Exhibit 99.3

Link to searchable text of slide shown above

Searchable text section of graphics shown above

AES Investor Presentation

AES CORPORATION

[GRAPHIC]

January 19, 2006

Safe Harbor Disclosure

Certain statements in the following presentation regarding AES’s business operations may constitute “forward looking statements.” Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those related to future earnings, growth and financial and operating performance. Forward-looking statements are not intended to be a guarantee of future results, but instead constitute AES’s current expectations based on reasonable assumptions. Forecasted financial information is based on certain material assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not limited to continued normal or better levels of operating performance and electricity demand at our distribution companies and operational performance at our contract generation businesses consistent with historical levels, as well as achievements of planned productivity improvements and incremental growth from investments at investment levels and rates of return consistent with prior experience. For additional assumptions see the Appendix to this presentation. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements due to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Important factors that could affect actual results are discussed in AES’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, but not limited to the risks discussed under the caption “Cautionary Statements and Risk Factors” in the Company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, as well as our other SEC filings. AES undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

www.aes.com

AES is Among the Largest Global Power Companies

[GRAPHIC]

$9.5 billion revenue power generation and distribution business

$1.6 billion net cash from operating activities

Capacity to serve 100 million people in 26 countries

Note: 2004 data.

Clear Strategic Focus

Contains Forward Looking Statements

Key Strategy Elements and Projected Financial Metrics 2003-2008

Global
Operational
Excellence

Deleveraging
and Credit
Improvement

Focused
Growth
Strategies

Double-digit growth in EPS from continuing operations(1)
Gross margin improvement to $3.5 billion
ROIC(2) improvement to 11%

(1) Based on 13-19% per year growth in diluted EPS from continuing operations from $0.56 per share 2003 base (pre-restatement). Implied range of 2008 EPS forecasts of up to $1.34 in 2008 is unchanged based on restated 2003 diluted EPS from continuing operations. See Appendix.

(2) Non-GAAP financial measures. Guidance includes growth projects committed to in 2004 and prior years. See Appendix.

Diversified Utilities and Generation Portfolio

2004 Revenue $9.5 billion		2004 Gross Margin $2.8 billion

[CHART]		[CHART]

• Regulated Utilities in 7 countries		• Generation(1)
		78% Revenue from long-term contracts
		22% Revenue from short-term contracts and spot sales

(1) Generation comprises Contract Generation and Competitive Supply segments

Generation KPI’s

		Key Peformance Indicator (KPI)

		• Lost time accidents (LTA)
Safety Excellence		• Near misses

Operational Excellence		• Equivalent forced outage rate (EFOR) • Operating cost per megawatt hour • Heat rate • Global sourcing (target spend & sourced savings)

Customer Service Excellence		• Equivalent forced outage rate (EFOR) • Commercial availability

KPI Example - Utility Generation Plant EFOR Improvement

IPL (US) and EDC (Venezuela) EFOR
2003-2005YTD(1)

[CHART]

EFOR Improvement

IPL sources of improvement:

• Targeted equipment replacement to improve reliability

• Increased open market power sales

EDC sources of improvement:

• Improved proactive maintenance

• Better outage planning

Results:

• 40% improvement at IPL

• 76% improvement at EDC

(1) Data through September 30, 2005

Utility KPI’s

	Key Performance Indicator (KPI)

	•	Lost time accidents (LTA)
Safety Excellence	•	Near misses
	•	Public safety

	•	Losses rate
Operational Excellence	•	Collections rate
	•	O&M per customer
	•	Overhead per customer

	•	System interruption frequency (SAIFI)
Customer Service Excellence	•	System interruption duration (SAIDI)
	•	Customer satisfaction surveys

Utility KPI Example - El Salvador O&M per Customer

El Salvador O&M per Customer

2003-2005YTD(1)

[CHART]

El Salvador O&M Cost Reduction

• Four distribution companies serving almost 1 million customers

Sources of improvement:

• Integrating four distribution companies to gain synergies

• Implemented rigorous work management process to streamline maintenance and improve workforce efficiency

• Feeder level analysis to optimize investments and asset importance

Results: 21% unit O&M cost reduction

(1) Data through September 30, 2005

Utility KPI Examples - Argentina Losses

Eden Total Loss Rate

2003-2005YTD(1)

[CHART]

Eden Total Loss Rate Reduction

• Distribution company serving almost 300,000 customers

Sources of improvement:

• Increased proactive contact with customers possibly committing fraud

• 100% increase in letters sent to bad debtors

• More aggressive and targeted disconnection effort and use of collection agents

Results: 27% total loss rate reduction

(1) Data through September 30, 2005

Financial Strategy Elements

Contains Forward Looking Statements

Target Capital Structure	•	$600 MM 2005-2006 parent debt reduction to achieve BB credit statistics
Target Capital Structure	•	Optimize return on invested capital


Robust Risk Management	•	Global interest rate, currency, energy cost risk management strategies
Robust Risk Management	•	Limited recourse project finance structures

Transparent Disclosure	•	Financial analysis and reporting
	•	Sarbanes/Oxley compliance
	•	Proactive investor communications
	•	Corporate values and rigorous code of business conduct and compliance program

Limited US Merchant Exposure Hedged With Creditworthy Customers

Contains Forward Looking Statements

AES Eastern Energy Contracting Strategy

Hedge Metrics (2005-6)(1)		Hedge % by Counterparty Credit (2005)(1)

[CHART]		[CHART]

(1) Data as of September 30, 2005

Actively Managed Floating Rate Debt Exposure

Contains Forward Looking Statements

AES Debt Profile

AES Fixed vs. Floating Rate Debt

[CHART]

Floating Rate Debt by Currency(2)

				Minority Interest
	Consolidated			Adjusted
US Dollar	45		%	57		%
Brazilian Real	36		%	18		%
Euro	12		%	16		%
Hungarian Forint	3		%	4		%
Venezuelan Bolivar	2		%	3		%
Other currencies	2		%	2		%
	100		%	100		%
Floating rate debt	$	3.7 billion		$	2.5 billion

(1) Including interest rate swaps

(2) Data as of September 30, 2005

Measuring Improvement through Gross Margin and Return on Invested Capital

Performance Drivers

Generation	Utilities

New Contracted Capacity	Tariff Process Management

Competitive Supply Dispatch	Demand Growth (non-US)	Revenues

Reduce EFOR	Reduce Commercial Losses	Gross
		Margin
Optimize Operating & Sourcing Costs Fuel Purchase Risk Management		Operating Costs


Overhead Cost Management Currency and Other Risk Management		Below Gross Margin	ROIC


Working Capital and Debt Reduction Asset Utilization		Asset Management

Strong Free Cash Flow Growth

Contains Forward Looking Statements

[CHART]

(1) Non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix.

(2) Based on midpoint of 2005 free cash flow financial guidance ($1,250 million)

Disciplined Use of Growing Free Cash Flow

			Contains Forward Looking Statements

		2005-2006	2006-2007 and Beyond
2005 Free Cash Flow(1) Profile		Strategy	Strategy

		Achieve BB/Ba2	Invest for growth
	Parent	credit metrics
	Free Cash Flow $350 MM	Rebuild development pipeline	Alternatives if growth projects don’t develop at adequate returns • investment grade credit • cash dividends • share repurchases
Free Cash
Flow(1)	Optimize Annually
$1,250 MM
		Subsidiary debt reduction
	Subsidiary
	Free Cash	Platform expansion
	Flow
	$900 MM	Dividends (AES and minority owners)

(1) Non-GAAP financial measure based on midpoint of 2005 guidance of $1.2 to $1.3 billion and is reconciled from 2005 guidance for net cash from operating activities of $1.9 to $2.0 billion less maintenance capital expenditures of $700 million. Estimated allocation of this midpoint 2005 free cash flow guidance is $350 million at the parent company and $900 million at subsidiaries.

Breadth of AES Capabilities

[GRAPHIC]	[GRAPHIC]	[GRAPHIC]

Distribution	Coal-Fired	Hydroelectric


[GRAPHIC]	[GRAPHIC]	[GRAPHIC]

Wind Power	LNG	Gas-Fired

Rebuilding Development Pipeline

Contains Forward Looking Statements

Deep Development Pipeline Supports Sustained Growth

4-6 Years for Greenfield Projects

3-4 Years for Wind Projects

Development Milestones	Market Assessment/ Feasibility Study	Negotiations/ Permits/ RFP	Purchase Agreement	Project Financing	Construction

Current Activity	38 Countries	6 Countries	1 Country	2 Countries	3 Countries

	Central America	Bahamas	Chile	Bulgaria	Chile
Examples of	China	Romania		Panama	Spain
Current	Eastern Europe	El Salvador			US
Portfolio	India	Middle East
Development	Pakistan	US
Activity	South Africa	Vietnam
	US

Demonstrated Success With Generation Growth Program

Contains Forward Looking Statements

Cumulative Generation Additions 2003-2006

(% Increase Above 2002 Base)

[CHART]

14 projects in 7 countries representing over 3,400 MW capacity
95%+ long-term contracts

Note: Includes projects under construction

Greenfield Example: Bulgaria

Contains Forward Looking Statements

670 MW lignite-fired power plant

• $1.4 billion project cost

• 15 year contract with NEK (national utility)

• 15 year lignite supply agreement minimizes energy supply risks

• Letter of government support

• €790 million non-recourse financing closed in December with commercial and multilateral banks

• Completing site acquisition and permitting

• Target first quarter 2006 start of construction

• US$300 million+ new revenues expected by 2010

Proposed AES Maritza Plant, Bulgaria
(artist rendition)

[CHART]

Platform Expansion Example: Chile

Contains Forward Looking Statements

120 MW San Pedro mixed-fuel power plant

• $37 million project cost

• Based on current generation tariff structure

• Supports peaking, fuel diversification and hydrology risk management strategies

• Uses diesel and natural gas

• Expected 2006 start-up

Proposed coal-fired power plants

• 200-250 MW plants at existing Ventanas and Guacolda sites

• 2009 Start-Up

• Combined capital costs $600 million

• Participating in Chilean RFP process

Combined platform expansion revenue potential $175 million by 2010

Ventanas Plant, Chile

[GRAPHIC]

Rigorous Capital Discipline

		Contains Forward Looking Statements

Strategic Objectives		Capital Allocation Process

Market Knowledge		Project Financial Analysis/Valuation

• Regional business model • Leverage existing assets		Independent Review

Execution Skills	Value Creation	Executive Office Approval

• Leverage operating model • People excellence		Board of Directors Approval > $25 Million

Risk Management		Project Execution

• Appropriate hurdle rates
• Reduce portfolio earnings/cash flow volatility

Key Takeaways

		Contains Forward Looking Statements

[GRAPHIC]	•	Global power market offers sizeable growth opportunities
		• AES well positioned to capitalize on these opportunities
		• Investment discipline firmly established
[GRAPHIC]	•	Strong AES financial metrics
		• Margin expansion
		• ROIC improvement
		• Growing free cash flow
[GRAPHIC]		• Improving credit quality
		• Double digit EPS growth
	•	Incentives aligned with investors
		• Stock performance (options)
		• Free cash flow growth (performance units)
		• Other performance metrics (restricted stock)

AES: The power of being global.

[GRAPHIC]

Thank you.

Appendix - Assumptions

Forecasted financial information is based on certain material assumptions. Such assumptions include, but are not limited to: 1) no unforeseen external events such as wars, depressions, or economic or political disruptions occur; 2) businesses continue to operate in a manner consistent with or better than prior operating performance, including achievement of planned productivity improvements including benefits of global sourcing, and in accordance with the provisions of their relevant contracts or concessions; 3) new business opportunities are available to AES in sufficient quantity so that AES can capture its historical market share; 4) no major disruptions or discontinuities occur in GDP, foreign exchange rates, inflation or interest rates during the forecast period; 5) negative factors do not combine to create highly negative low-probability business situations; 6) business-specific risks as described in the Company’s SEC filings do not occur.

In addition, benefits from global sourcing include avoided costs, reduction in capital project costs versus budgetary estimates, and projected savings based on assumed spend volume which may or may not actually be achieved. These benefits will not be fully reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial results.

Appendix - Definitions

• Free cash flow – Net cash from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures. Maintenance capital expenditures reflect property additions less growth capital expenditures.

• Lost Time Accident (LTA) - An incident in which the injured person is kept away from work beyond the day of the incident.

• Near Miss - an incident that occurred but did not result in any injury. In AES, we have expanded this to include unsafe conditions that have been observed.

• O&M – Operation and maintenance.

• Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) – An integrated maintenance methodology that optimizes among reactive, interval-based, condition-based, and proactive maintenance practices to take advantage of their respective strengths in order to maximize facility and equipment reliability while minimizing life-cycle costs.

• Return on invested capital (ROIC) - Defined as net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) divided by average capital. NOPAT is defined as income before tax and minority expense plus interest expense less income taxes less tax benefit on interest expense at effective tax rate. Average capital is defined as the average of beginning and ending total debt plus minority interest plus shareholders equity less debt service reserves.

• System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) – A measure of the cumulative duration of electric service forced and sustained interruptions experienced by customers each year, excluding “force majeure” events. SAIDI is calculated as the total number of customer minutes of sustained interruption divided by the number of customers served.

• System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) – A measure of the number of outages per customer per year. SAIFI is calculated by dividing the total number of customer-sustained interruptions by the number of customers served.

Appendix – Summary Financial Information 2002 – September 30, 2005

	Nine Months ending September 30,
	2005		2004		2004		2003		2002

Revenues	$	8,113	$	6,940	$	9,463	$	8,413	$	7,377
Gross margin	2,249		2,076		2,782		2,459		1,968
Income (loss) from continuing operations	453		231		258		311		(2,064		)
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations	$	0.68	$	0.36	$	0.40	$	0.52	$	(3.83	)

Free cash flow(1)	$	957	$	754	$	1,064	$	1,100	$	774
Maintenance capital expenditures	509		363		507		542		761
Net cash from operating activities	$	1,466	$	1,117	$	1,571	$	1,642	$	1,535

Note: Restated.

(1) Non-GAAP financial measure and is reconciled from net cash from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures.

Appendix – Reconciliation of Adjusted Earnings Per Share

	2005E		2004(2)(3)

Adjusted Earnings Per Share(1)	$	0.83	$	0.58
FAS 133 Mark-to-Market Gains/(Losses)(3)	—		(0.06		)
Currency Transaction Gains/(Losses)	—		(0.06		)
Net Asset Gains/(Losses and Impairments)	—		(0.05		)
Debt Retirement Gains/(Losses)	—		(0.01		)
Total Adjustment Factors	0.02		(0.18		)
Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations	$	0.85	$	0.40
Restatement Impacts (2004)			$	(0.17	)
Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations (before restatement)			$	0.57

(1) Adjusted earnings per share (a non-GAAP financial measure) is defined as diluted earnings per share from continuing operations excluding gains or losses associated with (a) mark-to-market amounts related to FAS 133 derivative transactions, (b) foreign currency transaction impacts on the net monetary position related to Brazil, Venezuela, and Argentina, (c) significant asset gains or losses due to disposition transactions and impairments, and (d) early retirement of recourse debt. AES believes that adjusted earnings per share better reflects the underlying business performance of the Company, and are considered in the Company’s internal evaluation of financial performance. Factors in this determination include the variability associated with mark-to-market gains or losses related to certain derivative transactions, and periodic strategic decisions to dispose of certain assets which may influence results in a given period. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior-period amounts to conform to the 2004 presentation.

(2) Restated. 2003 adjusted EPS not recalculated.

(3) 2004 results include $(0.03) related to Chile debt restructuring costs.

Appendix – Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

	Twelve Months Ending
Net Operating Profit After Tax (1)	September 2005			2004
IBT&MI	$	1,265		$	831
Reported Interest Expense	1,884			1,941
Income Tax Expense (2)	1,312			1,251
Net Operating Profit After Tax	1,837			1,521
Effective Tax Rate (3)	42		%	45		%

ROIC (4)	9.0		%	7.6		%

	September			December			September			December
Total Capital (5)	2005			2004			2004			2003
Total Debt	$	17,946		$	18,588		$	18,515		$	19,638
Minority Interest	1,517			1,279			981			961
Stockholders’Equity	1,421			972			1,572			(68		)
Debt Service Reserves and Other Deposits	(653		)	(737		)	(598		)	(617		)

Total Capital	$	20,231		$	20,102		$	20,470		$	19,914

Average Capital (6)	$	20,351		$	20,008

(1) Net operating profit after tax, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as income before tax and minority interest expense (IBT&MI) plus interest expense less income taxes less tax benefit on interest expense at the effective tax rate.

(2) Income tax expense calculated by multiplying the sum of IBT&MI and reported interest expense for the period by the effective tax rate for the period.

(3) Effective tax rate calculated by dividing reported income tax expense for the period by IBT&MI for the period.

(4) Return on invested capital (ROIC), a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as net operating profit after tax divided by average capital calculated over rolling 12 month basis.

(5) Total capital, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined as total debt plus minority interest plus shareholders equity less debt service reserves.

(6) Average capital is defined as the average of beginning and ending total capital over the last twelve months.