Investments and Derivative Instruments Level 1 (Notes)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2015

Investments and Derivative Instruments [Abstract]

Investments and Derivative Instruments [Text Block]

Net Investment Income (Loss)

	For the years ended December 31,
(Before-tax)	2015			2014			2013
Fixed maturities [1]	$	2,409		$	2,420		$	2,552
Equity securities	25			38			30
Mortgage loans	267			265			260
Policy loans	82			80			83
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments	227			294			287
Other investments [2]	138			179			167
Investment expenses	(118		)	(122		)	(115		)
Total net investment income	$	3,030		$	3,154		$	3,264

[1] Includes net investment income on short-term investments.

[2] Includes income from derivatives that hedge fixed maturities and qualify for hedge accounting.

Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses)

	For the years ended December 31,
(Before-tax)	2015			2014			2013
Gross gains on sales [1]	$	460		$	527		$	2,313
Gross losses on sales	(405		)	(250		)	(659		)
Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings	(102		)	(59		)	(73		)
Valuation allowances on mortgage loans	(5		)	(4		)	(1		)
Periodic net coupon settlements on credit derivatives	11			1			(8		)
Results of variable annuity hedge program
GMWB derivatives, net	(87		)	5			262
Macro hedge program	(46		)	(11		)	(234		)
Total results of variable annuity hedge program	(133		)	(6		)	28
Other, net [2]	18			(193		)	198
Net realized capital gains (losses)	$	(156	)	$	16		$	1,798

[1] Includes $1.5 billion of gains relating to the sales of the Retirement Plans and Individual Life businesses in the year ended December 31, 2013.

[2] Primarily consists of changes in the value of non-qualifying derivatives, transactional foreign currency revaluation gains (losses) on yen denominated fixed payout annuity liabilities and gains (losses) on non-qualifying derivatives used to hedge the foreign currency exposure of the liabilities. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, gains (losses) from transactional foreign currency revaluation of the yen denominated fixed payout annuity liabilities were $4, $116, and $250, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, gains (losses) on instruments used to hedge the foreign currency exposure on the yen denominated fixed payout annuities were $(21), $(148), and $(268), respectively. Also includes gains of $71 relating to the sales of the Retirement Plans and Individual Life businesses for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Net realized capital gains and losses from investment sales are reported as a component of revenues and are determined on a specific identification basis. Before tax, net gains and losses on sales and impairments previously reported as unrealized gains or losses in AOCI were $(32), $217, and $1.5 billion for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

Sales of Available-for-Sale Securities

	For the years ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
Fixed maturities, AFS
Sale proceeds	$	20,615		$	22,923		$	39,225
Gross gains [1]	372			456			2,143
Gross losses	(317		)	(182		)	(654		)
Equity securities, AFS
Sale proceeds	$	1,319		$	354		$	274
Gross gains	61			22			96
Gross losses	(46		)	(20		)	(20		)

[1] Includes $1.5 billion of gross gains related to the sale of the Individual Life and Retirement Plans businesses for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Sales of AFS securities in 2015 were primarily a result of duration and liquidity management, as well as tactical changes to the portfolio as a result of changing market conditions.

Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

The Company deems bonds and certain equity securities with debt-like characteristics (collectively “debt securities”) to be other-than-temporarily impaired (“impaired”) if a security meets the following conditions: a) the Company intends to sell or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before a recovery in value, or b) the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If the Company intends to sell or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before a recovery in value, a charge is recorded in net realized capital losses equal to the difference between the fair value and amortized cost basis of the security. For those impaired debt securities which do not meet the first condition and for which the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis, the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the fair value is separated into the portion representing a credit OTTI, which is recorded in net realized capital losses, and the remaining non-credit impairment, which is recorded in OCI. Generally, the Company determines a security’s credit impairment as the difference between its amortized cost basis and its best estimate of expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s effective yield prior to impairment. The remaining non-credit impairment is the difference between the security’s fair value and the Company’s best estimate of expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s effective yield prior to the impairment, which typically includes current market liquidity and risk premiums. The previous amortized cost basis less the impairment recognized in net realized capital losses becomes the security’s new cost basis. The Company accretes the new cost basis to the estimated future cash flows over the expected remaining life of the security by prospectively adjusting the security’s yield, if necessary.

The Company’s evaluation of whether a credit impairment exists for debt securities includes but is not limited to, the following factors: (a) changes in the financial condition of the security’s underlying collateral, (b) whether the issuer is current on contractually obligated interest and principal payments, (c) changes in the financial condition, credit rating and near-term prospects of the issuer, (d) the extent to which the fair value has been less than the amortized cost of the security and (e) the payment structure of the security. The Company’s best estimate of expected future cash flows used to determine the credit loss amount is a quantitative and qualitative process that incorporates information received from third-party sources along with certain internal assumptions and judgments regarding the future performance of the security. The Company’s best estimate of future cash flows involves assumptions including, but not limited to, various performance indicators, such as historical and projected default and recovery rates, credit ratings, current and projected delinquency rates, and loan-to-value ("LTV") ratios. In addition, for structured securities, the Company considers factors including, but not limited to, average cumulative collateral loss rates that vary by vintage year, commercial and residential property value declines that vary by property type and location and commercial real estate delinquency levels. These assumptions require the use of significant management judgment and include the probability of issuer default and estimates regarding timing and amount of expected recoveries which may include estimating the underlying collateral value. In addition, projections of expected future debt security cash flows may change based upon new information regarding the performance of the issuer and/or underlying collateral such as changes in the projections of the underlying property value estimates.

For equity securities where the decline in the fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary, a charge is recorded in net realized capital losses equal to the difference between the fair value and cost basis of the security. The previous cost basis less the impairment becomes the security’s new cost basis. The Company asserts its intent and ability to retain those equity securities deemed to be temporarily impaired until the price recovers. Once identified, these securities are systematically restricted from trading unless approved by investment and accounting professionals. The investment and accounting professionals will only authorize the sale of these securities based on predefined criteria that relate to events that could not have been reasonably foreseen. Examples of the criteria include, but are not limited to, the deterioration in the issuer’s financial condition, security price declines, a change in regulatory requirements or a major business combination or major disposition.

The primary factors considered in evaluating whether an impairment exists for an equity security include, but are not limited to: (a) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than the cost of the security, (b) changes in the financial condition, credit rating and near-term prospects of the issuer, (c) whether the issuer is current on preferred stock dividends and (d) the intent and ability of the Company to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery.

The following table presents the Company's impairments by impairment type.

	For the years ended December 31,
	2015		2014		2013
Intent-to-sell impairments	$	54	$	17	$	26
Credit impairments	29		37		32
Impairments on equity securities	16		2		15
Other impairments	3		3		—
Total impairments	$	102	$	59	$	73

The following table presents a roll-forward of the Company’s cumulative credit impairments on fixed maturities held.

	For the years ended December 31,
(Before-tax)	2015			2014			2013
Balance as of beginning of period	$	(424	)	$	(552	)	$	(1,013	)
Additions for credit impairments recognized on [1]:
Securities not previously impaired	(15		)	(15		)	(19		)
Securities previously impaired	(14		)	(22		)	(13		)
Reductions for credit impairments previously recognized on:
Securities that matured or were sold during the period	68			138			469
Securities the Company made the decision to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell	2			—			2
Securities due to an increase in expected cash flows	59			27			22
Balance as of end of period	$	(324	)	$	(424	)	$	(552	)

[1] These additions are included in the net OTTI losses recognized in earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Available-for-Sale Securities

The following table presents the Company’s AFS securities by type.

	December 31, 2015												December 31, 2014
	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Non- Credit OTTI [1]			Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Non- Credit OTTI [1]
ABS	$	2,520	$	24	$	(45	)	$	2,499	$	—		$	2,470	$	39	$	(37	)	$	2,472	$	(1	)
CDOs [2]	2,989		75		(23		)	3,038		—			2,776		98		(36		)	2,841		—
CMBS	4,668		105		(56		)	4,717		(8		)	4,235		196		(16		)	4,415		(6		)
Corporate	25,876		1,342		(416		)	26,802		(3		)	25,188		2,382		(211		)	27,359		(3		)
Foreign govt./govt. agencies	1,321		34		(47		)	1,308		—			1,592		73		(29		)	1,636		—
Municipal	11,124		1,008		(11		)	12,121		—			11,735		1,141		(5		)	12,871		—
RMBS	3,986		82		(22		)	4,046		—			3,815		122		(19		)	3,918		(1		)
U.S. Treasuries	4,481		222		(38		)	4,665		—			3,551		326		(5		)	3,872		—
Total fixed maturities, AFS	56,965		2,892		(658		)	59,196		(11		)	55,362		4,377		(358		)	59,384		(11		)
Equity securities, AFS [3]	842		38		(41		)	839		—			676		50		(27		)	699		—
Total AFS securities	$	57,807	$	2,930	$	(699	)	$	60,035	$	(11	)	$	56,038	$	4,427	$	(385	)	$	60,083	$	(11	)

[1] Represents the amount of cumulative non-credit OTTI losses recognized in OCI on securities that also had credit impairments. These losses are included in gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

[2] Gross unrealized gains (losses) exclude the fair value of bifurcated embedded derivatives within certain securities. Subsequent changes in value are recorded in net realized capital gains (losses).

[3] Excludes equity securities, FVO with a cost and fair value of $293 and $282, respectively, as of December 31, 2015, and $351 and $348 as of December 31, 2014.

The following table presents the Company’s fixed maturities, AFS, by contractual maturity year.

	December 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
Contractual Maturity	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
One year or less	$	2,373	$	2,405	$	2,141	$	2,168
Over one year through five years	10,929		11,200		11,264		11,827
Over five years through ten years	9,322		9,497		8,802		9,226
Over ten years	20,178		21,794		19,859		22,517
Subtotal	42,802		44,896		42,066		45,738
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities	14,163		14,300		13,296		13,646
Total fixed maturities, AFS	$	56,965	$	59,196	$	55,362	$	59,384

Estimated maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to security call or prepayment provisions. Due to the potential for variability in payment speeds (i.e. prepayments or extensions), mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are not categorized by contractual maturity.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company aims to maintain a diversified investment portfolio including issuer, sector and geographic stratification, where applicable, and has established certain exposure limits, diversification standards and review procedures to mitigate credit risk.

The Company had no investment exposure to any credit concentration risk of a single issuer greater than 10% of the Company's stockholders' equity, other than the U.S. government and certain U.S. government securities as of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2015, other than U.S. government and certain U.S. government agencies, the Company’s three largest exposures by issuer were Morgan Stanley, the State of California, and JP Morgan Chase & Co. which each comprised less than 1% of total invested assets. As of December 31, 2014, other than U.S. government and certain U.S. government agencies, the Company’s three largest exposures by issuer were the State of Illinois, JP Morgan Chase &Co., and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. which each comprised less than 1% of total invested assets. The Company’s three largest exposures by sector as of December 31, 2015, were municipal securities, financial services, and CMBS which comprised approximately 17%, 9% and 6%, respectively, of total invested assets. The Company’s three largest exposures by sector as of December 31, 2014 were municipal investments, financial services, and utilities which comprised approximately 17%, 7% and 6%, respectively, of total invested assets.

Unrealized Losses on AFS Securities

The following tables present the Company’s unrealized loss aging for AFS securities by type and length of time the security was in a continuous unrealized loss position.

	December 31, 2015
	Less Than 12 Months							12 Months or More							Total
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
ABS	$	1,619	$	1,609	$	(10	)	$	357	$	322	$	(35	)	$	1,976	$	1,931	$	(45	)
CDOs [1]	1,164		1,154		(10		)	1,243		1,227		(13		)	2,407		2,381		(23		)
CMBS	1,726		1,681		(45		)	189		178		(11		)	1,915		1,859		(56		)
Corporate	9,206		8,866		(340		)	656		580		(76		)	9,862		9,446		(416		)
Foreign govt./govt. agencies	679		646		(33		)	124		110		(14		)	803		756		(47		)
Municipal	440		430		(10		)	18		17		(1		)	458		447		(11		)
RMBS	1,349		1,340		(9		)	415		402		(13		)	1,764		1,742		(22		)
U.S. Treasuries	2,432		2,394		(38		)	8		8		—			2,440		2,402		(38		)
Total fixed maturities, AFS	18,615		18,120		(495		)	3,010		2,844		(163		)	21,625		20,964		(658		)
Equity securities, AFS [2]	480		449		(31		)	62		52		(10		)	542		501		(41		)
Total securities in an unrealized loss position	$	19,095	$	18,569	$	(526	)	$	3,072	$	2,896	$	(173	)	$	22,167	$	21,465	$	(699	)

	December 31, 2014
	Less Than 12 Months							12 Months or More							Total
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
ABS	$	897	$	893	$	(4	)	$	473	$	440	$	(33	)	$	1,370	$	1,333	$	(37	)
CDOs [1]	748		743		(5		)	1,489		1,461		(31		)	2,237		2,204		(36		)
CMBS	230		227		(3		)	319		306		(13		)	549		533		(16		)
Corporate	3,082		2,980		(102		)	1,177		1,068		(109		)	4,259		4,048		(211		)
Foreign govt./govt. agencies	363		349		(14		)	227		212		(15		)	590		561		(29		)
Municipal	74		73		(1		)	86		82		(4		)	160		155		(5		)
RMBS	320		318		(2		)	433		416		(17		)	753		734		(19		)
U.S. Treasuries	432		431		(1		)	361		357		(4		)	793		788		(5		)
Total fixed maturities, AFS	6,146		6,014		(132		)	4,565		4,342		(226		)	10,711		10,356		(358		)
Equity securities, AFS [2]	172		160		(12		)	102		87		(15		)	274		247		(27		)
Total securities in an unrealized loss position	$	6,318	$	6,174	$	(144	)	$	4,667	$	4,429	$	(241	)	$	10,985	$	10,603	$	(385	)

[1] Unrealized losses exclude the change in fair value of bifurcated embedded derivatives within certain securities, for which changes in fair value are recorded in net realized capital gains (losses).

[2] As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, excludes equity securities, FVO which are included in equity securities, AFS on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

As of December 31, 2015, AFS securities in an unrealized loss position consisted of 4,850 securities, primarily in the corporate sector, which were depressed primarily due to an increase in interest rates and/or widening of credit spreads since the securities were purchased. As of December 31, 2015, 91% of these securities were depressed less than 20% of cost or amortized cost. The increase in unrealized losses during 2015 was primarily attributable to wider credit spreads and an increase in interest rates.

Most of the securities depressed for twelve months or more relate to corporate securities concentrated in the financial services and energy sectors, student loan ABS, and structured securities with exposure to commercial and residential real estate. Corporate financial services securities and student loan ABS were primarily depressed because the securities have floating-rate coupons and have long-dated maturities, and current credit spreads are wider than when these securities were purchased. Corporate securities within the energy sector are primarily depressed due to a decline in oil prices. For certain commercial and residential real estate securities, current market spreads are wider than spreads at the securities' respective purchase dates. The Company neither has an intention to sell nor does it expect to be required to sell the securities outlined in the preceding discussion.

Mortgage Loans

Mortgage Loan Valuation Allowances

The Company’s security monitoring process reviews mortgage loans on a quarterly basis to identify potential credit losses. Commercial mortgage loans are considered to be impaired when management estimates that, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Criteria used to determine if an impairment exists include, but are not limited to: current and projected macroeconomic factors, such as unemployment rates, and property-specific factors such as rental rates, occupancy levels, LTV ratios and debt service coverage ratios (“DSCR”). In addition, the Company considers historic, current and projected delinquency rates and property values. These assumptions require the use of significant management judgment and include the probability and timing of borrower default and loss severity estimates. In addition, projections of expected future cash flows may change based upon new information regarding the performance of the borrower and/or underlying collateral such as changes in the projections of the underlying property value estimates.

For mortgage loans that are deemed impaired, a valuation allowance is established for the difference between the carrying amount and the Company’s share of either (a) the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, (b) the loan’s observable market price or, most frequently, (c) the fair value of the collateral. A valuation allowance has been established for either individual loans or as a projected loss contingency for loans with an LTV ratio of 90% or greater and after consideration of other credit quality factors, including DSCR. Changes in valuation allowances are recorded in net realized capital gains and losses. Interest income on impaired loans is accrued to the extent it is deemed collectible and the loans continue to perform under the original or restructured terms. Interest income ceases to accrue for loans when it is probable that the Company will not receive interest and principal payments according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans may resume accrual status when it is determined that sufficient collateral exists to satisfy the full amount of the loan and interest payments, as well as when it is probable cash will be received in the foreseeable future. Interest income on defaulted loans is recognized when received.

	December 31, 2015							December 31, 2014
	Amortized Cost [1]		Valuation Allowance			Carrying Value		Amortized Cost [1]		Valuation Allowance			Carrying Value
Total commercial mortgage loans	$	5,647	$	(23	)	$	5,624	$	5,574	$	(18	)	$	5,556

[1] Amortized cost represents carrying value prior to valuation allowances, if any.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the carrying value of mortgage loans associated with the valuation allowance was $82 and $140, respectively. There were no mortgage loans held-for-sale as of December 31, 2015, or December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2015, loans within the Company’s mortgage loan portfolio that have had extensions or restructurings other than what is allowable under the original terms of the contract are immaterial.

The following table presents the activity within the Company’s valuation allowance for mortgage loans. These loans have been evaluated both individually and collectively for impairment. Loans evaluated collectively for impairment are immaterial.

	For the years ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
Balance as of January 1	$	(18	)	$	(67	)	$	(68	)
(Additions)/Reversals	(7		)	(4		)	(2		)
Deductions	2			53			3
Balance as of December 31	$	(23	)	$	(18	)	$	(67	)

The weighted-average LTV ratio of the Company’s commercial mortgage loan portfolio was 54% as of December 31, 2015, while the weighted-average LTV ratio at origination of these loans was 62%. LTV ratios compare the loan amount to the value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan. The loan values are updated no less than annually through property level reviews of the portfolio. Factors considered in the property valuation include, but are not limited to, actual and expected property cash flows, geographic market data and capitalization rates. DSCR compares a property’s net operating income to the borrower’s principal and interest payments. The weighted average DSCR of the Company’s commercial mortgage loan portfolio was 2.63x as of December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the Company held two delinquent commercial mortgage loans past due by 90 days or more. The loans had a total carrying value and valuation allowance of $17 and $20, respectively, and neither loan was accruing income. As of December 31, 2014, the Company held one delinquent commercial mortgage loan past due by 90 days or more. The loan had a total carrying value and valuation allowance of $7 and $0, respectively, and was not accruing income.

The following table presents the carrying value of the Company’s commercial mortgage loans by LTV and DSCR.

Commercial Mortgage Loans Credit Quality
	December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Loan-to-value	Carrying Value		Avg. Debt-Service Coverage Ratio	Carrying Value		Avg. Debt-Service Coverage Ratio
Greater than 80%	$	24	0.81x	$	53	1.07x
65% - 80%	623		1.82x	789		1.75x
Less than 65%	4,977		2.75x	4,714		2.66x
Total commercial mortgage loans	$	5,624	2.63x	$	5,556	2.51x

The following tables present the carrying value of the Company’s mortgage loans by region and property type.

Mortgage Loans by Region
	December 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Carrying Value		Percent of Total		Carrying Value		Percent of Total
East North Central	$	289	5.1	%	$	211	3.8	%
East South Central	14		0.2	%	—		—	%
Middle Atlantic	384		6.8	%	468		8.4	%
Mountain	32		0.6	%	88		1.6	%
New England	446		7.9	%	381		6.9	%
Pacific	1,669		29.7	%	1,607		29.0	%
South Atlantic	1,174		20.9	%	1,019		18.3	%
West North Central	29		0.5	%	44		0.8	%
West South Central	318		5.7	%	302		5.4	%
Other [1]	1,269		22.6	%	1,436		25.8	%
Total mortgage loans	$	5,624	100.0	%	$	5,556	100.0	%

[1] Primarily represents loans collateralized by multiple properties in various regions.

Mortgage Loans by Property Type
	December 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Carrying Value		Percent of Total		Carrying Value		Percent of Total
Commercial
Agricultural	$	26	0.5	%	$	46	0.8	%
Industrial	1,422		25.3	%	1,476		26.6	%
Lodging	26		0.5	%	26		0.5	%
Multifamily	1,345		23.9	%	1,190		21.4	%
Office	1,547		27.5	%	1,517		27.3	%
Retail	1,109		19.7	%	1,147		20.6	%
Other	149		2.6	%	154		2.8	%
Total mortgage loans	$	5,624	100.0	%	$	5,556	100.0	%

Mortgage Servicing

The Company originates, sells and services commercial mortgage loans on behalf of third parties and recognizes servicing fees over the period that services are performed in fee income. As of December 31, 2015, under this program the Company serviced commercial mortgage loans with a total outstanding principal of $359, of which $129 was serviced on behalf of third parties and $230 was retained and reported on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, including $54 in separate account assets. Servicing rights are carried at the lower of cost or fair value and were zero as of December 31, 2015, because servicing fees were market-level fees at origination and remain adequate to compensate the Company to administer the servicing. The Company did not have any mortgage servicing arrangements as of December 31, 2014.

Variable Interest Entities

The Company is involved with various special purpose entities and other entities that are deemed to be VIEs primarily as a collateral or investment manager and as an investor through normal investment activities, as well as a means of accessing capital through a contingent capital facility ("the facility"). For further information on the facility, see Note 11 - Debt of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

A VIE is an entity that either has investors that lack certain essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest or lacks sufficient funds to finance its own activities without financial support provided by other entities. The Company performs ongoing qualitative assessments of its VIEs to determine whether the Company has a controlling financial interest in the VIE and therefore is the primary beneficiary. The Company is deemed to have a controlling financial interest when it has both the ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Based on the Company’s assessment, if it determines it is the primary beneficiary, the Company consolidates the VIE in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated VIEs

The following table presents the carrying value of assets and liabilities and the maximum exposure to loss relating to the VIEs for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Creditors have no recourse against the Company in the event of default by these VIEs nor does the Company have any implied or unfunded commitments to these VIEs. The Company’s financial or other support provided to these VIEs is limited to its collateral or investment management services and original investment.

	December 31, 2015						December 31, 2014
	Total Assets		Total Liabilities [1]		Maximum Exposure to Loss [2]		Total Assets		Total Liabilities [1]		Maximum Exposure to Loss [2]
CDOs [3]	$	5	$	5	$	—	$	5	$	5	$	—
Investment funds [4]	159		7		151		238		—		243
Limited partnerships and other alternative investments	2		—		2		3		1		2
Total	$	166	$	12	$	153	$	246	$	6	$	245

[1] Included in other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

[2] The maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss amount that the Company could recognize as a reduction in net investment income or as a realized capital loss and is the cost basis of the Company’s investment.

[3] Total assets included in cash in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.

[4] Total assets included in fixed maturities, FVO, short-term investments, equity, AFS, and cash in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

CDOs represent structured investment vehicles for which the Company has a controlling financial interest as it provides collateral management services, earns a fee for those services and also holds investments in the securities issued by these vehicles. Investment funds represent fixed income funds for which the Company has management and control of the investments, which is the activity that most significantly impacts its economic performance. Limited partnerships and other alternative impairments represent one hedge fund of funds in which the Company holds a majority interest in the fund as an investment.

Non-Consolidated VIEs

The Company, through normal investment activities, makes passive investments in structured securities issued by VIEs for which the Company is not the manager which are included in ABS, CDOs, CMBS and RMBS in the AFS securities table and fixed maturities, FVO, in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has not provided financial or other support with respect to these investments other than its original investment. For these investments, the Company determined it is not the primary beneficiary due to the relative size of the Company’s investment in comparison to the principal amount of the structured securities issued by the VIEs, the level of credit subordination which reduces the Company’s obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits and the Company’s inability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on these investments is limited to the amount of the Company’s investment.

In addition, the Company holds a significant variable interest for one VIE for which it is not the primary beneficiary and, therefore, was not consolidated on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. This VIE represents the facility that has been held by the Company since February 2007 and for which the Company has no implied or unfunded commitments. Assets and liabilities recorded for the facility were $7 and $8, respectively, as of December 31, 2015, and $12 and $14, respectively, as of December 31, 2014. Additionally, the Company has a maximum exposure to loss of $3 and $3, respectively, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, which represents the issuance costs that were incurred to establish the facility. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest as it does not manage the assets of the facility nor does it have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the facility, as the asset manager has significant variable interest in the vehicle. The Company’s financial or other support provided to the facility is limited to providing ongoing support to cover the facility’s operating expenses. For further information on the facility, see Note 11 - Debt of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Securities Lending, Repurchase Agreements and Other Collateral Transactions

The Company participates in securities lending programs to generate additional income. Through these programs, certain fixed maturities within the corporate, foreign government/government agencies, and municipal sectors as well as equity securities are loaned from the Company’s portfolio to qualifying third-party borrowers in return for collateral in the form of cash or securities. Borrowers of these securities provide collateral of 102% and 105% of the fair value of the securities lent at the time of the loan for domestic and non-domestic securities, respectively. The borrower will return the securities to the Company for cash or securities collateral at maturity dates generally of 90 days or less. Security collateral on deposit from counterparties in connection with securities lending transactions may not be sold or re-pledged, except in the event of default, and is not reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the loaned securities is monitored and additional collateral is obtained if the fair value of the collateral falls below 100% of the fair value of the loaned securities. The agreements provide the counterparty the right to sell or re-pledge the securities transferred. If cash, rather than securities, is received as collateral, the cash is typically invested in short-term investments or fixed maturities and is reported as an asset on the consolidated balance sheets. Income associated with securities lending transactions is reported as a component of net investment income on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value of securities on loan and the associated liability for cash collateral received was $67 and $68, respectively. The Company had no securities on loan as of December 31, 2014.

From time to time, the Company enters into repurchase agreements to manage liquidity or to earn incremental spread income. A repurchase agreement is a transaction in which one party (transferor) agrees to sell securities to another party (transferee) in return for cash (or securities), with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the same securities at a specified price at a later date. A dollar roll is a type of repurchase agreement where a mortgage backed security is sold with an agreement to repurchase substantially the same security at a specified time in the future. These transactions generally have a contractual maturity of ninety days or less.

As part of repurchase agreements, the Company transfers collateral of U.S. government and government agency securities and receives cash. For repurchase agreements, the Company obtains cash in an amount equal to at least 95% of the fair value of the securities transferred. The agreements contain contractual provisions that require additional collateral to be transferred when necessary and provide the counterparty the right to sell or re-pledge the securities transferred. The cash received from the repurchase program is typically invested in short-term investments or fixed maturities. Repurchase agreements include master netting provisions that provide the counterparties the right to offset claims and apply securities held by them with respect to their obligations in the event of a default. Although the Company has the contractual right to offset claims, fixed maturities do not meet the specific conditions for net presentation under U.S. GAAP. The Company accounts for the repurchase agreements as collateralized borrowings. The securities transferred under repurchase agreements are included in fixed maturities, AFS with the obligation to repurchase those securities recorded in other liabilities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company reported financial collateral pledged relating to repurchase agreements of $440 in fixed maturities, AFS and $5 in cash. The Company reported a corresponding obligation to repurchase the pledged securities of $445 in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company had no outstanding dollar roll transactions as of December 31, 2015. The Company had no outstanding repurchase agreements or dollar roll transactions as of December 31, 2014.

The Company is required by law to deposit securities with government agencies in certain states in which it conducts business. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the fair value of securities on deposit was approximately $2.5 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company has pledged as collateral $35 and $34, respectively, of U.S. government securities and government agency securities or cash for letters of credit.

Refer to Derivative Collateral Arrangements section of this note for disclosure of collateral in support of derivative transactions.

Equity Method Investments

The majority of the Company's investments in limited partnerships and other alternative investments, including hedge funds, real estate funds, and private equity and other funds (collectively, “limited partnerships”), are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The remainder of investments in limited partnerships and other alternative investments consists primarily of wholly-owned fund of funds accounted for under investment fund accounting which are measured at fair value as discussed in Note 4Fair Value Measurements of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For those limited partnerships and other alternative investments accounted for under the equity method, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as of December 31, 2015 is limited to the total carrying value of $2.9 billion. In addition, the Company has outstanding commitments totaling $748 to fund limited partnership and other alternative investments as of December 31, 2015. The Company’s investments in limited partnerships are generally of a passive nature in that the Company does not take an active role in the management of the limited partnerships. In 2015, aggregate investment income from limited partnerships and other alternative investments exceeded 10% of the Company’s pre-tax consolidated net income. Accordingly, the Company is disclosing aggregated summarized financial data for the Company’s limited partnership investments. This aggregated summarized financial data does not represent the Company’s proportionate share of limited partnership assets or earnings. Aggregate total assets of the limited partnerships in which the Company invested totaled $95.5 billion and $85.8 billion as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Aggregate total liabilities of the limited partnerships in which the Company invested totaled $15.2 billion and $10.6 billion as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Aggregate net investment income of the limited partnerships in which the Company invested totaled $1.0 billion, $3.6 billion and $1.8 billion for the periods ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Aggregate net income of the limited partnerships in which the Company invested totaled $6.3 billion, $9.6 billion and $8.4 billion for the periods ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of, and for the period ended, December 31, 2015, the aggregated summarized financial data reflects the latest available financial i

Derivative Instruments

The Company utilizes a variety of OTC, OTC-cleared and exchange traded derivative instruments as a part of its overall risk management strategy as well as to enter into replication transactions. Derivative instruments are used to manage risk associated with interest rate, equity market, commodity market, credit spread, issuer default, price, and currency exchange rate risk or volatility. Replication transactions are used as an economical means to synthetically replicate the characteristics and performance of assets that are permissible investments under the Company’s investment policies. The Company also may enter into and has previously issued financial instruments and products that either are accounted for as free-standing derivatives, such as certain reinsurance contracts, or may contain features that are deemed to be embedded derivative instruments, such as the GMWB rider included with certain variable annuity products.

Strategies that Qualify for Hedge Accounting

Certain derivatives the Company enters into satisfy the hedge accounting requirements as outlined in Note 1 of these financial statements. Typically, these hedge relationships include interest rate swaps and, to a lesser extent, foreign currency swaps where the terms or expected cash flows of the hedged item closely match the terms of the swap. The interest rate swaps are typically used to manage interest rate duration of certain fixed maturity securities or liability contracts. The hedge strategies by hedge accounting designation include:

Cash Flow Hedges

Interest rate swaps are predominantly used to manage portfolio duration and better match cash receipts from assets with cash disbursements required to fund liabilities. These derivatives primarily convert interest receipts on floating-rate fixed maturity securities to fixed rates. The Company also enters into forward starting swap agreements to hedge the interest rate exposure related to the purchase of fixed-rate securities, primarily to hedge interest rate risk inherent in the assumptions used to price certain liabilities.

Foreign currency swaps are used to convert foreign currency-denominated cash flows related to certain investment receipts and liability payments to U.S. dollars in order to reduce cash flow fluctuations due to changes in currency rates.

Fair Value Hedges

Interest rate swaps are used to hedge the changes in fair value of fixed maturity securities due to fluctuations in interest rates. These swaps are typically used to manage interest rate duration.

Non-qualifying Strategies

Derivative relationships that do not qualify for hedge accounting (“non-qualifying strategies”) primarily include the hedge program for the Company's variable annuity products as well as the hedging and replication strategies that utilize credit default swaps. In addition, hedges of interest rate, foreign currency and equity risk of certain fixed maturities, equities and liabilities do not qualify for hedge accounting.

The non-qualifying strategies include:

Interest Rate Swaps, Swaptions and Futures

The Company may use interest rate swaps, swaptions, and futures to manage duration between assets and liabilities in certain investment portfolios. In addition, the Company enters into interest rate swaps to terminate existing swaps, thereby offsetting the changes in value of the original swap. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the notional amount of interest rate swaps in offsetting relationships was $12.9 billion and $13.1 billion, respectively.

Foreign Currency Swaps and Forwards

The Company enters into foreign currency swaps and forwards to convert the foreign currency exposures of certain foreign currency-denominated fixed maturity investments to U.S. dollars. During 2015, the Company entered into foreign currency forwards to hedge non-U.S. dollar denominated cash and equity securities, as well as the currency impacts on changes in equity of a P&C runoff entity in the United Kingdom.

Fixed Payout Annuity Hedge

The Company formerly offered certain variable annuity products with a guaranteed minimum income benefit ("GMIB") and continues to reinsure certain yen denominated fixed payout annuities. The Company invests in U.S. dollar denominated assets to support the reinsurance liability. The Company entered into pay U.S. dollar, receive yen swap contracts to hedge the currency and yen interest rate exposure between the U.S. dollar denominated assets and the yen denominated fixed liability reinsurance payments.

Credit Contracts

Credit default swaps are used to purchase credit protection on an individual entity or referenced index to economically hedge against default risk and credit-related changes in value of fixed maturity securities. Credit default swaps are also used to assume credit risk related to an individual entity or referenced index as a part of replication transactions. These contracts require the Company to pay or receive a periodic fee in exchange for compensation from the counterparty should the referenced security issuers experience a credit event, as defined in the contract. The Company is also exposed to credit risk related to certain structured fixed maturity securities that have embedded credit derivatives, which reference a standard index of corporate securities. In addition, the Company enters into credit default swaps to terminate existing credit default swaps, thereby offsetting the changes in value of the original swap going forward.

Equity Index Swaps and Options

The Company enters into total return swaps to hedge equity risk of specific common stock investments which are accounted for using fair value option in order to align the accounting treatment within net realized capital gains (losses). The Company may also use equity index options to hedge the impact of an adverse equity market environment on the investment portfolio. In addition, the Company formerly offered certain equity indexed products, a portion of which contain embedded derivatives that require bifurcation. The Company uses equity index swaps to economically hedge the equity volatility risk associated with the equity indexed products.

Commodity Contracts

During 2015, the Company purchased for $11 put option contracts on West Texas Intermediate oil futures with a strike of $35 dollars per barrel in order to partially offset potential losses related to certain fixed maturity securities that could arise if oil prices decline substantially. The Company has since reduced its exposure to the targeted fixed maturity securities and therefore, these options were terminated at the end of 2015.

GMWB Derivatives, net

The Company formerly offered certain variable annuity products with GMWB riders. The GMWB product is a bifurcated embedded derivative (“GMWB product derivatives”) that has a notional value equal to the GRB. The Company uses reinsurance contracts to transfer a portion of its risk of loss due to GMWB. The reinsurance contracts covering GMWB (“GMWB reinsurance contracts”) are accounted for as free-standing derivatives with a notional amount equal to the GRB amount.

The Company utilizes derivatives (“GMWB hedging instruments”) as part of an actively managed program designed to hedge a portion of the capital market risk exposures of the non-reinsured GMWB riders due to changes in interest rates, equity market levels, and equity volatility. These derivatives include customized swaps, interest rate swaps and futures, and equity swaps, options and futures, on certain indices including the S&P 500 index, EAFE index and NASDAQ index. The following table presents notional and fair value for GMWB hedging instruments.

	Notional Amount				Fair Value
	December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Customized swaps	$	5,877	$	7,041	$	131	$	124
Equity swaps, options, and futures	1,362		3,761		2		39
Interest rate swaps and futures	3,740		3,640		25		11
Total	$	10,979	$	14,442	$	158	$	174

Macro Hedge Program

The Company utilizes equity options, swaps, futures, and foreign currency options to partially hedge against a decline in the equity markets and the resulting statutory surplus and capital impact primarily arising from the guaranteed minimum death benefit ("GMDB") and GMWB obligations. The following table presents notional and fair value for the macro hedge program.

	Notional Amount				Fair Value
	December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Equity swaps, options, and futures	$	4,548	$	5,983	$	147	$	141
Foreign currency options	—		400		—		—
Total	$	4,548	$	6,383	$	147	$	141

Contingent Capital Facility Put Option

The Company entered into a put option agreement that provides the Company the right to require a third-party trust to purchase, at any time, The Hartford’s junior subordinated notes in a maximum aggregate principal amount of $500. Under the put option agreement, The Hartford will pay premiums on a periodic basis and will reimburse the trust for certain fees and ordinary expenses.

Modified Coinsurance Reinsurance Contracts

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had approximately $895 and $1.0 billion, respectively, of invested assets supporting other policyholder funds and benefits payable reinsured under a modified coinsurance arrangement in connection with the sale of the Individual Life business, which was structured as a reinsurance transaction. The assets are primarily held in a trust established by the Company. The Company pays or receives cash quarterly to settle the results of the reinsured business, including the investment results. As a result of this modified coinsurance arrangement, the Company has an embedded derivative that transfers to the reinsurer certain unrealized changes in fair value due to interest rate and credit risks of these assets. The notional amount of the embedded derivative reinsurance contracts are the invested assets that are carried at fair value supporting the reinsured reserves.

Derivative Balance Sheet Classification

The following table summarizes the balance sheet classification of the Company’s derivative related net fair value amounts as well as the gross asset and liability fair value amounts. For reporting purposes, the Company has elected to offset within total assets or total liabilities based upon the net of the fair value amounts, income accruals, and related cash collateral receivables and payables of OTC derivative instruments executed in a legal entity and with the same counterparty under a master netting agreement, which provides the Company with the legal right of offset. The Company has also elected to offset within total assets or total liabilities based upon the net of the fair value amounts, income accruals and related cash collateral receivables and payables of OTC-cleared derivative instruments based on clearing house agreements. The following fair value amounts do not include income accruals or related cash collateral receivables and payables, which are netted with derivative fair value amounts to determine balance sheet presentation. Derivative fair value reported as liabilities after taking into account the master netting agreements was $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. Derivatives in the Company’s separate accounts, where the associated gains and losses accrue directly to policyholders, are not included in the table below. The Company’s derivative instruments are held for risk management purposes, unless otherwise noted in the following table. The notional amount of derivative contracts represents the basis upon which pay or receive amounts are calculated and is presented in the table to quantify the volume of the Company’s derivative activity. Notional amounts are not necessarily reflective of credit risk. The following tables exclude investments that contain an embedded credit derivative for which the Company has elected the fair value option. For further discussion, see the Fair Value Option section in Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

	Net Derivatives										Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	Notional Amount				Fair Value						Fair Value				Fair Value
Hedge Designation/ Derivative Type	Dec 31, 2015		Dec 31, 2014		Dec 31, 2015			Dec 31, 2014			Dec 31, 2015		Dec 31, 2014		Dec 31, 2015			Dec 31, 2014
Cash flow hedges
Interest rate swaps	$	3,527	$	3,999	$	17		$	44		$	50	$	52	$	(33	)	$	(8	)
Foreign currency swaps	143		143		(19		)	(19		)	7		3		(26		)	(22		)
Total cash flow hedges	3,670		4,142		(2		)	25			57		55		(59		)	(30		)
Fair value hedges
Interest rate swaps	23		32		—			—			—		—		—			—
Total fair value hedges	23		32		—			—			—		—		—			—
Non-qualifying strategies
Interest rate contracts
Interest rate swaps and futures	14,290		15,254		(814		)	(512		)	297		536		(1,111		)	(1,048		)
Foreign exchange contracts
Foreign currency swaps and forwards	653		177		17			1			17		3		—			(2		)
Fixed payout annuity hedge	1,063		1,319		(357		)	(427		)	—		—		(357		)	(427		)
Credit contracts
Credit derivatives that purchase credit protection	423		595		18			(6		)	22		4		(4		)	(10		)
Credit derivatives that assume credit risk [1]	2,458		1,487		(13		)	3			9		14		(22		)	(11		)
Credit derivatives in offsetting positions	4,059		5,343		(2		)	(3		)	40		53		(42		)	(56		)
Equity contracts
Equity index swaps and options	419		635		15			2			41		31		(26		)	(29		)
Variable annuity hedge program
GMWB product derivatives [2]	15,099		17,908		(262		)	(139		)	—		—		(262		)	(139		)
GMWB reinsurance contracts	3,106		3,659		83			56			83		56		—			—
GMWB hedging instruments	10,979		14,442		158			174			264		289		(106		)	(115		)
Macro hedge program	4,548		6,383		147			141			179		180		(32		)	(39		)
Other
Contingent capital facility put option	500		500		7			12			7		12		—			—
Modified coinsurance reinsurance contracts	895		974		79			34			79		34		—			—
Total non-qualifying strategies	58,492		68,676		(924		)	(664		)	1,038		1,212		(1,962		)	(1,876		)
Total cash flow hedges, fair value hedges, and non-qualifying strategies	$	62,185	$	72,850	$	(926	)	$	(639	)	$	1,095	$	1,267	$	(2,021	)	$	(1,906	)
Balance Sheet Location
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale	$	425	$	454	$	(3	)	$	2		$	—	$	2	$	(3	)	$	—
Other investments	23,253		23,014		1			364			409		624		(408		)	(260		)
Other liabilities	19,358		26,791		(798		)	(930		)	524		551		(1,322		)	(1,481		)
Reinsurance recoverables	4,000		4,633		162			90			162		90		—			—
Other policyholder funds and benefits payable	15,149		17,958		(288		)	(165		)	—		—		(288		)	(165		)
Total derivatives	$	62,185	$	72,850	$	(926	)	$	(639	)	$	1,095	$	1,267	$	(2,021	)	$	(1,906	)

[1] The derivative instruments related to this strategy are held for other investment purposes.

[2] These derivatives are embedded within liabilities and are not held for risk management purposes.

Change in Notional Amount

The net decrease in notional amount of derivatives since December 31, 2014 was primarily due to the following:

• The decline in notional amount related to the GMWB hedging instruments and the macro hedge program was primarily driven by portfolio re-positioning, a decline in equity markets, and the expiration of certain options. The decline in the GMWB product related notional amount was primarily driven by policyholder lapses and partial withdrawals.

• The decline in notional amount associated with interest rate derivatives was primarily driven by maturities of the derivatives.

• These declines were partially offset by an increase in notional amount related to credit derivatives that assume credit risk as a means to earn credit spread while re-balancing within certain fixed maturity sectors.

• Additional increases in notional related to foreign currency swaps and forwards were primarily driven by the purchase of foreign currency forwards to hedge Japanese yen-denominated cash and equity securities. In addition, the Company purchased foreign currency forwards to hedge the currency impacts on changes in equity of a P&C runoff entity in the United Kingdom.

Change in Fair Value

The net improvement in the total fair value of derivative instruments since December 31, 2014 was primarily related to the following:

• The decrease in fair value of non-qualifying interest rate derivatives was primarily due to the termination of offsetting swaps that were in a net gain position.

• The decrease in fair value related to the combined GMWB hedging program, which includes the GMWB product, reinsurance, and hedging derivatives, was primarily driven by liability model assumption updates, and underperformance of the underlying actively managed funds compared to their respective indices.

• The increase in fair value of fixed payout annuity hedges was primarily driven by the maturity of a currency swap, partially offset by an increase in U.S. interest rates.

• The increase in the fair value associated with modified coinsurance reinsurance contracts, which are accounted for as embedded derivatives and transfer to the reinsurer the investment experience related to the assets supporting the reinsured policies, was primarily driven by widening credit spreads and an increase in interest rates.

Offsetting of Derivative Assets/Liabilities

The following tables present the gross fair value amounts, the amounts offset, and net position of derivative instruments eligible for offset in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amounts offset include fair value amounts, income accruals and related cash collateral receivables and payables associated with derivative instruments that are traded under a common master netting agreement, as described in the preceding discussion. Also included in the tables are financial collateral receivables and payables, which are contractually permitted to be offset upon an event of default, although are disallowed for offsetting under U.S. GAAP.

As of December 31, 2015

	(i)		(ii)		(iii) = (i) - (ii)				(iv)			(v) = (iii) - (iv)
					Net Amounts Presented in the Statement of Financial Position					Collateral Disallowed for Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position		Derivative Assets [1]		Accrued Interest and Cash Collateral Received [2]			Financial Collateral Received [4]		Net Amount
Description
Other investments	$	933	$	756	$	1	$	176		$	100	$	77

	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities			Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position			Derivative Liabilities [3]			Accrued Interest and Cash Collateral Pledged [3]			Financial Collateral Pledged [4]			Net Amount
Description
Other liabilities	$	(1,730	)	$	(818	)	$	(798	)	$	(114	)	$	(889	)	$	(23	)

As of December 31, 2014

	(i)		(ii)		(iii) = (i) - (ii)					(iv)			(v) = (iii) - (iv)
					Net Amounts Presented in the Statement of Financial Position						Collateral Disallowed for Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position		Derivative Assets [1]		Accrued Interest and Cash Collateral Received [2]				Financial Collateral Received [4]		Net Amount
Description
Other investments	$	1,175	$	969	$	364	$	(158	)		$	109	$	97

	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities			Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position			Derivative Liabilities [3]			Accrued Interest and Cash Collateral Pledged [3]			Financial Collateral Pledged [4]			Net Amount
Description
Other liabilities	$	(1,741	)	$	(799	)	$	(927	)	$	(15	)	$	(1,079	)	$	137

[1] Included in other investments in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

[2] Included in other assets in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and is limited to the net derivative receivable associated with each counterparty.

[3] Included in other liabilities in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and is limited to the net derivative payable associated with each counterparty.

[4] Excludes collateral associated with exchange-traded derivatives instruments.

Cash Flow Hedges

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of OCI and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in current period earnings. All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

The following table presents the components of the gain or loss on derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges:

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
	Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)								Net Realized Capital Gains(Losses) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
	2015		2014			2013			2015		2014		2013
Interest rate swaps	$	28	$	150		$	(315	)	$	—	$	2	$	(3	)
Foreign currency swaps	—		(10		)	12			—		—		—
Total	$	28	$	140		$	(303	)	$	—	$	2	$	(3	)

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
		Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)
	Location	2015			2014			2013
Interest rate swaps	Net realized capital gain/(loss)	$	4		$	(1	)	$	91
Interest rate swaps	Net investment income	64			87			97
Foreign currency swaps	Net realized capital gain/(loss)	(9		)	(13		)	4
Total		$	59		$	73		$	192

As of December 31, 2015, the before-tax deferred net gains on derivative instruments recorded in AOCI that are expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next twelve months are $54. This expectation is based on the anticipated interest payments on hedged investments in fixed maturity securities that will occur over the next twelve months, at which time the Company will recognize the deferred net gains (losses) as an adjustment to net investment income over the term of the investment cash flows. The maximum term over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability of future cash flows for forecasted transactions, excluding interest payments on existing variable-rate financial instruments, is approximately three years.

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, the Company had no net reclassifications from AOCI to earnings resulting from the discontinuance of cash-flow hedges due to forecasted transactions that were no longer probable of occurring.

Fair Value Hedges

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss on the derivatives as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in current earnings. The Company includes the gain or loss on the derivative in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item. All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

The Company recognized in income gains (losses) representing the ineffective portion of fair value hedges as follows:

Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships
	Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income [1]
	2015				2014					2013
	Derivative		Hedged Item		Derivative			Hedged Item		Derivative			Hedged Item
Interest rate swaps
Net realized capital gains (losses)	$	—	$	—	$	(3	)	$	1	$	7		$	(12	)
Foreign currency swaps
Net realized capital gains (losses)	—		—		—			—		1			(1		)
Benefits, losses and loss adjustment expenses	—		—		—			—		(2		)	2
Total	$	—	$	—	$	(3	)	$	1	$	6		$	(11	)

[1] The amounts presented do not include the periodic net coupon settlements of the derivative or the coupon income (expense) related to the hedged item. The net of the amounts presented represents the ineffective portion of the hedge.

Non-qualifying Strategies

For non-qualifying strategies, including embedded derivatives that are required to be bifurcated from their host contracts and accounted for as derivatives, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized currently in earnings within net realized capital gains (losses). The following table presents the gain or loss recognized in income on non-qualifying strategies:

Non-qualifying Strategies
Gain (Loss) Recognized within Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses)
	December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
Interest rate contracts
Interest rate swaps, caps, floors, and forwards	$	(15	)	$	(172	)	$	50
Foreign exchange contracts
Foreign currency swaps and forwards	18			6			5
Fixed payout annuity hedge [1]	(21		)	(148		)	(268		)
Credit contracts
Credit derivatives that purchase credit protection	8			(10		)	(38		)
Credit derivatives that assume credit risk	(11		)	16			71
Equity contracts
Equity index swaps and options	19			3			(33		)
Commodity contracts
Commodity options	(9		)	—			—
Variable annuity hedge program
GMWB product derivative	(59		)	(2		)	1,306
GMWB reinsurance contracts	17			4			(192		)
GMWB hedging instruments	(45		)	3			(852		)
Macro hedge program	(46		)	(11		)	(234		)
Other
Contingent capital facility put option	(6		)	(6		)	(7		)
Modified coinsurance reinsurance contracts	46			(34		)	67
Derivative instruments formerly associated with HLIKK [2]	—			(2		)	—
Total [3]	$	(104	)	$	(353	)	$	(125	)

[1] The associated liability is adjusted for changes in spot rates through realized capital gains and was $4, $116 and $250 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which is not presented in this table

[2] These amounts relate to the termination of the hedging program associated with the Japan variable annuity product due to the sale of HLIKK.

[3] Excludes investments that contain an embedded credit derivative for which the Company has elected the fair value option. For further discussion, see the Fair Value Option section in Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements.

For the year ended December 31, 2015 the net realized capital gain (loss) related to derivatives used in non-qualifying strategies was primarily comprised of the following:

• The net gain related to foreign currency swaps and forwards was primarily driven by foreign currency forwards used to hedge the currency impacts on changes in equity of a P&C runoff entity in the United Kingdom. Also included were gains on foreign currency forwards used to hedge Japanese yen-denominated cash and equity securities.

• The net loss related to the yen denominated fixed payout annuity hedge was primarily driven by a decline in long term U.S. interest rates and a depreciation of the Japanese yen in relation to the U.S. dollar.

• The net gain related to equity derivatives was primarily driven by a total return swap used to hedge equity securities that increased due to a decline in Japanese equity markets since inception. An offsetting change in value was recorded on the equity securities since the Company has elected the fair value option in order to align the accounting with the derivative, resulting in changes in value on both the equity securities and the derivative recorded in net realized capital gains and losses. For further discussion, see the Fair Value Option section in Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements.

• The net loss related to the combined GMWB hedging program, which includes the GMWB product, reinsurance, and hedging derivatives, was primarily driven by liability model assumption updates, and underperformance of the underlying actively managed funds compared to their respective indices.

• The net loss on the macro hedge program was primarily due to time decay on options.

• The gain associated with modified coinsurance reinsurance contracts, which are accounted for as embedded derivatives and transfer to the reinsurer the investment experience related to the assets supporting the reinsured policies, was primarily driven by widening credit spreads and an increase in interest rates. The assets remain on the Company's books and the Company recorded an offsetting gain in AOCI as a result of the increase in market value of the bonds.

In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recognized gains of $3 and $13, respectively, due to cash recovered on derivative receivables that were previously written-off related to the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Inc. The derivative receivables were the result of the contractual collateral threshold amounts and open collateral calls prior to the bankruptcy filing as well as interest rate and credit spread movements from the date of the last collateral call to the date of the bankruptcy filing. For the year ended December 31, 2013, there were no recognized gains due to derivative receivables that were previously written-off related to the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Inc.

For the year ended December 31, 2014 the net realized capital gain (loss) related to derivatives used in non-qualifying strategies was primarily comprised of the following:

• The net loss related to interest rate derivatives was driven by a decline in U.S. interest rates.

• The net loss related to the yen denominated fixed annuity payout hedge was primarily driven by a decline in U.S. interest rates and a depreciation of the Japanese yen in relation to the U.S. dollar.

• The loss associated with modified coinsurance reinsurance contracts, which are accounted for as embedded derivatives and transfer to the reinsurer the investment experience related to the assets supporting the reinsured policies, was primarily driven by a decline in long-term interest rates, partially offset by credit spread widening. The assets remain on the Company's books and the Company recorded an offsetting gain in AOCI as a result of the increase in market value of the bonds.

For the year ended December 31, 2013 the net realized capital gain (loss) related to derivatives used in non-qualifying strategies was primarily due to the following:

• The net loss related to the yen denominated fixed payout annuity hedge was primarily driven by a depreciation of the Japanese yen in relation to the U.S. dollar.

• The net loss on the macro hedge program was primarily due to an improvement in domestic equity markets, and a decline in equity volatility.

• The net gain related to the combined GMWB hedging program, which includes the GMWB product, reinsurance, and hedging derivatives, was primarily driven by revaluing the liability for living benefits resulting from favorable policyholder behavior largely related to increased full surrenders and liability model assumption updates for partial lapses and withdrawal rates.

Refer to Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies for additional disclosures regarding contingent credit related features in derivative agreements.

Credit Risk Assumed through Credit Derivatives

The Company enters into credit default swaps that assume credit risk of a single entity or referenced index in order to synthetically replicate investment transactions that would be permissible under the Company's investment policies. The Company will receive periodic payments based on an agreed upon rate and notional amount and will only make a payment if there is a credit event. A credit event payment will typically be equal to the notional value of the swap contract less the value of the referenced security issuer’s debt obligation after the occurrence of the credit event. A credit event is generally defined as a default on contractually obligated interest or principal payments or bankruptcy of the referenced entity. The credit default swaps in which the Company assumes credit risk primarily reference investment grade single corporate issuers and baskets, which include standard diversified portfolios of corporate and CMBS issuers. The diversified portfolios of corporate issuers are established within sector concentration limits and may be divided into tranches that possess different credit ratings.

The following tables present the notional amount, fair value, weighted average years to maturity, underlying referenced credit obligation type and average credit ratings, and offsetting notional amounts and fair value for credit derivatives in which the Company is assuming credit risk as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

As of December 31, 2015
							Underlying Referenced Credit Obligation(s) [1]
Credit Derivative Type by Derivative Risk Exposure	Notional Amount [2]		Fair Value			Weighted Average Years to Maturity	Type	Average Credit Rating	Offsetting Notional Amount [3]		Offsetting Fair Value [3]
Single name credit default swaps
Investment grade risk exposure	$	190	$	(1	)	1 year	Corporate Credit/ Foreign Gov.	BBB+	$	176	$	(1	)
Below investment grade risk exposure	77		(2		)	2 years	Corporate Credit	B	77		1
Basket credit default swaps [4]
Investment grade risk exposure	3,036		22			4 years	Corporate Credit	BBB+	1,411		(13		)
Investment grade risk exposure	681		(19		)	6 years	CMBS Credit	AA+	212		1
Below investment grade risk exposure	153		(25		)	1 year	CMBS Credit	CCC	153		25
Embedded credit derivatives
Investment grade risk exposure	350		346			1 year	Corporate Credit	A+	—		—
Total [5]	$	4,487	$	321					$	2,029	$	13

As of December 31, 2014
							Unifying Referenced Credit Obligation(s) [1]
Credit Derivative Type by Derivative Risk Exposure	Notional Amount [2]		Fair Value			Weighted Average Years to Maturity	Type	Average Credit Rating	Offsetting Notional Amount [3]		Offsetting Fair Value [3]
Single name credit default swaps
Investment grade risk exposure	$	320	$	5		2 years	Corporate Credit/ Foreign Gov.	BBB+	$	247	$	(5	)
Below investment grade risk exposure	29		—			2 years	Corporate Credit	BB	29		(1		)
Basket credit default swaps [4]
Investment grade risk exposure	2,546		33			3 years	Corporate Credit	BBB	1,973		(25		)
Below investment grade risk exposure	38		(1		)	12 years	Corporate Credit	D	—		—
Investment grade risk exposure	722		(12		)	6 years	CMBS Credit	AA+	269		3
Below investment grade risk exposure	154		(22		)	2 years	CMBS Credit	CCC+	154		23
Embedded credit derivatives
Investment grade risk exposure	350		342			2 years	Corporate Credit	A	—		—
Total [5]	$	4,159	$	345					$	2,672	$	(5	)

[1] The average credit ratings are based on availability and the midpoint of the applicable ratings among Moody’s, S&P, Fitch and Morningstar. If no rating is available from a rating agency, then an internally developed rating is used.

[2] Notional amount is equal to the maximum potential future loss amount. These derivatives are governed by agreements, clearing house rules and applicable law which include collateral posting requirements. There is no additional specific collateral related to these contracts or recourse provisions included in the contracts to offset losses.

[3] The Company has entered into offsetting credit default swaps to terminate certain existing credit default swaps, thereby offsetting the future changes in value of, or losses paid related to, the original swap.

[4] Includes $3.9 billion and $3.5 billion as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, of notional amount on swaps of standard market indices of diversified portfolios of corporate and CMBS issuers referenced through credit default swaps. These swaps are subsequently valued based upon the observable standard market index.

[5] Excludes investments that contain an embedded credit derivative for which the Company has elected the fair value option. For further discussion, see the Fair Value Option section in Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements.

Derivative Collateral Arrangements

The Company enters into various collateral arrangements in connection with its derivative instruments, which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company pledged cash collateral associated with derivative instruments with a fair value of $488 and $120, respectively, for which the collateral receivable has been primarily included within other assets on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company also pledged securities collateral associated with derivative instruments with a fair value of $1.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, which have been included in fixed maturities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The counterparties have the right to sell or re-pledge these securities.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company accepted cash collateral associated with derivative instruments of $369 and $327, respectively, which was invested and recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in fixed maturities and short-term investments with corresponding amounts recorded in other liabilities. The Company also accepted securities collateral as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 with a fair value of $100 and $109, respectively, of which the Company has the ability to sell or repledge $100 and $97, respectively. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had no repledged securities and did not sell any securities. In addition, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, non-cash collateral accepted was held in separate custodial accounts and was not included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.