XML 34 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 7 - Derivative Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block]
Note 7 – Derivative Financial Instruments

On November 27, 2007, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement on the $16.3 million term loan in order to avoid the risks associated with fluctuating interest rates on this term loan and to eliminate the variability in the cash outflow for interest payments.  The interest rate swap agreement locks the interest rate on the notional value at 5.92% through November 29, 2014.  The notional value of the interest rate swap amortizes quarterly with payments that mirror the $16.3 million term loan.  Upon entering into this interest rate swap, the Company designated this derivative as a cash flow hedge by documenting the Company’s risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge along with methods for assessing the swap’s effectiveness in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging.

The fair value of the interest rate swap is recorded in other liabilities with the offset recorded in other comprehensive income.  At September 30, 2011, the notional value of the swap was $10.2 million and the fair value of the interest rate swap was approximately $1.0 million.  The following table presents certain information regarding our interest rate swap.

   
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized inOCI on
Derivative, Net of Tax
   
Amount of Loss Recognized in
Accumulated OCI, Net of Tax
 
   
Twelve Months Ended
September 30,
   
September 30,
   
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
                         
Interest rate swap agreement
  $ 189,425     $ (130,998 )   $ (587,258 )   $ (776,683 )

FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the observability of inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 
·
Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical assets in active markets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

 
·
Level 2 – Inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable. These inputs are either directly observable in the marketplace or indirectly observable through corroboration with market data for substantially the full contractual term of the asset or liability being measured.

 
·
Level 3 – Inputs that are not observable for which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability being measured. These inputs reflect management’s best estimate of the assumptions market participants would use in determining fair value.

The Company’s interest rate swap is an over-the-counter instrument and is classified in the Level 2 hierarchy as the fair value can be estimated from executed transactions or broker quotes corroborated by other market data. These broker quotes are based on observable market prices at which similar transactions could currently be executed.