Semi-Annual
Report |
December 31, 2012
|
A tax-free income investment
|
Serving Utah Investors
For Over 20 Years
Tax-Free Fund For Utah
“Sticking To Basics”
|
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
General Obligation Bonds (19.8%)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
City, County and State (3.8%)
|
|||||||||
Anderson, Indiana San District
|
|||||||||
$ | 505,000 |
4.600%, 07/15/23 AMBAC Insured
|
A1/A-/NR
|
$ | 521,210 | ||||
Coral Canyon, Utah Special Service
|
|||||||||
District
|
|||||||||
100,000 |
4.850%, 07/15/17
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
101,390 | ||||||
Harris County, Texas Utility District #268
|
|||||||||
905,000 |
4.375%, 09/01/27 Radian Insured
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
913,534 | ||||||
Houston, Texas Public Improvement
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/29
|
Aa2/AA/NR
|
1,167,310 | ||||||
King County, Washington School
|
|||||||||
District #401, School Board Guaranty
|
|||||||||
Program
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
4.500%, 12/01/25 AGMC Insured
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
1,106,930 | ||||||
Laredo, Texas
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
4.500%, 02/15/24 NPFG Insured
|
Aa2/AA/AA
|
532,275 | ||||||
McKinney, Texas
|
|||||||||
1,700,000 |
4.500%, 08/15/23 Syncora Guarantee,
|
||||||||
Inc. Insured
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
1,844,381 | |||||||
1,375,000 |
5.000%, 08/15/24 AMBAC Insured
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
1,540,041 | ||||||
San Patricio County, Texas
|
|||||||||
450,000 |
4.600%, 04/01/25 AMBAC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
491,130 | ||||||
Texas State Transportation Commission
|
|||||||||
Mobility Fund
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
4.500%, 04/01/33
|
Aaa/AA+/AAA
|
2,170,040 | ||||||
Washington State, Series D
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
5.000%, 01/01/29 AMBAC Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
Aa1/AA+/AA+
|
2,094,240 | |||||||
Washington State Various Purpose
|
|||||||||
1,405,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/30 Series A
|
Aa1/AA+/AA+
|
1,607,306 | ||||||
2,465,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/31 Series A
|
Aa1/AA+/AA+
|
2,816,484 | ||||||
Total City, County and State
|
16,906,271 | ||||||||
Education - Public Schools (2.8%)
|
|||||||||
Brownsboro, Texas Independent School
|
|||||||||
District
|
|||||||||
490,000 |
zero coupon, 08/15/16 PSF
|
||||||||
Guaranteed
|
NR/AAA/NR
|
471,292 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
General Obligation Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Education - Public Schools (continued)
|
|||||||||
Burnet, Texas Consolidated Independent
|
|||||||||
School District
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,460,000 |
0.050%, 08/01/14 PSF Guaranteed
|
AAA/NR/NR
|
$ | 1,452,671 | ||||
Carbon County, Wyoming School
|
|||||||||
District #1 (Rawlins Building)
|
|||||||||
2,050,000 |
4.500%, 06/15/28
|
NR/A+/NR
|
2,269,288 | ||||||
Clark County, Nevada School District
|
|||||||||
1,150,000 |
5.000%, 06/15/18 Series B AGMC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/A+
|
1,218,494 | |||||||
Florida State Board of Education Public
|
|||||||||
Education Capital Outlay
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
4.750%, 06/01/30 2005 Series F
|
Aa1/AAA/AAA
|
2,224,960 | ||||||
Nebo, Utah School District, School
|
|||||||||
Board Guaranty Program
|
|||||||||
2,900,000 |
4.500%, 07/01/24 Series A
|
Aaa/AAA/NR
|
3,435,804 | ||||||
Yakima County, Washington School
|
|||||||||
District #201, School Board Guaranty
|
|||||||||
Program
|
|||||||||
1,475,000 |
0.050%, 12/01/14
|
Aa1/NR/NR
|
1,462,684 | ||||||
Total Education - Public Schools
|
12,535,193 | ||||||||
Hospital (0.3%)
|
|||||||||
Skagit County, Washington Public
|
|||||||||
Hospital District No. 002, Refunding,
|
|||||||||
Island Hospital
|
|||||||||
1,120,000 |
0.250%, 12/01/15
|
A1/NR/NR
|
1,090,622 | ||||||
Local Public Property (6.1%)
|
|||||||||
Clark County, Nevada, Refunding
|
|||||||||
2,280,000 |
5.000%, 12/01/29 Series A
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
2,571,658 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/23 Series B
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
1,162,940 | ||||||
2,000,000 |
5.000%, 11/01/28 AGMC Insured
|
Aa1/AA+/AA
|
2,229,200 | ||||||
2,000,000 |
4.750%, 06/01/30 AGMC Insured
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
2,163,120 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
4.750%, 11/01/27 NPFG/FGIC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
1,100,900 | |||||||
Hurst, Texas Refunding & Improvement
|
|||||||||
570,000 |
0.050%, 08/15/15
|
Aa2/AA/NR
|
558,526 | ||||||
Kitsap County, Washington Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,255,000 |
4.850%, 07/01/28 NPFG Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
1,333,877 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
General Obligation Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Local Public Property (continued)
|
|||||||||
North Las Vegas, Nevada Refunding
|
|||||||||
Ltd. Tax
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,000,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/36
|
Baa2/A/BBB
|
$ | 1,055,420 | ||||
North Slope Borough, Alaska
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
zero coupon, 06/30/13 Series A NPFG
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/AA
|
998,490 | |||||||
San Angelo, Texas Certificates of
|
|||||||||
Participation Obligation
|
|||||||||
2,765,000 |
5.000%, 02/15/30 Series A
|
Aa2/AA/AA+
|
3,147,178 | ||||||
San Patricio County, Texas Certificates
|
|||||||||
of Obligation
|
|||||||||
2,260,000 |
4.750%, 04/01/31 AMBAC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
2,465,231 | ||||||
Utah State, Series A
|
|||||||||
2,500,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/26
|
Aaa/AAA/AAA
|
3,074,275 | ||||||
Washoe County, Nevada Refunding
|
|||||||||
Reno Sparks Convention
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/28
|
Aa2/AA/NR
|
2,269,020 | ||||||
Williamson County, Texas
|
|||||||||
1,610,000 |
5.000%, 02/15/23 NPFG Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
Aa1/AAA/NR
|
1,695,201 | |||||||
1,445,000 |
5.000%, 02/15/23 NPFG Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
Aa1/BBB/NR
|
1,520,631 | |||||||
Total Local Public Property
|
27,345,667 | ||||||||
School District (4.5%)
|
|||||||||
Clark County, Nevada School District
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
5.000%, 06/15/28 Series A
|
Aa3/AA-/A+
|
566,550 | ||||||
Comal, Texas Independent School
|
|||||||||
District
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
5.000%, 02/01/33 NPFG Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
Aaa/BBB/AAA
|
2,102,140 | |||||||
Davis County, Utah School District,
|
|||||||||
School Building, Utah School Board
|
|||||||||
Guaranty Program
|
|||||||||
2,640,000 |
4.000%, 06/01/27
|
Aaa/NR/NR
|
2,983,702 | ||||||
Granite School District, Utah, Salt Lake
|
|||||||||
County School Building, School Board
|
|||||||||
Guaranty Program
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/31
|
Aaa/NR/AAA
|
1,191,850 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
General Obligation Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
School District (continued)
|
|||||||||
Houston, Texas Independent School
|
|||||||||
District
|
|||||||||
$ | 3,000,000 |
5.000%, 02/15/28 AGMC Insured
|
Aaa/AA+/NR
|
$ | 3,126,750 | ||||
Magnolia, Texas Independent School
|
|||||||||
District Schoolhouse
|
|||||||||
1,495,000 |
5.000%, 08/15/25 NPFG/FGIC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
1,629,012 | |||||||
Navasota, Texas Independent School
|
|||||||||
District
|
|||||||||
475,000 |
5.000%, 08/15/23 NPFG/FGIC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
A1/NR/NR
|
502,422 | |||||||
North East Independent School District,
|
|||||||||
Texas
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 08/01/33 NPFG Insured PSF
|
||||||||
Guaranteed
|
Aaa/AAA/NR
|
1,061,860 | |||||||
Port Arthur, Texas Independent School
|
|||||||||
District School Building
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
5.250%, 02/15/30 NPFG/FGIC Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
Aa3/NR/AA-
|
2,110,240 | |||||||
Uintah County, Utah School District,
|
|||||||||
School Board Guaranty Program
|
|||||||||
455,000 |
4.250%, 02/01/24
|
Aaa/NR/NR
|
489,821 | ||||||
Wasatch County, Utah School District,
|
|||||||||
School Board Guaranty Program
|
|||||||||
880,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/25
|
Aaa/NR/NR
|
955,337 | ||||||
900,000 |
4.375%, 06/01/26
|
Aaa/NR/NR
|
981,999 | ||||||
Washoe County, Nevada School District
|
|||||||||
200,000 |
4.625%, 06/01/23 NPFG/FGIC Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
Aa2/AA/AA-
|
203,576 | |||||||
Washoe County, Nevada School District
|
|||||||||
Refunding & School Improvement
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/30 Series A
|
Aa2/AA/NR
|
2,287,280 | ||||||
Total School District
|
20,192,539 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
General Obligation Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Transportation (1.0%)
|
|||||||||
Texas State Transportation Commission
|
|||||||||
Mobility Fund
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,140,000 |
5.000%, 04/01/27 Series A
|
Aaa/AA+/AAA
|
$ | 1,294,801 | ||||
2,000,000 |
4.750%, 04/01/35 Series A NPFG/ IBC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aaa/AA+/AAA
|
2,133,560 | |||||||
Titus County, Texas Unlimited Tax And
|
|||||||||
Pass-Through Toll Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/28 Series 2012-A
|
NR/A/NR
|
1,138,470 | ||||||
Total Transportation
|
4,566,831 | ||||||||
Utilities (1.3%)
|
|||||||||
Central Utah Water Conservancy District
|
|||||||||
Refunding
|
|||||||||
765,000 |
5.000%, 04/01/28 Series B
|
NR/AA+/AAA
|
911,016 | ||||||
Las Vegas Valley, Nevada Water District
|
|||||||||
Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/30 Series C
|
Aa2/AA+/NR
|
1,171,950 | ||||||
Las Vegas Valley, Nevada Water District
|
|||||||||
Refunding & Water Improvement
|
|||||||||
2,500,000 |
5.000%, 02/01/38 Series A
|
Aa2/AA+/NR
|
2,772,200 | ||||||
Virgin Valley, Nevada Water District
|
|||||||||
955,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/34 AGC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
1,028,096 | ||||||
Total Utilities
|
5,883,262 | ||||||||
Total General Obligation Bonds
|
88,520,385 | ||||||||
Revenue Bonds (78.8%)
|
|||||||||
Airport (1.8%)
|
|||||||||
Alaska State International Airport Revenue
|
|||||||||
35,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/24 AMBAC Insured
|
||||||||
AMT
|
Aa3/NR/A+
|
35,055 | |||||||
Broward County, Florida Airport System
|
|||||||||
Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.375%, 10/01/29 Series O
|
A1/A+/A
|
1,161,150 | ||||||
Clark County, Nevada Passenger Facilities
|
|||||||||
Charge Revenue Las Vegas-McCarran
|
|||||||||
International Airport
|
|||||||||
1,500,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/30
|
A1/A+/NR
|
1,673,910 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Airport (continued)
|
|||||||||
Hillsborough County, Florida Aviation
|
|||||||||
Authority
|
|||||||||
$ | 2,185,000 |
5.250%, 10/01/23 NPFG Insured AMT
|
A1/A+/A+
|
$ | 2,238,423 | ||||
Miami-Dade County, Florida Aviation
|
|||||||||
Revenue Miami International Airport
|
|||||||||
1,675,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/22 Series A-1
|
A2/A/A
|
1,952,631 | ||||||
Reno-Tahoe, Nevada Airport Authority
|
|||||||||
Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/26 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/A
|
1,046,930 | ||||||
Total Airport
|
8,108,099 | ||||||||
Education (10.7%)
|
|||||||||
Florida Higher Education Facilities
|
|||||||||
Authority Revenue, Refunding,
|
|||||||||
Rollins College Project
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 12/01/37 Series A
|
A1/NR/NR
|
1,114,010 | ||||||
Florida State Board of Education Public
|
|||||||||
Education
|
|||||||||
210,000 |
4.500%, 06/01/25 AGMC Insured
|
Aa1/AAA/AAA
|
221,468 | ||||||
Hammond, Indiana School Building
|
|||||||||
Corp. First Mortgage
|
|||||||||
1,030,000 |
5.000%, 07/15/31 NPFG Insured
|
Baa2/AA+/NR
|
1,087,804 | ||||||
Hillsborough County, Florida School
|
|||||||||
Board COP
|
|||||||||
510,000 |
4.250%, 07/01/26 NPFG Insured
|
Aa2/AA-/AA
|
561,367 | ||||||
1,500,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/31 NPFG Insured
|
Aa2/AA-/AA
|
1,683,390 | ||||||
Salt Lake County, Utah Westminster
|
|||||||||
College Project
|
|||||||||
825,000 |
4.750%, 10/01/20
|
NR/BBB/NR
|
891,289 | ||||||
870,000 |
4.750%, 10/01/21
|
NR/BBB/NR
|
935,206 | ||||||
2,300,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/22
|
NR/BBB/NR
|
2,422,590 | ||||||
1,250,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/25
|
NR/BBB/NR
|
1,306,875 | ||||||
600,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/27
|
NR/BBB/NR
|
636,372 | ||||||
2,025,000 |
5.125%, 10/01/28
|
NR/BBB/NR
|
2,107,519 | ||||||
Southern Utah University Revenue
|
|||||||||
Refunding, Auxiliary System
|
|||||||||
Student Building Fee
|
|||||||||
875,000 |
4.000%, 05/01/19
|
NR/AA/NR
|
991,812 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Education (continued)
|
|||||||||
Texas A&M University Revenue
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,700,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/34
|
Aaa/AAA/AAA
|
$ | 2,089,929 | ||||
Texas State University System Financing
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
5.250%, 03/15/25
|
Aa2/AA-/AA
|
2,336,500 | ||||||
Tooele County, Utah Municipal Building
|
|||||||||
Authority School District Lease Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
4.875%, 06/01/25
|
A1/A+/NR
|
1,085,660 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/28
|
A1/A+/NR
|
1,079,430 | ||||||
Tyler, Texas Independent School District
|
|||||||||
325,000 |
5.000%, 02/15/26 AGMC Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
Aa3/AA/AA+
|
356,291 | |||||||
University of North Texas Revenue
|
|||||||||
Refunding Financing System
|
|||||||||
2,815,000 |
4.500%, 04/15/25 Series A
|
Aa2/NR/AA
|
3,271,058 | ||||||
University of Utah COP
|
|||||||||
3,170,000 |
4.350%, 12/01/26 AMBAC Insured
|
Aa2/AA-/NR
|
3,430,098 | ||||||
Utah State Board of Regents
|
|||||||||
2,980,000 |
4.500%, 04/01/29
|
Aa2/AA/NR
|
3,353,692 | ||||||
Utah State Board of Regents Auxiliary
|
|||||||||
& Campus Facility
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
4.125%, 04/01/20 NPFG Insured
|
Aa2/AA/NR
|
1,064,260 | ||||||
Utah State Board of Regents Lease
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
410,000 |
4.500%, 05/01/20 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/AA/NR
|
445,149 | ||||||
425,000 |
4.500%, 05/01/21 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/AA/NR
|
459,289 | ||||||
450,000 |
4.625%, 05/01/22 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/AA/NR
|
485,996 | ||||||
120,000 |
4.650%, 05/01/23 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/AA/NR
|
128,974 | ||||||
Utah State Board of Regents Office
|
|||||||||
Facility Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,045,000 |
5.000%, 04/01/23 NPFG Insured
|
Aa2/AA-/NR
|
1,134,003 | ||||||
Utah State Board of Regents, Utah,
|
|||||||||
Valley University Student Center
|
|||||||||
Building Fee And Unified System
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
3,005,000 |
5.000%, 11/01/28 Series 2012A
|
NR/AA/NR
|
3,589,262 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
4.000%, 11/01/29 Series 2012A
|
NR/AA/NR
|
1,076,570 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Education (continued)
|
|||||||||
Warsaw, Indiana Multi-School Building
|
|||||||||
Corp., First Mortgage
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,800,000 |
5.450%, 01/15/28 Series B
|
NR/AA+/NR
|
$ | 2,031,372 | ||||
Washington State Higher Education
|
|||||||||
Facilities Authority Revenue, Refunding,
|
|||||||||
Gonzaga University Project
|
|||||||||
950,000 |
5.000%, 04/01/24 Series B
|
A3/NR/NR
|
1,047,707 | ||||||
Washington State Higher Education
|
|||||||||
Facilities Authority Revenue, Seattle
|
|||||||||
University Project
|
|||||||||
1,250,000 |
5.250%, 11/01/27 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/A/NR
|
1,386,075 | ||||||
Washington State University Revenue
|
|||||||||
735,000 |
4.600%, 10/01/29 AGMC Insured
|
Aa2/AA-/NR
|
820,311 | ||||||
Weber State University, Utah Student
|
|||||||||
Facilities System
|
|||||||||
1,825,000 |
4.400%, 04/01/27 AGMC Insured
|
NR/AA/NR
|
1,939,446 | ||||||
1,275,000 |
5.125%, 04/01/32 NPFG Insured
|
Baa2/AA/NR
|
1,353,349 | ||||||
Total Education
|
47,924,123 | ||||||||
Education - Charter Schools (8.9%)
|
|||||||||
La Vernia, Texas Higher Education Finance
|
|||||||||
Corp., Jubilee Academy
|
|||||||||
3,428,600 |
6.500%, 03/15/38 144A†
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
3,428,703 | ||||||
Utah County, Utah Charter School
|
|||||||||
Revenue Lakeview Academy
|
|||||||||
210,000 |
5.350%, 07/15/17 Series A
|
NR/BBB-/NR
|
224,179 | ||||||
610,000 |
4.500%, 07/15/22
|
NR/BBB-/NR
|
612,721 | ||||||
Utah County, Utah Charter School
|
|||||||||
Revenue Lincoln Academy
|
|||||||||
635,000 |
5.450%, 06/15/17 Series A 144A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
638,461 | ||||||
Utah County, Utah Charter School
|
|||||||||
Revenue Renaissance Academy
|
|||||||||
225,000 |
5.350%, 07/15/17 Series A 144A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
230,256 | ||||||
Utah State Charter School Finance
|
|||||||||
Authority Entheos Academy
|
|||||||||
5,598,000 |
6.750%, 08/15/38 144A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
5,597,776 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Education - Charter Schools (continued)
|
|||||||||
Utah State Charter School Finance
|
|||||||||
Authority Fast Forward Academy
|
|||||||||
$ | 2,964,100 |
6.500%, 11/15/37 144A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
$ | 2,830,508 | ||||
Utah State Charter School Finance
|
|||||||||
Authority George Washington
|
|||||||||
Academy
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
6.750%, 07/15/28
|
NR/BB+/NR*
|
1,029,630 | ||||||
Utah State Charter School Finance
|
|||||||||
Authority Legacy Preparatory
|
|||||||||
Academy
|
|||||||||
5,510,000 |
6.750%, 06/15/38 144A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
5,496,445 | ||||||
7,625,000 |
7.250%, 06/15/39 144A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
7,587,333 | ||||||
Utah State Charter School Finance
|
|||||||||
Authority Ogden Preparatory
|
|||||||||
Academy, School Board Guaranty
|
|||||||||
Program
|
|||||||||
475,000 |
4.000%, 10/15/22
|
NR/AA/NR
|
537,790 | ||||||
505,000 |
4.000%, 10/15/23
|
NR/AA/NR
|
565,696 | ||||||
525,000 |
4.000%, 10/15/24
|
NR/AA/NR
|
582,351 | ||||||
Utah State Charter School Finance
|
|||||||||
Authority, Refunding & Improvement,
|
|||||||||
Davinci Academy
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
7.050%, 09/15/26 Series 2011A
|
NR/BBB-/NR
|
1,090,050 | ||||||
Utah State Charter School Finance
|
|||||||||
Authority Rockwell Charter School
|
|||||||||
900,000 |
6.750%, 08/15/28 144A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
796,212 | ||||||
Utah State Charter School Finance
|
|||||||||
Authority Ronald Wilson Reagan
|
|||||||||
Academy
|
|||||||||
1,315,000 |
5.750%, 02/15/22 Series A 144A
|
NR/BBB-/NR
|
1,397,911 | ||||||
Utah State Charter School Finance
|
|||||||||
Authority Venture Academy
|
|||||||||
7,040,000 |
6.750%, 11/15/38 144A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
7,048,730 | ||||||
Total Education - Charter Schools
|
39,694,752 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Hospital (5.3%)
|
|||||||||
Campbell County, Wyoming Hospital
|
|||||||||
District, Hospital Revenue, Memorial
|
|||||||||
Hospital Project
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,040,000 |
5.000%, 12/01/20
|
NR/A-/NR
|
$ | 1,165,434 | ||||
1,000,000 |
5.500%, 12/01/34
|
NR/A-/NR
|
1,081,570 | ||||||
Harris County, Texas Health Facility
|
|||||||||
Development Corp. Christus Health
|
|||||||||
Series A-6
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
4.750%, 07/01/30 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
1,098,330 | ||||||
Indiana Finance Authority Hospital
|
|||||||||
Revenue, Parkview Health System
|
|||||||||
1,350,000 |
5.875%, 05/01/29 (pre-refunded)
|
A1/NR/NR
|
1,449,630 | ||||||
Indiana Finance Authority Hospital
|
|||||||||
Revenue, Parkview Health System,
|
|||||||||
Unrefunded balance
|
|||||||||
300,000 |
5.875%, 05/01/29
|
A1/A+/NR
|
314,187 | ||||||
King County, Washington Public Hospital
|
|||||||||
District No. 002, Refunding, Evergreen
|
|||||||||
Healthcare
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.250%, 12/01/28
|
Aa3/A+/NR
|
1,136,220 | ||||||
Laramie County, Wyoming Hospital
|
|||||||||
Revenue, Cheyenne Regional
|
|||||||||
Medical Center Project
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 05/01/32
|
NR/A+/NR
|
1,114,350 | ||||||
Reno, Nevada Hospital Revenue,
|
|||||||||
Washoe Medical Center
|
|||||||||
725,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/23 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
783,703 | ||||||
680,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/23 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
735,060 | ||||||
Richmond, Indiana Hospital Revenue
|
|||||||||
250,000 |
5.000%, 01/01/19
|
NR/A/A
|
275,505 | ||||||
Riverton, Utah Hospital Revenue,
|
|||||||||
Intermountain Health Care Health
|
|||||||||
Services, Inc.
|
|||||||||
850,000 |
5.000%, 08/15/36
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
944,809 | ||||||
2,000,000 |
5.000%, 08/15/41
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
2,215,500 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Hospital (continued)
|
|||||||||
Tarrant County, Texas Cultural Education
|
|||||||||
Facilities Finance Corp. Hospital
|
|||||||||
Refunding, Scott & White Healthcare
|
|||||||||
Project
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,000,000 |
5.250%, 08/15/25
|
A1/A/AA-
|
$ | 1,131,020 | ||||
Utah County, Utah Hospital Revenue,
|
|||||||||
IHC Health Services, Inc.
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
5.000%, 05/15/29
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
581,500 | ||||||
5,205,000 |
5.000%, 05/15/43
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
5,814,662 | ||||||
Utah State Board of Regents Revenue
|
|||||||||
Hospital - University of Utah
|
|||||||||
3,000,000 |
5.000%, 08/01/31 Series B
|
Aa2/AA/NR
|
3,367,050 | ||||||
Washington State Health Care Facilities
|
|||||||||
Authority Revenue, Refunding, Fred
|
|||||||||
Hutchinson Cancer
|
|||||||||
595,000 |
5.000%, 01/01/18
|
A2/A/NR
|
674,254 | ||||||
Total Hospital
|
23,882,784 | ||||||||
Housing (3.8%)
|
|||||||||
Florida Housing Finance Corp.
|
|||||||||
410,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/21 AMT
|
Aa1/AA+/AA+
|
428,274 | ||||||
390,000 |
6.000%, 07/01/28
|
Aa1/AA+/AA+
|
420,346 | ||||||
Indianapolis, Indiana Multi-Family
|
|||||||||
365,000 |
4.850%, 01/01/21 AMT FNMA Insured
|
A1/NR/NR
|
370,986 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, Florida Housing
|
|||||||||
Finance Authority
|
|||||||||
535,000 |
5.000%, 11/01/23 AGMC Insured AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/A-
|
540,441 | ||||||
South Dakota Housing Development
|
|||||||||
Authority
|
|||||||||
45,000 |
6.000%, 05/01/28
|
Aa1/AAA/NR
|
45,093 | ||||||
Utah Housing Corporation Single
|
|||||||||
Family Mortgage
|
|||||||||
25,000 |
5.250%, 07/01/23 AMT
|
Aa2/AA/AA
|
25,024 | ||||||
660,000 |
5.125%, 07/01/24 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
660,515 | ||||||
590,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/25 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
589,770 | ||||||
290,000 |
5.100%, 01/01/26 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
291,380 | ||||||
90,000 |
5.650%, 07/01/27 AMT
|
Aa2/AA/AA
|
90,610 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.250%, 01/01/28 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
1,018,670 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Housing (continued)
|
|||||||||
Utah Housing Corporation Single
|
|||||||||
Family Mortgage (continued)
|
|||||||||
$ | 570,000 |
5.200%, 01/01/28 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
$ | 580,955 | ||||
1,690,000 |
5.800%, 07/01/28 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
1,781,429 | ||||||
635,000 |
5.700%, 07/01/28 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
667,048 | ||||||
465,000 |
5.500%, 07/01/28 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
485,093 | ||||||
750,000 |
6.100%, 01/01/29 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
798,465 | ||||||
1,250,000 |
5.250%, 07/01/28 Series A AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
1,307,213 | ||||||
575,000 |
4.950%, 01/01/32 Series A Class II
|
Aa2/AA/AA
|
608,747 | ||||||
2,105,000 |
4.500%, 01/01/24 Series A Class III .
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
2,231,595 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
4.000%, 07/01/28 Series B-1 Class I .
|
Aaa/AAA/AAA
|
1,031,370 | ||||||
950,000 |
4.625%, 07/01/32 Series B-1 Class II .
|
Aa2/AA/AA
|
1,001,310 | ||||||
870,000 |
4.500%, 07/01/23 Series C
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
927,933 | ||||||
Utah State Housing Finance Agency
|
|||||||||
35,000 |
5.700%, 07/01/15 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
35,165 | ||||||
285,000 |
5.500%, 07/01/18 AMT
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
288,862 | ||||||
15,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/18 AMT
|
Aaa/AA+/NR
|
15,013 | ||||||
140,000 |
5.600%, 07/01/23 AMT
|
Aa2/AA/AA
|
140,167 | ||||||
Wyoming Community Development
|
|||||||||
Authority Homeownership Mortgage
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
755,000 |
4.625%, 06/01/28 Series A
|
Aa2/NR/NR
|
802,482 | ||||||
Total Housing
|
17,183,956 | ||||||||
Local Public Property (10.5%)
|
|||||||||
Clark County, Nevada Improvement
|
|||||||||
District Special Local Improvement
|
|||||||||
#128 (Summerlin)
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
5.000%, 02/01/21 Series A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
458,435 | ||||||
Draper, Utah Sales Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,640,000 |
4.500%, 05/01/27 Series A
|
NR/AA/NR
|
1,893,560 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 05/01/32 Series A
|
NR/AA/NR
|
1,185,730 | ||||||
El Paso, Texas Solid Waste Disposal
|
|||||||||
System Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,540,000 |
5.125%, 08/15/28 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
1,565,379 | ||||||
Herriman, Utah Special Assessment
|
|||||||||
Towne Center Assessment Area
|
|||||||||
1,045,000 |
4.875%, 11/01/23
|
NR/A/NR
|
1,119,644 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Local Public Property (continued)
|
|||||||||
Herriman, Utah Special Assessment
|
|||||||||
Towne Center Assessment Area
|
|||||||||
(continued)
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,150,000 |
5.000%, 11/01/25
|
NR/A/NR
|
$ | 1,230,626 | ||||
1,975,000 |
5.000%, 11/01/29
|
NR/A/NR
|
2,052,025 | ||||||
Lincoln County, Wyoming Building
|
|||||||||
Corp. Lease Revenue
|
|||||||||
700,000 |
5.000%, 05/01/32
|
NR/A+/NR
|
787,045 | ||||||
New Albany, Indiana Development
|
|||||||||
Authority
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
4.250%, 02/01/22
|
NR/A-/NR
|
520,090 | ||||||
Orem, Utah Special Assessment
|
|||||||||
1,765,000 |
7.750%, 11/01/25
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
1,776,014 | ||||||
Riverton City, Utah Franchise & Sales
|
|||||||||
Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,585,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/31 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/AA-/AA
|
1,727,935 | ||||||
Salt Lake Valley, Utah Fire Service
|
|||||||||
District Lease Revenue
|
|||||||||
2,645,000 |
5.200%, 04/01/28
|
Aa2/NR/AA-
|
2,996,494 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.250%, 04/01/30
|
Aa2/NR/AA-
|
1,129,030 | ||||||
Sevier County, Utah Municipal Building
|
|||||||||
Authority Lease Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
915,000 |
5.000%, 11/15/19 NPFG/ FGIC Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
972,965 | |||||||
South Dakota State Building Authority
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
4.500%, 06/01/24 NPFG/ FGIC Insured
|
NR/AA/NR
|
545,415 | ||||||
South Ogden City, Utah Sales Tax
|
|||||||||
Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,895,000 |
4.375%, 05/01/29 NPFG/ FGIC Insured
|
Baa2/A+/NR
|
1,974,363 | ||||||
Twin Creeks, Utah Special Services
|
|||||||||
District
|
|||||||||
11,230,970 |
10.000%, 07/15/30 144A
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
11,296,334 | ||||||
Uintah County, Utah Municipal Building
|
|||||||||
Authority Lease Revenue
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/24
|
NR/A+/NR
|
556,965 | ||||||
2,000,000 |
5.300%, 06/01/28
|
NR/A+/NR
|
2,219,580 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Local Public Property (continued)
|
|||||||||
Uintah County, Utah Municipal Building
|
|||||||||
Authority Lease Revenue (continued)
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,005,000 |
5.500%, 06/01/37
|
NR/A+/NR
|
$ | 1,094,445 | ||||
1,120,000 |
5.500%, 06/01/40
|
NR/A+/NR
|
1,220,251 | ||||||
Utah State Municipal Finance Cooperative
|
|||||||||
Local Government Capital Appreciation
|
|||||||||
Pool Capital, Salt Lake
|
|||||||||
165,000 |
zero coupon, 03/01/14 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/AA
|
162,373 | ||||||
Utah Transit Authority Sales Tax Revenue,
|
|||||||||
Series A
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 06/15/28
|
Aa2/AAA/AA
|
1,155,210 | ||||||
Washington County/St. George Interlocal
|
|||||||||
Agency, Utah Lease Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
650,000 |
0.500%, 12/01/15 Series A
|
A1/A+/NR
|
639,970 | ||||||
1,365,000 |
0.500%, 12/01/16 Series A
|
A1/A+/NR
|
1,322,494 | ||||||
West Bountiful, Utah Courthouse Revenue
|
|||||||||
410,000 |
5.000%, 05/01/19
|
NR/A/A+
|
425,937 | ||||||
West Valley City, Utah Municipal Building
|
|||||||||
Authority Lease Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,645,000 |
4.500%, 08/01/22 Series A NPFG/
|
||||||||
FGIC Insured
|
NR/A+/A+
|
1,773,195 | |||||||
1,890,000 |
4.375%, 08/01/26 Series A NPFG/
|
||||||||
FGIC Insured
|
NR/A+/A+
|
2,006,443 | |||||||
West Valley City, Utah Sales Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
Capital Appreciation Bonds, Refunding
|
|||||||||
2,750,000 |
zero coupon, 07/15/35
|
NR/AA+/NR
|
980,512 | ||||||
Total Local Public Property
|
46,788,459 | ||||||||
State Agency (1.8%)
|
|||||||||
Utah Infrastructure Agency
|
|||||||||
Telecommunications & Franchise Tax
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.500%, 10/15/30 Series A AGMC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
1,183,200 | |||||||
1,475,000 |
5.250%, 10/15/33 Series A AGMC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
1,668,609 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
State Agency (continued)
|
|||||||||
Utah State Building Ownership Authority
|
|||||||||
Lease Revenue Refunding State
|
|||||||||
Facilities Master Lease Program
|
|||||||||
$ | 465,000 |
5.000%, 05/15/21 (pre-refunded)
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
$ | 533,197 | ||||
510,000 |
5.000%, 05/15/23 (pre-refunded)
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
584,797 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 05/15/24
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
1,249,320 | ||||||
1,080,000 |
5.000%, 05/15/25 (pre-refunded)
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
1,149,185 | ||||||
1,575,000 |
5.000%, 05/15/26
|
Aa1/AA+/NR
|
1,804,289 | ||||||
Total State Agency
|
8,172,597 | ||||||||
Tax Revenue (6.9%)
|
|||||||||
Bountiful City, Utah Sales Tax Refunding
|
|||||||||
Bond
|
|||||||||
191,000 |
3.500%, 06/01/13
|
NR/AA/NR
|
192,923 | ||||||
832,000 |
4.000%, 06/01/17
|
NR/AA/NR
|
910,707 | ||||||
Brigham, Utah Special Assessment
|
|||||||||
Voluntary Assessment Area
|
|||||||||
1,140,000 |
5.250%, 08/01/23
|
A1/NR/NR
|
1,266,836 | ||||||
895,000 |
5.500%, 08/01/29
|
A1/NR/NR
|
991,535 | ||||||
Clark County, Nevada Improvement
|
|||||||||
District
|
|||||||||
250,000 |
5.000%, 08/01/16
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
238,347 | ||||||
Coral Canyon, Utah Special Service
|
|||||||||
District
|
|||||||||
25,000 |
5.000%, 07/15/13 Escrowed to
|
||||||||
Maturity
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
25,624 | |||||||
250,000 |
5.500%, 07/15/18 (pre-refunded)
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
256,900 | ||||||
Henderson, Nevada Local Improvement
|
|||||||||
District
|
|||||||||
290,000 |
5.000%, 09/01/14
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
297,787 | ||||||
290,000 |
5.000%, 09/01/15
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
299,228 | ||||||
225,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/16
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
224,140 | ||||||
Holladay, Utah Redevelopment Agency
|
|||||||||
2,387,500 |
4.900%, 12/30/20
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
2,225,508 | ||||||
Jordanelle, Utah Special Service District
|
|||||||||
186,000 |
5.000%, 11/15/14
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
186,339 | ||||||
196,000 |
5.100%, 11/15/15
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
196,216 | ||||||
206,000 |
5.200%, 11/15/16
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
206,150 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Tax Revenue (continued)
|
|||||||||
Jordanelle, Utah Special Service District
|
|||||||||
(continued)
|
|||||||||
$ | 216,000 |
5.300%, 11/15/17
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
$ | 216,119 | ||||
228,000 |
5.400%, 11/15/18
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
228,082 | ||||||
240,000 |
5.500%, 11/15/19
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
240,000 | ||||||
253,000 |
5.600%, 11/15/20
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
252,028 | ||||||
268,000 |
5.700%, 11/15/21
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
265,047 | ||||||
283,000 |
5.800%, 11/15/22
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
278,602 | ||||||
299,000 |
6.000%, 11/15/23
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
295,224 | ||||||
La Verkin, Utah Sales and Franchise
|
|||||||||
Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
571,000 |
5.100%, 07/15/27†
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
565,792 | ||||||
Lehi, Utah Sales Tax
|
|||||||||
790,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/24 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
825,329 | ||||||
Mesquite, Nevada New Special
|
|||||||||
Improvement District
|
|||||||||
200,000 |
4.900%, 08/01/13
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
198,576 | ||||||
125,000 |
5.250%, 08/01/17
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
119,702 | ||||||
270,000 |
5.350%, 08/01/19
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
248,964 | ||||||
115,000 |
5.400%, 08/01/20
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
105,074 | ||||||
430,000 |
5.500%, 08/01/25
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
374,341 | ||||||
North Ogden, Utah Sales Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
195,000 |
5.000%, 11/01/24 Syncora Guarantee,
|
||||||||
Inc. Insured
|
NR/A+/AA
|
205,897 | |||||||
Payson City, Utah Sales Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
445,000 |
5.000%, 08/01/21 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
492,780 | ||||||
Riverton City, Utah Franchise & Sales
|
|||||||||
Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
750,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/24 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/AA-/AA
|
822,203 | ||||||
Salt Lake City, Utah Sales Tax
|
|||||||||
1,060,000 |
5.000%, 02/01/23 (pre-refunded)
|
NR/AAA/NR
|
1,161,347 | ||||||
1,115,000 |
5.000%, 02/01/24 (pre-refunded)
|
NR/AAA/NR
|
1,221,605 | ||||||
South Weber City, Utah
|
|||||||||
525,000 |
5.000%, 01/15/24 NPFG Insured
|
Baa2/A/AA-
|
543,060 | ||||||
Springville, Utah Special Assessment
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
397,000 |
5.500%, 01/15/17
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
397,012 | ||||||
420,000 |
5.650%, 01/15/18
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
419,962 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Tax Revenue (continued)
|
|||||||||
Springville, Utah Special Assessment
|
|||||||||
Revenue (continued)
|
|||||||||
$ | 442,000 |
5.800%, 01/15/19
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
$ | 439,993 | ||||
380,000 |
5.900%, 01/15/20
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
375,911 | ||||||
Utah Transit Authority Sales Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
6,560,000 |
5.000%, 06/15/36 AGMC Insured
|
||||||||
Series A
|
Aa2/AAA/AA
|
7,530,683 | |||||||
Vernal City, Utah Sales Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
515,000 |
4.750%, 09/01/31 AGC Insured
|
NR/AA/NR
|
575,270 | ||||||
300,000 |
4.875%, 09/01/34 AGC Insured
|
NR/AA/NR
|
332,373 | ||||||
Wasatch County, Utah Building Authority
|
|||||||||
130,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/15
|
A1/NR/NR
|
132,960 | ||||||
135,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/16
|
A1/NR/NR
|
137,943 | ||||||
Washington City, Utah Sales Tax
|
|||||||||
680,000 |
5.250%, 11/15/17 AMBAC Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
NR/A/NR
|
709,383 | |||||||
Weber County, Utah Sales Tax
|
|||||||||
385,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/23 AMBAC Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
A1/NR/NR
|
394,001 | |||||||
West Valley City, Utah Redevelopment
|
|||||||||
Agency
|
|||||||||
1,625,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/21
|
NR/A-/NR
|
1,708,736 | ||||||
320,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/22
|
NR/A-/NR
|
335,869 | ||||||
350,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/23
|
NR/A-/NR
|
366,380 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/24
|
NR/A-/NR
|
1,046,370 | ||||||
Total Tax Revenue
|
31,080,858 | ||||||||
Transportation (3.9%)
|
|||||||||
Central Puget Sound, Washington
|
|||||||||
Regional Transportation Authority
|
|||||||||
Sales Tax
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
5.000%, 11/01/25 Series A AMBAC
|
||||||||
Insured (pre-refunded)
|
Aa2/AAA/NR
|
2,214,160 | |||||||
Indiana Finance Authority Highway
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,950,000 |
4.500%, 12/01/25 NPFG/ FGIC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aa1/AA+/AA+
|
2,183,844 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Transportation (continued)
|
|||||||||
North Texas Turnpike Authority Revenue
|
|||||||||
$ | 2,000,000 |
6.100%, 01/01/28
|
A2/A-/NR
|
$ | 2,360,520 | ||||
Utah Transit Authority Sales Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
Capital Appreciation Refunding
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
zero coupon, 06/15/29 NPFG Insured
|
||||||||
Series A
|
A1/A-/A+
|
963,960 | |||||||
Utah Transit Authority Sales Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
Refunding
|
|||||||||
5,185,000 |
zero coupon, 06/15/23 Series A NPFG
|
||||||||
Insured
|
A1/A-/A+
|
3,444,499 | |||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 06/15/32
|
A1/A-/A+
|
1,160,780 | ||||||
Utah Transit Authority Sales Tax Revenue
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
5.000%, 06/15/27 Series A
|
Aa2/AAA/AA
|
2,317,140 | ||||||
Utah Transit Authority Sales Tax &
|
|||||||||
Transportation Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,450,000 |
4.125%, 06/15/22 AGMC Insured
|
Aa2/AAA/AA
|
1,563,680 | ||||||
195,000 |
5.250%, 06/15/32 AGMC Insured
|
Aa2/AAA/AA
|
264,229 | ||||||
Washoe County, Nevada Highway
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.500%, 02/01/28
|
A1/A+/NR
|
1,136,090 | ||||||
Total Transportation
|
17,608,902 | ||||||||
Utility (11.2%)
|
|||||||||
Clark County, Washington Public Utility
|
|||||||||
District No. 001 Generating Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 01/01/24
|
A2/A/A+
|
1,158,070 | ||||||
Corpus Christi, Texas Utility System
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 07/15/32
|
Aa3/A+/AA-
|
1,130,310 | ||||||
Cowlitz County, Washington Public
|
|||||||||
Utility District Electric Revenue
|
|||||||||
650,000 |
4.500%, 09/01/26 NPFG Insured
|
A1/NR/A
|
680,992 | ||||||
Douglas County, Washington Public
|
|||||||||
Utility District No. 001 Electric
|
|||||||||
Distribution System
|
|||||||||
635,000 |
0.050%, 12/01/15
|
Aa3/AA/NR
|
620,617 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Utility (continued)
|
|||||||||
Eagle Mountain, Utah Gas & Electric
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,385,000 |
4.250%, 06/01/20 Radian Insured
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
$ | 1,396,315 | ||||
1,440,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/21 Radian Insured
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
1,482,034 | ||||||
1,515,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/22 Radian Insured
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
1,557,465 | ||||||
Houston, Texas Utility System Revenue,
|
|||||||||
Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,165,000 |
5.125%, 05/15/28 Series A NPFG
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aa2/AA/AA-
|
1,232,057 | |||||||
Intermountain Power Agency, Utah
|
|||||||||
Power Supply Revenue, Refunding
|
|||||||||
250,000 |
5.250%, 07/01/23
|
A1/A+/AA-
|
255,572 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/21 Series A AGMC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
1,021,920 | |||||||
1,000,000 |
4.250%, 07/01/19 Series B
|
A1/A+/AA-
|
1,060,660 | ||||||
Jacksonville Electric Authority, Florida
|
|||||||||
Bulk Power System Revenue,
|
|||||||||
Scherer 4 Project
|
|||||||||
1,500,000 |
6.000%, 10/01/37 Series A
|
Aa2/AA-/AA
|
1,598,475 | ||||||
Jacksonville Electric Authority, Florida
|
|||||||||
Electric System Revenue
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/26
|
Aa3/A+/AA
|
511,645 | ||||||
500,000 |
4.500%, 10/01/32 Series Three 2012A
|
Aa2/AA-/AA
|
556,700 | ||||||
515,000 |
5.500%, 10/01/39
|
Aa3/A+/AA
|
535,492 | ||||||
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas
|
|||||||||
1,470,000 |
5.250%, 05/15/29
|
A1/A/A+
|
1,713,961 | ||||||
60,000 |
5.250%, 05/15/29 (pre-refunded)
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
75,389 | ||||||
5,000 |
5.250%, 05/15/29 (pre-refunded)
|
NR/NR/NR*
|
6,300 | ||||||
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas
|
|||||||||
Transmission Contract Revenue,
|
|||||||||
Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,065,000 |
5.000%, 05/15/33 AMBAC Insured
|
A2/A/A+
|
1,082,359 | ||||||
Port St. Lucie, Florida Utility System
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,200,000 |
5.250%, 09/01/26 NPFG Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
A1/NR/AA-
|
1,297,560 | |||||||
Santa Clara, Utah Electric Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,005,000 |
4.250%, 08/01/26 AGC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
988,679 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Utility (continued)
|
|||||||||
Sarasota, Florida Utility System Revenue
|
|||||||||
Refunding
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,455,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/27
|
NR/AA+/AA
|
$ | 1,795,557 | ||||
St. George, Utah Electric Revenue
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
4.500%, 06/01/20 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
533,135 | ||||||
3,750,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/38 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
4,055,587 | ||||||
Tacoma, Washington Solid Waste
|
|||||||||
Utility Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 12/01/23 Syncora Guarantee,
|
||||||||
Inc. Insured
|
A2/AA/AA-
|
1,102,320 | |||||||
Tallahassee, Florida Energy System
|
|||||||||
Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,500,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/28
|
Aa3/AA/AA-
|
1,692,765 | ||||||
Texas Municipal Power Agency Revenue
|
|||||||||
Unrefunded Balance
|
|||||||||
1,665,000 |
zero coupon, 09/01/14 NPFG Insured
|
A2/A+/A+
|
1,642,023 | ||||||
Utah Associated Municipal Power System
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 04/01/21 AGMC Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
1,011,560 | |||||||
Utah Associated Municipal Power System
|
|||||||||
Revenue, Horse Butte Wind Project
|
|||||||||
2,120,000 |
0.050%, 09/01/13 Series A
|
NR/A-/A-
|
2,113,746 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 09/01/30 Series A
|
NR/A-/A-
|
1,148,500 | ||||||
1,005,000 |
5.000%, 09/01/32 Series A
|
NR/A-/A-
|
1,142,605 | ||||||
Utah Associated Municipal Power
|
|||||||||
System Revenue Refunding, Payson
|
|||||||||
Power Project
|
|||||||||
2,000,000 |
5.000%, 04/01/24
|
NR/A-/A
|
2,361,100 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 04/01/25
|
NR/A-/A
|
1,166,130 | ||||||
6,375,000 |
5.000%, 04/01/26
|
NR/A-/A
|
7,396,594 | ||||||
Washington, Utah Electric Revenue
|
|||||||||
985,000 |
5.000%, 09/01/21 Syncora Guarantee,
|
||||||||
Inc. Insured
|
Baa1/NR/NR
|
1,024,233 | |||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 09/01/24 Syncora Guarantee,
|
||||||||
Inc. Insured
|
Baa1/NR/NR
|
1,031,750 | |||||||
Wyoming Municipal Power Agency
|
|||||||||
Power Supply System Revenue
|
|||||||||
720,000 |
5.500%, 01/01/28 Series A
|
A2/A-/NR
|
814,270 | ||||||
Total Utility
|
49,994,447 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Water and Sewer (14.0%)
|
|||||||||
Cape Coral, Florida Water & Sewer
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,000,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/36 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/A
|
$ | 1,115,650 | ||||
Central Utah Water Conservancy District
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/37 Series C
|
NR/AA+/AA+
|
1,170,580 | ||||||
Central Utah Water Conservancy District
|
|||||||||
Refunding, Jordanelle Hydrant
|
|||||||||
1,125,000 |
4.500%, 10/01/27 Series A
|
NR/AA+/AA
|
1,298,745 | ||||||
Central Weber, Utah Sewer Improvement
|
|||||||||
District Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/28 Series A AGMC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
NR/AA-/AA
|
1,150,170 | |||||||
2,000,000 |
4.375%, 03/01/30 Series A AGMC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
NR/AA-/AA
|
2,189,400 | |||||||
4,000,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/33 Series A AGMC
|
||||||||
Insured
|
NR/AA-/AA
|
4,511,760 | |||||||
Davie, Florida Water & Sewer Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/32 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/NR
|
1,142,000 | ||||||
Eagle Mountain, Utah Water and Sewer
|
|||||||||
690,000 |
4.750%, 11/15/25 NPFG Insured
|
Baa2/A+/AA-
|
741,336 | ||||||
Herriman City, Utah Water Revenue
|
|||||||||
Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,210,000 |
4.500%, 01/01/33 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/A/NR
|
1,280,519 | ||||||
Jordan Valley, Utah Water Conservancy
|
|||||||||
District Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/31 Series B
|
NR/AA+/AA
|
1,184,300 | ||||||
6,000,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/35 Series B
|
NR/AA+/AA
|
6,970,020 | ||||||
King County, Washington Sewer Revenue
|
|||||||||
660,000 |
5.000%, 01/01/33 AGMC Insured
|
Aa2/AA+/NR
|
752,882 | ||||||
Laredo, Texas Waterworks Sewer System
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,450,000 |
5.000%, 03/01/24 Series 2010
|
A1/AA-/AA-
|
1,744,103 | ||||||
Miami-Dade County, Florida Water and
|
|||||||||
Sewer Revenue System
|
|||||||||
1,500,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/29 AGMC Insured
|
Aa2/AA-/AA-
|
1,740,645 | ||||||
Mountain Regional Water Special Service
|
|||||||||
District Utah Water Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
3,000,000 |
5.000%, 12/15/33 AGMC Insured
|
NR/AA-/AA-
|
3,493,320 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Water and Sewer (continued)
|
|||||||||
Murray City, Utah Sewer and Water
|
|||||||||
$ | 440,000 |
5.000%, 10/01/19 AMBAC Insured
|
|||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
$ | 455,510 | ||||||
Ogden City, Utah Sewer & Water
|
|||||||||
Revenue Refunding
|
|||||||||
750,000 |
4.625%, 06/15/38 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
799,545 | ||||||
Orem, Utah Water & Storm Sewer
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 07/15/26
|
NR/AA/AA+
|
1,130,580 | ||||||
1,250,000 |
5.250%, 07/15/28
|
NR/AA/AA+
|
1,434,862 | ||||||
Pleasant Grove City, Utah Storm Water
|
|||||||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||
860,000 |
4.750%, 07/15/36 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/AA-/AA-
|
960,147 | ||||||
Pleasant Grove City, Utah Water Revenue
|
|||||||||
450,000 |
4.300%, 12/01/20 NPFG Insured
|
Baa2/BBB+/NR
|
477,729 | ||||||
760,000 |
4.625%, 12/01/23 AGMC Insured
|
NR/AA-/NR
|
845,971 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.250%, 12/01/29 AGMC Insured
|
NR/AA-/NR
|
1,133,120 | ||||||
1,370,000 |
5.000%, 12/01/31 Series B NPFG
|
||||||||
Insured
|
Baa2/BBB+/NR
|
1,456,776 | |||||||
Rapid City, South Dakota Water Revenue
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
5.000%, 11/01/29
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
599,115 | ||||||
1,655,000 |
5.250%, 11/01/39
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
1,905,253 | ||||||
Salt Lake & Sandy, Utah Metropolitan
|
|||||||||
Water District, Water Revenue,
|
|||||||||
Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,190,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/31 Series A
|
NR/AA+/AA+
|
1,433,295 | ||||||
650,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/31 Series A
|
NR/AA+/AA+
|
740,135 | ||||||
1,000,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/37 Series A
|
NR/AA+/AA+
|
1,166,830 | ||||||
San Antonio, Texas Water Revenue
|
|||||||||
Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,050,000 |
5.000%, 05/15/36 NPFG Insured
|
Aa1/AA/Aa+
|
1,149,414 | ||||||
South Valley, Utah Water Reclamation
|
|||||||||
Facility Sewer Revenue
|
|||||||||
2,110,000 |
5.000%, 08/15/24 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/A/NR
|
2,225,058 | ||||||
425,000 |
5.000%, 08/15/30 AMBAC Insured
|
NR/A/NR
|
444,567 | ||||||
South Weber City, Utah Water Revenue
|
|||||||||
730,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/35 AGMC Insured
|
NR/AA-/NR
|
808,928 | ||||||
930,000 |
5.000%, 06/01/40 AGMC Insured
|
NR/AA-/NR
|
1,022,861 |
Rating
|
|||||||||
Principal
|
Moody’s, S&P
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Revenue Bonds (continued)
|
and Fitch
|
Value
|
||||||
Water and Sewer (continued)
|
|||||||||
Utah Water Conservancy District
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,400,000 |
5.250%, 01/15/27
|
NR/A/NR
|
$ | 1,562,764 | ||||
Utah Water Finance Agency Revenue
|
|||||||||
970,000 |
4.000%, 10/01/20 AMBAC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
1,079,164 | ||||||
Utah Water Finance Agency Revenue
|
|||||||||
510,000 |
5.000%, 07/01/18 AMBAC Insured
|
||||||||
(pre-refunded)
|
A1/NR/NR
|
521,924 | |||||||
830,000 |
4.500%, 10/01/22 AMBAC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
871,135 | ||||||
870,000 |
4.500%, 10/01/23 AMBAC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
910,586 | ||||||
2,645,000 |
4.500%, 10/01/28 AMBAC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
2,894,952 | ||||||
Washington County, Utah Water
|
|||||||||
Conservancy District Refunding
|
|||||||||
1,770,000 |
4.500%, 10/01/24
|
NR/AA/AA
|
2,081,201 | ||||||
White City, Utah Water Improvement
|
|||||||||
District Revenue
|
|||||||||
500,000 |
5.000%, 02/01/23 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
549,150 | ||||||
700,000 |
5.000%, 02/01/25 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
764,827 | ||||||
840,000 |
5.000%, 02/01/27 AGMC Insured
|
Aa3/NR/NR
|
915,079 | ||||||
Total Water and Sewer
|
62,825,908 | ||||||||
Total Revenue Bonds
|
353,264,885 | ||||||||
Total Investments (cost $420,119,159
|
|||||||||
- note 4)
|
98.6% | 441,785,270 | |||||||
Other assets less liabilities
|
1.4 | 6,307,391 | |||||||
Net Assets
|
100.0% | $ | 448,092,661 | ||||||
* | Any security not rated (“NR”) by any of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (“NRSRO” or “Credit Rating Agency”) has been determined by the Investment Adviser to have sufficient quality to be ranked in the top four credit ratings if a credit rating were to be assigned by a NRSRO. | ||||||||
† | Illiquid security: Illiquid securities represent 0.9% of net assets. |
Notes:
144A – Private placement subject to SEC rule 144A, which modifies a two-year holding period requirement to permit qualified institutional buyers to trade these securities among themselves, thereby significantly improving the liquidity of these securities.
Pre-refunded bonds are bonds for which U.S. Government Obligations usually have been placed in escrow to retire the bonds at their earliest call date.
|
||||
Percent of
|
||||
Portfolio Distribution by Quality Rating
|
Investments1
|
|||
Aaa of Moody’s or AAA of S&P and Fitch
|
11.9 | % | ||
Aa of Moody’s or AA of S&P and Fitch
|
49.9 | |||
A of Moody’s or S&P and Fitch
|
20.2 | |||
Baa of Moody’s or BBB of S&P
|
3.6 | |||
BB+ of S&P
|
0.2 | |||
Not rated*
|
14.2 | |||
100.0 | % | |||
1 Calculated using the highest rating of the three NRSROs. |
PORTFOLIO ABBREVIATIONS:
AGC - Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGMC - Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC - American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp.
AMT - Alternative Minimum Tax
COP - Certificates of Participation
FGIC - Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.
FNMA - Federal National Mortgage Association
IBC - Insured Bond Certificates
NPFG - National Public Finance Guarantee
NR - Not Rated
PSF - Permanent School Fund
|
ASSETS
|
||||
Investments at value (cost $420,119,159)
|
$ | 441,785,270 | ||
Cash
|
2,525,098 | |||
Interest receivable
|
5,540,598 | |||
Receivable for Fund shares sold
|
333,852 | |||
Other assets
|
22,987 | |||
Total assets
|
450,207,805 | |||
LIABILITIES
|
||||
Dividends payable
|
1,316,838 | |||
Deferred income
|
299,804 | |||
Payable for Fund shares redeemed
|
256,732 | |||
Management fees payable
|
168,418 | |||
Distribution and service fees payable
|
21,450 | |||
Accrued expenses
|
51,902 | |||
Total liabilities
|
2,115,144 | |||
NET ASSETS
|
$ | 448,092,661 | ||
Net Assets consist of:
|
||||
Capital Stock - Authorized an unlimited number of shares,
|
||||
par value $0.01 per share
|
$ | 428,933 | ||
Additional paid-in capital
|
425,363,186 | |||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments (note 4)
|
21,666,111 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain on investments
|
467,799 | |||
Undistributed net investment income
|
166,632 | |||
$ | 448,092,661 | |||
CLASS A
|
||||
Net Assets
|
$ | 255,642,152 | ||
Capital shares outstanding
|
24,483,568 | |||
Net asset value and redemption price per share
|
$ | 10.44 | ||
Maximum offering price per share (100/96 of $10.44
|
||||
adjusted to nearest cent)
|
$ | 10.88 | ||
CLASS C
|
||||
Net Assets
|
$ | 105,962,215 | ||
Capital shares outstanding
|
10,152,458 | |||
Net asset value and offering price per share
|
$ | 10.44 | ||
Redemption price per share (*a charge of 1% is imposed on
|
||||
the redemption proceeds of the shares, or on the original
|
||||
price, whichever is lower, if redeemed during the first
|
||||
12 months after purchase)
|
$ | 10.44 | * | |
CLASS Y
|
||||
Net Assets
|
$ | 86,488,294 | ||
Capital shares outstanding
|
8,257,238 | |||
Net asset value, offering and redemption price per share
|
$ | 10.47 |
Investment Income:
|
||||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 9,338,742 | ||||||
Other income
|
11,938 | |||||||
9,350,680 | ||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||
Management fee (note 3)
|
$ | 1,121,944 | ||||||
Distribution and service fees (note 3)
|
776,840 | |||||||
Legal fees
|
101,082 | |||||||
Transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees
|
92,966 | |||||||
Trustees’ fees and expenses (note 7)
|
81,307 | |||||||
Shareholders’ reports and proxy statements .
|
25,833 | |||||||
Custodian fees (note 6)
|
11,560 | |||||||
Auditing and tax fees
|
10,737 | |||||||
Fund accounting fees
|
9,873 | |||||||
Insurance
|
9,751 | |||||||
Registration fees and dues
|
9,097 | |||||||
Chief compliance officer services (note 3)
|
4,484 | |||||||
Miscellaneous
|
21,245 | |||||||
Total expenses
|
2,276,719 | |||||||
Management fee waived (note 3)
|
(84,670 | ) | ||||||
Expenses paid indirectly (note 6)
|
(1,568 | ) | ||||||
Net expenses
|
2,190,481 | |||||||
Net investment income
|
7,160,199 | |||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments:
|
||||||||
Net realized gain from securities transactions
|
539,254 | |||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation on
|
||||||||
investments
|
6,608,742 | |||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on
|
||||||||
investments
|
7,147,996 | |||||||
Net change in net assets resulting from operations
|
$ | 14,308,195 |
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||
December 31, 2012
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
June 30, 2012
|
|||||||
OPERATIONS:
|
||||||||
Net investment income
|
$ | 7,160,199 | $ | 14,118,461 | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) from securities
|
||||||||
transactions
|
539,254 | 1,784,883 | ||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation
|
||||||||
(depreciation) on investments
|
6,608,742 | 18,089,142 | ||||||
Change in net assets from operations
|
14,308,195 | 33,992,486 | ||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS (note 10):
|
||||||||
Class A Shares:
|
||||||||
Net investment income
|
(4,417,803 | ) | (8,808,164 | ) | ||||
Class C Shares:
|
||||||||
Net investment income
|
(1,289,451 | ) | (2,616,170 | ) | ||||
Class Y Shares:
|
||||||||
Net investment income
|
(1,429,871 | ) | (2,648,622 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from distributions .
|
(7,137,125 | ) | (14,072,956 | ) | ||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS (note 8):
|
||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold
|
52,212,545 | 138,764,606 | ||||||
Reinvested dividends and distributions
|
4,052,847 | 8,525,121 | ||||||
Cost of shares redeemed
|
(42,866,108 | ) | (90,854,748 | ) | ||||
Change in net assets from capital
|
||||||||
share transactions
|
13,399,284 | 56,434,979 | ||||||
Change in net assets
|
20,570,354 | 76,354,509 | ||||||
NET ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Beginning of period
|
427,522,307 | 351,167,798 | ||||||
End of period*
|
$ | 448,092,661 | $ | 427,522,307 | ||||
* Includes undistributed net investment
|
||||||||
income, respectively, of:
|
$ | 166,632 | $ | 143,558 |
a)
|
Portfolio valuation: Municipal securities which have remaining maturities of more than 60 days are valued each business day based upon information provided by a nationally prominent independent pricing service and periodically verified through other pricing services. In the case of securities for which market quotations are readily available, securities are valued by the pricing service at the mean of bid and asked quotations. If a market quotation or a valuation from the pricing service is not readily available, the security is valued at fair value determined in good faith under procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Board of Trustees. Securities which mature in 60 days or less are generally valued at amortized cost if their term to maturity at purchase is 60 days or less, or by amortizing their unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the 61st day prior to maturity, if their term to maturity at purchase exceeds 60 days.
|
b)
|
Fair value measurements: The Fund follows a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and the Fund’s own market assumptions (unobservable inputs). These inputs are used in determining the value of the Fund’s investments and are summarized in the following fair value hierarchy:
|
Valuation Inputs
|
|
Investments in Securities
|
|||
Level 1 – Quoted Prices
|
$ | — | |||
Level 2 – Other Significant Observable
|
|||||
Inputs — Municipal Bonds*
|
441,785,270 | ||||
Level 3 – Significant Unobservable Inputs
|
— | ||||
Total
|
$ | 441,785,270 |
c)
|
Subsequent events: In preparing these financial statements, the Fund has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date these financial statements were issued.
|
d)
|
Securities transactions and related investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are reported on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded daily on the accrual basis and is adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of original issue and market discount. In connection with certain bonds, fee income is recognized by the Fund on a daily basis over the life of the bonds.
|
e)
|
Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to certain investment companies. The Fund intends to make distributions of income and securities profits sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, Federal income and excise taxes.
|
f)
|
Multiple class allocations: All income, expenses (other than class-specific expenses), and realized and unrealized gains or losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class. Class-specific expenses, which include distribution and service fees and any other items that are specifically attributed to a particular class, are also charged directly to such class on a daily basis.
|
g)
|
Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
h)
|
Accounting pronouncement: In December 2011, FASB (the “Financial Accounting Standards Board”) issued ASU (“Accounting Standards Update”) No. 2011-11 related to disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. The amendment in this ASU require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The guidance requires retrospective application for all comparative periods presented. Management is currently evaluating the impact this amendment may have on the Fund’s financial statements.
|
Six Months Ended
December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
June 30, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||||
Class A Shares:
|
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold
|
2,082,573 | $ | 21,698,512 | 7,110,240 | $ | 71,675,930 | ||||||||||
Reinvested distributions
|
242,710 | 2,532,483 | 515,800 | 5,202,390 | ||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed
|
(2,704,893 | ) | (28,240,551 | ) | (4,573,928 | ) | (46,002,731 | ) | ||||||||
Net change
|
(379,610 | ) | (4,009,556 | ) | 3,052,112 | 30,875,589 | ||||||||||
Class C Shares:
|
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold
|
1,485,387 | 15,497,719 | 3,676,797 | 36,925,228 | ||||||||||||
Reinvested distributions
|
75,652 | 789,017 | 178,950 | 1,803,826 | ||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed
|
(791,459 | ) | (8,250,180 | ) | (2,945,514 | ) | (29,480,749 | ) | ||||||||
Net change
|
769,580 | 8,036,556 | 910,233 | 9,248,305 | ||||||||||||
Class Y Shares:
|
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold
|
1,433,154 | 15,016,314 | 2,978,473 | 30,163,448 | ||||||||||||
Reinvested distributions
|
69,794 | 731,347 | 150,033 | 1,518,905 | ||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed
|
(609,394 | ) | (6,375,377 | ) | (1,510,885 | ) | (15,371,268 | ) | ||||||||
Net change
|
893,554 | 9,372,284 | 1,617,621 | 16,311,085 | ||||||||||||
Total transactions in Fund
|
||||||||||||||||
shares
|
1,283,524 | $ | 13,399,284 | 5,579,966 | $ | 56,434,979 |
Year Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
2012
|
2011
|
|||||||
Net tax-exempt income
|
$ | 14,072,731 | $ | 15,590,252 | ||||
Ordinary income
|
225 | 481,747 | ||||||
$ | 14,072,956 | $ | 16,071,999 |
Undistributed tax-exempt income
|
$ | 257,297 | ||
Accumulated net realized loss
|
(71,455 | ) | ||
Unrealized depreciation
|
15,200,927 | |||
Other temporary differences
|
(257,297 | ) | ||
$ | 15,129,472 |
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/12
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$ | 10.27 | $ | 9.74 | $ | 9.80 | $ | 9.35 | $ | 9.73 | $ | 9.91 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income(1)
|
0.18 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on securities (both
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
realized and unrealized)
|
0.17 | 0.53 | (0.05 | ) | 0.47 | (0.37 | ) | (0.17 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations
|
0.35 | 0.91 | 0.37 | 0.90 | 0.07 | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions (note 10):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from net investment income
|
(0.18 | ) | (0.38 | ) | (0.43 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.42 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions from capital gains
|
– | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions
|
(0.18 | ) | (0.38 | ) | (0.43 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.42 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$ | 10.44 | $ | 10.27 | $ | 9.74 | $ | 9.80 | $ | 9.35 | $ | 9.73 | ||||||||||||
Total return (not reflecting sales charge)
|
3.37 | %(2) | 9.49 | % | 3.87 | % | 9.74 | % | 0.91 | % | 2.45 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratios/supplemental data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in millions)
|
$ | 256 | $ | 255 | $ | 212 | $ | 232 | $ | 166 | $ | 158 | ||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
|
0.83 | %(3) | 0.83 | % | 0.83 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.63 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average net assets
|
3.33 | %(3) | 3.79 | % | 4.31 | % | 4.43 | % | 4.80 | % | 4.09 | % | ||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate
|
11 | %(2) | 17 | % | 25 | % | 9 | % | 25 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
The expense and net investment income ratios without the effect of the contractual expense cap were (note 3):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
|
0.87 | %(3) | 0.88 | % | 0.87 | % | 0.87 | % | 0.87 | % | 0.90 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average net assets
|
3.29 | %(3) | 3.74 | % | 4.28 | % | 4.37 | % | 4.68 | % | 3.82 | % | ||||||||||||
The expense ratios after giving effect to the contractual expense cap and expense offset for uninvested cash balances were (note 3):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
|
0.83 | %(3) | 0.83 | % | 0.83 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.74 | % | 0.61 | % |
Class C | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/12
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$ | 10.27 | $ | 9.74 | $ | 9.79 | $ | 9.34 | $ | 9.72 | $ | 9.91 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income(1)
|
0.13 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on securities (both
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
realized and unrealized)
|
0.17 | 0.53 | (0.04 | ) | 0.47 | (0.37 | ) | (0.18 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations
|
0.30 | 0.83 | 0.30 | 0.82 | – | 0.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions (note 10):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from net investment income
|
(0.13 | ) | (0.30 | ) | (0.35 | ) | (0.37 | ) | (0.38 | ) | (0.34 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions from capital gains
|
– | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions
|
(0.13 | ) | (0.30 | ) | (0.35 | ) | (0.37 | ) | (0.38 | ) | (0.34 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$ | 10.44 | $ | 10.27 | $ | 9.74 | $ | 9.79 | $ | 9.34 | $ | 9.72 | ||||||||||||
Total return (not reflecting CDSC)
|
2.95 | %(2) | 8.62 | % | 3.15 | % | 8.87 | % | 0.10 | % | 1.53 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratios/supplemental data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in millions)
|
$ | 106 | $ | 96 | $ | 83 | $ | 89 | $ | 50 | $ | 32 | ||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
|
1.63 | %(3) | 1.63 | % | 1.63 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.43 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average net assets
|
2.52 | %(3) | 2.98 | % | 3.51 | % | 3.60 | % | 3.99 | % | 3.29 | % | ||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate
|
11 | %(2) | 17 | % | 25 | % | 9 | % | 25 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
The expense and net investment income ratios without the effect of the contractual expense cap were (note 3):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
|
1.66 | %(3) | 1.68 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.70 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average net assets
|
2.49 | %(3) | 2.93 | % | 3.48 | % | 3.54 | % | 3.88 | % | 3.02 | % | ||||||||||||
The expense ratios after giving effect to the contractual expense cap and expense offset for uninvested cash balances were (note 3):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
|
1.62 | %(3) | 1.63 | % | 1.63 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.54 | % | 1.42 | % |
Class Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/12
|
Year Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
2012
|
2011
|
2010
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
$ | 10.30 | $ | 9.77 | $ | 9.83 | $ | 9.38 | $ | 9.76 | $ | 9.94 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income(1)
|
0.19 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on securities (both
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
realized and unrealized)
|
0.17 | 0.53 | (0.05 | ) | 0.47 | (0.37 | ) | (0.17 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations
|
0.36 | 0.93 | 0.39 | 0.92 | 0.09 | 0.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Less distributions (note 10):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from net investment income
|
(0.19 | ) | (0.40 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (0.44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions from capital gains
|
– | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions
|
(0.19 | ) | (0.40 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (0.44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of period
|
$ | 10.47 | $ | 10.30 | $ | 9.77 | $ | 9.83 | $ | 9.38 | $ | 9.76 | ||||||||||||
Total return (not reflecting CDSC)
|
3.46 | %(2) | 9.69 | % | 4.08 | % | 9.94 | % | 1.13 | % | 2.67 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratios/supplemental data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in millions)
|
$ | 86 | $ | 76 | $ | 56 | $ | 59 | $ | 44 | $ | 49 | ||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
|
0.63 | %(3) | 0.63 | % | 0.63 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.43 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average net assets
|
3.52 | %(3) | 3.98 | % | 4.51 | % | 4.64 | % | 5.00 | % | 4.29 | % | ||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate
|
11 | %(2) | 17 | % | 25 | % | 9 | % | 25 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
The expense and net investment income ratios without the effect of the contractual expense cap were (note 3):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
|
0.67 | %(3) | 0.68 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.70 | % | ||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
average net assets
|
3.49 | %(3) | 3.93 | % | 4.47 | % | 4.57 | % | 4.88 | % | 4.02 | % | ||||||||||||
The expense ratios after giving effect to the contractual expense cap and expense offset for uninvested cash balances were (note 3):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets
|
0.63 | %(3) | 0.63 | % | 0.63 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.42 | % |
Actual
|
||||
Total Return
|
Beginning
|
Ending
|
Expenses
|
|
Without
|
Account
|
Account
|
Paid During
|
|
Sales Charges(1)
|
Value
|
Value
|
the Period(2)
|
|
Class A
|
3.37%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,033.70
|
$4.25
|
Class C
|
2.95%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,029.50
|
$8.29
|
Class Y
|
3.46%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,034.60
|
$3.23
|
(1)
|
Assumes reinvestment of all dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, at net asset value and does not reflect the deduction of the applicable sales charges with respect to Class A shares or the applicable CDSC with respect to Class C shares. Total return is not annualized, as it may not be representative of the total return for the year.
|
(2)
|
Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 0.83%, 1.62% and 0.63% for the Fund’s Class A, C and Y shares, respectively, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
|
Hypothetical
|
||||
Annualized
|
Beginning
|
Ending
|
Expenses
|
|
Total
|
Account
|
Account
|
Paid During
|
|
Return
|
Value
|
Value
|
the Period(1)
|
|
Class A
|
5.00%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,021.02
|
$4.23
|
Class C
|
5.00%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,017.04
|
$8.24
|
Class Y
|
5.00%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,022.03
|
$3.21
|
(1)
|
Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 0.83%, 1.62% and 0.63% for the Fund’s Class A, C and Y shares, respectively, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
|
1.
|
To elect Trustees.
|
Dollar Amount of Votes:
|
||
Trustee
|
For
|
Withheld
|
Tucker Hart Adams
|
$398,645,419
|
$2,301,762
|
Ernest Calderón
|
$399,985,137
|
$ 962,044
|
Thomas A. Christopher
|
$399,916,409
|
$1,030,772
|
Gary C. Cornia
|
$400,305,916
|
$ 641,265
|
Grady Gammage, Jr.
|
$399,912,780
|
$1,034,401
|
Diana P. Herrmann
|
$398,910,315
|
$2,036,866
|
Lyle W. Hillyard
|
$399,549,905
|
$1,397,275
|
John C. Lucking
|
$399,870,282
|
$1,076,899
|
Anne J. Mills
|
$397,998,679
|
$2,948,502
|
2.
|
To ratify the selection of Tait, Weller & Baker LLP as the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm.
|
Dollar Amount of Votes:
|
||
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
$398,571,344
|
$897,669
|
$1,478,168
|
ITEM 2.
|
CODE OF ETHICS.
|
ITEM 3.
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
|
ITEM 4.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
|
ITEM 5.
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
|
ITEM 6.
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
|
ITEM 7.
|
DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
|
ITEM 8.
|
PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
|
ITEM 9.
|
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENTCOMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
|
ITEM 10.
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
|
ITEM 11.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
|
ITEM 12.
|
EXHIBITS.
|
By:
|
/s/ Diana P. Herrmann | |
President and Trustee
March 4 , 2013
|
||
By:
|
/s/ Joseph P. DiMaggio | |
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
March 4 , 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ Diana P. Herrmann | |
Diana P. Herrmann
President and Trustee
March 4 , 2013
|
||
By:
|
/s/ Joseph P. DiMaggio | |
Joseph P. DiMaggio
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
March 4 , 2013
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSRS of Tax-Free Fund For Utah;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
|
|
a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
a)
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
|
|
b)
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
/s/ Diana P. Herrmann | |
Title: President and Trustee
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSRS of Tax-Free Fund For Utah;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
|
|
a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
a)
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
|
|
b)
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
/s/ Joseph P. DiMaggio | |
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
Dated: March 4 , 2013
|
|
/s/ Diana P. Herrmann | |
President and Trustee
Tax-Free Fund For Utah
|
|||
Dated: March 4 , 2013
|
|
/s/ Joseph P. DiMaggio | |
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Tax-Free Fund For Utah
|
Q'4'V-]4HXHX8Q'$BH@Z*HP!5?3;
M%-/L8[=>2.6;U;N:MUPMN3NST(Q459!1112&59M.LISF6UA8^I09_.L"71[*
M/Q"EL\1%O/&6C`8C:PZ_R_6NIK%\0_N197@X:&<9/^R>O\J3&@_X1NV3_475
MU#Z!)./Y4?V9JL/_`![ZNS>BS)G]>:VJ*=A7,7S]?MS\]K;W*^L;;3^O^%']
MO20_\?>F74/J5&X?GQ6U10!FP:]IL_`NE0^DGR_J>*DU.T74M.9(V!/$X/
M1ATYJ6XL+2Z'[^VC<^I7G\^M8MWHR6=S9BRNI[<7-TD+!9"`-W?_`/72U#0]
MY\`>)CXH\*P74W%[`?(N@>OF*.OXC!_'VKJ*Y_PCX2L_"&F2VEK/--*999
MICRS8Q^'2N@KT(WLK[GG2MS.VP44451(4444`%>8_'3_`)$FR_["*?\`HN2O
M3J\Q^.G_`")-E_V$4_\`1/[@>9!X$1$
M/02Z@@;]V%S%