T | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from: ____________________ to ____________________ |
Florida | 65-0039856 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
2002 Summit Boulevard, 6th Floor Atlanta, Georgia | 30319 | |
(Address of principal executive office) | (Zip Code) |
Common Stock, $.01 par value | New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) | |
(Title of each class) | (Name of each exchange on which registered) |
Large Accelerated filer | T | Accelerated filer | o | |||
Non-accelerated filer | o | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | o |
PAGE | |||
• | uncertainty related to legislation, regulations, regulatory agency actions, government programs and policies, industry initiatives and evolving best servicing practices; |
• | uncertainty related to claims, litigation and investigations brought by government agencies and private parties regarding our servicing, foreclosure, modification and other practices; |
• | the characteristics of our servicing portfolio, including prepayment speeds along with delinquency and advance rates; |
• | our ability to grow and adapt our business, including the availability of new loan servicing and other accretive business opportunities; |
• | uncertainty related to acquisitions, including our ability to close acquisitions and to integrate the systems, procedures and personnel of acquired assets and businesses; |
• | our ability to contain and reduce our operating costs; |
• | our ability to successfully modify delinquent loans, manage foreclosures and sell foreclosed properties; |
• | our ability to effectively manage our regulatory and contractual compliance obligations; |
• | the adequacy of our financial resources, including our sources of liquidity and ability to fund and recover advances, repay borrowings and comply with debt covenants; |
• | the loss of the services of our senior managers; |
• | uncertainty related to general economic and market conditions, delinquency rates, home prices and disposition timelines on foreclosed properties; |
• | uncertainty related to the actions of loan owners, including mortgage-backed securities investors and government sponsored entities (GSEs), regarding loan put-backs, penalties and legal actions; |
• | uncertainty related to the processes for judicial and non-judicial foreclosure proceedings, including potential additional costs or delays or moratoria in the future or claims pertaining to past practices; |
• | our reserves, valuations, provisions and anticipated realization on assets; |
• | our ability to effectively manage our exposure to interest rate changes and foreign exchange fluctuations; |
• | our credit and servicer ratings and other actions from various rating agencies; |
• | our ability to maintain our technology systems and our ability to adapt such systems for future operating environments; |
• | failure of our internal security measures or breach of our privacy protections; and |
• | uncertainty related to the political or economic stability of foreign countries in which we have operations. |
ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
• | access to new business opportunities; |
• | low operating costs; |
• | strong customer service and quality processes; |
• | superior default management and loss mitigation; |
• | a scalable and compliant servicing platform; and |
• | diverse, cost-effective sources of capital. |
Counterparty | Acquisition Type | Date | Loan Count | MSR UPB (in billions) | ||||||
Saxon (1) | Asset | May 2010 | 38,000 | $ | 6.9 | |||||
HomeEq (2) | Platform | September 2010 | 134,000 | 22.4 | ||||||
Litton (3) | Platform | September 2011 | 245,000 | 38.6 | ||||||
Saxon (1) | Asset | April 2012 | 132,000 | 22.2 | ||||||
JPMorgan (4) | Asset | April 2012 | 41,200 | 8.1 | ||||||
Bank of America (5) | Asset | June 2012 | 51,000 | 10.1 | ||||||
Homeward (6) | Platform | December 2012 | 421,000 | 77.0 | ||||||
ResCap (7) | Platform | February 2013 | 1,740,000 | 183.1 | ||||||
Ally (8) | Asset | April - August 2013 | 466,900 | 87.5 | ||||||
OneWest (9) | Asset | August 2013 - March 2014 | 299,000 | 69.0 | ||||||
Greenpoint (10) | Asset | December 2013 | 31,400 | 6.3 |
(1) | Consists of conventional and non-Agency (includes forward mortgage loans originated as Alt-A and subprime) MSRs acquired from Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. (Saxon). |
(2) | Represents the U.S. non-Agency mortgage servicing business (HomeEq) acquired from Barclays Bank PLC. |
(3) | Represents the acquisition of the outstanding partnership interests of Litton Loan Servicing LP (Litton), a servicer and subservicer of primarily non-Agency mortgage loans, from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
(4) | Consists of non-Agency MSRs acquired from JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMorgan). |
(5) | Consists of conventional MSRs acquired from Bank of America, N.A. (Bank of America). |
(6) | On December 27, 2012, completed the merger of O&H Acquisition Corp. (O&H), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ocwen, and Homeward Residential Holdings, Inc. (Homeward), a servicer and subservicer of conventional, government insured and non-Agency mortgage loans and conventional and government insured loan originator, substantially all of the stock of which was owned by certain private equity funds that were managed by WL Ross & Co. LLC. |
(7) | Represents the acquisition of the U.S. mortgage servicing business (ResCap) of Residential Capital, LLC, a servicer, subservicer and master servicer of conventional, government insured and non-Agency mortgage loans, pursuant to a plan under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Residential Capital, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ally Financial Inc. |
(8) | Consists of conventional MSRs acquired from Ally Bank (Ally), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ally Financial Inc. Ocwen assumed the subservicing agreement between ResCap and Ally at the time of the ResCap acquisition. Upon completion of the Ally acquisition, the subservicing contract was terminated. |
(9) | Consists of conventional and non-Agency MSRs acquired from OneWest Bank, FSB (OneWest). The transaction is closing in tranches with the first closing in August 2013 and the last closing scheduled to take place in the first quarter 2014. |
(10) | Consists of primarily non-Agency MSRs from Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. (Greenpoint), a subsidiary of Capital One Bank, N.A. |
• | Moody’s Investor Services (January 2013) - Ocwen cured more loans than other subprime servicers and generated more cash-flow comparing the percentage of loans in static pools that started more than 90 days past due or in foreclosure and a year later became current, paid-off in full or were 60 days or less past due. Loans in bankruptcy at the beginning or end of the period were excluded from the Moody’s analysis. The same study also showed that Ocwen moved subprime loans through foreclosure faster than did other subprime servicers. |
• | BlackBox Logic (September 2013) - Ocwen’s modifications outstanding as a percentage of the portfolio of subprime securities was 59.2%, the highest across the other large subprime servicers. Ocwen’s re-default rate (more than 60+ days delinquent) outstanding was 26.6%, the lowest across the other large subprime servicers. |
• | Moody’s Investor Services (October 2013) - Ocwen’s performance ranked best among the servicers for the performance on over 1.1 million loans which were 60+ days delinquent or in foreclosure at the height of the mortgage crisis in December 2008. |
Delinquencies (% of UPB) | ||||||||
Acquisition | Acquisition Date | Upon Boarding to Ocwen’s System | December 31, 2013 | |||||
HomeEq | September 2010 | 28.0 | % | 20.3 | % | |||
Litton | September 2011 | 35.0 | 25.8 | |||||
Saxon | April 2012 | 28.7 | 23.5 | |||||
Homeward | December 2012 | 21.7 | 17.0 | |||||
ResCap | February 2013 | 11.4 | 9.4 |
Rating Agency | Residential Prime Servicer | Residential Subprime Servicer | Residential Special Servicer | Master Servicing | Date of last action |
Moody’s | na | SQ2 | SQ2 | na | March 2012 |
Morningstar | na | MOR RS1 (1) | MOR RS1 | na | October 2012 |
S&P | na | Above Average | Above Average | Average | November 2012 (RMBS Master Servicer July 2013) |
Fitch | RPS3 | RPS3 | RSS3 | RMS3 | October 2013 |
(1) | Non-prime rating. |
• | civil and criminal liability; |
• | loss of our licenses and approvals to engage in the servicing of residential mortgage loans; |
• | damage to our reputation in the industry; |
• | inability to raise capital; |
• | administrative fines and penalties and litigation, including class action lawsuits; |
• | governmental investigations and enforcement actions; and |
• | inability to execute on our business strategy, including our growth plans. |
• | creates an inter-agency body that is responsible for monitoring the activities of the financial system and recommending a framework for substantially increased regulation of large interconnected financial services firms; |
• | creates a liquidation framework for the resolution of certain bank holding companies and other large and interconnected nonbank financial companies; |
• | strengthens the regulatory oversight of securities and capital markets activities by the SEC; and |
• | creates the CFPB, a new federal entity responsible for regulating consumer financial services. |
• | force-placing insurance, unless there is a reasonable belief that the borrower has failed to comply with a contractual requirement to maintain insurance; |
• | charging a fee for responding to a valid qualified written request; |
• | failing to take timely action to respond to the borrower’s request to correct errors related to payment, payoff amounts, or avoiding foreclosure; |
• | failing to respond within 10 business days of a request from the borrower to provide contact information about the owner or assignee of their loan; and |
• | failing to return an escrow balance or provide a credit within 20 business days of a residential mortgage loan being paid off by the borrower. |
• | acknowledging receipt of a qualified written request under RESPA within 5 business days and providing a final response within 30 business days; |
• | promptly crediting mortgage payments received from the borrower on the date of receipt except where payment does not conform to previously established requirements; and |
• | sending an accurate payoff statement within a reasonable period of time but in no case more than 7 business days after receipt of a written request from the borrower. |
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
• | loss of our licenses and approvals to engage in our servicing and lending businesses |
• | damage to our reputation in the industry |
• | governmental investigations and enforcement actions |
• | administrative fines and penalties and litigation |
• | civil and criminal liability, including class action lawsuits |
• | inability to raise capital |
• | inability to execute on our business strategy, including our growth plans |
• | A commitment by Ocwen to service loans in accordance with specified servicing guidelines and to be subject to oversight by an independent national monitor for three years. Ocwen is presently subject to substantially the same guidelines and oversight with respect to the portion of its servicing portfolio acquired from ResCap in early 2013. |
• | A payment of $127.3 million, which includes a fixed amount for administrative expenses, to a consumer relief fund to be disbursed by an independent administrator to eligible borrowers. Pursuant to indemnification and loss sharing provisions of applicable acquisition documents, approximately half of this consumer relief fund payment is to be funded by the former owners of certain servicing portfolios previously acquired by Ocwen and integrated into Ocwen’s servicing platform. We established a reserve of $66.9 million with respect to our portion of the payment into the consumer relief fund. This reserve is expected to cover all of Ocwen’s portion of the consumer relief fund payment. |
• | A commitment by Ocwen to continue its principal forgiveness modification programs to delinquent and underwater borrowers, including underwater borrowers at imminent risk of default, in an aggregate amount of at least $2 billion over three years. These and all of Ocwen’s other loan modifications are designed to be sustainable for homeowners while providing a net present value for mortgage loan investors that is superior to that of foreclosure. Principal forgiveness as part of a loan modification is determined on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the applicable servicing agreement. Principal forgiveness does not involve an expense to Ocwen other than the operating expense incurred in arranging the modification, which is part of Ocwen’s role as loan servicer. |
• | Ocwen and the former owners of certain of the acquired servicing portfolios will receive from the Regulators comprehensive releases, subject to certain exceptions, from liability with respect to residential mortgage servicing, modification and foreclosure practices. |
• | Revenue. An increase in delinquencies may delay the timing of revenue recognition because we recognize servicing fees as earned which is generally upon collection of payments from borrowers or proceeds from REO liquidations. An increase in delinquencies also leads to lower float balances and float earnings. Additionally, an increase in delinquencies in our GSE servicing portfolio acquired from Homeward and ResCap will result in lower revenue because we collect servicing fees from GSEs only on performing loans. |
• | Expenses. Higher delinquencies increase our cost to service loans, as loans in default require more intensive effort to bring them current or manage the foreclosure process. An increase in advances outstanding relative to the change in the size of the servicing portfolio can result in substantial strain on our financial resources. This occurs because excess growth of advances increases financing costs with no offsetting increase in revenue, thus reducing profitability. If we are unable to fund additional advances, we could breach the requirements of our servicing agreements. Such developments could result in our losing our servicing rights, which would have a substantial negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations and could trigger cross-defaults under our various credit agreements. |
• | Valuation of MSRs. Apart from the risk of losing our servicing rights, defaults are involuntary prepayments resulting in a reduction in UPB. This may result in higher amortization and impairment in the value of our MSRs. |
• | limitations imposed on us by existing lending and similar agreements that contain restrictive covenants that may limit our ability to raise additional debt |
• | liquidity in the credit markets |
• | the strength of the lenders from whom we borrow |
• | limitations on borrowing on advance facilities that are limited by the amount of eligible collateral pledged |
• | Revenue. If prepayment speeds increase, our servicing fees will decline more rapidly than anticipated because of the greater than expected decrease in the UPB on which those fees are based. The reduction in servicing fees would be somewhat offset by increased float earnings because the faster repayment of loans will result in higher float balances that generate the float earnings. Conversely, decreases in prepayment speeds result in increased servicing fees but lead to lower float balances and float earnings. |
• | Expenses. Amortization of MSRs is one of our largest operating expenses. Since we amortize servicing rights in proportion to total expected income over the life of a portfolio, an increase in prepayment speeds leads to increased amortization expense as we revise downward our estimate of total expected income. Faster prepayment speeds also result in higher compensating interest expense. Decreases in prepayment speeds lead to decreased amortization expense as the period over which we amortize MSRs is extended. Slower prepayment speeds also lead to lower compensating interest expense. |
• | Valuation of MSRs. We base the price we pay for MSRs and the rate of amortization of those rights on, among other things, our projection of the cash flows from the related pool of mortgage loans. Our expectation of prepayment speeds is a significant assumption underlying those cash flow projections. If prepayment speeds were significantly greater than expected, the carrying value of our MSRs that we account for using the amortization method could exceed their estimated fair value. When the carrying value of these MSRs exceeds their fair value, we are required to record an impairment charge which has a negative impact on our financial results. Similarly, if prepayment speeds were significantly greater than expected, the fair value of our MSRs which we carry at fair value could decrease. When the fair value of these MSRs decreases, we record a loss on fair value which also has a negative impact on our financial results. |
• | representations and warranties concerning loan quality, contents of the loan file or loan underwriting circumstances are inaccurate |
• | adequate mortgage insurance is not secured within a certain period after closing |
• | a mortgage insurance provider denies coverage |
• | there is a failure to comply, at the individual loan level or otherwise, with regulatory requirements. We believe that, as a result of the current market environment, many purchasers of residential mortgage loans are particularly aware of the conditions under which originators must indemnify or repurchase loans and under which such purchasers would benefit from enforcing any indemnification rights and repurchase remedies they may have. |
• | unanticipated issues in integrating servicing, information, communications and other systems |
• | unanticipated incompatibility in servicing, lending, purchasing, logistics, marketing and administration methods |
• | not retaining key employees |
• | the diversion of management’s attention from ongoing business concerns |
ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
ITEM 2: | PROPERTIES |
Location | Owned/Leased | Square Footage | |||
Principal executive office: | |||||
Atlanta, Georgia (1) | Leased | 2,094 | |||
St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands | Leased | 4,400 | |||
Document storage and imaging facility: | |||||
West Palm Beach, Florida | Leased | 51,931 | |||
Business operations and support offices | |||||
U.S. facilities: | |||||
Coppell, Texas (2) | Leased | 182,700 | |||
Waterloo, Iowa (3) | Owned | 154,980 | |||
Addison, Texas (2) | Leased | 137,992 | |||
Fort Washington, Pennsylvania (3) | Leased | 127,980 | |||
Lewisville, Texas (3) | Leased | 78,413 | |||
Jacksonville, Florida (2) | Leased | 76,075 | |||
McDonough, Georgia (4) | Leased | 62,000 | |||
Rancho Cordova, California (5) | Leased | 53,107 | |||
West Palm Beach, Florida | Leased | 51,546 | |||
Houston, Texas (4) | Leased | 43,014 | |||
Eden Prairie, Minnesota (3) | Owned | 32,283 | |||
Burbank, California (3) | Leased | 18,601 | |||
Westborough, Massachusetts (3) | Leased | 18,158 | |||
Offshore facilities: | |||||
Mumbai, India (6) | Leased | 178,508 | |||
Bangalore, India (7) | Leased | 173,980 | |||
Pune, India (2) | Leased | 88,683 | |||
Manila, Philippines | Leased | 45,035 | |||
Montevideo, Uruguay | Leased | 17,463 |
(1) | We sublease this space from Altisource through October 2014. |
(2) | We assumed the leases in connection with our acquisition of Homeward. We ceased using the Jacksonville, Florida facility in 2013. |
(3) | We assumed the leases or acquired the facility in connection with our acquisition of ResCap. |
(4) | We assumed the lease in connection with our acquisition of Litton. The lease of the Texas facility expired in August 2012 but was renewed on a temporary basis for approximately one-third of the original space. Ocwen or the lessor could terminate this lease at any time by providing 150 days prior written notice. We gave notice on the lease in September 2013 and entered into a new lease for 36,382 square feet of the facility effective January 2014. We ceased using the Georgia facility in 2012. |
(5) | We assumed this lease in connection with our acquisition of Liberty. |
(6) | At December 31, 2013, we were in the process of transferring employees from two older facilities to a new facility. The total square footage shown includes only facilities that were occupied at December 31, 2013. In March 2014, employees will relocate from a 23,140 square foot facility, and the transfers will be complete. The leases on the older facilities will be terminated in the first quarter of 2014. |
(7) | At December 31, 2013, we were in the process of transferring employees from three older facilities to a new facility. The total square footage shown includes only facilities that were occupied at December 31, 2013. In March 2014, employees |
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
High | Low | ||||||
2013 | |||||||
First quarter | $ | 41.47 | $ | 34.68 | |||
Second quarter | 45.74 | 34.58 | |||||
Third quarter | 58.06 | 41.15 | |||||
Fourth quarter | 59.97 | 49.91 | |||||
2012 | |||||||
First quarter | $ | 16.90 | $ | 13.75 | |||
Second quarter | 18.78 | 14.54 | |||||
Third quarter | 28.10 | 18.94 | |||||
Fourth quarter | 38.80 | 28.64 |
Period Ending | ||||||||||||||||||
Index | 12/31/2008 | 12/31/2009 | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2012 | 12/31/2013 | ||||||||||||
Ocwen Financial Corporation | 100.00 | 104.25 | 103.92 | 157.73 | 376.80 | 604.03 | ||||||||||||
S&P 500 | 100.00 | 123.45 | 139.23 | 139.23 | 157.90 | 204.63 | ||||||||||||
S&P Diversified Financials | 100.00 | 128.53 | 134.06 | 92.59 | 128.59 | 179.26 |
(1) | Excludes the significant value distributed in 2009 to Ocwen investors in the form of Altisource common equity. |
Period | Total number of shares purchased | Average price paid per share | Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans | Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans | ||||||||||
November 1-November 30 | 667,112 | $ | 51.1059 | 667,112 | $ | 465.9 | million | |||||||
December 1-December 31 | 458,595 | $ | 56.5404 | 458,595 | $ | 440.0 | million | |||||||
Total | 1,125,707 | $ | 53.3198 | 1,125,707 |
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in thousands, except per share data and unless otherwise indicated) |
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2013 (1) (2) | 2012 (1) (2) | 2011 (1) | 2010 (1) | 2009 (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Selected Balance Sheet Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 7,873,770 | $ | 5,685,962 | $ | 4,728,024 | $ | 2,921,409 | $ | 1,769,350 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale | $ | 566,660 | $ | 509,346 | $ | 20,633 | $ | 25,803 | $ | 33,197 | ||||||||||
Loans held for investment - Reverse mortgages | 618,018 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Advances and match funded advances | 3,444,571 | 3,233,707 | 3,733,502 | 2,108,885 | 968,529 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | 2,069,381 | 764,150 | 293,152 | 193,985 | 117,802 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 416,558 | 416,176 | 70,240 | 12,810 | — | |||||||||||||||
Trading securities, at fair value (4) | — | — | — | — | 251,156 | |||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | $ | 6,017,087 | $ | 3,921,168 | $ | 3,384,713 | $ | 2,016,592 | $ | 903,487 | ||||||||||
Match funded liabilities | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | 2,532,745 | $ | 2,558,951 | $ | 1,482,529 | $ | 465,691 | ||||||||||
Financing liabilities | 1,284,229 | 306,308 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Long-term other secured borrowings | 1,288,740 | 18,466 | 563,627 | 277,542 | 143,395 | |||||||||||||||
Investment line (4) | — | — | — | — | 156,968 | |||||||||||||||
Mezzanine equity (5) | $ | 60,361 | $ | 153,372 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity (6) | $ | 1,796,322 | $ | 1,611,422 | $ | 1,343,311 | $ | 904,817 | $ | 865,863 | ||||||||||
Residential Loans and Real Estate Serviced for Others | ||||||||||||||||||||
Count | 2,861,918 | 1,219,956 | 671,623 | 479,165 | 351,595 | |||||||||||||||
UPB | $ | 464,651,332 | $ | 203,665,716 | $ | 102,199,222 | $ | 73,886,391 | $ | 49,980,077 |
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Selected Operations Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing and subservicing fees | $ | 1,823,559 | $ | 804,407 | $ | 458,838 | $ | 321,699 | $ | 264,467 | ||||||||||
Gain (loss) on loans held for sale, net | 121,694 | 215 | (2 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Other | 93,020 | 40,581 | 37,055 | 38,682 | 116,261 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenue | 2,038,273 | 845,203 | 495,891 | 360,381 | 380,728 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 1,301,294 | 363,907 | 239,547 | 236,474 | 235,654 | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations | 736,979 | 481,296 | 256,344 | 123,907 | 145,074 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (412,842 | ) | (223,455 | ) | (132,770 | ) | (85,923 | ) | (62,954 | ) | ||||||||||
Other, net | 11,086 | (333 | ) | (579 | ) | 1,170 | 11,141 | |||||||||||||
Other expense, net | (401,756 | ) | (223,788 | ) | (133,349 | ) | (84,753 | ) | (51,813 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | 335,223 | 257,508 | 122,995 | 39,154 | 93,261 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 41,074 | 76,585 | 44,672 | 5,545 | 96,110 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 294,149 | 180,923 | 78,323 | 33,609 | (2,849 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes (7) | — | — | — | 4,383 | 3,121 | |||||||||||||||
Net income | 294,149 | 180,923 | 78,323 | 37,992 | 272 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interests | — | — | 8 | (8 | ) | 25 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen stockholders | 294,149 | 180,923 | 78,331 | 37,984 | 297 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends (5) | (5,031 | ) | (85 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Deemed dividend related to beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock (5) | (6,989 | ) | (60 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | $ | 282,129 | $ | 180,778 | $ | 78,331 | $ | 37,984 | $ | 297 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 2.08 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.34 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (7) | — | — | — | 0.04 | 0.04 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to OCN common stockholders | $ | 2.08 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.38 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 2.02 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.32 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (7) | — | — | — | 0.04 | 0.04 | |||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to OCN common stockholders | $ | 2.02 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.36 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 135,678,088 | 133,912,643 | 104,507,055 | 100,273,121 | 78,252,000 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted (8) | 139,800,506 | 138,521,279 | 111,855,961 | 107,483,015 | 78,252,000 |
(1) | Includes significant business acquisitions, including ResCap (February 2013), Homeward (December 2012), Litton (September 2011) and HomEq (September 2010). These transactions primarily involved the acquisition of residential MSRs and related servicing advances. The operating results of the acquired businesses have been included in our results since their respective acquisition dates. See Note 3 — Business Acquisitions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
(2) | During 2013 and 2012, Ocwen completed sales to HLSS of Rights to MSRs together with the related servicing advances. We accounted for the sales to HLSS of Rights to MSRs as secured financings. As a result, the MSRs were not derecognized, and a liability was established equal to the sales price. Match funded liabilities were reduced in connection with these sales. See Note 4 — Sales of Advances and MSRs to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
(3) | On August 10, 2009, we completed the Separation by a pro-rata distribution of Altisource common stock to Ocwen shareholders. As a result of the Separation, we eliminated $88.5 million of assets (including goodwill and other intangibles) and $16.3 million of liabilities from our consolidated balance sheet effective at the close of business on August 9, 2009 and recorded a $72.1 million reduction in additional paid-in capital. After the separation, the operating results of Altisource are no longer included in our operating results. As a consequence of the Separation and related transactions, Ocwen recognized $52.0 million of income tax expense in 2009. OS consolidated revenues and expenses for 2009 prior to the Separation were $106.3 million and $91.8 million, respectively. |
(4) | During 2010, we liquidated our remaining investment in auction rate securities and used the proceeds to repay the investment line. Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on auction rate securities were $(7.9) million and $11.9 million during 2010 and 2009 respectively. |
(5) | Ocwen paid $162.0 million of the purchase price to acquire Homeward by issuing 162,000 shares of Series A Perpetual Convertible Preferred stock (Preferred Shares). On September 23, 2013, Ocwen paid $157.9 million to repurchase from the holders of the Preferred Shares all 3,145,640 shares of Ocwen common stock that were issued upon their election to convert 100,000 of the Preferred Shares into shares of Ocwen common stock. See Note 17 — Mezzanine Equity and Note 26 — Related Party Transactions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. |
(6) | On March 28, 2012, Ocwen issued 4,635,159 shares of its common stock upon redemption and conversion of the remaining balance of our 3.25% Convertible Notes due 2024. On November 9, 2011, Ocwen completed the public offering of 28,750,000 shares of common stock at a per share price of $13.00 and received net proceeds of $354.4 million. |
(7) | On December 3, 2009, we completed the sale of our investment in Bankhaus Oswald Kruber GmbH & Co. KG (BOK), a wholly owned German banking subsidiary. We have reported the results of operations of BOK in the consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations. Income from discontinued operations for 2010 represents a true-up of Ocwen’s income tax expense on the sale of BOK. |
(8) | Prior to the redemption of the 3.25% Convertible Notes, we computed their effect on diluted EPS using the if-converted method. We did not assume conversion of the 3.25% Convertible Notes to common stock for 2009 because the effect was anti-dilutive. We also use the if-converted method to compute the effect on EPS of the Preferred Shares; however, we assumed no conversion for 2013 or 2012 because the effect was anti-dilutive. |
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Transaction | Type | Completion Date | Purchase Price | Acquired MSR UPB | ||||||||
ResCap Acquisition (1) (2) (3) | Business | February 2013 | $ | 2,300 | $ | 183,100 | ||||||
Ally Bank (4) | Contract Assumption | February 2013 | N/A | 130,000 | ||||||||
Ally MSR Transaction (5) (6) | Asset | April - August 2013 | 621 | 87,500 | ||||||||
OneWest MSR Transaction (7) (8) (9) | Asset | August 2013 - March 2014 | 2,491 | 69,000 | ||||||||
Greenpoint MSR Transaction | Asset | December 2013 | 456 | 6,300 |
(1) | Acquired ResCap servicing platform, related assets and assumed liabilities and added approximately 2,450 U.S. based employees. |
(2) | Purchase price includes $389.9 million of MSRs and $1.7 billion of servicing advances, net of assumed liabilities of $74.6 million consisting primarily of accruals for compensatory fees for foreclosures that may ultimately exceed investor timelines. We recognized goodwill of $207.8 million in connection with the acquisition. |
(3) | Consists of $55.6 billion conventional and government insured, $55.6 billion non-Agency, $44.9 billion master servicing and $27.0 billion subservicing. Subsequent to the ResCap acquisition, we acquired $246.4 million UPB of newly originated government insured MSRs from ResCap at contractually agreed multiples of the applicable servicing fee, which approximated market value. |
(4) | We acquired the MSRs related to $87.5 billion in UPB from Ally Bank in the Ally MSR Transaction and terminated the subservicing contract with respect to the acquired MSRs. |
(5) | Purchase price includes $683.8 million of MSRs and $73.6 million of servicing advances and other receivables, net of the estimated fair value of the assumed origination representation and warranty obligations of $136.7 million in connection with the majority of the acquired MSRs. |
(6) | Consists of conventional MSRs. Prior to the acquisition, we subserviced these loans on behalf of Ally Bank under a contract assumption in connection with the ResCap Acquisition. We also acquired newly originated conventional MSRs from Ally Bank through August 31, 2013, at a contractually agreed multiple of the applicable servicing fee, which approximated market value. |
(7) | Purchase price and MSR UPB in connection with December and 2014 settlements are preliminary. Final purchase amounts could be different. |
(8) | Purchase price consists of $398.8 million of MSRs and $2.1 billion of servicing advances. The OneWest MSR Transaction is closing in stages with the final closing expected to occur during the first quarter of 2014. Purchase price, including the final closing, is $2.5 billion, consisting of $406.1 million of MSRs and $2.1 billion of servicing advances. |
(9) | UPB consists of $31.2 billion conventional MSRs and $37.8 billion non-Agency MSRs. Additional UPB acquired in the final closing is estimated to be $849.9 million non-Agency MSRs and $243.9 million conventional MSRs. |
Completion Date | Aggregate Proceeds | MSR UPB Sold | Advances and Match Funded Advances (1) | Deferred Gain | Match Funded Liabilities (1) Repaid | |||||||||||||||
HLSS (2): | ||||||||||||||||||||
March | $ | 803.9 | $ | 15,900.0 | $ | 703.2 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 625.8 | ||||||||||
May | 424.5 | 10,600.0 | 376.6 | 18.9 | 311.5 | |||||||||||||||
July | 2,600.0 | 83,300.0 | 2,400.0 | 9.6 | 1,974.0 | |||||||||||||||
October | 378.7 | — | 350.0 | 10.9 | 78.7 | |||||||||||||||
Other (3): | ||||||||||||||||||||
September | 21.5 | 1,500.0 | — | 3.2 | — | |||||||||||||||
October | 13.3 | 1,000.0 | — | 1.9 | — |
(1) | Match funded advances include advances sold to SPEs formed for the sole purpose of financing advances on loans that we service for others. We either account for these sales as secured financing transactions or we consolidate the SPE because Ocwen is the primary beneficiary of the SPE. The corresponding liability is classified as match funded liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
(2) | Consists of Rights to MSRs for non-Agency MSRs, including all such MSRs acquired in the Homeward and ResCap Acquisitions. Because we retained legal title to the MSRs, the sales of the Rights to MSRs have been accounted for as financings. See Note 4 — Sales of Advances and MSRs for additional information. |
(3) | Consists of 2013 vintage conventional MSRs generated on our Homeward lending platform. These transactions have been accounted for as sales with the gain deferred and recognized over the life of the subservicing contract. |
For the years ended December 31, | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2013 vs. 2012 | 2012 vs. 2011 | 2013 vs. 2012 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing and subservicing fees | $ | 1,823,559 | $ | 804,407 | $ | 458,838 | $ | 1,019,152 | $ | 345,569 | 127 | % | 75 | % | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on loans held for sale | 121,694 | 215 | (2 | ) | 121,479 | 217 | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||||||
Other | 93,020 | 40,581 | 37,055 | 52,439 | 3,526 | 129 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | 2,038,273 | 845,203 | 495,891 | 1,193,070 | 349,312 | 141 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 1,301,294 | 363,907 | 239,547 | 937,387 | 124,360 | 258 | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations | 736,979 | 481,296 | 256,344 | 255,683 | 224,952 | 53 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (412,842 | ) | (223,455 | ) | (132,770 | ) | (189,387 | ) | (90,685 | ) | 85 | 68 | |||||||||||||
Other | 11,086 | (333 | ) | (579 | ) | 11,419 | 246 | n/m | (42 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other expense, net | (401,756 | ) | (223,788 | ) | (133,349 | ) | (177,968 | ) | (90,439 | ) | 80 | 68 | |||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 335,223 | 257,508 | 122,995 | 77,715 | 134,513 | 30 | 109 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 41,074 | 76,585 | 44,672 | (35,511 | ) | 31,913 | (46 | ) | 71 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | 294,149 | 180,923 | 78,323 | 113,226 | 102,600 | 63 | 131 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | — | — | 8 | — | (8 | ) | n/m | (100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen stockholders | 294,149 | 180,923 | 78,331 | 113,226 | 102,592 | 63 | 131 | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | (5,031 | ) | (85 | ) | — | (4,946 | ) | (85 | ) | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||||
Deemed dividend related to beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock | (6,989 | ) | (60 | ) | — | (6,929 | ) | (60 | ) | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | $ | 282,129 | $ | 180,778 | $ | 78,331 | $ | 101,351 | $ | 102,447 | 56 | 131 | |||||||||||||
Segment income (loss) before taxes: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing | $ | 374,411 | $ | 274,363 | $ | 135,880 | $ | 100,048 | $ | 138,483 | 36 | % | 102 | % | |||||||||||
Lending | 35,624 | (258 | ) | — | 35,882 | (258 | ) | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate Items and Other | (74,812 | ) | (16,597 | ) | (12,885 | ) | (58,215 | ) | (3,712 | ) | 351 | 29 | |||||||||||||
$ | 335,223 | $ | 257,508 | $ | 122,995 | $ | 77,715 | $ | 134,513 | 30 | 109 | ||||||||||||||
n/m: not meaningful |
2013 | 2012 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
Cash | $ | 178,512 | $ | 220,130 | $ | (41,618 | ) | (19 | )% | |||||
Loans held for sale ($503.8 million and $426.5 million carried at fair value) | 566,660 | 509,346 | 57,314 | 11 | ||||||||||
Loans held for investment - reverse mortgages, at fair value | 618,018 | — | 618,018 | n/m | ||||||||||
Advances and match funded advances | 3,444,571 | 3,233,707 | 210,864 | 7 | ||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights ($116.0 million and $85.2 million carried at fair value) | 2,069,381 | 764,150 | 1,305,231 | 171 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets | 116,558 | 96,893 | 19,665 | 20 | ||||||||||
Goodwill | 416,558 | 416,176 | 382 | — | ||||||||||
Debt service accounts | 129,897 | 88,748 | 41,149 | 46 | ||||||||||
Other | 333,615 | 356,812 | (23,197 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Total assets | $ | 7,873,770 | $ | 5,685,962 | $ | 2,187,808 | 38 | |||||||
Total Assets by Segment: | ||||||||||||||
Servicing | $ | 6,241,757 | $ | 4,575,489 | $ | 1,666,268 | 36 | % | ||||||
Lending | 1,195,812 | 476,434 | 719,378 | 151 | ||||||||||
Corporate Items & Other | 436,201 | 634,039 | (197,838 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||||
Match funded liabilities | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | 2,532,745 | $ | (167,931 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||
Financing liabilities ($615.6 million and $0 carried at fair value) | 1,284,229 | 306,308 | 977,921 | 319 | ||||||||||
Other secured borrowings | 1,777,669 | 790,371 | 987,298 | 125 | ||||||||||
Other | 590,375 | 291,744 | 298,631 | 102 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | 6,017,087 | 3,921,168 | 2,095,919 | 53 | ||||||||||
Mezzanine equity | 60,361 | 153,372 | (93,011 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 1,796,322 | 1,611,422 | 184,900 | 11 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities, mezzanine equity and stockholders’ equity | $ | 7,873,770 | $ | 5,685,962 | $ | 2,187,808 | 38 | |||||||
Total Liabilities by Segment: | ||||||||||||||
Servicing | $ | 4,740,734 | $ | 3,440,888 | $ | 1,299,846 | 38 | % | ||||||
Lending | 1,107,413 | 388,094 | 719,319 | 185 | ||||||||||
Corporate Item & Other | 168,940 | 92,186 | 76,754 | 83 | ||||||||||
n/m: not meaningful |
• | interest earned on loan payments that we have collected but have not yet remitted to the owner of the mortgage (float earnings); |
• | referral commissions from brokers for REO properties sold through our network of brokers; |
• | Speedpay® fees from borrowers who pay by telephone or through the Internet; and |
• | late fees from borrowers who were delinquent in remitting their monthly mortgage payments but have subsequently become current. |
1. | When a loan becomes current via a non-HAMP modification, we earn $500 of deferred servicing fees and $300 of late fees. To the extent any principal is forgiven as part of a non-HAMP modification, no late fees are collected or earned. |
2. | When a loan becomes current via a HAMP modification, we earn $500 of deferred servicing fees and an initial HAMP fee of $1,000, or $1,500 if the loan was in imminent risk of default. We forfeit late fees in connection with a HAMP modification. |
3. | We earn HAMP success fees of up to $1,000 for HAMP modifications that remain less than 90 days delinquent at the first, second and third anniversary of the start of the trial modification. |
1. | The loan and borrower are evaluated for HAMP eligibility. If HAMP criteria are met, HAMP documentation and trial offer phases proceed. The three most common reasons for failure to qualify for HAMP are: |
• | existing loan terms that are already below a 31% debt to income (DTI) ratio; |
• | inadequate documentation; or |
• | inadequate or inconsistent income. |
2. | If the criteria to qualify for HAMP are not met, the loan and borrower are evaluated utilizing non-HAMP criteria that are more flexible and focus both on the borrower’s ability to pay and on maximizing net present value for investors. If the criteria are met, non-HAMP documentation and trial modification and/or modification phases proceed. |
3. | If the loan and borrower qualify for neither a HAMP nor a non-HAMP modification, liquidation of the loan then proceeds either via a discounted payoff, a deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure or a foreclosure and REO sale. |
Increase in Average Foreclosure Timelines (in Days) | ||||||
State Foreclosure Process | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||
Judicial | 75 | 130 | 133 | |||
Non-Judicial | 33 | 36 | 32 |
% Change | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2013 vs. 2012 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue | |||||||||||||||||
Servicing and subservicing fees: | |||||||||||||||||
Residential | $ | 1,800,598 | $ | 791,985 | $ | 453,590 | 127 | % | 75 | % | |||||||
Commercial | 17,907 | 12,575 | 6,390 | 42 | 97 | ||||||||||||
1,818,505 | 804,560 | 459,980 | 126 | 75 | |||||||||||||
Gain on loans held for sale, net | 39,490 | — | — | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||
Process management fees and other | 37,926 | 36,070 | 34,854 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | 1,895,921 | 840,630 | 494,834 | 126 | 70 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | |||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | 320,598 | 93,445 | 79,076 | 243 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of servicing rights | 282,526 | 72,897 | 42,996 | 288 | 70 | ||||||||||||
Servicing and origination | 95,180 | 25,028 | 8,118 | 280 | 208 | ||||||||||||
Technology and communications | 114,385 | 35,860 | 28,188 | 219 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Professional services | 34,840 | 19,834 | 15,203 | 76 | 30 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment | 85,767 | 41,645 | 20,609 | 106 | 102 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 162,788 | 55,606 | 37,011 | 193 | 50 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,096,084 | 344,315 | 231,201 | 218 | 49 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | 799,837 | 496,315 | 263,633 | 61 | 88 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 1,599 | 9 | 110 | n/m | (92 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (398,733 | ) | (221,948 | ) | (132,574 | ) | 80 | 67 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on debt redemption | (17,030 | ) | (1,514 | ) | 3,651 | n/m | (141 | ) | |||||||||
Other, net | (11,262 | ) | 1,501 | 1,060 | (850 | ) | 42 | ||||||||||
Total other expense, net | (425,426 | ) | (221,952 | ) | (127,753 | ) | 92 | 74 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 374,411 | $ | 274,363 | $ | 135,880 | 36 | 102 | |||||||||
n/m: not meaningful |
% Change | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2013 vs. 2012 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||||||
Residential Assets Serviced | |||||||||||||||||
Unpaid principal balance: | |||||||||||||||||
Performing loans (1) | $ | 397,462,893 | $ | 153,824,497 | $ | 71,900,689 | 158 | % | 114 | % | |||||||
Non-performing loans | 59,425,722 | 43,568,536 | 24,097,130 | 36 | 81 | ||||||||||||
Non-performing real estate | 7,762,717 | 6,272,683 | 6,201,403 | 24 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total residential assets serviced (2) | $ | 464,651,332 | $ | 203,665,716 | $ | 102,199,222 | 128 | 99 | |||||||||
Conventional loans (3) | $ | 218,657,915 | $ | 39,724,120 | $ | 8,918,573 | 450 | % | 345 | % | |||||||
Government insured loans | 45,484,303 | 10,022,475 | 110,332 | 354 | n/m | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency loans | 200,509,114 | 153,919,121 | 93,170,317 | 30 | 65 | ||||||||||||
Total residential loans serviced | $ | 464,651,332 | $ | 203,665,716 | $ | 102,199,222 | 128 | 99 | |||||||||
Percent of total UPB: | |||||||||||||||||
Servicing portfolio | 85.6 | % | 86.3 | % | 77.0 | % | (1 | )% | 12 | % | |||||||
Subservicing portfolio | 14.4 | 13.7 | 23.0 | 5 | (40 | ) | |||||||||||
Non-performing residential assets serviced (4) | 14.5 | 23.5 | 27.9 | (38 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||
Number of: | |||||||||||||||||
Performing loans (1) | 2,511,675 | 982,391 | 516,923 | 156 | % | 90 | % | ||||||||||
Non-performing loans | 308,468 | 204,325 | 123,584 | 51 | 65 | ||||||||||||
Non-performing real estate | 41,775 | 33,240 | 31,116 | 26 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Total number of residential assets serviced (2) | 2,861,918 | 1,219,956 | 671,623 | 135 | 82 | ||||||||||||
Conventional loans (3) | 1,221,483 | 215,321 | 47,947 | 467 | % | 349 | % | ||||||||||
Government insured loans | 289,185 | 54,632 | 695 | 429 | n/m | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency loans | 1,351,250 | 950,003 | 622,981 | 42 | 52 | ||||||||||||
Total residential loans serviced | 2,861,918 | 1,219,956 | 671,623 | 135 | 82 | ||||||||||||
Percent of total number: | |||||||||||||||||
Servicing | 84.4 | % | 86.0 | % | 77.5 | % | (2 | )% | 11 | % | |||||||
Subservicing | 15.6 | 14.0 | 22.5 | 11 | (38 | ) | |||||||||||
Non-performing residential assets serviced (4) | 12.2 | 18.4 | 21.2 | (34 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
% Change | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2013 vs. 2012 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||||||
Residential Assets Serviced | |||||||||||||||||
Average UPB of residential assets serviced | |||||||||||||||||
Servicing | $ | 320,907,907 | $ | 102,809,182 | $ | 67,417,338 | 212 | % | 52 | % | |||||||
Subservicing | 94,821,042 | 15,997,014 | 13,843,256 | 493 | 16 | ||||||||||||
$ | 415,728,949 | $ | 118,806,196 | $ | 81,260,594 | 250 | 46 | ||||||||||
Prepayment speed (average Constant Prepayment Rate or CPR) | 16.9 | % | 14.7 | % | 14.4 | % | 15 | % | 2 | % | |||||||
Average number of residential assets serviced | |||||||||||||||||
Servicing | 1,997,691 | 661,839 | 436,909 | 202 | % | 51 | % | ||||||||||
Subservicing | 623,210 | 100,815 | 94,493 | 518 | 7 | ||||||||||||
2,620,901 | 762,654 | 531,402 | 244 | 44 | |||||||||||||
Residential Servicing and Subservicing Fees | |||||||||||||||||
Loan servicing and subservicing fees: | |||||||||||||||||
Servicing | $ | 1,236,449 | $ | 527,535 | $ | 312,836 | 134 | % | 69 | % | |||||||
Subservicing | 146,576 | 45,769 | 27,404 | 220 | 67 | ||||||||||||
1,383,025 | 573,304 | 340,240 | 141 | 68 | |||||||||||||
HAMP fees | 152,081 | 76,615 | 42,025 | 99 | 82 | ||||||||||||
Late charges | 114,963 | 68,613 | 38,555 | 68 | 78 | ||||||||||||
Loan collection fees | 30,960 | 15,915 | 11,223 | 95 | 42 | ||||||||||||
Custodial accounts (float earnings) | 4,895 | 3,703 | 2,105 | 32 | 76 | ||||||||||||
Other | 114,674 | 53,835 | 19,442 | 113 | 177 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,800,598 | $ | 791,985 | $ | 453,590 | 127 | 75 | ||||||||||
Number of Completed Modifications | |||||||||||||||||
HAMP | 47,758 | 19,516 | 12,429 | 145 | % | 57 | % | ||||||||||
Non-HAMP | 66,592 | 63,434 | 63,776 | 5 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
Total | 114,350 | 82,950 | 76,205 | 38 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Financing Costs | |||||||||||||||||
Average balance of advances and match funded advances | $ | 2,844,865 | $ | 3,524,321 | $ | 2,515,507 | (19 | )% | 40 | % | |||||||
Average borrowings(5) | 2,590,516 | 2,876,891 | 1,833,641 | (10 | ) | 57 | |||||||||||
Interest expense on borrowings (5)(6) | 137,806 | 161,848 | 125,826 | (15 | ) | 29 | |||||||||||
Facility costs included in interest expense (5)(6) | 18,917 | 17,770 | 22,674 | 6 | (22 | ) | |||||||||||
Discount amortization included in interest expense (6) | 1,412 | 3,259 | 9,354 | (57 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||||||||
Effective average interest rate (5)(6) | 5.32 | % | 5.63 | % | 6.86 | % | (6 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||||
Average 1-month LIBOR | 0.19 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.23 | % | (21 | ) | 4 | ||||||||
% Change | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2013 vs. 2012 | 2012 vs. 2011 | |||||||||||||
Average Employment | |||||||||||||||||
India and other | 4,873 | 3,965 | 2,521 | 23 | % | 57 | % | ||||||||||
U. S. (7) | 3,322 | 661 | 552 | 403 | 20 | ||||||||||||
Total | 8,195 | 4,626 | 3,073 | 77 | 51 | ||||||||||||
Collections on loans serviced for others | $ | 84,484,413 | $ | 11,387,244 | $ | 6,618,201 | 642 | % | 72 | % | |||||||
n/m: not meaningful |
(1) | Performing loans include those loans that are current (less than 90 days past due) and those loans for which borrowers are making scheduled payments under loan modification, forbearance or bankruptcy plans. We consider all other loans to be non-performing. |
(2) | At December 31, 2013, we serviced 834,734 subprime non-Agency loans with a UPB of $146.0 billion. This compares to 747,908 subprime non-Agency loans with a UPB of $113.4 billion at December 31, 2012 and 548,504 subprime non-Agency loans with a UPB of $84.7 billion at December 31, 2011. |
(3) | Conventional loans at December 31, 2013 include 36,336 non-Agency loans with a UPB of $11.0 billion that we subservice and that consist primarily of jumbo loans which exceed loan size limits set by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. |
(4) | Excludes Freddie Mac loans serviced under special servicing agreements where we have no obligation to advance. |
(5) | Excludes interest expense related to financing liabilities that we recognized in connection with the HLSS Transactions. Interest on HLSS financing liabilities amounted to $245.8 million and $54.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Also excludes an average of $512.9 million and $92.0 million of HLSS financing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In 2012, excludes the effects, which were insignificant, of the facilities assumed in connection with the Homeward Acquisition. See Note 4 — Sales of Advances and MSRs to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the HLSS Transactions. |
(6) | During 2012, in addition to the $57.5 million scheduled quarterly principal repayments on our $575.0 million SSTL, we made mandatory principal prepayments of $274.5 million using a portion of the proceeds of the HLSS Transactions. The effective average interest rate declined from 2011 to 2012 principally because we used a portion of the proceeds from the HLSS Transactions to repay borrowings from higher cost advance funding facilities before repaying the fixed rate Litton facility in December. |
(7) | The ResCap and Homeward acquisitions directly added an average of 1,966 and 556 employees, respectively, during 2013. Average employment for 2012 and 2011 includes 36 and 286 employees, respectively, who transferred to Ocwen as part of the Litton acquisition. Excluding employees directly added in connection with these acquisitions, U.S average staffing was 799, 661 and 552 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
Amount of UPB | Count | |||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio at beginning of year | $ | 203,665,716 | $ | 102,199,222 | $ | 73,886,391 | 1,219,956 | 671,623 | 479,165 | |||||||||||
Additions | 370,803,318 | 120,955,907 | 41,289,514 | 2,191,064 | 631,523 | 259,788 | ||||||||||||||
Servicing transfers | (36,385,704 | ) | (959,575 | ) | (1,141,691 | ) | (192,700 | ) | (5,207 | ) | (6,299 | ) | ||||||||
Runoff | (73,431,998 | ) | (18,529,838 | ) | (11,834,992 | ) | (356,402 | ) | (77,983 | ) | (61,031 | ) | ||||||||
Portfolio at end of year | $ | 464,651,332 | $ | 203,665,716 | $ | 102,199,222 | 2,861,918 | 1,219,956 | 671,623 |
• | A 250% increase in the average UPB of assets serviced driven primarily by acquisitions and new MSR capitalization in connection with our lending activities. During 2013, acquired portfolios (including Homeward) added total servicing and subservicing fees of $862.4 million. This increase was offset in part by runoff of the portfolio as a result of principal repayments, modifications, real estate sales and servicing transfers; and |
• | A 38% increase in total completed modifications across all portfolios. |
• | A change in the portfolio product mix, with a larger proportion of the portfolio attributable to conventional and government insured loans for which we earn lower fees on average; |
• | A change in the portfolio profile, with a larger proportion of the portfolio growth attributable to performing loans, which leads to lower revenue potential for ancillary and default servicing; and |
• | A change in the portfolio mix, with a larger proportion of the portfolio attributable to subservicing for which we earn lower fees. |
• | Compensation and benefits increased by $227.2 million, or 243%, largely as a result of an increase in headcount resulting from the ResCap and Homeward Acquisitions. The average number of employees added in connection with these acquisitions were 1,966 and 556, respectively. |
• | Amortization of MSRs increased by $209.6 million in 2013 due principally to $205.9 million of additional amortization attributable to the Homeward, ResCap, Ally and OneWest acquisitions, offset in part by a decline in amortization attributable to portfolio runoff. |
• | Servicing and origination expenses for 2013 are reported net of $30.8 million in gains attributable to changes in fair value of our MSRs measured at fair value. Excluding these fair value gains, servicing and origination expenses increased by $100.9 million primarily due to $55.3 million of losses recognized in connection with our Ginnie Mae servicing, $21.5 million in scheduled interest paid to GSE investors on loans that voluntarily pay off during the month and increased costs attributable to the legacy Homeward and ResCap servicing platforms. As servicer, we are obligated to purchase delinquent loans from Ginnie Mae securitizations immediately prior to foreclosure at a price equal to the UPB of the loans plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon resolution of the loan, we file claims for reimbursement from the FHA or the VA in accordance with the contractual reimbursement levels. We may not be reimbursed fully for interest and principal losses and expenses to the extent that they exceed reimbursable rates. These costs are contemplated in the projected cash flows in connection with our Ginnie Mae MSRs. |
• | Technology and communications costs and Occupancy and equipment costs increased by a combined $122.6 million as we added facilities and infrastructure, largely in connection with the Homeward and ResCap Acquisitions, to support the residential servicing portfolio growth. |
• | Other operating expenses increased by $107.2 million due in large part to $50.9 million of additional overhead cost allocations for support services including law, human resources, accounting and finance. We also incurred $34.3 million of outsourcing expenses, primarily in connection with the ResCap servicing platform. The ResCap servicing platform leverages third-party outsourcing for a variety of functions. We anticipate these costs will be absorbed and/or diminish as the ResCap assets transition to the REALServicing™ platform. |
• | A 46% increase in the average UPB of assets serviced principally attributable to portfolio acquisitions and shift in portfolio mix to serviced from subserviced. The acquired portfolios generated incremental servicing fees of $144.7 million during 2012. In addition, we recognized an incremental $164.8 million of servicing fees on 2011 portfolio acquisitions. Because we acquired the Homeward servicing portfolio on December 27, 2012, it did not have a significant impact on 2012. These increases were offset in part by runoff of the portfolio as a result of principal repayments, modifications and real estate sales; |
• | Incentive fees of $25.0 million earned on subservicing portfolios added during 2012; |
• | A 12.0% increase in the ratio of the UPB of serviced loans to subserviced loans in our portfolio to 86.3% at December 31, 2012 as compared to 77.0% at December 31, 2011 as a result of portfolio acquisitions; and |
• | A 9.0% increase in completed modifications as compared to 2011. |
• | We recognized loan servicing fees and late charges of $100.7 million and $56.1 million during 2012 and 2011, respectively, for completed modifications. |
• | We also earned HAMP fees of $76.7 million and $42.0 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, which included HAMP success fees of $54.8 million and $27.1 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, for loans that were still performing at the one-year anniversary of their modification. |
• | Compensation and benefits increased by $14.4 million, or 18.0%, due to: |
◦ | A 67% increase in average staffing (excluding employees added as part of the Homeward and Litton acquisitions), as we increased our headcount to manage the actual and planned increases in the servicing portfolio and the insourcing of certain foreclosure functions that had previously been outsourced; offset by |
◦ | $34.0 million of nonrecurring expenses in 2011 that were associated with the Litton acquisition. |
• | Amortization of MSRs increased by $30.0 million in 2012 due principally to $39.7 million of additional amortization attributed to portfolio acquisitions completed in 2012 offset in part by a decline in amortization on pre-existing MSRs because of runoff of the portfolio. |
• | Technology and Communications costs and Occupancy and equipment costs increased by a combined $28.7 million as we have added facilities and infrastructure to support the servicing portfolio growth. |
• | Servicing and origination expense increased by $16.9 million primarily as a result of growth in the portfolio and a $6.7 million charge to establish a liability for compensatory fees based on performance against benchmarks for various metrics associated with the servicing of GSE non-performing loans. |
• | 2012 |
◦ | $18.2 million of incremental operating expenses attributable to the Litton acquisition consisting primarily of $2.5 million in severance and other employee termination benefits and $11.1 million in occupancy and equipment costs. Occupancy and equipment costs include $4.8 million to establish a liability for the remaining lease payments on a former Litton facility that we vacated. |
◦ | Professional services of $3.7 million in connection with the cancellation of a planned $200.0 million SSTL facility because cash generated from operations, the sale of assets to HLSS and maximized borrowings under our advance facilities enabled us to close acquisitions without upsizing the facility. |
• | 2011 |
◦ | $51.2 million of operating expenses includes $34.0 million of compensation and benefits, $5.0 million of technology and communication costs, $5.3 million of professional services and $5.0 million of occupancy costs related to the Litton acquisition. |
• | The effects of an increase in average borrowings under advance facilities principally as a result of acquisitions; and |
• | Interest on the $575.0 million SSTL that we entered into in connection with the Litton acquisition. |
• | The 2012 transfer of the HomEq advance facility to HLSS; |
• | The 2012 repayment of $2.0 billion of match funded liabilities with the proceeds from the sales of Rights to MSRs and match funded advances to HLSS; |
• | Lower spreads on advance facilities, particularly as a result of the 3.3875% fixed rate on the Litton advance facility; and |
• | Prepayments of the prior SSTL in 2011 resulting in the accelerated amortization of $12.6 million of deferred facility costs and unamortized discount. Excluding this accelerated amortization, the average rate on 2011 borrowings would have been 6.18%. |
Correspondent | Wholesale | Direct | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||
Forward loans (1) | $ | 4,967.3 | $ | 711.4 | $ | 390.2 | $ | 669.9 | $ | 6,738.8 | ||||||||
Reverse loans (2) | 179.0 | 510.2 | 276.0 | — | 965.2 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 5,146.3 | $ | 1,221.6 | $ | 666.2 | $ | 669.9 | $ | 7,704.0 |
(1) | Includes loans originated or purchased by Homeward and OLS. |
(2) | Includes loans originated or purchased by Liberty since the acquisition date of April 1, 2013. |
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | December 27, 2012 through December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Revenue | |||||||
Gain on loans held for sale, net | |||||||
Forward mortgages | $ | 48,561 | $ | 215 | |||
Reverse mortgages | 33,645 | — | |||||
82,206 | 215 | ||||||
Other | 38,693 | 141 | |||||
Total revenue | 120,899 | 356 | |||||
Operating expenses | |||||||
Compensation and benefits | 56,394 | 184 | |||||
Servicing and origination | 12,843 | 95 | |||||
Technology and communications | 4,402 | 22 | |||||
Professional services | 4,780 | 45 | |||||
Occupancy and equipment | 5,420 | 15 | |||||
Other operating expenses | 14,355 | 48 | |||||
Total operating expenses | 98,194 | 409 | |||||
Income (loss) from operations | 22,705 | (53 | ) | ||||
Other income (expense) | |||||||
Interest income | 16,295 | 309 | |||||
Interest expense | (13,508 | ) | (514 | ) | |||
Gain on debt redemption | 8,349 | — | |||||
Other, net | 1,783 | (1 | ) | ||||
Other income (expense), net | 12,919 | (206 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 35,624 | $ | (259 | ) |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Revenue | $ | 22,092 | $ | 5,122 | $ | 2,346 | |||||
Operating expenses | |||||||||||
Professional services | 84,266 | 9,334 | 4,758 | ||||||||
Other | 22,922 | 10,333 | 4,213 | ||||||||
107,188 | 19,667 | 8,971 | |||||||||
Loss from operations | (85,096 | ) | (14,545 | ) | (6,625 | ) | |||||
Other income (expense) | |||||||||||
Net interest income | 3,860 | 7,018 | 8,570 | ||||||||
Other, net | 6,424 | (9,069 | ) | (14,830 | ) | ||||||
Other income (expense), net | 10,284 | (2,051 | ) | (6,260 | ) | ||||||
Loss before income taxes | $ | (74,812 | ) | $ | (16,596 | ) | $ | (12,885 | ) |
• | Collections of servicing fees and ancillary revenues; |
• | Collections of prior servicer advances in excess of new advances; |
• | Proceeds from match funded liabilities; |
• | Proceeds from other borrowings, including warehouse facilities; |
• | Proceeds from sales of Rights to MSRs and related servicing advances to HLSS; and |
• | Proceeds from sales of originated loans. |
• | Payments for advances in excess of collections on existing servicing portfolios; |
• | Payment of interest and operating costs; |
• | Purchase of MSRs and related advances; |
• | Funding of originated loans; and |
• | Repayments of borrowings, including match funded liabilities and warehouse facilities. |
• | Requirements for maturing liabilities compared to dollars generated from maturing assets and operating cash flow, |
• | Future sales of Rights to MSRs and servicing advances; and |
• | The change in advances and match funded advances compared to the change in match funded liabilities and available borrowing capacity. |
• | We borrowed $1.3 billion under a new SSTL facility in connection with the ResCap Acquisition and repaid the remaining balance of the previous SSTL; |
• | We borrowed $1.2 billion under two new and one existing match funded advance facility in connection with the financing of advances that we acquired in connection with the ResCap Acquisition. The two new facilities were repaid and terminated in conjunction with the July 1, 2013 HLSS Transaction; |
• | We borrowed $1.2 billion under a new $1.4 billion bridge facility. The proceeds from this bridge facility were used to repay certain advance facilities that were assumed in the Homeward Acquisition. This facility was repaid and terminated in connection with the July 1, 2013 HLSS Transaction; |
• | We amended the maximum borrowing capacity of certain warehouse facilities and added two new warehouse facilities, increasing the available borrowing capacity available to our Lending business activities by $257.3 million; |
• | We borrowed $1.9 billion under a new match funded advance facility to finance advances acquired in connection with the OneWest and certain other MSR transactions; and |
• | We increased the borrowing capacity of a match funded advance facility from $225.0 million to $475.0 million in November 2013. |
Short-term | Long-term | Outlook | Date of last action | |
Fitch | B | B | Negative | May 2013 |
Moody’s | na | B1 | Stable | November 2012 |
S&P | na | B+ | Stable | November 2013 |
Change in Fair Value | |||||||
Down 25 bps | Up 25 bps | ||||||
Loans held for sale | $ | 11,439 | $ | (13,673 | ) | ||
Forward MBS trades | (11,649 | ) | 12,326 | ||||
Total loans held for sale and related derivatives | (210 | ) | (1,347 | ) | |||
Fair value MSRs | (7,946 | ) | 7,439 | ||||
MSRs, embedded in pipeline | (775 | ) | 588 | ||||
Total fair value MSRs | (8,721 | ) | 8,027 | ||||
Derivatives related to MSRs (1) | — | — | |||||
Total fair value MSRs and related derivatives | (8,721 | ) | 8,027 | ||||
Total, net | $ | (8,931 | ) | $ | 6,680 |
(1) | As disclosed above, effective April 1, 2013, we terminated the hedging program for our fair value MSRs and closed out the remaining economic hedge positions. |
Expected Maturity Date at December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | There- after | Total Balance | Fair Value (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate-Sensitive Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning cash | $ | 87,936 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 87,936 | $ | 87,936 | |||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.92 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 0.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, at fair value | 503,753 | — | — | — | — | — | 503,753 | 503,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 4.24 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 4.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value (2) | 50,592 | 4,504 | 2,124 | 1,429 | 907 | 3,351 | 62,907 | 62,907 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 4.12 | % | 7.23 | % | 6.71 | % | 6.61 | % | 6.38 | % | 6.38 | % | 4.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment - reverse mortgages | 25,082 | 48,185 | 50,214 | 46,051 | 42,565 | 405,921 | 618,018 | 618,018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 2.67 | % | 2.67 | % | 2.67 | % | 2.67 | % | 2.66 | % | 2.66 | % | 2.67 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Interest–earning collateral and debt service accounts | 134,982 | — | — | — | — | — | 134,982 | 134,982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.20 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total rate-sensitive assets | $ | 802,345 | $ | 52,689 | $ | 52,338 | $ | 47,480 | $ | 43,472 | $ | 409,272 | $ | 1,407,596 | $ | 1,407,596 | |||||||||||||||
Percent of total | 57.00 | % | 3.74 | % | 3.72 | % | 3.37 | % | 3.09 | % | 29.08 | % | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Rate-Sensitive Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Match funded liabilities | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | 2,364,814 | |||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 2.08 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 2.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings (3) | 488,929 | 27,219 | 11,690 | 11,690 | 1,238,141 | — | 1,777,669 | 1,762,876 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 1.96 | % | 4.24 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | — | 4.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Total rate-sensitive liabilities | $ | 2,853,743 | $ | 27,219 | $ | 11,690 | $ | 11,690 | $ | 1,238,141 | $ | — | $ | 4,142,483 | $ | 4,127,690 | |||||||||||||||
Percent of total | 68.89 | % | 0.66 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.28 | % | 30 | % | — | % | 100.00 | % |
Expected Maturity Date at December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | There- after | Total Balance | Fair Value (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate-Sensitive Derivative Financial Instruments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate caps | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,868,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,868,000 | $ | 442 | |||||||||||||||
Average strike rate | — | — | 3.00 | % | — | — | — | 3.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IRLCs | 751,436 | — | — | — | — | — | 751,436 | 8,433 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Forward MBS trades | 950,648 | — | — | — | — | — | 950,648 | 6,905 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average coupon | 3.76 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 3.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives, net | $ | 1,702,084 | $ | — | $ | 1,868,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,570,084 | $ | 15,780 | |||||||||||||||
Forward LIBOR curve (4) | 0.25 | % | 0.60 | % | 1.59 | % | 2.71 | % | 3.55 | % | 4.26 | % |
Expected Maturity Date at December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | There- after | Total Balance | Fair Value (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate-Sensitive Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning cash | $ | 108,796 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 108,796 | $ | 108,796 | |||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.84 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 0.84 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, at fair value | 426,480 | — | — | — | — | — | 426,480 | 426,480 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 3.60 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 3.60 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value (2) | 70,053 | 5,584 | 2,357 | 1,219 | 1,067 | 2,586 | 82,866 | 82,866 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 5.73 | % | 7.51 | % | 7.51 | % | 6.42 | % | 6.42 | % | 6.42 | % | 5.96 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Interest–earning collateral and debt service accounts | 120,458 | — | — | — | — | — | 120,458 | 120,458 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 0.36 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 0.36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total rate-sensitive assets | $ | 725,787 | $ | 5,584 | $ | 2,357 | $ | 1,219 | $ | 1,067 | $ | 2,586 | $ | 738,600 | $ | 738,600 | |||||||||||||||
Percent of total | 98.27 | % | 0.76 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.35 | % | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Rate-Sensitive Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Match funded liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | 1,348,999 | $ | 299,278 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,648,277 | $ | 1,648,810 | |||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 3.57 | % | 4.04 | — | — | — | — | 3.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable rate | 495,592 | 388,876 | — | — | — | — | 884,468 | 884,468 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 3.00 | % | 3.05 | % | — | — | — | — | 3.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lines of credit and other borrowings (3) | 774,508 | — | 18,466 | — | — | — | 792,974 | 797,799 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate | 4.37 | % | — | 3.71 | % | — | — | — | 4.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total rate-sensitive liabilities | $ | 2,619,099 | $ | 688,154 | $ | 18,466 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,325,719 | $ | 3,331,077 | |||||||||||||||
Percent of total | 78.75 | % | 20.69 | % | 0.56 | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | 100.00 | % |
Expected Maturity Date at December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | There- after | Total Balance | Fair Value (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate-Sensitive Derivative Financial Instruments: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative Assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate caps | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 425,000 | $ | 600,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,025,000 | $ | 168 | |||||||||||||||
Average strike rate | — | — | 4.50 | % | 5.00 | % | — | — | 4.79 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
IRLCs | 1,112,519 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,112,519 | 5,781 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps | — | 15,000 | 165,000 | 90,000 | 15,000 | 147,500 | 432,500 | 4,778 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average fixed rate | — | 0.45 | % | 0.56 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.89 | % | 2.14 | % | 1.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Forward MBS trades | 314,000 | — | — | — | — | — | 314,000 | 67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average coupon | 3.00 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 3.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forward MBS trades | 1,324,979 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,324,979 | 1,786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average coupon | 3.06 | % | — | — | — | — | — | 3.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Futures | 109,000 | — | — | — | — | — | 109,000 | 1,258 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps | 586,945 | 29,400 | 447,110 | — | — | — | 1,063,455 | 15,614 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average fixed rate | 1.75 | % | 0.69 | % | 0.81 | % | — | — | — | 1.33 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives, net | $ | 3,447,443 | $ | 44,400 | $ | 1,037,110 | $ | 690,000 | $ | 15,000 | $ | 147,500 | $ | 5,381,453 | $ | (7,864 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Forward LIBOR curve (4) | 0.22 | % | 0.33 | % | 0.60 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.76 | % | 3.48 | % |
(1) | See Note 5 — Fair Value to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional fair value information on financial instruments. |
(2) | Net of market valuation allowances and including non-performing loans. |
(3) | Excludes financing liabilities of $651.1 million and $303.7 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, that we recorded in connection with the sales of Rights to MSRs to HLSS which did not qualify as sales for accounting purposes. These financing liabilities have no contractual maturity and is amortized over the life of the transferred Rights to MSRs. Also, excludes the financing liabilities of $615.6 million at December 31, 2013 that we recorded in connection with the securitizations of HMBS which did not quality as sales for accounting purposes. These financing liabilities have no contractual maturity and are amortized as the related loans are repaid. |
(4) | Average 1-Month LIBOR for the periods indicated. |
Less Than One Year | After One Year Through Three Years | After Three Years Through Five Years | After Five Years | Total | |||||||||||||||
Other secured borrowings (1) | $ | 35,219 | $ | 41,529 | $ | 1,251,250 | $ | — | $ | 1,327,998 | |||||||||
Contractual interest payments (2) | 65,750 | 128,743 | 71,986 | — | 266,479 | ||||||||||||||
Originate/purchase mortgages or securities | 827,902 | — | — | — | 827,902 | ||||||||||||||
Reverse mortgage equity draws (3) | 244,208 | — | — | — | 244,208 | ||||||||||||||
Operating leases | 19,798 | 38,418 | 15,702 | — | 73,918 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,192,877 | $ | 208,690 | $ | 1,338,938 | $ | — | $ | 2,740,505 |
(1) | Amounts are exclusive of any related discount. Excludes match funded liabilities and borrowings under mortgage loan warehouse facilities as these represent non-recourse debt that has been collateralized by assets which are not available to satisfy general claims against Ocwen. Also excludes financing liabilities which result from sales of assets that do not qualify as sales for accounting purposes and, therefore, are accounted for as secured financings. See Note 15 — Borrowings to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to these excluded borrowings. |
(2) | Represents estimated future interest payments on other secured borrowings, based on applicable interest rates as of December 31, 2013. |
(3) | Represents additional equity draw obligations in connection with reverse mortgage loans originated or purchased by Liberty. Because these draws can be made in their entirety, we have classified them as due in less than one year at December 31, 2013. |
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Loans held for sale | $ | 566,660 | $ | 509,346 | ||||
Loans held for investment - reverse mortgages | 618,018 | — | ||||||
MSRs | 116,029 | 85,213 | ||||||
Derivative assets | 15,780 | 5,949 | ||||||
Assets at fair value | $ | 1,316,487 | $ | 600,508 | ||||
As a percentage of total assets | 17 | % | 11 | % | ||||
Financing liabilities | $ | 615,576 | $ | — | ||||
Derivative liabilities | — | 13,813 | ||||||
Liabilities at fair value | $ | 615,576 | $ | 13,813 | ||||
As a percentage of total liabilities | 10 | % | — | % | ||||
Assets at fair value using Level 3 inputs | $ | 797,396 | $ | 168,247 | ||||
As a percentage of assets at fair value | 61 | % | 28 | % | ||||
Liabilities at fair value using Level 3 inputs | $ | 615,576 | $ | 10,836 | ||||
As a percentage of liabilities at fair value | 100 | % | 78 | % |
• | Mortgage prepayment speeds; |
• | Delinquency rates, and |
• | Discount rates. |
Conventional | Government Insured | Non-Agency | |||
Prepayment speed | 8.1% - 15.8% | 10.4% - 17.1% | 17.4% - 19.2% | ||
Delinquency | 8.0% - 10.1% | 14.9% - 16.8% | 25.3% - 27.8% | ||
Discount rate | 9.2% | 11.0% | 16.7% | ||
Cost to service | $71 to $126 | $73 to $125 | $305 to $340 |
• | Increases in prepayment speeds generally reduce the value of our MSRs as the underlying loans prepay faster which causes accelerated MSR amortization, higher compensating interest payments and lower overall servicing fees, partially offset by a lower overall cost of servicing, increased float earnings on higher float balances and lower interest expense on lower servicing advance balances. |
• | Increases in delinquencies generally reduce the value of our MSRs as the cost of servicing increases during the delinquency period, and the amounts of servicing advances and related interest expense also increase. |
• | Increases in the discount rate reduce the value of our MSRs due to the lower overall net present value of the net cash flows. |
• | Increases in interest rate assumptions will increase interest expense for financing servicing advances although this effect is partially offset because rate increases will also increase the amount of float earnings that we recognize. |
Conventional | Government Insured | Non-Agency | |||||||||
Prepayment speed | $ | (117,610 | ) | $ | (22,431 | ) | $ | (33,108 | ) | ||
Delinquency | (11,482 | ) | (31,257 | ) | (87,417 | ) | |||||
Discount rate | (59,265 | ) | (6,699 | ) | (29,027 | ) | |||||
Cost to service | (33,888 | ) | (7,296 | ) | (114,777 | ) |
Servicing | Lending | Total | |||||||||
HomeEq | $ | 12,810 | $ | — | $ | 12,810 | |||||
Litton | 57,430 | — | 57,430 | ||||||||
Homeward | 218,170 | 46,159 | 264,329 | ||||||||
ResCap | 79,026 | — | 79,026 | ||||||||
Liberty | — | 2,963 | 2,963 | ||||||||
$ | 367,436 | $ | 49,122 | $ | 416,558 |
• | ASU 2013-04 (ASC 405, Liabilities): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. |
• | ASU 2013-05 (ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. |
• | ASU 2013-11 (ASC 740, Income Taxes): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). |
• | ASU 2011-11 (ASC 210, Balance Sheet): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities |
• | ASU 2013-01 (ASC 210, Balance Sheet): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities |
• | ASU 2013-02 (ASC 220, Comprehensive Income): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(3) | Exhibits. | |||
2.1 | Separation Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2009, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (1) | |||
2.2 | Purchase Agreement dated as of June 5, 2011, by and between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Ocwen Financial Corporation † (2) | |||
2.3 | Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2011, by and among Morgan Stanley (solely for purposes of Article 5, Section 7.4, Section 8.7, Article 11 and Article 12), SCI Services, Inc., Saxon Capital Holdings, Inc., Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings, LLC and Ocwen Financial Corporation † (3) | |||
2.4 | Amended and Restated Purchase Agreement, dated March 18, 2012, among Ocwen Financial Corporation (solely for purposes of Section 6.11, Section 6.12, Section 7.4, Section 7.8, Section 7.14, Section 10.2(b), Article 11 and Article 12), Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Morgan Stanley (solely for purposes of Article 5, Section 7.4, Article 11 and Article 12), SCI Services, Inc., Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., and Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings, LLC (4) | |||
2.5 | Merger Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2012, by and among Ocwen Financial Corporation, O&H Acquisition Corp., Homeward Residential Holdings, Inc., and WL Ross & Co. LLC † (5) | |||
2.6 | Asset Purchase Agreement between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, and Residential Capital, LLC, Residential Funding Company, LLC, GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Executive Trustee Services, LLC, ETS of Washington, Inc., EPRE LLC, GMACM Borrower LLC, and RFC Borrower LLC dated as of November 2, 2012 † (6) | |||
2.7 | Mortgage Servicing Rights Purchase and Sale Agreement between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and One West Bank, FSB dated as of June 13, 2013 (7) | |||
2.8 | Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and among Altisource Portfolio Solutions, Inc., Altisource Solutions S.à r.l., Ocwen Financial Corporation, Homeward Residential, Inc. and Power Valuation Services, Inc. (8) | |||
2.9 | Repurchase Letter Agreement, dated as of September 23, 2013, by and among Ocwen Financial Corporation and the holders of Series A Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock party thereto (9) | |||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (10) | |||
3.2 | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (filed herewith) |
3.3 | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (filed herewith) | |||
3.4 | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (11) | |||
3.5 | Articles of Correction (11) | |||
3.6 | Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, Articles of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock (12) | |||
3.7 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ocwen Financial Corporation (13) | |||
4.1 | Form of Certificate of Common Stock (10) | |||
4.2 | Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 | |||
10.1* | Ocwen Financial Corporation 1996 Stock Plan for Directors, as amended (14) | |||
10.2* | Ocwen Financial Corporation 1998 Annual Incentive Plan, as amended (15) | |||
10.3* | Amended Ocwen Financial Corporation 1991 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, dated October 26, 1999 (16) | |||
10.4* | Ocwen Financial Corporation Deferral Plan for Directors, dated March 7, 2005 (17) | |||
10.5* | Ocwen Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, dated May 10, 2007 (18) | |||
10.6* | Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Preferred Stock Plan (filed herewith) | |||
10.7 | Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2009, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (1) | |||
10.8 | Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2009, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (1) | |||
10.9 | Technology Products Services Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2009, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (1) | |||
10.10 | Services Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2009, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (1) | |||
10.11 | Data Center and Disaster Recovery Services Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2009, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (1) | |||
10.12 | Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2009, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (1) | |||
10.13 | Support Services Agreement, dated as of August 10, 2012, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (19) | |||
10.14 | Services Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (20) | |||
10.15 | Technology Products Services Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (20) | |||
10.16 | Data Center and Disaster Recovery Services Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (20) | |||
10.17 | Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (20) | |||
10.18 | First Amendment to Support Services Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (20) | |||
10.19 | First Amendment to Services Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (20) | |||
10.20 | First Amendment to Technology Products Services Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (20) | |||
10.21 | First Amendment to Data Center and Disaster Recovery Services Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (20) | |||
10.22 | First Amendment to Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (20) | |||
10.23 | Second Amendment to Services Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (8) | |||
10.24 | Second Amendment to Technology Products Services Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (8) | |||
10.25 | Second Amendment to Data Center and Disaster Recovery Services Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (8) |
10.26 | Second Amendment to Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (8) | |||
10.27 | First Amendment to Services Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (8) | |||
10.28 | First Amendment to Technology Products Services Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (8) | |||
10.29 | First Amendment to Data Center and Disaster Recovery Services Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (8) | |||
10.30 | First Amendment to Intellectual Property Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (8) | |||
10.31 | Third Amendment to Services Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2013, by and between Ocwen Financial Corporation and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (filed herewith) | |||
10.32 | Second Amendment to Services Agreement dated July 24, 2013 by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (filed herewith) | |||
10.33 | First Amended and Restated Support Services Agreement dated September 12, 2013, by and between Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. (filed herewith) | |||
10.34 | Agreement dated as of April 12, 2013 by and among Altisource Solutions S.à r.l., Ocwen Financial Corporation and Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (21) | |||
10.35 | Master Servicing Rights Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC (filed herewith) | |||
10.36 | Sale Supplement, dated February 10, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC (4) | |||
10.37 | Master Subservicing Agreement, dated October 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC (filed herewith) | |||
10.38 | Subservicing Supplement, dated February 10, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC (4) | |||
10.39 | Professional Services Agreement, dated February 10, 2012, between Ocwen Financial Corporation, together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, and HLSS Management, LLC (4) | |||
10.40 | Sale Supplement, dated as of July 1, 2013, to the Master Servicing Rights Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, HLSS Holdings, LLC and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd. (22) | |||
10.41 | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of July 1, 2013, to the Master Subservicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings LLC (22) | |||
10.42 | Amendment, dated as of September 30, 2013, to the Sale Supplement, dated as of July 1, 2013, to the Master Servicing Rights Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, HLSS Holdings, LLC and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd. (23) | |||
10.43 | Amendment, dated as of September 30, 2013, to the Subservicing Supplement, dated as of July 1, 2013, to the Master Subservicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings LLC (23) | |||
10.44 | Amendment, dated as of February 4, 2014, to the Sale Supplement dated as of July 1, 2013, the Sale Supplement dated February 10, 2012 and various other sale supplements, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, HLSS Holdings, LLC and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd. (filed herewith) | |||
10.45 | Amendment, dated as of February 4, 2014, to the Subservicing Supplement dated as of July 1, 2013, the Subservicing Supplement dated as of February 10, 2012 and various other subservicing supplements, among Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC (filed herewith) | |||
10.46 | Registration Rights Agreement, made and entered into as of December 27, 2012, by and among Ocwen Financial Corporation and the Holders (as defined therein) (13) | |||
10.47 | Guarantee between Ocwen Financial Corporation and OneWest Bank, FSB dated as of June 13, 2013 (7) | |||
10.48 | Senior Secured Term Loan Facility Agreement dated as of February 15, 2013 by and among Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Borrower, Ocwen Financial Corporation, as Parent, Certain Subsidiaries of Ocwen Financial Corporation, as Subsidiary Guarantors, the Lender Parties thereto, and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent (24) | |||
10.49 | Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of February 15, 2013 between each of the Grantor Parties thereto, and Barclays Bank PLC, as Collateral Agent (24) |
10.50 | Amendment No. 1 to Senior Secured Term Loan Facility Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of September 23, 2013 by and among Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Borrower, Ocwen Financial Corporation, as Parent, Certain Subsidiaries of Ocwen Financial Corporation, as Subsidiary Guarantors, the Lender Parties thereto, and Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (9) | |||
11.1 | Computation of earnings per share (26) | |||
12.1 | Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (filed herewith) | |||
21.0 | Subsidiaries (filed herewith) | |||
23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith) | |||
99.1 | Consent Judgment dated February 26, 2014 of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (filed herewith) | |||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |||
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |||
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |||
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document (filed herewith) | |||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (filed herewith) | |||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (filed herewith) | |||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (filed herewith) | |||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (filed herewith) | |||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (filed herewith) |
* | Management contract or compensatory plan or agreement. |
† | The schedules referenced in the Purchase Agreements, the Merger Agreement and the Asset Purchase Agreement have been omitted in accordance with Item 601 (b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any referenced schedules will be furnished supplementally to the SEC upon request. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 12, 2009. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 6, 2011. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 24, 2011. |
(4) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012. |
(5) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 5, 2012. |
(6) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 8, 2012. |
(7) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 13, 2013. |
(8) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2013. |
(9) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 24, 2013. |
(10) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit filed in connection with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-5153) as amended, declared effective by the SEC on September 25, 1996. |
(11) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. |
(12) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 28, 2012. |
(13) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 10, 2013. |
(14) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit filed in connection with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-44999), effective when filed with the SEC on January 27, 1998. |
(15) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit to our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2003. |
(16) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2000. |
(17) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
(18) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit to our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders as filed with the SEC on March 30, 2007. |
(19) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 16, 2012. |
(20) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 5, 2012. |
(21) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 18, 2013. |
(22) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2013. |
(23) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013. |
(24) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2013. |
(25) | Incorporated by reference from the similarly described exhibit included with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 24, 2013. |
(26) | Incorporated by reference from “Note 23 — Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share” on page F-55 of our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Ocwen Financial Corporation | ||
By: | /s/ Ronald M. Faris | |
Ronald M. Faris | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer (duly authorized representative) | ||
Date: February 28, 2014 |
/s/ William C. Erbey | Date: February 28, 2014 | |
William C. Erbey, | ||
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||
/s/ Ronald M. Faris | Date: February 28, 2014 | |
Ronald M. Faris, | ||
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer) | ||
/s/ Ronald J. Korn | Date: February 28, 2014 | |
Ronald J. Korn, Director | ||
/s/ William H. Lacy | Date: February 28, 2014 | |
William H. Lacy, Director | ||
/s/ Barry N. Wish | Date: February 28, 2014 | |
Barry N. Wish, Director | ||
/s/ Robert A. Salcetti | Date: February 28, 2014 | |
Robert A. Salcetti, Director | ||
/s/ Wilbur L. Ross | Date: February 28, 2014 | |
Wilbur L. Ross, Director | ||
/s/ John V. Britti | Date: February 28, 2014 | |
John V. Britti, | ||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) | ||
/s/ Catherine M. Dondzila | Date: February 28, 2014 | |
Catherine M. Dondzila, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer) |
Page | |
Consolidated Financial Statements: | |
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
Atlanta, Georgia |
February 28, 2014 |
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
Atlanta, Georgia |
February 28, 2014 |
December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Assets | |||||||
Cash | $ | 178,512 | $ | 220,130 | |||
Mortgage servicing rights ($116,029 and $85,213 carried at fair value) | 2,069,381 | 764,150 | |||||
Advances | 892,188 | 184,463 | |||||
Match funded advances | 2,552,383 | 3,049,244 | |||||
Loans held for sale ($503,753 and $426,480 carried at fair value) | 566,660 | 509,346 | |||||
Loans held for investment - reverse mortgages, at fair value | 618,018 | — | |||||
Goodwill | 416,558 | 416,176 | |||||
Receivables, net | 152,516 | 132,853 | |||||
Debt service accounts | 129,897 | 88,748 | |||||
Deferred tax assets, net | 116,558 | 96,893 | |||||
Premises and equipment, net | 53,786 | 33,247 | |||||
Other assets | 127,313 | 190,712 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 7,873,770 | $ | 5,685,962 | |||
Liabilities, Mezzanine Equity and Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||
Liabilities | |||||||
Match funded liabilities | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | 2,532,745 | |||
Financing liabilities ($615,576 and $0 carried at fair value) | 1,284,229 | 306,308 | |||||
Other secured borrowings | 1,777,669 | 790,371 | |||||
Other liabilities | 590,375 | 291,744 | |||||
Total liabilities | 6,017,087 | 3,921,168 | |||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 28) | |||||||
Mezzanine Equity | |||||||
Series A Perpetual Convertible Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 200,000 shares authorized; 62,000 and 162,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively; redemption value $62,000 plus accrued and unpaid dividends at December 31, 2013 | 60,361 | 153,372 | |||||
Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 135,176,271 and 135,637,932 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively | 1,352 | 1,356 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 818,427 | 911,942 | |||||
Retained earnings | 986,694 | 704,565 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes | (10,151 | ) | (6,441 | ) | |||
Total stockholders’ equity | 1,796,322 | 1,611,422 | |||||
Total liabilities, mezzanine equity and stockholders’ equity | $ | 7,873,770 | $ | 5,685,962 |
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Revenue | |||||||||||
Servicing and subservicing fees | $ | 1,823,559 | $ | 804,407 | $ | 458,838 | |||||
Gain (loss) on loans held for sale, net | 121,694 | 215 | (2 | ) | |||||||
Other revenues | 93,020 | 40,581 | 37,055 | ||||||||
Total revenue | 2,038,273 | 845,203 | 495,891 | ||||||||
Operating expenses | |||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | 442,777 | 122,341 | 99,844 | ||||||||
Amortization of servicing rights | 282,781 | 72,897 | 42,996 | ||||||||
Servicing and origination | 112,127 | 25,542 | 8,217 | ||||||||
Technology and communications | 140,466 | 45,362 | 33,617 | ||||||||
Professional services | 123,886 | 29,213 | 19,961 | ||||||||
Occupancy and equipment | 105,145 | 47,044 | 23,759 | ||||||||
Other operating expenses | 94,112 | 21,508 | 11,153 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,301,294 | 363,907 | 239,547 | ||||||||
Income from operations | 736,979 | 481,296 | 256,344 | ||||||||
Other income (expense) | |||||||||||
Interest income | 22,355 | 8,329 | 8,876 | ||||||||
Interest expense | (412,842 | ) | (223,455 | ) | (132,770 | ) | |||||
Gain (loss) on debt redemption | (8,681 | ) | (2,167 | ) | 3,651 | ||||||
Other, net | (2,588 | ) | (6,495 | ) | (13,106 | ) | |||||
Total other expense, net | (401,756 | ) | (223,788 | ) | (133,349 | ) | |||||
Income before income taxes | 335,223 | 257,508 | 122,995 | ||||||||
Income tax expense | 41,074 | 76,585 | 44,672 | ||||||||
Net income | 294,149 | 180,923 | 78,323 | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests | — | — | 8 | ||||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen stockholders | 294,149 | 180,923 | 78,331 | ||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | (5,031 | ) | (85 | ) | — | ||||||
Deemed dividends related to beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock | (6,989 | ) | (60 | ) | — | ||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | $ | 282,129 | $ | 180,778 | $ | 78,331 | |||||
Earnings per share attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | |||||||||||
Basic | $ | 2.08 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.75 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 2.02 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.71 | |||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | |||||||||||
Basic | 135,678,088 | 133,912,643 | 104,507,055 | ||||||||
Diluted | 139,800,506 | 138,521,279 | 111,855,961 |
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 294,149 | $ | 180,923 | $ | 78,323 | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes: | |||||||||||
Unrealized foreign currency translation gain (loss) arising during the year | 1 | 1 | 21 | ||||||||
Change in deferred gain (loss) on cash flow hedges arising during the year (1) | (11,558 | ) | (5,303 | ) | 589 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for losses on cash flow hedges included in net income (2) | 7,843 | 6,753 | 890 | ||||||||
Net change in deferred loss on cash flow hedges | (3,715 | ) | 1,450 | 1,479 | |||||||
Other | 4 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||
Total other comprehensive income, net of income taxes | (3,710 | ) | 1,455 | 1,505 | |||||||
Comprehensive income | 290,439 | 182,378 | 79,828 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests | — | — | (1 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Ocwen stockholders | $ | 290,439 | $ | 182,378 | $ | 79,827 |
(1) | Net of tax benefit (expense) of $0.8 million, $3.0 million and $(0.3) million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
(2) | Net of tax benefit (expense) of $(3.6) million, $3.8 million and $0.5 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
Ocwen Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Taxes | Non-controlling Interest in Subsidiaries | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 | 100,726,947 | $ | 1,007 | $ | 467,500 | $ | 445,456 | $ | (9,392 | ) | $ | 246 | $ | 904,817 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | — | — | — | 78,331 | — | (8 | ) | 78,323 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 28,750,000 | 288 | 354,157 | — | — | — | 354,445 | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of common stock options | 410,977 | 4 | 1,269 | — | — | — | 1,273 | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation | 11,364 | — | 3,195 | — | — | — | 3,195 | |||||||||||||||||||
Distribution to non-controlling interest holder | — | — | — | — | — | (247 | ) | (247 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes | — | — | — | — | 1,496 | 9 | 1,505 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 | 129,899,288 | 1,299 | 826,121 | 523,787 | (7,896 | ) | — | 1,343,311 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 180,923 | — | — | 180,923 | |||||||||||||||||||
Discount – Preferred stock beneficial conversion feature | — | — | 8,688 | — | — | — | 8,688 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deemed dividend related to beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock | — | — | — | (60 | ) | — | — | (60 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends ($0.26 per share) | — | — | — | (85 | ) | — | — | (85 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Conversion of 3.25% Convertible Notes | 4,635,159 | 46 | 56,364 | — | — | — | 56,410 | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of common stock options | 1,082,944 | 11 | 6,276 | — | — | — | 6,287 | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation | 20,541 | — | 14,493 | — | — | — | 14,493 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes | — | — | — | — | 1,455 | — | 1,455 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 | 135,637,932 | 1,356 | 911,942 | 704,565 | (6,441 | ) | — | 1,611,422 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 294,149 | — | — | 294,149 | |||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends ($37.29 per share) | — | — | — | (5,031 | ) | — | — | (5,031 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Deemed dividend related to beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock | — | — | — | (6,989 | ) | — | — | (6,989 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Conversion of preferred stock | 3,145,640 | 31 | 99,969 | — | — | — | 100,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (4,271,347 | ) | (42 | ) | (217,861 | ) | — | — | — | (217,903 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Exercise of common stock options | 652,015 | 7 | (2,612 | ) | — | — | — | (2,605 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Equity-based compensation | 12,031 | — | 26,989 | — | — | — | 26,989 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes | — | — | — | — | (3,710 | ) | — | (3,710 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2013 | 135,176,271 | $ | 1,352 | $ | 818,427 | $ | 986,694 | $ | (10,151 | ) | $ | — | $ | 1,796,322 |
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 294,149 | $ | 180,923 | $ | 78,323 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||||
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights | 282,781 | 72,897 | 42,996 | ||||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 1,412 | 3,259 | 8,853 | ||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs – senior secured term loan | 4,395 | 3,718 | 9,764 | ||||||||
Depreciation | 24,245 | 5,720 | 4,160 | ||||||||
Provision for bad debts | 34,816 | 5,030 | 852 | ||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of loans | (121,694 | ) | (215 | ) | 2 | ||||||
Loss on deconsolidation of variable interest entities | — | 3,167 | — | ||||||||
Realized and unrealized losses on derivative financial instruments | 14,336 | 4,294 | 7,426 | ||||||||
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt | 8,681 | 2,167 | (3,651 | ) | |||||||
Gain on valuation of mortgage servicing rights, at fair value | (30,816 | ) | (30 | ) | — | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in deferred tax assets, net | (22,112 | ) | 62,393 | 29,898 | |||||||
Origination and purchase of loans held for sale | (9,678,038 | ) | (172,262 | ) | — | ||||||
Proceeds from sale and collections of loans held for sale | 9,468,627 | 243,434 | 1,468 | ||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||
Decrease in advances and match funded advances | 295,108 | 1,443,643 | 842,545 | ||||||||
(Increase) decrease in receivables and other assets, net | 224,543 | (53,870 | ) | (36,452 | ) | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in servicer liabilities | 2,563 | 1,750 | (1,196 | ) | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | 67,773 | (4,343 | ) | (15,470 | ) | ||||||
Other, net | (3,606 | ) | 14,179 | 12,627 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 867,163 | 1,815,854 | 982,145 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||
Cash paid to acquire ResCap Servicing Operations (a component of Residential Capital, LLC) | (2,289,709 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Cash paid to acquire Liberty Home Equity Solutions, Inc. | (26,568 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Net cash acquired in acquisition of Correspondent One S.A. | 22,108 | — | — | ||||||||
Cash paid to acquire Homeward Residential Holdings, Inc. | — | (524,213 | ) | — | |||||||
Cash paid to acquire Litton Loan Servicing LP | — | — | (2,646,700 | ) | |||||||
Investment in unconsolidated entities | — | — | (15,340 | ) | |||||||
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities | 1,300 | 3,226 | 2,415 | ||||||||
Purchase of mortgage servicing rights, net | (987,663 | ) | (180,039 | ) | — | ||||||
Acquisition of advances in connection with the purchase of MSRs | (2,588,739 | ) | (1,920,437 | ) | — | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of advances and match funded advances | 3,842,537 | 2,824,645 | — | ||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of diversified fee-based businesses to Altisource Portfolio Solutions, SA | 210,793 | — | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of MSRs | 34,754 | — | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of advance financing subsidiary and special purpose entity | — | 76,334 | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of beneficial interest in consolidated variable interest entities | — | 3,020 | — | ||||||||
Origination of loans held for investment - reverse mortgages | (609,555 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Principal payments received on loans held for investment - reverse mortgages | 5,886 | — | — | ||||||||
Additions to premises and equipment | (28,915 | ) | (19,217 | ) | (3,822 | ) | |||||
Other | (1,207 | ) | (449 | ) | 8,329 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (2,414,978 | ) | 262,870 | (2,655,118 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||
(Repayment of) proceeds from match funded liabilities | (167,931 | ) | (1,665,330 | ) | 1,076,422 | ||||||
Proceeds from other borrowings | 9,633,914 | 204,784 | 563,500 | ||||||||
Repayments of other borrowings | (8,787,302 | ) | (822,137 | ) | (281,768 | ) | |||||
Payment of debt issuance costs – senior secured term loan | (25,758 | ) | (1,052 | ) | (13,147 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of mortgage servicing rights accounted for as a financing | 447,755 | 320,381 | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of loans accounted for as a financing | 604,991 | — | — | ||||||||
Issuance of common stock | — | — | 354,445 | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (217,903 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Redemption of 10.875% Capital Securities | — | (26,829 | ) | — | |||||||
Payment of preferred stock dividends | (5,115 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options | 2,302 | 6,005 | 1,483 | ||||||||
Other | 21,244 | (18,650 | ) | (11,524 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 1,506,197 | (2,002,828 | ) | 1,689,411 | |||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash | (41,618 | ) | 75,896 | 16,438 | |||||||
Cash at beginning of year | 220,130 | 144,234 | 127,796 | ||||||||
Cash at end of year | $ | 178,512 | $ | 220,130 | $ | 144,234 | |||||
Supplemental cash flow information | |||||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 413,014 | $ | 219,825 | $ | 128,947 | |||||
Income tax payments, net | 14,747 | 37,199 | 29,461 | ||||||||
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities | |||||||||||
Conversion of Series A preferred stock to common stock | $ | 100,000 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Conversion of 3.25% Convertible Notes to common stock | — | 56,410 | — | ||||||||
Supplemental business acquisition information (1) | |||||||||||
Fair value of assets acquired | |||||||||||
Cash | $ | — | $ | (79,511 | ) | $ | (23,791 | ) | |||
Loans held for sale | — | (558,721 | ) | — | |||||||
Advances | (1,747,201 | ) | (2,266,882 | ) | (2,468,137 | ) | |||||
Mortgage servicing rights | (389,944 | ) | (360,344 | ) | (144,314 | ) | |||||
Deferred tax assets | — | (52,103 | ) | — | |||||||
Premises and equipment | (16,423 | ) | (12,515 | ) | (3,386 | ) | |||||
Goodwill | (207,776 | ) | (345,936 | ) | (57,430 | ) | |||||
Debt service accounts | — | (69,287 | ) | — | |||||||
Receivables and other assets | (2,989 | ) | (27,765 | ) | (4,888 | ) | |||||
(2,364,333 | ) | (3,773,064 | ) | (2,701,946 | ) | ||||||
Fair value of liabilities assumed | |||||||||||
Match funded liabilities | — | 1,997,459 | — | ||||||||
Other secured borrowings | — | 864,969 | — | ||||||||
Servicing liabilities | — | — | 8,972 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 74,624 | 145,812 | 22,483 | ||||||||
Total consideration | (2,289,709 | ) | (764,824 | ) | (2,670,491 | ) | |||||
Issuance of preferred stock as consideration | — | 162,000 | — | ||||||||
Amount due from seller for purchase price adjustments | — | (900 | ) | — | |||||||
Cash paid | (2,289,709 | ) | (603,724 | ) | (2,670,491 | ) | |||||
Less cash acquired | — | 79,511 | 23,791 | ||||||||
Net cash paid | $ | (2,289,709 | ) | $ | (524,213 | ) | $ | (2,646,700 | ) |
(1) | See Note 3 — Business Acquisitions for information regarding the acquisitions of Liberty Home Equity Solutions, Inc. and Correspondent One S.A. during 2013. |
• | Combined Loans held for sale, at fair value of $426.5 million (previously reported as a separate line item) and Loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or fair value of $82.9 million (previously included in Other assets) in a new line item, Loans held for sale; |
• | Combined Mortgage servicing rights, at amortized cost of $676.7 million (previously reported as a separate line item) and Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value of $85.2 million (previously reported as a separate line item) in a new line item, Mortgage servicing rights; and |
• | Reclassified Financing liabilities of $306.3 million from Lines of credit and other secured borrowings to a new line item. |
Computer hardware and software | 2 – 3 years |
Buildings | 40 years |
Leasehold improvements | Term of the lease not to exceed useful life |
Furniture and fixtures | 5 years |
Office equipment | 5 years |
Proceeds received from securitizations | $ | 7,871,481 | |
Servicing fees collected | 20,333 | ||
Purchases of previously transferred assets, net of claims reimbursed | (358 | ) | |
$ | 7,891,456 |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Carrying value of assets: | |||||||
Mortgage servicing rights, at amortized cost | $ | 44,615 | $ | — | |||
Mortgage servicing rights, at fair value | 3,075 | 2,908 | |||||
Advances and match funded advances | 15,888 | — | |||||
Unpaid principal balance of loans transferred (1) | 5,641,277 | 238,010 | |||||
Maximum exposure to loss | $ | 5,704,855 | $ | 240,918 |
(1) | The UPB of the loans transferred is the maximum exposure to loss under our standard representations and warranties obligations. |
ResCap | Homeward | Litton | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase Price Allocation | February 15, 2013 | Adjust- ments | Revised | December 27, 2012 | Adjust- ments | Final | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 79,511 | $ | — | $ | 79,511 | $ | 23,791 | |||||||||||||
Loans held for sale | — | — | — | 558,721 | — | 558,721 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs(2) | 393,891 | (3,947 | ) | 389,944 | (1) | 358,119 | 2,225 | 360,344 | 144,314 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances and match funded advances (2) | 1,622,348 | 124,853 | 1,747,201 | (1) | 2,266,882 | — | 2,266,882 | 2,468,137 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets | — | — | — | 47,346 | 4,757 | 52,103 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment | 22,398 | (5,975 | ) | 16,423 | 16,803 | (4,288 | ) | 12,515 | 3,386 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt service accounts | — | — | — | 69,287 | — | 69,287 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated entities | — | — | — | 5,485 | — | 5,485 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables and other assets (3) | 2,989 | — | 2,989 | 56,886 | (34,606 | ) | 22,280 | 4,888 | |||||||||||||||||||
Match funded liabilities | — | — | — | (1,997,459 | ) | — | (1,997,459 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings | — | — | — | (864,969 | ) | — | (864,969 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities: | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liability for indemnification obligations | (49,500 | ) | — | (49,500 | ) | (32,498 | ) | — | (32,498 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Liability for certain foreclosure matters (4) | — | — | — | — | (13,430 | ) | (13,430 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued bonuses | — | — | — | (35,201 | ) | — | (35,201 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Checks held for escheat | — | — | — | (16,418 | ) | (35 | ) | (16,453 | ) | (3,939 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other | (24,840 | ) | (284 | ) | (25,124 | ) | (47,614 | ) | (616 | ) | (48,230 | ) | (27,516 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total identifiable net assets | 1,967,286 | 114,647 | 2,081,933 | 464,881 | (45,993 | ) | 418,888 | 2,613,061 | |||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill | 204,743 | 3,033 | 207,776 | (1) | 300,843 | 45,093 | 345,936 | 57,430 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total consideration | 2,172,029 | 117,680 | 2,289,709 | 765,724 | (900 | ) | 764,824 | 2,670,491 | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt repaid to seller at closing | — | — | — | — | — | — | (2,423,123 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Base purchase price, as adjusted | $ | 2,172,029 | $ | 117,680 | $ | 2,289,709 | $ | 765,724 | $ | (900 | ) | $ | 764,824 | $ | 247,368 |
(1) | Initial fair value estimate. |
(2) | As of the acquisition date, the purchase of certain MSRs from ResCap was not complete pending the receipt of certain consents and court approvals. During the third and fourth quarters of 2013, we obtained the required consents and approvals for a portion of these MSRs and paid an additional purchase price of $120.4 million to acquire the MSRs and related advances. The purchase price allocation has been revised to include the resulting adjustments to MSRs, advances and goodwill. We completed additional settlements in January and February 2014. |
(3) | The Homeward purchase price allocation has been revised to include a $34.6 million income tax liability, with an offsetting increase to goodwill. |
(4) | See Note 16 — Other Liabilities for additional information. |
Revenues | $ | 684,935 | ||
Net income | $ | 16,424 |
• | conforming servicing revenues to the revenue recognition policies followed by Ocwen; |
• | conforming the accounting for MSRs to the valuation and amortization policies of Ocwen; |
• | adjusting interest expense to eliminate the pre-acquisition interest expense of ResCap and to recognize interest expense as if the acquisition-related debt of Ocwen had been outstanding at January 1, 2012; and |
• | reporting acquisition-related charges for professional services as if they had been incurred in 2012 rather than 2013. |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 2,086,010 | $ | 1,263,692 | |||
Net income | $ | 285,302 | $ | 87,262 |
Revenues | $ | 5,881 | |
Net income | $ | 44 |
• | conforming servicing revenues to the revenue recognition policy followed by Ocwen; |
• | conforming the accounting for MSRs to the valuation and amortization policies of Ocwen; |
• | reversing depreciation recognized by Homeward and reporting depreciation based on the estimated fair values and remaining lives of the acquired premises and equipment at the date of acquisition; |
• | adjusting interest expense to eliminate the pre-acquisition interest expense of Homeward and to recognize interest expense as if the acquisition-related debt of Ocwen had been outstanding at January 1, 2011; and |
• | reporting acquisition-related charges for professional services related to the acquisition as if they had been incurred in 2011 rather than 2012. |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,362,927 | $ | 1,085,914 | |||
Net income | $ | 254,051 | $ | 163,647 |
Revenues | $ | 62,750 | |
Net loss (1) | $ | (20,910 | ) |
(1) | Net loss includes non-recurring transaction related expenses of $49.6 million, including (i) $33.1 million of severance and other compensation related to Litton employees, (ii) $6.8 million of amortization of the acquired MSRs, (iii) $2.0 million of depreciation resulting from the write-down of certain of the acquired furniture and fixtures that are no longer in use and (iv) $0.4 million of fees for professional services related to the acquisition. Net loss does not include an allocation of costs related to the servicing of the Litton loans on Ocwen’s platform. |
• | conforming revenues to the revenue recognition policy followed by Ocwen; |
• | conforming the accounting for MSRs to the valuation and amortization policy of Ocwen; |
• | reversing depreciation recognized by Litton and reporting depreciation based on the estimated fair values and remaining lives of the acquired premises and equipment at the date of acquisition; |
• | adjusting interest expense to eliminate the pre-acquisition interest expense of Litton and to recognize interest expense as if the acquisition-related debt of Ocwen had been outstanding at January 1, 2010; and |
• | reporting acquisition-related charges, including severance paid to Litton employees and fees for professional services related to the acquisition as if they had been incurred in 2010 rather than 2011. |
2011 | |||
(Unaudited) | |||
Revenues | $ | 642,033 | |
Net income (loss) | $ | 52,407 |
Employee termination benefits | Lease termination costs | Total | |||||||||
Liability balance as at December 31, 2010 | $ | 1,332 | $ | 7,794 | $ | 9,126 | |||||
Additions charged to operations (1) | 33,127 | — | 33,127 | ||||||||
Amortization of discount | — | 99 | 99 | ||||||||
Payments | (29,296 | ) | (2,606 | ) | (31,902 | ) | |||||
Liability balance as at December 31, 2011 | 5,163 | 5,287 | 10,450 | ||||||||
Additions charged to operations (1) | 2,869 | 5,030 | 7,899 | ||||||||
Amortization of discount | — | 176 | 176 | ||||||||
Payments | (8,032 | ) | (5,602 | ) | (13,634 | ) | |||||
Liability balance as at December 31, 2012 | — | 4,891 | 4,891 | ||||||||
Additions charged to operations (1) | 20,683 | — | 20,683 | ||||||||
Amortization of discount | — | 347 | 347 | ||||||||
Payments | (15,867 | ) | (2,784 | ) | (18,651 | ) | |||||
Liability balance as at December 31, 2013 (2) | $ | 4,816 | $ | 2,454 | $ | 7,270 |
(1) | Additions charged to operations during 2011 and 2012 were recorded in the Servicing segment. In 2013, $15.9 million of the charges were recorded in the Servicing segment, $0.7 million was recorded in the Lending segment and the |
(2) | We expect the remaining liability for employee termination benefits at December 31, 2013 to be settled in 2014. |
2013 | 2012 | |||||
Sale of MSRs accounted for as a financing | $ | 417,167 | 316,607 | |||
Sale of advances and match funded advances | 3,839,954 | 2,827,227 | ||||
Sale of advance SPEs: | ||||||
Match funded advances | — | 413,374 | ||||
Debt service account | — | 14,786 | ||||
Prepaid lender fees and debt issuance costs | — | 5,422 | ||||
Other prepaid expenses | — | 1,928 | ||||
Match funded liabilities | — | (358,335 | ) | |||
Accrued interest payable and other accrued expenses | — | (841 | ) | |||
Net assets of advance SPEs | — | 76,334 | ||||
Sales price, as adjusted | 4,257,121 | 3,220,168 | ||||
Amount due to (from) HLSS for post-closing adjustments at December 31 | — | (1,410 | ) | |||
Cash received on current year sales | 4,257,121 | 3,218,758 | ||||
Amount received from HLSS as settlement of post-closing adjustments outstanding at the end of the previous year | 1,410 | — | ||||
Total cash received | $ | 4,258,531 | 3,218,758 |
Level 1: | Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date. |
Level 2: | Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. |
Level 3: | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Level | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets: | |||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale: | |||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale, at fair value (a) | 2 | $ | 503,753 | $ | 503,753 | $ | 426,480 | $ | 426,480 | ||||||||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value (b) | 3 | 62,907 | 62,907 | 82,866 | 82,866 | ||||||||||||
Total Loans held for sale | $ | 566,660 | $ | 566,660 | $ | 509,346 | $ | 509,346 | |||||||||
Loans held for investment - Reverse mortgages, at fair value (a) | 3 | $ | 618,018 | $ | 618,018 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Advances and match funded advances (c) | 3 | 3,444,571 | 3,444,571 | 3,233,707 | 3,233,707 | ||||||||||||
Receivables, net (c) | 3 | 152,516 | 152,516 | 132,853 | 132,853 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||
Match funded liabilities (c) | 3 | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | 2,532,745 | $ | 2,533,278 | ||||||||
Financing liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||
HMBS-related borrowings, at fair value (a) | 3 | $ | 615,576 | $ | 615,576 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Other (c) | 3 | 668,653 | 668,653 | 306,308 | 306,308 | ||||||||||||
Total Financing liabilities | $ | 1,284,229 | $ | 1,284,229 | $ | 306,308 | $ | 306,308 | |||||||||
Other secured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||
Senior secured term loan (c) | 3 | $ | 1,284,901 | $ | 1,270,108 | $ | 305,997 | $ | 310,822 | ||||||||
Other (c) | 3 | 492,768 | 492,768 | 484,374 | 484,374 | ||||||||||||
Total Other secured borrowings | $ | 1,777,669 | $ | 1,762,876 | $ | 790,371 | $ | 795,196 | |||||||||
Derivative financial instruments (a): | |||||||||||||||||
IRLCs | 2 | $ | 8,433 | $ | 8,433 | $ | 5,781 | $ | 5,781 | ||||||||
Interest rate swaps | 3 | — | — | (10,836 | ) | (10,836 | ) | ||||||||||
Forward MBS trades | 1 | 6,905 | 6,905 | (1,719 | ) | (1,719 | ) | ||||||||||
U.S. Treasury futures | 1 | — | — | (1,258 | ) | (1,258 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest rate caps | 3 | 442 | 442 | 168 | 168 | ||||||||||||
MSRs: | |||||||||||||||||
MSRs, at fair value (a) | 3 | $ | 116,029 | $ | 116,029 | $ | 85,213 | $ | 85,213 | ||||||||
MSRs, at amortized cost (c) | 3 | 1,953,352 | 2,441,719 | 678,937 | 743,830 | ||||||||||||
Total MSRs | $ | 2,069,381 | $ | 2,557,748 | $ | 764,150 | $ | 829,043 |
(a) | Measured at fair value on a recurring basis. |
(b) | Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. |
(c) | Disclosed, but not carried, at fair value. |
Loans Held for Investment - Reverse Mortgages | HMBS-Related Borrowings | Derivative Financial Instruments, net | MSRs | Total | |||||||||||||||
January 1, 2013 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (10,668 | ) | $ | 85,213 | $ | 74,545 | ||||||||
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements: | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchases | 10,251 | (10,179 | ) | 498 | — | 570 | |||||||||||||
Issuances | 609,555 | (604,991 | ) | — | — | 4,564 | |||||||||||||
Sales | — | — | 24,156 | — | 24,156 | ||||||||||||||
Settlements | (5,886 | ) | 5,440 | (1,241 | ) | — | (1,687 | ) | |||||||||||
613,920 | (609,730 | ) | 23,413 | — | 27,603 | ||||||||||||||
Total realized and unrealized gains and (losses): (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings | 4,098 | (5,846 | ) | 60 | 30,816 | 29,128 | |||||||||||||
Included in Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | (12,363 | ) | — | (12,363 | ) | ||||||||||||
4,098 | (5,846 | ) | (12,303 | ) | 30,816 | 16,765 | |||||||||||||
Transfers in and / or out of Level 3 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 | $ | 618,018 | $ | (615,576 | ) | $ | 442 | $ | 116,029 | $ | 118,913 |
Derivative Financial Instruments, net | MSRs | Total | ||||||||||
January 1, 2012 | $ | (16,676 | ) | $ | — | $ | (16,676 | ) | ||||
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements: | ||||||||||||
Purchases | 4,946 | 85,183 | 90,129 | |||||||||
Issuances | — | — | — | |||||||||
Sales | (405 | ) | — | (405 | ) | |||||||
Settlements | 2,451 | — | 2,451 | |||||||||
6,992 | 85,183 | 92,175 | ||||||||||
Total realized and unrealized gains and (losses) (1): | ||||||||||||
Included in earnings | 7,331 | 30 | 7,361 | |||||||||
Included in Other comprehensive income (loss) | (8,315 | ) | — | (8,315 | ) | |||||||
(984 | ) | 30 | (954 | ) | ||||||||
Transfers in and / or out of Level 3 | — | — | — | |||||||||
December 31, 2012 | $ | (10,668 | ) | $ | 85,213 | $ | 74,545 |
Derivative Financial Instruments, net | ||||
January 1, 2011 | $ | (15,351 | ) | |
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements: | ||||
Purchases | 3,688 | |||
Settlements | 85 | |||
3,773 | ||||
Total realized and unrealized gains and (losses): | ||||
Included in earnings | (5,881 | ) | ||
Included in Other comprehensive income (loss) | 783 | |||
(5,098 | ) | |||
Transfers in and / or out of Level 3 | — | |||
December 31, 2011 | $ | (16,676 | ) |
(1) | Total losses attributable to derivative financial instruments still held at December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $1.2 million and $5.1 million, respectively. |
• | Life in years ranging from 2.76 to 23.25 (weighted average of 7.10); |
• | Conditional repayment rate ranging from 4.83% to 38.40% (weighted average of 9.65%); and |
• | Discount rate of 1.72%. |
• | Cost of servicing | • | Interest rate used for computing float earnings |
• | Discount rate | • | Compensating interest expense |
• | Interest rate used for computing the cost of financing servicing advances | • | Collection rate of other ancillary fees |
• | Prepayment speeds ranging from 6.41% to 17.50% (weighted average of 13.90%) depending on loan type; |
• | Delinquency rates ranging from 6.18% to 30.82% (weighted average of 17.32%) depending on loan type; |
• | Interest rate of 1-month LIBOR plus a range of 0.00% to 3.75% for computing the cost of financing servicing advances; |
• | Interest rate of 1-month LIBOR for computing float earnings; and |
• | Discount rates ranging from 9.98%% to 16.73% (weighted average of 11.64%) |
• | Mortgage prepayment speeds; |
• | Delinquency rates; and |
• | Discount rates. |
• | Life in years ranging from 2.74 to 22.55 (weighted average of 6.42); |
• | Conditional repayment rate ranging from 4.83% to 37.97% (weighted average of 9.65%); and |
• | Discount rate of 1.17%. |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Loans held for sale - fair value | $ | 503,753 | $ | 426,480 | |||
Loans held for sale - lower of cost or fair value | 62,907 | 82,866 | |||||
$ | 566,660 | $ | 509,346 |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 426,480 | $ | — | |||
Originations and purchases (1) | 8,106,742 | 670,147 | |||||
Proceeds from sales | (7,999,235 | ) | (241,960 | ) | |||
Gain (loss) on sale of loans (2) | (26,981 | ) | 3,889 | ||||
Other | (3,253 | ) | (5,596 | ) | |||
Ending balance | $ | 503,753 | $ | 426,480 |
(1) | Purchases include $60.0 million of reverse mortgages acquired in the Liberty Acquisition in 2013 and $558.7 million of forward mortgages acquired in the Homeward Acquisition in 2012. See Note 3 — Business Acquisitions for additional information. |
(2) | Includes gains of $41.7 million recorded during 2013 to adjust Loans Held for investment - reverse mortgages to fair value. |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 82,866 | $ | 20,633 | $ | 25,803 | |||||
Purchases | 1,632,390 | 65,756 | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales | (1,036,316 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Principal payments | (432,423 | ) | (1,474 | ) | (1,468 | ) | |||||
Transfers to accounts receivable | (218,629 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Transfers to real estate owned | (4,775 | ) | (999 | ) | (2,599 | ) | |||||
Gain on sale of loans | 35,087 | — | — | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in valuation allowance | (10,644 | ) | 568 | 354 | |||||||
Modifications, charge offs and other | 15,351 | (1,618 | ) | (1,457 | ) | ||||||
Ending balance | $ | 62,907 | $ | 82,866 | $ | 20,633 |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on sales of loans (1) | $ | 82,518 | $ | 6,797 | $ | (2 | ) | ||||
Change in fair value of IRLCs | 523 | 2 | — | ||||||||
Change in fair value of loans held for sale | (1,709 | ) | (5,462 | ) | — | ||||||
Gain (loss) on economic hedge instruments | 42,732 | (1,075 | ) | — | |||||||
Other | (2,370 | ) | (47 | ) | — | ||||||
$ | 121,694 | $ | 215 | $ | (2 | ) |
(1) | Includes gains of $74.8 million and $2.9 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing the value assigned to MSRs retained on sales of loans. Also includes gains of $35.1 million recorded during 2013 on sales of repurchased loans into Ginnie Mae guaranteed securitizations. |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Servicing: | |||||||
Principal and interest | $ | 141,307 | $ | 83,617 | |||
Taxes and insurance | 477,039 | 51,447 | |||||
Foreclosures, bankruptcy and other | 269,409 | 41,296 | |||||
887,755 | 176,360 | ||||||
Corporate Items and Other | 4,433 | 8,103 | |||||
$ | 892,188 | $ | 184,463 |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 184,463 | $ | 103,591 | |||
Acquisitions (1) | 734,794 | 118,360 | |||||
Transfers to match funded advances | (142,286 | ) | (74,317 | ) | |||
Sales of advances to HLSS | (200,749 | ) | — | ||||
New advances, net of collections | 315,966 | 36,829 | |||||
Other | — | — | |||||
Ending balance | $ | 892,188 | $ | 184,463 |
(1) | Servicing advances acquired in connection with the acquisition of MSRs through business acquisitions and asset acquisitions. See Note 3 — Business Acquisitions and Note 9 — Mortgage Servicing for additional information. |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Principal and interest | $ | 1,497,649 | $ | 1,577,808 | |||
Taxes and insurance | 830,113 | 1,148,486 | |||||
Foreclosures, bankruptcy, real estate and other | 224,621 | 322,950 | |||||
$ | 2,552,383 | $ | 3,049,244 |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 3,049,244 | $ | 3,629,911 | |||
Acquisitions (1) | 3,589,773 | 4,068,959 | |||||
Transfers from advances (2) | 142,286 | 74,317 | |||||
Sales of advances to HLSS | (3,639,205 | ) | (3,240,601 | ) | |||
Collections of pledged advances, net of new advances | (589,715 | ) | (1,483,342 | ) | |||
Ending balance | $ | 2,552,383 | $ | 3,049,244 |
(1) | Represents advances acquired in connection with business and asset acquisitions that were pledged to advance facilities at the date of acquisition. |
(2) | Represents new advances initially classified as Advances at the date of payment and subsequently pledged to advance facilities. |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
MSRs - Amortization method | $ | 1,953,352 | $ | 678,937 | |||
MSRs - Fair value measurement method | 116,029 | 85,213 | |||||
$ | 2,069,381 | $ | 764,150 |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 678,937 | $ | 293,152 | $ | 193,985 | ||||||
Additions recognized in connection with business acquisitions: | ||||||||||||
ResCap Acquisition (1) | 389,944 | — | — | |||||||||
Liberty Acquisition (1) | 2,840 | — | — | |||||||||
Homeward Acquisition (1) | — | 278,069 | — | |||||||||
Litton Acquisition (1) | — | — | 144,314 | |||||||||
Additions recognized in connection with asset acquisitions: | ||||||||||||
Ally MSR Transaction (2) | 683,787 | — | — | |||||||||
OneWest MSR Transaction (3) | 398,804 | — | — | |||||||||
Greenpoint MSR Transaction (4) | 33,647 | — | — | |||||||||
Saxon | — | 77,881 | — | |||||||||
JPMorgan | — | 23,445 | — | |||||||||
Bank of America | — | 64,569 | — | |||||||||
Other | 8,764 | 16,084 | — | |||||||||
Additions recognized on the sale of mortgage loans | 74,784 | — | — | |||||||||
Sales (5) | (28,403 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Servicing transfers and adjustments | (8,883 | ) | (4 | ) | — | |||||||
Change in valuation allowance | 2,375 | (88 | ) | 574 | ||||||||
Amortization (6) | (283,244 | ) | (74,171 | ) | (45,721 | ) | ||||||
Ending balance | $ | 1,953,352 | $ | 678,937 | $ | 293,152 | ||||||
Estimated fair value at end of year | $ | 2,441,719 | $ | 743,830 | $ | 340,015 |
(1) | See Note 3 — Business Acquisitions for additional information regarding MSRs recognized in connection with business acquisitions. |
(2) | The acquired MSRs relate to mortgage loans with a UPB of $87.5 billion owned by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. We also acquired servicing advances and other receivables of $73.6 million. Prior to the closing, we subserviced the related MSRs on behalf of Ally Bank. We assumed the origination representation and warranty obligations of approximately $136.7 million in connection with a majority of the acquired MSRs. We had been subservicing these MSRs on behalf of Ally under a subservicing contract that we assumed in connection with the ResCap Acquisition. No operations, entities or other assets were acquired in the transaction. |
(3) | The acquired MSRs relate to mortgage loans with a UPB of approximately $69.0 billion and related servicing advance receivables of $2.1 billion acquired in the OneWest MSR Transaction. No operations or other assets were purchased in the transaction. As part of the OneWest MSR Transaction, both the seller and OLS have agreed to indemnification provisions for the benefit of the other party. The OneWest MSR Transaction closed in stages, and the majority of loans were boarded onto our primary servicing platform as of December 31, 2013. Each closing is subject to, among other things, receipt of certain investor and third party consents and customary closing conditions. |
(4) | The acquired MSRs relate to mortgage loans with a UPB of approximately $6.3 billion and related servicing advance receivables of $422.1 million. |
(5) | Cash proceeds from the sale were $34.8 million. These MSRs were sold with subservicing retained. The gain on the sale of $5.1 million has been deferred and will be recognized in earnings over the life of the subservicing contract. |
(6) | In the Consolidated Statement of Operations, Amortization of mortgage servicing rights is reported net of the amortization of servicing liabilities and includes the amount of charges we recognized to increase servicing liability obligations. |
2014 | $ | 326,583 | |
2015 | 276,893 | ||
2016 | 234,207 | ||
2017 | 194,053 | ||
2018 | 160,804 |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 85,213 | $ | — | |||
Amount recognized in connection with the Homeward Acquisition (1) | — | 82,275 | |||||
Additions recognized on the sale of residential mortgage loans | — | 2,908 | |||||
Changes in fair value (2): | |||||||
Changes in market value assumptions | 44,199 | 30 | |||||
Realization of cash flows and other changes | (13,383 | ) | — | ||||
Ending balance | $ | 116,029 | $ | 85,213 |
(1) | See Note 3 — Business Acquisitions for additional information. |
(2) | Changes in fair value are recognized in Servicing and origination expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Adverse change in fair value | |||||||
10% | 20% | ||||||
Weighted average prepayment speeds | $ | (7,995 | ) | $ | (15,713 | ) | |
Discount rate (Option-adjusted spread) | $ | (4,497 | ) | $ | (8,659 | ) |
Residential | Commercial | Total | |||||||||
UPB at December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||
Servicing | $ | 78,675,160 | $ | — | $ | 78,675,160 | |||||
Subservicing | 23,524,062 | 290,863 | 23,814,925 | ||||||||
$ | 102,199,222 | $ | 290,863 | $ | 102,490,085 | ||||||
UPB at December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||
Servicing (1) | $ | 175,762,161 | $ | — | $ | 175,762,161 | |||||
Subservicing | 27,903,555 | 401,031 | 28,304,586 | ||||||||
$ | 203,665,716 | $ | 401,031 | $ | 204,066,747 | ||||||
UPB at December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||
Servicing (1) | $ | 397,546,635 | $ | — | $ | 397,546,635 | |||||
Subservicing | 67,104,697 | 400,502 | 67,505,199 | ||||||||
$ | 464,651,332 | $ | 400,502 | $ | 465,051,834 |
(1) | Includes UPB of $175.1 billion and $79.4 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for which the Rights to MSRs have been sold to HLSS. |
Amount | Count | |||||
California | $ | 112,200,350 | 436,374 | |||
Florida | 37,881,401 | 245,438 | ||||
New York | 30,548,742 | 129,364 | ||||
Texas | 20,838,925 | 203,035 | ||||
New Jersey | 20,336,702 | 97,207 | ||||
Other | 242,845,212 | 1,750,500 | ||||
$ | 464,651,332 | 2,861,918 |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Loan servicing and subservicing fees: | |||||||||||
Servicing | $ | 1,246,882 | $ | 535,415 | $ | 313,997 | |||||
Subservicing | 146,605 | 45,713 | 27,404 | ||||||||
1,393,487 | 581,128 | 341,401 | |||||||||
Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) fees | 152,812 | 76,764 | 42,025 | ||||||||
Late charges | 115,826 | 69,281 | 38,557 | ||||||||
Loan collection fees | 31,022 | 15,960 | 11,223 | ||||||||
Custodial accounts (float earnings) | 5,332 | 3,749 | 2,105 | ||||||||
Other | 125,080 | 57,525 | 23,527 | ||||||||
$ | 1,823,559 | $ | 804,407 | $ | 458,838 |
Receivables | Allowance for Losses | Net | |||||||||
December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||
Servicing (1) | $ | 124,537 | $ | (17,419 | ) | $ | 107,118 | ||||
Income taxes receivable | 6,369 | — | 6,369 | ||||||||
Due from related parties (2) | 14,553 | — | 14,553 | ||||||||
Other (3) | 24,579 | (103 | ) | 24,476 | |||||||
$ | 170,038 | $ | (17,522 | ) | $ | 152,516 | |||||
December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||
Servicing (1) | $ | 84,870 | $ | (1,647 | ) | $ | 83,223 | ||||
Income taxes receivable | 20,686 | — | 20,686 | ||||||||
Due from related parties (2) | 12,361 | — | 12,361 | ||||||||
Other | 18,577 | (1,994 | ) | 16,583 | |||||||
$ | 136,494 | $ | (3,641 | ) | $ | 132,853 |
(1) | The balances at December 31, 2013 and 2012 arise from our Servicing business and primarily include reimbursable expenditures due from investors and amounts to be recovered from the custodial accounts of the trustees. The balances at December 31, 2013 also include $54.0 million of receivables and $14.0 million of allowance for losses related to defaulted FHA or VA insured loans repurchased from Ginnie Mae guaranteed securitizations. |
(2) | See Note 26 — Related Party Transactions for additional information regarding transactions with Altisource and HLSS. |
(3) | Includes $13.6 million related to probable losses expected to be indemnified under the terms of the Homeward merger agreement. See Note 3 — Business Acquisitions for additional information. |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Computer hardware and software | $ | 51,060 | $ | 32,628 | |||
Buildings | 12,926 | — | |||||
Leasehold improvements | 25,467 | 14,950 | |||||
Furniture and fixtures | 13,174 | 10,367 | |||||
Office equipment and other | 12,506 | 9,108 | |||||
115,133 | 67,053 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (61,347 | ) | (33,806 | ) | |||
$ | 53,786 | $ | 33,247 |
Liberty Acquisition | ResCap Acquisition | Homeward Acquisition | Litton Acquisition | HomEq Acquisition | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 345,936 | $ | 57,430 | $ | 12,810 | $ | 416,176 | |||||||||||
Recognition of goodwill in connection with a business acquisition | 2,963 | 207,776 | — | — | — | 210,739 | |||||||||||||||||
Derecognition of goodwill in connection with the sale of a business | — | (128,750 | ) | (81,607 | ) | — | — | (210,357 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 2,963 | $ | 79,026 | $ | 264,329 | $ | 57,430 | $ | 12,810 | 416,558 |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Prepaid lender fees and debt issuance costs, net (1) | $ | 31,481 | $ | 14,389 | |||
Prepaid income taxes (2) | 20,585 | 23,112 | |||||
Prepaid expenses | 16,132 | 15,058 | |||||
Derivatives, at fair value (3) | 15,494 | 10,795 | |||||
Investment in unconsolidated entities (4) | 11,771 | 25,187 | |||||
Purchase price deposit (5) | 10,000 | 57,000 | |||||
Other | 21,850 | 45,171 | |||||
$ | 127,313 | $ | 190,712 |
(1) | These balances relate to match funded liabilities and other secured borrowings. We amortize these costs to the earlier of the scheduled amortization date, contractual maturity date or prepayment date of the debt. |
(2) | During 2012 and 2013, we completed intra-entity transfers of certain MSRs. The deferred tax effects of these transactions have been recognized as prepaid income tax assets and are being amortized to Income tax expense over a 7-year period. |
(3) | See Note 19 — Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities for additional information regarding derivatives. |
(4) | The balance at December 31, 2012 includes an investment of $13.4 million in Correspondent One. As disclosed in Note 3 — Business Acquisitions, we increased our ownership from 49% to 100% on March 31, 2013. Effective on that |
(5) | The balance at December 31, 2013 represents an initial cash deposit that we made in connection with the agreement we entered into on December 20, 2013 to acquire MSRs and related advances from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. This deposit along with an additional deposit of $15.0 million that we made in January 2014 will be held in escrow until the transaction closes. The balance at December 31, 2012 represents an earnest money cash deposit we made in connection with the ResCap Acquisition. This deposit was subsequently applied towards the purchase price upon closing of the transaction on February 15, 2013. See Note 3 — Business Acquisitions for additional information. |
Borrowing Type | Interest Rate | Maturity (1) | Amortization Date (1) | Available Borrowing Capacity (2) | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Fixed Rate: | ||||||||||||||||||
2011-Servicer Advance Revolving Trust 1 (3) | 2.23% | May 2043 | May 2013 | — | — | 325,000 | ||||||||||||
2011-Servicer Advance Revolving Trust 1 (3) | 3.37 – 5.92% | May 2043 | May 2013 | — | — | 525,000 | ||||||||||||
2012-Servicing Advance Revolving Trust 2 (3) | 3.27 – 6.90% | Sep. 2043 | Sep. 2013 | — | — | 250,000 | ||||||||||||
2012-Servicing Advance Revolving Trust 3 (3) | 2.98% | Mar. 2043 | Mar. 2013 | — | — | 248,999 | ||||||||||||
2012-Servicing Advance Revolving Trust 3 (3) | 3.72 – 7.04% | Mar. 2044 | Mar. 2014 | — | — | 299,278 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed rate | — | — | 1,648,277 | |||||||||||||||
Borrowing Type | Interest Rate | Maturity (1) | Amortization Date (1) | Available Borrowing Capacity (2) | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Variable Rate: | ||||||||||||||||||
Advance Receivable Backed Notes (4) | 1ML (5) + 285 bps | Apr. 2015 | Apr. 2014 | — | — | 205,016 | ||||||||||||
Advance Receivable Backed Notes Series 2012-ADV1 (6) | Commercial Paper (CP) rate + 225 or 335 bps | Dec. 2043 | Dec. 2013 | — | — | 232,712 | ||||||||||||
Advance Receivable Backed Notes Series 2012-ADV1 (7) | 1ML + 250 bps | Jun. 2016 | Jun. 2014 | 57,612 | 417,388 | 94,095 | ||||||||||||
Advance Receivable Backed Note | 1ML + 300 bps | Dec. 2015 | Dec. 2014 | 16,789 | 33,211 | 49,138 | ||||||||||||
2011-Servicing Advance Revolving Trust 1 (3) | 1ML + 300 bps | May 2043 | May 2013 | — | — | 204,633 | ||||||||||||
2012-Servicing Advance Revolving Trust 2 (3) | 1ML + 315 bps | Sep. 2043 | Sep. 2013 | — | — | 22,003 | ||||||||||||
2012-Servicing Advance Revolving Trust 3 (3) | 1ML + 300 bps – 675 bps | Mar. 2044 | Mar. 2014 | — | — | 40,626 | ||||||||||||
2012-Homeward Agency Advance Funding Trust 2012-1 (3) | Cost of Funds + 300 bps | Jan. 2014 | Jan. 2014 | 3,981 | 21,019 | 16,094 | ||||||||||||
2012-Homeward DSF Advance Revolving Trust 2012-1 (3) | 1ML + 450 bps | Feb. 2013 | Feb. 2013 | — | — | 20,151 | ||||||||||||
Advance Receivables Backed Notes, Series 2013-VF1, Class A (8) | 1ML + 175 bps (9) | Oct. 2044 | Oct. 2014 | 5,372 | 1,494,628 | — | ||||||||||||
Advance Receivables Backed Notes, Series 2013-VF2, Class A (8) | 1ML + 167 bps (10) | Oct. 2044 | Oct. 2014 | 1,325 | 385,645 | — | ||||||||||||
Advance Receivables Backed Notes, Series 2013-VF2, Class B (8) | 1ML + 425 bps (11) | Oct. 2044 | Oct. 2014 | 107 | 12,923 | — | ||||||||||||
Total variable rate | 85,186 | 2,364,814 | 884,468 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 85,186 | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | 2,532,745 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate | 2.08 | % | 3.52 | % |
(1) | The amortization date of our facilities is the date on which the revolving period ends under each advance facility note and repayment of the outstanding balance must begin if the note is not renewed or extended. The maturity date is the date on which all outstanding balances must be repaid. In two advance facilities, there are multiple notes outstanding. For each note, after the amortization date, all collections that represent the repayment of advances pledged to the facility must be applied to reduce the balance of the note outstanding, and any new advances are ineligible to be financed. |
(2) | Borrowing capacity is available to us provided that we have additional eligible collateral to pledge. Collateral may only be pledged to one facility. At December 31, 2013, none of the available borrowing capacity could be used based on the amount of eligible collateral that had been pledged. |
(3) | Advance facility assumed in the Homeward Acquisition. The 2011-Servicing Advance Revolving Trust 1, 2012-Servicing Advance Revolving Trust 2, 2012-Servicing Advance Revolving Trust 3 and 2012-Homeward DSF Advance Revolving Trust 2012-1 facilities were repaid in February 2013 from the proceeds of a new $1.7 billion bridge facility which has an amortization date of August 14, 2013. The amortization date of the 2012-Homeward Agency Advance Funding Trust 2012-1 facility has been extended to March 3, 2014. |
(4) | These notes were issued to finance the advances acquired from Bank of America, NA (BANA) in connection with the acquisition of MSRs. We repaid this facility in full in July 2013. |
(5) | 1-Month LIBOR (1ML) was 0.17% and 0.21% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
(6) | These notes were issued to finance the advances acquired from BANA in connection with the acquisition of MSRs. We repaid this facility in full in October 2013. |
(7) | The borrowing capacity under this facility was increased to $475.0 million in November 2013. |
(8) | These notes were issued in connection with the OneWest MSR Transaction. On February 3, 2014, the maximum borrowing capacity on the 2013-VF2 notes was increased by $100.0 million to a total of $500.0 million. On February 28, 2014, the maximum borrowing capacity under the 2013-VF1 note is scheduled to decline by $250.0 million to a total of $1.3 billion. On February 28, 2014 we negotiated a deferral for a month of the scheduled decrease in the maximum borrowing capacity under the 2013-VF1 Note. |
(9) | The interest margin on these notes increases to 200 bps on July 15, 2014, to 225 bps on August 15, 2014 and 250 bps on September 15, 2014. |
(10) | The interest margin on these notes increases to 191 bps on July 15, 2014, to 215 bps on August 15, 2014 and 238 bps on September 15, 2014. |
(11) | The interest margin on these notes increases to 486 bps on July 15, 2014, to 546 bps on August 15, 2014 and 607 bps on September 15, 2014. |
Borrowings | Collateral | Interest Rate | Maturity | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
Servicing: | ||||||||||||||
Financing liability – MSRs pledged | MSRs | (1) | (1) | $ | 651,060 | $ | 303,705 | |||||||
Financing liability – MSRs pledged | MSRs | (2) | (2) | — | 2,603 | |||||||||
651,060 | 306,308 | |||||||||||||
Lending: | ||||||||||||||
Financing liability - MSRs pledged | MSRs | (2) | (2) | 17,593 | — | |||||||||
HMBS-related borrowings (3) | Loans held for investment | 1ML + 220 bps | (3) | 615,576 | — | |||||||||
633,169 | — | |||||||||||||
$ | 1,284,229 | $ | 306,308 |
(1) | The HLSS Transaction financing liabilities have no contractual maturity but are amortized over the estimated life of the transferred Rights to MSRs using the interest method with the servicing income that is remitted to HLSS representing payments of principal and interest. For purposes of applying the interest method, the balance of the liability is reduced each month based on the change in the present value of the estimated future cash flows underlying the related MSRs. See Note 4 — Sales of Advances and MSRs for additional information regarding the HLSS Transactions. |
(2) | The financing liability is being amortized using the interest method with the servicing income that is remitted to the purchaser representing payments of principal and interest. |
(3) | Represents amounts due to the holders of beneficial interests in Ginnie Mae guaranteed HMBS. The beneficial interests have no maturity dates, and the borrowings mature as the related loans are repaid. See Note 2 — Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities for additional information. |
Borrowings | Collateral | Interest Rate | Maturity | Available Borrowing Capacity | December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Servicing: | ||||||||||||||||||
SSTL (1) | (1) | 1ML + 550 bps with a LIBOR floor of 150 bps (1) | Sep. 2016 | $ | — | $ | — | 314,229 | ||||||||||
SSTL (2) | (2) | 1-Month Euro-dollar rate + 375 bps with a Eurodollar floor of 125 bps (2) | Feb. 2018 | — | 1,290,250 | — | ||||||||||||
Senior unsecured term loan (3) | 1-Month Euro-dollar rate + 675 bps with a Eurodollar floor of 150 bps | Mar. 2017 | — | — | 75,000 | |||||||||||||
Promissory note (4) | MSRs | 1ML + 350 bps | May 2017 | — | 15,529 | 18,466 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase agreement | Loans held for sale (LHFS) | 1ML + 200 - 345 bps | Apr. 2014 | 82,493 | 17,507 | — | ||||||||||||
82,493 | 1,323,286 | 407,695 | ||||||||||||||||
Lending: | ||||||||||||||||||
Master repurchase agreement (5) | LHFS | 1ML + 175 bps | Mar. 2014 | 194,341 | 105,659 | 88,122 | ||||||||||||
Participation agreement (6) | LHFS | N/A | May 2014 | — | 81,268 | 58,938 | ||||||||||||
Master repurchase agreement (7) | LHFS | 1ML + 175 - 275 bps | Jul. 2014 | 58,010 | 91,990 | 133,995 | ||||||||||||
Master repurchase agreement (8) | LHFS | 1ML + 175 - 200 bps | Sep. 2014 | 210,164 | 89,836 | 107,020 | ||||||||||||
Master repurchase agreement | LHFS | 1ML + 275bps | Jul. 2014 | 48,025 | 51,975 | — | ||||||||||||
Mortgage warehouse agreement | LHFS | 1ML + 275 bps; floor of 350 bps | Jun. 2014 | 25,708 | 34,292 | — | ||||||||||||
536,248 | 455,020 | 388,075 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate Items and Other: | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under an agreement to repurchase (9) | Ocwen Real Estate Asset Liquidating Trust 2007-1 Notes | Class A-2 notes: 1ML + 200 bps; Class A-3 notes: 1ML + 300 bps | Monthly | — | 4,712 | 2,833 | ||||||||||||
618,741 | 1,783,018 | 798,603 | ||||||||||||||||
Discount (1)(2) | — | (5,349 | ) | (8,232 | ) | |||||||||||||
$ | 618,741 | $ | 1,777,669 | $ | 790,371 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate | 4.86 | % | 4.49 | % |
(1) | In February 2013, we repaid this loan in full and wrote off the remaining discount as part of the loss on extinguishment. |
(2) | On February 15, 2013, we entered into a new SSTL facility agreement and borrowed $1.3 billion that was used principally to fund the ResCap Acquisition and repay the balance of the previous SSTL. The loan was issued with an original issue discount of $6.5 million that we are amortizing over the term of the loan. We are required to repay the principal amount of the borrowings in consecutive quarterly installments of $3.3 million. In addition, we are generally required to use the net cash proceeds (as defined) from any asset sale (as defined) to repay loan principal. Generally, this provision applies to non-operating sales of assets, and net cash proceeds represent the proceeds from the sale of the assets, net of the repayment of any debt secured by a lien on the assets sold. However, for assets sales that are part of an HLSS Transaction, we have the option, within 180 days, either to invest the net cash proceeds in MSRs or related assets, such as advances, or to repay loan principal. The borrowings are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of Ocwen. Borrowings bear interest, at the election of Ocwen, at a rate per annum equal to either (a) the base rate [the greatest of (i) the prime rate in effect on such day, (ii) the federal funds rate in effect on such day plus 0.50% and (iii) the one-month Eurodollar rate (1-Month LIBOR)], plus a margin of 2.75% and a base rate floor of 2.25% or (b) the one month Eurodollar rate, plus a margin of 3.75% with a one month Eurodollar floor of 1.25%. To date we have elected option (b) to determine the interest rate. |
• | permit repurchases of all of the Preferred Shares, which may be converted to common stock prior to repurchase, and up to $1.5 billion of common stock, subject, in each case, to pro forma financial covenant compliance; |
• | eliminate the dollar cap on Junior Indebtedness (as defined in the SSTL) but retain the requirement for any such issuance to be subject to pro forma covenant compliance; |
• | include a value for whole loans (i.e., loans held for sale) in collateral value for purposes of calculating the loan-to-value ratio and include specified deferred servicing fees and the fair value of specified mortgage servicing rights in net worth for purposes of calculating the ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated tangible net worth; and |
• | modify the applicable quarterly covenant levels for the corporate leverage ratio, ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated tangible net worth and loan-to-value ratio. |
(3) | Ocwen borrowed funds from Altisource in connection with the financing of the Homeward Acquisition. See Note 26 — Related Party Transactions for additional information regarding this agreement with Altisource. We repaid this loan in full in February 2013. |
(4) | This note was issued to finance the acquisition of MSRs from BANA. Prepayments of the balance on this note may be required if the borrowing base, as defined, falls below the amount of the note outstanding. |
(5) | On March 19, 2013, the maturity date was extended to March 18, 2014 and the maximum borrowing capacity was increased from $125.0 million to $300.0 million. |
(6) | Under this participation agreement, the lender provides financing on an uncommitted basis for $50.0 million to $90.0 million at the discretion of the lender. The participation agreement allows the lender to acquire a 100% beneficial interest in the underlying mortgage loans. However, the transaction does not qualify for sale accounting treatment and is accounted for as a secured borrowing. The lender earns the stated interest rate of the underlying mortgage loans while the loans are financed under the participation agreement. In April 2013, we extended the maturity date of the participation agreement to May 31, 2014. |
(7) | On August 3, 2013, we extended the maturity date of this facility to August 2, 2014. |
(8) | On September 27, 2013, we extended the maturity date of this facility to September 26, 2014. |
(9) | Repurchase agreement for Class A-2 and A-3 notes issued by Ocwen Real Estate Asset Liquidating Trust 2007-1 which have a current face value of $24.5 million at December 31, 2013. This agreement has no stated credit limit and lending is determined for each transaction based on the acceptability of the securities presented as collateral. |
• | Specified net worth requirements; |
• | Restrictions on future indebtedness; and |
• | Monitoring and reporting of various specified transactions or events, including specific reporting on defined events affecting collateral underlying certain borrowing agreements. |
Expected Maturity Date (1) (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | There- after | Total Balance | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Match funded liabilities (3) | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,364,814 | $ | 2,364,814 | ||||||||||||||||
Other secured borrowings (3) | 488,929 | 27,219 | 11,690 | 11,690 | 1,238,141 | — | 1,777,669 | 1,762,876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 2,853,743 | $ | 27,219 | $ | 11,690 | $ | 11,690 | $ | 1,238,141 | $ | — | $ | 4,142,483 | $ | 4,127,690 |
(1) | For match funded liabilities, the expected maturity date is the date on which the revolving period ends for each advance financing facility note and repayment of the outstanding balance must begin if the note is not renewed or extended. |
(2) | Excludes $651.1 million recorded in connection with sales of MSRs and Rights to MSRs accounted for as financings and $615.6 million recorded in connection with the securitizations of HMBS that we record as financings. The MSR-related financing liabilities have no contractual maturity and are amortized over the life of the transferred Rights to MSRs. The HMBS-related financing liabilities have no contractual maturity and are amortized as the related loans are repaid. See Note 2 — Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities and Note 15 — Borrowings for additional information. |
(3) | At December 31, 2013 all Match funded liabilities and all Other secured borrowings were variable rate obligations. |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Liability for indemnification obligations (1) | $ | 192,716 | $ | 38,140 | |||
Accrued expenses | 108,870 | 68,068 | |||||
Due to related parties (2) | 77,901 | 45,034 | |||||
Liability for certain foreclosure matters (3) | 66,948 | 13,430 | |||||
Payable to servicing and subservicing investors (4) | 33,501 | 9,973 | |||||
Checks held for escheat | 24,392 | 33,259 | |||||
Liability for selected tax items (5) | 27,273 | 22,702 | |||||
Other | 58,774 | 61,138 | |||||
$ | 590,375 | $ | 291,744 |
(1) | The balance includes origination representation and warranty obligations and compensatory fees for foreclosures that may ultimately exceed investor timelines. These obligations were primarily assumed in connection with the Ally MSR Transaction, the ResCap Acquisition and the Homeward Acquisition. See Note 28 — Commitments and Contingencies for additional information. |
(2) | See Note 26 — Related Party Transactions for additional information regarding transactions with Altisource and HLSS. |
(3) | We recognized $53.5 million of expense in Professional services during 2013 to establish the liability. We recognized the remaining $13.4 million of the liability as an adjustment to the initial purchase price allocation related to the Homeward Acquisition. We applied this measurement period adjustment retrospectively to our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012 with an offsetting increase in goodwill. See Note 28 — Commitments and Contingencies for additional information. |
(4) | The balance represents amounts due to investors in connection with loans we service under servicing and subservicing agreements. |
(5) | See Note 22 — Income Taxes for information on the liability for selected tax items. |
• | Ranking. The Preferred Shares shall, with respect to the payment of dividends, redemption and distributions upon the liquidation, winding up or dissolution of Ocwen rank senior to all classes of common stock. |
• | Dividends. Holders of the Preferred Shares are entitled to receive mandatory and cumulative dividends payable quarterly at the rate per share equal to the greater of (i) 3.75% per annum multiplied by $1,000 per share and (ii) in the event Ocwen pays a regular quarterly dividend on its common stock in such quarter, the rate per share payable in respect of such quarterly dividend on an as-converted basis. If Ocwen declares a special dividend on common stock, then any dividend shall be payable to the holders of the shares of common stock and the holders of the Preferred Shares on a pari passu, as-converted basis. Any such dividend may be paid either in cash or in Preferred Shares. |
• | Conversion. Each Preferred Share, together with any accrued and unpaid dividends, may be converted to common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion price equal to $31.79. |
• | Redemption. Ocwen may redeem the Preferred Shares commencing on December 27, 2014. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock are redeemable, at Ocwen’s option, in whole, or, from time to time, in part, at any time beginning on the second anniversary of the issue date of the Preferred Shares, payable through the issuance of shares of common stock. The redemption amount is any accrued and unpaid dividends plus: 103% of the liquidation preference of $1,000 for each Preferred Share plus from the second anniversary of the issue date and prior to the third anniversary; 102% of the liquidation preference from the third anniversary and prior to the fourth anniversary; 101% of the liquidation preference from the fourth anniversary and prior to the fifth anniversary; and the liquidation preference from the fifth anniversary. |
• | Voting. The holders of Preferred Shares shall be entitled to vote on all matters submitted to the stockholders for a vote, voting together with the holders of the common stock as a single class, with each share of common stock entitled to one vote per share and each Preferred Share entitled to one vote for each share of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Share as of the record date for such vote or, if no record date is specified, as of the date of such vote. |
• | Protective Provisions. So long as the Preferred Shares are outstanding, Ocwen will not, without obtaining the approval of the holders of a majority of the Preferred Shares (i) issue any preferred stock other than the Preferred Shares, any senior securities or any parity securities in excess of $325 million; (ii) amend or alter the Articles of Designation or Articles of Incorporation in any manner that under the Florida Business Corporation Act requires the prior vote as a separate class of the holders of the Preferred Shares; (iii) amend or otherwise alter the Articles of Designation or the Articles of Incorporation in any manner that would adversely affect the rights, privileges or preferences of the Preferred Shares; (iv) pay any dividend in cash to the common stock in respect of any quarterly dividend unless the dividend payable in respect of such quarter on the Preferred Shares is also paid in cash to the same extent; or (v) waive compliance with any provision of the Articles of Designation or take any actions intended to circumvent the provisions of the Articles of Designation. |
• | Change of Control; Liquidation Event. |
1. | Change of Control. In the case of any change in control of Ocwen, then, upon consummation of such transaction, each holder of Preferred Shares shall be entitled to receive in respect of such share the greater of (i) the liquidation preference of $1,000 plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, whether or not declared, if any, or (ii) the amount such holder would receive if such holder converted such Preferred Shares into the kind and amount of securities, cash or other assets receivable upon the consummation of the change in control by a holder of the number of shares of Common Stock into which such Preferred Shares might have been converted immediately prior to such change in control; |
2. | Liquidation Event. Upon any liquidation event, each holder of Preferred Shares will be entitled to payment out of Ocwen’s assets available for distribution, before any distribution or payment out of such assets may be made to the holders of any junior securities, and subject to the rights of the holders of any senior securities or parity securities upon liquidation and the rights of Ocwen’s creditors, of an amount equal to the liquidation preference of $1,000 plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, whether or not declared. After payment in full of the liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon to which holders of Preferred Shares are entitled, such holders will not be entitled to any further participation in any distribution of Ocwen’s assets. |
Initial issuance price on December 27, 2012 | $ | 162,000 | |
Discount for beneficial conversion feature | (8,688 | ) | |
Accretion of BCF discount (Deemed dividend) | 60 | ||
Carrying value at December 31, 2012 | 153,372 | ||
Conversion of 100,000 Preferred Shares (1) | (100,000 | ) | |
Accretion of BCF discount (Deemed dividend) (2) | 6,989 | ||
Carrying value at December 31, 2013 | $ | 60,361 |
(1) | On September 23, 2013, holders elected to convert 100,000 of the Preferred Shares into 3,145,640 shares of common stock. See Note 26 — Related Party Transactions for additional information. |
(2) | Accretion includes a $3.5 million accelerated write-off of the unamortized discount related to the 100,000 Preferred Shares converted on September 23, 2013. |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges | $ | 10,026 | $ | 6,310 | |||
Other | 125 | 131 | |||||
$ | 10,151 | $ | 6,441 |
IRLCs | U.S. Treasury Futures | Forward MBS Trades | Interest Rate Caps | Interest Rate Swaps | |||||||||||||||
Beginning notional balance | $ | 1,112,519 | $ | 109,000 | $ | 1,638,979 | $ | 1,025,000 | $ | 1,495,955 | |||||||||
Additions | 5,887,759 | 85,000 | 10,578,176 | 1,900,000 | 1,280,000 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization | (228,806 | ) | — | (33,372 | ) | (56,000 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Maturities | (5,124,849 | ) | — | (4,156,314 | ) | — | (295,604 | ) | |||||||||||
Terminations | (895,187 | ) | (194,000 | ) | (7,076,821 | ) | (1,001,000 | ) | (2,480,351 | ) | |||||||||
Ending notional balance | $ | 751,436 | $ | — | $ | 950,648 | $ | 1,868,000 | $ | — | |||||||||
Fair value of derivative assets (liabilities) at: | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 | $ | 8,433 | $ | — | $ | 6,905 | $ | 442 | $ | — | |||||||||
December 31, 2012 | $ | 5,781 | $ | (1,258 | ) | $ | (1,719 | ) | $ | 168 | $ | (10,836 | ) | ||||||
Maturity | Jan. 2014 - Apr. 2014 | N/A | Jan. 2014 - Feb. 2014 | Nov. 2016 | N/A |
Purpose | Expiration Date | Notional Amount | Fair Value (1) | Gains / (Losses) | Consolidated Statement of Operations Caption | |||||||||||
Hedge the effect of changes in interest rates on interest expense on borrowings | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate caps | ||||||||||||||||
Hedge the effect of changes in 1ML on advance funding facilities | 2016 | $ | 1,868,000 | $ | 442 | $ | 56 | Other, net | ||||||||
Interest rate risk of mortgage loans held for sale and of IRLCs | ||||||||||||||||
Forward MBS trades | 2014 | 950,648 | 6,905 | 42,732 | Gain on loans held for sale, net | |||||||||||
IRLCs | 2014 | 751,436 | 8,433 | 523 | Gain on loans held for sale, net | |||||||||||
Total derivatives | $ | 15,780 | $ | 43,311 |
(1) | Derivatives are reported at fair value in Receivables, Other assets or in Other liabilities. |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 6,441 | $ | 7,896 | $ | 9,392 | |||||
Additional net losses on cash flow hedges | 12,363 | 8,315 | 615 | ||||||||
Ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings | (657 | ) | 41 | (1,393 | ) | ||||||
Losses on terminated hedging relationships amortized to earnings | (10,816 | ) | (10,592 | ) | (1,544 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in accumulated losses on cash flow hedges | 890 | (2,236 | ) | (2,322 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in deferred taxes on accumulated losses on cash flow hedges | 2,825 | 786 | 843 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in accumulated losses on cash flow hedges, net of taxes | 3,715 | (1,450 | ) | (1,479 | ) | ||||||
Other | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||
Ending balance | $ | 10,151 | $ | 6,441 | $ | 7,896 |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Gains (losses) on economic hedges | (2,861 | ) | 7,331 | (4,488 | ) | ||||||
Ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges | (657 | ) | 41 | (1,393 | ) | ||||||
Write-off of losses in AOCL for a discontinued hedge relationship (1) | (10,816 | ) | (4,633 | ) | (1,545 | ) | |||||
Write-off of losses in AOCL for hedge of a financing facility assumed by HLSS (2) | — | (5,958 | ) | — | |||||||
$ | (14,334 | ) | $ | (3,219 | ) | $ | (7,426 | ) |
(1) | Includes the write off in 2012 and 2013 of the remaining of unamortized losses when a borrowing under the related advance financing facility was repaid in full, and the facility was terminated. |
(2) | See Note 4 — Sales of Advances and MSRs. |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Loans held for sale | $ | 18,563 | $ | 2,946 | $ | 2,291 | |||||
Other | 3,792 | 5,383 | 6,585 | ||||||||
$ | 22,355 | $ | 8,329 | $ | 8,876 |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Match funded liabilities | $ | 75,979 | $ | 122,292 | $ | 93,051 | |||||
Financing liabilities (1) (2) | 246,241 | 54,710 | — | ||||||||
Other secured borrowings | 81,851 | 41,510 | 32,985 | ||||||||
Debt securities: | |||||||||||
3.25% Convertible Notes (3) | — | 153 | 1,834 | ||||||||
10.875% Capital Securities (4) | — | 1,894 | 2,840 | ||||||||
Other | 8,771 | 2,896 | 2,060 | ||||||||
$ | 412,842 | $ | 223,455 | $ | 132,770 |
(1) | Includes interest expense of $245.8 million and $54.7 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to financing liabilities recorded in connection with the HLSS Transactions as indicated in the table below: |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Servicing fees collected on behalf of HLSS | $ | 633,377 | $ | 117,789 | |||
Less: Subservicing fee retained by Ocwen | 317,723 | 50,162 | |||||
Net servicing fees remitted to HLSS | 315,654 | 67,627 | |||||
Less: Reduction in financing liability | 69,812 | 12,917 | |||||
Interest expense on HLSS financing liability | $ | 245,842 | $ | 54,710 |
(2) | Interest expense that we expect to be paid on the HMBS-related borrowings is included with net fair value gains in Other revenues. See Note 2 — Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities for additional information. |
(3) | We redeemed the remaining 3.25% Convertible Notes outstanding on March 28, 2012. |
(4) | We redeemed the remaining 10.875% Capital Securities outstanding on August 31, 2012. |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Domestic | $ | 76,957 | $ | 176,075 | $ | 118,708 | |||||
Foreign | 258,266 | 81,433 | 4,287 | ||||||||
$ | 335,223 | $ | 257,508 | $ | 122,995 |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Current: | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | 58,507 | $ | 10,621 | $ | 13,894 | |||||
State | 14,691 | (759 | ) | (195 | ) | ||||||
Foreign | 15,545 | 2,968 | 1,079 | ||||||||
88,743 | 12,830 | 14,778 | |||||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||||
Federal | (53,711 | ) | 62,704 | 29,440 | |||||||
State | (4,325 | ) | (431 | ) | 368 | ||||||
Foreign | (5,397 | ) | 1,482 | 86 | |||||||
Provision for valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | 15,764 | — | — | ||||||||
(47,669 | ) | 63,755 | 29,894 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 41,074 | $ | 76,585 | $ | 44,672 |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Expected income tax expense at statutory rate | $ | 117,328 | $ | 90,127 | $ | 43,049 | |||||
Differences between expected and actual income tax expense: | |||||||||||
State tax, after Federal tax benefit | 5,316 | (1,184 | ) | 254 | |||||||
Provision for liability for selected tax items | 12,218 | 5,558 | 1,611 | ||||||||
Permanent differences | (636 | ) | 15 | 61 | |||||||
Foreign tax differential | (107,621 | ) | (17,816 | ) | (716 | ) | |||||
Provision for valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | 15,764 | — | — | ||||||||
Other | (1,295 | ) | (115 | ) | 413 | ||||||
Actual income tax expense | $ | 41,074 | $ | 76,585 | $ | 44,672 |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||
Net operating loss carryforward | $ | 35,370 | $ | 16,068 | |||
Delinquent servicing fees | 36,480 | 19,559 | |||||
Accrued legal settlements | 27,320 | 5,411 | |||||
Reserve for servicing exposure | 20,446 | 59,273 | |||||
Partnership losses | 11,085 | 11,036 | |||||
Accrued incentive compensation | 10,037 | 6,210 | |||||
Accrued other liabilities | 7,452 | 2,662 | |||||
Bad debt and allowance for loan losses | 6,397 | 6,551 | |||||
Intangible asset amortization | 4,728 | 2,070 | |||||
Tax residuals and deferred income on tax residuals | 3,963 | 4,175 | |||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 2,956 | 3,127 | |||||
Foreign deferred assets | 2,802 | 3,055 | |||||
Accrued lease termination costs | 1,085 | 1,887 | |||||
Capital losses | 843 | 665 | |||||
Valuation allowance on real estate | 767 | 386 | |||||
Interest rate swaps | 743 | 3,813 | |||||
Net unrealized gains and losses on securities | — | 2,702 | |||||
Other | 10,560 | 7,339 | |||||
183,034 | 155,989 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||
Mortgage servicing rights amortization | 50,632 | 56,265 | |||||
Other | 80 | 2,831 | |||||
50,712 | 59,096 | ||||||
132,322 | 96,893 | ||||||
Valuation allowance | (15,764 | ) | — | ||||
Deferred tax assets, net | $ | 116,558 | $ | 96,893 |
2013 | 2012 | ||||||
Balance at January 1 | $ | 22,702 | $ | 4,524 | |||
Additions based on tax positions related to current year | — | 17,396 | |||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years | 4,944 | 875 | |||||
Lapses in statutes of limitation | (373 | ) | (93 | ) | |||
Balance at December 31 | $ | 27,273 | $ | 22,702 |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Basic EPS: | |||||||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | $ | 282,129 | $ | 180,778 | $ | 78,331 | |||||
Weighted average shares of common stock | 135,678,088 | 133,912,643 | 104,507,055 | ||||||||
Basic EPS | $ | 2.08 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 0.75 | |||||
Diluted EPS: | |||||||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | $ | 282,129 | $ | 180,778 | $ | 78,331 | |||||
Preferred stock dividends (1) | — | — | — | ||||||||
Interest expense on 3.25% Convertible Notes, net of income tax (2) | — | 107 | 1,187 | ||||||||
Adjusted net income attributable to Ocwen | $ | 282,129 | $ | 180,885 | $ | 79,518 | |||||
Weighted average shares of common stock | 135,678,088 | 133,912,643 | 104,507,055 | ||||||||
Effect of dilutive elements: | |||||||||||
Preferred Shares (1) | — | — | — | ||||||||
3.25% Convertible Notes (2) | — | 1,008,891 | 4,637,224 | ||||||||
Stock options | 4,110,355 | 3,593,419 | 2,711,682 | ||||||||
Common stock awards | 12,063 | 6,326 | — | ||||||||
Dilutive weighted average shares of common stock | 139,800,506 | 138,521,279 | 111,855,961 | ||||||||
Diluted EPS | $ | 2.02 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 0.71 | |||||
Stock options excluded from the computation of diluted EPS: | |||||||||||
Anti-dilutive(3) | — | 143,125 | 27,031 | ||||||||
Market-based(4) | 547,500 | 1,535,000 | 468,750 |
(1) | The effect of our Preferred Shares on diluted EPS is computed using the if-converted method. For purposes of computing diluted EPS, we assume the conversion of the Preferred Shares into shares of common stock unless the effect is anti-dilutive. Conversion of the Preferred Shares has not been assumed for 2013 and 2012 because the effect would have been antidilutive. There were no Preferred Shares outstanding during 2011. |
(2) | Prior to the redemption of the 3.25% Convertible Notes in March 2012, we also computed their effect on diluted EPS using the if-converted method. Interest expense and related amortization costs applicable to the 3.25% Convertible Notes, net of income tax, were added back to net income. We assumed the conversion of the 3.25% Convertible Notes into shares of common stock unless the effect was anti-dilutive. On March 28, 2012, we issued 4,635,159 shares of common stock upon conversion of $56.4 million of the 3.25% Convertible Notes. |
(3) | These stock options were anti-dilutive because their exercise price was greater than the average market price of our stock. |
(4) | Shares that are issuable upon the achievement of certain performance criteria related to Ocwen’s stock price and an annualized rate of return to investors. See Note 24 — Employee Compensation and Benefit Plans for additional information regarding these market-condition options. |
Type of Award | Percent of Options Awarded | Vesting Period | ||
Service Condition: | ||||
Time-Based | 25% | Ratably over four years (¼ on each of the four anniversaries of the grant date) | ||
Market Condition: | ||||
Performance-Based | 50 | Over three years beginning with ¼ vesting on the date that the stock price has at least doubled over the exercise price and the compounded annual gain over the exercise price is at least 20% and then ratably over three years (¼ on the next three anniversaries of the achievement of the market condition) | ||
Extraordinary Performance-Based | 25 | Over three years beginning with ¼ vesting on the date that the stock price has at least tripled over the exercise price and the compounded annual gain over the exercise price is at least 25% and then ratably over three years (¼ on the next three anniversaries of the achievement of the market condition) | ||
Total award | 100% |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Number of Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 8,938,179 | $ | 9.93 | 7,894,728 | $ | 5.48 | 8,084,953 | $ | 5.03 | |||||||||||
Granted (1) | 50,000 | 51.70 | 2,160,000 | 23.92 | 545,000 | 13 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised (2)(3) | (790,568 | ) | 5.35 | (1,116,549 | ) | 3.56 | (735,225 | ) | 6.01 | |||||||||||
Forfeited | (15,000 | ) | 15.27 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at end of year(4)(5) | 8,182,611 | 10.62 | 8,938,179 | 9.93 | 7,894,728 | 5.48 | ||||||||||||||
Exercisable at end of year (4)(5)(6) | 5,733,864 | 6.53 | 5,569,432 | 5.04 | 4,947,228 | 4.91 |
(1) | Stock options granted in 2012 include 2,000,000 options granted to Ocwen’s Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, William C. Erbey at an exercise price of $24.38 equal to the closing price of the stock on the day of the Committee’s approval. See Note 26 — Related Party Transactions for additional information regarding Mr. Erbey’s stock and stock option holdings. |
(2) | The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised, which is defined as the amount by which the market value of the stock on the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price, was $35.3 million, $23.9 million and $4.1 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
(3) | In connection with the exercise of stock options during 2013, 2012 and 2011, employees delivered 138,553, 33,605 and 324,248 shares, respectively, of common stock to Ocwen as payment for the exercise price and the income tax withholdings on the compensation. As a result, a total of 652,015, 1,082,944 and 410,977 net shares of stock were issued in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the exercise of stock options. |
(4) | Excluding 547,500 market-based options that have not met their performance criteria, the net aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable at December 31, 2013 was $351.0 million and $280.5 million, respectively. A total of 5,933,125 market-based options were outstanding at December 31, 2013, of which 3,960,002 were exercisable. |
(5) | At December 31, 2013, the weighted average remaining contractual term of options outstanding and options exercisable was 5.7 years and 4.7 years, respectively. |
(6) | The total fair value of the stock options that vested and became exercisable during 2013, 2012 and 2011, based on grant-date fair value, was $4.7 million, $2.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively. |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Black-Scholes | Binomial | Black-Scholes | Binomial | Black-Scholes | Binomial | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 2.32% | 0.24 - 3.56% | 1.20 – 1.60% | 0.70% – 3.06% | 1.57% | 0.35% – 2.74% | |||||
Expected stock price volatility (1) | 44% | 33 - 44% | 40% – 42% | 6.87% – 42% | 41% | 30% – 41% | |||||
Expected dividend yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
Expected option life (in years) (2) | 6.50 | 4.50 - 5.75 | 6.50 | 4.50 – 6.50 | 6.50 | 4.25 – 5.75 | |||||
Contractual life (in years) | — | 10 | — | 10 | — | 10 | |||||
Fair value | $24.32 | $18.04 - 21.38 | $6.49 – $10.48 | $3.41 – $8.87 | $5.51 | $4.66 – $4.09 |
(1) | We estimate volatility based on the historical volatility of Ocwen’s common stock over the most recent period that corresponds with the estimated expected life of the option. |
(2) | For the options valued using the Black-Scholes model we determined the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual term, exercise patterns and post vesting forfeitures. The expected term of the options valued using the lattice (binomial) model is derived from the output of the model. The lattice (binomial) model incorporates exercise assumptions based on analysis of historical data. For all options, the expected life represents the period of time that options granted were expected to be outstanding at the date of the award. |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Equity-based compensation expense: | |||||||||||
Stock option awards | $ | 5,388 | $ | 2,776 | $ | 926 | |||||
Stock awards | 260 | 158 | — | ||||||||
Excess tax benefit related to share-based awards | 21,244 | 11,031 | 2,142 |
Servicing | Lending | Corporate Items and Other | Corporate Eliminations | Business Segments Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Results of Operations | |||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue (1) (2) | $ | 1,895,921 | $ | 120,899 | $ | 22,092 | $ | (639 | ) | $ | 2,038,273 | ||||||||
Operating expenses (1) (3) | 1,096,084 | 98,194 | 107,188 | (172 | ) | 1,301,294 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 799,837 | 22,705 | (85,096 | ) | (467 | ) | 736,979 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 1,599 | 16,295 | 4,461 | — | 22,355 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (398,733 | ) | (13,508 | ) | (601 | ) | — | (412,842 | ) | ||||||||||
Other (1) (2) | (28,292 | ) | 10,132 | 6,424 | 467 | (11,269 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (425,426 | ) | 12,919 | 10,284 | 467 | (401,756 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 374,411 | $ | 35,624 | $ | (74,812 | ) | $ | — | $ | 335,223 | ||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue (1) (2) | $ | 840,630 | $ | 356 | $ | 5,122 | $ | (905 | ) | $ | 845,203 | ||||||||
Operating expenses (1) (3) | 344,315 | 409 | 19,667 | (484 | ) | 363,907 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 496,315 | (53 | ) | (14,545 | ) | (421 | ) | 481,296 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 9 | 309 | 8,011 | — | 8,329 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (221,948 | ) | (514 | ) | (993 | ) | — | (223,455 | ) | ||||||||||
Other (1) (2) | (13 | ) | — | (9,070 | ) | 421 | (8,662 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (221,952 | ) | (205 | ) | (2,052 | ) | 421 | (223,788 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 274,363 | $ | (258 | ) | $ | (16,597 | ) | $ | — | $ | 257,508 | |||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue (1) (2) | $ | 494,834 | $ | — | $ | 2,346 | $ | (1,289 | ) | $ | 495,891 | ||||||||
Operating expenses (1) (3) (4) | 231,201 | — | 8,971 | (625 | ) | 239,547 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 263,633 | — | (6,625 | ) | (664 | ) | 256,344 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 110 | — | 8,766 | — | 8,876 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (132,574 | ) | — | (196 | ) | — | (132,770 | ) | |||||||||||
Other (1) (2) | 4,711 | — | (14,830 | ) | 664 | (9,455 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (127,753 | ) | — | (6,260 | ) | 664 | (133,349 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 135,880 | $ | — | $ | (12,885 | ) | $ | — | $ | 122,995 |
Servicing | Lending | Corporate Items and Other | Corporate Eliminations | Business Segments Consolidated | |||||||||||||||
Total Assets | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 | $ | 6,241,757 | $ | 1,195,812 | $ | 436,201 | $ | — | $ | 7,873,770 | |||||||||
December 31, 2012 | $ | 4,575,489 | $ | 476,434 | $ | 634,039 | $ | — | $ | 5,685,962 | |||||||||
December 31, 2011 | $ | 4,301,371 | $ | — | $ | 426,653 | $ | — | $ | 4,728,024 |
(1) | Intersegment billings for services rendered to other segments are recorded as revenues, as contra-expense or as other income, depending on the type of service that is rendered. |
(2) | Servicing has a contractual right to receive interest income on float balances. However, Corporate controls investment decisions associated with the float balances. Accordingly, Servicing receives revenues generated by those investments |
(3) | Depreciation and amortization expense are as follows: |
Servicing | Lending | Corporate Items and Other | Business Segments Consolidated | ||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2013: | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense | $ | 13,525 | $ | 320 | $ | 10,400 | $ | 24,245 | |||||||
Amortization of MSRs | 282,526 | 255 | — | 282,781 | |||||||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 1,412 | — | — | 1,412 | |||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs – SSTL | 4,395 | — | — | 4,395 | |||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012: | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense | $ | 1,469 | $ | 8 | $ | 4,243 | $ | 5,720 | |||||||
Amortization of MSRs | 72,897 | — | — | 72,897 | |||||||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 3,259 | — | — | 3,259 | |||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs – SSTL | 3,718 | — | — | 3,718 | |||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2011: | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense | $ | 2,410 | $ | — | $ | 1,750 | $ | 4,160 | |||||||
Amortization of MSRs | 42,996 | — | — | 42,996 | |||||||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 8,853 | — | — | 8,853 | |||||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs – SSTL | 9,764 | — | — | 9,764 |
(4) | Operating expenses for 2011 include non-recurring transaction-related expenses associated with the Litton Acquisition of $50.3 million recorded in the Servicing segment. |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Revenues and Expenses: | |||||||||||
Altisource: | |||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 22,739 | $ | 16,532 | $ | 12,242 | |||||
Expenses | 55,119 | 28,987 | 23,226 | ||||||||
HLSS: | |||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 631 | $ | 195 | $ | — | |||||
Expenses | 2,018 | 2,432 | — | ||||||||
AAMC | |||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 1,238 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Residential | |||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 2,436 | $ | — | $ | — |
December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Net Receivable (Payable) | |||||||
Altisource | $ | (3,843 | ) | $ | (5,971 | ) | |
HLSS | (59,505 | ) | (25,524 | ) | |||
AAMC | 943 | — | |||||
Residential | 50 | — | |||||
$ | (62,355 | ) | $ | (31,495 | ) |
• | creates an inter-agency body that is responsible for monitoring the activities of the financial system and recommending a framework for substantially increased regulation of large interconnected financial services firms; |
• | creates a liquidation framework for the resolution of certain bank holding companies and other large and interconnected nonbank financial companies; |
• | strengthens the regulatory oversight of securities and capital markets activities by the SEC; and |
• | creates the CFPB, a new federal entity responsible for regulating consumer financial services. |
• | force-placing insurance, unless there is a reasonable belief that the borrower has failed to comply with a contractual requirement to maintain insurance; |
• | charging a fee for responding to a valid qualified written request; |
• | failing to take timely action to respond to the borrower’s request to correct errors related to payment, payoff amounts, or avoiding foreclosure; |
• | failing to respond within ten (10) business days of a request from the borrower to provide contact information about the owner or assignee of loan; and |
• | failing to return an escrow balance or provide a credit within twenty (20) business days of a residential mortgage loan being paid off by the borrower. |
• | acknowledging receipt of a qualified written request under RESPA within five (5) business days and providing a final response within thirty (30) business days; |
• | promptly crediting mortgage payments received from the borrower on the date of receipt except where payment does not conform to previously established requirements; and |
• | sending an accurate payoff statement within a reasonable period of time but in no case more than seven (7) business days after receipt of a written request from the borrower. |
• | A commitment by Ocwen to service loans in accordance with specified servicing guidelines and to be subject to oversight by an independent national monitor for three years. Ocwen is presently subject to substantially the same guidelines and oversight with respect to the portion of its servicing portfolio acquired from ResCap in early 2013. |
• | A payment of $127.3 million, which includes a fixed amount for administrative expenses, to a consumer relief fund to be disbursed by an independent administrator to eligible borrowers. Pursuant to indemnification and loss sharing provisions of applicable acquisition documents, approximately half of this consumer relief fund payment is to be funded by the former owners of certain servicing portfolios previously acquired by Ocwen and integrated into Ocwen’s servicing platform. Ocwen established a reserve of $66.9 million with respect to its portion of the payment into the consumer relief fund. This reserve is expected to cover all of Ocwen’s portion of the consumer relief fund payment. |
• | A commitment by Ocwen to continue its principal forgiveness modification programs to delinquent and underwater borrowers, including underwater borrowers at imminent risk of default, in an aggregate amount of at least $2 billion over three years. These and all of Ocwen’s other loan modifications are designed to be sustainable for homeowners while providing a net present value for loan investors that is superior to that of foreclosure. Principal forgiveness as part of a loan modification is determined on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the applicable servicing agreement. Principal forgiveness does not involve an expense to Ocwen other than the operating expense incurred in arranging the modification, which is part of Ocwen’s role as loan servicer. |
• | Ocwen and the former owners of certain of the acquired servicing portfolios will receive from the Regulators comprehensive releases, subject to certain exceptions, from liability with respect to residential mortgage servicing, modification and foreclosure practices. |
• | representations and warranties concerning loan quality, contents of the loan file or loan underwriting circumstances are inaccurate; |
• | adequate mortgage insurance is not secured within a certain period after closing; |
• | a mortgage insurance provider denies coverage; or |
• | there is a failure to comply, at the individual loan level or otherwise, with regulatory requirements. |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | $ | 38,140 | |
Provision for representation and warranty obligations | 18,154 | ||
New production reserves | 1,325 | ||
Obligations assumed in connection with MSR and servicing business acquisitions | 190,658 | ||
Charge-offs and other (1) | (55,561 | ) | |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 192,716 |
(1) | Includes principal and interest losses realized in connection with repurchased loans, make-whole, indemnification and fee payments and settlements net of recoveries, if any. |
2014 | $ | 19,798 | |
2015 | 20,087 | ||
2016 | 18,331 | ||
2017 | 11,249 | ||
2018 | 4,453 | ||
Thereafter | — | ||
Total minimum lease payments | $ | 73,918 |
Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 | September 30, 2013 | June 30, 2013 | March 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 555,955 | $ | 531,240 | $ | 544,812 | $ | 406,266 | |||||||
Operating expenses (1) | 340,876 | 346,260 | 371,508 | 242,650 | |||||||||||
Income from operations | 215,079 | 184,980 | 173,304 | 163,616 | |||||||||||
Other expense | (94,976 | ) | (108,705 | ) | (85,794 | ) | (112,281 | ) | |||||||
Income before income taxes | 120,103 | 76,275 | 87,510 | 51,335 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 14,824 | 9,273 | 10,789 | 6,188 | |||||||||||
Net income | 105,279 | 67,002 | 76,721 | 45,147 | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | (581 | ) | (1,446 | ) | (1,519 | ) | (1,485 | ) | |||||||
Deemed dividend related to beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock | (416 | ) | (4,401 | ) | (1,086 | ) | (1,086 | ) | |||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | $ | 104,282 | $ | 61,155 | $ | 74,116 | $ | 42,576 | |||||||
Earnings per share attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.77 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.31 | |||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.74 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.31 |
Quarters Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 | September 30, 2012 | June 30, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 236,590 | $ | 232,700 | $ | 211,381 | $ | 164,532 | |||||||
Operating expenses | 99,097 | 92,793 | 85,904 | 86,113 | |||||||||||
Income from operations | 137,493 | 139,907 | 125,477 | 78,419 | |||||||||||
Other expense | (61,014 | ) | (59,161 | ) | (55,313 | ) | (48,300 | ) | |||||||
Income before income taxes | 76,479 | 80,746 | 70,164 | 30,119 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 11,138 | 29,346 | 25,331 | 10,770 | |||||||||||
Net income | 65,341 | 51,400 | 44,833 | 19,349 | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | (85 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Deemed dividend related to beneficial conversion feature of preferred stock | (60 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | $ | 65,196 | $ | 51,400 | $ | 44,833 | $ | 19,349 | |||||||
Earnings per share attributable to Ocwen common stockholders | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.15 | |||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.14 |
(1) | Operating expenses for the second quarter of 2013 include a $52.8 million charge recorded in connection with an agreement with the CFPB, various state attorneys general and other agencies regarding certain foreclosure-related matters. See Note 28 — Commitments and Contingencies for additional information regarding this agreement. |
(A) | The Board of Directors is expressly authorized at any time, and from time to time, to provide for the issuance of shares of Preferred Stock in one or more series, with such voting powers, full or limited, or without voting powers, and with such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated and expressed in the resolutions providing for the issue thereof adopted by the Board of Directors, and as are not stated and expressed in these Articles of Incorporation, or any amendment thereto, including (but without limiting the generality of the foregoing) the following: |
(1) | the designation of and number of shares constituting such series; |
(2) | the dividend rate of such series, the conditions and dates upon which such dividends shall be payable, the preference or relation which such dividends shall bear to the dividends payable on any other class or classes or of any other series of capital stock, and whether such dividends shall be cumulative or non-cumulative; |
(3) | whether the shares of such series shall be subject to redemption by this corporation, and, if made subject to such redemption, the times, prices and other terms and conditions of such redemption; |
(4) | the terms and amounts of any sinking fund, if any, provided for the purchase or redemption of the shares of such series; |
(5) | whether or not the shares of such series shall be convertible into or exchangeable for shares of any other class or classes or of any other series of any class or classes of capital stock of this corporation, and, if provision be made for conversion or exchange, the times, prices, rates, adjustments and other terms and conditions of such conversion or exchange; |
(6) | the extent, if any, to which the holders of the shares of such series shall be entitled to vote as a class or otherwise with respect to the election of the directors or otherwise; |
(7) | the restrictions, if any, on the issue or reissue of any additional Preferred Stock; and |
(8) | the rights of the holders of the shares of such series upon the dissolution of, or upon the distribution of assets of, this corporation. |
(B) | Except as otherwise required by law and except for such voting powers with respect to the election of directors or other matters as may be stated in the resolutions of the Board of Directors creating any series of Preferred Stock, the holder of any such series shall have no voting power whatsoever. |
(A) | The Board of Directors is expressly authorized at any time, and from time to time, to provide for the issuance of shares of Preferred Stock in one or more series, with such voting powers, full or limited, or without voting powers, and with such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated and expressed in the resolutions providing for the issue thereof adopted by the Board of Directors, and as are not stated and expressed in these Articles of Incorporation, or any amendment thereto, including (but without limiting the generality of the foregoing) the following: |
(1) | the designation of and number of shares constituting such series; |
(2) | the dividend rate of such series, the conditions and dates upon which such dividends shall be payable, the preference or relation which such dividends shall bear to the dividends payable on any other class or classes or of any other series of capital stock, and whether such dividends shall be cumulative or non-cumulative; |
(3) | whether the shares of such series shall be subject to redemption by this corporation, and, if made subject to such redemption, the times, prices and other terms and conditions of such redemption; |
(4) | the terms and amounts of any sinking fund, if any, provided for the purchase or redemption of the shares of such series; |
(5) | whether or not the shares of such series shall be convertible into or exchangeable for shares of any other class or classes or of any other series of any class or classes of capital stock of this corporation, and, if provision be made for conversion or exchange, the times, prices, rates, adjustments and other terms and conditions of such conversion or exchange; |
(6) | the extent, if any, to which the holders of the shares of such series shall be entitled to vote as a class or otherwise with respect to the election of the directors or otherwise; |
(7) | the restrictions, if any, on the issue or reissue of any additional Preferred Stock; and |
(8) | the rights of the holders of the shares of such series upon the dissolution of, or upon the distribution of assets of, this corporation. |
(B) | Except as otherwise required by law and except for such voting powers with respect to the election of directors or other matters as may be stated in the resolutions of the Board of Directors creating any series of Preferred Stock, the holder of any such series shall have no voting power whatsoever. |
1. | Amendment to Section 11, Cooperation; Access; Steering Committee, subparagraph (a) of the Services Agreement. Subparagraph (a) of Section 11, Cooperation; Access; Steering Committee, is hereby deleted in its entirety and restated it as follows: |
2. | Amendment to Section 14(c), Warranties; Limitation of Liability; Indemnity. Section 14(c), is hereby deleted in its entirety and restated as follows: |
3. | Amendment to Section 15, Additional Agreements. Section 15, Additional Agreements, is hereby deleted in its entirety and restated as follows: |
(1) | Providing Party shall comply with applicable privacy and data laws and regulations including, without limitation, the GLB Act and only use Consumer Information to perform its obligations under this Agreement and/or as otherwise permitted under the applicable laws and regulations and will not disclose the Consumer Information contrary to the provisions of this Agreement or any other applicable laws and regulations. |
(2) | Providing Party shall develop written company policies and procedures, as well as implement appropriate physical and other security measures and controls reasonably designed to: (i) ensure the security, integrity, and confidentiality of the Consumer Information; (ii) protect against any reasonably foreseeable threats or hazards to the security and integrity of |
(3) | Providing Party shall, at a minimum, establish and maintain such data security program reasonably designed to meet the objectives of the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information as set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations at 12 C.F.R. Parts 30, 208, 211, 225, 263, 308, 364, 568 and 570. |
(4) | Within a reasonable time following Providing Party’s discovery of Consumer Information Breach, Providing Party shall take appropriate actions to address the Consumer Information Breach, including using its best efforts stop such Consumer Information Breach and notifying Customer Party. |
(5) | For purposes of this Section 15(d): |
a. | “Consumer Information” means “non-public personal information” of “consumers” or “customers” - as those terms are defined by the GLB Act - which Providing Party may receive, maintain, process or otherwise access from time to time in providing services to Customer Party pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. |
b. | “GLB Act” means, collectively, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. §6801, et seq.) and its implementing regulations. |
c. | “Consumer Information Breach” means any confirmed breach or compromise of the security, confidentiality or integrity of Consumer Information. |
4. | Counterparts. This Third Amendment may be signed in counterparts with the same effect as if both parties had signed one and the same document. This Third Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall together constitute one and the same agreement. Counterparts shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties; it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. This Third Amendment and its counterparts may be executed by providing an electronic signature under the terms of the Electronic Signatures Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7001 et seq., and may not be denied legal effect solely because it is in electronic form or permits the completion of the business transaction referenced herein electronically instead of in person. |
OCWEN | ALTISOURCE |
Ocwen Financial Corporation | Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. |
By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris | By: /s/ William B. Shepro |
Name: Ronald M. Faris | Name: William B. Shepro |
Title: President & CEO | Title: Manager |
Date: September 3, 2013 | Date: September 4, 2013 |
1. | Amendment to Section 11, Cooperation; Access; Steering Committee, subparagraph (a) of the Services Agreement. Subparagraph (a) of Section 11, Cooperation; Access; Steering Committee, is hereby deleted in its entirety and restated it as follows: |
2. | Amendment to Section 14(c), Warranties; Limitation of Liability; Indemnity. Section 14(c), is hereby deleted in its entirety and restated as follows: |
3. | Amendment to Section 15, Additional Agreements. Section 15, Additional Agreements, is hereby deleted in its entirety and restated as follows: |
(1) | Providing Party shall comply with applicable privacy and data laws and regulations including, without limitation, the GLB Act and only use Consumer Information to perform its obligations under this Agreement and/or as otherwise permitted under the applicable laws and regulations and will not disclose the Consumer Information contrary to the provisions of this Agreement or any other applicable laws and regulations. |
(2) | Providing Party shall develop written company policies and procedures, as well as implement appropriate physical and other security measures and controls reasonably designed to: (i) ensure the security, integrity, and confidentiality of the Consumer Information; (ii) protect against any reasonably foreseeable threats or hazards to the security and integrity of the Consumer |
(3) | Providing Party shall, at a minimum, establish and maintain such data security program reasonably designed to meet the objectives of the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information as set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations at 12 C.F.R. Parts 30, 208, 211, 225, 263, 308, 364, 568 and 570. |
(4) | Within a reasonable time following Providing Party’s discovery of Consumer Information Breach, Providing Party shall take appropriate actions to address the Consumer Information Breach, including using its best efforts stop such Consumer Information Breach and notifying Customer Party. |
(5) | For purposes of this Section 15(d): |
a. | “Consumer Information” means “non-public personal information” of “consumers” or “customers” - as those terms are defined by the GLB Act - which Providing Party may receive, maintain, process or otherwise access from time to time in providing services to Customer Party pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. |
b. | “GLB Act” means, collectively, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. §6801, et seq.) and its implementing regulations. |
c. | “Consumer Information Breach” means any confirmed breach or compromise of the security, confidentiality or integrity of Consumer Information. |
4. | Counterparts. This Second Amendment may be signed in counterparts with the same effect as if both parties had signed one and the same document. This Second Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall together constitute one and the same agreement. Counterparts shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other parties; it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. This Second Amendment and its counterparts may be executed by providing an electronic signature under the terms of the Electronic Signatures Act, 15 U.S.C. § 7001 et seq., and may not be denied legal effect solely because it is in electronic form or permits the completion of the business transaction referenced herein electronically instead of in person. |
OCWEN | OCWEN |
Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. | Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. |
By: /s/ Nikhil Malik | By: /s/ William B. Shepro |
Name: Nikhil Malik | Name: William B. Shepro |
Title: CFO | Title: Manager |
Date: September 3, 2013 | Date: September 4, 2013 |
OCWEN | ALTISOURCE |
Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. | Altisource Solutions S.à r.l. |
By: /s/ Timothy M. Hayes | By: /s/ William B. Shepro |
Name: Timothy M. Hayes | Name: William B. Shepro |
Title: Executive Vice President & General Counsel | Title: Manager |
Date: September 18, 2013 | Date: September 16, 2013 |
Services Provided | Service Period | Service Fee |
FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING Services Provided: Corporate Accounting Accounts Payables Accounts Receivables Corporate Secretary Support Financial Reporting Payroll Services Tax Treasury | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
HUMAN RESOURCES Services Provided: Benefits Administration Employee and Contractor On-boarding Employee Engagement HR Administration HR Strategy and Consulting HRIS Administration and Reporting Performance Management Platforms Personnel Files Recruiting Salary Administration Training and Compliance Support | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
RISK MANAGEMENT Services Provided: Service Organization Control Reporting (including SSAE 16, as may be amended from time to time) Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning Risk Management Support Information Security | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
OTHER OPERATIONS SUPPORT Services Provided: Capital Markets Modeling Quantitative Analytics General Business Consulting Business Development | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
Services Provided | Service Period | Service Fee |
CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY Services Provided: Scripting Support Staffing Models Training Development User and Task Analysis | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
CORPORATE SERVICES Services Provided: Facilities Management Mailroom Support Physical Security Travel Services | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING Services Provided: Accounting Services and Reporting Accounts Payables Accounts Receivables Corporate Secretary Support Financial Reporting Payroll Services Tax Treasury | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
HUMAN RESOURCES Services Provided: Benefits Administration Employee and Contractor On-boarding Employee Engagement HR Administration HR Strategy and Consulting HRIS Administration and Reporting Performance Management Platforms Personnel Files Recruiting Salary Administration Training and Compliance Support | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
RISK MANAGEMENT Services Provided: Quality Assurance Support Service Organization Control Reporting (including SSAE 16, as may be amended from time to time) Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Planning Information Security Support Six Sigma | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
Services Provided | Service Period | Service Fee |
PROCUREMENT SERVICES Services Provided: Contract Negotiation Vendor Compliance Vendor Management Services Insurance Risk Management | 24 | Fully Allocated Cost of providing services. |
OTHER OPERATIONS SUPPORT Services Provided: Capital Markets Modeling Quantitative Analytics General Business Consulting Business Development | the Term | Fully Allocated Cost |
• | it will process, use, maintain and disclose Personal Information only as necessary for the specific purpose for which this information was disclosed to it and only in accordance with the Agreement, the relevant Subject Servicing Agreements, such party’s then applicable privacy policies, the GLB Act, and the Privacy Laws; |
• | it will not disclose any Personal Information to any third party (including to the subject of such information) or any Representative who does not have a need to know such Personal Information; |
• | it will use the same care and discretion as Servicer uses and in no event less than a reasonable standard of care to hold and maintain Personal Information confidential; |
• | has implemented and will maintain an appropriate written information security program, the terms of which shall meet or exceed the requirements for financial institutions under the Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information (12 CFR Parts 30, 170, 208 225 and 364), to (a) ensure the security and confidentiality of all information provided to it by Servicer, including Personal Information (collectively, the “information”), (b) protect against any threats or hazards to the security or integrity of information, including unlawful destruction or accidental loss, alteration and any other form of unlawful processing, (c) prevent unauthorized access to, use or disclosure of the information and (d) ensure proper disposal of the information; |
• | it will ensure Personal Information is stored and transmitted in an encrypted format, and use commercially reasonable encryption key management, including storing and transmitting encryption keys separately from the Personal Information and other data being transmitted; |
• | it will immediately notify the other party in writing if it becomes aware of (a) any disclosure or use of any information by it or any of its Representatives in breach of this Exhibit, (b) any disclosure of any information to it or its Representatives where the purpose of such disclosure is not known, (c) any request for disclosure or inquiry regarding the information from a third party, (d) any Security Event involving Personal Information and (e) any change in applicable law that is likely to have a substantial adverse effect on its ability to comply with this Exhibit; |
• | it will not, and will ensure that its Representatives do not, break, bypass, or circumvent, or attempt to break, bypass or circumvent, any security system of either party or its respective Affiliates, to obtain, or attempt to obtain, access to any Personal Information or other Confidential Information; |
• | it will cooperate with the other party and the relevant supervisory authority in the event of litigation or a regulatory inquiry concerning the information and shall abide by the advice of the relevant supervisory authority with regard to the processing of such information; |
• | it will enter into further agreements as reasonably requested by the other party to comply with law from time to time; |
• | it has no reason to believe that any applicable law will prevent it from fulfilling its obligations under this Exhibit; |
• | at Servicer’s direction at any time, and in any event upon any termination or expiration of the Agreement, Ocwen will immediately return to Servicer any or all information and will destroy all records of such information, and under no circumstances shall Ocwen withhold from Servicer any Personal Information; and |
• | it will cause its Representatives to act in accordance with this Exhibit. |
1. | Sale Supplement, dated as of October 25, 2013, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
2. | Sale Supplement, dated as of July 1, 2013, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
3. | Sale Supplement, dated as of May 21, 2013, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
4. | Sale Supplement, dated as of March 13, 2013, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
5. | Sale Supplement, dated as of December 26, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
6. | Sale Supplement, dated as of September 28, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
7. | Sale Supplement, dated as of September 13, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
8. | Sale Supplement, dated as of August 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
9. | Sale Supplement, dated as of May 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
10. | Sale Supplement, dated as of February 10, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, as Seller, HLSS Holdings, LLC, as Purchaser, and Home Loan Servicing Solutions, Ltd., as Purchaser |
1. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of October 25, 2013, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
2. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of July 1, 2013, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
3. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of May 21, 2013, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
4. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of March 13, 2013, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
5. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of December 26, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
6. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of September 28, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
7. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of September 13, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
8. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of August 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
9. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of May 1, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
10. | Subservicing Supplement, dated as of February 10, 2012, between Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and HLSS Holdings, LLC |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings: | |||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes (1) | $ | 333,700 | $ | 257,394 | $ | 123,741 | $ | 37,783 | $ | 96,194 | |||||||||
Add: | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expensed and capitalized, except interest on deposits and amortization of capitalized debt expenses | 404,093 | 221,215 | 131,376 | 85,001 | 62,541 | ||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits | 8,749 | 2,238 | 1,390 | 918 | 572 | ||||||||||||||
Interest component of rental expense | 9,102 | 4,883 | 1,854 | 4,101 | 2,100 | ||||||||||||||
Total fixed charges (2) | 421,944 | 228,336 | 134,620 | 90,020 | 65,213 | ||||||||||||||
Earnings for computation purposes | $ | 755,644 | $ | 485,730 | $ | 258,361 | $ | 127,803 | $ | 161,407 | |||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges: | |||||||||||||||||||
Including interest on deposits (3) | 1.79 | 2.13 | 1.92 | 1.42 | 2.48 | ||||||||||||||
Excluding interest on deposits (3) | 1.83 | 2.15 | 1.94 | 1.43 | 2.50 |
(1) | Excludes income or loss from equity investees but includes any distributions received representing a return on capital. |
(2) | Fixed charges represent total interest expensed and capitalized, including and excluding interest on deposits, amortization of capitalized debt expenses as well as the interest component of rental expense. |
(3) | The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing (x) income from continuing operations before income taxes plus fixed charges by (y) fixed charges. |
Name | State or Other Jurisdiction of Organization | |
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (1) | Delaware | |
Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (1) | U.S. Virgin Islands | |
Homeward Residential Holdings, Inc. | Delaware | |
Homeward Residential, Inc. (1) | Delaware | |
Liberty Home Equity Solutions, Inc (1) | California | |
Investors Mortgage Insurance Holding Company | Delaware | |
REO Management, LLC (1) | U.S. Virgin Islands | |
Ocwen Master Advance Receivables Trust (2) | Delaware | |
Ocwen - Freddie Servicer Advance Receivables Trust 2012-ADV1 (2) | Delaware | |
Ocwen Servicer Advance Funding (Small Business Commercial), LLC (2) | Delaware |
(1) | Operating company |
(2) | Special purpose entity |
(1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ocwen Financial Corporation; |
(2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
(3) | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and the other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
(4) | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(e) and 15d—15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(f) and 15d—15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
(5) | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: February 28, 2014 | /s/ Ronald M. Faris | |
Ronald M. Faris, President and Chief Executive Officer |
(1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ocwen Financial Corporation; |
(2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
(3) | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and the other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
(4) | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(e) and 15d—15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(f) and 15d—15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
(5) | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: February 28, 2014 | /s/ John V. Britti | |
John V. Britti, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
(1) | I am the Chief Financial Officer of Ocwen Financial Corporation (the “Registrant”). |
(2) | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that |
• | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “periodic report”) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
• | the information contained in the periodic report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented. |
Name: | /s/ Ronald M. Faris |
Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: | February 28, 2014 |
(1) | I am the Chief Financial Officer of Ocwen Financial Corporation (the “Registrant”). |
(2) | I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that |
• | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “periodic report”) containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
• | the information contained in the periodic report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented. |
Name: | /s/ John V. Britti |
Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: | February 28, 2014 |
VI. | RELEASES |
I. | FORECLOSURE AND BANKRUPTCY INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION. |
A. | Standards for Documents Used in Foreclosure and Bankruptcy Proceedings. |
1. | Servicer shall ensure that factual assertions made in pleadings (complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim, answer or similar pleadings), bankruptcy proofs of claim (including any facts provided by Servicer or based on information provided by the Servicer that are included in any attachment and submitted to establish the truth of such facts) (“POC”), Declarations, affidavits, and sworn statements filed by or on behalf of Servicer in judicial foreclosures or bankruptcy proceedings and notices of default, notices of sale and similar notices submitted by or on behalf of Servicer in non-judicial foreclosures are accurate and complete and are supported by competent and reliable evidence. Before a loan is referred to non-judicial foreclosure, Servicer shall ensure that it has reviewed competent and reliable evidence to substantiate the borrower’s default and the right to foreclose, including the borrower’s loan status and loan information. |
2. | Servicer shall ensure that affidavits, sworn statements, and Declarations are based on personal knowledge, which may be based on the affiant’s review of Servicer’s books and records, in accordance with the evidentiary requirements of applicable state or federal law. |
3. | Servicer shall ensure that affidavits, sworn statements and Declarations executed by Servicer’s affiants are based on the affiant’s review and personal knowledge of the accuracy and completeness of the assertions in the affidavit, sworn statement or Declaration, set out facts that Servicer reasonably believes would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant is competent to testify on the matters stated. Affiants shall confirm that they have reviewed competent and reliable evidence to substantiate the |
4. | Servicer shall have standards for qualifications, training and supervision of employees. Servicer shall train and supervise employees who regularly prepare or execute affidavits, sworn statements or Declarations. Each such employee shall sign a certification that he or she has received the training. Servicer shall oversee the training completion to ensure each required employee properly and timely completes such training. Servicer shall maintain written records confirming that each such employee has completed the training and the subjects covered by the training. |
5. | Servicer shall review and approve standardized forms of affidavits, standardized forms of sworn statements, and standardized forms of Declarations prepared by or signed by an employee or officer of Servicer, or executed by a third party using a power of attorney on behalf of Servicer, to ensure compliance with applicable law, rules, court procedure, and the terms of this Agreement (“the Agreement”). |
6. | Affidavits, sworn statements and Declarations shall accurately identify the name of the affiant, the entity of which the affiant is an employee, and the affiant’s title. |
7. | Affidavits, sworn statements and Declarations, including their notarization, shall fully comply with all applicable state law requirements. |
8. | Affidavits, sworn statements and Declarations shall not contain information that is false or unsubstantiated. This requirement shall not preclude Declarations based on information and belief where so stated. |
9. | Servicer shall assess and ensure that it has an adequate number of employees and that employees have reasonable time to prepare, verify, and execute pleadings, POCs, motions for relief from stay (“MRS”), affidavits, sworn statements and Declarations. |
10. | Servicer shall not pay volume-based or other incentives to employees or third-party providers or trustees that encourage undue haste or lack of due diligence over quality. |
11. | Affiants shall be individuals, not entities, and affidavits, sworn statements and Declarations shall be signed by hand signature of the affiant (except for permitted electronic filings). For such documents, except for permitted electronic filings, signature stamps and any other means of electronic or mechanical signature are prohibited. |
12. | At the time of execution, all information required by a form affidavit, sworn statement or Declaration shall be complete. |
13. | Affiants shall date their signatures on affidavits, sworn statements or Declarations. |
14. | Servicer shall maintain records that identify all notarizations of Servicer documents executed by each notary employed by Servicer. |
15. | Servicer shall not file a POC in a bankruptcy proceeding which, when filed, contained materially inaccurate information. In cases in which such a POC may have been filed, Servicer shall not rely on such POC and shall (a) in active cases, at Servicer’s expense, take appropriate action, consistent with state and federal law and court procedure, to substitute such POC with an amended POC as promptly as reasonably practicable (and, in any event, not more than 30 days) after acquiring actual knowledge of such material inaccuracy and provide appropriate written notice to the borrower or borrower’s counsel; and (b) in other cases, at Servicer’s expense, take appropriate action after acquiring actual knowledge of such material inaccuracy. |
16. | Servicer shall not rely on an affidavit of indebtedness or similar affidavit, sworn statement or Declaration filed in a pending prejudgment judicial foreclosure or bankruptcy proceeding which (a) was required to be based on the affiant’s review and personal knowledge of its accuracy but was not, (b) was not, when so required, properly notarized, or (c) contained materially inaccurate information in order to obtain a judgment of foreclosure, order of sale, relief from the automatic stay or other relief in bankruptcy. In pending cases in which such affidavits, sworn statements or Declarations may have been filed, Servicer shall, at Servicer’s expense, take appropriate action, consistent with state and federal law and court procedure, to substitute such affidavits with new |
17. | In pending post-judgment, pre-sale cases in judicial foreclosure proceedings in which an affidavit or sworn statement was filed which was required to be based on the affiant’s review and personal knowledge of its accuracy but may not have been, or that may not have, when so required, been properly notarized, and such affidavit or sworn statement has not been re-filed, Servicer, unless prohibited by state or local law or court rule, will provide written notice to borrower at borrower’s address of record or borrower’s counsel prior to proceeding with a foreclosure sale or eviction proceeding. |
18. | In all states, Servicer shall send borrowers a statement setting forth facts supporting Servicer’s or holder’s right to foreclose and containing the information required in paragraphs I.B.6 (items available upon borrower request), I.B.10 (account statement), I.C.2 and I.C.3 (ownership statement), and IV.B.13 (loss mitigation statement) herein. Servicer shall send this statement to the borrower in one or more communications no later than 14 days prior to referral to foreclosure attorney or foreclosure trustee. Servicer shall provide the Monitoring Committee with copies of proposed form statements for review before implementation. |
B. | Requirements for Accuracy and Verification of Borrower’s Account Information. |
1. | Servicer shall maintain procedures to ensure accuracy and timely updating of borrower’s account information, including posting of payments and imposition of fees. Servicer shall also maintain adequate documentation of borrower account information, which may be in either electronic or paper format. |
2. | For any loan on which interest is calculated based on a daily accrual or daily interest method and as to which any obligor is not a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding without reaffirmation, Servicer shall promptly accept and apply all borrower payments, including cure payments (where authorized by law or contract), trial modification payments, as well as non-conforming payments, unless such application conflicts with contract provisions or prevailing law. Servicer shall ensure that properly identified payments shall be posted no more than two business days after receipt at the address specified by Servicer and credited as of the date received to borrower’s account. Each monthly payment shall be applied in the order specified in the loan documents. |
3. | For any loan on which interest is not calculated based on a daily accrual or daily interest method and as to which any obligor is not a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding without reaffirmation, Servicer |
a. | Servicer shall accept and apply at least two non-conforming payments from the borrower, in accordance with this subparagraph, when the payment, whether on its own or when combined with a payment made by another source, comes within $50.00 of the scheduled payment, including principal and interest and, where applicable, taxes and insurance. |
b. | Except for payments described in paragraph I.B.3.a, Servicer may post partial payments to a suspense or unapplied funds account, provided that Servicer (1) discloses to the borrower the existence of and any activity in the suspense or unapplied funds account; (2) credits the borrower’s account with a full payment as of the date that the funds in the suspense or unapplied funds account are sufficient to cover such full payment; and (3) applies payments as required by the terms of the loan documents. Servicer shall not take funds from suspense or unapplied funds accounts to pay fees until all unpaid contractual interest, principal, and escrow amounts are paid and brought current or other final disposition of the loan. |
4. | Notwithstanding the provisions above, Servicer shall not be required to accept payments which are insufficient to pay the full balance due after the borrower has been provided written notice that the contract has been declared in default and the remaining payments due under the contract have been accelerated. |
5. | Servicer shall provide to borrowers (other than borrowers in bankruptcy or borrowers who have been referred to or are going through foreclosure) adequate information on monthly billing or other account statements to show in clear and conspicuous language: |
b. | allocation of payments, including a notation if any payment has been posted to a “suspense or unapplied funds account”; |
c. | unpaid principal; |
d. | fees and charges for the relevant time period; |
e. | current escrow balance; and |
f. | reasons for any payment changes, including an interest rate or escrow account adjustment, no later than 21 days before the new amount is due (except in the case of loans as to which interest accrues daily or the rate changes more frequently than once every 30 days). |
6. | In the statements described in paragraphs I.A.18 and III.B.1.a, Servicer shall notify borrowers that they may receive, upon written request: |
a. | A copy of the borrower’s payment history since the borrower was last less than 60 days past due; |
b. | A copy of the borrower’s note; |
c. | If Servicer has commenced foreclosure or filed a POC, copies of any assignments of mortgage or deed of trust required to demonstrate the right to foreclose on the borrower’s note under applicable state law; and |
d. | The name of the investor that holds the borrower’s loan. |
7. | Servicer shall adopt enhanced billing dispute procedures, including for disputes regarding fees. These procedures will include: |
a. | Establishing readily available methods for customers to lodge complaints and pose questions, such as by providing toll-free numbers and accepting disputes by email; |
b. | Assessing and ensuring adequate and competent staff to answer and respond to consumer disputes promptly; |
c. | Establishing a process for dispute escalation; |
d. | Tracking the resolution of complaints; and |
e. | Providing a toll-free number on monthly billing statements. |
8. | Servicer shall take appropriate action to promptly remediate any inaccuracies in borrowers’ account information, including: |
a. | Correcting the account information; |
b. | Providing cash refunds or account credits; and |
c. | Correcting inaccurate reports to consumer credit reporting agencies. |
9. | Servicer’s systems to record account information shall be periodically independently reviewed for accuracy and completeness by an independent reviewer. |
10. | As indicated in paragraph I.A.18, Servicer shall send the borrower an itemized plain language account summary setting forth each of the following items, to the extent applicable: |
a. | The total amount needed to reinstate or bring the account current, and the amount of the principal obligation under the mortgage; |
b. | The date through which the borrower’s obligation is paid; |
c. | The date of the last full payment; |
d. | The current interest rate in effect for the loan (if the rate is effective for at least 30 days); |
e. | The date on which the interest rate may next reset or adjust (unless the rate changes more frequently than once every 30 days); |
f. | The amount of any prepayment fee to be charged, if any; |
g. | A description of any late payment fees; |
h. | A telephone number or electronic mail address that may be used by the obligor to obtain information regarding the mortgage; and |
i. | The names, addresses, telephone numbers, and Internet addresses of one or more counseling agencies or programs |
11. | In active chapter 13 cases, Servicer shall ensure that: |
a. | prompt and proper application of payments is made on account of (a) pre-petition arrearage amounts and (b) post-petition payment amounts and posting thereof as of the successful consummation of the effective confirmed plan; |
b. | the debtor is treated as being current so long as the debtor is making payments in accordance with the terms of the then-effective confirmed plan and any later effective payment change notices; and |
c. | as of the date of dismissal of a debtor’s bankruptcy case, entry of an order granting Servicer relief from the stay, or entry of an order granting the debtor a discharge, there is a reconciliation of payments received with respect to the debtor’s obligations during the case and appropriately update the Servicer’s systems of record. In connection with such reconciliation, Servicer shall reflect the waiver of any fee, expense or charge pursuant to paragraph III.B.1.c.i or III.B.1.d. |
C. | Documentation of Note, Holder Status and Chain of Assignment. |
1. | Servicer shall implement processes to ensure that Servicer or the foreclosing entity has a documented enforceable interest in the promissory note and mortgage (or deed of trust) under applicable state law, or is otherwise a proper party to the foreclosure action. |
2. | Servicer shall include a statement in a pleading, affidavit of indebtedness or similar affidavits in court foreclosure proceedings setting forth the basis for asserting that the foreclosing party has the right to foreclose. |
3. | Servicer shall set forth the information establishing the party’s right to foreclose as set forth in I.C.2 in a communication to be sent to the borrower as indicated in I.A.18. |
4. | If the original note is lost or otherwise unavailable, Servicer shall comply with applicable law in an attempt to establish ownership of the note and the right to enforcement. Servicer shall ensure good faith efforts to obtain or locate a note lost while in the possession of Servicer or Servicer’s agent and shall ensure that Servicer and Servicer’s agents who are expected to have possession of notes or assignments of mortgage on behalf of Servicer adopt procedures |
5. | Servicer shall not intentionally destroy or dispose of original notes that are still in force. |
6. | Servicer shall ensure that mortgage assignments executed by or on behalf of Servicer are executed with appropriate legal authority, accurately reflective of the completed transaction and properly acknowledged. |
1. | Proofs of Claim (“POC”). Servicer shall ensure that POCs filed on behalf of Servicer are documented in accordance with the United States Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and any applicable local rule or order (“bankruptcy law”). Unless not permitted by statute or rule, Servicer shall ensure that each POC is documented by attaching: |
a. | The original or a duplicate of the note, including all endorsements; a copy of any mortgage or deed of trust securing the notes (including, if applicable, evidence of recordation in the applicable land records); and copies of any assignments of mortgage or deed of trust required to demonstrate the right to foreclose on the borrower’s note under applicable state law (collectively, “Loan Documents”). If the note has been lost or destroyed, a lost note affidavit shall be submitted. |
b. | If, in addition to its principal amount, a claim includes interest, fees, expenses, or other charges incurred before the petition was filed, an itemized statement of the interest, fees, expenses, or charges shall be filed with the proof of claim (including any expenses or charges based on an escrow analysis as of the date of filing) at least in the detail specified in the current draft of Official Form B 10 |
c. | A statement of the amount necessary to cure any default as of the date of the petition shall be filed with the proof of claim. |
d. | If a security interest is claimed in property that is the debtor’s principal residence, the attachment prescribed by the appropriate Official Form shall be filed with the proof of claim. |
e. | Servicer shall include a statement in a POC setting forth the basis for asserting that the applicable party has the right to foreclose. |
f. | The POC shall be signed (either by hand or by appropriate electronic signature) by the responsible person under penalty of perjury after reasonable investigation, stating that the information set forth in the POC is true and correct to the best of such responsible person’s knowledge, information, and reasonable belief, and clearly identify the responsible person’s employer and position or title with the employer. |
2. | Motions for Relief from Stay (“MRS”). Unless not permitted by bankruptcy law, Servicer shall ensure that each MRS in a chapter 13 proceeding is documented by attaching: |
a. | To the extent not previously submitted with a POC, a copy of the Loan Documents; if such documents were previously submitted with a POC, a statement to that effect. If the promissory note has been lost or destroyed, a lost note affidavit shall be submitted; |
b. | To the extent not previously submitted with a POC, Servicer shall include a statement in an MRS setting forth the basis for asserting that the applicable party has the right to foreclose. |
c. | An affidavit, sworn statement or Declaration made by Servicer or based on information provided by Servicer (“MRS affidavit” (which term includes, without limitation, any facts provided by Servicer that are included in any attachment and submitted to establish the truth of such facts) setting forth: |
i. | whether there has been a default in paying pre-petition arrearage or post-petition amounts (an “MRS delinquency”); |
ii. | if there has been such a default, (a) the unpaid principal balance, (b) a description of any default with |
iii. | all amounts claimed, including a statement of the amount necessary to cure any default on or about the date of the MRS. |
d. | All other attachments prescribed by statute, rule, or law. |
e. | Servicer shall ensure that any MRS discloses the terms of any trial period or permanent loan modification plan pending at the time of filing of a MRS or whether the debtor is being evaluated for a loss mitigation option. |
E. | Quality Assurance Systems Review. |
1. | Servicer shall conduct regular reviews, not less than quarterly, of a statistically valid sample of affidavits, sworn statements, Declarations filed by or on behalf of Servicer in judicial foreclosures or bankruptcy proceedings and notices of default, notices of sale and similar notices submitted in non-judicial foreclosures to ensure that the documents are accurate and comply with prevailing law and this Agreement. |
a. | The reviews shall also verify the accuracy of the statements in affidavits, sworn statements, Declarations and documents used to foreclose in non-judicial foreclosures, the account summary described in paragraph I.B.10, the ownership statement described in paragraph I.C.2, and the loss mitigation statement described in paragraph IV.B.13 by reviewing the underlying information. Servicer shall take appropriate remedial steps if deficiencies are identified, including appropriate remediation in individual cases. |
b. | The reviews shall also verify the accuracy of the statements in affidavits, sworn statements and Declarations submitted in bankruptcy proceedings. Servicer shall take appropriate |
2. | The quality assurance steps set forth above shall be conducted by Servicer employees who are separate and independent of employees who prepare foreclosure or bankruptcy affidavits, sworn statements, or other foreclosure or bankruptcy documents. |
3. | Servicer shall conduct regular pre-filing reviews of a statistically valid sample of POCs to ensure that the POCs are accurate and comply with prevailing law and this Agreement. The reviews shall also verify the accuracy of the statements in POCs. Servicer shall take appropriate remedial steps if deficiencies are identified, including appropriate remediation in individual cases. The pre-filing review shall be conducted by Servicer employees who are separate and independent of the persons who prepared the applicable POCs. |
4. | Servicer shall regularly review and assess the adequacy of its internal controls and procedures with respect to its obligations under this Agreement and implement appropriate procedures to address deficiencies. |
II. | THIRD-PARTY PROVIDER OVERSIGHT. |
A. | Oversight Duties Applicable to All Third-Party Providers. |
1. | Servicer shall perform appropriate due diligence of Third-Party Providers’ qualifications, expertise, capacity, reputation, complaints, information security, document custody practices, business continuity, and financial viability. |
2. | Servicer shall amend agreements, engagement letters, or oversight policies, or enter into new agreements or engagement letters, with Third-Party Providers to require them to comply with Servicer’s applicable policies and procedures (which will incorporate any applicable aspects of this Agreement) and applicable state and federal laws and rules. |
3. | Servicer shall ensure that agreements, contracts or oversight policies provide for adequate oversight, including measures to enforce Third-Party Provider contractual obligations, and to ensure timely action with respect to Third-Party Provider performance failures. |
4. | Servicer shall ensure that foreclosure and bankruptcy counsel and foreclosure trustees have appropriate access to information from Servicer’s books and records necessary to perform their duties in preparing pleadings and other documents submitted in foreclosure and bankruptcy proceedings. |
5. | Servicer shall ensure that all information provided by or on behalf of Servicer to Third-Party Providers in connection with providing Servicing Activities is accurate and complete. |
6. | Servicer shall conduct periodic reviews of Third-Party Providers. These reviews shall include: |
a. | A review of a sample of the foreclosure and bankruptcy documents prepared by the Third-Party Provider, to provide for compliance with applicable state and federal law and this Agreement in connection with the preparation of the documents, and the accuracy of the facts contained therein; |
b. | A review of the fees and costs assessed by the Third-Party Provider to provide that only fees and costs that are lawful, reasonable and actually incurred are charged to borrowers and that no portion of any fees or charges incurred by any Third-Party Provider for technology usage, connectivity, or electronic invoice submission is charged as a cost to the borrower; |
c. | A review of the Third-Party Provider’s processes to provide for compliance with the Servicer’s policies and procedures concerning Servicing Activities; |
d. | A review of the security of original loan documents maintained by the Third-Party Provider; |
e. | A requirement that the Third-Party Provider disclose to the Servicer any imposition of sanctions or professional disciplinary action taken against them for misconduct related to performance of Servicing Activities; and |
f. | An assessment of whether bankruptcy attorneys comply with the best practice of determining whether a borrower has made a payment curing any MRS delinquency within two business days of the scheduled hearing date of the related MRS. |
7. | Servicer shall take appropriate remedial steps if problems are identified through this review or otherwise, including, when appropriate, terminating its relationship with the Third-Party Provider. |
8. | Servicer shall adopt processes for reviewing and appropriately addressing customer complaints it receives about Third-Party Provider services. |
9. | Servicer shall regularly review and assess the adequacy of its internal controls and procedures with respect to its obligations under this Section, and take appropriate remedial steps if deficiencies are identified, including appropriate remediation in individual cases. |
B. | Additional Oversight of Activities by Third-Party Providers. |
1. | Servicer shall require a certification process for law firms (and recertification of existing law firm providers) that provide residential mortgage foreclosure and bankruptcy services for Servicer, on a periodic basis, as qualified to serve as a Third-Party Provider to Servicer, including that attorneys have the experience and competence necessary to perform the services requested. |
2. | Servicer shall ensure that attorneys are licensed to practice in the relevant jurisdiction, have the experience and competence necessary to perform the services requested, and that their services comply with applicable rules, regulations and applicable law (including state law prohibitions on fee splitting). |
3. | Servicer shall ensure that foreclosure and bankruptcy counsel and foreclosure trustees have an appropriate Servicer contact to assist in legal proceedings and to facilitate loss mitigation questions on behalf of the borrower. |
4. | Servicer shall adopt policies requiring Third-Party Providers to maintain records that identify all notarizations of Servicer documents executed by each notary employed by the Third-Party Provider. |
III. | BANKRUPTCY. |
A. | General. |
1. | The provisions, conditions and obligations imposed herein are intended to be interpreted in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. Nothing herein shall require a Servicer to do anything inconsistent with applicable state or federal law, including the applicable bankruptcy law or a court order in a bankruptcy case. |
2. | Servicer shall ensure that employees who are regularly engaged in servicing mortgage loans as to which the borrower or mortgagor is in bankruptcy receive training specifically addressing bankruptcy issues. |
B. | Chapter 13 Cases. |
1. | In any chapter 13 case, Servicer shall ensure that: |
a. | So long as the debtor is in a chapter 13 case, within 180 days after the date on which the fees, expenses, or charges are incurred, Servicer shall file and serve on the debtor, debtor’s counsel, and the trustee a notice in a form consistent with Official Form B10 (Supplement 2) itemizing fees, expenses, or charges (1) that were incurred in connection with the claim after the bankruptcy case was filed, (2) that the holder asserts are recoverable against the debtor or against the debtor’s principal residence, and (3) that the holder intends to collect from the debtor. |
b. | Servicer replies within time periods established under bankruptcy law to any notice that the debtor has completed all payments under the plan or otherwise paid in full the amount required to cure any pre-petition default. |
c. | If the Servicer fails to provide information as required by paragraph III.B.1.a with respect to a fee, expense or charge within 180 days of the incurrence of such fee, expense, or charge, then, |
i. | Except for independent charges (“Independent charge”) paid by the Servicer that is either (A) specifically authorized by the borrower or (B) consists of amounts advanced by Servicer in respect of taxes, homeowners association fees, liens or insurance, such fee, expense or charge shall be deemed waived and may not be collected from the borrower. |
ii. | In the case of an Independent charge, the court may, after notice and hearing, take either or both of the following actions: |
(a) | preclude the holder from presenting the omitted information, in any form, as evidence in any contested matter or adversary proceeding in the case, unless the court determines that the failure was substantially justified or is harmless; or |
(b) | award other appropriate relief, including reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees caused by the failure. |
d. | If the Servicer fails to provide information as required by paragraphs III.B.1.a or III.B.1.b and bankruptcy law with respect to a fee, expense or charge (other than an Independent Charge) incurred more than 45 days before the date of the reply referred to in paragraph III.B.1.b, then such fee, expense or charge shall be deemed waived and may not be collected from the borrower. |
e. | Servicer shall file and serve on the debtor, debtor’s counsel, and the trustee a notice in a form consistent with the current draft of Official Form B10 (Supplement 1) (effective December 2011) of any change in the payment amount, including any change that results from an interest rate or escrow account adjustment, no later than 21 days before a payment in the new amount is due. Servicer shall waive and not collect any late charge or other fees imposed solely as a result of the failure of the borrower timely to make a payment attributable to the failure of Servicer to give such notice timely. |
IV. | LOSS MITIGATION. |
A. | Loss Mitigation Requirements. |
1. | Servicer shall be required to notify potentially eligible borrowers of currently available loss mitigation options prior to foreclosure referral. Upon the timely receipt of a complete loan modification application, Servicer shall evaluate borrowers for all available loan modification options for which they are eligible prior to referring a borrower to foreclosure and shall facilitate the submission and review of loss mitigation applications. The foregoing notwithstanding, Servicer shall have no obligation to solicit borrowers who are in bankruptcy. |
2. | Servicer shall offer and facilitate loan modifications for borrowers rather than initiate foreclosure when such loan modifications for which they are eligible are net present value (NPV) positive and meet other investor, guarantor, insurer and program requirements. |
3. | Servicer shall allow borrowers enrolled in a trial period plan under prior HAMP guidelines (where borrowers were not pre-qualified) and who made all required trial period payments, but were later denied a permanent modification, the opportunity to reapply for a HAMP or proprietary loan modification using current financial information. |
4. | Servicer shall promptly send a final modification agreement to borrowers who have enrolled in a trial period plan under current HAMP guidelines (or fully underwritten proprietary modification programs with a trial payment period) and who have made the required number of timely trial period payments, where the modification is underwritten prior to the trial period and has received any necessary investor, guarantor or insurer approvals. The borrower shall then be converted by Servicer to a permanent modification upon execution of the final modification documents, consistent with applicable program guidelines, absent evidence of fraud. |
B. | Dual Track Restricted. |
1. | If a borrower has not already been referred to foreclosure, Servicer shall not refer an eligible borrower’s account to foreclosure while the borrower’s complete application for any loan modification |
a. | Servicer determines (after the automatic review in paragraph IV.G.1) that the borrower is not eligible for a loan modification, or |
b. | If borrower does not accept an offered foreclosure prevention alternative within 14 days of the evaluation notice, the earlier of (i) such 14 days, and (ii) borrower’s decline of the foreclosure prevention offer. |
2. | If borrower accepts the loan modification resulting from Servicer’s evaluation of the complete loan modification application referred to in paragraph IV.B.1 (verbally, in writing (including e-mail responses) or by submitting the first trial modification payment) within 14 days of Servicer’s offer of a loan modification, then the Servicer shall delay referral to foreclosure until (a) if the Servicer fails timely to receive the first trial period payment, the last day for timely receiving the first trial period payment, and (b) if the Servicer timely receives the first trial period payment, after the borrower breaches the trial plan. |
3. | If the loan modification requested by a borrower as described in paragraph IV.B.1 is denied, except when otherwise required by federal or state law or investor directives, if borrower is entitled to an appeal under paragraph IV.G.3, Servicer will not proceed to a foreclosure sale until the later of (if applicable): |
a. | expiration of the 30-day appeal period; and |
b. | if the borrower appeals the denial, until the later of (if applicable) (i) if Servicer denies borrower’s appeal, 15 days after the letter denying the appeal, (ii) if the Servicer sends borrower a letter granting his or her appeal and offering a loan modification, 14 days after the date of such offer, (iii) if the borrower timely accepts the loan modification offer (verbally, in writing (including e-mail responses), or by making the first trial period payment), after the Servicer fails timely to receive the first trial period payment, and (iv) if the Servicer timely receives the first trial period payment, after the borrower breaches the trial plan. |
4. | If, after an eligible borrower has been referred to foreclosure, the Servicer receives a complete application from the borrower within |
5. | If the loan modification requested by a borrower described in paragraph IV.B.4 is denied, then, except when otherwise required by federal or state law or investor directives, if borrower is entitled to an appeal under paragraph IV.G.3, Servicer will not proceed to a foreclosure sale until the later of (if applicable): |
a. | expiration of the 30-day appeal period; and |
b. | if the borrower appeals the denial, until the later of (if applicable) (i) if Servicer denies borrower’s appeal, 15 days after the letter denying the appeal, (ii) if the Servicer sends borrower a letter granting his or her appeal and offering a loan modification, 14 days after the date of such offer, (iii) if the borrower timely accepts the loan modification offer (verbally, in writing (including e-mail responses), or by making the first trial period payment), after the failure of the Servicer timely to receive the first trial period payment, and (iv) if the Servicer timely receives the first trial period payment, after the borrower breaches the trial plan. |
6. | If, after an eligible borrower has been referred to foreclosure, Servicer receives a complete loan modification application more than 30 days after the Post Referral to Foreclosure Solicitation Letter, but more than 37 days before a foreclosure sale is scheduled, then while such loan modification application is |
7. | If the loan modification requested by a borrower described in paragraph IV.B.6 is denied and it is reasonable to believe that more than 90 days remains until a scheduled foreclosure date or the first date on which a sale could reasonably be expected to be scheduled and occur, then, except when otherwise required by federal or state law or investor directives, if borrower is entitled to an appeal under paragraph IV.G.3.a, Servicer will not proceed to a foreclosure sale until the later of (if applicable): |
a. | expiration of the 30-day appeal period; and |
b. | if the borrower appeals the denial, until the later of (if applicable) (i) if Servicer denies borrower’s appeal, 15 days after the letter denying the appeal, (ii) if the Servicer sends borrower a letter granting his or her appeal and offering a loan modification, 14 days after the date of such offer, (iii) if the borrower timely accepts the loan modification offer (verbally, in writing (including e-mail responses), or by making the first trial period payment), after the Servicer fails timely to receive the first trial period payment, and (iv) if the Servicer timely receives the first trial period payment, after the borrower breaches the trial plan. |
8. | If, after an eligible borrower has been referred to foreclosure, Servicer receives a complete loan modification application more than 30 days after the Post Referral to Foreclosure Solicitation Letter, but within 37 to 15 days before a foreclosure sale is scheduled, then Servicer shall conduct an expedited review of the borrower and, if the borrower is extended a loan modification offer, Servicer shall postpone any foreclosure sale until the earlier of (a) 14 days after the date of the related evaluation notice, and (b) the date the borrower declines the loan modification offer. If the borrower timely accepts the loan modification offer (either in writing or by submitting the first trial modification payment), Servicer shall delay the foreclosure sale until the later of (if applicable) (A) the failure by the Servicer timely to receive the first trial period payment, and (B) if the Servicer timely receives the first trial period payment, after the borrower breaches the trial plan. |
9. | If, after an eligible borrower has been referred to foreclosure, the Servicer receives a complete loan modification application more than 30 days after the Post Referral to Foreclosure Solicitation Letter and less than 15 days before a scheduled foreclosure sale, Servicer must notify the borrower before the foreclosure sale date as to Servicer’s determination (if its review was completed) or inability to complete its review of the loan modification application. If Servicer makes a loan modification offer to the borrower, then Servicer shall postpone any sale until the earlier of (a) 14 days after the date of the related evaluation notice, and (b) the date the borrower declines the loan modification offer. If the borrower timely accepts a loan modification offer (either in writing or by submitting the first trial modification payment), Servicer shall delay the foreclosure sale until the later of (if applicable) (A) the failure by the Servicer timely to receive the first trial period payment, and (B) if the Servicer timely receives the first trial period payment, after the borrower breaches the trial plan. |
10. | For purposes of this section IV.B, Servicer shall not be responsible for failing to obtain a delay in a ruling on a judgment or failing to delay a foreclosure sale if Servicer made a request for such delay, pursuant to any state or local law, court rule or customary practice, and such request was not approved. |
11. | Servicer shall not move to judgment or order of sale or proceed with a foreclosure sale under any of the following circumstances: |
a. | The borrower is in compliance with the terms of a trial loan modification, forbearance, or repayment plan; or |
b. | A short sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure has been approved by all parties (including, for example, first lien investor, junior lien holder and mortgage insurer, as applicable), and proof of funds or financing has been provided to Servicer. |
12. | If a foreclosure or trustee’s sale is continued (rather than cancelled) to provide time to evaluate loss mitigation options, Servicer shall promptly notify borrower in writing of the new date of sale (without delaying any related foreclosure sale). |
13. | As indicated in paragraph I.A.18, Servicer shall send a statement to the borrower outlining loss mitigation efforts undertaken with respect to the borrower prior to foreclosure referral. If no loss mitigation efforts were offered or undertaken, Servicer shall state whether it contacted or attempted to contact the borrower and, if applicable, why the borrower was ineligible for a loan modification or other loss mitigation options. |
14. | Servicer shall ensure timely and accurate communication of or access to relevant loss mitigation status and changes in status to its foreclosure attorneys, bankruptcy attorneys and foreclosure trustees and, where applicable, to court-mandated mediators. |
C. | Single Point of Contact. |
1. | Servicer shall establish an easily accessible and reliable single point of contact (“SPOC”) for each potentially-eligible first lien mortgage borrower so that the borrower has access to an employee of Servicer to obtain information throughout the loss mitigation, loan modification and foreclosure processes. |
2. | Servicer shall initially identify the SPOC to the borrower promptly after a potentially-eligible borrower requests loss mitigation assistance. Servicer shall provide one or more direct means of communication with the SPOC on loss mitigation-related correspondence with the borrower. Servicer shall promptly provide updated contact information to the borrower if the designated SPOC is reassigned, no longer employed by Servicer, or otherwise not able to act as the primary point of contact. |
a. | Servicer shall ensure that debtors in bankruptcy are assigned to a SPOC specially trained in bankruptcy issues. |
3. | The SPOC shall have primary responsibility for: |
a. | Communicating the options available to the borrower, the actions the borrower must take to be considered for these options and the status of Servicer’s evaluation of the borrower for these options; |
b. | Coordinating receipt of all documents associated with loan modification or loss mitigation activities; |
c. | Being knowledgeable about the borrower’s situation and current status in the delinquency/imminent default resolution process; and |
d. | Ensuring that a borrower who is not eligible for MHA programs is considered for proprietary or other investor loss mitigation options. |
4. | The SPOC shall, at a minimum, provide the following services to borrowers: |
a. | Contact borrower and introduce himself/herself as the borrower’s SPOC; |
c. | Explain the requirements of the programs for which the borrower is eligible; |
e. | Provide basic information about the status of borrower’s account, including pending loan modification applications, other loss mitigation alternatives, and foreclosure activity; |
f. | Notify borrower of missing documents and provide an address or electronic means for submission of documents by borrower in order to complete the loan modification application; |
g. | Communicate Servicer’s decision regarding loan modification applications and other loss mitigation alternatives to borrower in writing; |
h. | Assist the borrower in pursuing alternative non-foreclosure options upon denial of a loan modification; |
i. | If a loan modification is approved, call borrower to explain the program; |
j. | Provide information regarding credit counseling where necessary; |
k. | Help to clear for borrower any internal processing requirements; and |
l. | Have access to individuals with the ability to stop foreclosure proceedings when necessary to comply with the MHA Program or this Agreement. |
6. | Servicer shall ensure that the SPOC is available to borrowers via telephone, though such availability can be arranged on an appointment basis. If the SPOC is only reachable on an appointment basis, such appointment shall be made available to the borrower promptly, but in any event an appointment with the SPOC must be offered on a date no later than 7 days from the borrower’s request. Borrowers shall be offered the option of scheduling an appointment with another member of the SPOC team if their assigned SPOC is unavailable on the borrower’s requested date. In the event the SPOC is unavailable, Servicer shall ensure that personnel with access to all information required to be maintained under this section are available to the borrower to perform the SPOC’s normal duties. |
7. | Servicer shall ensure that a SPOC can refer and transfer a borrower to an appropriate supervisor upon request of the borrower. |
8. | Servicer shall ensure that relevant records relating to borrower’s account are promptly available to the borrower’s SPOC, so that the SPOC can timely, adequately and accurately inform the borrower of the current status of loss mitigation, loan modification, and foreclosure activities. |
9. | Servicer shall ensure that all regularly maintained records of communications between the SPOC and borrower, as well as any other notes related to the borrower’s file, are centrally accessible to other Servicer staff. |
10. | Servicer’s management shall supervise the SPOCs’ performance and regularly monitor workload, phone logs, call recordings, communication logs and complaints to ensure timely responses to borrowers. |
11. | Servicer shall designate one or more management level employees to be the primary contact for the Attorneys General, state financial regulators, the Executive Office of U.S. Trustee, each regional office of the U.S. Trustee, and federal regulators for communication regarding complaints and inquiries from individual borrowers who are in default and/or have applied for loan modifications. Servicer shall provide a written acknowledgment to all such inquiries within 10 business days. Servicer shall provide a substantive written response to all such inquiries within 30 days. Servicer shall provide relevant loan information to borrower and to Attorneys General, state financial regulators, federal regulators, the Executive Office of the U.S. Trustee, and each U.S. Trustee upon written request and if properly authorized. A written complaint filed by a borrower and forwarded by |
12. | Servicer shall establish and make available to Chapter 13 trustees a toll-free number staffed by persons trained in bankruptcy to respond to inquiries from Chapter 13 trustees. |
13. | Notwithstanding the assignment of a SPOC to a borrower, the Servicer shall not deny the borrower access to loss mitigation through the servicer’s personnel or representatives at homeownership and public workshops, nonprofit housing counselors, homeownership centers, and other avenues for accessing relief in which the servicer participates. |
D. | Loss Mitigation Communications with Borrowers. |
1. | Servicer shall commence outreach efforts to communicate loss mitigation options for first lien mortgage loans to all potentially eligible delinquent borrowers (other than those in bankruptcy) beginning on timelines that are in accordance with HAMP borrower solicitation guidelines set forth in the MHA Handbook version 4.3, Chapter II, Section 2.2, or the most recent version, regardless of whether the borrower is eligible for a HAMP modification. Servicer shall provide borrowers with notices that include contact information for national or state foreclosure assistance hotlines and state housing counseling resources, as appropriate. The use by Servicer of nothing more than prerecorded automatic messages in loss mitigation communications with borrowers shall not be sufficient in those instances in which it fails to result in contact between the borrower and one of Servicer’s loss mitigation specialists. Servicer shall conduct affirmative outreach efforts to inform delinquent second lien borrowers (other than those in bankruptcy) about the availability of payment reduction options. The foregoing notwithstanding, Servicer shall have no obligation to solicit borrowers who are in bankruptcy. |
2. | Servicer shall disclose and provide accurate information to borrowers relating to the qualification process and eligibility factors for loss mitigation programs. |
3. | Servicer shall communicate, at the written request of the borrower, with the borrower’s authorized representatives, including housing counselors. Servicer shall communicate with representatives from state attorneys general and financial regulatory agencies acting upon a written complaint filed by the borrower and forwarded by the state attorney general or financial regulatory agency to Servicer. When responding to the borrower regarding such complaint, Servicer shall include the applicable state attorney |
4. | Servicer shall cease all collection efforts while the borrower (i) is making timely payments under a trial loan modification or (ii) has submitted a complete loan modification application, and a modification decision is pending. Notwithstanding the above, Servicer reserves the right to contact a borrower to gather required loss mitigation documentation or to assist a borrower with performance under a trial loan modification plan. |
5. | Servicer shall consider partnering with third parties, including national chain retailers, and shall consider the use of select bank branches affiliated with Servicer, to set up programs to allow borrowers to copy, fax, scan, transmit by overnight delivery, or mail or email documents to Servicer free of charge. |
6. | Within five business days after referral to foreclosure, the Servicer (including any attorney (or trustee) conducting foreclosure proceedings at the direction of the Servicer) shall send a written communication (“Post Referral to Foreclosure Solicitation Letter”) to the borrower that includes clear language that: |
a. | The Servicer may have sent to the borrower one or more borrower solicitation communications; |
b. | The borrower can still be evaluated for alternatives to foreclosure even if he or she had previously shown no interest; |
c. | The borrower should contact the Servicer to obtain a loss mitigation application package; |
d. | The borrower must submit a loan modification application to the Servicer to request consideration for available foreclosure prevention alternatives; |
e. | Provides the Servicer’s contact information for submitting a complete loan modification application, including the Servicer’s toll-free number; and |
f. | Unless the form of letter is otherwise specified by investor directive or state law or the borrower is not eligible for an appeal under paragraph IV.G.3.a, states that if the borrower is contemplating or has pending an appeal of an earlier denial of a loan modification application, that he or she may submit a loan modification application in lieu of his or |
1. | Servicer shall develop or contract with a third-party vendor to develop an online portal linked to Servicer’s primary servicing system where borrowers can check, at no cost, the status of their first lien loan modifications. |
2. | Servicer shall design portals that may, among other things: |
a. | Enable borrowers to submit documents electronically; |
b. | Provide an electronic receipt for any documents submitted; |
c. | Provide information and eligibility factors for proprietary loan modification and other loss mitigation programs; and |
d. | Permit Servicer to communicate with borrowers to satisfy any written communications required to be provided by Servicer, if borrowers submit documents electronically. |
3. | Servicer shall participate in the development and implementation of a neutral, nationwide loan portal system linked to Servicer’s primary servicing system, such as Hope LoanPort to enhance communications with housing counselors, including using the technology used for the Borrower Portal, and containing similar features to the Borrower Portal. |
4. | Servicer shall update the status of each pending loan modification on these portals at least every 10 business days and ensure that each portal is updated on such a schedule as to maintain consistency. |
F. | Loan Modification Timelines. |
1. | Servicer shall provide written acknowledgement of the receipt of documentation submitted by the borrower in connection with a first lien loan modification application within 3 business days. In its initial acknowledgment, Servicer shall briefly describe the loan modification process and identify deadlines and expiration dates for submitted documents. |
2. | Servicer shall notify borrower of any known deficiency in borrower’s initial submission of information, no later than 5 business days after receipt, including any missing information or |
3. | Subject to section IV.B, Servicer shall afford borrower 30 days from the date of Servicer’s notification of any missing information or documentation to supplement borrower’s submission of information prior to making a determination on whether or not to grant an initial loan modification. |
4. | Servicer shall review the complete first lien loan modification application submitted by borrower and shall determine the disposition of borrower’s trial or preliminary loan modification request no later than 30 days after receipt of the complete loan modification application, absent compelling circumstances beyond Servicer’s control. |
5. | Servicer shall implement processes to ensure that second lien loan modification requests are evaluated on a timely basis. When a borrower qualifies for a second lien loan modification after a first lien loan modification in accordance with Section 2.c.i of the General Framework for Consumer Relief Provisions, the Servicer of the second lien loan shall (absent compelling circumstances beyond Servicer’s control) send loan modification documents to borrower no later than 45 days after the Servicer receives official notification of the successful completion of the related first lien loan modification and the essential terms. |
6. | For all proprietary first lien loan modification programs, Servicer shall allow properly submitted borrower financials to be used for 90 days from the date the documents are received, unless Servicer learns that there has been a material change in circumstances or unless investor requirements mandate a shorter time frame. |
7. | Servicer shall notify borrowers of the final denial of any first lien loan modification request within 10 business days of the denial decision. The notification shall be in the form of the non-approval notice required in paragraph IV.G.1 below. |
G. | Independent Evaluation of First Lien Loan Modification Denials. |
1. | Except when evaluated as provided in paragraphs IV.B.8 or IV.B.9, Servicer’s initial denial of an eligible borrower’s request for first lien loan modification following the submission of a complete loan modification application shall be subject to an independent evaluation. Such evaluation shall be performed by an independent entity or a different employee who has not been involved with the particular loan modification. |
a. | When a first lien loan modification is denied after independent review, Servicer shall send a written non-approval notice to the borrower identifying the reasons for denial and the factual information considered. The notice shall inform the borrower that he or she has 30 days from the date of the denial letter declination to provide evidence that the eligibility determination was in error. |
b. | If the first lien modification is denied because disallowed by investor, Servicer shall disclose in the written non-approval notice the name of the investor and summarize the reasons for investor denial. |
c. | For those cases where a first lien loan modification denial is the result of an NPV calculation, Servicer shall provide in the written non-approval notice the monthly gross income and property value used in the calculation. |
3. | Appeal Process. |
a. | After the automatic review in paragraph IV.G.1 has been completed and Servicer has issued the written non-approval notice, in the circumstances described in the first sentences of paragraphs IV.B.3, IV.B.5 or IV.B.7, except when otherwise required by federal or state law or investor directives, borrowers shall have 30 days to request an appeal and obtain an independent review of the first lien loan modification denial in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Servicer shall ensure that the borrower has 30 days from the date of the written non-approval notice to provide information as to why Servicer’s determination of eligibility for a loan modification was in error, unless the reason for non-approval is (1) ineligible mortgage, (2) ineligible property, (3) offer not accepted by borrower or request withdrawn, or (4) the loan was previously modified. |
b. | For those cases in which the first lien loan modification denial is the result of an NPV calculation, if a borrower disagrees with the property value used by Servicer in the NPV test, the borrower can request that a full appraisal be conducted of the property by an independent licensed appraiser (at borrower expense) consistent with HAMP directive 10-15. Servicer shall comply with the process set forth in HAMP directive 10-15, including using such value in the NPV calculation. |
c. | Servicer shall review the information submitted by borrower and use its best efforts to communicate the disposition of borrower’s appeal to borrower no later than 30 days after receipt of the information. |
d. | If Servicer denies borrower’s appeal, Servicer’s appeal denial letter shall include a description of other available loss mitigation, including short sales and deeds in lieu of foreclosure. |
1. | Servicer shall maintain adequate staffing and systems for tracking borrower documents and information that are relevant to foreclosure, loss mitigation, and other Servicer operations. Servicer shall make periodic assessments to ensure that its staffing and systems are adequate. |
2. | Servicer shall maintain adequate staffing and caseload limits for SPOCs and employees responsible for handling foreclosure, loss mitigation and related communications with borrowers and housing counselors. Servicer shall make periodic assessments to ensure that its staffing and systems are adequate. |
3. | Servicer shall establish reasonable minimum experience, educational and training requirements for loss mitigation staff. |
4. | Servicer shall document electronically key actions taken on a foreclosure, loan modification, bankruptcy, or other servicing file, including communications with the borrower. |
5. | Servicer shall not adopt compensation arrangements for its employees that encourage foreclosure over loss mitigation alternatives. |
6. | Servicer shall not make inaccurate payment delinquency reports to credit reporting agencies when the borrower is making timely reduced payments pursuant to a trial or other loan modification agreement. Servicer shall provide the borrower, prior to entering into a trial loan modification, with clear and conspicuous written information that adverse credit reporting consequences may result from the borrower making reduced payments during the trial period. |
7. | Where Servicer grants a loan modification, Servicer shall provide borrower with a copy of the fully executed loan modification agreement within 45 days of receipt of the executed copy from the borrower. All modifications shall be evidenced in writing. |
8. | Servicer shall not instruct, advise or recommend that borrowers go into default in order to qualify for loss mitigation relief. |
9. | Servicer shall not discourage borrowers from working or communicating with legitimate non-profit housing counseling services. |
10. | Servicer shall not, in the ordinary course, require a borrower to waive or release claims and defenses as a condition of approval for a loan modification program or other loss mitigation relief. However, nothing herein shall preclude Servicer from requiring a waiver or release of claims and defenses with respect to a loan modification offered in connection with the resolution of a contested claim, when the borrower would not otherwise be qualified for that loan modification under existing Servicer programs. |
11. | Servicer shall not charge borrower an application fee in connection with a request for a loan modification. Servicer shall provide borrower with a pre-paid overnight envelope or pre-paid address label for return of a loan modification application. However, if Servicer makes a copy of the loan modification application available free of charge via an internet portal, and allows for submission of the packet via electronic means, and the borrower elects to submit such documentation electronically, no pre-paid envelope or label shall be required. |
12. | Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, and to minimize the risk of borrowers submitting multiple loss mitigation requests for the purpose of delay, Servicer shall not be obligated to evaluate requests for loss mitigation options from (a) borrowers who have already been evaluated or afforded a fair opportunity to be evaluated consistent with the requirements of HAMP or proprietary modification programs, or (b) borrowers who were evaluated after the date of implementation of this Agreement, consistent with this Agreement, unless there has been a material change in the borrower’s financial circumstances that is documented by borrower and submitted to Servicer. |
I. | Proprietary First Lien Loan Modifications. |
1. | Servicer shall make publicly available information on its qualification processes, all required documentation and information necessary for a complete first lien loan modification application, and key eligibility factors for all proprietary loan modifications. |
2. | Servicer shall design proprietary first lien loan modification programs that are intended to produce sustainable modifications according to investor guidelines and previous results. Servicer shall design these programs with the intent of providing affordable payments for borrowers needing longer term or permanent assistance. |
3. | Servicer shall track outcomes and maintain records regarding characteristics and performance of proprietary first lien loan modifications. Servicer shall provide a description of modification waterfalls, eligibility criteria, and modification terms, on a publicly-available website. |
4. | Servicer shall not charge any application or processing fees for proprietary first lien loan modifications. |
1. | Servicer shall make publicly available information on its qualification processes, all required documentation and information necessary for a complete second lien modification application. |
2. | Servicer shall design second lien modification programs with the intent of providing affordable payments for borrowers needing longer term or permanent assistance. |
3. | Servicer shall not charge any application or processing fees for second lien modifications. |
4. | When an eligible borrower with a second lien submits all required information for a second lien loan modification and the modification request is denied, Servicer shall promptly send a written non-approval notice to the borrower. |
1. | Servicer shall make publicly available information on general requirements for the short sale process. |
2. | Servicer shall consider appropriate monetary incentives to underwater borrowers to facilitate short sale options. |
3. | Servicer shall develop a cooperative short sale process which allows the borrower the opportunity to engage with Servicer to pursue a short sale evaluation prior to putting home on the market. |
4. | Servicer shall send written confirmation of the borrower’s first request for a short sale to the borrower or his or her agent within 10 business days of receipt of the request and proper written authorization from the borrower allowing Servicer to communicate with the borrower’s agent. The confirmation shall include basic information about the short sale process and Servicer’s requirements, and will state clearly and conspicuously that the Servicer may demand a deficiency payment if such deficiency claim is permitted by applicable law. No such confirmation shall be required if Servicer has already provided a written acceptance or rejection of the short sale request prior to the passage of 10 business days. |
5. | Servicer shall send borrower at borrower’s address of record or to borrower’s agent timely written notice of any missing required documents for consideration of short sale within 30 days of receiving borrower’s request for a short sale. |
6. | Servicer shall review the short sale request submitted by borrower and communicate the disposition of borrower’s request no later than 30 days after receipt of all required information and third-party consents. |
7. | If the short sale request is accepted, Servicer shall contemporaneously notify the borrower whether Servicer or investor will demand a deficiency payment or related cash contribution and the approximate amount of that deficiency, if such deficiency obligation is permitted by applicable law. If the short sale request is denied, Servicer shall provide reasons for the denial in the written notice. If Servicer waives a deficiency claim, it shall not sell or transfer such claim to a third-party debt collector or debt buyer for collection. |
1. | Servicer may not deny any loss mitigation option to eligible borrowers on the basis that the borrower is a debtor in bankruptcy so long as borrower and any trustee cooperates in obtaining any appropriate approvals or consents. |
2. | Servicer shall, to the extent reasonable, extend trial period loan modification plans as necessary to accommodate delays in obtaining bankruptcy court approvals or receiving full remittance of debtor’s trial period payments that have been made to a chapter 13 trustee. In the event of a trial period extension, the debtor must make a trial period payment for each month of the trial period, including any extension month. |
3. | When the debtor is in compliance with a trial period or permanent loan modification plan, Servicer will not object to confirmation of the debtor’s chapter 13 plan, move to dismiss the pending bankruptcy case, or file a MRS solely on the basis that the debtor paid only the amounts due under the trial period or permanent loan modification plan, as opposed to the non-modified mortgage payments. |
1. | Ordinary Transfer of Servicing from Servicer to Successor Servicer or Subservicer. |
a. | At the time of transfer or sale, Servicer shall inform the successor servicer (including a subservicer) whether a loss mitigation request is pending. |
b. | Any contract for the transfer or sale of servicing rights shall obligate the successor servicer to accept and continue processing pending loss mitigation requests. |
c. | Any contract for the transfer or sale of servicing rights shall obligate the successor servicer to honor trial and permanent loan modification agreements or other types of loss mitigation agreements entered into by prior servicer. |
d. | Any contract for transfer or sale of servicing rights shall designate that borrowers are third party beneficiaries under paragraphs IV.M.1.b and IV.M.1.c, above. |
2. | Transfer of Servicing to Servicer. |
a. | When Servicer acquires servicing rights from another servicer, Servicer shall ensure that it will accept, and continue to process pending loss mitigation requests from the prior servicer, and that it will honor trial and permanent loan modification agreements or other loss mitigation agreements entered into by the prior servicer, as evidenced by the prior servicer or the borrower. If the borrower provides a copy of a loss mitigation offer and the borrower has complied in good faith with the terms of the offer, that shall be deemed evidence of a loss mitigation agreement. A borrower making payments that conform to the payment |
3. | Transfer of Servicing with Pending Loss Mitigation. |
a. | Where a loan file indicates that a loss mitigation request was pending within 60 days of transfer or a borrower indicates the same, and Servicer lacks clear written evidence of a loss mitigation denial by the prior servicer, Servicer shall take all reasonable steps to obtain confirmation from the prior servicer of the status of any loss mitigation activity or review of a loss mitigation request, and shall: |
i. | Where the prior servicer’s review was not complete, complete the review of the borrower's prior loss mitigation request, after notifying the borrower of any necessary information missing from such application, and afford the borrower an opportunity to have the loss mitigation request reviewed through the independent evaluation and appeal processes under paragraphs IV.G.1 or |
ii. | Provide the borrower a written denial notice, in compliance with paragraph IV.G.2, and provide the borrower 30 days to request an appeal under paragraph IV.G.3. |
b. | The Servicer shall not commence, refer to, or proceed with foreclosure until the servicer has satisfied all requirements under paragraph 3.a. above. |
4. | Transfer of Servicing of Loans where the Borrower is in Bankruptcy. |
a. | The following shall apply to all transfers of servicing rights to a third party from Servicer, including subservicing: |
i. | At the time of transfer or sale, Servicer shall inform the successor servicer or subservicer whether a borrower is a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding. |
ii. | Any contract for the transfer or sale of servicing rights shall obligate the successor servicer to ensure |
b. | The following shall apply to all transfers of servicing rights to Servicer from a third party including prior servicers or subservicers: |
i. | At the time of transfer or sale, Servicer shall identify whether a borrower is a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding. |
ii. | In any POC, MRS, or other document filed by or on behalf of Servicer in a bankruptcy proceeding, Servicer shall not impose or collect fees or charges assessed by a prior servicer, unless Servicer has properly itemized and verified those fees and charges, and otherwise complied with the requirements of Paragraphs, I.D, III.B, and VI. |
V. | PROTECTIONS FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL. |
A. | Servicer shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), 50 U.S.C. Appx. § 501 et seq., and any applicable state law offering protections to servicemembers. |
B. | When a borrower states that he or she is or was within the preceding 9 months (or the then applicable statutory period under the SCRA) in active military service or has received and is subject to military orders requiring him or her to commence active military service, Lender shall determine whether the borrower may be eligible for the protections of the SCRA or for the protections of the provisions of paragraph V.F. If Servicer determines the borrower is so eligible, Servicer shall, until Servicer determines that such customer is no longer protected by the SCRA, |
1. | if such borrower is not entitled to a SPOC, route such customers to employees who have been specially trained about the protections of the SCRA to respond to such borrower’s questions, or |
2. | if such borrower is entitled to a SPOC, designate as a SPOC for such borrower a person who has been specially trained about the protections of the SCRA (Servicemember SPOC). |
C. | Servicer shall, in addition to any other reviews it may perform to assess eligibility under the SCRA, (i) before referring a loan for foreclosure, (ii) within seven days before a foreclosure sale, and (iii) the later of (A) |
D. | When a servicemember provides written notice requesting protection under the SCRA relating to interest rate relief, but does not provide the documentation required by Section 207(b)(1) of the SCRA (50 USC Appx. § 527(b)(1)), Servicer shall accept, in lieu of the documentation required by Section 207(b)(1) of the SCRA, a letter on official letterheadfrom the servicemember’s commanding officer including a contact telephone number for confirmation: |
1. | Addressed in such a way as to signify that the commanding officer recognizes that the letter will be relied on by creditors of the servicemember (a statement that the letter is intended to be relied upon by the Servicemember’s creditors would satisfy this requirement); |
2. | Setting forth the full name (including middle initial, if any), Social Security number and date of birth of the servicemember; |
3. | Setting forth the home address of the servicemember; and |
4. | Setting forth the date of the military orders marking the beginning of the period of military service of the servicemember and, as may be applicable, that the military service of the servicemember is continuing or the date on which the military service of the servicemember ended. |
E. | Servicer shall notify customers who are 45 days delinquent that, if they are a servicemember, (a) they may be entitled to certain protections under the SCRA regarding the servicemember’s interest rate and the risk of foreclosure, and (b) counseling for covered servicemembers is available at agencies such as Military OneSource, Armed Forces Legal Assistance, and a HUD-certified housing counselor. Such notice shall include a toll-free number that servicemembers may call to be connected to a person who has been specially trained about the protections of the SCRA to respond to such borrower’s questions. Such telephone number shall either connect directly to such a person or afford a caller the ability to identify him-or herself as an eligible servicemember and be routed to such persons. Servicers hereby confirm that they intend to take reasonable steps to ensure the dissemination of such toll-free number to customers who may be eligible servicemembers. |
F. | Irrespective of whether a mortgage obligation was originated before or during the period of a servicemember’s military service, if, based on the determination described in the last sentence and subject to Applicable Requirements, a servicemember’s military orders (or any letter complying with paragraph V.D), together with any other documentation satisfactory to the Servicer, reflects that the servicemember is (a) eligible for Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay and (b) serving at a location (i) more than 750 miles from the location of the secured property or (ii) outside of the United States, then to the extent consistent with Applicable Requirements, the Servicer shall not sell, foreclose, or seize a property for a breach of an obligation on real property owned by a servicemember that is secured by mortgage, deed of trust, or other security in the nature of a mortgage, during, or within 9 months after, the period in which the servicemember is eligible for Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay, unless either (i) Servicer has obtained a court order granted before such sale, foreclosure, or seizure with a return made and approved by the court, or (ii) if made pursuant to an agreement as provided in section 107 of the SCRA (50 U.S.C. Appx. § 517). Unless a servicemember’s eligibility for the protection under this paragraph can be fully determined by a proper search of the DMDC website, Servicer shall only be obligated under this provision if it is able to determine, based on a servicemember’s military orders (or any letter complying with paragraph V.D), together with any other documentation provided by or on behalf of the servicemember that is satisfactory to the Servicer, that the servicemember is (a) eligible for Hostile Fire/Imminent Danger Pay and (b) serving at a location (i) more than 750 miles from the location of the secured property or (ii) outside of the United States. |
G. | Servicer shall not require a servicemember to be delinquent to qualify for a short sale, loan modification, or other loss mitigation relief if the servicemember is suffering financial hardship and is otherwise eligible for such loss mitigation. Subject to Applicable Requirements, for purposes of assessing financial hardship in relation to (i) a short sale or deed in lieu transaction, Servicer will take into account whether the servicemember is, as a result of a permanent change of station order, required to relocate even if such servicemember’s income has not been decreased, so long as the servicemember does not have sufficient liquid assets to make his or her monthly mortgage payments, or (ii) a loan modification, Servicer will take into account whether the servicemember is, as a result of his or her military orders required to relocate to a new duty station at least seventy five mile from his or her residence/secured property or to reside at a location other than the residence/secured property, and accordingly is unable personally to occupy the residence and (a) the residence will continue to be occupied by his or her dependents, or (b) the residence is the only residential property owned by the servicemember. |
H. | Servicer shall not make inaccurate reports to credit reporting agencies when a servicemember, who has not defaulted before relocating under |
A. | General Requirements. |
1. | All default, foreclosure and bankruptcy-related service fees, including third-party fees, collected from the borrower by Servicer shall be bona fide, reasonable in amount, and disclosed in detail to the borrower as provided in paragraphs I.B.10 and VI.B.1. |
B. | Specific Fee Provisions. |
1. | Schedule of Fees. Servicer shall maintain and keep current a schedule of common non-state specific fees or ranges of fees that may be charged to borrowers by or on behalf of Servicer. Servicer shall make this schedule available on its website and to the borrower or borrower’s authorized representative upon request. The schedule shall identify each fee, provide a plain language explanation of the fee, and state the maximum amount of the fee or how the fee is calculated or determined. |
2. | Servicer may collect a default-related fee only if the fee is for reasonable and appropriate services actually rendered and one of the following conditions is met: |
a. | the fee is expressly or generally authorized by the loan instruments and not prohibited by law or this Agreement; |
b. | the fee is permitted by law and not prohibited by the loan instruments or this Agreement; or |
c. | the fee is not prohibited by law, this Agreement or the loan instruments and is a reasonable fee for a specific service requested by the borrower that is collected only after clear and conspicuous disclosure of the fee is made available to the borrower. |
3. | Attorneys’ Fees. In addition to the limitations in paragraph VI.B.2 above, attorneys’ fees charged in connection with a foreclosure action or bankruptcy proceeding shall only be for work actually performed and shall not exceed reasonable and customary fees for such work. In the event a foreclosure action is terminated prior to the final judgment and/or sale for a loss mitigation option, a reinstatement, or payment in full, the borrower shall be liable only for reasonable and customary fees for work actually performed. |
4. | Late Fees. |
a. | Servicer shall not collect any late fee or delinquency charge when the only delinquency is attributable to late fees or delinquency charges assessed on an earlier payment, and the payment is otherwise a full payment for the applicable period and is paid on or before its due date or within any applicable grace period. |
b. | Servicer shall not collect late fees (i) based on an amount greater than the past due amount; (ii) collected from the escrow account or from escrow surplus without the approval of the borrower; or (iii) deducted from any regular payment. |
c. | Servicer shall not collect any late fees for periods during which (i) a complete loan modification application is under consideration; (ii) the borrower is making timely trial modification payments; or (iii) a written and binding short sale offer from a bona fide purchaser is being evaluated by Servicer. |
C. | Third-Party Fees. |
1. | Servicer shall not impose unnecessary or duplicative property inspection, property preservation or valuation fees on the borrower, including, but not limited to, the following: |
a. | No property preservation fees shall be imposed on eligible borrowers who have a pending application with Servicer for loss mitigation relief or are performing under a loss mitigation program, unless Servicer has a reasonable basis to believe that property preservation is necessary for the maintenance of the property, such as when the property is vacant or listed on a violation notice from a local jurisdiction; |
b. | No property inspection fee shall be imposed on a borrower any more frequently than the timeframes allowed under GSE or HUD guidelines unless Servicer has identified specific circumstances supporting the need for further property inspections; and |
c. | Servicer shall be limited to imposing property valuation fees (e.g., BPO) to once every 12 months, unless other valuations are requested by the borrower to facilitate a short sale or to support a loan modification as outlined in |
2. | Default, foreclosure and bankruptcy-related services performed by third parties shall be at reasonable market value. |
3. | Servicer shall not collect any fee for default, foreclosure or bankruptcy-related services by an affiliate unless the amount of the fee does not exceed the lesser of (a) any fee limitation or allowable amount for the service under applicable state law, and (b) the market rate for the service. To determine the market rate, Servicer shall obtain annual market reviews of its affiliates’ pricing for such default and foreclosure-related services; such market reviews shall be performed by a qualified, objective, independent third-party professional using procedures and standards generally accepted in the industry to yield accurate and reliable results. The independent third-party professional shall determine in its market survey the price actually charged by third-party affiliates and by independent third party vendors. |
4. | Servicer shall be prohibited from collecting any unearned fee, or giving or accepting referral fees in relation to third-party default or foreclosure-related services. |
5. | Servicer shall not impose its own mark-ups on Servicer initiated third-party default or foreclosure-related services. |
D. | Certain Bankruptcy Related Fees. |
1. | Servicer must not collect any attorney’s fees or other charges with respect to the preparation or submission of a POC or MRS document that is withdrawn or denied, or any amendment thereto that is required, as a result of a substantial misstatement by Servicer of the amount due. |
2. | Servicer shall not collect late fees due to delays in receiving full remittance of debtor’s payments, including trial period or permanent modification payments as well as post-petition conduit payments in accordance with 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(5), that debtor has timely (as defined by the underlying Chapter 13 plan) made to a chapter 13 trustee. |
VII. | FORCE-PLACED INSURANCE. |
A. | General Requirements for Force-Placed Insurance. |
1. | Servicer shall not obtain force-placed insurance unless there is a reasonable basis to believe the borrower has failed to comply with |
2. | Servicer shall not be construed as having a reasonable basis for obtaining force-placed insurance unless the requirements of this section VII have been met. |
3. | Servicer shall not impose any charge on any borrower for force-placed insurance with respect to any property securing a federally related mortgage unless: |
a. | Servicer has sent, by first-class mail, a written notice to the borrower containing: |
i. | A reminder of the borrower’s obligation to maintain hazard insurance on the property securing the federally related mortgage; |
ii. | A statement that Servicer does not have evidence of insurance coverage of such property; |
iii. | A clear and conspicuous statement of the procedures by which the borrower may demonstrate that the borrower already has insurance coverage; |
iv. | A statement that Servicer may obtain such coverage at the borrower’s expense if the borrower does not provide such demonstration of the borrower’s existing coverage in a timely manner; |
v. | A statement that the cost of such coverage may be significantly higher than the cost of the homeowner’s current coverage; |
vi. | For first lien loans on Servicer’s primary servicing system, a statement that, if the borrower desires to maintain his or her voluntary policy, Servicer will offer an escrow account and advance the premium due on the voluntary policy if the borrower: (a) accepts the offer of the escrow account; (b) provides |
vii. | A statement, in the case of single interest coverage, that the coverage may only protect the mortgage holder’s interest and not the homeowner’s interest. |
b. | Servicer has sent, by first-class mail, a second written notice, at least 30 days after the mailing of the notice under paragraph VII.A.3.a that contains all the information described in each clause of such paragraph |
c. | Servicer has not received from the borrower written confirmation of hazard insurance coverage for the property securing the mortgage by the end of the 15-day period beginning on the date the notice under paragraph VII.A.3.b was sent by Servicer. |
4. | Servicer shall accept any reasonable form of written confirmation from a borrower or the borrower’s insurance agent of existing insurance coverage, which shall include the existing insurance policy number along with the identity of, and contact information for, the insurance company or agent. |
5. | Servicer shall not place hazard or wind insurance on a mortgaged property, or require a borrower to obtain or maintain such insurance, in excess of the greater of replacement value, last-known amount of coverage or the outstanding loan balance, unless required by Applicable Requirements, or requested by borrower in writing. |
6. | Within 15 days of the receipt by Servicer of evidence of a borrower’s existing insurance coverage, Servicer shall: |
a. | Terminate the force-placed insurance; and |
b. | Refund to the consumer all force-placed insurance premiums paid by the borrower during any period during which the borrower’s insurance coverage and the force placed insurance coverage were each in effect, and any |
7. | Servicer shall make reasonable efforts to work with the borrower to continue or reestablish the existing homeowner’s policy if there is a lapse in payment and the borrower’s payments are escrowed. |
8. | Any force-placed insurance policy must be purchased for a commercially reasonable price. |
9. | No provision of this section VII shall be construed as prohibiting Servicer from providing simultaneous or concurrent notice of a lack of flood insurance pursuant to section 102(e) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. |
VIII. | GENERAL SERVICER DUTIES AND PROHIBITIONS. |
A. | Measures to Deter Community Blight. |
1. | Servicer shall develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that REO properties do not become blighted. |
2. | Servicer shall develop and implement policies and procedures to enhance participation and coordination with state and local land bank programs, neighborhood stabilization programs, nonprofit redevelopment programs, and other anti-blight programs, including those that facilitate discount sale or donation of low-value REO properties so that they can be demolished or salvaged for productive use. |
3. | As indicated in I.A.18, Servicer shall (a) inform borrower that if the borrower continues to occupy the property, he or she has responsibility to maintain the property, and an obligation to continue to pay taxes owed, until a sale or other title transfer action occurs; and (b) request that if the borrower wishes to abandon the property, he or she contact Servicer to discuss alternatives to foreclosure under which borrower can surrender the property to Servicer in exchange for compensation. |
4. | When the Servicer makes a determination not to pursue foreclosure action on a property with respect to a first lien mortgage loan, Servicer shall: |
a. | Notify the borrower of Servicer’s decision to release the lien and not pursue foreclosure, and inform borrower about his or her right to occupy the property until a sale or other title transfer action occurs; and |
b. | Notify local authorities, such as tax authorities, courts, or code enforcement departments, when Servicer decides to release the lien and not pursue foreclosure. |
B. | Tenants’ Rights. |
1. | Servicer shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws governing the rights of tenants living in foreclosed residential properties. |
2. | Servicer shall develop and implement written policies and procedures to ensure compliance with such laws. |
C. | Notification of Tax Consequences. |
1. | When the Servicer implements a loan modification, partial or complete lien forgiveness, or waives a deficiency resulting from a short sale or deed in lieu, the Servicer shall: |
a. | Notify the borrower that such action may have consequences with respect to the borrower’s federal, state, or local tax liability, as well as eligibility for any public assistance benefits the borrower may receive; |
b. | Notify the borrower that the Servicer cannot advise the borrower on tax liability or any effect on public assistance benefits; and |
c. | Notify the borrower that the borrower may wish to consult with a qualified individual or organization about any possible tax or other consequences resulting from the loan modification, lien forgiveness, short sale, or deed in lieu deficiency waiver. |
IX. | GENERAL PROVISIONS, DEFINITIONS, AND IMPLEMENTATION. |
A. | Applicable Requirements. |
1. | The servicing standards and any modifications or other actions taken in accordance with the servicing standards are expressly subject to, and shall be interpreted in accordance with, (a) applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, (b) the terms of the applicable mortgage loan documents, (c) Section 201 of the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009, and |
2. | In the event of a conflict between the requirements of the Agreement and the Applicable Requirements with respect to any provision of this Agreement such that the Servicer cannot comply without violating Applicable Requirements or being subject to adverse action, including fines and penalties, Servicer shall document such conflicts and notify the Monitor and the Monitoring Committee that it intends to comply with the Applicable Requirements to the extent necessary to eliminate the conflict. Any associated Metric provided for in the Enforcement Terms will be adjusted accordingly. |
B. | Definitions. |
1. | In each instance in this Agreement in which Servicer is required to ensure adherence to, or undertake to perform certain obligations, it is intended to mean that Servicer shall: (a) authorize and adopt such actions on behalf of Servicer as may be necessary for Servicer to perform such obligations and undertakings; (b) follow up on any material non-compliance with such actions in a timely and appropriate manner; and (c) require corrective action be taken in a timely manner of any material non-compliance with such obligations. |
2. | References to Servicer shall mean Ocwen Financial Corporation or Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”), regardless of whether Ocwen is acting as a servicer, master servicer, or sub-servicer, and shall include Servicer’s successors and assignees in the event of a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of Servicer or of Servicer’s division(s) or major business unit(s) that are engaged as a primary business in customer-facing servicing of residential mortgages on owner-occupied properties. |
1. | At the time the modification is offered, the borrower is at least 30 days delinquent or otherwise qualifies as being at imminent risk of default due to his or her financial situation; |
2. | The borrower’s pre-modification LTV is greater than 100%; |
3. | The borrower’s post-modification principal and interest payment is at least 10% lower than the pre-modification payment; |
4. | The borrower’s post-modification payment is at or below a debt-to-income ratio (“DTI”) of 31%, (or an affordability measurement consistent with HAMP guidelines), or in the case of a non-owner occupied property, an appropriate measure of affordability; |
5. | The borrower’s payments under the modified terms are current as of 90 days following the implementation of the modification; and |
6. | The borrower’s post-modification LTV is no greater than 120%, which may be determined in accordance with HAMP PRA. |
7. | The borrower’s post-modification LTV, as calculated at the time of offer, is no greater than 95%; and |
8. | The modification’s terms entitle the borrower to forgiveness of the entire amount of deferred principal over a period of no more than three years, with at least 1/3 of the deferred principal forgiven annually, so long as the borrower remains current in the mortgage. |
9. | Ocwen shall not, in the ordinary course, require a borrower to waive or release legal claims and defenses as a condition of approval for a loan modification under these Consumer Relief Requirements. However, nothing herein shall preclude Ocwen from requiring a waiver or release of legal claims and defenses with respect to a loan modification offered in connection with the resolution of a contested claim, when the borrower would not otherwise have qualified for that loan modification under existing Servicer programs. |
10. | Ocwen shall be entitled to receive credits towards its $2 billion Consumer Relief commitment for modifications it undertakes pursuant to the Consumer Relief Requirements described above on or after November 3, 2013. |
11. | If Ocwen fails to meet the $2 billion Consumer Relief commitment as set forth in these Consumer Relief Requirements within three years of the date the Consent Judgment is entered, Ocwen shall pay a cash penalty in an amount equal to the unmet commitment amount, subject to the requirements in Paragraph 12. |
12. | In the event there is a material change in market conditions that Ocwen can demonstrate makes it unable to meet the $2 billion Consumer Relief commitment notwithstanding its good faith efforts to do so, the parties commit to engage in good faith discussions regarding an extension or other modification of the terms of this commitment. |
13. | Ocwen agrees that it will not implement any of the Consumer Relief Requirements described herein through policies that are intended to (a) disfavor a specific geography within or among states that are a party to the Consent Judgment or (b) discriminate against any protected class of borrowers. This provision shall not preclude the implementation of pilot programs in particular geographic areas. |
14. | Satisfaction of the Consumer Relief Requirements by Ocwen in accordance with this Agreement in connection with any residential mortgage loan is expressly subject to, and shall be interpreted in accordance with, as applicable, the terms and provisions of the Servicer Participation Agreement with the U.S. Department of Treasury, any servicing agreement, subservicing agreement under which Ocwen services for others, special servicing agreement, mortgage or bond insurance policy or related agreement or requirements to which Ocwen is a party and by which it or its servicing affiliates are bound pertaining to the servicing or ownership of the mortgage loans, including without limitation the requirements, binding directions, or investor guidelines of the applicable investor (such as Fannie Mae or Freddie |
A. | Implementation Timeline. Ocwen (hereinafter “Servicer”) anticipates that it will phase in the implementation of the Servicing Standards, using a grid approach that prioritizes implementation based upon: (i) the importance of the Servicing Standard to the borrower; and (ii) the difficulty of implementing the Servicing Standard. In addition to the Servicing Standards that have been implemented upon entry of this Consent Judgment, the period for implementation will be within 60 days of entry of this Consent Judgment. For Metrics 6.D.i, 30, and 31 in Schedule D-1 hereto, the period for implementation will be within 180 days of entry of this Consent Judgment. For Metrics 32 and 33 in schedule D-1 hereto, the period for implementation will be within 90 days of entry of this Consent Judgment. In the event that Servicer, using reasonable efforts, is unable to implement certain standards on the specified timetable, Servicer may apply to the Monitor for a reasonable extension of time to implement those standards or requirements. |
B. | Monitoring Committee. A committee comprising of representatives of the state Attorneys General, State Mortgage Regulators and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) shall monitor Servicer’s compliance with this Consent Judgment (the “Monitoring Committee”). The Monitoring Committee may substitute representation, as necessary. Subject to Section F, the Monitoring Committee may share all Monitor Reports, as that term is defined in Section D.3 below, with any releasing party. |
C. | Monitor |
1. | Pursuant to an agreement of the parties, Joseph A. Smith Jr. is appointed to the position of Monitor under the Consent Judgment. If the Monitor is at any time unable to complete his or her duties under the Consent Judgment, Servicer and the Monitoring Committee shall mutually agree upon a replacement in accordance with the process and standards set forth in this Section C and Paragraph V.7 of the Consent Judgment. |
2. | Such Monitor shall be highly competent and highly respected, with a reputation that will garner public confidence in his or her ability to perform the tasks required under this Consent Judgment. The Monitor shall have the right to employ an accounting firm or firms or other firm(s) with similar capabilities to support the Monitor in carrying out his or her duties under the Consent Judgment. Monitor and Servicer shall agree on the selection of a “Primary Professional Firm,” which must have adequate capacity and resources to perform the work required under this agreement. The Monitor shall also have the right to engage one or more attorneys or other professional persons to represent or assist the Monitor in carrying |
3. | The Monitor and Professionals shall not have any prior relationships with the Parties that would undermine public confidence in the objectivity of their work and, subject to Section C.3(e), below, shall not have any conflicts of interest with any Party. |
(a) | The Monitor and Professionals will disclose, and will make a reasonable inquiry to discover, any known current or prior relationships to, or conflicts with, any Party, any Party’s holding company, any subsidiaries of the Party or its holding company, directors, officers, and law firms. |
(b) | The Monitor and Professionals shall make a reasonable inquiry to determine whether there are any facts that a reasonable individual would consider likely to create a conflict of interest for the Monitor or Professionals. The Monitor and Professionals shall disclose any conflict of interest with respect to any Party. |
(c) | The duty to disclose a conflict of interest or relationship pursuant to this Section C.3 shall remain ongoing throughout the course of the Monitor’s and Professionals’ work in connection with this Consent Judgment. |
(d) | All Professionals shall comply with all applicable standards of professional conduct, including ethics rules and rules pertaining to conflicts of interest. |
(e) | To the extent permitted under prevailing professional standards, a Professional’s conflict of interest may be waived by written agreement of the Monitor and Servicer. |
(f) | Servicer or the Monitoring Committee may move the Court for an order disqualifying any Professionals on the grounds that such Professional has a conflict of interest that has inhibited or could inhibit the Professional’s ability to act in good faith and with integrity and fairness towards all Parties. |
4. | The Monitor must agree not to be retained by any Party, or its successors |
5. | It shall be the responsibility of the Monitor to determine whether Servicer is in compliance with the Servicing Standards and whether Servicer has satisfied the Consumer Relief Requirements, in accordance with the authorities provided herein, and to report his or her findings as provided in Section D.3, below. |
6. | The manner in which the Monitor will carry out his or her compliance responsibilities under this Consent Judgment and, where applicable, the methodologies to be utilized shall be set forth in a work plan agreed upon by Servicer and the Monitor, and not objected to by the Monitoring Committee (the “Work Plan”). |
7. | Servicer will designate an internal quality control group that is independent from the line of business whose performance is being measured (the “Internal Review Group”) to perform compliance reviews each calendar quarter (“Quarter”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Work Plan (the “Compliance Reviews”) and in satisfaction of the Consumer Relief Requirements after the (A) end of each calendar year (and, in the discretion of the Servicer, any Quarter) and B) earlier of the Servicer’s assertion that it has satisfied its obligations thereunder and the third anniversary of the Start Date (the “Satisfaction Review”). For the purposes of this provision, a group that is independent from the line of business shall be one that does not perform operational work on mortgage servicing, and ultimately reports to a Chief Risk Officer, Chief Audit Executive, Chief Compliance Officer, or another employee or manager who has no direct operational responsibility for mortgage servicing. |
8. | The Internal Review Group shall have the appropriate authority, privileges, and knowledge to effectively implement and conduct the reviews and metric assessments contemplated herein and under the terms and conditions of the Work Plan. |
9. | The Internal Review Group shall have personnel skilled at evaluating and validating processes, decisions, and documentation utilized through the implementation of the Servicing Standards. The Internal Review Group may include non-employee consultants or contractors working at Servicer’s direction. |
10. | The qualifications and performance of the Internal Review Group will be subject to ongoing review by the Monitor. Servicer will appropriately remediate the reasonable concerns of the Monitor as to the qualifications or performance of the Internal Review Group. |
11. | Servicer’s compliance with the Servicing Standards shall be assessed via metrics identified and defined in Schedule D-1 hereto, as supplemented by and consistent with the metrics provided in the National Mortgage Settlement 2012 Consent Judgment and any additional metrics that may be developed in accordance with Section C.22 below (“the “Metrics”). The threshold error rates for the Metrics are set forth in Schedule D-1 (as supplemented from time to time in accordance with Section C.22, below, the “Threshold Error Rates”). The Internal Review Group shall perform test work to compute the Metrics each Quarter, and report the results of that analysis via the Compliance Reviews. The Internal Review Group shall perform test work to assess the satisfaction of the Consumer Relief Requirements within 45 days after the (A) end of each calendar year (and, in the discretion of the Servicer, any Quarter) and (B) earlier of (i) the end of the Quarter in which Servicer asserts that it has satisfied its obligations under the Consumer Relief Provisions and (ii) the Quarter during which the third anniversary of the Start Date occurs, and report that analysis via the Satisfaction Review. |
12. | Servicer and the Monitor shall reach agreement on the terms of the Work Plan within 90 days of the entry of the Consent Judgment, which time can be extended for good cause by agreement of Servicer and the Monitor. If such Work Plan is not objected to by the Monitoring Committee within 20 days, the Monitor shall proceed to implement the Work Plan. In the event that Servicer and the Monitor cannot agree on the terms of the Work Plan within 90 days or the agreed upon terms are not acceptable to the Monitoring Committee, Servicer and Monitoring Committee or the Monitor shall jointly petition the Court to resolve any disputes. If the Court does not resolve such disputes, then the Parties shall submit all |
13. | The Work Plan may be modified from time to time by agreement of the Monitor and Servicer. If such amendment to the Work Plan is not objected to by the Monitoring Committee within 20 days, the Monitor shall proceed to implement the amendment to the Work Plan. To the extent possible, the Monitor shall endeavor to apply the Servicing Standards uniformly across all Servicers. |
14. | The following general principles shall provide a framework for the formulation of the Work Plan: |
(a) | The Work Plan will set forth the testing methods and agreed procedures that will be used by the Internal Review Group to perform the test work and compute the Metrics for each Quarter. |
(b) | The Work Plan will set forth the testing methods and agreed procedures that will be used by Servicer to report on its compliance with the Consumer Relief Requirements of this Consent Judgment, including, incidental to any other testing, confirmation of state-identifying information used by Servicer to compile state-level Consumer Relief information as required by Section D.2. |
(c) | The Work Plan will set forth the testing methods and procedures that the Monitor will use to assess Servicer’s reporting on its compliance with the Consumer Relief Requirements of this Consent Judgment. |
(d) | The Work Plan will set forth the methodology and procedures the Monitor will utilize to review the testing work performed by the Internal Review Group. |
(e) | The Compliance Reviews and the Satisfaction Review may include a variety of audit techniques that are based on an appropriate sampling process and random and risk-based selection criteria, as appropriate and as set forth in the Work Plan. |
(f) | In formulating, implementing, and amending the Work Plan, Servicer and the Monitor may consider any relevant information relating to patterns in complaints by borrowers, issues or |
(g) | The Work Plan should ensure that Compliance Reviews are commensurate with the size, complexity, and risk associated with the Servicing Standard being evaluated by the Metric. |
(h) | Following implementation of the Work Plan, Servicer shall be required to compile each Metric beginning in the first full Quarter after the period for implementing the Servicing Standards associated with the Metric, or any extension approved by the Monitor in accordance with Section A, has run. |
15. | So that the Monitor may determine whether Servicer is in compliance with the Servicing Standards, Servicer shall provide the Monitor with its regularly prepared business reports analyzing Executive Office servicing complaints (or the equivalent); access to all Executive Office servicing complaints (or the equivalent) (with appropriate redactions of borrower information other than borrower name and contact information to comply with privacy requirements); and, if Servicer tracks additional servicing complaints, quarterly information identifying the three most common servicing complaints received outside of the Executive Office complaint process (or the equivalent). In the event that Servicer substantially changes its escalation standards or process for receiving Executive Office servicing complaints (or the equivalent), Servicer shall ensure that the Monitor has access to comparable information. |
16. | So that the Monitor may determine whether Servicer is in compliance with the Servicing Standards, Servicer shall notify the Monitor promptly if Servicer becomes aware of reliable information indicating Servicer is engaged in a significant pattern or practice of noncompliance with a material aspect of the Servicing Standards. |
17. | Servicer shall provide the Monitor with access to all work papers prepared by the Internal Review Group in connection with determining compliance with the Metrics or satisfaction of the Consumer Relief Requirements in accordance with the Work Plan. |
18. | If the Monitor becomes aware of facts or information that lead the Monitor to reasonably conclude that Servicer may be engaged in a pattern of noncompliance with a material term of the Servicing Standards that is reasonably likely to cause harm to borrowers or with any of the Consumer Relief Requirements, the Monitor shall engage Servicer in a review to determine if the facts are accurate or the information is correct. |
19. | Where reasonably necessary in fulfilling the Monitor’s responsibilities under the Work Plan to assess compliance with the Metrics or the satisfaction of the Consumer Relief Requirements, the Monitor may request information from Servicer in addition to that provided under Sections C.16-19. Servicer shall provide the requested information in a format agreed upon between Servicer and the Monitor. |
20. | Where reasonably necessary in fulfilling the Monitor’s responsibilities under the Work Plan to assess compliance with the Metrics or the satisfaction of the Consumer Relief Requirements, the Monitor may interview Servicer’s employees and agents, provided that the interviews shall be limited to matters related to Servicer’s compliance with the Metrics or the Consumer Relief Requirements, and that Servicer shall be given reasonable notice of such interviews. |
21. | Where the Monitor reasonably determines that the Internal Review Group’s work cannot be relied upon or that the Internal Review Group did not correctly implement the Work Plan in some material respect, the Monitor may direct that the work on the Metrics (or parts thereof) be reviewed by Professionals or a third party other than the Internal Review Group, and that supplemental work be performed as necessary. |
22. | If the Monitor becomes aware of facts or information that lead the Monitor to reasonably conclude that Servicer may be engaged in a pattern of noncompliance with a material term of the Servicing Standards that is reasonably likely to cause harm to borrowers or tenants residing in foreclosed properties, the Monitor shall engage Servicer in a review to determine if the facts are accurate or the information is correct. If after that review, the Monitor reasonably concludes that such a pattern exists and is reasonably likely to cause material harm to borrowers or tenants residing in foreclosed properties, the Monitor may propose an additional Metric and associated Threshold Error Rate relating to Servicer’s compliance with the associated term or requirement. Any additional Metrics and associated Threshold Error Rates (a) must be similar to the Metrics and associated Threshold Error Rates contained in Schedule D-1, (b) must relate to material terms of the Servicing Standards, (c) must either (i) be outcomes-based (but no outcome-based Metric shall be added with respect to any Mandatory Relief Requirement) or (ii) require the existence of policies and procedures required by the Servicing Standards, in a manner similar to Metrics 5.B-E, and (d) must be distinct from, and not overlap with, any other Metric or Metrics. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Monitor may add a Metric that satisfies (a)-(c) but does not |
23. | If Monitor proposes an additional Metric and associated Threshold Error Rate pursuant to Section C.22, above, Monitor, the Monitoring Committee, and Servicer shall agree on amendments to Schedule D-1 to include the additional Metrics and Threshold Error Rates provided for in Section C.22, above, and an appropriate timeline for implementation of the Metric. If Servicer does not timely agree to such additions, any associated amendments to the Work Plan, or the implementation schedule, the Monitor may petition the court for such additions. |
24. | Any additional Metric proposed by the Monitor pursuant to the processes in Sections C.22 or C.23 and relating to provision VIII.B.1 of the Servicing Standards shall be limited to Servicer’s performance of its obligations to comply with (1) the federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act and state laws that provide comparable protections to tenants of foreclosed properties; (2) state laws that govern relocation assistance payments to tenants (“cash for keys”); and (3) state laws that govern the return of security deposits to tenants. |
D. | Reporting |
1. | Following the end of each Quarter, Servicer will report the results of its Compliance Reviews for that Quarter (the “Quarterly Report”). The Quarterly Report shall include: (i) the Metrics for that Quarter; (ii) Servicer’s progress toward meeting its payment obligations under this Consent Judgment; and (iii) general statistical data on Servicer’s overall servicing performance described in Schedule Y. Except where an extension is granted by the Monitor, Quarterly Reports shall be due no later than 45 days following the end of the Quarter and shall be provided to: (1) the Monitor, and (2) the Board of Servicer or a committee of the Board designated by Servicer. The first Quarterly Report shall cover the first full Quarter after this Consent Judgment is entered. |
2. | Following the end of each Quarter, Servicer will transmit to each state a report (the “State Report”) including general statistical data on Servicer’s servicing performance, such as aggregate and state-specific information regarding the number of borrowers assisted and credited activities |
3. | The Monitor shall report on Servicer’s compliance with this Consent Judgment in periodic reports setting forth his or her findings (the “Monitor Reports”). The first three Monitor Reports will each cover two Quarterly Reports. If the first three Monitor Reports do not find Potential Violations (as defined in Section E.1, below), each successive Monitor Report will cover four Quarterly Reports, unless and until a Quarterly Report reveals a Potential Violation (as defined in Section E.1, below). In the case of a Potential Violation, the Monitor may (but retains the discretion not to) submit a Monitor Report after the filing of each of the next two Quarterly Reports, provided, however, that such additional Monitor Report(s) shall be limited in scope to the Metric or Metrics as to which a Potential Violation has occurred. |
4. | Prior to issuing any Monitor Report, the Monitor shall confer with Servicer and the Monitoring Committee regarding its preliminary findings and the reasons for those findings. Servicer shall have the right to submit written comments to the Monitor, which shall be appended to the final version of the Monitor Report. Final versions of each Monitor Report shall be provided simultaneously to the Monitoring Committee and Servicers within a reasonable time after conferring regarding the Monitor’s findings. The Monitor Reports shall be filed with the Court overseeing this Consent Judgment and shall also be provided to the Board of Servicer or a committee of the Board designated by Servicer. |
5. | The Monitor Report shall: (i) describe the work performed by the Monitor and any findings made by the Monitor during the relevant period, (ii) list the Metrics and Threshold Error Rates, (iii) list the Metrics, if any, where the Threshold Error Rates have been exceeded, (iv) state whether a Potential Violation has occurred and explain the nature of the Potential Violation, (v) state whether any Potential Violation has been cured, and (vi) state whether the Servicer has complied with the Other Requirements set forth in Sections B.9 and 12 of Exhibit C of this Consent Judgment. In addition, following each Satisfaction Review, the Monitor Report shall report on the Servicer’s satisfaction of the Consumer Relief Requirements, including regarding the number of borrowers assisted and number and dollar amount of credited loan modifications conducted pursuant to the Consumer Relief Requirements, and identify any material inaccuracies identified in prior State Reports. Except as otherwise provided herein, the |
6. | Upon the satisfaction of any category of payment obligation under this Consent Judgment, Servicer, at its discretion, may request that the Monitor certify that Servicer has discharged such obligation. Provided that the Monitor is satisfied that Servicer has met the obligation, the Monitor may not withhold and must provide the requested certification. Any subsequent Monitor Report shall not include a review of Servicer’s compliance with that category of payment obligation. |
7. | Within 120 days of entry of this Consent Judgment, the Monitor shall, in consultation with the Monitoring Committee and Servicer, prepare and present to Monitoring Committee and Servicer an annual budget providing its reasonable best estimate of all fees and expenses of the Monitor to be incurred during the first year of the term of this Consent Judgment, including the fees and expenses of Professionals and support staff (the “Monitoring Budget”). On a yearly basis thereafter, the Monitor shall prepare an updated Monitoring Budget providing its reasonable best estimate of all fees and expenses to be incurred by Ocwen during that year. Absent an objection within 20 days, a Monitoring Budget or updated Monitoring Budget shall be implemented. Consistent with the Monitoring Budget, Servicer shall pay all fees and expenses of the Monitor, including the fees and expenses of Professionals and support staff. The fees, expenses, and costs of the Monitor, Professionals, and support staff shall be reasonable. Servicer may apply to the Court to reduce or disallow fees, expenses, or costs that are unreasonable. |
E. | Potential Violations and Right to Cure |
1. | A “Potential Violation” of this Consent Judgment occurs if the Servicer has exceeded the Threshold Error Rate set for a Metric in a given Quarter. In the event of a Potential Violation, Servicer shall meet and confer with |
2. | Servicer shall have a right to cure any Potential Violation. |
3. | Subject to Section E.4, a Potential Violation is cured if (a) a corrective action plan approved by the Monitor (the “Corrective Action Plan”) is determined by the Monitor to have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the terms thereof; and (b) a Quarterly Report covering the Cure Period reflects that the Threshold Error Rate has not been exceeded with respect to the same Metric and the Monitor confirms the accuracy of said report using his or her ordinary testing procedures. The “Cure Period” shall be the first full quarter after completion of the Corrective Action Plan or, if the completion of the Corrective Action Plan occurs within the first month of a Quarter and if the Monitor determines that there is sufficient time remaining, the period between completion of the Corrective Action Plan and the end of that Quarter. |
4. | If after Servicer cures a Potential Violation pursuant to the previous section, another violation occurs with respect to the same Metric, then the second Potential Violation shall immediately constitute an uncured violation for purposes of Section I.3, provided, however, that such second Potential Violation occurs in either the Cure Period or the Quarter immediately following the Cure Period. |
5. | In addition to the Servicer’s obligation to cure a Potential Violation through the Corrective Action Plan, Servicer must remediate any material harm to particular borrowers identified through work conducted under the Work Plan. In the event that a Servicer has a Potential Violation that so far exceeds the Threshold Error Rate for a metric that the Monitor concludes that the error is widespread, Servicer shall, under the supervision of the Monitor, identify other borrowers who may have been harmed by such noncompliance and remediate all such harms to the extent that the harm has not been otherwise remediated. |
6. | In the event a Potential Violation is cured as provided in Sections E.3, above, then no Party shall have any remedy under the Consent Judgment (other than the remedies in Section E.5) with respect to such Potential Violation. |
1. | These provisions shall govern the use and disclosure of any and all information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” as set forth below, in documents (including email), magnetic media, or other tangible things provided by the Servicer to the Monitor in this case, including the subsequent disclosure by the Monitor to the Monitoring Committee of |
2. | The Monitor may, at his discretion, provide to the Monitoring Committee or to a participating state, State Mortgage Regulator, or the CFPB any documents or information received from the Servicer related to a Potential Violation or related to the review described in Section C.19; provided, however, that any such documents or information so provided shall be subject to the terms and conditions of these provisions. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the Monitor from providing documents received from the Servicer and not designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” to a participating state or the CFPB. |
3. | The Servicer shall designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” that information, document or portion of a document or other tangible thing provided by the Servicer to the Monitor, the Monitoring Committee or to any participating state, State Mortgage Regulator, or the CFPB that Servicer believes contains a trade secret or confidential research, development, or commercial information subject to protection under applicable state or federal laws (collectively, “Confidential Information”). These provisions shall apply to the treatment of Confidential Information so designated. |
4. | Except as provided by these provisions, all information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall not be shown, disclosed or distributed to any person or entity other than those authorized by these provisions. Participating states, State Mortgage Regulators, and the CFPB agree to protect Confidential Information to the extent permitted by law. |
5. | This agreement shall not prevent or in any way limit the ability of a participating state, State Mortgage Regulator, or the CFPB to comply with any subpoena, Congressional demand for documents or information, court order, request under the Right to Financial Privacy Act, or a state or federal public records or state or federal freedom of information act request; provided, however, that in the event that a participating state or the CFPB receives such a subpoena, Congressional demand, court order or other request for the production of any Confidential Information covered by this Order, the state, State Mortgage Regulator, or CFPB shall, unless prohibited under applicable law or unless the state or CFPB would violate or be in contempt of the subpoena, Congressional demand, or court order, (1) notify the Servicer of such request as soon as practicable and in no event more than ten (10) calendar days of its receipt or three calendar days before the return date of the request, whichever is sooner, and (2) allow the Servicer ten (10) calendar days from the receipt of the notice to obtain a protective order or stay of production for the documents or information |
G. | Dispute Resolution Procedures. Servicer, the Monitor, and the Monitoring Committee will engage in good faith efforts to reach agreement on the proper resolution of any dispute concerning any issue arising under the Consent Judgment, including any dispute or disagreement related to the withholding of consent, the exercise of discretion, or the denial of any application. Subject to Section I, below, in the event that a dispute cannot be resolved, Servicer, the Monitor, or the Monitoring Committee may petition the Court for resolution of the dispute. Where a provision of this agreement requires agreement, consent of, or approval of any application or action by a Party or the Monitor, such agreement, consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. |
H. | Consumer Complaints. Nothing in this Consent Judgment shall be deemed to interfere with existing consumer complaint resolution processes, and the Parties are free to bring consumer complaints to the attention of Servicer for resolution outside the monitoring process. In addition, Servicer will continue to respond in good faith to individual consumer complaints provided to it by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State Attorneys General or State Mortgage Regulators in accordance with the routine and practice existing prior to the entry of this Consent Judgment, whether or not such complaints relate to Covered Conduct released herein. |
I. | Enforcement |
1. | Consent Judgment. This Consent Judgment shall be filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and shall be enforceable therein. Servicer and the Releasing Parties shall waive their rights to seek judicial review or otherwise challenge or contest in any court the validity or effectiveness of this Consent Judgment. Notwithstanding such waiver, any State Party may bring an action in that Party’s state court to enforce the Judgment. Servicer and the Releasing Parties agree not to contest any jurisdictional facts, including the Court’s authority to enter this Consent Judgment. |
2. | Enforcing Authorities. Servicer’s obligations under this Consent Judgment shall be enforceable in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia or in the state court of any State Party that brings an action to enforce the Judgment. An enforcement action under this Consent Judgment may be brought by any Party to this Consent Judgment or the Monitoring Committee. Monitor Report(s) and Quarterly Report(s) shall not be admissible into evidence by a Party to this Consent Judgment, |
3. | Enforcement Action. In the event of an action to enforce the obligations of Servicer and to seek remedies for an uncured Potential Violation for which Servicer’s time to cure has expired, the sole relief available in such an action will be: |
(a) | Equitable Relief. An order directing non-monetary equitable relief, including injunctive relief, directing specific performance under the terms of this Consent Judgment, or other non-monetary corrective action. |
(b) | Civil Penalties. The Court or state court may award as civil penalties an amount not more than $1 million per uncured Potential Violation; or, in the event of a second uncured Potential Violation of Metrics 1.a, 1.b, or 2.a (i.e., a Servicer fails the specific Metric in a Quarter, then fails to cure that Potential Violation, and then in subsequent Quarters fails the same Metric again in a Quarter and fails to cure that Potential Violation again in a subsequent Quarter), where the final uncured Potential Violation involves widespread noncompliance with that Metric, the Court or state court may award as civil penalties an amount not more than $5 million for the second uncured Potential Violation. |
(c) | Any penalty or payment owed by Servicer pursuant to the Consent Judgment shall be paid to the clerk of the Court or state court or as otherwise agreed by the Monitor and the Servicer and distributed by the Monitor as follows: |
1. | In the event of a penalty based on a violation of a term of the Servicing Standards, the penalty shall be allocated, first, |
2. | In the event of a payment due under Paragraph B.11 of Exhibit C, one-third of the payment shall be allocated to the CFPB, one-third shall be allocated to the Plaintiff State Attorneys General to this Consent Judgment, and one-third shall be allocated to the State Mortgage Regulators that are parties to the separate Stipulation and Consent Agreement with Ocwen identified in this Consent Judgment. |
J. | Sunset. This Consent Judgment and all Exhibits shall retain full force and effect for three years from the date it is entered (the “Term”), unless otherwise specified in the Exhibit. Servicer shall submit a final Quarterly Report for the last quarter or portion thereof falling within the Term, and shall cooperate with the Monitor’s review of said report, which shall be concluded no later than six months following the end of the Term, after which time Servicer shall have no further obligations under this Consent Judgment. |
Executive Summary | |
Sampling: (a) A random selection of the greater of 100 loans and a statistically significant sample. (b) Sample will be selected from the population as defined in column E | |
Review and Reporting Period: Results will be reported Quarterly and 45 days after the end of the quarter. | |
Errors Definition: An error is a measurement in response to a test question related to the Servicing Standards that results in the failure of the specified outcome. Errors in response to multiple questions with respect to a single outcome would be treated as only a single error. | |
Metrics Tested | |
A | B | C | D | E | F | ||
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | ||
1. Outcome Creates Significant Negative Customer Impact | |||||||
A. Foreclosure sale in error | Customer is in default, legal standing to foreclose, and the loan is not subject to active trial, or BK. | n/a | 1% | Population Definition: Foreclosure Sales that occurred in the review period. A. Sample :# of Foreclosure Sales in the review period that were tested. B. Error Definition: # of loans that went to foreclosure sale in error due to failure of any one of the test questions for this metric. Error Rate = B/A | 1. Did the foreclosing party have legal standing to foreclose? 2. Was the borrower in an active trial period plan (unless the servicer took appropriate steps to postpone sale?) 3. Was the borrower offered a loan modification fewer than 14 days before the foreclosure sale date (unless the borrower declined the offer or the servicer took appropriate steps to postpone the sale)? 4. Was the borrower not in default (unless the default is cured to the satisfaction of the Servicer or investor within 10 days before the foreclosure sale date and the Servicer took appropriate stops to postpone sale)? 5. Was the borrower protected from foreclosure by Bankruptcy (unless Servicer had notice of such protection fewer than 10 days before the foreclosure sale date and Servicer took appropriate steps to postpone sale)? | ||
A | B | C | D | E | F |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions |
B. Incorrect Mod denial | Program eligibility, all documentation received, DTI test, NPV test. | 5% On income errors | 5% | Population Definition: Modification Denied In the Review Period. Error Definition: # of loans that were denied a modification as a result of failure of anyone of the test questions for this metric. | 1. Was the evaluation of eligibility Inaccurate (as per HAMP, Fannie, Freddie or proprietary modification criteria)? 2. Was the income calculation inaccurate? 3. Were the inputs used in the decision tool (NPV and Waterfall test) entered in error or inconsistent with company policy? 4. Was the loan NPV positive? 5. Was there an inaccurate determination that the documents received were incomplete? |
2. Integrity of Critical Sworn Documents | |||||
A. Was AOI properly | Based upon personal knowledge, properly | Question 1, | 5% | Population Definition: Affidavits of | 1. Taken as a whole and accounting for |
prepared | notarized, amounts agree to system of record within tolerance if overstated. | Y/N; Question 2, Amounts overstated (or, for question on | indebtedness filed in the review period. Error Definition: For question 1, yes; for question 2, the # of Loans where the sum of errors exceeds the allowable threshold. | contrary evidence provided by the Servicer, does the sample indicate systemic issues with either affiants lacking personal knowledge or improper notarization? 2. Verify all the amounts outlined below | |
Escrow Amounts, understated) by the greater of $99 or 1% of the Total Indebtedness Amount | against the system of record: a. Was the correct principal balance used Was the correct interest amount (and per diem) used? b. Was the escrow balance correct? c. Were correct other fees used? d. Was the correct corporate advance balance used? e. Was the correct late charge balance used? f. Was the suspense balance correct? g. Was the total indebtness amount on the Affidavit correct? | ||||
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
B. POC | Accurate statement of pre-petition arrearage to system of record. | Amounts over stated by the greater of $50 or 3% of the correct Pre-Petition Arrearage | 5% | Population Definition: POCs filed in the review period. Error Definition: # of Loans where sum of errors exceeds the allowable threshold. | 1. Are the correct amounts set forth in the form, with respect to pre-petition missed payments, fees, expenses charges, and escrow shortages or deficiencies? | |
C. MRS Affidavits | Customer is in default and amount of arrearage is within tolerance. | Amounts overstated (or for escrows amounts, understated) by the greater of $50 or 3% of the correct Post Petition Total Balance | 5% | Population Definition: Affidavits supporting MRS’s filed in the review period Error Definition: # of Loans where the sum of errors exceeds the allowable threshold. | 1. Verify against the system of record, within tolerance if overstated: a. the post-petition default amount; b. the amount of fees or charges applied to such pre-petition default amount or post-petition amount since the later of the date of the petition or the preceding statement; and c. escrow shortages or deficiencies. |
A | B | C | D | E | F |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions |
3. Pre-foreclosure Initiation | |||||
A. Pre Foreclosure Initiation | Accuracy of Account information. | Amounts over stated by the greater of $99 or 1% of the Total balance | 5% | Population Definition: Loans with a Foreclosure referral date in the review period. Error Definition: # of Loans that were referred to foreclosure with an error in any one of the foreclosure initiation test questions. | ** Verify all the amounts outlined below against the system of record. 1. Was the loan delinquent as of the date the first legal action was filed? 2. Was information contained the Account Statement completed accurately? a. The total amount needed to reinstate or bring the account current, and the amount of the principal |
b. The date through which the borrower’s obligation is paid; c. The date of the last full payment; d. The current interest rate in effect for the loan; e. The date on which the interest rate may next reset or adjust; f. The amount of any prepayment fee to be charged, if any; g. A description of any late payment fees; and h. A telephone number or electronic mail address that may be used by the obligor to obtain information regarding the mortgage. |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
B. Pre Foreclosure Initiation Notifications | Notification sent to the customer supporting right to foreclosure along with: Applicable information upon customers request, Account statement information, Ownership statement, and Loss Mitigation statement. Notifications required before 14 days prior to referral to foreclosure. | N/A | 5% | Population Definition: Loans with a Foreclosure referral date in the review period. Error Definition: # of Loans that were referred to foreclosure with an error in any one of the foreclosure initiation test questions. | 1. Were all the required notification statements mailed no later than 14 days prior to first Legal Date (i) Account Statement; (ii) Ownership Statement; and (iii) Loss Mitigation Statement? 2. Did the Ownership Statement accurately reflect that the servicer or investor has the right to foreclosure? 3. Was the Loss Mitigation Statement complete and did it accurately state that: | |
a. The borrower was ineligible (if applicable); or b. The borrower was solicited, was the subject of right party contact routines, and that any timely application submitted by the borrower was evaluated? | ||||||
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
4. Accuracy and Timeliness of Payment Application and Appropriateness of Fees | ||||||
A. Fees adhere to guidance (Preservation fees, Valuation fees and Attorney’s fees) | Services rendered, consistent with loan instrument, within applicable requirements. | Amounts over stated by the greater of $50 or 3% of the Total Default Related Fees Collected | 5% | Population Definition: Defaulted loans (60+) with borrower payable default related fees* collected. Error Definition: # of loans where the sum of default related fee errors exceeds the threshold. * Default related fees are defined as any fee collected for a default-related service after the agreement date. | For fees collected in the test period: 1. Was the frequency of the fees collected (in excess of what is consistent with state guidelines or fee provisions in servicing standards? 2. Was amount of the fee collected higher than the amount allowable under the Servicer’s Fee schedule and for which there was not a valid exception? | |
B. Adherence to customer payment processing | Payments posted timely (within 2 business | Amounts | 5% | Population Definition: All subject payments posted within review period. | 1. Were payments posted to the right account number? | |
days of receipt) and accurately. | understated by the greater $50.00 or 3% of the scheduled | Error Definition: # of loans with an error in any one of the payment application test questions. | 2. Were payments posted in the right amount? 3. Were properly identified conforming payments posted within 2 business days of receipt and credited as of the date of receipt? 4. Did servicer accept payments within $50.00 of the scheduled payment, including principal and interest | |||
payment | and where applicable taxes and insurance as required by the servicing standards? 5. Were partial payments credited to the borrower’s account as of the date that the funds cover a full payment? 6. Were payments posted to principal interest and escrow before fees and expenses? |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
C. Reconciliation of certain waived fees (I.b.11.C) | Appropriately updating the Servicer’s systems of record in in connection with the reconciliation of payments as of the date of dismissal of a debtor’s Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, entry of an order granting Servicer relief from the stay under Chapter 13, or entry of an order granting the debtor a discharge under Chapter 13, to reflect the waiver of any fee, expense or charge pursuant to paragraphs III.B.1.c.i or III.B.1.d of the Servicing Standards (within applicable tolerances). | Amounts over stated by the greater of $50 or 3 % of the correct reconciliation amount | 5% | Population Definition: All accounts where in line reconciliation routine is completed within review period. Error Definition: # of loans with an error in the reconciliation routine resulting in overstated amounts remaining on the borrower account. | 1. Were all required waivers of Fees, expense or charges applied and/or corrected accurately as part of the reconciliation? | |
D. Late fees adhere to guidance | Late fees are collected only as permitted under the Servicing Standards (within applicable tolerances). | Y/N | 5% | Population Definition: All late fees collected within the review period. Error Definition: # of loans with an error on any one of the test questions. | 1. Was a late fee collected with respect to a delinquency attributable solely to late fees or delinquency charges assessed on an earlier payment? | |
. |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
5. Policy/Process Implementation | ||||||
A. Third Party Vendor Management | Is periodic third party review process in place? Is there evidence of remediation of identified issues? | Y/N | N | Quarterly review of a vendors providing Foreclosure Bankruptcy, Loss mitigation and other Mortgage services. Error Definition: Failure on any one of the test questions for this metric. | 1. Is there evidence of documented oversight policies and procedures demonstrating compliance with vendor oversight provisions: (i) adequate due diligence procedures, (ii) adequate enforcement procedures (iii) adequate vendor performance evaluation procedures (iv) adequate remediation procedures?3 2. Is there evidence of periodic sampling and testing of foreclosure documents (including notices of default and letters of reinstatement) and bankruptcy documents prepared by vendors on behalf of the servicer? 3. Is there evidence of periodic sampling of fees and costs assessed by vendors to; (i) substantiate services were rendered (ii) fees are in compliance with servicer fee schedule (iii) Fees are compliant with state law and provisions of the servicing standards? 4. Is there evidence of vendor scorecards used to evaluate vendor performance that include quality metrics (error rate etc)? 5. Evidence of remediation for vendors who fail metrics set forth in vendor scorecards and/or QC sample tests consistent with the servicer policy and procedures? | |
B. Customer Portal | Implementation of a customer portal. | Y/N | N | A Quarterly testing review of Customer Portal. | 1. Does the portal provide loss mitigation status updates? |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
C. SPOC | Implement single point of contact (“SPOC”). | Y/N 5% For Ques Tion 4 | N For Que stio n #4: 5% | Quarterly review of SPOC program per provisions in the servicing standard. Population Definition (for Question 4): Potentially eligible borrowers who were identified as requesting loss mitigation assistance. Error Definition: Failure on any one of the test questions for this metric. | 1. Is there evidence of documented policies and procedures demonstrating compliance with SPOC program provisions? 2. Is there evidence that a single point of contact is available for applicable borrowers? 3. Is there evidence that relevant records relating to borrower’s account are available to the borrower’s SPOC? 4. Is there evidence that the SPOC has been identified to the borrower and the | |
method the borrower may use to contact the SPOC has been communicated to the borrower? |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Loan Level Tolerance for | Threshold | |||||
Metric | Measurements | Error 1 | Error Rate 2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
D. Workforce Management | Training and staffing adequacy requirements. | Y/N | N | Loss mitigation, SPOC and Foreclosure Staff. Error Definition: Failure on any one of the test questions for this metric. | 1. Is there evidence of documented oversight policies and procedures demonstrating effective forecasting, capacity planning, training and monitoring of staffing requirements for foreclosure operations? 2. Is there evidence of periodic training and certification of employees who prepare Affidavits sworn statements or declarations. | |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Loan Level Tolerance for | Threshold | |||||
Metric | Measurements | Error1 | Error Rate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
E. Affidavit of Indebtedness Integrity. | Affidavits of Indebtedness are signed by affiants who have personal knowledge of relevant facts and properly review the affidavit before signing it. | Y/N | N | Annual Review of Policy. | 1. Is there evidence of documented policies and procedures sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that affiants have personal knowledge of the matters covered by affidavits of indebtedness and have reviewed | |
affidavit before signing it? | ||||||
F. Account Status Activity. | System of record electronically documents key activity of a foreclosure, loan modification, or bankruptcy. | Y/N | N | Annual Review of Policy. | 1. Is there evidence of documented policies and procedures designed to ensure that the system of record contains documentation of key activities? |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
6. Customer Experiences | ||||||
A. Complaint response timeliness | Meet the requirements of Regulator complaint handling. | N/A | 5% | Population Definition: Government submitted complaints and inquiries from individual borrowers who are in default and/or have applied for loan modifications received during the three months prior to 40 days prior to the review period. (To allow for response period to expire). Error Definition: # of loans that exceeded the required response timeline. | 1. Was written acknowledgment regarding complaint/inquires sent within 10 business days of complaint/inquiry receipt?** 2. Was a written response (“Forward Progress”) sent within 30 calendar days of complaint/inquiry receipt?** ** receipt= from the Attorney General, state financial regulators, the Executive Office for United States Trustees/regional offices of the United States Trustees, and the federal regulators and documented within the System of Record. | |
B. Loss Mitigation | ||||||
i. Loan Modification Document Collection timeline compliance | N/A | 5% | Population Definition: Loan modifications and loan modification requests (packages) that that were missing documentation at receipt and received more than 40 days prior to the end of the review period. Error Definition: The total # of loans processed outside the allowable timelines as defined under each timeline requirement tested. | 1. Did the Servicer notify borrower of any known deficiency in borrower’s initial submission of information, no later than 5 business days after receipt, including any missing information or documentation? 2. Was the Borrower afforded 30 days from the date of Servicer’s notification of any missing information or documentation to supplement borrower’s submission of information prior to making a determination on whether or not to grant an initial loan modification? |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Loan Level | ||||||
Tolerance for | Threshold | |||||
Metric | Measurements | Error 1 | Error Rate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
ii. Loan Modification Decision/Notification timeline compliance | 10% | Population Definition: Loan modification requests (packages) that are denied or approved in the review period. | 1. Did the servicer respond to request for a modification within 30 days of receipt of all necessary documentation? 2. Denial Communication: Did the servicer notify | |||
Error Definition: The total # of loans processed outside the allowable timelines as defined under each timeline requirement tested. | customers within 10 days of denial decision? | |||||
iii. Loan Modification Appeal timeline compliance | 10% | Population Definition: Loan modification requests (packages) that are borrower appeals in the review period. | 1. Did Servicer respond to a borrowers request for an appeal within 30 days of receipt? | |||
Error Definition: The total # of loans | ||||||
processed outside the allowable timeline tested. | ||||||
iv. Short Sale Decision timeline compliance | 10% | Population Definition: Short sale requests (packages) that are complete in the three months prior to 30 days prior to the end of the review period. (to allow for short sale review to occur). | 1. Was short sale reviewed and a decision communicated within 30 days of borrower submitting completed package? | |||
Error Definition: The total # of loans | ||||||
processed outside the allowable timeline tested. |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
v. Short Sale Document Correction timeline compliance | 5% | Population Definition: Short sale requests (packages) missing documentation that are received in the three months prior to 30 | 1. Did the Servicer provide notice of missing documents within 30 days of the request for the short sale? | |||
days prior to the end of the review period (to allow for short sale review to occur). Error Definition: The total # of loans processed outside the allowable timeline tested. | ||||||
vi. Charge of application fees for Loss Mitigation | 1% | Population Definition: Loss mitigation requests (packages) that are Incomplete, | 1. Did the servicer assess a fee for processing a loss mitigation request? | |||
denied, approved and borrower appeals in the review period. (Same as 6.B.i) Error Definition: The # of loss mitigation applications where servicer collected a processing fee. | ||||||
vii. Short Sales | ||||||
a. Inclusion of notice of whether or not a deficiency will be required | Provide information related to any required deficiency claim. | n/a | 5% | Population Definition: Short sales approved in the review period. | 1. If the short sale was accepted, did borrower receive notification that deficiency or cash contribution will be needed? | |
Error Definition: The # of short sales that failed any one of the deficiency test questions | 2. Did borrower receive in this notification approximate amounts related to deficiency or cash contribution? | |||||
viii. Dual Track |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
a. Referred to foreclosure in violation of Dual Track Provisions | Loan was referred to foreclosure in error. | n/a | 5% | Population Definition: Loans with a first legal action date in the review period. Error Definition: The # of loans with a first legal filed in the review period that failed any one of the dual tracking test questions. | 1. Was the first legal action taken while the servicer was in possession of an active, complete loan modification package (as defined by the Servicing Standards) that was not decisioned as required by the standards? | |
2. Was the first legal commenced while the borrower was approved for a loan modification but prior to the expiration of the borrower acceptance period, borrower decline of offer or while in an active trial period plan? | ||||||
b. Failure to postpone foreclosure proceedings in violation of Dual Track Provisions | Foreclosure proceedings allowed to proceed in error. | n/a | 5% | Population Definition: Active foreclosures during review period. Error Definition: # of active foreclosures that went to judgment as a result of failure of any one on of the active foreclosure dual track test | 1. Did the servicer proceed to judgment or order of sale upon receipt of a complete loan modification package within 30 days of the Post-Referral to Foreclosure Solicitation Letter?** | |
question. | **Compliance of Dual tracking provisions for foreclosure sales are referenced in 1.A | |||||
C. Forced Placed Insurance | ||||||
i. Timeliness of notices | Notices sent timely with necessary information. | n/a | 5% | Population Definition: Loans with forced placed coverage initiated in review period. Error Definition: # of loans with active force place insurance resulting from an error in any one of the force-place insurance test questions. | 1. Did Servicer send all required notification letters (ref. V 3a i-vii) notifying the customer of lapse in insurance coverage? 2. Did the notification offer the customer the option to have the account escrowed to facilitate payment of all insurance premiums and any arrearage by the servicer prior to obtaining force place insurance? | |
3. Did the servicer assess forced place insurance when there was evidence of a | ||||||
valid policy? | ||||||
ii Termination of Force place Insurance | Timely termination of force placed insurance. | 5% | Population Definition: Loans with forced placed coverage terminated in review period. Error Definition: # of loans terminated force place insurance with an error in any one of the force-place insurance test questions. | 1. Did Servicer terminate FPI within 15 days of receipt of evidence of a borrower’s existing insurance coverage and refund the prorated portion to the borrower’s escrow account? |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error R ate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
D. Transfer of Servicing Rights | ||||||
i. Transfer of servicing to Servicer | Accept, and continue to process pending loan modification requests from the prior servicer and honor loan modification agreements entered into by the prior servicer. | n/a | 5% | Population Definition: Loans or loan servicing rights sold or transferred to the servicer during the review period, including for subservicing, with a pending loan modification request (in process) or a trial or permanent modification at the time of sale or transfer. Error Definition: # of loans with an error in any one of the transfer or servicing test questions. | 1. Did the Servicer accept and continue to process pending loan modification request of the prior servicer? 2. Did the Servicer honor trial and permanent loan modification agreements entered into by the prior servicer? |
A | B | C C C | D D | E E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error R ate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
# 30 | ||||||
Standards: N/A | Loan Modification Process | Y/N for Questions 1 -3 | 5% | Population Definition: 1st lien borrowers declined in the review period for incomplete or missing documents in their loan modification application.4 Error Definition: Loans where the answer to any one of the test questions is a No. | 1. Is there evidence Servicer or the assigned SPOC notified the borrower in writing of the documents required for an initial application package for available loan modification programs? 2. Provided the borrower timely submitted all documents requested in initial notice of incomplete information (“5 day letter”) or earlier ADRL letters, did the Servicer afford the borrower at least 30 days to submit the documents requested in the Additional Document Request Letter (“ADRL”) before declining the borrower for incomplete or missing documents? 3. Provided the borrower timely submitted all documents requested in the initial notice of incomplete information (“5-day letter”) and earlier ADRL letters, did the Servicer afford the borrower at least 30 days to submit any additional required documents from the last ADRL before referring the loan to foreclosure or proceeding to foreclosure sale? | |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
# 31 | ||||||
Standards: IV.C.4.g IV.G.2.a | Loan Modification Denial Notice Disclosure | Y/N for Questions 1 -2 | 5% | Population Definition: 1st lien borrowers declined in the review period for a loan modification application. Error Definition: Loans where the answer to any one of the test questions is a No. | 1. Did first lien loan modification denial notices sent to the borrower provide: a. the reason for denial; b. the factual information considered by the Servicer; and c. a timeframe for the borrower to provide evidence that the eligibility determination was in error? 2. Following the Servicer’s denial of a loan modification application, is there evidence the Servicer or the assigned SPOC communicated the availability of other loss mitigation alternatives to the borrower in writing? | |
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
# 32 | ||||||
Standards: | SPOC Implementation and Effectiveness | Y/N for Questions 1 -3 | 5% for Question 1 | Population Definition: | 1. Is there evidence that Servicer identified and provided updated contact information to the borrower upon assignment of a new SPOC if a | |
IV.C.2 | Y/N for Questions 2 -3 | For Question 1: 1st lien borrowers who were reassigned a SPOC for loss mitigation assistance in the review period For Question 2 and 3: Quarterly review of policies or procedures Error Definition: Failure on any one of the test questions for this Metric. | previously designated SPOC is unable to act as the primary point of contact? 2. Is there evidence of implementation of management routines or other processes to review the results of departmental level SPOC scorecards or other performance evaluation tools? 5 3. Is there evidence of the use of tools or management routines to monitor remediation, when appropriate, for the SPOC program if it is not achieving targeted program metrics? | |||
A | B | C | D | E | F | |
Metric | Measurements | Loan Level Tolerance for Error 1 | Threshold Error Rate2 | Test Loan Population and Error Definition | Test Questions | |
# 33 | ||||||
Standards: I.B.5 | Billing Statement Accuracy | For test question 1: Amounts overstated by the greater of $99 or 1% of the correct unpaid principal balance. For test questions 2 and 3: Amounts overstated by the greater of $50 or 3% of the total balance for the test question | 5% | Population Definition: Monthly billing statements sent to borrowers in the review period. 6 Error Definition: The # of Loans where the net sum of errors on any one of the test questions exceeds the applicable allowable tolerance. | 1. Does the monthly billing statement accurately show, as compared to the system of record at the time of the billing statement, the unpaid principal balance? 2. Does the monthly billing statement accurately show as compared to the system of record at the time of the billing statement each of the following: a. total payment amount due; and, b. fees and charges assessed for the relevant time period? 3. Does the monthly billing statement accurately show as compared to the system of record at the time of the billing statement the allocation of payments, including a notation if any payment has been posted to a “suspense or unapplied funds account”? |
• | Documents that provide an overview of the program, policy or procedures related to periodic performance evaluations, including the frequency thereof; or |
• | Sample departmental level SPOC scorecard or other performance evaluation tools that reflect performance and quality metrics, evidence of the use of thresholds to measure non-performance, identifiers when remediation is required and evidence that such remediation was identified by management, when appropriate. |
A. | Among other things, the Consent Judgment requires Ocwen to pay or cause to be paid $127,300,000.00 (the “Borrower Payment Amount”) by electronic funds transfer no later than ten (10) days of receiving notice from the Administrator appointed under Exhibit B. Ocwen shall also undertake, for the purposes specified in the Consent Judgment, certain consumer relief activities as set forth in Exhibit C to such Consent Judgment, and will be obligated to make certain payments (the “Consumer Relief Payments”) in the event that it does not or they do not complete the Consumer Relief Requirements set forth in Exhibit C to the Consent Judgment. This Release shall become effective upon payment of the Borrower Payment Amount. The CFPB may declare this Release null and void if Ocwen does not make the Consumer Relief Payments required under this Consent Judgment and fails to cure such non-payment within thirty (30) days of written notice by the CFPB, except that the Released Parties, other than Ocwen, are released upon the payment of the Borrower Payment Amount, at which time this nullification provision is only operative against Ocwen. |
C. | Notwithstanding any other term of this Release, the CFPB specifically reserves and does not release any liability for conduct other than conduct related to the Mortgage Servicing Practices asserted or that might have been asserted in the complaint. Furthermore, the CFPB specifically reserves and does not release any liability arising under any provision of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, or any other statute or law that prohibits discrimination of persons based on race, color, national origin, gender, disability, or any other protected status. |
222>32T44`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`!1110`4444`%%%%`#)/NC
M_?C_`/1BU_AB_P#!03_D_3]MS_L[O]I/_P!7+XTK_ 3JWA^X_:$;]GKP5J*D8:"7PI^Q[X5_9XA>Q89#6EWJ-\)
MU8K>RW05-L/_``V/^UMX]6W;X'_\$T_C@EG?$_QI\!/!$=RJMQ<77P8U>U65`3:3QDHP
M!VW@+_@F-_P3Z^&^HIK>@_LC_`S5/%< A^'OCO]FKQUX8U]/$,'P(_;,_:1^'7COP]\1H/)U+
MPOXY6T^&MO\`"M?&PNFM]1\+:W8>(=9E,%GXD;7K)Q=:0;2__OGHH`_%?_AP
M#_P3?_Z%O]IK_P`3M_;;_P#H@*/^'`'_``3?_P"A<_::_P#$[?VV_P#Z("OV
MHHH`_%?_`(<`?\$W_P#H7/VFO_$[?VV__H@*/^'`'_!-_P#Z%S]IK_Q.W]MO
M_P"B`K]J**`/Q7_X<`?\$W_^A<_::_\`$[?VV_\`Z("C_AP!_P`$W_\`H7/V
MFO\`Q.W]MO\`^B`K]J**`/Q7_P"'`'_!-_\`Z%S]IK_Q.W]MO_Z("C_AP!_P
M3?\`^A<_::_\3M_;;_\`H@*_:BB@#\5_^'`'_!-__H7/VFO_`!.W]MO_`.B`
MH_X<`_\`!-__`*%O]IK_`,3M_;;_`/H@*_:BB@#^`7_@JE_P;`_MF?'_`/:4
MBN?V&C\-?`W[,7@?PYH%GX*L?CI^V1^T;\2?'FN>-9[9=1\9>.[N#XF67Q3?
MP7/-J$]IX:TK2_#FO+;RZ1X3TW6[S;J.J3V]G_67_P`$\?V(]`_9S_9[^#9\
M8_L^?LP?`_\`::TWP%HNC?&;6/V<_AM\.;;1O$?CG1[8Z/K/BW3_`!M!\/\`
MPYXKU6/QF+./Q/<0ZSOO-*N=7N-$:YOH=.BO)_TOHH`P#I.IMC=XBOFVG(W6
M&BL0?4$Z<<&E_LK5/^ACOO\`P`T7_P"5];U%`_`&5JG_0QWW_@!HO_`,KZ
M/[*U3_H8[[_P`T7_`.5];U%`&!_9&I;MW_"0WN[^]_9^B[OS_L[-9.N^"[;Q
M1IESHGB6Z@\0:/>`+=Z5KGA_PSJ^FW2CHMQ8:CI%S:3*.PEA8#TY-=K10!^>
MOBK_`()6_L!^,;U]7U3]E3X&Z3XC9YI1XP^'GPZT/X->.8YYR3)=1>./@M'\
M._%L=V221=#63.A9ML@#,&YQ?^":6D>&KJWNO@]^VG_P4,^"L=BN-/T;1/VI
M=:^+_A.Q2-`+>UM_"7[5'A_]H'14T^!PS+9)!'&RNT3L8T@6']+:*`/S1E_9
M]_X*5^#)9;GX>_\`!0GX;?$NUA:/[-HW[3W[&7A'6+^\C7):*\\8_LX_$S]G
MN*"5^%^UQ>`[@*G)M'DS(WY%?\%H_P#@H=_P60_X)]?L5>+O'EI^SY^SYJEU
MXHD7P7+^U5^SOXV\?>*]$_9Z?6+FUL[7Q?XT^"7Q.^%UGJ>E7VM)<3:3X&\5
M/\0_%G@;0/%[Z?'XMMY;FY\/Z1X@_JCKG?%OA+POX]\+^(?!/C;P]HOBWP?X
MMT74_#?BCPOXDTRSUKP_XB\/:U9S:=K&AZWI&H0W%AJFDZI87$]GJ%A>02VU
MU;2R12QLK4`?Y57_``;N_P#!5+_@HY\%?VO+C]GWX*>"_'7[:'AW]J#Q;XB\
M6?$#X)^(?&\NGWZ?$34HIKW7OC[%\4O%.C^,+7X=7MM'J/Q>\7:_IFH:)X
MJT",_P!OV\_B>U\+:E9_Z)+Q?\%=_%\R0QW/_!/7X":;,5#W;1_M#?M4>(+6
M)I&5BL26?[)?A^:X6%UE7(:#S8#$V8[DR69_P3Y_X)(_L1_\$R)/BU>_LJ_#
M:[T#7/C)XLU'7_$OBCQ7JY\6>*=+\-RWS7^@_"KPSK]Y:0ZCI?PO\'2LQT#0
M)IKW4KR?RM3\5ZWXDU>VM-0MOTNH`_-BT_93_;M\22R#XE_\%//&VCV5Q&4N
M;#]FW]E3]G'X2IM>+:RVNJ?&+2OVG]?M-DJQR0S0ZC'<*&N$>1O-@-G6C_X)
MA>!-;EN9/BU^U;_P4#^.$5TYDN-+\;_MC?%+P3X9N&,HF"S^#_V>;GX'>%GA
M5C*BP#21$(9W@"^3%:I;?IA10!^>?AG_`()4?\$^_"5Q'?Z7^R1^S]J.M1/'
M*OB?QW\*O"WQ:\8-/%*9H[F3QC\7[3Q]XHDNUE.\73ZN;CA%\S9'&J?9'A3X
M;Z)X$TJ+0O!,.E>#]$@2*.#2/"WA/PCX=TN%((Q%"D6GZ-H=C9QI%$JQ1*D*
MB.-0B`*`*]$HH`P&TG4GQO\`$5ZV.1NT_16P?49TXXI1I6IC@>(KX#T%AHO_
M`,KJWJ*`,'^RM4_Z&.^_\`-%_P#E?1_96J?]#'??^`&B_P#ROK>HH`P?[*U3
M_H8[[_P`T7_Y7T?V5JG_`$,=]_X`:+_\KZWJ*`,'^RM4_P"ACOO_```T7_Y7
MT?V5JG_0QWW_`(`:+_\`*^MZB@#!_LK5/^ACOO\`P`T7_P"5]']E:I_T,=]_
MX`:+_P#*^MZB@#!_LK5/^ACOO_`#1?\`Y7T?V5JG_0QWW_@!HO\`\KZWJ*`,
M'^RM4_Z&.^_\`-%_^5]']E:I_P!#'??^`&B__*^MZB@#!_LK5/\`H8[[_P``
M-%_^5]']E:I_T,=]_P"`&B__`"OK>HH`P?[*U3_H8[[_`,`-%_\`E?1_96J?
M]#'??^`&B_\`ROK>HH`P?[*U3_H8[[_P`T7_`.5]']E:I_T,=]_X`:+_`/*^
MMZB@#!_LK5/^ACOO_`#1?_E?1_96J?\`0QWW_@!HO_ROK>HH`PAI>I@@GQ%?
M$`@D?8-&&0""1D:>",],CD`\8.#6[110`4444`,D^Z/]^/\`]&+7^&+_`,%!
M/^3]/VW/^SN_VD__`%*OVLO
MVK/$EK^TQ_P4$^+VD2Z3\1?C@UY+9^!?A;X%N=0;5M/_`&=_V7/!FKM/_P`*
MN^!7A64P(\<,WMW:Z=IG6_\$X/V,?A)\!?`5Y^T+9?%
M"\_:N_:&_:NTCP]\4_C%^VOXOM+/_A+OCG8^)]-LO$7A.#PC;6X>Q^'?P,T3
M1KS38OA9\)?"C6WACPQH,5A)/'J.N-=ZG+^E]`'/_P!HZW_T`?\`RK67_P`;
MH_M'6_\`H`_^5:R_^-UT%%`'/_VCK?\`T`?_`"K67_QNC^T=;_Z`/_E6LO\`
MXW7044`<_P#VCK?_`$`?_*M9?_&Z/[1UO_H`_P#E6LO_`(W7044`<_\`VCK?
M_0!_\JUE_P#&Z/[1UO\`Z`/_`)5K+_XW7044`<__`&CK?_0!_P#*M9?_`!NC
M^T=;_P"@#_Y5K+_XW7044`<__:.M_P#0!_\`*M9?_&Z/[1UO_H`_^5:R_P#C
M==!10!S_`/:.M_\`0!_\JUE_\;H_M'6_^@#_`.5:R_\`C==!10!@#4-:+*#H
M.`6`)_M:R.`2`3@1Y.!DX')Q@JSQ>(S_:P@AM%TI7OOQTT3]D+]J[X;?%'Q5\3="^%/P:^*?@/4
MOVI?VRO$5[^SWXL^(]KH'A_Q'\%?VKO"GP>TK3?&&FWDG@3Q#X2TCQ[X/\0?
M#;Q/:>)_!.L^';S3M>\!_%WXAO8>)KGQ!>3Z3K/:>*_V3OV@O"WQ8^.OCKX5
M_!;X#-X;\5^!_P#@FEX5\(^%X-;T+3K?3H/V1?B#\4-;\>S_``^TS6_!UQH'
MA7Q+X(T+Q_X
Subsequent Events
|
12 Months Ended |
---|---|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
|
Subsequent Events [Abstract] | |
Subsequent Events | Note 30 — Subsequent Events On January 22, 2014, we announced that we had entered into an agreement to acquire MSRs and related servicing advances from Wells Fargo. The portfolio of approximately 184,000 loans with a UPB of approximately $39.0 billion consists primarily of non-Agency residential mortgage loans. We recorded a $10.0 million good faith deposit at December 31, 2013 in connection with this transaction. An additional $15.0 million was deposited in escrow in January 2014. The transaction is subject to receipt of various approvals and consents and other customary closing requirements. In early February 2014, the NY DFS requested that Ocwen put an indefinite hold on the acquisition from Wells Fargo. The NY DFS expressed an interest in evaluating further our ability to handle more servicing. We have agreed to place the transaction on indefinite hold. We are cooperating with the NY DFS on this matter. On February 4, 2014, we finalized amendments to various sale supplements and servicing supplements entered into in connection with a Master Servicing Rights Purchase Agreement (MSRPA) dated as of October 1, 2012, and Master Subservicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, with HLSS. Each of these amendments is effective as of October 1, 2013. In connection with the amendments to the supplements, if a mortgage loan included in a sale of Rights to MSRs is refinanced by us, the excess servicing fees and rights to MSRs related to the new mortgage loan are transferred to HLSS effective with the prepayment of the refinanced mortgage loan, subject to certain thresholds. The preceding applies only after the aggregate UPB of refinanced mortgage loans refinanced by us exceeds 0.5% of the aggregate UPB of all rights to MSRs sold to HLSS under the sale supplements measured as the current UPB of rights to MSRs as of the beginning of each calendar year plus the weighted average UPB of rights to MSRs sold during the year. In addition, the interest rate applied to Excess Servicing Advances, as defined in the MSRPA, was changed to one-month LIBOR plus 275 basis points. On February 26, 2014, we issued $123.6 million of Ocwen Asset Servicing Income Series (OASIS), Series 2014-1 Notes (Notes) secured by Ocwen-owned MSRs relating to Freddie Mac mortgages of approximately $11.8 billion UPB (such mortgages, the reference pool). Noteholders are entitled to receive a monthly payment amount equal to the sum of: a) the designated servicing fee amount (21 basis points of the UPB of the reference pool); b) any termination payment amounts; c) any excess refinance amounts; and d) the note redemption amounts, each as defined in the indenture supplement for the Notes. The Notes have a final stated maturity of February 2028. This transaction is recorded as a financing and mitigates our match-funding risk as a result of prepayments as the noteholders’ payments vary over the life of the Notes based on the duration of the underlying Freddie Mac MSRs. As disclosed in Note 28 — Commitments and Contingencies, on December 19, 2013, we reached an agreement, which was subject to court approval, involving the CFPB and various state attorneys general and other state agencies that regulate the mortgage servicing industry. On February 26, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a consent judgment approving the agreement. |
Business Segment Reporting - Schedule of Segment Reporting Information (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Jun. 30, 2013
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Jun. 30, 2012
|
Mar. 31, 2012
|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||
Results of Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | $ 340,876 | $ 346,260 | $ 371,508 | [1] | $ 242,650 | $ 99,097 | $ 92,793 | $ 85,904 | $ 86,113 | $ 1,301,294 | $ 363,907 | $ 239,547 | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 22,355 | 8,329 | 8,876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (412,842) | (223,455) | (132,770) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 335,223 | 257,508 | 122,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | 7,873,770 | 5,685,962 | 7,873,770 | 5,685,962 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing [Member]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | 1,895,921 | [2],[3] | 840,630 | [2],[3] | 494,834 | [2],[3] | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 1,096,084 | [3],[4] | 344,315 | [3],[4] | 231,201 | [3],[4],[5] | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 799,837 | 496,315 | 263,633 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 1,599 | 9 | 110 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (398,733) | (221,948) | (132,574) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | (28,292) | [2],[3] | (13) | [2],[3] | 4,711 | [2],[3] | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (425,426) | (221,952) | (127,753) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 374,411 | 274,363 | 135,880 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | 6,241,757 | 4,575,489 | 6,241,757 | 4,575,489 | 4,301,371 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lending [Member]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | 120,899 | [2],[3] | 356 | [2],[3] | [2],[3] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 98,194 | [3],[4] | 409 | [3],[4] | [3],[4],[5] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 22,705 | (53) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 16,295 | 309 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (13,508) | (514) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 10,132 | [2],[3] | [2],[3] | [2],[3] | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 12,919 | (205) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 35,624 | (258) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | 1,195,812 | 476,434 | 1,195,812 | 476,434 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Items and Other [Member]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | 22,092 | [2],[3] | 5,122 | [2],[3] | 2,346 | [2],[3] | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 107,188 | [3],[4] | 19,667 | [3],[4] | 8,971 | [3],[4],[5] | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (85,096) | (14,545) | (6,625) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 4,461 | 8,011 | 8,766 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (601) | (993) | (196) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 6,424 | [2],[3] | (9,070) | [2],[3] | (14,830) | [2],[3] | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 10,284 | (2,052) | (6,260) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | (74,812) | (16,597) | (12,885) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | 436,201 | 634,039 | 436,201 | 634,039 | 426,653 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Eliminations [Member]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | (639) | [2],[3] | (905) | [2],[3] | (1,289) | [2],[3] | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | (172) | [3],[4] | (484) | [3],[4] | (625) | [3],[4],[5] | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (467) | (421) | (664) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 467 | [2],[3] | 421 | [2],[3] | 664 | [2],[3] | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 467 | 421 | 664 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Business Segments Consolidated [Member]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue | 2,038,273 | [2],[3] | 845,203 | [2],[3] | 495,891 | [2],[3] | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 1,301,294 | [3],[4] | 363,907 | [3],[4] | 239,547 | [3],[4],[5] | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 736,979 | 481,296 | 256,344 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 22,355 | 8,329 | 8,876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (412,842) | (223,455) | (132,770) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | (11,269) | [2],[3] | (8,662) | [2],[3] | (9,455) | [2],[3] | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net | (401,756) | (223,788) | (133,349) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 335,223 | 257,508 | 122,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | $ 7,873,770 | $ 5,685,962 | $ 7,873,770 | $ 5,685,962 | $ 4,728,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Borrowings - Maturities (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Dec. 31, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
---|---|---|
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
2014 | $ 2,853,743 | |
2015 | 27,219 | |
2016 | 11,690 | |
2017 | 11,690 | |
2018 | 1,238,141 | |
Thereafter | 0 | |
Total Balance | 4,142,483 | |
Fair Value | 4,127,690 | |
Long-term Debt, Gross | 1,284,229 | 306,308 |
Match Funded Liabilties [Member]
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
2014 | 2,364,814 | |
2015 | 0 | |
2016 | 0 | |
2017 | 0 | |
2018 | 0 | |
Thereafter | 0 | |
Total Balance | 2,364,814 | |
Fair Value | 2,364,814 | |
Other Secured Borrowings [Member]
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
2014 | 488,929 | |
2015 | 27,219 | |
2016 | 11,690 | |
2017 | 11,690 | |
2018 | 1,238,141 | |
Thereafter | 0 | |
Total Balance | 1,777,669 | 790,371 |
Fair Value | 1,762,876 | |
Other Secured Borrowings [Member] | Servicing [Member]
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
Long-term Debt, Gross | 1,323,286 | 407,695 |
Other Secured Borrowings [Member] | Lending [Member]
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
Long-term Debt, Gross | 455,020 | 388,075 |
Financing Liabilities [Member]
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
Long-term Debt, Gross | 1,284,229 | 306,308 |
Financing Liabilities [Member] | Servicing [Member]
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
Long-term Debt, Gross | 651,060 | 306,308 |
Financing Liabilities [Member] | Lending [Member]
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
Long-term Debt, Gross | 633,169 | 0 |
Financing Liabilities [Member] | Lending [Member] | HMBS - Related Borrowings [Member]
|
||
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||
Long-term Debt, Gross | $ 615,576 | $ 0 |
Borrowings (Tables)
|
12 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt Disclosure [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of Match Funded Liabilities | Match funded liabilities are comprised of the following at December 31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of Financing Liabilities | Financing liabilities are comprised of the following at December 31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of Other Secured Borrowings | Other secured borrowings are comprised of the following at December 31:
On September 23, 2013, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to the related Pledge and Security Agreement. These amendments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of Maturities of Borrowings | Aggregate long-term borrowings by maturity date at December 31, 2013 are as follows:
|
Match Funded Advance (Tables)
|
12 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers and Servicing [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of Advance Payments by Financial Institution on Foreclosed Properties | Advances, net, representing payments made on behalf of borrowers or on foreclosed properties, consisted of the following at December 31:
Match funded advances on residential loans we service for others are comprised of the following at December 31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of Activity In Match Funded Advances [Table Text Block] | The following table summarizes the activity in match funded advances for the years ended December 31:
|
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities - Schedule of Changes in Notional Balance of Holdings of Derivatives (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
9 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Interest Rate Lock Commitments [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Interest Rate Lock Commitments [Member]
|
Sep. 30, 2013
U S Treasury Futures [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2012
U S Treasury Futures [Member]
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Forward Mortgage Backed Securities Trades [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Forward Mortgage Backed Securities Trades [Member]
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Interest Rate Cap [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Interest Rate Cap [Member]
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Interest Rate Swap [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Interest Rate Swap [Member]
|
|||||
Derivative Notional Balance [Roll Forward] | ||||||||||||||||
Notional Amount, beginning balance | $ 1,112,519 | $ 109,000 | $ 1,638,979 | $ 1,025,000 | $ 1,495,955 | |||||||||||
Derivative Additions | 5,887,759 | 85,000 | 10,578,176 | 1,900,000 | 1,280,000 | |||||||||||
Amortization Of Derivative | (228,806) | 0 | (33,372) | (56,000) | 0 | |||||||||||
Derivative Maturities | (5,124,849) | 0 | (4,156,314) | 0 | (295,604) | |||||||||||
Derivative Terminations | (895,187) | (194,000) | (7,076,821) | (1,001,000) | (2,480,351) | |||||||||||
Notional Amount, ending balance | 751,436 | 0 | 950,648 | 1,868,000 | 0 | |||||||||||
Fair value of derivative assets (liabilities) at: | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative, Fair Value, Net | $ 15,494 | [1] | $ 10,795 | [1] | $ 5,781 | $ 8,433 | $ (1,258) | $ 0 | $ (1,719) | $ 6,905 | $ 168 | $ 442 | $ (10,836) | $ 0 | ||
Derivative Maturity Period | Jan. 2014 - Apr. 2014 | Jan. 2014 - Feb. 2014 | Nov. 2016 | |||||||||||||
|
,YHTTL",6N.T3X
MZ`1469=/>K4CF31[)QL(/UKG9`]#?X@,=L1F1K'81$4YJHSQ)*6C4+*B$VUE
M&0P1S8Y`\^N._-!9;`S)Z=17YH('FJ`RRCA+0T2S(]"<[W[DY(H)Z^Q%.(-P
M=@2<[K2*6=X;(JM=P:I;B4)ZV@>'B&]7X.O.T-PFY+ ].
M:S=,9G'JARR(76?'9?=:JG==I[C(3M3_(4A3[Y,$)DD(-$T\F`7SF,7)\RP>
M,M(K^9)W^6;5BJL#[0%SRG.NFHTM(;-:0A2#E(4*?E91C8%A":/OF\"/YROO
M'50I#&B+(&CJ.X@BLD=$&/80#YCT=&"10SJAW]-144HG#/H\FO$6(7-=!+6$
MS!H@,\%B)V924:B2M2:6)M%@+@1%%BBAB&P*0=A`$HO-37XUNG9A!7=E_7A!
MY]@B*-7582QFEK1:DLP&)*D?_T!ZZ$2+@NX$2WH5I53FZ9`)8A+-Y"5A8912
MJAD!A.' &(CR,!CH0X
M$N%(C".)$A'3`,8HT\#*1PO#_1C'SV`6IW@:IM;,F<^D;>>^0Y1YX"H*Q,=5
M`AP)<23"D1A'$B4BYH$=VU3#@1_KI.$@GX7ATI5EJYL,^%P@[N_W':(PV<,1
M'T<"'`EQ),*1&$?8Y3?SY7&C>1[XY3:_0"U(=2)[O1XZ7D"F,.GR9$[B,[*2H1XR)(I^E'4P.I;$/
M9BJ[W1VFJ@F"F^Y((9N8HJDIGIH29,*3RQYVFUSWJO[=:7CE&TYY^5Y%%NZD
M[X0]2,XZ=*;N)%LI
M99CIE*CA*)T*P2D(YM***5N=RQY%'*=3(3@%X0S!;"WY[)MI0LV%KT32(][6
M`5TE6ZY3J$ZLAS@(;@=3.&D$M\G6UWN(/D%W)ZVP-DK$I5-)U))?ZJXFV!`4
M6#H#`XS&08'U-1^BZ$Y6AT[;5MGO7V(\WB:AM-(<;K3#B@_1,PBEL>25B$TK
MQKF?UFD_4P1P#ANE;*85FAI^'Z*(I71*!!N%9E1Z@R6C:!DPWM'@X.))MWNX
M8I4C8F&=$L%&H;#2&2RP:!AD^@W/#P=7L2Y]IE.,1]YR<I5>
M$'TWW1%@E:74ES9*99],1'9+!"NAT-3#AO1&Z%V.+4&I6%@,Q$@$&X7"PG1;
M:B&2S32SN5$+2C1.],3455HQ"DO*22BI-`^S:B/T%`@S[K1IHETS;Y2(`=FZ
M)8*54%8XDXU5-CNO!B-4L;!.B6"C4%B[A
W>_K*),]U&/T>2RI'4SY&D