XML 42 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies.  
Commitments and Contingencies

9.  Commitments and Contingencies

 

Environmental Contingencies

 

We are currently involved with certain environmental remediation projects related to activities at former manufacturing operations of our wholly owned subsidiary Earle M. Jorgensen Company (“EMJ”) that were sold many years prior to our acquisition of EMJ in 2006. Although the potential cleanup costs could be significant, EMJ had insurance policies in place at the time they owned the manufacturing operations that are expected to cover the majority of the related costs. We do not expect that these obligations will have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Legal Matters

 

On April 29, 2014, a judgment was entered against the Company and its subsidiary, Chapel Steel Corp. (“Chapel”), along with four other co-defendants, in an antitrust lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. As previously disclosed, Reliance has been involved in this legal proceeding brought by two former employees who left the Company to start their own business and claim that Reliance and the co-defendants engaged in anticompetitive activities. The judgment, entered against all defendants jointly and severally, awarded the plaintiff $156 million in damages, representing a trebling under federal antitrust laws of the jury verdict of $52 million in damages. On May 27, 2014 the judgment was reduced to $153.5 million. All remaining defendants, including Reliance and Chapel, have filed Notices of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit seeking to have the judgment reversed, altered, or amended. Execution on the judgment is stayed pending the appeal. Despite the judgment, Reliance currently believes a reasonable range of its potential loss in this matter is between $10.0 million and $38.4 million.  The low end of the estimated range of potential loss is based on our current belief that we may be successful in our efforts, including the appeal or other proceeding, in reducing the judgment and/or settling this matter.  The high end of the estimated range of potential loss represents our estimate of Reliance’s maximum share of the judgment should we be unsuccessful in reducing the judgment or settling the matter at a lower amount.  We have determined that no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount and, therefore, have recognized a contingent liability equal to the minimum amount of the range. Our estimated range of potential loss is based on our opinion regarding the current status and likelihood of final resolution through appeal or other proceedings, and could change as a result of developments in the appeal or other proceedings or if the likelihood of settlement changes.  The ultimate financial obligation resulting from resolution of this matter could vary, perhaps materially, from our estimated range of potential loss.

 

From time to time, we are named as a defendant in legal actions. Generally, these actions arise out of our normal course of business. Except as disclosed above, we are not a party to any pending legal proceedings other than routine litigation incidental to the business. We expect that these other matters will be resolved without a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. We maintain liability insurance against risks arising out of our ordinary course of business.