COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

The Company leases its retail stores and certain equipment under operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through January 2025. Many of its retail store leases require the Company to pay CAM charges, insurance, property taxes and percentage rent ranging from 2% to 20% when sales volumes exceed certain minimum sales levels. The initial terms of such leases are typically 8 to 10 years, many of which contain renewal options exercisable at the Company’s discretion. Most leases also contain rent escalation clauses that come into effect at various times throughout the lease term. Rent expense is recorded under the straight-line method over the life of the lease. Other rent escalation clauses can take effect based on changes in primary mall tenants throughout the term of a given lease. Many leases also contain cancellation or kick-out clauses in the Company’s favor that relieve the Company of any future obligation under a lease if specified criteria are met. These cancellation provisions typically apply if annual store sales levels do not exceed certain amounts or mall occupancy targets are not achieved within the first 36 months of the lease. Generally, the Company is not required to make payments to landlords in order to exercise its cancellation rights under these provisions. The Wells Credit Facility and Term Loan do not preclude the transfer or disposal of assets related to the stores the Company is projecting to close by the end of fiscal 2014. None of the Company’s retail store leases contain purchase options.

As of February 1, 2014, minimum future rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows (in thousands):



Fiscal year ending:
January 31, 2015	$	78,251
January 30, 2016	66,092
January 28, 2017	52,050
February 3, 2018	44,864
February 2, 2019	36,163
Thereafter	58,752
Total future operating lease commitments	$	336,172

The table above does not include CAM charges, which are also a required contractual obligation under many of the Company’s store operating leases. In many of the Company’s leases, CAM charges are not fixed and can fluctuate significantly from year to year for any particular store. Store rents, including CAM, were approximately $134 million, $130 million and $131 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Of these amounts, $5 million in 2013, $7 million in 2012, and $4 million in 2011, were paid as percentage rent based on sales volume. The Company expects total CAM charges to continue to increase from year to year or as long-term leases come up for renewal at current market rates in excess of original lease terms.

Litigation

Charles Pfeiffer, individually and on behalf of other aggrieved employees vs. Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and Pacific Sunwear Stores Corp., Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, Case No. 1100527. On January 13, 2011, the plaintiff in this matter filed a lawsuit against the Company under California’s private attorney general act alleging violations of California’s wage and hour, overtime, meal break and rest break rules and regulations, among other things. The complaint seeks an unspecified amount of damages and penalties. The Company has filed an answer denying all allegations regarding the plaintiff’s claims and asserting various defenses. The Company is currently in the discovery phase of this case. As the ultimate outcome of this matter is uncertain, no amounts have been accrued by the Company as of the date of this report. Depending on the actual outcome of this case, provisions could be recorded in the future which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.

Tamara Beeney, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated vs. Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and Pacific Sunwear Stores Corporation, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2011-00459346-CU-OE-CXC. On March 18, 2011, the plaintiff in this matter filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company alleging violations of California’s wage and hour, overtime, meal break and rest break rules and regulations, among other things. The complaint seeks class certification, the appointment of the plaintiff as class representative, and an unspecified amount of damages and penalties. The Company has filed an answer denying all allegations regarding the plaintiff’s claims and asserting various defenses. On February 21, 2014, the plaintiff filed her motion to certify a class with respect to several claims. The Company’s opposition to such motion must be filed on or before June 16, 2014. A hearing on the plaintiff’s motion will be held on August 13, 2014. As the ultimate outcome of this matter is uncertain, no amounts have been accrued by the Company as of the date of this report. Depending on the actual outcome of this case, provisions could be recorded in the future which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.

The Company is also involved from time to time in other litigation incidental to its business. The Company currently cannot assess whether the outcome of current litigation will likely have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition and, from time to time, the Company may make provisions for probable litigation losses. Depending on the actual outcome of pending litigation, charges in excess of any provisions could be recorded in the future, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results.

Indemnities, Commitments and Guarantees

During the normal course of business, the Company agreed to certain indemnities, commitments and guarantees under which it may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions. These indemnities, commitments and guarantees include those given to various lessors in connection with facility leases for certain claims arising from such facility or lease and indemnities to directors and officers of the Company to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of California. The duration of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees varies, and in certain cases, is indefinite. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these indemnities, commitments and guarantees in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets other than as disclosed below.

Letters of Credit

The Company has issued guarantees in the form of commercial letters of credit, of which there were approximately $10 million and $12 million outstanding at February 1, 2014 and February 2, 2013 respectively, as security for merchandise shipments from overseas vendors. All in-transit merchandise covered by letters of credit is accrued for in accounts payable.