|
RE:
|
Dorman
Products, Inc. (the “Company”)
|
1.
|
We
note your discussion of current economic conditions that have affected
your business, including a slowdown of global economic activity,
instability in the financial markets, increased operating costs, lower
demand for your products, and consolidation in the automotive
aftermarket. In future filings, please revise your “Risk
Factors” section to include a discussion of the risks associated with
these economic conditions, if applicable, as well as all other material
risks to your business.
|
2.
|
We
note from your disclosure in Note 1 that warranty expense has continued to
increase over the last three years. We also note that in your
letter dated April 16, 2008, responding to SEC Staff comments on the Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, you indicated that the notes to
the financial statements in future filings would be revised to include the
reconciliations of changes in liabilities for product warranties, as
required by paragraph 14b of FIN No. 45. However, this
disclosure does not appear to be in the notes to the financial statements
in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. As
previously requested, please revise future filings to include these
required disclosures.
|
3.
|
We
note from your disclosure that the expected life assumption used in the
Black-Scholes model was calculated using the simplified method prescribed
by SAB No. 107. However, we also note that SAB 107 indicates
that more detailed information about exercise behavior will, over time,
become readily available to companies and as such, the Staff does not
expect that such a simplified method would be used for share option grants
once more detailed information becomes available. Please
explain to us why you believe it is appropriate to continue to use the
simplified method for your expected life assumption for the year ended
December 31 [27], 2008 and also through the quarter ended September 30,
2009. As part of your response, please tell us when you expect
to end the use of the simplified method for this
assumption.
|
4.
|
We
note that in regards to our prior review of the Company’s Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007, you responded in a letter dated April
16, 2008 that you would revise your section on quarterly results of
operations to discuss or cross-reference to a discussion of any material
or unusual changes that impacted the results of operations for the
quarters presented. In light of the fact that your disclosure
in your 2008 10-K includes quarters during the year ended December 31,
2007 in which you incurred goodwill impairment charges, we would expect
that a discussion or cross-reference to a discussion of these types of
unusual events would have been made. Please confirm that you
will revise future fillings
accordingly.
|
5.
|
We
note that no amounts were earned under your Executive Bonus Plan for
fiscal 2008. In light of the fact that you did not meet your
earnings targets, please disclose the basis for awarding discretionary
bonuses to your executives. Disclose, for example, the material
factors you considered in determining that based on each executive
officer’s “contribution, responsibility, and performance,” discretionary
bonuses were earned.
|
6.
|
We
note that you use benchmarking as a factor in setting executive
compensation levels. Please identify the companies against
which you benchmark. Refer to Item 402(b)(xiv) of Regulation
S-K.
|
|
·
|
The
Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosures in
its filings;
|
|
·
|
Staff
comments or changes to disclosures in response to staff comments do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filing; and
|
|
·
|
The
Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities
laws of the United States
|
Sincerely,
|
|
/s/
Mathias J. Barton
|
|
Mathias
J. Barton
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|