tmeaif-ncsra.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number [811-06111
The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
615 E. Michigan Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Mr. Gerald Hellerman
c/o U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
615 E. Michigan Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
(Name and address of agent for service)
(866) 700-6104
Registrant's telephone number, including area code
Date of fiscal year end: July 31, 2011
Date of reporting period: July 31, 2011
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
The Mexico Equity
and Income Fund, Inc.
Annual Report
July 31, 2011
The Mexico Equity and Income Fund Inc.
September 27, 2011
Dear Fellow Stockholders:
As I said in my last letter, if one can live with inevitable and unpredictable stomach churning declines, it is possible for an investor to earn good returns over the long term by investing in a volatile market like Mexico. Over the last five fiscal years, our Fund’s return based on market value has been at least 26.09% on the upside or at least 28.38% on the downside. Over the two year stretch of 2008 - 2009 the market return was down almost 60%. Yet, for the five years ending July 31, 2011, shareholders experienced a total return on their investment of about 70%.
Management’s ability to dampen the Fund’s volatility is limited given our mandate to invest in Mexican securities. Hopefully, good stock picking will generate good long term returns for stockholders as has been the case over the past five fiscal years and since the Fund’s inception. One thing the Board can do to enhance shareholder value is to have the Fund opportunistically repurchase its shares when they are trading at a discount to net asset value. These repurchases are accretive to the net asset value and may have the effect of narrowing the discount. We are now posting the number of shares repurchased every month on the Fund’s website at www.mxefund.com.
Sincerely yours,
Phillip Goldstein
Chairman
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
The Mexico Equity and Income Fund Inc.
Report of Pichardo Asset Management (“PAM”),
The Investment Adviser.
I. INTRODUCTION
For the Mexico Equity and Income Fund’s fiscal year ended July 31, 2011, the global economy experienced a large bout of volatility due to the lack of a clear path for resolving Europe’s sovereign debt crisis and the persistence of U.S. budgetary and unemployment problems. S&P downgraded the U.S. sovereign credit risk rating in August 2011, as negotiations over the debt ceiling confirmed the prevalence of a difficult political climate that restricts economic policy options.
As the global economy outlook grows ever gloomier and pro-growth steps either pay off or prove futile, Mexico must find ways to increase its meager 1.9% 10-year average economic growth soon, while continuing to decouple from its high correlation to the U.S. economy.
Labor market indicators have been characterized by healthy job growth during the period 2008-2009, but the unemployment rate has remained stubbornly high as the labor force in Mexico has increased in numbers. Economists (Source: UBS Mexico) believe that a reversal in migration flows to the U.S. is the single most important factor why the labor market remains soft, with quarterly average household income still showing a drop of -12.3% at the end of 2010 from 2008 levels. The biggest source of income contraction comes from compensation obtained from independent work, which points to ongoing weakness in the informal sector of the economy, specifically from self-employed activities. Real wages in the formal sector have remained largely stagnant; falling by more than 10% relative to their pre-crisis level.
The second challenge for Mexico is undoubtedly the ongoing crime-related problems that the country faces, and as UBS remarks if household incomes were to remain constrained, this would negatively impact domestic demand growth. A comprehensive labor reform in Mexico is urgent, not only as one of the best tools to keep youths from enlarging the ranks of organized crime but also to prevent higher unemployment rates as the estimated prolonged reversal of migration flows to the U.S. continues.
Amid a difficult external environment, Mexican GDP is still expected to grow between 3.5-4.0% year-over-year in 2011. Main factors driving economic activity are:
|
i.
|
|
a low fiscal deficit and debt as a percentage of GDP (30%), with a monetary policy conducive to price stability,
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
a flexible foreign exchange rate regime that has led to a relative undervalued Mexican currency, which is key to maintaining the competitiveness of Mexican exports despite the surge of capital flows to emerging markets,
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii.
|
|
a solid banking system with a capitalization level double that of the regulatory minimum and the commitment of Mexican development banks to continue granting credit to infrastructure,
|
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
|
iv.
|
|
contained inflationary pressures that are also determined by Mexico’s labor market difficulties, while on the positive side leaving Mexico in a good position to cut rates if the international environment deteriorates further.
|
The Mexican Stock Exchange performance during the Fund’s fiscal year, ended July 31, 2011 has been relatively one of the best performing markets in the Latam region.
The price to earnings (P/E) ratio for the Mexican market shows an inverse correlation with the level of Mexican Sovereign Risk, implying a lower cost of capital for investors reflected in higher valuation multiples. Regarding country risk premiums for the main Latam economies as of September 15, 2011, Argentina has the largest spread at 864 basis points (bps), with 233 bps for Brazil, 204 bps for Mexico and 164 for Chile.
MXE’s 26.75% net asset dollar gain per share outperformed the MSCI Mexico Index’s 22.03% by 472 basis points for the fund’s fiscal year period ended July 31, 2011.
The MXE’s net asset dollar per share posted a 14.53% annual average dollar return (with dividends reinvested) for the last 20 years since the Fund’s inception on August 30, 1990, through July 31, 2011. (Source: Thomson).
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns
|
|
|
As of July 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
MXE
|
Mexico
|
|
|
|
NAV
|
Market Price
|
MSCI
|
|
|
Year-to-date
|
3.43%
|
2.74%
|
-0.71%
|
|
|
1 Year
|
26.75%
|
26.09%
|
22.03%
|
|
|
5 Year
|
11.77%
|
14.60%
|
8.24%
|
|
|
10 Year
|
17.47%
|
17.97%
|
13.86%
|
|
|
Source:
|
MXE- U.S.Bancorp (1 and 5 yr),Bloomberg (10-yr).
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCI Mexico – Bloomberg.
|
|
|
|
Performance data quoted represents past performance; past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate such that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original costs. Current performance of the fund may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Performance data to the most recent month end may be obtained by calling U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, (414)877-785-0376.
We believe that adherence and discipline in following a de-indexed investment strategy during the Fund’s fiscal year, ended July 31, 2011 -supported by earnings per share and discounted cash flow (DCF) investment models- has enabled PAM’s investment management team to refrain from investing in the housing, cement and commodity (copper) sectors, where companies were affected by changing accounting standards, financial reengineering with high debt and no investment edge visibility and commodity high dollar prices.
At the end of July 31, 2011, the Fund had an approximate 37% in the so called Alpha (not academic) stocks, classified by PAM as: Defensive companies with dividend + buybacks, solid financials and Net Debt to Ebitda ratios that are either negative or less than 1.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
The Beta–growth companies approximately 31% of total assets added the most value to the Fund during its fiscal year period, ended July 31, 2011. By sectors, consumption and commodities –silver and copper- as well infrastructure -toll road concessions- sectors contributed the most.
We are now pleased to report that during the Fund’s fiscal year ended 2010 and 2011 we have managed to consistently outperform the Mexbol and the MSCI Mexico Indexes by adhering to the 2008 established investment strategy, asset class categories, stock specific metrics -including small stocks within the special situations asset category, as well as an active management.
The Fund has also managed to place its discount to NAV at levels of approximately 12% at the Fund’s fiscal year ended July 31, 2011.
II.MEXICO’S ECONOMIC REVIEW
During the period of August to December, 2010 (first half of the Fund’s fiscal year ended July 31, 2011), there was renewed hope among investors that the expansive monetary and fiscal policies put in place by U.S. authorities would lead to a favorable economic recovery, renewed job creation and improvement in consumer and business confidence.
From January to July, 2011 (the second half of the Fund’s 2011 fiscal year), as economic reports remained below the market consensus, it became clear that the U.S. economy was not experiencing a healthy rebound from the depths of the 2008-2009 recession, but rather a much slower pace of growth than originally forecasted.
The evolution of the Mexican economy has been favorable as of the second half of the Fund’s 2011 fiscal year, as Mexico’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increased 3.3% year-over-year (y/y) in 2Q11 (7.6% y/y in 2Q10 and -8.7% y/y in 2Q09), despite a deceleration of the U.S. economy. As of 2Q11, the main economic highlights are:
|
i.
|
|
Growth in primary activities decreased -3.7% y/y in 2Q11, utilities (waterworks, electricity and natural gas) surged 7.6% over the same period. These activities have benefitted from a strong rebound in infrastructure spending, as evidenced by an increase in Construction of 3.44% y/y in 2Q11. (Source: Mexico National Institute of Statistics, Geography, and Informatics, “INEGI”).
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
Gross fixed investment has undergone a substantial improvement of 11.5% y/y in 2Q11, primarily linked to the machinery and equipment component, which surged 27.3% y/y. Manufacturing activity was up 4.75% y/y, as industrial production increased 3.2% y/y. (Source: INEGI).
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii.
|
|
Strong performers in the industrial sector have been tobacco and beverages with a growth rate of 7.39% y/y and Commerce and Services +5.39% y/y. (Source: INEGI). The external sector offers signs of strong growth as imports and exports increased 19.59% and 21.63% y/y, respectively. (Source: INEGI). Trade figures for June 2011 show a surplus of US$107.9 million (-US$340.5 million in June 2010).
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv.
|
|
Retail sales grew 4.8% y/y in June 2011, averaging a growth rate of 2.9% year-to-date through June 2011 (1.5% y-t-d through June 2010) (source: Bloomberg).
|
|
|
|
|
|
v.
|
|
Based on Mexican Social Security Institute data, 43,329 new jobs were added in July 2011, for a total of 425,819 new jobs created year to date, through July 2011 (source: IMSS).
|
Amid the current negative environment, Banco de México, in July Mexico’s central bank and private analysts revised down expected 2011 GDP growth to 3.5%-4% from 4%-4.5% earlier this year.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Banco de México’s discount rate was maintained at 4.5% at the writing of this report where its members signaled that contained inflationary pressures (3.55% y/y in July 2011) along with a global environment of low growth leave the door open for future benchmark rate cuts.
The Mexican Peso has maintained its relative undervaluation since the 2008 global financial crisis ($10.90 pesos per Dollar at end 2007) closing July 2011 at $11.73 pesos per Dollar, which is an approximate appreciation of 7.24% for the one-year period ($12.64 pesos per Dollar at end July 2010).
Regarding PEMEX, the state oil company informed in its 2010 Annual Report that it has raised its proven reserves replenishment rate to 86% and expects it to reach 100% by 2012. It has also set a goal to produce 3 million barrels of oil per day by 2016, up from 2.55 million barrels per day in 2010. Pemex has also started assigning oil production contracts with incentives for private companies to exploit mature oil fields in the Gulf of Mexico.
III.THE MEXICAN STOCK EXCHANGE
Global equities have experienced strong corrections in 2011. At the time of writing, European stock markets have recorded the largest drops in dollar terms (-20% and UK -10%, approximately) linked to a problem of solvency; U.S. stock markets have lost below 10% on structural risk factors; major stock markets in Asia have retraced 15% while the Thai stock market has gained 4.31%. The Mexican Bolsa Index has lost approximately 10%.
The MSCI Mexico Index’s return of 22.03% for the fund’s 2011 fiscal year ranked it as the second best performing Latam related equity market after MSCI Argentina (+36.60%). The other MSCI related Indexes registered the following gains: Chile (+18.84%), Colombia (+14.19%), Peru (+7.68%) and Brazil (+4.23%). (Source: Bloomberg).
We reiterate that the performance of the MSCI-Mexico Index is characterized by illiquid constituent stocks which skyrocketed more than 80% during the Fund’s fiscal year ended July 31, 2011; and it has an approximate 60% concentration in five stocks with AMX weighing 31% and Walmex 10% as of the last rebalancing in September 2011 compared to MXE’s weight of approximately 18% in AMX and 6% in Walmex.
For the Fund’s fiscal year, ended July 31, the MSCI Mexico Index’s 22.03% dollar gain ranked it as the second best performing Latam related equity market after MSCI Argentina (36.60%). The other MSCI related Indexes registered the following gains: Chile (18.84%), Colombia (14.19%), Peru (7.68%) and Brazil (4.23%). (Source: Bloomberg).
The Mexican Stock Market had a market cap of approximately US $500 Bn as of the Fund’s fiscal year, ended July 31, 2011. Its main valuation metrics are: P/E = 20x, EV/EBITDA = 11x, P/BV = 2.98x, P/Cash Flow = 14x. In terms of the P/BV ratio, the Mexican market is still above the minimum level of 2.55x observed at the height of the 2008 crisis.
IV.THE FUND’S PERFORMANCE
We are pleased to report that MXE’s net asset dollar gain per share, as of July 31, 2011, reflects a dollar return position outperforming the Morgan Stanley Capital International Mexico Index by:
|
i.
|
|
248 basis points for the month of July gaining 1.69% (source: U.S. Bancorp).
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
414 basis points for the six month-period (January-July), registering a gain of 3.43% (source: U.S. Bancorp).
|
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
|
iii.
|
|
472 basis points for the one-year period through July 2011, gaining 26.75% in dollar terms (source: U.S. Bancorp).
|
At the MXE’s fiscal year ended July 31, 2011, the Fund’s market share price registered a 26.09% return, (source: U.S. Bancorp).
The main reasons why the MXE has outperformed its benchmark are, in our opinion: i) our continuous adherence to our investment strategy supported by our valuation and rating models, giving preference to companies with what we believe are solid balance sheets, a high free cash flow yield and strong corporate governance, ii) strict compliance with a fundamental analysis approach that prevents us from taking speculative positions, and iii) defensive positions, reflected in asset class diversification among private equity, REITS, small & mid caps and large caps.
The BETA asset class category, as classified by PAM, was the biggest contributor to the MXE’s net asset dollar gain per share of 26.75% for the one-year period through July 31, 2011, primarily toll road concessions, over-the-counter/generics, and the coke bottlers-related stocks.
PAM’s management team has generated a positive Alpha for MXE investors equivalent to 2% since the Fund’s inception (Source: PAM calculations). This calculation was performed using yearly return figures (Source: Bloomberg), considering reinvested dividends for the MXE starting in 1991 and starting in 2003 for the MSCI Mexico Index.
The volatility of MXE’s portfolio was 15.54% during the fund’s fiscal year ended July 31, 2011. This level is in line with 15.63%.
Performance data quoted represents past performance; past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate such that investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance of the fund may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Performance data to the most recent month end may be obtained by calling U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, (414)877-785-0376.
V.PORTFOLIO STRATEGY
For the Fund’s fiscal year ended July 31, 2011, PAM has continued to adhere to its investment strategy established in December 2008. This investment strategy classifies assets as follows: i) Alpha-defensive stocks: annual dividend + share buybacks; ii) Beta-free cash flow-growth stocks; iii) Special situations: discount to Book Value. PAM’s company rating, P/E, and DCF valuation models provide us with an additional investment decision-making tool.
For the Fund’s fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 the MXE’s non-indexed investment strategy registered its largest weighted sectors as follows: consumption, wireless telecom, petrochemicals and metals & mining.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
MXE’S TOP TEN HOLDINGS
As of July 31, 2011
|
|
MXE
|
2Q11 Sales
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
WEIGHT
|
Growth
|
|
Margin
|
Net
|
PORTFOLIO
|
SECTOR
|
%
|
YoY %
|
ROE %
|
%
|
Debt/EBITDA
|
AMERICA MOVIL
|
Telcos.
|
17.5
|
58.3
|
33.2
|
38.2
|
0.8x
|
LIVERPOOL
|
Department Stores
|
9.4
|
12.6
|
16.1
|
18.4
|
0.7x
|
MEXICHEM
|
Petrochemical
|
9.2
|
38.1
|
25.3
|
24.3
|
1.4x
|
GENOMMA LAB
|
Over-the-counter/generics
|
8.8
|
27.7
|
29.4
|
23.9
|
0.0x
|
WALMEX
|
Retailing
|
6.1
|
9.2
|
17.1
|
8.7
|
0.0x
|
CIDMEGA
|
Real Estate
|
4.4
|
(7.9)
|
3.5
|
26.60
|
3.4x
|
GFREGIO
|
Banking
|
4.2
|
9.2*
|
18.5
|
na
|
na
|
QUALITAS
|
Insurance
|
4.2
|
14.4*
|
15.5
|
na
|
na
|
FEMSA
|
Beverages
|
3.70
|
16.1
|
12.5
|
15.4
|
-0.1x
|
ARCA/CONTAL
|
Beverages
|
3.5
|
54.7
|
11.0
|
20.5
|
0.8x
|
* In the case of Banregio interest income, and for Qualitas retained premiums.
Source : Bloomberg
The MXE’s diversified portfolio also includes 4% in the Mexican Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), 3% in Private Equity, 2% in dollar-denominated corporate bonds, and 1% in cash and equivalents.
For the last twenty years we have had the privilege of advising the MXE’s asset portfolio and have been disciplined throughout our learning curve in monitoring companies through one-on-one meetings and diverse local institutional analyst and investor forums. The investment management team is comprised of Kathia Reynoso, Juan Carlos Maussan, CFA, and Eugenia Pichardo.
Sincerely yours,
Eugenia Pichardo
Portfolio Manager
Disclosures
The fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses must be considered carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment company, and it may be obtained by calling U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, (414) 765-4255/or visiting www.themexicoequityandincomefund.com. Read it carefully before investing.
Mutual fund investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market.
Investing in Foreign Securities
Investment in Mexican securities involves special considerations and risks that are not normally associated with investments in U.S. securities, including (1) relatively higher price volatility, lower liquidity and the small market capitalization of the Mexican securities markets; (2) currency fluctuations and the cost of converting Mexican pesos into U.S. dollars; (3) restrictions on foreign investment and potential restrictions on repatriation of capital invested in Mexico and remittance of profits and dividends accruing thereto; (4) political, economic and social risks and uncertainties, including risks of confiscatory taxation and expropriation or nationalization of assets; (5) higher rates of inflation, unemployment and interest rates than in the United States; and (6) less stringent disclosure requirements, less available information regarding Mexican public companies and less active regulatory oversight of Mexican public companies.
Mexican Economic and Political Factors. Although Mexico’s economy has strengthened in recent years and Mexico’s sovereign debt was recently upgraded to “investment-grade” rating by the three most prominent rating agencies, including Standard and Poor’s, Mexico continues to be characterized as a developing economy and investments in developing countries are subject to certain economic risks. Mexico has experienced widespread bank failures, currency devaluations, high levels of inflation and interest rates. Mexico is also dependent on certain industries and exports for economic health. The Portfolio Securities are denominated in pesos. As a result, the Portfolio Securities must increase in market value at a rate in excess of the rate of any decline in the value of the peso against the U.S. dollar in order to avoid a decline in their equivalent U.S. dollar value.
Mexican Securities Laws and Accounting Rules. There is less publicly available information about the issuers of Mexican securities, such as the Portfolio Securities, than is regularly published by issuers in the United States. Information provided by Mexican public companies may not be current, accurate or easily obtainable and, to the extent available, is likely to be in Spanish. Also, there is generally less governmental supervision and regulation of exchanges, brokers and issuers in Mexico than there is in the United States. U.S. holders of Portfolio Securities may also experience difficulties enforcing U.S. laws or obtaining service of process against the issuers of the Portfolio Securities.
The information provided herein represents the opinion of Pichardo Asset Management and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results, or investment advice.
Fund holdings and sector allocations are subject to change at any time, and should not be considered recommendations to buy or sell any security. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk. Please see the Schedule of Investments on pages 13-15 for the fund holdings as of the most recent quarter-end.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Definitions
•
|
MEXBOL-Mexico Bolsa Index: The Mexican Bolsa Index, or the IPC (Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones) is a capitalization-weighted index of the leading stocks traded on the Mexican Stock Exchange. The index was developed with a base level of 0.78 as of October 30, 1978.
|
•
|
MSCI MEXICO: The Morgan Stanley Capital International Index Mexico is a capitalization weighted index that monitors the performance of stocks from Mexico.
|
•
|
Mexbol-total return index. The Mexican Bolsa index that calculates the performance of their constituents assuming that all dividends and distributions are reinvested.
|
•
|
IPSA-Chile Stock Market Select: The IPSA Index (Indice de Precios Selectivo de Acciones) comprises the 40 stocks with the highest average annual trading volume in the Santiago Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Comercio de Santiago). On the last trading day of the year, the index is re-based back to 1000. The index has been calculated since 1977 and is revised on a quarterly basis. MERVAL-Argentina Merval Index: The Argentin Merval Index, a basket weighted index, is the market value of a stock portfolio, selected according to participation in the Buenos Aires Stock Exchange, number of transactions and trading value. The index has a base value of $0.01 as of June 30,1986. The index is revised every 3 months, taking into account trading volumes over the past 6 months.
|
•
|
IBOV-Brazil Bovespa Stock Exchange Index: The Bovespa Index is a total return index weighted by traded volume and is comprised of the most liquid stocks traded on the Sao Paulo Stock Exchange. The Bovespa Index has been divided 10 times by a factor of 10 since January 1, 1985, those dates are: 12/02/85, 04/14/89, 05/28/91, 01/26/93, 02/10/94, 08/29/88, 01/12/90, 01/21/92, 08/27/93, 03/03/97.
|
•
|
IBVC-Venezuela Stock Market Index: The IBC Index from the Caracas Stock Exchange (Venezuela), also known as the General Index, is a capitalization-weighted index of the 15 most liquid and highest capitalized stocks traded on the Caracas Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Valores de Caracas). The index was modified from a previous existing index on August 28, 1997, but essentially continues to be the same.
|
•
|
IGBVL-Peru Lima General Index: The IGBVL Index is a value weighted index that tracks the performance of the largest and most actively traded stocks on the Lima Exchange. The index was developed with a base value of 100 as of December 31, 1981.
|
•
|
IGBC-IGBC General Index: The IGBC Index from the Colombia Stock Exchange, also known as the General Index, is a Price-weighted index of the most liquid and highest capitalized stocks traded on the Colombia Stock Exchange (Bolsa de Valores de Colombia). This index was merged with Medellin and Occidente on 7/3/01.
|
•
|
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of common stocks comprised of major industrial companies and assumes reinvestment of dividends.
|
•
|
The S&P 500 Index is a broad based unmanaged index of 500 stocks, which is widely recognized as representative of the equity market in general.
|
You cannot invest directly in an index.
•
|
Basis point (bps) is one hundredth of a percentage point (0.01%).
|
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
•
|
The net asset value per share (NAV) is calculated as the total market value of all the securities and other assets held by a fund minus the total liabilities, divided by the total number of common shares outstanding. The NAV of an investment company will fluctuate with the changes in the market prices of the underlying securities. However, the market price of a closed-end fund is determined in the open market by buyers and sellers. This public market price is the price at which investors may purchase or sell shares of a closed-end fund. The market price of a closed-end fund fluctuates throughout the day and may differ from its underlying NAV, based on supply and demand for a fund’s shares on the open market. Shares of a closed-end fund may trade at a premium to (higher than) or a discount to (lower than) NAV. The difference between the market price and NAV is expressed as a percentage that is either a discount or a premium to the NAV, or underlying value.
|
•
|
Alpha-defensive companies: an asset classification created by PAM based on the following criteria: high total annual yield, clean balance sheet, market share dominance and pricing power.
|
•
|
Beta-growth companies: an asset classification created by PAM based on the following criteria: oversold stocks with consistent sales and EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization) growth, especially in the infrastructure and housing sectors.
|
•
|
Special Situation companies: an asset classification created by PAM and based on the following criteria: High discount to companies’ valuation.
|
•
|
INEGI -National Statistics, Geography and Information Institute-: provides geographic, demographic and economic information for Mexico. It also coordinates the Information Development Program and provides the public service of statistical and geographic information.
|
•
|
EPS: Earnings per share is the portion of a company’s profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock. Earnings per share serves as an indicator of a company’s profitability.
|
•
|
CAGR: Compound Annual Growth Rate. The year-over-year growth rate of an investment over a specified period of time. The compound annual growth rate is calculated by taking the nth root of the total percentage growth rate, where n is the number of years in the period being considered.
|
•
|
The Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio reflects the multiple of earnings at which a stock sells.
|
•
|
The correlation coefficient is a measure of the interdependence of two random variables that ranges in value from -1 to +1, indicating perfect negative correlation at -1 , absence of correlation at zero and perfect positive correlation at +1.
|
•
|
Cash flow measures the cash generating capability of a company by adding non-cash charges (e.g. depreciation) and interest expense to pretax income.
|
•
|
Book value is the net asset value of a company, calculated by subtracting total liabilities from total assets.
|
•
|
Free cash flow is revenue less operating expenses including interest expenses and maintenance capital spending. It is the discretionary cash that a company has after all expenses and is available for purposes such as dividend payments, investing back into the business or share repurchases.
|
•
|
Return on equity is a measure of a corporation’s profitability. It represents the average return on equity on the securities in the portfolio, not the actual return on equity on the portfolio.
|
References to other mutual funds should not be interpreted as an offer of these securities.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
RELEVANT ECONOMIC INFORMATION for the years ended December 31
Real Activity (million US$)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Real GDP Growth (y-o-y)
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
|
-6.50 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
Industrial Production (y-o-y Average)
|
|
|
5.78 |
% |
|
|
2.03 |
% |
|
|
-0.04 |
% |
|
|
7.29 |
% |
|
|
6.06 |
% |
Trade Balance (US billions)
|
|
|
-$6.10 |
|
|
|
-$11.20 |
|
|
|
$15.53 |
|
|
|
-$4.70 |
|
|
|
-$3.12 |
|
Exports
|
|
|
$253.90 |
|
|
|
$249.99 |
|
|
|
$291.81 |
|
|
|
$229.70 |
|
|
|
$298.36 |
|
Export growth (y-o-y)
|
|
|
10.30 |
% |
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
7.30 |
% |
|
|
-18.10 |
% |
|
|
28.20 |
% |
Imports
|
|
|
$260.00 |
|
|
|
$283.00 |
|
|
|
$308.65 |
|
|
|
$234.40 |
|
|
|
$301.48 |
|
Import growth (y-o-y)
|
|
|
13.10 |
% |
|
|
8.30 |
% |
|
|
9.50 |
% |
|
|
-19.90 |
% |
|
|
25.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Variables and Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28-Day CETES (T-bills) Average
|
|
|
7.10 |
% |
|
|
7.04 |
% |
|
|
7.97 |
% |
|
|
4.51 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
Exchange rate (Pesos/US$) Average
|
|
|
10.90 |
|
|
|
10.93 |
|
|
|
11.16 |
|
|
|
13.09 |
|
|
|
12.63 |
|
Inflation IPC, 12 month trailing
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
6.53 |
% |
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexbol Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD Return
|
|
|
45.77 |
% |
|
|
10.56 |
% |
|
|
-40.48 |
% |
|
|
55.34 |
% |
|
|
28.79 |
% |
Market Cap- (US billions)
|
|
|
$343.48 |
|
|
|
$441.04 |
|
|
|
$172.14 |
|
|
|
$257.88 |
|
|
|
$281.56 |
|
EV/EBITDA
|
|
|
10.60 |
x |
|
|
9.8 |
x |
|
|
7.4 |
x |
|
|
7.86 |
x |
|
|
9.48 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund’s NAV & Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Price Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV’s per share
|
|
|
59.29 |
% |
|
|
30.68 |
% |
|
|
-52.89 |
% |
|
|
52.27 |
% |
|
|
41.91 |
% |
Share Price
|
|
|
75.54 |
% |
|
|
24.39 |
% |
|
|
-47.46 |
% |
|
|
22.20 |
% |
|
|
48.41 |
% |
Sources: Banamex, Banco de Mexico, Bloomberg, INEGI
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Allocation of Portfolio Assets
(Calculated as a percentage of Total Investments)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Schedule of Investments
MEXICO – 99.75%
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON STOCKS – 91.66%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverages – 7.21%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arca Continental S.A.B. de C.V.
|
|
|
575,289 |
|
|
$ |
3,152,074 |
|
Fomento Economico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V.
|
|
|
462,000 |
|
|
|
3,338,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,490,339 |
|
Chemicals – 9.17%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexichem, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
1,911,659 |
|
|
|
8,247,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks – 4.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banregio Grupo Financiero S.A. de C.V. (a)
|
|
|
1,406,200 |
|
|
|
3,821,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction & Engineering – 4.48%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carso Infraestructura y Construccion, S.A. de C.V. (a)
|
|
|
1,680,000 |
|
|
|
1,023,404 |
|
Promotora y Operadora de Infraestructura, S.A. de C.V. (a)
|
|
|
599,900 |
|
|
|
3,007,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,030,750 |
|
Consumer Finance – 0.40%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financiera Independencia S.A.B. de C.V.
|
|
|
429,231 |
|
|
|
358,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services – 0.74%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telefonos De Mexico S.A.B. de C.V.
|
|
|
820,000 |
|
|
|
662,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing – 6.80%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grupo Comercial Chedraui, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
205,300 |
|
|
|
623,563 |
|
Wal-Mart de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. – Class V
|
|
|
1,991,000 |
|
|
|
5,492,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,116,187 |
|
Food Products – 1.14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grupo Bimbo, S.A.B. de C.V.
|
|
|
426,000 |
|
|
|
1,024,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services – 2.08%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medica Sur S.A.B. de C.V.
|
|
|
905,000 |
|
|
|
1,874,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure – 6.49%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alsea, S.A. de C.V. – Class A
|
|
|
1,647,500 |
|
|
|
1,865,444 |
|
Grupe, S.A. de C.V. (a)
|
|
|
2,978,486 |
|
|
|
3,971,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,836,826 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Schedule of Investments (continued)
COMMON STOCKS (CONTINUED)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Conglomerates – 3.62%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alfa, S.A. – Class A
|
|
|
108,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,596,621 |
|
Industrias CH, S.A. – Class B (a)
|
|
|
468,400 |
|
|
|
1,660,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,256,750 |
|
Insurance – 4.16%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualita Compania de Seguros
|
|
|
4,139,651 |
|
|
|
3,738,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining – 5.33%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grupo Mexico, S.A. – Series B
|
|
|
538,498 |
|
|
|
1,983,358 |
|
Industrias Penoles, S.A.
|
|
|
65,110 |
|
|
|
2,807,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,791,332 |
|
Multiline Retail – 9.38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Puerto De Liver
|
|
|
1,044,600 |
|
|
|
8,442,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals – 8.84%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genomma Lab Internacional SA (a)
|
|
|
3,463,700 |
|
|
|
7,950,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services – 17.57%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America Movil, S.A. de C.V. – Class L
|
|
|
12,265,798 |
|
|
|
15,800,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (Cost $76,820,822)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,443,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS – 2.70%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fibra Uno Administracion S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
1,294,500 |
|
|
|
2,426,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (Cost $2,095,703)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,426,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE BONDS – 0.53%
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Urbi, Desarrollos Urbanos, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.500%, 04/19/2016
|
|
$ |
461,300 |
|
|
|
479,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS (Cost $394,500)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479,752 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Schedule of Investments (concluded)
MEXICAN GOVERNMENT NOTE/BONDS – 1.37%
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico-united Mexican Sts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.125%, 12/30/2019
|
|
$ |
865,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,228,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL FOREIGN GOVERNMENT NOTE/BONDS (Cost $1,152,294)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,228,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATES – 2.99%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlas Discovery Trust II (b)
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
2,686,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATES (Cost $2,317,515)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,686,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 0.50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexican INAFIN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000% Coupon, 4.613% Effective Yield, 08/02/2011 (c)
|
|
|
5,232,628 |
* |
|
|
445,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (Cost $448,327)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL MEXICO (Cost $83,229,161)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,710,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNITED STATES – 0.33%
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT COMPANIES – 0.33%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First American Treasury Obligation – Class A, 0.000%
|
|
|
299,971 |
|
|
|
299,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENT COMPANIES (Cost $299,971)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL UNITED STATES (Cost $299,971)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (Cost $83,529,132) – 100.08%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,010,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES IN EXCESS OF OTHER ASSETS – (0.08)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NET ASSETS – 100.00%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89,948,178 |
|
Footnotes
Percentages are stated as a percent of net assets.
(a)
|
Non-income producing security.
|
(b)
|
Fair Valued Security.
|
(c)
|
Effective Yield based on the purchase price. The calculation assumes the security is held to maturity.
|
*
|
Principal amount in Mexican Pesos.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank.)
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Statement of Assets & Liabilities
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (Cost $83,529,132)
|
|
|
$ |
90,010,806 |
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
11,403 |
|
Receivables for investments sold
|
|
|
|
9,470,497 |
|
Dividends and interest receivable
|
|
|
|
16,760 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
10,182 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
99,519,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable for securities purchased
|
|
|
|
9,384,589 |
|
Advisory fees payable
|
|
|
|
60,622 |
|
Administration fees payable
|
|
|
|
18,023 |
|
Custody fees payable
|
|
|
|
18,485 |
|
Fund accounting fees payable
|
|
|
|
7,802 |
|
Legal fees payable
|
|
|
|
7,989 |
|
CCO fees payable
|
|
|
|
4,128 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
69,832 |
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
|
9,571,470 |
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
$ |
89,948,178 |
|
Net Asset Value Per Preferred Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
($764,506 / 57,639) |
|
|
$ |
13.26 |
|
Net Asset Value Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
($89,183,672 / 6,723,882) |
|
|
$ |
13.26 |
|
NET ASSETS CONSIST OF:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 57,639 shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,855,128 shares authorized)
|
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 6,723,882 shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,144,872 shares authorized)
|
|
|
|
6,724 |
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
88,996,871 |
|
Accumulated net realized loss on investments and foreign currency
|
|
|
|
(5,536,664 |
) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and foreign currency
|
|
|
|
6,481,189 |
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
$ |
89,948,178 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
For the Year Ended
July 31, 2011
Statement of Operations
INVESTMENT INCOME
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
$ |
990,017 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
135,630 |
|
Total Investment Income
|
|
|
1,125,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory fees (Note B)
|
|
$ |
686,118 |
|
Directors’ fees and expenses (Note B)
|
|
|
142,469 |
|
Administration fees (Note B)
|
|
|
103,428 |
|
Custodian fees (Note B)
|
|
|
75,504 |
|
Legal fees
|
|
|
47,554 |
|
Fund accounting fees (Note B)
|
|
|
47,057 |
|
Printing and mailing
|
|
|
43,337 |
|
CCO fees (Note B)
|
|
|
34,741 |
|
NYSE fees
|
|
|
34,235 |
|
Insurance expense
|
|
|
32,987 |
|
Audit fees
|
|
|
29,880 |
|
Transfer agent fees & expenses
|
|
|
19,535 |
|
Miscellaneous fees
|
|
|
284 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
1,297,129 |
|
NET INVESTMENT LOSS
|
|
|
(171,482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN ON INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain from investments and foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
11,258,224 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation on
|
|
|
|
|
investments and foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
7,990,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain from investments and foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
19,248,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$ |
19,077,045 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
For the
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2011
|
|
|
July 31, 2010
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment loss
|
|
$ |
(171,482 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,975 |
) |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffiliated Issuers
|
|
|
11,258,224 |
|
|
|
20,483,899 |
|
Affiliated Issuers
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(8,023 |
) |
Net realized gain from in-kind redemptions (Note A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffiliated Issuers
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
146,639 |
|
Affiliated Issuers
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
27,250 |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation in value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of investments and foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
7,990,303 |
|
|
|
2,602,190 |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
19,077,045 |
|
|
|
23,237,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Shareholders from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
(160,267 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
(1,586 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Decrease in net assets from distributions
|
|
|
(161,853 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock for dividend
|
|
|
(8,775 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Issuance of common stock for dividend
|
|
|
8,775 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Repurchase of common stock through Repurchase Plan (Note D)
|
|
|
(4,314,588 |
) |
|
|
(5,501,792 |
) |
Repurchase of preferred stock for in-kind tender offer
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,813,379 |
) |
Increase in net assets from capital share transactions
|
|
|
(4,314,588 |
) |
|
|
(9,315,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase in net assets
|
|
|
14,600,604 |
|
|
|
13,922,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
75,347,574 |
|
|
|
61,424,765 |
|
End of year*
|
|
$ |
89,948,178 |
|
|
$ |
75,347,574 |
|
* Including accumulated net investment loss of
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(260,079 |
) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Financial Highlights
For a Common Share Outstanding Throughout Each Year
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Per Share Operating Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
10.48 |
|
|
$ |
7.37 |
|
|
$ |
28.29 |
|
|
$ |
38.18 |
|
|
$ |
22.18 |
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on investments and foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
(13.95 |
) |
|
|
(2.57 |
) |
|
|
19.17 |
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations
|
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
|
|
|
(13.88 |
) |
|
|
(2.54 |
) |
|
|
19.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from net investment income
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
Distributions from net realized gains
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6.52 |
) |
|
|
(7.41 |
) |
|
|
(2.90 |
) |
Total dividends and distributions
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6.77 |
) |
|
|
(7.41 |
) |
|
|
(3.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive effect of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Repurchase Program
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Anti-dilutive effect of Common Rights Offering
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Anti-dilutive effect of Preferred In-Kind Tender Offer
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Dilutive effect of Preferred In-Kind Tender Offer
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.00 |
)(3) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Dilutive effect of Reinvestment of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions by Common Stockholders
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Total capital share transactions
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, end of period
|
|
$ |
13.26 |
|
|
$ |
10.48 |
|
|
$ |
7.37 |
|
|
$ |
28.29 |
|
|
$ |
38.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value, end of period
|
|
$ |
11.64 |
|
|
$ |
9.25 |
|
|
$ |
6.08 |
|
|
$ |
24.39 |
|
|
$ |
44.23 |
|
Total Investment Return Based on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value, end of period(1)
|
|
|
26.09 |
% |
|
|
52.14 |
% |
|
|
(43.10 |
)% |
|
|
(28.38 |
)% |
|
|
152.78 |
% |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Financial Highlights (continued)
For a Common Share Outstanding Throughout Each Year
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s)
|
|
$ |
89,184 |
|
|
$ |
74,609 |
|
|
$ |
56,980 |
|
|
$ |
106,484 |
|
|
$ |
100,251 |
|
Ratios of expenses to average net assets:
|
|
|
1.51 |
% |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
1.42 |
% |
Ratios of net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to average net assets:
|
|
|
(0.20 |
)% |
|
|
(0.02 |
)% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
(0.47 |
)% |
Portfolio turnover rate
|
|
|
253.20 |
%(2) |
|
|
365.58 |
%(2) |
|
|
335.64 |
%(2) |
|
|
224.10 |
%(2) |
|
|
135.49 |
%(2) |
(1)
|
Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common stock at the current market price on the first day and a sale at the current market price on the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment does not reflect brokerage commissions.
|
(2)
|
Calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without distinguishing between shares issued.
|
(3)
|
Less than 0.5 cent per share.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Financial Highlights
For a Preferred Share Outstanding Throughout Each Year
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Per Share Operating Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
10.48 |
|
|
$ |
7.37 |
|
|
$ |
28.29 |
|
|
$ |
38.18 |
|
|
$ |
22.18 |
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on investments and foreign currency transactions
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
(13.95 |
) |
|
|
(2.57 |
) |
|
|
19.17 |
|
Net increase (decrease) from investment operations
|
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
2.99 |
|
|
|
(13.88 |
) |
|
|
(2.54 |
) |
|
|
19.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from net investment income
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
Distributions from net realized gains
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6.52 |
) |
|
|
(7.41 |
) |
|
|
(2.90 |
) |
Total dividends and distributions
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6.77 |
) |
|
|
(7.41 |
) |
|
|
(3.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive effect of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Repurchase Program
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Anti-dilutive effect of Common Rights Offering
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Anti-dilutive effect of Preferred In-Kind Tender Offer
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Dilutive effect of Preferred In-Kind Tender Offer
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.00 |
)(3) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of Reinvestment of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions by Common Stockholders
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Total capital share transactions
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value, end of period
|
|
$ |
13.26 |
|
|
$ |
10.48 |
|
|
$ |
7.37 |
|
|
$ |
28.29 |
|
|
$ |
38.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share market value, end of period
|
|
$ |
11.93 |
* |
|
$ |
9.17 |
* |
|
$ |
6.85 |
|
|
$ |
25.50 |
|
|
$ |
36.10 |
|
Total Investment Return Based on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value, end of period(1)
|
|
|
30.36 |
%* |
|
|
33.87 |
%* |
|
|
(38.67 |
)% |
|
|
(8.25 |
)% |
|
|
110.66 |
% |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Financial Highlights (continued)
For a Preferred Share Outstanding Throughout Each Year
|
|
For the Year Ended July 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s)
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
$ |
4,444 |
|
|
$ |
22,742 |
|
|
$ |
54,567 |
|
Ratios of expenses to average net assets:
|
|
|
1.51 |
% |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
1.42 |
% |
Ratios of net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to average net assets:
|
|
|
(0.20 |
)% |
|
|
(0.02 |
)% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
(0.47 |
)% |
Portfolio turnover rate
|
|
|
253.20 |
%(2) |
|
|
365.58 |
%(2) |
|
|
335.64 |
%(2) |
|
|
224.10 |
%(2) |
|
|
135.49 |
%(2) |
(1)
|
Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of preferred stock at the current market price on the first day and a sale at the current market price on the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment does not reflect brokerage commissions.
|
(2)
|
Calculated on the basis of the Fund as a whole without distinguishing between shares issued.
|
(3)
|
Less than 0.5 cent per share.
|
*
|
Based on the mean of the bid and ask.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements
NOTE A: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”) was incorporated in Maryland on May 24, 1990, and commenced operations on August 21, 1990. The Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant accounting policies are as follows:
Portfolio Valuation. Investments are stated at value in the accompanying financial statements. All securities for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the last sales price prior to the time of determination of net asset value, or, if no sales price is available at that time, at the closing price last quoted for the securities (but if bid and asked quotations are available, at the mean between the current bid and asked prices, rather than the quoted closing price). Securities that are traded over-the-counter are valued, if bid and asked quotations are available, at the mean between the current bid and asked prices. Investments in short-term debt securities having a maturity of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost if their term to maturity from the date of purchase was less than 60 days, or by amortizing their value on the 61st day prior to maturity if their term to maturity from the date of purchase when acquired by the Fund was more than 60 days. Other assets and securities for which no quotations are readily available will be valued in good faith at fair value using methods determined by the Board of Directors. These methods include, but are not limited to, the fundamental analytical data relating to the investment; the nature and duration of restrictions in the market in which they are traded (including the time needed to dispose of the security, methods of soliciting offers and mechanics of transfer); the evaluation of the forces which influence the market in which these securities may be purchased or sold, including the economic outlook and the condition of the industry in which the issuer participates. The Fund has a Valuation Committee which oversees the valuation of portfolio securities.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income. The cost of investments sold is determined by use of the specific identification method for both financial reporting and income tax purposes. Interest income, including the accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recorded on an accrual basis; dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or, using reasonable diligence, when known to the Fund. The collectibility of income receivable from foreign securities is evaluated periodically, and any resulting allowances for uncollectible amounts are reflected currently in the determination of investment income.
Tax Status. No provision is made for U.S. Federal income or excise taxes as it is the Fund’s intention to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and to make the requisite distributions to its
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
shareholders that will be sufficient to relieve it from all or substantially all U.S. Federal income and excise taxes.
The Fund is subject to the following withholding taxes on income from Mexican sources:
Dividends distributed by Mexican companies are subject to withholding tax at an effective rate of 0.00%.
Interest income on debt issued by the Mexican federal government is generally not subject to withholding. Withholding tax on interest from other debt obligations such as publicly traded bonds and loans by banks or insurance companies is at a rate of 4.9% under the tax treaty between Mexico and the United States.
Gains realized from the sale or disposition of debt securities may be subject to a 4.9% withholding tax. Gains realized by the Fund from the sale or disposition of equity securities that are listed and traded on the Mexican Stock Exchange (“MSE”) are exempt from Mexican withholding tax if sold through the stock exchange. Gains realized on transactions outside of the MSE may be subject to withholding at a rate of 25% (20% rate prior to January 1, 2002) of the value of the shares sold or, upon the election of the Fund, at 35% (40% rate prior to January 1, 2002) of the gain. If the Fund has owned less than 25% of the outstanding stock of the issuer of the equity securities within the 12 month period preceding the disposition, then such disposition will not be subject to capital gains taxes as provided for in the treaty to avoid double taxation between Mexico and the United States.
New Tax Law. On December 22, 2010, The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Modernization Act”) was signed by The President. The Modernization Act is the first major piece of legislation affecting Regulated Investment Companies (“RICs”) since 1986 and it modernizes several of the federal income and excise tax provisions related to RICs. Some highlights of the enacted provisions are as follows:
New capital losses may now be carried forward indefinitely, and retain the character of the original loss. Under pre-enactment law, capital losses could be carried forward for eight years, and carried forward as short-term capital, irrespective of the character of the original loss.
The Modernization Act contains simplification provisions, which are aimed at preventing disqualification of a RIC for “inadvertent” failures of the asset diversification and/or qualifying income tests. Additionally, the Modernization Act exempts RICs from the preferential dividend rule, and repealed the 60-day designation requirement for certain types of pay-through income and gains.
Finally, the Modernization Act contains several provisions aimed at preserving the character of distributions made by a fiscal year RIC during the portion of its taxable year ending after October 31 or December 31, reducing the circumstances under which a RIC might be required to file amended Forms 1099 to restate previously reported distributions.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Except for the simplification provisions related to RIC qualification, the Modernization Act is effective for taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010. The provisions related to RIC qualification are effective for taxable years for which the extended due date of the tax return is after December 22, 2010.
New Accounting Pronouncement. In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” ASU No. 2011-04 requires additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, entities will need to disclose the following:
1)the amounts of any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 and the reasons for those transfers, and
2)for Level 3 fair value measurements, quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used, a description of the entity’s valuation processes, and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in the unobservable inputs and the interrelationship between inputs.
Management is currently evaluating the impact ASU No. 2011-04 will have on the Fund’s financial statement disclosures.
Summary of Fair Value Exposure at July 31, 2011. The Fund has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“Fair Value Measurements”) and FASB Staff Position “Determining Fair Value when the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identified Transactions that are not Orderly” (“Determining Fair Value”). Determining Fair Value clarifies Fair Value Measurements and requires an entity to evaluate certain factors to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in volume and level of activity for the security such that recent transactions and quoted prices may not be determinative of fair value and further analysis and adjustment may be necessary to estimate fair value. Determining Fair Value also requires enhanced disclosure regarding the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value in those instances as well as expanded disclosure of valuation levels for major security types. Fair Value Measurements requires the Fund to classify its securities based on valuation method. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1 –
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access.
|
|
|
Level 2 –
|
Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
|
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Level 3 –
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the company’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available.
|
The availability of observable inputs can vary from security to security and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of security, whether the security is new and not yet established in the marketplace, the liquidity of markets, and other characteristics particular to the security. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in level 3.
The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety, is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Fund’s investments carried at fair value as of July 31, 2011:
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
|
|
Level 1*
|
|
|
Level 2*
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverages
|
|
$ |
6,490,339 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
6,490,339 |
|
Capital Development Certificates
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,686,760 |
|
|
|
2,686,760 |
|
Chemicals
|
|
|
8,247,758 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,247,758 |
|
Commercial Banks
|
|
|
3,821,814 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,821,814 |
|
Construction & Engineering
|
|
|
4,030,750 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,030,750 |
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
358,018 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
358,018 |
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services
|
|
|
662,998 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
662,998 |
|
Food & Staples Retailing
|
|
|
6,116,187 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,116,187 |
|
Food Products
|
|
|
1,024,958 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,024,958 |
|
Health Care Providers & Services
|
|
|
1,874,413 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,874,413 |
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
|
|
|
1,865,444 |
|
|
|
3,971,382 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,836,826 |
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
|
|
3,256,750 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,256,750 |
|
Insurance
|
|
|
3,738,535 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,738,535 |
|
Metals & Mining
|
|
|
4,791,332 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,791,332 |
|
Multiline Retail
|
|
|
8,442,381 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,442,381 |
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
7,950,046 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,950,046 |
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services
|
|
|
15,800,812 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,800,812 |
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
78,472,535 |
|
|
|
3,971,382 |
|
|
|
2,686,760 |
|
|
|
85,130,677 |
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts
|
|
$ |
2,426,367 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,426,367 |
|
Corporate Bonds
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
479,752 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
479,752 |
|
Mexican Government Bonds
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,228,300 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,228,300 |
|
Short-Term Investments
|
|
$ |
299,971 |
|
|
$ |
445,739 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
745,710 |
|
Total Investment in Securities
|
|
$ |
81,198,873 |
|
|
$ |
6,125,173 |
|
|
$ |
2,686,760 |
|
|
$ |
90,010,806 |
|
*
|
There were no significant transfers between levels 1 and 2 during the period. Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
|
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Level 3 Reconciliation Disclosure
Following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
Description
|
Investments in Securities
|
Balance as of July 31, 2010
|
|
$ |
2,370,277 |
|
Acquisition/Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
— |
|
Realized gain
|
|
|
— |
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)(1)
|
|
|
316,483 |
|
Balance as of July 31, 2011
|
|
$ |
2,686,760 |
|
(1) Included in the net change of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the Statement of Operations.
Federal Income Taxes. The Fund intends to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code necessary to qualify as a regulated investment company and to make the requisite distributions of income and capital gains to its shareholders sufficient to relieve it from all or substantially all federal income taxes. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that permanent differences between financial reporting and tax reporting be reclassified between various components of net assets.
The Fund recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. The Adviser has analyzed the Fund’s tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years (2008-2010), or expected to be taken in the Fund’s 2011 tax returns. The Fund identifies its major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal, New York State and foreign jurisdictions where the Fund makes significant investments; however the Fund is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months.
The Fund intends to utilize provisions of the federal income tax laws which allow it to carry a realized capital loss forward and offset such losses against any future realized capital gains. At July 31, 2011, the Fund had accumulated capital loss carryforwards for tax purposes as follows:
Date of Expiration
|
Amount
|
July 31, 2017
|
$1,330,397
|
As of July 31, 2011, the Fund deferred post-October losses of $2,371,184, which will be recognized in the fiscal year ending July 31, 2012.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Reclassification of Capital Accounts. Accounting Principles generally accepted in the United States of America require certain components of net assets relating to permanent differences be reclassified between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset value per shares. The permanent differences are primarily attributed to foreign currency gain reclassifications. For the year ended July 31, 2011, the Fund decreased undistributed net investment loss by $593,414, increased accumulated realized loss by $94,240 and decreased paid in capital by $499,174.
Foreign Currency Translation. The books and records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Foreign currency amounts are translated into U.S. dollars on the following basis:
(i)
|
market value of investment securities, assets and liabilities at the current Mexican peso exchange rate on the valuation date, and
|
(ii)
|
purchases and sales of investment securities, income and expenses at the Mexican peso exchange rate prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions. Fluctuations in foreign currency rates, however, when determining the gain or loss upon the sale of foreign currency denominated debt obligations pursuant to U.S. Federal income tax regulations; such amounts are categorized as foreign exchange gain or loss for income tax reporting purposes.
|
The Fund reports realized foreign exchange gains and losses on all other foreign currency related transactions as components of realized gains and losses for financial reporting purposes, whereas such gains and losses are treated as ordinary income or loss for Federal income tax purposes.
Securities denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are subject to changes in value due to fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate. Foreign security and currency transactions may involve certain considerations and risks not typically associated with those of domestic origin as a result of, among other factors, the level of governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets and the possibilities of political or economic instability.
Distribution of Income and Gains. The Fund intends to distribute to shareholders, at least annually, substantially all of its net investment income, including foreign currency gains. The Fund also intends to distribute annually any net realized capital gains in excess of net realized capital losses (including any capital loss carryovers), except in circumstances where the Directors of the Fund determine that the decrease in the size of the Fund’s assets resulting from the distribution of the gains would generally not be in the interest of the Fund’s shareholders. An additional distribution may be made to the extent necessary to avoid payment of a 4% U.S. Federal excise tax.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount of dividends and distributions from net investment income and net realized gains are determined in accordance with U.S. Federal income tax regulations, which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
States of America. These “book/tax” differences are either considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their Federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification. To the extent they exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes, they are reported as distributions from additional paid-in capital.
Distributions to Shareholders. The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the periods ended July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010 were as follows:
Distributions paid from:
|
|
7/31/11
|
|
|
7/31/10
|
|
Ordinary Income
|
|
$ |
161,853 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Long-Term Capital Gain
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
161,853 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
As of July 31, 2011, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Cost of Investments for tax purposes(a)
|
|
$ |
85,094,937 |
|
Gross tax unrealized appreciation on investments
|
|
|
7,925,423 |
|
Gross tax unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
(3,009,554 |
) |
Net tax unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
|
|
|
4,915,869 |
|
Net tax unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on
|
|
|
|
|
investments
|
|
$ |
4,915,869 |
|
Other accumulated gains(losses)
|
|
$ |
(3,971,344 |
) |
Total accumulated earnings(losses)
|
|
$ |
944,525 |
|
(a)
|
Represents cost for federal income tax purposes. Differences between the Fund’s cost basis of investments at July 31, 2011, for book and tax purposes, relates primarily to the deferral of losses related to wash sales.
|
The Mexico Equity and Income Fund designates 98.24% of dividends declared for the fiscal year July 31, 2011 from net investment income as qualified dividend income under the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. (unaudited)
IN-KIND REDEMPTION
During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Mexico Equity and Income Fund realized $173,889 of net capital gains resulting from an in-kind redemption. Shareholders exchanged fund shares for securities held by the Fund rather than cash. Net capital gains or losses resulting from in-kind redemptions are excluded from the Fund’s taxable gains and are not distributed to shareholders. Because such gains are not taxable
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
to the Fund, and are not distributed to shareholders, they have been reclassified from accumulated net realized gains and losses to paid-in-capital. Such reclassification has no effect on the Fund’s net assets.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION APPLICABLE TO FOREIGN SHAREHOLDERS ONLY
The percent of ordinary income distributions designated as interest related dividends for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2011 was 0.00%. (unaudited)
The Percentage of taxable ordinary income distributions that are designated as short-term capital gain distributions under Internal Revenue Section 871(k)(2)(C) was 0.00%. (unaudited)
NOTE B: MANAGEMENT, INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Pichardo Asset Management, S.A. de C.V. serves as the Fund’s Investment Adviser (the “Investment Adviser”) under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) effective July 1, 2003. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Investment Adviser makes investment decisions for the Fund and supervises the acquisition and disposition of securities by the Fund. For its services, the Investment Adviser receives a monthly fee at an annual rate of 0.80% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended July 31, 2011, these fees amounted to $686,118.
Effective October 8, 2010, the Fund pays each of its directors who is not a director, officer or employee of the Investment Adviser, the Administrator or any affiliate thereof an annual fee of $25,000, paid pro rata, quarterly plus a fee of $500 for each meeting held telephonically. For serving the Fund as Chief Compliance Officer, in addition to the aforementioned Directors’ fees, Mr. Hellerman receives annual compensation in the amount of $30,000. In addition, the Fund reimburses the directors and Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) for travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with Board of Directors’ meetings and CCO due diligence requirements.
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (“USBFS”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp, serves as the Fund’s Administrator and, in that capacity, performs various administrative services for the Fund. USBFS also serves as the Fund’s Fund Accountant (the “Fund Accountant”) and Transfer Agent. U.S. Bank, N.A. serves as the Fund’s custodian (the “Custodian”). The Custodian is an affiliate of the Administrator. The Administrator prepares various federal and state regulatory filings, reports and returns for the Fund; prepares reports and materials to be supplied to the directors; monitors the activities of the Fund’s Custodian and Fund Accountant; coordinates the preparation and payment of the Fund’s expenses and reviews the Fund’s expense accruals.
For the year ended July 31, 2011, the Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc. incurred Administration fees of $103,428; Fund Accounting fees and expenses of $47,057, transfer agent fees and expenses of $19,535. and Custody fees of $75,504.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
NOTE C: PORTFOLIO ACTIVITY
Purchases and sales of securities other than short-term obligations, aggregated $213,629,139 and $215,501,429 respectively, for the year ended July 31, 2011.
At July 31, 2011 substantially all of the Fund’s assets were invested in Mexican securities. The Mexican securities markets are substantially smaller, less liquid, and more volatile than the major securities markets in the United States. Consequently, acquisitions and dispositions of securities by the Fund may be limited.
NOTE D: CAPITAL STOCK
During the year ended July 31, 2011 the Fund purchased 404,863 shares of capital stock in the open market at a cost of $4,314,588. The weighted average discount of these purchases comparing the average purchase price to net asset value at the close of the New Stock Exchange was 11.84%.
During the year ended July 31, 2011 the Fund repurchased and issued 754 common shares at a cost of $8,775 through the dividend reinvestment plan.
During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Fund purchased 646,525 shares of capital stock in the open market at a cost of $5,501,792. The weighted average discount of these purchases comparing the average purchase price to net asset value at the close of the New York Stock Exchange was 14.00%.
The Board of Directors approved in-kind tender offers to repurchase up to 25% of the Fund’s preferred stock in exchange for portfolio securities of the Fund valued at 99% of the Fund’s per share net asset value on the expiration date of the repurchase offers (the “Offers”). During the year ended July 31, 2010, the Fund commenced one offer with an expiation date of August 14, 2009. Following the expiration of this offer, the Fund redeemed 501,101 Preferred Shares or $3,813,379 of Capital Stock. The net asset value per share of the Fund’s common and preferred stockholders was decreased be approximately $0.003 in 2010 as a result of this offer.
During the year ended July 31, 2011 the Fund offered to convert any outstanding preferred shares to common shares on a one-for-one basis. As a result of this conversion offer, 12,800 preferred shares participated in the offer and where converted to common shares.
During the year ended July 31, 2010 the Fund offered to convert any outstanding preferred shares to common shares on a one-for-one basis. As a result of this conversion offer, 31,461 preferred shares participated in the offer and where converted to common shares.
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 that the Fund may purchase, from time to time, shares of its common and preferred stock in the open market.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
Notes to Financial Statements (concluded)
NOTE E: PREFERRED STOCK
Shares of the Preferred Stock have identical rights, voting powers, restrictions, and qualifications of the common stock of the Fund except for repurchase and conversion preference features and the ability to elect two directors.
In the event the Put Warrant Program is approved by the SEC and upon the anticipated issuance of put warrants by the Fund, all issued and outstanding shares of Preferred Stock will automatically convert to our common stock on a one-for-one basis upon the anticipated issuance of put warrants by the Fund and, shortly thereafter, stockholders will receive put warrants.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Report Of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”) as of July 31, 2011 and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2011, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc. as of July 31, 2011, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 26, 2011
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Additional Information
BOARD CONSIDERATION OF THE CONTINUATION OF THE FUND’S INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited)
In March 2011, the Board of Directors of The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc., (the “Fund”), including the Independent Directors, unanimously approved the renewal of the Fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Adviser for an additional one-year term. The information, material facts and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board’s approval are described below.
Information Reviewed
During the course of the year, Board members review a wide variety of materials relating to the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Fund by the Adviser, including reports on the Fund’s investment results, portfolio composition, investment strategy, and other matters. In addition, in connection with its annual review of the Agreement, the Board requested and reviewed supplementary information that included materials regarding the Fund’s investment results, advisory fee and expense comparisons, financial and profitability information regarding the Adviser, descriptions of various functions such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and information about the personnel providing investment management and administrative services to the Fund. In connection with its review, the Board received assistance and advice regarding legal and industry standards from counsel to the Fund. The Independent Directors discussed the approval of the Agreement with representatives of the Adviser and in a private session with counsel at which no representatives of the Adviser were present. In deciding to recommend approval of the Agreement, the Board and the Independent Directors did not identify any single or particular piece of information that, in isolation, was the controlling factor. This summary describes the most important, but not all, of the factors considered by the Board and the Independent Directors.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
With respect to the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser to the Fund, the Directors engaged in a broad discussion of the value the Adviser provided to the Fund and the experience of the Fund’s portfolio manager. The Board considered both the short-term and long-term performance of the Fund. The Board reviewed the Fund’s performance over various periods and compared these returns with data supplied by an independent provider of fund data on the returns of the Fund’s peers and relevant indices. They noted that the Adviser was delivering performance that continued to outperform its peers and relevant indices.
Advisory Fees, Total Expenses and Ancillary Benefits
With respect to advisory fees and total expenses, the Directors noted that the Fund’s management fees were within the range of the standard fees for comparable investment companies. The Board reviewed and
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Additional Information (continued)
discussed expenses and noted the Fund’s current expense ratio of 1.54% was reasonable when compared to funds with similar asset size and complexity. In addition, the Board reviewed and discussed the profitability to the Adviser and its relationship with the Fund, which they concluded was reasonable, and information regarding the Adviser’s financial capability to continue to provide services to the Fund in the future, which they concluded was adequate. The Directors considered the extent to which economies of scale were or should be reflected in the Fund’s advisory fee, and concluded that in view of the Fund’s investment results, the Fund’s reasonable level of total expenses and overall size of the net assets in the Fund that the investment advisory fees were reasonable and that there were no economies of scale available to this time that should be passed along to the Fund. The Board also considered ancillary benefits to the Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Fund. The Board noted that the Adviser has no affiliated entities that provide services to the Fund and that any such benefit was difficult to quantify and likely not significant.
Conclusions
Based on their review, including consideration of each of the factors referred to above, the Board and the Independent Directors concluded that the terms of the Agreement is fair and reasonable to the Fund and its stockholders, that the Fund’s stockholders receive reasonable value in return for the advisory fees paid to the Adviser by the Fund and that renewal of the Agreement was in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders.
NOTE 1: INFORMATION ABOUT PROXY VOTING
Information regarding how the Fund votes proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge upon request by calling toll-free at 1-877-785-0376 and the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve month period ended June 30 is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or by calling the toll-free number listed above.
NOTE 2: AVAILABILITY OF QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The filing will be available, upon request, by calling 1-877-785-0376. Furthermore, you will be able to obtain a copy of the filing on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov beginning with the filing for the period ended October 31, 2004. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Additional Information (concluded)
NOTE 3: INFORMATION ABOUT CERTIFICATIONS
In December 2010, the Fund submitted a CEO annual certification to the NYSE in which the Fund’s principal executive officer certified that she was not aware, as of the date of the certification, of any violation by the Fund of the NYSE’s Corporate Governance listing standards. In addition, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules, the Fund’s principal executive and principal financial officers have made quarterly certifications, included in the filing with the SEC on Forms N-CSR and N-Q, relating to, among other things, the Fund’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
NOTE 4: INFORMATION ON FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except for historical information contained in this report for the Fund, the matters discussed in this report may constitute forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include any adviser or portfolio manager predictions, assessments, analyses or outlooks for individual securities, industries, market sectors and/or markets. These statements involve risks and uncertainties. In addition to the general risks described for the Fund in the most recent Prospectus, other factors bearing on this report include the accuracy of the adviser’s or portfolio manager’s data, forecasts and predictions, and the appropriateness of the investment programs designed by the adviser or portfolio manager to implement their strategies efficiently and effectively. Any one or more of these factors, as well as other risks affecting the securities markets and investment instruments generally, could cause the actual results of the Fund to differ materially as compared to benchmarks associated with the Fund.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Dividends and Distributions
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
The Fund intends to distribute to shareholders substantially all of its net investment company taxable income at least annually. Investment company taxable income, as defined in section 852 of the Internal Revenue Service Code of 1986, includes all of the Fund’s taxable income minus the excess, if any, of its net realized long-term capital gains over its net realized short-term capital losses (including any capital loss carryovers), plus or minus certain other required adjustments. The Fund also expects to distribute annually substantially all of its net realized long-term capital gains in excess of net realized short-term capital losses (including any capital loss carryovers), except in circumstances where the Fund realizes very large capital gains and where the Directors of the Fund determine that the decrease in the size of the Fund’s assets resulting from the distribution of the gains would not be in the interest of the Fund’s shareholders generally.
Pursuant to the Fund’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan (the “Plan”), each shareholder will be deemed to have elected, unless the Plan Agent (as defined below) is otherwise instructed by the shareholder in writing, to have all distributions, net of any applicable U.S. withholding tax, automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Fund by U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC, the Fund’s transfer agent, as the Plan Agent (the “Plan Agent”). Shareholders who do not participate in the Plan will receive all dividends and distributions in cash, net of any applicable U.S. withholding tax, paid in U.S. dollars by check mailed directly to the shareholder by the Plan Agent, as dividend-paying agent. Shareholders who do not wish to have dividends and distributions automatically reinvested should notify the Plan Agent for The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc., c/o U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, ATTN: Ms. Casey Sauer, 615 East Michigan Street, Milwaukee, WI 53202. Dividends and distributions with respect to shares of the Fund’s Common Stock and Preferred Stock registered in the name of a broker-dealer or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”) will be reinvested under the Plan unless the service is not provided by the broker or nominee or the shareholder elects to receive dividends and distributions in cash. A shareholder whose shares are held by a broker or nominee that does not provide a dividend reinvestment program may be required to have his shares registered in his own name to participate in the Plan. Investors who own shares of the Fund’s Common Stock and Preferred Stock registered in street name should contact the broker or nominee for details.
The Plan Agent serves as agent for the shareholders in administering the Plan. If the Directors of the Fund declare an income dividend or a capital gains distribution payable either in the Fund’s Common Stock, Preferred Stock, or in cash, as shareholders may have elected, nonparticipants in the Plan will receive cash and participants in the Plan will receive Common Stock or Preferred Stock, respectively, to be issued by the Fund. If the market price per share on the valuation date equals or exceeds net asset value per share on that date, the Fund will issue new shares to participants at net asset value; or, if the net asset value is less than 95% of the market price on the valuation date, then such shares will be issued at 95% of the market price.
If net asset value per share on the valuation date exceeds the market price per share on that date, participants in the Plan will receive shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock from the Fund valued at
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Dividends and Distributions (concluded)
market price. The valuation date is the dividend or distribution payment date or, if that date is not a New York Stock Exchange trading day, the next preceding trading day. If the Fund should declare an income dividend or capital gains distribution payable only in cash, the Plan Agent will, as agent for the participants, buy Fund shares in the open market on the New York Stock Exchange or elsewhere, for the participants’ accounts on, or shortly after, the payment date.
The Plan Agent maintains all shareholder accounts in the Plan and furnishes written confirmations of all transactions in an account, including information needed by shareholders for personal and tax records. Shares in the account of each Plan participant will be held by the Plan Agent in noncertified form in the name of the participant, and each shareholder’s proxy will include those shares purchased pursuant to the Plan.
In the case of shareholders such as banks, brokers or nominees that hold shares for others who are beneficial owners, the Plan Agent will administer the Plan on the basis of the number of shares certified from time to time by the shareholders as representing the total amount registered in the shareholder’s name and held for the account of beneficial owners who participate in the Plan.
There is no charge to participants for reinvesting dividends or capital gains distributions payable in either Common Stock, Preferred Stock or cash. The Plan Agent’s fees for the handling or reinvestment of such dividends and capital gains distributions will be paid by the Fund. There will be no brokerage charges with respect to shares issued directly by the Fund as a result of dividends or capital gains distributions payable either in stock or in cash. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agent’s open market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of dividends or capital gains distributions payable in cash.
Brokerage charges for purchasing small amounts of Common Stock and Preferred Stock for individual accounts through the Plan are expected to be less than usual brokerage charges for such transactions because the Plan Agent will be purchasing stock for all participants in blocks and prorating the lower commissions thus attainable. Brokerage commissions will vary based on, among other things, the broker selected to effect a particular purchase and the number of participants on whose behalf such purchase is being made.
The receipt of dividends and distributions in Common Stock or Preferred Stock under the Plan will not relieve participants of any income tax (including withholding tax) that may be payable on such dividends or distributions.
Experience under the Plan may indicate that changes in the Plan are desirable. Accordingly, the Fund and the Plan Agent reserve the right to terminate the Plan as applied to any dividend or distribution paid subsequent to notice of the termination sent to participants at least 30 days before the record date for such dividend or distribution. The Plan also may be amended by the Fund or the Plan Agent, but (except when necessary or appropriate to comply with applicable law, or rules or policies of a regulatory authority) only upon at least 30 days’ written notice to participants. All correspondence concerning the Plan should be directed to the Plan Agent at the address above.
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Results of Annual
|
July 31, 2011
|
Stockholders Meeting
|
(Unaudited)
|
The Fund’s Annual Stockholders meeting was held on November 26, 2010, at 777 East Wisconsin Avenue, 31st Floor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202. As of October 15, 2010, the record date, outstanding shares of common and preferred stock were 6,987,208 and 68,939 respectively. Holders of 6,509,942 shares of the Fund were present at the meeting either in person or by proxy. These holders, as being holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Fund, constituted a quorum. The stockholders voted on three proposals. The stockholders elected three Directors to the Board of Directors two for the common share class and one for the preferred share class. The following table provides information concerning the matters voted on at the meeting:
I.
|
Election of Director – Common
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
|
Gerald Hellerman
|
4,121,493
|
2,321,151
|
|
Eugenia Pichardo
|
4,135,525
|
2,307,119
|
|
|
|
|
II.
|
Election of Director – Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For
|
Votes Against
|
|
Glenn Goodstein
|
51,530
|
15,768
|
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Privacy Policy
FACTS
|
|
WHAT DOES THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC. (THE “FUND”), AND SERVICE PROVIDERS TO THE FUND, ON THE FUND’S BEHALF, DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION?
|
Why?
|
|
Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do.
|
What?
|
|
The types of personal information we, and our service providers, on our behalf, collect and share depends on the product or service you have with us. This information can include:
|
|
|
•
|
Social Security number
|
|
|
•
|
account balances
|
|
|
•
|
account transactions
|
|
|
•
|
transaction history
|
|
|
•
|
wire transfer instructions
|
|
|
•
|
checking account information
|
|
|
When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice.
|
How?
|
|
All financial companies need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons the Fund, and our service providers, on our behalf, choose to share; and whether you can limit this sharing.
|
Reasons we can share your personal information
|
|
Does the Fund share?
|
|
Can you limit this sharing?
|
For our everyday business purposes –
such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s),
respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to
credit bureaus
|
|
Yes
|
|
No
|
For our marketing purposes –
to offer our products and services to you
|
|
No
|
|
We don’t share
|
For joint marketing with other financial companies
|
|
No
|
|
We don’t share
|
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes –
information about your transactions and experiences
|
|
Yes
|
|
No
|
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes –
information about your creditworthiness
|
|
No
|
|
We don’t share
|
For our affiliates to market to you
|
|
No
|
|
We don’t share
|
For nonaffiliates to market to you
|
|
No
|
|
We don’t share
|
Questions?
|
|
Call (877) 785-0376
|
|
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Privacy Policy (concluded)
What we do
|
|
|
|
Who is providing this notice?
|
|
The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”)
|
How does the Fund, and the
Fund’s service providers, on the
Fund’s behalf, protect my
personal information?
|
|
To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use,
we and our service providers use security measures that comply with
federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured
files and buildings.
|
How does the Fund, and the
Fund’s service providers, on
the Fund’s behalf, collect my
personal information?
|
|
We collect your personal information, for example, when you:
|
|
•
|
open an account
|
|
•
|
provide account information
|
|
•
|
give us your contact information
|
|
•
|
make a wire transfer
|
|
|
We also collect your information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates, or other companies.
|
Why can’t I limit all sharing?
|
|
Federal law gives you the right to limit only
|
|
|
•
|
sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your creditworthiness
|
|
|
•
|
affiliates from using your information to market to you
|
|
|
•
|
sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you
|
|
|
State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing.
|
Definitions
|
|
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.
|
|
|
•
|
None
|
Nonaffiliates
|
|
Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.
|
|
|
•
|
The Fund does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to you.
|
Joint marketing
|
|
A formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you.
|
|
|
•
|
The Fund does not jointly market.
|
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Management of the Fund
Board of Directors. The management and affairs of the Fund are supervised by the Board of Directors. The Board consists of five individuals, all of whom are not “interested persons” of the Fund as the term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). The Directors are fiduciaries for the Fund’s shareholders and are governed by the laws of the State of Maryland in this regard. The Board establishes policies for the operation of the Fund and appoints the officers who conduct the daily business of the Fund. The Directors and Interested Officers of the Fund are listed below with their addresses, present position(s) with the Fund, length of time served, principal occupations over at least the last five years, and any other Directorships held. Please note that there is only one fund in the complex that is overseen by the Directors.
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Year
|
Position(s)
|
Office/Length
|
Principal Occupation
|
Other Directorships
|
Name and Address
|
Born
|
with the Fund
|
of Time Served
|
During the Past Five Years
|
Held by Director
|
Gerald Hellerman
|
1937
|
Director, Chief
|
2010 / 10 years
|
Managing Director,
|
Director, Brantley
|
5431 NW 21st Avenue
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
Hellerman Associates
|
Capital Corporation;
|
Boca Raton, FL 33496
|
|
and Chief
|
|
|
Director, MVC
|
|
|
Compliance
|
|
|
Capital, Inc.;
|
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
Director, Old Mutual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolute Return and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
(consisting of six
|
|
|
|
|
|
funds); Director,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Opportunities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phillip Goldstein
|
1945
|
Director
|
2008 / 11 years
|
Principal of the general
|
Director, ASA Ltd.;
|
Park 80 West, Plaza Two,
|
|
|
|
partner of several investment
|
Chairman, Special
|
250 Pehle Avenue,
|
|
|
|
partnerships in the Bulldog
|
Opportunities
|
Suite 708,
|
|
|
|
Investors group of funds.
|
Fund Inc.; Chairman,
|
Saddle Brook, NJ 07663
|
|
|
|
Principal of the investment
|
Brantley Capital
|
|
|
|
|
advisor to the Special
|
Corporation;
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunities Fund, Inc.
|
Director, Korea
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Fund, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glenn Goodstein
|
1963
|
Director
|
2010 / 10 years
|
Registered Investment
|
None
|
2308 Camino Robledo
|
|
|
|
Advisor; held numerous
|
|
Carlsbad, CA 92009
|
|
|
|
executive positions with
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automatic Data Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
until 1996.
|
|
THE MEXICO EQUITY AND INCOME FUND, INC.
July 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Management of the Fund (concluded)
|
|
|
Term of
|
|
|
|
Year
|
Position(s)
|
Office/Length
|
Principal Occupation
|
Other Directorships
|
Name and Address
|
Born
|
with the Fund
|
of Time Served
|
During the Past Five Years
|
Held by Director
|
Rajeev Das
|
1968
|
Director
|
2009 / 10 years
|
Principal, Bulldog Investors,
|
None
|
68 Lafayette Avenue
|
|
|
|
a group of Investment Funds
|
|
Dumont, NJ 07628
|
|
|
|
Managing member of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunity Income Plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.P. an investment fund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew Dakos
|
1966
|
Director
|
2009 / 10 years
|
Managing Member of the
|
Director, Special
|
Park 80 West, Plaza Two
|
|
|
|
general partner of six
|
Opportunities
|
250 Pehle Avenue,
|
|
|
|
investment partnerships in
|
Fund Inc.; Director,
|
Suite 708
|
|
|
|
the Bulldog Investors group
|
Brantley Capital
|
Saddle Brook, NJ 07663
|
|
|
|
of Funds. President, Special
|
Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunities Fund, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal of the Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisor to Special
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunities Fund, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maria Eugenia Pichardo
|
1950
|
Interested
|
2010 / 1 year
|
Portfolio Manager of the
|
None
|
408 Teopanzolco Avenue
|
|
Director,
|
|
Fund since the Fund’s
|
|
3rd Floor-Reforma
|
|
Officer,
|
Indefinite / 7 years
|
Inception; President and
|
|
Cuernavaca, 62260
|
|
President
|
|
General Partner, Pichardo
|
|
Morelos Mexico
|
|
|
|
Asset Management, S.A. de
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.V. since 2003; Managing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director, Acciones y Valores
|
|
|
|
|
|
de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
|
|
|
|
from 1979 to 2002.
|
|
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank.)
THE MEXICO EQUITY
AND INCOME FUND, INC.
Investment Adviser:
Pichardo Asset Management, S.A. de C.V.
Paseo de Tamarindos 45-201
Bosques de las Lomas
Delegacion Cuajimalpa
Mexico DF 05120
Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm:
Tait, Weller & Baker LLP
1818 Market Street, Suite 2400
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Transfer Agent and Registrar,
Fund Administrator
and Fund Accountant:
U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC
615 East Michigan Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Custodian:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Custody Operations
1555 Rivercenter Drive, Suite 302
Milwaukee, WI 53212
Board of Directors:
Andrew Dakos
Rajeev Das
Phillip Goldstein
Glenn Goodstein
Gerald Hellerman
Eugenia Pichardo
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer. The registrant has not made any amendments to its code of ethics during the period covered by this report. The registrant has not granted any waivers from any provisions of the code of ethics during the period covered by this report. The registrant undertakes to provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of its code of ethics by mail when they call the registrant at 1-414-765-4255.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The registrant’s board of directors has determined that it does not have an audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee. At this time, the registrant believes that the experience provided by each member of the audit committee together offers the registrant adequate oversight for the registrant’s level of financial complexity.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The registrant has engaged its principal accountant to perform audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services during the past two fiscal years. “Audit services” refer to performing an audit of the registrant's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years. “Audit-related services” refer to the assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit. “Tax services” refer to professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. “Other services” were not provided by the principal accountant. The following table details the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed for each of the last two fiscal years for audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees and other fees by the principal accountant.
|
FYE 7/31/2011
|
FYE 7/31/2010
|
Audit Fees
|
$26,870
|
$26,000
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
$0
|
$0
|
Tax Fees
|
$3,000
|
$3,000
|
All Other Fees
|
$0
|
$0
|
The audit committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures that require the audit committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services of the registrant, including services provided to any entity affiliated with the registrant. All of the principal accountant’s hours spent on auditing the registrant’s financial statements were attributed to work performed by full-time permanent employees of the principal accountant.
The following table indicates the non-audit fees billed or expected to be billed by the registrant’s accountant for services to the registrant and to the registrant’s investment adviser (and any other controlling entity, etc.—not sub-adviser) for the last two years. The audit committee of the board of trustees/directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant's investment adviser is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence and has concluded that the provision of such non-audit services by the accountant has not compromised the accountant’s independence.
Non-Audit Related Fees
|
FYE 7/31/2011
|
FYE 7/31/2010
|
Registrant
|
$0
|
$0
|
Registrant’s Investment Adviser
|
$0
|
$0
|
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
The standing audit committee is comprised of Mr. Andrew Dakos, Mr. Phillip Goldstein and Mr. Rajeev Das.
Item 6. Investments.
Schedule of Investments is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES
The Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines contained in this document summarize The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc.’s (the “Fund”) positions on various issues of concern to the Fund’s shareholders. These Guidelines give general indication as to how the Fund’s Advisor will vote Fund shares on each issue listed. However, this listing does not address all potential voting issues or the intricacies that may surround individual proxy votes. For that reason there may be instances in which votes may vary from the guidelines presented here. The Fund endeavors to vote Fund shares in accordance with the Fund’s investment objectives and strategies.
I. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
A. Board and Governance Issues
1. Board of Director/Trustee Composition
The Board of Directors is responsible for the overall governance of the corporation.
The Fund advisor will oppose slates without at least a majority of independent directors (1/3 of directors who are outsiders to the corporation).
The Fund advisor will vote for shareholder proposals that request that the board audit, compensation and/or nominating committees include independent directors exclusively.
2. Increase Authorized Common Stock
The Fund advisor will generally support the authorization of additional common stock necessary to facilitate a stock split.
The Fund advisor will generally support the authorization of additional common stock, if the company already has a large amount of stock authorized but not issued or reserved for its stock option plans. In this latter instance, there is a concern that the authorized but unissued shares will be used as a poison pill or other takeover defense, which will be opposed. In addition, we will require the company to provide a specific purpose for any request to increase shares by more than 100 percent of the current authorization.
3. Blank Check Preferred Stock
Blank check preferred is stock with a fixed dividend and a preferential claim on company assets relative to common shares. The terms of the stock (voting dividend and conversion rights) are set by the Board at a future date without further shareholder action. While such an issue can in theory have legitimate corporate purposes, most often it has been used as a takeover defense since the stock has terms that make the entire company less attractive.
The Fund advisor will generally oppose the creation of blank check preferred stock.
4. Classified or “Staggered” Board
On a classified (or staggered) board, directors are divided into separate classes (usually three) with directors in each class elected to overlapping three-year terms. Companies argue that such Boards offer continuity in direction which promotes long-term planning. However, in some instances they may serve to deter unwanted takeovers since a potential buyer would have to wait at least two years to gain a majority of Board seats.
The Fund advisor will vote on a case-by-case basis on issues involving classified boards.
5. Supermajority Vote Requirements
Supermajority vote requirements in a company’s charter or bylaws require a level of voting approval in excess of a simple majority. Generally, supermajority provisions require at least 2/3 affirmative vote for passage of issues.
The Fund advisor will vote on a case-by-case issues involving supermajority voting.
6. Restrictions on Shareholders to Act by Written Consent
Written consent allows shareholders to initiate and carry out a shareholder action without waiting until the annual meeting or by calling a special meeting. It permits action to be taken by the written consent of the same percentage of outstanding shares that would be required to effect the proposed action at a shareholder meeting.
The Fund advisor will generally oppose proposals to limit or eliminate the right of shareholders to act by written consent.
7. Restrictions on Shareholders to Call Meetings
The Fund advisor will generally oppose such a restriction as it limits the right of the shareholder.
8. Limitations, Director Liability and Indemnification
Because of increased litigation brought against directors of corporations and the increased costs of director’s liability insurance, many states have passed laws limiting director liability for those acting in good faith. Shareholders however must opt into such statutes. In addition, many companies are seeking to add indemnification of directors to corporate bylaws.
The Fund advisor will generally support director liability and indemnification resolutions because it is important for companies to be able to attract the most qualified individuals to their Boards. Note: Those directors acting fraudulently would remain liable for their actions irrespective of this resolution.
9. Reincorporation
Corporations are in general bound by the laws of the state in which they are incorporated. Companies reincorporate for a variety of reasons including shifting incorporation to a state where the company has its most active operations or corporate headquarters, or shifting incorporation to take advantage of state corporate takeover laws.
While each reincorporation proposal will be evaluated based on its own merits, the Fund advisor will generally support reincorporation resolutions for valid business reasons (such as reincorporating in the same state as the corporate headquarters).
10. Cumulative Voting
Cumulative voting allows shareholders to “stack” their votes behind one or a few directors running for the board, thereby helping a minority of shareholders to win board representation. Cumulative voting gives minority shareholders a voice in corporate affairs proportionate to their actual strength in voting shares.
The Fund advisor will generally support proposals calling for cumulative voting in the election of directors.
11. Dual Classes of Stock
In order to maintain corporate control in the hands of a certain group of shareholders, companies may seek to create multiple classes of stock with differing rights pertaining to voting and dividends.
The Fund advisor will generally oppose dual classes of stock. However, the advisor will support classes of stock offering different dividend rights (such as one class which pays cash dividends and a second which pays stock dividends) depending on the circumstances.
12. Limit Directors’ Tenure
In general corporate directors may stand for re-election indefinitely. Opponents of this practice suggest that limited tenure would inject new perspectives into the boardroom as well as possibly creating room for directors from diverse backgrounds; however, continuity is important to corporate leadership and in some instances alternative means may be explored for injecting new ideas or members from diverse backgrounds into corporate boardrooms.
Accordingly, the Fund advisor will vote on a case-by-case basis attempts to limit director tenure.
13. Minimum Director Stock Ownership
The director share ownership proposal requires that all corporate directors own a minimum number of shares in the corporation. The purpose of this resolution is to encourage directors to have the same interest as other shareholders.
The Fund advisor will support resolutions that require corporate directors to own shares in the company.
14. Selection of Auditor
Annual election of the outside accountants is standard practice. While it is recognized that the company is in the best position to evaluate the competence of the outside accountants, we believe that outside accountants must ultimately be accountable to shareholders. Furthermore, audit committees have been the subject of a report released by the Blue Ribbon Commission on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees in conjunction with the NYSE and the National Association of Securities Dealers. The Blue Ribbon Commission concluded that audit committees must improve their current level of oversight of independent accountants. Given the rash of accounting irregularities that were not detected by audit panels or auditors, shareholder ratification is an essential step in restoring investor confidence.
The Fund advisor will oppose the resolutions seeking ratification of the auditor when fees for financial systems design and implementation exceed audit and all other fees, as this can compromise the independence of the auditor.
The Fund advisor will oppose the election of the audit committee chair if the audit committee recommends an auditors whose fees for financial systems design and implementation exceed audit and all other fees, as this can compromise the independence of the auditor.
B. Executive Compensation
1. Disclosure of CEO, Executive, Board and Management Compensation
On a case-by-case basis, the Fund advisor will support shareholder resolutions requesting companies to disclose the salaries of top management and the Board of Directors.
2. Compensation for CEO, Executive, Board and Management
The Fund advisor will oppose an executive compensation proposal if we believe the compensation does not reflect the economic and social circumstances of the company (i.e. at times of layoffs, downsizing, employee wage freezes, etc.).
3. Formation and Independence of Compensation Review Committee
The Fund advisor will support shareholder resolutions requesting the formation of a committee of independent directors to review and examine executive compensation.
4. Stock Options for Board and Executives
The Fund advisor will generally oppose stock option plans that in total offer greater than 15% of shares outstanding because of voting and earnings dilution.
The Fund advisor will generally oppose option programs that allow the repricing of underwater options. (Repricing divides shareholder and employee interests. Shareholders cannot “reprice” their stock and, therefore, optionees should not be treated differently).
The Fund advisor will generally oppose stock option plans that have option exercise prices below the marketplace on the day of the grant.
The Fund advisor will generally support options programs for outside directors subject to the same constraints previously described.
5. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOPs)
The Fund advisor will support ESOPs created to promote active employee ownership. However, they will oppose any ESOP whose purpose is to prevent a corporate takeover.
6. Pay Equity
The Fund advisor will support shareholder resolutions that request that management provide a race and/or gender pay equity report.
7. Ratio Between CEO and Worker Pay
The Fund advisor will generally support shareholder resolutions requesting that management report on the ratio between CEO and employee compensation.
8. Maximum Ratio Between CEO and Worker Compensation and/or Cap on CEO Compensation
The Fund advisor will vote on a case-by-case basis shareholder resolutions requesting management to set a maximum ratio between CEO and employee compensation and/or a cap on CEO compensation.
9. Changes to Charter or By-Laws
The Fund advisor will conduct a case-by-case review of the proposed changes with the voting decision resting on whether the proposed changes are in shareholder’s best interests.
10. Confidential Voting
Typically, proxy voting differs from voting in political elections in that the company is made aware of shareholder votes as they are cast. This enables management to contact dissenting shareholders in an attempt to get them to change their votes.
The Fund advisor will support confidential voting because the voting process should be free of coercion.
11. Equal Access to Proxy
Equal access proposals ask companies to give shareholders access to proxy materials to state their views on contested issues, including director nominations. In some cases, they would actually allow shareholders to nominate directors. Companies suggest that such proposals would make an increasingly complex process even more burdensome.
In general, the Fund advisor will oppose resolutions for equal access proposals.
12. Golden Parachutes
Golden parachutes are severance payments to top executives who are terminated or demoted pursuant to a takeover. Companies argue that such provisions are necessary to keep executives from “jumping ship” during potential takeover attempts.
The Fund advisor will support the right of shareholders to vote on golden parachutes because they go above and beyond ordinary compensation practices. In evaluating a particular golden parachute, we will examine total management compensation, the employees covered by the plan, and the quality of management.
C. Mergers and Acquisitions
1. Considering the Non-Financial Effects of a Merger Proposal
Such a proposal allows or requires the Board to consider the impact of merger decisions on various “stakeholders,” such as employees, communities, customers and business partners. This proposal gives the Board the right to reject a tender offer on the grounds that it would adversely affect the company’s stakeholders.
The Fund advisor will support shareholder resolutions that consider non-financial impacts of mergers.
2. Mergers, Restructuring and Spin-offs
A merger, restructuring, or spin-off in some way affects a change in control of the company’s assets. In evaluating the merit of each issue, we will consider the terms of each proposal. This will include an analysis of the potential long-term value of the investment.
The Fund advisor will support management proposals for merger or restructuring if the transaction appears to offer fair value and other proxy voting policies stated are not violated. For example, the advisor may oppose restructuring resolution which include in it significant takeover defenses and may again oppose the merger of a non-nuclear and a nuclear utility if it poses potential liabilities.
3. Poison Pills
Poison pills (or shareholder rights plans) are triggered by an unwanted takeover attempt and cause a variety of events to occur which may make the company financially less attractive to the suitor. Typically, directors have enacted these plans without shareholder approval. Most poison pill resolutions deal with putting poison pills up for a vote or repealing them altogether.
The Fund advisor will support proposals to put rights plans up for a shareholder vote. In general, poison pills will be opposed unless management is able to present a convincing case fur such a plan.
4. Anti-Greenmail Proposals
Greenmail is the payment a corporate raider receives in exchange for his/her shares. This payment is usually at a premium to the market price, so while greenmail can ensure the continued independence of the company, it discriminates against other shareholders.
The Fund advisor will generally support greenmail provisions.
5. Opt-Out of State Anti-Takeover Law
A strategy for dealing with anti-takeover issues has been a shareholder resolution asking for a company to opt-out of a particular state’s anti-takeover laws.
The Fund advisor will generally support bylaws changes requiring a company to opt-out of state anti-takeover laws. However, resolutions requiring companies to opt-into state anti-takeover statutes will be opposed.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Information is presented as of July 31, 2011.
Portfolio Manager. Ms. Maria Eugenia Pichardo is the Portfolio Manager responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, which includes making portfolio management decisions and executing transactions.
Ms. Pichardo has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since the Fund's inception (1990). She is also the President and General Partner of Pichardo Asset Management, S.A. de C.V. ("PAM') (the Fund's Investment Adviser) since February 2003. Prior to starting PAM, from 1989 to 1990 she was General Director of Acci-Worldwide S.A. de C. V, a wholly owned subsidiary of Acciones y Valores de Mexico, S. A. de C.V member of the Banamex Financial Group, subsidiary of Citigroup. Ms Pichardo was Managing Director and General Director of the International Sales Department of Acciones y Valores de Mexico, S. A. de C. V from 1983 to 1989.
Portfolio Manager Name
|
|
Registered
Investment
Company (dollar
amount and
number of
accounts)
|
|
Other Pooled
Investments (dollar
amount and number
of accounts)
|
|
Other Accounts
(dollar amount
and number of
accounts)
|
Ms. Maria Eugenia Pichardo
|
|
$89,948,178 (1)
|
|
$0 (0)
|
|
$3,630,614 (2)
|
Material Conflict of Interest. The Portfolio Manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to other accounts and accordingly may be presented with potential or actual conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest can arise in the allocation of securities to the various accounts when a security is purchased or sold over a period of time. “PAM” has established policies and procedures to reduce the conflict of interest.
The management of other accounts may result in the Portfolio Manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of the Fund and/or other accounts. In approving the Advisory Agreement, the Board of Directors was satisfied that the Portfolio Manager would be able to devote sufficient attention to the management of the Fund, and that PAM seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of the portfolio manager.
Compensation. Ms. Pichardo receives a fixed annual salary and bonus from PAM. Ms. Pichardo participates in a deferred compensation plan.
Securities Owned in the Fund by Portfolio Manager. As of July 31, 2011, the Portfolio Manager owned the following securities in the Fund:
Portfolio Manager Name
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity
Securities in the Fund
(None, $1-$10,000,
$10,001-$50,000,
$50,001-$100,000,
$100,001 - $500,000,
$500,001 to $1,000,000,
Over $1,000,000)
|
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of
Securities in all Registered
Investment Companies
Overseen by Portfolio
Manager in Family of
Investment Companies
|
Ms. Maria Eugenia Pichardo
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Period
|
|
(a)
Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased
|
|
(b)
Average Price Paid
per Share (or Unit)
|
|
(c)
Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part
of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
|
|
(d)
Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units)
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs
|
2/1/11 to 2/28/11
|
|
44,017
|
|
$11.27
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
3/1/11 to 3/31/11
|
|
36,991
|
|
$11.27
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
4/1/11 to 4/30/11
|
|
20,995
|
|
$11.70
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
5/1/11 to 5/31/11
|
|
64,163
|
|
$11.39
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
6/1/11 to 6/30/11
|
|
78,339
|
|
$11.26
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
7/1/11 to 7/31/11
|
|
5,467
|
|
$11.70
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
Total
|
|
249,972 (1)
|
|
$11.34
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
(1) 249,972 common shares were purchased pursuant to the Fund’s Stock Repurchase Program.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The registrant’s independent directors serve as its nominating committee, however they do not make use of a nominating committee charter.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a)
|
The Registrant’s President and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report, as required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Act and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on their review, such officers have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in this report is appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported and made known to them by others within the Registrant and by the Registrant’s service provider.
|
(b)
|
There were no changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)
|
(1) Any code of ethics or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy Item 2 requirements through filing an exhibit. Not applicable.
|
(2) A separate certification for each principal executive and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
(3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the Act sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons. None.
(b)
|
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Furnished herewith.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) The Mexico Equity and Income Fund, Inc.
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Maria Eugenia Pichardo
Maria Eugenia Pichardo, President
Date October 6, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Maria Eugenia Pichardo
Maria Eugenia Pichardo, President
Date October 6, 2011
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Gerald Hellerman
Gerald Hellerman, Chief Financial Officer
Date October 4, 2011