XML 64 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Commitments

Indemnification

As is customary in the Company’s industry, the Company’s standard contracts provide remedies to its customers, such as defense, settlement, or payment of judgment for intellectual property claims related to the use of the Company’s products. From time to time, the Company will indemnify customers against combinations of loss, expense, or liability arising from various trigger events related to the sale and the use of the Company’s products and services, usually up to a specified maximum amount. In addition, as permitted under state laws in the United States, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors and certain employees, and the Company’s bylaws permit the indemnification of the Company’s agents. The estimated fair value of the liability is not material.
 
Purchase Commitments
 
As of March 31, 2015, the Company, or its affiliates, had certain non-cancellable commitments which were not included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. These include outstanding capital purchase commitments of approximately $11.0 million and wafer purchase commitments of approximately $38.9 million.

Contingencies
 
Legal Proceedings
 
The Company is party to various legal proceedings. Management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations and statements of cash flows. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur in any of the legal proceedings described below or other legal proceedings that were not deemed material as of March 31, 2015, there exists the possibility of a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company has accrued for losses related to litigation that it considers probable and for which the loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that a probable loss cannot be reasonably estimated, it has not accrued for such losses. Management makes a determination as to when a potential loss is reasonably possible based on relevant accounting literature and then includes appropriate disclosure of the contingency. As the Company continues to monitor litigation matters, whether deemed material as of March 31, 2015 or not, its determination could change, and the Company may decide, at some future date, to establish an appropriate reserve.
    
Southern District of New York Action by LFoundry Rousset (“LFR”) and LFR Employees. On March 4, 2014, LFR and Jean-Yves Guerrini, on behalf of himself and a putative class of LFR employees, filed an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company, our French subsidiary, Atmel Rousset S.A.S. (“Atmel Rousset”) and LFoundry GmbH (“LF”), LFR’s German parent. The case purports to relate to Atmel Rousset’s June 2010 sale of its wafer manufacturing facility in Rousset, France to LF (the “Sale”), and LFR’s subsequent insolvency more than three years later. The complaint seeks significant damages in connection with claims for violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), RICO conspiracy, fraud, tortious interference with contract and trespass to chattels. On November 25, 2014, the Company moved to dismiss the complaint. Complaints filed in Paris against the Company, Atmel Rousset and another Company affiliate, arising from the Sale, were previously dismissed. The Company and Atmel Rousset consider the claims in this matter entirely devoid of merit and specious, and will continue to defend vigorously against them, assert counterclaims, and seek other relief, as appropriate.

Individual Labor Actions by former LFR Employees. Over 500 former employees of LFR have filed individual labor actions against Atmel Rousset in the labor court in Aix-en-Provence, France. As of March 31, 2015, the claimants had not yet provided the legal arguments underpinning their claims, although management believes each will argue that Atmel Rousset, together with LFR, was their co-employer. Atmel Rousset believes each of these actions is entirely devoid of merit and based substantially on the same specious arguments that the Paris Commercial Court summarily rejected in 2014 in related proceedings. Atmel Rousset therefore intends to defend vigorously each of these claims.

Other Contingencies
 
From time to time, the Company is notified of claims that its products may infringe patents, or other intellectual property, issued to or owned by other parties. The Company periodically receives demands for indemnification from its customers with respect to intellectual property matters. The Company also periodically receives claims relating to the quality of its products, including claims for additional labor costs, costs for replacing defective parts, reimbursement to customers for damages incurred in correcting defective products, costs for product recalls or other damages. Receipt of these claims and requests occurs in the ordinary course of the Company's business, and the Company responds based on the specific circumstances of each event. The Company undertakes an accrual for losses relating to those types of claims when it considers those losses “probable” and when a reasonable estimate of loss can be determined.

Product Warranties
 
The Company accrues for warranty costs based on historical trends of product failure rates and the expected material and labor costs to provide warranty services. The Company’s products are generally covered by a warranty typically ranging from 30 days to three years. Product warranty liability is included in accrued and other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Guarantees
 
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide standby letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to certain parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either the Company or its subsidiaries. The Company has not recorded any liability in connection with these guarantee arrangements. Based on historical experience and information currently available, the Company believes it will not be required to make any payments under these guarantee arrangements.