N-CSR 1 a_putnewoppsfund.htm PUTNAM NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number: (811- 06128 )

Exact name of registrant as specified in charter: Putnam New Opportunities Fund

Address of principal executive offices: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109


Name and address of agent for service:	Beth S. Mazor, Vice President
	One Post Office Square
	Boston, Massachusetts 02109

Copy to:	John W. Gerstmayr, Esq.
	Ropes & Gray LLP
	One International Place
	Boston, Massachusetts 02110

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:	(617) 292-1000

Date of fiscal year end: June 30, 2007

Date of reporting period: July 1, 2006— June 30, 2007

Item 1. Report to Stockholders:

The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:

What makes
Putnam different?

A time-honored tradition in money management

Since 1937, our values have been rooted in a profound sense of responsibility for the money entrusted to us.

A prudent approach to investing

We use a research-driven team approach to seek consistent, dependable, superior investment results over time, although there is no guarantee a fund will meet its objectives.

Funds for every investment goal

We offer a broad range of mutual funds and other financial products so investors and their financial representatives can build diversified portfolios.

A commitment to doing what’s right for investors

With a focus on investment performance, below-average expenses, and in-depth information about our funds, we put the interests of investors first and seek to set the standard for integrity and service.

Industry-leading service

We help investors, along with their financial representatives, make informed investment decisions with confidence.

In 1830, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice Samuel Putnam established The Prudent Man Rule, a legal foundation for responsible money management.

THE PRUDENT MAN RULE

All that can be required of a trustee to invest is that he shall conduct himself faithfully and exercise a sound discretion. He is to observe how men of prudence, discretion, and intelligence manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the permanent disposition of their funds, considering the probable income, as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested.

Putnam New
Opportunities
Fund

6| 30| 07

Annual Report


Message from the Trustees	1
About the fund	2
Performance and portfolio snapshots	4
Report from the fund managers	5
Performance in depth	9
Expenses	11
Portfolio turnover	13
Risk	13
Your fund’s management	14
Terms and definitions	15
Trustee approval of management contract	16
Other information for shareholders	20
Financial statements	21
Federal tax information	38
Brokerage commissions	38
Shareholder meeting results	39
About the Trustees	40
Officers	44

Cover photograph: Vineyard, Napa County, California © Charles O’Rear

Message from the Trustees

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

We are pleased to announce that Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. recently completed the sale of its ownership interest in Putnam Investments Trust, the parent company of Putnam Management and its affiliates, to Great-West Lifeco Inc. Great-West Lifeco is a financial services holding company with operations in Canada, the United States, and Europe and is a member of the Power Financial Corporation group of companies. With this sale, Putnam becomes part of a successful organization with a long-standing commitment to high-quality investment management and financial services. Please know that the change in ownership is not expected to affect the Putnam funds, the way Putnam manages money, or the funds’ management teams. Putnam will continue to operate as a separate company headquartered in Boston, and there will be no change in your funds’ fees or in the services your funds provide.

We would also like to take this opportunity to announce that Putnam President and Chief Executive Officer Ed Haldeman, one of your fund’s Trustees since 2004, was recently named President of the Funds, assuming this role from George Putnam, III. This change, together with the completion of the transaction with Great-West Lifeco, enables George Putnam to become an independent Trustee of the funds. Both George and Ed will continue serving on the Board of Trustees in our collective role of overseeing the Putnam funds on your behalf.

Lastly, we are pleased to inform you that a new independent Trustee, Robert J. Darretta, has joined your fund’s Board of Trustees. Mr. Darretta brings extensive leadership experience in corporate finance and accounting. He is a former Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Johnson & Johnson, one of the leading U.S. health-care and consumer products companies, where he also served as Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, and Treasurer.

In the following pages, members of your fund’s management team discuss the fund’s performance and strategies for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2007, and provide their outlook for the months ahead. As always, we thank you for your support of the Putnam funds.

Putnam New Opportunities Fund: investing through 17 years of unprecedented innovation

Long before most Americans could conceive of the Internet, digital music files, or a cell phone small enough to fit in their pockets, Putnam New Opportunities Fund was seeking growth potential in emerging, cutting-edge companies. The fund was also targeting stocks in more traditional industries, such as restaurants, retail stores, health care, and broadcasting, which can also offer strong growth potential.

For example, among the holdings in the fund’s portfolio shortly after the fund was introduced in 1990 was the stock of Symantec, then a 9-year-old emerging software company. Today, Symantec is a leading maker of antivirus software, which has seen explosive demand as the Internet and computer networks have become an essential component of everyday life.

The managers of the fund focus on bottom-up stock selection in seeking above-average growth for investors. Putnam’s in-house research organization, whose dedicated analysts work in teams, helps the management team find growth stocks that other investors may have overlooked. The specialized expertise of these Putnam analysts, who visit regularly with company managements, is critical to the fund’s growth strategy.

An important benefit of the fund’s strategy is its flexibility — it diversifies across a range of industries and capitalizations. The fund can invest in smaller companies that are in their emerging- or expansionary-growth phases, and these companies can remain in the fund’s portfolio until they grow to become market leaders.

Of course, historically, markets have been volatile at times for growing companies; the growth potential offered by these stocks comes with the risk of greater price fluctuations. Combining small-cap stocks with the stocks of larger, well-established companies provides a more diversified approach to help manage those risks.

With growth opportunities continuing to emerge across industries and market capitalizations, the managers of Putnam New Opportunities Fund will continue to focus on capturing growth potential for investors.

The fund invests some or all of its assets in small and/or midsize companies. Such investments increase the risk of greater price fluctuations. Stocks with above-average earnings growth may be more volatile, especially if earnings do not continue to grow.

In-depth analysis is key to successful stock selection.

Drawing on the expertise of a dedicated team of stock analysts, the fund’s management team seeks attractive growth stocks. Once a stock is selected for the portfolio, it is regularly assessed by the members of the team to ensure that it continues to meet their criteria, including:

Growth They examine each company’s financials, including its sales and earnings, and target those believed to offer growth potential.

Quality They look for high-quality companies, seeking characteristics such as solid management teams, sound business models, a record of strong performance, and high levels of free-cash flow.

Valuation They carefully consider how each stock is valued, seeking stocks whose valuations are attractive relative to the company’s growth potential.

Putnam New Opportunities Fund’s holdings have spanned many sectors
and industries over time.

Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. Share price, principal value, and return will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance of class A shares assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Fund returns in the bar chart do not reflect a sales charge. See pages 9–10 for additional performance information. For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower. A 1% short-term trading fee may apply. To obtain the most recent month-end performance, visit www.putnam.com.

“We believe this fund’s approach to seeking
out high-quality growth companies at
reasonable valuations and its flexibility to
invest in large-, mid-, and small-company
stocks should enable it to take advantage of a
strengthening growth environment.”

Kevin Divney, Portfolio Leader, Putnam New Opportunities Fund

Allocations represented as a percentage of net assets. Holdings and allocations may vary over time.

Report from the fund managers

The year in review

Your fund began its 2007 fiscal year in the midst of a significant market correction. However, despite increased volatility during much of the period, growth stocks rallied and delivered solid, double-digit returns. While your fund participated in this rally and achieved respectable results for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, it lagged its benchmark and the average return for funds in its Lipper peer group, Multi-Cap Growth Funds. We attribute this underperformance to unfavorable stock selection among technology and health-care companies. However, the fund’s greater-than-benchmark exposure to industrial, capital goods, and energy companies — and successful stock selection among these sectors — helped offset the weakness of its technology and health-care holdings. Virtually all of the key industry groups in which your fund invested significantly recorded robust performance during the period. Technology and capital goods stocks registered above-market gains, while health care lagged due to sharp price declines in several high-profile stocks. While value stocks moderately outperformed their growth counterparts for the period as a whole, growth stocks moved into the lead for the final three months of the period.

Market overview

As the fiscal year began, growth stock prices were depressed by prospects of higher inflation, rising interest rates, and escalating oil prices. Over the course of the year, the emerging problems surrounding subprime mortgages and their potential impact on the financial sector weighed heavily on the market. However, the economy remained resilient, consumers continued to spend, and investors concluded that the subprime difficulties did not appear to be a broader threat. The market rebounded steadily from mid-March through May before pulling back modestly in June, as investors’ concerns shifted to whether consumer spending levels would keep the economy on track.

Although value stocks — as measured by the Russell 3000 Value Index — outperformed their growth counterparts for the full period, growth stocks — as represented by the Russell 3000 Growth Index — outperformed during the final three months. The stocks of midsize companies — as measured by the Russell Midcap Growth Index — slightly outperformed the stocks of larger companies, and surpassed small-company stocks by a substantial margin.

Market sector and fund performance

This comparison shows your fund’s performance in the context of different market sectors for the 12 months ended 6/30/07. See the previous page and pages 9–10 for additional fund performance information. Index descriptions can be found on page 15.

Strategy overview

In order to focus our research and analysis on what we consider to be the most attractive opportunities in the growth-stock universe, we seek to invest in a limited number of stocks. Specifically, we look for high-quality growth companies with what we consider to be currently favorable valuations. As such, our stock-selection strategy is based on three fundamental criteria: the quality of the company, its near-term growth prospects, and a valuation forecast that meets our parameters. The ability to rotate among these criteria gives the fund the advantage of potentially favorable market positioning whether the market is rewarding one, two, or all three of these factors.

While it may not be a key consideration for many growth managers, valuation is a central component of our investment process. Our approach to valuing companies incorporates both historical financial data and forward-looking scenario analysis that enables us to examine a range of possible outcomes. Among the key elements that we consider is each company’s price-to-free-cash-flow ratio, which reflects its ability to generate cash flow relative to its current market price. We also examine a company’s operating profit margin and look for companies that we believe have the potential to expand their margins. We then break companies down into distinct market sectors and rank them in comparison to other companies with similar growth potential, operating margins, competitive environments, and capital requirements within each sector. Finally, to gauge current market sentiment toward a company, we will consider indicators such as analysts’ earnings forecasts.

Your fund’s holdings

While the fund’s allocation to energy stocks was not among its largest sector concentrations, our stock selection among energy companies provided the greatest boost to performance during the period. The fund’s energy holdings were led by National-Oilwell Varco, which manufactures systems, components, and products for the oil and gas industry, and Western Refining, an independent oil refiner. In April, National Oilwell Varco reported better-than-expected sales and earnings due to brisk demand for its drilling products, particularly its offshore rigs. Western Refining, meanwhile, completed its acquisition of competing independent refiner Giant Industries in May.

The fund’s greater-than-benchmark weighting in the capital goods sector also helped results. The top contributors from this industry group included Terex Corporation, a diversified manufacturer of machinery and equipment for construction, mining, shipping, and other industries. The

Comparison of top industry weightings

This chart shows how the fund’s top weightings have changed
over the last six months. Weightings are shown as a percentage of
net assets. Holdings will vary over time.

firm posted solid earnings for its fiscal first quarter, which ended on March 31, and has been benefiting from strength in non-residential construction, both in the United States and overseas. We were also pleased with the performance of Cummins, Inc., which makes engines, engine-related components, and electric power generation systems.

Amidst a generally strong economy and solid consumer spending, the fund also benefited from its exposure to consumer stocks. In fact, the top overall contributor to returns was specialty apparel retailer Guess? Inc. The firm consistently recorded stronger-than-expected sales and earnings during the period, and its stock performance reflected these exceptional results. We sold our position in this stock, taking profits.

While technology stocks as a group performed well during the period, two stocks in particular — Motorola and Brocade Communications Systems — detracted significantly from returns. The stock of Motorola, a leading provider of mobile phone handsets, had been under pressure since early January, when the company cut its sales and profit estimates due to increasing competition. We eliminated the fund’s investment in Motorola prior to the end of the period.

Brocade Communications — a company that provides switches and software for the network storage industry — performed well during most of the fiscal year. However, near the end of April, it was announced that the firm would be included in the investigation being conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission into stock-option granting practices at many technology companies. The stock began to move steadily downward and came under additional pressure in June, when the company announced disappointing earnings. We remain optimistic about Brocade’s prospects, given the company’s sales growth and the increasing demand in its core data storage markets.

The fund maintained a slightly greater-than-benchmark position in the lagging health-care sector. This exposure also hindered results, most notably due to the performance of Amgen, the world’s largest biotechnology company. Amgen’s stock declined precipitously starting in January, after it announced that Aranesp, a protein formulation that stimulates the production of red blood cells, had been linked to higher death rates when used to treat cancer patients who were suffering from anemia. Given the uncertainty introduced by this development, we sold the position before period-end.

Please note that the holdings discussed in this report may not have been held by the fund for the entire period. Portfolio composition is subject to review in accordance with the fund’s investment strategy and may vary in the future.

Top holdings

This table shows the fund’s top holdings, and the percentage of the fund’s net assets that each represented, as of 6/30/07. The fund’s holdings will change over time.


Holding	Percent of fund’s net assets	Industry
Apple Computer, Inc.	2.2%	Computers

Microsoft Corp.	2.0%	Software

Baxter International, Inc.	1.7%	Medical technology

Qualcomm, Inc.	1.7%	Communications equipment

Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.	1.5%	Metals

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)	1.5%	Investment banking/brokerage

Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.	1.4%	Retail

Monsanto Co.	1.4%	Chemicals

UnitedHealth Group, Inc.	1.4%	Health-care services

National-Oilwell Varco, Inc.	1.4%	Energy

The outlook for your fund

The following commentary reflects anticipated developments that could affect your fund over the next six months, as well as your management team’s plans for responding to them.

While certain sectors of the economy, such as housing, have slowed, others have continued to perform well, keeping broad-based U.S. economic growth intact. When developing our economic outlook, a key consideration for the fund is spending by consumers versus businesses. Business capital spending has been healthy, as evidenced by the solid results registered by many industrial companies. In fact, because of the strength in the industrial and manufacturing areas of the economy, these industry groups have taken on a more prominent role in our growth investing strategy. At the same time, thanks to a recent period of historically low unemployment, consumer spending has remained strong, which benefits many of the consumer-oriented companies that make up our investment universe.

With respect to other market sectors, we anticipate continued volatility among financial stocks. We do not currently believe that the well-publicized problems in the market for subprime mortgages will affect the broader financial sector over the long term. Nevertheless, these developments have created uncertainty in the marketplace, which will keep investors cautious toward financial stocks over the near term.

It appears that investors are becoming more aware of the compelling values that we believe exist among many large-company growth stocks, particularly in the technology sector. While there are no guarantees, if our expectations prove true, these developments may further strengthen the environment for growth investing. Furthermore, should this occur, we believe the fund’s three-pronged approach to seeking out high-quality growth companies at reasonable valuations, and its flexibility to invest in large-, mid-, and small-company stocks should enable it to take full advantage of the opportunities such an environment can offer.

The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam Management. They are not meant as investment advice.

Your fund’s performance

This section shows your fund’s performance for periods ended June 30, 2007, the end of its fiscal year. In accordance with regulatory requirements for mutual funds, we also include expense information taken from the fund’s current prospectus. Performance should always be considered in light of a fund’s investment strategy. Data represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. For the most recent month-end performance, please visit www.putnam.com or call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581. Class Y shares are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs. See the Terms and Definitions section in this report for definitions of the share classes offered by your fund.

Fund performance Total return for periods ended 6/30/07


	Class A		Class B		Class C		Class M		Class R	Class Y
(inception dates)	(8/31/90)		(3/1/93)		(7/26/99)		(12/1/94)		(1/21/03)	(7/19/94)
	NAV	POP	NAV	CDSC	NAV	CDSC	NAV	POP	NAV	NAV

Annual average
(life of fund)	13.92%	13.56%	13.08%	13.08%	13.07%	13.07%	13.33%	13.11%	13.65%	14.14%

10 years	58.23	49.94	47.25	47.25	46.84	46.84	50.52	45.61	54.44	62.23
Annual average	4.70	4.13	3.95	3.95	3.92	3.92	4.17	3.83	4.44	4.96

5 years	64.65	56.00	58.58	56.58	58.61	58.61	60.61	55.37	62.75	66.73
Annual average	10.49	9.30	9.66	9.38	9.66	9.66	9.94	9.21	10.23	10.77

3 years	36.42	29.26	33.36	30.36	33.40	33.40	34.40	30.02	35.39	37.45
Annual average	10.91	8.93	10.07	9.24	10.08	10.08	10.36	9.14	10.63	11.19

1 year	16.25	10.15	15.37	10.37	15.39	14.39	15.68	11.92	15.94	16.54

Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. After sales charge returns (public offering price, or POP) for class A and M shares reflect a maximum 5.25% and 3.25% load, respectively. Class B share returns reflect the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), which is 5% in the first year, declining to 1% in the sixth year, and is eliminated thereafter. Class C shares reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year and is eliminated thereafter. Class R and Y shares have no initial sales charge or CDSC. Performance for class B, C, M, R, and Y shares before their inception is derived from the historical performance of class A shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge (or CDSC) and, except for class Y shares, the higher operating expenses for such shares.

For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower.

A 1% short-term trading fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 7 days of purchase.

Change in the value of a $10,000 investment ($9,475 after sales charge)

Cumulative total return from 6/30/97 to 6/30/07

Past performance does not indicate future results. At the end of the same time period, a $10,000 investment in the fund’s class B and class C shares would have been valued at $14,725 and $14,684, respectively, and no contingent deferred sales charges would apply. A $10,000 investment in the fund’s class M shares ($9,675 after sales charge) would have been valued at $14,561 at public offering price. A $10,000 investment in the fund’s class R and class Y shares would have been valued at $15,444 and $16,223, respectively.

Comparative index returns For periods ended 6/30/07


		Lipper Multi-Cap
	Russell 3000	Growth Funds
	Growth Index	category average*

Annual average
(life of fund)	10.04%	12.30%

10 years	54.14	107.97
Annual average	4.42	7.07

5 years	58.02	73.38
Annual average	9.58	11.47

3 years	29.39	38.71
Annual average	8.97	11.41

1 year	18.84	18.72

Index and Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net asset value.

* Over the 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-year, and life-of-fund periods ended 6/30/07, there were 514, 410, 338, 132, and 32 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.

Fund price and distribution* information For the 12-month period ended 6/30/07


	Class A		Class B	Class C	Class M		Class R	Class Y
Share value:	NAV	POP	NAV	NAV	NAV	POP	NAV	NAV

6/30/06	$45.72	$48.25	$40.85	$43.34	$42.79	$44.23	$45.37	$47.34

6/30/07	53.15	56.09	47.13	50.01	49.50	51.16	52.60	55.17

* The fund made no distributions during the period.

Fund’s annual operating expenses For the fiscal year ended 6/30/06


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Total annual fund operating expenses	1.14%	1.89%	1.89%	1.64%	1.39%	0.89%

Expense information in this table is taken from the most recent prospectus, is subject to change, and may differ from that shown in the next section and in the financial highlights of this report. Expenses are shown as a percentage of average net assets.

Your fund’s expenses

As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees, distribution fees (12b-1 fees), and other expenses. In the most recent six-month period, your fund limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You may also pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial representative.

Review your fund’s expenses

The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Putnam New Opportunities Fund from January 1, 2007, to June 30, 2007. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Expenses paid per $1,000*	$ 6.16	$ 9.99	$ 9.99	$ 8.72	$ 7.44	$ 4.88

Ending value (after expenses)	$1,071.10	$1,067.00	$1,067.20	$1,068.40	$1,069.80	$1,072.50

* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 6/30/07. The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.

Estimate the expenses you paid

To estimate the ongoing expenses you paid for the six months ended June 30, 2007, use the calculation method below. To find the value of your investment on January 1, 2007, go to www.putnam.com and log on to your account. Click on the “Transaction History” tab in your Daily Statement and enter 01/01/2007 in both the “from” and “to” fields. Alternatively, call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.

Compare expenses using the SEC’s method

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total costs) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Expenses paid per $1,000*	$ 6.01	$ 9.74	$ 9.74	$ 8.50	$ 7.25	$ 4.76

Ending value (after expenses)	$1,018.84	$1,015.12	$1,015.12	$1,016.36	$1,017.60	$1,020.08

Compare expenses using industry averages

You can also compare your fund’s expenses with the average of its peer group, as defined by Lipper, an independent fund-rating agency that ranks funds relative to others that Lipper considers to have similar investment styles or objectives. The expense ratio for each share class shown below indicates how much of your fund’s average net assets have been used to pay ongoing expenses during the period.


	Class A	Class B	Class C	Class M	Class R	Class Y

Your fund’s annualized expense ratio*	1.20%	1.95%	1.95%	1.70%	1.45%	0.95%

Average annualized expense ratio for Lipper peer group†	1.38%	2.13%	2.13%	1.88%	1.63%	1.13%

* For the fund’s most recent fiscal half year; may differ from expense ratios based on one-year data in the financial highlights.

† Putnam is committed to keeping fund expenses below the Lipper peer group average expense ratio and will limit our fund expenses if they exceed the Lipper average. The Lipper average is a simple average of front-end load funds in the peer group that excludes 12b-1 fees as well as any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. To facilitate the comparison in this presentation, Putnam has adjusted the Lipper average to reflect the 12b-1 fees carried by each class of shares other than class Y shares, which do not incur 12b-1 fees. Investors should note that the other funds in the peer group may be significantly smaller or larger than the fund, and that an asset-weighted average would likely be lower than the simple average. Also, the fund and Lipper report expense data at different times and for different periods. The fund’s expense ratio shown here is annualized data for the most recent six-month period, while the quarterly updated Lipper average is based on the most recent fiscal year-end data available for the peer group funds as of 6/30/07.

Your fund’s portfolio turnover
and Morningstar^®Risk

Putnam funds are actively managed by teams of experts who buy and sell securities based on intensive analysis of companies, industries, economies, and markets. Portfolio turnover is a measure of how often a fund’s managers buy and sell securities for your fund. A portfolio turnover of 100%, for example, means that the managers sold and replaced securities valued at 100% of a fund’s assets within a one-year period. Funds with high turnover may be more likely to generate capital gains and dividends that must be distributed to shareholders as taxable income. High turnover may also cause a fund to pay more brokerage commissions and other transaction costs, which may detract from performance.

Turnover comparisons
Percentage of holdings that change every year


	2007	2006	2005	2004	2003

Putnam New Opportunities Fund	91%	84%	97%	61%	42%

Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds category average	103%	108%	117%	125%	142%

Turnover data for the fund is calculated based on the fund’s fiscal-year period, which ends on June 30. Turnover data for the fund’s Lipper category is calculated based on the average of the turnover of each fund in the category for its fiscal year ended during the indicated year. Fiscal years vary across funds in the Lipper category, which may limit the comparability of the fund’s portfolio turnover rate to the Lipper average. Comparative data for 2007 is based on information available as of 6/30/07.

Your fund’s Morningstar^®Risk

This risk comparison is designed to help you understand how your fund compares with other funds. The comparison utilizes a risk measure developed by Morningstar, an independent fund-rating agency. This risk measure is referred to as the fund’s Morningstar Risk.

Your fund’s Morningstar Risk is shown alongside that of the average fund in its Morningstar category. The risk bar broadens the comparison by translating the fund’s Morningstar Risk into a percentile, which is based on the fund’s ranking among all funds rated by Morningstar as of June 30, 2007. A higher Morningstar Risk generally indicates that a fund’s monthly returns have varied more widely.

Morningstar determines a fund’s Morningstar Risk by assessing variations in the fund’s monthly returns — with an emphasis on downside variations — over a 3-year period, if available. Those measures are weighted and averaged to produce the fund’s Morningstar Risk. The information shown is provided for the fund’s class A shares only; information for other classes may vary. Morningstar Risk is based on historical data and does not indicate future results. Morningstar does not purport to measure the risk associated with a current investment in a fund, either on an absolute basis or on a relative basis. Low Morningstar Risk does not mean that you cannot lose money on an investment in a fund. Copyright 2007 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete, or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information.

Your fund’s management

Your fund is managed by the members of the Putnam Mid-Cap Growth and Small and Emerging Growth teams. Kevin Divney is the Portfolio Leader and Brian DeChristopher and Richard Weed are Portfolio Members of your fund. The Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members coordinate the teams’ management of the fund.

For a complete listing of the members of the Putnam Mid-Cap Growth and Small and Emerging Growth teams, including those who are not Portfolio Leaders or Portfolio Members of your fund, visit Putnam’s Individual Investor Web site at www.putnam.com.

Investment team fund ownership

The table below shows how much the fund’s current Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members have invested in the fund and in all Putnam mutual funds (in dollar ranges). Information shown is as of June 30, 2007, and June 30, 2006.

Trustee and Putnam employee fund ownership

As of June 30, 2007, all 12 of the Trustees then on the Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds owned fund shares. The table below shows the approximate value of investments in the fund and all Putnam funds as of that date by the Trustees and Putnam employees. These amounts include investments by the Trustees’ and employees’ immediate family members and investments through retirement and deferred compensation plans.


		Total assets in
	Assets in the fund	all Putnam funds

Trustees	$ 569,000	$ 93,000,000

Putnam employees	$14,260,000	$467,000,000

Other Putnam funds managed by the Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members


Kevin Divney is also a Portfolio Leader of Putnam Vista Fund.	Richard Weed is also a Portfolio Leader of Putnam Discovery
	Growth Fund, Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund, and
Brian DeChristopher is also a Portfolio Member of Putnam	Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund.
Vista Fund.
	Kevin Divney, Brian DeChristopher, and Richard Weed may also
	manage other accounts and variable trust funds advised by
	Putnam Management or an affiliate.

Changes in your fund’s Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members

Your fund’s Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members did not change during the year ended June 30, 2007.

Terms and definitions

Important terms

Total return shows how the value of the fund’s shares changed over time, assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested all distributions in the fund.

Net asset value (NAV) is the price, or value, of one share of a mutual fund, without a sales charge. NAVs fluctuate with market conditions. NAV is calculated by dividing the net assets of each class of shares by the number of outstanding shares in the class.

Public offering price (POP) is the price of a mutual fund share plus the maximum sales charge levied at the time of purchase. POP performance figures shown here assume the 5.25% maximum sales charge for class A shares and 3.25% for class M shares.

Contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) is generally a charge applied at the time of the redemption of class B or C shares and assumes redemption at the end of the period. Your fund’s class B CDSC declines from a 5% maximum during the first year to 1% during the sixth year. After the sixth year, the CDSC no longer applies. The CDSC for class C shares is 1% for one year after purchase.

Share classes

Class A shares are generally subject to an initial sales charge and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).

Class B shares are not subject to an initial sales charge. They may be subject to a CDSC.

Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge and are subject to a CDSC only if the shares are redeemed during the first year.

Class M shares have a lower initial sales charge and a higher 12b-1 fee than class A shares and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).

Class R shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC and are available only to certain defined contribution plans.

Class Y shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC, and carry no 12b-1 fee. They are only available to eligible purchasers, including eligible defined contribution plans or corporate IRAs.

Comparative indexes

Lehman Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. investment-grade fixed-income securities.

Merrill Lynch 91-Day Treasury Bill Index is an unmanaged index that seeks to measure the performance of U.S. Treasury bills available in the marketplace.

Russell 3000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index of those companies in the broad-market Russell 3000 Index chosen for their growth orientation.

Russell 3000 Value Index is an unmanaged index of those companies in the broad-market Russell 3000 Index chosen for their value orientation.

S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.

Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You cannot invest directly in an index.

Lipper is a third-party industry-ranking entity that ranks mutual funds. Its rankings do not reflect sales charges. Lipper rankings are based on total return at net asset value relative to other funds that have similar current investment styles or objectives as determined by Lipper. Lipper may change a fund’s category assignment at its discretion. Lipper category averages reflect performance trends for funds within a category.

Trustee approval
of management contract

General conclusions

The Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds oversees the management of each fund and, as required by law, determines annually whether to approve the continuance of your fund’s management contract with Putnam Investment Management (“Putnam Management”). In this regard, the Board of Trustees, with the assistance of its Contract Committee consisting solely of Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as such term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the Putnam funds (the “Independent Trustees”), requests and evaluates all information it deems reasonably necessary under the circumstances. Over the course of several months ending in June 2007, the Contract Committee met several times to consider the information provided by Putnam Management and other information developed with the assistance of the Board’s independent counsel and independent staff. The Contract Committee reviewed and discussed key aspects of this information with all of the Independent Trustees. The Contract Committee recommended, and the Independent Trustees approved, the continuance of your fund’s management contract, effective July 1, 2007.

In addition, in anticipation of the sale of Putnam Investments to Great-West Lifeco, at a series of meetings ending in March 2007, the Trustees reviewed and approved new management and distribution arrangements to take effect upon the change of control. Shareholders of all funds approved the management contracts in May 2007, and the change of control transaction was completed on August 3, 2007. Upon the change of control, the management contracts that were approved by the Trustees in June 2007 automatically terminated and were replaced by new contracts that had been approved by shareholders. In connection with their review for the June 2007 continuance of the Putnam funds’ management contracts, the Trustees did not identify any facts or circumstances that would alter the substance of the conclusions and recommendations they made in their review of the contracts to take effect upon the change of control.

The Independent Trustees’ approval was based on the following conclusions:

• That the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided to the fund, the fees paid by competitive funds and the costs incurred by Putnam Management in providing such services, and

• That this fee schedule represented an appropriate sharing between fund shareholders and Putnam Management of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the fund at current asset levels.

These conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and were not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations and how the Trustees considered these factors are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for your fund and the other Putnam funds are the result of many years of review and discussion between the Independent Trustees and Putnam Management, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements in prior years.

Management fee schedules and categories; total expenses

The Trustees reviewed the management fee schedules in effect for all Putnam funds, including fee levels and breakpoints, and the assignment of funds to particular fee categories. In reviewing fees and expenses, the Trustees generally focused their attention on material changes in circumstances — for example, changes in a fund’s size or investment style, changes in Putnam Management’s operating costs or responsibilities, or changes in competitive practices in the mutual fund industry — that suggest that consideration of fee changes might be warranted. The Trustees concluded that the circumstances did not warrant changes to the management fee structure of your fund, which had been carefully developed over the years, re-examined on many occasions and adjusted where appropriate. The Trustees focused on two areas of particular interest, as discussed further below:

• Competitiveness. The Trustees reviewed comparative fee and expense information for competitive funds, which indicated that, in a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc., your fund ranked in the 7th percentile in management fees and in the 17th percentile in total expenses (less any applicable 12b-1 fees) as of December 31, 2006 (the first percentile being the least expensive funds and the 100th percentile being the most expensive funds). (Because the fund’s custom peer group is

smaller than the fund’s broad Lipper Inc. peer group, this expense information may differ from the Lipper peer expense information found elsewhere in this report.) The Trustees noted that expense ratios for a number of Putnam funds, which show the percentage of fund assets used to pay for management and administrative services, distribution (12b-1) fees and other expenses, had been increasing recently as a result of declining net assets and the natural operation of fee breakpoints.

The Trustees noted that the expense ratio increases described above were currently being controlled by expense limitations implemented in January 2004 and which Putnam Management had committed to maintain at least through 2007. In anticipation of the change of control of Putnam Investments, the Trustees requested, and received a commitment from Putnam Management and Great-West Lifeco, to extend this program through at least June 30, 2009. These expense limitations give effect to a commitment by Putnam Management that the expense ratio of each open-end fund would be no higher than the average expense ratio of the competitive funds included in the fund’s relevant Lipper universe (exclusive of any applicable 12b-1 charges in each case). The Trustees observed that this commitment to limit fund expenses has served shareholders well since its inception.

In order to ensure that the expenses of the Putnam funds continue to meet evolving competitive standards, the Trustees requested, and Putnam Management agreed, to extend for the twelve months beginning July 1, 2007, an additional expense limitation for certain funds at an amount equal to the average expense ratio (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) of a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper to correspond to the size of the fund. This additional expense limitation will be applied to those open-end funds that had above-average expense ratios (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) based on the custom peer group data for the period ended December 31, 2006. This additional expense limitation will not be applied to your fund because it had a below-average expense ratio relative to its custom peer group.

• Economies of scale. Your fund currently has the benefit of breakpoints in its management fee that provide shareholders with significant economies of scale, which means that the effective management fee rate of a fund (as a percentage of fund assets) declines as a fund grows in size and crosses specified asset thresholds. Conversely, as a fund shrinks in size — as has been the case for many Putnam funds in recent years — these breakpoints result in increasing fee levels. In recent years, the Trustees have examined the operation of the existing breakpoint structure during periods of both growth and decline in asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee schedules in effect for the funds represented an appropriate sharing of economies of scale at current asset levels. In reaching this conclusion, the Trustees considered the Contract Committee’s stated intent to continue to work with Putnam Management to plan for an eventual resumption in the growth of assets, and to consider the potential economies that might be produced under various growth assumptions.

In connection with their review of the management fees and total expenses of the Putnam funds, the Trustees also reviewed the costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by Putnam Management and its affiliates from the relationship with the funds. This information included trends in revenues, expenses and profitability of Putnam Management and its affiliates relating to the investment management and distribution services provided to the funds. In this regard, the Trustees also reviewed an analysis of Putnam Management’s revenues, expenses and profitability with respect to the funds’ management contracts, allocated on a fund-by-fund basis.

Investment performance

The quality of the investment process provided by Putnam Management represented a major factor in the Trustees’ evaluation of the quality of services provided by Putnam Management under your fund’s management contract. The Trustees were assisted in their review of the Putnam funds’ investment process and performance by the work of the Investment Process Committee of the Trustees and the Investment Oversight Committees of the Trustees, which had met on a regular monthly basis with the funds’ portfolio teams throughout the year. The Trustees concluded that Putnam Management generally provides a high-quality investment process —as measured by the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to such personnel, and in general the ability of Putnam Management to attract and retain high-quality personnel — but also recognize that this does not guarantee favorable investment results for every fund in every time period. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time periods and considered information comparing each fund’s performance with various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds. The Trustees noted the satisfactory investment performance of many Putnam funds. They also noted the disappointing investment performance of certain funds in recent years and discussed with senior management of Putnam Management the factors contributing to such underperformance and actions being taken to

improve performance. The Trustees recognized that, in recent years, Putnam Management has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes and in the fund product line to address areas of underperformance. In particular, they noted the important contributions of Putnam Management’s leadership in attracting, retaining and supporting high-quality investment professionals and in systematically implementing an investment process that seeks to merge the best features of fundamental and quantitative analysis. The Trustees indicated their intention to continue to monitor performance trends to assess the effectiveness of these changes and to evaluate whether additional changes to address areas of under-performance are warranted.

In the case of your fund, the Trustees considered that your fund’s class A share total return performance at net asset value was in the following percentiles of its Lipper Inc. peer group (Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds) for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2007 (the first percentile being the best-performing funds and the 100th percentile being the worst-performing funds):


One-year period	Three-year period	Five-year period

62nd	43rd	56th

(Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods shown elsewhere in this report. Over the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2007, there were 493, 396, and 319 funds, respectively, in your fund’s Lipper peer group.* Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.)

As a general matter, the Trustees concluded that cooperative efforts between the Trustees and Putnam Management represent the most effective way to address investment performance problems. The Trustees noted that investors in the Putnam funds have, in effect, placed their trust in the Putnam organization, under the oversight of the funds’ Trustees, to make appropriate decisions regarding the management of the funds. Based on the responsiveness of Putnam Management in the recent past to Trustee concerns about investment performance, the Trustees concluded that it is preferable to seek change within Putnam Management to address performance shortcomings. In the Trustees’ view, the alternative of terminating a management contract and engaging a new investment adviser for an underperforming fund would entail significant disruptions and would not provide any greater assurance of improved investment performance.

Brokerage and soft-dollar allocations; other benefits

The Trustees considered various potential benefits that Putnam Management may receive in connection with the services it provides under the management contract with your fund. These include benefits related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research services that may be useful to Putnam Management in managing the assets of the fund and of other clients. The Trustees indicated their continued intent to monitor the potential benefits associated with the allocation of fund brokerage to ensure that the principle of seeking “best price and execution” remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.

The Trustees’ annual review of your fund’s management contract also included the review of its distributor’s contract and distribution plan with Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership and the custodian agreement and investor servicing agreement with Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), each of which provides benefits to affiliates of Putnam Management. In the case of the custodian agreement, the Trustees considered that, effective January 1, 2007, the Putnam funds had engaged State Street Bank and Trust Company as custodian and began to transition the responsibility for providing custody services away from PFTC.

* The percentile rankings for your fund’s class A share annualized total return performance in the Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds category for the one-, five- and ten-year periods ended June 30, 2007 were 70%, 60%, and 69%, respectively. Over the one-, five- and ten-year periods ended June 30, 2007, the fund ranked 360 out of 514, 203 out of 338, and 91 out of 132, respectively. Note that this more recent information was not available when the Trustees approved the continuance of your fund’s management contract.

Comparison of retail and institutional fee schedules

The information examined by the Trustees as part of their annual contract review has included for many years information regarding fees charged by Putnam Management and its affiliates to institutional clients such as defined benefit pension plans, college endowments, etc. This information included comparison of such fees with fees charged to the funds, as well as a detailed assessment of the differences in the services provided to these two types of clients. The Trustees observed, in this regard, that the differences in fee rates between institutional clients and the funds are by no means uniform when examined by individual asset sectors, suggesting that differences in the pricing of investment management services to these types of clients reflect to a substantial degree historical competitive forces operating in separate market places. The Trustees considered the fact that fee rates across all asset sectors are higher on average for funds than for institutional clients, as well as the differences between the services that Putnam Management provides to the Putnam funds and those that it provides to institutional clients of the firm, but did not rely on such comparisons to any significant extent in concluding that the management fees paid by your fund are reasonable.

Other information for shareholders

Putnam’s policy on confidentiality

In order to conduct business with our shareholders, we must obtain certain personal information such as account holders’ addresses, telephone numbers, Social Security numbers, and the names of their financial advisors. We use this information to assign an account number and to help us maintain accurate records of transactions and account balances. It is our policy to protect the confidentiality of your information, whether or not you currently own shares of our funds, and in particular, not to sell information about you or your accounts to outside marketing firms. We have safeguards in place designed to prevent unauthorized access to our computer systems and procedures to protect personal information from unauthorized use. Under certain circumstances, we share this information with outside vendors who provide services to us, such as mailing and proxy solicitation. In those cases, the service providers enter into confidentiality agreements with us, and we provide only the information necessary to process transactions and perform other services related to your account. We may also share this information with our Putnam affiliates to service your account or provide you with information about other Putnam products or services. It is also our policy to share account information with your financial advisor, if you’ve listed one on your Putnam account. If you would like clarification about our confidentiality policies or have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact us at 1-800-225-1581, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., or Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Proxy voting

Putnam is committed to managing our mutual funds in the best interests of our shareholders. The Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures, as well as information regarding how your fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006, are available on the Putnam Individual Investor Web site, www.putnam.com/individual, and on the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. If you have questions about finding forms on the SEC’s Web site, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain the Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures at no charge by calling Putnam’s Shareholder Services at 1-800-225-1581.

Fund portfolio holdings

The fund will file a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may obtain the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about the SEC’s Web site or the operation of the Public Reference Room.

Financial statements

These sections of the report, as well as the accompanying Notes, preceded by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, constitute the fund’s financial statements.

The fund’s portfolio lists all the fund’s investments and their values as of the last day of the reporting period. Holdings are organized by asset type and industry sector, country, or state to show areas of concentration and diversification.

Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund’s net assets and share price are determined. All investment and non-investment assets are added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated separately for each class of shares. (For funds with preferred shares, the amount subtracted from total assets includes the liquidation preference of preferred shares.)

Statement of operations shows the fund’s net investment gain or loss. This is done by first adding up all the fund’s earnings — from dividends and interest income — and subtracting its operating expenses to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings — as well as any unrealized gains or losses over the period — is added to or subtracted from the net investment result to determine the fund’s net gain or loss for the fiscal year.

Statement of changes in net assets shows how the fund’s net assets were affected by the fund’s net investment gain or loss, by distributions to shareholders, and by changes in the number of the fund’s shares. It lists distributions and their sources (net investment income or realized capital gains) over the current reporting period and the most recent fiscal year-end. The distributions listed here may not match the sources listed in the Statement of operations because the distributions are determined on a tax basis and may be paid in a different period from the one in which they were earned.

Financial highlights provide an overview of the fund’s investment results, per-share distributions, expense ratios, net investment income ratios, and portfolio turnover in one summary table, reflecting the five most recent reporting periods. In a semiannual report, the highlight table also includes the current reporting period.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees and Shareholders of
Putnam New Opportunities Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the fund’s portfolio, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Putnam New Opportunities Fund (the “fund”) at June 30, 2007, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of investments owned at June 30, 2007 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 9, 2007

The fund’s portfolio 6/30/07


COMMON STOCKS (99.3%)*

	Shares		Value

Advertising and Marketing Services (0.3%)
inVentiv Health, Inc. †	319,100	$	11,682,251


Aerospace and Defense (3.7%)
Boeing Co. (The)	490,300		47,147,248
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.	218,100		21,240,759
Lockheed Martin Corp.	203,500		19,155,455
Raytheon Co.	1,038,500		55,964,765
Rockwell Collins, Inc.	266,000		18,790,240
			162,298,467


Airlines (1.2%)
Continental Airlines, Inc. Class B †	980,100		33,195,987
SkyWest, Inc.	814,500		19,409,535
			52,605,522


Automotive (0.2%)
AutoZone, Inc. †	51,300		7,008,606


Banking (1.0%)
Bank of America Corp.	687,500		33,611,875
UnionBanCal Corp.	178,800		10,674,360
			44,286,235


Basic Materials (0.8%)
Ceradyne, Inc. †	462,000		34,169,520


Beverage (1.7%)
Coca-Cola Co. (The)	814,000		42,580,340
PepsiCo, Inc.	499,900		32,418,515
			74,998,855


Biotechnology (2.3%)
Applera Corp. — Applied Biosystems Group	612,900		18,717,966
Celgene Corp. †	185,183		10,616,541
Genzyme Corp. †	524,900		33,803,560
Gilead Sciences, Inc. †	643,600		24,952,372
Invitrogen Corp. †	158,300		11,674,625
			99,765,064


Building Materials (0.5%)
Genlyte Group, Inc. (The) †	138,500		10,877,790
Sherwin-Williams Co. (The)	156,200		10,382,614
			21,260,404


Chemicals (2.3%)
Celanese Corp. Ser. A	275,500		10,683,890
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.	106,631		6,386,131
Lubrizol Corp. (The)	296,900		19,164,895
Monsanto Co.	941,700		63,602,418
			99,837,334


Commercial and Consumer Services (1.4%)
Diamond Management & Technology
Consultants, Inc.	764,700		10,094,040
Dun & Bradstreet Corp. (The)	138,000		14,211,240
Manpower, Inc.	151,000		13,928,240
Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. †	192,131		12,355,945
United Rentals, Inc. †	333,900		10,865,106
			61,454,571


COMMON STOCKS (99.3%)* continued

	Shares		Value

Communications Equipment (2.4%)
Comtech Telecommunications Corp. †	342,300	$	15,889,566
Harris Corp.	266,300		14,526,665
Qualcomm, Inc.	1,750,600		75,958,534
			106,374,765


Computers (5.7%)
ANSYS, Inc. †	396,900		10,517,850
Apple Computer, Inc. †	804,300		98,156,772
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. †	6,402,600		50,068,332
Compuware Corp. †	1,285,400		15,244,844
Emulex Corp. †	2,025,558		44,238,187
Lexmark International, Inc. Class A †	235,600		11,617,436
Micros Systems, Inc. †	194,100		10,559,040
NCR Corp. †	249,300		13,098,222
			253,500,683


Consumer (1.0%)
Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.	124,400		10,985,764
Blue Nile, Inc. †	39,000		2,355,600
Tupperware Brands Corp.	1,149,500		33,036,630
			46,377,994


Consumer Finance (0.4%)
Asta Funding, Inc.	263,900		10,141,677
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.	125,100		7,508,502
			17,650,179


Consumer Goods (2.1%)
Chattem, Inc. †	169,700		10,755,586
Colgate-Palmolive Co.	846,700		54,908,495
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.	894,700		26,331,021
			91,995,102


Consumer Services (0.3%)
Labor Ready, Inc. †	479,934		11,091,275
Nutri/System, Inc. †	59,488		4,154,642
			15,245,917


Electrical Equipment (0.2%)
WESCO International, Inc. †	146,481		8,854,776


Electronics (2.0%)
Amphenol Corp. Class A	551,600		19,664,540
Avnet, Inc. †	315,600		12,510,384
General Cable Corp. †	243,500		18,445,125
NVIDIA Corp. †	829,800		34,279,038
RF Micro Devices, Inc. †	251,300		1,568,112
			86,467,199


Energy (4.1%)
Cameron International Corp. †	388,400		27,758,948
Global Industries, Ltd. †	576,700		15,467,094
Grey Wolf, Inc. †	1,731,000		14,263,440
Halliburton Co.	832,400		28,717,800
National-Oilwell Varco, Inc. †	580,300		60,490,472
Pride International, Inc. †	287,900		10,784,734
Rowan Cos., Inc.	268,500		11,003,130
Superior Energy Services †	309,800		12,367,216
			180,852,834


COMMON STOCKS (99.3%)* continued

	Shares		Value

Energy (Other) (0.8%)
Covanta Holding Corp. †	1,509,100	$	37,199,315


Engineering & Construction (0.2%)
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. †	188,900		10,863,639


Entertainment (0.4%)
Regal Entertainment Group Class A	815,500		17,883,915


Financial (1.6%)
JPMorgan Chase & Co.	957,200		46,376,340
Moody’s Corp.	414,200		25,763,240
			72,139,580


Health Care Services (5.8%)
Apria Healthcare Group, Inc. †	298,000		8,573,460
Charles River Laboratories
International, Inc. †	268,200		13,844,484
Coventry Health Care, Inc. †	349,600		20,154,440
DaVita, Inc. †	270,300		14,563,764
Health Management Associates, Inc.
Class A	647,600		7,356,736
Humana, Inc. †	953,300		58,065,503
McKesson Corp.	229,400		13,681,416
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.	1,211,500		61,956,110
WellCare Health Plans, Inc. †	652,700		59,075,877
			257,271,790


Homebuilding (1.3%)
NVR, Inc. †	83,700		56,895,075


Household Furniture and Appliances (0.6%)
Tempur-Pedic International, Inc.	969,300		25,104,870


Insurance (0.5%)
Amtrust Financial Services, Inc.	211,100		3,966,569
Arch Capital Group, Ltd. (Bermuda) †	94,500		6,855,030
Markel Corp. †	22,600		10,951,056
			21,772,655


Investment Banking/Brokerage (3.9%)
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)	299,300		64,873,275
Lazard, Ltd. Class A (Bermuda)	328,200		14,778,846
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.	661,800		49,317,336
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.	540,700		45,191,706
			174,161,163


Lodging/Tourism (0.6%)
Choice Hotels International, Inc.	673,473		26,615,653


Machinery (2.4%)
Cummins, Inc.	141,200		14,290,852
Gardner Denver, Inc. †	262,700		11,177,885
Manitowoc Co., Inc. (The)	668,000		53,693,840
Terex Corp. †	129,100		10,495,830
Timken Co.	485,300		17,524,183
			107,182,590


COMMON STOCKS (99.3%)* continued

	Shares		Value

Manufacturing (1.7%)
Acuity Brands, Inc.	278,000	$	16,757,840
ITT Corp.	339,400		23,174,232
Knoll, Inc.	974,601		21,831,062
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.
(Switzerland) †	164,762		15,736,419
			77,499,553


Media (1.1%)
Meredith Corp.	237,500		14,630,000
Viacom, Inc. Class B †	805,053		33,514,356
			48,144,356


Medical Technology (6.1%)
Baxter International, Inc.	1,361,000		76,678,740
Becton, Dickinson and Co.	764,200		56,932,900
C.R. Bard, Inc.	208,100		17,195,303
Edwards Lifesciences Corp. †	253,467		12,506,062
Hospira, Inc. †	452,200		17,653,888
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. †	704,800		36,628,456
Mentor Corp.	33,528		1,363,919
Millipore Corp. †	161,400		12,119,526
Techne Corp. †	179,200		10,252,032
Waters Corp. †	473,500		28,106,960
			269,437,786


Metals (3.5%)
Agnico-Eagle Mines, Ltd. (Canada)	316,300		11,544,950
AK Steel Holding Corp. †	293,300		10,960,621
Cameco Corp. (Canada)	201,200		10,208,888
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.	849,500		65,980,665
Freeport-McMoRan Copper &
Gold, Inc. Class B	174,800		14,476,936
Nucor Corp.	540,600		31,706,190
Steel Dynamics, Inc.	223,700		9,375,267
			154,253,517


Office Equipment & Supplies (0.1%)
Steelcase, Inc.	228,200		4,221,700


Oil & Gas (3.8%)
Exxon Mobil Corp.	263,200		22,077,216
Frontier Oil Corp.	1,251,800		54,791,286
Holly Corp.	192,500		14,281,575
Penn West Energy Trust (Canada)	283,600		9,463,732
Tesoro Corp.	287,000		16,402,050
Unit Corp. †	224,500		14,123,295
Western Refining, Inc.	629,585		36,390,013
			167,529,167


Pharmaceuticals (1.6%)
Biovail Corp. (Canada)	605,200		15,384,184
Cephalon, Inc. †	185,200		14,888,228
Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. †	532,800		18,237,744
Mylan Laboratories, Inc.	774,700		14,091,793
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. †	757,836		9,321,383
			71,923,332


COMMON STOCKS (99.3%)* continued

	Shares		Value

Publishing (1.6%)
Marvel Entertainment, Inc. †	498,357	$	12,698,136
McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc. (The)	828,500		56,404,280
			69,102,416


Real Estate (0.9%)
CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc.
Class A †	392,600		14,329,900
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc.	124,200		14,096,700
Taubman Centers, Inc. (R)	253,200		12,561,252
			40,987,852


Restaurants (2.6%)
Brinker International, Inc.	419,311		12,273,233
CBRL Group, Inc.	236,300		10,038,024
Darden Restaurants, Inc.	264,300		11,626,557
Domino’s Pizza, Inc.	685,000		12,514,950
Jack in the Box, Inc. †	180,300		12,790,482
McDonald’s Corp.	1,123,200		57,013,632
			116,256,878


Retail (6.0%)
Aeropostale, Inc. †	574,400		23,940,992
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.	1,983,650		50,900,459
Big Lots, Inc. †	1,190,900		35,036,278
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. †	1,462,800		63,704,940
Dress Barn, Inc. †	556,500		11,419,380
EZCORP, Inc. Class A †	449,192		5,947,302
NBTY, Inc. †	296,200		12,795,840
Priceline.com, Inc. †	145,590		10,007,857
RadioShack Corp.	1,626,200		53,892,268
			267,645,316


Semiconductor (2.5%)
KLA-Tencor Corp.	793,900		43,624,805
Lam Research Corp. †	394,200		20,261,880
Teradyne, Inc. †	2,153,400		37,856,772
Verigy, Ltd. (Singapore) †	250,500		7,166,805
			108,910,262


Software (5.0%)
Autodesk, Inc. †	1,221,300		57,498,804
BMC Software, Inc. †	979,400		29,675,820
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. †	850,900		18,685,764
Intuit, Inc. †	410,700		12,353,856
Microsoft Corp. #	3,071,600		90,520,052
Parametric Technology Corp. †	664,900		14,368,489
			223,102,785


Staffing (0.5%)
Administaff, Inc.	159,315		5,335,459
Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. †	144,600		7,409,304
Korn/Ferry International †	345,510		9,073,093
			21,817,856


Technology (0.3%)
ON Semiconductor Corp. †	1,127,500		12,086,800


COMMON STOCKS (99.3%)* continued

	Shares		Value

Technology Services (2.6%)
Accenture, Ltd. Class A (Bermuda)	1,176,700	$	50,468,663
Blue Coat Systems, Inc. †	222,400		11,013,248
Convergys Corp. †	734,200		17,797,008
Ingram Micro, Inc. Class A †	534,600		11,606,166
Shanda Interactive Entertainment,
Ltd. ADR (China) †	283,884		8,800,404
VeriSign, Inc. †	471,900		14,973,387
			114,658,876


Telecommunications (2.6%)
Brightpoint, Inc. †	835,360		11,519,614
CenturyTel, Inc.	374,700		18,379,035
InterDigital Communications Corp. †	343,000		11,034,310
j2 Global Communications, Inc. †	915,500		31,950,950
NeuStar, Inc. Class A †	520,800		15,087,576
NII Holdings, Inc. †	284,200		22,946,308
Premiere Global Services, Inc. †	157,614		2,052,134
			112,969,927


Textiles (1.6%)
NIKE, Inc. Class B	1,032,200		60,166,938
Phillips-Van Heusen Corp.	184,500		11,175,165
			71,342,103


Tobacco (2.4%)
Loews Corp. — Carolina Group	632,700		48,888,729
Reynolds American, Inc.	394,300		25,708,360
UST, Inc.	580,300		31,167,913
			105,765,002


Toys (0.8%)
Hasbro, Inc.	1,147,500		36,042,975


Waste Management (0.3%)
Stericycle, Inc. †	351,200		15,614,352


Total common stocks (cost $3,975,848,312)		$	4,393,089,334



SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (0.5%)* (cost $23,006,054)

	Shares		Value

Putnam Prime Money Market Fund (e)	23,006,054	$	23,006,054



TOTAL INVESTMENTS

Total investments (cost $3,998,854,366)		$	4,416,095,388

* Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $4,424,263,111.

† Non-income-producing security.

# A portion of this security was pledged and segregated with the custodian to cover margin requirements for futures contracts at June 30, 2007.

(e) See Note 5 to the financial statements regarding investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund.

(R) Real Estate Investment Trust.

At June 30, 2007, liquid assets totaling $94,223 have been designated as collateral for open futures contracts.

ADR after the name of a foreign holding stands for American Depository Receipts, representing ownership of foreign securities on deposit with a custodian bank.


FUTURES CONTRACTS OUTSTANDING at 6/30/07

				Unrealized
	Number of		Expiration	appreciation/
	contracts	Value	date	(depreciation)

NASDAQ 100 Index E-Mini (Long)	86	$ 3,364,320	Sep-07	$ 2,573
Russell 2000 Index Mini (Long)	199	16,757,790	Sep-07	(71,260)
S&P 500 Index (Long)	8	3,030,800	Sep-07	(4,480)
S&P Mid Cap 400 Index E-Mini (Long)	111	10,036,620	Sep-07	(21,056)

Total				$(94,223)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Statement of assets and liabilities 6/30/07


ASSETS

Investment in securities, at value (Note 1):
Unaffiliated issuers (identified cost $3,975,848,312)	$ 4,393,089,334
Affiliated issuers (identified cost $23,006,054) (Note 5)	23,006,054

Dividends, interest and other receivables	3,499,547

Receivable for securities sold	185,638,935

Total assets	4,605,233,870


LIABILITIES

Payable to custodian (Note 2)	149,966

Payable for variation margin (Note 1)	66,882

Payable for securities purchased	161,400,318

Payable for shares of the fund repurchased	7,510,494

Payable for compensation of Manager (Notes 2 and 5)	6,094,174

Payable for investor servicing (Note 2)	1,317,314

Payable for custodian fees (Note 2)	16,296

Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2)	1,079,305

Payable for administrative services (Note 2)	9,246

Payable for distribution fees (Note 2)	2,670,583

Other accrued expenses	656,181

Total liabilities	180,970,759

Net assets	$ 4,424,263,111


REPRESENTED BY

Paid-in capital (Unlimited shares authorized) (Notes 1 and 4)	$ 7,179,327,517

Accumulated net realized loss on investments and foreign currency transactions (Note 1)	(3,172,210,163)

Net unrealized appreciation of investments and assets and liabilities in foreign currencies	417,145,757

Total — Representing net assets applicable to capital shares outstanding	$ 4,424,263,111


COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE AND OFFERING PRICE

Net asset value and redemption price per class A share ($3,418,392,420 divided by 64,312,222 shares)	$53.15

Offering price per class A share (100/94.75 of $53.15)*	$56.09

Net asset value and offering price per class B share ($482,812,408 divided by 10,243,824 shares)**	$47.13

Net asset value and offering price per class C share ($35,775,997 divided by 715,397 shares)**	$50.01

Net asset value and redemption price per class M share ($70,139,829 divided by 1,416,900 shares)	$49.50

Offering price per class M share (100/96.75 of $49.50)*	$51.16

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per class R share ($1,256,807 divided by 23,892 shares)	$52.60

Net asset value, offering price and redemption price per class Y share ($415,885,650 divided by 7,538,298 shares)	$55.17

* On single retail sales of less than $50,000. On sales of $50,000 or more the offering price is reduced.

** Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Statement of operations Year ended 6/30/07


INVESTMENT INCOME

Dividends (net of foreign tax of $213,314)	$ 42,968,110

Interest (including interest income of $1,561,064 from investments in affiliated issuers) (Note 5)	2,362,424

Total investment income	45,330,534


EXPENSES

Compensation of Manager (Note 2)	24,931,750

Investor servicing fees (Note 2)	15,842,054

Custodian fees (Note 2)	205,923

Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2)	175,070

Administrative services (Note 2)	74,184

Distribution fees — Class A (Note 2)	8,903,324

Distribution fees — Class B (Note 2)	5,444,505

Distribution fees — Class C (Note 2)	376,548

Distribution fees — Class M (Note 2)	555,940

Distribution fees — Class R (Note 2)	6,052

Other	1,362,276

Non-recurring costs (Notes 2 and 6)	21,705

Costs assumed by Manager (Notes 2 and 6)	(21,705)

Fees waived and reimbursed by Manager (Note 5)	(30,120)

Total expenses	57,847,506

Expense reduction (Note 2)	(1,644,918)

Net expenses	56,202,588

Net investment loss	(10,872,054)

Net realized gain on investments (Notes 1 and 3)	591,089,766

Net realized gain on futures contracts (Note 1)	2,886,906

Net realized gain on foreign currency transactions (Note 1)	7,748

Net realized gain on written options (Notes 1 and 3)	995,042

Net unrealized depreciation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies during the year	(1,042)

Net unrealized appreciation of investments, futures contracts and written options during the year	111,060,624

Net gain on investments	706,039,044

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations	$695,166,990

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Statement of changes in net assets


DECREASE IN NET ASSETS

	Year ended	Year ended
	6/30/07	6/30/06

Operations:
Net investment loss	$ (10,872,054)	$ (16,304,610)

Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency transactions	594,979,462	944,402,173

Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments and assets and liabilities in foreign currencies	111,059,582	(347,818,003)

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations	695,166,990	580,279,560

Redemption fees (Note 1)	3,609	12,783

Decrease from capital share transactions (Note 4)	(1,102,564,233)	(1,736,185,398)

Total decrease in net assets	(407,393,634)	(1,155,893,055)


NET ASSETS

Beginning of year	4,831,656,745	5,987,549,800

End of year	$ 4,424,263,111	$ 4,831,656,745

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial	highlights (For a common share outstanding throughout the period)



INVESTMENT OPERATIONS:								RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

			Net				Total			Ratio of net
	Net asset		realized and	Total		Net asset	return	Net	Ratio of	investment
	value,	Net	unrealized	from		value,	at net	assets,	expenses to	income (loss)	Portfolio
	beginning	investment	gain (loss) on	investment	Redemption	end	asset	end of period	average net	to average	turnover
Period ended	of period	income (loss)^(a)	investments	operations	fees	of period	value (%)^(b)	(in thousands)	assets (%)^(c)	net assets (%)	(%)

CLASS A
June 30, 2007	$45.72	(.08)^(d)	7.51	7.43	—^(e)	$53.15	16.25	$3,418,392	1.17^(d)	(.15)^(d)	91.32
June 30, 2006	41.60	(.09)^(d,h)	4.21	4.12	—^(e)	45.72	9.90^(h)	3,688,423	1.08^(d,h)	(.19)^(d,h)	83.63
June 30, 2005	38.96	.03^(d,f,g)	2.61	2.64	—^(e)	41.60	6.78^(g)	4,650,755	1.12^(d)	.07^(d,f,g)	97.25
June 30, 2004	32.79	(.19)^(d)	6.36	6.17	—^(e)	38.96	18.82	5,075,005	1.09^(d)	(.52)^(d)	60.86
June 30, 2003	32.28	(.17)	.68	.51	—	32.79	1.58	6,262,164	1.09	(.57)	42.43


CLASS B
June 30, 2007	$40.85	(.40)^(d)	6.68	6.28	—^(e)	$47.13	15.37	$482,812	1.92^(d)	(.91)^(d)	91.32
June 30, 2006	37.45	(.38)^(d,h)	3.78	3.40	—^(e)	40.85	9.08^(h)	610,991	1.83^(d,h)	(.94)^(d,h)	83.63
June 30, 2005	35.34	(.24)^(d,f,g)	2.35	2.11	—^(e)	37.45	5.97^(g)	784,295	1.87^(d)	(.68)^(d,f,g)	97.25
June 30, 2004	29.96	(.43)^(d)	5.81	5.38	—^(e)	35.34	17.96	1,674,238	1.84^(d)	(1.27)^(d)	60.86
June 30, 2003	29.72	(.36)	.60	.24	—	29.96	.81	1,850,775	1.84	(1.33)	42.43


CLASS C
June 30, 2007	$43.34	(.42)^(d)	7.09	6.67	—^(e)	$50.01	15.39	$35,776	1.92^(d)	(.91)^(d)	91.32
June 30, 2006	39.73	(.41)^(d,h)	4.02	3.61	—^(e)	43.34	9.09^(h)	39,825	1.83^(d,h)	(.94)^(d,h)	83.63
June 30, 2005	37.49	(.25)^(d,f,g)	2.49	2.24	—^(e)	39.73	5.98^(g)	42,827	1.87^(d)	(.68)^(d,f,g)	97.25
June 30, 2004	31.79	(.45)^(d)	6.15	5.70	—^(e)	37.49	17.93	55,005	1.84^(d)	(1.27)^(d)	60.86
June 30, 2003	31.53	(.37)	.63	.26	—	31.79	.83	64,015	1.84	(1.32)	42.43


CLASS M
June 30, 2007	$42.79	(.30)^(d)	7.01	6.71	—^(e)	$49.50	15.68	$70,140	1.67^(d)	(.66)^(d)	91.32
June 30, 2006	39.14	(.29)^(d,h)	3.94	3.65	—^(e)	42.79	9.32^(h)	78,230	1.58^(d,h)	(.69)^(d,h)	83.63
June 30, 2005	36.83	(.16)^(d,f,g)	2.47	2.31	—^(e)	39.14	6.27^(g)	104,545	1.62^(d)	(.43)^(d,f,g)	97.25
June 30, 2004	31.15	(.36)^(d)	6.04	5.68	—^(e)	36.83	18.24	134,157	1.59^(d)	(1.02)^(d)	60.86
June 30, 2003	30.82	(.30)	.63	.33	—	31.15	1.07	171,675	1.59	(1.07)	42.43


CLASS R
June 30, 2007	$45.37	(.18)^(d)	7.41	7.23	—^(e)	$52.60	15.94	$1,257	1.42^(d)	(.36)^(d)	91.32
June 30, 2006	41.38	(.19)^(d,h)	4.18	3.99	—^(e)	45.37	9.64^(h)	517	1.33^(d,h)	(.40)^(d,h)	83.63
June 30, 2005	38.85	(.09)^(d,f,g)	2.62	2.53	—^(e)	41.38	6.51^(g)	184	1.37^(d)	(.23)^(d,f,g)	97.25
June 30, 2004	32.76	(.27)^(d)	6.36	6.09	—^(e)	38.85	18.59	25	1.34^(d)	(.76)^(d)	60.86
June 30, 2003^†	28.90	(.10)	3.96	3.86	—	32.76	13.36^*	1	.59^*	(.36)^*	42.43


CLASS Y
June 30, 2007	$47.34	.05^(d)	7.78	7.83	—^(e)	$55.17	16.54	$415,886	.92^(d)	.10^(d)	91.32
June 30, 2006	42.97	.03^(d,h)	4.34	4.37	—^(e)	47.34	10.17^(h)	413,670	.83^(d,h)	.06^(d,h)	83.63
June 30, 2005	40.14	.13^(d,f,g)	2.70	2.83	—^(e)	42.97	7.05^(g)	404,943	.87^(d)	.34^(d,f,g)	97.25
June 30, 2004	33.70	(.10)^(d)	6.54	6.44	—^(e)	40.14	19.11	851,430	.84^(d)	(.27)^(d)	60.86
June 30, 2003	33.09	(.10)	.71	.61	—	33.70	1.85	930,912	.84	(.33)	42.43

See notes to financial highlights at the end of this section.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



30		31

Financial highlights (Continued)

* Not annualized.

† For the period January 21, 2003 (commencement of operations) to June 30, 2003.

(a) Per share net investment income (loss) has been determined on the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.

(b) Total return assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.

(d) Reflects waivers of certain fund expenses in connection with investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund in effect during the period. As a result of such waivers, the expenses of each class, as a percentage of its average net assets, reflect a reduction of the following amounts (Note 5):


	Percentage
	of average
	net assets

June 30, 2007	<0.01%

June 30, 2006	<0.01

June 30, 2005	<0.01

June 30, 2004	<0.01

(e) Amount represents less than $0.01 per share.

(f) Net investment income (loss) per share and ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets reflect a special dividend received by the fund which amounted to the following amounts:


		Percentage
		of average
	Per share	net assets

Class A	$0.15	0.39%

Class B	0.15	0.42

Class C	0.15	0.40

Class M	0.15	0.40

Class R	0.12	0.31

Class Y	0.17	0.43

(g) Reflects a non-recurring accrual related to Putnam Management’s settlement with the SEC regarding brokerage allocation practices, which amounted to the following amounts:


		Percentage
		of average
	Per share	net assets

Class A	$0.02	0.05%

Class B	0.01	0.04

Class C	0.02	0.05

Class M	0.02	0.05

Class R	0.03	0.08

Class Y	0.01	0.04

(h) Reflects a non-recurring reimbursement from Putnam Investments relating to the calculation of certain amounts paid by the fund to Putnam in previous years for transfer agent services, which amounted to $0.03 per share and 0.06% of average net assets for the period ended June 30, 2006.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Notes to financial statements 6/30/07

Note 1: Significant accounting policies

Putnam New Opportunities Fund (the “fund”), a Massachusetts business trust, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The fund seeks capital appreciation by investing principally in common stocks of companies that, in the judgment of Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”), the fund’s manager, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC, possess above-average, long-term growth potential.

The fund offers class A, class B, class C, class M, class R and class Y shares. Class A and class M shares are sold with a maximum front-end sales charge of 5.25% and 3.25%, respectively, and generally do not pay a contingent deferred sales charge. Class B shares, which convert to class A shares after approximately eight years, do not pay a front-end sales charge and are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge, if those shares are redeemed within six years of purchase. Class C shares have a one-year 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge and do not convert to class A shares. Class R shares, which are offered to qualified employee-benefit plans, are sold without a front-end sales charge or a contingent deferred sales charge. The expenses for class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares may differ based on the distribution fee of each class, which is identified in Note 2. Class Y shares, which are sold at net asset value, are generally subject to the same expenses as class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, but do not bear a distribution fee. Class Y shares are sold to certain eligible purchasers including certain defined contribution plans (including corporate IRAs), bank trust departments, trust companies and certain college savings plans.

Effective October 2, 2006, a 1.00% redemption fee may apply on any shares purchased on or after such date that are redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 7 days of purchase. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in-capital. Prior to October 2, 2006, a 2.00% redemption fee applied to any shares that were redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 5 days of purchase.

Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and expenses of the fund are borne pro-rata based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the fund, except that each class bears expenses unique to that class (including the distribution fees applicable to such classes). Each class votes as a class only with respect to its own distribution plan or other matters on which a class vote is required by law or determined by the Trustees. If the fund were liquidated, shares of each class would receive their pro-rata share of the net assets of the fund. In addition, the Trustees declare separate dividends on each class of shares.

In the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that may include agreements to indemnify another party under given circumstances. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be, but have not yet been, made against the fund. However, the fund expects the risk of material loss to be remote.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

A) Security valuation Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the last reported sales price on their principal exchange, or official closing price for certain markets. If no sales are reported — as in the case of some securities traded over-the-counter — a security is valued at its last reported bid price. Many securities markets and exchanges outside the U.S. close prior to the close of the New York Stock Exchange and therefore the closing prices for securities in such markets or on such exchanges may not fully reflect events that occur after such close but before the close of the New York Stock Exchange. Accordingly, on certain days, the fund will fair value foreign equity securities taking into account multiple factors, including movements in the U.S. securities markets. The number of days on which fair value prices will be used will depend on market activity and it is possible that fair value prices will be used by the fund to a significant extent. Securities quoted in foreign currencies, if any, are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate. Certain investments, including certain restricted securities, are also valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Such valuations and procedures are reviewed periodically by the Trustees. The fair value of securities is generally determined as the amount that the fund could reasonably expect to realize from an orderly disposition of such securities over a reasonable period of time. By its nature, a fair value price is a good faith estimate of the value of a security at a given point in time and does not reflect an actual market price, which may be different by a material amount.

B) Joint trading account Pursuant to an exemptive order from the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the fund may transfer uninvested cash balances, including cash collateral received under security lending arrangements, into a joint trading account along with the cash of other registered investment companies and certain other accounts managed by Putnam Management. These balances may be invested in issues of high-grade, short-term investments having maturities of up to 397 days for collateral received under security lending arrangements and up to 90 days for other cash investments.

C) Repurchase agreements The fund, or any joint trading account, through its custodian, receives delivery of the underlying securities, the market value of which at the time of purchase is required to be in an amount at least equal to the resale price, including accrued interest. Collateral for certain tri-party repurchase agreements is held at the counterparty’s custodian in a segregated account for the benefit of the fund and the counterparty. Putnam Management is responsible for determining that the value of these underlying securities is at all times at least equal to the resale price, including accrued interest.

D) Security transactions and related investment income Security transactions are recorded on the trade date (the date the order to buy or sell is executed). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined on the identified cost basis.

Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend income, net of applicable withholding taxes, is recognized on the ex-dividend date except that certain dividends from foreign securities, if any, are recognized as soon as the fund is informed of the ex-dividend date. Non-cash dividends, if any, are recorded at the fair market value of the securities

received. Dividends representing a return of capital or capital gains, if any, are reflected as a reduction of cost and/or as a realized gain.

E) Foreign currency translation The accounting records of the fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. The market value of foreign securities, currency holdings, and other assets and liabilities are recorded in the books and records of the fund after translation to U.S. dollars based on the exchange rates on that day. The cost of each security is determined using historical exchange rates. Income and withholding taxes are translated at prevailing exchange rates when earned or incurred. The fund does not isolate that portion of realized or unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in the foreign exchange rate on investments from fluctuations arising from changes in the market prices of the securities. Such gains and losses are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments. Net realized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions represent net realized exchange gains or losses on closed forward currency contracts, disposition of foreign currencies, currency gains and losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions and the difference between the amount of investment income and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the fund’s books and the U.S. dollar equivalent amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized appreciation and depreciation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies arise from changes in the value of open forward currency contracts and assets and liabilities other than investments at the period end, resulting from changes in the exchange rate. Investments in foreign securities involve certain risks, including those related to economic instability, unfavorable political developments, and currency fluctuations, not present with domestic investments.

F) Futures and options contracts The fund may use futures and options contracts to hedge against changes in the values of securities the fund owns or expects to purchase, or for other investment purposes. The fund may also write options on swaps or securities it owns or in which it may invest to increase its current returns.

The potential risk to the fund is that the change in value of futures and options contracts may not correspond to the change in value of the hedged instruments. In addition, losses may arise from changes in the value of the underlying instruments, if there is an illiquid secondary market for the contracts, or if the counterparty to the contract is unable to perform. Risks may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of assets and liabilities. When the contract is closed, the fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Realized gains and losses on purchased options are included in realized gains and losses on investment securities. If a written call option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as an addition to sales proceeds. If a written put option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as a reduction to the cost of investments.

Futures contracts are valued at the quoted daily settlement prices established by the exchange on which they trade. The fund and the broker agree to exchange an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the futures contract. Such receipts or payments are known as “variation margin.” Exchange traded options are valued at the last sale price or, if no sales are reported, the last bid price for purchased options and the last ask price for written options. Options traded over-the-counter are valued using prices supplied by dealers. Futures and written option contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.

G) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its taxable income within the prescribed time and otherwise comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) applicable to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax under Section 4982 of the Code, as amended. Therefore, no provision has been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or unrealized appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital gains.

At June 30, 2007, the fund had a capital loss carryover of $3,171,001,120 available to the extent allowed by the Code to offset future net capital gain, if any. The amount of the carryover and the expiration dates are:


Loss Carryover	Expiration

$1,394,513,202	June 30, 2010

1,776,487,918	June 30, 2011

H) Distributions to shareholders Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are recorded by the fund on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. The amount and character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. These differences include temporary and/or permanent differences of losses on wash sale transactions and net operating loss. Reclassifications are made to the fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under income tax regulations. For the year ended June 30, 2007, the fund reclassified $10,872,054 to decrease accumulated net investment loss and $10,864,306 to decrease paid-in-capital, with an increase to accumulated net realized loss of $7,748.

The tax basis components of distributable earnings and the federal tax cost as of June 30, 2007 were as follows:


Unrealized appreciation	$ 515,881,396
Unrealized depreciation	(99,943,640)
	————————————————
Net unrealized appreciation	415,937,756
Capital loss carryforward	(3,171,001,120)
Cost for federal income tax purposes	$ 4,000,157,632

Note 2: Management fee, administrative services
and other transactions

Putnam Management is paid for management and investment advisory services quarterly based on the average net assets of the fund. Such fee is based on the following annual rates: 0.70% of the first $500 million of average net assets, 0.60% of the next $500 million, 0.55% of the next $500 million, 0.50% of the next $5 billion, 0.475% of the next $5 billion, 0.455% of the next $5 billion, 0.44% of the next $5 billion, 0.43% of the next $5 billion, 0.42% of the next $5 billion, 0.41% of the next $5 billion, 0.40% of the next $5 billion, 0.39% of the next $5 billion, 0.38% of the next $8.5 billion and 0.37% thereafter.

Putnam Management has agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund through June 30, 2009, to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds viewed by Lipper, Inc. as having the same investment classification or objective as the fund. The expense reimbursement is

based on a comparison of the fund’s expenses with the average annualized operating expenses of the funds in its Lipper peer group for each calendar quarter during the fund’s last fiscal year, excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. For the year ended June 30, 2007, Putnam Management did not waive any of its management fee from the fund.

Effective August 3, 2007, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. sold its ownership interest in Putnam Management, its parent companies and affiliates to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great-West Lifeco, Inc. The fund’s shareholders have approved a new management contract that became effective upon the sale.

For the year ended June 30, 2007, Putnam Management has assumed $21,705 of legal, shareholder servicing and communication, audit and Trustee fees incurred by the fund in connection with certain legal and regulatory matters (including those described in Note 6).

The fund reimburses Putnam Management an allocated amount for the compensation and related expenses of certain officers of the fund and their staff who provide administrative services to the fund. The aggregate amount of all such reimbursements is determined annually by the Trustees.

Custodial functions for the fund’s assets were provided by Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), a subsidiary of Putnam, LLC, and by State Street Bank and Trust Company. Custody fees are based on the fund’s asset level, the number of its security holdings and transaction volumes. Putnam Investor Services, a division of PFTC, provided investor servicing agent functions to the fund. Putnam Investor Services received fees for investor servicing, subject to certain limitations, based on the number of shareholder accounts in the fund and the level of defined contribution plan assets in the fund. During the year ended June 30, 2007, the fund incurred $16,020,584 for custody and investor servicing agent functions provided by PFTC.

Under the custodian contract between the fund and State Street Bank and Trust Company, the custodian bank has a lien on the securities of the fund to the extent permitted by the fund’s investment restrictions to cover any advances made by the custodian bank for the settlement of securities purchased by the fund. At June 30, 2007, the payable to the custodian bank represents the amount due for cash advanced for the settlement of securities purchased.

The fund has entered into arrangements with PFTC and State Street Bank and Trust Company whereby PFTC’s and State Street Bank and Trust Company’s fees are reduced by credits allowed on cash balances. The fund also reduced expenses through brokerage service arrangements. For the year ended June 30, 2007, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $1,644,918 under these arrangements.

Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of which $1,137, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees receive additional fees for attendance at certain committee meetings, industry seminars and for certain compliance-related matters. Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their services as Trustees. George Putnam, III, who was not an independent Trustee during the period, also receives the foregoing fees for his services as Trustee.

The fund has adopted a Trustee Fee Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”) which allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of Trustees fees payable on or after July 1, 1995. The deferred fees remain invested in certain Putnam funds until distribution in accordance with the Deferral Plan.

The fund has adopted an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) covering all Trustees of the fund who have served as a Trustee for at least five years and were first elected prior to 2004. Benefits under the Pension Plan are equal to 50% of the Trustee’s average annual attendance and retainer fees for the three years ended December 31, 2005. The retirement benefit is payable during a Trustee’s lifetime, beginning the year following retirement, for the number of years of service through December 31, 2006. Pension expense for the fund is included in Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of operations. Accrued pension liability is included in Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of assets and liabilities. The Trustees have terminated the Pension Plan with respect to any Trustee first elected after 2003.

The fund has adopted distribution plans (the “Plans”) with respect to its class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The purpose of the Plans is to compensate Putnam Retail Management, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC and Putnam Retail Management GP, Inc., for services provided and expenses incurred in distributing shares of the fund. The Plans provide for payments by the fund to Putnam Retail Management at an annual rate of up to 0.35%, 1.00%, 1.00%, 1.00% and 1.00% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, respectively. The Trustees have approved payment by the fund at an annual rate of 0.25%, 1.00%, 1.00%, 0.75% and 0.50% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C, class M and class R shares, respectively.

For the year ended June 30, 2007, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received net commissions of $200,136 and $3,277 from the sale of class A and class M shares, respectively, and received $661,803 and $4,589 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class B and class C shares, respectively. A deferred sales charge of up to 1.00% and 0.65% is assessed on certain redemptions of class A and class M shares, respectively. For the year ended June 30, 2007, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received $907 and no monies on class A and class M redemptions, respectively.

Note 3: Purchases and sales of securities

During the year ended June 30, 2007, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities other than short-term investments aggregated $4,182,505,525 and $5,175,057,315, respectively. There were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.

Written option transactions during the year ended June 30, 2007 are summarized as follows:


	Contract	Premiums
	Amounts	Received

Written options outstanding
at beginning of year	$ 28,800	$ 24,549

Options opened	666,628	1,006,472
Options exercised	(50,470)	(33,513)
Options expired	(529,034)	(910,886)
Options closed	(115,924)	(86,622)

Written options outstanding
at end of year	$ —	$ —

Note 4: Capital shares

At June 30, 2007, there was an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized. In certain circumstances shares may be purchased or redeemed through the delivery to the fund or receipt by the shareholders, respectively, of securities, the fair value of which is used to determine the number of shares issued or redeemed. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:


CLASS A	Shares		Amount

Year ended 6/30/07:
Shares sold	4,747,481	$	233,393,750

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	4,747,481		233,393,750

Shares repurchased	(21,108,385)	(1,040,906,997)

Net decrease	(16,360,904)	$	(807,513,247)

Year ended 6/30/06:
Shares sold	7,090,831	$	323,578,415

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	7,090,831		323,578,415

Shares repurchased	(26,760,549)	(1,213,365,048)

Redemptions in kind	(11,442,046)		(529,080,227)

Net decrease	(31,111,764)	$(1,418,866,860)


CLASS B	Shares		Amount

Year ended 6/30/07:
Shares sold	625,369		$ 27,330,707

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	625,369		27,330,707

Shares repurchased	(5,339,812)		(232,916,321)

Net decrease	(4,714,443)		$(205,585,614)

Year ended 6/30/06:
Shares sold	1,098,871		$ 44,859,067

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	1,098,871		44,859,067

Shares repurchased	(7,083,792)		(288,129,279)

Net decrease	(5,984,921)		$(243,270,212)


CLASS C	Shares		Amount

Year ended 6/30/07:
Shares sold	76,233	$	3,548,876

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	76,233		3,548,876

Shares repurchased	(279,711)	(12,975,683)

Net decrease	(203,478)	$ (9,426,807)

Year ended 6/30/06:
Shares sold	130,754	$	5,654,158

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	130,754		5,654,158

Shares repurchased	(289,685)	(12,509,194)

Net decrease	(158,931)	$ (6,855,036)


CLASS M	Shares		Amount

Year ended 6/30/07:
Shares sold	83,594	$	3,832,925

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	83,594		3,832,925

Shares repurchased	(494,752)	(22,696,841)

Net decrease	(411,158)	$(18,863,916)

Year ended 6/30/06:
Shares sold	181,349	$	7,716,906

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	181,349		7,716,906

Shares repurchased	(1,024,641)	(43,488,871)

Net decrease	(843,292)	$(35,771,965)


CLASS R	Shares		Amount

Year ended 6/30/07:
Shares sold	32,916	$ 1,591,206

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	32,916		1,591,206

Shares repurchased	(20,419)	(1,042,929)

Net increase	12,497	$	548,277

Year ended 6/30/06:
Shares sold	16,608	$	757,250

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	16,608		757,250

Shares repurchased	(9,669)		(466,245)

Net increase	6,939	$	291,005


CLASS Y	Shares		Amount

Year ended 6/30/07:
Shares sold	1,050,421	$	53,570,976

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	1,050,421		53,570,976

Shares repurchased	(2,251,090)	(115,293,902)

Net decrease	(1,200,669)	$	(61,722,926)

Year ended 6/30/06:
Shares sold	1,292,228	$	61,098,068

Shares issued in connection with
reinvestment of distributions	—		—

	1,292,228		61,098,068

Shares repurchased	(1,977,874)		(92,810,398)

Net decrease	(685,646)	$	(31,712,330)

Note 5: Investment in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund

The fund invests in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund, an open-end management investment company managed by Putnam Management. Investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund are valued at its closing net asset value each business day. Management fees paid by the fund are reduced by an amount equal to the management and administrative services fees paid by Putnam Prime Money Market Fund with respect to assets invested by the fund in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund. For the year ended June 30, 2007, management fees paid were reduced by $30,120 relating to the fund’s investment in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund. Income distributions earned by the fund are recorded as income in the Statement of operations and totaled $1,561,064 for the year ended June 30, 2007. During the year ended June 30, 2007, cost of purchases and proceeds of sales of investments in Putnam Prime Money Market Fund aggregated $801,272,946 and $809,952,552, respectively.

Note 6: Regulatory matters and litigation

In late 2003 and 2004, Putnam Management settled charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Massachusetts Securities Division in connection with excessive short-term trading in Putnam funds. Payments from Putnam Management will be distributed to certain open-end Putnam funds and their shareholders. These allegations and related matters have served as the general basis for certain lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits against Putnam Management and, in a limited number of cases, some Putnam funds. Putnam Management believes that these lawsuits will have no material adverse effect on the funds or on Putnam Management’s ability to provide investment management services. In addition, Putnam Management has agreed to bear any costs incurred by the Putnam funds as a result of these matters.

Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management are named as defendants in a civil suit in which the plaintiffs allege that the management and distribution fees paid by certain Putnam funds were excessive and seek recovery under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management have contested the plaintiffs’ claims and the matter is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Based on currently available information, Putnam Management believes that this action is without merit and that it is unlikely to have a material effect on Putnam Management’s and Putnam Retail Management’s ability to provide services to their clients, including the fund.

Note 7: New accounting pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (the “Interpretation”). The Interpretation prescribes a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken by a filer in the filer’s tax return. The Interpretation is not expected to have a material effect on the fund’s financial statements. However, the conclusions regarding the Interpretation may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, further implementation guidance expected from the FASB, and on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (the “Standard”). The Standard defines fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The Standard applies to fair value measurements already required or permitted by existing standards. The Standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Putnam Management is currently evaluating what impact the adoption of the Standard will have on the fund’s financial statements.

Federal tax information and brokerage
commissions (unaudited)

Federal tax information

The Form 1099 you receive in January 2008 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar 2007.

Brokerage commissions

Brokerage commissions are paid to firms that execute trades on behalf of your fund. When choosing these firms, Putnam is required by law to seek the best execution of the trades, taking all relevant factors into consideration, including expected quality of execution and commission rate. Listed below are the largest relationships based upon brokerage commissions for your fund and the other funds in Putnam’s U.S. Small- and Mid-Cap group for the year ended June 30, 2007. The other Putnam mutual funds in this group are Putnam Capital Opportunities Fund, Putnam Discovery Growth Fund, Putnam Mid Cap Value Fund, Putnam OTC & Emerging Growth Fund, Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund, Putnam Small Cap Value Fund, Putnam Vista Fund, Putnam VT Capital Opportunities Fund, Putnam VT Discovery Growth Fund, Putnam VT Mid Cap Value Fund, Putnam VT New Opportunities Fund, Putnam VT OTC & Emerging Growth Fund, Putnam VT Small Cap Value Fund, and Putnam VT Vista Fund.

The top five firms that received brokerage commissions for trades executed for the U.S. Small- and Mid-Cap group are (in descending order) Citigroup Global Markets, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse First Boston, and Bear Stearns & Company. Commissions paid to these firms together represented approximately 39% of the total brokerage commissions paid for the year ended June 30, 2007.

Commissions paid to the next 10 firms together represented approximately 38% of the total brokerage commissions paid during the period. These firms are (in alphabetical order) CIBC World Markets, Deutsche Bank Securities, JPMorgan Clearing, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, RBC Capital Markets, SG Cowen, Thomas Weisel Partners, UBS Warburg, and Wachovia Securities.

Additional information about brokerage commissions is available on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Web site at www.sec.gov. Putnam funds disclose commissions by firm to the SEC in semiannual filings on Form N-SAR.

Shareholder meeting
results (unaudited)

May 15, 2007 meeting

A proposal to approve a new management contract between the fund and Putnam Investment Management, LLC was approved as follows:


Votes for	Votes against	Abstentions

49,484,339	2,463,187	1,796,442

All tabulations are rounded to the nearest whole number.

About the Trustees

Jameson A. Baxter (Born 1943), Trustee since 1994, Vice Chairman since 2005

Ms. Baxter is the President of Baxter Associates, Inc., a private investment firm.

Ms. Baxter serves as a Director of ASHTA Chemicals, Inc., Ryerson, Inc. (a metals service corporation), the Mutual Fund Directors Forum, and Advocate Health Care. She is Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees, Mount Holyoke College, having served as Chairman for five years. Until 2007, she was a Director of Banta Corporation (a printing and supply chain management company). Until 2004, she was a Director of BoardSource (formerly the National Center for Nonprofit Boards), and until 2002, she was a Director of Intermatic Corporation (a manufacturer of energy control products).

Ms. Baxter has held various positions in investment banking and corporate finance, including Vice President and Principal of the Regency Group, and Vice President of and Consultant to First Boston Corporation. She is a graduate of Mount Holyoke College.

Charles B. Curtis (Born 1940), Trustee since 2001

Mr. Curtis is President and Chief Operating Officer of the Nuclear Threat Initiative (a private foundation dealing with national security issues) and serves as Senior Advisor to the United Nations Foundation.

Mr. Curtis is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and serves as a Director of Edison International and Southern California Edison. Until 2006, Mr. Curtis served as a member of the Trustee Advisory Council of the Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University. Until 2003, Mr. Curtis was a member of the Electric Power Research Institute Advisory Council and the University of Chicago Board of Governors for Argonne National Laboratory. Prior to 2002, Mr. Curtis was a Member of the Board of Directors of the Gas Technology Institute and the Board of Directors of the Environment and Natural Resources Program Steering Committee, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Until 2001, Mr. Curtis was a member of the Department of Defense Policy Board and Director of EG&G Technical Services, Inc. (a fossil energy research and development support company).

From August 1997 to December 1999, Mr. Curtis was a Partner at Hogan & Hartson L.L.P., a Washington, D.C. law firm. Prior to May 1997, Mr. Curtis was Deputy Secretary of Energy and Under Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy. He served as Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from 1977 to 1981 and has held positions on the staff of the U.S. House of Representatives, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the SEC.

Robert J. Darretta (Born 1946), Trustee since 2007

Mr. Darretta serves as Director of UnitedHealth Group, a diversified health-care conglomerate.

Until April 2007, Mr. Darretta was Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Johnson & Johnson, a diversified health-care conglomerate. Prior to 2007, Mr. Darretta held several accounting and finance positions with Johnson & Johnson, including Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, and Treasurer.

Mr. Darretta received a B.S. in Economics from Villanova University.

Myra R. Drucker (Born 1948), Trustee since 2004

Ms. Drucker is Chair of the Board of Trustees of Commonfund (a not-for-profit firm specializing in asset management for educational endowments and foundations), Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of Sarah Lawrence College, and a member of the Investment Committee of the Kresge Foundation (a charitable trust). She is also a director of New York Stock Exchange LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the publicly-traded NYSE Group, Inc., a director of Interactive Data Corporation (a provider of financial market data, analytics, and related services to financial institutions and individual investors), and an advisor to RCM Capital Management (an investment management firm).

Ms. Drucker is an ex-officio member of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Pension Managers Advisory Committee, having served as Chair for seven years.

Until August 31, 2004, Ms. Drucker was Managing Director and a member of the Board of Directors of General Motors Asset Management and Chief Investment Officer of General Motors Trust Bank. Ms. Drucker also served as a member of the NYSE Corporate Accountability and Listing Standards Committee and the NYSE/NASD IPO Advisory Committee.

Prior to joining General Motors Asset Management in 2001, Ms. Drucker held various executive positions in the investment management industry. Ms. Drucker served as Chief Investment Officer of Xerox Corporation (a technology and service company in the document industry), where she was responsible for the investment of the company’s pension assets. Ms. Drucker was also Staff Vice President and Director of Trust Investments for International Paper (a paper products, paper distribution, packaging and forest products company) and previously served as Manager of Trust Investments for Xerox Corporation. Ms. Drucker received a B.A. degree in Literature and Psychology from Sarah Lawrence College and pursued graduate studies in economics, statistics and portfolio theory at Temple University.

John A. Hill (Born 1942), Trustee since 1985 and Chairman since 2000

Mr. Hill is Vice Chairman of First Reserve Corporation, a private equity buyout firm that specializes in energy investments in the diversified worldwide energy industry.

Mr. Hill is a Director of Devon Energy Corporation and various private companies controlled by First Reserve Corporation, as well as Chairman of TH Lee, Putnam Investment Trust (a closed-end investment company advised by an affiliate of Putnam Management). He is also a Trustee of Sarah Lawrence College. Until 2005, he was a Director of Continuum Health Partners of New York.

Prior to acquiring First Reserve Corporation in 1983, Mr. Hill held executive positions in investment banking and investment management with several firms and with the federal government, including Deputy Associate Director of the Office of Management and Budget and Deputy Director of the Federal Energy Administration. He is active in various business associations, including the Economic Club of New York, and lectures on energy issues in the United States and Europe. Mr. Hill holds a B.A. degree in Economics from Southern Methodist University and pursued graduate studies there as a Woodrow Wilson Fellow.

Paul L. Joskow (Born 1947), Trustee since 1997

Dr. Joskow is the Elizabeth and James Killian Professor of Economics and Management, and Director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Dr. Joskow serves as a Director of National Grid (a UK-based holding company with interests in electric and gas transmission and distribution and telecommunications infrastructure), a Director of TransCanada Corporation (an energy company focused on natural gas transmission and power services), a Director of Exelon Corporation (an energy company focused on power services), and a Member of the Board of Overseers of the Boston Symphony Orchestra. Prior to July 2006, he served as President of the Yale University Council and continues to serve as a Member of the Council. Prior to February 2005, he served on the board of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (a non-profit research institution). Prior to February 2002, he was a Director of State Farm Indemnity Company (an automobile insurance company), and prior to March 2000, he was a Director of New England Electric System (a public utility holding company).

Dr. Joskow has published six books and numerous articles on topics in industrial organization, government regulation of industry, and competition policy. He is active in industry restructuring, environmental, energy, competition and privatization policies — serving as an advisor to governments and corporations worldwide. Dr. Joskow holds a Ph.D. and M. Phil from Yale University and a B.A. from Cornell University.

Elizabeth T. Kennan (Born 1938), Trustee since 1992

Dr. Kennan is a Partner of Cambus-Kenneth Farm (thoroughbred horse and cattle breeding). She is President Emeritus of Mount Holyoke College.

Dr. Kennan served as Chairman and is now Lead Director of Northeast Utilities. She is a Trustee of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, of Centre College and of Midway College in Midway, Kentucky. Until 2006, she was a member of The Trustees of Reservations. Prior to 2001, Dr. Kennan served on the oversight committee of the Folger Shakespeare Library. Prior to June 2005, she was a Director of Talbots, Inc., and she has served as Director on a number of other boards, including Bell Atlantic, Chastain Real Estate, Shawmut Bank, Berkshire Life Insurance, and Kentucky Home Life Insurance. Dr. Kennan has also served as President of Five Colleges Incorporated, as a Trustee of Notre Dame University and is active in various educational and civic associations.

As a member of the faculty of Catholic University for twelve years, until 1978, Dr. Kennan directed the post-doctoral program in Patristic and Medieval Studies, taught history and published numerous articles. Dr. Kennan holds a Ph.D. from the University of Washington in Seattle, an M.S. from St. Hilda’s College at Oxford University and an A.B. from Mount Holyoke College. She holds several honorary doctorates.

Kenneth R. Leibler (Born 1949), Trustee since 2006

Mr. Leibler is a founding partner and former Chairman of the Boston Options Exchange, an electronic marketplace for the trading of listed derivative securities.

Mr. Leibler currently serves as a Trustee of Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston. He is also lead director of Ruder Finn Group, a global communications and advertising firm and a director of Northeast Utilities, which operates New England’s largest energy delivery system. Prior to December 2006, he served as a director of the Optimum Funds group. Prior to October 2006, he served as a director of ISO New England, the organization responsible for the operation of the electric generation system in the New England states. Prior to 2000, Mr. Leibler was a director of the Investment Company Institute in Washington, D.C.

Prior to January 2005, Mr. Leibler served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Boston Stock Exchange. Prior to January 2000, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Liberty Financial Companies, a publicly traded diversified asset management organization. Prior to June 1990, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the American Stock Exchange, and is the youngest person in Exchange history to hold the title of President. Prior to serving as Amex President, he held the position of Chief Financial Officer and headed its management and marketing operations. Mr. Leibler graduated magna cum laude with a degree in economics from Syracuse University, where he was elected Phi Beta Kappa.

Robert E. Patterson (Born 1945), Trustee since 1984

Mr. Patterson is Senior Partner of Cabot Properties, L.P. and Chairman of Cabot Properties, Inc. (a private equity firm investing in commercial real estate).

Mr. Patterson serves as Chairman Emeritus and Trustee of the Joslin Diabetes Center. Prior to June 2003, he was a Trustee of Sea Education Association. Prior to December 2001, he was President and Trustee of Cabot Industrial Trust (a publicly traded real estate investment trust). Prior to February 1998, he was Executive Vice President and Director of Acquisitions of Cabot Partners Limited Partnership (a registered investment adviser involved in institutional real estate investments). Prior to 1990, he served as Executive Vice President of Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Realty Advisors, Inc. (the predecessor company of Cabot Partners).

Mr. Patterson practiced law and held various positions in state government and was the founding Executive Director of the Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency. Mr. Patterson is a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School.

George Putnam, III (Born 1951), Trustee since 1984

Mr. Putnam is Chairman of New Generation Research, Inc. (a publisher of financial advisory and other research services), and President of New Generation Advisers, Inc. (a registered investment advisor to private funds). Mr. Putnam founded the New Generation companies in 1986.

Mr. Putnam is a Director of The Boston Family Office, LLC (a registered investment adviser). He is a Trustee of St. Mark’s School. Until 2006, he was a Trustee of Shore Country Day School, and until 2002 was a Trustee of the Sea Education Association.

Mr. Putnam previously worked as an attorney with the law firm of Dechert LLP (formerly known as Dechert Price & Rhoads) in Philadelphia. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School.

W. Thomas Stephens (Born 1942), Trustee since 1997

Mr. Stephens is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. (a paper, forest products and timberland assets company).

Mr. Stephens is a Director of TransCanadaPipelines, Ltd. Until 2004, Mr. Stephens was a Director of Xcel Energy Incorporated (a public utility company), Qwest Communications, and Norske Canada, Inc. (a paper manufacturer). Until 2003, Mr. Stephens was a Director of Mail-Well, Inc. (a diversified printing company). He served as Chairman of Mail-Well until 2001 and as CEO of MacMillan-Bloedel, Ltd. (a forest products company) until 1999.

Prior to 1996, Mr. Stephens was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Johns Manville Corporation. He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Arkansas.

Richard B. Worley (Born 1945), Trustee since 2004

Mr. Worley is Managing Partner of Permit Capital LLC, an investment management firm.

Mr. Worley serves as a Trustee of the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (a philanthropic organization devoted to health care issues), and the National Constitution Center. He is also a Director of The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation (a historical preservation organization) and the Philadelphia Orchestra Association. Mr. Worley also serves on the investment committees of Mount Holyoke College and World Wildlife Fund (a wildlife conservation organization).

Prior to joining Permit Capital LLC in 2002, Mr. Worley served as Chief Strategic Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management. He previously served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Investment Management and as a Managing Director of Morgan Stanley, a financial services firm. Mr. Worley also was the Chairman of Miller Anderson & Sherrerd, an investment management firm.

Mr. Worley holds a B.S. degree from the University of Tennessee and pursued graduate studies in economics at the University of Texas.

Charles E. Haldeman, Jr.* (Born 1948), Trustee since 2004 and President of the Funds since 2007

Mr. Haldeman is President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam, LLC (“Putnam Investments”) and President of the Putnam Funds. He is a member of Putnam Investments’ Executive Board of Directors and Advisory Council. Prior to November 2003, Mr. Haldeman served as Co-Head of Putnam Investments’ Investment Division.

Prior to joining Putnam Investments in 2002, Mr. Haldeman held executive positions in the investment management industry. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Delaware Investments and President and Chief Operating Officer of United Asset Management. Mr. Haldeman was also a partner and director of Cooke & Bieler, Inc. (an investment management firm).

Mr. Haldeman currently serves on the Board of Governors of the Investment Company Institute and as Chair of the Board of Trustees of Dartmouth College. He also serves on the Partners HealthCare Investment Committee, the Tuck School of Business and Dartmouth College Board of Overseers, and the Harvard Business School Board of Dean’s Advisors. He is a graduate of Dartmouth College, Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School. Mr. Haldeman is also a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) charterholder.

The address of each Trustee is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.

As of June 30, 2007, there were 104 Putnam Funds. All Trustees serve as Trustees of all Putnam funds.

Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, until his or her resignation, retirement at age 72, death, or removal.

* Trustee who is or may be deemed to be an "interested person" (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940) of the fund, Putnam Management, and/or Putnam Retail Management. Mr. Haldeman is the President of your fund and each of the other Putnam funds, and is President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam Investments.

Officers

In addition to Charles E. Haldeman, Jr., the other officers of the fund are shown below:

Charles E. Porter (Born 1938)
Executive Vice President, Principal Executive Officer, Associate
Treasurer, and Compliance Liaison
Since 1989

Jonathan S. Horwitz (Born 1955)
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
Since 2004

Prior to 2004, Managing Director,
Putnam Investments

Steven D. Krichmar (Born 1958)
Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
Since 2002

Senior Managing Director, Putnam Investments

Janet C. Smith (Born 1965)
Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer and Assistant Treasurer
Since 2007

Managing Director, Putnam Investments and Putnam Management

Susan G. Malloy (Born 1957)
Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
Since 2007

Managing Director, Putnam Investments

Beth S. Mazor (Born 1958)
Vice President
Since 2002

Managing Director, Putnam Investments

James P. Pappas (Born 1953)
Vice President
Since 2004

Managing Director, Putnam Investments and Putnam Management. During 2002, Chief Operating Officer, Atalanta/Sosnoff Management Corporation

Richard S. Robie, III (Born 1960)
Vice President
Since 2004

Senior Managing Director, Putnam Investments, Putnam Management
and Putnam Retail Management. Prior to 2003, Senior Vice President,
United Asset Management Corporation

Francis J. McNamara, III (Born 1955)
Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
Since 2004

Senior Managing Director, Putnam Investments, Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management. Prior to 2004, General Counsel, State Street Research & Management Company

Robert R. Leveille (Born 1969)
Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer
Since 2007

Managing Director, Putnam Investments, Putnam Management, and Putnam Retail Management. Prior to 2005, member of Bell Boyd & Lloyd LLC. Prior to 2003, Vice President and Senior Counsel, Liberty Funds Group LLC

Mark C. Trenchard (Born 1962)
Vice President and BSA Compliance Officer
Since 2002

Managing Director, Putnam Investments

Judith Cohen (Born 1945)
Vice President, Clerk and Assistant Treasurer
Since 1993

Wanda M. McManus (Born 1947)
Vice President, Senior Associate Treasurer and Assistant Clerk
Since 2005

Nancy E. Florek (Born 1957)
Vice President, Assistant Clerk, Assistant Treasurer
and Proxy Manager
Since 2005

The address of each Officer is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.

Fund information

Founded nearly 70 years ago, Putnam Investments was built around the concept that a balance between risk and reward is the hallmark of a well-rounded financial program. We manage over 100 mutual funds in growth, value, blend, fixed income, and international.


Investment Manager	Officers	Mark C. Trenchard
Putnam Investment	Charles E. Haldeman, Jr.	Vice President and BSA Compliance Officer
Management, LLC	President
One Post Office Square
Boston, MA 02109	Charles E. Porter	Judith Cohen
	Executive Vice President, Principal Executive	Vice President, Clerk and Assistant Treasurer
Marketing Services	Officer, Associate Treasurer, and
Putnam Retail Management	Compliance Liaison	Wanda M. McManus
One Post Office Square		Vice President, Senior Associate Treasurer
Boston, MA 02109	Jonathan S. Horwitz	and Assistant Clerk
	Senior Vice President and Treasurer
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company	Steven D. Krichmar	Nancy E. Florek
	Vice President and Principal Financial Officer	Vice President, Assistant Clerk,
		Assistant Treasurer and Proxy Manager
Legal Counsel	Janet C. Smith
Ropes & Gray LLP	Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer
	and Assistant Treasurer
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm	Susan G. Malloy
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP	Vice President and Assistant Treasurer


Trustees	Beth S. Mazor
John A. Hill, Chairman	Vice President
Jameson Adkins Baxter, Vice Chairman
Charles B. Curtis	James P. Pappas
Robert J. Darretta	Vice President
Myra R. Drucker
Charles E. Haldeman, Jr.	Richard S. Robie, III
Paul L. Joskow	Vice President
Elizabeth T. Kennan
Kenneth R. Leibler	Francis J. McNamara, III
Robert E. Patterson	Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
George Putnam, III
W. Thomas Stephens	Robert R. Leveille
Richard B. Worley	Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer

This report is for the information of shareholders of Putnam New Opportunities Fund. It may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, the most recent copy of Putnam’s Quarterly Performance Summary, and Putnam’s Quarterly Ranking Summary. For more recent performance, please visit www.putnam.com. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund, which are described in its prospectus. For this and other information or to request a prospectus, call 1-800-225-1581 toll free. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-1581.

Item 2. Code of Ethics:

(a) The fund’s principal executive, financial and accounting officers are employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC, the Fund's investment manager. As such they are subject to a comprehensive Code of Ethics adopted and administered by Putnam Investments which is designed to protect the interests of the firm and its clients. The Fund has adopted a Code of Ethics which incorporates the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments with respect to all of its officers and Trustees who are employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC. For this reason, the Fund has not adopted a separate code of ethics governing its principal executive, financial and accounting officers.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:

The Funds' Audit and Compliance Committee is comprised solely of Trustees who are "independent" (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the "Regulations")). The Trustees believe that each of the members of the Audit and Compliance Committee also possess a combination of knowledge and experience with respect to financial accounting matters, as well as other attributes, that qualify them for service on the Committee. In addition, the Trustees have determined that each of Mr. Patterson, Mr. Stephens, Mr. Leibler, Mr. Hill and Mr. Darretta meets the financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange's rules and qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" (as such term has been defined by the Regulations) based on their review of his pertinent experience and education. Certain other Trustees, although not on the Audit and Compliance Committee, would also qualify as "audit committee financial experts." The SEC has stated that the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 of Form N-CSR does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit and Compliance Committee and the Board of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:

The following table presents fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for services rendered to the fund by the fund’s independent auditor:


Fiscal		Audit-
year	Audit	Related	Tax	All Other
ended	Fees	Fees	Fees	Fees

June 30, 2007	$137,377	$852	$3,487	$6,907*
June 30, 2006	$112,126*	$--	$3,460	$ -

* Includes fees of $6,506 and $5,298 billed by the fund’s independent auditor to the fund for procedures necessitated by regulatory and litigation matters for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively. These fees were reimbursed to the fund by Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”).

For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007and June 30, 2006, the fund’s independent auditor billed aggregate non-audit fees in the amounts of $141,461 and $263,135 respectively, to the fund, Putnam Management and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Putnam Management that provides ongoing services to the fund.

Audit Fees represent fees billed for the fund’s last two fiscal years.

Audit-Related Fees represent fees billed in the fund’s last two fiscal years for services traditionally performed by the fund’s auditor, including accounting consultation for proposed transactions or concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and other audit or attest services not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees represent fees billed in the fund’s last two fiscal years for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice services. Tax planning and tax advice services include assistance with tax audits, employee benefit plans and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.

All Other Fees represent fees billed for services relating to an analysis of recordkeeping fees.

Pre-Approval Policies of the Audit and Compliance Committee. The Audit and Compliance Committee of the Putnam funds has determined that, as a matter of policy, all work performed for the funds by the funds’ independent auditors will be pre-approved by the Committee itself and thus will generally not be subject to pre-approval procedures.

The Audit and Compliance Committee also has adopted a policy to pre-approve the engagement by Putnam Management and certain of its affiliates of the funds’ independent auditors, even in circumstances where pre-approval is not required by applicable law. Any such requests by Putnam Management or certain of its affiliates are typically submitted in writing to the Committee and explain, among other things, the nature of the proposed engagement, the estimated fees, and why this work should be performed by that particular audit firm as opposed to another one. In reviewing such requests, the Committee considers, among other things, whether the provision of such services by the audit firm are compatible with the independence of the audit firm.

The following table presents fees billed by the fund’s independent auditor for services required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.


Fiscal	Audit-		All	Total
year	Related	Tax	Other	Non-Audit
ended	Fees	Fees	Fees	Fees
June 30,
2007	$ -	$ 41,129	$ -	$ -
June 30
, 2006	$ -	$ 138,160	$ -	$ -

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants

Not applicable

Item 6. Schedule of Investments:

The registrant’s schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the report to
shareholders in Item 1 above.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End Management
Investment Companies:

Not applicable

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies

Not Applicable

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and
Affiliated Purchasers:

Not applicable

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:

Not applicable

Item 11. Controls and Procedures:

(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the design and operation of such procedures are generally effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting: Not applicable

Item 12. Exhibits:

(a)(1) The Code of Ethics of The Putnam Funds, which incorporates the Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments, is filed herewith.

(a)(2) Separate certifications for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.

(b) The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Putnam New Opportunities Fund

By (Signature and Title):

/s/Janet C. Smith
Janet C. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer

Date: August 29, 2007

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By (Signature and Title):

/s/Charles E. Porter
Charles E. Porter
Principal Executive Officer

Date: August 29, 2007

By (Signature and Title):

/s/Steven D. Krichmar
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer

Date: August 29, 2007