-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
JFN3TGhns+bTNw4hZiOvODWe0mb8oV2EFaS06KJaFO9iQEYVOuZiqTgDXodWcw+M
L/hic8Pg+i25rwAlOq6QGQ==
UNITED STATES X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 Commission file number 0-18516 ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------- (exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 51-0002090 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 664 Churchmans Road, Newark, Delaware 19702 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Address of principal executive offices (302) 453 - 6900 ----------------------------------------------------------- Registrant's telephone number, including area code Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Class A Non-Voting Common Stock Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. X Yes No Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes X No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes X No The aggregate market value of the non-voting and voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at March 3, 2003 was $66,743,840 and $3,773,790, respectively. As of March 3, 2003, 2,185,880 shares and 391,824 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, respectively, were outstanding. PART I Item 1. - Business. Artesian Resources Corporation ("Artesian Resources" or the "Company") operates as the parent holding company of Artesian Water Company, Inc. ("Artesian Water"), our principal subsidiary, Artesian Water Pennsylvania, Inc. and two non-regulated subsidiaries. Artesian Water Company was organized in 1927 as the successor to the Richardson Park Water Company, founded in 1905. In 1984, the name of Artesian Water Company was changed to Artesian Resources Corporation and the utility assets were contributed to the newly formed subsidiary, Artesian Water. In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we frequently use the terms "we," "our" and the "Company" to refer to Artesian Resources and its subsidiaries, including Artesian Water. We distribute and sell water to residential, commercial, industrial, governmental, municipal and utility customers throughout the State of Delaware. As of December 31, 2002, we had 68,000 metered customers and served a population of approximately 226,000 (including contract services), representing approximately 27% of Delaware's total population. We also provide water for public and private fire protection to customers in our service territories. Our gross water sales revenue for 2002 was approximately $33.6 million, and our percentages of gross water sales revenue by major customer classifications were 60% for residential, 32% for commercial, industrial, governmental, municipal and utility, and 8% for fire protection and other. These percentages have remained fairly constant for the past three years. We have received recognition of Artesian Water Pennsylvania, Inc. as a regulated public water utility by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission in 2002. We are now serving a community in Pennsylvani
a of 39 customers. Our current market area is the State of Delaware, which had a population of approximately 800,000 at December 31, 2002. According to the US Census Bureau, Delaware's population has increased 17.6% over the last 10 years, the 14th largest percentage increase among the states. Although New Castle is the most populous of Delaware's three counties, Sussex County, in southern Delaware, has experienced the most significant growth with a population increase of approximately 38.3% over the last ten years. The largest project, which was completed in 2002, is the Bayville Iron Removal Facilities project in Sussex County, Delaware, with a total cost of $4.17 million. Substantial portions of Delaware, particularly outside of New Castle County, are not served by a public water system and represent potential opportunities for Artesian Water to obtain new exclusive franchised service areas for Artesian Water. We continue to focus resources on developing and serving existing service territories and obtaining new ter
ritories throughout the state. In Delaware, a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity ("CPCN") grants a water company the exclusive right to serve all existing and new customers within a designated area. Effective July 1, 2001, the authority to issue CPCNs was transferred to the Delaware Public Service Commission ("PSC") from the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control ("DNREC"). In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we refer to these Certificates as "CPCNs" or "franchises." We hold CPCNs for approximately 140 square miles of exclusive service territory, which is segmented into a number of service areas. Our largest connected regional water system, consisting of approximately 98.6 square miles and 64,300 customers, is located in northern Delaware. A significant portion of our exclusive service territory remains undeveloped, and if and when development occurs and there is population growth in these areas, we will increase our customer base by providing water service to the newly developed areas and n
ew customers. The total number of customers we serve has grown at an average annual rate of approximately 2.7% for the last ten years. Within our existing service territory, we hold CPCNs for nearly 5,000 acres zoned for industrial and manufacturing development. Since 1993, we have significantly expanded our service territory by acquiring new exclusive service areas in Delaware through grants of CPCNs. This expansion, which has occurred in southern New Castle, Kent and Sussex Counties, has increased our exclusive service area in Delaware by approximately 30% since 1993. The pursuit of new service territory in the State of Delaware by water companies is competitive. We have identified sufficient sources of groundwater supply to serve our expanding customer base for the foreseeable future. Our self-supply has increased from 63% of our total water supply in 1992 to approximately 82% in 2002. Since 1992, we have increased our sources of groundwater supply from our own wells by 50%, or nearly nine million gallons per day. We plan to continue development of new sources of groundwater supplies previously identified. Our primary sources of water are our wells that pump groundwater from aquifers and other formations. To supplement our groundwater supply, we purchase surface water through interconnections only in the northern service area of our New Castle County system. The purchased surface water is blended with our groundwater supply for distribution to our customers. Nearly 82% of the overall 7.2 billion gallons of water we distributed in all our systems during 2002 came from our groundwater wells, while the remaining 18% came from interconnections with other utilities and municipalities. During 2002, our average rate of water pumped was approximately 16.4 million gallons per day ("mgd") from our groundwater wells and approximately 3.3 mgd was supplied from interconnections. Our peak water supply capacity currently is approximately 45.5 mgd. Our peak water demand in 2002 was approximately 29.3 mgd. We believe that we have in place sufficient capacity to provide water service for the foreseeable future
to all existing and new customers in all of our service territories. We have 94 operating and 52 monitoring wells in our systems. Our northern New Castle County system is interconnected. In the remainder of the state, we have several satellite systems that have not yet been connected by transmission and distribution facilities. We intend to join these systems into larger integrated regional systems through the construction of a transmission and distribution network as development continues and our expansion efforts provide us with contiguous exclusive service territories. We have 17 interconnections with four neighboring water utilities and six municipalities that provide us with the ability to purchase or sell water. Interconnection agreements with the Chester Water Authority and the City of Wilmington have "take or pay" clauses requiring us to take, as of December 31, 2002, minimum draws totaling 864,000,000 gallons annually. Because of the drought, the Chester Water Authority reduced their minimum draw for 2002 only. We presently use the minimum draws under these agreements. The Chester Water Authority agreement, which expires in 2021, provides for a renewal period of an additional 25 years at our option, subject to the approval of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. Our remaining take or pay agreement with that municipality was renewed in December 2001 for a period of five years. All of the interconnections provide Artesian Water the ability to sell water to neighboring water utilities or municipalities. Under state laws and regulations, we are required to file applications with the DNREC for water allocation permits for each of our production wells pumping quantities of water above certain levels. Presently, we have permits for 69 wells, permit applications pending for 14 wells and 11 wells not requiring a permit. Our access to aquifers within our service territory is not exclusive. Water allocation permits control the amount of water which can be drawn from water resources and are granted with specific restrictions on water level draw down limits, annual, monthly and daily pumpage limits, and well field allocation pumpage limits. Our ability to supply the demands of our customers has not been affected by private usage of the aquifers by landowners or the limits imposed by the state. Because of the extensive regulatory requirements relating to the withdrawal of any significant amounts of water from the aquifers, we believe that third party usage of the aquifers within our service territory will not
interfere with our ability to meet the present and future demands of our customers. At the end of 2002, we were serving customers through approximately 915 miles of transmission and distribution mains. Mains range in diameter from two inches to twenty-four inches, and most of the mains are made of ductile iron, cast iron or transite pipe. Ductile iron is more durable than plastic and we install ductile iron pipes wherever possible. We are installing a more durable type of plastic pipe only near ocean front property in southern Delaware where corrosive conditions of the surrounding ground affect the longevity of ductile iron pipe. We also supply public fire protection service through approximately 3,600 hydrants installed throughout our service territories. We have 30 storage tanks, most of which are elevated, providing total system storage of 38.0 million gallons. We also are developing and using an aquifer storage and recovery system. At some locations, we rely on hydropneumatic tanks to maintain adequate system pressures. Where possible, we will combine our smaller satellite systems with systems having elevated storage facilities. We pump all of our water with electric power purchased from major electric utilities. We also have diesel and propane powered generating equipment at selected treatment and elevated storage facilities for the provision of basic water service during possible electrical outages. We derive about 90% of our self-supplied groundwater from wells located in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. The remaining 10% come from wells in the Piedmont Province. We use a variety of treatment methods, including aeration, pH adjustment, chlorination, fluoridation and iron removal, to meet federal, state and local water quality standards. Additionally, a corrosion inhibitor is added to all of our self-supplied groundwater and most of the supply from interconnections. We have 42 different water treatment facilities. All water supplies that we purchase from neighboring utilities are potable. We believe the costs of treating groundwater are significantly lower than those of treating surface water. We are subject to regulation by federal, state and local agencies with respect to, among other things, rates charged for water service, awards of new service territory, water allocation rights, water quality and environmental matters. Artesian Water, as a public utility, is regulated by the PSC with respect to rates and charges for service, the sale and issuance of securities, mergers and other matters. We periodically seek rate increases to cover the cost of increased operating expenses, increased financing expenses due to additional investments in utility plant and other costs of doing business. We filed for a rate increase in April 2002, but we cannot predict whether the PSC will approve the requested increase, approve a smaller increase or deny any such request. We currently derive our water service revenues from water consumption, upon which base rates are applied, which were last increased as of December 3, 2002. This reflects a temporary increase of approximately 11.4%, which Artesian Water is permitted to collect by law, under bond, until the PSC makes a final rate determination. On June 1, 2002, we placed temporary rates into effect, up to the statutory limit of $2.5 million on an annualized basis, under bond. The previous increase was placed in effect July 1, 2001, which authorized a return on equity rate of 10.5%, with an overall rate of return on rate base of 8.99%. A public water utility operating in Delaware must obtain a CPCN for a service territory to begin or expand its operations, which is granted by the PSC. Currently the PSC grants a CPCN under circumstances where there has been a determination that the water in the proposed service area does not meet the regulations governing drinking water standards of the State Board of Health for human consumption, where the supply is insufficient to meet the projected demand, or where the applicant is in possession of one of the following: (i) a signed service agreement with the developer of a proposed subdivision or development, which subdivision or development has been duly approved by the respective county government; (ii) a petition requesting such service signed by a majority of the landowners of the proposed territory to be served; or (iii) a duly certified copy of a resolution from the governing body of a county or municipality requesting the applicant to provide service to the proposed territory to be served. C
PCNs are not transferable, and a water utility must obtain the approval of the PSC to abandon a service territory once granted. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"), DNREC, and the Delaware Division of Public Health ("DPH") and regulate the water quality of our treatment and distribution systems. We believe that we are in material compliance with all current federal, state and local water quality standards, including regulations under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Chester Water Authority, which supplies water to Artesian Water through interconnections in northern New Castle County, is regulated by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection as well as the EPA. As required by the Safe Drinking Water Act, the EPA has established maximum contaminant levels for various substances found in drinking water. DPH has set maximum contaminant levels for certain substances that are more restrictive than the maximum contaminant levels set by the EPA. The DPH is the EPA's agent for enforcing the Safe Drinking Water Act in Delaware and, in that capacity, monitors the activities of Artesian Water and reviews the results of water quality tests performed by Artesian Water for adherence to applicable regulations. Artesian Water is also subject to other laws regulating substances and contaminants in water, including the Lead and Copper Rule, rules for volatile organic compounds and the Total Coliform Rule. Because we have no surface water sources of supply that we treat for consumption, the Surface Water Treatment Rule generally does not apply to us. Delaware enacted legislation in 1998 requiring water utilities to meet secondary water quality standards that include limitations on iron content, odor and other water quality-related issues that are not proven health risks but may be objectionable for consumption. We believe our current treatment systems and facilities meet or exceed these secondary standards. As a normal by-product of iron removal, our treatment facility at Old County Road in New Castle County and our treatment facility in South Bethany in Sussex County generate iron removed from untreated groundwater plus residue from chemicals used in the treatment process. We have contracted with a licensed third party vendor to dispose of the solids produced at these facilities. Our other iron removal facilities rely on disposal through county-approved wastewater facilities. Management believes that compliance with existing federal, state or local laws and regulations regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has no material effect upon the business and affairs of Artesian Resources. On December 19, 1996, Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc. ("Artesian Wastewater") was created as a non-regulated subsidiary of Artesian Resources. Artesian Wastewater provides wastewater treatment services in Delaware. In 1999, Artesian Wastewater began operating a wastewater facility for the town of Middletown in southern New Castle County. This subsidiary did not engage in any business activity in 1998. On March 12, 1997, Artesian Wastewater became a one-third participant, along with heavy-construction contractor George and Lynch and engineering firm Woodward-Clyde International-Americas (a subsidiary of URS Greiner), in a limited liability company called AquaStructure Delaware, L.L.C. ("AquaStructure"). The business of Artesian Water is subject to seasonal fluctuations. The demand for water during the warmer months is generally greater than during cooler months due primarily to additional requirements for water in connection with cooling systems, private and public swimming pools and lawn sprinklers. Throughout the year, and particularly during warmer months, demand will vary with rainfall and temperature levels. The Company has no collective bargaining agreements with any of its employees, and its work force is not union organized or union represented. As of December 31, 2002, we employed 178 full-time and six part-time employees, all of whom were non-unionized. Of this number, 24 were officers and managers; 98 were employed as operations personnel, including engineers, technicians, draftsman, maintenance and repair persons, meter readers and utility personnel; and 46 were employed in the accounting, budgeting, information systems, human resources, customer relations, public relations and conservation departments. The remaining ten employees were administrative personnel. We believe that our employee relations are good. Item 2. - Properties. The corporate headquarters of Artesian Resources, Artesian Water and its other non-regulated subsidiaries are located at 664 Churchmans Road, Newark, Delaware. The property is leased from White Clay Realty by Artesian Water through December 31, 2002. Artesian Water, in December of 2002, filed a condemnation action in the Delaware Superior Court, seeking to acquire title to the office and shop complex currently leased by Artesian, known as 664 Churchmans Road, Newark, Delaware (the "Property"). Artesian Water filed this action under its statutory power of eminent domain against the owner of the Property, White Clay Realty, a Delaware Limited Partnership, and each of the limited partners. White Clay Realty has no general partner and the Superior Court has ruled that the partnership is dissolved and all of the former partners now own the Property jointly as tenants in common. Certain of the officers and directors of Artesian Resource are tenants in common or the beneficiary of a tenant in
common. A special committee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of outside directors who have no ownership interest in the Property, made the determination to purchase the Property through the condemnation procedures. Under this procedure, if the acquisition of the Property is approved by the court, the fair market value of the Property will be determined by a panel of commissioners after an evidentiary hearing. Artesian Water's independent appraiser has valued the Property to be worth $3,800,000. Until a final determination of the condemnation, the parties have agreed that Artesian Water may continue to occupy the Property under the terms of the lease with a quarterly rental payment of $43,361. See Item 13, Transactions with Management and Affiliated Interests, for further disclosures. Artesian Resources and Artesian Development Company, Inc. ("Artesian Development"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Artesian Resources, own various parcels of land in New Castle County, Delaware. The Artesian Water owns land, transmission and distribution mains, pump facilities, treatment plants, storage tanks and related facilities within New Castle, Kent and Sussex Counties, Delaware. In the aggregate, we own rights-of-way and easements totaling approximately 694 acres. Substantially all of Artesian Water's utility plant, except utility plant within the town of Townsend, Delaware, is pledged as security
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
(Title of class)
Of the 694 acres we own, Artesian Development owns approximately eleven-acres zoned for office buildings located immediately adjacent to our corporate headquarters. ADC has no present plans to purchase new land or develop the acreage it owns.
All of our existing facilities adequately meet current necessary production capacities and current levels of utilization.
Item 3. - Legal Proceedings.
On April 2, 2002, Artesian Water filed a petition with the PSC seeking to raise rates for water service by 23.12%, or $7.5 million. As is permitted by law, we placed a 7.71% rate increase into effect under bond beginning June 1, 2002. On June 17, 2002, we filed a supplemental application reducing the requested increase to 19%, or $6.4 million. Hearings regarding the rate increase were held on October 30 and 31, 2002. During these hearings, we reduced our requested rate increase to 14.2%, or $4.8 million. Beginning December 3, 2002, as is permitted by law, we placed an additional 3.69% of the proposed rates into effect. These rates represent an increase in water consumption charges, customer charges and fire hydrant ready to serve charges necessary to generate an increase in operating revenues of approximately $3.9 million.. On March 18, 2003 the PSC approved an increase in rates for Artesian Water. Based on the decisions made during the Commission hearings the company has calculated the increase t
o be approximately $3.3 million, this calculation has been reviewed by PSC staff. Pending review of the final order by the PSC, which has not been issued, the final amount and impact of the new rate on customer bills will be determined. Any revenues that have been deferred and are subsequently approved for recovery will be recorded as revenue in 2003.
The office building and shop complex utilized by Artesian Water are leased at an average annual rental of $175,000 from a partnership, White Clay Realty, in which certain of Artesian Resources' officers and directors are a partner or the beneficiary of a partner (Dian C. Taylor and John R. Eisenbrey, Jr.). The current rental of $175,000 is below market. Artesian Water, in December 2002, filed a condemnation action in the Delaware Superior Court, seeking to acquire title to the office and shop complex currently leased by Artesian, known as 664 Churchmans Road, Newark, Delaware (the "Property"). Artesian Water filed this action under its statutory power of eminent domain against the owner of the Property, White Clay Realty, a Delaware Limited Partnership, and each of the limited partners. White Clay Realty has no general partner and the Superior Court has ruled that the partnership is dissolved and all of the former partners now own the Property jointly as tenants in common. A special committ
ee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of outside directors who have no ownership interest in the Property, made the determination to purchase the Property through the condemnation procedures. Under this procedure, if the acquisition of the Property is approved by the court, the fair market value of the Property will be determined by a panel of commissioners after an evidentiary hearing. Artesian Water's independent appraiser has valued the Property to be worth $3,800,000. In December 2002, Artesian Water issued a payment to the Prothonotary for the State of Delaware for $3,800,000. As the court has delayed payment until the matter is decided, the amount is to be refunded to Artesian and is recorded as a receivable at December 31, 2002. Until a final determination of the condemnation, the parties have agreed that Artesian Water may continue to occupy the Property under the terms of the lease with a quarterly rental payment of $43,361.
There are no other material legal proceedings pending at this date.
Item 4. - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2002.
PART II
Item 5. - Market for Company's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
Artesian Resources' Class A Non-Voting Common Stock ("Class A Stock") is listed on the Nasqad National Market and trades under the symbol "ARTNA." On March 3, 2003, there were 795 holders of record of the Class A Stock. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing sale prices for the Class A Stock on the Nasqad National Market and the cash dividends declared per share:
CLASS A NON-VOTING COMMON STOCK
|
|
Dividend |
||
2001 |
||||
First Quarter |
$26.75 |
$23.25 |
$0.275 |
|
Second Quarter |
26.98 |
23.55 |
0.275 |
|
Third Quarter |
28.50 |
24.55 |
0.280 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
30.94 |
26.25 |
0.280 |
|
2002 |
||||
First Quarter |
$31.50 |
$28.60 |
$0.290 |
|
Second Quarter |
34.00 |
28.22 |
0.290 |
|
Third Quarter |
29.75 |
25.14 |
0.290 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
29.89 |
27.02 |
0.290 |
|
2003 |
||||
First Quarter (through March 3, 2003) |
$32.24 |
$29.57 |
$0.2975 |
The closing sale prices shown above reflect prices between dealers and do not include retail markups or markdowns or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. |
Our Class B Voting Stock ("Class B Stock") is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "ARTNB." There has been a limited and sporadic public trading market for the Class B Voting Common Stock. As of March 3, 2003, the last reported trade of the Class B Voting Common Stock on the OTC Bulletin Board was at a price of $30.00 per share on June 14, 2002. As of March 3, 2003, we had 221 holders of record of the Class B Voting Common Stock. |
Item 6. - Selected Financial Data
.
The selected consolidated financial data for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2002 are derived from the audited financial statements of the Company. The following data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes and also with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
|||||||||||
For the year ended December 31 , |
|||||||||||
In thousands, except per share and operating data |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
||||||
|
|||||||||||
Operating revenues |
|||||||||||
Water sales |
$ |
33,644 |
$ |
31,362 |
$ |
27,090 |
$ |
26,310 |
$ |
25,096 |
|
Other revenue |
953 |
625 |
461 |
467 |
370 |
||||||
$ |
34,597 |
$ |
31,987 |
$ |
27,551 |
$ |
26,777 |
$ |
25,466 |
||
Operating expenses |
|||||||||||
Operating and maintenance |
$ |
18,334 |
$ |
17,619 |
$ |
15,399 |
$ |
14,690 |
$ |
14,273 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
3,392 |
3,001 |
2,706 |
2,417 |
2,183 |
||||||
State and federal income taxes |
2,825 |
2,184 |
1,619 |
1,960 |
1,808 |
||||||
Property and other taxes |
1,871 |
1,782 |
1,616 |
1,620 |
1,535 |
||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ |
26,422 |
$ |
24,586 |
$ |
21,340 |
$ |
20,687 |
$ |
19,799 |
|
Operating income |
$ |
8,175 |
$ |
7,401 |
$ |
6,211 |
$ |
6,090 |
$ |
5,667 |
|
Other income, net |
380 |
457 |
295 |
188 |
215 |
||||||
Total income before interest charges |
$ |
8,555 |
$ |
7,858 |
$ |
6,506 |
$ |
6,278 |
$ |
5,882 |
|
Interest charges |
4,388 |
4,537 |
4,055 |
3,298 |
3,162 |
||||||
Net income |
$ |
4,167 |
$ |
3,321 |
$ |
2,451 |
$ |
2,980 |
$ |
2,720 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
42 |
51 |
61 |
71 |
82 |
||||||
Net income applicable to common stock |
$ |
4,125 |
$ |
3,270 |
$ |
2,390 |
$ |
2,909 |
$ |
2,638 |
|
Net income per share of common stock: |
|||||||||||
Basic |
$ |
1.75 |
$ |
1.61 |
$ |
1.19 |
$ |
1.48 |
$ |
1.47 |
|
Diluted |
$ |
1.71 |
$ |
1.58 |
$ |
1.17 |
$ |
1.46 |
$ |
1.45 |
|
Avg. shares of common stock outstanding |
|||||||||||
Basic |
2,356 |
2,026 |
2,007 |
1,961 |
1,796 |
||||||
Diluted |
2,408 |
2,072 |
2,044 |
1,996 |
1,816 |
||||||
Cash dividends per share of common stock |
$ |
1.16 |
$ |
1.11 |
$ |
1.095 |
$ |
1.06 |
$ |
0.97 |
|
As of or for the year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
BALANCE SHEET DATA |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
||||||
Utility plant, at original cost |
|||||||||||
less accumulated depreciation |
$ |
167,338 |
$ |
152,356 |
$ |
134,038 |
$ |
122,481 |
$ |
109,780 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
183,072 |
$ |
163,534 |
$ |
144,407 |
$ |
132,482 |
$ |
119,376 |
|
Notes payable |
$ |
3,163 |
$ |
16,118 |
$ |
2,000 |
$ |
7,617 |
$ |
7,704 |
|
Long-term obligations and |
|||||||||||
redeemable preferred stock, |
|||||||||||
including current portions |
$ |
64,591 |
$ |
50,998 |
$ |
52,236 |
$ |
36,165 |
$ |
32,696 |
|
Stockholders' equity |
$ |
51,176 |
$ |
34,445 |
$ |
32,829 |
$ |
32,356 |
$ |
27,933 |
|
Total capitalization |
$ |
115,246 |
$ |
84,015 |
$ |
83,846 |
$ |
67,285 |
$ |
60,486 |
|
OPERATING DATA |
|||||||||||
Average water sales per customer |
$ |
495 |
$ |
474 |
$ |
417 |
$ |
420 |
$ |
419 |
|
Water pumped (millions of gallons) |
7,198 |
7,321 |
6,886 |
6,758 |
6,739 |
||||||
Number of metered customers |
68,049 |
66,173 |
64,902 |
62,621 |
60,688 |
||||||
Miles of water main |
917 |
888 |
872 |
842 |
820 |
Item 7 - Management's Discussion & Analysis of Operations & Financial Condition
General Information
Artesian Resources Corporation ("Artesian Resources") is a non-operating holding company, whose income is derived from the earnings of our four wholly-owned subsidiary companies and our one-third interest in AquaStructure, a Limited Liability Corporation whose primary activity is marketing wastewater services. Artesian Water Company, Inc. ("Artesian Water"), our principal subsidiary, is the oldest and largest public water utility in the State of Delaware and has been providing water service within the state since 1905. We distribute and sell water to residential, commercial, industrial, governmental, municipal and utility customers throughout Delaware. In addition, we provide services to other water utilities, including operations and billing functions. We also have contract operation agreements with thirteen private and municipal water providers. In 2002, approximately 99.1% of our net income applicable to common stock was attributable to Artesian Water's service to custo
mers, with the remaining 0.9% related to the other subsidiaries.
Upon recognition from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission as a regulated utility, our other water utility subsidiary, Artesian Water Pennsylvania, Inc., began operations in 2002, providing water service to a residential community, consisting of 41 homes, in Chester County. Our other subsidiaries, neither of which is regulated, are Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc., which provides wastewater services in Delaware, and Artesian Development Corporation, whose sole activity has been ownership of an eleven-acre parcel of land.
Strategic Direction
Our profitability is primarily attributable to the sale of water by Artesian Water, the amount of which is dependent on seasonal fluctuations in weather, particularly during the summer months when water demand may vary with rainfall and temperature.
While customer growth in our utility subsidiary will continue to be a major focus in 2003, we are aggressively seeking opportunities that produce revenue streams that are unrelated to weather. These opportunities include our wastewater management subsidiary's operation of a new spray irrigation wastewater treatment facility with a capacity of 2.5 million-gallons-per-day for the town of Middletown, Delaware, which began in the third quarter of 2002. In addition, we will continue to focus attention on expanding our contract operations opportunities with municipalities and private water providers in Delaware and surrounding areas.
Ensuring our customers have a dependable supply of safe, high-quality water has been, and will continue to be, a high priority. We expect to make investments in 2003 that will increase our sources of water and enhance our ability to deliver supply from our Aquifer Storage and Recovery Program. We are the first and only water utility in Delaware to utilize this technology that capitalizes on Delaware's unique geology to provide storage capacity for water to be used during periods of peak water demand.
Regulatory Matters and Inflation
As of December 31, 2002, we had approximately 68,000 metered customers and serviced a population of approximately 226,000, representing approximately 27% of Delaware's total population. The Delaware Public Service Commission ("PSC") regulates Artesian Water's rates charged for water service, the sale and issuance of our securities and other matters. We periodically seek rate increases to cover the cost of increased operating expenses, increased financing expenses due to additional investments in utility plant and other costs of doing business. In Delaware, utilities are permitted to place rates into effect on a temporary basis pending completion of a rate increase proceeding. Increases in the number of customers served by Artesian Water also contribute to increases in our operating revenues.
We are affected by inflation, most notably by the continually increasing costs required to maintain, improve and expand our service capability. The cumulative effect of inflation results in significantly higher facility costs, compared to investments made 20 to 40 years ago, which must be recovered from future cash flows.
In 2001, Delaware passed a statute permitting water utilities to put into effect, on a semi-annual basis, increases related to specific types of distribution system improvements through a Distribution System Improvement Charge (DSIC). This charge is available to water utilities to be implemented between general rate increase application that normally recognize changes in a water utility's overall financial position. The DSIC process significantly reduces expenses when compared to those typically associated with general rate increase requests. We requested on November 30, 2001, and subsequently implemented, a 0.53% overall surcharge for bills rendered subsequent to January 1, 2002. The first effective date for the implementation of DSIC was January 1, 2002. Revenues generated by this charge totaled $66,000 in 2002.
We filed an application with the PSC on April 2, 2002, to increase rates for water service for all of Artesian Water's customers. A temporary rate increase, calculated to increase annualized revenues $2.5 million was approved by the PSC and placed into effect on June 1, 2002. As a result on June 1, 2002, when these temporary rates went into effect, by statute, the DSIC surcharge returned to zero for the remainder of 2002. Beginning December 3, 2002, as is permitted by law, the Company placed an additional temporary rate increase into effect to generate an additional $1.4 million of annualized revenues. If such rates are found to be in excess of rates the PSC finds to be appropriate, the utility must refund the portion found in excess to customers with interest. On March 18, 2003 the PSC approved an increase in rates for Artesian Water. Based on the decisions made during the Commission hearings, the Company has calculated the increase to be approximately $3.3 million; this calculat
ion has been reviewed by PSC staff. Pending review of the final order by the PSC, which has not been issued, the final amount and impact of the new rate on customer bills will be determined. Any revenues that have been deferred and are subsequently approved for recovery will be recorded as revenue in 2003.
Significant Accounting Policies
We record water service revenue, including amounts billed to customers on a cycle basis and unbilled amounts, based upon estimated usage from the date of the last meter reading to the end of the accounting period. These estimates are made on an individual customer basis, based on the previous year's consumption in the same period, and are adjusted to reflect current changes in water demand on a system-wide basis. While actual usage for individual customers may differ materially from the estimate, we believe the overall total estimate of consumption and revenue for the fiscal period will not differ materially from actual billed consumption, as the overall estimate has been adjusted to reflect any change in overall demand on the system for the period.
Our regulated water utility records deferred regulatory assets under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation," which are expenses that may be recovered over various lengths of time as prescribed by the PSC. As the utility incurs certain expenses, such as expenses related to rate case applications, a deferred regulatory asset is created. Adjustments to these deferred regulatory assets are made when the PSC determines whether the expense is recoverable in rates, the length of time over which an expense is recoverable, or, because of changes in circumstances, whether a remaining balance of deferred expense is no longer recoverable in rates charged to customers. Adjustments to reflect changes in recoverability of certain deferred regulatory assets may have a material effect on our financial results.
Results of Operations
2002 Compared to 2001
Operating Revenues
Revenues totaled $34.6 million in 2002 and were 8.2% above revenues in 2001 of $32.0 million, reflecting an increase in water sales of 7.3% due to customer growth and rate increases approved by the PSC in 2002. We realized 97.2% of our total revenue in 2002 from the sale of water.
We filed an application with the PSC on April 2, 2002, to increase rates for water service for all of Artesian Water's customers. A temporary rate increase, calculated to increase annualized revenues $2.5 million was approved by the PSC and placed into effect on June 1, 2002. Beginning December 3, 2002, as is permitted by law, the Company placed an additional rate increase into effect, to generate an additional increase in annualized revenues of $1.4 million. The increase in revenues for the various customer classes will not consistently match changes in consumption levels for the class primarily due to our use of a multiple rate block structure. This structure charges different rates for different levels of consumption. In addition, rate increases are distributed among the rate blocks and service charges through a cost of service analysis and may not reflect, on an individual class or charge basis, the overall increase in rates approved by the PSC.
Percentage of Revenues by Customer Class |
|||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|||
Residential |
59.57% |
60.28% |
59.64% |
Commercial |
23.83% |
24.80% |
25.67% |
Industrial |
1.31% |
1.25% |
0.75% |
Government and Other |
12.54% |
11.71% |
12.27% |
Other Utility operating revenues |
1.92% |
1.60% |
1.51% |
Non-Utility operating revenues |
0.83% |
0.36% |
0.16% |
|
|||
Total |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Residential
Residential water service revenues in 2002 amounted to $20.6 million, an increase of 6.9% over the $19.3 million recorded in 2001. The increase in 2002 follows an increase of 17.4% in 2001. The volume of water sold to residential customers, however, decreased by 5.0 % from 3,809 million gallons in 2001 to 3,627 million gallons in 2002, primarily as a result of drought water use restrictions. The number of residential customers served increased 2.8% in 2002.
Commercial
Revenues from commercial customers in 2002 increased by 3.9% to $8.2 million, from $7.9 million in 2001. The volume of water sold to commercial customers decreased by 9.1% from 2,384 million gallons in 2001 to 2,167 million gallons in 2002, primarily as a result of drought water use restrictions. The number of commercial customers served increased 1.2% in 2002
.Industrial
Revenues from industrial customers in 2002 increased by 13.1% to $453,000, from $400,000 in 2001. The volume of water sold to industrial customers increased 33.8% from 165 million gallons in 2001 to 221 million gallons in 2002 primarily as a result of the addition of one new customer.
Government and Other
Government and other revenues in 2002 increased by 15.8% to $4.3 million, from $3.7 million in 2001. Revenues derived from fire protection services totaled $2.3 million in 2002, exceeding 2001 revenue by 22.9%. The remaining revenue increase was derived from the sale of water to neighboring utilities, government agencies, pools and other temporary and seasonal customers.
Other Utility Operating Revenue
Other utility operating revenue, derived from contract operations, antenna leases on water tanks and finance charges increased 30.6% in 2002 to $666,000, from $509,000 in 2001. This is primarily a result of an increase in revenues for contract operation services.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation and taxes, increased approximately $715,000, or 4.1%, to $18.3 million in 2002. The increase in operating expenses resulted primarily from an increase in payroll and related expense of $731,000, or 8.2%, due to the addition of new employees and increases in annual merit compensation. Purchased water expenditure decreased $267,000 from 2001 levels due to Chester Water Authority removing minimum purchase requirements due to the drought conditions in the summer and fall of 2002 and our ability to rely on our less costly groundwater supply. Water treatment expense increased $68,000 primarily due to expanded testing of our sources of supply. Finally, our administrative expenses remained flat. This reflects the one-time $280,000 expense recognition in 2001 for legal costs associated with the suspended negotiations for the purchase of Tidewater Utilities, a subsidiary of Middlesex Water Company, offset by an increase in 2002 in consulting and temporary s
ervices of $323,000, which reflects the use of these services prior to filling positions with full-time employees. The ratio of operating expense, excluding depreciation and taxes, to total revenue was 53.0% for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to 55.1% for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Operating and Maintenance Expenses |
|||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
|
|||
Payroll and Associated expense |
52.47% |
50.46% |
49.88% |
Purchased Water |
13.55% |
15.62% |
16.57% |
Repair and Maintenance |
5.48% |
5.11% |
4.22% |
Water Treatment |
3.47% |
3.50% |
3.45% |
Administrative |
23.96% |
24.90% |
25.63% |
Non-utility Operating |
1.07% |
0.41% |
0.25% |
|
|||
Total operating and maintenance expenses |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $391,000, or 13.0%, due to increases in our utility plant in service. Income tax expense increased $641,000, or 29.3%, due to increased profitability in 2002. Our total effective income tax rate for 2002 and 2001 was 40.4% and 39.7%, respectively.
Interest Charges
Interest charges decreased $149,000, or 3.3%, primarily due to a $208,000 decrease in interest associated with our short-term debt. Average outstanding lines of credit during 2002 of $16.5 million increased by $2.3 million, compared to the average outstanding lines of credit during 2001 of $14.2 million. The average interest rate applied to these balances decreased from 4.8% in 2001 to 2.7% in 2002.
Net Income
For the year ended December 31, 2002, our net income applicable to common stock increased $855,000, or 26.1%, compared to in 2001. The increase in net income was primarily due to decreases in purchased water and legal expenses, lower interest rates on short-term lines of credit, continued customer growth, and rate increases authorized in 2001 and 2002.
2001 Compared to 2000
Operating Revenues
Revenues totaled $32.0 million in 2001 and were 16.1% above revenues in 2000 of $27.6 million, reflecting an increase in water sales of 15.8% due to customer growth and rate increases approved by the PSC in 2001. We realized 98.0% of our total revenue in 2001 from the sale of water.
We filed an application with the PSC on December 5, 2000, to increase rates for water service for all of Artesian Water's customers. A temporary rate increase calculated to increase annualized revenue by $2.5 million was approved by the PSC and placed into effect on February 3, 2001. We received final approval, in PSC Docket 00-647 on June 19, 2001, to increase rates up to a total annualized increase in revenues of $3.7 million, or $1.2 million more than permitted under temporary rates. The approval was the result of a stipulated settlement reached with the PSC Staff and Division of Public Advocate. The increase in revenues for the various customer classes will not consistently match changes in consumption levels for the class primarily due to our use of a multiple rate block structure. This structure charges different rates for different levels of consumption. In addition, rate increases are distributed among the rate blocks and service charges through a cost of service analysis and may not reflect,
on an individual class or charge basis, the overall increase in rates approved by the PSC.
Residential
Residential water service revenues in 2001 amounted to $19.3 million, an increase of 17.4% over the $16.4 million recorded in 2000. The increase in 2001 followed an increase of 1.4% in 2000. The volume of water sold to residential customers, however, decreased marginally from 3,817 million gallons in 2000 to 3,809 million gallons in 2001. The number of residential customers served increased 2.0% in 2001.
Commercial
Revenues from commercial customers in 2001 increased by 12.1% to $7.9 million, from $7.1 million in 2000. The volume of water sold to commercial customers increased by 16.9% from 2,039 million gallons in 2000 to 2,384 million gallons in 2001. The number of commercial customers served increased 1.1% in 2001.
Industrial
Revenues from industrial customers in 2001 increased by 93.9% to $400,000, from $207,000 in 2000. The volume of water sold to industrial customers increased 108.9% from 79 million gallons in 2000 to 165 million gallons in 2001, primarily as a result of the addition of one new customer.
Government and Other
Government and other revenues in 2001 increased by 10.9% to $3.7 million, from $3.4 million in 2000. Revenues derived from state, federal and local governmental agencies totaled $700,000 in 2001, exceeding 2000 revenue by 41.8%. The remaining revenue increase was derived from the sale of water to neighboring utilities, public fire protection service, pools and other temporary and seasonal customers.
Other Utility Operating Revenue
Other utility operating revenue, derived from contract operations, antenna leases on water tanks and finance charges increased 21.8% in 2001 to $509,000, from $418,000 in 2000. The increase is primarily a result of a 28.3% increase in revenues for antenna leases and the addition of contract operation agreements.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation and taxes, increased approximately $2.2 million, or 14.4%, to $17.6 million in 2001. The increase in operating expenses resulted primarily from an increase in payroll and related expense of $1.2 million, or 15.7%, due to the addition of new employees and increases in annual merit compensation. Purchased water expenditures increased $201,000 over 2000 levels despite continuing to maintain minimum purchase requirements primarily due to the recognition of a credit in 2000 for water sold back to a provider in 2000. Repair and maintenance expenses increased as a result of an increase of $244,000 for tank painting expense, which reflects the first year of a five-year tank painting and maintenance agreement, which we entered into in 2000. Water treatment expense increased $86,000 reflecting the increased amount of chemicals used as a result of an increase in water pumped and a $42,000 increase related to the expanded testing of our sources of supply. Finally, o
ur administrative expenses increased approximately $481,000, which primarily reflects the one-time $280,000 expense recognition for legal costs associated with the suspended negotiations for the purchase of Tidewater Utilities, a subsidiary of Middlesex Water Company. An additional $73,000 increase in our auditing and tax expense was recorded and reflects an increase in fees associated with the 2001 year end audit and additional fees related to our 2000 year end audit services. The remaining increase of $128,000 represents increases in a number of administrative expenses including bank fees, customer survey expense, regulatory commission expense and training expenses. The ratio of operating expense, excluding depreciation and taxes, to total revenue was 55.1% for the year ended December 31, 2001, compared to 55.9% for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $295,000, or 10.9%, due to increases in our utility plant in service. Income tax expense increased $565,000, or 34.9%, due to increased profitability in 2001. Our total effective income tax rate for 2000 and 2001 was 39.8% and 39.7%, respectively.
Interest Charges
Interest charges increased $482,000, or 11.9%, primarily due to an increase of $949,000 in interest related to long-term debt due to a full year recognition of interest on the Series O First Mortgage Bonds issued December 29, 2000, and the interest associated with the $4.3 million note issued by the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services on January 31, 2001. This increase is partially offset by a $353,000 decrease in interest associated with our short-term debt. The average outstanding lines of credit during 2001 of $14.2 million increased by $1.4 million, compared to the average outstanding lines of credit during 2000 of $12.8 million. However, the average interest rate applied to these balances decreased from 7.2% in 2000 to 4.8% in 2001. In addition, interest charges related to the early redemption of the Series K First Mortgage Bonds of $47,000 and $65,000 for refunds of revenues collected under bond which were in excess of the final rate increase award in 2000 were reflected in 200
0 for which no similar entry was recorded in 2001.
Net Income
For the year ended December 31, 2001, our net income applicable to common stock increased $880,000, or 36.8%, compared to the same period in 2000. The increase in net income was primarily due to rate increases authorized in 2000 and 2001, increases in consumption following a period of reduced consumption in 2000, a year with unusual frequency of summer rainfall, continued customer growth and lower interest rates on short-term lines of credit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our primary sources of liquidity for 2002 were $14.9 million in net proceeds from the issuance of Artesian Resources Class A Common Stock, $2.8 million provided by cash flow from operating activities and an increase of $2.5 million in contributions and advances. Cash flow from operating activities was primarily provided by our utility operations, and was impacted by the timeliness and adequacy of rate increases and reduced water usage as a result of the water restrictions and drought emergency in Delaware during 2002; this was offset by a change in receivable due to a pending refund related to the condemnation proceedings concerning our office building.
A significant part of our ability to maintain and meet our financial objectives is to assure our investments in utility plant are recovered in the rates charged to customers. As such, we file rate increase requests to recover increases in operating expenses and investments in utility plant, the timing of which is dependent upon the estimated cost of the administrative process in relation to the deficiency which is to be alleviated. We filed for a rate increase in April 2002, but we cannot predict whether the Public Service Commission will approve the requested increase, approve a smaller increase or deny any such request. We currently derive our water service revenues from water consumption, upon which base rates are applied, which were last increased as of December 3, 2002. This reflects a temporary increase of approximately 11.4%, which Artesian Water is permitted to collect by law, under bond, until the Public Service Commission makes a final rate determination. We expect a final decision on this
matter in the first six months of 2003.
We rely on our sources of liquidity for investments in our utility plant and to meet our various payment obligations. We expect that our aggregate investments in our utility plant and systems in 2003 will be approximately $19.7 million. Our total obligations related to dividend and sinking fund payments on preferred stock, interest and principal payments on indebtedness, rental payments and water service interconnection agreements for 2003 are anticipated to be approximately $8.7 million. We expect that our available cash balances, our projected cash generated from operations and available bank credit lines will be sufficient to fund our activities for the next two years.
Investment in Utility Plant and Systems
Capital expenditures decreased by approximately $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, or approximately 13.8%, from $21.3 million in 2001 to $18.4 million in 2002. Investment in utility plant, excluding advances and contributions in aid of construction received from real estate developers, decreased by $3.3 million, or 17.3%, from $19.2 million in 2001 to $15.9 million in 2002. Developers financed $2.3 million for the installation of water mains and hydrants serving their developments, compared to $2.1 million financed by developers in 2001.
We invested approximately $7.5 million in new transmission and distribution facilities, including refunds of advances for developer-financed infrastructure. We invested $5.4 million in new infrastructure to serve 1,837 new customers and $1.9 million in our rehabilitation program for transmission and distribution facilities, replacing aging or deteriorating mains.
Capital expenditures of $7.2 million were made to enhance or improve existing treatment facilities, rehabilitation of pumping equipment and installation of new wells to increase supply capabilities. We invested approximately $5.7 million for sources of supply to add new treatment processes and upgrade existing facilities and $1.5 million for new sources of supply throughout Delaware
The remaining $1.4 million of capital investment in 2002 was made for general plant, including fleet vehicles and computer equipment.
Investment in Utility Plant and Systems |
||||||
In thousands |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
|
||||||
Source of supply |
$ |
1,491 |
$ |
1,217 |
$ |
470 |
Treatment and pumping |
5,686 |
5,935 |
1,526 |
|||
Transmission and distribution |
7,451 |
10,657 |
10,476 |
|||
General plant and equipment |
1,429 |
1,428 |
177 |
|||
Developer financed utility plant |
2,345 |
2,108 |
1,717 |
|||
|
||||||
Total Investment in utility plant and systems |
$ |
18,402 |
$ |
21,345 |
$ |
14,366 |
We have planned to invest approximately $19.7 million in utility plant in 2003. Developers are expected to finance an additional $4.3 million in utility plant construction. The largest portion of projected investment is primarily a result of our efforts to identify, develop, treat and protect sources of water supply to assure uninterrupted service to our customers. We expect to invest approximately $7.4 million in new treatment facilities, equipment and wells throughout Delaware.
As part of our total utility plant investment, we expect to invest over $11.8 million in transmission and distribution facilities. We project approximately $5.2 million will be invested in the relocations of facilities as a result of government mandates and renewals associated with the rehabilitation of aging infrastructure. We will also invest approximately $6.6 million in new transmission and distribution facilities to improve our system hydraulics and address service needs in growth areas of our service territory.
Approximately $5.7 million of expected utility plant investment represents expenditures for our general plant and equipment, such as fleet vehicles, computer equipment and tools. Of this expected investment, $3.8 million represents the purchase of Artesian Water's office and shop complex. Artesian Water, in December 2002, filed a condemnation action in the Delaware Superior Court, seeking to acquire title to the office and shop complex currently leased by Artesian, known as 664 Churchmans Road, Newark, Delaware (the "Property"). Artesian Water filed this action under its statutory power of eminent domain against the owner of the Property, White Clay Realty, a Delaware Limited Partnership, and each of the limited partners. White Clay Realty has no general partner and the Superior Court has ruled that the partnership is dissolved and all of the former partners now own the Property jointly as tenants in common. Certain of the officers and directors of Artesian Resources are tenants in common or
the beneficiary of a tenant in common (Dian C. Taylor and John R. Eisenbrey, Jr.) A special committee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of outside directors who have no ownership interest in the Property, made the determination to purchase the Property through the condemnation procedures. Under this procedure, if the acquisition of the Property is approved by the court, the fair market value of the Property will be determined by a panel of commissioners after an evidentiary hearing. Artesian Water's independent appraiser has valued the Property to be worth $3,800,000. In December 2002, Artesian Water issued a payment to the Prothonotary for the State of Delaware for $3,800,000. Until a final determination of the condemnation, the parties have agreed that Artesian Water may continue to occupy the Property under the terms of the lease with a quarterly rental payment of $43,361. As the court has delayed payment until the matter is decided, the amount is to be refunded to Artesian and is recorde
d as a receivable at December 31, 2002.
Financing
We have several sources of liquidity to finance our investment in utility plant and other fixed assets. We estimate that the projected investment of approximately $19.7 million will be financed by our operations and external sources, including a combination of capital investment and short-term borrowings under our revolving credit agreements discussed below. Developers are expected to finance, through advances and contributions in aid of construction, an additional $4.3 million of capital expenditures, which includes the installation of mains and hydrants in new developments.
Our cash flows from operations are primarily derived from water sales revenues and may be materially affected by changes in water sales due to weather and the timing and extent of increases in rates approved by the Delaware Public Service Commission`.
At December 31, 2002, Artesian Water had lines of credit with three separate financial institutions totaling $35.0 million to meet its temporary cash requirements. These revolving credit facilities are unsecured. As of December 31, 2002, we had $17.2 million of available funds under these lines. The interest rate for borrowings under each of these lines is the London Interbank Offering Rate plus 1.0% or the banks' federal funds rate plus 1.0%, at our discretion. All the facilities are reviewed annually by each bank for renewal.
We may, from time to time, sell our securities to meet capital requirements. The amount and timing of future sales of our securities will depend upon market conditions and our specific needs. Our trust indentures, which set certain criteria for the issuance of new long-term debt, limit long-term debt, including the short-term portion thereof, to 66 2/3% of total capitalization. Our debt to total capitalization, including the short-term portion thereof, was 48.93% at December 31, 2002.
In order to meet the expected level of investment in utility plant and retain future financing flexibility, we issued a $25 million Series P 6.58% First Mortgage Bond on January 31, 2003. With the proceeds we refinanced our Series L 8.03% First Mortgage Bond, which was due on February 1, 2003, along with $14.9 million of outstanding short-term debt under our lines of credit. Our debt to total capitalization, including the short-term portion thereof, was approximately 55.58% after this issuance.
On February 25, 2003, Artesian Water Company, Inc. (the "Company") entered into an agreement to borrow funds from the Delaware Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (the "Fund"). The Company previously received a binding commitment offer from the Fund for a loan in the amount of $2,900,285 for a term of twenty years at an interest rate of 3.57%. The loan will be used for costs associated with the installation of new public water systems for Keenwick West/Keenwick South and Route 54, Phase II projects in Sussex County, Delaware. The funds will be disbursed as construction is completed.
The 7% Preferred Stock was called on February 21, 2003. The total amount paid to shareholders was $30.00 per share or $326,040.
Contractual Obligations |
||||||||||||
Payments Due by Period |
||||||||||||
In thousands |
Less than |
1-3 |
4-5 |
After 5 |
|
|||||||
Long-term debt |
$ |
10,000 |
$ |
---- |
$ |
15,000 |
$ |
20,000 |
$ |
45,000 |
||
State revolving fund loan |
143 |
306 |
334 |
3,387 |
4,170 |
|||||||
Operating leases |
72 |
150 |
13 |
------ |
235 |
|||||||
Unconditional purchase |
2,970 |
5,958 |
5,642 |
37,424 |
51,994 |
|||||||
Other long-term obligations |
527 |
498 |
---- |
---- |
1,025 |
|||||||
Called 7% Preferred Stock |
326 |
---- |
---- |
---- |
326 |
|||||||
Total contractual cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
===== |
==== |
===== |
===== |
====== |
Long-term debt obligations reflect the maturities of certain series of our first mortgage bonds, which we intend to refinance when due. The state revolving fund loan obligation has an amortizing mortgage payment, payable over a 20-year period, and will be refinanced as future securities are issued. Both the long-term debt and the state revolving fund loan have certain provisions, which could result in default and subsequently require the obligation to be repaid, however, there are also specific cure provisions which allow us to avoid default of the obligation. We have not experienced conditions which would result in our default under these agreements, and we do not anticipate any such occurrence. Payments for unconditional purchase obligations reflect minimum water purchase obligations under our interconnection agreements with neighboring utilities.
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure." Statement No. 148 amends Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," by providing alternate methods of transitioning to fair value based accounting for Stock-Based compensation, for those who choose to change. It also amends disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 for both annual and interim financial statements. Certain of the disclosure modifications are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002, and are included in the notes to these consolidated financial statements.
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This statement nullifies EITF 94-3, which addressed this subject. The statement requires recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity when the liability is incurred. Our adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operation.
In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections." Statement No. 145 eliminates accounting treatment described in Statements 4 and 64 related to Extinguishment of Debt and amends Statement 13 regarding the use of sale - lease back accounting. Our adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operation.
In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." Statement No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. Statement No. 143 requires recognition of a liability at fair value and an increase to the carrying value of the related asset for any retirement obligation. This amount would then be amortized over the life of the asset. The liability would be adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in the estimated future cash flows. This statement is effective January 2003. Our adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others," an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. This Interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. The Interpretation also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of the Interpretation are applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002 and are not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim and annual periods ending after December 31, 2002.
Cautionary Statement
Statements in this Annual Report which express our "belief," "anticipation," "projection" or "expectation," as well as other statements which are not historical fact, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These may include statements regarding our goals, priorities and growth and expansion plans, the timing and the amount of a final decision in our pending rate case, our investment in utility plant and systems in 2003, and our sources of financing. Also included is our anticipated payments due in 2003 and satisfaction of our debt covenants. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, including material changes in demand from larger customers, changes in weather, availability of labor, changes in government policies, levels of rate relief granted and changes in economic conditions and the other risks set forth
in our Registration Statement on Form S-2, Registration number 333-87864, under the caption "Risk Factors." All of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report are based on our current beliefs and we undertake no obligation to update any of these cautionary statements.
Item 8. - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
||||
December 31, |
||||
In thousands |
2002 |
2001 |
||
ASSETS |
||||
Utility plant, at original cost less accumulated depreciation |
$ |
167,338 |
$ |
152,356 |
Current assets |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
874 |
1,053 |
||
Accounts receivable, net |
2,743 |
2,610 |
||
Receivable, other |
3,800 |
---- |
||
Unbilled operating revenues |
2,718 |
2,159 |
||
Materials and supplies-at cost on FIFO basis |
712 |
616 |
||
Prepaid property taxes |
651 |
589 |
||
Prepaid expenses and other |
422 |
448 |
||
11,920 |
7,475 |
|||
Other assets |
||||
Non-utility property (less accumulated depreciation 2002-$76; 2001-$82) |
308 |
297 |
||
Other deferred assets |
1,069 |
1,178 |
||
1,377 |
1,475 |
|||
Regulatory assets, net |
2,437 |
2,228 |
||
$ |
183,072 |
$ |
163,534 |
|
====== |
====== |
|||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
||||
Stockholders' equity |
||||
Common stock |
$ |
2,575 |
$ |
2,040 |
Additional paid-in-capital |
40,341 |
25,107 |
||
Retained earnings |
8,260 |
7,026 |
||
Preferred stock |
---- |
272 |
||
Total stockholders' equity |
51,176 |
34,445 |
||
Preferred stock-mandatory redeemable, net of current portion |
100 |
200 |
||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
63,970 |
49,370 |
||
115,246 |
84,015 |
|||
Current liabilities |
||||
Notes payable |
3,163 |
16,118 |
||
Current portion of long-term debt |
421 |
1,328 |
||
Current portion of mandatory redeemable preferred stock |
100 |
100 |
||
Accounts payable |
3,119 |
4,745 |
||
Overdraft payable |
709 |
983 |
||
Income taxes payable |
135 |
38 |
||
Deferred income taxes |
---- |
229 |
||
Interest accrued |
569 |
555 |
||
Customer deposits |
410 |
414 |
||
Other |
905 |
988 |
||
9,531 |
25,498 |
|||
Deferred credits and other liabilities |
||||
Net advances for construction |
19,457 |
18,754 |
||
Postretirement benefit obligation |
1,298 |
1,360 |
||
Deferred investment tax credits |
873 |
904 |
||
Deferred income taxes |
8,024 |
5,660 |
||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
||||
29,652 |
26,678 |
|||
Net contributions in aid of construction |
28,643 |
27,343 |
||
$ |
183,072 |
$ |
163,534 |
|
====== |
====== |
|||
The notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements . |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
||||||
|
||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
In thousands, except per share amounts |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
Operating revenues |
||||||
Water sales |
$ |
33,644 |
$ |
31,362 |
$ |
27,090 |
Other utility operating revenue |
666 |
509 |
418 |
|||
Non-utility operating revenue (Note 7) |
287 |
116 |
43 |
|||
34,597 |
31,987 |
27,551 |
||||
Operating expenses |
||||||
Utility operating expenses |
17,963 |
17,368 |
15,181 |
|||
Non-utility operating expenses (Note 7) |
196 |
73 |
39 |
|||
Related party expenses (Note 8) |
175 |
178 |
179 |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,392 |
3,001 |
2,706 |
|||
Taxes |
||||||
State and federal income |
||||||
Currently payable (Note 3) |
693 |
470 |
223 |
|||
Deferred (Note 3) |
2,132 |
1,714 |
1,396 |
|||
Property and other |
1,871 |
1,782 |
1,616 |
|||
26,422 |
24,586 |
21,340 |
||||
Operating income |
8,175 |
7,401 |
6,211 |
|||
Other income net |
||||||
Allowance for funds used during construction |
380 |
375 |
253 |
|||
Miscellaneous |
---- |
82 |
42 |
|||
380 |
457 |
295 |
||||
Income before interest charges |
8,555 |
7,858 |
6,506 |
|||
Interest charges |
4,388 |
4,537 |
4,055 |
|||
Net income |
4,167 |
3,321 |
2,451 |
|||
Dividends on preferred stock |
42 |
51 |
61 |
|||
Net income applicable to common stock |
$ |
4,125 |
$ |
3,270 |
$ |
2,390 |
Income per common share: |
||||||
Basic |
$ |
1.75 |
$ |
1.61 |
$ |
1.19 |
Diluted |
$ |
1.71 |
$ |
1.58 |
$ |
1.17 |
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||
Basic |
2,356 |
2,026 |
2,007 |
|||
Diluted |
2,408 |
2,072 |
2,044 |
|||
Cash dividends per share of common stock |
$ |
1.16 |
$ |
1.11 |
$ |
1.095 |
The notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
||||||
For the Year Ended December 31 , |
||||||
(In thousands) |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||
Net income |
$ |
4,167 |
$ |
3,321 |
$ |
2,451 |
Adjustments to reconcile net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,238 |
2,848 |
2,537 |
|||
Deferred income taxes, net |
2,104 |
1,628 |
1,425 |
|||
Allowance for funds used during construction |
(380) |
(375) |
(253) |
|||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(133) |
(643) |
368 |
|||
Receivable, other |
(3,800) |
---- |
---- |
|||
Unbilled operating revenues |
(559) |
(57) |
(95) |
|||
Materials and supplies |
(96) |
114 |
(20) |
|||
Prepaid property taxes |
(62) |
2 |
(43) |
|||
Prepaid expenses and other |
26 |
172 |
(314) |
|||
Other deferred assets |
124 |
157 |
(214) |
|||
Regulatory assets |
(209) |
136 |
244 |
|||
Accounts payable |
(1,626) |
1,577 |
(790) |
|||
State and federal income taxes |
97 |
38 |
(665) |
|||
Interest accrued |
14 |
25 |
(125) |
|||
Customer deposits and other, net |
(89) |
45 |
(472) |
|||
Postretirement benefit obligation |
(62) |
(95) |
(83) |
|||
|
||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
2,754 |
8,893 |
3,951 |
|||
|
||||||
Cash flows used in investing activities |
||||||
Capital expenditures (net of AFUDC) |
(18,402) |
(21,345) |
(14,366) |
|||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
13 |
11 |
24 |
|||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
(15) |
--- |
(29) |
|||
|
||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(18,404) |
(21,334) |
(14,371) |
|||
|
||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||
Net (repayments) borrowings under line of credit agreements |
1,716 |
9,811 |
(1,310) |
|||
Overdraft payable |
(274) |
(241) |
643 |
|||
Net advances and contributions in aid of construction |
2,542 |
2,169 |
1,569 |
|||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
--- |
4,307 |
20,000 |
|||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
15,560 |
590 |
280 |
|||
Dividends |
(2,724) |
(2,296) |
(2,257) |
|||
Principal payments under capital lease obligations |
--- |
(26) |
(23) |
|||
Principal payments under long-term debt obligations |
(1,249) |
(1,112) |
(8,112) |
|||
Redemption of preferred stock |
(100) |
(100) |
(100) |
|||
|
||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
15,471 |
13,102 |
10,690 |
|||
|
||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(179) |
661 |
270 |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
1,053 |
392 |
122 |
|||
|
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ |
874 |
$ |
1,053 |
$ |
392 |
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|||||
Interest paid |
$ |
4,312 |
$ |
4,426 |
$ |
4,045 |
Income taxes paid |
$ |
440 |
$ |
432 |
$ |
750 |
The notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||
In thousands, except share amounts |
|||
Common Shares |
|||
Preferred Shares |
Outstanding |
Common Shares |
|
Outstanding 7% |
Class A |
Outstanding |
|
Prior Preferred |
Non-Voting |
Class B |
|
Balance as of December 31, 1999 |
10,868 |
1,606,195 |
391,824 |
Net income |
|||
Cash dividends declared |
|||
Common stock |
|||
Preferred stock |
|||
Stock repurchase |
|||
Issuance of common stock |
|||
Officer bonus |
2,100 |
||
Dividend reinvestment plan |
9,727 |
|
|
Employee stock options |
3,500 |
||
Employee Retirement Plan (4) |
(188) |
||
Balance as of December 31, 2000 |
10,868 |
1,621,334 |
391,824 |
Net income |
|||
Cash dividends declared |
|||
Common stock |
|||
Preferred stock |
|||
Stock repurchase (5) |
|||
Issuance of common stock |
|||
Officer bonus |
6,000 |
||
Dividend reinvestment plan |
9,906 |
||
Employee stock options |
5,462 |
||
Employee Retirement Plan (4) |
5,452 |
||
Balance as of December 31, 2001 |
10,868 |
1,648,154 |
391,824 |
Net income |
|||
Cash dividends declared |
|||
Common stock |
|||
Preferred stock |
|||
Stock repurchase (5) |
(10,868) |
||
Issuance of common stock |
|||
Public stock issuance(3) |
500,000 |
||
Officer bonus |
3,600 |
||
Dividend reinvestment plan |
10,773 |
||
Employee stock options |
18,530 |
||
Employee Retirement Plan (4) |
1,453 |
||
Balance as of December 31, 2002 |
0 |
2,182,510 |
391,824 |
(1) |
At December 31, 2002, Class A Non-Voting Common Stock had 15,000,000 authorized. At December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, Class A Non-Voting Common Stock had 3,500,000 shares authorized. |
(2) |
At December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, Class B Common Stock had 1,040,000 shares authorized. |
(3) |
Artesian Resources Corporation issued 500,000 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock on |
(4) |
Artesian Resources registered 200,000 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock available |
(5) |
Includes redemption of 7% prior preferred shares which will be redeemed as of February 21, 2003. |
The notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||
$25 Par Value |
|||
Preferred |
$1 Par Value |
||
7% Prior |
Class A |
$1 Par Value |
|
In thousands, except share amounts |
Preferred |
Non-Voting (1) |
Class B (2) |
Balance as of December 31, 1999 |
$ 272 |
$ 1,606 |
$ 392 |
Net income |
|||
Cash dividends declared |
|||
Common stock |
|||
Preferred stock |
|||
Stock repurchase |
|||
Issuance of common stock |
|||
Officer bonus |
2 |
||
Dividend reinvestment plan |
10 |
||
Employee stock options |
3 |
||
Employee Retirement Plan (4) |
|||
Balance as of December 31, 2000 |
$ 272 |
$ 1,621 |
$ 392 |
Net income |
|||
Cash dividends declared |
|||
Common stock |
|||
Preferred stock |
|||
Stock repurchase |
|||
Issuance of common stock |
|||
Officer bonus |
6 |
||
Dividend reinvestment plan |
10 |
||
Employee stock options |
6 |
||
Employee Retirement Plan (4) |
|
5 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2001 |
$ 272 |
$ 1,648 |
$ 392 |
Net income |
|||
Cash dividends declared |
|||
Common stock |
|||
Preferred stock |
|||
Stock repurchase |
(272) |
||
Issuance of common stock |
500 |
||
Officer bonus |
4 |
||
Dividend reinvestment plan |
11 |
||
Employee stock options |
19 |
||
Employee Retirement Plan (4) |
1 |
||
Balance as of December 31, 2002 |
$ 0 |
$ 2,183 |
$ 392 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||
Additional |
|||
Paid-in |
Retained |
||
In thousands, except share amounts |
Capital |
Earnings |
Total |
Balance as of December 31, 1999 |
$ 24,153 |
$ 5,933 |
$ 32,356 |
Net income |
2,451 |
2,451 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|||
Common stock |
(2,196) |
(2,196) |
|
Preferred stock |
(61) |
(61) |
|
Stock repurchase |
(57) |
(57) |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|||
Officer bonus |
45 |
47 |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
223 |
233 |
|
Employee stock options |
66 |
69 |
|
Employee Retirement Plan (4) |
(13) |
(13) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2000 |
$ 24,474 |
$ 6,070 |
$ 32,829 |
Net income |
3,321 |
3,321 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
(2,245) |
||
Common stock |
(2,245) |
(51) |
|
Preferred stock |
(51) |
(69) |
|
Stock repurchase |
(69) |
||
Issuance of common stock |
|||
Officer bonus |
151 |
157 |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
249 |
259 |
|
Employee stock options |
97 |
103 |
|
Employee Retirement Plan (4) |
136 |
141 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2001 |
$ 25,107 |
$ 7,026 |
$ 34,445 |
Net income |
4,167 |
4,167 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|||
Common stock |
(2,683) |
(2,683) |
|
Preferred stock |
(41) |
(41) |
|
Stock repurchase |
(209) |
(481) |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|||
Public Stock Purchase |
14,408 |
14,908 |
|
Officer bonus |
108 |
112 |
|
Dividend reinvestment plan |
309 |
320 |
|
Employee stock options |
370 |
389 |
|
Employee Retirement Plan (4) |
39 |
40 |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2002 |
$40,341 |
$ 8,260 |
$51,176 |
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Artesian Resources Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries ("Artesian Resources" or the "Company"), including its principal operating company, Artesian Water Company, Inc. ("Artesian Water"). Appropriate elimination's have been made for all material inter-company transactions and account balances.
Utility Subsidiary Accounting
The accounting records of Artesian Water and Artesian Water Pennsylvania, Inc. are maintained in accordance with the uniform system of accounts as prescribed by the Delaware Public Service Commission ("PSC") and the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ("PAPUC"), respectively. Artesian Water follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation," which provides guidance for companies in regulated industries.
Utility Plant and Capitalized Leases
All additions to plant are recorded at cost. Cost includes direct labor, materials, and indirect charges for such items as transportation, supervision, pension, and other fringe benefits related to employees engaged in construction activities. When depreciable units of utility plant are retired, the cost of retired property, together with any cost associated with retirement and less any salvage value or proceeds received, is charged to accumulated depreciation. Maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of plant are charged to expense as incurred.
In accordance with a rate order issued by the PSC, Artesian Water accrues an Allowance for Funds Used During Construction ("AFUDC"). AFUDC, which represents the cost of funds devoted to construction projects through the date the project is placed in service, is capitalized as part of construction work in progress. The rate used for the AFUDC calculation is based on Artesian Water's weighted average cost of debt and the rate of return on equity authorized by the PSC. The rate used to capitalize AFUDC in 2002, 2001 and 2000 was 8.3%, 8.5%, and 9.3%, respectively.
Utility plant comprises : |
|||||||||
Estimated |
|||||||||
Useful |
December 31, |
||||||||
Life |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
In thousands |
In Years |
||||||||
Utility plant at original cost |
|||||||||
Utility plant in service |
|||||||||
Intangible plant |
--- |
$ 123 |
$ 103 |
||||||
Source of supply plant |
45-85 |
12,015 |
10,049 |
||||||
Pumping and water treatment plant |
35-62 |
27,187 |
21,459 |
||||||
Transmission and distribution plant |
|||||||||
Mains |
81 |
99,781 |
90,785 |
||||||
Services |
39 |
17,844 |
16,269 |
||||||
Storage tanks |
79 |
11,950 |
10,276 |
||||||
Meters |
26 |
8,347 |
8,065 |
||||||
Hydrants |
60 |
5,364 |
4,941 |
||||||
General plant |
5-31 |
14,637 |
13,505 |
||||||
Property held for future use |
--- |
2,400 |
3,132 |
||||||
Construction work in progress |
--- |
2,004 |
5,291 |
||||||
201,652 |
183,875 |
||||||||
Less - accumulated depreciation |
34,314 |
31,519 |
|||||||
$167,338 |
$152,356 |
Depreciation and Amortization
For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is provided using the straight-line method at rates based on estimated economic useful lives, which range from 5 to 85 years. Composite depreciation rates for utility plant were 2.19%, 2.15% and 2.14%, for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. In a rate order issued by the PSC, the Company was directed effective January 1, 1998 to begin using revised depreciation rates for utility plant. In rate orders issued by the PSC, Artesian Water was directed effective May 28, 1991 and August 25, 1992 to offset depreciation on utility property funded by Contributions in Aid of Construction ("CIAC") and Advances for Construction ("Advances"), respectively, against CIAC and Advances. Other deferred assets are amortized using the straight-line method over applicable lives, which range from 2 to 20 years.
Regulatory Assets
Certain expenses are recoverable through rates, without a return on investment, and are deferred and amortized during future periods using various methods as permitted by the PSC. Expenses related to rate proceedings are amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of 2 years. The postretirement benefit obligation, which is being amortized over 20 years, is adjusted for the difference between the net periodic postretirement benefit costs and the cash payments. The deferred income taxes will be amortized over future years as the tax effects of temporary differences previously flowed through to the customers reverse.
Regulatory assets at December 31, net of amortization, comprise:
2002 |
2001 |
|||
In thousands |
||||
Postretirement benefit obligation |
$ |
1,298 |
$ |
1,360 |
Deferred income taxes recoverable in future rates |
642 |
657 |
||
Expense of rate proceedings |
497 |
211 |
||
$ |
2,437 |
$ |
2,228 |
Other Deferred Assets
Certain expenses are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method over various time periods ranging from 2 to 25 years. In 1992, Artesian Water entered a 10-year agreement for a water service interconnection with the Chester (Pennsylvania) Water Authority ("Chester"). The interconnection was placed in service during October 1992 at a total cost of $1.5 million and was amortized over a 10-year period as approved by the PSC.
Other deferred assets at December 31, net of amortization, comprise:
2002 |
2001 |
|||
In thousands |
||||
Chester interconnection |
$ |
--- |
$ |
149 |
Debt issuance expense |
501 |
560 |
||
Other |
568 |
469 |
||
$ |
1,069 |
$ |
1,178 |
Advances for Construction
Water mains, services and hydrants, or cash advances to reimburse Artesian Water its costs to construct water mains, services and hydrants, are contributed to Artesian Water by customers, real estate developers and builders in order to extend water service to their properties. The value of these contributions is recorded as Advances for Construction. Artesian Water makes refunds on these advances over a specific period of time based on operating revenues generated by the specific plant or as new customers are connected to the mains. After all refunds are made, any remaining balance is transferred to CIAC.
Contributions in Aid of Construction
CIAC includes the non-refundable portion of advances for construction and direct contributions of water mains, services and hydrants, or cash to reimburse Artesian Water its costs to construct water mains, services and hydrants by customers, real estate developers and builders in order to extend water service to their properties.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are provided in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" on all differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they are carried in the financial statements based on the enacted tax rates to be in effect when such temporary differences are expected to reverse.
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 mandated that Advances and CIAC received subsequent to December 31, 1986, generally are taxable income to Artesian Water. For Advances, Artesian Water was directed by the PSC to pay the related taxes and collect amounts equal to the taxes paid from the developer. For CIAC, Artesian Water was directed to pay the taxes instead of the developer contributing the taxes. The 1996 Tax Act provided an exclusion from taxable income for CIAC and Advances received after June 12, 1996 by Artesian Water that are not included in the rate base for rate-making purposes.
Investment tax credits were deferred through 1986 and are recognized as a reduction of deferred income tax expense over the estimated economic useful lives of the related assets.
Stock Compensation Plans
At December 31, 2002, the Company had two stock-based compensation plans, which are described in Note 9. The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for compensation expense under its plans. Accordingly, the aggregate compensation cost that has been charged against income for the two plans was $99,000, $38,000 and $41,000 for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Had compensation cost for the Company's two plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation," the Company's net income and net income per common share would have been reduced to the pro-forma amounts indicated below:
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
In thousands, except per share data |
||||||
Net income applicable to common stock |
||||||
As reported |
$ |
4,125 |
$ |
3,270 |
$ |
2,390 |
Add: compensation expense included in net income (net of tax) |
|
23 |
|
|||
Deduct: compensation expense using fair value based method (net of tax) |
(161) |
(153) |
(116) |
|||
Pro-forma |
$ |
4,023 |
$ |
3,140 |
$ |
2,299 |
Basic net income per common share |
||||||
As reported |
$ |
1.75 |
$ |
1.61 |
$ |
1.19 |
Pro-forma |
$ |
1.71 |
$ |
1.55 |
$ |
1.15 |
Diluted net income per common share |
||||||
As reported |
$ |
1.71 |
$ |
1.58 |
$ |
1.17 |
Pro-forma |
$ |
1.67 |
$ |
1.52 |
$ |
1.12 |
Revenue Recognition and Unbilled Revenues
Water service revenue for financial statement purposes includes amounts billed to customers on a cycle basis and unbilled amounts based upon estimated usage from the date of the last meter reading to the end of the accounting period.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, Artesian Resources considers all temporary cash investments with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Artesian Water utilizes its bank's controlled disbursement service to reduce the use of its line of credit by funding checks as they are presented to the bank for payment rather than at issuance. If the checks currently outstanding, but not yet funded, exceed the cash balance on Artesian Water's books, the net liability is recorded as a current liability on the balance sheet in the Overdraft Payable account.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make estimates concerning unbilled revenues and regulatory asset recovery that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from management's estimate.
NOTE 2
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value.
Current Assets and Liabilities
For those current assets and liabilities that are considered financial instruments, the carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.
Long-term Financial Liabilities
The fair value of Artesian Resources' long-term debt and mandatorily redeemable preferred stock as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, determined by discounting their future cash flows using current market interest rates on similar instruments with comparable maturities, are approximately as shown below:.
Fair value of financial instruments at December 31, |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||
Carrying |
Estimated |
Carrying |
Estimated |
||||||||
In thousands |
|||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ |
63,970 |
$ |
67,762 |
$ |
49,370 |
$ |
50,685 |
|||
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock |
$ |
100 |
$ |
92 |
$ |
200 |
$ |
184 |
The fair value of Advances cannot be reasonably estimated due to the inability to accurately estimate future refunds expected to be paid over the life of the contracts. Refund payments are based on the water sales to new customers in the particular development constructed. Future refunds expected to be paid would have to be estimated on a per contract basis using the past history of refund payments. The fair value of Advances would be less than the carrying amount because these financial instruments are non-interest bearing.
NOTE 3
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes reflect temporary differences between the valuation of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting.
At December 31, 2002, for state income tax purposes, Artesian Resources had recorded a deferred tax asset of $669,000 related to separate company net operating loss carry forwards aggregating approximately $8,639,000. These net operating loss carry forwards will expire if unused between 2003 and 2022. Artesian Resources has recorded a valuation allowance to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized due to the expiration of the state net operating loss carry forwards. The valuation allowance decreased from $590,000 in 2001 to $506,000 in 2002 mainly due to the expiration of these loss carry forwards.
At December 31, 2002, for federal income tax purposes, there were minimum tax credit carry forwards aggregating approximately $3,113,000 resulting from the payment of alternative minimum tax in current and prior years. These minimum tax credit carry forwards may be carried forward indefinitely to offset future regular federal income taxes. Artesian Resources has not recorded a valuation allowance for these federal tax carry forwards, because the Company believes it is more likely than not those benefits will be realized.
Components of Income Tax Expense |
||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
In thousands |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||
State income taxes |
||||||
Current |
$ |
1 |
$ |
(62) |
$ |
51 |
Deferred - current |
||||||
Property taxes |
5 |
--- |
4 |
|||
Allowance for bad debts |
(2) |
--- |
--- |
|||
Deferred - non-current |
||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
597 |
754 |
267 |
|||
Rate case expenses |
25 |
--- |
(13) |
|||
State net operating loss |
106 |
(185) |
--- |
|||
Tax credit carry forwards |
---- |
--- |
(1) |
|||
Valuation allowance |
(84) |
(95) |
--- |
|||
Other |
(18) |
(47) |
63 |
|||
Total state income tax expense |
$ |
630 |
$ |
365 |
$ |
371 |
|
|
=== |
|
=== |
|
=== |
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
Federal income taxes |
$ |
692 |
$ |
532 |
$ |
172 |
Current |
||||||
Deferred - current |
||||||
Property taxes |
19 |
---- |
14 |
|||
Allowance for bad debts |
(8) |
---- |
(1) |
|||
Deferred - non-current |
||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
2,130 |
2,690 |
952 |
|||
Rate case expenses |
89 |
(13) |
(45) |
|||
Federal tax credit carry forwards |
--- |
--- |
4 |
|||
Amortization of investment tax credits |
(30) |
(31) |
--- |
|||
Alternative minimum tax |
(649) |
(1,556) |
(83) |
|||
Amortization of regulatory asset for deferred taxes |
10 |
10 |
(15) |
|||
Other |
(58) |
187 |
250 |
|||
Total federal income tax expense |
$ |
2,195 |
$ |
1,819 |
$ |
1,248 |
===== |
====== |
===== |
Reconciliation of effective tax rate: |
||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||
In thousands |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
Amount |
% |
Amount |
% |
Amount |
% |
|||||
Reconciliation of effective tax rate |
||||||||||
Income before federal and state |
||||||||||
income taxes |
$ |
6,992 |
100.0 |
$ |
5,505 |
100.0 |
$ |
4,056 |
100.0 |
|
Amount computed at statutory rate |
2,377 |
34.0 |
1,872 |
34.0 |
1,379 |
34.0 |
||||
Reconciling items |
||||||||||
State income tax-net of federal tax |
||||||||||
benefit |
411 |
5.9 |
241 |
4.4 |
247 |
6.0 |
||||
Other |
37 |
0.5 |
71 |
1.3 |
(7) |
(0.2) |
||||
Total income tax expense and effective rate |
$ |
2,825 |
40.4 |
$ |
2,184 |
39.7 |
$ |
1,619 |
39.8 |
|
===== |
=== |
==== |
=== |
===== |
==== |
Deferred income taxes at December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 were comprised of the following:
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||
In thousands |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
Deferred tax assets related to: |
|||||||
Federal alternative minimum tax credit carry forwards |
$ |
3,113 |
$ |
2,464 |
$ |
908 |
|
Federal and state operating loss carry forwards |
669 |
775 |
685 |
||||
Bad debt allowance |
47 |
38 |
35 |
||||
Valuation allowance |
(506) |
(590) |
(685) |
||||
Stock Options |
117 |
82 |
74 |
||||
Total deferred tax assets |
$ |
3,440 |
$ |
2,769 |
$ |
1,017 |
|
===== |
===== |
===== |
|||||
Deferred tax liabilities related to: |
|||||||
Property plant and equipment basis differences |
(10,754) |
(7,993) |
(4,808) |
||||
Expenses of rate proceedings |
(197) |
(84) |
(97) |
||||
Property taxes |
(259) |
(234) |
(235) |
||||
Other |
(254) |
(286) |
(14) |
||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(11,464) |
(8,597) |
(5,154) |
||||
Net deferred tax liability |
$ |
(8,024) |
$ |
(5,828) |
$ |
(4,137) |
|
====== |
===== |
===== |
|||||
Deferred taxes, which are classified into a net current and non-current balance, are presented in the balance sheet as follows: |
|||||||
Deferred tax assets related to: |
|||||||
Current deferred tax (liability) asset |
$ |
--- |
$ |
(229) |
$ |
94 |
|
Non-current deferred tax liability |
(8,024) |
(5,660) |
(4,231) |
||||
Deferred tax asset in other assets |
--- |
61 |
--- |
||||
Net deferred tax liability |
$ |
(8,024) |
$ |
(5,828) |
$ |
(4,137) |
|
===== |
===== |
===== |
NOTE 4
PREFERRED STOCK
Artesian Resources has two classes of preferred stock outstanding. The 7% Prior Preferred stock (on which dividends are cumulative) is redeemable at Artesian Resources' option at $30.00 per share plus accrued dividends. On January 17, 2003, Artesian Resources issued a notice of redemption to all 7% Prior Preferred stockholders, setting February 21, 2003 as the date of record for the redemption. As such, the Company has reclassified $271,700 from Preferred Stock to Notes Payable on the Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2002. The 9.96% Series Cumulative Prior Preferred stock has annual sinking fund provisions (mandatory redemption requirements), and is redeemable at Artesian Resources' option at $25.00 per share on February 1, 2003 and thereafter. The Company chose not to exercise the option to redeem on January 31, 2003. Under mandatory sinking fund provisions, redemptions will aggregate $100,000 (4,000 shares) annually in 2003 and 2004. The Company also has 100,000 shares of $1.00 par value Series
Preferred stock authorized but unissued. See the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity.
There are 40,000 authorized shares of the 9.96% Series Cumulative Prior Preferred stock with a par value of $25 per share, of which 8,000 and 12,000 shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Cash dividends paid in 2002 and 2001 were $22,000 and $32,000, respectively.
NOTE 5
COMMON STOCK AND ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL
The Class A Non-Voting Common Stock ("Class A Stock") of Artesian Resources trades on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol ARTNA. The Class B Common Stock of Artesian Resources trades on the NASDAQ Bulletin Board under the symbol ARTNB.
In 2002, Artesian Resources issued 500,000 shares of Class A Stock at $32.00 per share. Net proceeds from the offering were used to reduce debt incurred to finance investment in utility plant.
Under Artesian Resources' dividend reinvestment plan, stockholders were issued 10,773, 9,906 and 9,727 shares at fair market value for the reinvestment of $320,000, $259,000 and $233,000 of their cash dividends for the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
NOTE 6
DEBT
Artesian Water has available three unsecured lines of credit, with no financial covenant restrictions, totaling $35.0 million at December 31, 2002, which are renewable annually at each of the bank's discretion. Borrowings under the lines of credit bear interest based on the London Interbank Offering Rate ("LIBOR") plus 1.0% for 30, 60, 90, or 180 days or the banks' federal funds rate plus 1.0%, at the option of Artesian Water.
At December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, Artesian Water had $17.8 million, $16.1 million and $6.3 million outstanding under these lines at weighted average interest rates of 2.3%, 2.6% and 7.5%, respectively. The maximum amount outstanding was $24.4 million, $16.7 million and $18.8 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The twelve month average amount outstanding was approximately $16.5 million, $14.2 million and $12.8 million, at weighted average annual interest rates of 2.7%, 4.8% and 7.2% in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
On December 29, 2000, Artesian Water issued a $20.0 million, 8.17%, twenty year Series O First Mortgage Bond to redeem the Series K $7.0 million First Mortgage Bond and to pay down the lines of credit. On December 29, 2020, the Series O First Mortgage Bond matures.
On June 17, 1997, Artesian Water issued a $10.0 million, 7.84%, ten year Series M First Mortgage Bond and borrowed $2.5 million against a $5.0 million, ten year Series N First Mortgage Bond to repay the outstanding balance on the lines of credit. On September 18, 1997, Artesian Water borrowed the remaining $2.5 million on the Series N First Mortgage Bond. The $5.0 million, ten year Series N First Mortgage Bond has a fixed interest rate of 7.56%. On February 1, 2003, the Series L First Mortgage Bond matures. No other repayments or sinking fund deposits on first mortgage bonds are required over the next five years. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, substantially all of Artesian Water's utility plant was pledged as security for the First Mortgage Bonds. In addition, the trust indentures contain covenants which limit long-term debt, including the current portion thereof, to 66 2/3% of total capitalization including the current portion of the long-term debt, and which, in certain circumstances, could res
trict the payment of cash dividends. As of December 31, 2002, however, no dividend restrictions were imposed under these covenants.
On May 4, 1999, Artesian repurchased 126,353 shares of Class B Common Stock and 24,165 shares of Class A Non-Voting Common Stock from Helena C. Taylor and Ellis D. Taylor in exchange for a promissory note (the "Note") in the principal amount of $4,450,000 representing the purchase price of the stock, with a discounted present value of $4,307,000. The Note is payable quarterly, on a calendar basis, over a four-year period and in sixteen equal principal installments of $278,125 commencing on June 30, 1999. The outstanding balance on the Note bears interest in an amount computed based on the quarterly dividend the Taylors would have received on the stock transferred to Artesian but not yet paid for by Artesian. In addition, the principal installment is adjusted on a quarterly basis to reflect changes in the book value per common share of the Company as reported in its most recent quarterly financial statement distributed to stockholders prior to the quarterly payment. Such amounts, if any, represent conti
ngent purchase price of the stock and will be charged to retained earnings. At December 31, 2002, Artesian had $278,000 outstanding under this promissory note.
On January 31, 2001, Artesian Water entered into a financing agreement with the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services to borrow funds totaling not more than $4,307,144 from the State's Revolving Loan Fund under an unsecured General Obligation Note. The note bears interest of 4.48% and is payable ratably over twenty years. The effective rate of the loan, including expenses related to the closing, is 4.53%. The funds of $4,307,144 were received in August 2001. The Company used the proceeds of this revolving loan to repay outstanding short-term debt.
On January 31, 2003, Artesian Water issued a $25.0 million, 6.58%, 15 year Series P First Mortgage Bond to redeem the Series L $10.0 million First Mortgage Bond and to pay down the lines of credit. On January 31, 2018, the Series P First Mortgage Bond matures. As such, the Company reclassified $14,943,000 from Notes Payable to Long-term Debt on the Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2002.
Long-term debt consists of:
December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||||||||
In thousands |
|||||||||||||||||||
First mortgage bonds |
|||||||||||||||||||
Series L, 8.03%, due February 1, 2003 |
$ |
10,000 |
$ |
10,000 |
|||||||||||||||
Series M, 7.84%, due December 31, 2007 |
10,000 |
10,000 |
|||||||||||||||||
Series N, 7.56%, due December 31, 2007 |
5,000 |
5,000 |
|||||||||||||||||
Series O, 8.17%, due December 29, 2020 |
20,000 |
20,000 |
|||||||||||||||||
45,000 |
45,000 |
||||||||||||||||||
Note payable to Ellis & Helena Taylor |
278 |
1,391 |
|||||||||||||||||
State revolving fund loan |
4,170 |
4,307 |
|||||||||||||||||
Note payable |
14,943 |
---- |
|||||||||||||||||
64,391 |
50,698 |
||||||||||||||||||
Less current maturities |
421 |
1,328 |
|||||||||||||||||
$ |
63,970 |
$ |
49,370 |
||||||||||||||||
Payments due by period: |
|||||||||||||||||||
In thousands |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ |
10,000 |
$ |
--- |
$ |
--- |
$ |
--- |
$ |
15,000 |
|||||||||
State revolving fund loan |
$ |
143 |
$ |
150 |
$ |
156 |
$ |
163 |
$ |
171 |
|||||||||
Note payable to Ellis & |
|||||||||||||||||||
Helena Taylor |
$ |
278 |
$ |
--- |
$ |
--- |
$ |
--- |
$ |
--- |
|||||||||
Total payments |
$ |
10,421 |
$ |
150 |
$ |
156 |
$ |
163 |
$ |
15,171 |
NOTE 7
NON-UTILITY OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENSES
Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc. (Artesian Wastewater) is a non-regulated subsidiary of Artesian Resources, which provides wastewater treatment services in Delaware. On March 12, 1997, Artesian Wastewater became a one-third owner in AquaStructure Delaware, L.L.C., and markets proposals to design and construct wastewater treatment facilities.
Non-utility operating revenue consists of $287,000, $116,000 and $43,000 received by Artesian Wastewater in 2002, 2001 and 2000.
On July 17, 2002, Artesian Wastewater began contractual operations of a wastewater treatment plant for which AquaStructure has a twenty-year agreement with a Delaware municipality. This agreement shall be extended for an additional twenty years unless advance notice is given. The current term for the agreement is due to be completed on February 1, 2021.
Non-utility operating expenses are as follows:
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
In thousands |
||||||
Artesian Wastewater |
$ |
194 |
$ |
66 |
$ |
33 |
Artesian Resources |
1 |
2 |
6 |
|||
Artesian Development |
1 |
5 |
--- |
|||
Total |
$ |
196 |
$ |
73 |
$ |
39 |
NOTE 8
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The office building and shop complex utilized by Artesian Water are leased at an average annual rental of $175,000 from a partnership, White Clay Realty, in which certain of Artesian Resources' officers and directors (Dian C. Taylor and John R. Eisenbrey, Jr.) are a partner or the beneficiary of a partner. The current rental of $175,000 is below market. In December of 2002, Artesian Water filed a condemnation action in the Delaware Superior Court, seeking to acquire title to the office and shop complex currently leased by Artesian Water, known as 664 Churchmans Road, Newark, Delaware (the "Property"). Artesian Water filed this action under its statutory power of eminent domain against the owner of the Property, White Clay Realty, a Delaware Limited Partnership, and each of the limited partners. White Clay Realty has no general partner and the Superior Court has ruled that the partnership is dissolved and all of the former partners now own the Property jointly as tenants in common. Certai
n of the officers and directors of Artesian Resources are tenants in common or the beneficiary of a tenant in common (Dian C. Taylor and John R. Eisenbrey, Jr.) A special committee of the Board of Directors of Artesian Resources, composed entirely of outside directors who have no ownership interest in the Property, made the determination to purchase the Property through the condemnation procedures. Under this procedure, if the acquisition of the Property is approved by the court, the fair market value of the Property will be determined by a panel of commissioners after an evidentiary hearing. Artesian Water's independent appraiser has valued the Property to be worth $3,800,000. In December 2002, Artesian Water issued a payment to the Prothonotary for the State of Delaware for $3,800,000. As the court has delayed payment until the matter is decided, the amount is to be refunded to Artesian and is recorded as a receivable at December 31, 2002. Until a final determination of the condemnation, the parties
have agreed that Artesian Water may continue to occupy the Property under the terms of the lease with a quarterly rental payment of $43,361.
Rental expense associated with related party transactions are as follows:
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
In thousands |
||||||
White Clay Realty |
$ |
175 |
$ |
178 |
$ |
179 |
NOTE 9
STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
In 1992, the Company instituted the 1992 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (1992 Plan), which was subsequently amended in 1998. Under the 1992 Plan, options to purchase shares of Class A Stock may be granted to employees at prices not less than 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant. The number of authorized shares is 500,000 Employees who participate and who are not executive officers or directors of the Company may receive options to purchase up to 1,000 shares. Each director or officer who participates in any year may request an option to purchase 3,000 shares of stock. The option price for directors and officers of the Company is 90% of the fair market value on the date of grant. Options granted under this plan to employees who are not executive officers or directors extend for a period of one year. Options granted to officers and directors extend to a period of ten years. All options are exercisable after six months of service from the date of initial grant, and are adjusted fo
r stock dividends and splits. Employees, officers and directors become eligible to exercise options under the 1992 plan, after one year of service to the Company.
In 1996, the Company instituted the Incentive Stock Option Plan (the ISO Plan), under which the Company is authorized to grant options up to 100,000 shares of Class A Stock, to its key employees and officers. Options are granted at the fair market value on the date of grant. The option exercise period shall not exceed ten years from the date of grant and will be determined by the Company for each stock option granted. Options granted will vest in accordance with the terms and conditions determined by the Company and are adjusted for stock dividends and splits.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively: dividend yield of 4.0%, 4.2% and 4.6%; expected volatility of 0.34, 0.34 and 0.34; risk free interest rates of 2.10%, 3.16% and 6.17% for the employee options under the 1992 Plan, 4.19%, 4.93%, and 6.44% for the director and officer options under the 1992 Plan for 2002, 2001 and 2000 respectively, and 4.93% and 6.69% for options under the ISO Plan for 2001 and 2000 and expected lives of one year for the employee options and five years for the director and officer options under the 1992 Plan for all years, five years for the 2001, and eight years for the 2000 ISO Plan options. Shares of Classs A Stock have been reserved for future issuance under the 1992 Plan and ISO Plan.
The following summary reflects changes in the Class A shares under option:
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
Plan options |
||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
172,603 |
$19.47 |
149,016 |
$18.14 |
127,640 |
$17.35 |
Granted |
31,466 |
$27.77 |
40,361 |
$23.78 |
31,756 |
$21.91 |
Exercised |
(18,530) |
$16.46 |
(5,462) |
$14.95 |
(3,500) |
$16.24 |
Canceled |
(3,112) |
$24.38 |
(11,312) |
$19.44 |
(6,880) |
$21.83 |
Outstanding at end of year |
182,427 |
$21.13 |
172,603 |
$19.47 |
149,016 |
$18.14 |
Options exercisable at year end |
146,487 |
$20.54 |
121,207 |
$17.78 |
110,395 |
$17.02 |
Weighted average fair value of |
||||||
options granted during the year |
$31.18 |
$24.42 |
$23.17 |
The following tables summarize information about employee stock options outstanding at December 31, 2002:
Options Outstanding |
|||
Range of |
Shares Outstanding |
Weighted Average |
Weighted Average |
$12.71-$20.87 |
74,781 |
5.05 Years |
$16.59 |
$21.00-$27.90 |
107,646 |
7.44 Years |
$24.28 |
Options Exercisable |
|||
Range of |
Shares Exercisable |
Weighted Average |
|
$12.71-$20.87 |
74,781 |
$16.59 |
|
$21.00-$27.90 |
71,706 |
$24.65 |
NOTE 10
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
401(k) Plan
Artesian Resources has a defined contribution 401(k) Salary Reduction Plan (Plan) which covers substantially all employees. Under the terms of the Plan, Artesian Resources contributes 2% of eligible salaries and wages and matches employee contributions up to 6% of gross pay at a rate of 50%. Artesian Resources may, at its option, make additional contributions of up to 3% of eligible salaries and wages. No such additional contributions were made in 2002, 2001 and 2000. Plan expenses, which include Company contributions and administrative fees, for the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, were approximately $374,000, $310,000 and $323,000, respectively.
Postretirement Benefit Plan
Artesian Water has a Postretirement Benefit Plan (Benefit Plan), which provides medical and life insurance benefits to certain retired employees. Prior to the amendment of the Benefit Plan, substantially all employees could become eligible for these benefits if they reached retirement age while still working for Artesian Water.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" ("SFAS 106"), requires Artesian Water to accrue the expected cost of providing postretirement health care and life insurance benefits as employees render the services necessary to earn the benefits. Artesian Resources elected to defer recognition and amortize its transition obligation over twenty years.
Artesian Water recognized an offsetting regulatory asset with respect to the SFAS 106 liability. This asset is recorded based on the PSC order, which permits Artesian Water to continue recovery of postretirement health care and life insurance expense on a pay-as-you-go basis for the remaining eligible employees. Artesian Water anticipates liquidating its SFAS 106 obligation and substantially recovering the expenses in rates over a period of approximately 20 years (based on the age and life expectancy of the remaining eligible participants). Further, expense recovery as a percentage of rates is expected to remain constant over the initial years, and then decline until the obligation is liquidated. Amounts charged to expense were $62,000, $95,000 and $83,000 for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The following table sets forth the amount recognized in Artesian Resources' Consolidated Balance Sheet for the Benefit Plan as of December 31:
2002 |
2001 |
||||
In thousands |
|||||
Change in benefit obligation |
|||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
$ |
1,008 |
$ |
950 |
|
Interest cost |
68 |
70 |
|||
Plan participant contributions |
3 |
3 |
|||
Actuarial (gain)/loss |
(45) |
71 |
|||
Benefits paid |
(82) |
(86) |
|||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
$ |
952 |
$ |
1,008 |
|
Change in plan assets |
|||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
|
Employer contributions |
79 |
83 |
|||
Plan participant contributions |
3 |
3 |
|||
Benefits paid |
(82) |
(86) |
|||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
$ |
0 |
$ |
0 |
|
Accrued expense |
|||||
Funded status |
$ |
(952) |
$ |
(1,008) |
|
Unrecognized net gain |
(439) |
(454) |
|||
Unrecognized transition obligation |
93 |
102 |
|||
Accrued postretirement benefit cost |
$ |
(1,298) |
$ |
(1,360) |
For measurement purposes, a 12.0% annual rate of increase in per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2002; the rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5% through the year 2010 and remain at that level thereafter. The health care cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect on the amount of the obligation and periodic cost reported. An increase in the assumed health care cost trend rates by 1% in each year would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2002 by $59,000 and the interest cost component of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the year then ended by $5,000.
The weighted-average discount rate used in determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 6.5% and 7.0% for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001.
Supplemental Pension Plan
Effective October 1, 1994, Artesian Water established a Supplemental Pension Plan (Supplemental Plan) to provide additional retirement benefits to full-time employees hired prior to April 26, 1994. The purpose of the Supplemental Plan is to help employees save for future retiree medical costs, which will be paid by employees. The Supplemental Plan accomplishes this objective by providing additional cash resources to employees upon a termination of employment or retirement, to meet the cost of future medical expenses. Artesian Water has established a contribution based upon each employee's years of service ranging from 2% to 6% of eligible salaries and wages. Artesian Water also provides additional benefits to individuals who were over age 50 as of January 1, 1994. These individuals are referred to as the "Transition Group." Effective November 1, 1994, individuals eligible for the Transition Group had the opportunity to defer compensation to the Supplemental Plan, and to receive a transition matc
hing contribution for 5 years. Each one-dollar of eligible salaries and wages deferred by the Transition Group was matched with three, four, or five dollars by Artesian Water based on the employee's years of service subject to certain limitations under the federal tax rules. Plan expenses, which include Company contributions and administrative fees, for the years 2002, 2001 and 2000 were approximately $239,000, $220,000 and $177,000, respectively.
NOTE 11
COMMITMENTS
The office building and shop complex utilized by Artesian Water are leased at an average annual rental of $175,000 from a partnership, White Clay Realty, in which certain of Artesian Resources' officers and directors are a partner or the beneficiary of a partner (Dian C. Taylor and John R. Eisenbrey, Jr.). The current rental of $175,000 is below market. Artesian Water, in December 2002, filed a condemnation action in the Delaware Superior Court, seeking to acquire title to the office and shop complex currently leased by Artesian, known as 664 Churchmans Road, Newark, Delaware (the "Property"). Artesian Water filed this action under its statutory power of eminent domain against the owner of the Property, White Clay Realty, a Delaware Limited Partnership, and each of the limited partners. White Clay Realty has no general partner and the Superior Court has ruled that the partnership is dissolved and all of the former partners now own the Property jointly as tenants in common. A special com mittee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of outside directors who have no ownership interest in the Property, made the determination to purchase the Property through the condemnation procedures. Under this procedure, if the acquisition of the Property is approved by the court, the fair market value of the Property will be determined by a panel of commissioners after an evidentiary hearing. Artesian Water's independent appraiser has valued the Property to be worth $3,800,000. In December 2002, Artesian Water issued a payment to the Prothonotary for the State of Delaware for $3,800,000. As the court has delayed payment until the matter is decided, the amount is to be refunded to Artesian and is recorded as a receivable at December 31, 2002. Until a final determination of the condemnation, the parties have agreed that Artesian Water may continue to occupy the Property under the terms of the lease with a quarterly rental payment of $43,361.
In 1995, Artesian Water entered into four 5-year leases for computer equipment and in 1997, Artesian Water entered into a 10-year lease for a land easement. Both have been recorded as capital leases. Also in 1997, Artesian Water entered into a 33-year operating lease for a parcel of land with improvements located in South Bethany, a municipality in Sussex County, Delaware.
During 1996, Artesian Water entered into a 10-year lease commitment for office space. Rent expense for 2002, 2001 and 2000 for the office space was $71,000, $69,000 and $67,000, respectively.
Future minimum annual rental payments under these lease obligations for the four years subsequent to 2002 are as follows:
In thousands |
||
2003 |
$ |
72 |
2004 |
74 |
|
2005 |
76 |
|
2006 |
13 |
|
$ |
235 |
Artesian Water has two water service interconnection agreements with two neighboring utilities which require minimum annual purchases. Rates charged under all agreements are subject to change. Effective August 1, 1997, Artesian Water renegotiated the contract with Chester Water Authority to, among other things, reduce the minimum purchase requirements from 1,459 million gallons to 1,095 million gallons annually and to extend the contract through the year 2021. The interconnection agreement with the City of Wilmington expires in 2006. The minimum annual purchase commitments for all interconnection agreements for 2003 through 2007 and the aggregate total for the years 2008 through 2021, at current rates, are as follows:
In thousands |
||
2003 |
$ |
2,970 |
2004 |
2,978 |
|
2005 |
2,970 |
|
2006 |
2,970 |
|
2007 |
2,672 |
|
2008 through 2021 |
37,434 |
|
$ |
51,994 |
Expenses for purchased water were $2,485,000, $2,752,000 and $2,551,000 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
In 2001, Artesian Water entered into a 5-year agreement with Allied Painting, Inc. to paint all tanks that are scheduled to be painted in the next 5 years, including 2001. The expenditures committed to in the agreement for the years 2003-2005 are as follows:
In thousands |
||
2003 |
$ |
249 |
2004 |
249 |
|
2005 |
249 |
|
$ |
747 |
Budgeted mandatory utility plant expenditures, due to planned governmental highway projects which require the relocation of Artesian Water's water service mains, expected to be incurred in 2003 through 2007 are as follows:
In thousands |
(unaudited) |
|
2003 |
$ |
1,450 |
2004 |
752 |
|
2005 |
600 |
|
2006 |
800 |
|
2007 |
1,800 |
|
$ |
5,402 |
The exact timing and extent of these relocation projects is controlled primarily by the Delaware Department of Transportation.
NOTE 12
GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION OF CUSTOMERS
Artesian Water and Artesian Water Pennsylvania provide water utility service to customers within their established service territory in portions of Pennsylvania and all three counties of Delaware, pursuant to rates filed with and approved by the PSC and the PAPUC. As of December 31, 2002, Artesian Water was serving 68,010 customers and Artesian Water Pennsylvania was serving 39 customers.
NOTE 13
RATE PROCEEDINGS
On April 2, 2002, Artesian Water Company, Inc. filed a petition with the Delaware Public Service Commission seeking to raise rates for water service by 23.12% or $7.5 million. The Company, as is permitted by law, placed a 7.71% rate increase into effect under bond beginning June 1, 2002. On June 17, 2002, the Company filed a supplemental application reducing the requested increase to 19%, or $6.4 million. Hearings regarding the rate increase were held on October 30 and 31, 2002. During these hearings, the Company reduced its requested rate increase to 14.2%, or $4.8 million. Beginning December 3, 2002, as is permitted by law, the Company placed an additional 3.69% of the proposed rates into effect. These rates represent an increase in water consumption charges, customer charges, and fire hydrant ready-to-serve charges necessary to generate an increase in operating revenues of approximately $3.9 million.
NOTE 14
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE AND EQUITY PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive effect of employee stock options.
The following table summarizes the shares used in computing basic and diluted net income per share:
Years Ended December 31, |
|||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
In thousands |
|||
Average common shares outstanding during the |
|||
period for Basic computation |
2,356 |
2,026 |
2,007 |
Dilutive effect of employee stock options |
52 |
46 |
37 |
Average common shares outstanding during the |
|||
period for Diluted computation |
2,408 |
2,072 |
2,044 |
Equity per common share was $21.72, $16.87 and $16.22 at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. These amounts were computed by dividing stockholders' equity excluding preferred stock by the number of basic weighted average shares of common stock outstanding at the end of each year.
NOTE 15
Selected Consolidated Quarterly Fina ncial Data (Unaudited)
The following table presents certain historical consolidated statements of operations data for each quarter for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001:
In thousands (except |
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter |
||||
per share data) |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
Operating revenues |
$7,744 |
$6,960 |
$8,644 |
$7,974 |
$9,460 |
$8,947 |
$8,749 |
$8,106 |
Operating income |
$1,512 |
$1,270 |
$1,856 |
$1,889 |
$2,551 |
$2,549 |
$2,256 |
$1,693 |
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share |
||||||||
Basic |
$ 0.26 |
$ 0.13 |
$ 0.40 |
$ 0.44 |
$ 0.59 |
$ 0.71 |
$ 0.46 |
$ 0.34 |
Diluted |
$ 0.25 |
$ 0.12 |
$ 0.39 |
$ 0.43 |
$ 0.58 |
$ 0.70 |
$ 0.45 |
$ 0.33 |
NOTE 16
IMPACT OF RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure." Statement No. 148 amends Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," by providing an alternate method of transitioning to fair value based accounting for stock-based compensation for those who choose to change. It also amends disclosure requirements for both annual and interim financial statements. Certain of the disclosure modifications are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002 and are included in the notes to these consolidated financial statements.
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." This statement nullifies EITF 94-3, which addressed this subject. The statement requires recognition of
a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity when the liability is incurred. Our adoption of this| statement will not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operation.
In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections. " Statement No. 145 eliminates accounting treatment described in Statements 4 and 64 related to Extinguishment of Debt and amends Statement 13 regarding the use of sale - lease back accounting. Our adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operation.
In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." Statement No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. Statement No. 143 requires recognition of a liability at fair value and an increase to the carrying value of the related asset for any retirement obligation. This amount would then be amortized over the life of the asset. The liability would be adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in the estimated future cash flows. This statement is effective January 2003. Our adoption of this statement will not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others," an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. This Interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under guarantees issued. The Interpretation also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of the Interpretation are applicable to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002 and are not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim and annual periods ending after December 31, 2002.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Artesian Resources Corporation and Subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Artesian Resources Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule as listed in Item 15 of this Form 10-K. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Artesian Resources Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 7, 2003
Item 9. - Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures.
None.
PART III
Item 10. - Directors and Executive Officers.
Name |
Age |
Position |
Dian C. Taylor |
57 |
Director since 1991, Chair of the Board since July 1993, and Chief Executive Officer and President of Artesian Resources Corporation and its Subsidiaries since September 1992. Ms. Taylor has been employed by the Company since August 1991. She was formerly a consultant to the Small Business Development Center at the University of Delaware from February 1991 to August 1991 and Owner and President of Achievement Resources Inc. from 1977 to 1991. Achievement Resources, Inc. specialized in strategic planning, marketing, entrepreneurial and human resources development consulting. Ms. Taylor was a marketing director for SMI, Inc. from 1982 to 1985. Ms. Taylor is the sister of Norman H. Taylor, Jr. and the aunt of John R. Eisenbrey, Jr. She serves on the Executive and Budget Committees. |
Kenneth R. Biederman |
59 |
Director since 1991, Professor of Finance at the College of Business and Economics of the University of Delaware since May 1996. Interim Dean of the College of Business and Economics of the University of Delaware from February 1999 to June 2000. Dean of the College of Business and Economics of the University of Delaware from 1990 to 1996. Director of Chase Manhattan Bank USA from 1993 to 1996. Formerly a financial and banking consultant from 1989 to 1990 and President of Gibraltar Bank from 1987 to 1989. Previously Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of West Chester Savings Bank; Economist and former Treasurer of the State of New Jersey and Staff Economist for the United States Senate Budget Committee. He serves on the Executive; Audit; Personnel, Compensation and Benefits; Budget; and Stock Option Committees. |
John R. Eisenbrey, Jr. |
47 |
Director since 1993, owner and President of Bear Industries, Inc., a privately held mechanical contracting firm specializing in fire protection, for more than sixteen years. Mr. Eisenbrey is the nephew of Dian C. Taylor and Norman H. Taylor, Jr. He serves on the Audit; Personnel, Compensation, and Benefits; and Stock Option Committees. |
Norman H. Taylor, Jr. |
63 |
Director since 2001, Manager of Facility Construction and Transportation of Artesian Water Company, Inc. since July 1997. Mr. Taylor has been employed by Artesian Water Company, Inc. since 1965 and has held various operational and supervisory positions within the Company. Mr. Taylor is the brother of Dian C. Taylor and the uncle of John R. Eisenbrey, Jr. He serves on the Budget Committee. |
William C. Wyer |
56 |
Director since 1991, Managing Director of Wilmington Renaissance Corporation (formerly Wilmington 2000) since January 1998. Wilmington Renaissance Corporation is a private organization seeking to revitalize the City of Wilmington, Delaware. Mr. Wyer has served as a Director of GMAC Bank since August 2001. President of All Nation Life Insurance and Senior Vice President of Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Delaware from September 1995 to January 1998. Managing Director of Wilmington 2000 from May 1993 to September 1995. Formerly President of Wyer Group, Inc. from 1991 to 1993 and Commerce Enterprise Group from 1989 to 1991, both of which are management-consulting firms specializing in operations reviews designed to increase productivity, cut overhead and increase competitiveness, and President of the Delaware State Chamber of Commerce from 1978 to 1989. He serves on the Executive; Audit; Budget; Stock Option; and Personnel, Compensation and Benefits Committees. |
Joseph A. DiNunzio |
40 |
Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary of Artesian Resources Corporation and its Subsidiaries since March 2000. Mr. DiNunzio previously served as Vice President and Secretary of Artesian Resources Corporation and its Subsidiaries since January 1995. Mr. DiNunzio has been employed by the Company since 1990 and has held various executive and management level positions within the Company. Prior to joining Artesian, Mr. DiNunzio was employed by PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1984 to 1989. |
Bruce P. Kraeuter |
53 |
Vice President of Engineering and Planning of Artesian Water Company, Inc. Mr. Kraeuter has served as an officer since March 1995. Mr. Kraeuter has been employed by the Company since July 1989 and has held various executive and operational positions within the Company. Mr. Kraeuter served as Senior Engineer with the Water Resources Agency for New Castle County, Delaware from 1974 to 1989. |
John J. Schreppler, II |
46 |
Vice President, Assistant Secretary and General Counsel of Artesian Resources Corporation and Artesian Water Company, Inc. since July 2000. Prior to joining the Company he practiced law in Wilmington, Delaware as John J. Schreppler, II P.A. from February 1999, and before that as a partner in The Bayard Firm from 1988 to 1999. |
David B. Spacht |
43 |
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Artesian Resources Corporation and its Subsidiaries since January 1995. The Company has employed Mr. Spacht since 1980 and he has held various executive and management level positions within the Company. |
John M. Thaeder |
44 |
Vice President of Operations of Artesian Water Company, Inc. Mr. Thaeder has served as an officer since February 1998. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Thaeder was employed by Hydro Group, Inc. from 1996 to 1998 as Southeastern District Manager of Sales and Operations from Maryland to Florida. During 1995 and 1996, Mr. Thaeder was Hydro Group's Sales Manager of the Northeast Division with sales responsibilities from Maine to Florida. From 1988 to 1995, he served as District Manager of the Layne Well and Pump Division of Hydro Group. |
In accordance with the provisions of the Company's By-laws, the Board is divided into three classes. Members of each class serve for three years and one class is elected each year to serve a term until his or her successor shall have been elected and qualified or until earlier resignation or removal.
The executive officers are elected or approved by our Board or our appropriate subsidiary to serve until his or her successor is appointed or shall have been qualified or until earlier death, resignation or removal.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, directors, officers and certain beneficial owners of the Company's equity securities are required to file reports of their transactions in the Company's equity securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission on specified due dates. With respect to the fiscal year 2002, reports of transactions by all directors, officers and such beneficial holders were timely filed, with the exception of late filed Form 5's for Dian C. Taylor, Kenneth R. Biederman, John R. Eisenbrey, Jr., Norman H. Taylor, Jr., William C. Wyer, Joseph A. DiNunzio, Bruce P. Kraeuter, John J. Schreppler, II, David B. Spacht and John M. Thaeder: relating to the reporting of option grants dated June 5, 2002 for 3,000 shares of Class A Stock for each. In making this statement, the Company has relied on the written representations of its directors, officers and five percent (5%) stockholders and copies of the reports that they filed with the Securities and Excha
nge Commission.
Item 11. - Executive Compensation.
The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation for the three most recent fiscal years earned by the Chief Executive Officer and the next five highest paid executive officers whose annual salaries and bonuses exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal year 2002.
Summary Compensation Table |
|||||||||
Long Term |
|||||||||
Annual Compensation |
Compensation(5) |
||||||||
Number of |
|
||||||||
Other |
|||||||||
Name and Principal |
Annual |
||||||||
Position |
Year |
Salary |
Bonus |
Compensation |
Dian C. Taylor |
2002 |
$ |
214,250 |
$ |
86,480(1) |
$ |
47,512(4) |
3,000 |
$ |
17,605 |
Director, Chair, |
2001 |
$ |
204,615 |
$ |
75,665(2) |
$ |
29,554(4) |
8,000 |
$ |
16,687 |
CEO & President |
2000 |
$ |
193,270 |
$ |
45,947(3) |
$ |
18,540(4) |
3,000 |
$ |
17,492 |
Joseph A. DiNunzio |
2002 |
$ |
162,000 |
$ |
27,245(1) |
$ |
780 |
3,000 |
$ |
15,772 |
Senior Vice President & |
2001 |
$ |
142,692 |
$ |
49,115(2) |
$ |
1,313 |
5,000 |
$ |
13,211 |
Corporate Secretary |
2000 |
$ |
133,270 |
$ |
20,628(3) |
$ |
671 |
3,000 |
$ |
12,003 |
David B. Spacht |
2002 |
$ |
142,294 |
$ |
20,072(1) |
$ |
1,212 |
3,000 |
$ |
10,962 |
Vice President, |
2001 |
$ |
131,250 |
$ |
35,236(2) |
$ |
959 |
3,000 |
$ |
10,134 |
Chief Financial Officer |
2000 |
$ |
125,962 |
$ |
18,046(3) |
$ |
1,071 |
3,000 |
$ |
8,827 |
& Treasurer |
||||||||||
Bruce P. Kraeuter |
2002 |
$ |
125,875 |
$ |
21,333(1) |
$ |
1,391 |
3,000 |
$ |
12,904 |
Vice President of |
2001 |
$ |
116,106 |
$ |
35,424(2) |
$ |
1,980 |
3,000 |
$ |
12,393 |
Engineering & Planning |
2000 |
$ |
112,808 |
$ |
10,272(3) |
$ |
1,507 |
3,000 |
$ |
10,469 |
John M. Thaeder |
2002 |
$ |
125,875 |
$ |
18,715(1) |
$ |
1,999 |
3,000 |
$ |
6,763 |
Vice President of |
2001 |
$ |
116,106 |
$ |
33,735(2) |
$ |
1,807 |
3,000 |
$ |
6,738 |
Planning & Distribution |
2000 |
$ |
106,538 |
$ |
9,839(3) |
$ |
2,193 |
3,000 |
$ |
5,526 |
John J. Schreppler, II |
2002 |
$ |
128,500 |
$ |
11,363(1) |
----- |
3,000 |
2,478 |
||
Vice President, Assistant |
2001 |
$ |
121,154 |
$ |
32,113(2) |
----- |
3,000 |
----- |
||
Secretary & General |
2000 |
$ |
53,232 |
$ |
155 |
----- |
----- |
----- |
||
Counsel |
||||||||||
(1) |
Includes the realized value of the stock awards and cash bonuses approved by the Personnel, Compensation and Benefits Committee on June 19, 2002 under the Company's Cash and Stock Bonus Compensation Plan to Ms. Taylor and Messrs. DiNunzio, Spacht, Kraeuter, Thaeder and Schreppler. Ms. Taylor received 1,500 shares of Class A Stock and $37,679 in cash. Mr. DiNunzio received 500 shares of Class A Stock and $11,245 in cash. Mr. Spacht received 300 shares of Class A Stock and $7,352 in cash. Mr. Kraeuter received 300 shares of Class A Stock and $7,669 in cash. Mr. Thaeder received 300 shares of Class A Stock and $7,669 in cash. Mr. Schreppler received 200 shares of Class A Stock and $3,926 in cash. The cash portion's of the bonus were issued to cover the individual tax liability associated with the stock bonus issued. The fair market value of the Class A Stock issued (and included in the table above) was $31.25 per share based on the closing price on the Nasdaq National Market on the date o
f the award. |
(2) |
Includes the realized value of the stock awards and cash bonuses approved by the Personnel, Compensation and Benefits Committee on October 1, 2001 under the Company's Cash and Stock Bonus Compensation Plan to Ms. Taylor and Messrs. DiNunzio, Spacht, Kraeuter, Thaeder and Schreppler. Ms. Taylor received 1,200 shares of Class A Stock and $18,580 in cash. Mr. DiNunzio received 750 shares of Class A Stock and $14,005 in cash. Mr. Spacht received 500 shares of Class A Stock and $8,829 in cash. Mr. Kraeuter received 500 shares of Class A Stock and $9,004 in cash. Mr. Thaeder received 500 shares of Class A Stock and $9,004 in cash. Mr. Schreppler received 500 shares of Class A Stock and $8,566 in cash. The cash portion of the bonus was issued to cover the individual tax liability associated with the stock bonus issued. The fair market value of the Class A Stock issued (and included in the table above) was $26.25 per share based on the closing price on the Nasdaq National Market on the date o
f the award. |
(3) |
Includes the realized value of stock awards and cash bonuses approved by Personnel, Compensation and Benefits Committee on March 29, 2000 under the Company's Cash and Stock Bonus Compensation Plan to Ms. Taylor and Messrs. DiNunzio, Spacht, Kraeuter and Thaeder. Ms. Taylor received 1,000 shares of Class A Stock and $20,855 in cash. Mr. DiNunzio received 500 shares of Class A Stock and $9,424 in cash. Mr. Spacht received 200 shares of Class A Stock and $2,159 in cash. Mr. Kraeuter received 200 shares of Class A Stock and $2,159 in cash. Mr. Thaeder received 200 shares of Class A Stock and $2,438 in cash. The cash portion of the bonuses were issued to cover the individual tax liability associated with the stock bonuses issued. The fair market value of the Class A Stock issued (and included in the table above) was $22.125 per share based on the closing price on the Nasdaq Nationial Market on the date of the award. |
(4) |
Includes $22,750 in 2002, $19,300 in 2001 and $11,200 in 2000 received as compensation for attendance at meetings of the Board and its committees. In 2002, 2001 and 2000, Ms. Taylor received $23,705, $8,958 and $5,765 respectively, in medical expense reimbursements from the Company's Officer's Medical Reimbursement Plan. |
(5) |
The Company contributes two percent of an eligible employee's gross earnings to the 401(k) Plan. In addition, the Company matches fifty percent of the first six percent of the employee's gross earnings that the employee contributes to the 401(k) Plan. The amounts disclosed in this column include our contributions under the 401(k) Plan for the fiscal year 2002 - Ms. Taylor, $8,493, Mr. DiNunzio, $7,978, Mr. Spacht $2,740, Mr. Kraeuter $6,841, Mr. Schreppler $2,478 and Mr. Thaeder $6,763; for the fiscal year 2001 - Ms. Taylor $8,793, Mr. DiNunzio $6,325, Mr. Spacht, $2,533, Mr. Kraeuter $6,788 and Mr. Thaeder $6,738, and for the fiscal year 2000 - Ms. Taylor $9,755, Mr. DiNunzio $6,670, Mr. Spacht $2,522, Mr. Kraeuter $5,951, Mr. Thaeder $5,625. In addition, effective October 1, 1994, the Company established a Supplemental 401(k) Retirement Plan (the "Supplemental Plan"). All employees hired before April 26, 1994 and under the age of sixty at that date are eligible for the Supplemental Plan . Employees over the age of sixty waived participation in the plan in order to receive Company paid medical, dental and life insurance benefits upon retirement. The Company will not provide such benefits to any other current or future employees. The amounts disclosed in this column also include our contributions under the Supplemental Plan for the fiscal year 2002 - Ms. Taylor $9,112, Mr. DiNunzio $7,794, Mr. Spacht $8,221, Mr. Kraeuter $6,063; for the fiscal year 2001 - Ms. Taylor $7,894, Mr. DiNunzio $6,886, Mr. Spacht $7,600, Mr. Kraeuter $5,605; and for the fiscal year 2000 - Ms. Taylor $7,736, Mr. DiNunzio $5,336, Mr. Spacht $6,305, and Mr. Kraeuter $4,518. |
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following table sets forth information regarding options granted in the 2002 fiscal year to the executive |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Potential Realizable Value at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assumed Annual Rates of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Price Appreciation for |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individual Grants |
Option Term(1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name Number of |
% of Total |
Market |
Exercise |
Expiration |
0% ($) |
5% ($) |
10% ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
Options |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options |
Employees |
Date of |
Share |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
in Fiscal Year |
Grant |
($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dian C. Taylor |
3,0002 |
13.4 |
$ 31 |
$27.90 |
6/5/12 |
$10,050 |
$69,009 |
$159,436 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph A. DiNunzio |
3,0002 |
13.4 |
$ 31 |
$27.90 |
6/5/12 |
$10,050 |
$69,009 |
$159,436 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
David B. Spacht |
3,0002 |
13.4 |
$ 31 |
$27.90 |
6/5/12 |
$10,050 |
$69,009 |
$159,436 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Bruce P. Kraeuter |
3,0002 |
13.4 |
$ 31 |
$27.90 |
6/5/12 |
$10,050 |
$69,009 |
$159,436 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
John M. Thaeder |
3,0002 |
13.4 |
$ 31 |
$27.90 |
6/5/12 |
$10,050 |
$69,009 |
$159,436 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
John J. Schreppler |
3,0002 |
13.4 |
$ 31 |
$27.90 |
6/5/12 |
$10,050 |
$69,009 |
$159,436 |
(1) |
Amounts represent the hypothetical gains that could be achieved from the respective options if exercised at the end of the option term. These gains are based on assumed rates of stock appreciation of zero percent (0%), five percent (5%) and ten percent (10%) compounded annually from the date the respective options were granted to their expiration date based upon the grant price. |
(2) |
Option granted for Class A Stock under the 1992 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan. Each grant was made on June 5, 2002 and the shares underlying the options granted will become exercisable in six months following the date of grant. |
Option Exercises and Fiscal Year End Values
The following table provides certain information concerning option exercises during 2002 by the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table and year end option values:
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End Option Values |
||||
Number of Securities |
Value of Unexercised |
|||
Underlying Unexercised |
In-the Money |
|||
Shares |
|
Options at Fiscal |
Options at Fiscal |
|
Name |
Exercise (#) |
Realized |
Exercisable/Unexercisable(1) |
Exercisable/Unexercisable(2) |
Dian C. Taylor |
--- |
--- |
27,000/6,000 |
$266,264/$24,340 |
Joseph A. DiNunzio |
--- |
--- |
17,700/6,800 |
$193,116/$41,395 |
David B. Spacht |
--- |
--- |
13,052/5,200 |
$121,871/$32,995 |
Bruce P. Kraeuter |
4,500 |
72,668 |
9,300/5,200 |
$ 66,771/$32,995 |
John M. Thaeder |
--- |
--- |
8,300/5,200 |
$ 54,249/$32,995 |
John J. Schreppler, II |
--- |
--- |
3,600/2,400 |
$ 8,400/$12,600 |
(1) |
All securities represent options to purchase shares of the Class A Stock. |
(2) |
Based on $29.65 per share, which was the last reported sale price of the Company's Class A Stock as reported by Nasdaq on December 31, 2002. |
Outside directors receive an annual retainer fee of $8,000 paid in advance. Each director receives $1,000 for each Board meeting attended, $500 for each committee meeting attended on the day of a regular board meeting and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended on any other day. The chair of each committee receives an annual retainer of $1,000.
The Company has an Officer's Medical Reimbursement Plan that reimburses officers for certain medical expenses not covered under the Company's medical insurance plan.
The Company has a Cash and Stock Bonus Compensation Plan for officers. The purpose of this plan is to compensate the officers of the Company and Artesian Water, as appointed by the Board of Directors, for their contributions to the long-term growth and prosperity of the Company in the form of cash or shares of the Class A Stock of the Company. Compensation in the form of a bonus of the Class A Stock of the Company paid to such officers also serves to increase such officers' proprietary interest in the Company.
Item 12. - Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owner s and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the equity securities of the Company for each director and each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and each beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of any class of the Company's voting securities and all directors and executive officers as a group, based in each case on information furnished to the Company. Addresses are provided for each beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the Company's voting Securities.
Class A Non-Voting |
Class B Common |
|||
Shares |
Percent (2) |
Shares |
Percent (2) |
|
Dian C. Taylor (3) |
|
|
|
|
Kenneth R. Biederman (3) |
28,500 |
1.3% |
--- |
--- |
John R. Eisenbrey, Jr. (3)(4) |
|
|
|
|
Norman H. Taylor, Jr. (3) (5) |
|
|
|
|
William C. Wyer(3) |
27,000 |
1.2% |
--- |
--- |
Joseph A. DiNunzio (3) (6) |
21,321 |
1.0% |
46 |
--- |
Bruce P. Kraeuter (3) |
16,031 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
David B. Spacht (3) |
14,228 |
--- |
84 |
--- |
John J. Schreppler, II |
4,300 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
John M. Thaeder (3) |
11,636 |
--- |
606 |
--- |
Estate of Hilda Taylor |
|
|
|
|
Louisa Taylor Welcher (7) |
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (10 Individuals)(3) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The nature of ownership consists of sole voting and investment power unless otherwise indicated. The amount also includes all shares issuable to such person or group upon the exercise of options held by such person or group to the extent such options are exercisable within 60 days after March 3, 2003. |
(2) |
The percentage of the total number of shares of the class outstanding is shown where that percentage is one percent or greater. Percentages for each person are based on the aggregate number of shares of the applicable class outstanding as of March 3, 2003, and all shares issuable to such person upon the exercise of options held by such person, to the extent such options are exercisable within 60 days of that date. |
(3) |
Includes options to purchase shares of the Company's Class A Non-Voting Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share as follows: Ms. Taylor (27,000 shares); Mr. Biederman (21,000 shares); Mr. Eisenbrey (7,729 shares); Mr. Taylor (6,900 shares); Mr. Wyer (21,000 shares); Mr. DiNunzio (17,700 shares); Mr. Kraeuter (9,300 shares); Mr. Schreppler (3,600); Mr. Spacht (13,052 shares); and Mr. Thaeder (8,300 shares). |
(4) |
Includes 347 shares of the Class B Stock owned by a trust, of which Mr. Eisenbrey, Jr. is a trustee and has a beneficial ownership interest, and 196 shares of the Class B Stock held in custodial accounts for Mr. Eisenbrey, Jr.'s daughters. |
(5) |
Includes 718 shares of the Class B Stock and 179 shares of the Class A Stock owned by Mr. Taylor's wife for which Mr. Taylor disclaims beneficial ownership. |
(6) |
Includes 12 shares of the Class A Stock held in custodial accounts for Mr. DiNunzio's sons. |
(7) |
Includes 64 shares of the Class B Stock held jointly by Ms. Welcher's husband and son, 730 shares of the Class B Stock held by Ms. Welcher's sons, 142 shares of the Class A Stock held by Ms. Welcher's husband and 706 shares of the Class A Stock held by Ms. Welcher's sons. Ms. Welcher disclaims beneficial ownership of all of the shares disclosed in the foregoing sentence. |
Equity Compensation Plan Information |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
|
|
||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
||||||
|
|
|||||
Total |
182,427 |
98,954 |
(1) |
Includes 13,100 shares available for issue under the stock and cash bonus plans for officers |
Item 13. - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The office building and shop complex utilized by Artesian Water are leased at an average annual rental of $175,000 from a partnership, White Clay Realty, in which certain of Artesian Resources' officers and directors are a partner or the beneficiary of a partner (Dian C. Taylor and John R. Eisenbrey, Jr.). The current rental of $175,000 is below market. Artesian Water, in December of 2002, filed a condemnation action in the Delaware Superior Court, seeking to acquire title to the office and shop complex currently leased by Artesian, known as 664 Churchmans Road, Newark, Delaware (the "Property"). Artesian Water filed this action under its statutory power of eminent domain against the owner of the Property, White Clay Realty, a Delaware Limited Partnership, and each of the limited partners. White Clay Realty has no general partner and the Superior Court has ruled that the partnership is dissolved and all of the former partners now own the Property jointly as tenants in common. A special c
ommittee of the Board of Directors, composed entirely of outside directors who have no ownership interest in the Property, made the determination to purchase the Property through the condemnation procedures. Under this procedure, if the acquisition of the Property is approved by the court, the fair market value of the Property will be determined by a panel of commissioners after an evidentiary hearing. Artesian Water's independent appraiser has valued the Property to be worth $3,800,000. Until a final determination of the condemnation, the parties have agreed that Artesian Water may continue to occupy the Property under the terms of the lease with a quarterly rental payment of $43,361.
In 2001, Artesian Water purchased for $875,000, certain parcels of land for water production wells from Glendale Enterprises Limited, a company wholly-owned by the estate of Ellis D. Taylor.
On April 29, 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with Ellis D. Taylor, who has since passed away, and his spouse, Helena C. Taylor (the "Taylors"), to repurchase 126,353 shares of Class B Stock and 24,165 shares of Class A Stock (the "Taylor Stock") owned by the Taylors. On May 4, 1999, the Company executed a promissory note (the "Note") in the principal amount of $4,450,000 representing the purchase price of the Taylor Stock. Commencing on June 30, 1999, the Note is payable quarterly, on a calendar basis, over a four-year period. The outstanding balance on the Note bears interest in an amount based on the quarterly dividend the Taylors would have received on the Stock transferred to the Company but not yet paid for by the Company. In addition, the principal installment is adjusted on a quarterly basis to reflect changes in the book value per common share of the Company as reported in its most recent quarterly financial statement distributed to stockholders prior to the quarterly payment. For
the year ended December 31, 2002, principal payments (including book value adjustments) totaled $1,321,000 and interest payments totaled $38,000. At December 31, 2002, the Company had $278,000 outstanding under the Note.
Item 14. - Controls and Procedures.
An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 12, 2003 was carried out by us under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed and are being operated in a manner that provides reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. A controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have b een detected. Subsequent to the date of the most recent evaluation of our internal controls, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Item 15. - Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
Page(s)* |
|||||
|
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
||||
(1) Financial Statements: |
|||||
Report of Independent Auditors |
41 |
||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2002 and 2001 |
19 |
||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2002 |
20 |
||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2002 |
21 |
||||
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the three years |
|||||
ended December 31, 2002 |
22-24 |
||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
25-40 |
||||
(2) Financial Statement Schedule: |
|||||
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
56 |
||||
(3) Exhibits: see (c) below |
|||||
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. A current report on Form 8-K dated December 3, 2002 was filed with the Securties and Exhange Commission on December 6, 2002 reporting the implementation of temporary rates. |
|||||
(c) Exhibits |
|||||
* Page number shown refers to page number in this Report on Form 10-K |
|||||
ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION |
|||||
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT |
|||||
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 |
|||||
INDEX TO EXHIBITS |
|||||
Exhibit |
|||||
Number |
Description |
||||
3.1 |
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective May 26, 1995 incorporated |
||||
by reference to Exhibit 3 filed with the Company Form 10-Q for the quarter ended |
|||||
June 30, 1995. |
|||||
3.3 |
By-laws of the Company effective April 27, 1993 incorporated by reference filed with |
||||
the Artesian Resources Corporation Form 8-K filed April 27, 1993. |
|||||
4.1 |
Thirteenth and Fourteenth Indentures dated as of June 17, 1997 between Artesian Water |
||||
Company, Inc., subsidiary of the Company, and the Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. |
|||||
Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Company's Form 10-Q for the |
|||||
quarter ended June 30, 1997. |
|||||
4.2 |
Twelfth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 5, 1995 between Artesian Water |
||||
Company, Inc. subsidiary of the Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. |
|||||
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Annual Report |
|||||
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995. |
|||||
4.3 |
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 16, 1993 between Artesian Water |
||||
Company, Inc., subsidiary of the Company and Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company. |
|||||
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Annual Report on Form |
|||||
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992. |
|||||
4.4 |
Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1989 between Artesian Water Company, |
||||
Inc., subsidiary of the Company, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. Incorporated |
|||||
by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10 |
|||||
filed April 30, 1990 and as amended by Form 8 filed on June 19, 1990. |
|||||
10.4 |
Artesian Resources Corporation Incentive Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995. |
||||
10.5 |
Share Repurchase Agreement dated April 28, 1999 and related Promissory Note dated May 4, 1999. |
||||
10.6 |
Officer's Medical Reimbursement Plan dated May 27, 1992. Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit filed with the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.** |
||||
11 |
Statement Re: Computation of Net Income per Class A and Class B Common Shares.* |
||||
21 |
Subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2002.* |
||||
23.1 |
The consent of KPMG LLP.* |
||||
24.1 |
Power of Attorney (included on signature page).* |
||||
99.1 |
Form of Officer Certifications Required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
SIGNATURES |
||
ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION |
||
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has |
||
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. |
||
Date: 3/21/03 |
By: David B. Spacht /s/ |
|
David B. Spacht, Vice President, Chief |
||
Financial Officer and Treasurer |
||
|
||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
||
Each person in so signing also makes, constitutes and appoints Dian C. Taylor, Chairman, President, and |
||
Chief Executive Officer of Artesian Resources Corporation, and David B. Spacht, Vice President, Chief |
||
Financial Officer and Treasurer of Artesian Resources Corporation, and each of them acting alone, as his |
||
or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, in his or her name, place and stead, to execute and cause to be |
||
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission any or all amendments to this report. |
||
|
||
Signature |
Title |
Date |
Principal Executive Officer: |
||
/s/ Dian C. Taylor |
||
Dian C. Taylor |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
3/21/03 |
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer: |
||
/s/ David B. Spacht |
||
David B. Spacht |
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
3/21/03 |
and Treasurer |
||
Directors: |
||
/s/ Dian C. Taylor |
||
Dian C. Taylor |
Director |
3/21/03 |
/s/ Norman H. Taylor, Jr. |
||
Norman H. Taylor, Jr. |
Director |
3/21/03 |
/s/ Kenneth R. Biederman |
||
Kenneth R. Biederman |
Director |
3/21/03 |
/s/ William C. Wyer |
||
William C. Wyer |
Director |
3/21/03 |
/s/ John R. Eisenbrey, Jr. |
||
John R. Eisenbrey, Jr. |
Director |
3/21/03 |
|
ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION |
|||
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT |
||||
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 |
||||
INDEX TO EXHIBITS |
||||
Exhibit |
||||
Number |
Description |
|||
3.1 |
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company effective May 26, 1995 incorporated |
|||
by reference to Exhibit 3 filed with the Company Form 10-Q for the quarter ended |
||||
June 30, 1995. |
||||
3.3 |
By-laws of the Company effective April 27, 1993 incorporated by reference filed with |
|||
the Artesian Resources Corporation Form 8-K filed April 27, 1993. |
||||
4.1 |
Thirteenth and Fourteenth Indentures dated as of June 17, 1997 between Artesian Water |
|||
Company, Inc., subsidiary of the Company, and the Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. |
||||
Incorporated by reference to the exhibits filed with the Company's Form 10-Q for the |
||||
quarter ended June 30, 1997. |
||||
4.2 |
Twelfth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 5, 1995 between Artesian Water |
|||
Company, Inc. subsidiary of the Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. |
||||
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Annual Report |
||||
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995. |
||||
4.3 |
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 16, 1993 between Artesian Water |
|||
Company, Inc., subsidiary of the Company and Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company. |
||||
Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Annual Report on Form |
||||
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992. |
||||
4.4 |
Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 1989 between Artesian Water Company, |
|||
Inc., subsidiary of the Company, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. Incorporated |
||||
by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10 |
||||
filed April 30, 1990 and as amended by Form 8 filed on June 19, 1990. |
||||
10.4 |
Artesian Resources Corporation Incentive Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to the exhibit filed with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995. |
|||
10.5 |
Share Repurchase Agreement dated April 28, 1999 and related Promissory Note dated May 4, 1999. |
|||
10.6 |
Officer's Medical Reimbursement Plan dated May 27, 1992. Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit filed with the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.** |
|||
11 |
Statement Re: Computation of Net Income per Class A and Class B Common Shares.* |
|||
21 |
Subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2002.* |
|||
23.1 |
The consent of KPMG LLP.* |
|||
24.1 |
Power of Attorney (included on signature page).* |
|||
99.1 |
Form of Officer Certifications Required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
____________________________ |
|
* |
Filed herewith. |
** |
Compensation plan or arrangement required to be filed or incorporated as an exhibit. |
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Dian C. Taylor certify that:
Date: March 21, 2003
Dian C. Taylor/s/
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, David B. Spacht, certify that:
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, the periods presented in this Report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 21, 2003
David B. Spacht/s/
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 11
ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION |
||||||
COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE |
||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
Earnings |
||||||
Income Applicable to Common Stock Shares, |
$ |
4,125,431 |
$ |
3,270,342 |
$ |
2,389,731 |
to Class A Non-Voting and Class B Common Stock |
||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
||||||
Basic |
2,355,640 |
2,026,276 |
2,007,190 |
|||
Diluted |
2,408,392 |
2,071,543 |
2,043,965 |
|||
Net Income per Common Share, to Class A |
||||||
Non-Voting and Class B Common Stock |
||||||
Basic |
$ |
1.75 |
$ |
1.61 |
$ |
1.19 |
Diluted |
$ |
1.71 |
$ |
1.58 |
$ |
1.17 |
EXHIBIT 21
ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Subsidiaries of Registrant
The following list includes the Registrant and all of its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002. The voting equity interests of each company shown is owned, to the extent indicated by the percentage, the company immediately above, which is not indented to the same degree. All subsidiaries of the Registrant appearing in the following table are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries.
|
|
Percentage of Voting |
Artesian Resources Corporation |
Delaware |
|
Artesian Water Company, Inc. |
Delaware |
100 |
Artesian Water Pennsylvania, Inc. |
Pennsylvania |
100 |
Artesian Development Corporation |
Delaware |
100 |
Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc. |
Delaware |
100 |
AquaStructure Delaware, L.L.C. |
Delaware |
33 1/3 |
ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
Balance at |
Charged to |
Charged |
|
Balance at |
Classification |
|||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2000 |
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-78043) on Form S-8 of Artesian Resources Corporation of our report dated February 7, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Artesian Resource Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of Artesian Resources Corporation.
/s/KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 19, 2003
ARTESIAN RESOURCE CORPORATION
FORM OF OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements
I, Dian C. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer, and David B. Spacht, Chief Financial Officer, of Artesian Resources Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on our knowledge:
Date: As of March 21, 2003
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER:
_______________________________ _________________________
Dian C. Taylor/s/s David B. Spacht/s/
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----