Subsequent Event Note

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2019

Subsequent Event Note

Subsequent Event Note

17. Subsequent Event Note

On October 28, 2019, Provident Premier Master Fund Ltd. (the “Plaintiff”), filed and served an Amended Statement of Claim against Northern Alberta Oil Ltd., Deep Well Oil & Gas (Alberta) Ltd., Andora Energy Corporation and MP Energy West Canada Corp. (the “Defendants”) in the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta Judicial District of Calgary. The Original Statement of Claim had been filed on November 1, 2018 but the Company states that it had never been served so the Company was not aware of it.

The Plaintiff claims that on December 12, 2003, Nearshore Petroleum Corporation (“Nearshore”) entered into a royalty agreement with Northern Alberta Oil Ltd. (“Northern”) in which Northern granted a 6.5% gross overriding royalty (“GORR”) in all petroleum substances produced, saved and marketed from six of the Company's oil sands leases located within the Company's Sawn Lake properties. The Plaintiff further claims that on September 22, 2006, Nearshore and Gemini Strategies LLC (“Gemini”) entered into a royalty conveyance agreement whereby Nearshore sold 1% of the GORR to Gemini. The Plaintiff further states that Gemini acquired the 1% GORR as agent for Provident, Grey K Fund LP (“Grey K”) and Grey K Offshore Fund Ltd. (“Grey K Offshore”). The Plaintiff further claims that on September 22, 2006, Gemini delivered a notice of assignment, in accordance with the 1993 Canadian Association of Petroleum Landmen Assignment Procedure (the “1993 CAPL”), to the grantors of the 1% GORR, novating Provident (66.67%, net 0.6667%), Grey K (19.33%, net 0.1933%) and Grey K Offshore (14%, net 0.14%) into the GORR agreement. The Plaintiff further claims that on September 2, 2009, any legal title in the GORR beneficially owned by Grey K and Grey K Offshore vested in the Crown in right of Alberta pursuant to Section 229(1) of the Business Corporations Act and pursuant to section 15 of the Unclaimed Personal Property and Vested Property Act. The Plaintiff further claims that the GORR was payable by one or more of the Defendants to Provident and that the Defendants are in breach of the GORR agreement by failing to pay the GORR. Despite the allegation within the claim that the GORR was payable to each of Provident, Grey K and Grey K Offshore, the only Plaintiff named in the Amended Statement of Claim is Provident and relief is only being sought by Provident in relation to its purported 0.67% interest.

The Plaintiff seeks: 1) A declaration that the Plaintiff is the legal owner of 0.67% of the GORR payable on all oil sands produced from the lands which is payable by one or more of the Defendants; 2) An accounting to determine the amount of the outstanding royalty of which judgment is estimated by the Plaintiff to be in the amount of $100,000 Cdn; and 3) Interest and costs.

The Company continues to deny the validity of the Purported 6.5% Royalty in the first instance. As well, if the Purported 6.5% Royalty was valid, which is denied, it was not a gross overriding interest, but rather an overriding interest, which allowed for the deduction of operating and marketing costs. The Company plans to vigorously defend itself against the Plaintiff’s claims.