SFAS No. 109, are summarized as follows: Year ended December 31, January 31, 2003 2003 ----------- ----------- Tax Credit Carryforwards 1,033,693 $ 1,037,182 Inventory 34,226 172,776 Accrued expenses 61,918 144,638 Depreciation and amortization 49,351 77,917 Capital loss carryforward 66,412 66,412 Net operating loss carryforward 873,962 -- ----------- ----------- Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance 2,119,562 1,498,925 Valuation allowance (2,119,562) (1,498,925) ----------- ----------- Net deferred tax asset $ -- $ -- =========== =========== SFAS No. 109 requires a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. The Company increased the valuation allowance by $620,637 during the year ended December 31, 2003. The net deferred tax asset has been fully reserved due to the uncertainty of the Company's ability to generate taxable income under the more likely than not criteria of FAS 109. The Company had domestic losses before taxes of $1,784,230 and $2,234,994 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, respectively. The Company had foreign losses before taxes of $1,447,370 and $950,239 for the years ended December 31, 2003 and January 31, 2003, respectively. The Company has permanently reinvested the accumulated earnings of its foreign subsidiaries, mostly in the form of plant, property and equipment, and therefore will not repatriate the net balance of such earnings (approximately $.9 million as of December 31, 2003) to the United States. In November 2000, the Curacao government extended the 2% profit tax holiday enjoyed by AB-Curacao for an additional 15 years. The statutory rate is 30%. At December 31, 2003, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $2.1 million and $4.0 million for Federal and State income tax purposes, respectively. These will expire at various dates from 2022 and 2023. As December 31, 2003, the Company has approximately $1,000,000 in tax credits which expire at various dates from 2018 through 2023. F-12 8. Credit Facilities The Company, through its subsidiary ABC-Curacao, has a two-year, non-amortizing loan of $455,000 at 6.5% interest from Korpodeko, a Curacao development corporation established to develop industry on the island of Curacao. The entire principal was due November 2003. In September 2003, Korpodeko agreed to modify the terms of the loan. Korpodeko permitted the Company to repay 20%, or $91,000 of the loan principal in December 2003, and pay the remaining principal, or $364,000 in November 2004. In return, the Company agreed to an interest rate increase from 6.5% to 7.5% from November 2003 to the new maturity in November 2004. On the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003, short-term liabilities include the remaining $364,000 due November 2004. Substantially all of the Company's fixed assets located in Curacao, with a book value of $3.2 million at December 31, 2003, are pledged as collateral for these obligations. The Company has also guaranteed the Korpodeko loan. In March 2003, the Company borrowed $100,000 from an individual lender, evidenced by a one-year promissory note, bearing interest of 8% per annum, which was due March 11, 2004. In March 2004, the holder of the note extended the note for one year. The Company granted to the lender warrants to purchase up to 10,000 common shares of the Company at $1.18, the closing price on that day, until March 11, 2008. The fair value of these warrants, based on Black-Scholes methodology, is $5,000 and was recorded as interest expense during the calendar year 2003. The Company's chairman has personally guaranteed the promissory note. On June 19, 2003, the Company entered into a financing transaction with Bio Partners LP, a private investor group, pursuant to which the Company sold to Bio Partners in a private placement (1) a $1.575 million convertible note (the "Note"), issued at face value, and (2) 295,312 shares (the "Shares") of Company common stock, issued at par value, or $.001 per share. The net proceeds to us were approximately $890,000, after the payment of expenses and repayment of $500,000 previously advanced to us by a principal of Bio Partners. The Note matures on June 19, 2005 and bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum with an effective interest rate of 36%. Interest-only payments under the Note are payable monthly in arrears and the entire principal amount is payable at maturity. Up to $1,141,875 aggregate principal amount of the Note is convertible into the Company's common stock at any time, at a conversion price of $2.50 per share, subject to customary adjustments. The Note also contains restrictions on the Company's ability to incur debt as long as the Note is outstanding. The Note is secured by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of BioSpecifics and its New York subsidiary, Advance Biofactures Corporation ("ABC"). In addition, ABC has guaranteed the obligations of the Company under the Note and the chairman has personally guaranteed 50% of the obligations under the Note. The loan discount of $281,000 (representing the fair value of the shares issued) and loan costs of $258,000 on the Note are being be amortized over the expected life of the Note. 9. Major Customer and Royalty and License Agreements The Company's primary royalty and license agreements are for its FDA approved product, Collagenase ABC. The Company derives most of its net sales of the product and all of its royalty revenues from one customer in the United States, Abbott Laboratories ("Abbott") who, pursuant to an exclusive licensing agreement (the "Agreement"), compounds the product into Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment ("Santyl(R)" or "ointment"), a prescription drug used to treat dermal ulcers and burns. F-13 Abbott accounted for approximately $2,906,000 and $3,196,000 of our product sales and royalties for the calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, respectively. These amounts were approximately 90% and 78% of our revenues during the calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, respectively. At December 31, 2003, we had firm booked orders with Abbott for the product. We will not be able to fulfill all these orders in a timely manner due to the time required to manufacture our product. Abbott and the Company have agreed on a manufacturing and delivery timetable for future deliveries of product and manufacture of Santyl(R). The royalty revenues from Abbott were earned on North American sales of Santyl(R) to distributors by Smith & Nephew, Inc. ("S&N") through December 31, 2003. The January 2000 sub-license agreement under which S&N marketed Santyl(R) ointment terminated on June 30, 2003 but it was agreed they would continue to market through the end of 2003. The Ross Products Division of Abbott Laboratories Inc. assumed United States marketing responsibility for Collagenase Santyl(R) Ointment effective January 1, 2004. During 2003, the Abbott Agreement automatically renewed for an additional 10-year period, to August 2013. The minimum annual royalty is $60,000 per year. Royalties from Abbott were $1,683,915 and $2,140,534 in calendar year 2003 and fiscal year 2003, respectively. In fiscal 1997, the Company entered into an agreement to license Collagenase ABC for sale in Germany to the German subsidiary of an international pharmaceutical company. The agreement calls for an initial payment on signing and further payments if and when the German health authority grants marketing approval of Collagenase ABC ointment. Accordingly, deferred revenue at December 31, 2003 is $45,000 from this agreement. The deferred revenue is refundable if approval in Germany is not obtained. 10. Stockholders' Equity Stock Option Plans In July 1994, the Company's stockholders approved a stock option plan (the "1993 plan", which expired July 2004) for eligible key employees, directors, independent agents, and consultants who make a significant contribution toward the Company's success and development and to attract and retain qualified employees. Under the 1993 plan, qualified incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may be granted to purchase up to an aggregate of 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions. The exercise price per share of common stock may not be less than 100% (110% for qualified incentive stock options granted to stockholders owning at least 10% of common shares) of the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. In general, the options vest and become exercisable in four equal annual installments following the date of grant, although the Board of Directors, at its discretion, may provide for different vesting schedules, and expire ten years (five years for qualified incentive stock options granted to stockholders owning at least 10% of common shares) after such date. In accordance with terms of the 1993 plan, no option shall be granted under the plan subsequent to ten years after its effective date, or July 2004. In July 1997, the Company's stockholders approved a stock option plan (the "1997 plan") with terms identical to the 1993 plan. The 1997 plan authorizes the granting of awards of up to an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions. F-14 In August 2001, the Company's stockholders approved a stock option plan (the "2001 plan"), with terms similar to the 1997 plan. The 2001 plan authorizes the granting of awards of up to an aggregate of 750,000 shares of the Company's common stock, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions. On December 16, 2003, stockholders approved an amendment to the 2001 stock option plan which increased the number of shares authorized for grant from 750,000 shares to 1,750,000 shares, an increase of 1,000,000 shares. A total of 1,750,000 shares of common stock are now authorized for issuance under the amended 2001 plan, of which 775,000 were subject to outstanding options at December 31, 2003. There are a total of 1,018,650 shares available for grant from the 1993, 1997, and 2001 plans. The summary of the stock options activity is as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2003 January 31, 2003 ------------------------ ------------------------ Weighted Weighted Average Average Exercise Exercise Shares Price Shares Price ---------- -------- ---------- -------- Outstanding at beginning of year 1,358,325 $ 1.98 1,100,500 $ 2.00 Options granted 50,000 1.28 427,750 1.00 Options exercised -- -- (27,000) 1.00 Options canceled or expired (57,700) 2.77 (142,925) 4.20 ---------- -------- ---------- -------- Outstanding at end of year 1,350,625 $ 1.77 1,358,325 1.98 ---------- ------- ---------- -------- Options exercisable at year end 1,250,625 1.86 1,269,325 1.98 Shares available for future grant 1,006,150 -- 56,150 --
During calendar 2003 and fiscal 2003, the Company granted 15,000 and 11,000 options, respectively, to consultants at an exercise price of $1.23 and $1.00 per share, respectively. In connection with these options, the Company recorded in calendar 2003 and fiscal 2003 an expense of $14,000 and $7,600, respectively, representing the estimated fair value of the options. During calendar 2003 and fiscal 2003, the Company granted 35,000 and 416,750 options, respectively, to employees of the Company at prices ranging from $1.00 to $3.00. The calendar 2003 options vest over 4 years and the fiscal 2003 options immediately vest. The following table summarizes information relating to stock options by exercise price as at December 31, 2003: Outstanding Exercisable Weighted Averag Weighted Average Option Life Exercise Option exercise price Shares (years) price Shares price - ---------- --------- ----- -------- --------- -------- $1.00-1.38 973,600 7.8 $ 1.04 873,600 $ 1.00 1.88 108,250 6.0 1.88 108,250 1.88 2.00-2.88 54,750 6.8 2.63 54,750 2.63 3.00-3.88 48,300 4.5 3.04 48,300 3.04 4.00-4.63 97,425 3.4 4.17 97,425 4.17 5.81-7.25 23,000 1.0 6.32 23,000 6.32 8.00 5,300 1.0 8.00 5,300 8.00 9.13 40,000 0.5 9.13 40,000 9.13 --------- ----- -------- --------- -------- 1,350,625 6.8 $ 1.77 1,250,625 $ 1.86 --------- ----- -------- --------- -------- F-15 11. Commitments and Contingencies (a) Lease Agreements The Company's operations are principally conducted in leased premises. Future minimum annual rental payments required under noncancellable operating leases are approximated as follows: Year ending December 31, 2004 $159,000 2005 47,000 2006 6,000 Rent expense under all operating leases amounted to approximately $191,000 in both calendar 2003 and fiscal 2003, respectively. The S.J. Wegman Company, which is owned by the Company's President and certain of his relatives, is the 100% shareholder of the Wilbur Street Corporation ("WSC"), which owns and leases a facility to ABC-New York. In January 1998, WSC and the Company entered into a triple net lease agreement that provides for an annual rent starting at $125,000, which can increase annually by the amount of the annual increase in the consumer price index for the greater New York metropolitan region. The lease term is 7 years, expiring January 31, 2005. The Company paid approximately $161,000 representing rent and real estate taxes to WSC in each of calendar 2003 and fiscal 2003. ABC-Curacao leases a building in Brievengat, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles from an unrelated company wholly owned by the Insular Territory of Curacao. The lease term, which originally commenced on January 1, 1977, is automatically renewed upon the same terms every five years, unless either party gives three months notice prior to the expiration of the five-year period. The lessor is entitled to revalue the rent for each successive five-year period. The lease has been renewed through March 1, 2006. Rent expense amounted to approximately $30,000 in calendar 2003 and fiscal 2003. (b) Scientific Advisory Board The Company has an eight member Scientific Advisory Board ("the Board") that provides research and consultation services to the Company. In fiscal 2003, the Company recorded approximately $24,000 for payments to Board members under these agreements. In calendar 2003, the Company made no payments to the Board. (c) Potential Product Liability The sale of Collagenase ABC, as well as the development and marketing of any potential products of the Company, expose the Company to potential product liability claims both directly from patients using the product or products in development, as well as from the Company's agreement to indemnify certain distributors of the product for claims made by others. The Company has product liability insurance which covers the use of the licensed product, Collagenase Santyl(R), and clinical experiments of potential products in the United States. No known claims are pending against the Company at the current time. F-16 (d) Employment Agreement The Company has an employment agreement with the managing director of its German subsidiary, Bio Pharma. The Company or the managing director upon one year's written notice can terminate the contract. The agreement provides for an annual salary, currently $195,000, and a like severance payment if the agreement is terminated by the Company without cause. The managing director left the employ of the Company in January 2004 and resigned as a Director effective April 30, 2004. (e) FDA Observation In 1999, the FDA advised the Company, as a result of their inspectional observations, that it would revoke its license to manufacture the enzyme and ointment unless the Company could immediately provide satisfactory assurance of its compliance with the applicable GMP regulations. The Company submitted such a plan in 1999. The FDA notified the Company on July 28, 2003 that its request to supplement its biologics license for collagenase ABC was approved ("FDA approval"). The FDA notification acknowledged the Company's written commitments to provide additional information regarding ongoing studies and when to submit this information to its biologics license for review. Regardless of this FDA approval, the FDA letter will remain in effect until the Company demonstrates compliance with the applicable federal standards and regulations, which the Company understands to be two "satisfactory annual GMP inspections" of its Lynbrook and Curacao manufacturing facilities. The Company believes that it has made progress in complying with the applicable federal standards and regulations, although there can be no assurances as to when the FDA letter will be rescinded, if at all. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the FDA completed an inspection of the Company's Lynbrook facility. The Company is hopeful that after the next FDA inspection is completed at its Lynbrook facility, the Company will be eligible to have the FDA letter rescinded. In May 2004, the FDA inspected the facility of the Company's Subcontractor. To the best of the Company's knowledge, the FDA has not commented on the inspection, nor is the FDA obligated to do so.The FDA has not conducted an inspection of the Company's Curacao facility since July 2002. 12. Segment Information The Company is engaged in one segment, specifically research, development, and production of pharmaceutical products. Operations in this business segment are summarized below by geographic area. All unaffiliated revenues from South America are generated by ABC-Curacao and primarily represent export sales made to Brazil and India ("S.A.").
North Year ended December 31, 2003: America S.A. and Europe Eliminations Consolidated - ----------------------------- ------- --------------- ------------ ------------ Revenues $2,905,765 $333,775 $3,239,540 Intercompany revenue between geographic regions 764,471 (764,471) - Loss from operations (1,652,836) (1,451,237) (3,104,073) Loss before taxes (1,784,230) (1,447,370) (3,231,600) Identifiable assets 2,141,223 3,541,657 (127,909) 5,554,971 Capital expenditures (7,960) 24,149 16,189 Depreciation and amortization 117,670 581,459 699,129
F-17
North Year ended January 31, 2003: America S.A. and Europe Eliminations Consolidated - ----------------------------- ------- --------------- ------------ ------------ Revenues $3,196,356 $882,884 $4,079,240 Intercompany revenue between geographic regions 629,640 (629,640) - Loss from operations (2,299,442) (940,917) (3,240,359) Loss before taxes (2,234,994) (950,239) (3,185,233) Identifiable assets 2,614,313 4,284,218 (262,520) 6,636,011 Capital expenditures 3,885 48,383 52,268 Depreciation and amortization 125,199 511,458 636,657
The information presented above may not be indicative of results if the geographic areas were independent organizations. Intercompany transactions are made at transfer prices which management believes to be equivalent to those made at arms-length. 13. Related Party Transactions The Company has two loans to the Company's chairman. One loan, whose principal balance at December 31, 2003 is $494,302 is a demand promissory note, bears interest at 9% per annum, and is collateralized by approximately 1,800,000 shares of the Company's stock. Another loan, whose principal balance at December 31, 2003 is $56,820 is a demand promissory note, bears interest at 9% per annum, and is uncollateralized. The Company also has two loans with Wilbur St. Corporation ("WSC"), an affiliate of the chairman. One loan is a non-amortizing loan from WSC in the amount of $82,606 and bears interest at 9% per annum; the other is for advances to WSC in the amount of $15,647. For financial statement purposes, all these loans, which aggregate $649,375 of principal, are classified as components of stockholders' equity in the balance sheet and appear as "Notes due from chairman and other related party". During calendar 2003, the Chairman repaid net principal of $375,935 on these loans. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to collect on these notes. Interest income accrued for these loans but not recognized for financial statement purposes aggregated approximately $42,000 and $101,000 for the calendar year 2003 and fiscal 2003, respectively. ABC-New York has notes payable to a former director of the Company and to a partner of the S.J. Wegman Company, an affiliate, amounting to $15,010 at December 31, 2003. The notes, which bear interest at 9% per annum, are payable on demand. 14. Employee Benefit Plan ABC-New York has a 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan for employees who meet minimum age and service requirements. Contributions to the plan by ABC - New York are discretionary and subject to certain vesting provisions. The Company made no contributions to this plan for calendar 2003 or fiscal 2003. F-18 15. Subsequent Events In June 2004, the Company entered into a development and license agreement Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.("the Auxilium Agreement"). Under the agreement, the Company has granted Auxilium the rights to develop products containing its enzyme ("AA4500") for the treatment of Peyronie's and Dupuytren's disease. The Company has granted Auxilium the exclusive world-wide license to any products developed under the agreement other than dermal formulations labeled for topical administration. The Company also granted Auxilium the option to develop and license the technology for use in other indications other than dermal formulations labeled for topical administration. The agreement extends, on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, for the longer of the patent life, the expiration of any regulatory exclusivity period or 12 years. Auxilium may terminate the agreement with 90 days written notice. Auxilium is obligated to pay all clinical and regulatory development costs on an on-going basis, to purchase commercial inventory from the Company and to pay royalties based on product sales. In addition, Auxilium is obligated to make milestone payments for contract initiation, receipt of technical data, manufacturing process development, the one-year anniversary date, filing of regulatory applications and receipt of regulatory approval. In June 2004, we received an up-front payment under the agreement totalling $2,500,000. In August 2004, we received an additional $2,500,000 for delivery of all in-process research and development material product data relating to Dupuytren's and Peyronie's disease. We may also receive up to $10,500,000 of contingent milestone payments under this agreement if all existing conditions are met. Additional milestone obligations may be due if Auxilium exercises an option to develop and license our enzyme for additional medical indications. In March 2004, the chairman's deferred salary of $100,000 during the three months ended June 2003 has been applied against the chairman's note receivable. On March 22, 2004 the Nasdaq Listings Qualifications Panel (the "Panel") informed the Company in writing of its determination to delist the Company's common stock from The NASDAQ SmallCap Market effective with the open of business on March 24, 2004. The Nasdaq notice stated that the Panel's determination was based on the Company's failure to satisfy the $2.5 million shareholders' equity requirement as of December 31, 2003. The Company's common stock was immediately eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board effective with the open of business on March 24, 2004. The OTC Bulletin Board symbol assigned to the Company is BSTC. No application was required to be filed for inclusion on the OTC Bulletin Board. F-19
EX-24 2 developmentagmtexh24.txt AGREEMENT Exhibit 24 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENT dated as of June 3, 2004 BY AND BETWEEN BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (a Delaware corporation) AND AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (A DELAWARE CORPORATION) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, SOME OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REDACTED TO PRESERVE TRADE SECRETS. SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 1.7 BTC PATENTS SCHEDULE 1.16 COST OF GOODS SCHEDULE 1.21 ENZYME SCHEDULE 3.2 CLINICAL TRIALS i DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENT This DEVELOPMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") dated the 3rd day of June, 2004 (the "June 3, 2004") is by and between BioSpecifics Technologies Corp., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware and having its principal office at 35 Wilbur Street, Lynbrook, New York 11563, and its Affiliates ("BTC"), and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and having its principal office at 160 West Germantown Pike, Norristown, PA 19401("Auxilium"). BTC and Auxilium shall sometimes be referred to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as "Parties." INTRODUCTION WHEREAS, BTC controls certain BTC Patents and BTC Know-How (each as defined below) related to the Enzyme and the Product (each as defined below), and has the right to grant certain rights and licenses thereunder as set forth herein, and WHEREAS, Auxilium has certain expertise in the development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products, and Auxilium wishes to obtain certain licenses and options to develop and commercialize the Product for certain therapeutic uses in humans, and WHEREAS, BTC wishes to convey such licenses to Auxilium. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties to this Agreement mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Agreement, the following initially capitalized terms in this Agreement, whether used in the singular or plural, shall have the following meanings: 1.1 "Additional Indication" shall mean any Indication for a Product outside of the Field. 1.2 "Additional Indication Option" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(b). 1.3 "Adverse Drug Experience" shall mean any of the following as such terms are defined at either 21 C.F.R. ss. 312.32 or 21 C.F.R. ss. 314.80: an "adverse drug experience," a "life-threatening adverse drug experience," a "serious adverse drug experience," or an "unexpected adverse drug experience" and the foreign counterparts thereof. 1.4 "Affiliate" shall mean any corporation, company, partnership, joint venture or firm which controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with a specified person or entity. For purposes of this Section 1.4, "control" shall be presumed to exist if one of the following conditions is met: (a) in the case of corporate entities, direct or indirect ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of the stock or shares having the right to vote for the election of directors, and (b) in the case of non-corporate entities, direct or indirect ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of the equity interest with the power to direct the management and policies of such non-corporate entities. The Parties acknowledge that in the case of certain entities organized under the laws of certain countries outside of the United States, the maximum percentage ownership permitted by law for a foreign investor may be less than fifty percent (50%), and that in such cases such lower percentage shall be substituted in the preceding sentence, provided that such foreign investor has the power to direct the management and policies of such entity. 1.5 "Auxilium Remaining Indication" shall mean an Additional Indication for a Product that Auxilium believes has a reasonable probability of obtaining Regulatory Approval and achieving commercial success, but for which BTC does not wish to undertake Stage I Development. 1.6 "BTC Know-How" shall mean any proprietary information or materials related to the Manufacture, preparation, formulation, use or development of the Enzyme or the Product Controlled by BTC during the Term and shall include formulations, processes, techniques, formulas, biological, chemical, assay control and manufacturing, technical, pre-clinical, clinical or other data, methods, know-how, and trade secrets. 1.7 "BTC Patents" shall mean those Patents Controlled by BTC with at least one claim directed to the Enzyme or the Product (or processes, improvements, uses and intermediates for the foregoing) including those listed on Schedule 1.7 attached hereto as it may be amended from time to time. 1.8 "BTC Product" shall mean any pharmaceutical product that includes Enzyme as an active ingredient and is under development for an Indication (or is indicated for use) outside the Field. 1.9 "Business Day" shall mean any day on which banking institutions in New York, New York are open for business. 1.10 "Clinical Trials" shall mean tests and studies in human subjects or patients that are required to obtain, maintain, or sustain Regulatory Approval in a country in the Territory. 1.11 "Commercialization" or "Commercialize" shall mean activities directed to marketing, promoting, co-promoting, distributing, importing, exporting, offering for sale and selling the Product. When used as a verb, "Commercialize" means to engage in Commercialization. 1.12 "Commercially Reasonable Efforts" means, with respect to a Party, the efforts and resources which would be used by that Party relating to a certain activity or activities, consistent with its normal business practices, which are consistent with the general level of effort and resources in the pharmaceutical industry for a company similar in size and scope. 2 1.13 "Competing Product" shall mean a product that contains Enzyme and is sold in a country by a Person (other than Auxilium) in an Indication for which Auxilium is marketing a Product in such country. 1.14 "Confidential Information" has the meaning set forth in Section 10.1 1.15 "Controlled" or "Controls", when used in reference to intellectual property, shall mean the legal authority or right of a Party hereto (or any of its Affiliates) to grant a license or sublicense of intellectual property rights to another Party, or to otherwise disclose proprietary or trade secret information to such other Party, without breaching the terms of any agreement with a Third Party, infringing upon the intellectual property rights of a Third Party, or misappropriating the proprietary or trade secret information of a Third Party. 1.16 "Cost of Goods" shall mean the total cost of Product in Final Packaging, including, but not limited to, the sum of the following actual costs: (i) manufacturing, shipping and storage of Enzyme; (ii) manufacturing, shipping and storage of Product, prior to sale to a Third Party; (iii) commercial packaging and labeling; (iv) routine quality compliance and quality assurance programs; and (v) customs or excise taxes, import duties, sales taxes and other taxes or duties (other than those taxes resulting from sales to a Third Party of Product in finished packaged and labeled form). In the event that BTC manufactures Enzyme or Products, Cost of Goods shall be calculated in accordance with Schedule 1.16. 1.17 "Develop" or "Development" shall mean Stage I Development and Stage II Development. When used as a verb, "Developing" means to engage in Development. For purposes of clarity, in no event shall Development include Manufacture. 1.18 "Development Costs" shall mean costs associated with Development activities. 1.19 "Effective Date" shall mean the date specified in the first paragraph of this Agreement. 1.20 "EMEA" shall mean the European Medicines Evaluation Agency or any successor agency thereto. 1.21 "Enzyme" shall mean the purified form of the enzyme currently identified by BTC as Collagenase ABC, more particularly described on Schedule 1.21, and any variants or derivatives thereof. 1.22 "European Union" shall mean the countries of the European Union, as it is constituted as of the Effective Date and as it may be expanded from time to time. 1.23 "Exercised Indication" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(c). 1.24 "Exercised Indication Date" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(c). 1.25 "Exercise Period" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.2(c). 3 1.26 "FDA" shall mean the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or its successor agency. 1.27 "Field" shall mean, subject to expansion pursuant to Section 2.2, the prevention or treatment of Dupuytren's Disease and Peyronie's Disease. 1.28 "Final Packaging" means the labeling and packaging to be used in connection with the Product labeled for use in the Field in the Territory, including the packaging of package inserts and components reasonably necessary for sale of the finished Product to the ultimate consumer. 1.29 "Indemnified Party" has the meaning set forth in Section12.3. 1.30 "Indemnifying Party" has the meaning set forth in Section 12.3. 1.31 "Indication" shall mean a pharmaceutical application for the Product. 1.32 "Infringement Claim" has the meaning set forth in Section 8.2(a). 1.33 "Law" shall mean any applicable statute, law, ordinance, regulation, order, or rule of any federal, state, local, foreign, or other governmental agency or body or of any other type of regulatory body (including common law) or securities exchange, including those covering pharmaceutical sales, environmental, pollution, energy, safety, health, transportation, bribery, record-keeping, zoning, antidiscrimination, antitrust, wage and hour, and price and wage control matters. 1.34 "Licensed Technology" shall mean the BTC Patents and the BTC Know-How. 1.35 "Loss" has the meaning set forth in Section 12.1. 1.36 "Major Market Country" shall mean the United States, each country of the European Union. 1.37 "MAA" shall mean an application seeking Regulatory Approval of the Regulatory Authority in the European Union to market and sell a Product in the Field in the European Union. 1.38 "MAA Acceptance" shall mean the written notification by the applicable Regulatory Authority that the MAA has met all the criteria for filing acceptance. 1.39 "Manufacture" or "Manufacturing" shall mean manufacturing, filling, processing, testing, engineering, designing, redesigning, packaging, storing, quality control, quality assurance, releasing, disposing, handling, shipping, and all other activities undertaken or required to be undertaken in order to manufacture and supply the Product in its Final Packaging and related devices and apparatus for administration thereof, in the case of commercial supplies, or packaged in accordance with Laws, in the case of clinical supplies. 4 1.40 "NDA" or "New Drug Application" shall mean a new drug application filed with the FDA pursuant to 21 C.F.R. ss.314, seeking permission to market the Product for a particular Indication in the Field in interstate commerce in the United States. 1.41 "NDA Filing Acceptance" shall mean the written notification by the FDA that the NDA has met all the criteria for filing acceptance. 1.42 "Net Sales" shall mean the gross amount invoiced by Auxilium and its Affiliates or Sublicensees on account of sales of the Product in Final Packaging to Third Parties in the Territory, less the total of: (a) trade, cash or quantity discounts not already reflected in the amount invoiced; (b) excise, sales and other consumption taxes and customs duties to the extent included in the invoice price; (c) freight, insurance and other transportation charges to the extent specifically included in the invoice price; (d) returns or retroactive price reductions; and (e) compulsory payments and rebates directly related to the sale of the Product accrued, paid or deducted pursuant to governmental regulations. 1.43 "Orphan Drug Designation" shall mean the special designation of Product by FDA's Orphan Product Division which provides the Product with the opportunity to obtain additional market exclusivity from the date the drug receives FDA approval and also possible tax and regulatory approval benefits. The term "Orphan Drug Designation" shall include any foreign counterparts of the foregoing. 1.44 "Patents" shall mean any patents or patent applications and any continuations, continuations-in-part, divisions, provisionals, substitutions, patents of addition, reissues, reexamination, renewals or extensions thereof (including any supplemental patent certificates) and any confirmation patent or registration patent and all foreign counterparts of any of the foregoing. 1.45 "Person" shall mean any individual, corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization or government or political subdivision thereof. 1.46 "Phase II Clinical Trials" shall mean a Clinical Trial for the Product on a number of patients, no fewer than the number required to allow for the detection of statistical differences between the control and treated patients, for the purposes of determining dose and evaluating safety and efficacy in the proposed therapeutic indication, conducted in accordance with current good clinical practices and in accordance with a protocol that has been reviewed by the FDA and reflects any comments or concerns raised by the same. 1.47 "Phase III Clinical Trials" shall mean a Clinical Trial for the Product on sufficient numbers of patients to generate safety and efficacy data to support Regulatory Approval in the proposed therapeutic indication, conducted in accordance with current good clinical practices and in accordance with a protocol that has been reviewed by the FDA and reflects any comments or concerns raised by the same. 1.48 "Product" shall mean pharmaceutical product containing Enzyme as an active ingredient and any reformulation, improvement, enhancement, 5 combination, refinement, or modification thereof; provided however, Product shall specifically exclude dermal formulations labeled for topical administration. 1.49 "Product Data" shall mean the physical embodiment, to the extent available of: (a) the know-how, including relevant laboratory notebook information, screening data and synthesis schemes, including descriptions in any form, data and other information, and (b) all other data including Regulatory Data and any other pre-clinical and clinical data and information, technical, chemical, safety and scientific data, information and know-how, obtained or generated in connection with Development of the Product in the Field. 1.50 "Product Details" shall mean a face-to-face meeting, in an individual or group practice setting, between a healthcare professional with prescribing authority who is a target prescriber of a Product in the Field and a professional representative of the applicable Party during which the key attributes of a Product are verbally presented to such healthcare professional. When used as a verb, "detail" or "detailing" shall mean to engage in a Detail. 1.51 "Regulatory Approval" shall mean, with respect to a country or group of countries in the Territory, all authorizations by the appropriate governmental entity or entities necessary for commercial sale of the Product in the Field for a particular Indication in that country or group of countries including, where applicable, approval of labeling, price, reimbursement and manufacturing. 1.52 "Regulatory Authority" shall mean the FDA or any foreign counterpart or additional governmental or regulatory agencies in the Territory responsible for applicable Regulatory Approvals. 1.53 "Regulatory Data" shall mean any and all research data, pharmacology data, chemistry, manufacturing, and control data, preclinical data, clinical data or all other documentation submitted, or required to be submitted, to Regulatory Authorities in association with regulatory filings for the Product in the Field (including any Drug Master Files (DMFs), Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control ("CMC") data, or similar documentation). 1.54 "Remaining Indication" shall mean an Additional Indication for which Auxilium has not exercised an Additional Indication Option within the Exercise Period. 1.55 "Stage I Development" shall mean pre-clinical and clinical drug development activities reasonably necessary to completing all development activities up to and including the completion of Phase II Clinical Trials for the Product in the Field, including pre-clinical studies, test method development, statistical analysis, Clinical Trials, regulatory affairs, and activities directed to seeking Regulatory Approvals. 1.56 "Stage I Development Costs" shall mean costs associated with Stage I Development activities. 1.57 "Stage II Development" shall mean non-clinical and clinical drug development activities reasonably necessary to the development and submission of Regulatory Data to a Regulatory Authority for the purpose of achieving 6 Regulatory Approval, including non-clinical studies, test method development, statistical analysis, Clinical Trials, regulatory affairs, and activities directed to seeking Regulatory Approvals. 1.58 "Stage II Development Costs" shall mean costs associated with Stage II Development activities. 1.59 "Standard Terms" has the meaning set forth in Section 6.4(d). 1.60 "Sublicense Income" shall mean (a) the upfront payment, if any, actually received from a Sublicensee by Auxilium upon execution of an agreement with such Sublicensee, and (b) any milestone payments actually received from a Sublicensee by Auxilium in consideration for the grant of a sublicense to such Sublicensee under the Licensed Technology in the Field; provided, however, that Sublicense Income shall not include any such consideration received by Auxilium from any such Sublicensee in return for, as payment for or otherwise in respect of: (i) equity or debt of Auxilium (provided, however, that the exclusion contained in this sub-clause (i) shall not apply to transactions between Auxilium and its Affiliates), (ii) the manufacture or supply of ingredients or products, (iii) the performance of services (including research and development services other than screening services performed on behalf of a Sublicensee) or other similar payments, (iv) reimbursement of Auxilium's out of pocket costs and expenses, including patent expenses, or (v) the sale of Auxilium in whole or in part. 1.61 "Sublicensee" shall mean a Person to whom Auxilium grants any right or license to use the Licensed Technology to make, use or sell the Product in the Field in the Territory. 1.62 "Supply Agreement" has the meaning set forth in Section 6.4. 1.63 "Term" has the meaning set forth in Section11.1(a). 1.64 "Territory" shall mean all the countries and territories of the world. 1.65 "Third Party" shall mean any Person or other entity other than Auxilium, BTC or their respective Affiliates. 1.66 "Vial" shall means a single dose unit of Product. ARTICLE 2 LICENSE AND OPTION 2.1 License Grant to Auxilium (a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, on the Effective Date, BTC hereby grants to Auxilium an exclusive license under the Licensed Technology to research, Develop, use, Commercialize, market, sell and distribute the Product for the Field in the Territory. (b) Subject to the terms and condition of this Agreement, BTC hereby grants to Auxilium a non-exclusive right and license under the Licensed Technology to Manufacture or have Manufactured the Product for the Field in the 7 Territory. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.1(b), Auxilium shall not exercise its license pursuant to this Section 2.1(b) to Manufacture the Product except as permitted by, and solely for the purposes set forth in, Article 6. (c) The licenses granted under Sections 2.1(a) and 2.2(b) shall include the right to grant sublicenses (and in the case of Section 2.1(a), distribution rights); provided, however, that all such sublicenses shall contain terms and conditions which are consistent with the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. 2.2 Option to License Additional Indications (a) Development of Additional Indications for Products. The Parties shall cooperate in good faith in generating ideas and concepts for Additional Indications for Products. BTC shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to conduct Stage I Development for the use of the Product for the treatment of Frozen Shoulder. BTC shall summarize such efforts in reports to be submitted to the Joint Development Committee on a quarterly basis. (b) Option Grant. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, BTC hereby grants to Auxilium an exclusive option to an exclusive license to Products in the Territory for each Additional Indication on the same terms and conditions as provided for Indications in the Field (each, an "Additional Indication Option"). (c) Exercise Period; Exercise of Option. The period during which Auxilium may exercise an Additional Indication Option (the "Exercise Period") shall commence on the date on which BTC submits a Phase II Clinical Trial report to Auxilium for the Product for such Additional Indication and ends one hundred and twenty (120) days thereafter. BTC shall provide Auxilium with a copy of a Phase II Clinical Trial report and, any additional data or results in its control. Auxilium may exercise the Additional Indication Option at any time during the Exercise Period by delivering to BTC a written notice of exercise with regard to such Additional Indication (each, an "Exercised Indication") that sets forth the effective date of the exercise (the "Exercised Indication Date"). Upon receipt, BTC shall counter-sign the exercise notice which shall then be appended to and incorporated by reference into this Agreement effective the Exercised Indication Date. (d) License Grant Upon Exercise of Option. Effective on the Exercised Indication Date, the Field definition shall be amended and expanded to include the relevant Exercised Indication. (e) Auxilium Remaining Indications. Auxilium shall have the right to Develop and Commercialize Auxilium Remaining Indications at its sole cost and expense. Upon notification to BTC of Auxilium's intent to Develop and Commercialize an Auxilium Remaining Indication, the Field definition shall be amended and expanded to include such Auxilium Remaining Indication. 2.3 Remaining Indications BTC may offer Third Parties the right under the Licensed Technology to research, Develop, use Commercialize, market, sell and distribute the Product for any Remaining Indication (the "Remaining Indication Rights"), provided that, prior to executing a definitive agreement 8 with a Third Party for one or more Remaining Indications, BTC must (a) provide Auxilium with a written summary of the material terms of the proposed agreement (the "Offer Terms"), and (b) grant Auxilium an option, exercisable for seventy-five (75) days after Auxilium's receipt of the written summary, to agree to equivalent terms, in which case the Parties shall negotiate in good faith an exclusive license agreement on such terms as promptly as possible thereafter. In the event that Auxilium does not exercise an option to license a Remaining Indication within such seventy-five (75) day period, the Remaining Indication Rights may be licensed to such Third Party on terms and conditions no less favorable to BTC than the Offer Terms. 2.4 Transfer of BTC Know-How Within forty-five (45) days of the Effective Date, BTC shall, or shall cause its Affiliates to, transfer to Auxilium all material Product Data relating to Dupuytren's Disease and Peyronie's Diseases, including but not limited to preclinical, clinical data, clinical trial protocols, study data tabulations, reports, the right of cross-reference and permission to use in Auxilium Regulatory Data and regulatory filings, investigator-generated data granted by the owners of such data, etc., in reasonably satisfactory form. Promptly, but in no event more than thirty (30) days, after the Exercised Indications Date, BTC shall, or shall cause its Affiliates to, transfer to Auxilium all Product Data relating to such Exercised Indication, in reasonably satisfactory form. 2.5 Exclusivity During the Term and any extension thereof, and for two years thereafter, neither BTC nor any of its Affiliates shall, except as otherwise set forth and provided in this Agreement, (a) directly or indirectly develop, manufacture, market, sell, detail or promote any Competing Product or (b) encourage off-label use of a Competing Product that could affect labeled usage of the Product in the Field. In addition, in the event that BTC markets a BTC Product outside the Field within a country in the Territory where Auxilium is promoting the Product within the Field, BTC shall promote the BTC Product under a trademark different from the Auxilium Trademark, and will not knowingly market, ship, distribute, promote, sell or otherwise put into circulation the BTC Products within the Field in such country or in any other country within the Territory. In the event that BTC enters into any agreements with its distributors or wholesalers for the BTC Products in a country in the Territory, it shall include in any and all said agreements appropriate provisions providing, to the extent not prohibited by Law, that the BTC Products must be distributed and sold solely outside the Field within such country in the Territory. In the event that Auxilium enters into any agreements with its distributors or wholesalers for the Product in the Field, it shall include in any and all said agreements appropriate provisions providing, to the extent not prohibited by Law, that the Product must be distributed and sold solely within the Field within such country in the Territory. ARTICLE 3 PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT 3.1 Joint Development Committee (a) Formation. As soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement, BTC and Auxilium will establish a Joint Development Committee (the "JDC") made up of two (2) representatives designated by each Party hereto to assist in coordinating scientific interactions and resolving potential disagreements between BTC and Auxilium during the course of the Development of 9 Product. The JDC Chair will be appointed by Auxilium from among the members of the committee designated by Auxilium. Each of BTC and Auxilium shall have one vote on the JDC and, in the event of a deadlock with respect to any action, the vote of Auxilium , rendered after reasonable and open discussion among the members of the JDC, shall be final and controlling. BTC shall not take any action with respect to Remaining Indications that would be detrimental to the Product or damaging to Auxilium. Notwithstanding the foregoing, BTC will advise the JDC of all Development and Commercialization of Remaining Indications. The JDC shall have the right to discuss and comment on such activities but shall not have the final vote with respect to such activities as they relate to Remaining Indications. (b) Quarterly Meetings. While a Product is under Development, the JDC shall meet formally at least quarterly, or with such other frequency, and at such time and location, as may be established by the JDC, for the following purposes, among others: (i) to oversee and coordinate Development activities of the Parties for Products; (ii) to receive and review reports by the Parties as may be submitted to the JDC on a quarterly basis; and (iii) to discuss matters relating to Patents related to the Product, including but not limited to issues of inventorship and decisions relating to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Patents, provided however, when the JCC is established, the JCC and the JDC will coordinate responsibility on such matters. Meetings of the JDC may be held in person or by teleconference, as may be determined by the JDC. 3.2 Auxilium's Stage II Development Activities. (a) Dupuytren's Disease and Peyronie's Disease. As soon as it has received the relevant Product Data pursuant to Section 2.4, Auxilium shall assume all responsibility for (including financial responsibility), and have sole discretion over, all continuing Development of the Product for Dupuytren's Disease and Peyronie's Disease including all Clinical Trials underway as of the Effective Date and listed on Schedule 3.2. Auxilium shall not have financial responsibility for Development Costs or any other costs incurred in connection with Development related to Dupuytren's Disease and Peyronie's Disease prior to the Effective Date. (b) Exercised Indications On each Exercised Indication Date, Auxilium shall be entitled to assume responsibility for, and have sole discretion over, all continuing Development activities for the Product for each such Exercised Indication. Auxilium shall have one (1) year after the relevant Exercised Indication Date to initiate Stage II Development for such Exercised Indication, provided, however, that such obligations shall not be binding upon Auxilium to the extent that BTC fails to (i) deliver material Product Data to Auxilium in accordance with Section 2.4, or (ii) supply Auxilium with material amounts of clinical supplies of the Product for use in the Field in accordance with the delivery scheduled specified by Auxilium under the terms of Section 6.3. (c) Cooperation The Parties agree to cooperate with respect to the transfer of Development activities from BTC to Auxilium including transferring Clinical Trials and making introductions of Auxilium to clinical investigators and opinion leaders. (d) Stage II Development Costs. 10 (i) Dupuytren's Disease and Peyronie's Disease. Auxilium shall be responsible for all the Development Costs related to the Product for Dupuytren's Disease and Peyronie's Disease and incurred by Auxilium after the Effective Date; provided, however, that BTC shall continue to be responsible for all Development Costs which are which are incurred prior to the Effective Date. (ii) Exercised Indications. In the event Auxilium assumes responsibility for Stage II Development of the Product for an Exercised Indication, Auxilium shall be responsible for all Development Costs related to the Product for such Exercised Indication and incurred by Auxilium after the Exercised Indication Date; provided, however, that BTC shall continue to be responsible for all Development Costs which are incurred prior to the Exercised Indication Date. (iii) Right of Set-Off. To the extent that Auxilium pays any Stage I Development Costs resulting from additional Stage I Development that is requested or required by a Regulatory Authority after assuming responsibility for Development of the Product for any Indication, Auxilium shall be entitled to set-off the amount of such Stage I Development Costs against any amounts due to BTC pursuant to Section 7.1. 3.3 Data and Records (a) Ownership of Data. Auxilium shall retain ownership of all Product Data, information and results related to Development activities for the Product, provided, however, that Auxilium hereby grants to BTC a right of reference with respect to Remaining Indications to the Regulatory Data contained in Regulatory Approvals Controlled by Auxilium for the Product in the Field. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (a) if Auxilium's license rights to the Product terminate with respect to an Indication within the Field, Auxilium shall assign BTC its right, title and interest in and to the Product and Regulatory Data for that Indication, and (b) if Auxilium's license rights to a Product hereunder terminate entirely, Auxilium shall assign BTC its right, title and interest in and to all such Product and Regulatory Data; provided, however, that Auxilium may maintain a copy of such Regulatory Data for legal and archival purposes. (b) Development Records. Each Party shall each maintain records in sufficient detail and in good scientific manner appropriate for patent purposes and as will properly reflect all work done and results achieved in the performance of Development activities hereunder (including all Regulatory Data in the form required to be maintained under any applicable governmental regulations). Such records shall include books, records, reports, research notes, charts, graphs, comments, computations, analyses, recordings, photographs, computer programs and documentation thereof, computer information storage means, samples of materials and other graphic or written data generated in connection with the Development activities. Subject to the terms and conditions of Article 10 below, each Party shall provide the other the right to inspect (no more than once a year) such records upon reasonable request and during normal business hours, and shall provide copies of all requested records, to the extent reasonably required for the performance of the requesting Party's obligations under this Agreement. 11 ARTICLE 4 REGULATORY MATTERS 4.1 Efforts Within twelve (12) months of filing for Regulatory Approval in any Major Market Country, Auxilium will file for Regulatory Approval in all the Major Market Countries. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a different dossier is required for any such other Major Market Country(ies), Auxilium will exercise Commercially Reasonable Efforts to seek Regulatory Approval with respect to such country(ies). Auxilium may develop additional formulations, dosage forms or delivery systems for the Product in the Field as may be commercially practicable at its own expense. For purposes of clarity, Remaining Indications shall not be subject to this Article 4; provided, however, that BTC shall not conduct Development or Commercialization of Product in such Remaining Indication in a manner that jeopardizes Auxilium's Development or Commercialization of Product in the Field. 4.2 Regulatory Matters in the Territory. As between the Parties, Auxilium shall be responsible in the Territory for ensuring compliance with all regulatory requirements relating to the Product labeled for use in the Field (i.e., obtaining, maintaining, and updating all required any Regulatory Approvals). Without limiting the foregoing, Auxilium shall (i) file all regulatory filings and supporting documentation; (ii) serve as the designated regulatory official for purposes of receiving communications from the Regulatory Authority; and (iii) report any Adverse Drug Experience to Regulatory Authorities. 4.3 Ownership. All Regulatory Approvals relating to the Products labeled for use in the Field shall be the property of Auxilium and held in the name of Auxilium or its designee. BTC shall promptly take whatever steps necessary to transition any existing regulatory filings to Auxilium. As promptly as possible after the Effective Date, BTC shall cause the Investigational New Drug ("IND") # 5780 and IND # 5588, and all foreign counterparts thereof, to be assigned to Auxilium. 4.4 Regulatory Interactions for Product. (a) Communications with Regulatory Authority; Advice of Counsel. BTC shall not communicate with Regulatory Authorities, or take any action regarding an investigation or a request by a Regulatory Authority with respect to a Product in the Field, except (i) with the prior written consent of Auxilium, or (ii) upon the advice of legal counsel that such communication is required by Law. BTC shall cooperate with Auxilium and provide all reasonable assistance and take all actions reasonably requested by Auxilium that are necessary to comply with any Law applicable to a Product in the Field. If BTC is advised by its legal counsel that it must communicate with any Regulatory Authority, then BTC shall promptly, but in no event more than two (2) Business Days, advise Auxilium of the same and provide Auxilium in advance with a copy of any proposed written communication with such Regulatory Authority and comply with any and all reasonable requests of Auxilium concerning any such communication with such Regulatory Authority. (b) Receipt of Correspondence; Inspections. Each Party shall promptly, but in any event within three (3) Business Days, (i) provide to the other copies of any material documents or correspondence received from any 12 Regulatory Authority related to Development activities for a Product and (ii) inform the other Party of any inspections, proposed regulatory actions, investigations or requests for information or a meeting by any Regulatory Authority with respect to a Product. In the event BTC does not have advance notice of an inspection by a Regulatory Authority, it shall immediately notify Auxilium of such inspection and it shall cooperate with such Regulatory Authority. (c) Recalls and Withdrawals. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Supply Agreement, Auxilium shall have sole responsibility for and shall make all decisions with respect to any recall, market withdrawals or any other corrective action related to the Products labeled for use in the Field in the Territory; provided however, (i) Auxilium shall immediately notify BTC of any decision to initiate a recall or withdrawal of such Product; (ii) all costs and expenses with respect to a recall, market withdrawal or other corrective action for such Product shall be borne by Auxilium unless such recall, market withdrawal or other corrective action was due to the negligence, willful misconduct or material breach of this Agreement or the Supply Agreement by BTC; and (iii) BTC shall immediately notify Auxilium of any decision to initiate a recall or withdrawal of a Product outside of the Field. Each Party shall provide the other Party with recall information received by it in sufficient detail to allow the Parties to comply with Law. (d) Notice. Each Party shall provide the other Party with notice, in a sufficiently timely basis to enable the other Party to comply in all material respects with Laws, of notification or other information which it receives (directly or indirectly) from, any Regulatory Authority (and providing, as soon as reasonably possible, copies of any associated written requests) that (i) raises any material concerns regarding the safety or efficacy of a Product; (ii) indicates or suggests a claim of a Third Party arising in connection with a Product, or (iii) is reasonably likely to lead to a recall or market withdrawal of a Product, provided that neither Party shall be obliged to disclose information in breach of any contractual restriction which it could not reasonably have avoided or which disclosure would waive any legal privilege. 4.5 Inquiries, Adverse Events, etc. As between the Parties, Auxilium shall be responsible for the surveillance, receipt and evaluation of product complaints for Product labeled for use in the Field in the Territory and reporting to Regulatory Authorities Adverse Drug Experiences for the Products in the Field. As between the Parties, BTC shall be responsible for the surveillance, receipt and evaluation of product complaints for Product labeled for use outside the Field and reporting to Regulatory Authorities Adverse Drug Experiences for the Products outside the Field. Each Party shall ensure that, in the Development or Commercialization of the Product, it will record, investigate, summarize, notify, report and review all Adverse Drug Experiences in accordance with Law. Each Party shall (i) adhere to all requirements of Laws which relate to the reporting and investigation of Adverse Drug Experiences, and (ii) keep the Parties informed of such events. (a) Each Party shall submit reports of all Adverse Drug Experiences associated with the use of the Product and other required safety information (e.g., PSUR's or annual safety reports) to the Regulatory Authorities in accordance with Law. Each Party shall submit a copy of each such report to the other Party in advance of such submission to permit the other Party to comply with legal requirements applicable to it and comment on such reports. 13 (b) Each Party shall submit reports of all Adverse Drug Experiences associated with the use of Product for which Regulatory Approval has not been achieved and other required safety information to the Regulatory Authorities in accordance with Law. Each Party shall submit a copy of each such report to the other Party in advance of such submission to permit the other Party to comply with legal requirements applicable to it and comment on such reports. (c) In order to accomplish the objectives of this Section and to the extent required by Law, within one hundred and eighty (180) days of the Effective Date, the Parties shall discuss and develop an agreement containing mutually acceptable guidelines and procedures for the receipt, recordation, communication, exchange and reporting of Adverse Drug Experiences for the Product. 4.6 Approval of Labeling and Promotional Materials. Auxilium shall be responsible to seek or obtain any necessary Regulatory Authority approvals of any label, labeling, package inserts or outserts, monographs and packaging, and promotional materials for use in connection with the Products labeled for use in the Field and for determining whether the same requires approval from Regulatory Authority. The Parties shall cooperate in such efforts to seek and obtain such approvals. 4.7 Cooperation. The Parties shall cooperate to provide each other all reasonable assistance and take all actions reasonably requested that are necessary to comply with Laws, including safety updates, amendments, annual reports, pharmacovigilance filings, investigator notifications, facility inspections, and certifications and maintenance and updates for regulatory filings and Regulatory Approvals. Unless otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement, the Parties will cooperate, communicate and provide reasonable assistance to each other with regard to all CMC matters related to the Product. ARTICLE 5 COMMERCIALIZATION 5.1 Joint Commercialization Committee. (a) Formation. Not later than the commencement of Phase III Clinical Trials for any Product, BTC and Auxilium will establish a Joint Commercialization Committee (the "JCC") made up of two (2) representatives designated by each Party hereto to assist in coordinating interactions and resolving potential disagreements between BTC and Auxilium during the course of the Commercialization of Product. The JCC shall meet each and every calendar quarter. The JCC Chair will be appointed by Auxilium from among the members of the committee designated by Auxilium. Auxilium and BTC shall each have one vote on the JCC. The objective of the JCC shall be to reach agreement by consensus on all matters falling within its authority hereunder. In the event of a deadlock with respect to any action, the vote of Auxilium, after reasonable opportunity for open discussion among the members of the JCC, shall control. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the JCC shall not have authority to commit the financial resources of either party. 14 (b) Patent Position. The JCC will coordinate with the JDC in discuss matters relating to Patents related to the Product, including but not limited to issues of inventorship and decisions relating to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Patents. (c) Coordinated Strategy. The JCC shall meet at least quarterly or with such frequency and at such time and location as may be establishd by the JCC and will monitor the overall strategy and oversee the global marketing of all Products. The JCC will have the opportunity to review market research plans and research results, clinical development results and similar items for each Product, including Products Developed for Remaining Indications, for the purpose of advising and assisting in communicating a unified global marketing strategy; provided, however, that with respect to Remaining Indications, the JCC shall not have the final vote. 5.2 Commercialization. Auxilium shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to Commercialize the Product in the Field in each country in the Territory. Subject to Section 5.4 below, Auxilium shall be responsible for and have sole discretion over all aspects of Commercialization of the Product for use in the Field in the Territory. 5.3 Orders, Booking Sales. Auxilium shall have the sole right and responsibility for Product in the Field in each country in the Territory to (a) receive, accept, and fill orders for such Product, (b) control invoicing, order processing, and collection of accounts receivable for such Product sales, and (c) record such Product sales in its books of account. If, for any reason, BTC receives orders for such Product, BTC shall forward such orders to Auxilium (or, if directed by Auxilium, to Auxilium' wholesalers) as soon as practicable. If any quantities of such Product are returned to BTC, BTC shall immediately notify Auxilium and ship them to the facility designated by Auxilium. 5.4 BTC Co-Promotion Rights. In the event that BTC provides written notice of its intent within ninety (90) days after an NDA Acceptance for a Product in the Field in the Territory indicated for use for any Exercised Indication, BTC will be allowed to provide up to ten percent (10%) of the Product Details for such Indication. In addition, in the event that BTC provides written notice of its intent within ninety (90) days after an NDA Acceptance for Frozen Shoulder, BTC will be allowed to provide up to ten percent (10%) of the Product Details for Dupuytren's Disease. Notwithstanding Section 13.10, BTC's co-promotion rights granted pursuant to this Section shall not be assignable or transferable to any other Person. ARTICLE 6 MANUFACTURE AND SUPPLY 6.1 Joint Manufacturing Committee. (a) Within forty-five (45) days after the Effective Date, BTC and Auxilium will establish a Joint Manufacturing Committee (the "JMC") made up of two (2) representatives designated by each Party hereto to which shall oversee the manufacturing of Product on a worldwide basis, including the planning, manufacturing and supply (including supply chain management). The JMC Chair will be appointed by BTC from among the members of the committee designated by BTC. Each of BTC and Auxilium shall have one vote on the JMC. The objective of the JMC shall be to reach agreement by consensus on all matters falling within its 15 authority hereunder. In the event of a deadlock with respect to any action, the vote of BTC, after reasonable opportunity for open discussion among the members of the JMC, shall control. (b) Specific Responsibilities of the JMC. In support of its responsibility for overseeing the Manufacturing of Product on a worldwide basis the JMC shall meet at least quarterly or with such higher frequency, and at such time and location as may be established by the JMC, and the JMC shall perform the following activities: (i) delineate requirements and responsibilities for development and licensure of manufacturing processes and facilities for Product and for supply of Product in the Territory; (ii) together with the Joint Development Committee, develop a manufacturing strategy to enable development and licensure of manufacturing processes and facilities for Product in the Territory that includes all aspects of manufacture and release, including but not limited to formulations, intermediate, dosage form, devices, product characterization studies, stability studies and manufacturing plans and forecasts; (iii) review quality assurance efforts, including but not limited to those efforts with respect to the establishment of specifications and quality standards for Product; (iv) together with the Joint Development Committee review and comment on the process for Product Development and the drafting and contents of the CMC section of a Drug Approval Application for Product; (v) review technology transfer plans for any changes in manufacturing sites, testing sites, and responsibilities in the supply chain for Product, it being understood that decisions regarding the selection of which of a Party's own manufacturing and testing sites shall be used to manufacture any component of a Product, if a Party manufactures any component of a Product pursuant to this Agreement or any related supply agreement, shall remain in the sole control of such Party; (vi) prepare for regulatory inspections and ensure adherence to compliance standards with respect to Product; and (vii) review quality compliance and manufacturing related regulatory issues concerning the Product or any component thereof as important issues arise through meetings and review of relevant written material produced by Auxilium, BTC or any Regulatory Authority. 6.2 Development and Scale-Up. BTC shall, at its own cost and expense, develop the formulation and the finished dosage form and scale-up the Manufacture for commercial supply of the Enzyme and the Product for each Indication for use in the Field, including the lyophilized injection formulation, to be registered with Regulatory Authorities in accordance with Law and in sufficient time prior to anticipated commercial launch of a Product to provide for sufficient supply of Product for use in the Field. Notwithstanding 16 the foregoing, Auxilium will have the sole right and responsibility for selecting the finished dosage form and presentation for the Product in the Field. 6.3 Clinical Supply. (a) Supply by BTC. BTC shall be responsible for supplying or arranging for the supply of the Product suitable for use by Auxilium in Clinical Trials. All the Product shall be Manufactured in accordance with applicable specifications, all Laws, and shall be subject to the Standard Terms set forth in below. BTC will supply Auxilium, free of charge, with bulk vials containing sufficient quantities of the Product to treat up to five hundred (500) patients per year in Clinical Trials. If Auxilium requires additional clinical supplies, BTC will supply Auxilium with such clinical supplies at its Cost of Goods. Auxilium will be entitled to qualify a back up supplier for the Manufacture of clinical and commercial supplies of Product in the Field (the "Back-Up Supplier ") at any time after the Effective Date. BTC will use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to ensure that such Back-Up Supplier has sufficient know-how to Manufacture Product, including (i) providing all protocols, registration applications and other substantive regulatory documents, including, but not limited to, all data, scientific dossiers and governmental authorizations; (ii) providing access and reference to all regulatory dossiers and filings produced by BTC, its Affiliates and sublicensees relating to the Product; (iii) providing access to BTC Know-How in reasonably satisfactory form, and (iv) providing all technical assistance reasonably requested by the Back-Up Supplier related to the Manufacture of the Product. Auxilium will require that the Back-up Supplier execute a written confidentiality agreement with both Auxilium and BTC, in a form consistent with industry standards, which includes, among other things, an undertaking by the Back-up Supplier to keep confidential the manufacturing information and know-how disclosed to the Back-up Supplier by BTC. In the manufacturing information and know-how disclosed to the Back-up Supplier by BTC. In addition, Auxilium will use reasonable commercial efforts to seek the cooperation of the Back-up Supplier in sharing with BTC and Auxilium information concerning the Manufacture of the Product that Back-up Supplier may acquire in connection with such Manufacture. (b) Notification of Requirements. Auxilium will provide BTC with XXXX days notice of its requirements for clinical supplies of Product including a delivery schedule and address. BTC will provide notice within three (3) Business Days of receipt of such notice if BTC is unable to supply Auxilium with the quantities of clinical supplies of Product in accordance with the delivery schedule. In such event, the Parties shall cooperate but BTC shall be primarily responsible, at its sole cost and expense, for procuring such quantities of Product from the Back-Up Supplier as are necessary to compensate for any such deficiency. (c) Late Delivery of Clinical Supply. In the event that BTC is more than thirty (30) days late in delivering such material amount of clinical supplies, in addition to any other remedies Auxilium may have in Law or equity, BTC will forgive Auxilium XXXX per day for each additional day, such amounts to be creditable against any milestone payments due to BTC under Article 7. 6.4 Commercial Supply; Supply Agreement. BTC will supply or arrange for the supply of all necessary commercial quantities of the Product in the 17 Territory. No later than three (3) months after the Effective Date, the Parties shall enter into a commercial supply agreement on customary and reasonable terms and conditions (the "Supply Agreement"), such Supply Agreement shall include the following: (a) Royalty. Auxilium will pay BTC on a country-by-country and Product by Product basis a royalty payment of X percent (X%) of Net Sales of Products in the Field for the Term. Such royalty may be reduced as follows: (i) Competing Product Sales. If a Competing Product is sold in a country in the Territory with a unit based market share of X% or greater, then there shall be no royalty due for sales in that country in the Territory. (ii) Third Party Royalties. If the Manufacturing, Development or Commercialization of the Product by the Parties in accordance with this Agreement would, but for a license from such Third Party, infringe on such Third Party Patents, any royalties or other payments due to Third Parties pursuant to a license acquired by Auxilium then the royalty may be reduced by up to X% by such the royalty amounts to a floor of not less than X percent (X%) in any case. (b) Supply Price. (i) Basic Supply Price. Subject to the adjustments set forth below, the "Supply Price" for the Product shall be calculated as a percentage of Net Sales as follows: XXXX Provided, however, the Supply Price shall not equal less than X percent (X%) of BTC's Cost of Goods for the Product as provided in Schedule 1.16 (the "Minimum Supply Price"). (ii) Adjustments to Supply Price. (A) Most Favored Customer. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, if at any time during the Term BTC sells or provides products including Enzyme as an active ingredient to any customer for commercial use at rates more favorable than those accorded to Auxilium, BTC shall promptly offer Auxilium the benefit of such more favorable terms and conditions or rates, which, upon acceptance, shall be retroactive to the date that such more favorable terms and conditions were first effective for such other customer. In order for Auxilium to receive more favorable cost rates, Auxilum must accept the same basic business deal conditions as those provided to a party receiving the more favorable rates. Upon Auxilium's reasonable request, BTC shall 18 provide written confirmation that it is in compliance with the requirements of this Section. (B) Reduction In Cost of Goods. If BTC is successful in reducing the Cost of Goods, the Supply Price to Auxilium will be reduced by fifty percent (50%) of such dollar reduction. (C) Supply of Samples. Product samples shall be provided at no charge to Auxilium for use in post-market clinical trials and for selected use as commercial samples for dispensing to patients by an appropriate health care provider, but in no event for direct distribution to patients. The number of Product samples to be provided to Auxilium shall be set forth in the Supply Agreement. (D) Delay in Delivery. If, for any reason other than a force majeure, the BTC delivers any shipment of Product in accordance with this Article later than the date of delivery set out in the purchase order as agreed by the Parties pursuant to the Supply Agreement then: (1) a X% reduction in the Supply Price of Product if the shipment is delivered more than thirty (30) days but less than sixty (60) days late; (2) a X% reduction in the Supply Price of Product if the shipment is delivered more than sixty (60) days but less than ninety (90) days late; and (3) a X% reduction in the Supply Price of Product if the shipment is delivered more than ninety (90) days late. (4) Once the price has been reduced in accordance with this Section, it will not revert to the original price unless and until the deliveries are no longer delayed. (c) Stand-By Rights; Back Up Supplier. (i) Standby Rights. Auxilium will be entitled to seek from the Back-Up Supplier the greater of (a) X% its requirements and (b) that quantity of Product that BTC is unable to provide, for a period of XX following the occurrence of any of the events set forth in (A), (B) or (C) below (the "Standby Rights"). In the event that Auxilium exercises its Standby Rights, the amount of Product that Auxilium is obligated to source from BTC pursuant to the Supply Agreement shall be reduced by such quantity for such one (1) year period. (A) Failure to Meet Firm Order. If, for any reason, including, without limitation, as a result of a force majeure, BTC is unable to supply at least 75% of the amount of Product specified under a Firm Order, then Auxilium may exercise its Standby Rights by providing written notice; provided, however, that in the event that BTC is unable to supply the full amount specified in Auxilium's Firm Order for two consecutive quarters (regardless of the amount of such material shortfall), Auxilium may exercise its Standby Rights by providing written notice to BTC. In addition, 19 Auxilium shall be permitted to seek supply of any shortfall (regardless of amount of such shortfall or the number of times BTC has fulfill some or all of an Auxilium Firm Order) from the Back-Up Supplier on a per event basis without specifically invoking its Stand-By Rights. (B) Egregious Delivery Delay. If, for any reason, other than a force majeure, BTC delivers any quantity of any Product more than X days after the date such delivery was due, then Auxilium may exercise its Standby Rights by providing written notice. (C) Nonconforming Product. If any X consecutive shipments contain nonconforming Product and BTC (1) fails to replace any nonconforming Product with conforming Product in a timely manner or (2) fails to replace nonconforming Product within fifteen (15) Business Days after a dispute regarding whether any rejected quantity of any Product constitutes nonconforming Product is decided in Auxilium's favor, then Auxilium may exercise its Standby Rights by providing written notice. (ii) Offset. Auxilium will be entitled to offset any royalties owed to BTC by the amount represented by the difference between the Back Up Supplier's supply price and BTC's supply price. (iii) BTC's Use of the Back Up Supplier. If BTC opts to use the Back Up Supplier to provide Product to Auxilium, then BTC will either reimburse Auxilium for half of the documented costs and expenses Auxilium incurred in qualifying, sourcing and maintaining such Back Up Supplier or BTC will not be entitled to receive a royalty from Auxilium for the Product sourced from such Back Up Supplier. (d) Maintenance of Inventory. The Supply Agreement will require that by the time of Commercialization of the Product, BTC will maintain at least a six (6) month supply of API Enzyme and such reserve supply of Product as may be set forth in the Supply Agreement. (e) Allocation of Supply. In the event of a shortage of raw materials necessary to Manufacture the Product, BTC shall allocate X percent (X%) of the total available supply of raw materials and Product to Auxilium. (f) Continuous Improvement and Reduction of Cost of Goods. BTC shall use reasonable efforts to continuously improve its performance, and any Product suppliers' performance in the supply of the Product, including but not limited to, reducing Cost of Goods, increasing yield, and optimizing delivery timing. (g) Standard Terms of Supply. With respect to the supply of the Product, BTC shall make the following representations, warranties, and covenants (the "Standard Terms"): (i) The Product shall be Manufactured in accordance with all Laws and, at the time of delivery of the Product, such the Product will 20 comply with the specifications, shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship, shall be fit for the purpose for which it is intended, and shall not be adulterated or misbranded within the meaning of the Act, and shall not constitute an article which may not, under the Act, be introduced into interstate commerce. BTC provides no other warranties, express or implied, regarding the Product and disclaims all other express or implied warranties, including the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. (ii) The Product sold and shipped shall be Manufactured in accordance with all Laws in effect at the time and place of Manufacture of the Product, and all waste, including all hazardous waste, generated at the time of Manufacture of the Product shall be disposed of in accordance with all Laws; (iii) All records as are necessary and appropriate to demonstrate compliance with Laws shall be maintained by BTC and such Manufacture of the Product shall be performed in a facility maintaining a current drug establishment registration with the FDA as set forth in 21 C.F.R. ss. 207; (iv) BTC shall ensure that it, its Affiliates, and its subcontractors maintain all Governmental Permits that may be necessary to Manufacture and ship the Product; (v) BTC shall advise Auxilium of any information which arises out of BTC's, its Affiliates, and its subcontractors, as applicable, Manufacturing, relating to the Product, which have adverse regulatory compliance or reporting consequences concerning such the Product; (vi) BTC shall provide to Auxilium any information reasonably requested by Auxilium and shall consult Auxilium before providing any information to any Regulatory Authority in connection with Manufacture of the Product. BTC shall as promptly as possible, but in no event later than within ten (10) days, advise Auxilium of any requests by any Regulatory Authority for inspections at the premises of BTC or any of its Affiliates or subcontractors with respect to the Product; (vii) In the event BTC, its Affiliates, or its subcontractors are inspected by the FDA or any similar or related Regulatory Authority relating to the Product, BTC agrees to notify Auxilium of any such inspection and will use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to ensure that Auxilium shall have the right to be present during such inspection. BTC shall promptly notify Auxilium of any alleged violations or deficiencies relating to a Manufacturing facility at which the Product are Manufactured, packaged, or stored, and shall promptly disclose to Auxilium all relevant portions of any notice of observations or potential violations as well as a copy of its response thereto; (viii) Neither BTC, its Affiliates nor subcontractors shall use, in the Manufacture of any the Product, in any capacity the services of any person, including any firm or individual, debarred or subject to debarment under the Generic Drug Enforcement Act of 1992, amending the Act at 21 U.S.C. ss. 335a. BTC agrees to notify Auxilium immediately in the event any person providing services to BTC, its 21 Affiliates, or subcontractors relating to this Agreement is debarred or becomes subject to debarment; and (ix) For the purpose of permitting a quality and compliance audit, BTC, its Affiliates, and subcontractors shall grant to authorized representatives of (or a Third Party hired on behalf of Auxilium who is reasonably acceptable to BTC), in general not more than once per month, upon reasonable notice, access to areas of each of its plants to the extent permitted by Law. Auxilium shall have the right, subject to any Third Party confidentiality obligations and at its sole expense, to examine those technical records made by BTC, its Affiliates or subcontractors that relate to the Manufacture of the Product. (h) Customary Terms. The Supply Agreement shall also include provisions for: forecasting and ordering, inventory maintenance requirements; packaging obligations; back-up suppliers, compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, Auxilium guidelines, and specifications, and all Laws. ARTICLE 7 PAYMENTS 7.1 Milestone Payments by Auxilium. (a) Amount of Milestone Payments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # MILESTONE UNITED STATES DOLLARS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 The Effective Date $2.5 million ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 The delivery to Auxilium of the Product Data relating to $2.5 million Dupuytren's Disease and Peyronie's Disease in accordance with Section 2.4 of this Agreement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 The one (1) year anniversary of the Effective Date $X ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Upon first of either NDA Acceptance or MAA Acceptance for Dupuytren's $X the following Indications on an Indication by Indication Disease basis: ----------------------------------------- Peyronie's Disease $X ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Receipt by Auxilium or its Affiliate of first Regulatory Dupuytren's $X Approval in the United States or three or more of the United Disease Kingdom, Spain, Germany, France or Italy with labeling ----------------------------------------- approved for the following Indications on an Indication by Peyronie's Disease $X Indication basis: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Timing of Milestone Payments. For milestones 1, 2 and 3, payment shall be made within ten (10) Business Days after the occurrence of the event giving rise to a payment obligation hereunder. For milestones 4 and 5, payment shall be made within thirty (30) days after the occurrence of the event giving rise to a payment obligation hereunder. All payments shall be made by 22 wire transfer in United States Dollars to the credit of such bank account as may be designated, from time to time, by BTC in writing. 7.2 Process Development Milestones Within thirty (30) days following the Effective Date, BTC will provide Auxilium with a plan for the scale-up of Manufacturing for clinical and commercial supplies of Product (the "Manufacturing Plan") which is acceptable to Auxilium. The Manufacturing Plan shall contain, among other things, a schedule setting forth a timeline for the achievement of certain manufacturing process development milestones (the "Process Development Milestones"). Auxilium shall pay to BTC the amount of $X monthly upon achieving the Process Development Milestones (the "Process Development Payments"); provided, however, that Auxilium may suspend the Process Development Payments at anytime if it determines, in its reasonable judgement that BTC has not consistently met the Process Development Milestones. For purposes of clarification, in no event will the Process Development Payments exceed $X in the aggregate. 7.3 Payments for Exercised Indications. (a) Upon Exercise of Option. Within ten (10) Business Days of the inclusion on Exercised Indications in the Field, Auxilium shall make the following one-time license fee payments to BTC on a per Indication basis: Amount Indication ------ ---------- $X Cellulite reduction $X Frozen Shoulder $X Each Additional Indication (b) Upon Approval. Within ten (10) Business days of receipt by Auxilium of the first Regulatory Approval from the FDA for an Exercised Indication, Auxilium shall make the following milestone payments to BTC on a per Indication basis: Amount Labeling Approved for the following Indication ------ ---------------------------------------------- $X Cellulite reduction $X Treatment of keloids $X Treatment of lipomas $X Frozen Shoulder $X Each Additional Indication 7.4 Payments Related to Sublicense Income. Within thirty (30) Business Days of receiving Sublicense Income, Auxilium shall make a payment to BTC in the following amount: 7.3.1 If Auxilium has not conducted a Clinical Trial for Product in the relevant Indication prior to the effective date of the relevant sublicense, then Auxilium will remit X percent (X%) of the Sublicense Income actually received. 23 7.3.2 If Auxilium has conducted Clinical Trials for a Product in the relevant Indication prior to the date of the relevant sublicense, then Auxilium will remit X percent (X%) of Sublicense Income actually received. 7.3.3 Auxilium has obtained Regulatory Approval for a Product in the relevant Indication prior to the date of the relevant sublicense, then Auxilium will remit X percent (X%) of Sublicense Income actually received. 7.3.4 If the field of use of the sublicense to the Product is non-human use, then Auxilium will remit X percent (X%) of the Sublicense Income actually received for that field of use. 7.5 Currency. All payments shall be payable in United States Dollars. 7.6 Books and Records. Auxilium agrees to maintain and retain, in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, complete and accurate records showing all transactions and information relating to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of entry to which they pertain. 7.7 Audit Rights. Upon the written request of BTC and not more than once in each calendar year, Auxilium shall permit an independent certified public accounting firm (other than on a contingency fee basis) selected by BTC and acceptable to Auxilium (which acceptance by Auxilium shall not be unreasonably withheld) to have access during normal business hours to such records of Auxilium as may be reasonably necessary to verify Auxilium's compliance with the payment terms of this Article 7. The accounting firm shall enter into an acceptable and customary confidentiality agreement with Auxilium obligating the accounting firm to retain in confidence all information of Auxilium which it obtains in performing such audits hereunder, and such audit shall be subject to Auxilium's third Party confidentiality obligations. Any audit under this Section 7.7 shall be at the expense of BTC, unless a particular audit reveals an underpayment of five percent (5%) or more of the amount that should have been paid to BTC for the period audited, in which case, Auxilium shall bear the expense of such audit. 7.8 Taxes. Auxilium shall be entitled to deduct from its payments to BTC the amount of any withholding taxes required to be withheld by Auxilium or its Affiliates or sublicensees to the extent BTC or sublicensees pay to the appropriate governmental authority on behalf of BTC such taxes. Auxilium shall deliver to BTC, upon BTC's request, proof of payment of all such taxes. Each Party shall provide assistance to the other Party in seeking any benefits available to such Party with respect to government tax withholdings by any relevant law or double tax treaty. 7.9 Interest. Any payments payable by either party which are not paid on or before the date such payments are due under this Agreement (other than such payments which are the subject of a good faith dispute between the Parties) shall bear interest at the prime rate of interest plus 1%, calculated on the number of days that payment is delinquent. 7.10 Blocked Payments. In the event that, by reason of Laws or regulations in any country, it becomes impossible or illegal for Auxilium or an Affiliate or sublicensee of Auxilium, to transfer, or have transferred on its 24 behalf, distribution fees or other payments to BTC, Auxilium shall promptly notify BTC of the conditions preventing such transfer and such distribution fees or other payments shall be deposited in local currency in the relevant country to the credit of BTC in a recognized banking institution designated by BTC or, if none is designated by BTC within a period of thirty (30) days, in a recognized banking institution selected by Auxilium or its Affiliate or sublicensee, as the case may be, and identified in a notice given to BTC. ARTICLE 8 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 8.1 BTC Patentable Inventions and Know-How. (a) BTC Patent Prosecution. (i) During the term of the Agreement, BTC shall, diligently and in the reasonable exercise of its commercial discretion, prepare, file, prosecute, maintain, renew and defend BTC Patents in the countries where such BTC Patents are filed as of the Effective Date; provided, however, that BTC shall select patent counsel with Auxilium's consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. (ii) If BTC does not intend to file for patent protection or does not wish to continue preparation, prosecution, or maintenance of a BTC Patent, then it shall give at least thirty (30) days advance notice, and in no event less than a reasonable period of time for Auxilium to act in its stead. (A) In such case, Auxilium may elect at its sole discretion to continue preparation, filing and prosecution or maintenance of the discontinued BTC Patent at its sole expense. (B) Ownership of any such discontinued BTC Patent shall at the request of Auxilium be assigned to Auxilium and BTC shall execute such documents and perform such acts as may be reasonably necessary for assigning such ownership to Auxilium. (C) Discontinuance may be elected on a country-by-country basis or for a patent application or patent series in total. (b) Cooperation. BTC will consult Auxilium and will keep Auxilium continuously informed of all matters relating to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of BTC Patents including, but not limited to, disclosing to Auxilium the complete text of all such BTC Patents. (i) BTC shall provide Auxilium with a copy of any BTC Patents relating to Enzyme or Product withing thirty (30) days of the Effective Date. Prior to filing the first of any new Patents in any jurisdiction, BTC shall provide Auxilium with a copy of any such Patent applications and copies of all material correspondence with the relevant patent office pertaining to the BTC Patents and directly relating to Enzyme or Product. 25 (ii) BTC shall consider all of Auxilium's comments in good faith and take all steps reasonably necessary to optimize the patent position for the Product. (iii) In no event shall BTC relinquish control of the prosecution of BTC Patents to a Third Party. 8.2 Infringement Claims by Third Parties. (a) Notice. If the manufacture, use or sale of the Product under the BTC Patents results in a claim or a threatened claim by a Third Party against a Party hereto for patent infringement or for inducing or contributing to patent infringement ("Infringement Claim"), the Party first having notice of an Infringement Claim shall promptly notify the other in writing. The notice shall set forth the facts of the Infringement Claim in reasonable detail. (b) Third Party Licenses. In the event that practicing under the BTC Patents in connection with manufacture, use or sale of the Product in a country would infringe a Third Party Patent and a license to such Third Party Patent is available and Auxilium in its sole discretion seeks such a license, the Parties agree: (i) Auxilium will be responsible for all costs associated with acquiring any Third Party license to the extent required for Auxilium to continue to make, use and sell the Product and the Enzyme, provided however, Auxilium may offset such costs against the Royalty, with a minimum floor of three percent (3%) in accordance with Section 6.4 or, prior to commercial launch, offset such costs against any milestones due to BTC pursuant to Article 7; and (ii) Auxilium will use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to obtain any such required licenses under the Third Party's Patents with a right to sublicense to BTC and if requested by BTC will grant such sublicense, under reasonable sublicense terms mutually acceptable to both BTC and Auxilium. (c) Litigation. In the event of the institution of any suit by a Third Party against Auxilium as a result of Auxilium's Development or Commercialization of the Product or the Enzyme, Auxilium shall have the right but, not the obligation, to defend such suit at its expense; BTC shall cooperate and assist Auxilium in any such litigation at Auxilium' expense. In the event of the institution of any suit by a Third Party against BTC as a result of BTC's Manufacture of the Product or the Enzyme, BTC shall have the right but, not the obligation, to defend such suit at its expense. Auxilium shall cooperate and assist BTC in any such litigation at BTC's expense. For purposes of clarity, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Article 12, to the extent applicable, Auxilium will be entitled to seek indemnification from BTC for Losses arising in connection with such suit. 8.3 Infringement Claims Against Third Parties. (a) Cooperation. BTC and Auxilium each agree to take reasonable actions to protect BTC Patents from infringement. If one Party brings any such action or proceeding, the second Party may be joined as a Party plaintiff if 26 necessary for the action or proceeding to proceed and, in case of joining, the second Party agrees to give the first Party reasonable assistance and authority to file and to prosecute such suit. (b) Notice. If any BTC Patents are infringed by a Third Party, the Party to this Agreement first having knowledge of such infringement, or knowledge of a reasonable probability of such infringement, shall promptly notify the other in writing. The notice shall set forth the facts of such infringement in reasonable detail. (c) Institution of Proceedings. BTC, shall have the primary right, but not the obligation, to institute, prosecute, and control with its own counsel at its own expense any action or proceeding with respect to infringement of the claims of such BTC Patents and Auxilium shall have the right, but not the obligation at its own expense, to be represented in such action by its own counsel. (d) Failure to Institute Proceedings. If BTC fails to institute, prosecute, and control such action or prosecution and fails to do so within a period of one hundred twenty (120) days after receiving notice of the infringement, Auxilium shall have the right to bring and control any such action by counsel of its own choice, and BTC shall have the right, at its own expense, to be represented in any such action by counsel of its own choice. (e) Division of Damages Award. Any recovery made in connection with such infringement claim shall be divided as follows: (i) the Party that initiated and prosecuted such action shall recoup all of its costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) incurred in connection with such action, whether the recovery is by settlement or otherwise; (ii) the other Party then shall, to the extent possible, recover its costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) incurred in connection with such action; (iii) if BTC initiated and prosecuted the action, the amount of any recovery remaining shall be retained by BTC; and (iv) if Auxilium initiated and prosecuted the action, the amount of any recovery remaining shall be retained by Auxilium, except that BTC shall receive a portion equivalent to the amount it would have received in accordance with the terms of Section 6.4 as if such amount were Net Sales of Auxilium. (f) Settlement. The Parties shall keep each other informed of the status of and of their respective activities regarding any litigation or settlement thereof concerning Product; provided, however, that no settlement or consent judgment or other voluntary final disposition of a suit under this Section may be undertaken without the consent of the other Party if such settlement would require the other Party to be subject to an injunction or to make a monetary payment or would otherwise adversely affect the other Party's rights under this Agreement or the validity of BTC Patents. 27 8.4 Notice of Certification. BTC and Auxilium each shall immediately give notice to the other of any certification filed under the "U.S. Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984" (or its foreign equivalent) claiming that a BTC Patent is invalid or that infringement will not arise from the manufacture, use or sale of any Product by a Third Party. (a) If BTC decides not to bring infringement proceedings against the entity making such a certification, BTC shall give notice to Auxilium of its decision not to bring suit within twenty one (21) days after receipt of notice of such certification. (b) Auxilium may then, but is not required to, bring suit against the Party that filed the certification; provided, however, that the costs incurred by Auxilium in connection with such suit shall be creditable against milestone payments payable by Auxilium in accordance with Article 7. (c) Any suit by Auxilium or BTC shall either be in the name of Auxilium or in the name of BTC, or jointly in the name of Auxilium and BTC, as may be required by law. (d) For this purpose, the Party not bringing suit shall execute such legal papers necessary for the prosecution of such suit as may be reasonably requested by the Party bringing suit. 8.5 Patent Term Extensions. The Parties shall cooperate in good faith with each other in gaining patent term extension wherever applicable to BTC Patents covering Enzyme or Product. (a) Auxilium and BTC shall jointly determine which BTC Patents shall be extended. (b) All filings for such extension shall be made by the Party responsible for prosecution and maintenance of the BTC Patent, provided, however, that in the event that the Party who is responsible for prosecution and maintenance of the BTC Patent elects not to file for an extension, such Party shall (i) inform the other Party of its intention not to file and (ii) grant the other Party the right to file for such extension. 8.6 Trademarks. (a) Each Party and its Affiliates shall retain all right, title and interest in and to its and their respective corporate names and logos. (b) Auxilium shall be solely responsible for selecting a trademark (the "Auxilium Trademark") to use for each country in the Territory. The Product shall be promoted and sold, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, in the Territory under the Auxilium Trademark. Auxilium (or its local Affiliates, as appropriate) shall own and retain all rights to Auxilium Trademark, and all goodwill associated therewith throughout the Territory. Auxilium shall also own rights to any internet domain names incorporating the Auxilium Trademark or any variation or part of Auxilium Trademark as its URL address or any part of such address. 28 ARTICLE 9 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 9.1 BTC Represents and Warrants. BTC hereby represents and warrants to Auxilium that: (a) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by BTC and constitutes the valid and binding obligation of BTC, enforceable against BTC in accordance with its terms except as enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, fraudulent conveyance, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other laws relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally and by general equitable principles. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of BTC, its officers and directors; (b) As of the Effective Date BTC owns or possesses adequate licenses or other rights necessary to make, use and sell all technology covered by the BTC Patents, and to grant the licenses herein and the granting of the licenses to Auxilium hereunder does not violate any right known to BTC of any Third Party; (c) BTC represents that to the best of its knowledge, as of the Effective Date it is not aware that the development, manufacture, use or sale of the Enzyme or the Product pursuant to this Agreement may infringe or conflict with any Third Party right or Patent, and BTC is not aware of any pending patent application that, if issued, would be infringed by the development, manufacture, use or sale of the Enzyme or the Product pursuant to this Agreement; (d) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by BTC does not conflict with any agreement, instrument or understanding, oral or written, to which it is a Party or by which it may be bound, and, to the best of its knowledge, does not violate any material law or regulation of any court, governmental body or administrative or other agency having authority over it; (e) BTC has disclosed to Auxilium all material information in its control pertaining to the suitability of Enzyme as a pharmaceutical candidate; (f) The Product has valid and effective Orphan Drug Designation under the applicable FDA statutes, rules or regulations, effective, May 23, 1996, and March 12, 1996 BTC has no reason to believe such Orphan Drug Designation shall be terminated prior to the Effective Date. (g) BTC is not currently a Party to, and during the Term will not enter into, any agreements, oral or written, that are inconsistent with its obligations under this Agreement; (h) BTC is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the state of Delaware and has full legal power and authority to enter into this Agreement; and (i) BTC is not subject to any order, decree or injunction by a court of competent jurisdiction which prevents or materially delays the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 29 9.2 Auxilium Represents and Warrants. Auxilium hereby represents and warrants to BTC that: (a) The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Auxilium does not conflict with any agreement, instrument or understanding, oral or written, to which it is a Party or by which it may be bound, and, to the best of its knowledge, does not violate any material law or regulation of any court, governmental body or administrative or other agency having authority over it; (b) Auxilium is not currently a Party to, and during the Term will not enter into, any agreements, oral or written, that are inconsistent with its obligations under this Agreement; (c) Auxilium is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the state of Delaware and has full legal power and authority to enter into this Agreement; and (d) Auxilium is not subject to any order, decree or injunction by a court of competent jurisdiction which prevents or materially delays the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 9.3 Disclaimer of Warranties. THE LIMITED WARRANTIES CONTAINED IN THIS ARTICLE ARE THE SOLE WARRANTIES GIVEN BY THE PARTIES AND ARE MADE EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OF AND EXCLUDE ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, INFRINGEMENT OR OTHERWISE, AND ALL OTHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES PROVIDED BY COMMON LAW, STATUTE OR OTHERWISE ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED BY BOTH PARTIES. ARTICLE 10 CONFIDENTIALITY 10.1 Confidentiality. During the Term, and for a period of five (5) years thereafter, each Party hereto will maintain in confidence all information disclosed, and reasonably believed by the other party to be confidential whether orally or in writing, by the other Party hereto ("Confidential Information"). Neither Party shall use, disclose or grant use of such Confidential Information except as required under this Agreement. Each Party shall use at least the same standard of care as it uses to protect its own Confidential Information to ensure that its and its Affiliates' employees, agents, consultants, and clinical investigators only make use of Confidential Information for the purpose of this Agreement and do not disclose or make any unauthorized use of such Confidential Information. Each Party shall promptly notify the other upon discovery of any unauthorized use or disclosure of Confidential Information. Confidential Information shall not include any information which and to the extent: (a) was already known to the receiving Party, other than under an obligation of confidentiality, at the time of disclosure by the other Party; (b) was generally available to the public or otherwise part of the public domain at the time of its disclosure to the other Party; 30 (c) becomes generally available to the public or otherwise part of the public domain after its disclosure and other than through any act or omission of the receiving Party in breach of this Agreement; (d) was disclosed to the receiving Party, other than under an obligation of confidentiality, by a Third Party who had no obligation to the other Party not to disclose such information; or (e) was independently developed by the receiving Party without reference to the disclosure by the other Party, as documented by written records. 10.2 Terms of Agreement. The Parties agree that the material financial terms of the Agreement shall be considered the Confidential Information of both Parties. 10.3 Permitted Disclosure. Each Party may disclose the Confidential Information to the extent such disclosure is reasonably necessary in filing or prosecuting patent applications, prosecuting or defending litigation, or complying with any applicable statute or governmental regulation provided such Party has given the disclosing Party prompt written notice allowing it to limit such disclosure. In addition, either Party may disclose Confidential Information to its Affiliates and to its Sublicensees; provided, however, in connection with any such disclosure the disclosing Party shall secure confidential treatment of such Confidential Information. 10.4 Employee Obligations . The Parties shall undertake to ensure that all their employees who have access to Confidential Information of the other Party are under obligations of confidentiality fully consistent with those provided in this Article. 10.5 Publication. No Party may publish confidential or proprietary information of the other Party, without the consent of the other Party. The reviewing Party shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of the proposed oral disclosure or written publication to provide comments or proposed changes to the disclosing Party. The review period may be extended for an additional two (2) months to permit the reviewing Party to file one or more patent applications as it deems appropriate. This Section 10.5 shall be inapplicable to the publication of information presented in substantially the same form in which was previously published or disclosed to the public, and to any other disclosures which, on the advice of counsel, are required by law to be disclosed. 10.6 Prior Agreements. The obligations of Confidentiality and Nondisclosure set forth in this Section 10 supersede any and all prior and contemporaneous communications, representations, agreements or understandings, whether oral or written concerning the subject matter of this Section 10. ARTICLE 11 TERM AND TERMINATION 11.1 Term. (a) Term.Unless earlier terminated as provided herein, the Term shall commence as of the Effective Date and shall remain in full force and effect on a Product by Product and country by country basis until the later of 31 (i) the last to expire valid claim of a patent covering such Product, (ii) the expiration of the regulatory exclusivity period conveyed by Orphan Drug Designation with respect to such Product, and (iii) twelve (12) years (the "Term"). (b) Accrued Obligations. Except where explicitly provided elsewhere herein, termination of this Agreement for any reason, or expiration of this Agreement, will not affect: (i) obligations, including the payment of any royalties or other sums which have accrued as of the date of termination or expiration, and (ii) rights and obligations which, from the context thereof, are intended to survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. 11.2 Termination for Insolvency. Either Party may terminate this Agreement immediately upon delivery of written notice to the other Party (a) upon the institution by or against the other Party of insolvency, receivership or bankruptcy proceedings or any other proceedings for the settlement of the other Party's debts; provided, however with respect to involuntary proceedings, that such proceedings are not dismissed within one hundred and twenty (120) days; (b) upon the other Party's making an assignment for the benefit of creditors; or (c) upon the other Party's dissolution or ceasing to do business. 11.3 Material Breach. Either Party may terminate this Agreement upon ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other Party upon the material breach by the other Party of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided, however, that such termination shall become effective only if the other Party shall fail to remedy or cure the breach within such ninety (90) day period. 11.4 Termination by Auxilium. Auxilium may terminate this Agreement in its entirety or on a country-by-country basis or on an Indication by Indication basis or on a Product by Product basis at any time upon ninety (90) days prior written notice to BTC. 11.5 Effect Of Termination. (a) Effect On License. Upon the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, the rights licensed under this Agreement shall be treated as follows: (i) Upon the expiration of the Term or the termination of this Agreement by Auxilium pursuant to Section 11.2 or Section 11.3, Auxilium shall have a fully paid-up, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, transferable, worldwide, non-exclusive right and license under the Licensed Technology existing as of the date of such expiration to make, have made, use, offer to sell, and sell the Product in the Territory. (ii) Upon termination of this Agreement by BTC pursuant to Section 11.2 or 11.3, or by Auxilium pursuant to Section 11.4 all rights to Product shall revert to BTC. (b) Ongoing Obligations. (i) Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason, each Party shall no later than thirty (30) days after such termination return to the other Party or destroy any Confidential Information disclosed by the other Party, except for one copy which may be retained in its confidential files. 32 (ii) Upon termination of this Agreement by BTC pursuant to Sections 11.2 or 11.3 or by Auxilium pursuant to Section 11.4, Auxilium shall assign and deliver to BTC all Regulatory Data and information (including registration dossiers) obtained for or in pursuing Regulatory Approvals, and all Regulatory Approvals (e.g., to BTC; designee in the Territory as permitted under the Law) for Product in the Territory received as of such termination date. 11.6 Inventory. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon early termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 11.2, 11.3 or 11.4, Auxilium shall have the right to sell all remaining Product in its inventory within six (6) months after the date of termination, but shall be bound to the royalty payments provided by Article 7.4 herein.. Thereafter, Auxilium agrees to destroy any remaining supply of Product or return it to BTC at BTC's request and direction. ARTICLE 12 INDEMNIFICATION 12.1 Auxilium. Auxilium shall defend BTC at Auxilium' cost and expense, and will indemnify and hold BTC and their respective directors, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, representatives, and agents harmless from and against any and all losses, costs, damages, fees, or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses) ("Losses") incurred in connection with or arising out of any Third Party claim (a "Third Party Claim") directly relating to (i) any material breach by Auxilium of its representations or warranties or obligations pursuant to this Agreement, (ii) any gross negligence or willful misconduct of Auxilium, its Affiliates, or their respective directors, officers, employees, contractors, consultants, agents, representatives, or sublicensees in the exercise of any of Auxilium' rights or the performance of any of Auxilium' obligations under this Agreement, and (iii) the handling, packaging, storage, or Commercialization by Auxilium or any of its Affiliates or sublicensees of any Product in the Territory (excluding all intellectual property infringement or related claims, which are covered in Section 12.2); provided that notwithstanding the foregoing, in all cases referred to in this Section 12.1, Auxilium shall have no liability to BTC for any Losses to the extent that such Losses were caused by any item for which BTC is required to indemnify Auxilium pursuant to Section 12.2. 12.2 BTC. BTC shall defend Auxilium and its Affiliates at BTC's cost and expense, and will indemnify and hold Auxilium and its Affiliates and their respective directors, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, representatives, and agents harmless from and against any and all Losses incurred in connection with or arising out of any Third Party Claim directly relating to (i) material breach by BTC of any of its representations, warranties or obligations pursuant to this Agreement, (ii) gross negligence or willful misconduct of BTC in the exercise of any of its rights or the performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement, (iii) personal injury and other product liability resulting from BTC's Development, Manufacture, or Commercialization of any Product, (iv) intellectual property infringement or related claims, including any Third Party Claim and trade secret misappropriation liability relating to the Development, Manufacture, or Commercialization of any Product, (v) any liability or other claims from the Manufacture, handling, packaging, storage, sale, or other disposition of any Product by BTC or any of its Affiliates or sublicensees, and (vi) any liability or claims arising from Product supplied by or on behalf of BTC to Auxilium that was not Manufactured in accordance with current Good Manufacturing Practices, Good Clinical Practice and 33 Good Laboratory Practices, the specifications or all Laws and regulations except for such Losses that are indemnified pursuant to the Supply Agreement; provided that notwithstanding the foregoing, in all cases referred to in this Section 12.2, BTC shall have no liability to Auxilium for any Losses to the extent (and only to the extent) that such Losses were caused by any item for which Auxilium is required to indemnify BTC pursuant to Section 12.1. 12.3 Claims Procedures. Each Party entitled to be indemnified by the other Party (an "Indemnified Party") pursuant to Section 12.1 or 12.2 hereof shall give notice to the other Party (an "Indemnifying Party") promptly after such Indemnified Party has actual knowledge of any threatened or asserted claim as to which indemnity may be sought, and shall permit the Indemnifying Party to assume the defense of any such claim or any litigation resulting therefrom; provided: (a) That counsel for the Indemnifying Party, who shall conduct the defense of such claim or any litigation resulting therefrom, shall be approved by the Indemnified Party (whose approval shall not unreasonably be withheld) and the Indemnified Party may participate in such defense at such Party's expense (unless (i) the employment of counsel by such Indemnified Party has been authorized by the Indemnifying Party; or (ii) the Indemnified Party shall have reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between the Indemnifying Party and the Indemnified Party in the defense of such action, in each of which cases the Indemnifying Party shall pay the reasonable fees and expenses of one law firm serving as counsel for the Indemnified Party, which law firm shall be subject to approval, not to be unreasonably withheld, by the Indemnifying Party). (b) The failure of any Indemnified Party to give notice as provided herein shall not relieve the Indemnifying Party of its obligations under this Agreement to the extent that the failure to give notice did not result in harm to the Indemnifying Party. (c) No Indemnifying Party, in the defense of any such claim or litigation, shall, except with the approval of each Indemnified Party which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, consent to entry of any judgment or enter into any settlement which (i) would result in injunctive or other relief being imposed against the Indemnified Party; or (ii) does not include as an unconditional term thereof the giving by the claimant or plaintiff to such Indemnified Party of a release from all liability in respect to such claim or litigation. (d) Each Indemnified Party shall furnish such information regarding itself or the claim in question as an Indemnifying Party may reasonably request in writing and shall be reasonably required in connection with the defense of such claim and litigation resulting therefrom. 12.4 Escrow. In the event of any Third Party Claim against Auxilium for which BTC is obligated to indemnify Auxilium in accordance with Section 12.2, Auxilium shall be entitled, until a final un-appealable decision has been rendered or a settlement has been reached (a "Final Decision"), to pay an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of all amounts due to BTC on Net Sales of Products (such aggregate amount, the "Escrowed Amount") into an escrow account maintained by a Third Party reasonably acceptable to BTC. To the extent that Auxilium incurs any Losses in connection with such Third Party Claim, an amount equal to 34 the amount of any such Losses shall be distributed to Auxilium out of such escrow account, with the remainder (if any) to be paid to BTC. In the event that the Escrow Amount is less than the amount of such Losses, BTC shall pay the difference to Auxilium within thirty (30) days of such Final Decision. 12.5 Insurance. During the Term, each of Auxilium and BTC shall maintain general liability and product liability insurance in the following amounts: (i) at all times prior to approval of a NDA for a Product, $3,000,000 per occurrence, and (ii) at all times after approval of a NDA for a Product, $5,000,000. 12.6 Compliance. The Parties shall comply fully with all Laws and regulations in connection with their respective activities under this Agreement. ARTICLE 13 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 13.1 Dispute Resolution. In the event of any controversy or claim arising out of relating to or in connection with any provision of this Agreement, or the rights or obligations hereunder, the Parties shall try to settle their differences amicably between themselves. Either Party may initiate such informal dispute resolution by sending written notice of the dispute to the other Party, and within ten (10) business days after such notice appropriate representatives of the Parties shall meet for attempted resolutions by good faith negotiations. If such representatives are unable to resolve such disputed matters, it shall be referred to the Chief Executive Officers of BTC and Auxilium, for discussion and resolution. If they are unable to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days of initiating such negotiations, the Parties agree first to submit the dispute to non-binding mediation before resorting to litigation or other mutually agreed dispute resolution mechanism. The dispute resolution procedures set forth herein shall not limit a court from granting a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction in order to preserve the status quo of the Parties pending arbitration or to protect a Party's trademark or confidential or proprietary information. 13.2 Construction. Unless the context of this Agreement clearly requires otherwise, (a) references to the plural include the singular, the singular the plural, the part the whole, (b) references to any gender include all genders, (c) "or" has the inclusive meaning frequently identified with the phrase "and/or," (d) "including" has the inclusive meaning frequently identified with the phrase "including but not limited to" or "including", and (e) references to "hereunder" or "herein" relate to this Agreement. The section and other headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not control or affect the construction of this Agreement or the interpretation thereof in any respect. Section, subsection, and Schedule references are to this Agreement unless otherwise specified. Each accounting term used herein that is not specifically defined herein shall have the meaning given to it under GAAP. 13.3 Governing Law; Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be construed and the respective rights of the Parties determined according to the substantive laws of the State of New York notwithstanding the provisions governing conflict of laws under such New York law to the contrary, except matters of intellectual property law which shall be determined in accordance with the intellectual property laws relevant to the intellectual property in question. 35 13.4 Post-Closing Access to Information. BTC shall afford to representatives of Auxilium reasonable access to offices, plants, properties, books and records of BTC relating to the Product, during normal business hours, in order that Auxilium may have an opportunity to make such reasonable investigations as it desires with respect to Product. At all times after the Effective Date, each Party will permit the other Party and its representatives (including its counsel and auditors) during normal business hours, for a proper purpose to have reasonable access to and examine and make copies of, at the expense of the copying Party, all books, records, files and documents in its possession which relate to the Product. 13.5 Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. All rights and licenses granted under or pursuant to any section of this Agreement are, and shall otherwise be deemed to be, for purposes of Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code, licenses of rights to "intellectual property" as defined under Section 101(35A) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Parties shall retain and may fully exercise all of their respective rights and elections under section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. 13.6 Waiver. The failure on the part of Auxilium or BTC to exercise or enforce any rights conferred upon it hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any such rights nor operate to bar the exercise or enforcement thereof at any time or times thereafter. The observance of any Term may be waived (either generally or in a particular instance and either retroactively or prospectively) by the Party entitled to enforce such term, but any such waiver shall be effective only if in writing signed by the Party against whom such waiver is to be asserted. 13.7 Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be held liable or responsible to the other Party nor be deemed to have defaulted under or breached this Agreement for failure or delay in fulfilling or performing any Term, other than an obligation to make a payment, when such failure or delay is caused by or results from fire, floods, embargoes, government regulations, prohibitions or interventions, war, acts of war (whether war be declared or not), insurrections, riots, civil commotions, strikes, lockouts, acts of God, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of the affected Party. 13.8 Severability. It is the intention of the Parties to comply with all Laws domestic or foreign in connection with the performance of its obligations hereunder. In the event that any provision of this Agreement, or any part hereof, is found invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement will be binding on the Parties hereto, and will be construed as if the invalid or unenforceable provision or part thereof had been deleted, and the Agreement shall be deemed modified to the extent necessary to render the surviving provisions enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 13.9 Government Acts. In the event that any act, regulation, directive, or law of a government, including its departments, agencies or courts, should make impossible or prohibit, restrain, modify or limit any material act or obligation of Auxilium or BTC under this Agreement, the Party, if any, not so affected shall have the right, at its option, to suspend or terminate this Agreement as to such country, if good faith negotiations between the Parties to make such modifications to this Agreement as may be necessary to fairly address the impact thereof, after a reasonable period of time are not successful in producing mutually acceptable modifications to this Agreement. 36 13.10 Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned or otherwise transferred by either Party without the prior written consent of the other Party; provided, however, that either Party may assign this Agreement, without the consent of the other Party, in connection with the transfer or sale of all or substantially all of its assets or business or in the event of its merger or consolidation with another company. In all cases the assigning Party shall provide the other Party with prompt notice of any such assignment. Any purported assignment in contravention of this Section shall, at the option of the nonassigning Party, be null and void and of no effect. No assignment shall release either Party from responsibility for the performance of any accrued obligation of such Party hereunder. 13.11 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate, both of which shall be deemed to be originals, and both of which shall constitute one and the same Agreement. 13.12 No Agency. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to create an agency, joint venture, amalgamation, partnership or similar relationship between BTC and Auxilium. Notwithstanding any of the provisions of this Agreement, neither Party shall at any time enter into, incur, or hold itself out to third Parties as having authority to enter into or incur, on behalf of the other Party, any commitment, expense, or liability whatsoever, and all contracts, expenses and liabilities undertaken or incurred by one Party in connection with or relating to the development, manufacture or sale of Enzymes or Product shall be undertaken, incurred or paid exclusively by that Party, and not as an agent or representative of the other Party. 13.13 Notice. All communications between the Parties with respect to any of the provisions of this Agreement will be sent to the addresses set out below, or to other addresses as designated by one Party to the other by notice pursuant hereto, by internationally recognized courier or by prepaid certified, air mail (which shall be deemed received by the other Party on the seventh business day following deposit in the mails), or by facsimile transmission or other electronic means of communication (which shall be deemed received when transmitted), with confirmation by letter given by the close of business on or before the next following business day: If to BTC, at: ------------- Biospecifics Technologies Corp. 35 Wilbur Street Lynbrook, New York 11563 Attn: ____________________ with a copy to: -------------- Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner LLP 163 Madison Avenue P.O. Box 1989 Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1989 Attn.: Leslie Gladstone Restaino, Esq. If to Auxilium at: ----------------- Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc. 160 West Germantown Pike Norristown, PA 19401 Attn: __________________ 37 with a copy to: -------------- Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Attn: Manya S. Deehr, Esq. 13.14 Headings. The paragraph headings are for convenience only and will not be deemed to affect in any way the language of the provisions to which they refer. 13.15 Assurances. Neither Party will take any action, or fail to act in a manner, which would prejudice the rights intended to be granted to the other Party pursuant to this Agreement. 13.16 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the Parties relating to the matters referred to herein, and may only be amended by a written document, duly executed on behalf of the respective Parties. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 38 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date. AUXILIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. By: ----------------------------------- Name: Title: BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. By: ----------------------------------- Name: Title: SCHEDULE 1.7 BTC PATENTS BIOSPECIFICS TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES PATENT APPLICATIONS AND EXISTING PATENTS 1. U.S. Patent 5,393,792, patented February 28, 1995, inventors Dr. Harold Stern and Dr. David Yee, title: High Dosage Topical Forms of Collagenase 2. U.S. Patent 5,422,103, patented June 6, 1995, inventors Dr. Harold Stern and Dr. David Yee, title: High Dosage Topical Forms of Collagenase 3. U.S. Patent 5,514,370, patented May 7, 1995, inventors Dr. Harold Stern and Dr. David Yee, title: High Dosage Forms of Collagenase (Method of Treatment with...). Note: Foreign patent applications corresponding to the above U.S. applications have been filed in 14 foreign countries (Australia, Canada, 9 countries of the European patent convention, (Austria, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Hungary, Japan, Russia). Patents have issued in all countries except Japan, where the application is pending. 4. U.S. application inventors Edwin H. Wegman, Burton Bronsther, and Erwin T. Jacob, title: Reduction of Adipose Tissue. US Patent Application # 10/172601 pending. 5. U.S. Patent 6.086.872, patented July 11, 2000, inventor Thomas L. Wegman, Amelioration of Dupuytren's Disease. Note: Foreign patents corresponding to the above patent have been granted in 4 countries. France (2,772,273 granted 4/25/03), Australia (733,208 granted 8/23/01), UK (98050503 granted 10/10/01) and Sweden (9800806-3 granted 3/2/04). Patents have been filed in Denmark, and , Norway. 6. U.S. Patent 6.022,539, patented February 8, 2000, inventor Thomas L. Wegman, Amelioration of Peyronie's Disease. Note: Foreign patent application corresponding to the above application have been filed in 9 countries. Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom. Corresponding patent French Patent 0006863 has issued. 7.U.S. Patent 5,173,295, patented December 22, 1992, inventor Peter Wehling, title: Method of Enhancing the Regeneration of Injured Nerves and Adhesive Pharmaceutical Formulation Therefor. 8. U.S. Patent 5,279,825, patented January 18, 1994, inventor Peter Wehling, title: Method of Enhancing the Regeneration of Injured Nerves and Adhesive Pharmaceutical Formulation Therefor. Note: Foreign patent application corresponding to the above two cases filed in the European Patent Office (5 countries) For France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK foreign application in European Patent Office. 9. European Patent Office Patent EPO721781B1 June 2002 - inventors Edwin H. Wegman, Burton Bronsther, and Erwin T. Jacob, title: Reduction of Adipose Tissue Using Collagenase. This patent is being extended into 12 additional countries. PATENTS LICENSED TO ADVANCE BIOFACTURES CORP. 10. US Patent 5,851,522, patented December 22, 1998 inventor Dr. I. M Herman titled "Enhancing Keratinocyte Migration. EPO, (9 countries), Canada 11. US Patent 5,718,897, patented on February 17, 1998. Inventor Dr. Ira Herman, Title: Enhancing Keratinocyte Migration and Proliferation. Note: Foreign patent application corresponding to the above case has been filed in Australia, Canada, EPO (12 countries). Updated: May 24, 2004 SCHEDULE 1.16 COST OF GOODS The cost of Enzyme or a Product manufactured by BTC shall mean the fully allocated cost of manufacturing, which shall include: 1. Materials cost, which means the price paid for raw material components and finished goods which are purchased from outside vendors as well as any freight and duty where applicable. 2. Direct labor costs, which means the employment costs including, salary and employee benefits within the relevant manufacturing operating unit. 3. Direct and factory overheads, which means the cost of specific activities that are provided by support functions. Overhead costs includes expenses associated with quality assurance testing, batch review, equipment maintenance costs, manufacturing energy and utilities, waste removal, storage, transportation, insurance, management and administrative expenses, general facilities costs, environmental engineering, interest expense and property taxes. Cost of Goods shall be calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. BTC's Cost of Goods for Enzyme or Product shall in no event exceed 110% of the cost of Enzyme or Product as supplied, or as could be supplied, by a Third Party, as measured at the request of Auxilium and no more frequently than once per calendar year. SCHEDULE 1.21 ENZYME Schedule 1.2.1 Enzyme The enzyme is collagenase obtained by fermentation of Clostridium histolyticum, purified by chromatography, lyophilized and substantially free from other proteinases. SCHEDULE 3.2 CLINICAL TRIALS SCHEDULE 3.2 CLINICAL TRIALS DUPUYTREN'S DISEASE Dupy 303a and Dupy 303b Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study of the Relative Safety and Efficacy of Collagenase Therapy in the Treatment of Residual Type Dupuytren's Disease 11/21/03 Dupy 299 An Open Label Training Study for the Use of Collagenase Therapy for the Use of Collagenase Therapy in the Treatment of Residual Type Dupuytren's Disease 4/4/03 Dupy 404 An Open Label Study of the Relative Safety and Efficacy of Collagenase Therapy in the Treatment of Residual Type Dupuytren's Disease 4/4/03 PEYRONIE'S DISEASE 1035-PEY An Open Label Study To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Collagenase Therapy in the Treatment of Peyronie's Disease 1/2/03
EX-31.1 3 exh311.txt CERTIFICATION Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Edwin H. Wegman, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, Interim Principal Financial Officer and Director, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of BioSpecifics Technologies, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. In my capacity as CEO and the registrant's interim principal accounting offier, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have: designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or will cause such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; I will evaluate the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and will present in future reports our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and I have disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting 5. In my capacity as CEO and the registrant's interim principal accounting offier I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the preperation for design of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a. all foreseen significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. any foreseen fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other individuals who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting Date: November 2, 2004 /s/ Edwin H. Wegman -------------------------- Edwin H Wegman Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Interim Principal Accounting Officer EX-32.1 4 exh321.txt CERTIFICATION Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the annual report of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edwin H. Wegman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, subject to form TH and 12b(5); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Edwin H. Wegman ----------------------------------------- Edwin H. Wegman President and Chief Executive Officer and Interim Principal Accounting Officer November 2, 2004
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----