10-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011

OR

o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from ___ to ___

Commission File Number: 000-19061

USCORP

(Exact name of the Company as specified in its charter)

Nevada	87-0403330
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4535 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200, Las Vegas, NV 89102

(Address of principal executive offices)

(702) 933-4034

(The Company’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class	Names of each exchange on which registered
None	None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Shares, $0.01 Par Value

Indicate by check mark whether the Company (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of The Company’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a small departing company.

Large Accelerated Filer ¨	Accelerated Filer ¨
Non-Accelerated Filer ¨	Small Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

State the issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $0.0

State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such stock, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. As of January 9, 2012, the value of such stock was $2,643,897. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by certain persons who own 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

Number of shares outstanding of Issuer’s class A common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding on September 30, 2011: 194,966,611 shares. Number of shares outstanding of Issuer’s class B common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding on September 30, 2011: 5,060,500 shares.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: The following documents are incorporated by reference herein below: (a) Our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, filed with the SEC on form S-8 on October 29, 2009, and amended on December 29, 2009, and (b) On September 22, 2004 USCorp adopted a Code of Ethics for officers and directors of the Company, filed previously with the SEC on Form 10-KSB on November 26, 2004.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes ¨; No x

FORM 10-K

September 30, 2011

USCORP

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
PART I		3
ITEM 1	Description of Business	3
Item 1A	Risk Factors	16
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	19
ITEM 2	Properties	19
ITEM 3	Legal Proceedings	20
ITEM 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	20
PART II		21
ITEM 5	Market for The Company’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	21
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	22
ITEM 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
Item 7A	Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure about Market Risk	25
ITEM 8	Financial Statements	25
ITEM 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants	43
ITEM 9A(T)	Controls and Procedures	43
ITEM 9B	Other Information	43
PART III		43
ITEM 10	Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance	43
ITEM 11	Executive Compensation	45
ITEM 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	46
ITEM 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	46
ITEM 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	47
ITEM 15	Exhibits	47
Signatures		48

2

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the information contained in this Annual Report may constitute forward-looking statements or statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about future events. The words “estimate”, “plan”, “intend”, “expect”, “anticipate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements which involve, and are subject to, known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause the Company’s actual results, financial or operating performance, or achievements to differ from future results, financial or operating performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Projections and assumptions contained and expressed herein were reasonably based on information available to the Company at the time so furnished and as of the date of this filing. All such projections and assumptions are subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, and no assurance can be given that the projections will be realized. Potential investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

BACKGROUND

USCorp (hereafter, the “Company”, “we” and “our” refer to USCorp) was formed in May 1989 in the state of Nevada as The Movie Greats Network, Inc. In August 1992, the Company changed its name to The Program Entertainment Group, Inc. In August 1997, the Company changed its name to Santa Maria Resources, Inc. In September 2000, the Company changed its name to Fantasticon, Inc. and in January 2002 the Company changed its name to USCorp.

In April 2002, the Company acquired USMetals, Inc. (“USMetals”), a Nevada corporation, and holder of 141 unpatented lode mining claims by issuing 24,200,000 shares of Company Class A Common Stock in exchange for all of the then issued and outstanding shares of USMetals. USMetals became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On March 22, 2011 USCorp through its wholly owned subsidiary USMetals entered into an Asset Funding/Operation and Shareholders Agreement with Arizona Gold Corp., a private British Columbia Corporation (“AGC”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, AGC Corp, a private Arizona company (“AGCAZ”), providing for the sale of USMetals’ 172 Arizona mining claims known as the Twin Peaks Project (the “Twin Peaks Project”) to AGCAZ in exchange for 90,200,000 shares or 61.34% of AGC’s common stock (the “Transaction”).  The Twin Peaks Project now consists of 268 Lode and 8 Placer Claims.

Southwest Resource Development, Inc. (“Southwest”) was formed and organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 3, 2004 as a wholly owned subsidiary of USCorp. On or about May 29, 2004, Southwest acquired 8 lode and 21 placer mining claims (the “Mining Claims”) in Imperial County, California. Since being formed by USCorp Southwest has added additional claims for a total of 200 lode and placer claims that we refer to as the Picacho Salton Project.

Both USMetals and Southwest have acquired additional mining claims since being acquired and USCorp has performed significant exploration work, including the completion of feasibility studies, environmental, ecological and biological reports and performed drilling as described more fully below (See “USMETALS - Summary of Organization and Business” and “SOUTHWEST RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, INC. - Summary of Organization and Business”).

OVERVIEW

USCorp is an “exploration stage” company. The Company’s mining interests are held in the names of its wholly owned subsidiaries, USMetals, Inc. (“USMetals”) and Southwest Resource Development, Inc. (“Southwest”). USMetal’s operations center on completing exploration and beginning development of the mining property known as the Twin Peaks Project and the mining properties which the Company refers to as the Picacho Salton Project. The Company has realized no revenues from operations to date.

The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, USMetals, owns 276 unpatented mining claims in the Eureka Mining District of Yavapai County, Arizona, called the Twin Peaks Project; and through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Southwest, owns a total of 200 unpatented mining claims in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County, California, called the Picacho Salton Project.

3

A. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS.

We have included in this discussion of Recent Developments summaries of recent press releases, without providing updating or clarifying statements about what we said at the time of the press release. Additional information, including updates and clarifications, if any, follow in subsequent paragraphs and in other sections of this Report.

At the beginning of Fiscal 2011, in October 2010, we announced signing a Joint Venture Agreement. In November we relased additional details about the agreement and on February 2, 2011 we revealed the agreement was with Yasheng Group, a Chinese agricultural conglomerate, and that we had terminated the agreement due to the failure of Yasheng to perform. Under the terms of the agreement, failure to perform by either party within the stated time period unwound the terms, conditions, obligations and duties of the agreement between the parties so that neither party was harmed by having entered into the terminated agreement.

Later in February we entered into an agreement with Constellation Asset Advisors, after they had completed months of extensive due diligence regarding USCorp and our mining properties, however after we determined they would not be able to assist us, we terminated the agreement amicably.

In March we disclosed information about the OTC Markets and the inclusion of USCorp’s Class A Common Stock in the OTC Markets’ OTCQB trading platform.

In April we were pleased to announce a significant renegotiation and reduction of our debt. We are no longer in default on our debentures or gold bullion loan. We have paid down our debenture debt from $700,000 to $550,000; negotiated a payment schedule of an additional $50,000 which was paid in December, 2011; and we have renegotiated the due dates for the remaining amounts due on the debentures and our gold bullion loan until March 31, 2012.

One of the most significant events of the year was announced on June 13, 2011: Our agreement with Arizona Gold Corp (“AGC”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, AGC Corp (“AGCAZ”) to finance and complete the exploration and development of our Twin Peaks Project mining claims group. The transfer of the mining claims to AGCAZ was consummated in stages in order to protect USCorp shareholders’ investment in the development of the Twin Peaks Project. Later that month we introduced the Board Members of AGC and the project management team as well as the expansion of the Twin Peaks Project as follows:

William Hay, Chairman, holds an MBA from Queens University in Canada and has an engineering degree in Mathematics. Mr. Hay was the co-founder and CEO of Thane International, a global direct marketing company with over 200 employees and grossing $400 million (USD) a year in revenue, with office locations in La Quinta, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Sydney, Copenhagen and Mexico City from 1990 to 2005. Moving on from 2005 to present, Mr. Hay served as the chairman of the board of directors and president of Direct Marketing Holdings, which served as a parent company to Thane International. He also serves as manager at Kilauea Ohana Plantation, LLC.

Denise Dubarry-Hay, Secretary and Treasurer and Director, was also co-founder of Thane International. She has also served as director of the Palm Springs International Film Festival, Thane International, Electric Retailers Association, Woman’s Leader’s Forum and many more. Personal projects that Dubarry developed grossed over $1 billion (USD); she has a powerful sense of what works in the market and a track record to prove it.

Mark Peterson is an economic geologist with over 27 years of mining industry experience. He is currently vice president of exploration of New Gold Inc., an intermediate gold producer which is projected to produce over 1 million ounces of gold this year. Mr. Peterson previously held positions as VP of exploration for Metallica Resources Inc., as well as exploration geologist with Lac Minerals Inc.

J. Robert Swidler, Director, holds an MBA from Cornell University and a Bachelor’s of Communications from McGill University. Mr. Swindler is affiliated with Egon Zehnder International, the worldwide executive search firm and management consultant. He is formerly founder and president of J. Robert Swidler, Inc., Montreal/Toronto; and a partner at Touche Ross & Co./P.S. Ross & Partners, Management Consultants in Montreal.

Dean Belbas, Director, retired as a senior VP of General Mills after 41 years with the company. He worked in public relations, consumer goods marketing and corporate and investor communications. Mr. Belbas also served on the board of directors on NASDAQ companies, three private companies and a privately held trust company.

Robert Dultz serves AGC as Vice President. His biographical information appears under Management.

4

Since its inception some 42 years ago, Pincock Allen & Holt, (http://www.pincock.com) part of Runge Limited, has earned a reputation as a premier international consulting and engineering firm. They are one of the oldest and most respected organizations within the mining and energy consulting community. Pincock Allen & Holt has an unparalleled reputation for integrity and for technical, commercial, and engineering excellence. Its corporate resume includes more than 3,900 successfully completed assignments for many of the world’s foremost precious metal, base metal, industrial mineral, coal and energy operations. Pincock Allen & Holt reports are widely used to secure project financing and successfully undergo reviews and audits.

USCorp originally had 141 unpatented mining claims on Bureau of Land Management ground controlled by USMetals. The claims covered an area of 2,820 acres. Over the years USCorp added 31 additional claims to bring the total to 172, and following the strong recommendations of Pincock Allen & Holt, AGC added an additional 104 claims west of the original claim block to cover several new vein systems lying outside the original 141 claim boundary.

In July we released the result of assays of grab samples made by PAH’s Bart Stone. Surface grab samples in the area provided assay results that confirmed our original expectations for the area. In a grab assay situation, one would be very happy if 20% of the samples showed the presence of gold and silver. Assay results from samples taken over a period of several weeks in the Spring of 2011 and prepared by highly respected Jacobs Assay Office, established in 1880, indicated that of the 105 samples 48 of them or 45.7% showed the presence of gold above 0.10 per ounce ton and/or silver above 0.25 per ounce per ton. Some selected examples of these assays include:

Samples	Gold oz/t	Silver oz/t
QDER	.010	17.95
PIC	.002	.45
SDW2	1.152	1.05
WASSAMI*	.736	23.35
BSOC1	.902	53.00
WENCRBS (duplicate)	.380	.40
WCQZ	.599	.25
DUPLICATE WCQZ	.663	.60

*taken from sand/gravel at base of dike

The above assays are primarily those taken from the new claim area recommended by Pincock Allen & Holt and secured by the Company.

Later in July we received approval of our Mining Plan of Operations from the Bureau of Land Management that is an expansion of the previously approved 3 Phase program in order to include sections of the recently expanded Twin Peaks Project.

In August we released a summary of a report by PAH’s chief geologist Bart Stone regarding the geology of the Twin Peaks Project claims. The conclusions of that report are significant: PAH concluded that the Twin Peaks property has definite upside potential, that “a potential 5,000,000 tons or more of resources” [gold and silver] resides in three lengthy quartz vein structures, including two discovered during PAH's site visit, and that other gold and silver mineralization [that is, gold and silver bearing ore] also occurs at fault intersections, and in known historic workings on the property.

In October we announced that drilling would be conducted by Boart Longyear Drilling (“Boart Longyear”), the leading provider of mineral exploration drilling services and drilling products in the world. Boart Longyear is the only integrated drilling services and products provider, combining engineering excellence, global manufacturing facilities and the most experienced drilling services group in the business…With over 120 years of global mineral exploration expertise and the most innovative products in the market.

In November we launched our new web site, www.uscorpgold.com and published a letter to our shareholders that summarized our accomplishments over the past year. A few days later we announced that drilling had begun on our Twin Peaks Project and that the areas that are being drilled include those identified in a Pincock Allen & Holt (PAH) report. According to that report, the property is believed to have definite upside potential with gold and silver mineralization occurring at fault intersections, in known historic workings on the property and in five extensive mineralized quartz vein structures, including four that were discovered in the past year.

5

B. DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT BUSINESS OPERATIONS.

The Company’s plan of operation and business objectives are to engage in (a) the precious metals exploration, mining, and refining business, and (b) the acquisition of qualified candidates engaged in businesses that would complement the Company’s existing or proposed operations. All of the Company’s California mining claims are held by its wholly owned subsidiary Southwest Resource Development, Inc. As discussed in this report, the Company’s interest in its Arizona mining claims are now held by AGC Corp, an Arizona corporation that is a private, wholly owned subsidiary of Arizona Gold Corp, a private British Columbia corporation.

USMETALS - Summary of Organization and Business.

USMetals (“USMetals”) was formed and organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 3, 2000. On or about April 2, 2002, the Company acquired USMetals and its 141 lode mining claims (the “Mining Claims”). The purpose of USMetals is to engage in the business of acquiring and developing mineral properties, exploring for gold, silver, and other non-ferrous metals and minerals within the contiguous United States. It is the further intention of USMetals to mine and to process any commercially-proven reserves developed at its properties. The company has recently expanded the Twin Peaks Project to a total of 276 Lode and Placer claims.

The Twin Peaks Mining Claims of USMetals, are located in West-Central Arizona, in the Eureka Mining District of Yavapai County, Arizona, approximately 42 miles west of Prescott, Arizona. Within the boundaries of these Mining Claims, more commonly referred to as the “Twin Peaks Project”, are the historic sites of the Crosby, Hayes, Swiss Belle and Gloryhole Mines, past producers of gold and silver. The Twin Peaks Project claims are geographically located in the southwestern division of the Eureka Mining District, which includes many significant mines and prospects. There are tungsten mines in the Camp Wood area, to the northeast, the existing historic gold mines and prospects which abut the Twin Peaks property to the southeast along the Santa Maria River, and tungsten, copper, and zinc mines to the south and southeast. The area has a long history of mining activities. Mining companies can obtain experienced labor, affordable housing, equipment repair, and mining services within the district.

The Santa Maria River traverses the Mining Claims and USMetals  is the only company that holds water rights to that section of the river, a valuable asset for a mining company in this arid country.

All of the Twin Peaks’ mining properties are unpatented mining claims; consequently, the Company has only possessory title with respect to such properties. The claims were duly transferred by official deed from the prior owner to USMetals on March 22, 2002 and from USMetals to AGCAZ in May 2011. The real property upon which the Twin Peaks claims are located is subject to a paramount lien by the United States of America; all of the Company’s claims are subject to the applicable rules and regulations of the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, which administers our use and activities on said Mining Claims. The Company has paid all of the required fees in order to maintain the Twin Peaks Mining Claims for the current periods. All of the necessary documents and affidavits have been filed with the Yavapai County Recorder.

The Company and USMetals have had a number of strategic working relationships with various independent contractors in order to develop its Mining Claims. USMetals further relies on the declarations and valuations formed and given in past geological exploration and geochemical studies. USMetals has had consulting and/or independent contractor relationships with Pincock Allen & Holt (“PAH”) Boart Longyear, LLC, Image2Map Services, LLC, Harris Drilling Company, ALS Chemex, SGS Labs, Country Chemist, and the 129-year-old Jacobs Assay 1880 with offices in Tucson, AZ. that has been recognized by the Bureau of Land Management; Laguna Mountain Environmental, Biozone, Inc. and Wondjina Research Institute. It should be noted that if USMetals was forced to disassociate itself with one or more of the abovementioned independent contractors, it could readily secure the services of other individuals or entities to perform the work or services of equal or greater quality; the loss of any one or all of the abovementioned contractors would not cause USMetals  material adverse effects; however, each of these firms has demonstrated its capability and reliability in assisting the Company and USMetals to develop the Mining Claims, and, to date, the abovementioned contractors have provided invaluable assistance to The Company’s senior executive management in evaluating the potential represented by the Twin Peaks Mining Claims.

6

The Company in 2007 completed a feasibility study on the Twin Peaks Project that identified mineralized material on the property. During fiscal 2009 we completed Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 2.5 of a 3-phase drilling program. For a summary of the results of that drilling program please see “Recent Developments” in our Form 10-K for period ending September 30, 2009 and 2010 respectively. Currently we are in the process of completing Phase 3 of the 2008 drilling program. And completion of the drilling program on the recently acquired additional 104 unpatented mining claims. The current drilling program includes recent discoveries made on the 172 original claims.

SOUTHWEST RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, INC. - Summary of Organization and Business

Southwest Resource Development, Inc. (“Southwest”) was formed and organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 3, 2004 as a wholly owned subsidiary of USCorp. On or about May 29, 2004, Southwest acquired 8 lode and 21 placer mining claims (the “Mining Claims”). This claims group has been expanded to a total of 200 claims consisting of 30 placer claims and 170 lode claims, on approximately 5,760 acres Some of the placer and lode claims cover the same ground.  The purpose of Southwest is to engage in the business of acquiring and developing mineral properties, exploring for gold, silver, and other non-ferrous metals and minerals within the contiguous United States. It is the further intention of Southwest to mine and to process any commercially-proven reserves developed at its properties.

In lieu of cash payment for the original 8 lode and 21 placer claims acquired in 2004 the Company entered into what is essentially a joint venture with the former owners whereby the former owners are entitled to receive 20% of all net smelter returns of gold after expenses, whether paid in cash or in kind. All of the remaining claims are wholly owned by USCorp’s subsidiary, Southwest.

The Company has spent the last 8 years developing and implementing a plan that would bring multiple properties under Company ownership. Through its wholly owned subsidiary, Southwest, the Company has now acquired for development of a total of 200 lode and placer claims of precious metal properties located in the Chocolate Mountain region of the Mesquite Mining District in Imperial County, California: Geological testing has successfully recovered gold and silver from dry washes and feeder rills. Laboratory analysis indicates these findings warrant continued development. A feasibility study that identified mineralized material on the Picacho Salton Project was prepared in 2007. The Company has completed archeological and environmental and ecological reports and submitted a Mining Plan of Operations to drill to the Bureau of Land Management who completed their review of the Plan.

The Chocolate Mountains region, located in southeastern Imperial county of California, includes the Picacho State Park and surrounding areas that has a rich history of gold mining activities dating back to 1775. This property is in a district that has been producing gold since the 1800s. In 1890 a large stamp mill was built beside the Colorado River at the town of Picacho. The Picacho Mine was opened in the Picacho Basin area and a narrow gauge railroad began hauling ore from the mine to the mill. By 1904, the town of Picacho had a population of 2,500 people. The ruins of the mill are in the Picacho State Recreation Area a few miles east of the Picacho Salton Project claims. Thousands of people visit the old mill ruins each year. To the south and west of the Picacho Salton Project claims there are ruins of many old placer and lode workings as well as recently producing major mining operations.

Numerous discoveries of placer gold throughout Imperial County have remained undeveloped due to a common problem encountered by small miners. Due to the lack of an adequate water supply to support placer gold recovery operations in the region, scores of small and medium size mining operations have failed to successfully recover precious metals known to exist throughout the region. Southwest believes it has located a potentially adequate water source. Southwest intends to use a state of the art gold recovery system designed and developed for the specific conditions found on these properties. Based on the recent reports of geologists and engineers, Southwest believes this property has the potential to develop into a significant gold producing operation.

Historically, mining has been carried out in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County using old hard rock mining and placer methods. However, in 1984, new mining methods (“heap leaching”) were used to develop and mine low-grade ore bodies, with an economically viable cut-off grade as low as .01 to .02 ounces of gold per ton. Geological Support Services, LLC recently completed a feasibility study that has identified mineralized material on the Picacho Salton Project. Southwest intends to go into production as soon as possible after approvals and financing are obtained.

7

In 2008 we submitted a Mining Plan of Operations (MPO) to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to conduct a 3-phase drilling program. Our MPO has been approved by the BLM. (see “Recent Developments”)

Property descriptions, locations and nature of ownership.

Picacho Salton Project consisting of 200 Lode and Placer Claims in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County, California, U.S.A. The Claims group is situated on approximately 5,760 acres (see maps below). Some of the most recently added property has common borders to Southwest’s other gold properties. Means of access to the eastern most portion of the property is by an unmarked private dirt road, south of Picacho State Park. Access to other portions of the property are also by various unmarked dirt roads, please see Maps below.

In Arizona the 276 unpatented lode and placer mining claims, covers 5,520 acres, which the Company refers to as the “Twin Peaks Project”. These claims are located in the Eureka Mining District of Yavapai County, Arizona, U.S.A. Access to the property from the west is by county maintained and private dirt roads from Highway 93 (connecting Phoenix, Arizona with Las Vegas, Nevada).

The Company pays an annual Maintenance Fee payment to the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) for each of its claims. Maintenance Fee payments of $140 per claim are due on or before August 31 each year.

Maps indicating the locations of our properties.

1In this Map the boxed areas represent the approximate locations of the company’s Picacho Salton Project mining claims in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County, California.

8

9

2 The number “1” in the map is the approximate location of our Twin Peaks Project claims. The Picacho Salton claims are represented by the number “2” in this map.13

3This map shows the Twin Peak Project claims group outlined in Blue. Shaded areas indicate areas of historical exploration work during the past 30 years.

History of previous operations.

Twin Peaks Project claims group, in the Eureka Mining District of Yavapai County, Arizona: From a historical perspective, Spaniards arrived in the area over 400 years ago and used the Santa Maria River to gain access to the claims area. According to historical sources, the local Native Americans were used by the Spaniards to mine gold and silver in the area, which was refined and shipped to Spain. More recently, in the 1800s, John Lawler and Charles Crosby pioneered the Eureka Mining District. In 1883, John Lawler discovered the area was rich in gold, silver, lead, and zinc.

Charles Crosby first discovered the Crosby Mine and worked his claims from 1906 to 1933. His works are on a mineralized structure and flat zone. When the Crosby Mine opened in 1906, it processed 120 ounces of gold per day. It operated a 40-stamp amolotion mill until World War II. The Crosby group of claims are in the northeast corner of the Twin Peaks claims group.

From the mid-1920s to the mid-1930s, a prospector worked the Gloryhole claim, in the southwest quadrant of the Company’s Twin Peaks claims group. The ore he mined ran over 8 ounces of gold per ton. In 1941 and 1942, the claim was yielding 2.6 ounces of gold per ton. At that time, the ore was shipped to the railhead at Hillside and then by train to a smelter in El Paso, Texas.

In 1885, the Hayes Silver Mine opened. The deposit at the mine was so rich - over 300 ounces of gold and silver per ton - that the owners shipped the ore directly to England for smelting and refining. The Hayes claims group is part of the Company’s Twin Peaks claims group and located in the western quadrant of the property.

10

Picacho Salton Project Claims in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County, California: There has been no commercial scale mining on any of the Company’s claims in this region.

The present condition of the property, the work we have completed on the property, our proposed program of exploration and development, and the current state of exploration and development of the property.

Twin Peaks Project Claims Group: The Company has conducted exploration work on the property, including drilling 3,000 feet of core samples in 2002 (in addition to 10,000 feet drilled by prior owners) and road improvements to repair and create dirt road accesses to the property, and re-stake all claims using GPS. The Company relies on geological work of experts performed by us and under prior ownership in support of our reports of the presence of gold, silver, uranium and other mineralization on the property. In 2007 we completed a feasibility study on the Twin Peaks Project that identified mineralized material. In December 2007, we received a Cultural Resource Survey (an archeological report) for proposed drill sites as part of the Company’s application filed in August 2007 with the BLM to conduct additional drilling to prove up reserves. In August and September and October of 2008 5,000 feet of holes were drilled using reverse circulation drilling, completing Phase One, Phase Two and Phase 2.5 of our current drilling program. During the Phase 1 drilling program the Company participated in a multi-agency test program of the NITON pXRF. The handheld device is purportedly capable of analyzing an ore sample and providing an immediate analysis of all minerals present above an atomic weight of 12. Certified assay results from the labs of samples taken during the Phase 1 and 2 drilling program and the preliminary results produced by the NITON pXRF were compared. The comparison was inconclusive regarding the usefulness of the device in exploration activities. The Company is not conducting mineral extraction operations on this property yet.

In 2011 the BLM approved a revised Mining Plan of Operations for an expanded drilling program on the Twin Peaks Project. Boart Longyear, the drilling company that conducted our Phase 1, 2 and 2.5 drilling programs, has been conducting the revised drilling program, which began in November 2011 and is scheduled for completion by March 2012.

Regarding the Picacho Salton Project Claims Groups in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County: On November 1, 2006 USCorp announced the acquisition of what we then referred to as the “Picacho Salton Mining Property”, through its wholly owned subsidiary Southwest. Situated on approximately 5,760 acres covering 200 mining claims of precious metal properties and located in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County, California, some of these newly acquired claims have common borders to USCorp’s Picacho Gold Property. The Company’s California properties are now collectively known as the Picacho Salton Project. The Company has performed exploration work on the property. The Company relies on geological work of experts performed by us and work performed by experts under prior ownership in support of our early reports of the presence of gold and silver on the property. The Company completed a feasibility study in 2007 that identified mineralized material on the Picacho Salton Project. Our MPO has been approved by the BLM. (see “Recent Developments”). There are no current mineral extraction operations on this property. The proposed program is exploratory in nature.

The physical condition of the plant and equipment and the source of power utilized with respect to each property.

At this time there are no physical plants on any of the Company’s properties. The Company owns rights to water on the Santa Maria River which traverses the Twin Peaks Project property. Power is available on properties adjacent to the Twin Peaks Project and portable generators can be used as necessary. Power is also available on properties adjacent to our placer claims in California and portable generators can be used when necessary. There are natural wells located in several places on our California claims. We will supplement well water with trucked water if necessary.

Adequate roads exist to each of our claims groups. Some existing roads have been repaired or extended.

A brief description of the rock formations and mineralization of existing or potential economic significance on the properties, including the identity of the principal metallic or other constituents.

In regards to the Twin Peaks Project, past geologic valuations have been confirmed by recent geological work as reported in the 2007 feasibility study on the project indicating mineralized material on claims within the boundaries of the Twin Peaks. The Company uses these historical and current reports in support of its determination that economically viable mineralization is present on the properties.

11

According to past geologic valuations the Crosby claims are within an area of banded gray schist that is surrounded by light-colored granite and intruded by pegmatite, rhyolite-porphyry, and basic dikes. The vein strikes N10E, and dips 25 to 30 degrees E, and attains a width of up to 18 inches in the old workings. Rich ore from the oxidized zone shows brecciated quartz with abundant cellular limonite. Several structural zones appear to control the mineralization within the claim group. It can be considered that an alignment of a structural trend exists, with a bearing of about N2OE between the Hayes Mine and the Crosby Mine, with the Swiss Belle Mine at midway along the trend. Another structural zone which is expressed by a dike and is reported to run from the Santa Maria River to the base of Hayes Peak has an average bearing of about N53W. The Hayes Shaft was sunk within this dike. The dike probably passes slightly west of the Gloryhole Mine and then intersects a N2OE structural zone near the base of Hayes Peak. The structural zones seem to influence wide areas adjacent to them, which is confirmed by favorable assays and also by the Very Low Frequency Electromagnetic survey. Cut off grade valuations were not performed.

Picacho Salton Project Claims Groups in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County: A past geochemical sampling program has indicated mineralized material at the Goldstar placer claims; tonnage and grade valuations were not performed. The Company used such reports in support of its determination that economically viable mineralization may be present on the properties as stated in various historical reports.

The phased nature of the exploration process, and the place in the process our current exploration activities occupy.

Phase 1 of the exploration process has been completed on a portion of the Hayes group of claims within the Twin Peaks Project. Phase I supplemented the previous exploration effort with additional geological, geochemical and geophysical surveys, drilling, excavations and road building. We also completed a scoping study. Phase I was designed to furnish pertinent data for the design of Phase II Mining Operation Plan.

In August 2008 we commenced with drilling and assaying in the areas previously targeted in prior geological reports. The drilling program was designed to confirm the geology and mineralization in the target areas; a broad program is not necessary due to prior geological work. Extra samples have been retained for metallurgical testing on promising zones.

The results of testing the samples has allowed us to plan the conceptual mine and milling plans, including flow-sheets that were used in the feasibility study process along with the on-going economic and cost modeling evaluation of the project. While the results were being evaluated we completed the collection of the archeological and environmental data necessary for further exploration.

Phases 1, 2 and 2.5 of the Twin Peaks drilling program have been completed as of the date of this Report. Pincock Allen & Holt has done further exploration on the Twin Peaks property, and designed a drilling program on selected claims within the Twin Peaks claims group which the BLM has approved; financing has been obtained, and drilling started in November 2011 with completion expected in March 2012.

Test Production Program Budget and Plan

We have plans for Test Production in order to perfect the methods to be used in commercial scale heap leach mining or other appropriate mining method. We have received a Test Production plan and budget for the Picacho Salton Project Claims in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County from one of our Consulting Geologists that is summarized as follows:

To start placer testing operations we must first purchase and modify a wash plant. The pad and setup of the wash plant is next.

The dirt access road from the Highway to the site (approximately 2 miles) must be reworked or repaired. We will also need a Front End Loader (“F.E.L.”) with Back-Hoe attachment. For continuous hard work excavating trenches, digging test pits and carrying alluvial material back to the wash plant for processing on a daily basis. It would be used for the duration of the test production program.

12

The sampling method is standard in geological exploration and is confined to dry arroyo drainages and rills. Grab samples taken outside of the dry river beds and rills will be by prospectors pick or regular pick and shovel. Instruments to be used will be a VLF unit, an EM unit, microscopes, spectrometer, GPS unit, possibly an I.R. unit, a magnetometer and miscellaneous sieves. A 10 or 12 kW generator set will independently power the night lights and camper unit. We need to determine if the present wells go down a minimum of 400 feet to reach adequate water supply to support test production wash plant.

We will make a decision whether to proceed with each successive phase of the exploration program upon completion of the previous phase and upon analysis of the results of that program.

We will follow QA/QC protocols provided by the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration Guidance on best practices for Exploration www.smenet.org.

Recent Initial Exploration and Exploitation

Although many companies and individuals are engaged in the mining business, including large established mining companies, there is a limited supply of desirable mineral lands available for claim staking, lease, or other acquisition in the United States and other areas where USCorp contemplates conducting its exploration and/or production activities. However, it has been determined by qualified geologists and mining companies that USCorp’s Arizona properties have mineralization of a variety of precious and non-precious minerals. Historically, the specific geographic region in which USCorp intends to conduct its exploratory and mining activities has been the subject of various general samplings, which were performed by the State of Arizona, the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Mines, and the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management.

The Company has relied upon a number of studies by companies that are not presently affiliated or associated with USCorp to determine the feasibility and valuation of USCorp’s pursuit to develop its Mining Claims. These studies are comprised of several exploration techniques, such as geological and geophysical surveys, drilling, and excavations, in order to determine the economic potential, and subsequent exploration and mining, of the Claims. These different firms have utilized varied means to calculate the potential of the exploration and development of the Twin Peaks Project’s Mining Claims.

Early Exploration Conducted and Valuations.

The Twin Peaks Project: Past geological studies indicate that beginning in 1981 a geologist performed certain exploratory drillings in order to obtain samples of the contents from the Crosby Mine Site No. 6, located Yavapai County, Arizona (one of the claims in in what is now called the Twin Peaks Project). The geologist drilled 28 core drill holes on a grid the Crosby claim site. His report was based on 200-foot depth cores. This area was 18,519 cubic yards, or approximately 20,000 tons of mineralized material. The total area that was drilled was 1,500’ x 600’ x 200’. A total of 744 core samples were taken from the 6,000-foot of core hole drillings. The samples were assayed for gold and silver.

The results indicated the presence of mineralization of gold and silver. The core samples also revealed quartz monzonite porphyry formations throughout the area of sampling. The many faults located in this area were of considerable importance in controlling supergene enrichment; the largest quantity and highest grade of ore occurs when these faults intersect or are closely spaced. There was significant evidence of this enrichment recorded from the samples taken from the Crosby Mine site area. And, the gold and silver that was found is natural to the formations of the enrichment zone.

Recent Exploration and Samplings

The 2008 geological surveys confirmed prior geological reports. It was verified that the Twin Peaks Project is on a mineralized structure and flat zone with gold and silver carrying mineralization.

Historically, over 10,000 feet of core drillings were performed and over 1,500 fire assays were conducted. These assays showed gold and silver mineralization.

The geological, geophysical, and geochemical studies stated above were reviewed and evaluated by an independent mining, consulting, and geologic firm that was engaged to evaluate the commercial feasibility of the claims. The report and economic study recommended the continuation of exploration and the start of production.

13

The geological justification for the exploration project at the Twin Peaks Project is that numerous past geological studies have found gold and silver mineralization at various locations within the boundaries of the claims group. There are also areas within the claims group that contain uranium and areas containing polymetals.

In 2011 Pincock, Allen & Holt’s Chief Geologist, Bart Stone, conducted an examination of the Twin Peaks project, including the newly added 104 claims located west of the historical claims group.

The PAH Geological Summary contained the following points:

(1) GEOLOGIC FORMATION. "The Twin Peaks project is situated in the faulted border zone between the Colorado Plateau and the Southern Basin and Range Province of the North American Craton (Craton: a large, stable block of the earth's crust). Pegmatites are abundant and reach lengths of dozens of feet and widths of up to 10 feet. Typical mineralogy of the pegmatites includes large Muscovite books, black tourmaline crystals, quartz crystals, and orthoclase and plagioclase class feldspars." (Pegmatites: coarse-grained, igneous rocks, usually granite, characterized by large well-formed crystals, and often contain rare elements.)

(2) GEOLOGIC ORIGIN OF PRECIOUS METAL MINERALIZATION AT TWIN PEAKS. "Localized faulting has led to Cretaceous and Tertiary volcanic activity and epigenetic hypogene enrichment." Epigenetic refers to ores and mineral products introduced into their surrounding rocks after the rocks themselves had already come into existence. Hypogene enrichment (in a deeper layer) is significant because a mineral of supergene origin (from a more superficial layer) is likely to disappear within a few hundred feet of depth. If the relative proportion of supergene to hypogene ore minerals can be estimated (by Phase 3 drilling and assay), the ratio gives a basis for estimating the grade of ore that will be expected in the primary zone below the reach of enrichment.

(3) ASSAY RESULTS IN SUPPORT OF GEOLOGY. PAH noted that "…good gold values were found near the contact between the Tertiary plug and the underlying granitics just to the south of the Hayes mine area…" PAH also noted large pegmatite veins and structural fault zones with gold and silver at various dip and strike angles. Examples of assay results are given in our July 18, 2011 press release.

(4) ORE TYPE. Gold and silver mineralization in the claims area is characterized by massive white Drusy quartz with relict sulfide casts. Drusy quartz veins are typical of precious metal systems worldwide. Two extensive drusy quartz veins carrying gold and silver mineralization were discovered during PAH's site visit in addition to other gold and silver deposits found at fault intersections and in known historical workings on the property.

(5) ESTIMATION OF PRECIOUS METALS AT TWIN PEAKS. PAH concluded that the Twin Peaks property has definite upside potential, that “a potential 5,000,000 tons or more of resources” [gold and silver] resides in three lengthy quartz vein structures, including two discovered during PAH's site visit, and that other gold and silver mineralization [that is, gold and silver bearing ore] also occurs at fault intersections, and in known historic workings on the property.

As discussed herein, Boart Longyear has been contracted to complete the revised Phase 3 Drilling program that now includes additional drilling targets in the newly added claims group. This program began in November 2011 and we expect to complete this drilling program in March 2012. Selected assay results may be reported during the drilling period.

The geological justification for the exploration project at the Picacho Salton Project claims is that there is visible gold in the ground and past geological studies have found gold and silver at various locations within the boundaries of the claims groups.

In 2007 we conducted additional exploration, testing; GPS locating, surveying and re-staking of all claims; adding a total of 77 significant claims to the group of which 70 claims are primarily gold bearing and seven claims, approximately 140 acres, are Pink Rhyolite (decorative rock) and construction grade aggregate. The Company commissioned a feasibility study covering the mining claims, that says in part: “The feasibility study operating plan assumes an open caste quarry type operation containing [mineralized material]. The plan anticipates conventional truck and shovel mining techniques. Processing to be phased according to ore type and permit approvals. Initial capital costs are anticipated to be $13,790,300 all amounts are in U.S. Dollars.”

14

A breakdown of the exploration timetable and budget, including estimated amounts that will be required for each exploration activity.

Based on the above referenced feasibility study the exploration timetable and budget for the Twin Peaks Project is as follows:

Initial capital costs are currently estimated to be $12,974,728. All amounts are in US dollars to complete a comprehensive drilling program, road repair and extensions, design and building of a test mill. The estimate of six month time period is an estimate of time need to perform tasks only and does not take into account delays for governmental review and approval of our mining plan.

The exploration timetable and budget for the Picacho Salton Project claims is as follows:

Initial capital costs are anticipated to be $13,790,300 all amounts are in U.S. Dollars to complete an electromagnetic flyover, comprehensive road repair and extensions, design and purchase of a wash plant. The estimate of twelve week time period is an estimate of time needed to perform tasks only and does not take into account delays for governmental review and approval of our mining plan.

How the exploration program will be funded.

Funding will be by equity or debt financing in the form of private placements, working interest joint venture, farm outs, sale or mergers, and/or gold bullion loans in the United States, Europe and Asia. To date we have received the proceeds from a gold bullion loan in the amount of $635,000 as previously reported in Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 27, 2005, in addition to proceeds from private placements and proceeds from convertible debentures. We continue to pursue additional sources of financing. (see “Recent Developments”)

Identification of who will be conducting any proposed exploration work, and a discussion of their qualifications.

The Company is utilizing the services of Boart Longyear Drilling, Image2Map Services, Inc., and Pincock Allen & Holt, for exploration and geological work on the Company’s properties. Given adequate financing we intend to use additional qualified mining consultants and engineers subject to their availability and willingness and our need, but we have not contracted with any other vendors as of the date of this Report.

Boart Longyear is the leading provider of mineral exploration drilling services and drilling products in the world. The Company is the only integrated drilling services and products provider, combining engineering excellence, global manufacturing facilities and the most experienced drilling services group in the business. With over 120 years of global mineral exploration expertise and the most innovative products in the market, Boart Longyear ultimately delivers unmatched reliability, productivity and safety to the worksite.

Since its inception some 42 years ago, Pincock Allen & Holt, (http://www.pincock.com) part of Runge Limited, has earned a reputation as a premier international consulting and engineering firm. They are one of the oldest and most respected organizations within the mining and energy consulting community. Pincock Allen & Holt has an unparalleled reputation for integrity and for technical, commercial, and engineering excellence. Its corporate resume includes more than 3,900 successfully completed assignments for many of the world’s foremost precious metal, base metal, industrial mineral, coal and energy operations. Pincock Allen & Holt reports are widely used to secure project financing and successfully undergo reviews and audits.

Image2Map Services, Inc. provides image processing and geological interpretations of satellite and aerial imagery to mining and minerals exploration companies worldwide. The company specializes in spectral interpretation to locate potential hydrothermal alteration targets and structure interpretation to locate potential lineaments and circular structures potentially related to mineralization of metallic deposits.

Specific Environmental Regulation.

Mining is subject to potential risks and liabilities associated with pollution of the environment and the disposal of waste products occurring as a result of mineral exploration and production. Environmental liability may result from mining activities conducted by others prior to USMetals’ ownership of a property. Insurance for environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production) is not generally available at a reasonable price to companies within the industry. To the extent USMetals is subject to environmental liabilities, the payment of such liabilities would reduce funds otherwise available to USMetals and could have a material adverse effect on USMetals.

15

In the context of environmental compliance and permitting, including the approval of reclamation plans, The Company must comply with standards, laws and regulations which may entail greater or lesser costs and delays depending on the nature of the activity to be permitted, constructed and operated and how stringently the regulations are implemented by the applicable regulatory authority. It is possible that the costs and delays associated with compliance with such laws, regulations and permits could become such that a company would not proceed with the development of a project or the operation or further development of a mine. Laws, regulations and regulatory policies involving the protection and remediation of the environment are constantly changing at all levels of government and are generally becoming more restrictive and the costs imposed on the development and operation of mineral properties are increasing as a result of such changes. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, significant expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations.

The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) continues the development of a solid waste regulatory program specific to mining operations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”). The difficulty is that many Federal laws duplicate existing state regulations.

Mining companies in the United States are also subject to regulations under (i) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”) which regulates and establishes liability for the release of hazardous substances and (ii) the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) which identifies endangered species of plants and animals and regulates activities to protect these species and their habitats. Revisions to CERCLA and ESA are being considered by Congress; the impact on The Company of these revisions is not clear at this time. Environmental laws and regulations enacted and adopted in the future may have a significant impact upon our future operations.

Reclamation plans which are approved by various environmental regulatory authorities are subject to on-going review and modification. Although the Company’s management believes that the reclamation plans developed and implemented for its mine sites are reasonable under current conditions, any future re-determination of reclamation conditions or requirements could significantly increase USMetals’ and Southwest’s costs of implementation of such plans.

USCorp expects to utilize “green” methods as much as possible beyond those required by existing environmental rules and regulations. We are exploring using wind and solar power to supplement our energy requirements; captured rainwater in order to reduce use of ground water and water that may have to be trucked in; solar powered conveyor belts to transport ore for processing, green fuels for vehicles, and other environment-friendly technologies that have been recently developed. USCorp principals have had preliminary discussions with international providers of such services that have been field testing the latest “green” technologies in African mines and other locations.

Competition.

There is aggressive competition within the minerals industry to discover and acquire properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete for promising gold exploration projects with other entities, many of which have greater financial and other resources than The Company. In addition, The Company will compete with other firms in its efforts to obtain financing to explore and develop mineral properties including the claims it already owns. Further, the mining industry is typified by companies with significantly greater financial resources and market recognition than the Company. At present, USCorp is not a significant factor within this industry.

Employees and Independent Contractors.

As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company did not employ any persons other than its executive officers, an Administrative Assistant, and occasional clerical help.

As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries have utilized as principal consultant and advisors: Boart Longyear Drilling, Harris Drilling, Pincock Allen & Holt, and Image2Map Services which, in turn, may work with subcontractors that perform work indirectly for the Company and its subsidiaries.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Lack of Operating History and Earnings. The Company has no operating history or revenues. The Company expects to incur further losses in the foreseeable future due to significant costs associated with its business development, and the business development of its subsidiaries, including costs associated with its acquisition of new mining claims and/or operations. There can be no assurance that The Company’s operations will ever generate sufficient revenues to fund its continuing operations that The Company will ever generate positive cash flow from its operations, or that The Company will attain or thereafter sustain profitability in any future period.

16

Speculative Nature of The Company’s Proposed Operations; Dependence Upon Management. The success of The Company’s operations, independently and through its subsidiaries, and its proposed plan of operation will depend largely on the operations, financial condition, and management of The Company. While management intends to engage in the business purposes stated herein, there can be no assurance that it, or any of its subsidiaries, will be successful in conducting such business. Presently, the Company is totally dependent upon the personal efforts of its current management. The loss of any officer or director of The Company could have a material adverse effect upon its business and future prospects. The Company does not presently have key-man life insurance upon the life of any of its officers or directors. None of our management are chemists, metallurgists, mining engineers or geologists and as such do not have the technical experience in exploring for, starting, and/or operating a mine. Upon adequate funding management intends to hire qualified and experienced personnel, including additional officers and directors, and mining specialists, professionals and consulting firms to advise management as needed; however there can be no assurance that management will be successful in raising the necessary funds, recruiting, hiring and retaining such qualified individuals. Such consultants have no fiduciary duty to The Company or its shareholders, and may not perform as expected. The success of The Company will, in significant part, depend upon the efforts and abilities of management, including such consultants as are or may be engaged in the future.

Risks Inherent In Exploration and Mining Operations. Mineral exploration is highly speculative and capital intensive. Most exploration efforts are not successful, in that they do not result in the discovery of mineralization of sufficient quantity or quality to be profitably mined. The Company’s Mining Claims are also indirectly subject to all hazards and risks normally incidental to developing and operating mining properties. These risks include insufficient ore reserves, fluctuations in production costs that may make mining of reserves uneconomic; significant environmental and other regulatory restrictions; and the risks of injury to persons, property or the environment. In particular, the profitability of gold mining operations is directly related to the price of gold. The price of gold fluctuates widely and is affected by numerous factors that are beyond the control of any mining company. These factors include expectations with respect to the rate of inflation, the exchange rates of the dollar and other currencies, interest rates, global or regional political, economic or banking crises, and a number of other factors. If the price of gold should drop dramatically, the value of the Mining Claims could also drop dramatically, and the Company might then be unable to recover its investment in those interests or properties. Selection of a property for exploration or development; the determination to construct a mine and to place it into production, and the dedication of funds necessary to achieve such purposes, are decisions that must be made long before the first revenues from production will be received. Price fluctuations between the time that such decisions are made and the commencement of production can drastically affect the economics of a mine. The volatility of gold prices represents a substantial risk, generally, which no amount of planning or technical expertise can eliminate.

Uncertainty of Reserves and Mineralization Estimates. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating proven and probable reserves and mineralization, including many factors beyond The Company’s control. The estimation of reserves and mineralization is a subjective process and the accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Results of drilling, metallurgical testing and production and the evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimate may justify revision of such estimates. No assurances can be given that the volume and grade of reserves recovered and rates of production will not be less than anticipated. Assumptions about prices are subject to great uncertainty and gold prices have fluctuated widely in the past. Declines in the market price of gold or other precious metals also may render reserves or mineralization containing relatively lower grades of ore uneconomic to exploit. Changes in operating and capital costs and other factors including, but not limited to, short-term operating factors such as the need for sequential development of ore bodies and the processing of new or different ore grades, may materially and adversely affect reserves.

Environmental Risks. Mining is subject to potential risks and liabilities associated with pollution of the environment and the disposal of waste products occurring as a result of mineral exploration and production. Insurance against environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and production) is not generally available to The Company (or to other companies within the gold industry) at a reasonable price. To the extent The Company becomes subject to environmental liabilities, the satisfaction of any such liabilities would reduce funds otherwise available and could have a material adverse effect on The Company. Laws and regulations intended to ensure the protection of the environment are constantly changing, and are generally becoming more restrictive.

17

Proposed Federal Legislation. Beginning in the 1990s, the U.S. Congress adopted revisions of the General Mining Law of 1872, which governs the creation of mining claims and related activities on Federal public lands in the United States. Similarly, the U. S. Congress and the Clinton Administration eliminated the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which was the agency responsible for gathering and maintaining data on mines throughout the United States. Beyond changes to the existing laws, the Congress or the Bush Administration, or the incoming Obama Administration may propose or adopt new laws; any such revisions could also impair USMetals’ and Southwest’s ability to develop, in the future, any mineral prospects that are located on unpatented mining claims on Federal lands.

Title to Properties. The validity of unpatented mining claims, which constitute all of The Company’s property holdings, is often uncertain and such validity is always subject to contest. Unpatented mining claims are unique property interests and are generally considered subject to greater title risks than patented mining claims, or other real property interests that are owned in fee simple. The Company has not filed any patent applications for any of its properties that are located on Federal public lands in the United States, (specifically, in the States of Arizona and California), and, under changes to the General Mining Law, patents may not be available for such properties. Although management believes it has taken requisite action to acquire satisfactory title to its undeveloped properties, it does not intend to go to the expense to obtain title opinions until financing is secured to develop the property, with the attendant risk that title to some properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, may be defective.

Competition. There is aggressive competition within the minerals industry to discover and acquire properties considered to have commercial potential. The Company will compete for promising gold exploration projects with other entities, many of which have greater financial and other resources than The Company. In addition, the Company will compete with other firms in its efforts to obtain financing to explore and develop mineral properties.

The Company’s Financial Statements Contain a “Going Concern Qualification.” The Company may not be able to operate as a going concern. The independent auditors’ report accompanying its financial statements contains an explanation that The Company’s financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern. Note 1 to these financial statements indicates that The Company is in the exploration stage and needs additional funds to implement its plan of operations. This condition raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company’s audit report and financial statements are included herein as “PART II, Item 7”.

Uncertainty As To Management’s Ability To Control Costs And Expenses. With respect to The Company’s development of its mining properties and the implementation of commercial operations, management cannot accurately project or give any assurance, with respect to its ability to control development and operating costs and/or expenses. Consequently, if management is not able to adequately control costs and expenses, such operations may not generate any profit or may result in operating losses.

No Dividends. The Company has not paid any dividends nor, by reason of its present financial status and contemplated financial requirements, does it anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Risks of Low-Priced Stocks And Possible Effect of “Penny Stock” Rules on Liquidity. Currently the Company’s stock is defined as a “penny stock” under Rule 3a51-1 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In general, a “penny stock” includes securities of companies which are not listed on the principal stock exchanges or the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (“NASDAQ”) or National Market System (“NASDAQ NMS”) and have a bid price in the market of less than $5.00; and companies with net tangible assets of less than $2,000,000 ($5,000,000 if the issuer has been in continuous operation for less than three years), or which has recorded revenues of less than $6,000,000 in the last three years. “Penny stocks” are subject to rule 15g-9, which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers that sell such securities to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors” (generally, individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual incomes exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with their spouses, or individuals who are officers or directors of the issuer of the securities). For transactions covered by Rule 15g-9, a broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale. Consequently, this rule may adversely affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell The Company’s stock, and therefore, may adversely affect the ability of The Company’s stockholders to sell stock in the public market.

18

Shares Eligible for Future Sale. A total of  194,996,611 shares of Voting Class A Common Stock are issued and outstanding as of the date of this Annual Report, of which approximately  156,978,318 shares thereof are “restricted securities” as that term is defined under the Securities Act. Therefore, all such restricted shares must be held indefinitely unless subsequently registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from registration becomes available. One exemption that may be available in the future is Rule 144 adopted under the Securities Act. Generally, under Rule 144 any person holding restricted securities for at least one year may publicly sell in ordinary brokerage transactions, within a 3 month period, the greater of one (1%) percent of the total number of a company’s shares outstanding or the average weekly reported volume during the four weeks preceding the sale, if certain conditions of Rule 144 are satisfied by the company and the seller. Furthermore, with respect to sellers who are “non-affiliates” of the company, as that term is defined in Rule 144, the volume sale limitation does not apply and an unlimited number of shares may be sold, provided the seller meets a holding period of 2 years. However, the SEC revised Rule 144, effective February 15, 2008, which shortens the holding period to six months in some cases and remove the volume restrictions for any such sales. Sales under Rule 144 may have a depressive effect on the market price of The Company’s securities, should a public market be available for The Company’s shares.

We have issued an aggregate of $700,000 principal amount of convertible debentures (the “Debentures”). These Debentures were issued over a period of two years and accrue interest at the rate of 4% or 5%. The conversion price for these Debentures is $0.125 per share and may be converted into an aggregate of 5,600,000 shares of our common stock. As of the date of this report we have paid down $125,000 of the debentures and the due dates have been extended to March 2012.

Safe Harbor Statement: Under the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, except for the statements of historical fact contained herein, the information presented constitutes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to those with respect to the price of gold, the timing of the exploration of the Company’s properties, the timing of the development of the Company’s properties, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production, mineralization and “reserve” determination involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the actual results of current exploration and development activities, conclusions of economic evaluations, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, future prices of gold, silver or other metals and minerals. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

(See “Forward Looking Statements”, PART I).

(D) Reports to Security Holders

The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that SEC internet site is http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company’s principal executive offices are located at 4535 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200, Las Vegas, NV 89102 and its telephone number is (702) 933-4034

19

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On September 29, 2010 a meeting of the shareholders was held without notice pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Nevada corporate statues and the bylaws of the corporation at which meeting a majority of the shares of the company were voted in person and by proxy. A summary of the matters submitted to the security holders follow. All items were approved by majority vote:

The terms and conditions of the Company’s Series A and Series B Preferred stock were amended to read as follows: that all issued and outstanding USCorp Preferred stock, when converted to Common A Stock shall be returned to the Treasury of Preferred Stock of the Company;

The nominations for fiscal 2011 directors by the shareholders were Robert Dultz, Director and Chairman, Spencer Eubank, Director, Michelle Seibel, Director, and as outside directors Carl O’Baugh, and B. K. Simerson were approved and the individuals accepted their election to their respective positions;

The Officers of the corporation for fiscal 2011 were elected by the Board of Directors: Robert Dultz CEO, President and acting CFO; Spencer Eubank Secretary-Treasurer; and Michelle Siebel Assistant Secretary;

The purchase of Series A Preferred stock by Officers and Directors of the corporation at par value was authorized by the shareholders as follows: Robert Dultz 1.5 million; Spencer Eubank 500 thousand shares; Michelle Seibel 250 thousand shares; Carl O’Baugh 50 thousand shares and B. K. Simerson 50 thousand shares;

The release of proprietary corporate information, including information regarding the corporation’s properties, to select individuals and entities after acknowledging the confidentiality of that information for the purpose of fund raising, property development, joint-ventures, mergers and acquisitions, loans and other deal making activities was approved by the shareholders;

The re-negotiation of the “Gold Bullion Loan” and Convertible Debentures to gain an extension of time to repay these from the lenders was approved;

The Board was authorized to take whatever actions are deemed necessary by the Board to protect the corporation’s rights, through its subsidiaries to explore, develop and extract the minerals at the Twin Peaks Project property and the Picacho Salton Project property;

Spinning off the corporation’s subsidiaries, USMetals, Inc., and Southwest Resource Development, Inc. when and if deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors was authorized by the Shareholders;

The Shareholders authorized distribution to the corporation’s shareholders of shares in USMetals, Inc., and Southwest Resource Development, Inc., at a rate of 1 subsidiary share for each 10 USCorp Common A, Common B, (Regulation S shares which can trade anywhere outside of the U.S. and trade at this time in Europe), and Series A and B Preferred shares (our Preferred shares are not traded publically) (based on conversion rate) owned, or such other rate as may be determined by the Board, and to issue USMetals, Inc., and Southwest Resource Development, Inc. shares to warrant holders of USCorp warrants when they exercise their warrants, fractions to be rounded to the next highest full share;

The determination to implement or to not implement such spin-offs, at the discretion of the Board, when and if necessary, in order to protect the investments and rights of the shareholders as well as the ownership of said properties by USMetals, Inc., and Southwest Resource Development, Inc., was authorized by the shareholders;

The Shareholders authorized the Board to raise funds by selling stock via private placement or public offering in a manner, for prices and at times to be determined by the Board;

20

The formation of a joint venture entity and/or a joint venture with “the Chinese Conglomerate (“TCC“) according to the Joint Venture Agreement signed by USCorp and TCC when and if TCC fulfills the conditional terms and conditions of said agreement, namely funding of the joint venture was approved by the shareholders;

The shareholders authorized the Board to extend the final cut-off date of January 15, 2011 of the Joint Venture Agreement with TCC if it is deemed by the Board to be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to do so; and

The shareholders approved all prior actions of the Board of Directors during fiscal 2010.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

The Company’s securities are quoted on the OTC Markets and as of December 27, 2003 the Company’s shares are also traded on the Third Segment of the Berlin Stock Exchange under symbol UCP.BER, WKN # A0BLBB. As of May 11, 2006 USCorp’s Class B Non-Voting Common Shares have been included in the Deutche Boerse Exchange trading within the Open Market (Freiverkehr) under the Symbol “U9C.F” and the WKN# is A0JEQQ.

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the range of high and low closing price quotations for the Company’s common stock during the past two fiscal years. These quotations represent inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions:

PERIOD	HIGH		LOW
Quarter ended December 31, 2009		0.07		0.03
Quarter ended March 31, 2010		0.22		0.02
Quarter ended June 30, 2010		0.07		0.03
Quarter ended September 30, 2010		0.07		0.02
Quarter ended December 31, 2010		0.13		0.05
Quarter ended March 31, 2011		0.08		0.04
Quarter ended June 30, 2011		0.08		0.04
Quarter ended September 30, 2011		0.10		0.04

On January 6, 2012 the reported closing price for the Company’s common stock was $0.05 per share; there were approximately 1,200 record holders of the Company’s shares.

21

The Company has not paid any dividends and there are presently no plans to pay any such dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of dividends in the future will be determined by the Board of Directors in light of conditions then existing, including earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors. There are no contractual restrictions on the Company’s present or future ability to pay dividends. Further, there are no restrictions on any of the Company’s subsidiaries which would, in the future, adversely affect the Company’s ability to pay dividends to its shareholders. The Company desires to pay a dividend when in production, paid in gold out of profits from production.

Recent Sales of registered and unregistered securities.

Fiscal 2010 sales of registered securities:

During fiscal year 2010, the Company issued 6,798,596 shares of registered Class A common stock for services rendered by professionals and consultants under our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan dated October 29, 2009, file and film numbers: 333-162742 and 091231543 respectively, as amended on December 29, 2009, incorporated herein by reference.

Fiscal 2011 sales of unregistered securities:

The shares and warrants described herein were sold to accredited investors under the Regulation D exemption and were exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933. Neither we nor any person acting on our behalf offered or sold these securities by any form of general solicitation or general advertising. The shares sold are restricted securities and the certificates representing these shares have been affixed with a standard restrictive legend, which states that the securities cannot be sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 or an exemption therefrom. Each purchaser represented to us that he was purchasing the securities for his own account and not for the account of any other persons. Each purchaser was provided with written disclosure that the securities have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and therefore cannot be sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 or an exemption therefrom.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 41,594,631 common shares with 41,594,631 warrants attached convertible into the same amount of common shares at a weighted average exercise price of $0.11 expiring in 2011 and 2012.  The Company received proceeds of $2,907,580.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 5,016,591 shares of common stock to consultants for services rendered valued by the Company at $358,430.

During fiscal year 2011, holders of the preferred A stock converted 1.05 million preferred A into 8.4 million shares of common stock.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 3,200,000 shares of common stock to extend the maturity date of the Gold Bullion Loan discussed in Note 5.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock to pay $50,000 of the convertible debentures discussed in Note 6.

Sales of Securities Table:

Class	Registered Securities		Unregistered Securities
Registration or Exemption	Registered Form S-8		Regulation D, Rule 144
Common A		3,173,037		59,326,579
Warrants to purchase Common A		0		42,764,999

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and the other financial data appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.

The information set forth in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21 E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, among others (i) expected changes in the Company’s revenues and profitability, (ii) prospective business opportunities and (iii) the Company’s strategy for financing its business. Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical information or statements of current condition. Some forward-looking statements may be identified by use of terms such as “believes”, “anticipates”, “intends” or “expects”. These forward-looking statements relate to the plans, objectives and expectations of the Company for future operations. Although the Company believes that its expectations with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, in light of the risks and uncertainties inherent in all future projections, the inclusion of forward-looking statements in this Annual Report should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives or plans of the Company will be achieved.

22

The Company’s revenues and results of operations could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) changes in external competitive market factors, (ii) termination of certain operating agreements or inability to enter into additional operating agreements, (iii) inability to satisfy anticipated working capital or other cash requirements, (iv) changes in or developments under domestic or foreign laws, regulations, governmental requirements or in the mining industry, (v) changes in the Company’s business strategy or an inability to execute its strategy due to unanticipated changes in the market, (vi) various competitive factors that may prevent the Company from competing successfully in the marketplace, and (ix) the Company’s lack of liquidity and its ability to raise additional capital. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive. The Company undertakes no obligation to release publicly the results of any future revisions it may make to forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

OVERVIEW

The Company is an “exploration stage” company. During fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, the Company’s activities centered on the exploration of USMetals’ mining property known as the Twin Peaks Project in the Eureka Mining District of Yavapai County, Arizona, the exploration of the Picacho Salton Project Claims in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County, California. During the fiscal year, the Company did not engage in any commercially viable operations and realized no revenues from its activities. The annual costs incurred to date were primarily for the continued exploration of the Company’s mining properties including the current drilling program, expansion and maintenance of the Company’s website, legal and accounting costs in conjunction with the Company’s general and administrative expenses in anticipation of completing exploration and commencing a test production program on the Company’s mining properties. The annual maintenance fee payment for the 476 claims owned by the Company is $140 per claim for a total annual cost of $66,640.

All of the Company’s mining claims are held through its subsidiaries, USMetals, Inc. and Southwest Resource Development, Inc. Pincock Allen & Holt has agreed to continue to supervise and direct the work of the Twin Peaks Project Team.

The Company owns 276 unpatented mining claims totaling 5,520 acres in the Eureka Mining District of Yavapai County, Arizona. These claims have a history of mining activity from the middle of the 19th century to the beginning of World War II. Gold, silver, copper and other minerals were recovered. The previous owners started acquisition of this claim group in the early 1940s and by the mid-1980s the claims group totaled 134 claims. Exploration, drilling and assessment work was done and several geological reports were completed indicating the presence of economically viable deposits of precious metals and complex ores.

In 2007 and 2008 we conducted exploration, testing, GPS surveying and re-staking of all claims, and completed Phases 1, 2 and 2.5 of a 3-phase drilling program; and in 2009 we added 36 claims to the group (see “Recent Developments”). In 2007 a feasibility study and technical report were prepared by Geological Support Services, LLC, which stated in part: “The feasibility study operating plan assumes an open cast quarry type operation containing [mineralized material]. The project anticipates utilizing conventional truck and shovel mining methods with the processing of ore at full production of 800 tons per day for the first year. Estimated mine life is 12.9 years. Production levels (and mine life) will increase as proven reserve amounts increase. The feasibility study, at the time it was written, assumed an economic base case, utilizing $600 per ounce gold and $12 per ounce silver.

The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Southwest Resource development, Inc., (“Southwest”) owns 200 unpatented lode and placer mining claims totaling approximately 5,760 acres in the Mesquite Mining District of eastern Imperial County, California which the Company refers to as the Picacho Salton Project Claims. These claims and the surrounding Mesquite Mining District have a history of mining activity going back almost 200 years. The majority or most of the exploration, drilling and assessment work at the Picacho Salton Project Claims in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County was done and geological reports were completed by prior owners in the 1980s and indicated at that time the presence of economically viable deposits of precious metals.

23

In 2008 we conducted additional exploration, testing, GPS surveying and re-staking of all claims, and added a total of 77 claims to the group of which 70 claims are primarily gold bearing and seven claims, approximately 140 acres, are Pink Rhyolite (decorative rock) and construction grade aggregate. Geological Support Services LLC completed a feasibility study covering the gold claims, it says in part: “The feasibility study operating plan assumes an open caste quarry type operation containing [mineralized material]. The plan anticipates conventional truck and shovel mining techniques. Processing will be phased according to ore type and permit approvals. Phase 1 being a wash and sedimentation gravity system with initial production capacity of 1,000 tons per day ramping to 6,000 tons per day. This type of operation has been proven to achieve .02 ounce per ton recovery, in the targeted placers. With approval of cyanide leach permits, the implementation of leaching facilities will increase recovery to the 87% target. Also along with the construction of the leaching facilities, the milling circuit for processing the hard rock lode ore will be constructed. This grinding circuit will be designed to crush incoming hard rock down to 150- prior to gravity separation and leaching. Although this study is based on production of 6,000 tons a day it is anticipated that if additional water resources are developed production could be increased to greater levels. Mine life is estimated to be in excess of 20 years. The feasibility study, at the time it was written, assumed an economic base case utilizing a $600 per ounce gold price.

I. Results of Operations

Comparison of operating results.

The Company has not yet commenced commercial operations and has had no revenues from operations.

General and administrative expense for fiscal 2011 was $1,919,947 compared to $912,984 for last year, an increase of  $1,006,990.  Every category increased due to the effect beginning work on the Twin Peaks Project. Administrative and professional fees nearly tripled from $37,410 in 2010 to $108,930 in 2011; consulting costs increased from $215,278 in 2010 to $451,080 in 2011; Administration expenses increased from $605,229 for fiscal 2010 compared to $991,835 for 2011. The increase in all costs was a direct result of the development of the Twin Peaks Project and associated increase in administrative expenses, including clerical costs, equipment purchases, consultant and professional fees and space rental costs.

As a result of general and administrative costs, the Company experienced a net loss from operations of $912,984 for the year ended September 30, 2010 compared to loss from operations of $1,919,174 for the year ended September 30, 2011.

After interest expense in fiscal 2010 of $116,593, compared to $179,796 in fiscal 2011, the Company realized a net loss for fiscal 2010 of $2,203,184 as compared to a net loss of $3,086,774 for fiscal 2011. This loss translated into a loss of $.02 per share for fiscal 2010, compared to a loss of $.02 per share for fiscal 2011.

II. Discussion of Financial Condition: Liquidity and Capital Resources

At September 30, 2010 cash on hand was $354,019 as compared with $1,686,996 at September 30, 2011.

The increase in cash is due to the following factors: Operations used $1,450,287, we purchased office equipment of $29,816, we issued common stock for $2,907,580, we received subscriptions on our common stock of $30,500, and we paid down the convertible notes by $125,000.

Total assets at September 30, 2010 were $354,395 as compared to $1,829,340 at September 30, 2011.

The Company’s total stockholders’ deficit changed from $3,501,837 at September 30, 2010 to $3,064,601 at September 30, 2011. The increase was mainly due to the issuance of common stock for $2,907,580, the issuance of stock for services $3,658,430, the issuance of stock to extend debt maturities of $208,000, the issuance of stock to pay debenture of $50,000, and a net loss of the year for the year of $3,086,774.

We may consider a private placement for royalties or working interest to raise funds for operations and continued exploration and development programs.

Regarding regulatory issues, the Company is subject to the following:

1. The securities laws, regulations and rules of the United States because we are a public corporation and because our Class A Common stock trades on the over-the-counter bulletin board;

2. Nevada corporation and business statues because we are a Nevada corporation;

3. Bureau of Land Management policies, rules and regulations because our mining claims are located on U.S. Federal government Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management land;

24

4. Federal Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management regulators in California and

5. Federal Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management regulators in Arizona.

As of the date of this report the company intends to file its first quarter of fiscal 2012 report on form 10-Q for October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 with the SEC. In the event that enough additional money for operations is not received the Company may discontinue filing with the SEC due to the relatively high costs in terms of money and legal, accounting, clerical and administrative man-hours of preparing these reports and being a fully reporting company. In that event we expect our Class A and Class B shares to be disqualified from trading in Germany on the Deutche Boerse exchanges. We expect our Class A common shares would continue trading in the United States on the OTC Markets Pink Sheets.

Impact of Inflation

The general level of inflation has been relatively low during the last several fiscal years and has not had a significant impact on the Company.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

None

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13-a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company's board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

* pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

* provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of the Company; and

* provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework," issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of September 30, 2011, the Company's internal control over financial reporting is effective.

25

There have not been any changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

26

DONAHUE ASSOCIATES, LLC

Certified Public Accountants

27 Beach Road Suite CO5A

Monmouth Beach, NJ 07750

Tel. 732-229-7723

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of USCorp.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of USCorp as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related s consolidated statements of operations, consolidated stockholders' equity, and consolidated cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2011, and from inception to September 30, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of USCorp as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2011, and from inception to September 30, 2011 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also discussed in Note 2.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

\s\Donahue Associates LLC

Monmouth Beach, N.J.

January 12, 2012

27

USCorp

(an Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010

	30-Sep-11			30-Sep-10
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	1,686,996		$	354,019
Deferred charge		116,204			0
Total current assets	$	1,803,200		$	354,019
Other assets:
Property & equipment- net		26,140			376
Total assets	$	1,829,340		$	354,395
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable & accrued expenses	$	147,539		$	65,468
Gold bullion loan		4,061,340			3,016,841
Convertible debentures payable		581,700			700,000
Subscriptions payable		30,500			0
Total current liabilities	$	4,821,079		$	3,782,309
Shareholders' equity:
Series A preferred stock, one share convertible to eight shares of common; par value $0.001, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 3,993,750 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and 2,943,750 at September 30, 2011		4,304			5,365
Series B preferred stock, one share convertible to two shares of common; 10% cumulative stated dividend, stated value $0.50, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 141,687 outstanding at September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2011, stated value; $0.50		63,498			63,498
Common stock B- $.001 par value, authorized 250,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding, 5,060,500 shares at September 30, 2010 and 5,060,500 at September 30, 2011		5,060			5,060
Common stock A- $.01 par value, authorized 550,000,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding, 135,955,389 shares at September 30, 2010 and 194,966,611 at September 30, 2011	$	1,949,667		$	1,359,555
Additional paid in capital		15,804,892			12,870,994
Accumulated deficit - exploration stage		(20,819,160	)		(17,732,386	)
Total shareholders' deficit		(3,064,601	)		(3,501,837	)
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Deficit	$	1,829,340		$	354,395
See the notes to the financial statements.

28

USCorp

(an Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Years Ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010

and from Inception, May 1989 through September 30, 2011

							Inception
	30-Sep-11			30-Sep-10			to Date
General and administrative expenses:
Consulting	$	451,080		$	215,248		$	7,425,831
Administration		991,835			605,229			7,652,621
License & claim development expenses		368,129			55,097			615,688
Professional fees		108,930			37,410			823,063
Total general & administrative expenses		1,919,974			912,984			16,517,203
Net loss from operations	$	(1,919,974	)	$	(912,984	)	$	(16,517,203	)
Other income (expenses):
Interest income		285			0			8,193
Interest expense		(179,796	)		(116,593	)		(1,228,358	)
Gain (loss) on unhedged derivative		(987,289	)		(1,173,607	)		(3,081,792	)
Net loss before provision for income taxes	$	(3,086,774	)	$	(2,203,184	)	$	(20,819,160	)
Provision for income taxes		0			0			0
Net loss	$	(3,086,774	)	$	(2,203,184	)	$	(20,819,160	)
Basic & fully diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)
Weighted average of common shares outstanding:
Basic & fully diluted		168,514,462			92,355,392

See the notes to the financial statements.

29

USCorp

(an Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010

and from Inception, May 1989 through September 30, 2011

							Inception
	30-Sep-11			30-Sep-10			to Date
Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(3,086,774	)	$	(2,203,184	)	$	(20,819,160	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income items not requiring the use of cash:
Consulting fees		414,069			302,670			5,301,532
Depreciation expense		4,052			654			21,231
Interest expense		265,210			116,593			1,250,199
Impairment expense		0			0			3,049,465
Loss on unhedged underlying derivative		987,289			1,173,607			3,081,792
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities :
Deferred charge		(116,204	)		0			(116,204	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		82,071			16,345			147,539
Net cash used by operations	$	(1,450,287	)	$	(593,315	)	$	(8,083,606	)
Investing activities:
Purchase of office equipment	$	(29,816	)	$	0		$	(47,371	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(29,816	)		0			(47,371	)
Financing activities:
Issuance of common stock	$	2,907,580		$	1,001,369		$	8,133,525
Issuance of preferred stock		0			0			68,863
Issuance of common B stock		0			0			5,060
Issuance of gold bullion note		0			0			648,282
Capital contributed by shareholder		0			0			356,743
Subscriptions received (transferred to common stock)		30,500			(96,383	)		30,500
Issuance (payment) of convertible notes		(125,000	)		0			575,000
Advances received (paid) shareholder		0			23,821			0
Net cash provided by financing activities		2,813,080			928,807			9,817,973
Net increase (decrease) in cash	$	1,332,977		$	335,492		$	1,686,996
Cash balance at beginning of the fiscal year		354,019			18,527			0
Cash balance at September 30th	$	1,686,996		$	354,019		$	1,686,996
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid during the year	$	0		$	0
Income taxes paid during the year	$	0		$	0

See the notes to the financial statements.

30

USCorp

(an Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

From Inception in May 1989

			Common
	Common		Par		Paid in		Accumulated						Stock
	Shares		Value		Capital		Deficit			Total			Price *
Inception		0	$	0	$	0	$	0		$	0
Issuance of common stock		84,688		847		1,185,153					1,186,000		$	0.07
Net income fiscal 1990								520,000			520,000
Balance at September 30, 1990-unaudited		84,688	$	847	$	1,185,153	$	520,000		$	1,706,000
Net income fiscal 1991								1,108,000			1,108,000
Balance at September 30, 1991-unaudited		84,688	$	847	$	1,185,153	$	1,628,000		$	2,814,000
Issuance of common stock		472		5		32,411					32,416		$	0.22
Net income fiscal 1992								466,000			466,000
Balance at September 30, 1992-unaudited		85,160	$	852	$	1,217,564	$	2,094,000		$	3,312,416
Net loss fiscal 1993								(3,116,767	)		(3,116,767	)
Balance at September 30, 1993-unaudited		85,160	$	852	$	1,217,564	$	(1,022,767	)	$	195,649
Net loss fiscal 1994								(63,388	)		(63,388	)
Balance at September 30, 1994-unaudited		85,160	$	852	$	1,217,564	$	(1,086,155	)	$	132,261
Net income fiscal 1995								(132,261	)		(132,261	)
Balance at September 30, 1995-unaudited		85,160	$	852	$	1,217,564	$	(1,218,416	)	$	0
Net loss fiscal 1996								0			0
Balance at September 30, 1996-unaudited		85,160	$	852	$	1,217,564	$	(1,218,416	)	$	0

31

USCorp

(an Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

From Inception in May 1989

(Continued)

	Common		Common		Paid in		Accumulated						Stock
	Shares		Par Value		Capital		Deficit			Total			Price *
Stock issued for mining claim		150,000		1,500		598,500					600,000		$	0.20
Issuance of common stock		50,000		500		59,874					60,374		$	0.06
Stock issued for services		14,878		149		29,608					29,757		$	0.10
Net loss fiscal 1997								(90,131	)		(90,131	)
Balance at September 30, 1997-unaudited		300,038	$	3,001	$	1,905,546	$	(1,308,547	)	$	600,000
Capital contributed by shareholder						58,668					58,668
Net loss fiscal 1998								(58,668	)		(58,668	)
Balance at September 30, 1998-unaudited		300,038	$	3,001	$	1,964,214	$	(1,367,215	)	$	600,000
Capital contributed by shareholder						28,654					28,654
Net income fiscal 1999								(26,705	)		(26,705	)
Balance at September 30, 1999-unaudited		300,038	$	3,001	$	1,992,868	$	(1,393,920	)	$	601,949
Capital contributed by shareholder						22,750					22,750
Net loss fiscal 2000								(624,699	)		(624,699	)
Balance at September 30, 2000-unaudited		300,038	$	3,001	$	2,015,618	$	(2,018,619	)	$	0

32

USCorp

(an Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

From Inception in May 1989

(Continued)

	Common		Common		Paid in			Accumulated						Stock
	Shares		Par Value		Capital			Deficit			Total			Price *
Issuance of common stock		103,535		1,035		611,943						612,978		$	0.15
Issued stock for compensation		50,000		500		19,571						20,071		$	0.04
Capital contributed by shareholder						21,719						21,719
Net loss fiscal 2001									(654,768	)		(654,768	)
Balance at September 30, 2001-unaudited		453,573	$	4,536	$	2,668,851		$	(2,673,387	)	$	0
Issued stock to purchase mining claim		24,200,000		242,000		2,207,466						2,449,466		$	0.10
Issued shares to employees		267,500		2,675		(2,675	)					0
Capital contributed by shareholders						143,480						143,480
Net loss for the fiscal year									(2,591,671	)		(2,591,671	)
Balance at September 30, 2002-unaudited		24,921,073	$	249,211	$	5,017,122		$	(5,265,058	)	$	1,275
Issued stock for services		872,000		8,720		264,064						272,784		$	0.31
Beneficial conversion feature						3,767						3,767
Capital contributed by shareholders						81,472						81,472
Net loss for the fiscal year									(865,287	)		(865,287	)
Balance at September 30, 2003		25,793,073	$	257,931	$	5,366,425		$	(6,130,345	)	$	(505,989	)

33

USCorp

(an Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

From Inception in May 1989

(Continued)

	Common		Common		Paid in		Accumulated						Stock
	Shares		Par Value		Capital		Deficit			Total			Price *
Issuance of common stock		550,000		5,500		206,500					212,000		$	0.39
Issued stock to pay bills		1,069,945		10,699		460,077					470,776		$	0.44
Issued stock for services		2,118,444		21,184		652,714					673,898		$	0.32
Net loss for the fiscal year								(964,108	)		(964,108	)
Balance at September 30, 2004		29,531,462	$	295,314	$	6,685,716	$	(7,094,453	)	$	(113,423	)
Issuance of common stock		150,000		1,500		46,500					48,000		$	0.32
Issued stock for services		2,840,000		28,400		331,600					360,000		$	0.13
Issued stock to pay debt		400,000		4,000		50,000					54,000		$	0.14
Issuance of warrants						1,817					1,817
Net loss for the fiscal year								(628,337	)		(628,337	)
Balance at September 30, 2005		32,921,462	$	329,214	$	7,115,633	$	(7,722,790	)	$	(277,943	)
Issued stock for services		885,000		8,850		70,800					79,650		$	0.09
Net loss for the period								(837,551	)		(837,551	)
Balance at September 30, 2006		33,806,462	$	338,064	$	7,186,433	$	(8,560,341	)	$	(1,035,844	)
Issued stock for services		50,000		500		4,500					5,000		$	0.10
Issuance of convertible debt						648,098					648,098
Net loss for the fiscal year								(3,176,745	)		(3,176,745	)
Balance at September 30, 2007		33,856,462		338,564		7,839,031		(11,737,086	)		(3,559,491	)

34

USCorp

(an Exploration Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

From Inception in May 1989

(Continued)

	Common		Common		Paid in			Accumulated						Stock
	Shares		Par Value		Capital			Deficit			Total			Price *
Issuance of common stock		10,011,879		100,119		638,559						738,678		$	0.07
Issued stock for services		9,517,664		95,177		2,447,473						2,542,650		$	0.27
Conversion of debentures		7,200,000		72,000		828,000						900,000		$	0.13
Conversion of preferred stock		26,626		266		6,401						6,667		$	0.25
Issuance of convertible debt						56,000						56,000
Net loss for the fiscal period- as restated									(2,498,879	)		(2,498,879	)
Balance at September 30, 2008		60,612,631		606,126		11,815,464			(14,235,965	)		(1,814,375	)
Issuance of common stock		12,261,765		122,618		304,845						427,463		$	0.03
Issued stock for services		845,064		8,451		53,939						62,390		$	0.07
Issued stock to settle lawsuit		200,000		2,000		10,000						12,000		$	0.06
Conversion of Preferred A		400,000		4,000		(3,933	)					67
Issuance of convertible debt						3,000						3,000
Net loss for the year									(1,293,237	)		(1,293,237	)
Balance at September 30, 2009		74,319,460		743,195		12,183,315			(15,529,202	)		(2,602,692	)
Issuance of common stock		43,457,363		434,574		566,795						1,001,369		$	0.02
Issued stock for services		8,778,566		87,786		214,884						302,670		$	0.03
Converted preferred A		9,400,000		94,000		(94,000	)					0
Net loss for the year									(2,203,184	)		(2,203,184	)
Balance at September 30, 2010		135,955,389		1,359,555		12,870,994			(17,732,386	)		(3,501,837	)
Issuance of common stock		41,594,631		415,946		2,491,634						2,907,580		$	0.07
Issued stock for services		5,016,591		50,166		308,264						358,430		$	0.07
Issued stock to extend debt maturities		3,200,000		32,000		176,000						208,000		$	0.07
Issued stock to pay debenture		800,000		8,000		42,000						50,000		$	0.06
Converted preferred A stock		8,400,000		84,000		(84,000	)					0
Net loss for the year									(3,086,774	)		(3,086,774	)
Balance at September 30, 2011		194,966,611	$	1,949,667	$	15,804,892		$	(20,819,160	)	$	(3,064,601	)

*- Price adjusted for stock splits                          Please see the notes to the financial statements.

35

USCorp

(an Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the Years Ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010

1. Organization of the Company and Significant Accounting Principles

USCorp (the “Company”) is a publicly held corporation formed in May 1989 in the state of Nevada. In April 2002 the Company acquired USMetals, Inc. (“USMetals”), a Nevada corporation, and its 141 unpatented mining claims in Yavapai County Arizona. USMetals and its 141 unpatented mining claims known as The Twin Peaks Project now consists of 268 unpatented Lode and 8 Placer Claims. In addition, The Company, through its subsidiary Southwest Resource Development, Inc., owns 200 unpatented Lode and Placer Claims on five properties in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County, California, which the Company collectively refers to as the Picacho Salton Project.

The Company has no revenues to date and has defined itself as an “exploration stage” company.

Exploration Stage Company- the Company has no operations or revenues since its inception and therefore qualifies for treatment as an Exploration Stage company as per the accounting guidance.  Financial transactions are accounted for as per generally accepted accounted principles.  Costs incurred during the development stage are accumulated in “accumulated deficit- exploration stage” and are reported in the Stockholders’ Deficit section of the balance sheet.

Consolidation- the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries.  All significant inter-company balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates- The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses at the date of the financial statements and for the period they include.  Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Cash- For the purpose of calculating changes in cash flows, cash includes all cash balances and highly liquid short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

Long Lived Assets- The Company reviews for the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount.

Property and Equipment- Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation expense on equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset, which is estimated at three years.

Income taxes- The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between the consolidated financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable income or deductible expenses in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets and liabilities to the amount expected to be realized.  Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period adjusted for the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The Company follows the accounting requirements associated with uncertainty in income taxes using the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC 740, Income Taxes. Using that guidance, tax positions initially need to be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the positions will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities.  It also provides guidance for derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  As of September 30, 2011, the Company has no uncertain tax positions that qualify for either recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.  All tax returns from tax years 2007 to 2010 are subject to IRS audit.

36

Mineral Properties- Costs incurred to acquire mineral interest in properties, to drill and equip exploratory sites within the claims groups, to conduct exploration and assay work are expensed as incurred.

Revenue Recognition- Mineral sales will result from undivided interests held by the Company in mineral properties. Sales of minerals will be recognized when delivered to be picked up by the purchaser. Mineral sales from marketing activities will result from sales by the Company of minerals produced by the Company (or affiliated entities) and will be recognized when delivered to purchasers. Mining revenues generated from the Company’s day rate contracts, included in mine services revenue, will be recognized as services are performed or delivered.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

ASU No. 2011-02; A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”).  In April, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, intended to provide additional guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a restructuring of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and are to be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-02 will not have a material affect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2011-04; Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.   In May, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04. The amendments in this ASU generally represent clarifications of Topic 820, but also include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed.  This ASU results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.  The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. The Company will adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and does not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations.

2. Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which assume the continuity of the Company as a going concern.  However, the Company has incurred significant losses since its inception and has no revenues and continues to rely on the issuance of shares and warrants to raise capital to fund its business operations.

Management’s plans with regard to this matter are as follows:

* Obtain the necessary approvals and permits to complete exploration and begin test production on our properties as warranted. An application for drilling on Picacho Salton Project has been submitted to the Bureau of Land Management and is being reviewed by them. A drilling plan for the newly-expanded Twin Peaks Project has been approved and commenced in November 2011.

* Complete the recently approved revised drilling program currently underway on the Twin Peaks property with expected completion in March 2012;

* Receive BLM permit for Picacho Salton Project in California; Drill the Picacho Salton Project.

* Receive and analyze the Twin Peaks assays and drill reports and Picacho Salton assays and drill reports;

* Review the results of the drilling programs on each of the sites when completed . After consideration of the nature of the ore bodies of the properties, Management will make decisions regarding further development of the properties, including beginning commercial scale operations when exploration is completed on the Twin Peaks Project and the Picacho Salton Project.

* Continue exploration and ramp up transitioning to development and production in order to meet ongoing and anticipated demand for gold and silver.

37

* Continue to augment our mining exploration team and strategic business relationships with quality and results-oriented people as needed: professionals and consulting firms to advise management to handle mining operations, acquisitions and development of existing and future mineral resource properties.

* Continue to recruit strategic business alliances with consultants, engineers, contractors as well as joint venture partners when appropriate, and set up an information and communication network that allows the alliance to function effectively to develop the properties.

* Draw up and Submit to the BLM the final Mining Plan of Operations ("MPO") for the Twin Peaks; Submit the MPO to the BLM;

* Submit the Final MPO on the Picacho Salton Project to the BLM.

* Begin commercial scale operations on one or more of the properties as soon as the required permits and approvals have been granted, or be acquired by a major gold mining company.

* Continue to acquire additional properties and/or from strategic business relationships with corporations with properties as joint ventures or subsidiaries in order to advance the company’s growth plans.

3. Fair values of Financial Instruments

Cash, deferred charge, accounts payable and accrued expenses, subscriptions payable, gold bullion loan payable, convertible debentures payable and the advances payable to shareholder in the balance sheet are estimated to approximate fair market value at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010.

4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 is comprised as follows.

	30-Sep-11			30-Sep-10
Office equipment	$	21,305		$	17,555
Vehicle		16,065			0
Land deposit		10,000			0
Accumulated depreciation		(21,230	)		(17,179	)
Property & equipment- net	$	26,140		$	376

In June 2011, the Company deposited $10,000 in escrow for 20 acres of land in Yavapai County, Arizona.  The purchase price of the land is $750,000 and is currently undergoing title search.  The Company intends to purchase the land once the title search has been affirmed. .As of the date of this filing this transaction has not yet been consummated.

5. Gold Bullion Promissory Note

In September 2005, the Company issued a promissory note to a shareholder and received proceeds of $648,282. The note requires the Company to pay the shareholder 2,507 ounces of Gold Bullion (.999 pure). Originally, the promissory note came due in September 2007. Subsequently, the holder of the note extending the maturity date on an informal ongoing basis. The loan had been in default but the maturity debt was extended to March 2012 in exchange for 3,200,000 shares of common stock.  The Company continues to accrue interest and to calculate the loan at fair value.

The loss on the underlying gold derivative on the promissory note has been calculated as follows.

Carrying value of loan	$	979,548
Fair value of loan		4,061,340
Life to date loss on unhedged underlying derivative	$	(3,081,792	)

38

6. Convertible Debentures

During the fiscal year 2007, the Company issued convertible debentures with a face value of $1,200,000. The debentures were convertible into common stock at $0.125 per share.  The debentures had an interest rate of 5%. During the fiscal year 2008, the holder of these debentures converted $900,000 of the debentures to 7,200,000 shares of common stock.

In fiscal year 2008 the Company issued an additional convertible debenture to the same holder and received proceeds of $200,000.  This debenture is exercisable into common stock at $0.125 per share, and has an interest rate of 4%.

In fiscal year 2009 the Company issued an additional convertible debenture to the same holder and received proceeds of $200,000.  This debenture is exercisable into common stock at $0.125 per share, and has an interest rate of 4%. The Company issued an additional $56,700 debenture during fiscal year 2009 exercisable at $0.15 per share and at an interest rate of 5%.

In fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock and paid $125,000 to pay $175,000 of the debentures.

All of the debentures had been in default but the maturity dates were extended to March 2012 in exchange for the payment of 800,000 shares of common stock and $125,000 to pay down $175,000 of the debentures.  The Company has agreed to pay the balance of the debentures as follows:  $25,000 by December 31, 2011 and $500,000 by March 31, 2012.

7. Income Tax Provision

Provision for income taxes is comprised of the following:

	30-Sep-11			30-Sep-10
Net loss before provision for income taxes	$	(3,086,774	)	$	(2,203,184	)
Current tax expense:
Federal	$	0		$	0
State		0			0
Total	$	0		$	0
Less deferred tax benefit:
Tax loss carryforwards		4,583,914			3,225,733
Allowance for recoverability		(4,583,914	)		(3,225,733	)
Provision for income taxes	$	0		$	0

39

A reconciliation of provision for income taxes at the statutory rate to provision for income taxes at the Company's effective tax rate is as follows:
Statutory U.S. federal rate		34	%		34	%
Statutory state and local income tax		10	%		10	%
Less allowance for tax recoverability		-44	%		-44	%
Effective rate		0	%		0	%
Deferred income taxes are comprised of the following:
Tax loss carryforwards	$	4,583,914		$	3,225,733
Allowance for recoverability		(4,583,914	)		(3,225,733	)
Deferred tax benefit	$	0		$	0

Note:  The deferred tax benefits arising from the timing differences begin to expire in tax years 2011 to 2030 and may not be recoverable upon the purchase of the Company under current IRS statutes.

8. Issuances of Common Stock

During fiscal year 2010, the Company issued 31,680,386 shares of common stock and received proceeds of $743,494. Purchasers of the common stock also received the option to purchase an additional 104,244,579 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $0.06 per share expiring in fiscal years 2011 and 2012.

During fiscal year 2010, the Company issued 8,778,566 shares of common stock to consultants for services received valued at $292,291.

During fiscal year 2010, 11,776,975 warrants were exercised and the Company issued 11,776,975 shares of common stock and received proceeds of $257,875.

During fiscal year 2010, holders of the preferred A convertible stock converted 1,175,000 shares of preferred A into 9,400,000 shares of common stock.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 41,594,631 common shares with 41,594,631 warrants attached convertible into the same amount of common shares at a weighted average exercise price of $0.11 expiring in 2011 and 2012.  The Company received proceeds of $2,907,580.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 5,016,591 shares of common stock to consultants for services rendered valued by the Company at $358,430.

During fiscal year 2011, holders of the preferred A stock converted 1.05 million preferred A into 8.4 million shares of common stock.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 3,200,000 shares of common stock to to extend the maturity date of the Gold Bullion Loan discussed in Note 5.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock to pay $50,000 of the convertible debentures discussed in Note 6..

40

9. Common Stock Options

The Company applies ASC 718, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” to account for its option issues.  Accordingly, all options granted are recorded at fair value using a generally accepted option pricing model at the date of the grant.  For purposes of determining the option value at issuance, the fair value of each option granted is measured at the date of the grant by the option pricing model with the following assumptions:

	2011			2010
Dividend yield		0.00	%		0.00	%
Risk free interest rate		0.50	%		0.50	%
Volatility		23.00	%		39.00	%

The fair values generated by option pricing model may not be indicative of the future values, if any, that may be received by the option holder.

The following is a summary of common stock options outstanding at September 30, 2011:

				Wgtd Avg		Wgtd Years
	Amount			Exercise Price		to Maturity
Outstanding at September 30, 2009		9,491,303		$	0.33		0.54
Issues		104,684,063
Exercises		(11,776,975	)
Expired		(1,818,907	)
Outstanding at September 30, 2010		100,579,484		$	0.06		1.42
Issues		42,764,999
Exercises		(34,585,000	)
Expired		(28,084,484	)
Outstanding at September 30, 2011		80,674,999		$	0.10		0.71

10. Stock Incentive Plan

The Company provides for a Stock Incentive Plan for its officers, directors, and employees as fully explained in our Form S-8 filing dated December 29, 2009 and as Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 10-K/A for period ending September 30, 2010 filing date April 22, 2011 both of which are included herein by reference.  The plan provides for incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. The Board of Directors will determine the exercise price of an employee’s option at the date of the grant. The exercise price of an incentive stock option may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant, or less than 110% of the fair market value if the participant owns more than 10% of the outstanding common stock. The Board of Directors will also determine the term of an option at the date of the grant. The term of an incentive stock option or non-qualified stock option may not exceed ten years from the date of grant, but any incentive stock option granted to a participant who owns more than 10% of the outstanding common stock will not be exercisable after the expiration of five years after the date the option is granted. Subject to any further limitations in the applicable agreement, if a participant’s employment terminates, an incentive stock option will terminate and expire no later than three months after the date of termination of employment.

41

Incentive stock options are also subject to the further restriction that the aggregate fair market value, determined as of the date of the grant, of the market value of the common Stock as to which any incentive stock option first becomes exercisable in any calendar year is limited to $100,000 per recipient. If incentive stock options covering more than $100,000 worth of the common stock first become exercisable in any one calendar year, the excess will be non-qualified options. For purposes of determining which options, if any, have been granted in excess of the $100,000 limit, options will be considered to become exercisable in the order granted. The plan also provides for the payment of professionals with Class A Common Shares of the Company’s stock.

11. Class B Common Shares

The Class B Common shares are non-voting shares that trade on the Frankfurt stock exchange under the symbol U9CB.F. There are 250,000,000 shares authorized and 5,060,500 issued and outstanding. The par value of these shares is $0.001. These shares do not trade in the United States on any market and the Company has no plans to register these shares for trading in the U.S.

12.  Net Loss per Share

The Company applies ASC 260, “Earnings per Share” to calculate loss per share.  In accordance with ASC 260, basic net loss per share has been computed based on the weighted average of common shares outstanding during the years, adjusted for the financial instruments outstanding that are convertible into common stock during the years.  The effects of the common stock options and the debentures convertible into shares of common stock, however, have been excluded from the calculation of loss per share because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Net loss per share is computed as follows:

	30-Sep-11			30-Sep-10
Net loss before cumulative preferred dividend	$	(3,086,774	)	$	(2,203,184	)
Cumulative dividend preferred payable		(49,464	)		(42,380	)
Net loss to common shareholders	$	(3,136,238	)	$	(2,245,564	)
Weighted average		168,514,462			92,355,392
Basic & fully diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)

13. Concentrations of Credit

The Company heavily relies upon the efforts of the Company’s chief executive officer and majority shareholder for the success of the Company.  A withdrawal of the chief executive’s officer efforts would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.

42

14. Subsequent Events

Between October 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011 the Company issued 12,655,000 shares of common stock (some of which were paid for during prior quarter) and received proceeds of $178,585.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

There are no changes or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure.

ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure and controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2010. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Item 9B. Other Information

In October 2004 the shareholders approved a new class of Common Stock, 250,000,000 shares of $.001 par value Series B Common Stock. Effective November 17, 2004, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to create a new series “Class B” of $.001 par value common stock in the amount of 250,000,000 shares.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Name	Age	Position Held
Robert Dultz	70	Chief Executive Officer, acting CFO, President and a Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Spencer Eubank	60	Secretary, Treasurer and a Director
Carl W. O’Baugh	80	Director
B. Keith Simerson	55	Director
Michelle Seibel	56	Director
Michael D. Love	60	Vice President of Business Development and Investor Relations

Directors hold office until the next annual shareholders meeting or until their death, resignation, retirement, removal, disqualification, or until a successor has been elected. Vacancies in the Board are filled by majority vote of the remaining directors. Officers of the Company serve at the will of the Board of Directors.

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE OF CURRENT DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008

Robert Dultz, USCorp’s Chairman and CEO since January 2002 and President since 2008, has an over 25-year association with the Twin Peaks property and as an individual is a former owner of a portion of the claims which make up the Twin Peaks property. Mr. Dultz is the former Chairman and President of American Metals and Minerals, Inc., (a public company “AMM” 1980s); He also served in various officer and director positions with Sweet Stuff, Inc. and U.S. Network Funding, Inc. (both public companies 1980s and 1990s) Santa Maria Resources, Inc., (also public “SMRR” 1990s) and U.S. Metals And Minerals, Inc. (a private company “USM&M” 2000s). AMM, SMRR and USM&M were each prior corporate owners of the Twin Peaks claims. Since 2000 he has been a majority shareholder of corporate owners of the claims: U.S. Metals and Minerals and USCorp. Over the past thirty years Mr. Dultz has served on the boards of several publicly traded companies including those named above. For the past five years Mr. Dultz has spent in excess of 90% of his time working for USCorp. He does not serve on the boards of any other public companies at this time. Mr. Dultz has held the same board and officer positions as he holds with USCorp on USCorp’s wholly owned subsidiaries, USMetals, Inc., and Southern Resource Development, Inc. since they were acquired. He has not served on the boards of any other public companies during the past five years. Since March, 2011 Mr. Dultz has also served as the Vice President of Arizona Gold Corp., a private British Colombia Corporation.

43

Spencer Eubank is Secretary, Treasurer and Director of the Company. Mr. Eubank has a 20-year history of association with the Twin Peaks Project properties and is a former owner of a portion of the Twin Peaks Project claims. Mr. Eubank is responsible for maintaining the records of the Company and works closely with the senior executive management of the Company in day-to-day operations. Mr. Eubank was elected to the board of directors based on his prior association with corporate owners of the properties, as a shareholder of and consultant to American Metals and Minerals, Inc. (a public company 1990s), as an officer and director of Santa Maria Resources, Inc. (a public company 1990s) and U.S. Metals and Minerals, Inc. (a private company 1990s), his knowledge of the properties as a former owner of a portion of the claims group that makes up the Twin Peaks Project (1990s), and his consulting experience working with company operators and assisting them in their communications with legal and accounting professionals. In the 1990s Mr. Eubank served on the boards of several public, private and not-for-profit Companies as an officer and director including EssxSport Corp. (a public company January 1996 to March 1998), and Pla.Net.Com, Inc. (a public company February 1997 to July 1999); The Laurinburg Group, Inc. (a private company, 1990s), Southern Development Company (a public company, 1990s) and Route 66 Gold Miners, Inc., (a not-for-profit company, 2000s). During the past 5 years, except for a brief period in 2006, Mr. Eubank has held the same board and officer positions with USCorp and on USCorp’s wholly owned subsidiaries, USMetals, Inc., and Southern Resource Development, Inc. since they were acquired. He has not served on the boards of any other public companies during the past five years. He devotes approximately 50% of his time to USCorp. Since the early 1990s Mr. Eubank has been the owner of UpAndRunning (1990s) and Business2Business (2000s) independent private research and consulting services. Mr. Eubank has degrees in Theology (B.Th., 1985) and Sociology (B.A., 1988).

Carl W. O’ Baugh, an Independent Director of the Company since January 2002, and has an over 20-year association with the Twin peaks property. Former Vice President of USCorp and Former President of American Metals and Minerals, Inc., a prior corporate owner of the Twin Peaks claims. He is the former President of Golconda Gems, Inc., that during the 1980s and early 1990s was a wholesale gem cutting, importing and distribution company with operations in the United States and Mexico and over 200 employees. His extensive knowledge and experience of gems, minerals and metals as well as his long association with the Twin Peaks Project Claims were factors in his election to the board of directors. Mr. O’Baugh has not served on the boards of any other public companies in the past 5 years. Mr. O’Baugh has been retired since 2000 and devotes less than 5% of his time to USCorp.

B. Keith Simerson is an Independent Director of the Company. Mr. Simerson was elected to the Board based on his expertise in, and track record of, helping companies across many industries, governments, and public-sector agencies and organizations formulate an execute strategy and he is experienced in helping corporations and organizations plan, prepare for, integrate, and coordinate their growth and development. Mr. Simerson co-founded in 2001 and today is one of two co-owners of Tradewinds Consulting, LLC, a consultancy that provides a range of strategic planning, change management, and leadership development services to four branches of the military, several federal government agencies, various management consulting firms, and to clients in the automotive, heavy construction, civil engineering, consumer electronics, industrial supplies, heavy machinery, rubber, paper, medical devices, and electronics industries. Mr. Simerson earned his Doctorate in Education with emphasis in management and organization development, from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. He earned an M.A. with emphasis in administration, supervision, and higher education, from Appalachian State University. He also has BA and AAS degrees and specialty certifications. Mr. Simerson is the co-author of The Manager as Leader (Praeger Publishers, 2006), Fired, Laid Off, Out of a Job: A Manual for Understanding, Coping, Surviving (Greenwood, 2003), and Evaluating Police Management Development Programs (Praeger Publishing, 1990). Mr. Simerson is also the author of Strategic Planning: A Practical Guide to Strategy Formulation and Execution (ABC-CLIO, 2011). Since 2007 Mr. Simerson has been on the Faculty of Northwestern University’s School of Education and Social Policy, where he instructs, researches, and publishes in the areas of Strategic Thinking, Strategy Formulation, Strategic Planning, and Strategy Execution. Mr. Simerson spends less than 5% of his time in service to USCorp.

Michelle Seibel is a Director and Assistant Secretary of the Company. Until 2006 Ms. Seibel was an entrepreneurial business owner of Computer Friendly providing IT consulting services in California and has extensive experience in bookkeeping training, and also until 2006 she was the owner of Seibel Custom Applications a business that provided construction management services. She works closely with the Company’s Chairman and CEO and was elected to the board based on her business experience and her ability to understand shareholder and investor relations. She has not served on the boards of any other public companies and is not otherwise employed at this time. Ms. Seibel devotes approximately 50% of her time in service to USCorp.

44

Michael D. Love, is USCorp’s Vice President of Investor Relations and Business Development. Mr. Love was appointed as an officer of USCorp based on his over 30 years of domestic and international business experience, as well as his knowledge of USCorp, its management, and its properties as a long-time shareholder. Over the years he has raised more than $3 billion dollars and generated revenue in excess of $600 million for various projects in the fields of charitable and business fundraising, municipal bonds (as an account executive with MuniciCorp of California, Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith 1970s and 1980s), commodity trading, (as an account executive with Smith, Barney, Harris & Upham, North Star Metals, and as a member of the Minor Metals Trader Association Western Europe, 1980s and 1990s), marketing of investment and high tech products, real estate sales and acquisitions (as CEO of North Star Metals Development Corp. 1980s), sports promotions (as CEO of CML Promotions, 1980s), newspaper operations (as Chairman of The African Times Newspaper, 1990s) and most recently as CEO and Founder of Ehbet Marketing (1990s and 2000s). During the past ten years Mr. Love has worked on various projects as an independent consultant including being an advisor to USCorp’s management. Mr. Love is a Vietnam Veteran and he has a BA in Business Administration. Mr. Love spends approximately 80% of his time in service to USCorp.

(a) Family relationships.

There are no family relationships among the officers or directors.

(b) Involvement in certain legal proceedings.

There have been no events under any bankruptcy act, no criminal proceedings and no judgments or injunctions material to the evaluation of the ability and integrity of any director or executive officer during the past ten years except for the personal bankruptcy of Ms. Seibel in 2006.

(c) Adoption of Code of Ethics.

On September 22, 2004 USCorp adopted a Code of Ethics for officers and directors of the Company, filed previously on Form 10-KSB on November 26, 2004 and included herein by reference.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of its common stock, to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and each exchange (or market quotation system) on which the Company’s securities are registered. Officers, directors and greater than ten-percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all ownership forms they file.

Based solely on current management’s review of the copies of such forms received by it from former management, the Company believes that, during the year ended September 30, 2011 its officers, directors, and greater than ten-percent beneficial owners complied with all applicable filing requirements.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

During the fiscal year, some of USCorp’s officers did not devote their full time to the affairs of USCorp, and none of them received monetary compensation for their services as officers; however, USCorp’s officers and directors have purchased shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred stock at par value. USCorp’s Chairman, President and CEO, Robert Dultz, devoted his full time to the affairs of USCorp. Mr. Dultz may receive cash, stock or a combination thereof in repayment of his advances and in compensation for his full time efforts. (see Notes to the Summary Compensation Table below.)

Summary Compensation Table(1)

Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock awards ($)		Option awards ($)		Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)		Change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings ($)		All other compensation ($)		Total ($)
Robert Dultz PEO and PFO	Fiscal 2010		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Robert Dultz PEO and PFO	Fiscal 20110		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0

(1) Mr. Dultz is USCorp’s CEO and Acting CFO. There are no written employment agreements in effect for any executives, officers or directors at this time. Unwritten agreements are that executives, officers and directors who agree to serve might receive monetary compensation for employment (a) when the Company has sufficient financing and (b) if approved by the Board of Directors; however the Board of Directors has not approved any such compensation as of the date of this report. There are no additional unwritten employment agreement provisions in effect for any executives, officers or directors at this time, including no provision that cover compensation for service rendered in the past and up to the point when the Company establishes sufficient financing.

45

As of the date of this report USCorp does not have an executive committee that approves obligations in excess of $10,000. These functions are performed by our Board of Directors in accordance with our bylaws, in Article VI, Sections 2 and 8.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of USCorp’s Class A Common Stock by each person or group that is known by USCorp to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of its outstanding Common Stock, each director of USCorp, each person named in the Summary Compensation Table, and all directors and executive officers of USCorp as a group as of September 30, 2011.

Unless otherwise indicated, USCorp believes that the persons named in the table below, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole voting and investment power with respect to the Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by them, where applicable. As of September 30, 2011, there were 194,996,911 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding.

Name and	Class A		Series A				Percentage
Address of	Common		Preferred				of
Beneficial	Voting		Voting*		Total		Voting
Owner	Ownership		Ownership		Votes		Ownership
Robert Dultz c/o USCorp,
4535 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200,
Las Vegas, NV 89102		18,122,925		5,750,000		64,122,925		47.16	%
Spencer Eubank c/o USCorp,
4535 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200,
Las Vegas, NV 89102		1,619,980		500,000		5,619,980		4.13	%
Carl O’Baugh c/o USCorp,
4535 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200,
Las Vegas, NV 89102		426,250		50,000		826,250		0.61	%
B. Keith Simerson c/o USCorp,
4535 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200,
Las Vegas, NV 89102				56,250		450,000		0.33	%
Michelle Seibel
4535 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200,
Las Vegas, NV 89102		60,000		250,000		2,060,000		1.52	%
Officers, Directors and Affiliates as a group (5 individuals)		20,229,155		6,606,250		73,079,155		53.75	%

*Series A Preferred Shares are convertible to Common 8 for 1 and are voting before conversion.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Company is provided office equipment and space by the chief executive officer and majority shareholder, Mr. Robert Dultz. The replacement value of office equipment is approximately $24,000 per year and the space currently consists of approximately 1,500 square feet. . At this time Mr. Dultz does not charge USCorp for the use of this space. The approximate cost of leasing 1,500 square feet of office space is between $22,500 and $25,000 per year. Also during fiscal 2010 Mr. Dultz loaned USCorp $10,000 and received $40,246 as payment in full for loans made during fiscal 2010 and in prior years to the Company. There were no other related party transactions during the period of this report.

46

PART IV

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy regarding the retention of the independent auditors that requires pre-approval of all services by the Audit Committee or the Chairman of the Audit Committee. When services are pre-approved by the Chairman of the Audit Committee, notice of such approvals is given simultaneously to the other members of the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the fees paid to Donahue Associates, LLC for the reports covering fiscal 2010 and 2011 for audit, audit-related, tax and other services.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with the Company’s management; and discussed with Donahue Associates, LLC, independent auditors for the Company, the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended.

The aggregate fees billed for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2011 for professional services rendered by Donahue Associates, LLC for the audit of the Company’s financial statements were $10,700 for fiscal 2010 and $17,100 for audit and quarterly review of interim financial statements filed on Form 10-Q, respectively, during fiscal 2011.

Audit-Related Fees

Donahue Associates, LLC did not bill us for any assurance or related services that were related to the performance of the audit of the financial statements.

Tax Fees

Donahue Associates, LLC has provided professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning in the amount of $450 during fiscal 2011.

Other Fees

No other fees were paid to Donahue Associates, LLC.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

(A) EXHIBITS

3.1	USCorp Articles of Incorporation as Amended (1)
3.2	USCorp Bylaws (1)
10.1	Stock Incentive Plan (1)
14.1	Code of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers*
21.1	List of Subsidiaries (1)
23.1	Consent of Donahue Associates, LLC
31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

* Previously filed on Form 10-KSB, November 26, 2004

(1) Previously filed on Form 10-K/A April 22, 2011

47

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company has duly caused this amended report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	USCORP.
Dated: January 12, 2012	By:	\s\ Robert Dultz
		Robert Dultz
		President, Chairman, CEO and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Annual Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature	Title	Date
\s\ Robert Dultz	President, Chairman and CEO	January 12, 2012
Robert Dultz	and acting Chief Financial Officer
\s\ Spencer Eubank	Secretary-Treasurer	January 12, 2012
Spencer Eubank	and Director
\s\ Carl O’Baugh	Director	January 12, 2012
Carl O’Baugh
\s\ B. Keith Simerson	Director	January 12, 2012
B. Keith Simerson
\s\ Michelle Seibel	Director	January 12, 2012
Michelle Seibel

48

EX-23.1

EX-23.1.

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

USCorp.

We consent to the inclusion in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, of our report relating to the balance sheet of USCorp as of September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, cash flows for the years then ended.

\s\ Donahue Associates, LLC

Donahue Associates, LLC

Monmouth Beach, New Jersey

January 12, 2012

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert Dultz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of USCorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of The registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 12, 2012	By:	\s\ Robert Dultz
		Robert Dultz, President
		Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of USCorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Dultz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

\s\ Robert Dultz

Robert Dultz, President

Chief Executive Officer and

Acting Chief Financial Officer

Date: January 12, 2012

XML

Fair values of Financial Instruments

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Fair values of Financial Instruments

3. Fair values of Financial Instruments

Cash, deferred charge, accounts payable and accrued expenses, subscriptions payable, gold bullion loan payable, convertible debentures payable and the advances payable to shareholder in the balance sheet are estimated to approximate fair market value at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010.

XML

Going Concern

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Going Concern

2. Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which assume the continuity of the Company as a going concern.  However, the Company has incurred significant losses since its inception and has no revenues and continues to rely on the issuance of shares and warrants to raise capital to fund its business operations.

Management’s plans with regard to this matter are as follows:

* Obtain the necessary approvals and permits to complete exploration and begin test production on our properties as warranted. An application for drilling on Picacho Salton Project has been submitted to the Bureau of Land Management and is being reviewed by them. A drilling plan for the newly-expanded Twin Peaks Project has been approved and commenced in November 2011.

* Complete the recently approved revised drilling program currently underway on the Twin Peaks property with expected completion in March 2012;

* Receive BLM permit for Picacho Salton Project in California; Drill the Picacho Salton Project.

* Receive and analyze the Twin Peaks assays and drill reports and Picacho Salton assays and drill reports;

* Review the results of the drilling programs on each of the sites when completed . After consideration of the nature of the ore bodies of the properties, Management will make decisions regarding further development of the properties, including beginning commercial scale operations when exploration is completed on the Twin Peaks Project and the Picacho Salton Project.

* Continue exploration and ramp up transitioning to development and production in order to meet ongoing and anticipated demand for gold and silver.

* Continue to augment our mining exploration team and strategic business relationships with quality and results-oriented people as needed: professionals and consulting firms to advise management to handle mining operations, acquisitions and development of existing and future mineral resource properties.

* Continue to recruit strategic business alliances with consultants, engineers, contractors as well as joint venture partners when appropriate, and set up an information and communication network that allows the alliance to function effectively to develop the properties.

* Draw up and Submit to the BLM the final Mining Plan of Operations ("MPO") for the Twin Peaks; Submit the MPO to the BLM;

* Submit the Final MPO on the Picacho Salton Project to the BLM.

* Begin commercial scale operations on one or more of the properties as soon as the required permits and approvals have been granted, or be acquired by a major gold mining company.

* Continue to acquire additional properties and/or from strategic business relationships with corporations with properties as joint ventures or subsidiaries in order to advance the company’s growth plans.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Current assets:
Cash	$ 1,686,996	$ 354,019
Deferred charge	116,204	0
Total current assets	1,803,200	354,019
Other assets:
Property & equipment- net	26,140	376
Total assets	1,829,340	354,395
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable & accrued expenses	147,539	65,468
Gold bullion loan	4,061,340	3,016,841
Convertible debentures payable	581,700	700,000
Subscriptions payable	30,500	0
Total current liabilities	4,821,079	3,782,309
Shareholders' equity:
Additional paid in capital	15,804,892	12,870,994
Accumulated deficit - exploration stage	(20,819,160)	(17,732,386)
Total shareholders' deficit	(3,064,601)	(3,501,837)
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Deficit	1,829,340	354,395
Series A Preferred Stock
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock	4,304	5,365
Series B Preferred Stock
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock	63,498	63,498
Common stock B
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock	5,060	5,060
Common stock A
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock	$ 1,949,667	$ 1,359,555

XML

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (USD $)		Total	For Cash	Mining Claim	Services	Compensation	Employees	Bills Payment	Debt Payment	Conversion of debentures	Conversion of preferred stock	Lawsuit Settlement	Series A Preferred Stock	Extended Debt Maturities	Debenture	Common Shares	Common Shares For Cash	Common Shares Mining Claim	Common Shares Services	Common Shares Compensation	Common Shares Employees	Common Shares Bills Payment	Common Shares Debt Payment	Common Shares Conversion of debentures	Common Shares Conversion of preferred stock	Common Shares Lawsuit Settlement	Common Shares Series A Preferred Stock	Common Shares Extended Debt Maturities	Common Shares Debenture	Paid in Capital	Paid in Capital For Cash	Paid in Capital Mining Claim	Paid in Capital Services	Paid in Capital Compensation	Paid in Capital Employees	Paid in Capital Bills Payment	Paid in Capital Debt Payment	Paid in Capital Conversion of debentures	Paid in Capital Conversion of preferred stock	Paid in Capital Lawsuit Settlement	Paid in Capital Series A Preferred Stock	Paid in Capital Extended Debt Maturities	Paid in Capital Debenture	Accumulated Deficit
Beginning Balance at Apr. 30, 1989		$ 0														$ 0														$ 0														$ 0
Beginning Balance (in shares) at Apr. 30, 1989																0
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	84,688
Issuance of common stock			1,186,000														847														1,185,153
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.07
Net income (loss)		520,000																																										520,000
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1990		1,706,000														847														1,185,153														520,000
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1990																84,688
Net income (loss)		1,108,000																																										1,108,000
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1991		2,814,000														847														1,185,153														1,628,000
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1991																84,688
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	472
Issuance of common stock			32,416														5														32,411
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.22
Net income (loss)		466,000																																										466,000
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1992		3,312,416														852														1,217,564														2,094,000
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1992																85,160
Net income (loss)		(3,116,767)																																										(3,116,767)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1993		195,649														852														1,217,564														(1,022,767)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1993																85,160
Net income (loss)		(63,388)																																										(63,388)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1994		132,261														852														1,217,564														(1,086,155)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1994																85,160
Net income (loss)		(132,261)																																										(132,261)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1995		0														852														1,217,564														(1,218,416)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1995																85,160
Net income (loss)		0																																										0
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1996		0														852														1,217,564														(1,218,416)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1996																85,160
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	50,000	150,000	14,878
Issuance of common stock			60,374	600,000	29,757												500	1,500	149												59,874	598,500	29,608
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.06	$ 0.2	$ 0.1
Net income (loss)		(90,131)																																										(90,131)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1997		600,000														3,001														1,905,546														(1,308,547)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1997																300,038
Capital contributed by shareholder		58,668																												58,668
Net income (loss)		(58,668)																																										(58,668)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1998		600,000														3,001														1,964,214														(1,367,215)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1998																300,038
Capital contributed by shareholder		28,654																												28,654
Net income (loss)		(26,705)																																										(26,705)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 1999		601,949														3,001														1,992,868														(1,393,920)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 1999																300,038
Capital contributed by shareholder		22,750																												22,750
Net income (loss)		(624,699)																																										(624,699)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2000		0														3,001														2,015,618														(2,018,619)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2000																300,038
Capital contributed by shareholder		21,719																												21,719
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	103,535			50,000
Issuance of common stock			612,978			20,071											1,035			500											611,943			19,571
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.15			$ 0.04
Net income (loss)		(654,768)																																										(654,768)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2001		0														4,536														2,668,851														(2,673,387)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2001																453,573
Capital contributed by shareholder		143,480																												143,480
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																		24,200,000			267,500
Issuance of common stock				2,449,466			0											242,000			2,675											2,207,466			(2,675)
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]			$ 0.1
Net income (loss)		(2,591,671)																																										(2,591,671)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2002		1,275														249,211														5,017,122														(5,265,058)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2002																24,921,073
Beneficial conversion feature		3,767																												3,767
Capital contributed by shareholder		81,472																												81,472
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																			872,000
Issuance of common stock					272,784														8,720														264,064
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]				$ 0.31
Net income (loss)		(865,287)																																										(865,287)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2003		(505,989)														257,931														5,366,425														(6,130,345)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2003																25,793,073
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	550,000		2,118,444			1,069,945
Issuance of common stock			212,000		673,898			470,776									5,500		21,184			10,699									206,500		652,714			460,077
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.39		$ 0.32			$ 0.44
Net income (loss)		(964,108)																																										(964,108)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2004		(113,423)														295,314														6,685,716														(7,094,453)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2004																29,531,462
Issuance of warrants		1,817																												1,817
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	150,000		2,840,000				400,000
Issuance of common stock			48,000		360,000				54,000								1,500		28,400				4,000								46,500		331,600				50,000
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.32		$ 0.13				$ 0.14
Net income (loss)		(628,337)																																										(628,337)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2005		(277,943)														329,214														7,115,633														(7,722,790)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2005																32,921,462
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																			885,000
Issuance of common stock					79,650														8,850														70,800
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]				$ 0.09
Net income (loss)		(837,551)																																										(837,551)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2006		(1,035,844)														338,064														7,186,433														(8,560,341)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2006																33,806,462
Issuance of convertible debt		648,098																												648,098
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																			50,000
Issuance of common stock					5,000														500														4,500
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]				$ 0.1
Net income (loss)		(3,176,745)																																										(3,176,745)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2007		(3,559,491)														338,564														7,839,031														(11,737,086)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2007																33,856,462
Issuance of convertible debt		56,000																												56,000
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	10,011,879		9,517,664					7,200,000	26,626
Issuance of common stock			738,678		2,542,650					900,000	6,667						100,119		95,177					72,000	266						638,559		2,447,473					828,000	6,401
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.07		$ 0.27					$ 0.13	$ 0.25
Net income (loss)		(2,498,879)																																										(2,498,879)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2008		(1,814,375)														606,126														11,815,464														(14,235,965)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2008																60,612,631
Issuance of convertible debt		3,000																												3,000
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	12,261,765		845,064							200,000
Issuance of common stock			427,463		62,390							12,000					122,618		8,451							2,000					304,845		53,939							10,000
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.03		$ 0.07							$ 0.06
Converted preferred A (in shares)																											400,000
Converted preferred A													67														4,000														(3,933)
Net income (loss)		(1,293,237)																																										(1,293,237)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2009		(2,602,692)														743,195														12,183,315														(15,529,202)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2009																74,319,460
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	43,457,363		8,778,566
Issuance of common stock			1,001,369		302,670												434,574		87,786												566,795		214,884
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.02		$ 0.03
Converted preferred A (in shares)																											9,400,000
Converted preferred A													0														94,000														(94,000)
Net income (loss)		(2,203,184)																																										(2,203,184)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2010		(3,501,837)														1,359,555														12,870,994														(17,732,386)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2010																135,955,389
Issuance of common stock (in shares)																	41,594,631		5,016,591									3,200,000	800,000
Issuance of common stock			2,907,580		358,430									208,000	50,000		415,946		50,166									32,000	8,000		2,491,634		308,264									176,000	42,000
Issuance of common stock, stock price	[1]		$ 0.07		$ 0.07									$ 0.07	$ 0.06
Converted preferred A (in shares)																											8,400,000
Converted preferred A													0														84,000														(84,000)
Net income (loss)		(3,086,774)																																										(3,086,774)
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2011		$ (3,064,601)														$ 1,949,667														$ 15,804,892														$ (20,819,160)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2011																194,966,611

[1] Price adjusted for stock splits Please see the notes to the

XML

Organization of the Company and Significant Accounting Principles

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Organization of the Company and Significant Accounting Principles

1. Organization of the Company and Significant Accounting Principles

USCorp (the “Company”) is a publicly held corporation formed in May 1989 in the state of Nevada. In April 2002 the Company acquired USMetals, Inc. (“USMetals”), a Nevada corporation, and its 141 unpatented mining claims in Yavapai County Arizona. USMetals and its 141 unpatented mining claims known as The Twin Peaks Project now consists of 268 unpatented Lode and 8 Placer Claims. In addition, The Company, through its subsidiary Southwest Resource Development, Inc., owns 200 unpatented Lode and Placer Claims on five properties in the Mesquite Mining District of Imperial County, California, which the Company collectively refers to as the Picacho Salton Project.

The Company has no revenues to date and has defined itself as an “exploration stage” company.

Exploration Stage Company- the Company has no operations or revenues since its inception and therefore qualifies for treatment as an Exploration Stage company as per the accounting guidance.  Financial transactions are accounted for as per generally accepted accounted principles.  Costs incurred during the development stage are accumulated in “accumulated deficit- exploration stage” and are reported in the Stockholders’ Deficit section of the balance sheet.

Consolidation- the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries.  All significant inter-company balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates- The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses at the date of the financial statements and for the period they include.  Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Cash- For the purpose of calculating changes in cash flows, cash includes all cash balances and highly liquid short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

Long Lived Assets- The Company reviews for the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than its carrying amount.

Property and Equipment- Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation expense on equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset, which is estimated at three years.

Income taxes- The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between the consolidated financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable income or deductible expenses in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income.  Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets and liabilities to the amount expected to be realized.  Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period adjusted for the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The Company follows the accounting requirements associated with uncertainty in income taxes using the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC 740, Income Taxes. Using that guidance, tax positions initially need to be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the positions will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities.  It also provides guidance for derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  As of September 30, 2011, the Company has no uncertain tax positions that qualify for either recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.  All tax returns from tax years 2007 to 2010 are subject to IRS audit.

Mineral Properties- Costs incurred to acquire mineral interest in properties, to drill and equip exploratory sites within the claims groups, to conduct exploration and assay work are expensed as incurred.

Revenue Recognition- Mineral sales will result from undivided interests held by the Company in mineral properties. Sales of minerals will be recognized when delivered to be picked up by the purchaser. Mineral sales from marketing activities will result from sales by the Company of minerals produced by the Company (or affiliated entities) and will be recognized when delivered to purchasers. Mining revenues generated from the Company’s day rate contracts, included in mine services revenue, will be recognized as services are performed or delivered.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

ASU No. 2011-02; A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”).  In April, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, intended to provide additional guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a restructuring of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and are to be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-02 will not have a material affect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2011-04; Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.   In May, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04. The amendments in this ASU generally represent clarifications of Topic 820, but also include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed.  This ASU results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.  The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. The Company will adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and does not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010
Series A Preferred Stock
Preferred stock, shares issued for each share of convertible preferred stock	8	8
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	2,943,750	3,993,750
Preferred stock, outstanding	2,943,750	3,993,750
Series B Preferred Stock
Preferred stock, shares issued for each share of convertible preferred stock	2	2
Preferred stock, cumulative stated dividend	10.00%	10.00%
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.50	$ 0.50
Preferred stock, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Preferred stock, outstanding	141,687	141,687
Common stock B
Common stock, par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, authorized	250,000,000	250,000,000
Common stock, issued	5,060,500	5,060,500
Common stock, outstanding	5,060,500	5,060,500
Common stock A
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, authorized	550,000,000	550,000,000
Common stock, issued	194,966,611	135,955,389
Common stock, outstanding	194,966,611	135,955,389

XML

Class B Common Shares

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Class B Common Shares

11. Class B Common Shares

The Class B Common shares are non-voting shares that trade on the Frankfurt stock exchange under the symbol U9CB.F. There are 250,000,000 shares authorized and 5,060,500 issued and outstanding. The par value of these shares is $0.001. These shares do not trade in the United States on any market and the Company has no plans to register these shares for trading in the U.S.

XML

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Jan. 09, 2012
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-K
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2011
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Trading Symbol	USCS
Entity Registrant Name	USCORP
Entity Central Index Key	0000873185
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--09-30
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Public Float		$ 2,643,897
Common Class A
Document Information [Line Items]
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	194,966,611
Common Class B
Document Information [Line Items]
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	5,060,500

XML

Net Loss per Share

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Net Loss per Share

12.  Net Loss per Share

The Company applies ASC 260, “Earnings per Share” to calculate loss per share.  In accordance with ASC 260, basic net loss per share has been computed based on the weighted average of common shares outstanding during the years, adjusted for the financial instruments outstanding that are convertible into common stock during the years.  The effects of the common stock options and the debentures convertible into shares of common stock, however, have been excluded from the calculation of loss per share because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Net loss per share is computed as follows:

	30-Sep-11			30-Sep-10
Net loss before cumulative preferred dividend	$	(3,086,774	)	$	(2,203,184	)
Cumulative dividend preferred payable		(49,464	)		(42,380	)
Net loss to common shareholders	$	(3,136,238	)	$	(2,245,564	)
Weighted average		168,514,462			92,355,392
Basic & fully diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended		269 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011
General and administrative expenses:
Consulting	$ 451,080	$ 215,248	$ 7,425,831
Administration	991,835	605,229	7,652,621
License & claim development expenses	368,129	55,097	615,688
Professional fees	108,930	37,410	823,063
Total general & administrative expenses	1,919,974	912,984	16,517,203
Net loss from operations	(1,919,974)	(912,984)	(16,517,203)
Other income (expenses):
Interest income	285	0	8,193
Interest expense	(179,796)	(116,593)	(1,228,358)
Gain (loss) on unhedged derivative	(987,289)	(1,173,607)	(3,081,792)
Net loss before provision for income taxes	(3,086,774)	(2,203,184)	(20,819,160)
Provision for income taxes	0	0	0
Net loss	$ (3,086,774)	$ (2,203,184)	$ (20,819,160)
Basic & fully diluted net loss per common share	$ (0.02)	$ (0.02)
Weighted average of common shares outstanding:
Basic & fully diluted	168,514,462	92,355,392

XML

Convertible Debentures

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Convertible Debentures

6. Convertible Debentures

During the fiscal year 2007, the Company issued convertible debentures with a face value of $1,200,000. The debentures were convertible into common stock at $0.125 per share.  The debentures had an interest rate of 5%. During the fiscal year 2008, the holder of these debentures converted $900,000 of the debentures to 7,200,000 shares of common stock.

In fiscal year 2008 the Company issued an additional convertible debenture to the same holder and received proceeds of $200,000.  This debenture is exercisable into common stock at $0.125 per share, and has an interest rate of 4%.

In fiscal year 2009 the Company issued an additional convertible debenture to the same holder and received proceeds of $200,000.  This debenture is exercisable into common stock at $0.125 per share, and has an interest rate of 4%. The Company issued an additional $56,700 debenture during fiscal year 2009 exercisable at $0.15 per share and at an interest rate of 5%.

In fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock and paid $125,000 to pay $175,000 of the debentures.

All of the debentures had been in default but the maturity dates were extended to March 2012 in exchange for the payment of 800,000 shares of common stock and $125,000 to pay down $175,000 of the debentures.  The Company has agreed to pay the balance of the debentures as follows:  $25,000 by December 31, 2011 and $500,000 by March 31, 2012.

XML

Gold Bullion Promissory Note

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Gold Bullion Promissory Note

5. Gold Bullion Promissory Note

In September 2005, the Company issued a promissory note to a shareholder and received proceeds of $648,282. The note requires the Company to pay the shareholder 2,507 ounces of Gold Bullion (.999 pure). Originally, the promissory note came due in September 2007. Subsequently, the holder of the note extending the maturity date on an informal ongoing basis. The loan had been in default but the maturity debt was extended to March 2012 in exchange for 3,200,000 shares of common stock.  The Company continues to accrue interest and to calculate the loan at fair value.

The loss on the underlying gold derivative on the promissory note has been calculated as follows.

Carrying value of loan	$	979,548
Fair value of loan		4,061,340
Life to date loss on unhedged underlying derivative	$	(3,081,792	)

XML

Concentrations of Credit

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Concentrations of Credit

13. Concentrations of Credit

The Company heavily relies upon the efforts of the Company’s chief executive officer and majority shareholder for the success of the Company.  A withdrawal of the chief executive’s officer efforts would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.

XML

Common Stock Options

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Common Stock Options

9. Common Stock Options

The Company applies ASC 718, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” to account for its option issues.  Accordingly, all options granted are recorded at fair value using a generally accepted option pricing model at the date of the grant.  For purposes of determining the option value at issuance, the fair value of each option granted is measured at the date of the grant by the option pricing model with the following assumptions:

	2011			2010
Dividend yield		0.00	%		0.00	%
Risk free interest rate		0.50	%		0.50	%
Volatility		23.00	%		39.00	%

The fair values generated by option pricing model may not be indicative of the future values, if any, that may be received by the option holder.

The following is a summary of common stock options outstanding at September 30, 2011:

				Wgtd Avg		Wgtd Years
	Amount			Exercise Price		to Maturity
Outstanding at September 30, 2009		9,491,303		$	0.33		0.54
Issues		104,684,063
Exercises		(11,776,975	)
Expired		(1,818,907	)
Outstanding at September 30, 2010		100,579,484		$	0.06		1.42
Issues		42,764,999
Exercises		(34,585,000	)
Expired		(28,084,484	)
Outstanding at September 30, 2011		80,674,999		$	0.10		0.71

XML

Income Tax Provision

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Income Tax Provision

7. Income Tax Provision

Provision for income taxes is comprised of the following:

	30-Sep-11			30-Sep-10
Net loss before provision for income taxes	$	(3,086,774	)	$	(2,203,184	)
Current tax expense:
Federal	$	0		$	0
State		0			0
Total	$	0		$	0
Less deferred tax benefit:
Tax loss carryforwards		4,583,914			3,225,733
Allowance for recoverability		(4,583,914	)		(3,225,733	)
Provision for income taxes	$	0		$	0

A reconciliation of provision for income taxes at the statutory rate to provision for income taxes at the Company's effective tax rate is as follows:
Statutory U.S. federal rate		34	%		34	%
Statutory state and local income tax		10	%		10	%
Less allowance for tax recoverability		-44	%		-44	%
Effective rate		0	%		0	%
Deferred income taxes are comprised of the following:
Tax loss carryforwards	$	4,583,914		$	3,225,733
Allowance for recoverability		(4,583,914	)		(3,225,733	)
Deferred tax benefit	$	0		$	0

Note:  The deferred tax benefits arising from the timing differences begin to expire in tax years 2011 to 2030 and may not be recoverable upon the purchase of the Company under current IRS statutes.

XML

Issuances of Common Stock

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Issuances of Common Stock

8. Issuances of Common Stock

During fiscal year 2010, the Company issued 31,680,386 shares of common stock and received proceeds of $743,494. Purchasers of the common stock also received the option to purchase an additional 104,244,579 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $0.06 per share expiring in fiscal years 2011 and 2012.

During fiscal year 2010, the Company issued 8,778,566 shares of common stock to consultants for services received valued at $292,291.

During fiscal year 2010, 11,776,975 warrants were exercised and the Company issued 11,776,975 shares of common stock and received proceeds of $257,875.

During fiscal year 2010, holders of the preferred A convertible stock converted 1,175,000 shares of preferred A into 9,400,000 shares of common stock.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 41,594,631 common shares with 41,594,631 warrants attached convertible into the same amount of common shares at a weighted average exercise price of $0.11 expiring in 2011 and 2012.  The Company received proceeds of $2,907,580.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 5,016,591 shares of common stock to consultants for services rendered valued by the Company at $358,430.

During fiscal year 2011, holders of the preferred A stock converted 1.05 million preferred A into 8.4 million shares of common stock.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 3,200,000 shares of common stock to to extend the maturity date of the Gold Bullion Loan discussed in Note 5.

During fiscal year 2011, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock to pay $50,000 of the convertible debentures discussed in Note 6..

XML

Stock Incentive Plan

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Stock Incentive Plan

10. Stock Incentive Plan

The Company provides for a Stock Incentive Plan for its officers, directors, and employees as fully explained in our Form S-8 filing dated December 29, 2009 and as Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 10-K/A for period ending September 30, 2010 filing date April 22, 2011 both of which are included herein by reference.  The plan provides for incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. The Board of Directors will determine the exercise price of an employee’s option at the date of the grant. The exercise price of an incentive stock option may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant, or less than 110% of the fair market value if the participant owns more than 10% of the outstanding common stock. The Board of Directors will also determine the term of an option at the date of the grant. The term of an incentive stock option or non-qualified stock option may not exceed ten years from the date of grant, but any incentive stock option granted to a participant who owns more than 10% of the outstanding common stock will not be exercisable after the expiration of five years after the date the option is granted. Subject to any further limitations in the applicable agreement, if a participant’s employment terminates, an incentive stock option will terminate and expire no later than three months after the date of termination of employment.

Incentive stock options are also subject to the further restriction that the aggregate fair market value, determined as of the date of the grant, of the market value of the common Stock as to which any incentive stock option first becomes exercisable in any calendar year is limited to $100,000 per recipient. If incentive stock options covering more than $100,000 worth of the common stock first become exercisable in any one calendar year, the excess will be non-qualified options. For purposes of determining which options, if any, have been granted in excess of the $100,000 limit, options will be considered to become exercisable in the order granted. The plan also provides for the payment of professionals with Class A Common Shares of the Company’s stock.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended		269 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011
Operating Activities:
Net loss	$ (3,086,774)	$ (2,203,184)	$ (20,819,160)
Adjustments to reconcile net income items not requiring the use of cash:
Consulting fees	414,069	302,670	5,301,532
Depreciation expense	4,052	654	21,231
Interest expense	265,210	116,593	1,250,199
Impairment expense	0	0	3,049,465
Loss on unhedged underlying derivative	987,289	1,173,607	3,081,792
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities :
Deferred charge	(116,204)	0	(116,204)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	82,071	16,345	147,539
Net cash used by operations	(1,450,287)	(593,315)	(8,083,606)
Investing activities:
Purchase of office equipment	(29,816)	0	(47,371)
Net cash used by investing activities	(29,816)	0	(47,371)
Financing activities:
Issuance of preferred stock	0	0	68,863
Capital contributed by shareholder	0	0	356,743
Subscriptions received (transferred to common stock)	30,500	(96,383)	30,500
Advances received (paid) shareholder	0	23,821	0
Net cash provided by financing activities	2,813,080	928,807	9,817,973
Net increase (decrease) in cash	1,332,977	335,492	1,686,996
Cash balance at beginning of the fiscal year	354,019	18,527	0
Cash balance at September 30th	1,686,996	354,019	1,686,996
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid during the year	0	0
Income taxes paid during the year	0	0
Gold Bullion Note
Financing activities:
Issuance (payment) of notes	0	0	648,282
Convertible Notes
Financing activities:
Issuance (payment) of notes	(125,000)	0	575,000
Common Class A
Financing activities:
Issuance of common stock	2,907,580	1,001,369	8,133,525
Common Class B
Financing activities:
Issuance of common stock	$ 0	$ 0	$ 5,060

XML

Property and Equipment

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Property and Equipment

4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment at September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 is comprised as follows.

	30-Sep-11			30-Sep-10
Office equipment	$	21,305		$	17,555
Vehicle		16,065			0
Land deposit		10,000			0
Accumulated depreciation		(21,230	)		(17,179	)
Property & equipment- net	$	26,140		$	376

In June 2011, the Company deposited $10,000 in escrow for 20 acres of land in Yavapai County, Arizona.  The purchase price of the land is $750,000 and is currently undergoing title search.  The Company intends to purchase the land once the title search has been affirmed. .As of the date of this filing this transaction has not yet been consummated.

XML

Subsequent Events

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Subsequent Events

14. Subsequent Events

Between October 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011 the Company issued 12,655,000 shares of common stock (some of which were paid for during prior quarter) and received proceeds of $178,585.