XML 22 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Net Income (Loss) Per Share  
Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Note C — Net Income (Loss) Per Share

 

Net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, increased to include dilutive potential common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options that were outstanding during the period.  For periods of net loss, diluted net loss per common share equals basic net loss per common share because common stock equivalents are not included in periods where there is a loss, as they are antidilutive.  A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator in the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share calculation is as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

495,924

 

$

(293,964

)

$

1,023,091

 

$

(1,722,443

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share- weighted average shares outstanding

 

12,008,420

 

12,316,878

 

12,036,124

 

12,222,146

 

Effect of dilutive stock options

 

364,920

 

 

303,921

 

 

Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share- weighted average shares outstanding

 

12,373,340

 

12,316,878

 

12,340,045

 

12,222,146

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income (loss) per share

 

$

0.04

 

$

(0.02

)

$

0.09

 

$

(0.14

)

Dilute net income (loss) per share

 

$

0.04

 

$

(0.02

)

$

0.08

 

$

(0.14

)

 

Employee stock options to purchase 1,063,500 shares were excluded from the diluted net income per share calculation for the third quarter of fiscal 2012 because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock and their effect would have been antidilutive.