XML 49 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Asset Impairment Expense
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Impairment or Disposal of Tangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
ASSET IMPAIRMENT EXPENSE
ASSET IMPAIRMENT EXPENSE
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Buffalo Gap II
$

 
$

 
$
159

 
$

UK Wind

 
37

 

 
37

DPL
235

 

 
235

 

Other

 

 

 
8

Total asset impairment expense
$
235

 
$
37

 
$
394

 
$
45


DPL — During the second quarter of 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived generation assets at DPL. Uncertainty created by the Supreme Court of Ohio’s June 20, 2016 opinion, lower expectations of future revenue resulting from the most recent PJM capacity auction, and higher anticipated environmental compliance costs resulting from third party studies were collectively determined to be an impairment indicator for these assets. The Company performed a long-lived asset impairment analysis and determined that the carrying amount of Killen, a coal-fired generation facility, and certain DPL peaking generation facilities were not recoverable. The Killen and DPL peaking generation asset groups were determined to have a fair value of $84 million and $5 million, respectively, using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized a total asset impairment expense of $235 million. DPL is reported in the US SBU reportable segment.
Buffalo Gap II — During the first quarter of 2016, the Company tested the recoverability of its long-lived assets at Buffalo Gap II. Impairment indicators were identified based on a decline in forward power curves. The Company determined that the carrying amount was not recoverable. The Buffalo Gap II asset group was determined to have a fair value of 92 million using the income approach. As a result, the Company recognized an asset impairment expense of $159 million ($49 million attributable to AES). Buffalo Gap II is reported in the US SBU reportable segment.
UK Wind — During the second quarter of 2015, the Company decided to no longer pursue two wind projects in the United Kingdom based on recent regulatory clarifications specific to these projects, resulting in a full impairment. Impairment indicators were also identified at four other wind projects based on their development status and a reassessment of the likelihood that each project would be pursued given aviation concerns, regulatory changes, economic considerations and other factors. The Company determined that the carrying amounts of each of these asset groups, which totaled $38 million, were not recoverable. In aggregate, the asset groups were determined to have a fair value of $1 million using the market approach and, as a result, the Company recognized an asset impairment expense of $37 million. The UK Wind projects were reported in the Europe SBU reportable segment.