1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and Basis of Presentation – BE Aerospace, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) designs, manufactures, sells and services commercial aircraft and business jet cabin interior products consisting of a broad range of seating, interior systems, including structures for food and beverage storage and preparation equipment, and distributes aerospace fasteners and consumables. The Company’s principal customers are the operators of commercial and business jet aircraft, aircraft manufacturers and their suppliers. As a result, the Company’s business is directly dependent upon the conditions in the commercial airline, business jet and aircraft manufacturing industries. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Consolidation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BE Aerospace, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Financial Statement Preparation – The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition – Sales of products are recorded when the earnings process is complete. This generally occurs when the products are shipped to the customer in accordance with the contract or purchase order, risk of loss and title has passed to the customer, collectability is reasonably assured and pricing is fixed and determinable. In instances where title does not pass to the customer upon shipment, the Company recognizes revenue upon delivery or customer acceptance, depending on the terms of the sales contract.

Service revenues primarily consist of engineering activities and are recorded when services are performed.

Revenues and costs under certain long-term contracts are recognized using contract accounting under the percentage-of-completion method in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-35, Construction–Type and Production–Type Contracts (“ASC 605-35”), with the majority of the contracts accounted for under the cost-to-cost method. Under the cost-to-cost method, the revenues related to the long-term contracts are recognized based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to total estimated costs to be incurred. The Company uses the units-of-delivery method to account for certain contracts, principally with the Boeing Company and Airbus Industries. Under the units-of delivery method, revenues are recognized based on the contract price of units delivered.

The percentage-of-completion method requires the use of estimates of costs to complete long-term contracts. Due to the duration of these contracts as well as the technical nature of the products involved, the estimation of these costs requires management’s judgment in connection with assumptions and projections related to the outcome of future events. Management’s assumptions include future labor performance and rates and projections relative to material and overhead costs, as well as the quantity and timing of product deliveries. The Company reevaluates its contract estimates periodically and reflects changes in estimates in the current period using the cumulative catch-up method. Revenues associated with any contractual claims are recognized when it is probable that the claim will result in additional contract revenue and the amount can be reasonably estimated. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, approximately 15%, 14% and 16% of our revenues, respectively, were derived from contracts accounted for using percentage of completion accounting. Net costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts were $72.2 and $63.3 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Excess over average costs on long term contracts accounted for using the units of production method of accounting were $87.1 and $69.4 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in the period in which the losses become evident and determinable.

Income Taxes – The Company provides deferred income taxes for temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for income tax purposes. Deferred income taxes are computed using enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company records uncertain tax positions within income tax expense and classifies interest and penalties related to income tax as income tax expense.

Cash Equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable – The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer's current creditworthiness, as determined by review of their current credit information. The Company continuously monitors collections and payments from its customers and maintains a provision for estimated credit losses based upon historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that have been identified. The allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $8.2 and $7.4, respectively.

Inventories – The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market, using FIFO or weighted average cost method. The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on historical demand, as well as an estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements. Demand for the Company’s products can fluctuate significantly. In accordance with industry practice, costs in inventory include amounts relating to long-term contracts with long production cycles and to inventory items with long procurement cycles, some of which are not expected to be realized within one year.

Property and Equipment– Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated generally under the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of one to fifty years (or the lesser of the term of the lease for leasehold improvements, as appropriate).

Debt Issuance Costs – Costs incurred to issue debt are deferred and amortized as interest expense over the term of the related debt. Unamortized debt issue costs are written off at the time of prepayment.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets – Under FASB ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed at least annually for impairment. Acquired intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their individual useful lives. Patents and other intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over periods ranging from five to thirty-four years.

The Company has eight reporting units, which were determined based on materiality and on the guidelines contained in FASB ASC Topic 350, Subtopic 20, Section 35. Each reporting unit represents either (a) an operating segment (which is also a reportable segment) or (b) a component of an operating segment, which constitutes a business, for which there is discrete financial information available that is regularly reviewed by segment management.

On at least an annual basis, management assesses whether there has been any impairment in the value of goodwill by first comparing the fair value to the net carrying value of reporting units. If the carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the implied fair value of the asset being tested is less than its carrying value. In this event, the asset is written down accordingly. The fair values of reporting units for goodwill impairment testing are determined using valuation techniques based on estimates, judgments and assumptions management believes are appropriate in the circumstances. The sum of the fair values of the reporting units are evaluated based on market capitalization determined using average share prices within a reasonable period of time near the selected testing date (calendar year-end), plus an estimated control premium plus the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, management believes the estimated fair value of each of the Company’s reporting units with goodwill balances was substantially in excess of its carrying value.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested at least annually for impairment. Impairment for intangible assets with indefinite lives exists if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value. The fair values of indefinite-lived intangible assets are determined using valuation techniques based on estimates, judgments and assumptions management believes are appropriate in the circumstances. As of December 31, 2011, the Company’s annual impairment testing yielded no impairments of indefinite-lived intangible assets.

Long-Lived Assets – The Company assesses potential impairments to its long-lived assets when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. An impairment loss is recognized when the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset (or group of assets) is less than its carrying amount. Any required impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the asset's carrying value exceeds its fair value and is recorded as a reduction in the carrying value of the related asset and a charge to operating results. There were no impairments of long lived assets in 2011, 2010, and 2009.

Product Warranty Costs – Estimated costs related to product warranties are accrued at the time products are sold. In estimating its future warranty obligations, the Company considers various relevant factors, including the Company's stated warranty policies and practices, the historical frequency of claims and the cost to replace or repair its products under warranty. Estimated warranty costs are embedded in the accrued liabilities balances on the consolidated balance sheet. The following table provides a reconciliation of the activity related to the Company's accrued warranty expense:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
Balance at beginning of period	$	38.0		$	26.6		$	22.4
Accruals for warranties issued during the period		34.5			29.2			26.5
Settlements of warranty claims		(21.0	)		(17.8	)		(22.3	)
Balance at end of period	$	51.5		$	38.0		$	26.6

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – The Company accounts for share-based compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), whereby share-based compensation cost is measured on the date of grant, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized over the requisite service period.

Compensation cost recognized during the three years ended December 31, 2011 related to grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units. No compensation cost related to stock options was recognized during those periods as no options were granted during the three year period ended December 31, 2011 and all options were vested as of December 31, 2006.

The Company has established a qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Plan allows qualified employees (as defined in the plan) to participate in the purchase of designated shares of the Company's common stock at a price equal to 85% of the closing price for each semi-annual stock purchase period. The fair value of employee purchase rights represents the difference between the closing price of the Company’s shares on the date of purchase and the purchase price of the shares. The value of the rights granted during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $0.7, $0.5 and $0.6, respectively.

Treasury Stock – The Company may periodically repurchase shares of its common stock from employees for the satisfaction of their individual payroll tax withholding upon vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units in connection with the Company’s Long Term Incentive Plan. The Company’s repurchases of common stock are recorded at the average cost of the common stock and are presented as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital. The Company repurchased 161,297, 197,343 and 94,388 shares of its common stock for $6.0, $6.7 and $1.7, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 respectively.

Research and Development – Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred.

Foreign Currency Translation – The assets and liabilities of subsidiaries located outside the United States are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recognized currently in income, and those resulting from translation of financial statements are accumulated as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Company's European subsidiaries utilize the British pound or the Euro as their local functional currency.

Concentration of Risk – The Company’s products and services are primarily concentrated within the aerospace industry with customers consisting primarily of commercial airlines, a wide variety of business jet customers and commercial aircraft manufacturers. In addition to the overall business risks associated with the Company’s concentration within the airline and aerospace industries, the Company is exposed to a concentration of collection risk on credit extended to commercial airlines and commercial aircraft manufacturers. The Company’s management performs ongoing credit evaluations on the financial condition of all of its customers and maintains allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable based on expected collectability. Credit losses have historically been within management's expectations and the provisions established.

Significant customers change from year to year depending on the level of refurbishment activity and/or the level of new aircraft purchases by such customers. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated net sales.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04), which amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurement. These amendments, effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is prohibited), result in common definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Consequently, the amendments change some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends FASB ASC 220, Comprehensive Income. This guidance, effective retrospectively for the interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is permitted), requires presentation of total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ equity was eliminated. The items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income were not changed. Additionally, no changes were made to the calculation and presentation of earnings per share. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. This guidance defers only those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 and ASU 2011-12 are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which amends existing guidance by giving an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If this is the case, companies will need to perform a more detailed two-step goodwill impairment test, which is used to identify potential goodwill impairments and to measure the amount of goodwill impairment losses to be recognized, if any. ASU 2011-08 will be effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for years beginning after December 15, 2011 (early adoption is permitted). The adoption of ASU 2011-08 will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.