Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Dec. 24, 2021

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and disclosures of contingencies at the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates relate to useful lives of fixed and intangible assets, current expected credit losses/allowances for doubtful accounts and customer returns and sales allowances. Such estimates could also relate to the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, including goodwill and intangible assets, net realizable value of inventory, accrued liabilities, the valuation of stock-based awards, deferred tax valuation allowances, and other reserves. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior-period amounts to conform to current-period reporting classifications.

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant CustomersFinancial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions that management believes to be of a high credit quality. To manage credit risk related to accounts receivables, the Company evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers and maintains allowances, to the extent necessary, for potential credit losses based upon the aging of its accounts receivable balances and known collection issues.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards and Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

The Company qualifies as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 and has elected to “opt in” to the extended transition related to complying with new or revised accounting standards, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public and nonpublic companies, the Company will adopt the new or revised standard at the time nonpublic companies adopt the new or revised standard and will do so until such time that the Company either (i) irrevocably elects to “opt out” of such extended transition period or (ii) no longer qualifies as an emerging growth company. The Company may choose to early adopt any new or revised accounting standards whenever such early adoption is permitted for nonpublic companies.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued its new lease accounting guidance in Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016‑02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”), which is codified as Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842 (“ASC 842”) and replaces ASC Topic 840, Leases (“ASC 840”). ASU 2016-02 and all subsequent amendments amend various aspects of existing guidance for leases and require significant additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about lease arrangements. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize lease assets representing the right to use an underlying asset and lease liabilities representing the obligation to make lease payments over the lease term, measured on a discounted basis, for substantially all leases. ASU 2016-02 retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases using classification criteria that are substantially similar to the previous lease guidance. Although the Company has elected to opt-in to the extended transition dates for new or revised accounting standards to align with nonpublic companies, the Company elected to early adopt ASU 2016-02 effective March 27, 2021. The Company used the optional transition method to the modified retrospective approach, which eliminates the requirement to restate the prior period financial statements. Under this transition provision, the Company has applied ASU 2016-02 to reporting periods beginning on March 27, 2021, while prior periods continue to be reported and disclosed in accordance with the legacy guidance under ASC 840.

A number of practical expedients and policy elections are available under the new guidance to reduce the burden of adoption and ongoing compliance with ASC 842. The Company elected the “package of practical expedients”, which permitted the Company to retain lease classification and initial direct costs for any identified leases that existed prior to adoption of ASC 842. Under this transition guidance, the Company also did not reassess whether any existing contracts at March 27, 2021 are, or contain, leases and carried forward its initial determination under legacy lease guidance. The Company has elected not to adopt the “hindsight” practical expedient and, therefore, will measure the right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability using the remaining portion of the lease term at adoption on March 27, 2021.

The Company made an accounting policy election available under the new lease standard to not recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less. For all other leases, the initial measurement of the lease liability is based on the present value of future lease payments over the lease term at the application date or the commencement date of the lease. Lease payments may include fixed rent escalation clauses or payments that depend on an index or a rate (such as the consumer price index) measured using the index or applicable rate at lease commencement. Subsequent changes in the index or rate and any other variable payments, such as market-rate base rent adjustments, are recognized as variable lease expense in the period incurred. Payments for terminating a lease are included in lease payments

only when it is probable they will be incurred. To determine the present value of lease payments, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate, as the leases generally do not have a readily determinable implicit discount rate. The Company applies judgment in assessing factors such as Company-specific credit risk, lease term, nature and quality of the underlying collateral, currency and economic environment in determining the lease-specific incremental borrowing rate. The carrying value of the ROU assets at the application date equals the lease liability adjusted for any initial direct costs incurred and lease payments made at or before the commencement date and for any lease incentives.

The Company’s leases generally include a non-lease component representing additional services transferred to the Company. The Company has made an accounting policy election to account for lease and non-lease components in its contacts as a single lease component for all asset classes. The non-lease components are usually variable in nature and recorded in variable lease expense in the period incurred.

Adoption of ASC 842 resulted in ROU assets of $18,403 and lease liabilities of $18,759 related to the Company’s operating leases at March 27, 2021. The Company does not have any leases classified as finance leases. The adoption of ASC 842 did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated net income or consolidated cash flows and did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”), which adds an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. The ASU is also intended to reduce complexity by decreasing the number of credit impairment models that entities use to account for debt instruments. The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 effective March 27, 2021 and concluded that the standard update did not have a material impact on either the financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures. There was no impact on beginning balance retained earnings upon adoption of this ASU.

The Company is exposed to credit losses primarily through trade and other financing receivables arising from revenue transactions. The Company uses an aging schedule method to estimate current expected credit losses based on days of delinquency, including information about past events and current economic conditions. The Company’s accounts receivable is separated into two categories using a portfolio methodology to evaluate the allowance under the CECL impairment model based on sales categorization and similar credit quality and worthiness of the customers: original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and distributors. The receivables in each category share similar risk characteristics. The change to the CECL impairment model resulted in an immaterial increase in the provision for expected credit losses compared to the allowance for doubtful accounts under the previous incurred loss method.

The Company increases the allowance for expected credits losses when the Company determines all or a portion of a receivable is uncollectible. The Company recognizes recoveries as a decrease to the allowance for expected credit losses. For the three- and nine-month periods ended December 24, 2021, no material changes in the allowance occurred.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2021-08”), which eliminates the diversity in practice and inconsistency related to the accounting for acquired revenue contracts with customers in a business combination. The amendments in ASU 2021-08 require an acquiring entity to apply ASC Topic 606, Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities in a business combination as if the acquired contracts with customers were originated by the acquiring entity at the acquisition date. An acquirer may assess how the acquiree applied ASC 606 and generally should recognize and measure the acquired contract assets and contract liabilities consistent with the recognition and measurement in the acquiree’s financial statements as prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. If unable to rely on the acquiree’s accounting due to errors, noncompliance with U.S. GAAP, or differences in accounting policies, the acquirer should consider the terms of the acquired contracts, such as timing of payment, identify each performance obligation in the contracts, and allocate the total transaction price to each identified performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis as of contract inception (that is, the date the acquiree entered into the contracts) or contract modification to determine what should be recorded at the acquisition date. The guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that early adopts in an interim period should apply the amendments (1) retrospectively to all business combinations for which the acquisition date occurs on or after the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period of early application and (2) prospectively to all business combinations that occur on or after the date of initial application. The Company is currently in the process of

evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures, which will be dependent on the consummation of any future business combination.

In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt—Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) (“ASU 2021-04”). ASU 2021-04 outlines how an entity should account for modifications made to equity-classified written call options, including stock options and warrants to purchase the entity’s own common stock. The guidance in the ASU requires an entity to treat a modification of an equity-classified written call option that does not cause the option to become liability-classified as an exchange of the original option for a new option. This guidance applies whether the modification is structured as an amendment to the terms and conditions of the equity-classified written call option or as termination of the original option and issuance of a new option. The guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.