XML 84 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The impact of our creditworthiness has been considered in the fair value measurements noted below. In addition, the fair value measurement of a liability must reflect the nonperformance risk of an entity.
In thousands
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Total as of
December 31, 2014
 
Level 1
Inputs
 
Level 2
Inputs
 
Level 3
Inputs
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
22,236

 
$
22,236

 
$

 
$

Short-term investments
380

 
380

 

 

Derivative financial instruments
515

 

 
515

 

Total assets
$
23,131

 
$
22,616

 
$
515

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$
19,941

 
$

 
$

 
$
19,941

Derivative financial instruments
$
2,408

 
$

 
$
2,408

 
$

Total liabilities
$
22,349

 
$

 
$
2,408

 
$
19,941


In thousands
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
Total as of
December 31, 2013
 
Level 1
Inputs
 
Level 2
Inputs
 
Level 3
Inputs
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
67,167

 
$
67,167

 
$

 
$

Short-term investments
413

 
413

 

 

Total assets
$
67,580

 
$
67,580

 
$

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$
12,527

 
$

 
$

 
$
12,527

Total liabilities
$
12,527

 
$

 
$

 
$
12,527


For our derivative financial instruments we use a market approach valuation technique based on observable market transactions of spot and forward rates.
We recorded a $0.5 million asset related to the fair value of the U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar foreign currency swap which was classified as other assets at December 31, 2014. The objective of the swap is to offset the foreign exchange risk to the U.S. dollar equivalent cash outflows for our Canadian subsidiary.
We recorded a $2.4 million liability related to the fair value of treasury locks which was classified as current liabilities at December 31, 2014. The purpose was to lock in the treasury rate on the issuance of expected private placement debt and to eliminate interest rate risk. The fair value of the hedge was calculated by taking the present value of the difference between the locked rate and the forward rates at December 31, 2014. The hedge will terminate in April 2015 at which time the settlement amount, net of tax, will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income and amortized to net interest expense over the life of the underlying debt.
We had contingent consideration liabilities recorded using Level 3 inputs in the amount of $19.9 million, of which $7.9 million was classified as current liabilities at December 31, 2014. Contingent consideration liabilities were $12.5 million at December 31, 2013. Contingent consideration represents amounts expected to be paid as part of acquisition consideration only if certain future events occur. These events are usually targets for revenues or earnings related to the business acquired. We arrive at the fair value of contingent consideration by applying a weighted probability of potential outcomes to the maximum possible payout. The calculation of these potential outcomes is dependent on both past financial performance and management assumptions about future performance. If the financial performance measures were all fully met, our maximum liability would be $23.8 million at December 31, 2014. Contingent consideration liabilities are reassessed each quarter and are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in current liabilities within "Other current liabilities" and in noncurrent liabilities within "Other liabilities." Changes to contingent consideration are reflected in the table below:
In thousands
Contingent consideration at January 1, 2014
 
$
12,527

Increases due to acquisitions
 
17,174

Decrease due to change in noncontrolling interests
 
(4,379
)
Decrease due to payments
 
(2,737
)
Changes due to foreign currency fluctuations
 
(1,192
)
Changes in fair value reflected in Selling, general, and administrative expenses
 
(1,452
)
Contingent consideration at December 31, 2014
 
$
19,941


Fair Value of Debt: At December 31, 2014, the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations was estimated, using Level 2 inputs, at $1.67 billion compared to a carrying amount of $1.66 billion. At December 31, 2013, the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations was estimated, using Level 2 inputs, at $1.41 billion compared to a carrying amount of $1.43 billion. The fair values were estimated using an income approach by applying market interest rates for comparable instruments. The Company has no current plans to retire a significant amount of its debt prior to maturity.
There were no movements of items between fair value hierarchies.