10-Q

United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2012

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                  to              

Commission File Number 000-28540

VERSANT CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

California	94-3079392
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 450, Redwood City, California 94065

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(650) 232-2400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý   Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o	Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer o	Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)  Yes o No x

As of September 10, 2012, there were outstanding2,726,899 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, no par value.

VERSANT CORPORATION

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended July 31, 2012

 Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1. Financial Statements	3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 (Unaudited)	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)	5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	34
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	35
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	35
Item 6. Exhibits	36
Signatures	37
Certifications

2

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except for share amounts)

(unaudited)

	July 31, 2012			October 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,577		$	23,145
Trade accounts receivable, net	1,542			2,183
Deferred income taxes	778			898
Other current assets	612			481
Total current assets	24,509			26,707
Property and equipment, net	904			993
Goodwill	8,589			8,589
Intangible assets, net	231			309
Other assets	38			38
Total assets	$	34,271		$	36,636
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	316		$	152
Accrued liabilities	1,461			1,076
Deferred revenues	2,840			2,695
Total current liabilities	4,617			3,923
Other long-term liabilities	196			178
Total liabilities	4,813			4,101
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, no par value, 7,500,000 shares authorized, 2,750,899 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2012, and 2,935,125 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2011	88,736			90,055
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net	(480		)	31
Accumulated deficit	(58,798		)	(57,551		)
Total shareholders’ equity	29,458			32,535
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	34,271		$	36,636

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	July 31,			July 31,		July 31,			July 31,
	2012			2011		2012			2011
Revenues:
License	$	1,350		$	2,344	$	6,148		$	6,758
Maintenance	1,674			1,821		4,998			5,396
Professional services	18			39		84			139
Total revenues	3,042			4,204		11,230			12,293
Cost of revenues:
License	57			66		189			199
Amortization of intangible assets	26			26		78			164
Maintenance	326			384		1,027			1,111
Professional services	9			26		41			68
Total cost of revenues	418			502		1,335			1,542
Gross profit	2,624			3,702		9,895			10,751
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	1,627			1,341		4,560			4,161
Research and development	1,328			1,055		3,668			2,967
General and administrative	815			786		2,654			3,093
Restructuring	—			25		—			25
Total operating expenses	3,770			3,207		10,882			10,246
Income (loss) from operations	(1,146		)	495		(987		)	505
Interest and other income (expense), net	73			34		129			(14		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(1,073		)	529		(858		)	491
Provision for income taxes	96			55		389			93
Net income (loss)	$	(1,169	)	$	474	$	(1,247	)	$	398
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.42	)	$	0.16	$	(0.44	)	$	0.13
Diluted	$	(0.42	)	$	0.16	$	(0.44	)	$	0.13
Shares used in per share calculation:
Basic	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,122
Diluted	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,123

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	July 31,			July 31,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(1,247	)	$	398
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	368			282
Amortization of intangible assets	78			164
Share based compensation	688			768
Restructuring charges	—			25
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, net	503			1,062
Other assets	(172		)	(318		)
Accounts payable	171			71
Accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities	455			(289		)
Deferred revenues	361			93
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,205			2,256
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(354		)	(670		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(354		)	(670		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	285			202
Repurchases of common stock	(2,291		)	(3,584		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(2,006		)	(3,382		)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(413		)	27
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(1,568		)	(1,769		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	23,145			24,911
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	21,577		$	23,142
Supplemental disclosures of cash flows information:
Cash paid for:
Income taxes	$	22		$	336

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Basis of Presentation

Versant Corporation (with its subsidiaries, collectively referred to in this report as “Versant” or “the Company”) was incorporated in California in August 1988. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this report on Form 10-Q include all of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of Versant and all entities in which Versant has a controlling interest (subsidiaries) required to be consolidated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Inter-company accounts and transactions between consolidated companies have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of the Company, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are normal recurring adjustments. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles related to interim financial statements and the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements.

The financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared with the presumption that users of the interim financial information have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the Company’s preceding fiscal year ended October 31, 2011. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with those audited financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, filed on January 30, 2012 (File/Film No. 000-28540/12556329), as amended by the Form 10-K/A filed on February 28, 2012 (File/Film No. 000-28540/12648015). The Company’s operating results for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period, for the full fiscal year ending October 31, 2012, or for any future periods. Further, the preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts reported therein. A change in facts or circumstances relating to the estimates could result in a change to the estimates and could impact future operating results.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Fair Value Measurement Disclosure

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") amended the disclosure requirements for the fair value measurements for recurring and nonrecurring non-financial assets and liabilities. The guidance requires new disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures were effective for the Company’s second quarter of fiscal year 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements, which were effective for the Company’s first quarter of fiscal year 2012. The adoption of this guidance had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance which amends ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. This Accounting Standards Update amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and requires performing Step 2 if qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

6

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Presentation of Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The issuance of ASU 2011-05 is intended to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 supersedes the presentation options in ASC Topic 220 and facilitates convergence of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity and requiring that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance will be appliedretrospectively and early adoption is permitted. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance to amend and simplify the rules related to testing goodwill for impairment. The revised guidance allows an entity to make an initial qualitative evaluation, based on the entity’s events and circumstances, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of this qualitative assessment determine whether it is necessary to perform the currently required two-step impairment test. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Intangible Asset Impairment Testing

In July 2012, the FASB issued guidance to allow an entity the option to first assess qualitatively whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test under the existing guidance. This guidance also provides examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider when performing the qualitative assessment such as negative or declining cash flows and deterioration in industry, market or macroeconomic conditions. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim testing dates within those years, beginning after September 15, 2012 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). Early adoption of the amended guidance is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 2. Fair Value Measurements

Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market for the transaction and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

The FASB guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2: inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not

active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or

• Level 3: unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

7

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Our significant financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following types of instruments as of July 31, 2012 (Level 1, 2 and 3 inputs are defined above):

	Fair Value Hierarchy	As of July 31, 2012
		(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash	Level 1		$	803
Money market funds	Level 1		16,433
Time deposits	Level 1		4,341
Total			$	21,577
The fair value of money market funds and time deposits reflect quoted market prices in an active market.

Note 3. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves

Versant evaluates and revises its allowance for doubtful accounts receivable as part of its quarter end process at the subsidiary and corporate level. The Company’s management assigns a risk factor and percentage of risk to each account receivable, the collection of which is considered non-routine. Accounts are considered past due in accordance with contractual terms which usually provide for payment within 30 to 90 days. The Company also assigns a general reserve to all its overdue accounts, excluding the non-routine items.

The following table summarizes the activities in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts:

	Nine Months Ended			Fiscal Year Ended
	July 31, 2012			October 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Beginning balance	$	16		$	8
Adjustments to provision	(8		)	8
Ending balance	$	8		$	16

The following table summarizes trade accounts receivable balances in excess of 10% of the Company's total trade accounts receivable as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 (in thousands): 

	As of July 31, 2012			As of October 31, 2011
Customer A		$	276	1	$	—
Customer B		204		1	—
Customer C	1	—			362
Customer D	1	—			311
Customer E	1	—			225

(1) Balance not in excess of 10% of trade accounts receivable

8

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The following table presents the Company’s goodwill balance as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	Net Carrying Amount as of
	July 31, 2012		October 31, 2011
Versant Europe	$	241	$	241
Poet Holdings, Inc.	5,752		5,752
FastObjects, Inc.	677		677
JDO Genie (PTY), Ltd	50		50
db4o	1,869		1,869
Total	$	8,589	$	8,589

Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment, applying a fair-value based test. The Company's impairment evaluation for goodwill is conducted annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. Versant conducted its annual impairment test in October 2011 and determined there was no impairment.

The process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the determination of the fair value of the Company's single reporting unit. Inherent in such a fair value determination are certain judgments and estimates, including the interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations, and assumptions about the Company's strategic plans with regard to its operations. The Company believes at this time that the carrying value of its remaining goodwill is appropriate, although to the extent additional information arises, it is possible that the Company's conclusions regarding impairment of the remaining goodwill could change and result in a material effect on its financial position and results of operations. No events or circumstances occurred during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Company below its carrying amount. The Company intends to conduct its next annual impairment evaluation as of October 31, 2012.

Intangible Assets

The Company’s intangible asset balances as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	July 31, 2012						October 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
Intangible assets:
db4o-Developed Technology (Amortized over 5 years)	$	300	$	220	$	80	$	300	$	175	$	125
db4o-Customer Relationships (Amortized over 9 years)	210		86		124		210		68		142
db4o-Trade Name (Amortized over 5 years)	100		73		27		100		58		42
Total	$	610	$	379	$	231	$	610	$	301	$	309

Aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets was $26,000 and $78,000 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012, and $26,000 and $164,000 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2011.

9

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

The projected amortization of the Company’s existing intangible assets as of July 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):

	Amortization
Three months ending October 31, 2012	$	26
Fiscal year ending October 31,
2013	103
2014	30
2015	23
2016	23
Thereafter	26
Total	$	231

Note 5.  Commitments and Contingencies

Lease commitments

Versant’s principal commitments as of July 31, 2012 consist of obligations under operating leases for facilities and equipment.

Versant leases office space for its U.S. headquarters in Redwood City, California and also leases field office space in Cupertino, California and Hamburg and Munich, Germany under operating lease agreements. The Company's operating lease arrangements as of July 31, 2012 are summarized below (in thousands):

Leased Office Facility:	Lease Expiration Date	Total Rent Payable over the Remaining Lease Term		Options to Renew at Fair Value
Hamburg, Germany	11/30/2014	$	371	Two three year renewal options
Redwood City, California	5/31/2013	$	172	Two one year renewal options
Munich, Germany	2/28/2014	$	38	Single two year renewal option
Redwood City, California	5/31/2014	$	187	Single one year renewal option
Cupertino, California	1/15/2013	$	18	none

Our minimum commitments under non-cancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year as of July 31, 2012 are as follows (in thousands): 

	Facilities Leases		Equipment Leases		Total
Three months ending October 31, 2012	$	122	$	1	$	123
Fiscal year ending October 31,
2013	406		3		409
2014	227		—		227
2015	13		—		13
2016	—		—		—
Total	$	768	$	4	$	772

Total rent expense for all operating leases was $128,000 and $98,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $373,000 and $292,000 for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

10

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Contingencies

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and disputes that may arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. There were no ongoing material legal proceedings as of July 31, 2012.

The Company enters into indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business. The Company's license agreements with customers generally require it to indemnify the customer against claims that its software infringes third party patent, copyright, trademark or other proprietary rights. Such indemnification obligations are generally limited in a variety of industry-standard respects. If a liability associated with any of the Company's indemnifications becomes probable and the amount of the liability is reasonably estimable or the minimum amount of a range of loss is reasonably estimable, then an appropriate liability will be established. The estimated fair value of these indemnification liabilities is minimal and no accrual has been established.

Note 6. Per Share Data

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase. The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	July 31, 2012			July 31, 2011		July 31, 2012			July 31, 2011
Net income (loss)	$	(1,169	)	$	474	$	(1,247	)	$	398
Calculation of basic net income (loss) per share:
Weighted average - common shares outstanding	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,122
Net income (loss) per share, basic	$	(0.42	)	$	0.16	$	(0.44	)	$	0.13
Calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share:
Weighted average - common shares outstanding	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,122
Dilutive effect of employee and director stock options	—			—		—			1
Weighted average - common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive common shares	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,123
Net income (loss) per share, diluted	$	(0.42	)	$	0.16	$	(0.44	)	$	0.13

For the three months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, 644,000 and 341,000 potentially dilutive shares, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share by the application of the treasury stock method. For the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, 643,000 and 355,000 potentially dilutive shares, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share by the application of the treasury stock method.

Note 7. Common Stock Repurchases

Fiscal Year 2012 Stock Repurchase Program

On November 28, 2011 Versant’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program announced on December 1, 2011 pursuant to which Versant is authorized to repurchase up to $5.0 million of its common stock in fiscal year 2012. This stock repurchase program is currently scheduled to expire upon the earlier of October 31, 2012, or at such time as Versant has expended $5.0 million to repurchase outstanding common shares under the program; however the program may be suspended, discontinued or extended at any earlier time by the Company.

From the date of announcement of this stock repurchase program through July 31, 2012, Versant acquired under this program a total of 215,844 common shares on the open market for approximately $2.3 million at an average purchase price of $10.58 per share, leaving approximately $2.7 million in authorized funds available for future repurchases of stock under this program.

11

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Fiscal year 2011 Stock Repurchase Program

On November 29, 2010 Versant’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing Versant to repurchase up to $5.0 million of its outstanding common shares on the open market, in block trades or otherwise. This stock repurchase program expired by its terms on October 31, 2011. Pursuant to this program, Versant acquired 240,629 common shares on the open market for approximately $3.0 million at an average purchase price of $12.23 per share.

Other Stock Repurchase

On March 10, 2011, Versant and the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer ("Former CEO") entered into a separation agreement (the “Separation Agreement”). On March 28, 2011, pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Versant repurchased 62,545 shares of Versant common stock owned by the Former CEO at a price of $13.50 per share, which reflected recent market trading prices of Versant’s common stock as of the date of the Separation Agreement.

Note 8. Employee and Director Benefit Plans

The Company grants common stock options and awards restricted stock units under its 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, grants common stock options under its 2005 Directors' Stock Option Plan and issues stock under its 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which plans have been approved by Versant's shareholders.

Shares Reserved for Future Issuance

At the Company's 2011 annual shareholder meeting, held on April 18, 2011, the shareholders approved an increase of 300,000 shares and 20,000 shares in the numbers of shares reserved under the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 2005 Directors Stock Option Plan, respectively.

As of July 31, 2012, the Company had reserved shares of common stock for the following purposes (in thousands):

Reserved for issuance:
Employee Stock Purchase Plan	11
Shares available for grant under 2005 Equity Incentive Plan	309
Shares available for grant under 2005 Directors Stock Option Plan	23
Unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock units	644
Balance as of July 31, 2012	987

The following table summarizes stock option activities under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2012				2011
	Shares in thousands		Weighted average exercise price		Shares in thousands		Weighted average exercise price
Stock option activities:
Outstanding at the beginning of the period	651		$	15.20	515		$	16.84
Granted	62		10.80		165		11.96
Exercised	(13	)	9.42		(7	)	4.03
Forfeited and expired	(122	)	14.89		(26	)	26.98
Outstanding at the end of the period	578		$	14.92	647		$	15.31
Options exercisable at the end of the period	480		$	15.46	442		$	16.06

On February 21, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to allow the grant of restricted stock units under the plan. During the nine months ended July 31, 2012, the Board of Directors

12

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

awarded 66,000 restricted stock units to employees which generally began vesting on December 1, 2011. These restricted stock units have a three-year vesting schedule in which 25% of the award vests after nine months and the remaining 75% vests ratably thereafter on a quarterly basis.

The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activities under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2012
	Units in thousands		Weighted average grant date fair value
Restricted stock unit activities:
Unvested awards at the beginning of the period	—			$	—
Awards	66			10.58
Vesting	—			—
Forfeited	(1	)		10.74
Unvested awards at the end of the period	65			$	10.58

Under the 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, employees may generally defer up to 10% of their compensation to purchase shares of our common stock at a discount equal to 15% of the lower of the fair market value per share of our common stock on (i) the commencement date of the applicable six month offering period or (ii) the applicable purchase date. During the nine months ended July 31, 2012, 19,032 shares were issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Approximately 11,000 shares remained available for future issuance under this plan as of July 31, 2012.

Note 9. Share Based Compensation

Share based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period of the award. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant and the fair value of each share issued under Versant’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (or “ESPP”) is estimated at the beginning of the purchase period, using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, based on the following assumptions:

	Stock Options		ESPP
	Nine Months Ended July 31,		Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2012	2011	2012	2011
Assumptions:
Volatility	45% - 50%	46% - 53%	31% - 37%	23% - 31%
Expected life	4.25 - 5.75 years	3.6 - 5.5 years	6 - 12 months	6 - 12 months
Weighted average risk-free interest rate	0.65% - 1.03%	1.36% - 1.95%	0.06% - 0.21%	0.10% - 0.28%
Dividend yield	—	—	—	—

Share based compensation expense recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations related to the Company’s equity incentive plans and stock purchase plan was as follows (in thousands):
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Share based compensation expense:
Stock options and restricted stock units	$	194	$	231	$	651	$	727
ESPP	14		13		37		41
Total	$	208	$	244	$	688	$	768

13

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Share based compensation recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations, by operating statement caption, was as follows (in thousands):
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Share based compensation expense:
Cost of revenues	$	18	$	15	$	54	$	48
Sales and marketing	62		67		202		193
Research and development	46		50		163		154
General and administrative	82		112		269		373
Total	$	208	$	244	$	688	$	768

Note 10. Restructuring

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company committed to the implementation of a restructuring plan pursuant to which it closed its research and development facility in Pune, India and is winding down the affairs of its subsidiary, Versant India Private Limited (“Versant India”). The restructuring plan was undertaken to consolidate the Company’s research and development efforts into one location in Germany in order to streamline operations, create management efficiencies and increase productivity. The restructuring was substantially completed during the second quarter ended April 30, 2010.

Since the plan was undertaken, Versant has incurred restructuring costs of $203,000 as of July 31, 2012. No restructuring costs were incurred in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012. Restructuring costs were $25,000 in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2011.

Note 11. Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach to accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted statutory tax rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets when uncertainty exists regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets. The Company had net deferred tax assets of $778,000 and $898,000 as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, respectively.

The Company has significant deferred tax assets arising primarily from net operating loss ("NOL") carry forwards in the U.S., California and in Germany. Ultimately, the realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company’s generation of sufficient future taxable income to enable it to use net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards during those periods in which such carry forwards can be utilized by the Company under applicable tax laws. In evaluating Versant’s ability to utilize its deferred tax assets, management of the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including past operating results in the most recent fiscal years and an assessment of expected future results of operations on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis.

The Company has experienced substantial past tax losses in its U.S. operations. Due to the lack of forecast future taxable income and the relative size of the Company’s federal and California net operating loss carry forwards, considerable uncertainty exists that the Company will realize these deferred tax assets. Based on this objective evidence, a full valuation allowance has been recorded against the Company’s deferred tax assets related to its U.S. operations.

The Company has also experienced substantial past tax losses in its European operations. In its most recent fiscal years, the Company has generated taxable income and begun to utilize its deferred tax assets related to its German net operating loss carry forwards. Management of the Company has forecast taxable income for its European operations in fiscal year 2012. The global economic downturn has negatively impacted the Company’s operating results in all regions.  The Company has experienced declining revenues as economic conditions have remained difficult. Given the uncertainty of the macroeconomic environment, future revenues and operating results are difficult to forecast. Therefore, management has concluded it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of its deferred tax assets related to its German net operating loss carry forwards only to the extent of its expected taxable income in fiscal year 2012.

14

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Significant management judgment is required to determine when, in the future, it will become more likely than not that additional net deferred tax assets will be realized. Management will continue to assess the realizability of the tax benefit available based on actual and forecast operating results. Management does not anticipate significant changes to its uncertain tax positions through October 31, 2012.

The provision for income tax (benefit) expense consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,			July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011			2012		2011
Income tax (benefit) expense:
Federal and state	$	—	$	(1	)	$	4	$	(1	)
Foreign - Europe	88		38			295		68
Foreign - India	—		—			67		—
Foreign withholding	8		18			23		26
Total current	$	96	$	55		$	389	$	93

The provision for income tax expense differs from the amount estimated by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes, primarily due to foreign income taxed at other than U.S. rates, foreign withholding taxes and state taxes.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income taxes and to income taxes in various states in the U.S. as well as in foreign jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2006. However, with respect to tax years no longer subject to examination due to expiration of the statute of limitations, income may nevertheless be recomputed for the purpose of determining the amount of NOL that may be carried over to “open” years.

In conjunction with the wind-down of the Company's operations in India, an income tax inspection was conducted. Additional taxes and penalties of approximately $67,000 were imposed as a result of this inspection, which have been included in our income tax provision for the nine months ended July 31, 2012.

Note 12. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets consists of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments.

Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	July 31,			July 31,			July 31,			July 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(1,169	)	$	474		$	(1,247	)	$	398
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(258		)	(93		)	(511		)	65
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,427	)	$	381		$	(1,758	)	$	463

15

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 13. Segment and Geographic Information

ASC 280, Segment Reporting establishes standards for the manner in which public companies report information about operating segments in annual and interim financial statements which require the reporting of segment information using the “management approach.” Under this approach, operating segments are identified in substantially the same manner as they are reported internally and used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) for purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources. Based on this approach, the Company has determined that it operates in a single operating segment, Data Management.

The following table reflects the percentage of revenues generated by customers that accounted for ten percent or more of total revenues and the related accounts receivable balances (in thousands, except percentages):
	Customer A				Customer B				Customer C
Customer revenues as a percentage of total revenues in the following periods:
Three months ended July 31, 2012	—		%	1	—		%	1	10		%
Three months ended July 31, 2011	11		%		11		%		—		%	1
Nine months ended July 31, 2012	19		%		—		%	1	—		%	1
Nine months ended July 31, 2011	10		%		—		%	1	—		%	1
Accounts receivable balance as of:
July 31, 2012	$	100			$	—			$	276
July 31, 2011	$	255			$	—			$	—
Industry	Telecommunications				Health Care				Telecommunications

(1) Customer revenues not in excess of 10% of total revenues

The Company predominantly operates in North America, Europe and Asia. In general, revenues are attributed to the country in which the revenue-bearing contract originates.

The following table reflects revenues for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 by each geographic region (in thousands): 

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Revenues by region:
North America	$	1,369	$	1,953	$	3,524	$	4,941
Europe	1,556		1,950		7,244		6,756
Asia	117		301		462		596
	$	3,042	$	4,204	$	11,230	$	12,293

16

VERSANT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

The following table reflects long-lived assets as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 in each geographic region (in thousands): 

	July 31, 2012		October 31, 2011
Total long-lived assets by region:
North America	$	491	$	438
Germany	447		588
Asia	4		5
	$	942	$	1,031

Note 14. Related Party Transactions

The Company has entered into a consulting arrangement (the "Brammer Consulting Agreement") with Dr. Robert F. Brammer, a currently serving member of the Board of Directors, under which Dr. Brammer will provide business development services to the Company. The Brammer Consulting Agreement, which was entered into in fiscal year 2012 with a one year term, currently provides for consulting fees of $10,000 per month. Consulting expenses incurred with respect to the Brammer Consulting Agreement for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 were $20,000 and $30,000, respectively.

17

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Item 2 and the discussion and analysis included in this item should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report and the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, filed on January 30, 2012 (File/Film No. 000-28540/12556329), as amended by the Form 10-K/A filed on February 28, 2012 (File/Film No. 000-28540/12648015). Our historic operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods.

The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding the Company’s expected future financial performance, assets, liquidity and trends anticipated for the Company’s business. These forward-looking statements are based on the Company’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about the Company’s business and the Company’s industry, which in turn are based on information that is reasonably available to the Company as of the date of this report. Forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “forecasts,” “guidance,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. We caution readers that these forward-looking statements are not intended to be assurances of our future performance or financial condition and are subject to, and involve, significant known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual operating results, financial condition, levels of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from any future operating results, financial condition, levels of activity, performance or achievements that are expressed, forecast, projected, implied in, anticipated or contemplated by the forward-looking statements.  These known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, those risks, uncertainties and factors discussed elsewhere in this report, in the Company’s other SEC filings and in Part I, Item 1A (“Risk Factors”) and in Part II, Item 7 (“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”) of the Company’s report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, as amended. Versant undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise or occur after the date of this report.

Background and Overview

We design, develop, market and support high performance, object-oriented database management software solutions and provide related maintenance and professional services. Our products and services address the complex data management needs of enterprises and providers of products requiring data management functions. In December 2011 we announced a strategic product roadmap in which we have outlined our plans to create database software related to very large data problems. The goal of this new product development strategy is to extend Versant's proven ability to provide data solutions for large, distributed systems to emerging so-called Big Data and near real-time analytical application opportunities. Our products and services collectively comprise our single operating segment, which we call “Data Management.”

Our end-user customers typically use our products to manage data for business systems and to enable these systems to access and integrate data necessary for the customers' data management applications. Our data management products and services offer customers the ability to manage real-time, XML and other types of hierarchical and navigational data. We believe that by using our data management solutions, customers cut their hardware costs, accelerate and simplify their development efforts, significantly reduce administration costs and deliver products and services with a significant competitive edge.

Our Data Management business is currently comprised of the following key products:

• Versant Object Database or “VOD”, previously known as VDS, an eighth generation object-oriented database management system that is used in high-performance, large-scale, real-time commercial applications in distributed computing environments. We also offer several optional ancillary products for use with Versant Object Database to extend its capabilities, provide compatibility and additional protection of stored data.

• FastObjects, an object-oriented database management system that can be embedded as a high performance component into customers' applications and systems.

• db4o, an open source object-oriented database software solution targeting the embedded device market.

Our Versant Object Database product offerings are used primarily by larger organizations, such as technology providers, telecommunications carriers, government defense agencies, defense contractors, healthcare companies and companies in the financial services and transportation industries, each of which have significant large-scale data management requirements. With the incorporation of the FastObjects solution into our product line following our March 2004 merger with Poet Holdings, Inc.,

18

we expanded the scope of our solutions to also address the data management needs of smaller business systems. By our acquisition of db4o in December 2008, we further expanded the scope of our solutions to include the embedded device market.

Under our strategic product roadmap, we are developing database software products to address "Big Data" problems. Versant is developing these new products in order to provide data management software that enables the development of analytical applications for the intelligent "real-time enterprise" and has initiated this development process, which is expected to involve cooperation with strategic technology partners. In June 2012, Versant announced its free, pre-release version of Versant JPA for the Cloud, a pure, cloud-based Java client for the Versant Object Database (VOD). With this new Java-based API, expected to be generally available in October 2012, enterprise development teams can leverage existing programming skills and the cloud's inherent ability to quickly scale infrastructure up and down to address the volume, variety, and velocity demands of complex Big Data.

Our customers' data management needs can involve many business functions, ranging from management of the use and sharing of a company's internal enterprise data to the processing of externally originated information such as customer enrollment, billing and payment transaction data. Our solutions have also been used to solve complex data management issues such as fraud detection, risk analysis and yield management and can be adapted for use with many different applications.

In addition to our product offerings, we provide maintenance and technical support services to assist our users in using our products. We also offer a variety of consulting and training services to assist users in developing and deploying applications based on Versant Object Database, FastObjects and db4o.

We license our products and sell associated maintenance, training and consulting services to end-users through our direct sales force and through value-added resellers, systems integrators and distributors. In addition to these products and services, we resell related software developed by third parties.

To date, substantially all of our revenues have been derived from the following data management products and related services:

• Sales of licenses for Versant Object Database and FastObjects;

• Maintenance and technical support services for our products, including db4o;

• Consulting and training services;

• Nonrecurring engineering fees received in connection with providing services associated with Versant Object Database;

• The resale of licenses, and maintenance, training and consulting services for third-party products that complement Versant Object Database;

• Reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses, which we incurred and are recorded as revenues in our statements of income.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of our assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and of our revenues and expenses during the reporting period covered by our financial statements. We base these estimates and judgments on information reasonably available to us, such as our historical experience and industry trends, economic and seasonal fluctuations and on our own internal projections that we derive from that information. Although we believe our estimates to be reasonable under the circumstances, there can be no assurances that our estimates will be accurate given that the application of these accounting policies necessarily involves the exercise of subjective judgment and the making of assumptions regarding many future variables and uncertainties. We consider “critical” those accounting policies that require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, and that are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. These critical accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, goodwill impairment, acquired intangible assets and their impairment and income taxes.

19

During the first nine months of fiscal year 2012, there were no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates. Please refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, filed on January 30, 2012 (File/Film No. 000-28540/12556329), as amended by the Form 10-K/A filed on February 28, 2012 (File/Film No. 000-28540/12648015) for a more complete discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.

Results of Operations The following table sets forth certain items from our condensed consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of our total revenues for the periods indicated:
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
	(unaudited)
Revenues:
License	44	%	56	%	55	%	55	%
Maintenance	55		43		44		44
Professional services	1		1		1		1
Total revenues	100		100		100		100
Cost of revenues:
License	2		2		2		1
Amortization of intangible assets	1		1		1		1
Maintenance	11		9		9		9
Professional services	—		—		—		—
Total cost of revenues	14		12		12		11
Gross profit	86		88		88		89
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	53		31		40		34
Research and development	44		25		33		24
General and administrative	27		19		24		25
Restructuring	—		1		—		—
Total operating expenses	124		76		97		83
Income (loss) from operations	(38	)	12		(9	)	6
Interest and other income (expense), net	2		1		1		—
Income (loss) before income taxes	(36	)	13		(8	)	6
Provision for income taxes	3		1		3		1
Net income (loss)	(39	)%	12	%	(11	)%	5	%

20

Revenues

The following table summarizes our license, maintenance and professional services revenues for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		Change
	2012		2011		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Revenues:
License	$	1,350	$	2,344	$	(994	)	(42	)%
Maintenance	1,674		1,821		(147		)	(8	)
Professional services	18		39		(21		)	(54	)
Total	$	3,042	$	4,204	$	(1,162	)	(28	)%

	Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		Change
	2012		2011		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Revenues:
License	$	6,148	$	6,758	$	(610	)	(9	)%
Maintenance	4,998		5,396		(398		)	(7	)
Professional services	84		139		(55		)	(40	)
Total	$	11,230	$	12,293	$	(1,063	)	(9	)%

Total Revenues. Total revenues are comprised of license fees and fees for maintenance, training, consulting, technical and other support services. Fluctuations in our total revenues can be attributed to changes in economic and industry conditions, product and customer mix, general trends in information technology spending, changes in geographic demand, and the corresponding impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, delays in (or sometimes acceleration of) forecast revenue transactions with customers or royalty reporting to us of items such as back maintenance charges can cause revenue fluctuations, particularly on a quarterly basis. Further, product life cycles impact revenues periodically as old contracts expire and new products are released.

The inherently unpredictable business cycle of an enterprise software company makes discernment of continued and meaningful business trends difficult, particularly in the current uncertain economic environment. In terms of license revenues, although economic conditions have slightly improved, we are still experiencing lengthy sales cycles and customer preference for licensing our software on an “as needed” basis, versus the historical practice of prepaying license fees in advance of usage, a factor which can adversely affect the amount of our license revenues. In addition, the continuing stagnation in general economic conditions has further lengthened our sales cycle and created increased pricing pressure, as many customers strive to reduce their operating costs. License revenues are also a critical factor in driving the amount of our maintenance services revenues, as new license customers typically enter into support and maintenance agreements with us, from which our maintenance revenues are derived over future fiscal periods. As customers endeavor to control costs, the Company has experienced, and may continue to experience, lower rates of maintenance contract renewal as well as a trend of migration from premium support options to less expensive support levels, which has, and in the future would, adversely affect the levels of our maintenance revenues.

Our total revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2012 decreased approximately $1.2 million (or 28%) compared to the corresponding period in fiscal year 2011. This resulted primarily from an approximate $994,000 decrease in license revenues resulting from fewer larger license transactions in the period. Total revenues also reflected approximately $235,000 of unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations compared to the same quarter in fiscal year 2011.

Our total revenues for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 decreased approximately $1.1 million (or 9%) compared to the corresponding period in fiscal year 2011. This decrease was primarily due to an approximate $610,000 decrease in license revenues resulting from fewer larger license transactions and an approximate $398,000 decrease in maintenance revenues, which were principally due to a decrease in recognized back maintenance revenues compared to the first nine months of our

21

fiscal year 2011 and to a lesser extent, lapsed premium support contracts. Total revenues also reflected approximately $479,000 of unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations compared to the same period in fiscal year 2011.

One telecommunications customer accounted for approximately 8% and 11% of our total revenues in the three months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. This same customer accounted for approximately 19% and 10% of our total revenues in the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. A different telecommunications customer accounted for approximately 10% of our total revenues in the three months ended July 31, 2012. One health care customer accounted for approximately 11% of total revenues in the three months ended July 31, 2011.

License. License revenues represent perpetual and term license fees recognized from our End-User and Value Added Resellers customers.

License revenues were $1.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2012, a decrease of $994,000 (or 42%) from $2.3 million reported for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. This decrease in license revenues resulted primarily from fewer larger license transactions in the current quarter, including the absence of a transaction comparable to an approximate $500,000 end-user license transaction recognized in the third quarter of our prior fiscal year. License revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2012 also included an approximate $99,000 decrease resulting from unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

License revenues were $6.1 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2012, a decrease of $610,000 (or 9%) from $6.8 million reported for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The decrease in license revenues resulted primarily from fewer larger transactions. License revenues for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 included an approximate $261,000 decrease resulting from unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Maintenance. Maintenance and technical support revenues include revenues derived from maintenance agreements, under which we provide customers with software upgrades and internet and telephone access to support personnel, dedicated technical assistance and emergency response support options.

Maintenance revenues were $1.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 2012, decreasing $147,000 (or 8%) from the $1.8 million reported for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The decrease in maintenance revenues in the current quarter was primarily due to $135,000 in unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations compared to the same period in fiscal year 2011.

Maintenance revenues were $5.0 million for the nine months ended July 31, 2012, a decrease of $398,000 (or 7%) from $5.4 million reported for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. This decrease in maintenance revenues resulted from a decrease of approximately $148,000 in recognized back maintenance revenues during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and approximately $216,000 in unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.

Professional Services. Professional services revenues consist of revenues from consulting, training and technical support as well as billable travel expenses incurred by our professional services organization.

Professional services revenues were $18,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2012, a decrease of $21,000 (or 54%) from $39,000 reported for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. Professional services revenues were $84,000 for the nine months ended July 31, 2012, a decrease of $55,000 (or 40%) from $139,000 reported for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The year to date decrease in professional services revenues compared to the corresponding period a year ago was largely attributable to one consulting engagement with a European customer for approximately $53,000 that was performed in the first quarter of our prior fiscal year 2011.

22

International Revenues. The following table summarizes our revenues by geographic area for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except percentages):
	Three Months Ended July 31,
			Percentage				Percentage		Change
	2012		of revenues		2011		of revenues		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Revenues by region:
North America	$	1,369	45	%	$	1,953	46	%	$	(584	)	(30	)%
Europe	1,556		51		1,950		46		(394		)	(20	)
Asia	117		4		301		8		(184		)	(61	)
	$	3,042	100	%	$	4,204	100	%	$	(1,162	)	(28	)%

	Nine Months Ended July 31,
			Percentage				Percentage		Change
	2012		of revenues		2011		of revenues		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Revenues by region:
North America	$	3,524	31	%	$	4,941	40	%	$	(1,417	)	(29	)%
Europe	7,244		65		6,756		55		488			7
Asia	462		4		596		5		(134		)	(22	)
	$	11,230	100	%	$	12,293	100	%	$	(1,063	)	(9	)%

Total revenues decreased approximately $1.2 million (or 28%) in the three months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the corresponding period of fiscal year 2011. The decrease in total revenues was primarily due to an approximate $584,000 (or 30%) decrease in North American revenues and an approximate $394,000 (or 20%) decrease in European revenues. Total revenues for the three months ended July 31, 2012 also included approximately $235,000 in unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which are primarily connected with our European operations. Each region’s revenue as a percentage of total revenue varies from quarter to quarter as a result of the transactions specific to that region in each quarter and does not necessarily reflect a trend.

Total revenues decreased approximately $1.1 million (or 9%) in the nine months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the corresponding period of fiscal year 2011. The decrease in total revenues was primarily due to an approximate $1.4 million (or 29%) decrease in North American revenues that was partially offset by an approximate $488,000 (or 7%) increase in European revenues. Total revenues for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 also included approximately $479,000 in unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, which are primarily connected with our European operations.

International revenues (revenues from the European and Asian regions) represented approximately 55% and 69% of our total revenues for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012, as compared to 54% and 60% for the comparable periods in fiscal year 2011. The increases in revenues outside North America as a percentage of total revenues resulted from a greater number of larger license transactions in Europe coupled with a decrease in larger license transactions and recognized back maintenance in North America that resulted in a decrease of approximately $584,000 and $1.4 million in North American revenues for the three and nine month periods ended July 31, 2012 compared to the same periods in 2011.

Revenues from North America. The $584,000 (or 30%) decrease in revenues from North America in the three months ended July 31, 2012 was primarily the result an approximate $523,000 (or 44%) decrease in license revenues. This decrease resulted from fewer larger license transactions in the three months ended July 31, 2012 and the recognition of $500,000 of revenue from an end-user license transaction in the third quarter of our prior fiscal year, for which there was no comparable transaction in the quarter ended July 31, 2012. Service revenues in North America declined approximately $61,000 (or 8%) for the three months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2011.

The $1.4 million (or 29%) revenue decrease from North America in the nine months ended July 31, 2012 was primarily the result of an approximate $1.2 million (or 47%) decrease in license revenues and an approximate $253,000 (or 10%) decrease in services revenue. The decrease in license revenues was primarily due to the relative absence in this period of larger license transactions in North America. The decrease in North American maintenance revenues for the nine months ended July 31, 2012

23

was primarily due to an approximate $148,000 decrease in recognized back maintenance compared to the first nine months of prior fiscal year 2011 and an approximate $103,000 decrease resulting from unrenewed maintenance contracts.

Revenues from Europe. Revenues from Europe decreased $394,000 (or 20%) in the three months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011, primarily due to an approximate $301,000 (or 32%) decrease in license revenues and an approximate $93,000 (or 9%) decrease in services revenues. These European revenue decreases for the three months ended July 31, 2012 were predominantly caused by approximately $235,000 in decreases resulting from unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations compared to the same period in fiscal year 2011 and to a lesser extent, fewer larger license transactions.

Revenues from Europe increased $488,000 (or 7%) in the nine months ended July 31, 2012, primarily due to an approximate $642,000 increase in license revenues resulting from a greater number of larger transactions in that region and an increase in the average license volume per customer. Services revenues generated in Europe decreased approximately $155,000 during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2011 due to the termination of premium maintenance agreements and reduced professional services revenue. Total revenues from Europe for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 were also impacted by an approximate $479,000 decrease due to unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Since the Company’s acquisition of Poet Holdings, Inc. in early 2004, we have generally derived a higher percentage of our revenues from Europe due to stronger demand for our products there. We expect in the future to continue to experience a somewhat stronger demand for our products in Europe compared to our other geographic markets.

Revenues from Asia. Revenues from the Asia Pacific region decreased $184,000 (or 61%) during the three months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2011 due to an approximate $175,000 decrease in license revenues resulting from fewer larger license transactions. Service revenues declined slightly, decreasing approximately $9,000 from the corresponding period in fiscal year 2011.

Revenues from the Asia Pacific region decreased $134,000 (or 22%) during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the same period in fiscal year 2011 principally due to an approximate $88,000 decrease in license revenues resulting from fewer larger license transactions. Service revenues decreased approximately $44,000 from the corresponding period in fiscal year 2011 largely due to one customer moving to a less expensive support option.

A variety of factors may impact Versant’s future revenues, including the potential strengthening of the U.S. dollar (which would have the effect of further reducing portions of our revenue as a result of unfavorable currency exchange fluctuations), the generally more difficult economic environment currently being experienced in the global economy, which may negatively impact demand for our products and services, and competitive market conditions.

24

Cost of Revenues

The following table summarizes total cost of revenues for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except percentages): 

	Three Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		Change
	2012		2011		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Cost of revenues:
License	$	57	$	66	$	(9	)	(14	)%
Amortization of intangible assets	26		26		—			—
Maintenance	326		384		(58		)	(15	)
Professional services	9		26		(17		)	(65	)
Total	$	418	$	502	$	(84	)	(17	)%

	Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		Change
	2012		2011		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Cost of revenues:
License	$	189	$	199	$	(10	)	(5	)%
Amortization of intangible assets	78		164		(86		)	(52	)
Maintenance	1,027		1,111		(84		)	(8	)
Professional services	41		68		(27		)	(40	)
Total	$	1,335	$	1,542	$	(207	)	(13	)%

Total Cost of Revenues. Total cost of revenues was $418,000 (or 14% of revenues) and $1.3 million (or 12% of revenues) for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012, respectively, declining compared to $502,000 (or 12% of revenues) and $1.5 million (or 11% of revenues) for the comparable periods in fiscal year 2011. The decrease in the cost of revenues includes an approximate $33,000 decrease and an approximate $48,000 decrease due to favorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012, respectively.

License. Cost of license revenues consists primarily of royalties, the cost of third party products which we resell to our customers, as well as product media, shipping and packaging costs.

Cost of license revenues was $57,000 (or 4% of license revenues) and $189,000 (or 3% of license revenues) for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012, respectively, remaining relatively stable compared to $66,000 (or 3% of license revenues) and $199,000 (or 3% of license revenues) reported for the comparable periods in fiscal year 2011.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. Amortization of intangible assets results from our fiscal year 2009 acquisition of db4o and fiscal year 2004 acquisition of Poet Holdings, Inc.

Amortization of intangible assets was $26,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011. Amortization of intangible assets was $78,000 for the nine months ended July 31, 2012, a decrease of $86,000 (or 52%) from $164,000 reported for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The year to date decrease was due to intangible assets related to Poet Holdings, Inc. being fully amortized in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011. We expect to incur amortization charges of approximately $26,000 for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2012.

Maintenance. Cost of maintenance revenues consists primarily of salaries, bonuses and consulting fees for customer support personnel and related expenses, including employee benefits and allocated overhead.

Cost of maintenance revenues was $326,000 (or 19% of maintenance revenues) and $1.0 million (or 21% of maintenance revenues) for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 compared to $384,000 (or 21% of maintenance revenues) and $1.1

25

million (or 21% of maintenance revenues) reported for the comparable periods in fiscal year 2011, remaining generally consistent in both dollars and as a percentage of revenues. The decrease in the cost of maintenance revenues includes an approximate $28,000 decrease and an approximate $40,000 decrease due to favorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012, respectively.

Professional Services. Cost of professional services consists of salaries, bonuses, third party consulting fees and other costs associated with supporting our professional services organization.

Cost of professional services revenues decreased $17,000 to $9,000 (or 50% of professional services revenues) for the three months ended July 31, 2012 compared to $26,000 (or 67% of professional services revenues) reported for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. Cost of professional services revenues decreased $27,000 to $41,000 (or 49% of professional services revenues) for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 compared to $68,000 (or 49% of professional services revenues) reported for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. Cost of professional services to provide training and consulting vary according to product mix, number of participants and travel arrangements.

Operating Expenses

The following table summarizes our operating expenses for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		Change
	2012		2011		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	$	1,627	$	1,341	$	286		21	%
Research and development	1,328		1,055		273			26
General and administrative	815		786		29			4
Restructuring	—		25		(25		)	(100	)
Total	$	3,770	$	3,207	$	563		18	%

	Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		Change
	2012		2011		Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	$	4,560	$	4,161	$	399		10	%
Research and development	3,668		2,967		701			24
General and administrative	2,654		3,093		(439		)	(14	)
Restructuring	—		25		(25		)	(100	)
Total	$	10,882	$	10,246	$	636		6	%

Total Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses were $3.8 million (or 124% of revenues) for the three months ended July 31, 2012 and $3.2 million (or 76% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The $563,000 (or 18%) increase in total operating expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2012 resulted primarily from an approximate $559,000 increase in investment in sales and marketing and research and development. Total operating expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2012 included an approximate decrease of $246,000 due to favorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations which most significantly impact our research and development costs.

Total operating expenses were $10.9 million (or 97% of revenues) for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and $10.2 million (or 83% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The $636,000 (or 6%) increase in total operating expenses for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 resulted primarily from an approximate $1.1 million increase in investment in sales and marketing and research and development that was partially offset by an approximate $439,000 decrease in general and administrative costs. Total operating expenses for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 included an approximate decrease of

26

$363,000 due to favorable foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations which most significantly impact our research and development costs.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel and personnel related expenses, commissions earned by sales personnel, and expenses associated with trade shows, travel and other marketing communication costs, such as advertising and public relations.

Sales and marketing expenses were $1.6 million (or 53% of revenues) for the three months ended July 31, 2012 and $1.3 million (or 31% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The $286,000 increase (or 21%) in sales and marketing expenses in the three months ended July 31, 2012 was primarily due to the expansion of marketing programs including public relations, lead generation and qualification, participation in trade groups and advertising which increased approximately $195,000 compared to the corresponding period in 2011. Contributing to the increase in sales and marketing costs was an approximate $126,000 increase related to personnel changes including our new Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing, director of energy sector business development and a new product manager, including compensation, facilities and travel costs and an approximate $59,000 increase in consulting services. These increases were partially offset by an approximate $35,000 decrease in the costs of distribution in Asia and a decrease of approximately $79,000 resulting from favorable foreign currency exchange fluctuations.

Sales and marketing expenses were $4.6 million (or 40% of revenues) for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and $4.2 million (or 34% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The $399,000 increase (or 10%) in sales and marketing expenses in the nine months ended July 31, 2012 was primarily due to an approximate $332,000 expansion of marketing programs, an approximate $116,000 increase in consulting services, an approximate $76,000 increase in compensation, facilities and travel costs related to personnel changes and an approximate $90,000 increased investment in sales and marketing infrastructure, including costs for our new website and customer relationship management software. These increases to sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the corresponding period of fiscal year 2011 were partially offset by an approximate $75,000 decrease in the costs of distribution in Asia, an approximate $40,000 decrease in recruiting costs and a decrease of approximately $107,000 resulting from favorable foreign currency exchange fluctuations.

We expect our sales and marketing expenses to continue to increase during the remainder of fiscal year 2012 due to anticipated increases in programs to implement our Big Data strategic product development initiative and we expect that sales and marketing expenses will continue to represent a considerable percentage of our total operating expenditures in the future.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel and related expenses, including payroll and employee benefits, expenses for facilities and payments made to outside software development contractors.

Research and development expenses were $1.3 million (or 44% of revenues) for the three months ended July 31, 2012 and $1.1 million (or 25% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The $273,000 (or 26%) increase was primarily due to an approximate $134,000 increase in personnel costs in both Germany and the United States, including related travel and facilities costs, and an approximate $240,000 increase in strategic consulting costs as we invest in new product development efforts to pursue our Big Data strategic product development initiative. Research and development expenses for the three months ended July 31, 2012 included an approximate $129,000 decrease due to favorable foreign currency exchange fluctuations.

Research and development expenses were $3.7 million (or 33% of revenues) for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and $3.0 million (or 24% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The $701,000 (or 24%) increase was primarily due to an approximate $450,000 increase in personnel costs in both Germany and the United States, an approximate $133,000 increase in related travel, training and facilities costs and an approximate $293,000 increase in strategic consulting costs. Research and development expenses for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 included an approximate $203,000 decrease due to favorable foreign currency exchange fluctuations compared to the corresponding period in fiscal year 2011.

We expect our research and development expenses to continue to increase significantly during the remainder of fiscal year 2012 compared to our research and development expense levels in fiscal year 2011. As part of our strategic Big Data product development initiative, we plan to invest resources, including investments in relationships with strategic technology partners, to develop new data management software products capable of enabling customers' development of Big Data analytic applications.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related expenses and general operating expenses.

27

General and administrative expenses were $815,000 (or 27% of revenues) for the three months ended July 31, 2012 compared to $786,000 (or 19% of revenues) for the same period in fiscal year 2011. The $29,000 (or 4%) increase in general and administrative expense for the three months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2011 was primarily due to an approximate $50,000 increase in professional services costs and an approximate $13,000 increase in Directors fees partially offset by an approximate $38,000 decrease due to favorable foreign currency exchange fluctuations.

General and administrative expenses were $2.7 million (or 24% of revenues) for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and $3.1 million (or 25% of revenues) for the comparable period in fiscal year 2011. The $439,000 (or 14%) decrease in general and administrative expense was primarily due to approximately $470,000 in one-time separation costs incurred in the second quarter of our prior fiscal year 2011 related to the departure of our former CEO. This decrease was partially offset by an approximate $86,000 increase in professional services costs for the nine months ended July 31, 2012. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2011 included an approximate $53,000 decrease due to favorable foreign currency exchange fluctuations.

We expect our general and administrative expenses to remain relatively consistent with the current quarter for the remainder of fiscal year 2012.

Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net

The following table summarizes our interest and other income (expense), net for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		Change
	2012		2011		Amount		Percentage
	(unaudited)
Interest and other income (expense), net:
Interest and other income (expense), net	$	13	$	13	$	—	—	%
Foreign exchange income (loss)	60		21		39		186
Total	$	73	$	34	$	39	115	%

	Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,			Change
	2012		2011			Amount		Percentage
	(unaudited)
Interest and other income (expense), net:
Interest and other income (expense), net	$	94	$	44		$	50	114	%
Foreign exchange income (loss)	35		(58		)	93		160
Total	$	129	$	(14	)	$	143	1,021	%

Interest and other income (expense), net, consists of interest income earned on our cash and cash equivalents, net of interest expense due to our financing activities, miscellaneous costs or refunds and foreign exchange rate gains or losses as a result of settling transactions denominated in currencies other than our functional currency.

Interest and other income (expense), net, was income of $73,000 (or 2% of total revenues) and $129,000 (or 1% of total revenues) for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and income of $34,000 (or 1% of total revenues) and expense of $14,000 (or less than 1% of total revenues) for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2011, respectively. The approximate $39,000 (or 115%) and $143,000 (or 1,021%) increase in interest and other income (expense), net for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 is due to an increase in earned interest on our cash reserves and primarily due to the favorable change in foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from settling transactions denominated in currencies other than our functional currency.

28

Provision for Income Taxes

The following table reflects the Company’s income tax expense (benefit) for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,			Change
	2012		2011			Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Income tax (benefit) expense:
Foreign withholding taxes	$	8	$	18		$	(10	)	(56	)%
Provision for income taxes - Europe	88		38			50			132
Provision for income taxes - India	—		—			—			—
Federal, state and franchise taxes	—		(1		)	1			100
Total	$	96	$	55		$	41		75	%

	Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,			Change
	2012		2011			Amount			Percentage
	(unaudited)
Income tax (benefit) expense:
Foreign withholding taxes	$	23	$	26		$	(3	)	(12	)%
Provision for income taxes - Europe	295		68			227			334
Provision for income taxes - India	67		—			67			100
Federal, state and franchise taxes	4		(1		)	5			500
Total	$	389	$	93		$	296		318	%

The Company’s tax provisions were based upon our projected fiscal year 2012 and 2011 effective tax rates. We incurred foreign withholding taxes of approximately $8,000 and $23,000 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012, and $18,000 and $26,000 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2011, respectively, which we have included in our income tax provision.

Although we have not exhausted our net operating tax loss carry forwards in Germany, the German tax code provides for certain annual statutory limitations related to the use of tax loss carry forward amounts. We recorded income tax expense for our European operations of approximately $88,000 and $38,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and approximately $295,000 and $68,000 for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In the first nine months of fiscal year 2012, our German subsidiary has had higher profits than in the same period of fiscal year 2011 primarily due to the timing of revenue transactions, the mix of products sold, the unrealized foreign exchange gains on holdings of US dollars and to a lesser extent, the absence of the one-time separation costs associated with our former CEO and managing director of our German subsidiary incurred in fiscal year 2011.

In conjunction with the wind-down of our operations in India, we were subject to an income tax inspection. Additional taxes and penalties of approximately $67,000 were imposed as a result of this inspection, which have been included in our income tax provision for the nine months ended July 31, 2012.

In evaluating our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including our past operating results in the most recent fiscal years and our assessment of expected future results of operations on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis. Significant management judgment is required to determine when, in the future, the realization of our net deferred tax assets will become more likely than not. The Company will continue to assess the realizability of the tax benefit available based on actual and forecast operating results.

29

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table sets forth certain consolidated balance sheets data as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 and certain consolidated statements of cash flows data for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except percentages):

	July 31, 2012		October 31, 2011		Percentage Change
	(unaudited)
Working Capital	$	19,892	$	22,784	(13)%
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,577	$	23,145	(7)%

	Nine Months Ended
	July 31,			July 31,			Percentage
	2012			2011			Change
	(unaudited)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	1,205		$	2,256		(47)%
Net cash used in investing activities	(354		)	(670		)	(47)%
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(2,006	)	$	(3,382	)	(41)%

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We funded our business from cash generated by our operations during the nine months ended July 31, 2012. As of July 31, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $21.6 million, a decrease of $1.6 million from the $23.1 million of cash and cash equivalents we held at October 31, 2011.

As of July 31, 2012, $5.1 million of our $21.6 million in cash and cash equivalents was held in foreign financial institutions, of which $2.3 million was held in foreign currencies.

The following table summarizes our cash balances held in foreign currencies and their equivalent U.S. dollar amounts (in thousands):
	July 31, 2012				October 31, 2011
	Local Currency		U.S. Dollar		Local Currency		U.S. Dollar
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
Cash in foreign currency:
Euros	€	1,744	$	2,140	€	1,919	$	2,716
Indian Rupee	Rs	10,794	195		Rs	12,824	265
Total			$	2,335			$	2,981

Foreign Currency Risk. We transact business in various foreign currencies and, accordingly, we are subject to exposure from adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our net operating results in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, was comprised of approximately $235,000 of unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations on our revenues, $33,000 of favorable foreign currency fluctuations on our cost of revenues, and $246,000 of favorable foreign currency fluctuations on our operating expenses, resulting in a net favorable effect of approximately $44,000 on our income from operations for the three months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the same three month period ended July 31, 2011.

The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our net operating results in the first nine months of fiscal year 2012, as compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2011, was comprised of approximately $479,000 of unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations on our revenues, $48,000 of favorable foreign currency fluctuations on our cost of revenues, and $363,000 of favorable foreign currency fluctuations on our operating expenses, resulting in a net unfavorable effect of approximately $68,000 on our income from operations for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 compared to the nine months ended July 31, 2011.

30

Operating expenses incurred by our foreign subsidiaries are denominated primarily in local currencies. We currently do not use financial instruments to hedge these operating expenses. While we intend to continue to assess the need to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an ongoing basis, we do not at this time anticipate establishing any hedging during fiscal year 2012.

Our exposure to foreign exchange risk is primarily related to the magnitude of foreign net profits and losses denominated in euros, as well as our net position of monetary assets and monetary liabilities in the euro (though in the future the same could be true of other foreign currencies depending on the source of our revenues). This exposure has the potential to produce either gains or losses within our consolidated results. However, in some instances our European operations act as a natural hedge, since both operating expenses as well as revenues are denominated in local currencies. In these instances, although an unfavorable change in the exchange rate of the euro against the U.S. dollar will result in lower revenues when translated into U.S. dollars, our European operating expenditures will be lower as well.

Additionally, we held approximately 89% of our total cash and cash equivalents balances at July 31, 2012 in the form of U.S. dollars to assist in minimizing the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.

In relation to our cash balances held overseas, there were no European Union foreign exchange restrictions on repatriating our overseas-held cash to the United States. However, we may be subject to income tax withholding in the source countries and to U.S. federal and state income taxes in the future if the cash payment or transfer from our subsidiaries to the U.S. parent were to be characterized as a dividend. Other payments made by our European overseas subsidiary in the ordinary course of business (e.g. payment of royalties or interest from the subsidiary to the U.S. parent) were generally not subject to income tax withholding under existing tax treaties.

Interest Rate Risk. Our cash equivalents primarily consist of money market accounts and short-term time deposits; accordingly, our interest rate risk is not considered significant.

Stock Repurchase Program. On November 28, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program announced on December 1, 2011, pursuant to which Versant is authorized to repurchase up to $5.0 million of its common stock in fiscal year 2012. This stock repurchase program is currently scheduled to expire upon the earlier of October 31, 2012, or at such time as Versant has expended $5.0 million to repurchase outstanding common shares under the program; however the program may be suspended, discontinued or extended at any earlier time by the Company.

From the date of announcement of this stock repurchase program through July 31, 2012, Versant acquired under this program a total of 215,844 common shares on the open market for approximately 2.3 million at an average purchase price of $10.58 per share, leaving approximately $2.7 million in authorized funds available for future repurchases of stock under this program at July 31, 2012.

Taking into consideration the contingent cash outflows related to potential common stock repurchases, our current cost structure, our anticipated expenses and our current estimates of revenues and collections in fiscal year 2012, we expect to operate with a moderate negative cash flow in fiscal year 2012.

Cash Flow provided by Operating Activities

The main source of our operating cash flows is cash collections from customers who have purchased or resold our products and services. Our primary uses of cash in operating activities are for personnel related expenditures and facility costs.

We generated $1.2 million of cash flows from operations in the nine months ended July 31, 2012. This amount resulted from $1.2 million in net loss adjusted for non-cash charges of $1.1 million and a $1.3 million decrease in operating assets net of liabilities during the first nine months of fiscal year 2012. The decrease in operating assets net of liabilities was primarily related to an approximate $503,000 decrease in trade accounts receivable, an approximate $455,000 increase in accrued liabilities principally related to strategic consulting costs and an approximate $361,000 increase in deferred revenues.

We generated $2.3 million of cash flows from operations in the nine months ended July 31, 2011. This amount resulted from $398,000 in net income adjusted for non-cash charges of $1.2 million and a $611,000 decrease in operating assets net of liabilities during the first nine months of fiscal year 2011. The decrease in operating assets net of liabilities was primarily related to an approximate $1.1 million decrease in trade accounts receivable partially offset by an approximate $318,000 increase in other assets principally due to tax prepayments and an approximate $289,000 decrease in accrued liabilities.

The timing of collections from our customers for accounts receivable, the timing of renewal of maintenance contracts and to a lesser extent, payments to our vendors for accounts payable will significantly impact cash flows in our operating activities, and

31

differences in these variables contributed to the differences in our cash flows from operations in the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011. We typically pay our vendors and service providers in accordance with their invoice terms and conditions. Our standard payment terms for our invoices are usually between 30 and 90 days net.

We measure the effectiveness of our collection efforts by an analysis of our accounts receivable and our days sales outstanding (DSO). We calculate DSO by taking the ending accounts receivable balances (net of bad debt allowance) divided by the average daily sales amount. Average daily sales amount is calculated by dividing the total quarterly revenue recognized net of changes in deferred revenues by 91.25 days. Our DSOs were 59 days and 49 days for the three months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Collections of accounts receivable and related DSO could fluctuate in future periods due to the timing and amount of our revenues and the effectiveness of our collection efforts.

Cash Flow used in Investing Activities

For the nine months ended July 31, 2012, $354,000 of cash was used in investing activities for the purchases of property and equipment, including software licenses, hardware and infrastructure for our server room.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, $670,000 of cash was used in investing activities for the purchases of property and equipment, including software licenses, new hardware for testing environments and website design costs.

Cash Flow used in Financing Activities

On November 28, 2011 and November 29, 2010, our Board of Directors approved stock repurchase programs. Under each program, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to $5.0 million worth of its outstanding common shares from time to time on the open market, in block trades or otherwise. The stock repurchase program approved on November 30, 2010 expired pursuant to its own terms on October 31, 2011.

The primary source of cash flows from financing activities is proceeds from the sale of common stock under our Equity Incentive Plan, Directors’ Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2012, $2.0 million of cash was used in financing activities, consisting of $2.3 million of cash used to repurchase our common stock, partially offset by cash inflows of $285,000 from the issuance of common stock under our Equity Incentive and Employee Stock Purchase Plans.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, $3.4 million of cash was used by financing activities, consisting of $3.6 million of cash used to repurchase our common stock, partially offset by cash inflows of $202,000 from the issuance of common stock under our Equity Incentive and Employee Stock Purchase Plans.

Our future liquidity and capital resources could be impacted by our stock repurchase program as described above, and by the exercise of outstanding common stock options and the cash proceeds we receive upon exercise of these securities. As of July 31, 2012, we had approximately 11,000 shares available to issue under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, approximately 332,000 shares available to issue under our current Equity Incentive Plan and our Directors' Stock Option Plan and approximately 644,000 shares in outstanding option grants and restricted stock units under our equity plans. The timing of the issuance, the duration of vesting provisions and the grant price will all impact the timing of any proceeds. Accordingly, we cannot estimate the amount of such proceeds at this time.

Commitments and Contingencies

Our principal commitments as of July 31, 2012 consist of obligations under operating leases for facilities and equipment. As reported in Note 5, Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) under Item 1 of Part I, of this Report, the Company leases office space for its U.S. headquarters in Redwood City, California and also leases field office space in Hamburg and Munich, Germany under multi-year operating lease agreements.

The Company enters into indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business. The Company's license agreements with customers generally require it to indemnify the customer against claims that its software infringes third party patent, copyright, trademark or other proprietary rights. Such indemnification obligations are generally limited in a variety of industry-standard respects. If a liability associated with any of the Company's indemnifications becomes probable and the amount of the liability is reasonably estimable or the minimum amount of a range of loss is reasonably estimable, then an appropriate liability will be established. The estimated fair value of these indemnification liabilities is minimal, though the Company has received correspondence from a customer asserting that the Company has a potential indemnification obligation to such customer. Based

32

on currently available information, the Company disputes this assertion.

On November 28, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program pursuant to which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to $5.0 million of its common stock in fiscal year 2012. The stock repurchase program is currently scheduled to expire upon the earlier of October 31, 2012, or upon such time as Versant has expended $5.0 million to repurchase outstanding common shares under the program; however the program may be earlier suspended, discontinued, or extended at any time by the Company.

After taking into account potential common stock repurchases under our current stock repurchase program, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash to be generated from operations will be sufficient to finance our operations during the next twelve months. However, if we fail to generate adequate cash flows from operations in the future, due to an unexpected decline in our revenues, difficulties or delays in collection of revenues or due to a sustained increase in cash expenditures in excess of the revenues generated, then our cash balances may not be sufficient to fund our continuing operations without obtaining additional debt or equity financing. Additional cash may also be needed to acquire or invest in, and integrate, complementary businesses or products or to obtain the right to use complementary technologies, and we expect that, in the event of such an acquisition or investment that is significant, it will be necessary for us to seek additional debt or equity financing.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For recent accounting pronouncements see Note 1, Basis of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Foreign Currency Risk. We transact business in various foreign currencies and, accordingly, we are subject to exposure from adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our net operating results in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2011, was comprised of approximately $235,000 of unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations on our revenues, $33,000 of favorable foreign currency fluctuations on our cost of revenues, and $246,000 of favorable foreign currency fluctuations on our operating expenses, resulting in a net favorable effect of approximately $44,000 on our income from operations for the three months ended July 31, 2012.

The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our net operating results in the first nine months of fiscal year 2012, as compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2011, was comprised of approximately $479,000 of unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations on our revenues, $48,000 of favorable foreign currency fluctuations on our cost of revenues, and $363,000 of favorable foreign currency fluctuations on our operating expenses, resulting in a net unfavorable effect of approximately $68,000 on our income from operations for the nine months ended July 31, 2012.

Operating expenses incurred by our foreign subsidiaries are denominated primarily in local currencies. We currently do not use financial instruments to hedge these operating expenses. While we intend to continue to assess the need to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an ongoing basis, we do not at this time anticipate establishing any hedging during fiscal year 2012.

Our exposure to foreign exchange risk is primarily related to the magnitude of foreign net profits and losses denominated in euros, as well as our net position of monetary assets and monetary liabilities in the euro (though in the future the same could be true of other foreign currencies depending on the source of our revenues). This exposure has the potential to produce either gains or losses within our consolidated results. However, in some instances our European operations act as a natural hedge, since both operating expenses as well as revenues are denominated in local currencies. In these instances, although an unfavorable change in the exchange rate of the euro against the U.S. dollar will result in lower revenues when translated into U.S. dollars, our European operating expenditures will be lower as well.

Additionally, we held approximately 89% of our total cash and cash equivalents balances at July 31, 2012 in the form of U.S. dollars to assist in minimizing the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.

Interest Rate Risk. Our cash equivalents primarily consist of money market accounts and short-term time deposits; accordingly, our interest rate risk is not considered significant.

We do not own any derivative financial instruments as of July 31, 2012.

33

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), include components of our internal control over financial reporting. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is expressed at the level of reasonable assurance because a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met.

Based on the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures by our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that (i) information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting  (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) during the three months ended July 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

34

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c) Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

On November 28, 2011 Versant’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program pursuant to which Versant is authorized to repurchase up to $5.0 million of its common stock in fiscal year 2012. This stock repurchase program is currently scheduled to expire upon the earlier of October 31, 2012, or at such time as Versant has expended $5.0 million to repurchase outstanding common shares under the program; however the program may be suspended, discontinued or extended at any earlier time by the Company.

The stock repurchase activity during the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 is summarized as follows:

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
	Total Number of Shares Purchased (2)	Average Price Paid Per Share (1)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan or Program	Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan or Program
Period:
May 1 - May 31, 2012	10,969	$	9.81	10,969	$	2,839,097
June 1 - June 30, 2012	12,487	9.75		12,487	$	2,717,367
July 1 - July 31, 2012	—	—		—	$	2,717,367
Three months ended July 31, 2012	23,456	$	9.78	23,456
November 28, 2011 - April 30, 2012	192,388	$	10.67	192,388
Nine months ended July 31, 2012	215,844	$	10.58	215,844

(1) Average price paid per share is calculated on a settlement basis and excludes commission.

(2) All repurchases reflected in the above table were made pursuant to the Company's fiscal 2012 stock repurchase program, announced on December 1, 2011, which authorizes the repurchase of up to $5.0 million of common stock. The stock repurchase program is currently scheduled to expire upon the earlier of October 31, 2012, or at such time as Versant has expended $5.0 million to repurchase outstanding common shares under the program; however the program may be suspended, discontinued, terminated or extended at any time by the Company.

35

Item 6.  Exhibits

(a)  Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:

Exhibit  Number	Exhibit Description
31.01	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.02	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.01*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.02*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.ins†	XBRL Instance Document
101.sch†	XBRL Schema Document
101.cal†	XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.pre†	XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.lab†	XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.def†	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

 ___________________________________________________

*This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

†     In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits is furnished and deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

36

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		VERSANT CORPORATION
Dated:	September 13, 2012	/s/ Bernhard Woebker
		Bernhard Woebker
		Chief Executive Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer) and Director
		/s/ Jerry Wong
		Jerry Wong
		Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

37

EX-31.01

Exhibit 31.01

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Bernhard Woebker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Versant Corporation (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:    September 13, 2012

By:    /s/ Bernhard Woebker

Bernhard Woebker

Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.02

Exhibit 31.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jerry Wong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Versant Corporation (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:    September 13, 2012

By:    /s/ Jerry Wong

Jerry Wong

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.01

Exhibit 32.01

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Versant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bernhard Woebker, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the quarterly period covered by the Report.

/s/ Bernhard Woebker

Bernhard Woebker

Chief Executive Officer

September 13, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.02

EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Versant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry Wong, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the quarterly period covered by the Report.

/s/ Jerry Wong

Jerry Wong

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

September 13, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Per Share Data (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Per Share Data [Abstract]
Net income (loss) in $	$ (1,169)	$ 474	$ (1,247)	$ 398
Weighted Average - common shares outstanding	2,755	3,021	2,839	3,122
Net income (loss) per share, basic in $ per share	$ (0.42)	$ 0.16	$ (0.44)	$ 0.13
Incremental Common Shares Attributable to Share-based Payment Arrangements	0	0	0	1
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding and potentially dilutive common shares	2,755	3,021	2,839	3,123
Net income (loss) per share, diluted in $ per share	$ (0.42)	$ 0.16	$ (0.44)	$ 0.13
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, in shares	644	341	643	355

XML

Segment and Geographic Information Major Customers (Details) (Data Management Segment [Member], USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended				9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012		Jul. 31, 2011		Jul. 31, 2012		Jul. 31, 2011
Customer revenues in excess of 10% - A [Member]
Revenue, Major Customer [Line Items]
Entity-Wide Revenue, Major Customer, Percentage	0.00%	[1]	11.00%		19.00%		10.00%
Entity-Wide Revenue, Major Customer Receivable Balance	$ 100		$ 255		$ 100		$ 255
Major Customer Industry					Telecommunications
Customer revenues in excess of 10% - B [Member]
Revenue, Major Customer [Line Items]
Entity-Wide Revenue, Major Customer, Percentage	0.00%	[1]	11.00%		0.00%	[1]	0.00%	[1]
Entity-Wide Revenue, Major Customer Receivable Balance	0		0		0		0
Major Customer Industry					Health Care
Customer revenues in excess of 10% - C [Member]
Revenue, Major Customer [Line Items]
Entity-Wide Revenue, Major Customer, Percentage	10.00%		0.00%	[1]	0.00%	[1]	0.00%	[1]
Entity-Wide Revenue, Major Customer Receivable Balance	$ 276		$ 0		$ 276		$ 0
Major Customer Industry					Telecommunications

[1] not in excess of 10% of trade accounts receivable

XML

Income Taxes Current Provision (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) [Line Items] [Line Items]
Provision for income taxes	$ 96	$ 55	$ 389	$ 93
Federal and State
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) [Line Items] [Line Items]
Provision for income taxes	0	(1)	4	(1)
Foreign - Europe
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) [Line Items] [Line Items]
Provision for income taxes	88	38	295	68
Foreign - India
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) [Line Items] [Line Items]
Provision for income taxes	0	0	67	0
Income Tax Examination, Liability Recorded	67		67
Foreign Withholding
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) [Line Items] [Line Items]
Provision for income taxes	$ 8	$ 18	$ 23	$ 26

XML

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves Concentration of Risk (Details) (Credit Concentration Risk [Member], USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jul. 31, 2012		Oct. 31, 2011
Customer A
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Fair Value, Concentration of Risk, Accounts Receivable	$ 276		$ 0	[1]
Customer B
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Fair Value, Concentration of Risk, Accounts Receivable	204		0	[1]
Customer C
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Fair Value, Concentration of Risk, Accounts Receivable	0	[1]	362
Customer D
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Fair Value, Concentration of Risk, Accounts Receivable	0	[1]	311
Customer E
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Fair Value, Concentration of Risk, Accounts Receivable	$ 0	[1]	$ 225

[1] not in excess of 10% of trade accounts receivable

XML

Per Share Data (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Per Share Data [Abstract]

Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted [Table Text Block]

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	July 31, 2012			July 31, 2011		July 31, 2012			July 31, 2011
Net income (loss)	$	(1,169	)	$	474	$	(1,247	)	$	398
Calculation of basic net income (loss) per share:
Weighted average - common shares outstanding	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,122
Net income (loss) per share, basic	$	(0.42	)	$	0.16	$	(0.44	)	$	0.13
Calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share:
Weighted average - common shares outstanding	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,122
Dilutive effect of employee and director stock options	—			—		—			1
Weighted average - common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive common shares	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,123
Net income (loss) per share, diluted	$	(0.42	)	$	0.16	$	(0.44	)	$	0.13

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details) (Brammer Consulting Agreement [Member], USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2012
Brammer Consulting Agreement [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Related Party, Contract term - in years		1 year
Related Party Transaction, Monthly Fee		$ 10
Related Party Transaction, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses from Transactions with Related Party	$ 20	$ 30

XML

Share Based Compensation (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	$ 208	$ 244	$ 688	$ 768
All Option and Restricted Stock Unit Plans [Member]
Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	194	231	651	727
All Option and Restricted Stock Unit Plans [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Volatility Rate			45.00%	46.00%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Term			4 years 3 months	3 years 7 months
Fair Value Assumptions, Risk Free Interest Rate			0.65%	1.36%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Dividend Rate			0.00%	0.00%
All Option and Restricted Stock Unit Plans [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Volatility Rate			50.00%	53.00%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Term			5 years 9 months	5 years 6 months
Fair Value Assumptions, Risk Free Interest Rate			1.03%	1.95%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Dividend Rate			0.00%	0.00%
2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]
Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	$ 14	$ 13	$ 37	$ 41
2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Volatility Rate			31.00%	23.00%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Term			0 years 6 months	0 years 6 months
Fair Value Assumptions, Risk Free Interest Rate			0.06%	0.10%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Dividend Rate			0.00%	0.00%
2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Volatility Rate			37.00%	31.00%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Term			1 year	1 year
Fair Value Assumptions, Risk Free Interest Rate			0.21%	0.28%
Fair Value Assumptions, Expected Dividend Rate			0.00%	0.00%

XML

Commitments and Contingencies Operating Leases (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Remainder of Fiscal Year	$ 123		$ 123
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due, Next Twelve Months	409		409
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Two Years	227		227
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Three Years	13		13
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Four Years	0		0
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	772		772
Operating Leases, Rent Expense, Net	128	98	373	292
Facilties Leases
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Remainder of Fiscal Year	122		122
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due, Next Twelve Months	406		406
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Two Years	227		227
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Three Years	13		13
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Four Years	0		0
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	768		768
Equipment Leases
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Remainder of Fiscal Year	1		1
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due, Next Twelve Months	3		3
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Two Years	0		0
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Three Years	0		0
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Due in Four Years	0		0
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	4		4
Hamburg, Germany
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Number of Renewal Options - Lessee			2
Length of Renewal Option - Lessee			3 years
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	371		371
Redwood City, California, Main
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Number of Renewal Options - Lessee			2
Length of Renewal Option - Lessee			1 year
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	172		172
Munich, Germany
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Number of Renewal Options - Lessee			1
Length of Renewal Option - Lessee			2 years
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	38		38
Redwood City, California, Expansion
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Number of Renewal Options - Lessee			1
Length of Renewal Option - Lessee			1 year
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	187		187
Cupertino, California
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Number of Renewal Options - Lessee			0
Length of Renewal Option - Lessee			0 years
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Due	$ 18		$ 18

XML

Other Comprehensive Income (loss), net (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Net income (loss)	$ (1,169)	$ 474	$ (1,247)	$ 398
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Foreign Currency Transaction and Translation Gain (Loss)	(258)	(93)	(511)	65
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$ (1,427)	$ 381	$ (1,758)	$ 463

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Text Block]

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The following table presents the Company’s goodwill balance as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	Net Carrying Amount as of
	July 31, 2012		October 31, 2011
Versant Europe	$	241	$	241
Poet Holdings, Inc.	5,752		5,752
FastObjects, Inc.	677		677
JDO Genie (PTY), Ltd	50		50
db4o	1,869		1,869
Total	$	8,589	$	8,589

Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment, applying a fair-value based test. The Company's impairment evaluation for goodwill is conducted annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. Versant conducted its annual impairment test in October 2011 and determined there was no impairment.

The process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the determination of the fair value of the Company's single reporting unit. Inherent in such a fair value determination are certain judgments and estimates, including the interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations, and assumptions about the Company's strategic plans with regard to its operations. The Company believes at this time that the carrying value of its remaining goodwill is appropriate, although to the extent additional information arises, it is possible that the Company's conclusions regarding impairment of the remaining goodwill could change and result in a material effect on its financial position and results of operations. No events or circumstances occurred during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Company below its carrying amount. The Company intends to conduct its next annual impairment evaluation as of October 31, 2012.

Intangible Assets

The Company’s intangible asset balances as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	July 31, 2012						October 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
Intangible assets:
db4o-Developed Technology (Amortized over 5 years)	$	300	$	220	$	80	$	300	$	175	$	125
db4o-Customer Relationships (Amortized over 9 years)	210		86		124		210		68		142
db4o-Trade Name (Amortized over 5 years)	100		73		27		100		58		42
Total	$	610	$	379	$	231	$	610	$	301	$	309

Aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets was $26,000 and $78,000 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012, and $26,000 and $164,000 for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2011.

The projected amortization of the Company’s existing intangible assets as of July 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):

	Amortization
Three months ending October 31, 2012	$	26
Fiscal year ending October 31,
2013	103
2014	30
2015	23
2016	23
Thereafter	26
Total	$	231

XML

Share Based Compensation (Details 2) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	$ 208	$ 244	$ 688	$ 768
Cost of Sales [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	18	15	54	48
Selling and Marketing Expense [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	62	67	202	193
Research and Development Expense [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	46	50	163	154
General and Administrative Expense [Member]
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Line Items]
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	$ 82	$ 112	$ 269	$ 373

XML

Other Comprehensive Income (loss), net (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Abstract]

Schedule of Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Table Text Block]

Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	July 31,			July 31,			July 31,			July 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(1,169	)	$	474		$	(1,247	)	$	398
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(258		)	(93		)	(511		)	65
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,427	)	$	381		$	(1,758	)	$	463

XML

Income Taxes (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Schedule of Components of Income Tax Expense (Benefit) [Table Text Block]

The provision for income tax (benefit) expense consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,			July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011			2012		2011
Income tax (benefit) expense:
Federal and state	$	—	$	(1	)	$	4	$	(1	)
Foreign - Europe	88		38			295		68
Foreign - India	—		—			67		—
Foreign withholding	8		18			23		26
Total current	$	96	$	55		$	389	$	93

XML

Restructuring (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring	$ 0	$ 25	$ 0	$ 25
Retructuring Plan - Versant India Private Ltd [Member] | Operating Expense [Member]
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items]
Restructuring and Related Cost, Cost Incurred to Date			203
Restructuring	$ 0	$ 25	$ 0	$ 25

XML

Segment and Geographic Information (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Segment and Geographic Information [Abstract]

Schedule of Revenue by Major Customers by Reporting Segments [Table Text Block]

The following table reflects the percentage of revenues generated by customers that accounted for ten percent or more of total revenues and the related accounts receivable balances (in thousands, except percentages):
	Customer A				Customer B				Customer C
Customer revenues as a percentage of total revenues in the following periods:
Three months ended July 31, 2012	—		%	1	—		%	1	10		%
Three months ended July 31, 2011	11		%		11		%		—		%	1
Nine months ended July 31, 2012	19		%		—		%	1	—		%	1
Nine months ended July 31, 2011	10		%		—		%	1	—		%	1
Accounts receivable balance as of:
July 31, 2012	$	100			$	—			$	276
July 31, 2011	$	255			$	—			$	—
Industry	Telecommunications				Health Care				Telecommunications

(1) Customer revenues not in excess of 10% of total revenues

Schedule of Revenue from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets, by Geographical Areas [Table Text Block]

The following table reflects revenues for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 by each geographic region (in thousands): 

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Revenues by region:
North America	$	1,369	$	1,953	$	3,524	$	4,941
Europe	1,556		1,950		7,244		6,756
Asia	117		301		462		596
	$	3,042	$	4,204	$	11,230	$	12,293

The following table reflects long-lived assets as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 in each geographic region (in thousands): 

	July 31, 2012		October 31, 2011
Total long-lived assets by region:
North America	$	491	$	438
Germany	447		588
Asia	4		5
	$	942	$	1,031

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details) (Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member], Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member], USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jul. 31, 2012
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Cash	$ 803
Money Market Funds	16,433
Time Deposits	4,341
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Fair Value Disclosure	$ 21,577

XML

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves [Abstract]

Schedule of Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Disclosure [Text Block]

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves

Versant evaluates and revises its allowance for doubtful accounts receivable as part of its quarter end process at the subsidiary and corporate level. The Company’s management assigns a risk factor and percentage of risk to each account receivable, the collection of which is considered non-routine. Accounts are considered past due in accordance with contractual terms which usually provide for payment within 30 to 90 days. The Company also assigns a general reserve to all its overdue accounts, excluding the non-routine items.

The following table summarizes the activities in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts:

	Nine Months Ended			Fiscal Year Ended
	July 31, 2012			October 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Beginning balance	$	16		$	8
Adjustments to provision	(8		)	8
Ending balance	$	8		$	16

The following table summarizes trade accounts receivable balances in excess of 10% of the Company's total trade accounts receivable as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 (in thousands): 

	As of July 31, 2012			As of October 31, 2011
Customer A		$	276	1	$	—
Customer B		204		1	—
Customer C	1	—			362
Customer D	1	—			311
Customer E	1	—			225

(1) Balance not in excess of 10% of trade accounts receivable

XML

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves Allowance for doubtful accounts (Details) (Allowance for Trade Receivables [Member], USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Allowance for Trade Receivables [Member]
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Disclosure [Line Items]
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Beginning Balance	$ 16	$ 8
Adjustments to provision	(8)	8
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Ending Balance	$ 8	$ 16

XML

Common Stock Repurchases (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2011 Officer Stock Repurchase [Member]	Jul. 31, 2012 Fiscal Year 2012 Stock Repurchase Program [Member]	Oct. 31, 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 Stock Repurchase Program [Member]
Equity, Type of Repurchased Shares [Line Items]
Stock Repurchase Program, Authorized Amount		$ 5,000	$ 5,000
Stock Repurchase Program, Period in Force		11 months 3 days	11 months 2 days
Stock Repurchased During Period, Shares	62,545	215,844	240,629
Stock Repurchased During Period, Value	844	2,283	3,000
Stock Repurchased - Avg. price per share	$ 13.50	$ 10.58	$ 12.23
Stock Repurchase Program, Remaining Authorized Repurchase Amount		$ 2,717

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jul. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 21,577	$ 23,145
Trade accounts receivable, net	1,542	2,183
Deferred income taxes	778	898
Other current assets	612	481
Total current assets	24,509	26,707
Property and equipment, net	904	993
Goodwill	8,589	8,589
Intangible assets, net	231	309
Other assets	38	38
Total assets	34,271	36,636
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	316	152
Accrued liabilities	1,461	1,076
Deferred revenues	2,840	2,695
Total current liabilities	4,617	3,923
Other long-term liabilities	196	178
Total liabilities	4,813	4,101
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity
Common Stock, no par value, 7,500,000 shares authorized, 2,750,899 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2012 and 2,935,125 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2011	88,736	90,055
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net	(480)	31
Accumulated deficit	(58,798)	(57,551)
Total shareholders’ equity	29,458	32,535
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$ 34,271	$ 36,636

XML

Income Taxes Valuation Allowance (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jul. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Valuation Allowance [Line Items]
Deferred income taxes	$ 778	$ 898

XML

Basis of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Basis of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]

Basis of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Basis of Presentation

Versant Corporation (with its subsidiaries, collectively referred to in this report as “Versant” or “the Company”) was incorporated in California in August 1988. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this report on Form 10-Q include all of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of Versant and all entities in which Versant has a controlling interest (subsidiaries) required to be consolidated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Inter-company accounts and transactions between consolidated companies have been eliminated in consolidation.

The financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of the Company, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are normal recurring adjustments. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles related to interim financial statements and the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements.

The financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared with the presumption that users of the interim financial information have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the Company’s preceding fiscal year ended October 31, 2011. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with those audited financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, filed on January 30, 2012 (File/Film No. 000-28540/12556329), as amended by the Form 10-K/A filed on February 28, 2012 (File/Film No. 000-28540/12648015). The Company’s operating results for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period, for the full fiscal year ending October 31, 2012, or for any future periods. Further, the preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts reported therein. A change in facts or circumstances relating to the estimates could result in a change to the estimates and could impact future operating results.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Fair Value Measurement Disclosure

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") amended the disclosure requirements for the fair value measurements for recurring and nonrecurring non-financial assets and liabilities. The guidance requires new disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures were effective for the Company’s second quarter of fiscal year 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements, which were effective for the Company’s first quarter of fiscal year 2012. The adoption of this guidance had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance which amends ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. This Accounting Standards Update amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and requires performing Step 2 if qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Presentation of Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The issuance of ASU 2011-05 is intended to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 supersedes the presentation options in ASC Topic 220 and facilitates convergence of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity and requiring that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance will be appliedretrospectively and early adoption is permitted. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance to amend and simplify the rules related to testing goodwill for impairment. The revised guidance allows an entity to make an initial qualitative evaluation, based on the entity’s events and circumstances, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of this qualitative assessment determine whether it is necessary to perform the currently required two-step impairment test. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Intangible Asset Impairment Testing

In July 2012, the FASB issued guidance to allow an entity the option to first assess qualitatively whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test under the existing guidance. This guidance also provides examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider when performing the qualitative assessment such as negative or declining cash flows and deterioration in industry, market or macroeconomic conditions. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim testing dates within those years, beginning after September 15, 2012 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). Early adoption of the amended guidance is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Intangible assets (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2011
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net	$ 231		$ 231		$ 309
Amortization of intangible assets	26	26	78	164
Data Management Segment [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Gross	610		610		610
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Accumulated Amortization	379		379		301
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net	231		231		309
Developed Technology Rights [Member] | Data Management Segment [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Gross	300		300		300
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Accumulated Amortization	220		220		175
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net	80		80		125
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life			5 years
Customer Relationships [Member] | Data Management Segment [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Gross	210		210		210
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Accumulated Amortization	86		86		68
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net	124		124		142
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life			9 years
Trade Names [Member] | Data Management Segment [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Gross	100		100		100
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Accumulated Amortization	73		73		58
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net	$ 27		$ 27		$ 42
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life			5 years

XML

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves [Abstract]

Schedule of Allowance for doubtful accounts [Table Text Block]

	Nine Months Ended			Fiscal Year Ended
	July 31, 2012			October 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Beginning balance	$	16		$	8
Adjustments to provision	(8		)	8
Ending balance	$	8		$	16

Schedules of Concentration of Risk, by Risk Factor [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes trade accounts receivable balances in excess of 10% of the Company's total trade accounts receivable as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 (in thousands): 

	As of July 31, 2012			As of October 31, 2011
Customer A		$	276	1	$	—
Customer B		204		1	—
Customer C	1	—			362
Customer D	1	—			311
Customer E	1	—			225

(1) Balance not in excess of 10% of trade accounts receivable

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Expected Amortization (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jul. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Amortization Expense, Remainder of Fiscal Year	$ 26
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Amortization Expense, Year Two	103
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Amortization Expense, Year Three	30
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Amortization Expense, Year Four	23
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Amortization Expense, Year Five	23
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Amortization Expense, after Year Five	26
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net	$ 231	$ 309

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Operating Leases of Lessee Disclosure [Table Text Block]

The Company's operating lease arrangements as of July 31, 2012 are summarized below (in thousands):

Leased Office Facility:	Lease Expiration Date	Total Rent Payable over the Remaining Lease Term		Options to Renew at Fair Value
Hamburg, Germany	11/30/2014	$	371	Two three year renewal options
Redwood City, California	5/31/2013	$	172	Two one year renewal options
Munich, Germany	2/28/2014	$	38	Single two year renewal option
Redwood City, California	5/31/2014	$	187	Single one year renewal option
Cupertino, California	1/15/2013	$	18	none

Schedule of Future Minimum Rental Payments for Operating Leases [Table Text Block]

Our minimum commitments under non-cancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year as of July 31, 2012 are as follows (in thousands): 

	Facilities Leases		Equipment Leases		Total
Three months ending October 31, 2012	$	122	$	1	$	123
Fiscal year ending October 31,
2013	406		3		409
2014	227		—		227
2015	13		—		13
2016	—		—		—
Total	$	768	$	4	$	772

XML

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market for the transaction and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

The FASB guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2: inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not

active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or

• Level 3: unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Financial Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Our significant financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following types of instruments as of July 31, 2012 (Level 1, 2 and 3 inputs are defined above):

	Fair Value Hierarchy	As of July 31, 2012
		(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash	Level 1		$	803
Money market funds	Level 1		16,433
Time deposits	Level 1		4,341
Total			$	21,577
The fair value of money market funds and time deposits reflect quoted market prices in an active market.

XML

Balance Sheet (Parentheticals)	Jul. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Common stock, authorized	7,500,000	7,500,000
Common stock, issued	2,750,899	2,935,125
Common stock, outstanding	2,750,899	2,935,125

XML

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Abstract]

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Note [Text Block]

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets consists of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments.

Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows (in thousands):
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	July 31,			July 31,			July 31,			July 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(1,169	)	$	474		$	(1,247	)	$	398
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(258		)	(93		)	(511		)	65
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,427	)	$	381		$	(1,758	)	$	463

XML

Document and Entity Information Document (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Sep. 10, 2012	Apr. 30, 2012
Entity Information [Line Items]
Entity Registrant Name	Versant Corporation
Entity Central Index Key	0000865917
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--10-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jul. 31, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		2,726,899
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Public Float			$ 24,511

XML

Segment and Geographic Information

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Segment and Geographic Information [Abstract]

Segment Reporting Disclosure [Text Block]

Segment and Geographic Information

ASC 280, Segment Reporting establishes standards for the manner in which public companies report information about operating segments in annual and interim financial statements which require the reporting of segment information using the “management approach.” Under this approach, operating segments are identified in substantially the same manner as they are reported internally and used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) for purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources. Based on this approach, the Company has determined that it operates in a single operating segment, Data Management.

The following table reflects the percentage of revenues generated by customers that accounted for ten percent or more of total revenues and the related accounts receivable balances (in thousands, except percentages):
	Customer A				Customer B				Customer C
Customer revenues as a percentage of total revenues in the following periods:
Three months ended July 31, 2012	—		%	1	—		%	1	10		%
Three months ended July 31, 2011	11		%		11		%		—		%	1
Nine months ended July 31, 2012	19		%		—		%	1	—		%	1
Nine months ended July 31, 2011	10		%		—		%	1	—		%	1
Accounts receivable balance as of:
July 31, 2012	$	100			$	—			$	276
July 31, 2011	$	255			$	—			$	—
Industry	Telecommunications				Health Care				Telecommunications

(1) Customer revenues not in excess of 10% of total revenues

The Company predominantly operates in North America, Europe and Asia. In general, revenues are attributed to the country in which the revenue-bearing contract originates.

The following table reflects revenues for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011 by each geographic region (in thousands): 

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Revenues by region:
North America	$	1,369	$	1,953	$	3,524	$	4,941
Europe	1,556		1,950		7,244		6,756
Asia	117		301		462		596
	$	3,042	$	4,204	$	11,230	$	12,293

The following table reflects long-lived assets as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 in each geographic region (in thousands): 

	July 31, 2012		October 31, 2011
Total long-lived assets by region:
North America	$	491	$	438
Germany	447		588
Asia	4		5
	$	942	$	1,031

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Revenues:
License	$ 1,350	$ 2,344	$ 6,148	$ 6,758
Maintenance	1,674	1,821	4,998	5,396
Professional services	18	39	84	139
Total revenues	3,042	4,204	11,230	12,293
Cost of revenues:
License	57	66	189	199
Amortization of intangible assets	26	26	78	164
Maintenance	326	384	1,027	1,111
Professional services	9	26	41	68
Total cost of revenues	418	502	1,335	1,542
Gross profit	2,624	3,702	9,895	10,751
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing	1,627	1,341	4,560	4,161
Research and development	1,328	1,055	3,668	2,967
General and administrative	815	786	2,654	3,093
Restructuring	0	25	0	25
Total operating expenses	3,770	3,207	10,882	10,246
Income (loss) from operations	(1,146)	495	(987)	505
Interest and other income (expense), net	73	34	129	(14)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(1,073)	529	(858)	491
Provision for income taxes	96	55	389	93
Net income (loss)	$ (1,169)	$ 474	$ (1,247)	$ 398
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic (in $ per share)	$ (0.42)	$ 0.16	$ (0.44)	$ 0.13
Diluted (in $ per share)	$ (0.42)	$ 0.16	$ (0.44)	$ 0.13
Shares used in per share calculation:
Basic (in shares)	2,755	3,021	2,839	3,122
Diluted (in shares)	2,755	3,021	2,839	3,123

XML

Common Stock Repurchases

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Common Stock Repurchases [Abstract]

Common Stock Repurchases [Text Block]

Common Stock Repurchases

Fiscal Year 2012 Stock Repurchase Program

On November 28, 2011 Versant’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program announced on December 1, 2011 pursuant to which Versant is authorized to repurchase up to $5.0 million of its common stock in fiscal year 2012. This stock repurchase program is currently scheduled to expire upon the earlier of October 31, 2012, or at such time as Versant has expended $5.0 million to repurchase outstanding common shares under the program; however the program may be suspended, discontinued or extended at any earlier time by the Company.

From the date of announcement of this stock repurchase program through July 31, 2012, Versant acquired under this program a total of 215,844 common shares on the open market for approximately $2.3 million at an average purchase price of $10.58 per share, leaving approximately $2.7 million in authorized funds available for future repurchases of stock under this program.

Fiscal year 2011 Stock Repurchase Program

On November 29, 2010 Versant’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing Versant to repurchase up to $5.0 million of its outstanding common shares on the open market, in block trades or otherwise. This stock repurchase program expired by its terms on October 31, 2011. Pursuant to this program, Versant acquired 240,629 common shares on the open market for approximately $3.0 million at an average purchase price of $12.23 per share.

Other Stock Repurchase

On March 10, 2011, Versant and the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer ("Former CEO") entered into a separation agreement (the “Separation Agreement”). On March 28, 2011, pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Versant repurchased 62,545 shares of Versant common stock owned by the Former CEO at a price of $13.50 per share, which reflected recent market trading prices of Versant’s common stock as of the date of the Separation Agreement.

XML

Per Share Data

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Per Share Data [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share [Text Block]

Per Share Data

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase. The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	July 31, 2012			July 31, 2011		July 31, 2012			July 31, 2011
Net income (loss)	$	(1,169	)	$	474	$	(1,247	)	$	398
Calculation of basic net income (loss) per share:
Weighted average - common shares outstanding	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,122
Net income (loss) per share, basic	$	(0.42	)	$	0.16	$	(0.44	)	$	0.13
Calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share:
Weighted average - common shares outstanding	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,122
Dilutive effect of employee and director stock options	—			—		—			1
Weighted average - common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive common shares	2,755			3,021		2,839			3,123
Net income (loss) per share, diluted	$	(0.42	)	$	0.16	$	(0.44	)	$	0.13

For the three months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, 644,000 and 341,000 potentially dilutive shares, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share by the application of the treasury stock method. For the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, 643,000 and 355,000 potentially dilutive shares, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share by the application of the treasury stock method.

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Goodwill [Table Text Block]

The following table presents the Company’s goodwill balance as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	Net Carrying Amount as of
	July 31, 2012		October 31, 2011
Versant Europe	$	241	$	241
Poet Holdings, Inc.	5,752		5,752
FastObjects, Inc.	677		677
JDO Genie (PTY), Ltd	50		50
db4o	1,869		1,869
Total	$	8,589	$	8,589

Schedule of Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Table Text Block]

The Company’s intangible asset balances as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	July 31, 2012						October 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
Intangible assets:
db4o-Developed Technology (Amortized over 5 years)	$	300	$	220	$	80	$	300	$	175	$	125
db4o-Customer Relationships (Amortized over 9 years)	210		86		124		210		68		142
db4o-Trade Name (Amortized over 5 years)	100		73		27		100		58		42
Total	$	610	$	379	$	231	$	610	$	301	$	309

Schedule of Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Future Amortization Expense [Table Text Block]

The projected amortization of the Company’s existing intangible assets as of July 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):

	Amortization
Three months ending October 31, 2012	$	26
Fiscal year ending October 31,
2013	103
2014	30
2015	23
2016	23
Thereafter	26
Total	$	231

XML

Related Party Transactions

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 14. Related Party Transactions

The Company has entered into a consulting arrangement (the "Brammer Consulting Agreement") with Dr. Robert F. Brammer, a currently serving member of the Board of Directors, under which Dr. Brammer will provide business development services to the Company. The Brammer Consulting Agreement, which was entered into in fiscal year 2012 with a one year term, currently provides for consulting fees of $10,000 per month. Consulting expenses incurred with respect to the Brammer Consulting Agreement for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012 were $20,000 and $30,000, respectively.

XML

Restructuring

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Restructuring [Abstract]

Restructuring and Related Activities Disclosure [Text Block]

Restructuring

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company committed to the implementation of a restructuring plan pursuant to which it closed its research and development facility in Pune, India and is winding down the affairs of its subsidiary, Versant India Private Limited (“Versant India”). The restructuring plan was undertaken to consolidate the Company’s research and development efforts into one location in Germany in order to streamline operations, create management efficiencies and increase productivity. The restructuring was substantially completed during the second quarter ended April 30, 2010.

Since the plan was undertaken, Versant has incurred restructuring costs of $203,000 as of July 31, 2012. No restructuring costs were incurred in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2012. Restructuring costs were $25,000 in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2011.

XML

Employee and Director Benefit Plans

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Employee and Director Benefit Plans [Abstract]

Employee and Director Benefit Plans [Text Block]

Employee and Director Benefit Plans

The Company grants common stock options and awards restricted stock units under its 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, grants common stock options under its 2005 Directors' Stock Option Plan and issues stock under its 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which plans have been approved by Versant's shareholders.

Shares Reserved for Future Issuance

At the Company's 2011 annual shareholder meeting, held on April 18, 2011, the shareholders approved an increase of 300,000 shares and 20,000 shares in the numbers of shares reserved under the Company's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 2005 Directors Stock Option Plan, respectively.

As of July 31, 2012, the Company had reserved shares of common stock for the following purposes (in thousands):

Reserved for issuance:
Employee Stock Purchase Plan	11
Shares available for grant under 2005 Equity Incentive Plan	309
Shares available for grant under 2005 Directors Stock Option Plan	23
Unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock units	644
Balance as of July 31, 2012	987

The following table summarizes stock option activities under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2012				2011
	Shares in thousands		Weighted average exercise price		Shares in thousands		Weighted average exercise price
Stock option activities:
Outstanding at the beginning of the period	651		$	15.20	515		$	16.84
Granted	62		10.80		165		11.96
Exercised	(13	)	9.42		(7	)	4.03
Forfeited and expired	(122	)	14.89		(26	)	26.98
Outstanding at the end of the period	578		$	14.92	647		$	15.31
Options exercisable at the end of the period	480		$	15.46	442		$	16.06

On February 21, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to allow the grant of restricted stock units under the plan. During the nine months ended July 31, 2012, the Board of Directors awarded 66,000 restricted stock units to employees which generally began vesting on December 1, 2011. These restricted stock units have a three-year vesting schedule in which 25% of the award vests after nine months and the remaining 75% vests ratably thereafter on a quarterly basis.

The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activities under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2012
	Units in thousands		Weighted average grant date fair value
Restricted stock unit activities:
Unvested awards at the beginning of the period	—			$	—
Awards	66			10.58
Vesting	—			—
Forfeited	(1	)		10.74
Unvested awards at the end of the period	65			$	10.58

Under the 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, employees may generally defer up to 10% of their compensation to purchase shares of our common stock at a discount equal to 15% of the lower of the fair market value per share of our common stock on (i) the commencement date of the applicable six month offering period or (ii) the applicable purchase date. During the nine months ended July 31, 2012, 19,032 shares were issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Approximately 11,000 shares remained available for future issuance under this plan as of July 31, 2012.

XML

Share Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Share-based Compensation [Abstract]

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Text Block]

Share Based Compensation

Share based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period of the award. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant and the fair value of each share issued under Versant’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (or “ESPP”) is estimated at the beginning of the purchase period, using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, based on the following assumptions:

	Stock Options		ESPP
	Nine Months Ended July 31,		Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2012	2011	2012	2011
Assumptions:
Volatility	45% - 50%	46% - 53%	31% - 37%	23% - 31%
Expected life	4.25 - 5.75 years	3.6 - 5.5 years	6 - 12 months	6 - 12 months
Weighted average risk-free interest rate	0.65% - 1.03%	1.36% - 1.95%	0.06% - 0.21%	0.10% - 0.28%
Dividend yield	—	—	—	—

Share based compensation expense recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations related to the Company’s equity incentive plans and stock purchase plan was as follows (in thousands):
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Share based compensation expense:
Stock options and restricted stock units	$	194	$	231	$	651	$	727
ESPP	14		13		37		41
Total	$	208	$	244	$	688	$	768

Share based compensation recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations, by operating statement caption, was as follows (in thousands):
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Share based compensation expense:
Cost of revenues	$	18	$	15	$	54	$	48
Sales and marketing	62		67		202		193
Research and development	46		50		163		154
General and administrative	82		112		269		373
Total	$	208	$	244	$	688	$	768

XML

Income Taxes

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach to accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted statutory tax rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets when uncertainty exists regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets. The Company had net deferred tax assets of $778,000 and $898,000 as of July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, respectively.

The Company has significant deferred tax assets arising primarily from net operating loss ("NOL") carry forwards in the U.S., California and in Germany. Ultimately, the realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company’s generation of sufficient future taxable income to enable it to use net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards during those periods in which such carry forwards can be utilized by the Company under applicable tax laws. In evaluating Versant’s ability to utilize its deferred tax assets, management of the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including past operating results in the most recent fiscal years and an assessment of expected future results of operations on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis.

The Company has experienced substantial past tax losses in its U.S. operations. Due to the lack of forecast future taxable income and the relative size of the Company’s federal and California net operating loss carry forwards, considerable uncertainty exists that the Company will realize these deferred tax assets. Based on this objective evidence, a full valuation allowance has been recorded against the Company’s deferred tax assets related to its U.S. operations.

The Company has also experienced substantial past tax losses in its European operations. In its most recent fiscal years, the Company has generated taxable income and begun to utilize its deferred tax assets related to its German net operating loss carry forwards. Management of the Company has forecast taxable income for its European operations in fiscal year 2012. The global economic downturn has negatively impacted the Company’s operating results in all regions.  The Company has experienced declining revenues as economic conditions have remained difficult. Given the uncertainty of the macroeconomic environment, future revenues and operating results are difficult to forecast. Therefore, management has concluded it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of its deferred tax assets related to its German net operating loss carry forwards only to the extent of its expected taxable income in fiscal year 2012.

Significant management judgment is required to determine when, in the future, it will become more likely than not that additional net deferred tax assets will be realized. Management will continue to assess the realizability of the tax benefit available based on actual and forecast operating results. Management does not anticipate significant changes to its uncertain tax positions through October 31, 2012.

The provision for income tax (benefit) expense consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,			July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011			2012		2011
Income tax (benefit) expense:
Federal and state	$	—	$	(1	)	$	4	$	(1	)
Foreign - Europe	88		38			295		68
Foreign - India	—		—			67		—
Foreign withholding	8		18			23		26
Total current	$	96	$	55		$	389	$	93

The provision for income tax expense differs from the amount estimated by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes, primarily due to foreign income taxed at other than U.S. rates, foreign withholding taxes and state taxes.

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income taxes and to income taxes in various states in the U.S. as well as in foreign jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2006. However, with respect to tax years no longer subject to examination due to expiration of the statute of limitations, income may nevertheless be recomputed for the purpose of determining the amount of NOL that may be carried over to “open” years.

In conjunction with the wind-down of the Company's operations in India, an income tax inspection was conducted. Additional taxes and penalties of approximately $67,000 were imposed as a result of this inspection, which have been included in our income tax provision for the nine months ended July 31, 2012.

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jul. 31, 2012	Oct. 31, 2011
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill	$ 8,589	$ 8,589
Versant Europe | Data Management Segment [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill	241	241
Poet Holdings, Inc | Data Management Segment [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill	5,752	5,752
FastObjects, Inc. | Data Management Segment [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill	677	677
JDO Genie (PTY), Ltd. | Data Management Segment [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill	50	50
db4o | Data Management Segment [Member]
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill	$ 1,869	$ 1,869

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements, Recurring and Nonrecurring [Table Text Block]

Our significant financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following types of instruments as of July 31, 2012 (Level 1, 2 and 3 inputs are defined above):

	Fair Value Hierarchy	As of July 31, 2012
		(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash	Level 1		$	803
Money market funds	Level 1		16,433
Time deposits	Level 1		4,341
Total			$	21,577
The fair value of money market funds and time deposits reflect quoted market prices in an active market.

XML

Employee and Director Benefit Plans (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Employee and Director Benefit Plans [Abstract]

Disclosure of Share-based Compensation Arrangements - Shares reserved for Future Issuance [Table Text Block]

As of July 31, 2012, the Company had reserved shares of common stock for the following purposes (in thousands):

Reserved for issuance:
Employee Stock Purchase Plan	11
Shares available for grant under 2005 Equity Incentive Plan	309
Shares available for grant under 2005 Directors Stock Option Plan	23
Unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock units	644
Balance as of July 31, 2012	987

Schedule of Stock Options Roll Forward [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes stock option activities under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2012				2011
	Shares in thousands		Weighted average exercise price		Shares in thousands		Weighted average exercise price
Stock option activities:
Outstanding at the beginning of the period	651		$	15.20	515		$	16.84
Granted	62		10.80		165		11.96
Exercised	(13	)	9.42		(7	)	4.03
Forfeited and expired	(122	)	14.89		(26	)	26.98
Outstanding at the end of the period	578		$	14.92	647		$	15.31
Options exercisable at the end of the period	480		$	15.46	442		$	16.06

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Restricted Stock Units Award Activity [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activities under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2012
	Units in thousands		Weighted average grant date fair value
Restricted stock unit activities:
Unvested awards at the beginning of the period	—			$	—
Awards	66			10.58
Vesting	—			—
Forfeited	(1	)		10.74
Unvested awards at the end of the period	65			$	10.58

XML

Segment and Geographic Information Geographical Information (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2011
Revenues from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets [Line Items]
Revenues	$ 3,042	$ 4,204	$ 11,230	$ 12,293
Long-Lived Assets	942		942		1,031
Segment, Geographical, North America [Member]
Revenues from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets [Line Items]
Revenues	1,369	1,953	3,524	4,941
Long-Lived Assets	491		491		438
Segment, Geographical, Europe and Other [Member]
Revenues from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets [Line Items]
Revenues	1,556	1,950	7,244	6,756
Long-Lived Assets	447		447		588
Segment, Geographical, Asia [Member]
Revenues from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets [Line Items]
Revenues	117	301	462	596
Long-Lived Assets	$ 4		$ 4		$ 5

XML

Employee and Director Benefit Plans (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Shares reserved for future issuance
Number of Shares Authorized	987,000
2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]
Shares reserved for future issuance
Number of Shares Available for Grant	11,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement, Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Maximum Employee Subscription Rate	10.00%
Discount from Market Price, Offering Date	15.00%
Discount from Market Price, Purchase Date	15.00%
Shares Issued in Period	19,032
All Option and Restricted Stock Unit Plans [Member]
Shares reserved for future issuance
Unexercised stock options and unvested restricted stock units	644,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Additional Disclosures
Options, Outstanding, Number, Beginning Balance	651,000	515,000
Options, Grants in Period, Gross	62,000	165,000
Options, Exercises in Period	(13,000)	(7,000)
Options, Forfeitures and Expirations in Period	(122,000)	(26,000)
Options, Outstanding, Number, Ending Balance	578,000	647,000
Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price - Beginning Balance (in $)	$ 15.20	$ 16.84
Options, Grants in Period, Weighted Average Exercise Price (in $)	$ 10.80	$ 11.96
Options, Exercises in Period, Weighted Average Exercise Price (in $)	$ 9.42	$ 4.03
Options, Forfeitures and Expirations in Period, Weighted Average Exercise Price (in $)	$ 14.89	$ 26.98
Options, Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price - Ending Balance (in $)	$ 14.92	$ 15.31
Options, Exercisable, Number	480,000	442,000
Options, Exercisable, Weighted Average Exercise Price (in $)	$ 15.46	$ 16.06
2005 Equity Incentive Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period (in years)	3 years
Portion of Grant Vesting at Cliff Vest Date	25.00%
Number of Months in Cliff Vesting Period	9 months
Portion of Grant Vesting Ratably After Cliff Vest Date	75.00%
Number of Months in the Ratable Vesting Period	2 years 3 months
Shares reserved for future issuance
Number of Additional Shares Authorized		300,000
Number of Shares Available for Grant	309,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Additional Disclosures
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Number - Beginning Balance	0
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Grants in Period	66,000
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Vested in Period	0
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Forfeited in Period	(1,000)
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Number - Ending Balance	65,000
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value - Beginning (in $)	$ 0.00
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Grants in Period, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in $)	$ 10.58
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Vested in Period, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in $)	$ 0.00
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Forfeitures, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (in $)	$ 10.74
Equity Instruments Other than Options, Nonvested, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value - Ending (in $)	$ 10.58
2005 Directors Stock Option Plan [Member]
Shares reserved for future issuance
Number of Additional Shares Authorized		20,000
Number of Shares Available for Grant	23,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2012	Jul. 31, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$ (1,247)	$ 398
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	368	282
Amortization of intangible assets	78	164
Share based compensation	688	768
Restructuring Charges	0	25
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, net	503	1,062
Other assets	(172)	(318)
Accounts payable	171	71
Accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities	455	(289)
Deferred revenues	361	93
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,205	2,256
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	354	670
Net cash used in investing activities	(354)	(670)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	285	202
Repurchases of common stock	(2,291)	(3,584)
Net cash used in financing activities	(2,006)	(3,382)
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(413)	27
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(1,568)	(1,769)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	23,145	24,911
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	21,577	23,142
Supplemental disclosures of cash flows information: Cash paid for:
Income taxes	$ 22	$ 336

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

Commitments and Contingencies

Lease commitments

Versant’s principal commitments as of July 31, 2012 consist of obligations under operating leases for facilities and equipment.

Versant leases office space for its U.S. headquarters in Redwood City, California and also leases field office space in Cupertino, California and Hamburg and Munich, Germany under operating lease agreements. The Company's operating lease arrangements as of July 31, 2012 are summarized below (in thousands):

Leased Office Facility:	Lease Expiration Date	Total Rent Payable over the Remaining Lease Term		Options to Renew at Fair Value
Hamburg, Germany	11/30/2014	$	371	Two three year renewal options
Redwood City, California	5/31/2013	$	172	Two one year renewal options
Munich, Germany	2/28/2014	$	38	Single two year renewal option
Redwood City, California	5/31/2014	$	187	Single one year renewal option
Cupertino, California	1/15/2013	$	18	none

Our minimum commitments under non-cancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year as of July 31, 2012 are as follows (in thousands): 

	Facilities Leases		Equipment Leases		Total
Three months ending October 31, 2012	$	122	$	1	$	123
Fiscal year ending October 31,
2013	406		3		409
2014	227		—		227
2015	13		—		13
2016	—		—		—
Total	$	768	$	4	$	772

Total rent expense for all operating leases was $128,000 and $98,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $373,000 and $292,000 for the nine months ended July 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Contingencies

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and disputes that may arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. There were no ongoing material legal proceedings as of July 31, 2012.

The Company enters into indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business. The Company's license agreements with customers generally require it to indemnify the customer against claims that its software infringes third party patent, copyright, trademark or other proprietary rights. Such indemnification obligations are generally limited in a variety of industry-standard respects. If a liability associated with any of the Company's indemnifications becomes probable and the amount of the liability is reasonably estimable or the minimum amount of a range of loss is reasonably estimable, then an appropriate liability will be established. The estimated fair value of these indemnification liabilities is minimal and no accrual has been established.

XML

Share Based Compensation (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Share-based Compensation [Abstract]

Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions [Table Text Block]

	Stock Options		ESPP
	Nine Months Ended July 31,		Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2012	2011	2012	2011
Assumptions:
Volatility	45% - 50%	46% - 53%	31% - 37%	23% - 31%
Expected life	4.25 - 5.75 years	3.6 - 5.5 years	6 - 12 months	6 - 12 months
Weighted average risk-free interest rate	0.65% - 1.03%	1.36% - 1.95%	0.06% - 0.21%	0.10% - 0.28%
Dividend yield	—	—	—	—

Schedule of Compensation Cost for Share-based Payment Arrangements, Allocation of Share-based Compensation Costs by Plan [Table Text Block]

Share based compensation expense recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations related to the Company’s equity incentive plans and stock purchase plan was as follows (in thousands):
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Share based compensation expense:
Stock options and restricted stock units	$	194	$	231	$	651	$	727
ESPP	14		13		37		41
Total	$	208	$	244	$	688	$	768

Schedule of Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Table Text Block]

Share based compensation recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations, by operating statement caption, was as follows (in thousands):
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,		July 31,		July 31,		July 31,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Share based compensation expense:
Cost of revenues	$	18	$	15	$	54	$	48
Sales and marketing	62		67		202		193
Research and development	46		50		163		154
General and administrative	82		112		269		373
Total	$	208	$	244	$	688	$	768

XML

Commitments and Contingencies Loss Contingencies (Details) (Indemnification Agreement [Member], USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jul. 31, 2012
Indemnification Agreement [Member]
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]
Loss Contingency Accrual, at Carrying Value	$ 0

XML

Basis of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements Level 2 (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2012

Basis of Presentation and Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment, applying a fair-value based test. The Company's impairment evaluation for goodwill is conducted annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. Versant conducted its annual impairment test in October 2011 and determined there was no impairment.

The process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the determination of the fair value of the Company's single reporting unit. Inherent in such a fair value determination are certain judgments and estimates, including the interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations, and assumptions about the Company's strategic plans with regard to its operations. The Company believes at this time that the carrying value of its remaining goodwill is appropriate, although to the extent additional information arises, it is possible that the Company's conclusions regarding impairment of the remaining goodwill could change and result in a material effect on its financial position and results of operations. No events or circumstances occurred during the nine months ended July 31, 2012 that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Company below its carrying amount. The Company intends to conduct its next annual impairment evaluation as of October 31, 2012.

Consolidation, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Versant Corporation (with its subsidiaries, collectively referred to in this report as “Versant” or “the Company”) was incorporated in California in August 1988. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this report on Form 10-Q include all of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows of Versant and all entities in which Versant has a controlling interest (subsidiaries) required to be consolidated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Inter-company accounts and transactions between consolidated companies have been eliminated in consolidation.

Basis of Accounting [Text Block]

The financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of the Company, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are normal recurring adjustments. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles related to interim financial statements and the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Fair Value Measurement Disclosure

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") amended the disclosure requirements for the fair value measurements for recurring and nonrecurring non-financial assets and liabilities. The guidance requires new disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures were effective for the Company’s second quarter of fiscal year 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements, which were effective for the Company’s first quarter of fiscal year 2012. The adoption of this guidance had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Description of New Accounting Pronouncements Not yet Adopted [Text Block]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance which amends ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. This Accounting Standards Update amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and requires performing Step 2 if qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Presentation of Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The issuance of ASU 2011-05 is intended to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 supersedes the presentation options in ASC Topic 220 and facilitates convergence of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity and requiring that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance will be appliedretrospectively and early adoption is permitted. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance to amend and simplify the rules related to testing goodwill for impairment. The revised guidance allows an entity to make an initial qualitative evaluation, based on the entity’s events and circumstances, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The results of this qualitative assessment determine whether it is necessary to perform the currently required two-step impairment test. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Intangible Asset Impairment Testing

In July 2012, the FASB issued guidance to allow an entity the option to first assess qualitatively whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test under the existing guidance. This guidance also provides examples of events and circumstances that an entity should consider when performing the qualitative assessment such as negative or declining cash flows and deterioration in industry, market or macroeconomic conditions. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim testing dates within those years, beginning after September 15, 2012 (November 1, 2012 for the Company). Early adoption of the amended guidance is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market for the transaction and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.

The FASB guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

• Level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2: inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not

active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or

• Level 3: unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Versant evaluates and revises its allowance for doubtful accounts receivable as part of its quarter end process at the subsidiary and corporate level. The Company’s management assigns a risk factor and percentage of risk to each account receivable, the collection of which is considered non-routine. Accounts are considered past due in accordance with contractual terms which usually provide for payment within 30 to 90 days. The Company also assigns a general reserve to all its overdue accounts, excluding the non-routine items.

Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]

Share based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period of the award. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant and the fair value of each share issued under Versant’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (or “ESPP”) is estimated at the beginning of the purchase period, using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires an asset and liability approach to accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted statutory tax rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets when uncertainty exists regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets.

Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

ASC 280, Segment Reporting establishes standards for the manner in which public companies report information about operating segments in annual and interim financial statements which require the reporting of segment information using the “management approach.” Under this approach, operating segments are identified in substantially the same manner as they are reported internally and used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) for purposes of evaluating performance and allocating resources. Based on this approach, the Company has determined that it operates in a single operating segment, Data Management.