United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2007

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to                   

Commission File Number 000-28540

VERSANT CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

California	94-3079392
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6539 Dumbarton Circle, Fremont, California 94555
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(510) 789-1500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of  “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o Yes    x  No

As of June 7, 2007, there were outstanding 3,663,176 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, no par value.

VERSANT CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended April 30, 2007

Table of Contents

Certifications

2

PART I.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	April 30, 2007			October 31, 2006
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	13,960		$	8,231
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $82 and $62 at April 30, 2007 and October 31, 2006, respectively	2,076			2,885
Other current assets	907			782
Total current assets	16,943			11,898
Property and equipment, net	522			385
Goodwill	6,720			6,720
Intangible assets, net	1,038			1,196
Other assets	105			62
Total assets	$	25,328		$	20,261
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	288		$	154
Accrued liabilities	2,258			2,363
Deferred revenues	4,021			3,083
Deferred rent	25			99
Total current liabilities	6,592			5,699
Deferred revenues	717			742
Long-term capital lease obligations	20			28
Total liabilities	7,329			6,469
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, no par value	95,442			95,089
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net	762			521
Accumulated deficit	(78,205		)	(81,818		)
Total stockholders’ equity	17,999			13,792
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	25,328		$	20,261

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	April 30,		April 30,		April 30,		April 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Revenues:
License	$	3,285	$	1,745	$	6,449	$	4,258
Maintenance	1,877		1,457		3,794		3,090
Professional services	28		578		98		1,057
Total revenues	5,190		3,780		10,341		8,405
Cost of revenues:
License	94		58		141		162
Amortization of intangible assets	79		79		158		158
Maintenance	370		345		776		729
Professional services	20		291		60		625
Total cost of revenues	563		773		1,135		1,674
Gross profit	4,627		3,007		9,206		6,731
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	874		765		1,634		1,711
Research and development	821		702		1,713		1,571
General and administrative	1,095		871		2,303		1,924
Restructuring	—		84		—		218
Total operating expenses	2,790		2,422		5,650		5,424
Income from operations	1,837		585		3,556		1,307
Outside shareholders’ income from Variable Interest Entity	—		—		—		138
Interest and other income, net	141		34		243		46
Gain on disposal of Variable Interest Entity	—		131		—		131
Income from continuing operations before taxes	1,978		750		3,799		1,622
Net provision for income taxes	153		99		356		182
Net income from continuing operations	1,825		651		3,443		1,440
Gain from sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—		468		—		468
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	81		35		170		22
Net income	$	1,906	$	1,154	$	3,613	$	1,930
Basic income per share:
Net income from continuing operations	$	0.51	$	0.18	$	0.95	$	0.40
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income tax	$	0.02	$	0.14	$	0.05	$	0.14
Net income per share, basic	$	0.53	$	0.32	$	1.00	$	0.54
Diluted income per share:
Net income from continuing operations	$	0.50	$	0.18	$	0.94	$	0.40
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income tax	$	0.02	$	0.14	$	0.05	$	0.14
Net income per share, diluted	$	0.52	$	0.32	$	0.99	$	0.54
Shares used in per share calculation:
Basic	3,618		3,569		3,612		3,564
Diluted	3,698		3,578		3,677		3,570
Non-cash stock-based compensation included in the above expenses:
Cost of revenues	$	16	$	14	$	29	$	25
Sales and marketing	$	21	$	12	$	40	$	20
Research and development	$	8	$	20	$	19	$	37
General and administrative	$	42	$	18	$	81	$	39

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	April 30,			April 30,
	2007			2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	3,613		$	1,930
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain from sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—			(468		)
Gain on disposal of Variable Interest Entity	—			(131		)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(170		)	(22		)
Depreciation and amortization	144			108
Amortization of intangible assets	158			158
Stock-based compensation	169			121
Write-off of property and equipment	—			25
Non-cash operating expenses related to cancellation of common stock	—			(50		)
Provision (recovery) of bad debt allowance	17			(93		)
Changes in current assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	848			1,248
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(107		)	(256		)
Accounts payable	138			(485		)
Accrued liabilities and other liabilities	(207		)	(829		)
Deferred revenues	816			216
Deferred rent	(74		)	(68		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	5,345			1,404
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of Websphere	—			500
Proceeds from sale of Vanatec	—			6
Purchases of property and equipment	(257		)	(65		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(257		)	441
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net	184			38
Principal payments under capital lease obligations	(8		)	(3		)
Net payments under short-term note and bank loan	—			(39		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	176			(4		)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	295			81
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents from operating, investing and financing activities	5,559			1,922
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations	170			22
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	8,231			3,958
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	13,960		$	5,902

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1.   GENERAL AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of Versant and all entities in which Versant has a controlling voting interest (subsidiaries) required to be consolidated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Intercompany accounts and transactions between consolidated companies have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments, which, in the opinion of the Company, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are normal recurring adjustments. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles related to interim financial statements and the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

The financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared with the presumption that users of the interim financial information have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the Company’s preceding fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with those audited financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, filed on January 29, 2007 (File No. 000-28540). The Company’s operating results for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending October 31, 2007, or for any future periods. Further, the preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts reported therein. A change in facts or circumstances surrounding the estimates could result in a change to the estimates and impact future operating results.

In July 2005, Versant, through its subsidiary Versant GmbH, entered into certain agreements to effect a spin-off of tangible assets, technology rights and contracts related to its Versant Open Access.NET (“VOA.NET”) business to Vanatec GmbH (a then newly formed privately held German based company). As a result, in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46(R), Vanatec’s operating results were included in Versant’s consolidated financial statements for the three-month periods ended July 31, 2005, October 31, 2005 and January 31, 2006 and through March 27, 2006. On March 27, 2006, Versant sold its entire equity interest in Vanatec to a third party investor and entered into a joint ownership agreement with Vanatec with respect to technology it had previously licensed to Vanatec. As a result of this sale of its interest in Vanatec, as of March 27, 2006, Versant was no longer required to consolidate the operating results of Vanatec, and as such, the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of April 30, 2006 and as of and for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 do not include the accounts of Vanatec.

NOTE 2.   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated income statements for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007, related to stock options was $64,000 and $124,000, respectively; and related to the Company’s employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) was $23,000 and $45,000, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated income statements for the three and six months ended April 30, 2006, related to stock options was $58,000 and $108,000, respectively; and related to ESPP was $6,000 and $13,000, respectively.

NOTE 3.   NET INCOME PER SHARE

Basic net income per share excludes the effect of potentially dilutive securities and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share, however, reflects the potential dilution of securities by adding dilutive common stock options and shares subject to repurchase to the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.

6

Additionally, FASB 128, Earnings per Share, requires that employee equity share options, non-vested shares, and similar equity instruments granted to employees be treated as potential common shares in computing diluted earnings per share. Diluted earnings per share is based on the actual number of options or shares granted and not yet forfeited, unless doing so would be anti-dilutive. If equity share options or other equity instruments are outstanding for only part of a period, the shares issuable are weighted to reflect the portion of the period during which the equity instruments are outstanding. The options are included in the diluted earnings per share computation using the treasury stock method and assuming that the proceeds will be used to buy back the Company’s shares. Proceeds equal average unrecognized compensation plus exercise price and hypothetical windfall tax benefits (or a reduction for shortfalls that would be credited to additional paid in capital).

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended April 30,				Six Months Ended April 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Net income from continuing operations	$	1,825	$	651	$	3,443	$	1,440
Gain from sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—		468		—		468
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax	81		35		170		22
Net income	$	1,906	$	1,154	$	3,613	$	1,930
Calculation of basic net loss per share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding	3,618		3,569		3,612		3,564
Net income per share from continuing operations	$	0.51	$	0.18	$	0.95	$	0.40
Earnings per share from discontinued operations, net of income tax, basic	$	0.02	$	0.14	$	0.05	$	0.14
Net income per share, basic	$	0.53	$	0.32	$	1.00	$	0.54
Calculation of diluted net income per share:
Weighted average - common shares outstanding	3,618		3,569		3,612		3,564
Dilutive securities -common stock options and shares subject to repurchase	80		9		65		6
Weighted average - common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive common shares	3,698		3,578		3,677		3,570
Net income per share from continuing operations	$	0.50	$	0.18	$	0.94	$	0.40
Earnings per share from discontinued operations, net of income tax, diluted	$	0.02	$	0.14	$	0.05	$	0.14
Net income per share, diluted	$	0.52	$	0.32	$	0.99	$	0.54
Anti-dilutive common stock options, not included in net income per share calculation	287		263		287		263

NOTE 4.   OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Other comprehensive income presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet consists of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments.

Comprehensive income for the three and six month periods ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006, is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended April 30,				Six Months Ended April 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Net income, as reported	$	1,906	$	1,154	$	3,613	$	1,930
Foreign currency translation adjustment	221		99		241		122
Other comprehensive income	$	2,127	$	1,253	$	3,854	$	2,052

NOTE 5.   SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for the manner in which public companies report information about operating segments in annual and interim financial statements. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method for determining what information to report is based on the way management organizes the operating segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The Company’s chief

7

operating decision-maker is considered to be the Company’s chief executive officer (CEO). The CEO reviews financial information presented on an entity level basis accompanied by non-aggregated information about revenues by product type and certain information about geographic regions for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The entity level financial information is identical to the information presented in the accompanying statements of operations. Therefore, the Company has determined that it operates in a single operating segment, Data Management.

The Company operates in North America, Europe and Asia. In general, revenues are attributed to the country in which the contract was originated.

The following table reflects revenues for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006 by each geographic region (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended April 30,				Six Months Ended April 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Revenues by region:
North America	$	1,995	$	1,110	$	4,426	$	2,445
Europe	2,827		2,566		5,421		5,753
Asia	368		104		494		207
Total	$	5,190	$	3,780	$	10,341	$	8,405

The following table reflects long-lived assets as of April 30, 2007 and October 31, 2006 in each geographic region (in thousands):

	As of April 30,		As of October 31,
	2007		2006
Long-lived assets by region:
North America	$	182	$	161
Europe	302		173
Asia	143		113
Total	$	627	$	447

NOTE 6.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” the Company records an accrual for a contingency when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If a range of liability is probable and estimable and some amount within the range appears to be a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the Company accrues that amount. If a range of liability is probable and estimable and no amount within the range appears to be a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the Company accrues the minimum of such probable range. Often these issues are subject to substantial uncertainties and, therefore, the probability of loss and an estimation of damages are difficult to ascertain. These assessments can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management.

The Company’s software license agreements generally include certain provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if the Company’s software products infringe upon a third party’s intellectual property rights. To date, the Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of any indemnification. As a result of current litigation in which Rockwell Automation, one of Versant’s customers, is seeking indemnification from the Company for alleged infringement of intellectual property rights asserted against it by Systems America, Inc., Versant has recorded an immaterial loss contingency reserve as of January 31, 2007 in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5. The Company is contesting the allegations of infringement of intellectual property rights asserted in this litigation.

NOTE 7.   DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On February 1, 2006 Versant completed the sale of the assets associated with its WebSphere consulting practice to Sima Solutions (“Sima”), a privately held U.S. based company. Versant’s WebSphere consulting practice provided consulting and training

8

services to end-users of IBM’s WebSphere® application server software. As a result of this transaction Versant ceased conducting its WebSphere business. In connection with Versant’s sale of its WebSphere assets, certain employees of Versant, who formerly worked in Versant’s WebSphere Practice, joined Sima.

Based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144 (“SFAS 144”), Impairments of Long-Lived Assets and Discontinued Operations, the WebSphere transaction met the criteria of a long-lived asset (disposal group) held for sale at the end of the first quarter ended January 31, 2006. As a result, Versant has reflected the results of operations of its WebSphere consulting practice for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006 as discontinued operations. Therefore, reported revenues for these periods no longer include any revenues from the WebSphere consulting practice. The results from the discontinued WebSphere operations, however, are reported as net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes.

The sale of Versant’s WebSphere consulting practice assets was consummated pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated February 1, 2006 (the “Sale Agreement”) between Versant and Sima, to which Versant is entitled to receive contingent earn-out payments from Sima related to the WebSphere business for a 24-month period following the closing of the Sale Agreement. For the three and six months ended April 30, 2007, Versant recorded $81,000 and $170,000, respectively, in royalties from Sima pursuant to the Sale Agreement as income from discontinued operations.

NOTE 8.   RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48, which clarifies FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, establishes the criterion that an individual tax position has to meet for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in the Company’s financial statements. On initial application, FIN 48 will be applied to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remains open. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the adoption date will be recognized or continue to be recognized. The cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 will be reported as an adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the period in which it is adopted.

FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and will be adopted by the Company on November 1, 2007. The Company has not yet been able to complete its evaluation of the impact of adopting FIN 48 and as a result, is not yet able to estimate the effect, if any, the adoption of FIN 48 will have on its financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement 157, Fair Value Measurements, (FAS 157). This statement clarifies the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and requires expanded financial statement disclosures about fair value measurements for assets and liabilities. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. This new guidance will become effective for Versant on November 1, 2008 and the Company is currently assessing the impact of FAS 157 on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant and Divisions of Corporation Finance and Investment Management released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108), which provides interpretive guidance on how registrants should quantify financial statement misstatements. Currently, the two methods most commonly used by preparers and auditors to quantify misstatements are the “rollover” method (which focuses primarily on the income statement impact of misstatements) and the “iron curtain” method (which focuses primarily on the balance sheet impact of misstatements). Under SAB 108, registrants will be required to consider both the rollover and iron curtain methods (i.e., a dual approach) when evaluating the materiality of financial statement errors. Registrants will need to revisit their prior materiality assessments and consider them using both the rollover and iron curtain methods.  SAB 108 is effective for annual financial statements in the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. Therefore, SAB 108 will become effective for Versant in the fiscal year ending October 31, 2007. The SAB provides transition accounting and disclosure guidance for situations in which a registrant concludes that a material error(s) existed in prior-period financial statements under the dual approach. Specifically, registrants will be permitted to restate prior period financial statements or recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying SAB 108 through an adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the year of adoption. The Company believes SAB 108 will not have a material impact on its annual financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides a “Fair Value Option” under which a company may irrevocably elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and liabilities. This Fair Value Option will be available on a contract-by-contract basis with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as those changes occur. The effective date for SFAS 159 is the beginning of each reporting entity’s first fiscal year end that begins after November 15, 2007. Therefore, SFAS 159 will

9

become effective for Versant in the fiscal year ending October 31, 2008. SFAS 159 also allows an entity to early adopt the statement as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after the issuance of SFAS 159, provided that the entity also adopts the requirements of SFAS No. 157. The Company is currently evaluating whether adoption of SFAS 159 will have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report and the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2006 filed with the SEC on January 29, 2007. Our historic operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods.

The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. The forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding the Company’s expected future financial performance, assets, liquidity and trends anticipated for the Company’s business. These statements are based on the Company’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about the Company’s business and the Company’s industry, which are based on information that is reasonably available to the Company as of the date of this report. Forward-looking statements many include words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “forecasts,” “guidance,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual operating results, levels of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from any future operating results, levels of activity, performance or achievements that are expressed, forecasted, projected, implied in or anticipated or contemplated by the forward-looking statements.  These known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, those risks, uncertainties and factors discussed elsewhere in this report, in the Company’s other SEC filings and in Part I, Item 1A (“Risk Factors”) and in Part II, Item 7 ( “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”) of the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. Versant undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise or occur after the date of this report.

Background and Overview

We design, develop, market and support high performance object-oriented data management software that forms a critical component of the infrastructure of enterprise computing.  Companies use Versant solutions to solve complex data management and data integration problems. We design, develop, market and support object-oriented database management system products to address such problems. We also provide related product support, training, and consulting services to assist users in developing and deploying software applications based on our products. We operate our business of providing these products and related services within a single operating segment that we refer to as “Data Management”.

Our products are typically used by customers to manage data for business systems and enable these systems to access and integrate data necessary for the customers’ data management applications. Our data management products and services offer customers the ability to manage real-time, XML and other types of hierarchical and navigational data. We believe that by using our data management solutions, customers cut their hardware costs, accelerate and simplify their development efforts, significantly reduce administration costs and deliver products with a significant competitive edge.

Our Data Management business is currently comprised of the following key products:

·Versant Object Database, previously called VDS, a seventh-generation object database management system that is used in high-performance, large-scale, real-time applications. Versant Object Database is designed to support multi-user, commercial applications in distributed computing environments. Versant Object Database enables users to store, manage, and distribute information that often cannot be administered effectively through traditional database technologies.

10

·FastObjects, an object-oriented database management system that can be embedded as a high performance component into customers’ applications and systems.

Our Versant Object Database product offerings are used primarily by larger organizations, such as technology providers, telecommunications carriers, government defense agencies and defense contractors, healthcare companies and companies in the financial services and transportation industries, each of which have significant large-scale data management requirements. Versant JDO, a product that we introduced in fiscal 2004, as part of the technology we acquired in June 2004 from JDO Genie, has now been absorbed and integrated into the Versant product family and is no longer sold as standalone product. With the incorporation of Poet’s FastObjects solution into our product line following our March 2004 merger with Poet, we have expanded the scope of our solutions to also address data management needs of smaller business systems.

Our customers’ data management needs can involve many business functions, ranging from management of the use and sharing of a company’s internal enterprise data to the processing of externally originated information such as customer enrollment, billing and payment transaction data. Our solutions have also been used to solve complex data management issues such as fraud detection, risk analysis and yield management.

In addition to our product offerings, to assist users in developing and deploying applications based on Versant Object Database and FastObjects, we offer a variety of services, including consulting, training and technical support services.

We license our products and sell associated maintenance, training and consulting services to end-users through our direct sales force and through value-added resellers, systems integrators and distributors.

In addition to these products and services, we resell related software developed by third parties. To date, substantially all of our revenues have been derived from the following data management products and related services:

·Sales of licenses for Versant Object Database and FastObjects;

·Maintenance and technical support services for our products;

·Consulting services and training services;

·Nonrecurring engineering fees received in connection with providing services associated with Versant Object Database and FastObjects;

·The resale of licenses, and maintenance, training and consulting services for third-party products that complement Versant Object Database;

·Reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses, which we incurred and are recorded as revenues in our statement of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of our assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and of our revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We base these estimates and judgments on information reasonably available to us, such as our historical experience and trends and industry, economic and seasonal fluctuations, and on our own internal projections that we derive from that information. Although we believe our estimates to be reasonable under the circumstances, there can be no assurances that such estimates will be accurate given that the application of these accounting policies necessarily involves the exercise of subjective judgment and the making of assumptions regarding future uncertainties. We consider “critical” those accounting policies that require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, and that are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. These critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, goodwill and acquired intangible assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, stock-based compensation, and income taxes.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenues in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions, and SOP 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts. Our revenues consist mainly of revenues earned under software license agreements, maintenance support agreements (otherwise known as post-contract customer support or “PCS”), and, to a lesser degree, agreements for consulting and training activities.

11

We use the residual method to recognize revenues when a license agreement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date. If there is an undelivered element under the license arrangement, we defer revenues based on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the fair value of the undelivered element, as determined by the price charged when the element is sold separately. If VSOE of fair value does not exist for all undelivered elements of a transaction, we defer all revenues from that transaction until sufficient evidence exists or all elements have been delivered. Under the residual method, discounts are allocated only to the delivered elements in a multiple element arrangement, with any undelivered elements being deferred based on the vendor-specific objective evidence of the value of such undelivered elements. We typically do not offer discounts on future undeveloped products.

Revenues from software license arrangements, including prepaid license fees, are recognized when all of the following criteria are met:

·Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists.

·Delivery has occurred and there are no future deliverables except PCS.

·The fee is fixed and determinable. If we cannot conclude that a fee is fixed and determinable, then assuming all other criteria have been met, we recognize the revenues, as payments become due in accordance with paragraph 29 of SOP 97-2.

·Collection is probable. Probability of collection is assessed using the following customer information: credit service reports, bank and trade references, public filings, and/or current financial statements. Prior payment experience is reviewed on existing customers. Payment terms in excess of our standard payment terms of 30-90 days net are granted only on an exception basis, typically in situations where customers elect to purchase development and deployment licenses simultaneously for an entire project and are attempting to align their payments with their deployment schedules. Extended payment terms are only granted to customers with a proven ability to pay at the time the order is received, and with prior approval of our senior management. In accordance with paragraph 27 of SOP 97-2, we have an established history of collection, without concessions, on longer-term receivables. We typically do not grant extended payment terms beyond 90 days.

If an acceptance period or other contingency exists, revenues are not recognized until customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance period, or satisfaction of the contingency, as applicable. Our license fees are non-cancelable and non-refundable, and we have not made concessions or granted refunds for any unused amount. Also, our customer agreements for prepaid deployment licenses do not make payment of our license fees contingent upon the actual deployment of the software. Therefore, a customer’s delay or acceleration in its deployment schedule does not impact our revenue recognition in such cases. Revenues from related PCS for all product lines are usually billed in advance of the service being provided and are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term in which the PCS is to be performed, which is generally twelve months. In some cases PCS revenues are paid in arrears of the service being provided and are recognized as revenues at the time the customer provides a report to us for deployments made during a given time period. Training and consulting revenues are recognized when a purchase order is received, the services have been performed and collection is deemed probable. Consulting services are billed on an hourly, daily or monthly rate. Training classes are billed based on group or individual attendance.

We categorize our customers into two broad groups, End-Users and Value Added Resellers (VARs).  End User customers are companies who use our products internally and do not redistribute our product outside of their corporate organizations. VAR customers include traditional Value Added Resellers, Systems Integrators, Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) and other vendors who redistribute our products to their external third party customers, either individually or as part of an integrated product.

We license our data management products through two types of perpetual licenses — development and test licenses and deployment licenses. Development and test licenses are typically sold on a per seat basis and authorize a customer to develop and test an application program that uses our software product. Prior to an End-User customer being able to deploy an application that it has developed under our development license, it must purchase deployment licenses based on the number of computers connected to the server that will run the application using our product. For certain applications, we offer deployment licenses priced on a per user basis. Pricing of Versant Object Database, and FastObjects licenses varies according to several factors, including the number of computer servers on which the application runs and the number of users that are able to access the server

12

at any one time. Customers may elect to simultaneously purchase development and deployment licenses for an entire project. These development and deployment licenses may also provide for prepayment of a nonrefundable amount for future deployment.

VARs and distributors purchase development licenses from us on a per seat basis on terms similar to those of development licenses sold directly to End-Users. VARs are authorized to sublicense deployment copies of our data management products that are either bundled or embedded in the VAR’s applications and sold directly to End-Users. VARs are required to report their distribution of our software and are charged a royalty that is based either on the number of copies of our application software that are distributed or computed as a percentage of the selling price charged by the VARs to their end-user customers. These royalties from VARs may be prepaid in full or paid upon deployment. Provided that all other conditions for revenue recognition have been met, revenues from arrangements with VARs are recognized, (i) as to prepaid license arrangements, when the prepaid licenses are sold to the VARs, and (ii) as to other license arrangements, at the time the VAR provides a royalty report to us for sales made by the VAR during a given period.

Revenues from the resale of third-party products or services are recorded at total contract value with the corresponding cost included in the cost of sales when we act as a principal in these transactions by assuming the risks and rewards of ownership (including the risk of loss for collection, delivery or returns). When we do not assume the risks and rewards of ownership, revenues from the resale of third-party products or services are recorded at contract value net of the cost of sales.

In instances where a customer requests engineering work for porting our products to an unsupported platform or customization of our software for specific functionality, or any other non-routine technical assignment, we recognize revenues in accordance with SOP 81-1 Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 45 (As Amended), Long-Term Construction-Type Contracts and use either time and material percentage of completion or completed contract methods for recognizing revenues. We use the percentage of completion method if we can make reasonable and dependable estimates of labor costs and hours required to complete the work in question. We periodically review these estimates in connection with work performed and rates actually charged and recognize any losses when identified. Progress to completion is determined using the cost-to-cost method, whereby cost incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated cost determines the percentage completed and revenue recognized. When using the percentage of completion method, the following conditions must exist:

·An agreement must include provisions that clearly specify the rights regarding goods or services to be provided and received by both parties, the consideration to be exchanged and the manner and terms of settlement.

·The customer is able to satisfy their obligations under the contract.

·Versant is able to satisfy its obligations under the contract.

The completed contract method is used when reasonable or dependable estimates cannot be made. As a result, in such situations, we defer all revenues until such time that the work is fully completed.

Management makes significant judgments and estimates in connection with the determination of the revenue recognized in each accounting period. If we had made different judgments or utilized different estimates for any period, material differences in the amount and timing of revenue recognized would have resulted.

Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets

We account for purchases of acquired companies in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations and account for the related acquired intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. In accordance with SFAS 141, we allocate the cost of the acquired companies to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired according to their respective fair values as of the date of completion of the acquisition, with the remaining amount being classified as goodwill. Certain intangible assets, such as acquired technology, are amortized to expense over time, while in-process research and development costs (“IPR&D”), if any, are charged to operations expenditures at the time of acquisition.

We test for any goodwill impairment within our single Data Management operating segment. All our goodwill has been aggregated from, and acquired in connection with, the following acquisitions:

·Versant Europe, acquired in 1997;

·Poet Holdings, Inc., acquired in March 2004;

13

·Technology of JDO Genie (PTY) Ltd, acquired in June 2004; and

·FastObjects, Inc., acquired in July 2004.

We test goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS 142, which requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events, as provided in SFAS 142. We use the market approach to assess the fair value of our assets and this value is compared with the carrying value of those assets to test for impairment. The total fair value of our assets is estimated by summing the fair value of our equity less our liabilities. Under this approach, if the estimated fair value of our assets is greater than the carrying value of these assets, then there is no goodwill impairment. If the estimated fair value of our assets is less than the carrying value of these assets, then we allocate the reporting unit’s estimated fair value to its assets and liabilities as though the reporting unit had just been acquired in a business combination. The impairment loss is the amount, if any, by which the implied fair value of goodwill allocable to the reporting unit is less than that reporting unit’s goodwill carrying amount and would be recorded in operating results during the period of such impairment.

As required by SFAS 142, we ceased amortizing goodwill effective November 1, 2002. Prior to November 1, 2002, we amortized goodwill over five years using the straight-line method.

Identifiable intangibles are currently amortized over five years in relation to the JDO Genie (PTY) Ltd acquisition, six years in relation to the FastObjects, Inc. acquisition, and seven years in relation to our acquisition of Poet, using the straight-line method in each of these cases.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding accounts receivable and provide an allowance for a portion of our accounts receivable if collection becomes doubtful. We also make judgments about the creditworthiness of our customers, based on ongoing credit evaluations and the aging profile of customers’ accounts receivable, as well as the current economic trends that might impact the level of credit losses in the future. Historically, our allowance for doubtful accounts has been sufficient to cover our actual credit losses. However, since we cannot predict changes in the financial stability of our customers, we cannot guarantee that our allowance will continue to be sufficient. If actual credit losses exceed the allowance that we have established, it would increase our operating expenses and reduce our reported net income or increase our net loss. We evaluate and revise our bad debt allowance as part of our quarter end process at each subsidiary and corporate level. Our management assigns a risk factor and percentage of risk to each account receivable, the collection of which is considered non-routine. We also assign a general reserve to all our overdue accounts, excluding the non-routine items. Our allowance for doubtful accounts amounted to $82,000, or 4% of gross accounts receivable, and $62,000, or 2% of gross accounts receivable, at April 30, 2007 and October 31, 2006, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

We have exercised significant judgment and estimates to determine the variables used in calculation of the stock-based compensation.

We chose the closed-form model of the Black-Scholes option pricing model to arrive at stock options expense valuation. The Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model assumes that option exercises occur at the end of an option’s contractual term, and that expected volatility, expected dividends, and risk-free interest rates are constant over the option’s term.

The expected life of an employee share option is the period of time that it is expected to be outstanding. We use a historical model to arrive at the expected life of our options, but we also take into consideration other factors that could possibly impact the future expected life of the options. We determined that the estimated expected life of the options granted under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”) during the three months ended April 30, 2007 was 2.3 years. We believe that none of the variables, such as the vesting period, expected volatility, blackout periods and employee demographics, have materially changed. Therefore, we have concluded that the historical expected life represents fairly the expected future life of the options at this time.

The expected life for the options granted to the board members under the Directors Plan, who are not employees of Versant, is 5.75 years. We used the simplified method allowed by SAB 107 to arrive at this calculation. Under the simplified method, the expected term is equal to vesting term plus original contractual term divided by two.

14

We have further estimated that the expected life of rights to purchase shares under our ESPP is six months, which is the duration of each purchase period in our plan.

Volatility is a measure of the amount by which a financial variable, such as share price, has fluctuated (historical volatility) or is expected to fluctuate (expected volatility) during the expected life of the options. The Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model does not incorporate a range of expected volatilities over the option’s expected life. We use the historical volatility over the expected term of the options to estimate the expected volatility. We calculate the standard deviation of price changes for the periods of four years, three years, two years, one and half years, one year and half a year. Then, we calculate historical volatility for the past four, three, two, one and half, one, and half-year periods. We, however, take into account other current information available to determine that the expected volatility, derived based on historical volatility, represents fairly the future volatility of our common stock. At this time, we do not believe that there is any indication that future volatility will differ from historical volatility. We have estimated that our volatility is 84% for options granted during the three months ended April 30, 2007.

We use the U.S. Treasury Strip rates listed on the last Thursday of every month in the Wall Street Journal to compute the risk-free interest rate.

We have not distributed any dividends to our common shareholders and do not expect to do so in the near future.

We estimate forfeiture rates at the time of grant and revise it in subsequent periods if actual forfeiture rates differ from those estimates. We apply the forfeiture rate to the unvested portion of the option valuation and perform a true up for the amount of the valuation to be recorded, as options vest, if the actual forfeiture rate is different from the one applied in prior periods. The current forfeiture rate for the unvested portion of the option valuation recognized for the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007 is at 20% for grants under the Equity Incentive Plan and 15% for grants under the Director Plan. We have assumed that all participants in our ESPP will hold onto their contributions to acquire their shares at the end of the period. Therefore, we have not provided any forfeiture provision for our ESPP for the six month purchase period commencing December 1, 2006.

Income Taxes

We estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate and account for income taxes payable as part of the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. This process involves estimating our actual current tax expense as well as assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation and amortization, for financial and tax reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet to the extent deemed realizable. We then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and the extent we believe that recovery is not likely. We establish a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets to the extent such assets are not deemed to be realizable. If we establish a valuation allowance or increase it in a given period, then we must increase the tax provision in our statement of operations.

Significant management judgment is required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. Due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, we have established full valuation allowances at October 31, 2006 and April 30, 2007 for our deferred tax assets.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage relationship of certain items from our condensed consolidated statement of operations to total revenues:

15

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	April 30,				April 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
Revenues:
License	63	%	46	%	62	%	51	%
Maintenance	36		39		37		37
Professional services	1		15		1		12
Total revenues	100		100		100		100
Cost of revenues:
License	2		1		1		2
Amortization of intangible assets	2		2		2		2
Maintenance	7		9		7		9
Professional services	0		8		1		7
Total cost of revenues	11		20		11		20
Gross profit	89		80		89		80
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	17		21		16		20
Research and development	16		19		17		19
General and administrative	21		23		22		23
Restructuring	0		2		0		3
Total operating expenses	54		65		55		65
Income from operations	35		15		34		15
Outside shareholders’ income from Variable Interest Entity	0		0		0		2
Interest and other income, net	3		1		3		1
Gain on disposal of Variable Interest Entity	0		3		0		2
Income from continuing operations before taxes	38		19		37		20
Net provision for income taxes	3		3		4		2
Net income from continuing operations	35		16		33		18
Gain from sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes	0		12		0		6
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	2		1		2		0
Net income	37	%	29	%	35	%	24	%

Revenues

The following table summarizes license, maintenance and professional services revenues for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	April 30,									April 30,
					Change									Change
	2007		2006		Amount			Percentage		2007		2006		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)									(unaudited)
Revenues:
License revenues	$	3,285	$	1,745	$	1,540		88	%	$	6,449	$	4,258	$	2,191		51	%
Maintenance revenues	1,877		1,457		420			29	%	3,794		3,090		704			23	%
Professional services revenues	28		578		(550		)	-95	%	98		1,057		(959		)	-91	%
Total	$	5,190	$	3,780	$	1,410		37	%	$	10,341	$	8,405	$	1,936		23	%

Total Revenues. Total revenues are comprised of license fees, and revenues from maintenance, consulting, training and other support services. Fluctuations in total revenues are generally attributable to changes in product and customer mix, general trends in information technology spending, as well as to changes in geographic mix and the corresponding impact of changes in foreign exchange rates. Further, product life cycles impact revenues periodically as old contracts end and new products are released. Our revenues as shown in the above table and in the accompanying statements of operations included in this report do not include revenues from our disposed WebSphere consulting practice. Instead, as required by generally accepted accounting principles, our financial statements report former WebSphere activities as “net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes”. See NOTE 7 of our “NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS” in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

16

Our total revenues increased by $1.4 million (or 37%) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 from the corresponding period in fiscal 2006. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in license and maintenance revenues, and included favorable foreign currency fluctuations of $128,000, and was partly offset by decreases in professional services revenues.

Our total revenues increased by $1.9 million (or 23%) for the six months ended April 30, 2007 from the corresponding period in fiscal 2006. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in license and maintenance revenues, and included favorable foreign currency fluctuations of $208,000, and was partly offset by decreases in professional services revenues.

Two customers each accounted for 15% or more of our total revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2007, and one customer accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues for the six months ended April 30, 2007. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues for the three and six months ended April 30, 2006.

The inherently unpredictable business cycle of an enterprise software company makes discernment of continued and meaningful business trends difficult. In terms of license revenues, we are still experiencing lengthy sales cycles and customers’ preference for licensing our software on an “as needed” basis, versus the historical practice of prepaying license fees in advance of usage, a factor adversely affecting our license revenues. This trend is more apparent in the telecommunications and technology industries.

In recent fiscal years our second fiscal quarter is typically a relatively weaker quarter of the fiscal year. However, revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2007 has been strong, with a significant portion of the increase in license revenues for the quarter  resulting from a license transaction with a defense contractor, which we had originally expected to close later in this fiscal year. Based on the first two quarters’ performance in fiscal 2007, Versant has raised its guidance for fiscal 2007. The Company expects total revenue growth for full year fiscal 2007 over fiscal 2006 of approximately 10%, which the Company anticipates will be driven primarily by estimated license revenue growth of approximately 25% in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006, offset by a decrease in professional services revenues in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006. .

Revenues by Category.  The following table summarizes our revenues by category for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended													Six Months Ended
	April 30,													April 30,
			Percentage				Percentage		Changes							Percentage				Percentage		Changes
	2007		of revenues		2006		of revenues		Amount			Percentage		2007		of revenues		2006		of revenues		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)													(unaudited)
Revenues by category:
License	$	3,285	63	%	$	1,745	46	%	$	1,540		88	%	$	6,449	62	%	$	4,258	51	%	$	2,191		51	%
Maintenance	1,877		36	%	1,457		39	%	420			29	%	3,794		37	%	3,090		36	%	704			23	%
Professional service	28		1	%	578		15	%	(550		)	-95	%	98		1	%	1,057		13	%	(959		)	-91	%
Total	$	5,190	100	%	$	3,780	100	%	$	1,410		37	%	$	10,341	100	%	$	8,405	100	%	$	1,936		23	%

License.  License revenues were $3.3 million for the three months ended April 30, 2007, an increase of $1.5 million (or 88%) from $1.8 million reported for the comparable period in fiscal 2006.  The higher license revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2007 were due in part to a significant license transaction with a U.S. defense contractor for approximately $788,000, and a license agreement with a European company for approximately $591,000 and royalties of $226,000 in arrears from an existing customer.

License revenues were $6.4 million for the six months ended April 30, 2007, an increase of $2.2 million (or 51%) from $4.2 million reported for the comparable period in fiscal 2006.  The higher license revenues for the six months ended April 30, 2007 were due in part to two significant license agreements with two U.S. customers for approximately $788,000 and $ 479,000, as well as two additional license agreements with two European customers for approximately $591,000 and $270,000 and royalties of $226,000 in arrears from an existing customer.

Maintenance.  Maintenance revenues were $1.9 million for the three months ended April 30, 2007, an increase of $420,000 (or 29%) from $1.5 million reported for the comparable period in fiscal 2006. The higher maintenance revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2007 were mainly due to maintenance revenues related to three new maintenance agreements with existing European based customers for approximately $191,000 and several new maintenance agreements with several U.S. based customers for approximately $218,000.

17

Maintenance revenues were $3.8 million for the six months ended April 30, 2007, an increase of $704,000 (or 23%) from $3.1 million reported for the comparable period in fiscal 2006. The higher maintenance revenues for the six months ended April 30, 2007 were mainly due to revenues related to three new maintenance agreements with existing European based customers as mentioned above for approximately $358,000, and several new maintenance agreements with several U.S. based customers for approximately $247,000, and back maintenance revenues related to one U.S. customer for approximately $99,000.

Maintenance revenues have increased for both the three and six months ended April 30, 2007, due primarily to license revenue growth from the comparable periods in fiscal 2006, and to a lesser extent, due to the sales of higher priced premium support and maintenance for software applications using older versions of our software.

Professional Services.  Professional services revenues were $28,000 for the three months ended April 30, 2007, a decline of $550,000 (or 95%) from $578,000 reported for the comparable period in fiscal 2006. This decline compared to the corresponding period in fiscal 2006 was mainly due to the fact that in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we recognized $432,000 in revenues from two significant percentage-of-completion consulting projects with two European customers but had no such corresponding revenue transactions in the second quarter of fiscal 2007.

Professional services revenues were $98,000 for the six months ended April 30, 2007, a decline of $959,000 (or 91%) from $1.1 million reported for the comparable period in fiscal 2006. This decline compared to the corresponding period in fiscal 2006 was mainly due to the fact that in the first six months of fiscal 2006, we recognized $891,000 in revenues from two significant percentage-of-completion consulting projects with two European customers but had no such corresponding revenue transactions of this magnitude in the first six months of fiscal 2007.

We expect professional services revenues for the final two quarters of fiscal 2007 to be significantly lower than our professional services revenues for the final two quarters of fiscal 2006 for the reason that, in fiscal 2006, we were engaged in two  percentage-of-completion consulting projects with two European customers that generated significant professional services revenues, whereas we do not expect to be engaged in comparable consulting projects during the remainder of fiscal 2007.

International Revenues. The following table summarizes our revenues by geographic area for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended												Six Months Ended
	April 30,												April 30,
			Percentage				Percentage		Change						Percentage				Percentage		Change
	2007		of revenues		2006		of revenues		Amount		Percentage		2007		of revenues		2006		of revenues		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)												(unaudited)
Revenues by geographic area:
North America	$	1,995	38	%	$	1,110	29	%	$	885	80	%	$	4,426	43	%	$	2,445	29	%	$	1,981		81	%
Europe	2,827		55	%	2,566		68	%	261		10	%	5,421		52	%	5,753		69	%	(332		)	-6	%
Asia	368		7	%	104		3	%	264		254	%	494		5	%	207		2	%	287			139	%
Total	$	5,190	100	%	$	3,780	100	%	$	1,410	37	%	$	10,341	100	%	$	8,405	100	%	$	1,936		23	%

International revenues represented approximately 62% of our total revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2007, as compared to 71% for the comparable period in 2006.

International revenues represented approximately 57% of our total revenues for the six months ended April 30, 2007, as compared to 71% for the comparable period in 2006.

For the three months ended April 30, 2007, we experienced a higher proportion of revenues in North America than in recent quarters due to the closing of a significant license transaction for approximately $788,000 with a North American customer. The decrease in revenues for European operations was due primarily to two significant percentage-of-completion consulting projects for the three months ended April 30, 2006 not repeated in the second quarter of fiscal 2007, and was partially offset by an increase in license revenues from European operations as a result of a significant license agreement with a European customer during the three months ended April 30, 2007. We also experienced an increase in revenues from our Asia Pacific region during the three months ended April 30, 2007, primarily due to royalties of $226,000 in arrears from an existing Asian customer.

For the six months ended April 30, 2007, we experienced a higher proportion of revenues in North America than in recent quarters due to the closing of several mid-size license and maintenance transactions, including one significant license transaction with a North American customer. The decrease in revenues for European operations was due primarily to two significant percentage-of-completion consulting projects for the six months ended April 30, 2006 not repeated in the comparable period of

18

fiscal 2007. We also experienced an increase in revenues from our Asia Pacific region during the six months ended April 30, 2007, primarily due to royalties of $226,000 in arrears from an existing Asian customer.

In general, the higher percentage of international revenues for both periods is mainly due to stronger demand for our products in Europe and discontinuation of our U.S. WebSphere consulting practice.

Cost of Revenues

The following table summarizes total cost of revenues for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	April 30,				Change					April 30,				Change
	2007		2006		Amount			Percentage		2007		2006		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)									(unaudited)
Cost of revenues:
Cost of license	$	94	$	58	$	36		62	%	$	141	$	162	$	(21	)	-13	%
Amortization of intangible assets	79		79		—			0	%	158		158		—			0	%
Cost of maintenance	370		345		25			7	%	776		729		47			6	%
Cost of professional services	20		291		(271		)	-93	%	60		625		(565		)	-90	%
Total	$	563	$	773	$	(210	)	-27	%	$	1,135	$	1,674	$	(539	)	-32	%

Total Cost of Revenues.  Total cost of revenues was $563,000 for the three months ended April 30, 2007, a decline of $210,000 (or 27%) from total cost of revenues of $773,000 reported for the comparable period in 2006. This decline resulted primarily from a decrease in cost of professional services and included unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations of approximately $43,000.

Total cost of revenues was $1.1 million for the six months ended April 30, 2007, a decline of $539,000 (or 32%) from total cost of revenues of $1.7 million reported for the comparable period in 2006. This decline resulted primarily from a decrease in cost of professional services and included unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations of approximately $70,000.

License. Cost of license revenues consists primarily of royalties and cost of third party products (which we resell to our customers), product media and packaging costs.

Cost of license revenues was $94,000 (or 3% of license revenues) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 as compared to $58,000 (or 3% of license revenues) for the corresponding period in 2006. The increase of $36,000 (or 62%) in absolute dollars for the three months ended April 30, 2007 from the comparable period in fiscal 2006 was primarily due to an increase in cost of third party products of $31,000.

Cost of license revenues was $141,000 (or 2% of license revenues) for the six months ended April 30, 2007 as compared to $162,000 (or 4% of license revenues) for the corresponding period in 2006. The decrease of $21,000 (or 13%) in absolute dollars for the six months ended April 30, 2007 from the comparable period in fiscal 2006 was primarily due to reduction of shipping and overhead costs of $21,000.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets consists of the amortization of intangible assets from our fiscal 2004 acquisitions of Poet Holdings, Inc., FastObjects, Inc. and JDO Genie technology. Amortization of intangible assets was $79,000 and $158,000, respectively for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006. We expect to incur approximately $79,000 per quarter for amortization of intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal 2007.

Maintenance. Cost of maintenance revenues consists primarily of customer support personnel and related expenses, including payroll, employee benefits and allocated overhead.

Cost of maintenance revenues was $370,000 (or 20% of maintenance revenues) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 compared to $345,000 (or 24% of maintenance revenues) for the corresponding period in fiscal 2006, a modest increase of $25,000 (or 7%) in absolute dollars for the three months ended April 30, 2007 over the comparable period in fiscal 2006.

19

Cost of maintenance revenues was $776,000 (or 20% of maintenance revenues) for the six months ended April 30, 2007 compared to $729,000 (or 24% of maintenance revenues) for the corresponding period in fiscal 2006, a modest increase of $47,000 (or 6%) in absolute dollars for the six months ended April 30, 2007 over the comparable period in fiscal 2006.

Cost of maintenance revenues as a percentage of maintenance revenues decreased for both the three and six month periods ended April 30, 2007 from the corresponding periods in fiscal 2006. This decrease was primarily due to the fact that we have been able to provide increased maintenance and support services thus far in fiscal 2007 with approximately the same number of personnel as we used to provide such services in fiscal 2006.

Professional Services. Cost of professional services consists of salaries, bonuses, third party consulting fees and other costs associated with supporting our professional services organization.

Cost of professional services revenues was $20,000 (or 71% of professional services revenues) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 as compared to $291,000 (or 50% of professional services revenues) for the corresponding period in 2006. The decline in absolute dollars of $271,000 (or 93%) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 from the comparable period in fiscal 2006 was primarily due to the reallocation of headcounts of the European consulting team to research and development as a result of the completion of two major percentage-of-completion consulting projects with two European customers in fiscal 2006.

Cost of professional services revenues was $60,000 (or 61% of professional services revenues) for the six months ended April 30, 2007 as compared to $625,000 (or 59% of professional services revenues) for the corresponding period in 2006. The decline in absolute dollars of $565,000 (or 90%) for the six months ended April 30, 2007 over the comparable period in fiscal 2006 was primarily due to the reallocation of headcounts of the European consulting team to research and development as a result of the completion of two major percentage-of-completion consulting projects with two European customers in fiscal 2006.

Operating Expenses

The following table summarizes the operating expenses for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	April 30,				Change					April 30,				Change
	2007		2006		Amount			Percentage		2007		2006		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)									(unaudited)
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	$	874	$	765	$	109		14	%	$	1,634	$	1,711	$	(77	)	-5	%
Research and development	821		702		119			17	%	1,713		1,571		142			9	%
General and administrative	1,095		871		224			26	%	2,303		1,924		379			20	%
Restructuring charges	—		84		(84		)	-100	%	—		218		(218		)	-100	%
Total	$	2,790	$	2,422	$	368		15	%	$	5,650	$	5,424	$	226		4	%

Total Operating Expenses.  Total operating expenses were $2.8 million for the three months ended April 30, 2007, an increase of $368,000 (or 15%) from $2.4 million reported for the comparable period in 2006. This increase resulted primarily from increases in our general and administrative, sales and marketing, and research and development expenses for the three months ended April 30, 2007, and included an unfavorable foreign currency exchange fluctuation of $53,000.

Total operating expenses were $5.7 million for the six months ended April 30, 2007, an increase of $226,000 (or 4%) from $5.4 million reported for the comparable period in 2006. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in our general and administrative and research and development expenses, and were partially offset by reductions in our sales and marketing expenses and the absence of restructuring charges during the six months ended April 30, 2007, and included an unfavorable foreign currency exchange fluctuation of $72,000.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel and personnel related expenses, commissions earned by sales personnel, trade shows, travel and other marketing communication costs, such as advertising and other marketing programs.

Sales and marketing expenses were $874,000 (or 17% of revenues) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 and $765,000 (or 21% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal 2006. The $109,000 (or 14%) increase in absolute dollars for the three months ended April 30, 2007 was partly due to an approximate $93,000 increase in marketing expenses related to advertising campaigns and trade shows in our European operations, and an approximate $90,000 increase in sales commissions and bonuses as

20

a result of higher revenues than the comparable period in fiscal 2006 in both our European and U.S. operations. The increase was partially offset by one headcount reduction in our U.S. operations (resulting in a reduction of salary, commissions, employee severance and other payroll related expenses totaling $52,000).

Sales and marketing expenses were $1.6 million (or 16% of revenues) for the six months ended April 30, 2007 and $1.7 million (or 20% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal 2006. The $77,000 (or 5%) decline in absolute dollars for the six months ended April 30, 2007 was partly due to one headcount reduction in our U.S. operations (resulting in a reduction of salary, commissions, employee severance and other payroll related expenses totaling $89,000). The decrease was partially offset by an approximate $43,000 increase in marketing expenses due to advertising campaigns and trade shows.

We expect our quarterly sales and marketing expenses to be relatively consistent for the remainder of fiscal 2007, and to continue to represent a considerable percentage of our total operating expenditures in the future.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel and related expenses, including payroll and employee benefits, facility expenses and costs to engage software development contractors.

Research and development expenses were $821,000 (or 16% of revenues) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 and $702,000 (or 19% of revenues) for the comparable period in 2006. The $119,000 (or 17%) increase in absolute dollars for the three months ended April 30, 2007 was mainly due to an increase of seven headcounts in our European operations, resulting in an increase of approximately $332,000 from the comparable period for 2006, and an increase in building rent expenses in our Indian development center for approximately $40,000 from the comparable period for 2006. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in research and development expenses as a result of headcount reductions of four personnel in our U.S. operations, resulting in a reduction of salary and payroll related expenses of approximately $255,000.

Research and development expenses were $1.7 million (or 17% of revenues) for the six months ended April 30, 2007 and $1.6 million (or 19% of revenues) for the comparable period in 2006. The $142,000 (or 9%) increase in absolute dollars for the six months ended April 30, 2007 was mainly due to an increase of seven headcounts in our European operations, resulting in an increase of approximately $470,000 from the comparable period for 2006, and an increase in building rent expenses in our Indian development center for approximately $40,000 from the comparable period for 2006. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in research and development expenses as a result of headcount reductions of four personnel in our U.S. operations, resulting in a reduction of salary and payroll related expenses of approximately $368,000.

We anticipate that we will continue to invest significant resources in research and development activities to develop new products, advance the technology of our existing products and develop new business opportunities. We expect research and development expenditures to generally remain at the current levels for the remainder of fiscal 2007.

General and Administrative.  General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related expenses and general operating expenses.

General and administrative expenses were $1.1 million (or 21% of revenues) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 and $871,000 (or 23% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal 2006. The $224,000 (or 26%) increase in absolute dollars for the three months ended April 30, 2007 was primarily due to an approximate $114,000 increase in legal fees and costs associated with a pending litigation, an approximate $99,000 increase in bonuses as a result of higher net income for the Company, and an approximate $63,000 increase in repairs as a result of actual and estimated repairs to our Fremont building site as well as an overall increase in facility expenses. These increases were offset by an approximate $83,000 decrease in salaries and severance expenses related to one headcount reduction in our U.S. operations.

General and administrative expenses were $2.3 million (or 22% of revenues) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 and $1.9 million (or 23% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal 2006. The $379,000 (or 20%) increase in absolute dollars for the six months ended April 30, 2007 was primarily due to an approximate $228,000 increase in legal fees and costs associated with a pending litigation, an approximate $206,000 increase in bonuses as a result of higher net income for the Company, and an approximate $99,000 increase in repairs as a result of actual and estimated repairs to our Fremont building site as well as overall increase in facility expenses. These increases were offset by an approximate $147,000 decrease in salaries and severance expenses related to one headcount reduction in our U.S. operations.

21

During the remainder of fiscal year 2007 we expect our general and administrative expenses to be at levels generally consistent with the levels experienced during the first two quarters of the fiscal year. We anticipate continuing to incur legal and related costs associated with the pending litigation against the Company, and additionally, costs associated with implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Outside Shareholders’Income from Variable Interest Entity

During the three months ended July 31, 2005, as part of our restructuring plan, we spun-off the assets of our VOA.Net product to Vanatec, and we committed to the capital contribution to Vanatec of an additional 212,500 euros (or $260,000), which we fully contributed on November 3, 2005. We determined that equity at risk in Vanatec was not sufficient to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; therefore, we considered Vanatec a variable interest entity in accordance with FIN 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (As Amended).

Vanatec’s results were included in our consolidated financial statements for the three month periods ended July 31, 2005, October 31, 2005 and January 31, 2006 and through March 27, 2006. During the three months ended January 31, 2006, we absorbed our share of Vanatec’s losses up to the point that it exceeded variable interest liability; and subsequent to that we absorbed 100% of the losses that Vanatec had incurred for an additional amount of $35,000 for the three months ended January 31, 2006. In addition, we continued to absorb 100% of Vanatec’s losses for an additional amount of $70,000 for the period between February 1, 2006 and March 27, 2006, until we determined that we were no longer required to consolidate Vanatec’s operating results, as described below.

On March 27, 2006, we sold our 19.6% interest in Vanatec to a third party investor for 4,900 euros and entered into a joint ownership agreement with Vanatec with respect to certain technology we had previously licensed to Vanatec. According to this agreement, Vanatec is obligated to pay Versant a running royalty interest at a rate of six percent of its net proceeds, but no less than 30 euros per copy from licenses it grants of the co-owned technology, for a period of five years following the effective date of this agreement. Further, at any time during the royalty period, Vanatec has the right to exercise a buyout for its royalty obligations by making a one-time payment to Versant of 450,000 euros. As a result of Versant’s sale of its interest in Vanatec and this agreement, Versant determined that it was no longer the primary beneficiary of Vanatec as defined by FIN 46 (R), and thus, was no longer required to consolidate Vanatec’s operating results after March 27, 2006. Therefore, we recorded a gain of $131,000 related to the deconsolidation of Vanatec during the three months ended April 30, 2006. This amount is comprised of the reversal of the excess losses that we had absorbed previously for $105,000, and the payment that we received from a third party investor in lieu of our interest in Vanatec for $6,000, transfer of property and equipment for $17,000; other comprehensive income for $6,000; and offset by foreign currency losses of $3,000. Consequently, the results of Vanatec are not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007.

Interest and Other Income, Net

Interest and other income, net consists of interest income net of interest expense, miscellaneous refunds and foreign exchange rate gains and losses.

The following table summarizes interest and other income, net for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
	April 30,					Change					April 30,						Change
	2007			2006		Amount			Percentage		2007			2006			Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)										(unaudited)
Interest income	$	116		$	18	$	98		544	%	$	212		$	47		$	165		351	%
Interest expense	(3		)	1		(4		)	400	%	(4		)	(2		)	(2		)	100	%
Other income	78			—		78			100	%	85			—			85			100	%
Foreign exchange gain (loss)	(50		)	15		(65		)	-433	%	(50		)	1			(51		)	-5100	%
Interest and other income, net	$	141		$	34	$	107		315	%	$	243		$	46		$	197		428	%

Interest and other income, net was $141,000 (or 3% of total revenues) for the three months ended April 30, 2007 and was $34,000 (or 1% of total revenues) for the comparable period in 2006. The increase in absolute dollars of $107,000 was largely due to an increase in interest income from both our European and U.S. operations as a result of higher cash balances as well as higher

22

interest rates, and an increase in other income associated with the sale of excess furniture related to the pending relocation of our U.S. headquarters, and were partially offset by foreign exchange rate fluctuations.

Interest and other income, net was $243,000 (or 3% of total revenues) for the six months ended April 30, 2007 and was $46,000 (or 1% of total revenues) for the comparable period in 2006. The increase in absolute dollars of $197,000 was largely due to an increase in interest income from both our European and U.S. operations as a result of higher cash balances as well as higher interest rates, and an increase in other income associated with the sale of excess furniture related to the pending relocation of our U.S. headquarters and foreign exchange rate fluctuations.

Provision for Income Taxes

The following table reflects the Company’s provision for income taxes for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	April 30,				Change					April 30,				Change
	2007		2006		Amount			Percentage		2007		2006		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)									(unaudited)
Foreign withholding taxes	$	27	$	—	$	27		100	%	$	44	$	—	$	44		100	%
Provision for income taxes Germany & UK	122		81		41			51	%	287		151		136			90	%
US state and franchise taxes	4		18		(14		)	-78	%	25		31		(6		)	-19	%
Total	$	153	$	99	$	54		55	%	$	356	$	182	$	174		96	%

Although we have not exhausted our net operating tax loss carry forwards in Germany, the German tax code provides for certain annual statutory limitations related to the use of tax loss carry forward amounts. As such, we accrued income taxes for our European operations of approximately $122,000 and $287,000, respectively, for the three and six months ended April 30, 2007. The Company’s tax provision is based upon our projected fiscal 2007 effective tax rates.

We incurred foreign withholding tax and state franchise tax of approximately $31,000 and $18,000 for the three months ended April 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and foreign withholding tax and state franchise tax of approximately $69,000 and $31,000 for the six months ended April 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which we have included in our income tax provision.

We record a valuation allowance to reduce our tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. We have recorded a valuation allowance for all of our deferred tax assets as of April 30, 2007, except to the extent of deferred tax liabilities, as we are presently unable to conclude that it is more likely than not that the existing net deferred tax assets will be realized.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We funded our business from cash generated by our operations during the six months ended April 30, 2007. As of April 30, 2007, we had a cash and cash equivalents balance of approximately $14.0 million, an increase of $5.8 million over the $8.2 million of cash and cash equivalents we held at October 31, 2006.

As of April 30, 2007, $9.8 million of our $14.0 million in cash and cash equivalents at that date was held in foreign financial institutions, of which $7.2 million was held in foreign currencies.

The following table summarizes our cash balances held in foreign currencies and their equivalent U.S. dollar amounts for the periods indicated (in thousands):

23

	As of April 30, 2007					As of October 31, 2006
	Local Currency			U.S. Dollar		Local Currency			U.S. Dollar
	(unaudited)
Cash in foreign currency:
Euros	€	5,086		$	6,941	€	2,907		$	3,699
British Pound	£	101		202		£	106		200
India Rupee	Rs.		901	22		Rs.		1,137	25
Total				$	7,165				$	3,924

We transact business in various foreign currencies and, accordingly, we are subject to exposure from adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates.  To date, the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our net operating results has not been significant. Operating expenses incurred by our foreign subsidiaries are denominated primarily in local currencies. We currently do not use financial instruments to hedge these operating expenses. We intend to assess the need to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an ongoing basis during fiscal 2007.

Our exposure to foreign exchange risk is related to the magnitude of foreign net profits and losses denominated in euros and Pound Sterling, as well as our net position of monetary assets and monetary liabilities in those foreign currencies. These exposures have the potential to produce either gains or losses within our consolidated results. Our European operations, however, in some instances act as a natural hedge since both operating expenses as well as revenues are denominated in local currencies. In these instances, although an unfavorable change in the exchange rate of euros or Pound Sterling against the U.S. dollar will result in lower revenues when translated into U.S. dollars, the operating expenditures will be lower as well. Additionally, since most of our cash resides outside the United States, we have maintained approximately 27% of our cash balance in Europe in the form of U.S. dollars to reduce the impact of any foreign currency fluctuations.

In relation to our cash balances held overseas, there were no European Union foreign exchange restrictions on repatriating our overseas-held cash to the United States.  However, we may be subject to income tax withholding in the source countries and to U.S. federal and state income taxes if the cash payment or transfer from our subsidiaries to the U.S. parent were to be classified as a dividend.  Other payments made by our European overseas subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business (e.g. payment of royalties or interest from the subsidiaries to the U.S. parent) were generally not subject to income tax withholding due to tax treaties.

Our cash equivalents primarily consist of money market accounts; accordingly, our interest rate risk is not considered significant.

We believe that, with our current cost structure, we can reasonably expect to operate at a positive cash flow level for the remainder of fiscal 2007.

Cash Flow provided by Operating Activities

The following table aggregates certain line items from the cash flow statement to present the key items affecting our operating activities for the periods indicated (in thousands):

24

	Six Months Ended
	April 30,
	2007			2006
	(unaudited)
Net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income	$	3,613		$	1,930
Gains from the disposal of assets	—			(599		)
Net income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(170		)	(22		)
Non-cash adjustments	488			269
Accounts receivable	848			1,248
Prepaid expense and other assets	(107		)	(256		)
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities	(143		)	(1,382		)
Deferred revenues	816			216
Total	$	5,345		$	1,404

The main source of our operating cash flows is cash collections from customers who have purchased our products and services. Our primary uses of cash in operating activities are for personnel related expenditures and facilities costs.

We generated $5.3 million of cash flows from operations during the six months ended April 30, 2007. This was primarily derived from $3.6 million in net income, an increase of $816,000 in deferred revenues, and a decrease of $848,000 in trade accounts receivable, and was partially offset by an increase of $107,000 in prepaid expense and other assets and $143,000 cash used towards a reduction in accounts payables, accrued liabilities and other liabilities.

Non-cash adjustments were $488,000 for the six months ended April 30, 2007 compared to $269,000 for the corresponding period in 2006. Non-cash adjustments may increase or decrease in the future and, as a result, positively or negatively impact our future operating results, but they will not have a direct impact on our cash flows.

The timing of payments to our vendors for accounts payable and collections from our customers for accounts receivable will impact our cash flows from operating activities. We typically pay our vendors and service providers in accordance with their invoice terms and conditions. Our standard payment terms for our invoices are usually between 30 and 60 days net.

We measure the effectiveness of our collection efforts by an analysis of our accounts receivable and our days sales outstanding (DSO). We calculate DSO by taking the ending accounts receivable balances (net of bad debt allowance) divided by the average daily sales amount. Average daily sales amount is calculated by dividing the total quarterly revenue recognized net of changes in deferred revenues by 91.25 days. Collection of accounts receivable and related DSO could fluctuate in the future periods, due to timing and amount of our revenues and the effectiveness of our collection efforts. Our DSOs were 36 days and 38 days for the three months ended April 30, 2007 and April 30, 2006, respectively.

Our working capital was $10.4 million as of April 30, 2007 compared to $6.2 million as of October 31, 2006.

Cash Flow used in Investing Activities

The primary use of our cash in investing activities is typically for the acquisition of property and equipment.

For the six months ended April 30, 2007, $257,000 of cash was used in investing activities and was comprised entirely of purchases of property and equipment.

We anticipate an increase in purchases of property and equipment in the remainder of fiscal 2007, including costs related to the replacement of older server equipment and other computer related equipment in both Germany and the U.S., and capital expenditures related to new corporate headquarters in the U.S., as the current building lease expires on June 30, 2007.

25

Cash Flow provided by Financing Activities

The primary source of cash from financing activities is proceeds from sale of common stock under our Equity Incentive Plan, Directors Stock Option Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

For the six months ended April 30, 2007, $176,000 in cash was provided by financing activities comprised of the following:

·Cash inflows of $184,000 due to proceeds from the sale of common stock under our equity incentive and employee stock purchase plans, and

·Principal payments of $8,000 under capital lease obligations.

Our future liquidity and capital resources could be impacted by the exercise of outstanding common stock options and the cash proceeds we receive upon exercise of these securities. Further, as of June 7, 2007 we had approximately 281,923 shares available to issue under our current equity incentive and director plans. The timing of the issuance, the duration of their vesting provision and the grant price will all impact the timing of any proceeds. Accordingly, we cannot estimate the amount of such proceeds at this time.

Commitments and Contingencies

Our principal commitments as of April 30, 2007 consist of obligations under operating leases for facilities and equipment commitments.

Our annual minimum commitments as of April 30, 2007 under non-cancelable operating leases, not recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 30, 2007, are as follows (in thousands):

	Rental		Equipment
	Leases		Leases		Total
Six months ending October 31, 2007	$	424	$	24	$	448
Fiscal year ending October 31,
2008	411		43		454
2009	340		34		374
2010	177		16		193
Thereafter	—		22		22
Total	$	1,352	$	139	$	1,491

On March 23, 2007, we entered into an office building lease with CA-Shorebreeze Limited Partnership pursuant to which we are leasing approximately 6,800 square feet in an office facility located in Redwood City, California. The lease has a term of thirty-six months, which is currently expected to commence in June 2007.  The Redwood City, California office to be occupied under the lease will serve as our new U.S headquarters, replacing our current facility in Fremont, California, whose lease expires on June 30, 2007. Monthly rent under the lease will initially be approximately $19,000 per month, and is subject to 4% annual increases thereafter. The total rent payable over the full thirty-six month lease term (net of two months rent abatement) will be approximately $671,000. We have an option to extend the term of the lease for one additional one-year period at a rent equal to the then fair market lease rate. Pursuant to the lease, the landlord has agreed to provide a tenant improvement allowance of approximately $101,000. Any tenant improvement costs exceeding this allowance will be borne by us.

On June 21, 2005, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement, a Streamline Facility Agreement and an Intellectual Property Security Agreement with a financial institution (collectively, the “Loan Agreements”). Under the terms of these Loan Agreements, we may borrow up to a maximum of $3.0 million from the bank at any one time under a revolving secured accounts receivable-based line of credit. This line of credit permits us to obtain short-term loan advances from the financial institution equal to 80% of the face amount of our specific eligible accounts receivable. The interest rate on each advance will be either 4.0% or 4.5% above the bank’s prime rate. Our obligations to the financial institution under the Loan Agreements are secured by a first security interest in all of our assets, including our equipment, cash and intellectual property. The credit facility provided by the Loan Agreements will expire by June 21, 2007. As of April 30, 2007 Versant had no outstanding indebtedness under the Loan Agreements.

26

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash to be generated from operations will be sufficient to finance our operations during the next twelve months. However, if we fail to generate adequate cash flows from operations in the future, due to an unexpected decline in our revenues, or due to a sustained increase in cash expenditures in excess of the revenues generated; then our cash balances may not be sufficient to fund our continuing operations without obtaining additional debt or equity financing. Additional cash may also be needed to acquire or invest in complementary businesses or products or to obtain the right to use complementary technologies, and we expect that, in the event of such an acquisition or investment that is significant, it will be necessary for us to seek additional debt or equity financing.

If we are required to obtain additional financing for our working capital, there can be no assurance that such financing will be available to us on reasonable financial or other terms, or at all. The prices at which new investors might be willing to purchase our securities may be lower than the market value or the trading price of our common stock. The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could also result in dilution to our shareholders, which could be substantial and may involve the issuance of preferred securities that would have liquidation preferences that entitle holders of the preferred securities to receive certain amounts before holders of our common stock in connection with an acquisition or business combination involving Versant or a liquidation of Versant. New investors may also seek agreements giving them additional voting control or seats on our board of directors. Even if we were able to obtain additional debt or equity financing, the terms of any such financing might significantly restrict our business activities and in some circumstances, might require us to obtain the approval of our shareholders, which could delay or prevent consummation of the financing transaction.

Our software license agreements generally include certain provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if our software products infringe upon a third party’s intellectual property rights. To date, we have not incurred any material costs as a result of any indemnification. As a result of current litigation in which Rockwell Automation, one of our customers, is seeking indemnification from us for alleged infringement of intellectual property rights asserted against it by Systems America, Inc., we have recorded an immaterial loss contingency reserve as of January 31, 2007 in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5. We are contesting the allegations of infringement of intellectual property rights asserted in this litigation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48, which clarifies FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, establishes the criterion that an individual tax position has to meet for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in the Company’s financial statements. On initial application, FIN 48 will be applied to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remains open. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the adoption date will be recognized or continue to be recognized. The cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 will be reported as an adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the period in which it is adopted.

FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and will be adopted by the Company on November 1, 2007. The Company has not yet been able to complete its evaluation of the impact of adopting FIN 48 and as a result, is not yet at this time able to estimate the effect, if any, the adoption of FIN48 will have on its financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement 157, Fair Value Measurements, (“FAS 157”). This statement clarifies the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and requires expanded financial statement disclosures about fair value measurements for assets and liabilities. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. This new guidance will become effective for Versant on November 1, 2008 and the Company is currently assessing the impact of FAS 157 on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant and Divisions of Corporation Finance and Investment Management released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108), which provides interpretive guidance on how registrants should quantify financial statement misstatements. Currently, the two methods most commonly used by preparers and auditors to quantify misstatements are the “rollover” method (which focuses primarily on the income statement impact of misstatements) and the “iron curtain” method (which focuses primarily on the balance sheet impact of misstatements). Under SAB 108, registrants will be required to consider both the rollover and iron curtain methods (i.e., a dual approach) when evaluating the materiality of financial statement errors. Registrants will need to revisit their prior materiality assessments and consider them using both the rollover and iron curtain methods.  SAB 108 is effective for annual financial statements in the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. Therefore, SAB 108 will become effective for Versant in the fiscal year ending October 31, 2007. The SAB provides transition

27

accounting and disclosure guidance for situations in which a registrant concludes that a material error(s) existed in prior-period financial statements under the dual approach. Specifically, registrants will be permitted to restate prior period financial statements or recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying SAB 108 through an adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the year of adoption. The Company believes SAB 108 will not have a material impact on its annual financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides a “Fair Value Option” under which a company may irrevocably elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for certain financial assets and liabilities. This Fair Value Option will be available on a contract-by-contract basis with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as those changes occur. The effective date for SFAS 159 is the beginning of each reporting entity’s first fiscal year end that begins after November 15, 2007. Therefore, SFAS 159 will become effective for Versant in the fiscal year ending October 31, 2008. SFAS 159 also allows an entity to early adopt the statement as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after the issuance of SFAS 159, provided that the entity also adopts the requirements of SFAS No. 157. The Company is currently evaluating whether adoption of SFAS 159 will have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Risk Factors

The Company’s business faces many risks and uncertainties. When evaluating our business and prospects you should, in addition to other information contained in this report and our other filings with the SEC, particularly consider the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A (“Risk Factors”) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, filed with the SEC on January 29, 2007 (File No. 000-28540).

ITEM 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Foreign currency hedging instruments.  We transact business in various foreign currencies and, accordingly, we are subject to exposure from adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates.  To date, the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on revenue and operating expenses has not been material. Operating expenses incurred by our foreign subsidiaries are denominated primarily in local currencies.  We currently do not use financial instruments to hedge these operating expenses.  We intend to assess the need to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an ongoing basis during the remainder of fiscal 2007.

Our exposure to foreign exchange risk is related to the magnitude of foreign net profits and losses denominated in euros, and our net position of monetary assets and monetary liabilities in those foreign currencies. These exposures have the potential to produce either gains or losses within our consolidated results. Our European operations, however, in some instances act as a natural hedge since both operating expenses as well as revenues are denominated in local currencies. In these instances, although an unfavorable change in the exchange rate of euros against the U.S. dollar will result in lower revenues when translated into U.S. dollars, the operating expenditures will be lower as well. Additionally, since most of our cash resides outside the United States, we have maintained approximately 27% of our cash balance in Europe in the form of U.S. dollars to reduce the impact of any foreign currency fluctuations.

We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.

Interest rate risk.  Our cash equivalents primarily consist of money market accounts; therefore, we do not believe that our interest rate risk is significant at this time.

ITEM 4T.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)   Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

SEC rules define the term “disclosure controls and procedures” to mean a company’s controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in its reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure

28

Based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures by our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

(b)  Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended April 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

SEC rules define the term “internal control over financial reporting” as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

·Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

·Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

·Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 4.   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

We held our 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 23, 2007. Set forth below are descriptions of the matters voted on at the meeting and the results of the votes taken at the meeting.

1. Election of Directors. At the meeting, the following individuals were elected to the Company’s Board of Directors, each to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his successor has been duly elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal:

29

Name of Director	Votes For	Votes Withheld
Jochen Witte	2,882,992	5,399
Uday Bellary	2,880,727	7,664
Wiliam Henry Delevati	2,881,587	6,804
Herbert May	2,880,692	7,699
Bernhard Woebker	2,861,792	26,599

2. Amendment of 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Approval of an amendment to the Company’s 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the plan by 50,000 shares:

Votes For	Votes Against	Vote Abstained	Broker Non-Votes
1,637,565	30,490	12,673	1,207,663

3. Amendment of 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. Approval of an amendment to the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the plan by 200,000 shares:

Votes For	Votes Against	Vote Abstained	Broker Non-Votes
1,628,096	38,712	6,020	1,215,563

4. Ratification of Accountant. Ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2007 ending October 31, 2007:

Votes For	Votes Against	Vote Abstained	Broker Non-Votes
2,879,056	1,564	7,771	—

ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS

(a)Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:

						Filed
						with
Exhibit		Incorporated by Reference				this
Number	Exhibit Description	Form	File Number	Exhibit	File Date	10-Q
10.01	Office Building Lease dated March 23, 2007, between Versant Corporation and CA-Shorebreeze Limited Partnership					X
10.02	Versant Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended through April 12, 2007 (and approved at 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders)	8-K	000-28540	10.02	04/16/07

30

10.03	Versant Corporation 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended through December 21, 2006 (and approved at 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders)	8-K	000-28540	10.03	04/26/07
31.01	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002					X
31.02	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002					X
32.01*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002					X
32.02*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002					X

* This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

31

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		VERSANT CORPORATION
Dated:	June 13, 2007	/s/ Jerry Wong
		Jerry Wong
		Vice President, Finance
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
		Financial and Accounting Officer)
		/s/Jochen Witte
		Jochen Witte
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer)

32