HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

The following are definitions of significant terms used in this Form 10-Q:

Bbl		Barrel (of oil)

Mcf		Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas)

MMBtu		One million British Thermal Units, a common energy measurement

net proceeds		Gross proceeds received by XTO Energy from sale of production from the underlying properties, less applicable costs, as defined in the net profits interest conveyances

net profits income		Net proceeds multiplied by the net profits percentage of 80%, which is paid to the trust by XTO Energy. “Net profits income” is referred to as “royalty income” for tax reporting purposes.

net profits interest		An interest in an oil and gas property measured by net profits from the sale of production, rather than a specific portion of production. The following defined net profits interests were conveyed to the trust from the underlying properties:

.		80% net profits interests - interests that entitle the trust to receive 80% of the net proceeds from the underlying properties

underlying properties		XTO Energy’s interest in certain oil and gas properties from which the net profits interests were conveyed. The underlying properties include working interests in predominantly gas-producing properties located in Kansas, Oklahoma and Wyoming.

working interest		An operating interest in an oil and gas property that provides the owner a specified share of production that is subject to all production expense and development costs

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

The condensed financial statements included herein are presented, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the trustee believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the trust’s financial statements and the notes thereto included in the trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of the trustee, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust at June 30, 2007 and the distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 have been included. Distributable income for such interim periods is not necessarily indicative of the distributable income for the full year.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Bank of America, N.A., as Trustee

for the Hugoton Royalty Trust:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust as of June 30, 2007 and the related condensed statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. These condensed financial statements are the responsibility of the trustee.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

The accompanying condensed financial statements are prepared on a modified cash basis as described in Note 1 which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with the basis of accounting described in Note 1.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Hugoton Royalty Trust as of December 31, 2006, and the related statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the year then ended (not presented herein), included in the trust’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in our report dated February 28, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus included in the trust’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K from which it has been derived.

KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas

July 19, 2007

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Condensed Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Trust Corpus

	June 30,	December 31,
	2007	2006
	(Unaudited)

ASSETS

Cash and short-term investments	$4,919,280	$1,813,000

Net profits interests in oil and gas properties - net (Note 1)	159,594,894	163,796,772

	$164,514,174	$165,609,772
LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS

Distribution payable to unitholders	$4,919,280	$1,813,000

Trust corpus (40,000,000 units of beneficial interest authorized and outstanding)	159,594,894	163,796,772

	$164,514,174	$165,609,772

The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Condensed Statements of Distributable Income (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30		June 30
	2007	2006	2007	2006

Net profits income	$21,251,246	$21,125,072	$37,986,631	$60,210,966

Interest income	40,122	50,097	69,169	136,342

Total income	21,291,368	21,175,169	38,055,800	60,347,308

Administration expense	445,368	202,929	967,520	333,468

Distributable income	$20,846,000	$20,972,240	$37,088,280	$60,013,840

Distributable income per unit (40,000,000 units)	$0.521150	$0.524306	$0.927207	$1.500346

The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Condensed Statements of Changes in Trust Corpus (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30
	2007		2006		2007		2006

Trust corpus, beginning of period	$161,914,911		$169,197,088		$163,796,772		$171,935,330

Amortization of net profits interests	(2,320,017	)	(2,092,453	)	(4,201,878	)	(4,830,695	)

Distributable income	20,846,000		20,972,240		37,088,280		60,013,840

Distributions declared	(20,846,000	)	(20,972,240	)	(37,088,280	)	(60,013,840	)

Trust corpus, end of period	$159,594,894		$167,104,635		$159,594,894		$167,104,635

The accompanying notes to condensed financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Basis of Accounting

The financial statements of Hugoton Royalty Trust are prepared on the following basis and are not intended to present financial position and results of operations in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”):

· Net profits income recorded for a month is the amount computed and paid by XTO Energy Inc., the owner of the underlying properties, to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee for the trust. Net profits income consists of net proceeds received by XTO Energy from the underlying properties in the prior month, multiplied by a net profits percentage of 80%.

Costs deducted in the calculation of net proceeds for the 80% net profits interests generally include applicable taxes, transportation, marketing and legal costs, production expense, development costs, operating charges and other costs.

· Net profits income is computed separately for each of three conveyances under which the net profits interests were conveyed to the trust. If monthly costs exceed revenues for any conveyance, such excess costs must be recovered, with accrued interest, from future net proceeds of that conveyance and cannot reduce net proceeds from the other conveyances.

· Trust expenses are recorded based on liabilities paid and cash reserves established by the trustee for liabilities and contingencies.

· Distributions to unitholders are recorded when declared by the trustee.

The trust’s financial statements differ from those prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP because revenues are recognized when received rather than accrued in the month of production, expenses are recognized when paid rather than when incurred and certain cash reserves may be established by the trustee for contingencies which would not be recorded under U.S. GAAP. This comprehensive basis of accounting other than U.S. GAAP corresponds to the accounting permitted for royalty trusts by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as specified by Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts.

Most accounting pronouncements apply to entities whose financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, directing such entities to accrue or defer revenues and expenses in a period other than when such revenues were received or expenses were paid. Because the trust’s financial statements are prepared on the modified cash basis, as described above, most accounting pronouncements are not applicable to the trust’s financial statements.

The initial carrying value of the net profits interests of $247,066,951 represents XTO Energy’s historical net book value for the interests on December 1, 1998, the date of the transfer to the trust. Amortization of the net profits interests is calculated on a unit-of-production basis and charged directly to trust corpus. Accumulated amortization was $87,472,057 as of June 30, 2007 and $83,270,179 as of December 31, 2006.

2. Development Costs

The following summarizes actual development costs, budgeted development costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income, and the cumulative actual costs compared to the amount deducted:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted - beginning of period	$5,311,688		$(2,436,653	)	$(3,410,174	)	$113,905
Actual costs	(10,010,915	)	(11,059,379	)	(13,789,053	)	(23,509,937	)
Budgeted costs deducted	7,750,000		12,600,000		20,250,000		22,500,000
Cumulative actual costs under (over) the amount deducted - end of period	$3,050,773		$(896,032	)	$3,050,773		$(896,032	)

As a result of increased development activity and higher costs, the monthly development deduction was increased to $5.0 million beginning with the August 2006 distribution. With a reduction in development activity in first quarter 2007 and based on the development budget for 2007, the development cost deduction was lowered to $3.75 million beginning with the February 2007 distribution. Because of lower than anticipated actual costs as a result of the timing of expenditures, the development cost deduction was lowered to $2.0 million for the April and May 2007 distributions, but was increased to $3.75 million with the June 2007 distribution and is expected to be maintained at that level through year end.

XTO Energy has advised the trustee that total 2007 budgeted development costs for the underlying properties are approximately $46.0 million. The 2007 budget year generally coincides with the trust distribution months from April 2007 through March 2008. The monthly development cost deduction will be reevaluated by XTO Energy and revised as necessary, based on the 2007 budget and the timing and amount of actual expenditures.

3. Contingencies

Litigation

On October 17, 1997, an action, styled United States of America ex rel. Grynberg v. Cross Timbers Oil Company, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma by Jack J. Grynberg on behalf of the United States under the qui tam provisions of the U.S. False Claims Act against XTO Energy. The plaintiff alleges that XTO Energy underpaid royalties on natural gas produced from federal leases and lands owned by Native Americans in amounts in excess of 20% as a result of mismeasuring the volume of natural gas, incorrectly analyzing its heating content and improperly valuing the natural gas during at least the past ten years. The plaintiff seeks treble damages for the unpaid royalties (with interest, attorney’s fees and expenses), civil penalties between $5,000 and $10,000 for each violation of the U.S. False Claims Act, and an order for XTO Energy to cease the allegedly improper measuring practices. This lawsuit against XTO Energy and similar lawsuits filed by Grynberg against more than 300 other companies have been consolidated in the United States District Court for Wyoming. In October 2002, the court granted a motion to dismiss Grynberg’s royalty valuation claims, and Grynberg’s appeal of this decision was dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction in May 2003. In response to a motion to dismiss filed by XTO Energy and other defendants in October 2006, the district judge held that Grynberg failed to establish the jurisdictional requirements to maintain the action against XTO Energy and other defendants and dismissed the actions for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Grynberg has filed an appeal of this decision. While XTO Energy is unable to predict the final outcome of this case or estimate the amount of any possible loss, it has informed the trustee that it believes that the allegations of this lawsuit are without merit and intends to vigorously defend the action. However, an order to change measuring practices or a related settlement could adversely affect the trust by reducing net proceeds in the future by an amount that is presently not determinable, but, in XTO Energy management’s opinion, is not currently expected to be material to the trust’s annual distributable income, financial position or liquidity.

An amended petition for a class action lawsuit, Beer, et al. v. XTO Energy Inc., was filed in January 2006, in the District Court of Texas County, Oklahoma by royalty owners of natural gas wells in Oklahoma. The plaintiffs allege that XTO Energy has not properly accounted to the plaintiffs for the royalties to which they are entitled and seek an accounting regarding the natural gas and other products produced from their wells and the prices paid for the natural gas and other products produced, and for payment of the monies allegedly owed since June 2002, with a certain limited number of plaintiffs claiming monies owed for additional time. A hearing on the class certification has not been scheduled. The plaintiffs have not alleged, in their petition, an amount they are seeking. XTO Energy has informed the trustee that it believes that it has strong defenses to this lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend its position. However, if XTO Energy ultimately makes any settlement payments or receives a judgment against it, the trust will bear its 80% share of such settlement or judgment related to production from the underlying properties. Additionally, if a judgment or settlement increases the amount of future payments to royalty owners, the trust would bear its proportionate share of the increased payments through reduced net proceeds. XTO Energy has informed the trustee that, although the amount of any reduction in net proceeds is not presently determinable, in its management’s opinion, the amount is not currently expected to be material to the trust’s annual distributable income, financial position or liquidity.

Certain of the underlying properties are involved in various other lawsuits and certain governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. XTO Energy has advised the trustee that it does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims will have a material effect on trust annual distributable income, financial position or liquidity.

Other

Several states have enacted legislation to require state income tax withholding from nonresident recipients of oil and gas proceeds. After consultation with its state tax counsel, XTO Energy has advised the trustee that it believes the trust is not subject to these withholding requirements. However, regulations could be issued by the various states which could change this conclusion. Should the trust be required to withhold state taxes, distributions to the unitholders would be reduced by the required amount, subject to the unitholder’s right to file a state tax return to claim any refund due.

Item 2. Trustee’s Discussion and Analysis.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the trustee’s discussion and analysis contained in the trust’s 2006 annual report, as well as the condensed financial statements and notes thereto included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports are available on the trust’s web site at www.hugotontrust.com.

Distributable Income

Quarter

For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, net profits income was $21,251,246, as compared to $21,125,072 for second quarter 2006. This 1% increase in net profits income is primarily the result of lower development costs, partially offset by lower oil and gas prices, lower gas sales volumes and increased production expense. See “Net Profits Income” on the following page.

After adding interest income of $40,122 and deducting administration expense of $445,368, distributable income for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $20,846,000, or $0.521150 per unit of beneficial interest. Administration expense for the quarter increased from the prior year quarter primarily because of higher costs related to additional unitholder tax reporting and an increased number of unitholders. For second quarter 2006, distributable income was $20,972,240 or $0.524306 per unit. Distributions to unitholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were:

		Distribution
Record Date	Payment Date	per Unit

April 30, 2007	May 14, 2007	$0.175096
May 31, 2007	June 14, 2007	0.223072
June 29, 2007	July 16, 2007	0.122982
		$0.521150

Six Months

For the six months ended June 30, 2007, net profits income was $37,986,631, compared with $60,210,966 for the same 2006 period. This 37% decrease in net profits income is primarily the result of lower gas prices and gas sales volumes, partially offset by lower development costs. See “Net Profits Income” on the following page.

After adding interest income of $69,169 and deducting administration expense of $967,520, distributable income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was $37,088,280, or $0.927207 per unit of beneficial interest. Administration expense for the first six months of 2007 was significantly higher than in the first six months of 2006 primarily because of higher costs related to additional unitholder tax reporting and an increased number of unitholders. Decreased interest income over these periods was primarily because of lower net profits income. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, distributable income was $60,013,840, or $1.500346 per unit.

Net Profits Income

Net profits income is recorded when received by the trust, which is the month following receipt by XTO Energy, and generally two months after oil and gas production. Net profits income is generally affected by three major factors:

· oil and gas sales volumes,

· oil and gas sales prices, and

· costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income.

The following is a summary of the calculation of net profits income received by the trust:

	Three Months			Six Months
	Ended June 30 (a)		Increase	Ended June 30 (a)		Increase
	2007	2006	(Decrease)	2007	2006	(Decrease)
Sales Volumes
Gas (Mcf) (b)
Underlying properties	6,772,042	7,176,303	(6%)	13,858,793	14,586,316	(5%)
Average per day	76,090	80,633	(6%)	76,568	80,587	(5%)
Net profits interests	3,267,244	3,309,314	(1%)	5,917,208	7,639,883	(23%)

Oil (Bbls) (b)
Underlying properties	78,597	82,719	(5%)	146,723	160,984	(9%)
Average per day	883	929	(5%)	811	889	(9%)
Net profits interests	40,089	36,854	9%	73,266	83,903	(13%)

Average Sales Prices
Gas (per Mcf)	$6.21	$6.32	(2%)	$6.07	$7.73	(21%)
Oil (per Bbl)	$58.60	$63.54	(8%)	$57.94	$61.38	(6%)

Revenues
Gas sales	$42,048,589	$45,389,975	(7%)	$84,113,926	$112,794,726	(25%)
Oil sales	4,605,736	5,255,704	(12%)	8,500,434	9,881,003	(14%)

Total Revenues	46,654,325	50,645,679	(8%)	92,614,360	122,675,729	(25%)

Costs
Taxes, transportation and other	4,588,818	4,868,673	(6%)	9,453,616	10,596,228	(11%)
Production expense	5,556,962	4,778,536	16%	11,015,529	10,325,253	7%
Development costs (c)	7,750,000	12,600,000	(38%)	20,250,000	22,500,000	(10%)
Overhead	2,194,487	1,992,130	10%	4,411,926	3,990,541	11%

Total Costs	20,090,267	24,239,339	(17%)	45,131,071	47,412,022	(5%)

Net Proceeds	26,564,058	26,406,340	1%	47,483,289	75,263,707	(37%)

Net Profits Percentage	80%	80%		80%	80%

Net Profits Income	$21,251,246	$21,125,072	1%	$37,986,631	$60,210,966	(37%)

(a)	Because of the two-month interval between time of production and receipt of net profits income by the trust, (1) oil and gas sales for the quarter ended June 30 generally represent production for the period February through April and (2) oil and gas sales for the six months ended June 30 generally represent production for the period November through April.

(b)	Oil and gas sales volumes are allocated to the net profits interests based upon a formula that considers oil and gas prices and the total amount of production expense and development costs. Changes in any of these factors may result in disproportionate fluctuations in volumes allocated to the net profits interests. Therefore, comparative discussion of oil and gas sales volumes is based on the underlying properties.

(c)	See Note 2 to Condensed Financial Statements.

The following are explanations of significant variances on the underlying properties from second quarter 2006 to second quarter 2007 and from the first six months of 2006 to the comparable period in 2007:

Sales Volumes

Gas

Gas sales volumes decreased 6% for the second quarter and 5% for the six-month period primarily because of natural production decline, partially offset by increased production from new wells and workovers and the timing of cash receipts.

Oil

Oil sales volumes decreased 5% for the second quarter and 9% for the six-month period primarily because of natural production decline, partially offset by increased production from new wells and workovers and the timing of cash receipts. In addition, oil sales volumes decreased for the six-month period because of prior period volume adjustments in 2007.

Sales Prices

Gas

The second quarter 2007 average gas price was $6.21 per Mcf, a 2% decrease from the second quarter 2006 average gas price of $6.32 per Mcf. For the six-month period, the average gas price decreased 21% to $6.07 per Mcf in 2007 from $7.73 per Mcf in 2006. The aftermath of 2005 Gulf of Mexico hurricane activity elevated 2006 prices, while the lack of such activity in 2006 contributed to lower prices in 2007. Prices will continue to be affected by weather, the U.S. economy, the level of North American production, crude oil prices and import levels of liquified natural gas, and are expected to remain volatile. The second quarter 2007 gas price is primarily related to production from February through April 2007, when the average NYMEX price was $7.34 per MMBtu, or 3% lower than the comparable 2006 period average NYMEX price of $7.58 per MMBtu. The average NYMEX price for May and June 2007 was $7.55 per MMBtu. At July 16, 2007, the average NYMEX futures price for the following twelve months was $7.63 per MMBtu. Recent trust gas prices have averaged approximately 20% lower than the NYMEX price.

Recent gas prices in the Rocky Mountain region have been significantly lower as a result of pipeline constraints and lower regional demand. This has resulted in lower realized prices for the trust’s Wyoming gas production. Realized gas prices for May 2007 Wyoming production were approximately 33% lower than the NYMEX price. With current pipeline expansions not projected for completion until late 2007 or early 2008, the lower realized gas prices are expected to continue for the remainder of the year. At July 16, 2007, the average futures price for the following six months is expected to be approximately 38% lower than the NYMEX price. Wyoming gas production was approximately 28% of total trust gas production for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007.

Oil

The second quarter 2007 average oil price was $58.60 per Bbl, an 8% decrease from the second quarter 2006 average oil price of $63.54 per Bbl. The year-to-date average oil price decreased 6% to $57.94 per Bbl in 2007 from $61.38 per Bbl in 2006. Oil prices were lower for both periods primarily because of higher oil prices in 2006 as a result of 2005 Gulf of Mexico hurricanes, supply shortage concerns and inadequate sour crude refining capacity. Declining gasoline supplies, strong global demand and geopolitical concerns have

caused recent oil prices to fluctuate between $65.00 and $74.00 per Bbl. Oil prices are expected to remain volatile. The average NYMEX price for May and June 2007 was $65.52 per Bbl. At July 16, 2007, the average NYMEX futures price for the following twelve months was $73.45 per Bbl. Recent trust oil prices have averaged approximately 5% lower than the NYMEX price.

Costs

Taxes

Taxes, transportation and other decreased 6% for the quarter and 11% for the six-month period primarily because of decreased production taxes related to lower revenues. In addition, decreased taxes, transportation and other for the six-month period was partially offset by increased property taxes related to the timing of cash disbursements.

Production

Production expense increased 16% for the quarter and 7% for the six-month period primarily because of increased repair and maintenance, compressor rental, labor and other costs, partially offset by decreased fuel costs.

Development

Development costs deducted in the calculation of net profits income are based on the development budget. These development costs decreased 38% for the second quarter and 10% for the six-month period primarily because of the timing of development activity and expenditures and lower costs. During the first half of 2007, 13 wells were completed and six wells were pending completion on the underlying properties at June 30.

As of December 31, 2006, cumulative actual costs exceeded cumulative budgeted costs deducted by approximately $3.4 million. In calculating net profits income, XTO Energy deducted budgeted development costs of $7.8 million for the quarter and $20.3 million for the six-month period. After considering actual development costs of $10.0 million for the quarter and $13.8 million for the six-month period, cumulative budgeted costs deducted exceeded actual costs by approximately $3.1 million at June 30, 2007.

Overhead

Overhead increased 10% for the quarter and 11% for the six-month period primarily because of the annual rate adjustment based on an industry index and prior period adjustments.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements regarding the net profits interests, underlying properties, development activities, annual and monthly development, production and other costs and expenses, oil and gas prices and differentials to NYMEX prices, supply shortages, future drilling, completion of pipeline expansions, workover and restimulation plans, distributions to unitholders and industry and market conditions, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties which are detailed in Part I, Item 1A of the trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which is incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. Although XTO Energy and the trustee believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither XTO Energy nor the trustee can give any assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

There have been no material changes in the trust’s market risks, as disclosed in Part II, Item 7A of the trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the trustee carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the trust’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, the trustee concluded that the trust’s disclosure controls and procedures are functioning effectively to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods required and that this information is accumulated and communicated to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In its evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures, the trustee has relied, to the extent considered reasonable, on information provided by XTO Energy. There has not been any change in the trust’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the trust’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Not applicable.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed under Part I, Item 1A of the trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Items 2 through 5.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits.

	Exhibit Number and Description

	(15)		Awareness letter of KPMG LLP

	(31)		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

	(32)		Section 1350 Certification

	(99)		Items 1A, 7 and 7A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for Hugoton Royalty Trust filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST
	By BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE


	By	/S/ NANCY G. WILLIS
			Nancy G. Willis
		Vice President


	XTO ENERGY INC.


Date: July 20, 2007	By	/S/ LOUIS G. BALDWIN
				Louis G. Baldwin
		Executive Vice President
		and Chief Financial Officer

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 1-10476

Texas	58-6379215
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

Bank of America, N.A., P.O. Box 830650, Dallas, Texas		75283-0650
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(877) 228-5083
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NONE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if change since last report)

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hugoton Royalty Trust, for which Bank of America, N.A. acts as Trustee;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), or for causing such controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and I have:

	(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes;

	(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors:

	(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.



	Glossary of Terms

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

	Condensed Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Trust Corpus at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006


	Condensed Statements of Distributable Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006


	Condensed Statements of Changes in Trust Corpus for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Item 2.	Trustee’s Discussion and Analysis

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.	Risk Factors

Item 6.	Exhibits

	Signatures

	Bank of America, N.A.,
		Trustee for Hugoton Royalty Trust


July 20, 2007	By		/S/ NANCY G. WILLIS
			Nancy G. Willis
			Vice President