XML 107 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


(a) Concentrations of Credit Risk


          The creditworthiness of any counterparty is evaluated by the Company, taking into account credit ratings assigned by rating agencies. The credit approval process involves an assessment of factors including, among others, the counterparty and country and industry credit exposure limits. Collateral may be required, at the discretion of the Company, on certain transactions based on the creditworthiness of the counterparty.


          The areas where significant concentrations of credit risk may exist include unpaid losses and loss expenses recoverable and reinsurance balances receivable (collectively, “reinsurance assets”) and in the investment fixed income portfolio.


          Reinsurance Assets


          The Company’s reinsurance assets resulted from reinsurance arrangements in the course of its operations. A credit exposure exists with respect to reinsurance assets as they may be uncollectible. The Company manages its credit risk in its reinsurance relationships by transacting with reinsurers that it considers financially sound, and if necessary, the Company may hold collateral in the form of funds, trust accounts and/or irrevocable letters of credit. This collateral can be drawn on for amounts that remain unpaid beyond specified time periods on an individual reinsurer basis. For further details regarding the Company’s reinsurance assets, see, Note 9, “Reinsurance.”


          Fixed Income Portfolio


          The Company did not have an aggregate direct investment in any single corporate issuer in excess of 5% of shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010. Corporate issuers represent only direct exposure to fixed maturities and short-term investments of the parent issuer and its subsidiaries. These exposures exclude asset and mortgage back securities that were issued, sponsored or serviced by the parent and government-guaranteed issues, but does include covered bonds.


          Broker credit risk


          In addition, the Company underwrites a significant amount of its insurance and reinsurance property and casualty business through brokers and a credit risk exists should any of these brokers be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations with respect to the payments of insurance and reinsurance balances to the Company. During the three years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, P&C gross written premiums generated from or placed by the below companies individually accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated gross written premiums from P&C operations, as follows:


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31
(Percentage of consolidated gross written premiums from P&C operations)

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 


 


 


 

AON Corporation and subsidiaries

 

 

20

%

 

21

%

 

20

%

Marsh & McLennan Companies

 

 

20

%

 

21

%

 

18

%

Willis Group and subsidiaries

 

 

12

%

 

11

%

 

9

%


          These companies are large, well established companies and there are no indications that any of them are financially troubled. No other broker and no one insured or reinsured accounted for more than 10% of gross premiums written from P&C operations in any of the three years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, or 2009.


(b) Other Investments


          The Company has committed to invest in several limited partnerships and provide liquidity financing to a structured investment vehicle. At December 31, 2011, the Company has commitments, which include potential additional add-on clauses to fund further $100.6 million over approximately the next nine years.


(c) Investments in Affiliates


          The Company owns a minority interest in certain closed-end funds, certain limited partnerships and similar investment vehicles, including funds managed by those companies. The Company has commitments, which include potential additional add-on clauses, to invest a further $34.6 million over approximately the next five years.


(d) Properties


          The Company rents space for certain of its offices under leases that expire up to 2031. Total rent expense under operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $32.9 million, $31.8 million and $34.4 million, respectively. Future minimum rental commitments under existing operating leases are expected to be as follows:


 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,
(U.S. dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

2012

 

$

34,867

 

2013

 

 

32,012

 

2014

 

 

24,865

 

2015

 

 

17,409

 

2016

 

 

16,004

 

2017-2031

 

 

55,779

 

 

 



 

Total minimum future rentals

 

$

180,936

 

 

 



 


          During 2003, the Company entered into a purchase, sale and leaseback transaction to acquire new office space in London. The Company has recognized a capital lease asset of $100.7 million and $107.4 million, and deferred a gain of $30.6 million and $32.6 million related to this lease at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The gain is being amortized to income in line with the amortization of the asset. The future minimum lease payments in the aggregate are expected to be $224.6 million and annually for the next five years are as follows:


 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,
(U.S. dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

2012

 

$

11,169

 

2013

 

 

11,448

 

2014

 

 

11,734

 

2015

 

 

12,028

 

2016

 

 

12,328

 

2017-2028

 

 

165,937

 

 

 



 

Total future minimum lease payments

 

$

224,644

 

 

 



 


(e) Tax Matters


          The Company is an Irish corporation and, except as described below, neither it nor its non-U.S. subsidiaries have paid U.S. corporate income taxes (other than withholding taxes on dividend income) on the basis that they are not engaged in a trade or business or otherwise subject to taxation in the U.S. However, because definitive identification of activities which constitute being engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. is not provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, regulations or court decisions, there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will not contend that the Company or its non-U.S. subsidiaries are engaged in a trade or business or otherwise subject to taxation in the U.S. If the Company or its non-U.S. subsidiaries were considered to be engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. (and, if the Company or such subsidiaries were to qualify for the benefits under the income tax treaty between the U.S. and Bermuda and other countries in which the Company operates, such businesses were attributable to a “permanent establishment” in the U.S.), the Company or such subsidiaries could be subject to U.S. tax at regular tax rates on its taxable income that is effectively connected with its U.S. trade or business plus an additional 30% “branch profits” tax on such income remaining after the regular tax, in which case there could be a significant adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.


(f) Letters of Credit


          At December 31, 2011 and 2010, $1.9 billion and $2.4 billion of letters of credit were outstanding, of which 93.8% and 21.1%, respectively, were collateralized by the Company’s investment portfolios, primarily supporting U.S. non-admitted business and the Company’s Lloyd’s syndicates’ capital requirements.


(g) Claims and Other Litigation


          The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to litigation and arbitration in the normal course of its business. These lawsuits and arbitrations principally involve claims on policies of insurance and contracts of reinsurance and are typical for the Company and for the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry in general. Such legal proceedings are considered in connection with the Company’s loss and loss expense reserves. Reserves in varying amounts may or may not be established in respect of particular claims proceedings based on many factors, including the legal merits thereof. In addition to litigation relating to insurance and reinsurance claims, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to lawsuits and regulatory actions in the normal course of business that do not arise from or directly relate to claims on insurance or reinsurance policies. This category of business litigation typically involves, among other things, allegations of underwriting errors or misconduct, employment claims, regulatory activity, shareholder disputes or disputes arising from business ventures. The status of these legal actions is actively monitored by management.


          Legal actions are subject to inherent uncertainties, and future events could change management’s assessment of the probability or estimated amount of potential losses from pending or threatened legal actions. Based on available information, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of pending or threatened legal actions, both individually and in the aggregate, will not result in losses having a material effect on the Company’s financial position or liquidity at December 31, 2011.


          If management believes that, based on available information, it is at least reasonably possible that a material loss (or additional material loss in excess of any accrual) will be incurred in connection with any legal actions or claims, the Company discloses an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, either individually or in the aggregate, as appropriate, if such an estimate can be made, or discloses that an estimate cannot be made. Based on the Company’s assessment as at December 31, 2011, no such disclosures are considered necessary.


(h) Financial and Other Guarantee Exposures


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial and Other Guarantee Exposures Summary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,
(U.S. dollars in thousands except number of contracts and term to maturity)

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 


 


 

Number of financial guarantee contracts at January 1

 

 

37

 

 

41

 

Number of financial guarantee contracts matured, prepaid or commuted during the year

 

 

(33

)

 

(4

)

 

 



 



 

Number of financial guarantee contracts at December 31

 

 

4

 

 

37

 

 

 



 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Principal outstanding

 

$

115,464

 

$

198,696

 

Interest outstanding

 

 

 

 

6,119

 

 

 



 



 

Aggregate outstanding exposure

 

$

115,464

 

$

204,814

 

 

 



 



 

Total gross claim liability recorded

 

$

1,399

 

$

23,470

 

Total unearned premiums and fees recorded

 

$

425

 

$

571

 

Weighted average contractual term to maturity

 

 

26.7 years

 

 

13.2 years

 


          Financial Guarantee Exposures


          As part of the Company’s legacy financial guarantee business, during January 2011, the Company commuted 32 of the 37 financial guarantee transactions that were outstanding at December 31, 2010, including three non-performing transactions. This commutation eliminated $41.9 million of notional financial guarantee exposure (including principal and interest) for a payment of $22.1 million. The $22.1 million was included in the gross claim liability at December 31, 2010. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2011, one guarantee was terminated upon prepayment of the underlying notes.


          The Company’s outstanding financial guarantee contracts at December 31, 2011 provide credit support for a variety of collateral types with the exposures comprised of (i) $108.3 million notional financial guarantee on three notes backed by zero coupon bonds and bank perpetual securities, including some issued by European financials; and (ii) $7.2 million notional financial guarantee relating to future scheduled repayments on a government-subsidized housing project. At December 31, 2011, there were no reported events of default on these obligations.


          During 2010, in addition to the exposures discussed above, the Company also provided credit support for $386.5 million of notional financial guarantee exposure (including principal and interest) on a Chilean toll road structure. This was eliminated on August 5, 2010, when the issuer decided to prepay the debt. In addition, $47.5 million notional financial guarantee that was outstanding on a collateralized fund obligation was eliminated when the fund was wound-up in an orderly manner.


          Surveillance procedures to track and monitor credit deteriorations in the insured financial obligations are performed by the primary obligors for each transaction on the Company’s behalf. Information regarding the performance status and updated exposure values is provided to the Company on a quarterly basis and evaluated by management in recording claims reserves.


          Other Guarantee Exposures


          On June 28, 2010, the Company’s subsidiary, XLIB, completed a commutation, termination and release agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with European Investment Bank (“EIB”) which fully extinguished and terminated all of the guarantees issued to EIB by XLI in connection with financial guaranty policies between certain subsidiaries of Syncora Holdings and EIB. These guarantees were provided for the benefit of EIB relating to project finance transactions comprised of transportation, school and hospital projects with an average rating of BBB, written between 2001 and 2006 with anticipated maturities ranging between 2027 and 2038. The guarantees had been accounted for under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) section 460-10, Guarantees (previously FIN 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.”)


          Under the Termination Agreement, XLIB paid $38 million to EIB, and all of XLIB’s exposures under the EIB guarantees, with aggregate par outstanding of approximately $900 million, were eliminated. In addition, a further $0.5 million was paid to EIB for expenses in relation to the termination. Pursuant to the obligations of Syncora Holdings and its affiliates (collectively “Syncora”) under the Master Agreement, Syncora paid XLIB $15.0 million. The net cost of this transaction is reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income as “Loss on Termination of Guarantee.”