Corvel Corporation


Delaware		33-0282651

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)


2010 Main Street, Suite 600
Irvine, CA		92614

(Address of principal executive office)		(zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including code:		(949) 851-1473

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value, as of September 30, 2003 was 10,583,191.


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets — March 31, 2003 (audited) and September 30, 2003 (unaudited)	Page 3
	Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) — Three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2003	Page 4
	Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) — Six months ended September 30, 2002 and 2003	Page 5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) — Six months ended September 30, 2002 and 2003	Page 6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — September 30, 2003	Page 7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		Page 12
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		Page 21
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		Page 21
PART II.OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		Page 22
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds		Page 22
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities		Page 22
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		Page 22
Item 5. Other Information		Page 22
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		Page 22
Signatures		Page 23
Exhibit Index

As of March 31, 2003 and September 30, 2003


		March 31, 2003			Sept. 30, 2003

		(audited)			(unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	5,913,000		$	6,361,000
Accounts receivable, net			45,394,000			43,241,000
Prepaid taxes and expenses			1,815,000			1,967,000
Deferred income taxes			5,029,000			5,029,000

	Total current assets		58,151,000			56,598,000

Property and Equipment, Net			25,848,000			27,690,000
Other Assets			9,326,000			13,568,000

TOTAL ASSETS		$	93,325,000		$	97,856,000

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable		$	6,880,000		$	8,870,000
Accrued liabilities			13,758,000			11,631,000

	Total current liabilities		20,638,000			20,501,000

Deferred income taxes			5,467,000			5,467,000
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock			2,000			2,000
Paid-in-capital			47,465,000			50,713,000
Treasury Stock, (5,231,307 shares at March 31, 2003 and 5,442,877 shares at September 30, 2003)			(84,127,000	)		(91,522,000	)
Retained earnings			103,880,000			112,695,000

	Total stockholders’ equity		67,220,000			71,888,000

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	93,325,000		$	97,856,000


	Three months ended September 30,
		2002		2003

REVENUES		$	69,353,000	$	76,978,000
Cost of Revenues			56,021,000		63,548,000

Gross profit			13,332,000		13,430,000
General and administrative expenses			6,734,000		6,239,000

Income before income taxes			6,598,000		7,191,000
Income tax provision			2,507,000		2,733,000

NET INCOME		$	4,091,000	$	4,458,000
Net income per common and common equivalent share
Basic		$	.38	$	.42

Diluted		$	.37	$	.41

Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
Basic			10,750,000		10,593,000
Diluted			11,056,000		10,877,000


	Six months ended September 30,

	2002		2003

REVENUES	$	135,654,000	$	152,890,000
Cost of Revenues		110,012,000		125,852,000

Gross profit		25,642,000		27,038,000
General and administrative expenses		12,545,000		12,819,000

Income before income taxes		13,097,000		14,219,000
Income tax provision		4,977,000		5,404,000

NET INCOME	$	8,120,000	$	8,815,000

Net income per common and common equivalent share
Basic	$	.75	$	.83

Diluted	$	.73	$	.81

Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
Basic		10,789,000		10,609,000
Diluted		11,124,000		10,886,000


	Six months ended September 30,

	2002			2003

Cash flows from Operating Activities
NET INCOME	$	8,120,000		$	8,815,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation		6,170,000			4,274,000
Tax benefits from stock options exercised		150,000			450,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		(5,558,000	)		2,594,000
Prepaid taxes and expenses		(193,000	)		(78,000	)
Accounts payable		(1,178,000	)		1,730,000
Accrued liabilities		1,325,000			(2,403,000	)
Other assets		1,013,000			(476,000	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		9,849,000			14,906,000

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Investment in acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(2,977,000	)		(4,103,000	)
Additions to property and equipment		(7,719,000	)		(5,758,000	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(10,696,000	)		(9,861,000	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Purchase of treasury stock		(7,627,000	)		(7,395,000	)
Exercise of common stock options		1,421,000			2,798,000

Net cash used in financing activities		(6,206,000	)		(4,597,000	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents:		(7,053,000	)		448,000
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning		12,601,000			5,913,000

Cash and cash equivalents at end	$	5,548,000		$	6,361,000

The unaudited financial statements herein have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared under the presumption that users of the interim financial information have either read or have access to the audited financial statements for the latest fiscal year ended March 31, 2003. Accordingly, footnote disclosures which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the March 31, 2003 audited financial statements have been omitted from these interim financial statements.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended September 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended March 31, 2003 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company’s Board of Directors approved the commencement of a share repurchase program in the fall of 1996. In August 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 1,000,000 share expansion to its existing stock repurchase plan, increasing the total number of shares approved for repurchase to 6,100,000 shares from 5,100,000 shares. Since the commencement of the share repurchase program, the Company has spent $92 million to repurchase 5,442,877 shares of its common stock, equal to 33% of the outstanding common stock. The average price of these repurchases is $16.82 per share. During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, the Company repurchased 119,781 shares for $4,383,000. These purchases have been funded primarily from the net earnings of the Company and along with the proceeds from the exercise of common stock options and the employee stock purchase plan and related income tax benefits from the exercise of these options. CorVel has 10,583,191 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2003.

In May 2002, the Company acquired AnciCare, PPO, Inc., a Florida-based national provider of diagnostic imaging services. The Company paid approximately $3.4 million ($2.9 million during fiscal 2003 and $475,000 during fiscal 2004) and recorded approximately $3.3 million for goodwill. If the results of the AnciCare operations attain certain revenue during each of the three years after the date of acquisition, the Company will pay an additional amount for the purchase, which is expected to be funded from future earnings generated by the acquisition. Any additional amounts paid will increase the goodwill related to the acquisition.

The following table summarizes the recorded value of the AnciCare assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:

During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, the Company expanded its existing office automation service line with the acquisition of Scan One, a provider of scanning, optical character recognition and document management services. The Company expects that this acquisition will provide the opportunity to sell scanning and document management, the services of Scan One, through a number of the Company’s larger offices. These services are synergistic with the Company’s medical bill review processing. This acquisition was completed at the end of the June quarter and had a negligible impact on the Company’s revenues and net income for the three and six months ended September 30, 2003.

The following unaudited pro forma summary presents information as if the aforementioned acquisitions had been completed as of April 1, 2002, the beginning of fiscal 2003. The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred nor is it necessarily indicative of future results of operations of the combined companies.

CORVEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2003 (Unaudited)

Weighted average basic shares decreased from 10,750,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 to 10,593,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. Weighted average diluted shares decreased from 11,056,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 to 10,877,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. Weighted average basic shares decreased from 10,789,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2002 to 10,609,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2003. Weighted average diluted shares decreased from 11,124,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2002 to 10,886,000 for the six months ended September 30, 2003. The net decrease in each of these weighted share calculations are due to the repurchase of common shares as noted above offset by an increase in shares due to the exercise of stock options by the Company’s employees in both the Company’s employees stock option plan and employee stock purchase plan. The difference between the weighted average basic shares and the weighted average diluted shares is due to the impact of outstanding options for the Company’s common stock.

Earnings per common and common equivalent shares were computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during the quarter. The calculations of the basic and diluted weighted shares for the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2003, are as follows:


Diluted Earnings Per Share:	Three months ended September 30,

	2002		2003

Weighted average common shares outstanding		10,750,000		10,593,000
Net effect of dilutive common stock options		306,000		284,000

Total common and common equivalent shares		11,056,000		10,877,000

Net Income	$	4,091,000	$	4,458,000

Earnings per share	$	.37	$	.41

CORVEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2003 (Unaudited)


Diluted Earnings Per Share:	Six months ended September 30,

	2002		2003

Weighted average common shares outstanding		10,789,000		10,609,000
Net effect of dilutive common stock options		335,000		277,000

Total common and common equivalent shares		11,124,000		10,886,000

Net Income	$	8,120,000	$	8,815,000

Earnings per share	$	.73	$	.81

The Company has various stock-based employee compensation plans that are described more fully in Note E to the Consolidated Financial Statements (in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K). The Company accounts for these plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is included in net income as all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

CORVEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2003 (Unaudited)

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to all outstanding and unvested awards in each six month period ended September 30:


	2002		2003

Net income	$	8,120,000	$	8,815,000
Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of taxes		440,000		484,000

Pro forma net income	$	7,680,000	$	8,331,000

Earnings per share — basic
As reported	$	0.75	$	0.83
Pro forma	$	0.71	$	0.79
Earnings per share — diluted
As reported	$	0.73	$	0.81
Pro forma	$	0.69	$	0.77

During fiscal 1997, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the adoption of a Shareholder Rights Plan. The Rights Plan, which is similar to rights plans adopted by numerous other public companies, provides for a dividend distribution to CorVel stockholders of one preferred stock purchase “Right” for each outstanding share of CorVel’s common stock. The Rights are designed to assure that all stockholders receive fair and equal treatment in the event of any proposed takeover of the company and to encourage a potential acquirer to negotiate with the Board of Directors prior to attempting a takeover.

In April 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to its existing stockholder rights agreement (the “Rights Agreement”) to: 1) extend the expiration date of the rights to February 10, 2012, 2) increase the initial exercise price of each right from $42 ($125 before adjusting for the two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend in May 1999 and the three-for-two stock split in the form of a 50% stock dividend in August 2001) to $118 and 3) enable Fidelity Management & Research Company and its affiliates to purchase up to 18% of the shares of common stock of the Company without triggering the stockholder rights. The limitations under the Rights Agreement remain in effect for all other stockholders of the Company. The Rights will not be exercisable until the occurrence of certain takeover-related events. The issuance of the Rights has no dilutive effect on the Company’s earnings per share.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This report may include certain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including (without limitation) statements with respect to anticipated future operating and financial performance, growth and acquisition opportunities and other similar forecasts and statements of expectation. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “could” and “should” and variations of these words and similar expressions, are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements made by the Company and its management are based on estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions of management at the time of such statements and are not guarantees of future performance. The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information or otherwise.

Actual future performance, outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking made by the Company and its management as a result of a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Representative examples of these factors include (without limitation) general industry and economic conditions; interest rate trends; cost of capital and capital requirements; competition from other managed care companies; customer contract cancellations; the ability to expand certain areas of the Company’s business; shifts in customer demands; changes in operating expenses, including employee wages, benefits and medical inflation; governmental and public policy changes and the continued availability of financing in the amounts and on the terms necessary to support the Company’s future business.

The Section entitled “Risk Factors” set forth in this report discusses some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The following table contains certain financial data as a percentage of revenues:

During the six months ended September 30, 2003, the Company expanded its existing office automation service line with the acquisition of Scan One, a provider of scanning, optical character recognition and document management services. The Company expects that this acquisition will provide the opportunity to sell scanning and document management, the services of Scan One, through a number of the Company’s larger offices. These services are synergistic with the Company’s medical bill review processing. This acquisition was completed at the end of the June 2003 quarter and had a negligible impact on the Company’s revenues and net income for the three and six months ended September 30, 2003.

Revenues increased 11.0% from $69.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, to $77.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $7.6 million.

This increase in revenues was primarily due to a 16.6% increase in provider program revenues from $37.9 million to $44.2 million, an increase of $6.3 million. Provider program revenues include bill review, PPO revenue, and revenue from CorCare Select products, primarily independent medical examinations, MRI and other diagnostic services. Most of the increase in provider program revenues is due to the Company’s introduction of its CorcareRX program and an increase in revenue from the Company’s MedCheck Select business. During the quarter ended September 2003, the Company’s results included a full quarter of revenue from the aforementioned acquisition of Scan One at the end of the quarter ended June 30, 2003, whereas the quarter ended September 2002 did not include any revenues from Scan One.

The Company’s patient management revenues increased 4.2% from $31.5 million to $32.8 million, an increase of $1.3 million. The increase in patient management revenues is primarily attributable to a nominal increase in referrals along with a price increase during the past year.

Revenues increased 12.7% from $135.7 million for the six months ended September 30, 2002, to $152.9 million for the six months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $17.2 million.

This increase in revenues was primarily due to a 19.3% increase in provider program revenues from $72.5 million to $86.5 million, an increase of $14.0 million. Approximately half of the increase in provider program revenues is due to the Company’s introduction of its CorcareRX program. A significant portion of the remainder of the growth is due to growth in the Company’s MedCheck Select service, an increase in revenues from providing independent medical examination services and revenues from the aforementioned acquisition in the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

The Company’s patient management revenues increased 5.1% from $63.2 million to $66.4 million, an increase of $3.2 million. The increase in patient management revenues is primarily attributable to a nominal increase in referrals along with a price increase during the past year.

The Company’s total revenue increased 1.2%, or less than $1 million, from $73.1 million in the quarter ending December 31, 2002 to $74.0 million in the quarter ending March 31, 2003. Revenues increased 2.6%, or less than $2 million, from the quarter ended March 31, 2003 to $75.9 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2003. Revenues increased 1.4%, or approximately $1 million, from the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to $77.0 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2003. Excluding the aforementioned acquisition of Scan One, the sequential percentage increase in revenues for the September quarter would have been 0.3%. The sequential percentage increases in revenue of 1.2%, 2.6%, and 1.4% in the past three quarters, respectively, are less than the Company has historically experienced and is due partially to a lack of growth in the number of employees in the national labor market along with a decrease in the growth rate in workers compensation claims filed by injured workers and a competitive pricing environment.

The Company’s cost of revenue consists primarily of salaries for primarily case managers, medical bill analysts, branch managers, administrative support, PPO developers, systems support staff and account executives. Other costs included in the cost of revenues are: salary related taxes and benefits, rent, telephone, and costs related to Company’s field computer systems, including depreciation.

Cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2003 increased to 80.8% from 82.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The increase in the cost of sales percentage and corresponding decrease in the gross profit margin from the second quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2004 is primarily attributable to a greater increase in the Company’s Corcare Select revenues primarily, independent medical examination, CorcareRX, and MRI services compared to the growth rate in its bill review, PPO revenues and case management services. The Company’s gross profit margin in CorcareRX services, independent medical examination revenue, and MRI services are generally lower than the margins in bill review, PPO revenues and case management services.

Cost of revenues for the six months ended September 30, 2003 increased to 82.3% from 81.1% for the six months ended September 30, 2002. The increase in the cost of sales percentage and corresponding decrease in the gross profit margin from the six months ended September 30, 2002 to the six months ended September 30, 2003 is primarily attributable to the same reasons for the increase in the cost of revenues percentage and corresponding decrease in the gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2003.

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased from 9.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2002, to 8.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2003. This decrease was primarily due to a write off of $1.5 million of software in the quarter ended September 30, 2002 which increased the general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue to a higher than normal percentage. General and administrative expenses were $6.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $6.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003.

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased from 9.2% for the six months ended September 30, 2002, to 8.4% for the six months ended September 30, 2003. This decrease was primarily due to a write off of $1.5 million of software in the quarter ended September 30, 2002 which increased the general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue to a higher than normal percentage. General and administrative expenses were $12.5 million for the six months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $12.8 million for the six months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in actual general and administrative costs in the six months ended September 30, 2003 is due primarily to an increase in costs in the systems departments.

The Company’s income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2003 was $2.5 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The Company’s income tax expense for the six months ended September 30, 2002 and 2003 was $5.0 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The increases in the income tax expenses for the three and six month periods ended September 30, 2003 compared to the same periods for the prior year is due to an increase in profitability. The effective income tax rate for each period presented is 38%. This rate differed from the statutory federal tax rate of 35.0% primarily due to state income taxes and certain non-deductible expenses.

The Company has funded its operations and capital expenditures primarily with cash flows from operations. During the six months ended September 30, 2003, net working capital decreased by $1.4 million, from $37.5 million at March 31, 2003 to $36.1 million at September 30, 2003. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable, although revenues increased from the prior year. The increase in cash flow from operations allowed the Company to continue to repurchase its common stock and acquire Scan One in an all cash transaction. Cash increased from $5.9 million at March 31, 2003 to $6.4 million at September 30, 2003.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, the Company repurchased 119,781 shares of its common stock for $4.4 million. Since the repurchase program was enacted in the fall of 1996, the Company has repurchased 5.4 million shares for $92 million for an average purchase price of $16.82. These repurchases were made with cash generated by the operations of the Company. The Company has historically required substantial capital to fund the growth of its operations, particularly working capital to fund the growth in accounts receivable and invest in the expansion of its strategic systems and applications.

In April 2003, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a financial institution to provide borrowing capacity of up to $5 million. This agreement expires in September 2004. Borrowings under this agreement bear interest at either a fluctuating LIBOR-based rate plus 1.25% or at the financial institution’s prime lending rate, subject to the option of the Company. There were no borrowings under the line at September 30, 2003.

The Company currently believes that the cash balance at September 30, 2003, the expected cash flow generated from operations, the expected cash flow from the exercise of stock options and the Company’s borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund the Company’s working capital needs for at least the next twelve months.

Cash flow from operating activities increased from $9.8 million during the six months ended September 30, 2002 to $14.9 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2003 primarily due to the increase in earnings from $8.1 million to $8.8 million in the respective quarters and a decrease in the number of days sales outstanding (DSO) in accounts receivable from 54 days at March 31, 2003 to 51 days at September 30, 2003. Additionally, the DSO increased from March 31, 2002 to September 30, 2002 which created a use of cash compared to a decrease in DSO from March 31, 2003 to September 30, 2003 which created a source of cash during the quarter.

Cash flow used in investing activities decreased from $10.7 million in the six months ended September 30, 2003 to $9.9 million in the six months ended September 30, 2003 primarily due to the decrease in the amount of capital expenditures from $7.7 million for the six months ended September 30, 2002 to $5.8 million for the six months ended September 30, 2003, partially offset by an increase in the investments in acquisitions.

Cash flow used in investing activities decreased from $6.2 million in the six months ended September 30, 2002 to $4.6 million in the six months ended September 30, 2003 primarily due to an increase in the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options from the Employee Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that require application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.

The following is not intended to be a comprehensive list of our accounting policies. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting an available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

We have identified the following accounting policies as critical to us: 1) revenue recognition, 2) allowance for uncollectible accounts, 3) valuation of long-lived assets, 4) accrual for self-insured costs, and 5) accounting for income taxes.

Revenue recognition: The Company’s revenues are recognized primarily as services are rendered based on time and expenses incurred. A certain portion of the Company’s revenues are derived from fee schedule auditing which is based on the number of provider charges audited and, to a lesser extent, on a percentage of savings achieved for the Company’s clients.

Allowance for uncollectible accounts: The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the customers’ current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes-off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Valuation of long-lived assets — We assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles, property, plant and equipment, goodwill and investments whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

Impairments are recognized when we determine that the carrying value of intangibles, long-lived assets and related goodwill may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment. We generally measure any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. A loss in the value of an investment will be recognized in income in the period it is determined that the decline in value is other than temporary.

Accrual for self-insurance costs – The Company self-insures for the group medical costs and workers’ compensation costs of its employees. The Company purchases stop loss insurance for large claims. Management believes that the self-insurance reserves are appropriate; however, actual claims costs may differ from the original estimates requiring adjustments to the reserves.

Accounting for income taxes — As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our actual current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. If the Company was to establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, the Company must include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of income. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and our deferred tax assets and liabilities.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The Company expects to continue to account for stock options under APB No. 25. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements. Certain of the disclosure modifications are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and are included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Certain statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as well as the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2003, such as statements concerning the development of new services, possible legislative changes, and other statements contained herein regarding matters that are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended). Because such statements involve risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Past financial performance is not necessarily a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical performance to anticipate results or future period trends. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, those discussed below. In addition, reference is made to the Company’s most recent annual report for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.

Many states, including a number of those in which the Company transacts business, have licensing and other regulatory requirements applicable to the Company’s business. Approximately half of the states have enacted laws that require licensing of businesses, which provide medical review services. Some of these laws apply to medical review of care covered by workers’ compensation. These laws typically establish minimum standards for qualifications of personnel, confidentiality, internal quality control, and dispute resolution procedures. These regulatory programs may result in increased costs of operation for the Company, which may have an adverse impact upon the Company’s ability to compete with other available alternatives for health care cost control. In addition, new laws regulating the operation of managed care provider networks have been adopted by a number of states. These laws may apply to managed care provider networks having contracts with the Company or to provider networks which the Company may organize. To the extent the Company is governed by these regulations, it may be subject to additional licensing requirements, financial oversight and procedural standards for beneficiaries and providers.

Regulation in the health care and workers’ compensation fields is constantly evolving. The Company is unable to predict what additional government regulations, if any, affecting its business may be promulgated in the future. The Company’s business may be adversely affected by failure to comply with existing laws and regulations, failure to obtain necessary licenses and government approvals or failure to adapt to new or modified regulatory requirements. Proposals for health care legislative reforms are regularly considered at the federal and state levels. To the extent that such proposals affect workers’ compensation, such proposals may adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations. In addition, changes in workers’ compensation laws or regulations may impact demand for the Company’s services, require the Company to develop new or modified services to meet the demands of the marketplace or modify the fees that the Company may charge for its services. One of the proposals which has been considered is 24-hour health coverage, in which the coverage of traditional employer-sponsored health plans is combined with workers’ compensation coverage to provide a single insurance plan for work-related and non-work-related health problems. Incorporating workers’ compensation coverage into conventional health plans may adversely affect the market for the Company’s services.

The Company, through its utilization management services, makes recommendations concerning the appropriateness of providers’ medical treatment plans of patients throughout the country, and it could share in potential liabilities for adverse medical consequences. The Company does not grant or deny claims for payment of benefits and the Company does not believe that it engages in the practice of medicine or the delivery of medical services. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will not be subject to claims or litigation related to the grant or denial of claims for payment of benefits or allegations that the Company engages in the practice of medicine or the delivery of medical services. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be subject to other litigation that may adversely affect the Company’s business or results of operations. The Company maintains professional liability insurance and such other coverages as the Company believes are reasonable in light of the Company’s experience to date. There can be no assurance, however, that such insurance will be sufficient or available in the future at reasonable cost to protect the Company from liability which might adversely affect the Company’s business or results of operations.

The Company faces competition from large insurers, health maintenance organizations (“HMOs”), preferred provider organizations (“PPOs”), third party administrators and other managed health care companies. The Company believes that, as managed care techniques continue to gain acceptance in the workers’ compensation marketplace, CorVel’s competitors will increasingly consist of nationally focused workers’ compensation managed care service companies, insurance companies, HMOs and other significant providers of managed care products. Legislative reforms in some states permit employers to designate health plans such as HMOs and PPOs to cover workers’ compensation claimants. Because many health plans have the ability to manage medical costs for workers’ compensation claimants, such legislation may intensify competition in the market served by the Company. Many of the Company’s current and potential competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial and marketing resources than those of the Company, and there can be no assurance that the Company will continue to maintain its existing performance or be successful with any new products or in any new geographical markets it may enter.

Legislative reforms in some states permit employers to designate health plans such as HMOs and PPOs to cover workers’ compensation claimants. Because many health plans have the capacity to manage health care for workers’ compensation claimants, such legislation may intensify competition in the market served by the Company. Within the past few years, several states have experienced decreases in the number of workers’ compensation claims and the average cost per claim which have been reflected in workers’ compensation insurance premium rate reductions in those states. The Company believes that declines in workers’ compensation costs in these states are due principally to intensified efforts by payors to manage and control claim costs, to improved risk management by employers and to legislative reforms. If declines in workers’ compensation costs occur in many states and persist over the long-term, they may have an adverse impact on the Company’s business and results of operations.

The Company is dependent to a substantial extent upon the continuing efforts and abilities of certain key management personnel. In addition, the Company faces competition for experienced employees with professional expertise in the workers’ compensation managed care area. The loss of, or the inability to attract, qualified employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

The Company’s strategy is to continue its internal growth and, as strategic opportunities arise in the workers’ compensation managed care industry, to consider acquisitions of, or relationships with, other companies in related lines of business. As a result, the Company is subject to certain growth-related risks, including the risk that it will be unable to retain personnel or acquire other resources necessary to service such growth adequately. Expenses arising from the Company’s efforts to increase its market penetration may have a negative impact on operating results. In addition, there can be no assurance that any suitable opportunities for strategic acquisitions or relationships will arise or, if they do arise, that the transactions contemplated thereby could be completed. If such a transaction does occur, there can no assurance that the Company will be able to integrate effectively any acquired business into the Company. In addition, any such transaction would be subject to various risks associated with the acquisition of businesses, including the financial impact of expenses associated with the integration of businesses.

There can be no assurance that any future acquisition or other strategic relationship will not have an adverse impact on the Company’s business or results of operations. If suitable opportunities arise, the Company anticipates that it would finance such transactions, as well as its internal growth, through working capital or, in certain instances, through debt or equity financing. There can be no assurance, however, that such debt or equity financing would be available to the Company on acceptable terms when, and if, suitable strategic opportunities arise.

The Company expects that a considerable amount of its future growth will depend on its ability to process and manage claims data more efficiently and to provide more meaningful healthcare information to customers and payors of healthcare. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to develop, license or otherwise acquire software to address these market demands as well or as timely as its competitors.

The market price of the Company’s Common Stock may be highly volatile. Factors such as variations in the Company’s revenues, earnings and cash flow, general market trends in the workers’ compensation managed care market, and announcements of innovations by the Company or its competitors could cause the market price of the Common Stock to fluctuate substantially. Specifically, the quarter to quarter percentage growth in operating results for the Company’s most recently completed fiscal years was lower than the growth rates historically experienced by the Company. The Company’s slower growth rate in those quarters was partially attributable to a reduction in the growth rate of health care expenditures nationally, contributing to a reduction in the growth of claims processed by the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company’s growth rate in the future, if any, will be at or near historical levels.

CorVel’s management, with the participation of CorVel’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of CorVel’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, CorVel’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, CorVel’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to the material information relating to CorVel (or its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the reports CorVel files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

During the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report, there has been no change in CorVel’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, CorVel’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Company is involved in litigation arising in the normal course of business. The Company believes that resolution of these matters will not result in any payment that, in the aggregate, would be material to the financial position or financial operations of the Company.

Item 4 — Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - At the Company’s regularly scheduled annual meeting, held on August 7, 2003, the shareholders approved the elections of V. Gordon Clemons, Steven J. Hamerslag, Alan R. Hoops, R. Judd Jessup, and Jeffery J. Michael to the Company’s Board of Directors to serve one year terms, with 7,996,383 shares, 8,990,625 shares, 8,990,525 shares, 8,990,625 shares, and 8,970,250 shares, respectively.

3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002.

3.2 Bylaws of the Company. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 Registration No. 33-40629.

31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

On July 23, 2003, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K to furnish disclosure under Item 9 of the report (intended to be furnished under Item 12) regarding the Company’s press release announcing the Company’s unaudited financial results for the quarter ending June 30, 2003.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002.

3.2		Bylaws of the Company. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 Registration No. 33-40629.

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


	CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
	CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED
	CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED
	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — UNAUDITED
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk -
	Item 4 – Controls and Procedures –
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1 – Legal Proceedings –
	Item 2 — Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds —
	Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities —
	Item 4 — Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders -
	Item 5 — Other Information —
	Item 6 — Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K –
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2


Accounts receivable, net	$	3,039,000
Property and equipment, net		297,000
Prepaid expenses		93,000
Goodwill		3,302,000

Subtotal		6,731,000

Less: Accounts payable and other current liabilities		3,243,000

Net Assets	$	3,488,000


	6 months ended		6 months ended
	Sept. 30, 2002		Sept. 30, 2003

Pro forma revenue	$	139,105,000	$	153,627,000
Pro forma net income	$	8,145,000	$	8,815,000


		CORVEL CORPORATION

		By: V. Gordon Clemons
		V. Gordon Clemons, Chairman of the Board,
		Chief Executive Officer, and President

		By: Richard J. Schweppe
		Richard J. Schweppe,
		Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2003

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents


x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Basic Earnings Per Share:	Three months ended September 30,

	2002		2003

Weighted average common shares outstanding		10,750,000		10,593,000

Net Income	$	4,091,000	$	4,458,000

Earnings per share	$	.38	$	.42


Three months ended Sept. 30:	2002			2003

Revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of services		80.8			82.6

Gross profit		19.2			17.4

General and administrative		9.7			8.1

Income from operations		9.5			9.3

Income tax provision		3.6			3.5

Net Income		5.9	%		5.8	%


Six months ended September 30:	2002			2003

Revenues		100.0%			100.0	%
Cost of services		81.1			82.3

Gross profit		18.9			17.7

General and administrative		9.2			8.4

Income from operations		9.7			9.3

Income tax provision		3.7			3.5

Net Income		6.0	%		5.8	%