XML 66 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Non-Recourse Debt
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
DEBT

7. NON-RECOURSE DEBT

Significant transactions

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we had the following significant debt transactions at our subsidiaries:

 

  • Tietê issued new debt of $251 million partially offset by repayments of $60 million;
  • El Salvador issued new debt of $310 million partially offset by repayments of $150 million;
  • Sul issued new debt of $150 million partially offset by repayments of $34 million;
  • Mong Duong drew $119 million under its construction loan facility; and
  • Masinloc refinanced its senior debt facility of $500 million and incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of $43 million. See Note 12Other Income and Expense for further information.

Debt in default

The following table summarizes the Company's subsidiary non-recourse debt in default or accelerated as of March 31, 2013 and is classified as current non-recourse debt unless otherwise indicated:

   Primary Nature  March 31, 2013
 Subsidiary of Default Default Amount Net Assets
          
     (in millions)
 Maritza Covenant $ 819 $ 576
 Sonel Covenant   264   361
 Kavarna Covenant   196   82
 Changuinola Covenant   395   249
 Saurashtra Covenant   25   15
 Total   $ 1,304   

The above defaults are not payment defaults, but are instead technical defaults triggered by failure to comply with other covenants and/or other conditions such as (but not limited to) failure to meet information covenants, complete construction or other milestones in an allocated time, meet certain minimum or maximum financial ratios, or other requirements contained in the non-recourse debt documents of the Company.

In addition, in the event that there is a default, bankruptcy or maturity acceleration at a subsidiary or group of subsidiaries that meets the applicable definition of materiality under the corporate debt agreements of The AES Corporation, there could be a cross-default to the Company's recourse debt. At March 31, 2013 none of the defaults listed above individually or in the aggregate results in a cross-default under the recourse debt of the Company.