N-CSR
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED
SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-06153
Integrity Managed Portfolios
(Exact name of registrant as specified in
charter)
1 Main Street North, Minot, ND |
|
58703 |
(Address of principal offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
Brent Wheeler and/or Kevin Flagstad, PO Box 500, Minot, ND 58702
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 701-852-5292
Date of fiscal year end: July 31
Date of reporting period: July 29, 2016
Item 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
{Logo}
INTEGRITY MANAGED PORTFOLIOS
Kansas Municipal Fund
Nebraska Municipal Fund
Oklahoma Municipal Fund
Maine Municipal Fund
New Hampshire Municipal Fund
Annual Report
July 29, 2016
|
|
Investment
Adviser |
Principal
Underwriter |
Transfer Agent |
Custodian |
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
*The Funds are distributed through Integrity Funds Distributor, LLC. Member FINRA |
|
|
DEAR SHAREHOLDERS:
Enclosed is the report of the operations for the Kansas Municipal Fund, Nebraska Municipal Fund, Oklahoma Municipal Fund, Maine Municipal Fund, and New Hampshire Municipal Fund (each a “Fund”, and collectively the “Funds”) for the year ended July 29, 2016. Each Fund’s portfolio and related financial statements are presented within for your review.
Economic Recap
U.S. economic activity continued to expand in the third quarter of 2015 as an increase in jobs and a steady unemployment rate indicated that labor market conditions improved once again according to the Federal Open Market Committee’s (“FOMC”) or (“Committee”) statement. Household spending also increased, likely driven by low energy prices. Nevertheless, the FOMC did not believe conditions were appropriate to begin increasing the federal funds rate in the third quarter, citing international factors as a concern. However, as economic activity continued to expand at a moderate pace in the fourth quarter, and given the considerable improvement in labor market conditions and confidence that inflation would rise over the medium term, the Committee decided to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to ¼ to ½ percent. U.S. economic activity continued to expand at a moderate pace in the first quarter of 2016, despite global economic and financial developments, as noted by the FOMC statement in mid-March. Strong job gains indicated that labor market conditions continued to improve. Household spending also increased in the first quarter. The FOMC’s statement in mid-June however, noted that the pace of improvement in the labor market had slowed while growth in economic activity continued to pick up. Although the unemployment rate declined, job gains diminished in the second quarter. Growth in household spending continued to strengthen and the housing sector continued to improve. The Committee expected that economic activity would continue to expand at a moderate pace and labor market indicators would strengthen, however, global economic and financial developments continued to pose risks, as the Brexit vote took over headlines with Britain electing to leave the European Union. Against that backdrop, the Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at ¼ to ½ percent in June. Going forward, the Committee will continue to assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. The Committee also noted that they expect that economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate.
Municipal Bond Market Recap
Municipal bonds bounced back in the third quarter of 2015 after a tough second quarter. Interest rates fell throughout the yield curve over the quarter. The falling rates were principally driven by uncertainty on the timing of when the FOMC would begin to increase the federal funds rate. The 10-year muni/Treasury yield ratio was sitting at 98.6% at the end of the third quarter, continuing to offer a compelling value for municipal bond investors. The relative cheapness of municipals to Treasuries would offer a buffer from volatility going into the fourth quarter. Returns were again positive for the muni bond market in the fourth quarter, in what was a very stable quarter for municipal bonds. Interest rates fell throughout the mid to long end of the yield curve, while rising on the short end of the curve on the back of the FOMC increasing the federal funds rate in December. Issuance for the quarter came in at $71.642 billion nationally, a 25.3% decrease over the same quarter last year. With the notable drop off in supply and demand picking up in the quarter, the muni/Treasury ratio returned closer to its historical average, falling to 84.4% at the end of 2015.
A favorable supply/demand dynamic and investors seeking stability propelled municipal bonds to a strong start in the first seven months of 2016. Municipal bonds continued their strong performance from 2015, posting back to back quarters of positive returns. Demand remained strong with 43 consecutive weeks of positive fund flows into municipal bond funds as of the end of July, as issuance has come in slightly below last year through the first seven months of 2016.
Investors sought safety in municipal bonds even as municipal and treasury yields moved lower, while central banks around the world continued to try and stimulate growth by keeping short-term rates at or around zero. Another contributing factor to the rally during the first seven months of the year was the United Kingdom’s vote to leave the European Union and the possible ripple effects around the world. With fears of slowing worldwide economic growth, many analysts are forecasting a lower probability of rate hikes from the FOMC for the remainder of 2016. With less likelihood of a move by the Fed, yields fell throughout the curve during the first seven months of the year. Even as municipal bonds have rallied they continue to offer investors value vs their Treasury counterparts with the 10 year muni/Treasury ratio sitting at 96.1% at the end of July, up from 84.4% at the end of 2015 and above its historical average.
Fund Performance and Outlook
We continue to follow a disciplined strategy of investing to maximize tax-exempt income while seeking value in the municipal market. Recent market activity and the possibility of rising rates has lead us to favor high quality, higher coupon bonds. As interest rates fluctuate, the portfolio becomes diversified with a broad range of securities that help us achieve a high level of current tax-free income for shareholders. All else equal, the shorter maturity structure and higher coupons will be more defensive, mitigating some negative impact to each Fund’s share price should a rise in rates occur.
The Kansas Municipal Fund began the period at $10.87 per share and ended the period at $11.13 per share for a total return of 5.30%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index’s return of 6.95%. At the end of the period the average weighted coupon and maturity of the Fund at market value was 4.90% and 12 years, respectively.
The Nebraska Municipal Fund began the period at $10.48 per share and ended the period at $10.82 per share for a total return of 5.94%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index’s return of 6.95%. At the end of the period the average weighted coupon and maturity of the Fund at market value was 4.79% and 14 years, respectively.
The Oklahoma Municipal Fund began the period at $11.64 per share and ended the period at $12.10 per share for a total return of 6.47%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index’s return of 6.95%. At the end of the period the average weighted coupon and maturity of the Fund at market value was 4.67% and 14 years, respectively.
The Maine Municipal Fund began the period at $10.99 per share and ended the period at $11.31 per share for a total return of 5.44%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index’s return of 6.95%. At the end of the period the average weighted coupon and maturity of the Fund at market value was 4.58% and 12 years, respectively.
The New Hampshire Municipal Fund began the period at $10.76 per share and ended the period at $11.07 per share for a total return of 5.12%*. This compares to the Barclays Capital Municipal Index’s return of 6.95%. At the end of the period the average weighted coupon and maturity of the Fund at market value was 4.42% and 12 years, respectively.
Income exempt from federal income taxes and each Fund's respective state tax (interest and dividend tax with respect to New Hampshire) with preservation of capital remains the primary objective of the Funds.
If you would like more frequent updates, please visit the Funds’ website at www.integrityvikingfunds.com for daily prices along with pertinent Fund information.
Sincerely,
The Portfolio Management Team
The views expressed are those of The Portfolio Management Team of Viking Fund Management, LLC (“Viking Fund Management”, “VFM”, or the “Adviser”). The views are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector, the markets generally, or any of the funds in the Integrity Viking family of funds.
*Performance does not include applicable front-end or contingent deferred sales charges, which would have reduced the performance. For Kansas Municipal Fund, Nebraska Municipal Fund, Oklahoma Municipal Fund, Maine Municipal Fund, and New Hampshire Municipal Fund, the total annual fund operating expense ratio (before expense waivers and reimbursements and including acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 1.18%, 1.21%, 1.20%, 1.29%, and 1.68%, respectively. The net annual fund operating expense ratio (after expense waivers and reimbursements and excluding acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 0.98%, 0.98%, 0.98%, 0.98%, and 0.98%, respectively. The Fund’s investment adviser has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses through November 29, 2016 so that total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers and expense reimbursements (excluding taxes, brokerage fees, commissions, extraordinary and non-recurring expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses) do not exceed 0.98% of average daily net assets. This expense limitation agreement may only be terminated or modified prior to November 29, 2016 with the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
You should consider each Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.
Bond prices and therefore the value of bond funds decline as interest rates rise. Because each Fund invests in securities of a single state, the Funds are more susceptible to factors adversely impacting the respective state than a municipal bond fund that does not concentrate its securities in a single state.
For investors subject to the alternative minimum tax, a portion of the each Fund’s dividends may be taxable. Distributions of capital gains are generally taxable.
KANSAS MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment
Kansas Municipal Fund without Sales Charge |
Kansas Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
|
7/31/06 |
$10,000 |
$9,752 |
$10,000 |
7/31/07 |
$10,306 |
$10,050 |
$10,426 |
7/31/08 |
$10,604 |
$10,341 |
$10,723 |
7/31/09 |
$11,035 |
$10,761 |
$11,271 |
7/30/10 |
$11,710 |
$11,420 |
$12,303 |
7/29/11 |
$12,064 |
$11,764 |
$12,701 |
7/31/12 |
$13,037 |
$12,714 |
$14,035 |
7/31/13 |
$12,728 |
$12,413 |
$13,726 |
7/31/14 |
$13,468 |
$13,134 |
$14,723 |
7/31/15 |
$13,876 |
$13,532 |
$15,246 |
7/29/16 |
$14,612 |
$14,249 |
$16,306 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ended July 29, 2016
Since Inception |
|||||
|
1 year |
3 year |
5 year |
10 year |
(November 15, 1990) |
Without sales charge |
5.30% |
4.71% |
3.90% |
3.87% |
4.33% |
With sales charge (3.75%) |
2.66% |
3.83% |
3.38% |
3.60% |
4.23% |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio (before expense waivers and reimbursements and including acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 1.18%. The net annual fund operating expense ratio (after expense waivers and reimbursements and excluding acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 0.98%. The Fund’s investment adviser has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses through November 29, 2016 so that total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers and expense reimbursements (excluding taxes, brokerage fees, commissions, extraordinary and non-recurring expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses) do not exceed 0.98% of average daily net assets. This expense limitation agreement may only be terminated or modified prior to November 29, 2016 with the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends. The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
NEBRASKA MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment
Nebraska Municipal Fund without Sales Charge |
Nebraska Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
|
7/31/06 |
$10,000 |
$9,751 |
$10,000 |
7/31/07 |
$10,316 |
$10,060 |
$10,426 |
7/31/08 |
$10,604 |
$10,340 |
$10,723 |
7/31/09 |
$10,997 |
$10,723 |
$11,271 |
7/30/10 |
$11,617 |
$11,328 |
$12,303 |
7/29/11 |
$11,999 |
$11,701 |
$12,701 |
7/31/12 |
$12,986 |
$12,664 |
$14,035 |
7/31/13 |
$12,472 |
$12,162 |
$13,726 |
7/31/14 |
$13,363 |
$13,031 |
$14,723 |
7/31/15 |
$13,836 |
$13,492 |
$15,246 |
7/29/16 |
$14,658 |
$14,293 |
$16,306 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ended July 29, 2016
Since Inception |
|||||
|
1 year |
3 year |
5 year |
10 year |
(November 17, 1993) |
Without sales charge |
5.94% |
5.53% |
4.08% |
3.90% |
3.88% |
With sales charge (3.75%) |
3.28% |
4.63% |
3.56% |
3.64% |
3.77% |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio (before expense waivers and reimbursements and including acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 1.21%. The net annual fund operating expense ratio (after expense waivers and reimbursements and excluding acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 0.98%. The Fund’s investment adviser has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses through November 29, 2016 so that total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers and expense reimbursements (excluding taxes, brokerage fees, commissions, extraordinary and non-recurring expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses) do not exceed 0.98% of average daily net assets. This expense limitation agreement may only be terminated or modified prior to November 29, 2016 with the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends. The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment
Oklahoma Municipal Fund without Sales Charge |
Oklahoma Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
|
7/31/06 |
$10,000 |
$9,754 |
$10,000 |
7/31/07 |
$10,310 |
$10,056 |
$10,426 |
7/31/08 |
$10,414 |
$10,157 |
$10,723 |
7/31/09 |
$10,860 |
$10,592 |
$11,271 |
7/30/10 |
$11,687 |
$11,399 |
$12,303 |
7/29/11 |
$12,172 |
$11,872 |
$12,701 |
7/31/12 |
$13,304 |
$12,976 |
$14,035 |
7/31/13 |
$12,832 |
$12,516 |
$13,726 |
7/31/14 |
$13,656 |
$13,319 |
$14,723 |
7/31/15 |
$14,041 |
$13,695 |
$15,246 |
7/29/16 |
$14,950 |
$14,581 |
$16,306 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ended July 29, 2016
Since Inception |
|||||
|
1 year |
3 year |
5 year |
10 year |
(September 25, 1996) |
Without sales charge |
6.47% |
5.22% |
4.20% |
4.10% |
4.18% |
With sales charge (3.75%) |
3.79% |
4.33% |
3.66% |
3.84% |
4.05% |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio (before expense waivers and reimbursements and including acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 1.20%. The net annual fund operating expense ratio (after expense waivers and reimbursements and excluding acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 0.98%. The Fund’s investment adviser has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses through November 29, 2016 so that total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers and expense reimbursements (excluding taxes, brokerage fees, commissions, extraordinary and non-recurring expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses) do not exceed 0.98% of average daily net assets. This expense limitation agreement may only be terminated or modified prior to November 29, 2016 with the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends. The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
MAINE MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment
Maine Municipal Fund without Sales Charge |
Maine Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
|
7/31/06 |
$10,000 |
$9,750 |
$10,000 |
7/31/07 |
$10,289 |
$10,032 |
$10,426 |
7/31/08 |
$10,642 |
$10,375 |
$10,723 |
7/31/09 |
$11,197 |
$10,917 |
$11,271 |
7/30/10 |
$11,812 |
$11,517 |
$12,303 |
7/29/11 |
$12,107 |
$11,804 |
$12,701 |
7/31/12 |
$13,171 |
$12,842 |
$14,035 |
7/31/13 |
$12,859 |
$12,538 |
$13,726 |
7/31/14 |
$13,466 |
$13,129 |
$14,723 |
7/31/15 |
$13,785 |
$13,440 |
$15,246 |
7/29/16 |
$14,536 |
$14,172 |
$16,306 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ended July 29, 2016
Since Inception |
|||||
|
1 year |
3 year |
5 year |
10 year |
(December 5, 1991) |
Without sales charge |
5.44% |
4.17% |
3.72% |
3.81% |
4.53% |
With sales charge (3.75%) |
2.82% |
3.28% |
3.19% |
3.55% |
4.42% |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio (before expense waivers and reimbursements and including acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 1.29%. The net annual fund operating expense ratio (after expense waivers and reimbursements and excluding acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 0.98%. The Fund’s investment adviser has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses through November 29, 2016 so that total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers and expense reimbursements (excluding taxes, brokerage fees, commissions, extraordinary and non-recurring expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses) do not exceed 0.98% of average daily net assets. This expense limitation agreement may only be terminated or modified prior to November 29, 2016 with the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends. The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
NEW HAMPSHIRE MUNICIPAL FUND
PERFORMANCE (unaudited)
Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment
New Hampshire Municipal Fund without Sales Charge |
New Hampshire Municipal Fund with Maximum Sales Charge |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index |
|
7/31/06 |
$10,000 |
$9,753 |
$10,000 |
7/31/07 |
$10,302 |
$10,047 |
$10,426 |
7/31/08 |
$10,686 |
$10,421 |
$10,723 |
7/31/09 |
$11,049 |
$10,775 |
$11,271 |
7/30/10 |
$11,783 |
$11,491 |
$12,303 |
7/29/11 |
$12,094 |
$11,795 |
$12,701 |
7/31/12 |
$12,945 |
$12,625 |
$14,035 |
7/31/13 |
$12,662 |
$12,348 |
$13,726 |
7/31/14 |
$13,234 |
$12,907 |
$14,723 |
7/31/15 |
$13,558 |
$13,223 |
$15,246 |
7/29/16 |
$14,253 |
$13,900 |
$16,306 |
Average Annual Total Returns for the periods ended July 29, 2016
Since Inception |
|||||
|
1 year |
3 year |
5 year |
10 year |
(December 31, 1992) |
Without sales charge |
5.12% |
4.03% |
3.34% |
3.61% |
4.17% |
With sales charge (3.75%) |
2.46% |
3.15% |
2.82% |
3.35% |
4.06% |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio (before expense waivers and reimbursements and including acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 1.68%. The net annual fund operating expense ratio (after expense waivers and reimbursements and excluding acquired fund fees and expenses) as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 0.98%. The Fund’s investment adviser has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses through November 29, 2016 so that total annual fund operating expenses after fee waivers and expense reimbursements (excluding taxes, brokerage fees, commissions, extraordinary and non-recurring expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses) do not exceed 0.98% of average daily net assets. This expense limitation agreement may only be terminated or modified prior to November 29, 2016 with the approval of the Fund’s Board of Trustees.
Performance data quoted above is historical. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted. The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 800-276-1262.
The table and graph above do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.
The graph comparing the Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how the Fund performed. To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two. The Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees. A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio. Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results. In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities to match the index. If they could, transaction costs and other expenses would be incurred. All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends. The results prior to August 1, 2009 were achieved while the Fund was managed by a different investment adviser. The current investment adviser may produce different investment results than those achieved by the previous investment adviser.
KANSAS MUNICIPAL FUND
PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS July 29, 2016
General Obligation |
46.5% |
Health Care |
20.2% |
Other Revenue |
15.7% |
Utilities |
10.8% |
Cash Equivalents and Other |
3.2% |
Education |
2.3% |
Transportation |
1.0% |
Housing |
0.3% |
|
100.0% |
Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.
These percentages are based on net assets and are subject to change.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS July 29, 2016
Principal |
Fair |
|||
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS (96.8%) |
||||
|
||||
Education (2.3%) |
||||
#Colby KS Comnty College Cops 3.000% 05/01/38 |
$ |
500,000 |
$ |
469,590 |
KS Dev Fin Auth Sales Tax Rev K-St-Olathe Innovation-L1 5.000% 09/01/39 |
200,000 |
221,428 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev Wichita ST Univ Student Hsg 5.000% 06/01/27 |
250,000 |
288,405 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty Unified Sch 5.250% 09/01/20 |
345,000 |
378,127 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty Unified Sch 5.250% 09/01/20 |
15,000 |
16,406 |
||
|
1,373,956 |
|||
General Obligation (46.5%) |
||||
Bourbon Cnty KS USD #234 (Fort Scott) 5.000% 09/01/27 |
250,000 |
307,452 |
||
Bourbon Cnty KS USD #234 (Fort Scott) 5.000% 09/01/28 |
250,000 |
303,750 |
||
Bourbon Cnty KS USD #234 (Fort Scott) 5.000% 09/01/29 |
250,000 |
301,105 |
||
Bourbon Cnty KS USD #234 (Fort Scott) 5.000% 09/01/30 |
250,000 |
300,490 |
||
Bourbon Cnty KS USD #234 (Fort Scott) 5.000% 09/01/31 |
500,000 |
598,525 |
||
Butler Cnty KS USD #402 5.250% 09/01/21 |
560,000 |
613,726 |
||
Butler Cnty KS USD #402 4.000% 09/01/30 |
250,000 |
289,910 |
||
Butler Cnty KS USD #385 5.000% 09/01/18 |
500,000 |
544,180 |
||
Cowley Cnty KS USD #470 5.500% 09/01/21 |
100,000 |
109,503 |
||
Cowley Cnty KS USD #470 4.750% 09/01/27 |
490,000 |
535,942 |
||
Dickinson Cnty KS USD #473 5.000% 09/01/27 |
325,000 |
367,932 |
||
Dickinson Cnty KS USD #473 4.400% 09/01/29 |
100,000 |
111,379 |
||
Douglas Cnty KS USD #348 Baldwin GO 4.000% 09/01/30 |
250,000 |
293,757 |
||
Douglas Cnty KS USD #491 Eudora 5.500% 09/01/24 |
250,000 |
273,957 |
||
Douglas Cnty KS USD #491 Eudora 5.000% 09/01/23 |
375,000 |
422,947 |
||
Douglas Cnty KS USD #491 Eudora 5.125% 09/01/29 |
250,000 |
281,332 |
||
Ford Cnty KS Sales Tax - Ser A 4.500% 09/01/24 |
500,000 |
501,410 |
||
*Franklin Cnty KS USD #290 5.000% 09/01/40 |
3,000,000 |
3,534,000 |
||
Harvey Cnty KS USD #373 (Newton) 4.000% 09/01/18 |
250,000 |
269,467 |
||
Harvey Cnty KS USD #373 (Newton) 5.000% 09/01/23 |
200,000 |
219,664 |
||
Harvey Cnty KS USD #373 (Newton) 5.000% 09/01/25 |
1,000,000 |
1,098,320 |
||
Jackson Cnty KS USD #336 5.000% 09/01/29 |
250,000 |
293,348 |
||
Jackson Cnty KS USD #336 5.000% 09/01/34 |
250,000 |
289,010 |
||
Johnson & Miami Cnty KS USD #230 3.500% 09/01/30 |
250,000 |
270,440 |
||
Johnson Cnty KS USD #231 5.000% 10/01/25 |
250,000 |
307,775 |
||
Johnson Cnty KS USD #233 4.000% 09/01/18 |
150,000 |
162,213 |
||
Junction City KS Ref & Impt 5.000% 09/01/25 |
250,000 |
259,110 |
||
Junction City KS Unlimited GO 4.250% 09/01/21 |
100,000 |
110,618 |
||
Junction City KS Unlimited GO 4.400% 09/01/22 |
100,000 |
110,595 |
||
Junction City KS Unlimited GO 4.500% 09/01/23 |
100,000 |
109,814 |
||
Leavenworth Cnty KS USD #453 GO Impt & Ref 5.250% 03/01/24 |
200,000 |
229,072 |
||
Leavenworth Cnty KS USD #453 4.750% 09/01/25 |
300,000 |
333,939 |
||
*Leavenworth Cnty KS USD #453 GO Impt & Ref 5.125% 03/01/29 |
1,000,000 |
1,144,520 |
||
Leavenworth Cnty KS USD #458 5.000% 09/01/29 |
500,000 |
601,805 |
||
Leavenworth Cnty KS USD #469 Lansing 4.000% 09/01/30 |
320,000 |
352,758 |
||
Wichita Cnty KS USD #467 (Leoti) 5.000% 10/01/18 |
100,000 |
109,953 |
||
Manhattan KS GO 5.000% 11/01/28 |
130,000 |
141,696 |
||
Miami Cnty KD USD #368 5.000% 09/01/27 |
250,000 |
292,340 |
||
Miami Cnty USD #416 Louisburg 5.000% 09/01/20 |
275,000 |
276,108 |
||
Montgomery Cnty KS USD #446 5.000% 09/01/33 |
250,000 |
262,940 |
||
Neosho Cnty KS USD #413 4.000% 09/01/31 |
250,000 |
276,023 |
||
Newton KS Unlimited GO 5.000% 09/01/21 |
100,000 |
114,223 |
||
Newton KS Unlimited GO 4.750% 09/01/29 |
435,000 |
478,557 |
||
Olathe KS GO 4.000% 10/01/19 |
100,000 |
100,608 |
||
Park City KS 5.100% 12/01/20 |
200,000 |
229,390 |
||
Park City KS 5.500% 12/01/24 |
100,000 |
116,014 |
||
Park City KS 6.000% 12/01/29 |
500,000 |
588,315 |
||
City of Park City KS 5.375% 12/1/25 |
250,000 |
287,748 |
||
Salina KS GO 4.625% 10/01/27 |
200,000 |
209,290 |
||
Scott Cnty KS Ref GO 5.000% 04/01/32 |
500,000 |
617,260 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty KS USD #261 5.000% 11/01/21 |
245,000 |
259,497 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty KS USD #261 5.000% 11/01/21 |
5,000 |
5,307 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty KS USD #262 5.000% 09/01/18 |
100,000 |
109,764 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty KS USD #262 5.000% 09/01/28 |
485,000 |
532,569 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty KS USD #262 5.000% 09/01/28 |
15,000 |
16,209 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty Unified Sch 5.000% 09/01/24 |
245,000 |
267,256 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty Unified Sch 5.000% 09/01/24 |
5,000 |
5,447 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty KS USD #262 5.000% 09/01/35 |
1,000,000 |
1,168,200 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty KS USD #265 (Goddard) 4.250% 10/01/20 |
750,000 |
816,795 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty KS USD #265 (Goddard) 4.500% 10/01/26 |
250,000 |
272,763 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty Unified Sch 5.250% 09/01/19 |
215,000 |
235,597 |
||
Sedgwick Cnty Unified Sch 5.250% 09/01/19 |
10,000 |
10,959 |
||
Seward Cty KS Unlimited GO Hosp Ref & Impt 5.000% 08/01/34 |
260,000 |
302,955 |
||
Seward Cty KS Unlimited GO Hosp Ref & Impt 5.000% 08/01/34 |
240,000 |
274,142 |
||
Seward Cty KS USD #480 GO 5.000% 09/01/34 |
500,000 |
576,485 |
||
Seward Cty KS USD #480 GO 5.000% 09/01/33 |
500,000 |
584,530 |
||
Seward Cty KS USD #480 GO 4.250% 09/01/39 |
500,000 |
547,325 |
||
Sherman Cnty KS USD #352 (Goodland) GO 3.000% 09/01/33 |
500,000 |
522,415 |
||
Wichita KS GO 4.500% 09/01/22 |
150,000 |
157,452 |
||
Wichita KS GO 4.750% 09/01/27 |
180,000 |
188,752 |
||
Wyandotte Cnty KS GO 5.000% 08/01/19 |
150,000 |
150,038 |
||
Wyandotte Cnty KS GO 5.000% 08/01/25 |
250,000 |
261,165 |
||
Wyandotte Cnty KS GO 5.000% 08/01/27 |
500,000 |
522,330 |
||
Wyandotte Cnty KS USD #202 5.250% 09/01/18 |
100,000 |
110,478 |
||
Wyandotte Cnty KS USD #202 5.000% 09/01/25 |
250,000 |
307,333 |
||
|
28,159,993 |
|||
Health Care (20.2%) |
||||
Ashland KS Public Bldg Commission Revenue 5.000% 09/01/30 |
1,020,000 |
1,127,794 |
||
Ashland KS Public Bldg Commission Revenue 5.000% 09/01/35 |
500,000 |
546,920 |
||
Ashland KS Public Bldg Commission Revenue 5.000% 09/01/32 |
550,000 |
625,740 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Lease Rev Univ KS Tenant 5.000% 06/15/39 |
1,000,000 |
1,088,190 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev Sisters Leavenworth-Ser A 5.000% 01/01/40 |
435,000 |
500,298 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev Sisters Leavenworth-Ser A 5.000% 01/01/40 |
65,000 |
71,341 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev Adventist Health 5.150% 11/15/23 |
250,000 |
282,532 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev Adventist Health 5.250% 11/15/24 |
250,000 |
283,687 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev Adventist Health 5.500% 11/15/29 |
100,000 |
113,553 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Hlth Facs Rev Stormont-Vail Healthcare 5.125% 11/15/32 |
410,000 |
431,447 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Hlth Facs Rev Stormont-Vail Healthcare 5.125% 11/15/36 |
500,000 |
519,225 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Hlth Facs Rev Hays Med Ctr 5.000% 05/15/25 |
250,000 |
272,950 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Hlth Facs Rev Hays Med Ctr 5.000% 05/15/35 |
1,000,000 |
1,082,480 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Hlth Facs Rev (KU Hlth Sys) 5.000% 03/01/28 |
755,000 |
841,576 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Hlth Facs Rev Stormont-Vail Healthcare 4.125% 11/15/27 |
100,000 |
111,072 |
||
Lincoln Cnty KS Pub Bldg (Lincoln Cnty Hosp) 5.500% 03/01/35 |
500,000 |
530,145 |
||
Manhattan KS Hosp Rev Mercy Health Ctr 5.000% 11/15/23 |
250,000 |
298,055 |
||
Manhattan KS Hosp Rev Mercy Health Ctr 5.000% 11/15/24 |
250,000 |
296,823 |
||
Manhattan KS Hosp Rev Mercy Health Ctr 5.000% 11/15/29 |
500,000 |
576,940 |
||
Olathe KS Hlth Facs Rev Olathe Med Ctr 5.000% 09/01/29 |
500,000 |
518,135 |
||
Olathe KS Hlth Facs Rev Olathe Med Ctr 5.000% 09/01/30 |
250,000 |
274,368 |
||
Olathe KS Hlth Facs Rev Olathe Med Ctr 4.000% 09/01/28 |
250,000 |
270,343 |
||
Olathe KS Hlth Facs Rev Olathe Med Ctr 4.000% 09/01/30 |
445,000 |
479,474 |
||
Univ KS Hosp Auth 5.000% 09/01/35 |
500,000 |
593,740 |
||
Univ KS Hosp Auth 5.000% 09/01/26 |
60,000 |
60,242 |
||
Univ KS Hosp Auth 5.000% 09/01/26 |
40,000 |
40,128 |
||
Wichita KS Hosp Rev (Via Christi Hlth Sys) 5.000% 11/15/29 |
300,000 |
366,681 |
||
|
12,203,879 |
|||
Housing (0.3%) |
||||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev (Sec. 8) Rev Ref. 6.400% 01/01/24 |
170,000 |
|
170,471 |
|
|
||||
Other Revenue (15.7%) |
||||
Butler Cnty KS Pub Bldg Impt Rev 4.500% 10/01/21 |
160,000 |
160,179 |
||
Dodge City KS Sales Tax Rev 5.000% 06/01/21 |
310,000 |
347,321 |
||
Dodge City KS Sales Tax Rev 4.400% 06/01/25 |
350,000 |
386,347 |
||
Dodge City KS Sales Tax Rev 4.500% 06/01/28 |
100,000 |
110,666 |
||
*Dodge City KS Sales Tax Rev 5.250% 06/01/31 |
1,000,000 |
1,127,400 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev KS Projs-Ser B 4.125% 05/01/31 |
500,000 |
534,540 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev Athletic Facs (K-St Athletics Inc) 5.000% 07/01/32 |
250,000 |
260,337 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev (KS St Proj) Unrefunded 5.000% 10/01/17 |
20,000 |
20,030 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev (KS St Proj) 5.000% 11/01/34 |
500,000 |
553,995 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev (Dept Admin) 5.000% 11/01/25 |
250,000 |
252,893 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev (KS St Proj) 5.250% 11/01/25 |
350,000 |
370,891 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev (KS St Proj) 5.000% 05/01/35 |
250,000 |
272,055 |
||
Lincoln Cnty KS Pub Bldg (Lincoln Cnty Hosp) 5.000% 03/01/28 |
250,000 |
264,853 |
||
Manhattan KS Sales Tax Rev Downtown Redev 5.250% 12/01/26 |
80,000 |
87,368 |
||
Manhattan KS Sales Oblig Rev North Proj Area - Downtown A 5.000% 12/01/26 |
500,000 |
532,110 |
||
Manhattan KS Sales Tax Rev 4.500% 12/01/25 |
500,000 |
558,590 |
||
*Manhattan KS Sales Tax Rev 5.000% 12/01/32 |
1,000,000 |
1,142,090 |
||
Neosho Cnty KS Sales Tax Rev 4.000% 10/01/23 |
500,000 |
546,675 |
||
Topeka KS Pub Bldg Commn Lease Rev Social & Rehab Proj 5.000% 06/01/22 |
255,000 |
279,720 |
||
Washinton Cnty KS Pub Bldg Com Rev Law Enforcement Ctr & Hosp Proj 4.000% 09/01/28 |
600,000 |
669,696 |
||
Washinton Cnty KS Pub Bldg Com Rev Law Enforcement Ctr & Hosp Proj 5.000% 09/01/32 |
500,000 |
573,090 |
||
Washinton Cnty KS Pub Bldg Com Rev Law Enforcement Ctr & Hosp Proj 5.000% 09/01/37 |
400,000 |
453,468 |
||
|
9,504,314 |
|||
Transportation (1.0%) |
||||
KS Dept of Transportation Highway Rev. 5.000% 09/01/35 |
250,000 |
312,175 |
||
KS Dev Fin Auth Rev (Road Revolving Fund) 4.625% 10/01/26 |
250,000 |
268,912 |
||
|
581,087 |
|||
Utilities (10.8%) |
||||
*KS Municipal Energy Agency (Jameson Energy Project) Rev 5.750% 07/01/38 |
1,000,000 |
1,218,930 |
||
KS Pwr Pool Elec Util Rev 4.500% 12/01/28 |
500,000 |
545,515 |
||
KS Pwr Pool Elec Util Rev 5.000% 12/01/31 |
750,000 |
830,625 |
||
Kansas Power Pool Elec Util Rev Dogwood Fac-Ser A 4.000% 12/01/31 |
500,000 |
545,255 |
||
Wichita KS Wtr & Swr Rev 5.000% 10/01/23 |
300,000 |
305,328 |
||
Wyandotte Cnty KS Govt Util Sys Rev 5.000% 09/01/24 |
200,000 |
220,390 |
||
Wyandotte Cnty KS Govt Util Sys Rev 5.000% 09/01/29 |
500,000 |
546,615 |
||
Wyandotte Cnty KS Govt Util Sys Rev 5.000% 09/01/36 |
250,000 |
286,480 |
||
*Wyandotte Cnty KS Govt Util Sys Rev 5.000% 09/01/32 |
1,250,000 |
1,450,388 |
||
Wyandotte Cnty KS Govt Util Sys Rev Impt - Ser A 5.000% 09/01/35 |
500,000 |
595,965 |
||
|
6,545,491 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $54,205,350) |
$ |
58,539,191 |
||
|
||||
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES (3.2%) |
|
1,949,700 |
||
|
||||
NET ASSETS (100.0%) |
$ |
60,488,891 |
||
|
||||
*Indicates all or a portion of bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed-delivery purchases. |
||||
#When-issued purchase as of July 29, 2016. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
NEBRASKA MUNICIPAL FUND
PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS July 29, 2016
Utilities |
33.3% |
Education |
23.2% |
General Obligation |
21.6% |
Health Care |
10.2% |
Other Revenue |
7.9% |
Housing |
1.8% |
Transportation |
1.3% |
Cash Equivalents and Other |
0.7% |
|
100.0% |
Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.
These percentages are based on net assets and are subject to change.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS July 29, 2016
Principal |
Fair |
|||
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS (99.3%) |
||||
|
||||
Education (23.2%) |
||||
Douglas Cnty NE Edl Facs Rev Creighton Univ 5.500% 07/01/30 |
$ |
350,000 |
$ |
402,895 |
*Douglas Cnty NE Edl Facs Rev Creighton Univ 5.875% 07/01/40 |
1,500,000 |
1,746,600 |
||
Douglas Cnty NE Hosp Auth #2 (Boys Town Proj) 4.750% 09/01/28 |
200,000 |
213,374 |
||
Lincoln NE Ed & Fac Rev (Wesleyan Univ) 4.000% 04/01/32 |
750,000 |
804,465 |
||
NE St Colleges Student Fees (Wayne St College) 3.250% 07/01/36 |
500,000 |
517,805 |
||
Metropolitan Cmnty College Fort Omaha Campus Project 3.000% 03/01/36 |
500,000 |
506,935 |
||
NE Edl Fin Auth Rev Ref - Clarkson College Proj 5.050% 09/01/30 |
250,000 |
287,833 |
||
NE Elem & Secondary Sch Auth Ed Facs Rev 4.750% 09/01/28 |
250,000 |
267,787 |
||
Univ of NE Brd of Regt (Sutudent Fees & Fac) 5.000% 07/01/35 |
1,500,000 |
1,833,630 |
||
Univ of NE Brd of Regt (Sutudent Fees & Fac) 5.000% 05/15/35 |
500,000 |
607,815 |
||
Univ of NE Rev 5.000% 05/15/33 |
250,000 |
311,165 |
||
Univ of NE Brd of Regt Student Facs 5.000% 05/15/32 |
250,000 |
258,988 |
||
Univ of NE Brd of Regt (Hlth & Rec Proj) 5.000% 05/15/33 |
600,000 |
646,848 |
||
Univ of NE Rev Lincoln Student 4.000% 07/01/24 |
250,000 |
269,660 |
||
Univ of NE Omaha Student Hsg Proj 4.500% 05/15/30 |
250,000 |
276,003 |
||
Univ of NE Omaha Student Hsg Proj 5.000% 05/15/35 |
275,000 |
311,894 |
||
Univ of NE (Univ of NE - Lincoln Student Fees) Rev 5.000% 07/01/42 |
1,000,000 |
1,146,260 |
||
Univ of NE Lincoln Student Facs 5.000% 07/01/38 |
250,000 |
|
291,093 |
|
|
10,701,050 |
|||
General Obligation (21.6%) |
||||
Douglas Cnty NE SD #010 4.000% 12/15/34 |
300,000 |
335,835 |
||
Douglas CNTY SCH DIST #59 Bennington 3.000% 12/15/35 |
500,000 |
509,635 |
||
Hall Cnty NE Ref GO 4.000% 12/15/29 |
250,000 |
252,817 |
||
#Hall Cnty NE Arpt Auth Ser-A Amt GO 5.000% 07/15/30 |
410,000 |
457,621 |
||
#Hall Cnty NE Arpt Auth Ser-A Amt GO 5.000% 07/15/31 |
435,000 |
484,590 |
||
Hall Cnty NE Sch Dist #2 Grand Is GO 5.000% 12/15/33 |
500,000 |
605,765 |
||
Hall Cnty NE Sch Dist #2 Grand Is GO 5.000% 12/15/39 |
500,000 |
596,285 |
||
LaVista, NE Hwy Allocation FD 3.000% 5/01/36 |
600,000 |
603,468 |
||
Lincoln-Lancaster Cnty Neb Pub Bldg Lease Rev 4.000% 10/15/30 |
100,000 |
101,645 |
||
City of Lincoln COP 4.000% 04/01/27 |
325,000 |
390,530 |
||
*Omaha NE (Convention Center) GO 5.250% 04/01/27 |
1,000,000 |
1,348,520 |
||
Omaha NE Various Purpose 4.250% 10/15/26 |
500,000 |
503,990 |
||
Omaha NE Unlimited GO 5.000% 10/15/25 |
250,000 |
282,850 |
||
Sarpy Cnty Sch Dist #27 Papillion-LA Vista GO 5.000% 12/01/28 |
250,000 |
274,073 |
||
Papio Missouri River NE Natural Res Dist GO 4.000% 12/15/24 |
250,000 |
261,883 |
||
Papio Missouri River NE Natural Res Dist GO 5.000% 12/15/26 |
250,000 |
272,475 |
||
Papio Missouri River NE Ref-Flood Protn & Wtr Quality Enhancement 4.000% 12/15/30 |
1,000,000 |
1,073,520 |
||
Ralston NE Arena GO 4.500% 09/15/31 |
500,000 |
506,720 |
||
Sarpy Cnty NE Sch Dist #37 Ref & Sch Bldg 5.000% 12/15/35 |
250,000 |
304,635 |
||
#Sarpy Cnty NE Sch Dist #37 Ref & Sch Bldg - Gretna Public Schools 3.000% 12/15/39 |
500,000 |
493,870 |
||
Scotts Bluff Cnty NE Sch Dist #32 GO 5.000% 12/01/31 |
250,000 |
|
309,345 |
|
|
9,970,072 |
|||
Health Care (10.2%) |
||||
Adams Cnty NE Hosp Auth #1 Hosp Rev (Mary Lanning Mem Hosp) 5.250% 12/15/33 |
250,000 |
272,103 |
||
Douglas Cnty NE Hosp Auth #002 (NE Med Ctr) 5.000% 11/15/16 |
250,000 |
252,778 |
||
Douglas Cnty NE Hosp Auth #002 Immanuel Group 5.500% 01/01/30 |
500,000 |
561,105 |
||
Douglas Cnty NE Hosp Methodist Health 5.500% 11/01/38 |
795,000 |
878,761 |
||
Douglas Cnty NE Hosp Methodist Health 5.500% 11/01/38 |
415,000 |
458,724 |
||
*Lancaster Cnty NE Hosp Auth #1 (BryanLGH Med Ctr Proj) 4.750% 06/01/21 |
1,000,000 |
1,002,930 |
||
Lincoln Cnty NE Hosp Auth (Great Plains Regl Med Cntr) 5.000% 11/01/23 |
250,000 |
291,530 |
||
Lincoln Cnty NE Hosp Auth (Great Plains Regl Med Cntr) 5.000% 11/01/24 |
250,000 |
290,610 |
||
Lincoln Cnty NE Hosp Auth (Great Plains Regl Med Cntr) 5.000% 11/01/25 |
250,000 |
290,545 |
||
Lincoln Cnty NE Hosp Auth (Great Plains Regl Med Cntr) 5.000% 11/01/32 |
250,000 |
283,985 |
||
Lincoln Cnty NE Hosp Auth #1 North Platte 4.000% 11/01/37 |
150,000 |
|
157,815 |
|
|
4,740,886 |
|||
Housing (1.8%) |
||||
Lancaster Cnty NE Hosp Auth #1 Immanuel Oblig Group 5.500% 01/01/30 |
250,000 |
280,553 |
||
Sarpy Cnty NE Hosp Auth #1 Immanuel Oblig Group 5.500% 01/01/30 |
500,000 |
|
561,105 |
|
|
841,658 |
|||
Other Revenue (7.9%) |
||||
Lincoln NE West Haymarket Joint Pub Agy GO Fac 5.000% 12/15/42 |
750,000 |
871,485 |
||
NE Coop Republican Platte Enhancement Project River 5.125% 12/15/33 |
250,000 |
272,345 |
||
NE Coop Republican Platte Enhancement Project River 5.000% 12/15/38 |
160,000 |
170,843 |
||
NE Coop Republican Platte Enhancement Project River 3.850% 12/15/30 |
300,000 |
309,897 |
||
Omaha Convention Hotel Corp 5.000% 02/01/35 |
500,000 |
506,440 |
||
Omaha Pub Fac Corp Lease Rev Omaha Tech & Forestry Equip 4.000% 11/15/31 |
115,000 |
121,179 |
||
*Omaha NE Special Tax Rev 5.000% 02/01/27 |
1,000,000 |
1,183,090 |
||
Upper Republican Natural Resource District 4.000% 12/15/24 |
200,000 |
|
212,484 |
|
|
3,647,763 |
|||
Transportation (1.3%) |
||||
Lincoln NE Pkg Rev 5.500% 08/15/31 |
500,000 |
|
588,930 |
|
|
||||
Utilities (33.3%) |
||||
*Central Plains Energy Proj Rev 5.000% 09/01/27 |
1,000,000 |
1,163,750 |
||
Central Plains Energy Proj Rev 5.250% 09/01/37 |
500,000 |
574,130 |
||
Central Plains Energy Proj Rev 5.000% 09/01/42 |
500,000 |
564,135 |
||
#Dawson NE Pub Pwr Dist Elec Sys Rev 3.050% 06/15/36 |
575,000 |
575,978 |
||
Grand Island NE Sewer Sys Rev 5.000% 09/15/26 |
250,000 |
303,493 |
||
Hastings NE Comb Utility Rev Ref 4.000% 10/15/32 |
500,000 |
554,095 |
||
*Lincoln NE Elec Syst Rev 5.000% 09/01/37 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
1,179,900 |
Lincoln NE San Swr Rev 4.500% 06/15/29 |
250,000 |
256,043 |
||
Lincoln NE Solid Waste Mgmt Rev 4.000% 08/01/25 |
275,000 |
321,742 |
||
Lincoln NE Solid Waste Mgmt Rev 4.000% 08/01/27 |
400,000 |
461,360 |
||
Lincoln NE Wtr Rev 4.000% 08/15/25 |
250,000 |
272,080 |
||
Lincoln NE Wtr Rev 4.500% 08/15/34 |
250,000 |
270,588 |
||
NE Metro Util Dist Omaha Wtr Rev 4.000% 12/15/24 |
750,000 |
850,860 |
||
NE Metro Util Dist Omaha Wtr Rev 4.000% 12/15/26 |
250,000 |
284,950 |
||
Muni Energy Agy of NE Pwr Supply Sys Rev 5.125% 04/01/24 |
195,000 |
216,260 |
||
Muni Energy Agy of NE Pwr Supply Sys Rev 5.000% 04/01/30 |
500,000 |
575,595 |
||
Muni Energy Agy of NE Pwr Supply Sys Rev 5.000% 04/01/32 |
100,000 |
114,716 |
||
NE Pub Pwr Dist Rev 5.000% 01/01/41 |
250,000 |
301,375 |
||
NE Pub Pwr Dist Rev 5.000% 01/01/28 |
250,000 |
296,515 |
||
NE Pub Pwr Dist Rev 5.000% 01/01/30 |
500,000 |
591,340 |
||
Omaha NE Metro Util Wtr Dist Rev 4.375% 12/01/26 |
400,000 |
405,296 |
||
Omaha NE Pub Pwr Dist Elec Sys Rev 5.250% 02/01/23 |
250,000 |
268,417 |
||
Omaha NE Pub Pwr Dist Elec Sys Rev 5.500% 02/01/33 |
100,000 |
107,742 |
||
Omaha NE Pub Pwr Dist Elec Sys Rev 6.200% 02/01/17 |
140,000 |
142,735 |
||
Omaha Sanitation & Sewer 5.000% 11/15/29 |
250,000 |
309,537 |
||
Omaha Sanitation & Sewer 5.000% 11/15/30 |
250,000 |
308,887 |
||
Omaha Sanitation & Sewer 5.000% 11/15/31 |
500,000 |
615,190 |
||
Omaha NE Pub Pwr Dist Sep Elec Sys Rev 5.000% 02/01/32 |
250,000 |
303,700 |
||
Omaha NE Pub Pwr Dist Sep Elec Sys Rev 5.000% 02/01/31 |
445,000 |
548,974 |
||
Omaha NE Pub Pwr Dist Sep Elec Sys Rev 4.000% 02/01/32 |
400,000 |
448,136 |
||
Omaha NE Pub Pwr Dist Sep Elec Sys Rev 4.000% 02/01/35 |
365,000 |
406,807 |
||
NE Pub Pwr Generation Agy Whelan Energy 5.000% 01/01/24 |
250,000 |
254,780 |
||
NE Pub Pwr Generation Agy Whelan Energy 5.000% 01/01/27 |
250,000 |
254,780 |
||
NE Pub Pwr Generation Agy Whelan Energy 5.000% 01/01/32 |
780,000 |
794,648 |
||
NE Pub Pwr Generation Agy Whelan Energy 5.000% 01/01/32 |
220,000 |
224,206 |
||
Southern Pub Pwr Dist 5.000% 12/15/23 |
250,000 |
|
277,210 |
|
|
15,399,950 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $42,910,833) |
$ |
45,890,309 |
||
|
||||
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES (0.7%) |
|
326,733 |
||
|
||||
NET ASSETS (100.0%) |
$ |
46,217,042 |
||
|
||||
*Indicates all or a portion of bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed-delivery purchases. |
||||
#When-issued purchase as of July 29, 2016. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL FUND
PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS July 29, 2016
Utilities |
32.7% |
Other Revenue |
24.1% |
Education |
21.0% |
Transportation |
7.9% |
Cash Equivalents and Other |
4.9% |
Health Care |
4.4% |
General Obligation |
4.1% |
Housing |
0.9% |
|
100.0% |
Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.
These percentages are based on net assets and are subject to change.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS July 29, 2016
Principal |
Fair |
|||
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS (95.1%) |
||||
|
||||
Education (21.0%) |
||||
OK Agric & Mech Colleges Rev (OK St Univ) 5.000% 07/01/39 |
$ |
140,000 |
$ |
155,148 |
OK Agric & Mech Colleges Rev (OK St Univ) 4.400% 08/01/39 |
740,000 |
801,797 |
||
*OK Community College Student Fac Rev 4.375% 07/01/30 |
750,000 |
815,798 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Lease Rev Master St Higher Ed 4.400% 12/01/29 |
250,000 |
271,840 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Lease Rev Higher Ed Master Ppty 5.000% 06/01/39 |
500,000 |
593,615 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Lease Rev Higher Ed Master Ppty 5.000% 06/01/29 |
250,000 |
307,032 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Lease Rev Higher Ed Master Ppty 5.000% 06/01/34 |
500,000 |
605,410 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Lease Rev Higher Ed Master Ppty 5.000% 06/01/39 |
500,000 |
594,800 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Rev East Central Univ 4.000% 08/01/30 |
280,000 |
314,182 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Rev East Central Univ 4.000% 08/01/31 |
290,000 |
324,501 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Rev East Central Univ 4.000% 08/01/32 |
305,000 |
340,109 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Rev East Central Univ 4.000% 08/01/33 |
315,000 |
350,047 |
||
Brd of Regt (OK Univ Science Ctr) 5.000% 07/01/36 |
1,000,000 |
1,063,570 |
||
Univ of OK Rev 5.000% 07/01/37 |
290,000 |
334,579 |
||
Univ of OK Rev Gen-Ser A 5.000% 07/01/41 |
500,000 |
578,375 |
||
Univ of OK Rev Gen-Ser A 3.375% 07/01/42 |
435,000 |
454,001 |
||
Univ of OK Rev Gen-Ser C 5.000% 07/01/36 |
500,000 |
599,095 |
||
Univ of OK Rev Gen-Ser C 4.000% 07/01/40 |
650,000 |
718,263 |
||
Univ of OK Rev Gen-Ser C 5.000% 07/01/38 |
500,000 |
|
598,110 |
|
|
9,820,272 |
|||
General Obligation (4.1%) |
||||
Broken Arrow GO Series A 4.125% 08/01/31 |
180,000 |
199,217 |
||
Oklahoma City OK 5.000% 03/01/27 |
400,000 |
426,344 |
||
*Oklahoma City OK 4.000% 03/01/24 |
1,000,000 |
1,175,960 |
||
Oklahoma City OK GO 3.000% 03/01/30 |
100,000 |
|
103,145 |
|
|
1,904,666 |
|||
Health Care (4.4%) |
||||
OK St Dev Fin Auth Hlth Sys Rev Ref Sef A 5.000% 08/15/25 |
350,000 |
446,281 |
||
OK St Dev Fin Auth Hlth Sys Rev Ref Sef A 5.000% 08/15/29 |
250,000 |
306,842 |
||
OK St Dev Fin Auth Hlth Sys Rev Ref Sef A 4.000% 08/15/38 |
250,000 |
271,107 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Rev (St John Hlth Sys) 5.000% 02/15/42 |
250,000 |
280,580 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Rev (St John Hlth Sys) 5.000% 02/15/37 |
15,000 |
15,370 |
||
OK Dev Fin Auth Rev (St John Hlth Sys) 5.000% 02/15/37 |
485,000 |
492,581 |
||
Tulsa Cnty Ind Auth Health Fac 4.600% 02/01/35 |
250,000 |
|
270,090 |
|
|
2,082,851 |
|||
Housing (0.9%) |
||||
OK Hsg Fin Agy Single Family Mtg Rev AMT 5.050% 09/01/23 |
190,000 |
191,148 |
||
OK Hsg Fin Agy Single Family Mtg Rev AMT 5.150% 09/01/29 |
95,000 |
95,472 |
||
OK Hsg Fin Agy Single Family Mtg Rev AMT 5.200% 09/01/32 |
90,000 |
90,522 |
||
OK Hsg Fin Agy Single Family Mtg Rev AMT 5.100% 03/01/17 |
15,000 |
15,128 |
||
OK Hsg Fin Agy Single Family Mtg Rev AMT 5.100% 09/01/17 |
10,000 |
|
10,140 |
|
|
402,410 |
|||
Other Revenue (24.1%) |
||||
Collinsville OK Mun Auth Sales Tax Rev 5.000% 03/01/35 |
275,000 |
319,105 |
||
Collinsville OK Mun Auth Sales Tax Rev 5.000% 03/01/40 |
250,000 |
290,095 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Economic Dev Trust 5.000% 03/01/32 |
250,000 |
281,023 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Economic Dev Trust 5.000% 03/01/34 |
500,000 |
559,995 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Economic Dev Trust 5.000% 03/01/33 |
250,000 |
280,558 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Pub Ppty Auth Hotel Tax Rev 4.500% 10/01/31 |
155,000 |
159,979 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Pub Ppty Auth Hotel Tax Rev 5.000% 10/01/27 |
350,000 |
432,061 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Pub Ppty Auth Hotel Tax Rev 5.000% 10/01/28 |
400,000 |
490,616 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Pub Ppty Auth Hotel Tax Rev 5.000% 10/01/29 |
625,000 |
762,156 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Pub Ppty Auth Hotel Tax Rev 5.000% 10/01/36 |
230,000 |
273,470 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Pub Ppty Auth Hotel Tax Rev 5.000% 10/01/39 |
835,000 |
989,951 |
||
OK State Water Resources Board Rev. 5.000% 10/01/29 |
250,000 |
308,430 |
||
OK State Water Resources Loan Program Rev. 5.000% 10/01/33 |
500,000 |
615,160 |
||
Okmulgee Cnty OK Govtl Bldg Auth Sales Tax Rev 4.250% 12/01/35 |
500,000 |
548,700 |
||
Pawnee Cnty OK Pub Programs Auth Sales Tax Rev 4.875% 02/01/30 |
145,000 |
161,518 |
||
*Rogers Cnty OK Indl Dev Auth Cap Impt Rev 4.900% 04/01/35 |
500,000 |
558,350 |
||
Sand Springs OK Muni Auth Capital IMPT Rev 4.250% 01/01/35 |
250,000 |
275,853 |
||
Sand Springs OK Muni Auth Capital IMPT Rev 4.000% 01/01/36 |
500,000 |
535,435 |
||
Tahlequah OK Pub Facs Auth Sales Tax Rev 4.000% 04/01/23 |
550,000 |
624,602 |
||
Tulsa Cnty OK Indl Auth Cap Impts Rev 3.000% 09/01/27 |
245,000 |
255,143 |
||
Tulsa Cnty OK Pub Facs Auth Capital Impt Rev Ref 3.000% 11/01/22 |
500,000 |
543,110 |
||
Tulsa Airport Impt Rev 5.000% 06/01/23 |
420,000 |
484,235 |
||
Tulsa Airport Impt Rev 5.000% 06/01/24 |
230,000 |
263,658 |
||
Tulsa Airport Impt Rev 5.250% 06/01/25 |
245,000 |
282,615 |
||
Tulsa Airport Impt Rev 5.250% 06/01/26 |
360,000 |
414,166 |
||
Tulsa OK Pkg Auth Pkg Rev 4.000% 07/01/25 |
500,000 |
|
552,565 |
|
|
11,262,549 |
|||
Transportation (7.9%) |
||||
Oklahoma City OK Airport Tr Jr Lien Ref Series B 5.000% 07/01/19 |
250,000 |
261,166 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Airport Tr Jr Lien Ref Series B 5.000% 07/01/21 |
250,000 |
260,510 |
||
OK St Cap Impt Auth 4.000% 10/01/24 |
800,000 |
908,528 |
||
OK St Cap Impt Auth 4.000% 10/01/25 |
1,000,000 |
1,129,860 |
||
OK St Turnpike Auth Rev 5.000% 01/01/28 |
250,000 |
288,135 |
||
OK St Turnpike Auth Rev 4.000% 01/01/31 |
500,000 |
545,860 |
||
OK St Turnpike Auth Rev 5.000% 01/01/30 |
250,000 |
|
286,365 |
|
|
3,680,424 |
|||
Utilities (32.7%) |
||||
Clinton OK Public Works Auth Utility 4.000% 12/01/34 |
750,000 |
829,013 |
||
Clinton OK Public Works Auth Utility 4.000% 12/01/39 |
500,000 |
543,425 |
||
Coweta Pub Works Util Rev 5.000% 08/01/34 |
100,000 |
109,999 |
||
Edmond, OK Pub Wks Auth Sales Tax & Util Sys Rev 4.000% 07/01/41 |
355,000 |
390,408 |
||
Glenpool Util Rev 5.100% 12/01/35 |
250,000 |
287,965 |
||
Grand River Dam Auth Rev 5.000% 06/01/27 |
1,000,000 |
1,080,130 |
||
Grand River Dam Auth Rev 4.800% 06/01/33 |
200,000 |
212,744 |
||
*Grand River Dam Auth Rev 5.250% 06/01/40 |
2,000,000 |
2,280,460 |
||
*Midwest City Municipal Auth Cap Impt Rev 5.000 % 03/01/25 |
2,000,000 |
2,350,000 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Wtr Util Tr Wtr & Swr Sys Rev 4.000% 07/01/34 |
250,000 |
263,638 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Wtr Util Tr Wtr & Swr Sys Rev 5.000% 07/01/31 |
250,000 |
294,015 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Wtr Util Tr Wtr & Swr Sys Rev 5.000% 07/01/34 |
100,000 |
123,425 |
||
Oklahoma City OK Wtr Util Tr Wtr & Swr Sys Rev 4.000% 07/01/39 |
175,000 |
194,995 |
||
*OK Mun Pwr Auth Rev 5.750% 01/01/24 |
1,900,000 |
2,221,803 |
||
OK Municipal Power Auth Ref-Ser A 5.000% 01/01/38 |
575,000 |
686,239 |
||
OK Wtr Resources Brd 5.000% 04/01/28 |
500,000 |
558,695 |
||
OK Wtr Resources Brd 5.000% 04/01/32 |
140,000 |
166,516 |
||
Oklahoma St Wtr Resource Brd Rev 4.000% 04/01/25 |
150,000 |
171,570 |
||
Sallisaw OK Mun Auth Rev 4.450% 01/01/28 |
100,000 |
108,347 |
||
Sapulpa OK Mun Auth Util Sys Rev 5.000% 04/01/28 |
750,000 |
885,727 |
||
Seminole OK Utilities Auth Sales Tax Rev 3.000% 09/01/24 |
100,000 |
107,470 |
||
Seminole OK Utilities Auth Sales Tax Rev 3.150% 09/01/25 |
380,000 |
410,081 |
||
Seminole OK Utilities Auth Sales Tax Rev 3.300% 09/01/26 |
315,000 |
339,523 |
||
Tulsa OK Metropolitan Util Auth Ref- Ser C 5.000% 10/01/25 |
500,000 |
|
647,495 |
|
|
15,263,683 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $41,265,797) |
$ |
44,416,855 |
||
|
||||
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES (4.9%) |
|
2,301,178 |
||
|
||||
NET ASSETS (100.0%) |
$ |
46,718,033 |
||
|
||||
* Indicates all or a portion of bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed-delivery purchases. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
MAINE MUNICIPAL FUND
PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS July 29, 2016
General Obligation |
26.8% |
Health Care |
19.9% |
Education |
17.3% |
Housing |
12.5% |
Transportation |
10.1% |
Other Revenue |
6.4% |
Utilities |
5.2% |
Cash Equivalents and Other |
1.8% |
|
100.0% |
Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.
These percentages are based on net assets and are subject to change.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS July 29, 2016
Principal |
Fair |
|||
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS (98.2%) |
||||
|
||||
Education (17.3%) |
||||
ME Edl Ln Auth Student Ln Rev 5.875% 12/01/39 |
$ |
130,000 |
$ |
143,590 |
ME Edl Ln Auth Student Ln Rev 4.450% 12/01/25 |
100,000 |
110,187 |
||
*ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev Ser A-Bowdoin College 5.125% 07/01/39 |
715,000 |
790,139 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/39 |
500,000 |
594,100 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/34 |
250,000 |
302,125 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/37 |
185,000 |
194,106 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 4.750% 07/01/31 |
250,000 |
280,125 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev Colby Clg 4.000% 07/01/24 |
270,000 |
309,749 |
||
Regl Sch Unit No 1 ME Lower Kennebec Region Sch Unit 5.000% 02/01/26 |
100,000 |
116,352 |
||
Univ of ME Sys Rev 4.625% 03/01/29 |
100,000 |
102,446 |
||
Univ of ME Sys Rev 4.750% 03/01/37 |
545,000 |
558,734 |
||
Univ of ME Sys Rev 4.750% 03/01/37 |
5,000 |
|
5,093 |
|
|
3,506,746 |
|||
General Obligation (26.8%) |
||||
Auburn, ME GO 4.500% 09/01/22 |
100,000 |
118,203 |
||
Bangor ME 4.000% 09/01/24 |
155,000 |
165,084 |
||
Falmouth ME GO 4.250% 11/15/31 |
200,000 |
223,404 |
||
Gorham, ME Unlimited GO 4.000% 10/01/23 |
100,000 |
113,675 |
||
Gray ME Unlimited GO 4.000% 10/15/26 |
280,000 |
304,847 |
||
Gray ME Unlimited GO 4.000% 10/15/27 |
280,000 |
304,074 |
||
Lewiston ME GO 3.000% 02/15/31 |
185,000 |
196,561 |
||
State of Maine General Obligation 4.000% 06/01/20 |
150,000 |
170,946 |
||
Maine ST GO BDS 2016 B 5.000% 06/01/26 |
250,000 |
328,625 |
||
ME St Hsg Auth Energy Recovery Fd 5.000% 06/15/24 |
250,000 |
282,242 |
||
Portland ME 4.250% 05/01/29 |
150,000 |
162,308 |
||
Portland ME 4.125% 10/01/29 |
100,000 |
108,073 |
||
Portland ME UNLTD GO 5.000% 08/01/21 |
125,000 |
152,489 |
||
Portland ME 5.000% 08/01/22 |
125,000 |
150,499 |
||
Presque Isle ME 3.000% 12/01/37 |
140,000 |
143,987 |
||
Presque Isle ME 3.125% 12/01/39 |
165,000 |
170,153 |
||
Saco ME GO 4.000% 04/01/28 |
100,000 |
108,821 |
||
Scarborough, ME GO 4.000% 11/01/28 |
100,000 |
113,458 |
||
ME Sch Adminstrative Dist # 51 4.250% 10/15/29 |
250,000 |
271,220 |
||
ME Sch Adminstrative Dist # 51 4.000% 10/15/29 |
100,000 |
117,634 |
||
South Berwick ME 2.000% 10/01/25 |
400,000 |
419,568 |
||
Waterville ME GO 4.000% 07/01/25 |
135,000 |
152,732 |
||
Waterville ME GO 3.000% 04/01/25 |
250,000 |
275,550 |
||
Wells-Ogunquit Community School Dist. 4.000% 11/01/24 |
100,000 |
121,412 |
||
Town of York ME 2.250% 10/01/32 |
755,000 |
|
745,019 |
|
|
5,420,584 |
|||
Health Care (19.9%) |
||||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/20 |
50,000 |
58,071 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/20 |
130,000 |
149,764 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 4.500% 07/01/31 |
10,000 |
11,417 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.250% 07/01/23 |
10,000 |
11,711 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 4.500% 07/01/31 |
190,000 |
204,581 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.250% 07/01/23 |
190,000 |
218,540 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/22 |
15,000 |
15,660 |
||
*ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/39 |
610,000 |
668,255 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/26 |
115,000 |
127,783 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/20 |
250,000 |
287,073 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/40 |
250,000 |
277,263 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/30 |
500,000 |
588,300 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/31 |
500,000 |
585,165 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/23 |
15,000 |
18,718 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/23 |
235,000 |
289,957 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/22 |
5,000 |
5,201 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/22 |
230,000 |
237,804 |
||
ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev E Main Healthcare - Ser A 4.000% 07/01/46 |
250,000 |
|
257,870 |
|
|
4,013,133 |
|||
Housing (12.5%) |
||||
*ME Health & Higher Ed Facs Auth Rev 5.000% 07/01/29 |
1,000,000 |
1,175,930 |
||
ME St Hsg Auth Mtg Pur 4.000% 11/15/24 |
45,000 |
47,934 |
||
ME St Hsg Auth Mtg Pur 4.000% 11/15/35 |
435,000 |
461,213 |
||
ME St Hsg Auth Mtg Pur 4.000% 11/15/30 |
250,000 |
265,207 |
||
ME St Hsg Auth Mtg Pur 3.300% 11/15/35 |
330,000 |
333,749 |
||
#ME St Hsg Auth 3.000% 11/15/36 |
250,000 |
|
249,415 |
|
|
2,533,448 |
|||
Other Revenue (6.4%) |
||||
ME Governmental Facs Auth Ser A 4.000% 10/01/24 |
200,000 |
222,568 |
||
Maine Municipal Bond Bank 4.000% 11/01/38 |
125,000 |
135,924 |
||
Maine Municipal Bond Bank 5.000% 11/01/25 |
125,000 |
151,709 |
||
Maine Municipal Bond Bank 5.000% 11/01/27 |
100,000 |
125,815 |
||
Maine Municipal Bond Bank 3.000% 11/01/33 |
100,000 |
102,014 |
||
ME Mun Bd Bk (Swr & Wtr) Rev Unrefunded 4.900% 11/01/24 |
5,000 |
5,012 |
||
*PR Pub Fin Corp Comwlth Appropriations 5.375% 06/01/18 |
515,000 |
|
556,236 |
|
|
1,299,278 |
|||
Transportation (10.1%) |
||||
*ME Mun Bd Bk Transn Infrastructure Rev 5.000% 09/01/24 |
1,000,000 |
1,130,460 |
||
Maine St Tpk Auth Spl Oblig 4.000% 07/01/32 |
250,000 |
273,110 |
||
Portland ME Airport Rev 5.250% 01/01/35 |
250,000 |
273,605 |
||
Portland ME Airport Rev 5.000% 07/01/22 |
100,000 |
117,493 |
||
Portland ME Airport Rev 5.000% 07/01/23 |
100,000 |
119,676 |
||
Portland ME Airport Rev 5.000% 07/01/24 |
100,000 |
|
117,827 |
|
|
2,032,171 |
|||
Utilities (5.2%) |
||||
*Kennebunk ME Pwr & Light Dist 5.000% 08/01/22 |
500,000 |
519,440 |
||
Portland ME Wtr Dist Rev 4.250% 11/01/27 |
500,000 |
|
523,015 |
|
|
1,042,455 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $18,706,499) |
$ |
19,847,815 |
||
|
||||
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES (1.8%) |
|
365,172 |
||
|
||||
NET ASSETS (100.0%) |
$ |
20,212,987 |
||
|
||||
* Indicates all or a portion of bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed-delivery purchases. |
||||
#When-issued purchase as of July 29, 2016. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
NEW HAMPSHIRE MUNICIPAL FUND
PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS July 29, 2016
General Obligation |
45.6% |
Education |
17.8% |
Health Care |
13.5% |
Cash Equivalents and Other |
10.6% |
Housing |
5.9% |
Utilities |
3.5% |
Transportation |
3.1% |
|
100% |
Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.
These percentages are based on net assets and are subject to change.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS July 29, 2016
Principal |
Fair |
|||
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS (89.4%) |
||||
|
||||
Education (17.8%) |
||||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Ref-Univ New Hampshire 5.000% 07/01/28 |
$ |
175,000 |
$ |
220,423 |
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Ref Univ Sys of NH 3.000% 07/01/37 |
170,000 |
172,222 |
||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Ref-Univ Sys of NH 3.000% 07/01/38 |
115,000 |
115,793 |
||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev (Pinkerton Academy) 4.625% 06/01/30 |
175,000 |
187,320 |
||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev (Pinkerton Academy) 4.875% 06/01/35 |
70,000 |
75,877 |
||
*NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Southern NH Univ 5.000% 01/01/17 |
200,000 |
202,736 |
||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Southern NH Univ 5.000% 01/01/20 |
100,000 |
113,661 |
||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Dartmouth College 5.250% 06/01/39 |
100,000 |
|
112,861 |
|
|
1,200,893 |
|||
General Obligation (45.6%) |
||||
Concord NH GO 4.000% 07/15/24 |
50,000 |
59,989 |
||
#Concord NH Ref GO 4.000% 08/15/26 |
200,000 |
246,138 |
||
Dover NH GO Ref 5.000% 06/15/25 |
100,000 |
131,364 |
||
Dover NH GO 5.000% 06/15/39 |
100,000 |
103,257 |
||
Dover NH GO 4.000% 06/15/28 |
100,000 |
111,808 |
||
Hillsborough NH GO 4.000% 11/01/20 |
100,000 |
100,217 |
||
Hillsborough NH GO 4.000% 11/01/21 |
100,000 |
100,217 |
||
Hooksett NH Sch Dist GO 5.000% 07/15/22 |
100,000 |
122,679 |
||
Merrimack Cnty NH GO 4.250% 12/01/19 |
100,000 |
105,287 |
||
Merrimack Cnty NH GO 4.500% 12/01/27 |
100,000 |
105,593 |
||
Nashua NH GO 3.000% 10/1/35 |
175,000 |
183,641 |
||
*NH Mun Bd Bk 2009 Series D 4.000% 07/15/25 |
175,000 |
189,291 |
||
NH St GO Cap Impt - Ser B 5.000% 12/01/28 |
75,000 |
95,342 |
||
NH St Cap Impt GO 4.750% 03/01/27 |
100,000 |
107,023 |
||
Portsmouth NH GO 3.000% 06/15/36 |
525,000 |
541,611 |
||
Portsmouth NH GO Cap Impt 4.000% 12/01/30 |
100,000 |
110,575 |
||
*Rochester NH GO Ser A 3.000% 03/01/32 |
130,000 |
140,430 |
||
Rochester NH GO Ser C 3.000% 10/15/35 |
100,000 |
105,622 |
||
Salem NH School District GO 5.000% 11/15/24 |
100,000 |
128,049 |
||
*Salem NH School District GO 4.000% 12/01/27 |
250,000 |
|
292,848 |
|
|
3,080,981 |
|||
Health Care (13.5%) |
||||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Wentworth Douglas Hosp 5.500% 01/01/26 |
100,000 |
115,695 |
||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Southern NH Med Ctr 5.250% 10/01/23 |
100,000 |
104,759 |
||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Healthcare Sys-Covenant Hlth-B 5.000% 07/01/24 |
100,000 |
107,066 |
||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Cheshire Med Ctr 4.000% 07/01/39 |
100,000 |
105,670 |
||
*NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Covenant Health 5.000% 07/01/31 |
150,000 |
158,775 |
||
NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Catholic Med Center 5.000% 07/01/24 |
100,000 |
115,485 |
||
*NH Health & Ed Facs Auth Rev Concord Hosp-Ser A 5.000% 10/01/26 |
100,000 |
117,447 |
||
NH St Health & Ed Fac Covenant Hlth Sys 5.000% 07/01/42 |
75,000 |
|
83,731 |
|
|
908,628 |
|||
Housing (5.9%) |
||||
NH St Hsg Fin Auth Single Family Mtg Rev 5.350% 07/01/40 |
70,000 |
71,924 |
||
NH St Hsg Fin Auth Single Family Mtg Rev 4.625% 07/01/25 |
135,000 |
141,163 |
||
NH St Hsg Fin Auth Single Family Mtg Rev 4.875% 07/01/28 |
70,000 |
76,120 |
||
NH St Hsg Fin Auth Multi Family Hsg 5.200% 07/01/31 |
100,000 |
|
110,155 |
|
|
399,362 |
|||
Transportation (3.1%) |
||||
Manchester NH Gen Airport Rev 5.000% 01/01/23 |
75,000 |
88,806 |
||
NH St Turnpike Sys Rev 5.000% 08/01/25 |
100,000 |
|
121,370 |
|
|
210,176 |
|||
Utilities (3.5%) |
||||
NH St Bus Fin Auth Wtr Fac Rev AMT Pennuchuck Wtr Wks 5.000% 01/01/29 |
100,000 |
118,382 |
||
NH St Bus Fin Auth Wtr Fac Rev AMT Pennuchuck Wtr Wks 5.000% 01/01/30 |
100,000 |
|
118,369 |
|
|
236,751 |
|||
|
||||
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS (COST: $5,782,969) |
$ |
6,036,791 |
||
|
||||
OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES (10.6%) |
|
717,537 |
||
|
||||
NET ASSETS (100.0%) |
$ |
6,754,328 |
||
|
||||
*Indicates all or a portion of bonds are segregated by the custodian to cover when-issued or delayed delivery purchases. |
||||
#When-issued purchase as of July 29, 2016. |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Assets and Liabilities July 29, 2016
New |
|||||||||||||||
Kansas |
Nebraska |
Oklahoma |
Maine |
Hampshire |
|||||||||||
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
|||||||||||
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
|||||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||
Investments in securities, at cost |
$ |
54,205,350 |
$ |
42,910,833 |
$ |
41,265,797 |
$ |
18,706,499 |
$ |
5,782,969 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Investments in securities, at fair value |
$ |
58,539,191 |
$ |
45,890,309 |
$ |
44,416,855 |
$ |
19,847,815 |
$ |
6,036,791 |
|||||
Cash |
1,751,170 |
1,983,293 |
1,970,336 |
491,030 |
937,984 |
||||||||||
Receivable for Fund shares sold |
10,000 |
0 |
556,000 |
8,800 |
0 |
||||||||||
Accrued dividends receivable |
81 |
44 |
71 |
37 |
10 |
||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
810,882 |
432,232 |
446,442 |
147,497 |
37,245 |
||||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
2,136 |
3,667 |
3,234 |
2,016 |
819 |
||||||||||
Total assets |
$ |
61,113,460 |
$ |
48,309,545 |
$ |
47,392,938 |
$ |
20,497,195 |
$ |
7,012,849 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
|||||||||||||||
Payable for securities purchased |
$ |
484,400 |
$ |
2,005,098 |
$ |
583,433 |
$ |
250,000 |
$ |
246,316 |
|||||
Payable for Fund shares redeemed |
31,133 |
4,906 |
6,912 |
2,773 |
0 |
||||||||||
Dividends payable |
38,527 |
30,089 |
30,312 |
7,461 |
2,918 |
||||||||||
Trustees' fees payable |
3,482 |
2,613 |
2,615 |
1,106 |
312 |
||||||||||
Payable to affiliates |
|
47,197 |
|
34,237 |
|
36,270 |
|
14,672 |
|
4,763 |
|||||
Accrued expenses |
19,830 |
15,560 |
15,363 |
8,196 |
4,212 |
||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ |
624,569 |
$ |
2,092,503 |
$ |
674,905 |
$ |
284,208 |
$ |
258,521 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
NET ASSETS |
$ |
60,488,891 |
$ |
46,217,042 |
$ |
46,718,033 |
$ |
20,212,987 |
$ |
6,754,328 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
NET ASSETS ARE REPRESENTED BY: |
|||||||||||||||
Capital stock outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized |
$ |
56,372,453 |
$ |
43,498,002 |
$ |
43,923,784 |
$ |
19,056,896 |
$ |
6,513,377 |
|||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments |
(223,427) |
(261,641) |
(356,809) |
30 |
(15,742) |
||||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income (loss) |
6,024 |
1,205 |
0 |
14,745 |
2,871 |
||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
|
4,333,841 |
|
2,979,476 |
|
3,151,058 |
|
1,141,316 |
|
253,822 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
NET ASSETS |
$ |
60,488,891 |
$ |
46,217,042 |
$ |
46,718,033 |
$ |
20,212,987 |
$ |
6,754,328 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding |
5,436,053 |
4,270,592 |
3,860,797 |
1,787,069 |
609,926 |
||||||||||
Net asset value per share* |
$ |
11.13 |
$ |
10.82 |
$ |
12.10 |
$ |
11.31 |
$ |
11.07 |
|||||
Public offering price (sales charge of 2.50%) |
$ |
11.42 |
$ |
11.10 |
$ |
12.41 |
$ |
11.60 |
$ |
11.35 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
* Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Operations For the year ended July 29, 2016
New |
|||||||||||||||
Kansas |
Nebraska |
Oklahoma |
Maine |
Hampshire |
|||||||||||
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
|||||||||||
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
|||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
|||||||||||||||
Interest |
$ |
2,212,005 |
$ |
1,528,010 |
$ |
1,478,884 |
$ |
616,022 |
$ |
165,635 |
|||||
Dividends |
1,430 |
1,129 |
761 |
506 |
279 |
||||||||||
Total investment income |
$ |
2,213,435 |
$ |
1,529,139 |
$ |
1,479,645 |
$ |
616,528 |
$ |
165,914 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
EXPENSES |
|||||||||||||||
Investment advisory fees |
$ |
291,410 |
$ |
214,232 |
$ |
218,519 |
$ |
91,228 |
$ |
26,276 |
|||||
Distribution (12b-1) fees |
145,705 |
107,116 |
109,260 |
45,614 |
13,138 |
||||||||||
Transfer agent fees |
81,595 |
59,985 |
61,185 |
25,544 |
7,357 |
||||||||||
Administrative service fees |
105,528 |
83,918 |
85,119 |
49,477 |
31,291 |
||||||||||
Professional fees |
15,795 |
12,089 |
12,346 |
6,603 |
3,664 |
||||||||||
Reports to shareholders |
2,057 |
1,513 |
1,463 |
779 |
308 |
||||||||||
License, fees, and registrations |
3,582 |
7,148 |
3,979 |
2,685 |
1,301 |
||||||||||
Audit fees |
13,420 |
10,289 |
10,194 |
4,463 |
1,383 |
||||||||||
Trustees’ fees |
5,181 |
3,817 |
3,873 |
1,621 |
461 |
||||||||||
Transfer agent out-of-pockets |
4,978 |
3,418 |
3,266 |
1,576 |
512 |
||||||||||
Custodian fees |
6,388 |
4,647 |
5,129 |
2,130 |
1,067 |
||||||||||
Legal fees |
8,729 |
6,440 |
6,550 |
2,744 |
788 |
||||||||||
Insurance expense |
1,444 |
1,011 |
1,038 |
431 |
128 |
||||||||||
Total expenses |
$ |
685,812 |
$ |
515,623 |
$ |
521,921 |
$ |
234,895 |
$ |
87,674 |
|||||
Less expenses waived or reimbursed |
|
(114,648) |
|
(95,728) |
|
(93,624) |
|
(56,087) |
|
(36,173) |
|||||
Total net expenses |
$ |
571,164 |
$ |
419,895 |
$ |
428,297 |
$ |
178,808 |
$ |
51,501 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INVESTMENT INCOME |
$ |
1,642,271 |
$ |
1,109,244 |
$ |
1,051,348 |
$ |
437,720 |
$ |
114,413 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS |
|||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions |
$ |
39,118 |
$ |
6,667 |
$ |
52,357 |
$ |
30 |
$ |
(2,287) |
|||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
|
1,334,412 |
|
1,377,841 |
|
1,655,184 |
|
536,043 |
|
145,181 |
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
$ |
1,373,530 |
$ |
1,384,508 |
$ |
1,707,541 |
$ |
536,073 |
$ |
142,894 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS |
$ |
3,015,801 |
$ |
2,493,752 |
$ |
2,758,889 |
$ |
973,793 |
$ |
257,307 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets For the year ended July 29, 2016
New |
|||||||||||||||
Kansas |
Nebraska |
Oklahoma |
Maine |
Hampshire |
|||||||||||
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
|||||||||||
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
|||||||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ |
1,642,271 |
$ |
1,109,244 |
$ |
1,051,348 |
$ |
437,720 |
$ |
114,413 |
|||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions |
|
39,118 |
|
6,667 |
|
52,357 |
|
30 |
|
(2,287) |
|||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
|
1,334,412 |
|
1,377,841 |
|
1,655,184 |
|
536,043 |
|
145,181 |
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
$ |
3,015,801 |
$ |
2,493,752 |
$ |
2,758,889 |
$ |
973,793 |
$ |
257,307 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ |
(1,641,358) |
$ |
(1,108,961) |
$ |
(1,051,277) |
$ |
(436,128) |
$ |
(112,772) |
|||||
Net realized gain on investments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(8,442) |
0 |
||||||||||
Total distributions |
$ |
(1,641,358) |
$ |
(1,108,961) |
$ |
(1,051,277) |
$ |
(444,570) |
$ |
(112,772) |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS |
|||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of shares |
$ |
5,676,711 |
$ |
6,523,495 |
$ |
7,816,620 |
$ |
3,302,647 |
$ |
2,298,225 |
|||||
Proceeds from reinvested dividends |
1,165,076 |
746,962 |
665,587 |
349,320 |
71,416 |
||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(6,305,595) |
(3,627,437) |
(5,899,274) |
(1,442,995) |
(924,067) |
||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions |
$ |
536,192 |
$ |
3,643,020 |
$ |
2,582,933 |
$ |
2,208,972 |
$ |
1,445,574 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS |
$ |
1,910,635 |
$ |
5,027,811 |
$ |
4,290,545 |
$ |
2,738,195 |
$ |
1,590,109 |
|||||
NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
$ |
58,578,256 |
41,189,231 |
$ |
42,427,488 |
$ |
17,474,792 |
$ |
5,164,219 |
||||||
NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD |
$ |
60,488,891 |
$ |
46,217,042 |
$ |
46,718,033 |
$ |
20,212,987 |
$ |
6,754,328 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income |
$ |
6,024 |
$ |
1,205 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
14,745 |
$ |
2,871 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Changes in Net Assets For the year ended July 31, 2015
New |
|||||||||||||||
Kansas |
Nebraska |
Oklahoma |
Maine |
Hampshire |
|||||||||||
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
Municipal |
|||||||||||
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
|||||||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$ |
1,648,160 |
$ |
1,098,865 |
$ |
997,811 |
$ |
428,956 |
$ |
106,922 |
|||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions |
|
(5,419) |
|
5,696 |
|
27,061 |
|
14,679 |
|
5,549 |
|||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
|
98,524 |
|
313,698 |
|
104,391 |
|
(38,419) |
|
1,109 |
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations |
$ |
1,741,265 |
$ |
1,418,259 |
$ |
1,129,263 |
$ |
405,216 |
$ |
113,580 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS FROM |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ |
(1,647,296) |
$ |
(1,098,476) |
$ |
(997,700) |
$ |
(427,448) |
$ |
(105,037) |
|||||
Total distributions |
$ |
(1,647,296) |
$ |
(1,098,476) |
$ |
(997,700) |
$ |
(427,448) |
$ |
(105,037) |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS |
|||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of shares |
$ |
4,753,374 |
$ |
4,850,261 |
$ |
6,684,819 |
$ |
1,283,466 |
$ |
1,170,331 |
|||||
Proceeds from reinvested dividends |
1,141,713 |
665,490 |
522,925 |
294,444 |
66,338 |
||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed |
(6,926,940) |
(4,380,652) |
(3,707,085) |
(1,532,262) |
(764,914) |
||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions |
$ |
(1,031,853) |
$ |
1,135,099 |
$ |
3,500,659 |
$ |
45,648 |
$ |
471,755 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS |
$ |
(937,884) |
$ |
1,454,882 |
$ |
3,632,222 |
$ |
23,416 |
$ |
480,298 |
|||||
NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
$ |
59,516,140 |
$ |
39,734,349 |
$ |
38,795,266 |
$ |
17,451,376 |
$ |
4,683,921 |
|||||
NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD |
$ |
58,578,256 |
$ |
41,189,231 |
$ |
42,427,488 |
$ |
17,474,792 |
$ |
5,164,219 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income |
$ |
5,111 |
$ |
2,333 |
$ |
860 |
$ |
13,153 |
$ |
9,448 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: Organization
Integrity Managed Portfolios (the “Trust”) was organized as a Massachusetts business trust on August 10, 1990 and commenced operations on November 15, 1990. The Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end management investment company and consists of five series (the “Funds”).
The Kansas Municipal Fund (“KS Muni Fund”), Nebraska Municipal Fund (“NE Muni Fund”), and Oklahoma Municipal Fund (“OK Muni Fund”), each a non-diversified Fund, seek the highest level of current income that is exempt from both federal income tax and each Fund’s respective state income tax as is consistent with preservation of capital. The Maine Municipal Fund (“ME Muni Fund”) and New Hampshire Municipal Fund (“NH Muni Fund”), each a non-diversified Fund, seek the highest level of current income that is exempt from both federal income tax and each Fund’s respective state income tax (interest and dividend tax with respect to New Hampshire) without assuming undue risk.
Each Fund is an investment company and accordingly follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standard Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies.
NOTE 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Investment security valuation—Securities for which quotations are not readily available are valued using a matrix system at fair value as determined by the Funds’ administrative services agent, Integrity Fund Services, LLC (“Integrity Fund Services” or “IFS”). The matrix system has been developed based on procedures approved by the Board of Trustees and includes consideration of the following: yields or prices of municipal bonds of comparable quality; type of issue, coupon, maturity, and rating; indications as to value from dealers; indications as to value from municipal bond market activity; and general market conditions. Because the market value of securities can only be established by agreement between parties in a sales transaction, and because of the uncertainty inherent in the valuation process, the fair values as determined may differ from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the securities existed. Refer to Note 3 for further disclosures related to the inputs used to value the Funds’ investments. Shares of a registered investment company, including money market funds that are not traded on an exchange are valued at the investment company’s net asset value per share.
When-issued securities—The Funds may purchase securities on a when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. The price of the underlying securities and the date when the securities will be delivered and paid for are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. The values of the securities purchased on a when-issued basis are identified as such in the Funds’ Schedule of Investments. With respect to purchase commitments, the Fund identifies securities as segregated in its custodial records with a value at least equal to the amount of the commitment. Losses may arise due to changes in the value of the underlying securities, if the counterparty does not perform under the contract’s terms, or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic, or other factors.
Contingent deferred sales charge—In the case of investments of $500,000 or more, a 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) may be assessed on shares redeemed within 24 months of purchase (excluding shares purchased with reinvested dividends and/or distributions).
Federal and state income taxes—Each Fund is a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund’s policy is to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code that are applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and any net realized gain on investments to its shareholders; therefore, no provision for income taxes is required.
As of and during the year ended July 29, 2016, the Funds did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. The Funds recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the Statements of Operations. During the year, the Funds did not incur any interest or penalties.
For all open tax years and all major taxing jurisdictions, management of the Funds has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Open tax years are those that are open for examination by taxing authorities. Furthermore, management of the Funds is also not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
Premiums and discounts—Premiums and discounts on municipal securities are accreted and amortized over the lives of the respective securities.
Security transactions, investment income, expenses and distributions—Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the first in, first out basis unless specifically identified. Interest income and estimated expenses are accrued daily. The Funds declare dividends from net investment income daily and pay such dividends monthly. Capital gains, when available, are distributed at least annually. Dividends are reinvested in additional shares of the Funds at net asset value or paid in cash. Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences are primarily due to differing treatment for market discount and capital loss carryforwards. In addition, other amounts have been reclassified within the composition of net assets to more appropriately conform financial accounting to tax basis treatment.
Use of estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Common expenses—Common expenses of the Trust are allocated among the Funds within the Trust based on relative net assets of each Fund or the nature of the services performed and the relative applicability to each Fund.
Reporting period end date—For financial reporting purposes, the last day of the reporting period will be the last business day of the month.
NOTE 3: Fair Value Measurements
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds’ investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels: Level 1 inputs are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 inputs are based on significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.). Level 3 inputs are based on significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds’ investments as of July 29, 2016:
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
||||||||||
KS Muni Fund |
Municipal Bonds |
$ |
0 |
$ |
58,539,191 |
$ |
0 |
|
58,539,191 |
||||
Total |
$ |
0 |
$ |
58,539,191 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
58,539,191 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
NE Muni Fund |
Municipal Bonds |
$ |
0 |
$ |
45,890,309 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
45,890,309 |
||||
Total |
$ |
0 |
$ |
45,890,309 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
45,890,309 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
OK Muni Fund |
Municipal Bonds |
$ |
0 |
$ |
44,416,855 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
44,416,855 |
||||
Total |
$ |
0 |
$ |
44,416,855 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
44,416,855 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
ME Muni Fund |
Municipal Bonds |
$ |
0 |
$ |
19,847,815 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
19,847,815 |
||||
Total |
$ |
0 |
$ |
19,847,815 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
19,847,815 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
NH Muni Fund |
Municipal Bonds |
$ |
0 |
$ |
6,036,791 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
6,036,791 |
||||
|
Total |
$ |
0 |
$ |
6,036,791 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
6,036,791 |
See Schedule of Investments to view by type of obligation. The Funds did not hold any Level 3 assets during the year ended July 29, 2016. There were no transfers into or out of Level 1 or Level 2 during the year ended July 29, 2016. The Funds consider transfers into or out of Level 1 and Level 2 as of the end of the reporting period. The Funds did not hold any derivative instruments at any time during the year ended July 29, 2016.
NOTE 4: Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) for the year ended July 29, 2016, were as follows:
KS Muni |
NE Muni |
OK Muni |
ME Muni |
NH Muni |
||||||||||
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
||||||||||
Purchases |
$ |
6,895,481 |
$ |
7,440,614 |
$ |
7,998,360 |
$ |
3,367,511 |
$ |
2,460,811 |
||||
Sales |
$ |
7,194,855 |
$ |
3,122,228 |
$ |
4,512,441 |
$ |
330,000 |
$ |
1,167,093 |
NOTE 5: Capital Share Transactions
Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
KS Muni |
NE Muni |
OK Muni |
ME Muni |
NH Muni |
||||||
Year Ended 7/29/16: |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
|||||
Shares sold |
515,596 |
610,955 |
656,299 |
294,264 |
208,450 |
|||||
Shares issued from reinvestments |
105,988 |
70,178 |
56,033 |
31,317 |
6,539 |
|||||
Shares redeemed |
(574,747) |
(340,869) |
(496,094) |
(129,061) |
(85,209) |
|||||
Net increase (decrease) |
46,837 |
340,264 |
216,238 |
196,520 |
129,780 |
|||||
|
||||||||||
KS Muni |
NE Muni |
OK Muni |
ME Muni |
NH Muni |
||||||
Year Ended 7/31/15: |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
|||||
Shares sold |
434,821 |
462,386 |
572,764 |
116,160 |
108,612 |
|||||
Shares issued from reinvestments |
104,484 |
63,312 |
44,740 |
26,611 |
6,140 |
|||||
Shares redeemed |
(633,613) |
(416,575) |
(317,309) |
(138,627) |
(70,882) |
|||||
Net increase (decrease) |
(94,308) |
109,123 |
300,195 |
4,144 |
43,870 |
NOTE 6: Income Tax Information
At July 29, 2016, the net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) based on the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was as follows:
KS Muni |
NE Muni |
OK Muni |
ME Muni |
NH Muni |
|||||||||||
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
|||||||||||
Investments at cost |
$ |
54,199,325 |
$ |
42,909,627 |
$ |
41,265,797 |
$ |
18,691,754 |
$ |
5,780,099 |
|||||
Unrealized appreciation |
$ |
4,355,261 |
$ |
2,981,039 |
$ |
3,167,313 |
$ |
1,166,117 |
$ |
267,122 |
|||||
Unrealized depreciation |
(15,395) |
(357) |
(16,255) |
(10,056) |
(10,430) |
||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation* |
$ |
4,339,866 |
$ |
2,980,682 |
$ |
3,151,058 |
$ |
1,156,061 |
$ |
256,692 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Differences between financial reporting-basis and tax-basis are due to differing treatment of market discount. |
||||||||||||||
The tax character of distributions paid or accrued were as follows:
Year Ended 7/29/16: |
KS Muni Fund |
NE Muni Fund |
OK Muni Fund |
ME Muni Fund |
NH Muni Fund |
|||||||||
Tax-exempt income |
$ |
1,641,358 |
$ |
1,108,961 |
$ |
1,051,277 |
$ |
436,128 |
$ |
112,772 |
||||
Capital gains |
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
8,442 |
|
$ |
0 |
Year Ended 7/31/15: |
KS Muni Fund |
NE Muni Fund |
OK Muni Fund |
ME Muni Fund |
NH Muni Fund |
|||||||||
Tax-exempt income |
$ |
1,647,296 |
$ |
1,098,476 |
$ |
997,700 |
$ |
427,448 |
$ |
105,037 |
||||
As of July 29, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
KS Muni |
NE Muni |
OK Muni |
ME Muni |
NH Muni |
|||||||||||
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
Fund |
|||||||||||
Undistributed tax-exempt income |
$ |
38,527 |
$ |
30,089 |
$ |
30,312 |
$ |
7,461 |
$ |
2,918 |
|||||
Undistributed capital gain |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
0 |
|
Accumulated capital and other losses |
(223,427) |
(261,642) |
(356,809) |
0 |
(15,742) |
||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation* |
4,339,866 |
2,980,682 |
3,151,058 |
1,156,061 |
256,692 |
||||||||||
Total accumulated earnings/(deficit) |
$ |
$4,154,966 |
$ |
$2,749,129 |
$ |
$2,824,561 |
$ |
$1,163,552 |
$ |
$243,868 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Differences between financial reporting-basis and tax-basis are due to differing treatment of market discount. |
||||||||||||||
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (“Act”), funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period of time. The short-term and long-term character of such losses are retained rather than being treated as short-term as under previous law. Pre-enactment losses are eligible to be carried forward for a maximum period of eight years. Pursuant to the Act, post-enactment capital losses must be utilized before pre-enactment capital losses. As a result, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. The Funds’ capital loss carryforward amounts as of July 29, 2016 are as follows:
|
|
KS Muni |
|
|
NE Muni |
|
|
OK Muni |
|
|
NH Muni |
Expires in 2018 |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
260,308 |
|
$ |
- |
Non-expiring S-T losses |
|
133,526 |
|
|
177,427 |
|
|
52,527 |
|
|
12,953 |
Non-expiring L-T losses |
|
89,901 |
|
|
84,215 |
|
|
43,974 |
|
|
2,789 |
Total |
$ |
223,427 |
|
$ |
261,642 |
|
$ |
356,809 |
|
$ |
15,742 |
For the year ended July 29, 2016, NH Muni Fund reclassified accumulated net realized loss of $529 to paid-in capital due to expired capital loss carryforward. For the year ended July 29, 2016, KS Muni Fund, NE Muni Fund, OK Muni Fund, and NH Muni Fund utilized capital loss carryforwards of $39,118, $8,077, $53,288, and $5,931, respectively. For the year ended July 29, 2016, NE Muni Fund, OK Muni Fund, and NH Muni Fund reclassified accumulated net investment income of $1,411, $931, and $8,218, respectively, to accumulated realized gain due to market discount on bonds sold.
NOTE 7: Investment Advisory Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Viking Fund Management (“VFM”), the Funds’ investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, LLC (“Integrity Funds Distributor” or “IFD”), the Funds’ underwriter; and IFS, the Funds’ transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Corridor Investors, LLC (“Corridor Investors” or “Corridor”), the Funds’ sponsor. A Trustee of the Funds is also a Governor of Corridor.
VFM provides investment advisory and management services to the Funds. The Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) provides for fees to be computed at an annual rate of 0.50% of each Fund’s average daily net assets. Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, VFM has contractually agreed to waive its management fee and to reimburse expenses for the Funds, other than extraordinary or non-recurring expenses and acquired fund fees and expenses, until November 29, 2016 so that the net annual operating expenses do not exceed 0.98%. After November 29, 2016, the expense limitation may be terminated or revised. VFM and affiliated service providers may also voluntarily waive fees or reimburse expenses not required under the advisory or other contracts from time to time. An expense limitation lowers expense ratios and increases returns to investors. Certain Officers of the Funds are also Officers and Governors of VFM.
Year Ended 7/29/16 |
Payable at 7/29/16 |
||||||||
Advisory Fees* |
|
Advisory Fees Waived |
Advisory Fees* |
||||||
KS Muni Fund |
$ |
238,889 |
$ |
52,521 |
$ |
19,908 |
|||
NE Muni Fund |
$ |
170,933 |
$ |
43,299 |
$ |
14,757 |
|||
OK Muni Fund |
$ |
176,137 |
$ |
42,382 |
$ |
14,710 |
|||
ME Muni Fund |
$ |
67,521 |
$ |
23,707 |
$ |
5,907 |
|||
NH Muni Fund |
$ |
14,345 |
$ |
11,931 |
$ |
1,560 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
After waivers. |
||||||||
IFD serves as the principal underwriter for the Funds and receives sales charges deducted from sale proceeds and CDSC from applicable redemptions. Also, the Funds have adopted a distribution plan for each class of shares as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act. Distribution plans permit the Funds to reimburse their principal underwriter for costs related to selling shares of the Funds and for various other services. These costs, which consist primarily of commissions and service fees to broker-dealers who sell shares of the Funds, are paid by shareholders through expenses called “Distribution Plan expenses.” The Funds currently pay an annual distribution fee of up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets. Certain Officers of the Funds are also Officers and Governors of IFD.
Year Ended 7/29/16 |
Payable at 7/29/16 |
|||||||||||||||
Sales |
|
Distribution |
Distribution |
Sales |
|
Distribution |
||||||||||
Charges |
CDSC |
Fees* |
Fees Waived |
Charges |
CDSC |
Fees* |
||||||||||
KS Muni Fund |
$ |
96,519 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
119,445 |
$ |
26,260 |
$ |
3,379 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
9,954 |
||
NE Muni Fund |
$ |
101,374 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
85,467 |
$ |
21,649 |
$ |
1,341 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
7,378 |
||
OK Muni Fund |
$ |
118,910 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
88,069 |
$ |
21,191 |
$ |
3,410 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
7,355 |
||
ME Muni Fund |
$ |
45,331 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
33,761 |
$ |
11,853 |
$ |
678 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
2,953 |
||
NH Muni Fund |
$ |
24,166 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
7,172 |
$ |
5,966 |
$ |
267 |
$ |
0 |
$ |
780 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
After waivers. |
|||||||||||||||
IFS acts as the Funds’ transfer agent for a monthly variable fee equal to 0.14% of the Funds’ average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Funds’ first $200 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $200 million plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. IFS also acts as the Funds’ administrative services agent for a monthly fee equal to the sum of a fixed fee of $2,000 and a variable fee equal to 0.14% of the Funds’ average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Funds’ first $200 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $200 million plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. Certain Officers of the Funds are also Officers and Governors of IFS.
Year Ended 7/29/16 |
Payable at 7/29/16 |
|||||||||||||
Transfer |
Transfer |
Admin. |
Admin. |
Transfer |
Admin. |
|||||||||
Agency |
Agency |
Service |
Service |
Agency |
Service |
|||||||||
Fees* |
Fees Waived |
Fees* |
Fees Waived |
Fees* |
Fees* |
|||||||||
KS Muni Fund |
$ |
70,933 |
$ |
15,640 |
$ |
85,301 |
$ |
20,227 |
$ |
6,797 |
$ |
7,159 |
||
NE Muni Fund |
$ |
50,575 |
$ |
12,828 |
$ |
65,966 |
$ |
17,952 |
$ |
5,090 |
$ |
5,671 |
||
OK Muni Fund |
$ |
51,886 |
$ |
12,565 |
$ |
67,633 |
$ |
17,486 |
$ |
5,133 |
$ |
5,662 |
||
ME Muni Fund |
$ |
20,134 |
$ |
6,986 |
$ |
35,936 |
$ |
13,541 |
$ |
2,066 |
$ |
3,068 |
||
NH Muni Fund |
$ |
4,399 |
$ |
3,470 |
$ |
16,485 |
$ |
14,806 |
$ |
580 |
$ |
1,576 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
After waivers. |
|||||||||||||
NOTE 8: Principal Risks
The Funds invest primarily in municipal securities from a specific state. The Funds may also invest in municipal securities of U.S. territories and possessions (such as Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam). Each Fund is therefore more susceptible to political, economic, legislative, or regulatory factors adversely affecting issuers of municipal securities in its specific state or U.S. territories and possessions.
Interest rate risk is the risk that bond prices will decline in value because of changes in interest rates. There is normally an inverse relationship between the fair value of securities sensitive to prevailing interest rates and actual changes in interest rates. The longer the average maturity of a Fund’s portfolio, the greater its interest rate risk.
KANSAS MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
|||||||||||
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
|||||||||||
7/29/16 |
7/31/15 |
7/31/14 |
7/31/13 |
7/31/12 |
|||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
$ |
10.87 |
$ |
10.85 |
$ |
10.56 |
$ |
11.12 |
$ |
10.64 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$ |
0.31 |
$ |
0.31 |
$ |
0.32 |
$ |
0.30 |
$ |
0.37 |
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments3 |
0.26 |
0.02 |
0.29 |
(0.56) |
0.48 |
||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
$ |
0.57 |
$ |
0.33 |
$ |
0.61 |
$ |
(0.26) |
$ |
0.85 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income |
$ |
(0.31) |
$ |
(0.31) |
$ |
(0.32) |
$ |
(0.30) |
$ |
(0.37) |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
$ |
11.13 |
$ |
10.87 |
$ |
10.85 |
$ |
10.56 |
$ |
11.12 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Return (excludes any applicable sales charge) |
5.30% |
3.03% |
5.81% |
(2.37%) |
8.07% |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) |
$60,489 |
$58,578 |
$59,516 |
$64,405 |
$48,093 |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after waivers1,2,* |
0.98% |
0.98% |
1.01% |
1.08% |
1.07% |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets before waivers2 |
1.18% |
1.16% |
1.16% |
1.17% |
1.18% |
||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets1,2,* |
2.81% |
2.80% |
2.95% |
2.75% |
3.36% |
||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
12.10% |
10.87% |
6.63% |
13.40% |
11.46% |
1 |
This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers or reimbursements by the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
|
|
2 |
Average net assets was calculated using a 360-day period. |
|
|
3 |
Realized and unrealized gains and loss per share in this caption are balancing amounts necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per share for the period, and may not reconcile with the aggregate gains and losses in the Statement of Operations due to share transactions for the period. |
|
|
* |
For the year ended July 31, 2012, the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers voluntarily waived a portion of their fees equal to 0.08% of average net assets for the period of August 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012. |
|
|
|
|
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
NEBRASKA MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
|||||||||||
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
|||||||||||
7/29/16 |
7/31/15 |
7/31/14 |
7/31/13 |
7/31/12 |
|||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
$ |
10.48 |
$ |
10.40 |
$ |
9.99 |
$ |
10.69 |
$ |
10.20 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$ |
0.27 |
$ |
0.29 |
$ |
0.29 |
$ |
0.29 |
$ |
0.34 |
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments3 |
0.34 |
0.08 |
0.41 |
(0.70) |
0.49 |
||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
$ |
0.61 |
$ |
0.37 |
$ |
0.70 |
$ |
(0.41) |
$ |
0.83 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income |
$ |
(0.27) |
$ |
(0.29) |
$ |
(0.29) |
$ |
(0.29) |
$ |
(0.34) |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
$ |
10.82 |
$ |
10.48 |
$ |
10.40 |
$ |
9.99 |
$ |
10.69 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Return (excludes any applicable sales charge) |
5.94% |
3.54% |
7.14% |
(3.96%) |
8.23% |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) |
$46,217 |
$41,189 |
$39,734 |
$41,633 |
$46,038 |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after waivers1,2,* |
0.98% |
0.98% |
1.01% |
1.08% |
1.07% |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets before waivers2 |
1.20% |
1.19% |
1.20% |
1.20% |
1.21% |
||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets1,2* |
2.58% |
2.72% |
2.89% |
2.72% |
3.22% |
||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
7.47% |
11.76% |
3.88% |
23.65% |
12.38% |
1 |
This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers or reimbursements by the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
|
|
2 |
Average net assets was calculated using a 360-day period. |
|
|
3 |
Realized and unrealized gains and loss per share in this caption are balancing amounts necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per share for the period, and may not reconcile with the aggregate gains and losses in the Statement of Operations due to share transactions for the period. |
|
|
* |
For the year ended July 31, 2012, the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers voluntarily waived a portion of their fees equal to 0.08% of average net assets for the period of August 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012. |
|
|
|
|
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
OKLAHOMA MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
|||||||||||
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
|||||||||||
7/29/16 |
7/31/15 |
7/31/14 |
7/31/13 |
7/31/12 |
|||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
$ |
11.64 |
$ |
11.60 |
$ |
11.20 |
$ |
11.93 |
$ |
11.24 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$ |
0.28 |
$ |
0.29 |
$ |
0.31 |
$ |
0.32 |
$ |
0.34 |
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments3 |
0.46 |
0.04 |
0.40 |
(0.73) |
0.69 |
||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
$ |
0.74 |
$ |
0.33 |
$ |
0.71 |
$ |
(0.41) |
$ |
1.03 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income |
$ |
(0.28) |
$ |
(0.29) |
$ |
(0.31) |
$ |
(0.32) |
$ |
(0.34) |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
$ |
12.10 |
$ |
11.64 |
$ |
11.60 |
$ |
11.20 |
$ |
11.93 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Return (excludes any applicable sales charge) |
6.47% |
2.82% |
6.42% |
(3.54%) |
9.30% |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) |
$46,718 |
$42,427 |
$38,795 |
$41,551 |
$43,253 |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after waivers1,2,* |
0.98% |
0.98% |
1.01% |
1.08% |
1.07% |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets before waivers2 |
1.19% |
1.18% |
1.19% |
1.18% |
1.19% |
||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets1,2,* |
2.40% |
2.44% |
2.72% |
2.70% |
2.93% |
||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
10.58% |
14.53% |
1.41% |
9.54% |
17.72% |
1 |
This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers or reimbursements by the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Average net assets was calculated using a 360-day period. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Realized and unrealized gains and loss per share in this caption are balancing amounts necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per share for the period, and may not reconcile with the aggregate gains and losses in the Statement of Operations due to share transactions for the period. |
|
|
|
|
* |
For the year ended July 31, 2012, the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers voluntarily waived a portion of their fees equal to 0.08% of average net assets for the period of August 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. |
||
|
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
||
MAINE MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
|||||||||||
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
|||||||||||
7/29/16 |
7/31/15 |
7/31/14 |
7/31/13 |
7/31/12 |
|||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
$ |
10.99 |
$ |
11.00 |
$ |
10.79 |
$ |
11.36 |
$ |
10.77 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$ |
0.27 |
$ |
0.27 |
$ |
0.29 |
$ |
0.31 |
$ |
0.34 |
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments3 |
0.33 |
(0.01) |
0.21 |
(0.57) |
0.59 |
||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
$ |
0.60 |
$ |
0.26 |
$ |
0.50 |
$ |
(0.26) |
$ |
0.93 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Less Distributions: |
|||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income |
$ |
(0.27) |
$ |
(0.27) |
$ |
(0.29) |
$ |
(0.31) |
$ |
(0.34) |
|||||
Distributions from net realized gains |
(0.01) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
||||||||||
Total distributions |
$ |
(0.28) |
$ |
(0.27) |
$ |
(0.29) |
$ |
(0.31) |
$ |
(0.34) |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
$ |
11.31 |
$ |
10.99 |
$ |
11.00 |
$ |
10.79 |
$ |
11.36 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Return (excludes any applicable sales charge) |
5.44% |
2.37% |
4.72% |
(2.37%) |
8.79% |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) |
$20,213 |
$17,475 |
$17,451 |
$17,702 |
$18,084 |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after waivers1,2,* |
0.98% |
0.98% |
1.01% |
1.08% |
1.07% |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets before waivers2 |
1.29% |
1.28% |
1.28% |
1.27% |
1.29% |
||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets1,2,* |
2.39% |
2.45% |
2.70% |
2.76% |
3.11% |
||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
1.88% |
16.18% |
11.27% |
11.52% |
1.87% |
1 |
This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers or reimbursements by the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
|
|
2 |
Average net assets was calculated using a 360-day period. |
|
|
3 |
Realized and unrealized gains and loss per share in this caption are balancing amounts necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per share for the period, and may not reconcile with the aggregate gains and losses in the Statement of Operations due to share transactions for the period. |
|
|
* |
For the year ended July 31, 2012, the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers voluntarily waived a portion of their fees equal to 0.08% of average net assets for the period of August 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012. |
|
|
|
|
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
NEW HAMPSHIRE MUNICIPAL FUND
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Selected per share data and ratios for the periods indicated
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
|||||||||||
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
Ended |
|||||||||||
7/29/16 |
7/31/15 |
7/31/14 |
7/31/13 |
7/31/12 |
|||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
$ |
10.76 |
$ |
10.74 |
$ |
10.55 |
$ |
11.07 |
$ |
10.66 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from investment operations: |
|||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
$ |
0.24 |
$ |
0.24 |
$ |
0.28 |
$ |
0.28 |
$ |
0.33 |
|||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments3 |
0.31 |
0.02 |
0.19 |
(0.52) |
0.41 |
||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
$ |
0.55 |
$ |
0.26 |
$ |
0.47 |
$ |
(0.24) |
$ |
0.74 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Distributions from net investment income |
$ |
(0.24) |
$ |
(0.24) |
$ |
(0.28) |
$ |
(0.28) |
$ |
(0.33) |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD |
$ |
11.07 |
$ |
10.76 |
$ |
10.74 |
$ |
10.55 |
$ |
11.07 |
|||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Return (excludes any applicable sales charge) |
5.12% |
2.45% |
4.53% |
(2.19%) |
7.04% |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA |
|||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) |
$6,754 |
$5,164 |
$4,684 |
$5,173 |
$4,854 |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets after waivers1,2,* |
0.98% |
0.98% |
1.01% |
1.08% |
1.07% |
||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets before waivers2 |
1.67% |
1.71% |
1.71% |
1.67% |
1.78% |
||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets1,2,* |
2.17% |
2.27% |
2.68% |
2.62% |
3.07% |
||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
23.42% |
13.08% |
4.85% |
10.57% |
13.73% |
1 |
This row reflects the impact, if any, of fee waivers or reimbursements by the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers. |
|
|
2 |
Average net assets was calculated using a 360-day period. |
|
|
3 |
Realized and unrealized gains and loss per share in this caption are balancing amounts necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per share for the period, and may not reconcile with the aggregate gains and losses in the Statement of Operations due to share transactions for the period. |
|
|
* |
For the year ended July 31, 2012, the Adviser and/or affiliated service providers voluntarily waived a portion of their fees equal to 0.08% of average net assets for the period of August 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012. |
|
|
|
|
Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. |
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Integrity Managed Portfolios
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, of Integrity Managed Portfolios, comprising Kansas Municipal Fund, Maine Municipal Fund, Nebraska Municipal Fund, New Hampshire Municipal Fund, and Oklahoma Municipal Fund (the “Funds”) as of July 29, 2016, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 29, 2016, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers or counterparties were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the Funds constituting Integrity Managed Portfolios as of July 29, 2016, the results of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Cohen & Company, Ltd.
COHEN & COMPANY, LTD.
Cleveland, Ohio
September 27, 2016
EXPENSE EXAMPLE (unaudited)
As a shareholder of the Funds, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the one-half year period shown below and held for the entire one-half year period.
Actual expenses - The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in these columns together with the amount you invested to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an account value of $8,600 divided by $1,000 equals 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes - The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees, or exchange fees. Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
Beginning |
Ending |
Expenses |
|||
Account |
Account |
Paid |
Annualized |
||
Value |
Value |
During |
Expense |
||
|
1/29/2016 |
7/29/2016 |
Period* |
Ratio |
|
Kansas Municipal Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
$1,000.00 |
$1,024.15 |
$4.96 |
0.98% |
|
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) |
$1,000.00 |
$1,020.10 |
$4.95 |
0.98% |
|
Nebraska Municipal Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
$1,000.00 |
$1,026.82 |
$4.97 |
0.98% |
|
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) |
$1,000.00 |
$1,020.10 |
$4.95 |
0.98% |
|
Oklahoma Municipal Fund |
|||||
Actual |
$1,000.00 |
$1,026.40 |
$4.96 |
0.98% |
|
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) |
$1,000.00 |
$1,020.10 |
$4.95 |
0.98% |
|
Maine Municipal Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
$1,000.00 |
$1,021.72 |
$4.95 |
0.98% |
|
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) |
$1,000.00 |
$1,020.10 |
$4.95 |
0.98% |
|
New Hampshire Municipal Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
$1,000.00 |
$1,022.44 |
$4.95 |
0.98% |
|
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) |
$1,000.00 |
$1,020.10 |
$4.95 |
0.98% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 180 days in one-half year period, and dividend by 360 days in the fiscal year (to reflect the one-half year period). |
||||
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS (unaudited)
The Board of Trustees (“Board”) of the Funds consists of five Trustees (the “Trustees”). These same individuals, unless otherwise noted, also serve as Trustees for the five series of Integrity Managed Portfolios, the five series of The Integrity Funds, and the two series of Viking Mutual Funds. Four Trustees are not “interested persons” (80% of the total) as defined under the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”). The remaining Trustee is “interested” (the “Interested Trustees”) by virtue of his affiliation with Viking Fund Management, LLC and its affiliates.”
For the purposes of this section, the “Fund Complex” consists of the five series of Integrity Managed Portfolios, the five series of The Integrity Funds, and the two series of Viking Mutual Funds.
Each Trustee serves a Fund until its termination; or until the Trustee’s retirement, resignation, or death; or otherwise as specified in the Funds’ organizational documents. Each Officer serves an annual term. The tables that follow show information for each Trustee and Officer of the Funds.
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES |
|
Name, Date of Birth, Date Service Began, and Number of Funds Overseen in Fund Complex |
Principal
Occupations for Past Five Years |
Jerry M. Stai |
Principal occupation(s): Minot State University (1999 to present); Non-Profit Specialist, Bremer Bank (2006 to 2014); Director/Trustee: Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc. (2006 to 2012), The Integrity Funds and Integrity Managed Portfolios (2006 to present), and Viking Mutual Funds (2009 to present) Other Directorships Held: Not Applicable |
Orlin W. Backes |
Principal occupation(s): Attorney: McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C. (1963 to 2012); Director/Trustee: Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc. (1995 to 2012), Integrity Managed Portfolios (1996 to present), The Integrity Funds (2003 to present), and Viking Mutual Funds (2009 to present) Other Directorships Held: Not Applicable |
R. James Maxson |
Principal occupation(s): Attorney: Maxson Law Office P.C. (2002 to present); Director/Trustee: Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc. (1999 to 2012), Integrity Managed Portfolios (1999 to present), The Integrity Funds (2003 to present), and Viking Mutual Funds (2009 to present) Other Directorships Held: Peoples State Bank of Velva, St. Joseph’s Community Health Foundation and St. Joseph’s Foundation, Minot Community Land Trust |
Wade A. Dokken |
Principal occupation(s): Member, WealthVest Financial Partners (2009 to present); Co-President, WealthVest Marketing (2009 to present), Trustee: Integrity Managed Portfolios (2016 to present), The Integrity Funds (2016 to present), and Viking Mutual Funds (2016 to present) Other Directorships Held: Not Applicable |
|
|
The Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains more information about the Funds’ Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor at 800-276-1262. |
INTERESTED TRUSTEE |
||
Name, Position with Trust, Date of Birth, Date Service Began, and Number of Funds Overseen in Fund Complex |
Principal
Occupations for Past Five Years |
|
Robert E. Walstad(1) |
Principal occupation(s): Governor (2009 to present): Corridor Investors, LLC; Portfolio Manager (2010 to 2013): Viking Fund Management, LLC; Director and Chairman: Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc. (1994 to 2012); Trustee and Chairman: Integrity Managed Portfolios (1996 to present), The Integrity Funds (2003 to present), and Viking Mutual Funds (2009 to present) Other Directorships Held: Governor: Mainstream Investors, LLC (2012) |
|
|
||
(1) |
Trustee who is an “interested person” of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Mr. Walstad is an interested person by virtue of being an Officer of the Funds and ownership in Corridor Investors the parent company of Viking Fund Management, Integrity Fund Services and Integrity Funds Distributor. |
|
OTHER OFFICERS |
|
Name, Position with Trust, Date of Birth, and Date Service Began |
Principal
Occupations for Past Five Years |
Shannon D. Radke |
Principal occupation(s): Governor, CEO, and President (2009 to present): Corridor Investors, LLC; Governor and President (1998 to present) and Senior Portfolio Manager (1999 to present): Viking Fund Management, LLC; Governor and President (2009 to present): Integrity Fund Services, LLC and Integrity Funds Distributor, LLC; President: Viking Mutual Funds (1999 to present), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc. (2009 to 2012), The Integrity Funds (2009 to present), and Integrity Managed Portfolios (2009 to present) Other Directorships Held: Minot Chamber of Commerce |
Peter A. Quist |
Principal occupation(s): Governor (2009 to present): Corridor Investors, LLC; Attorney (inactive); Vice President (1994 to 2012): Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.; Vice President: Integrity Managed Portfolios (1996 to present); The Integrity Funds (2003 to present); and Viking Mutual Funds (2009 to present) Other Directorships Held: Not applicable |
Adam C. Forthun |
Principal occupation(s): Fund Accounting Manager (2008 to present) and Chief Operating Officer (2013 to present): Integrity Fund Services, LLC; Treasurer: Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc. (2008 to 2012), Integrity Managed Portfolios and The Integrity Funds (2008 to present), and Viking Mutual Funds (2009 to present) Other Directorships Held: Not applicable |
Brent M. Wheeler MF CCO: October 2005 |
Principal occupation(s): Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer: Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc. (2005 to 2012), Integrity Managed Portfolios and The Integrity Funds, (2005 to present), and Viking Mutual Funds (2009 to present); Secretary (2009 to 2012): Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.; Secretary (2009 to present): Integrity Managed Portfolios, The Integrity Funds, and Viking Mutual Funds Other Directorships Held: Not applicable |
|
|
The SAI contains more information about the Funds’ Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor at 800-276-1262. |
PRIVACY POLICY
Rev. 12/2012
|
|
|
FACTS |
WHAT DOES INTEGRITY VIKING FUNDS DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why? |
Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What? |
The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include: |
|
|
|
|
|
Social Security number, name, address |
|
|
|
|
|
Account balance, transaction history, account transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment experience, wire transfer instructions |
|
|
|
|
When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
How? |
All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons Integrity Viking Funds chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reasons we can share your personal information |
Does Integrity Viking Funds share? |
Can you limit this sharing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For our everyday business purposes— |
Yes |
No |
|
|
such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For our marketing purposes— |
Yes |
No |
|
|
to offer our products and services to you |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For joint marketing with other financial companies |
No |
We don’t share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes— |
Yes |
No |
|
|
information about your transactions and experiences |
||
|
|
|
|
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes— |
No |
We don’t share |
|
|
information about your creditworthiness |
||
|
|
|
|
For non-affiliates to market to you |
No |
We don’t share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Questions? |
Call 1-800-601-5593 or go to www.integrityvikingfunds.com |
|
|
PRIVACY POLICY (Continued)
Page 2 |
|
|
Who we are |
|
|
|
|
|
Who is providing this notice? |
Integrity Viking Funds (a family of investment companies) |
|
|
|
||||
What we do |
||||
|
||||
|
|
|||
How does Integrity Viking Funds protect my personal information? |
To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings. We |
|||
|
|
|||
|
train employees on privacy, information security and protection of client information. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
limit access to nonpublic personal information to those employees requiring such information in performing their job functions. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
How does Integrity Viking Funds collect my personal information? |
We collect your personal information, for example, when you: |
|||
|
|
|||
|
open an account or seek financial or tax advice |
|||
|
|
|||
|
provide account information or give us your contact information |
|||
|
|
|||
|
make a wire transfer |
|||
|
|
|||
We also collect your personal information from other companies. |
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Why can’t I limit all sharing? |
Federal law gives you the right to limit only: |
|||
|
|
|||
|
sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes—information about your creditworthiness |
|||
|
|
|||
|
affiliates from using your information to market to you |
|||
|
|
|||
|
sharing for non-affiliates to market to you |
|||
|
||||
State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing. |
||||
|
|
|||
|
||
Definitions |
||
|
||
|
|
|
Affiliates |
Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies |
|
|
|
|
|
The Integrity Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
Viking Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Managed Portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
Corridor Investors, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
Viking Fund Management, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Funds Distributor, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
Integrity Fund Services, LLC |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Non-affiliates |
Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. |
|
|
||
Integrity Viking Funds does not share with non-affiliates so they can market to you. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint marketing |
A formal agreement between non-affiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you. |
|
|
||
Integrity Viking Funds doesn’t jointly market. |
||
|
|
Integrity Viking Funds includes: |
|
|
|
|
The Integrity Funds |
|
|
|
Viking Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
Integrity Managed Portfolios |
PROXY VOTING OF FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in each Fund’s portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 800-276-1262. A report on Form N-PX of how the Funds voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through the Funds’ website at www.integrityvikingfunds.com. The information is also available from the Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) database on the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) at www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE
Within 60 days of the end of its second and fourth fiscal quarters, the Funds provide a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in their semi-annual and annual reports on the Form N-CSR(S). These reports are filed electronically with the SEC and are delivered to the shareholders of the Funds. The Funds also file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The Funds’ Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 202-551-8090. You may also access this information from the Funds’ website at www.integrityvikingfunds.com.
SHAREHOLDER INQUIRIES AND MAILINGS
Direct inquiries regarding the Funds to: |
Direct inquiries regarding account information to: |
To reduce their expenses, the Funds may mail only one copy of its prospectus and each annual and semi-annual report to those addresses shared by two or more accounts. If you wish to receive additional copies of these documents, please call Integrity Funds Distributor at 800-276-1262 or contact your financial institution. Integrity Funds Distributor will begin sending you individual copies 30 days after receiving your request.
Integrity Viking Funds are sold by prospectus only. An investor should consider the investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the investment company. You may obtain a prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser or at www.integrityvikingfunds.com. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.
{Logo}
Equity Funds
Integrity Dividend Harvest Fund
Integrity Energized Dividend Fund
Integrity Growth & Income Fund
Williston Basin/Mid-North America Stock Fund
Corporate Bond Fund
Integrity High Income Fund
State-Specific Tax-Exempt Bond Funds
Viking Tax-Free Fund for North Dakota
Viking Tax-Free Fund for Montana
Kansas Municipal Fund
Maine Municipal Fund
Nebraska Municipal Fund
New Hampshire Municipal Fund
Oklahoma Municipal Fund
Item 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
At the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer (herein referred to as the “Code”). There were no amendments to the Code during the period covered by this report. The registrant did not grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from any provisions of the Code during the period of this report. The Code is available on the Integrity Viking Funds website at http://www.integrityvikingfunds.com. A copy of the Code is also available, without charge, upon request by calling 800-601-5593. The Code is filed herewith pursuant to Item 12(a)(1) as EX-99.CODE ETH.
Item 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
The Board of Trustees has determined that Jerry Stai is an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Stai is “independent” for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
|
(a) |
Audit Fees: The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Cohen Fund Audit Services, Ltd. (“Cohen”), the principal accountants for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements, for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years were $39,750 for the year ended July 29, 2016 and $39,750 for the year ended July 31, 2015. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(b) |
Audit-Related Fees: The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by Cohen that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item were$0 for the year ended July 29, 2016 and $0 for the year ended July 31, 2015. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(c) |
Tax Fees: The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Cohen for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $12,500 for the year ended July 29, 2016 and $12,500 for the year ended July 31, 2015. Such services included review of excise distribution calculations (if applicable), preparation of the Trust’s federal, state, and excise tax returns, tax services related to mergers, and routine counseling. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(d) |
All Other Fees: The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by Cohen other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item: None. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(e) |
(1) |
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and procedures that require the audit committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided to the registrant by the principal accountant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Percentage of services referred to in 4(b) through 4(d) that were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0% of the services described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of Item 4 were not pre-approved by the audit committee. |
|
|
|
||
|
(f) |
All services performed on the engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year-end were performed by Cohen’s full-time permanent employees. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(g) |
Non-Audit Fees: None. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(h) |
Principal Accountant’s Independence: The registrant’s auditor did not provide any non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or controlled with the registrant’s investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant. |
Item 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable
Item 6. INVESTMENTS.
The Schedule of Investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Item 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable
Item 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable
Item 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable
Item 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of trustees in the last fiscal half year.
Item 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
|
(a) |
Based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR (the “Report”), the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer believe that the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effectively designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the Report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by the filing date, including ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Report is accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer who are making certifications in the Report, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal half-year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. EXHIBITS.
|
(a) |
(1) |
Code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed and attached hereto as EX-99. CODE ETH. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2 under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2) is filed and attached hereto as EX-99. CERT. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed and attached hereto. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Integrity Managed Portfolios
By: /s/ Shannon D. Radke
Shannon D. Radke
President
October 3, 2016
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ Shannon D. Radke
Shannon D. Radke
President
October 3, 2016
By: /s/ Adam Forthun
Adam Forthun
Treasurer
October 3, 2016
CODE OF ETHICS FOR THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND
PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICERS OF THE INTEGRITY VIKING FAMILY OF FUNDS
This Code of Ethics (the “Code”) for Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officers has been adopted by each of the investment companies within the Integrity Viking Funds complex (collectively, “Funds”) to effectuate compliance with Section 406 under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules adopted to implement Section 406.
This Code applies to each Fund’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller or persons deemed to be performing similar critical financial and accounting functions (the “Covered Officers”).
Purpose of the Code
This Code sets forth standards and procedures that are reasonably designed to promote:
|
|
|
|
|
Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; |
|
|
|
|
|
Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a registrant files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in other public communications made by the Funds; |
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
|
The prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Accountability for adherence to the Code. |
In general, the principles that govern honest and ethical conduct, including the avoidance of conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, reflect, at the minimum: (1) the duty in performing any responsibilities as a Covered Officer, to place the interests of the Funds ahead of personal interests; (2) the fundamental standard that Covered Officers should not take inappropriate advantage of their positions; (3) the duty to assure that the Fund’s financial reports to its shareholders are prepared honestly and accurately in accordance with applicable rules and regulations; and (4) the duties performed by the Covered Officer on behalf of the Funds are conducted in an honest and ethical manner.
Each Covered Officer should adhere to a high standard of business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual and apparent conflicts of interest.
Ethical Handling of Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest
A “conflict of interest” occurs when a Covered Officer’s private interest interferes with the interests of the Funds. Certain conflicts of interest arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Funds and already are subject to the conflict of interest provisions in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Investment Advisers Act”). This Code does not, and is not intended to, repeat or replace existing programs and procedures, and such conflicts fall outside of the parameters of this Code.
Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts arise from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between each Fund and the investment adviser of which the Covered Officers are also officers and/or employees. As a result, this Code recognizes that the Covered Officers will, in the normal course of their duties, be involved in establishing procedures and implementing decisions that will have different effects on the adviser and the Funds. The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationship between the Funds and the adviser and is consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Funds. If such duties are performed in conformity with the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, such activities will be deemed to have been handled ethically. In addition, it is recognized by the Funds’ Boards of Directors/Trustees (“Boards”) that the Covered Officers may also be officers or employees of one or more other investment companies covered by this or other codes.
Prohibited Activities
Other conflicts of interest are covered by the Code, even if such conflicts of interest are not subject to provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act. The following list provides examples of conflicts of interest under the Code, but keep in mind that these examples are not exhaustive. The foremost principle is that the personal interest of a Covered Officer should not be placed before the interest of the Funds or their shareholders.
Each Covered Officer must:
|
|
|
|
|
Not use his personal influence or personal relationships improperly to influence investment decisions or financial reporting by the Funds whereby the Covered Officer would benefit personally to the detriment of the Funds or their shareholders; |
|
|
|
|
|
Not cause the Funds to take action, or fail to take action, for the individual personal benefit of the Covered Officer rather than the benefit the Funds; |
|
|
|
|
|
Not use material non-public knowledge of portfolio transactions made or contemplated for the Funds to trade personally or cause others to trade personally in contemplation of the market effect of such transactions; |
|
|
|
|
|
Not intentionally cause a Fund to fail to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations, including failure to comply with the requirement of full, fair, accurate, understandable and timely disclosure in reports and documents that a Fund files with, or submits to, the SEC and in public communications made by the Funds; |
|
|
|
|
|
Not fail to acknowledge or certify compliance with this Code on an annual basis. |
Adopted 9/24/03, Reviewed 12/09/05, 12/11/06, 12/10/2010, 09/16/2011, 9/17/2012, 9/20/2013 , 9/22/2014 updated 12/07/07, 12/10/08, 10/14/2009
There are some conflict of interest situations that should always be discussed with the Compliance Department or, under certain circumstances, the Board of Directors/Trustees if material. Examples of these include:
|
|
|
|
|
Service as a director on the board of any public company absent prior authorization by the Board; |
|
|
|
|
|
The receipt of any gifts of more than de minimis value, generally gifts in excess of $100; |
|
|
|
|
|
The receipt of any entertainment from any company with which the Funds have current or prospective business dealings unless such entertainment is business related, reasonable in cost, appropriate as to time and place, and not so frequent as to raise a suggestion of unethical conduct; |
|
|
|
|
|
Any ownership interest in, or employment relationship with, any of the Fund’s service providers, other than its investment adviser, principal underwriter, administrator or any affiliated person thereof; |
|
|
|
|
|
A direct or indirect financial interest in commissions paid by the Funds for effecting portfolio transactions or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest arising from the Covered Officer’s employment, such as compensation or equity ownership. |
Disclosure and Compliance
|
|
|
|
|
Each Covered Officer must familiarize himself with the disclosure requirements generally applicable to the Funds; |
|
|
|
|
|
Each Covered Officer must not knowingly misrepresent, or cause others to misrepresent, facts about the Funds to others, including to the Fund’s directors/trustees and auditors, and to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations; |
|
|
|
|
|
Each Covered Officer should, to the extent appropriate within his area of responsibility, consult with other officers and employees of the Funds and the adviser with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the Funds file with the SEC and in other public communications made by the Funds; and |
|
|
|
|
|
It is the responsibility of each Covered Officer to promote compliance with the standards and restrictions imposed by applicable laws, rules and regulations. |
Reporting and Accountability
Each Covered Officer must:
|
|
|
|
|
Upon adoption of the Code or upon becoming a Covered Officer, affirm in writing to the Board that he has received, read, understands and will adhere to this Code; |
|
|
|
|
|
Annually affirm to the Board that he has received and read the Code and that he understands that he is subject to, and has complied with, the requirements of the Code; |
|
|
|
|
|
Not retaliate against any other Covered Officer or any employee of the Funds or their affiliated persons for reports of potential violations that are made in good faith; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Notify Compliance, who will then notify the Fund’s Audit Committee or the Fund’s legal counsel promptly if he knows of any violation of this Code or if a potential violation exists. Failure to do so is itself a violation of this Code. |
The Fund’s Audit Committee (the “Committee”) or in their discretion, the Fund’s legal counsel, is responsible for applying this Code to specific situations in which questions are presented under it and has the authority to interpret this Code in any particular situation. Any approvals or waivers sought by the Principal Executive Officer will be considered by the Committee. In determining whether to waive any of the provisions of this Code, the Committee will consider whether the proposed waiver (1) is prohibited by the Code; (2) is consistent with honest and ethical conduct; and (3) will result in a conflict of interest between the Covered Officer’s personal and professional obligations to the Funds.
Adopted 9/24/03, Reviewed 12/09/05, 12/11/06, 12/10/2010, 09/16/2011, 9/17/2012, 9/20/2013 , 9/22/2014 updated 12/07/07, 12/10/08, 10/14/2009
Investigating Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest
The Funds will follow these procedures in investigating and enforcing the Code:
|
|
|
|
|
The Committee will take all appropriate action to investigate any potential violations reported to them; |
|
|
|
|
|
If, after such investigation, the Committee believes that no violation has occurred, no further action is necessary; |
|
|
|
|
|
Any matter that the Committee believes is a violation will be reported to the Board; |
|
|
|
|
|
If the Board agrees that a violation has occurred, it will consider appropriate action, which may include review of, and appropriate modifications to, applicable policies and procedures; notification to appropriate personnel of the investment adviser or its board; or a recommendation to dismiss the Covered Officer; |
|
|
|
|
|
The Committee will be responsible for granting waivers, as appropriate; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Any changes to or waivers of this Code will, to the extent required, be disclosed as provided by SEC rules. |
Other Policies and Procedures
This Code shall be the sole code of ethics adopted by the Funds for purposes of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and forms applicable to registered investment companies thereunder. While other policies or procedures of the Funds, the Funds’ adviser, principal underwriter, or other service providers govern the behavior or activities of the Covered Officers who are subject to this Code, they are superseded by this Code to the extent that they overlap or conflict with the provisions of this Code.
Amendments
At least annually, the Board of Directors/Trustees of each Fund will review the Code and determine whether any amendments are necessary or desirable. Any amendments to this Code, other than amendments to Exhibit A, must be approved or ratified by a majority vote of the Board, including a majority of independent directors.
Record Retention and Confidentiality
All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to this Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly to the extent permitted by applicable laws, rules and regulations. Except as otherwise required by law or this Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the appropriate Board and its counsel.
For Internal Use Only
The Code is intended solely for the internal use by the Funds and does not constitute an admission, by or on behalf of any Fund, as to any fact, circumstance, or legal conclusion.
__________________________________
Shannon Radke
President
Date: _____________________
Adopted 9/24/03, Reviewed 12/09/05, 12/11/06, 12/10/2010, 09/16/2011, 9/17/2012, 9/20/2013 , 9/22/2014 updated 12/07/07, 12/10/08, 10/14/2009
EX-99.906 CERT
CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section
906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Name of Registrant: Integrity Managed Portfolios
Date of Form N-CSR: July 29, 2016
The undersigned, the principal executive officer of Integrity Managed Portfolios (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, with respect to the Form N-CSR referred to above, to the best of his knowledge and belief, after reasonable inquiry:
|
|
|
|
1. |
such Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
|
|
2. |
the information contained in such Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification below, as of the 3rd day of October 2016.
/s/ Shannon D. Radke
Shannon D. Radke
President, Integrity Managed Portfolios
The undersigned, the principal financial officer of the Registrant, hereby certifies that, with respect to the Form N-CSR referred to above, to the best of his knowledge and belief, after reasonably inquiry:
|
|
|
|
1. |
such Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|
|
|
|
2. |
the information contained in such Form N-CSR fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certification below, as of the 3rd day of October 2016.
/s/ Adam Forthun
Adam Forthun
Treasurer, Integrity Managed Portfolios
1 |
EX-99 CERT
CERTIFICATION
I, Shannon D. Radke, certify that:
|
|
|
1. |
I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Integrity Managed Portfolios; |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
|
|
|
4. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
|
5. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: October 3, 2016
/s/ Shannon D. Radke
Shannon D. Radke
President
I, Adam Forthun, certify that:
|
|
|
1. |
I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Integrity Managed Portfolios; |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|
|
|
|
4. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and |
|
|
|
5. |
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: October 3, 2016
/s/ Adam Forthun
Adam Forthun
Treasurer