XML 29 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
LOSS (GAIN) ON SALE OF ASSETS AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT CHARGES
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
LOSS (GAIN) ON SALE OF ASSETS AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT CHARGES  
LOSS (GAIN) ON SALE OF ASSETS AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT CHARGES

Note 10 LOSS (GAIN) ON SALE OF ASSETS AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT CHARGES

  • Dream

Gain on Sale of Assets

        On February 15, 2011, the Company sold its legacy "DREAM" business, including its French subsidiary, Digital Research in Electronics, Acoustics and Music SAS (DREAM), which sold custom-designed ASIC chips for karaoke and other entertainment machines, for 1,700 Euros. The Company recorded a gain of $1,882, which is reflected in gain on sale of assets in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

  • Rousset, France

Loss on Sale of Assets

        On June 23, 2010, the Company closed the sale of its manufacturing operations in Rousset, France to LFoundry GmbH ("LFoundry"). Under the terms of the agreement, the Company transferred manufacturing assets and related liabilities (valued at $61,646) to the buyer in return for nominal cash consideration. In connection with the sale, the Company entered into certain other ancillary agreements, including a Manufacturing Services Agreement ("MSA") under which the Company will purchase wafers from LFoundry for four years following the closing on a "take-or-pay" basis. Upon closing of this transaction, the Company recorded a loss on sale of $94,052, which is summarized in the following table:

 
  Three Months Ended  
(in thousands)
  June 30,
2010
 

Net assets transferred

  $ 61,646  

Fair value of Manufacturing Services Agreement

    92,417  

Currency translation adjustment

    (97,367 )

Severance cost liability

    27,840  

Transition services

    4,746  

Selling costs

    3,173  

Other related costs

    1,597  
       
 

Loss on Sale of Assets

  $ 94,052  
       

        As future wafer purchases under the MSA were negotiated at pricing above their fair value, the Company recorded a liability in conjunction with the sale, representing the present value of the unfavorable purchase commitment. The Company obtained current market prices for wafers from unaffiliated, well-known third party foundries, taking into consideration minimum volume requirements as specified in the contract, process technology, industry pricing trends and other factors. The Company determined that the difference between the contract prices and the market prices over the term of the agreement totaled $103,660 as of June 30, 2010. The present value of this liability totaled $92,417 (discount rate of 7%) and is included in loss on sale of assets in the consolidated statements of operations. The discount rate was determined based on publicly-traded debt for companies comparable to the Company. The present value of the liability will be recognized as a credit to cost of revenues over the term of the MSA as the wafers are purchased and the present value discount of $11,243 will be recognized as interest expense over the same term. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 the Company reduced the liability by approximately $7,854 and $15,708, respectively, offset in part by interest expense of approximately $1,250 and $2,500, respectively.

        The sale of the Rousset, France manufacturing operations resulted in the substantial liquidation of the Company's investment in its European manufacturing facilities, and accordingly, the Company recorded a gain of $97,367 related to currency translation adjustments that was previously recorded within stockholders' equity, as the Company concluded, based on guidance related to foreign currency, that it should similarly release all remaining related currency translation adjustments.

        As part of the sale, the Company agreed to reimburse LFoundry for specified severance costs expected to be incurred subsequent to the sale. The Company entered into an escrow agreement in which the Company agreed to remit funds to LFoundry for the required benefits and payments to those employees who are determined to be part of the approved departure plan. The Company recorded a liability of $27,840 as a component of the loss on sale. This amount was paid to the escrow account in the first quarter of 2011.

        As part of the sale of the manufacturing operations, the Company incurred $4,746 in software/hardware and consulting costs to set up a separate, independent IT infrastructure for LFoundry. These costs were incurred to facilitate, and as a condition of, the sale to LFoundry; the IT infrastructure provided no benefit to the Company and the costs related to those efforts would not have been incurred if the Company were not selling the manufacturing operations. Therefore, the direct and incremental consulting costs associated with these services were recorded as part of the loss on sale. The Company also incurred $1,597 of other costs related to the sale, including performance-based bonuses of $497 for non-executive Company employees responsible for assisting in the completion of the sale to LFoundry.

        The Company also incurred direct and incremental consulting costs of $3,173, which represented broker commissions and legal fees associated with the sale to LFoundry.

        The Company has retained a minority equity interest in the manufacturing operations ("the entity") sold to LFoundry. This equity interest provides limited protective rights to the Company, but no decision-making rights that are significant to the economic performance of the entity. The Company is an equity holder that is shielded from economic losses and does not participate fully in the entity's residual economics; accordingly, the Company has concluded that its interest in the entity is a variable interest entity ("VIE"). A VIE must be consolidated into the Company's financial statements if the Company is its primary beneficiary; a primary beneficiary means an entity having the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance or having the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. In determining whether the Company is the primary beneficiary, it identified the significant activities of the VIE and the parties that have the power to direct them, determined the equity, profit and loss participation, and reviewed the funding and operating agreements. Based on the above factors, the Company determined that it is not the primary beneficiary and hence will not consolidate the VIE. As part of the sale, the Company entered into a wafer supply agreement, an arrangement to reimburse specified employee severance costs that LFoundry may incur, and has leased land and a building to LFoundry. The Company's maximum exposure related to these arrangements is not expected to be significantly in excess of the amounts recorded and it does not intend to provide any other support to the VIE, financial or otherwise.

Asset Impairment Charges

        The asset disposal group the Company initially expected to transfer to LFoundry was determined as of December 31, 2009 when the Company reclassified $83,260 in long-term assets as held for sale. Following negotiation with LFoundry, the Company determined that certain assets should instead remain with the Company. As a result, the Company reclassified property and equipment to held and used in the quarter ended June 30, 2010. In connection with this reclassification, the Company assessed the fair value of these assets to be retained and concluded that the fair value of the assets was lower than its carrying value less depreciation expense that would have been recognized had the assets been continuously classified as held and used. As a result, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $11,922 in the three months ended June 30, 2010.