e10vq

VOTES AGAINST

ABSTENTIONS

BROKER NON-VOTE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006

Commission File Number 1-5620

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Pennsylvania (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		23-1609753 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Building 800 435 Devon Park Drive, Wayne, PA (Address of principal executive offices)		19087 (Zip Code)

(610) 293-0600
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes o No þ

Number of shares outstanding as of August 2, 2006
Common Stock 120,155,036

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	June 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005
	(in thousands except per share data)
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	94,101		$	127,553
Restricted cash		532			1,348
Marketable securities		38,934			31,770
Trading securities		2,331			—
Restricted marketable securities		3,870			3,805
Accounts receivable, less allowances ($1,597 - 2006; $1,720- 2005)		47,518			49,656
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7,530			6,122
Current assets of discontinued operations		147			—

Total current assets		194,963			220,254
Property and equipment, net		44,278			39,520
Ownership interests in and advances to companies		21,614			17,897
Long-term marketable securities		1,129			3,311
Long-term restricted marketable securities		7,573			9,457
Intangible assets, net		13,436			15,618
Goodwill		97,053			97,462
Note receivable — related party		376			—
Other		7,850			9,119
Non-current assets of discontinued operations		—			3,562

Total Assets	$	388,272		$	416,200

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Current portion of credit line borrowings	$	17,405		$	14,523
Current maturities of long-term debt		3,582			3,380
Current portion of convertible senior debentures		—			5,000
Accounts payable		7,466			11,380
Accrued compensation and benefits		13,218			15,130
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		13,304			16,119
Deferred revenue		6,996			8,062
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		—			1,119

Total current liabilities		61,971			74,713
Long-term debt		6,029			5,170
Other long-term liabilities		16,610			14,824
Convertible senior debentures		145,000			145,000
Deferred taxes		877			895
Minority interest		6,622			10,478
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations		—			145

Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable stock-based compensation		2,032			—
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 1,000 shares authorized		—			—
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; 120,155 and 119,935 shares issued and outstanding in 2006 and 2005		12,016			11,993
Additional paid-in capital		748,819			747,953
Accumulated deficit		(612,775	)		(597,088	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,071			3,166
Treasury stock, at cost (2 shares-2005)		—			(6	)
Unamortized deferred compensation		—			(1,043	)

Total shareholders’ equity		149,131			164,975

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	388,272		$	416,200

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(in thousands, except per share data)
	(unaudited)
Revenue
Product sales	$	3,947		$	3,475		$	9,414		$	5,506
Service sales		52,502			41,214			102,519			77,725

Total revenue		56,449			44,689			111,933			83,231

Operating Expenses
Cost of sales — product		2,474			953			4,840			1,638
Cost of sales — service		35,809			28,422			70,924			54,966
Selling, general and administrative		26,938			19,073			53,282			39,346
Research and development		3,208			2,206			6,593			4,850
Amortization of intangibles		972			894			2,251			1,832

Total operating expenses		69,401			51,548			137,890			102,632

Operating loss		(12,952	)		(6,859	)		(25,957	)		(19,401	)
Other income (loss), net		(1,243	)		1,259			1,894			1,250
Impairment — related party		—			(102	)		—			(260	)
Interest income		1,610			1,148			3,180			2,279
Interest expense		(1,659	)		(1,564	)		(3,293	)		(3,100	)
Equity income (loss)		335			(1,376	)		(270	)		(5,407	)
Minority interest		1,895			1,215			3,892			2,851

Net loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(12,014	)		(6,279	)		(20,554	)		(21,788	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		1,183			(150	)		1,101			11

Net loss from continuing operations		(10,831	)		(6,429	)		(19,453	)		(21,777	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		1,596			(1,250	)		3,766			(1,995	)

Net Loss	$	(9,235	)	$	(7,679	)	$	(15,687	)	$	(23,772	)


Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share:
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.18	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		0.01			(0.01	)		0.03			(0.02	)

Net Loss Per Share	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.20	)


Shares Used in Computing Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share		121,499			120,779			121,390			120,714

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of discontinued operations	$	38		$	(1,097	)
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations		(15,972	)		(15,157	)

Net cash used in operating activities		(15,934	)		(16,254	)


Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from sales of and distributions from companies and funds		1,712			512
Advances to companies		—			(389	)
Acquisitions of ownership interests in companies, funds and subsidiaries, net of cash acquired		(8,004	)		(3,598	)
Increase in restricted cash and marketable securities		(39,656	)		(44,148	)
Decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities		32,491			18,513
Capital expenditures		(10,363	)		(5,190	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		516			4,212
Capitalized software costs		(171	)		(39	)
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations		6,154			—
Other, net		(446	)		(57	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(17,767	)		(30,184	)


Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Repurchase of convertible senior debentures		(3,775	)		—
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities		67,501			49,003
Repayments on revolving credit facilities		(64,595	)		(45,430	)
Borrowings of term debt		3,684			2,737
Repayments of term debt		(2,620	)		(5,081	)
Increase (decrease) in restricted cash		(282	)		508
Issuance of Company common stock, net		356			—
Issuance of subsidiary common stock, net		50			64
Purchase of subsidiary common stock, net		—			(601	)
Offering costs on issuance of subsidiary common stock		(70	)		—

Net cash provided by financing activities		249			1,200


Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(33,452	)		(45,238	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period		127,553			146,874

Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period	$	94,101		$	101,636

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2006

1. GENERAL

The accompanying unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. (the “Company”) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the interim financial statements rules and regulations of the SEC. In the opinion of management, these statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year or for any interim period. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations relating to interim financial statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries in which it directly or indirectly owns more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities.

The Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows include the following subsidiaries:


Three Months Ended June 30,
2006		2005
Acsis, Inc. (“Acsis”)		Alliance Consulting
Alliance Consulting Group		Clarient
Associates, Inc. (“Alliance		Laureate Pharma
Consulting”)		Mantas
Clarient, Inc. (“Clarient”)		Pacific Title
Laureate Pharma, Inc. (“Laureate		Pacific Title
Pharma”)
Mantas, Inc. (“Mantas”)
Pacific Title and Art Studio, Inc.
(“Pacific Title”)


Six Months Ended June 30,
2006		2005
Acsis Alliance Consulting Clarient Laureate Pharma Mantas Pacific Title		Alliance Consulting Clarient Laureate Pharma Mantas Pacific Title

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

The Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets include the following majority-owned subsidiaries:


June 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
Acsis		Acsis
Alliance Consulting		Alliance Consulting
Clarient		Clarient
Laureate Pharma		Laureate Pharma
Mantas		Mantas
Pacific Title		Pacific Title

Alliance Consulting operates on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year, ending on the Saturday closest to the end of the fiscal period. The Company and all other subsidiaries operate on a calendar year. Alliance Consulting’s second quarter ended on July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005, each a period of 13 weeks and year-to-date a period of 26 weeks.

See Note 3 for discontinued operations treatment of components of Alliance Consulting, Laureate Pharma and Mantas.

3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Laureate Pharma – Totowa Operations

In December 2005, Laureate Pharma sold its Totowa operations for $16.0 million in cash. Laureate Pharma recognized a $7.7 million gain on the transaction. The Totowa operations are reported in discontinued operations in 2005.

Mantas – Telecommunications Business

Mantas sold its telecommunications business and certain related assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2006 for $2.1 million in cash. As a result of the sale, Mantas recorded a gain of $1.9 million in the first quarter of 2006. Mantas’ telecommunications business is reported in discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Alliance Consulting – Southwest Region

Alliance Consulting completed the sale of its Southwest region on May 1, 2006 for proceeds of $4.5 million, including cash of $3.0 million and stock of the acquiror of $1.5 million. As a result of the sale, Alliance Consulting recorded a gain of $1.6 million in the second quarter of 2006. Alliance Consulting’s Southwest region is reported in discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Results of all discontinued operations were as follows:


	Three Months ended June 30,						Six Months ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
Revenue	$	957		$	3,321		$	3,869		$	7,623
Operating expenses		(925	)		(4,571	)		(3,575	)		(9,618	)

Net income (loss) from operations		32			(1,250	)		294			(1,995	)
Gain on disposal		1,564			—			3,472			—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	$	1,596		$	(1,250	)	$	3,766		$	(1,995	)

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations were as follows:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2006		2005
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
Accounts receivable, less allowances	$	147	$	—

Total current assets		147		—

Property and equipment, net		—		173
Goodwill		—		3,377
Other assets		—		12

Total non-current assets		—		3,562

Total Assets	$	147	$	3,562


Deferred revenue	$	—	$	1,119
Other long-term liabilities		—		145

Total liabilities	$	—	$	1,264

Carrying value	$	147	$	2,298

4. MARKETABLE SECURITIES

Marketable securities include the following:


	Current				Long-term
	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
Held-to-maturity:
Certificates of deposit	$	4,692	$	12,289	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury securities		1,109		2,845		—		—
Mortgage and asset-backed securities		—		2,457		—		—
Commercial paper		33,133		14,179		—		—

		38,934		31,770		—		—
Restricted U.S. Treasury securities		3,870		3,805		7,573		9,457

		42,804		35,575		7,573		9,457

Available-for-sale:
Equity securities		—		—		1,129		3,311
Trading securities:
Equity securities		2,331		—		—		—

	$	45,135	$	35,575	$	8,702	$	12,768

As of June 30, 2006, the contractual maturities of securities are as follows:


	Years to Maturity
	(in thousands)
			(unaudited)
	Less Than		One to		No Single
	One Year		Five Years		Maturity Date		Total
Held-to-maturity	$	42,804	$	7,573	$	—	$	50,377
Available-for-sale		—		—		1,129		1,129
Trading		2,331		—		—		2,331

	$	45,135	$	7,573	$	1,129	$	53,837

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company’s investment in available-for-sale securities had generated, on a cumulative basis, unrealized gains of $1.1 million and $3.3 million, respectively, which are reflected in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded $1.2 million and $0.4 million of unrealized losses associated with the Company’s investment in trading securities, which are reflected in Other Income (Loss), Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following is a summary of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment:


	Alliance
	Consulting		Clarient		Mantas			Acsis			Total
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
Balance at December 31, 2005	$	51,782	$	14,259	$	19,490		$	11,931		$	97,462
Purchase price adjustments		—		—		(36	)		(373	)		(409	)

Balance at June 30, 2006	$	51,782	$	14,259	$	19,454		$	11,558		$	97,053

As discussed in Note 15, the Acsis purchase price allocation is not yet final.

Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. The following table provides a summary of the Company’s intangible assets with definite and indefinite useful lives:


	June 30, 2006
		Gross
	Amortization	Carrying		Accumulated
	Period	Value		Amortization		Net
	(In thousands)
	(unaudited)
Customer-related	7 – 10 years	$	8,991	$	2,155	$	6,836
Technology-related	3 – 10 years		12,951		10,908		2,043
Process-related	3 years		1,363		757		606
Tradenames	20 years		1,222		35		1,187
Covenant not-to-compete	1 year		470		273		197

			24,997		14,218		10,869
Tradenames	Indefinite		2,567		—		2,567

Total		$	27,564	$	14,128	$	13,436


	December 31, 2005
		Gross
	Amortization	Carrying		Accumulated
	Period	Value		Amortization		Net
	(In thousands)
Customer-related	7 - 10 years	$	8,991	$	1,626	$	7,365
Technology-related	3 - 10 years		12,882		9,677		3,205
Process-related	3 years		1,363		530		833
Tradenames	20 years		1,222		5		1,217
Covenant not-to-compete	1 year		470		39		431

			24,928		11,877		13,051
Tradenames	Indefinite		2,567		—		2,567

Total		$	27,495	$	11,877	$	15,618

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $1.0 million and $2.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, and $0.9 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The following table provides estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets:


	Total
	(In thousands)
	(unaudited)
Remainder of 2006	$	1,328
2007		2,141
2008		1,724
2009		1,279
2010 and thereafter		4,397

	$	10,869

6. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. FIN 48 also includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods and increases the level of disclosures associated with any recorded income tax uncertainties. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We do not believe adoption of FIN 48 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method and record such expense in its consolidated financial statements. In addition, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) requires additional accounting and disclosure related to the income tax and cash flow effects resulting from share-based payment arrangements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. See Note 10.

7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Comprehensive income (loss) is the change in equity of a business enterprise from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Excluding net income (loss), the Company’s sources of comprehensive income (loss) are from net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on its holdings classified as available-for-sale and foreign currency translation adjustments.

The following summarizes the components of comprehensive loss:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(10,831	)	$	(6,429	)	$	(19,453	)	$	(21,777	)

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments		118			(29	)		87			(55	)
Unrealized holding losses in available-for-sale securities		(1,956	)		(1,505	)		(2,182	)		(7,073	)

Other comprehensive loss from continuing operations		(1,838	)		(1,534	)		(2,095	)		(7,128	)

Comprehensive loss from continuing operations		(12,669	)		(7,963	)		(21,548	)		(28,905	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		1,596			(1,250	)		3,766			(1,995	)

Comprehensive loss	$	(11,073	)	$	(9,213	)	$	(17,782	)	$	(30,900	)

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

8. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS

Consolidated long-term debt consists of the following:


	June 30,			December 31

	2006			2005
	(In thousands)
	(unaudited)
Subsidiary credit line borrowings (guaranteed by the Company)	$	17,405		$	14,523
Subsidiary term loans (guaranteed by the Company)		3,500			4,000

		20,905			18,523
Other term loans		1,927			855
Capital lease obligations		4,184			3,695

		27,016			23,073
Less current maturities		(20,987	)		(17,903	)

Total long-term debt, less current portion	$	6,029		$	5,170

In May 2006, the Company renewed its revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings and issuances of letters of credit and guarantees of up to $55 million. In addition, a subsidiary increased their facility by $3 million. Borrowing availability under the facility is reduced by the amounts outstanding for the Company’s borrowings and letters of credit and amounts guaranteed under partner company facilities maintained with that same lender. This credit facility bears interest at the prime rate (8.25% at June 30, 2006) for outstanding borrowings. The credit facility is subject to an unused commitment fee of 0.0125%, which is subject to reduction based on deposits maintained at the bank. The facility requires cash collateral equal to one times the Company’s borrowings and letters of credit and amounts borrowed by partner companies under the guaranteed portion of the partner company facilities maintained at the same bank. The credit facility matures in May 2007.

Availability under the Company’s revolving credit facility at June 30, 2006 is as follows:


	Revolving Credit			Letters of Credit			Total
				(in thousands)
				(unaudited)
Size of facility	$	48,664		$	6,336		$	55,000
Subsidiary facilities at same bank (a)		(31,500	)		—			(31,500	)
Outstanding letter of credit (b)		—			(6,336	)		(6,336	)

Amount available at June 30, 2006	$	17,164		$	—		$	17,164


(a)		The Company’s ability to borrow under its credit facility is limited by the amounts outstanding for the Company’s borrowings and letters of credit and amounts guaranteed under partner company facilities maintained at the same bank. Of the total facilities, $20.9 million is outstanding under these facilities at June 30, 2006 and included as debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(b)		In connection with the sale of CompuCom, the Company provided to the landlord of CompuCom’s Dallas headquarters, a letter of credit, which will expire on March 19, 2019, in an amount equal to $6.3 million.

All subsidiary facilities expire in February 2007 with the exception of Acsis’ facility, which expired in June 2006 and is expected to be renewed in August.

Borrowings are secured by substantially all of the assets of the respective subsidiaries. These obligations bear interest at variable rates ranging between the prime rate minus 0.5% and the prime rate plus 1.0%. These facilities contain financial and non-financial covenants.

Debt as of June 30, 2006 bears interest at fixed rates ranging between 4.0% and 20.3% and variable rates indexed to the prime rate plus 1.75%. Debt as of December 31, 2005 bore interest at fixed rates ranging between 4.0% and 22.0% and variable rates indexed to the prime rate plus 1.75%.

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

The Company’s debt matures as follows:


	Total
	(In thousands)
	(unaudited)
Remainder of 2006	$	2,678
2007		20,080
2008		2,716
2009		1,534
2010 and thereafter		8

Total debt	$	27,016

9. CONVERTIBLE SENIOR DEBENTURES

In February 2004, the Company completed the sale of $150 million of 2.625% convertible senior debentures with a stated maturity of March 15, 2024. Interest on the 2024 Debentures is payable semi-annually. At the debenture holders’ option, the 2024 Debentures are convertible into our common stock through March 14, 2024, subject to certain conditions. The conversion rate of the debentures at June 30, 2006 was $7.2174 of principal amount per share. The closing price of the Company’s common stock at June 30, 2006 was $2.16. The 2024 Debenture holders may require repurchase of the debentures on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or March 20, 2019 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their respective face amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Debenture holders may also require repurchase of the debentures upon certain events, including sale of all or substantially all of our common stock or assets, liquidation, dissolution or a change in control. Subject to certain conditions, the Company may redeem all or some of the 2024 Debentures commencing March 20, 2009. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company repurchased $5 million of the face value of the 2024 Debentures for $3.8 million in cash. In connection with the repurchase, the Company recorded $0.1 million of expense related to the acceleration of deferred debt issuance costs associated with the 2024 Debentures, resulting in a net gain of $1.1 million, which is included in Other Income (Loss), Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006. At June 30, 2006, the market value of the $145 million of outstanding 2024 Debentures was approximately $112.7 million based on quoted market prices.

As required by the terms of the 2024 Debentures, after completing the sale of CompuCom, the Company escrowed $16.7 million on October 8, 2004 for interest payments through March 15, 2009 on the 2024 Debentures. A total of $11.4 million is included in Restricted Marketable Securities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2006, of which $3.9 million is classified as a current asset.

10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method and record such expense in its consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under this application, the Company is required to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.

Equity Compensation Plans

The Company has three equity compensation plans: the 1999 Equity Compensation Plan, with 9.0 million shares authorized for issuance; the 2001 Associates Equity Compensation Plan with 5.4 million shares authorized for issuance; and the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan, with 6.0 million shares authorized for issuance. Employees and consultants are eligible for grants of stock options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, stock units, performance units and other stock-based awards under each of these plans; directors and executive officers are eligible for grants only under the 1999 and 2004 Equity Compensation Plans. During 2005, 6,000,000 options also were awarded outside of existing plans as inducement awards in accordance with New York Stock Exchange rules.

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

To the extent allowable, all grants are incentive stock options. Options granted under the plans are at prices equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. Upon exercise of stock options, the Company issues shares first from treasury stock, if available, then from authorized but unissued shares. At June 30, 2006, the Company had reserved 23.7 million shares of common stock for possible future issuance under its equity compensation plans. Several subsidiaries also maintain separate equity compensation plans for their employees, directors and advisors.

Classification of Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation expense is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,		Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006		2006
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
Cost of sales – product	$	—	$	3
Cost of sales – service		20		40
Selling, general and administrative		1,681		3,686
Research and development		48		88

	$	1,749	$	3,817

Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Had compensation cost been recognized consistent with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” the Company’s consolidated net loss from continuing operations and discontinued operations and loss per share from continuing operations and from discontinued operations would have been as follows:


		Three Months Ended June 30,			Six Months Ended June 30,
		2005			2005
		(in thousands, except per share data)
		(unaudited)
Consolidated net loss from continuing operations	As reported	$	(6,429	)	$	(21,777	)
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in net loss, net of minority interest	As reported		519			1,038
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense from continuing operations determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects			(1,777	)		(3,608	)

Consolidated net loss from continuing operations	Pro forma		(7,687	)		(24,347	)
Net loss from discontinued operations	As reported		(1,250	)		(1,995	)

	Pro forma	$	(8,937	)	$	(26,342	)


Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share:
Net loss from continuing operations	As reported	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)
Net loss from discontinued operations	As reported		(0.01	)		(0.02	)

		$	(0.06	)	$	(0.20	)


Net loss from continuing operations	Pro forma	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.20	)
Net loss from discontinued operations	Pro forma		(0.01	)		(0.02	)

		$	(0.07	)	$	(0.22	)

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

The Company

The fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards to employees during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the end of the quarter in which the grant occurred. The expected life of stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the stock option’s expected life.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(unaudited)
Service-Based Awards
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%
Expected volatility		73	%		85	%		73	%		85	%
Average expected option life	5 years			5 years			5 years			5 years
Risk-free interest rate		5.2	%		4.0	%		5.1	%		4.0	%

Market-Based Awards
Dividend yield		0	%		N/A			0	%		N/A
Expected volatility		67	%		N/A			67	%		N/A
Average expected option life	6 years				N/A		6 years				N/A
Risk-free interest rate		5.2	%		N/A			5.0	%		N/A

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options issued by the Company during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $1.60 per share and $1.48 per share, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value of options issued by the Company during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was $0.74 per share.

The Company granted 0.4 million and 0.7 million market-based stock option awards to employees during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The Company granted 8.6 million market-based stock option awards to employees during 2005. The awards entitle participants to vest in a number of options determined by achievement of certain target market capitalization increases (measured by reference to stock price increases on a specified number of outstanding shares) over an eight-year period. The requisite service periods for the market-based awards are based on our estimate of the dates on which the market conditions will be met as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service periods using the straight-line method, but is accelerated if market capitalization targets are achieved earlier than estimated. Based on the achievement of market capitalization targets, 0.2 million and 1.2 million shares vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The Company recorded $0.7 million and $1.4 million of compensation expense related to the market-based awards in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The maximum number of unvested shares at June 30, 2006 attainable under these grants is 8.1 million shares.

All other outstanding options are service-based awards that generally vest over four years after the date of grant and expire eight years after the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method. The requisite service period for service-based awards is the period over which the award vests. The Company recorded $0.4 million and $0.8 million of compensation expense related to these awards during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006.

During the second quarter of 2006, the Company granted twenty-one thousand stock options to members of its advisory boards, which comprise non-employees. Such awards vest over one year, are equity classified and are marked-to-market each period.

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

Option activity of the Company is summarized below:


				Weighted		Weighted Average		Aggregate
				Average		Remaining		Intrinsic
	Shares			Exercise Price		Contractual Life		Value
	(In thousands)							(In thousands)
	(unaudited)
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		18,971		$	2.20
Options granted		1,006			2.31
Options exercised		(222	)		1.60
Options canceled/forfeited		(611	)		4.00

Outstanding at June 30, 2006		19,144			2.15		6.16	$	10,751


Options exercisable at June 30, 2006		7,283			3.08		4.52		2,206
Shares available for future grant		3,098

The total intrinsic value of options exercised in the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.1 million. No options were exercised in the six months ended June 30, 2005.

At June 30, 2006, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the plans for service-based awards was $3.0 million. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.

At June 30, 2006, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the plans for market-based awards was $4.3 million. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 4.9 years but would be accelerated if market capitalization targets are achieved earlier than estimated.

Total compensation expense for restricted stock issuances was approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. No unamortized compensation expense related to restricted stock issuances remains at June 30, 2006.

The Company has previously issued deferred stock units to certain employees. The Company issued deferred stock units during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, to directors who elected to defer all or a portion of directors’ fees earned. Deferred stock units issued to directors in lieu of directors fees are 100% vested at grant; matching deferred stock units equal to 25% of directors’ fees deferred vest one year following grant. Deferred stock units are payable in stock on a one-for-one basis. Payments in respect of the deferred stock units are generally distributable following termination of employment or service, death, permanent disability or retirement. Total compensation expense for deferred stock units was approximately $0.1 and $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. Unamortized compensation expense related to deferred stock units at June 30, 2006 is $0.3 million.

Deferred stock unit activity is summarized below:


				Weighted
				Average
	Shares			Grant Date Fair Value
	(In thousands)
	(unaudited)
Unvested at December 31, 2005		196		$	3.21
Granted		20			2.23
Vested		(75	)		2.40
Forfeited		(44	)		4.41

Unvested at June 30, 2006		97			3.10

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

The total fair value of deferred stock units vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

Consolidated Subsidiaries

The fair value of the Company’s subsidiaries’ stock-based awards to employees during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the end of the quarter in which the grant occurred. The expected life of stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees. The expected life of stock options granted for subsidiaries that do not have sufficient historical exercise behavior of employees was calculated using the simplified method of determining expected term as provided in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “Share-Based Payment” (“SAB 107”). Expected volatility for publicly-held subsidiaries was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the stock option’s expected life. Expected volatility for privately-held subsidiaries is based on the average historical volatility of comparable companies for a period equal to the stock option’s expected life. The fair value of the underlying stock of privately-held subsidiaries on the date of grant was determined based on a number of valuation methods, including discounted cash flows and revenue and acquisition multiples.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(unaudited)
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%
Expected volatility		38% – 92	%		75% - 100	%		38% - 96	%		70% - 103	%
Average expected option life	5 – 6 years			4 – 5 years			5 – 6 years			4 – 5 years
Risk-free interest rate		4.9% - 5.3	%		3.9% - 4.0	%		4.3% - 5.3	%		3.9% - 4.1	%

Stock options granted by subsidiaries generally are service-based awards that vest four years after the date of grant and expire 7 to 10 years after the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method. The requisite service period is the period over which the award vests. The Company’s consolidated subsidiaries recorded $0.6 million and $1.6 million of compensation expense related to these awards during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.

At June 30, 2006, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted under the consolidated subsidiaries’ plans was $5.2 million. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.6 years.

During the second quarter of 2006, certain subsidiaries granted stock options to advisory boards, which comprise of non-employees. Such awards vest over four years, are equity classified and are marked-to-market each period.

Certain employees of our subsidiaries have the right to require the respective subsidiary to purchase shares of common stock of the subsidiary received by the employee pursuant to the exercise of options or the conversion of deferred stock units. The employee must hold the shares for at least six months prior to exercising this right. The required purchase price is 75% to 100% of the fair market value at the time the right is exercised. These options and deferred stock units qualify for equity-classification under SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with EITF Issue No. D-98, however, these instruments are classified outside of permanent equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as Redeemable Stock-Based Compensation at their current redemption amount based on the number of options and deferred stock units vested as of June 30, 2006.

11. INCOME TAXES

The Company’s consolidated net income tax benefit recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, was $1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively. The Company recognized a $1.3 million tax benefit in the three months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, related to uncertain tax positions for which the statute of limitations expired during the period in the applicable tax jurisdictions. The Company also recognized tax expense of $0.1 million and $0.2 million in the three and six months

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

ended June 30, 2006 related to the Company’s share of net state and foreign tax expenses recorded by subsidiaries. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance to reduce its net deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized in future years. Accordingly, the net operating loss benefit that would have been recognized in 2006 was offset by a valuation allowance.

12. NET LOSS PER SHARE

The calculations of net loss per share were:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands except per share data)
	(unaudited)
Basic:
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(10,831	)	$	(6,429	)	$	(19,453	)	$	(21,777	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		1,596			(1,250	)		3,766			(1,995	)

Net loss	$	(9,235	)	$	(7,679	)	$	(15,687	)	$	(23,772	)


Average common shares outstanding		121,499			120,779			121,390			120,714


Net loss from continuing operations	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.18	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		0.01			(0.01	)		0.03			(0.02	)

Net loss per share	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.20	)


Diluted:
Net loss from continuing operations principle	$	(10,831	)	$	(6,429	)	$	(19,453	)	$	(21,777	)
Effect of holdings		(34	)		(128	)		(49	)		(181	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		1,596			(1,250	)		3,766			(1,995	)

Net loss	$	(9,269	)	$	(7,807	)	$	(15,736	)	$	(23,953	)


Average common shares outstanding		121,499			120,779			121,390			120,714


Loss per share from continuing operations	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.18	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		0.01			(0.01	)		0.03			(0.02	)

Diluted loss per share	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.20	)

Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding for purposes of computing net income (loss) per share includes outstanding common shares and vested deferred stock units (DSU’s).

If a consolidated or equity method partner company has dilutive stock options, unvested restricted stock, DSU’s, warrants or securities outstanding, diluted net loss per share is computed by first deducting from net loss the income attributable to the potential exercise of the dilutive securities of the company. This impact is shown as an adjustment to net loss for purposes of calculating diluted net loss per share.

The following potential shares of common stock and their effects on income were excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive:

	•		At June 30, 2006 and 2005, options to purchase 19.1 million and 8.7 million shares of common stock at prices ranging from $1.03 to $45.47 per share, were excluded from the 2006 and 2005 calculations, respectively.

	•		At June 30, 2005, unvested restricted stock units convertible into 0.1 million shares of stock were excluded from the calculation. At June 30, 2006 and 2005, unvested deferred stock units convertible into 0.3 million and 0.5 million shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculations.

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

•

At June 30, 2006 and 2005, a total of 20.1 million and 20.8 million shares related to the Company’s 2024 Debentures (See Note 9) representing the weighted average effect of assumed conversion of the 2024 Debentures were excluded from the calculation.

13. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Parent company financial information is provided to present the financial position and results of operations of the Company as if the consolidated companies (see Note 2) were accounted for under the equity method of accounting for all periods presented during which the Company owned its interest in these companies.

Parent Company Balance Sheets


	June 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
	(In thousands)
	(unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	78,766	$	108,300
Restricted cash		—		1,098
Marketable securities		38,934		31,770
Trading securities		2,331		—
Restricted marketable securities		3,870		3,805
Other current assets		1,279		1,704

Total current assets		125,180		146,677
Ownership interests in and advances to companies		177,645		175,133
Long-term marketable securities		1,129		3,311
Long-term restricted marketable securities		7,573		9,457
Note receivable — related party		376		—
Other		4,267		5,109

Total Assets	$	316,170	$	339,687


Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current convertible senior debentures	$	—	$	5,000
Current liabilities		9,675		13,625

Total current liabilities		9,675		18,625
Long-term liabilities		10,332		11,087
Convertible senior debentures		145,000		145,000
Shareholders’ equity		151,163		164,975

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	316,170	$	339,687

Parent Company Statements of Operations


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
				(in thousands)
				(unaudited)
Operating expenses	$	(5,342	)	$	(3,617	)	$	(10,944	)	$	(8,233	)
Other income (loss), net		(1,237	)		920			1,877			910
Impairment — related party		—			(102	)		—			(260	)
Interest income		1,555			1,117			3,037			2,200
Interest expense		(1,190	)		(1,236	)		(2,404	)		(2,472	)
Equity loss		(5,901	)		(3,511	)		(12,303	)		(13,922	)

Net loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(12,115	)		(6,429	)		(20,737	)		(21,777	)
Income tax benefit		1,284			—			1,284			—
Equity income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations		1,596			(1,250	)		3,766			(1,995	)

Net Loss	$	(9,235	)	$	(7,679	)	$	(15,687	)	$	(23,772	)

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

Parent Company Statements of Cash Flows


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(7,308	)		$	(12,037	)


Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from sales of and distributions from companies		517				512
Advances to companies		—				(389	)
Acquisitions of ownership interests in companies, funds and subsidiaries, net of cash acquired		(14,004	)			(3,598	)
Advances to related party		(386	)			(112	)
Increase in restricted cash and marketable securities		(39,656	)			(44,148	)
Decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities		32,491				18,513
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		—				4,160
Capital expenditures		(76	)			(37	)
Other, net		1,209				116

Net cash used in investing activities		(19,905	)			(24,983	)


Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Repurchase of convertible senior debentures		(3,775	)			—
Decrease in restricted cash		1,098				—
Issuance of Company common stock, net		356				—

Net cash used in financing activities		(2,321	)			—


Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(29,534	)			(37,020	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period		108,300				128,262

Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period	$	78,766			$	91,242

Parent Company cash and cash equivalents exclude marketable securities, which consists of longer-term securities, including commercial paper and certificates of deposit.

14. OPERATING SEGMENTS

Management evaluates segment performance based on segment revenue, operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income taxes, which reflects the portion of income (loss) allocated to minority shareholders.

Other Items includes certain corporate expenses, which are not identifiable to the operations of the Company’s operating business segments. Other Items primarily consists of general and administrative expenses related to corporate operations, including employee compensation, insurance and professional fees including legal, finance and consulting. Other Items also includes interest income, interest expense and income taxes, which are reviewed by management independent of segment results.

The following tables reflect the Company’s consolidated operating data by reportable segment. Each segment includes the results of the respective consolidated company and records the Company’s share of income or losses for entities accounted for under the equity method. Segment results also include impairment charges, gains or losses related to the disposition of the partner companies and the mark to market of trading securities. All significant intersegment activity has been eliminated in consolidation. Accordingly, segment results reported by the Company exclude the effect of transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries and among the Company’s subsidiaries.

Revenue is attributed to geographic areas based on where the services are performed or the customer’s shipped to location. A majority of the Company’s revenue is generated in the United States.

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company’s assets were primarily located in the United States.

The following represents the segment data from continuing operations:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
																										Total
				Alliance						Laureate					Pacific		Other			Total			Other			Continuing
	Acsis			Consulting			Clarient			Pharma			Mantas		Title		Companies			Segments			Items			Operations
Revenues	$	4,584		$	25,868		$	7,496		$	2,468		$	8,439	$	7,594	$	—		$	56,449		$	—		$	56,449
Operating income (loss)	$	(1,884	)	$	(678	)	$	(4,341	)	$	(2,478	)	$	1,094	$	677	$	—		$	(7,610	)	$	(5,342	)	$	(12,952	)
Net income (loss)	$	(1,776	)	$	(828	)	$	(2,685	)	$	(2,634	)	$	1,128	$	660	$	(958	)	$	(7,093	)	$	(3,738	)	$	(10,831	)

Segment Assets
June 30, 2006	$	31,095		$	78,458		$	39,629		$	22,150		$	37,283	$	19,349	$	25,074		$	253,038		$	135,087		$	388,125
December 31, 2005	$	30,993		$	80,959		$	40,599		$	21,479		$	37,294	$	18,864	$	21,208		$	251,396		$	161,242		$	412,638


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
		(in thousands)
		(unaudited)
																								Total
		Alliance					Laureate						Pacific		Other			Total			Other			Continuing
		Consulting		Clarient			Pharma			Mantas			Title		Companies			Segments			Items			Operations
Revenues		$	19,665	$	5,209		$	2,823		$	7,544		$	9,448	$	—		$	44,689		$	—		$	44,689
Operating income (loss)		$	306	$	(3,246	)	$	(2,035	)	$	(291	)	$	2,272	$	—		$	(2,994	)	$	(3,865	)	$	(6,859	)
Net income (loss)		$	95	$	(1,994	)	$	(2,115	)	$	(290	)	$	2,567	$	(1,484	)	$	(3,221	)	$	(3,208	)	$	(6,429	)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
																									Total
				Alliance						Laureate					Pacific		Other		Total			Other			Continuing
	Acsis			Consulting			Clarient			Pharma			Mantas		Title		Companies		Segments			Items			Operations
Revenues	$	8,985		$	51,080		$	14,246		$	4,646		$	17,823	$	15,153	$	—	$	111,933		$	—		$	111,933
Operating Income (loss)	$	(4,128	)	$	(950	)	$	(8,889	)	$	(4,722	)	$	2,743	$	933	$	—	$	(15,013	)	$	(10,944	)	$	(25,957	)
Net Income (loss)	$	(3,905	)	$	(1,314	)	$	(5,386	)	$	(4,964	)	$	2,788	$	931	$	350	$	(11,500	)	$	(7,953	)	$	(19,453	)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
		(in thousands)
		(unaudited)
																									Total
		Alliance						Laureate						Pacific		Other			Total			Other			Continuing
		Consulting			Clarient			Pharma			Mantas			Title		Companies			Segments			Items			Operations
Revenues		$	38,106		$	9,216		$	5,016		$	14,121		$	16,772	$	—		$	83,231		$	—		$	83,231
Operating income (loss)		$	(613	)	$	(7,442	)	$	(4,391	)	$	(1,651	)	$	3,215	$	—		$	(10,882	)	$	(8,519	)	$	(19,401	)
Net income (loss)		$	(964	)	$	(4,532	)	$	(4,534	)	$	(1,658	)	$	3,448	$	(5,506	)	$	(13,746	)	$	(8,031	)	$	(21,777	)

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

Other Items


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(in thousands)
	(unaudited)
Corporate operations	$	(4,921	)	$	(3,058	)	$	(9,054	)	$	(8,042	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		1,183			(150	)		1,101			11

	$	(3,738	)	$	(3,208	)	$	(7,953	)	$	(8,031	)

15. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Acquisitions by the Company – 2006

In June 2006, the Company acquired additional common shares of Acsis for an aggregate purchase price of $6 million in cash at the same per share value as the December 2005 acquisition. Taking into account our existing ownership, the result of the June 2006 incremental equity purchase was an increase in ownership in Acsis of 1.2% to 95%. The capital provided is expected to be used by Acsis to support their long-term growth strategy.

Acquisitions by the Company – 2005

In December 2005, the Company acquired 94% of Acsis, Inc. for approximately $26 million in cash plus options with a fair market value of $1.7 million. Acsis provides enterprise data collection solutions to global manufacturers. The Acsis transaction was accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the Consolidated Financial Statements reflect the operations of Acsis from the acquisition date.

In November 2005, Clarient entered into a securities purchase agreement with a limited number of accredited investors pursuant to which Clarient issued shares of common stock and warrants to purchase additional shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $15 million. Of the total placement of $15 million, the Company funded $9 million to Clarient. The Company participated in the private placement to support Clarient’s diagnostic services business line expansion as well as to maintain the Company’s controlling interest.

In April and June 2005, the Company acquired additional shares of Pacific Title from minority shareholders for a total of $1.3 million, increasing its ownership in Pacific Title from 93% to 100%. Of the total purchase price, $1.2 million was allocated to working capital and $0.1 million was allocated to property and equipment.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:


	Acsis		Clarient
	(In thousands)
	(unaudited)
Working Capital	$	4,241	$	8,372
Property and equipment		1,263		210
Intangible assets		8,366		209
Acquired In-Process Research and Development		1,974		209
Goodwill		11,558		—

Total Purchase Price	$	27,402	$	9,000

The intangible assets of Acsis consist of a covenant not-to-compete with a one year life, developed technology with a three year life, customer-related intangibles with a 10 year life, and a tradename with a 20 year life. Property and equipment are being depreciated over their weighted average lives (3 years to 5 years). The acquired in-process research and development costs were charged to earnings in 2005. The purchase price allocation for Acsis is preliminary.

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of the Company as if the acquisition of Acsis had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented, after giving effect to certain adjustments, including amortization of intangibles with definite useful lives. The pro forma results of operations are not indicative of the actual results that would have occurred had the acquisitions been completed at the beginning of the period presented and are not intended to be a projection of future results.


	Three Months Ended June 30,			Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2005
	(In thousands except per share data)
	(unaudited)
Total revenue	$	50,913		$	94,350
Net loss	$	(6,287	)	$	(21,820	)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)

16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In May 2001, the Company entered into a $26.5 million loan agreement with Warren V. Musser, the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The proceeds of the loan were used to repay margin loans guaranteed by the Company in October 2000.

Through June 30, 2006, the Company has recognized net impairment charges against the loan of $15.4 million to the estimated value of the collateral that the Company held at each respective date. The Company’s carrying value of the loan at June 30, 2006 is $0.4 million. The Company will continue to evaluate the value of the collateral compared to the carrying value of the note on a quarterly basis.

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company and Warren V. Musser, the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company were named as defendants in putative class action and related cases filed in 2001 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the “District Court”). Among other things, the plaintiffs alleged that the Company failed to disclose certain information regarding allegedly manipulative margin trading by Mr. Musser and a loan and guarantee extended by the Company to Mr. Musser. These cases were known as “In Re: Safeguard Scientifics Securities Litigation”. In 2003, the District Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. In November 2004, the District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Company and Mr. Musser with respect to all claims asserted. In December 2004, the plaintiffs appealed the District Court’s orders. In April 2006, the District Court approved a final settlement of these cases. In the settlement, the twelve individual plaintiffs who sued the Company and Mr. Musser released and dismissed with prejudice all claims and actions against the Company and Mr. Musser in exchange for an immaterial settlement amount, which was paid by Safeguard’s insurer. The settlement was not a class action settlement, and provided no payments to shareholders other than these twelve plaintiffs. The final dismissal of these cases occurred on June 27, 2006. In the settlement, neither Safeguard nor Mr. Musser have admitted any wrongdoing.

In addition, the Company, and its partner companies, are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. While in the current opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations, no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these lawsuits, and one or more adverse rulings could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations, or that of our partner companies.

In connection with its ownership interests in certain affiliates, the Company has the following outstanding guarantees:

SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
JUNE 30, 2006


			Debt Included on
			Consolidated
			Balance Sheet at
	Amount		June 30, 2006
	(in millions)
	(unaudited)
Consolidated companies guarantees – credit facilities	$	31.5	$	20.9
Other consolidated company guarantees – operating leases		4.7		—
Non-consolidated company guarantees		3.8		—

Total	$	40.0	$	20.9

Additionally, we have committed capital of approximately $6.7 million, including a commitment to provide Clarient up to $3.0 million to support a proposed acquisition and commitments made in prior years to various private equity funds. These commitments will be funded over the next several years, including approximately $4.9 million which is expected to be funded during the next twelve months.

Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to return a portion or all the distributions it received as a general partner to the certain private equity funds (the “clawback”). Assuming the private equity funds in which the Company are a general partner are liquidated or dissolved on June 30, 2006 and assuming for these purposes the only distributions from the funds were equal to the carrying value of the funds on the June 30, 2006 financial statements, the maximum clawback we would be required to return for our general partner interest is approximately $8 million. Management estimates its liability to be approximately $6 million. This amount is reflected in “Other Long-Term Liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2006.

The Company’s ownership in the general partner of the funds which have potential clawback liabilities range from 19-30%. The clawback liability is joint and several, such that the Company may be required to fund the clawback for other general partners should they default. The funds have taken several steps to reduce the potential liabilities should other general partners default, including withholding all general partner distributions in escrow and adding rights of set-off among certain funds. The Company believes its liability due to the default of other general partners is remote.

The Company has employment agreements with certain executive officers that provide for severance payments to the executive officer in the event the officer is terminated without cause or an officer terminates their employment for “good reason.”

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Note concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about us, the industries in which we operate and other matters, as well as management’s beliefs and assumptions and other statements regarding matters that are not historical facts. These statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects. For example, when we use words such as “projects,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “will,” “opportunity,” “potential” or “may,” variations of such words or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes, we are making forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, include, among others, managing rapidly changing technologies, limited access to capital, competition, the ability to attract and retain qualified employees, the ability to execute our strategy, the uncertainty of the future performance of our partner companies, acquisitions and dispositions of companies, the inability to manage growth, compliance with government regulation and legal liabilities, additional financing requirements, labor disputes and the effect of economic conditions in the business sectors in which our partner companies operate, all of which are discussed below under the heading “Factors that May Affect Future Results” in Item 1A in Safeguard’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and updated, as applicable, in Item 1A – Risk Factors below. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to predict or control. In addition, as a result of these and other factors, our past financial performance should not be relied on as an indication of future performance.

All forward-looking statements attributable to us, or to persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report might not occur.

Overview

Safeguard’s charter is to build value in revenue-stage information technology and life sciences businesses. We provide growth capital as well as a range of strategic, operational and management resources to our partner companies. Safeguard participates in expansion financings, carve-outs, management buy-outs, recapitalizations, industry consolidations and early-stage financings. Our vision is to be the preferred catalyst for creating great information technology and life sciences companies.

We strive to create long-term value for our shareholders through building value in our partner companies. We help our partner companies in their efforts to increase market penetration, grow revenue and improve cash flow in order to create long-term value. We concentrate on companies that operate in two categories:

Information Technology – including companies focused on providing software, technology-enabled services and information technology services for analytics and business intelligence, enterprise applications and infrastructure; and

Life Sciences – including companies focused on therapeutics and treatments, pharmaceutical services, drug formulation and delivery techniques, diagnostics and devices.

Principles of Accounting for Ownership Interests in Partner Companies

The various interests that we acquire in our partner companies and private equity funds are accounted for under three methods: consolidation, equity or cost. The applicable accounting method is generally determined based on our influence over the entity, primarily determined based on our voting interest in the entity.

Consolidation Method. Partner companies in which we directly or indirectly own more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities are accounted for under the consolidation method of accounting. Participation of other partner company shareholders in the income or losses of our consolidated partner companies is reflected as Minority Interest in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Minority interest adjusts our consolidated operating results to reflect only our share of the earnings or losses of the consolidated partner company. However, if there is no minority interest balance remaining on the

Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the respective partner company, we record 100% of the consolidated partner company’s losses; we record 100% of subsequent earnings of the partner company to the extent of such previously recognized losses in excess of our proportionate share.

Equity Method. The partner companies whose results are not consolidated, but over whom we exercise significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. We also account for our interests in some private equity funds under the equity method of accounting, based on our respective general and limited partner interests. Under the equity method of accounting, our share of the income or loss of the company is reflected in Equity Income (Loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

When the carrying value of our holding in an equity method partner company is reduced to zero, no further losses are recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations unless we have outstanding guarantee obligations or have committed additional funding to the equity method company. When the equity method partner company subsequently reports income, we will not record our share of such income until it equals the amount of our share of losses not previously recognized.

Cost Method. Partner companies not consolidated or accounted for under the equity method are accounted for under the cost method of accounting. Under the cost method, our share of the income or losses of such entities is not included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. However, the effect of the change in market value of cost method holdings classified as trading securities is reflected in Other Income (Loss), Net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Accounting policies, methods and estimates are an integral part of consolidated financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management’s current judgments. These judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience with regard to past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting policies, methods and estimates are particularly important because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ from management’s current judgments.

On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates.

While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates affecting our financial statements, areas that are particularly significant include the following:

	•		Revenue recognition

	•		Recoverability of goodwill

	•		Recoverability of long-lived assets

	•		Recoverability of ownership interests in and advances to companies

	•		Income taxes

	•		Allowance for doubtful accounts

	•		Commitments and contingencies

	•		Stock-based compensation

Revenue Recognition

During the three and six months of 2006 and 2005, our revenue from continuing operations was attributable to Acsis, Inc. (“Acsis”) (2006 only), Alliance Consulting Group Associates, Inc. (“Alliance Consulting”), Clarient, Inc. (“Clarient”), Laureate Pharma, Inc. (“Laureate Pharma”), Mantas, Inc. (“Mantas”) and Pacific Title and Art Studio, Inc. (“Pacific Title”).

Acsis recognizes revenue from software licenses, related consulting services, hardware and post-contract customer support (PCS). Revenue from software license agreements are recognized upon delivery, provided that all of the following conditions are met: a non-cancelable license agreement has been signed; the software or hardware has been delivered; no significant production, modification or customization of the software is required; the fee is fixed or determinable; and collection of the resulting receivable is deemed probable. In software arrangements that include rights to software products, hardware products, PCS, and/or other services, Acsis allocates the total arrangement fee among each deliverable based on vendor-specific objective evidence using the residual method. Revenue from PCS agreements is recognized ratably over the

term of the maintenance period, generally one year. Consulting and training services provided by Acsis that are not considered essential to the functionality of the software products are recognized as the respective services are performed.

Alliance Consulting generates revenue primarily from consulting services. Alliance Consulting generally recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services are performed, the service fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. Revenue from services is recognized as services are performed. Alliance Consulting also performs certain services under fixed-price service contracts related to discrete projects. Alliance Consulting recognizes revenue from these contracts using the percentage-of-completion method, primarily based on the actual labor hours incurred to date compared to the estimated total hours of the project. Any losses expected to be incurred on jobs in process are charged to income in the period such losses become known. Changes in estimates of total costs could result in changes in the amount of revenue recognized.

Clarient generates revenue from diagnostic services, system sales and fee-per-use charges. Clarient recognizes revenue for diagnostic services at the time of completion of services at amounts equal to the contractual rates allowed from third parties, including Medicare, insurance companies and, to a small degree, private patients. These expected amounts are based both on Medicare allowable rates and Clarient’s collection experience with other third party payors.

Clarient recognizes revenue for fee-per-use agreements based on the greater of actual usage fees or the minimum monthly rental fee. Under this pricing model, Clarient owns or retains a substantial risk of ownership of most of the ACIS^{^®} instruments that are engaged in service and, accordingly, all related depreciation and maintenance and service costs are expensed as incurred. For those instruments that are sold, Clarient recognizes and defers revenue using the residual method pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Position No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” (SOP 97-2), as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Arrangements.” At the outset of the arrangement with the customer, Clarient defers revenue for the fair value of its undelivered elements (e.g., maintenance) and recognizes revenue for the remainder of the arrangement fee attributable to the elements initially delivered in the arrangement (e.g., software license and related instrument) when the basic criteria in SOP 97-2 have been met. Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance contract, typically twelve months. Clarient does not recognize revenue on sales of assets subject to an operating lease where they retain a substantial risk of ownership.

Clarient recognizes revenue on system sales in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, as amended by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, when all criteria for revenue recognition have been met. Such criteria includes, but is not limited to: existence of persuasive evidence of an arrangement; fixed and determinable product pricing; satisfaction of the terms of the arrangement including passing title and risk of loss to their customer upon shipment; and reasonable assurance of collection from their customer in accordance with the terms of the arrangement. For system sales delivered under the Dako distribution and development agreement, Clarient recognizes revenue when those ACIS^{^®}instruments have been delivered and accepted by an end-user customer. Systems sold under a leasing arrangement are accounted for as sales-type leases pursuant to SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” if applicable. Clarient recognizes the net effect of these transactions as a sale because of the bargain purchase option granted to the lessee. Clarient recognizes revenue from research and development agreements over the contract performance period, starting with the contract’s commencement. The upfront payment is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated performance period. Milestone payments are recognized as revenue when they are earned and collectible, but not prior to the removal of any contingencies for each individual milestone.

Laureate Pharma’s revenue is primarily derived from contract manufacturing work, process development services, and formulation and filling. Laureate Pharma enters into revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables in order to meet its customers’ needs. Multiple element revenue agreements are evaluated under Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue Number 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” to determine whether the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and whether objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item exists. Deliverables in an arrangement that do not meet the separation criteria in EITF 00-21 are treated as one unit of accounting for purposes of revenue recognition. Revenue is generally recognized upon the performance of services. Certain services are performed under fixed price contracts. Revenue from these contracts are recognized on a percentage of completion basis. When current cost estimates indicate a loss is expected to be incurred, the entire loss is recorded in the period in which it is identified. Changes in estimates of total costs could result in changes in the amount of revenue recognized.

Mantas recognizes revenue from software licenses, related consulting services and PCS. For software installations or implementations that include significant production, development or customization, Mantas recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method. Mantas measures progress toward completion by reference to total costs incurred compared

to total estimated costs to be incurred in completing the services. Changes in the estimates of total cost could result in changes in the amount of revenue recognized. Revenue recognized using the percentage-of-completion method is limited by the existence of customer acceptance provisions of contractually defined milestones and corresponding customer rights to refund for certain portions of the fee. In certain cases where acceptance provisions exist, Mantas defers revenue recognition of the portion of the fee subject to refund until Mantas has evidence that the acceptance provisions have been met. In cases where acceptance provisions are based on objective criteria that Mantas has a successful history of meeting, the license fee is included in total contract revenue that is recognized using the percentage of completion method. When current analysis of cost estimates indicate a loss is expected to be incurred, the entire loss is recorded in the period in which it is identified.

In certain circumstances revenue from software license agreements and product sales are recognized upon delivery, provided that all of the following conditions are met: a non-cancelable license agreement has been signed; the software has been delivered; no significant production, modification or customization of the software is required; the fee is fixed or determinable; and collection of the resulting receivable is deemed probable. In software arrangements that include rights to software products, hardware products, PCS, and/or other services, Mantas allocates the total arrangement fee among each deliverable based on vendor-specific objective evidence using the residual method. Revenue from maintenance agreements is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance period, generally one year. Consulting and training services provided by Mantas that are not considered essential to the functionality of the software products are recognized as the respective services are performed.

Pacific Title’s revenue is primarily derived from providing archival and post-production services to the motion picture and television industry. Pacific Title recognizes revenue generally upon the performance of services. Pacific Title performs certain services under fixed-price contracts. Revenue from these contracts is recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis based on costs incurred to total estimated costs to be incurred. Changes in the estimates of total cost could result in changes in the amount of revenue recognized. Any anticipated losses on contracts are expensed when identified.

Recoverability of Goodwill

We conduct a review for impairment of goodwill annually on December 1^st. Additionally, on an interim basis, we assess the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to historical or expected future operating results, significant changes in the manner or use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business, divestiture of all or part of the business, significant negative industry or economic trends or a decline in a company’s stock price for a sustained period.

We test for impairment at a level referred to as a reporting unit (same as or one level below an operating segment as defined in SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”). If we determine that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we assess whether goodwill of the reporting unit is impaired. To determine fair value, we use a number of valuation methods including quoted market prices, discounted cash flows and revenue and acquisition multiples. Depending on the complexity of the valuation and the significance of the carrying value of the goodwill to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we may engage an outside valuation firm to assist us in determining fair value. As an overall check on the reasonableness of the fair values attributed to our reporting units, we compare and contrast the aggregate fair values for all reporting units with our average total market capitalization for a reasonable period of time.

The carrying value of goodwill at June 30, 2006 was $97 million.

We operate in industries which are rapidly evolving and extremely competitive. It is reasonably possible that our accounting estimates with respect to the ultimate recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill could change in the near term and that the effect of such changes on our Consolidated Financial Statements could be material. While we believe that the current recorded carrying values of our companies are not impaired, there can be no assurance that a significant write-down or write-off will not be required in the future.

Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets

We test long-lived assets, including property and equipment and amortizable intangible assets, for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that we may not be able to recover the asset’s carrying amount. When events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may exist, we evaluate the recoverability by determining whether

the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of that asset cover the carrying value at the evaluation date. If the undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying value, we measure any impairment loss as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value.

The carrying value of net intangible assets at June 30, 2006 was $13 million. The carrying value of net property and equipment at June 30, 2006 was $44 million.

Recoverability of Ownership Interests In and Advances to Companies

On a continuous basis (but no less frequently than at the end of each quarterly period) we evaluate the carrying value of our equity and cost method partner companies for possible impairment based on achievement of business plan objectives and milestones, the fair value of each company relative to its carrying value, the financial condition and prospects of the company and other relevant factors. We then determine whether there has been an other than temporary decline in the carrying value of our ownership interest in the company. Impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

The fair value of privately held companies is generally determined based on the value at which independent third parties have invested or have committed to invest in these companies or based on other valuation methods including discounted cash flows, valuation of comparable public companies and the valuation of acquisitions of similar companies. The fair value of our ownership interests in private equity funds is generally determined based on the value of our pro rata portion of the funds’ net assets and estimated future proceeds from sales of investments provided by the funds’ managers.

The new cost basis of a company is not written-up if circumstances suggest the value of the company has subsequently recovered.

We operate in industries which are rapidly evolving and extremely competitive. It is reasonably possible that our accounting estimates with respect to the ultimate recoverability of the carrying value of ownership interests in and advances to partner companies, including goodwill, could change in the near term and that the effect of such changes on our Consolidated Financial Statements could be material. While we believe that the current recorded carrying values of our equity and cost method partner companies are not impaired, there can be no assurance that our future results will confirm this assessment or that a significant write-down or write-off of the carrying value will not be required in the future.

Income Taxes

We are required to estimate income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We must assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent that we believe recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We have recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized in future years. If we determine in the future that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be realized, then the previously established valuation allowance would be reversed.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate prepared by management based on identification of the collectibility of specific accounts and the overall condition of the receivable portfolios. When evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, we specifically analyze trade receivables, historical bad debts, customer credits, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms. If the financial condition of customers or vendors were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Likewise, should we determine that we would be able to realize more of our receivables in the future than previously estimated, an adjustment to the allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjustments are recorded as deemed necessary.

Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, we are a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions which arise in the normal course of business. Additionally, we have received distributions as both a general partner and a limited partner from certain private equity funds. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to return a portion or all the distributions we received as a general partner to the fund for a further distribution to the fund’s limited partners (the “clawback”). We are also a guarantor of various third-party obligations and commitments, and are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of provision required for these commitments and contingencies, if any, which would be charged to earnings, is made after careful analysis of each matter. The provision may change in the future due to new developments or changes in circumstances. Changes in the provision could increase or decrease our earnings in the period the changes are made.

Stock-based Compensation

As permitted by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Accordingly no compensation expense was recorded for stock options issued to employees at fair market value.

On January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method and record such expense in its consolidated financial statements. We adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under this application, we are required to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.

We estimate the grant date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions. These assumptions include estimating the expected term of the award and the estimated volatility of our stock price over the expected term. Changes in these assumptions and in the estimated forfeitures of stock option awards can materially affect the amount of stock-based compensation recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the requisite service periods for market-based stock option awards are based on our estimate of the dates on which the market conditions will be met as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Changes in the derived requisite service period or achievement of market capitalization targets earlier than estimated can materially affect the amount of stock-based compensation recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Results of Operations

Other items include certain expenses which are not identifiable to the operations of the Company’s operating business segments. Other items primarily consist of general and administrative expenses related to our corporate operations, including employee compensation, insurance and professional fees, including legal, finance and consulting. Other items also includes interest income, interest expense and income taxes, which are reviewed by management independent of segment results.

The following tables reflect our consolidated operating data by reportable segment. Each segment includes the results of our consolidated companies and records our share of income or losses for entities accounted for under the equity method. Segment results also include impairment charges, gains or losses related to the disposition of the companies and the mark to market of trading securities. All significant intersegment activity has been eliminated in consolidation. Accordingly, segment results reported by us exclude the effect of transactions between us and our subsidiaries and among our subsidiaries.

The Company’s operating results including net income (loss) before income taxes by segment are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Acsis	$	(1,776	)	$	N/A		$	(3,905	)	$	N/A
Alliance Consulting		(828	)		95			(1,314	)		(964	)
Clarient		(2,685	)		(1,994	)		(5,386	)		(4,532	)
Laureate		(2,634	)		(2,115	)		(4,964	)		(4,534	)
Mantas		1,128			(290	)		2,788			(1,658	)
Pacific Title		660			2,567			931			3,448
Other companies		(958	)		(1,484	)		350			(5,506	)

Total segments		(7,093	)		(3,221	)		(11,500	)		(13,746	)

Other items
Corporate operations		(4,921	)		(3,058	)		(9,054	)		(8,042	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		1,183			(150	)		1,101			11

Total other items		(3,738	)		(3,208	)		(7,953	)		(8,031	)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		(10,831	)		(6,429	)		(19,453	)		(21,777	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations		1,596			(1,250	)		3,766			(1,995	)

Net Loss	$	(9,235	)	$	(7,679	)	$	(15,687	)	$	(23,772	)

Included in the above is stock-based compensation expense, which for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 reflects the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) as follows:


	Stock-Based Compensation
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
			(In thousands)
Acsis	$	39	$	N/A	$	63	$	N/A
Alliance Consulting		262		81		528		165
Clarient		266		77		652		145
Laureate Pharma		39		—		81		—
Mantas		42		—		94		—
Pacific Title		—		139		139		277

Total segment results		648		297		1,557		587
Other items		1,101		222		2,260		451

	$	1,749	$	519	$	3,817	$	1,038

There is intense competition in the markets in which these companies operate, and we expect competition to intensify in the future. Additionally, the markets in which these companies operate are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent introduction of new products and services, shifting distribution channels, evolving government regulation, frequently changing intellectual property landscapes and changing customer demands. Their future success depends on each company’s ability to execute its business plan and to adapt to its respective rapidly changing markets.

Acsis

We acquired 94% of Acsis in December 2005. As a result there is no comparative financial information for the prior year period.


	Three Months Ended June 30,			Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2006
	(In thousands)
Revenue	$	4,584		$	8,985


Operating expenses
Cost of sales		3,236			6,494
Selling, general and administrative		2,407			4,778
Research and development		441			1,081
Amortization of intangibles		384			760

Total operating expenses		6,468			13,113

Operating loss		(1,884	)		(4,128	)
Interest, net		4			10
Minority interest		104			213

Net loss before income taxes	$	(1,776	)	$	(3,905	)

Acsis is a leading provider of software and service solutions that assist manufacturing companies in improving efficiencies throughout the entire supply-chain. Its solutions enable manufacturers to automate plant floor/warehouse operations and take advantage of emerging automated-ID technologies, including radio frequency identification (“RFID”) and barcode.

Acsis draws from a variety of technologies and service offerings to create a solution that matches the client’s business, budget and IT environment. Solutions range from value-added services for implementing SAPConsole, to its proven DataPass middleware offering, to the next generation of shop floor process automation and data collection using their Data-Link enterprise solution suite. If requested, Acsis will provide all necessary hardware, consulting services and software to deliver a turnkey data-collection / supply chain solution.

Acsis’ competition generally comes from large, diversified software or consulting businesses or niche providers with a variety of individual solutions for barcode, RFID or other data collection systems. Acsis differentiates itself by providing a single, integrated platform which can be used across the entire enterprise / supply chain to increase efficiencies and reduce operational costs.

Acsis recognizes revenue from software licenses, related consulting services, hardware and PCS. Revenue from software license agreements is recognized upon delivery, provided that all of the following conditions are met: a non-cancelable license agreement has been signed; the software or hardware has been delivered and there is vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value of any undelivered elements; no significant production, modification or customization of the software is required; the fee is fixed or determinable; and collection of the resulting receivable is deemed probable. Revenue from PCS agreements is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance period, generally one-year. Consulting and training services provided by Acsis that are not consider essential to the functionality of the software products are recognized as the respective services are performed.

In June 2006, Safeguard acquired additional common shares of Acsis for an aggregate purchase price of $6 million in cash increasing our ownership by 1.2% to 95%. We funded Acsis to support their long-term growth strategy.

At June 30, 2006, we owned a 95% voting interest in Acsis.

Revenue.

Quarter June 30, 2006 vs. March 31, 2006. Revenue increased $0.2 million, or 4.2%, in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the first quarter of 2006. The increase is due to increases in both PCS and license revenue. During the quarter, Acsis signed five new license customers. Acsis expects revenue to increase modestly for the remainder of the year although license revenue is generally recognized upon delivery which may cause variability in the timing of revenue.

Operating Expenses.

Quarter June 30, 2006 vs. March 31, 2006. Operating expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 2.7%, in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the first quarter of 2006. Gross margins increased to 29.4% for the second quarter of 2006, up from 26.0% in the first quarter of 2006. The increase is due to the increase in license revenue and increased utilization of the consulting staff. Selling, general and administrative expense was flat for the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the first quarter of 2006.

Research and development expense decreased slightly for the second quarter as compared to the first quarter of 2006. Acsis released three new products in June 2006. Acsis expects research and development costs to increase in future periods as they continue to develop new products.

Acsis anticipates that its net loss in the third quarter of 2006 will be consistent with the second quarter of 2006. Acsis anticipates the addition of management resources and new sales and product initiatives during 2006 to assist in growth. As a result of these strategies, Acsis expects continued losses in 2006.

Alliance

Alliance operates on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year, ending on the Saturday closest to the end of the fiscal period. Alliance’s second quarter ended on July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005, each a period of 13 weeks, and year-to-date a period of 26 weeks, respectively. The financial information presented below does not include the results of operations of Alliance Consulting’s Southwest region business, which is included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. Alliance Consulting completed the sale of that business during the second quarter of 2006, which resulted in a net gain of $1.6 million. The Southwest region business generated revenue of $1.0 million and $3.1 million, with net income of $1.7 million, for both the three and six months ended July 1, 2006, respectively. For the three and six months ended July 2, 2005, the Southwest region business generated revenue of $1.8 million and $5.2 million, respectively, with net loss of $0.1 million and net income of $0.2 million, respectively.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Revenue	$	25,868		$	19,665		$	51,080		$	38,106


Operating expenses
Cost of sales		18,377			13,580			36,645			26,315
Selling, general and administrative		7,926			5,555			14,898			11,925
Amortization of intangibles		243			224			487			479

Total operating expenses		26,546			19,359			52,030			38,719

Operating income (loss)		(678	)		306			(950	)		(613	)
Other income (loss), net		9			(23	)		19			(22	)
Interest, net		(159	)		(188	)		(383	)		(335	)
Minority interest		—			—			—			6

Net income (loss) before income taxes	$	(828	)	$	95		$	(1,314	)	$	(964	)

Alliance Consulting is a leading national business intelligence consultancy providing services primarily to clients in the Fortune 2000 market in the pharmaceutical, financial services and manufacturing industries. Alliance Consulting specializes in information management, which is comprised of a full range of business intelligence solutions from data acquisition and warehousing to master data management, analytics and reporting; and application services, which includes software development, integration, testing and application support delivered through a high quality and cost-effective hybrid global delivery model. Alliance Consulting has developed a strategy focused on enabling business intelligence through the application of deep domain experience and custom-tailored project teams to deliver software solutions and consulting services.

Alliance Consulting recognizes revenue upon the performance of services. Contracts for such services are typically for one year or less. Alliance Consulting performs certain services under fixed-price contracts related to discrete projects. Alliance Consulting recognizes revenue from these contracts using the percentage-of-completion method based on the percentage of labor hours incurred to date compared to the estimated total hours of the project. Losses expected to be incurred on jobs in process are charged to income in the period such losses become known.

While global economic conditions continue to cause companies to be cautious about increasing their use of consulting and IT services, Alliance Consulting continues to see growing demand for its services. Alliance Consulting continues to experience pricing pressures from its competitors as well as from clients facing pressure to control costs. In addition, the growing use of offshore resources to provide lower-cost service delivery capabilities within the industry continues to place pressure on pricing and revenue. Alliance Consulting expects to continue to focus on maintaining and growing its blue chip client base and providing high quality solutions and services to its clients.

In July 2006, Alliance Consulting completed the purchase of specific assets and assumed certain liabilities of Fusion Technologies, Inc., a provider of strategic information technology solutions to rapidly growing organizations within the United States. This purchase further enhances Alliance Consulting’s offshore capabilities to its new and existing clients. Since the transaction was completed after July 1, 2006, there is no impact on the consolidated operating results of Alliance Consulting for the periods presented. Alliance Consulting expects that revenue will increase slightly as compared to prior periods and the acquisition will account for less than 10% of total revenue in 2006.

At June 30, 2006, we owned 100% of Alliance.

Revenue.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue, including reimbursement of expenses, increased $6.2 million, or 31.5% in 2006 as compared to the prior year period. This increase was due to growth in existing accounts as well as the development of new key accounts; plus the expansion of Alliance Consulting’s Outsourcing, Master Data Management and Global Delivery services. In Outsourcing engagements, Alliance Consulting assumes responsibility for managing a client’s business applications with the goal of improving reliability and performance of those applications while reducing costs. Master Data Management includes business intelligence and data management as well as corporate performance management. Global Delivery is Alliance Consulting’s high quality, lower-priced offshore delivery and support service. Revenue from these services was $8.8 million for the second quarter of 2006 as compared to $2.4 million for the second quarter of 2005.

Alliance Consulting’s top ten customers accounted for approximately 61% of total revenue in 2006 and approximately 63% of total revenue in 2005. The same two customers each represented more than 10% of total revenue for the three months ended July 1, 2006 and July 2, 2005.

Revenue growth is expected to continue in 2006 from further penetration of newly developed accounts in the financial services sector, practice expansion within the ERP marketplace and the impact of the Fusion acquisition, although Alliance Consulting continues to closely monitor the impact of global economic trends on IT spending. In addition, Alliance Consulting is continuing to target mid-market pharmaceutical companies which they believe have higher potential for growth in IT spending as opposed to the large pharmaceutical manufacturers. Alliance Consulting will continue to leverage its Outsourcing, Master Data Management and Global Delivery capabilities to facilitate growth in all of its vertical market sectors. Partially offsetting future revenue growth will be the early termination of a significant customer contract as a result of the acquisition of the client by another party. Associated with this acquisition, Alliance has been engaged to assist with the conversion of the existing client’s ERP platform over to the buyer’s ERP platform. Clients continue to award projects in multiple phases resulting in extended sales cycles and gaps between phases. Alliance Consulting must also compete against larger IT services companies with greater resources and more developed offshore delivery organizations.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue, including reimbursement of expenses, increased $13.0 million, or 34.0% in 2006 as compared to the prior year period. This increase was due to growth in existing accounts, the development of new key accounts and the expansion of Alliance Consulting’s Outsourcing, Master Data Management and Global Delivery services. Revenue from these services was $16.6 million in 2006 as compared to $5.2 million in 2005.

Alliance Consulting’s top ten customers accounted for approximately 62% of total revenue in 2006 and approximately 59% of total revenue in 2005. Two customers each represented more than 10% of total revenue for 2006; one customer represented more than 10% of total revenue for 2005.

Cost of Sales.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales increased $4.8 million, or 35.3% in 2006 as compared to the prior year period. This increase was primarily a result of growth in revenues. Gross margin declined from 30.9% in 2005 to 29.0% in 2006 primarily due to higher reimbursable expenses with no margin.

Alliance Consulting expects gross margins to improve in future periods due to the impact of the Fusion acquisition but expects margins to continue to be affected by general economic uncertainty, increases in overall pricing pressures within the industry, discounts required for longer-term engagements, increased employee and contractor costs resulting from greater competition within the talent pool due to declining unemployment levels, wage inflation in India as the demand for those resources increases, resource availability and ability to retain key resources and efficiency in project management.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales increased $10.3 million, or 39.3% in 2006 as compared to the prior year period. This increase was primarily a result of growth in revenues. Gross margin declined from 30.9% in 2005 to 28.3% in 2006 primarily due to an increase in reimbursable expenses and higher staffing costs due to additional full-time employees.

Selling, General and Administrative.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.4 million, or 42.7% in 2006 as compared to the prior year period. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 30.6% of revenue in 2006 as compared to 28.2% of revenue in 2005. The increase was due to higher variable compensation of approximately $0.7 million due to growth in revenues, a restructuring charge of $0.5 million taken to consolidate multiple facilities within the same geographic market, severance costs of approximately $0.3 million, costs associated with expanding the sales organization of approximately $0.2 million and incremental stock-based compensation costs due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) of approximately $0.2 million.

Selling, general and administrative costs are expected to increase as Alliance Consulting’s business continues to grow; including the impact of the Fusion acquisition and the expanded facility in Hyderabad, India. As a percentage of revenue, however, costs are expected to decrease as certain costs are not expected to reoccur. Alliance Consulting also expects to continue realizing benefits from cost savings initiatives including moving certain positions off-shore and right-sizing sales offices.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.0 million, or 24.9% in 2006 as compared to the prior year period. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 29.2% of revenue in 2006 as compared to 31.3% of revenue in 2005. The increase in dollars was due to a restructuring charge of $0.5 million taken to consolidate multiple facilities within the same market, an increase in variable compensation due to growth in revenues of approximately $1.0 million, severance costs of approximately $0.3 million, incremental stock-based compensation charges of approximately $0.3 million due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), costs associated with expanding the sales organization and incremental travel costs associated with the growth in revenues. The decrease as a percentage of revenue is due to the company’s fixed costs and benefits from cost savings initiatives.

Interest, Net.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Interest expense remained relatively flat in 2006 as compared to 2005, as a result of higher interest rates partially offset by lower outstanding debt balances in 2006. The proceeds from the sale of the Southwest region were used to pay down debt.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Interest expense increased slightly as compared to the prior year period due to an increase in interest rates, partially offset by lower average outstanding debt balances in 2006 due to the reduction of debt using the proceeds from the sale of the Southwest region. Interest expense is expected to increase in the remainder of 2006 due to borrowings to fund the Fusion acquisition.

Net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Net loss of $0.8 million in the second quarter of 2006 as compared to net income of $0.1 million in 2005 is primarily related to restructuring and severance charges included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Net loss remained relatively flat due to the growth in revenues offset by the decline in gross margins and higher selling, general and administrative expenses related to restructuring and severance charges.

Clarient


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Revenue	$	7,496		$	5,209		$	14,246		$	9,216

Operating expenses
Cost of sales		3,904			2,699			7,559			5,184
Selling, general and administrative		6,407			4,632			12,587			9,086
Research and development		1,181			759			2,291			1,646
Amortization of intangibles		345			365			698			742

Total operating expenses		11,837			8,455			23,135			16,658

Operating loss		(4,341	)		(3,246	)		(8,889	)		(7,442	)
Interest, net		(135	)		(23	)		(176	)		(50	)
Minority interest		1,791			1,275			3,679			2,960

Net loss before income taxes	$	(2,685	)	$	(1,994	)	$	(5,386	)	$	(4,532	)

Clarient is a comprehensive cancer diagnostics company providing cellular assessment and cancer characterization to community pathologists, academic researchers, university hospitals and biopharmaceutical companies. Clarient addresses these customers’ needs through applications of its proprietary bright field microscopy technology. Its Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS®) instrument is a premiere digital cellular imaging solution that provides precise, reproducible results required by targeted cancer therapies and drug discovery efforts. Clarient leverages ACIS® to provide a broad range of oncology testing services (for community pathologists focused on cancer diagnosis and prognosis) and biopharmaceutical services (in support of companies and researchers developing new cancer therapies).

Clarient generates revenue from diagnostic services, system sales and fee-per-use charges. Clarient recognizes revenue for fee-per-use agreements based on the greater of actual usage fees or the minimum monthly rental fee. Revenue on system sales is recognized upon acceptance by the customer subsequent to a testing and evaluation period. For system sales delivered under the Dako distribution and development agreement, Clarient recognizes revenue when those ACIS® instruments have been delivered and accepted by an end-user customer. Revenue for diagnostic services is recognized at the time of completion of services at amounts equal to contractual rates from third parties including Medicare, insurance companies and to a small degree, private patients. The expected amount is based on both Medicare allowable rates and Clarient’s collection experience with other third party payors.

The decision to provide in-house laboratory services was made in 2004 to give Clarient an opportunity to capture a significant service-related revenue stream over the much broader and expanding cancer diagnostic testing marketplace while also optimizing the level of service and accuracy provided to remote pathology customers. Clarient believes that they are positioned to participate in this growth because of their proprietary analysis capabilities, depth of experience of the staff in their diagnostic laboratory, relationships with the pharmaceutical companies, and demonstrated ability to develop unique assays to support new diagnostic tests.

Clarient operates primarily in two businesses: 1) the services group which delivers critical oncology testing services to community pathologists, biopharmaceutical companies and other researchers; and 2) the technology group which is engaged in the development, manufacture and marketing of an automated cellular imaging system that is designed to assist physicians in making critical medical decisions.

In June 2006, Clarient entered into a definitive agreement to purchase substantially all of the assets of Trestle Holdings, Inc. (“Trestle”) and Trestle Acquisition Corp. ( a wholly-owned subsidiary of Trestle). The proposed purchase strategically positions Clarient as a leading provider in the anatomical pathology market integrating image analysis, high-speed scanning capabilities and virtual microscopy into one offering. Complementing Clarient’s current proprietary ACIS®with Trestle’s technology enables Clarient to cover virtually all of the pathology samples needing anatomical laboratory analysis.

As of June 30, 2006, we owned a 57% voting interest in Clarient.

Revenue.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue increased $2.3 million, or 43.9%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. Revenue from Clarient’s services group increased 139% or $3.7 million from $2.7 million in 2005 to $6.4 million in 2006. This increase resulted from the execution of Clarient’s marketing and sales strategy to increase Clarient’s sales to additional new customers and to enter into new managed care contracts. This was driven by increasing the number of available tests being performed that include immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and florescent in-situ hybridization (“FISH”).

Partially offsetting the increase in revenues from the services group is a decline of $1.4 million in the technology group. The change is primarily the result of a decrease in instrument systems revenue from $1.5 million for the second quarter 2005 to $0.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and a decline in per click revenue of $0.5 million from $1.0 million to $0.5 million in the comparable three month period. Clarient sold three ACIS^{^®} systems and two remote viewing stations in the current quarter as compared to the sale of 14 ACIS^Ò systems in the second quarter of 2005. This decline was partially offset by an increase in development revenue in the second quarter 2006 of $0.3 million compared to no development revenue in the same period of 2005.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue increased $5.0 million, or 54.6%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. Revenue from Clarient’s services group increased 163% or $7.4 million from $4.5 million in 2005 to $11.9 million in 2006. The increase resulted from the execution of Clarient marketing and sales strategy to increase Clarient’s sales to additional new customers and to enter into new managed care contracts. This was driven by increasing the number of available tests being performed that include immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and FISH. Clarient anticipates that diagnostic services revenues will increase throughout 2006 as their suite of advanced cancer diagnostic tests available becomes more comprehensive combined with additional penetration of Clarient’s sales force and additional managed care penetration and increased revenue from existing customers.

Partially offsetting the increase in revenues from the services group is a decline of $2.3 million in the technology group. The change was primarily the result of a decrease in instrument systems revenue from $2.4 million in 2005 to $0.7 million in 2006, a decrease of 70%, and a decline in per click revenue of $1.0 million from $2.3 million to $1.3 million in the comparable six month period, a decrease of 26%. The decline was partially offset by an increase in development revenue in the second quarter of 2006 of $0.4 million compared to no development revenue in the same period of 2005. Clarient expects technology group revenue will increase for the remainder of 2006 as a result of the sale of systems through the Dako distribution agreement, particularly from the planned launch of Acsis III in the fourth quarter of 2006, and development fees earned for the on-going development of a new generation of the ACIS^{^®} system.

Cost of Sales.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales increased $1.2 million, or 44.6%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. Cost of revenue for the services group in 2006 was $3.4 million compared to $2.0 million in 2005. Gross margin for Claient’s services group in 2006 was 46%, compared to 23% in 2005. The improvement in gross margin in the second quarter of 2006 was attributable to achieving economies of scale in Clarient’s diagnostics laboratory operations.

Partially offsetting the increase in cost of sales in the services group was a $0.1 million decline in cost of sales in the technology group. Gross margins for Clarient’s technology group were 60% in 2006 compared to 75% in 2005. This decrease in gross margin was a result of lower than expected sales volume combined with the anticipated lower per system sales price as Clarient moved to a distributor sales arrangement.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales increased $2.4 million, or 45.8%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. Cost of revenue for the services group in 2006 was $6.7 million compared to $3.9 million in 2005, an increase of 73%. Gross margin for Clarient’s services group for 2006 was 44%, compared to 14% in 2005. The increase in gross margin in 2006 was attributable to achieving economies of scale in Clarient’s diagnostics laboratory operations. Clarient anticipates similar gross margin results throughout 2006.

Partially offsetting the increase in cost of sales in the services group was a $0.5 million decline in cost of sales in the technology group. Gross margins for Clarient’s technology group were 65% in 2006 and 73% in 2005. Clarient attributes the decrease in gross margin to a result of lower than expected sales volume combined with anticipated lower per system sales price as they moved to a distributor sales a agreement.

Selling, General and Administrative.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative costs increased $1.8 million, or 38.3%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. Expenses related to both selling, general and administrative and diagnostic services administration are included in this category. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2006 increased approximately $1.3 million, or 42.4%, to $4.4 million compared to $3.1 million for the comparable period in 2005. As a percent of revenues, these costs remained flat at 59% in the second quarter 2005 and in the second quarter 2006. The increase in expenses in the current quarter was primarily due to increases in rent expense related to Clarient’s new facility, increases in selling expenses to support the growing diagnostics services business, the implementation of SFAS No. 123(R), and relocation expenses.

Also contributing to the overall increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was diagnostic services administration expenses which were $2.0 million in 2006 compared to $1.5 million in 2005, an increase of 30%. The increase was primarily due to higher collection costs due to the increase in services group revenues and cash collections for the period.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.5 million, or 38.5%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. Expenses related to both selling, general and administrative and diagnostic services administration are included in this category. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2006 increased approximately $2.3 million, or 37.3% to $8.4 million compared to $6.1 million for the comparable period in 2005. As a percent of revenues, these costs decreased from 66% in 2005 to 59% in 2006. The increase in expenses in the first six months was primarily due to increases in rent expense related to Clarient’s new facility, increases in selling expenses to support the growing diagnostics services business, higher stock-based compensation expense due to the implementation of SFAS No. 123(R) and relocation and recruiting expenses. Clarient expects sales expenses to support their growing diagnostics services business will continue to grow throughout the remainder of 2006, and expect general and administrative expenses to decline as a percentage of revenues as their infrastructure costs stabilize.

Also contributing to the overall increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was diagnostic services administration expenses which were $4.2 million in 2006 compared to $3.0 million in 2005. The increase was primarily due to higher collection costs due to an increase in services group revenue for the period, and the addition of medical and administrative staff to support this rapidly growing segment of Clarient’s business. These costs are expected to continue to increase for the remaining two quarters of 2006, relative to the prior period, because of higher collection costs on an anticipated, continued increase in services group revenue.

Research and Development.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Research and development expenses increased $0.4 million, or 55.6%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to personnel and consultants supporting the development activity under Clarient’s agreement with Dako. While development expenses are higher, Clarient earns development fees under the terms of its distribution and development agreement with Dako which are recognized in revenue. These development activities, which are intended to produce features that could expand the volume of clinical tests supported by ACIS® and increase the utility of the ACIS® as a tool for researchers, are important to increasing clinical system test volume, expanding the number of clinical system placements and increasing research systems sales.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Research and development expenses increased $0.6 million, or 39.2%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to personnel and consultants supporting the development activity under Clarient’s agreement with Dako. While development expenses are higher, Clarient earns development fees under the terms of our distribution and development agreement with Dako which are recognized in revenue. These development activities, which are intended to produce features that could expand the volume of clinical tests supported by ACIS® and increase the utility of the ACIS® as a tool for researchers, are important to increasing clinical system test volume, expanding the number of clinical system placements and increasing research systems sales. Clarient expects development expenses to continue at similar levels until completion of ACIS III®, which it expects to launch in the fourth quarter of 2006.

Net Loss Before Income Taxes.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Net loss increased $0.7 million, or 34.7%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. The increase is primarily attributable to higher selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses, partially offset by improved gross margin in the services group in 2006.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Net loss increased $0.9 million, or 18.8%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. The increase is primarily attributable to higher selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses, partially offset by improved gross margin in the services group in 2006.

Laureate Pharma

The financial information presented below does not include the results of operations of the Totowa facility, which was sold in December 2005 are included in discontinued operations in 2005. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the Totowa operation generated revenue of $1.0 million and $1.4 million and a net loss of $0.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Revenue	$	2,468		$	2,823		$	4,646		$	5,016


Operating expenses
Cost of sales		3,676			3,881			6,917			7,460
Selling, general and administrative		1,270			977			2,451			1,947

Total operating expenses		4,946			4,858			9,368			9,407

Operating loss		(2,478	)		(2,035	)		(4,722	)		(4,391	)
Interest, net		(156	)		(80	)		(242	)		(143	)

Net loss before income taxes	$	(2,634	)	$	(2,115	)	$	(4,964	)	$	(4,534	)

Laureate Pharma is a life sciences company dedicated to providing critical services to facilitate biopharmaceutical product development and manufacturing. Laureate Pharma seeks to become a leader in the biopharmaceutical industry by delivering superior development and manufacturing services to its customers.

Laureate Pharma’s broad range of services includes: bioprocessing, quality control and quality assurance. Laureate Pharma provides process development and manufacturing services on a contract basis to biopharmaceutical companies. Laureate Pharma operates a facility in Princeton, New Jersey.

Laureate Pharma’s customers generally include small to mid-sized biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies seeking outsourced bioprocessing manufacturing and development services. Laureate Pharma’s customers are often dependent on the availability of funding to pursue drugs that are in early stages of clinical trials, and thus have high failure rates. Losses of one or more customers can result in significant swings in profitability from quarter to quarter and year to year. Although there has been a trend among biopharmaceutical companies to outsource drug production functions, this trend may not continue. Many of Laureate Pharma’s contracts are short term in duration. As a result, Laureate Pharma must seek to replace these short-term contracts with new contracts to sustain its revenue.

Laureate Pharma’s revenue is generated by the sale of contract manufacturing services to support the development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products. Revenue is generally recognized upon the performance of services. Certain services are performed under fixed-price contracts. Revenue from these contracts is recognized on a percentage of completion basis based on costs incurred to total estimated costs to be incurred. Any anticipated losses on contracts are expensed when identified.

Laureate Pharma has recently begun an expansion of its biopharmaceutical manufacturing facility to increase capacity and broaden its service offerings.

As of June 30, 2006, we owned a 100% voting interest in Laureate Pharma.

Revenue.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue decreased $0.4 million or 12.6% in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to decreased revenues from production and purification. This was offset by increased revenues related to support services. Laureate signed one large contract with a new customer during the quarter and purchase orders were received to begin work for two additional new projects.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue decreased $0.4 million or 7.4% in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to decreased revenues related to production and purification. This was offset by increased revenues related to support services. With new contracts signed in 2006 and additional purchase orders received, Laureate Pharma expects an increase in revenues for the remainder of 2006.

Cost of Sales.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales decreased $0.2 million, or 5.3%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to a decline in revenue and reductions in raw material consumption.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales decreased $0.5 million, or 7.3%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to a decline in revenue and reductions in material consumption. Laureate expects an increase in cost of sales due to increased revenues for the remainder of 2006.

Selling, General and Administrative.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $0.3 million, or 30.0% in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to increases in staffing costs of $0.2 million, marketing expenses of $0.1 million and other administrative support costs of $0.1 million.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $0.5 million, or 25.9%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to increases in staffing costs of $0.3 million, marketing expenses of $0.1 million and other administrative support costs of $0.2 million. Selling, general and administrative expense is expected to remain relatively constant in 2006 except for variable compensation related to increased sales.

Net Loss Before Income Taxes.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Net loss increased $0.5 million, or 24.5%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to reduced revenues and increased selling, general and administrative expenses partially offset by decreased cost of sales.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Net loss increased $0.4 million, or 9.5%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to reduced revenues and increased selling, general and administrative expenses partially offset by decreased cost of sales.

Mantas

The financial information presented below does not include the results of operations of Mantas’ telecommunications business, which are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. The telecommunications business generated revenue of $0.7 million and net income of $0.4 million, excluding a gain on the sale of $1.9 million, in the six months ended June 30, 2006 and generated revenue of $0.5 million and $1.0 million and a net loss of $0.4 million and $0.7 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006		2005			2006		2005
	(In thousands)
Revenue	$	8,439	$	7,544		$	17,823	$	14,121


Operating expenses
Cost of sales		3,640		3,648			7,096		7,095
Selling, general and administrative		2,119		2,435			4,457		4,862
Research and development		1,586		1,447			3,221		3,204
Amortization of intangibles		—		305			306		611

Total operating expenses		7,345		7,835			15,080		15,772

Operating income (loss)		1,094		(291	)		2,743		(1,651	)
Interest, net		34		1			45		(7	)

Net income (loss) before income taxes	$	1,128	$	(290	)	$	2,788	$	(1,658	)

Mantas is a software company which provides integrated, single-source, behavior detection solutions for the global financial market. Mantas’ products are used by global industry leaders to help ensure the integrity of their enterprise and to

provide adherence with industry regulations, operational transparency requirements and risk identification and mitigation. All of Mantas’ financial services products are based on its Behavior Detection Platform™ which utilizes proprietary analytical techniques to provide applications for anti-money laundering, trading and brokerage compliance and fraud management. The Mantas Behavior Detection Platform can analyze billions of accounts and transactions, all in the context of one another, in order to identify suspicious activities for further review. Mantas also provides complete end-to-end case management and enterprise integration as well as real time analytics and reporting to customers in over 60 countries.

Mantas recognizes revenue from software licenses, post-contract customer support and related consulting services under contracts ranging from one to five years. For software installations or implementations, Mantas recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method based on total costs incurred compared to total estimated cots to be incurred. In certain circumstances revenue from software license agreements and product sales are recognized upon delivery, provided that certain conditions are met. In cases where acceptance provisions are based on objective criteria that Mantas has a successful history of meeting, the license fee is included in total contract revenue that is recognized using the percentage of completion method. Mantas encounters competition from software development companies focusing on compliance solutions for the financial services market and general consulting firms, as well as from internal development. These competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sales of their products. Mantas believes that continuing market consolidation in the financial services industry has intensified competition among software providers, causing increased pricing pressure, but also an increase in the competitive gap between market leaders and other participants.

As of June 30, 2006, we owned an 88% voting interest in Mantas.

Revenue.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue increased $0.9 million, or 11.9%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. The increase is primarily due to more implementations in progress which generated higher services revenue offset by lower product revenue as a result of the timing of customer acceptances.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue increased $3.7 million, or 26.2%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. This increase is due to higher product revenue from several significant customer acceptances in the first half of 2006 as well as new projects with associated license revenue. In addition, Mantas recognized increased services revenue primarily from ongoing and new deployments for one of its customers as well as higher services and maintenance revenues from a larger customer base. Mantas expects revenue to continue to increase in the remainder of 2006 as it continues to provide additional products and services to its existing customer base, acquires new customers and introduces new product offerings to the market.

Cost of Sales.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales remained constant in 2006 as compared to 2005. Mantas is achieving higher services margins as they continue to leverage lower cost resources and generate higher maintenance margins as the customer base grows. Gross margin increased in 2006 to 56.9% as compared to 51.6% in 2005 as a result of higher revenue as well as improved services margins on its product implementations.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales remained constant in 2006 as compared to 2005. Mantas is achieving higher services margins as they continue to leverage lower cost resources and generate higher maintenance margins as the customer base grows. Gross margin increased to 60.2% in 2006 as compared to 49.8% 2005 due to higher product to services revenue mix which creates a higher average margin as well as improved services margins on its product implementations. Mantas expects cost of sales to increase at a similar rate as revenue, however, does not expect services margins to continue to grow at the same rate.

Selling, General and Administrative.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative costs decreased $0.3 million, or 13.0%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. Mantas attributes this decline to lower sales headcount and lower product management costs in 2006 as compared to 2005.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative costs declined $0.4 million, or 8.3%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. Mantas attributes this decline to lower sales headcount and lower marketing expenditures. Mantas expects these costs to increase slightly in the remainder of 2006 due to hiring within the sales and product management departments.

Net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Net income for 2006 was $1.1 million compared to net loss of $0.3 million in 2005. Mantas attributes the change to higher gross margins as a result of additional product license revenue and higher service margins.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Net income for 2006 was $2.8 million compared to net loss of $1.7 million in 2005. Mantas attributes the change to higher gross margins as a result of additional product license revenue and higher service margins.

Pacific Title


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Revenue	$	7,594		$	9,448		$	15,153		$	16,772

Operating expenses
Cost of sales		5,450			5,567			11,053			10,550
Selling, general and administrative		1,467			1,609			3,167			3,007

Total operating expenses		6,917			7,176			14,220			13,557

Operating income		677			2,272			933			3,215
Other income (loss), net		(15	)		362			(2	)		362
Interest, net		(2	)		(7	)		—			(14	)
Minority interest		—			(60	)		—			(115	)

Net income before income taxes	$	660		$	2,567		$	931		$	3,448

Pacific Title is a leading provider of a broad range of digital and photo-chemical services for post-production and archival applications in the Hollywood motion picture and television industry. Pacific Title provides a complete array of state-of-the art digital post-production capabilities both for new releases and restoration of film libraries, leading the transformation from optical, analog image reproduction and processing with digital image processing technologies, which we believe is more cost-effective and flexible. In 2005, Pacific Title introduced a digital YCM process, which is a proprietary method of archiving films, involving the transfer of the film to three color film reels: (yellow, cyan and magenta), which can be stored for more than 100 years.

Pacific Title recognizes revenue on a percentage of completion basis based on costs incurred to total estimated costs to be incurred. Any anticipated losses on contracts are expensed when identified.

As of June 30, 2006, we owned a 100% voting interest in Pacific Title.

Revenue.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue decreased $1.9 million, or 19.6%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 due primarily to a reduction in revenue of approximately $2 million from trailer production. Partially offsetting the overall decline in revenue were increases within two newer lines of business, digital intermediate and digital YCM.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Revenue decreased $1.6 million, or 9.7%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. The decline is primarily attributable to a $2.4 million decrease in trailer revenue. Partially offsetting the overall decline in revenue were revenues from two newer lines of business, digital intermediate and digital YCM. Revenue for the remainder of the year is expected to be consistent with the first two quarters.

Cost of Sales.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales decreased $0.1 million, or 2.1%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to lower variable costs related to the lower revenues for the same period partially offset by higher direct labor costs of $0.3 million in 2006, mostly related to an increase in visual effects and digital intermediate work. Overhead labor costs increased $0.1 million in 2006 due to increased staffing and increases in wages and benefits.

Gross margin decreased $1.8 million in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to the decline in revenue. The disproportionate decrease in revenue to cost of sales is mostly attributable to the high degree of fixed costs, no significant reduction in trailer expenses relative to the loss of trailer revenue and to increased expenses of two new departments.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Cost of sales increased $0.5 million, or 4.8%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to higher direct labor costs of $0.3 million, mostly related to an increase in visual effects and digital intermediate work. Overhead labor costs increased $0.1 million due to increased staffing and increases in wages and benefits.

Gross margin decreased $2.1 million in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to a decline in revenue. The disproportionate decrease in revenue to cost of sales is mostly attributable to the high degree of fixed costs, no significant reduction in trailer expenses relative to the loss of trailer revenue and to increased expenses of two new departments.

Cost of sales is expected to decrease modestly as a result of certain cost containment measures.

Selling, General and Administrative.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative expense decreased $0.1 million, or 8.8%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to a reduction in sales commissions on lower sales in 2006, lower deferred compensation expense of $0.1 million as a result of deferred stock units (DSUs) which were fully amortized at the end of the first quarter of 2006 and reduced professional fees of $0.2 million.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Selling, general and administrative expense increased $0.2 million, or 5.3%, in 2006 as compared to 2005. In 2005, $0.3 million of previously accrued costs associated with the close of an inactive business unit were reversed by Pacific Title. Partially offsetting the increase were declines in professional fees of $0.2 million, DSU amortization of $0.1 million and sales commissions of $0.1 million on lower revenues. Selling, general and administrative is expected to remain constant for the remainder of the year.

Net Income Before Income Taxes.

Quarter 2006 vs. 2005. Net income decreased $1.9 million, or 74.3%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 primarily due to lower revenue with a relatively fixed expense base.

Year-to-date 2006 vs. 2005. Net income decreased $2.5 million, or 73.0%, in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to lower revenue with a relatively fixed expense base.

Other Companies


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Other income (loss), net	$	(1,293	)	$	(36	)	$	620		$	(101	)
Equity income (loss)		335			(1,448	)		(270	)		(5,405	)

Net income (loss) before income taxes	$	(958	)	$	(1,484	)	$	350		$	(5,506	)

Other Income (Loss), Net


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Gain on sale of companies and funds, net	$	—		$	282		$	1,181		$	282
Loss on trading securities		(1,261	)		(218	)		(532	)		(218	)
Impairment charges		—			(100	)		—			(200	)
Other		(32	)		—			(29	)		35

	$	(1,293	)	$	(36	)	$	620		$	(101	)

Gain on sale of companies and funds of $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 relates to the sale of a cost method investment whose carrying value was zero. Gain on sale of companies and funds of $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 reflects a gain on distribution of stock from a private equity fund.

Loss on trading securities in 2006 primarily reflects the adjustment to fair value of our holdings in Traffic.com, which are classified as trading securities following their initial public offering in January 2006. Loss on trading securities in 2005 reflects the adjustment to fair value of our holdings in Arbinet-thexchange.

Equity Income (Loss). Equity income (loss) fluctuates with the number of partner companies and funds accounted for under the equity method, our voting ownership percentage in these partner companies and funds and the net results of operations of these partner companies. We recognize our share of losses to the extent we have cost basis in the equity investee or we have outstanding commitments or guarantees. Certain amounts recorded to reflect our share of the income or losses of our partner companies accounted for under the equity method are based on estimates and on unaudited results of operations of those companies and may require adjustments in the future when audits of these entities are made final.


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006		2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Share of equity method companies’ results of operations	$	—	$	(1,337	)	$	—		$	(1,732	)
Share of private equity funds’ results of operations		335		(111	)		(270	)		(3,673	)

	$	335	$	(1,448	)	$	(270	)	$	(5,405	)

During 2005, we restructured our ownership interest in four private equity funds from a general partner to a special limited partner interest. As a result of the change, we have virtually no influence over these funds; therefore, effective April 1, 2005, we began accounting for these funds on the cost method. In December 2005, we sold most of our holdings in certain private equity funds. These private equity funds accounted for $0.1 million and $3.4 million of equity loss in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. We expect that equity loss related to our holdings in private equity funds will be lower for the remainder of 2006 as compared to the comparable period of 2005 as a result of the sales of a majority of our holdings in the private equity funds in 2005, as well as the possible sale of our remaining holdings in private equity funds.

Corporate Operations


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
General and administrative costs, net	$	(4,241	)	$	(3,643	)	$	(8,684	)	$	(8,068	)
Stock-based compensation		(1,101	)		(222	)		(2,260	)		(451	)
Interest income		1,555			1,117			3,037			2,200
Interest expense		(1,190	)		(1,236	)		(2,404	)		(2,472	)
Impairment – related party		—			(102	)		—			(260	)
Other		56			1,028			1,257			1,009

	$	(4,921	)	$	(3,058	)	$	(9,054	)	$	(8,042	)

General and Administrative Costs, Net. Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of employee compensation, insurance, professional fees such as legal, accounting and consulting, and travel-related costs. The increase of $0.6 million during the second quarter of 2006 as compared to the second quarter of 2005 relates to an increase of $0.7 million in employee related costs due to new hires to support Safeguard’s long-term strategy, as well as an increase in professional fees of $0.3 million partially offset by a $0.3 million decline in insurance expense. General and administrative costs increased $0.6 million for the six month period 2006 as compared to the prior year period primarily due to an increase of $0.8 million in

employee related costs due to new hires to support Safeguard’s long-term strategy, as well as an increase in professional fees of $0.4 million partially offset by a $0.5 million decline in insurance expense.

We expect full year corporate selling, general and administrative expenses to continue to be slightly higher in 2006 as compared to the prior year.

Stock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation consists primarily of expense related to stock option grants and grants of restricted stock and deferred stock units to our employees. The increase of $0.9 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively as compared to the prior year period is primarily attributable to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) the Company recognized expense related to restricted stock and deferred stock units but not stock options. Of the $1.1 million and $2.3 million expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, $0.7 million and $1.4 million relates to market-based awards and $0.4 million and $0.9 million relates to service-based awards, respectively. Stock based compensation expense related to corporate operations is included in Selling, general and administrative in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Interest Income. Interest income includes all interest earned on available cash balances as well as any interest income associated with any outstanding notes receivable to Safeguard. Interest income increased $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the three and six months of 2006, respectively, as compared to 2005. This net increase is attributable to higher interest rates partially offset by lower invested cash balances in 2006 as compared to 2005.

Interest Expense. Interest expense is primarily related to our 2.625% convertible senior debentures with a stated maturity of 2024. Interest expense remained constant for the three and six months of 2006 as compared to 2005.

Impairment –Related Party. In May 2001, we entered into a loan agreement with Mr. Musser, our former CEO. We recorded impairment charges of $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, to write down the note to the estimated value of the collateral that we held at that time.

Other. Included in the six months ended June 30, 2006 is a net gain of $1.1 million on the repurchase of $5 million of face value of the 2024 Debentures. Included in this category in 2005 is $0.9 million related to the sale of certain property.

Income Tax Benefit

Our consolidated net income tax benefit recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, was $1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively. We recognized a $1.3 million tax benefit in the three months ended June 30, 2006 related to uncertain tax positions for which the statute of limitations expired during the period in the applicable tax jurisdictions. We also recognized tax expense of $0.1 million and $0.2 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, related to our share of net state and foreign taxes recorded by subsidiaries. We have recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized in future years. Accordingly, the net operating loss benefit that would have been recognized in 2006 was offset by a valuation allowance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Parent Company

We fund our operations with cash on hand as well as proceeds from sales of and distributions from partner companies, private equity funds and trading securities. In prior periods we have also used sales of available-for-sale securities, sales of our equity and issuance of debt as sources of liquidity. Our ability to generate liquidity from sales of partner companies, sales of available-for-sale securities and from equity and debt issuances has been adversely affected from time to time by the decline in the U.S. capital markets and other factors.

As of June 30, 2006, at the parent company level, we had $78.8 million of cash and cash equivalents, and $38.9 million of marketable securities for a total of $117.7 million. In addition to the amounts above, we have $11.4 million of marketable securities in escrow associated with our interest payments due on the 2024 Debentures through March 2009 and our consolidated subsidiaries had cash and cash equivalents of $15.8 million.

Proceeds from sales of and distributions from companies and funds were $0.2 million and $0.5 million and $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.

In May 2006, we renewed our revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings, issuances of letters of credit and guarantees of up to $55 million. Borrowing availability under the facility is reduced by the amounts outstanding for Safeguard borrowings and letters of credit and amounts guaranteed under partner company facilities maintained with that same lender. This credit facility matures in May 2007 and bears interest at the prime rate (8.25% at June 30, 2006) for outstanding borrowings. The credit facility is subject to an unused commitment fee of 0.0125%, which is subject to reduction based on deposits maintained at the bank. The facility requires cash collateral equal to one times Safeguard borrowings and letters of credit and amounts borrowed by partner companies under the guaranteed portion of the partner company facilities maintained at the same bank. This facility provides us flexibility to implement our strategy and support our companies.

Availability under our revolving credit facility at June 30, 2006 is as follows (in thousands):


	Revolving Credit			Letters of Credit			Total
Size of facility	$	48,664		$	6,336		$	55,000
Subsidiary facilities at same bank (a)		(31,500	)		—			(31,500	)
Outstanding letter of credit (b)		—			(6,336	)		(6,336	)

Amount Available at June 30, 2006	$	17,164		$	—		$	17,164


(a)		Our ability to borrow under our credit facility is limited by the amounts outstanding for Safeguard borrowings and letters of credit and amounts guaranteed under partner company facilities maintained at the same bank. Of the total facilities, $20.9 million is outstanding under these facilities at June 30, 2006 and included as debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(b)		In connection with the sale of CompuCom, we provided to the landlord of CompuCom’s Dallas headquarters lease, a letter of credit, which will expire on March 19, 2019, in an amount equal to $6.3 million.

Additionally, we have committed capital of approximately $6.7 million, including a commitment to Clarient up to $3.0 million to support a proposed acquisition and commitments made in prior years to various private equity funds. These commitments will be funded over the next several years, including approximately $4.9 million which is expected to be funded in the next twelve months. We do not intend to commit new investments in additional private equity funds and may seek to reduce our current ownership interests in, and our existing commitments to the funds in which we hold interests.

All subsidiary facilities expire in February 2007 with the exception of Acsis’ facility. Acsis’ facility which expired in June 2006 is expected to be renewed in August.

The transactions we enter into in pursuit of our strategy could increase or decrease our liquidity at any point in time. As we seek to acquire interests in information technology and life sciences companies or provide additional funding to existing partner companies, we may be required to expend our cash or incur debt, which will decrease our liquidity. Conversely, as we dispose of our interests in companies from time-to-time we may receive proceeds from such sales which could increase our liquidity. From time-to-time, we are engaged in discussions concerning acquisitions and dispositions which, if consummated, could impact our liquidity, perhaps significantly.

On April 21, 2006, we acquired a 12% interest in Authentium for $5.5 million in cash.

In May 2001, we entered into a loan agreement with Mr. Musser, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. To date we have recognized net impairment charges against the loan of $15.4 million, to the estimated value of the collateral that we held at each respective date. The carrying value of the loan at June 30, 2006 is $0.4 million. Since 2001, we have received a total of $15.2 million in cash paydowns on the loan. We continue to use reasonable commercial efforts to collect Mr. Musser’s outstanding loan obligation. These efforts have included and may, in the future include, the sale of existing collateral, obtaining and selling additional collateral, litigation and a negotiated resolution.

We have received distributions as both a general partner and a limited partner from certain private equity funds. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to return a portion or all the distributions we received as a general partner to the fund for further distribution to the fund’s limited partners (the “clawback”). Assuming for these purposes only that the funds are liquidated or dissolved on June 30, 2006 and, the only distributions from the funds are equal to the carrying value of the funds on the June 30, 2006 financial statements, the maximum clawback we would be required to return for our general partner interest is $8 million. Management estimates its liability to be approximately $6 million, which is reflected in “Other Long-Term Liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Our previous ownership in the general partners of the funds which have potential clawback liabilities range from 19 -30%. The clawback liability is joint and several, such that we may be required to fund the clawback for other general partners should they default. The funds have taken several steps to reduce the potential liabilities should other general partners default, including withholding all general partner distributions and placing them in escrow and adding rights of set-off among certain funds. We believe our liability under the default of other general partners is remote.

We have outstanding $145 million of 2.625% convertible senior debentures with a stated maturity of March 15, 2024. Interest on the 2024 Debentures is payable semi-annually. At the note holders’ option, the notes are convertible into our common stock before the close of business on March 14, 2024 subject to certain conditions. The conversion rate of the notes at June 30, 2006 was $7.2174 of principal amount per share. The closing price of our common stock on June 30, 2006 was $2.16. The note holders may require repurchase of the 2024 Debentures on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or March 20, 2019 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their respective amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The note holders may also require repurchase of the notes upon certain events, including sale of all or substantially all of our common stock or assets, liquidation, dissolution or a change in control. Subject to certain conditions, we may redeem all or some of the 2024 Debentures commencing March 20, 2009. During the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $5 million of face value of the 2024 Debentures for $3.8 million. We may use up to an additional $16.2 million to repurchase additional 2024 Debentures.

For reasons we have discussed, we believe our cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2006 and other internal sources of cash flow are expected to be sufficient to fund our cash requirements for the next twelve months, including commitments to our existing companies and funds, our current operating plan to acquire interests in new partner companies and our general corporate requirements.

Consolidated Subsidiaries

Most of our consolidated subsidiaries incurred losses in 2005 and the first half of 2006 and may need additional capital to fund their operations. From time-to-time, some or all of our consolidated subsidiaries may require additional debt or equity financing or credit support from us to fund planned expansion activities. If we decide not to provide sufficient capital resources to allow them to reach a positive cash flow position and they are unable to raise capital from outside resources, they may need to scale back their operations. If Alliance Consulting, Clarient, Mantas and Pacific Title meet their business plans for 2006 and the related milestones established by us, we believe they will have sufficient cash or availability under established lines of credit to fund their operations for at least the next twelve months. We expect Laureate Pharma will require additional capital in 2006 to fund their business plan, including their capital expansion program. In June 2006, we provided $6.0 million in funding to Acsis to support development of its new products, which when combined with their availability under the anticipated line of credit, we believe will provide them with sufficient cash to fund their long-term growth strategies.

Consolidated subsidiaries have outstanding facilities that provide for aggregate borrowings of up to $47 million. These facilities contain financial and non-financial covenants and expire at various points in the first quarter of 2007, with the exception of Acsis’ debt facility, which is expected to be renewed in August.

As of June 30, 2006, outstanding borrowings under these facilities were $20.9 million.

During the first quarter of 2006, Clarient entered into a Master Purchase Agreement pursuant to which it sold Automated Cellular Imaging System (ACIS®) cost-per-test units that were previously leased to customers for a gross amount of $2.3 million. The purchaser also has the option to purchase additional units worth up to $1.0 million which Clarient expects to complete in 2006.

In June 2006, we committed to provide Clarient up to $3.0 million to support a proposed acquisition.

Analysis of Parent Company Cash Flows

Cash flow activity for the Parent Company was as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(7,308	)	$	(12,037	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(19,905	)		(24,983	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,321	)		—

	$	(29,534	)	$	(37,020	)

Cash Used In Operating Activities

2006 vs. 2005. Net cash used in operating activities decreased $4.7 million in 2006 as compared to the prior year period. The decline is primarily attributable to reduced net loss in 2006 as compared to 2005.

Cash Used In Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities primarily reflects the acquisition of ownership interests in companies from third parties, partially offset by proceeds from the sales of non-strategic assets and private equity funds.

2006 vs. 2005. Net cash used in investing activities decreased $5.1 million in 2006 as compared to the prior period. The decline is primarily attributable to a $18.5 million net decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities. Partially offsetting the overall decline is an increase of $10.4 million in acquisitions of ownership interests in companies, funds and subsidiaries. Included in 2006 is Safeguard’s additional investment in Acsis of $6.0 million in the second quarter of 2006.

Cash Used in Financing Activities

2006 vs. 2005. Net cash used in financing activities increased $2.3 million in 2006 as compared to the prior period. The increase is primarily related to $3.8 million of cash used to repurchase $5.0 million of face value of the 2024 Debentures in the first quarter of 2006, partially offset by a decrease in restricted cash.

Consolidated Working Capital

Consolidated working capital decreased to $133 million at June 30, 2006 compared to $147 million at December 31, 2005. The decrease is primarily attributable to cash expended on new and follow-on holdings as well as to fund continuing operations.

Analysis of Consolidated Company Cash Flows

Cash flow activity was as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2006			2005
	(in thousands)
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(15,934	)	$	(16,254	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(17,767	)		(30,184	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		249			1,200

	$	(33,452	)	$	(45,238	)

Cash Used In Operating Activities

2006 vs. 2005. Net cash used in operating activities decreased $0.3 million in 2006 as compared to the prior year period. The decrease is primarily related to a decrease in net loss, offset by working capital changes.

Cash Used In Investing Activities

2006 vs. 2005. Net cash used in investing activities decreased $12.4 million in 2006 as compared to the prior year period. This decline is primarily related to a $18.5 million net decrease in restricted cash and marketable securities and $6.2 million of proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations. Partially offsetting the overall decline is an increase of $4.4 million related to acquisitions of ownership interests in companies, funds and subsidiaries and an increase of $5.2 million in capital expenditures.

Cash Provided by Financing Activities

2006 vs. 2005. Net cash provided by financing activities decreased $1.0 million in 2006 as compared to 2005. The decline is primarily related to $3.8 million of cash used to repurchase $5.0 million of face value of the 2024 Debentures in the first quarter of 2006. Partially offsetting the decline is an increase in net borrowings under credit facilities and term debt.

Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of June 30, 2006 by period due or expiration of the commitment.


	Payments Due by Period
			Rest of		2007 and		2009 and		Due after
	Total		2006		2008		2010		2010
	(in millions)
Contractual Cash Obligations
Lines of credit (a)	$	17.4	$	0.9	$	16.5	$	—	$	—
Long-term debt (a)		5.4		0.8		3.4		1.2		—
Capital leases		4.2		1.0		2.9		0.3		—
Convertible senior debentures (b)		145.0		—		—		—		145.0
Operating leases		29.6		3.3		11.1		7.3		7.9
Funding commitments (c)		6.7		4.0		2.6		0.1		—
Potential clawback liabilities (d)		6.0		—		1.1		—		4.9
Other long-term obligations (e)		3.6		0.4		1.6		1.6		—

Total Contractual Cash Obligations	$	217.9	$	10.4	$	39.2	$	10.5	$	157.8


	Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period
			Rest of		2007 and		2009 and		Due after
	Total		2006		2008		2010		2010
	(in millions)
Other Commitments
Letters of credit (f)	$	10.9	$	4.3	$	0.2	$	—	$	6.4


(a)		We have various forms of debt including lines of credit and term loans. Of our total outstanding guarantees of $40.0 million, $20.9 million of outstanding debt associated with the guarantees is included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2006. The remaining $19.1 million is not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets or in the above table.

(b)		In February 2004, we completed the issuance of $150 million of 2.625% convertible senior debentures with a stated maturity of March 15, 2024. During the first quarter of 2006, we repurchased $5 million of the face value of the 2024 Debentures for $3.8 million in cash.

(c)		These amounts include funding commitments to private equity funds and private companies. The amounts have been included in the respective years based on estimated timing of capital calls provided to us by the funds’ management. Also included is our $3.0 million commitment to Clarient to support a proposed acquisition in 2006.

(d)		We have received distributions as both a general partner and a limited partner from certain private equity funds. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to return a portion or all the distributions we received as a general partner to the fund for a further distribution to the fund’s limited partners (the “clawback”). Assuming the funds were liquidated or dissolved on June 30, 2006 and the only value provided by the funds is the carrying values


		represented on the June 30, 2006 financial statements, the maximum clawback we would be required to return is $8 million. Management estimates its liability to be approximately $6 million. This amount is reflected in “Other Long-Term Liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(e)		Reflects the amounts payable to our former Chairman and CEO under a consulting contract.

(f)		Letters of credit include a $6.3 million letter of credit provided to the landlord of CompuCom’s Dallas headquarters lease in connection with the sale of CompuCom; $1.1 million letter of credit issued by a subsidiary supporting a subsidiary guarantee; and $3.5 million letter of credit issued by subsidiaries supporting their office leases.

We have retention employment agreements with certain executive officers that provide for severance payments to the executive officer in the event the officer is terminated without cause or the officer terminates his employment for “good reason.”

We are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Factors That May Affect Future Results

Forward-looking statements in this report and those made from time to time by us through our senior management team are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from results anticipated in forward-looking statements are described in our SEC filings. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

Risks Related to Our Business

Our business depends upon the performance of our partner companies, which is uncertain.

If our partner companies do not succeed, the value of our assets could be significantly reduced and require substantial impairments or write-offs, and our results of operations and the price of our common stock could decline. The risks relating to our partner companies include:

	§		many of our partner companies have a history of operating losses or a limited operating history;

	§		intensifying competition affecting the products and services our partner companies offer could adversely affect their businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects for growth;

	§		inability to adapt to the rapidly changing marketplaces;

	§		inability to manage growth;

	§		the need for additional capital to fund their operations, which we may not be able to fund or which may not be available from third parties on acceptable terms, if at all;

	§		inability to protect their proprietary rights and infringing on the proprietary rights of others;

	§		certain of our partner companies could face legal liabilities from claims made against their operations, products or work;

	§		the impact of economic downturns on their operations, results and growth prospects;

	§		inability to attract and retain qualified personnel; and

	§		government regulations and legal uncertainties may place financial burdens on the businesses of our partner companies.

These risks are discussed in greater detail under the caption “— Risks Related to Our Partner Companies” below.

The identity of our partner companies and the nature of our interests in them could vary widely from period to period.

As part of our strategy, we continually assess the value to our shareholders of our interests in our partner companies. We also regularly evaluate alternative uses for our capital resources. As a result, depending on market conditions, growth prospects and other key factors, we may, at any time, change the partner companies on which we focus, sell some or all of our interests in any of our partner companies or otherwise change the nature of our interests in our partner companies. Therefore, the nature of our holdings in them could vary significantly from period to period.

Our consolidated financial results may also vary significantly based upon the partner companies that are included in our financial statements. For example:

	§		For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, we consolidated the results of operations of Acsis, Alliance Consulting, Clarient, Laureate Pharma, Mantas and Pacific Title.

	§		In December 2005, we completed the purchase of Acsis and we have consolidated the results of operations of the acquired business from the date of the transaction.

Our partner companies currently provide us with little cash flow from their operations so we rely on cash on hand, liquidity events and our ability to generate cash from capital raising activities to finance our operations.

We need capital to acquire new partner companies and to fund the capital needs of our existing partner companies. We also need cash to service and repay our outstanding debt, finance our corporate overhead and meet our funding commitments to private equity funds. As a result, we have substantial cash requirements. Our partner companies currently provide us with little cash flow from their operations. To the extent our partner companies generate any cash from operations, they generally retain the funds to develop their own businesses. As a result, we must rely on cash on hand, liquidity events and new capital raising activities to meet our cash needs. If we are unable to find ways of monetizing our holdings or to raise additional capital on attractive terms, we may face liquidity issues that will require us to curtail our new business efforts, constrain our ability to execute our business strategy and limit our ability to provide financial support to our existing partner companies.

Fluctuations in the price of the common stock of our publicly traded partner companies may affect the price of our common stock.

Fluctuations in the market price of the common stock of our publicly traded partner companies are likely to affect the price of our common stock. The market price of our publicly traded partner companies’ common stock has been highly volatile and subject to fluctuations unrelated or disproportionate to operating performance. The aggregate market value of our interests in our publicly-traded partner companies at June 30, 2006 (Clarient (Nasdaq: CLRT), eMerge Interactive (Nasdaq: EMRG) and Traffic.com (Nasdaq: TRFC)) was approximately $37.4 million.

Intense competition from other acquirers of interests in companies could result in lower gains or possibly losses on our partner companies.

We face intense competition from companies with similar business strategies and from other capital providers as we acquire and develop interests in our partner companies. Some of our competitors have more experience identifying and acquiring companies and have greater financial and management resources, brand name recognition or industry contacts than we have. Although most of our acquisitions will be made at a stage when our partner companies are not publicly traded, we may pay higher prices for those equity interests because of higher trading prices for securities of similar public companies and competition from other acquirers and capital providers, which could result in lower gains or possibly losses.

We may be unable to obtain maximum value for our holdings or sell our holdings on a timely basis.

We hold significant positions in our partner companies. Consequently, if we were to divest all or part of our holdings in a partner company, we may have to sell our interests at a relative discount to a price which may be received by a seller of a smaller portion. For partner companies with publicly traded stock, we may be unable to sell our holdings at then-quoted market prices. The trading volume and public float in the common stock of our publicly-traded partner companies are small relative to our holdings. As a result, any significant divestiture by us of our holdings in these partner companies would likely have a material adverse effect on the market price of their common stock and on our proceeds from such a divestiture.

Additionally, we may not be able to take our partner companies public as a means of monetizing our position or creating shareholder value.

Registration and other requirements under applicable securities laws may adversely affect our ability to dispose of our holdings on a timely basis.

Our success is dependent on our executive management.

Our success is dependent on our executive management team’s ability to execute our strategy. A loss of one or more of the members of our executive management team without adequate replacement could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our business strategy may not be successful if valuations in the market sectors in which our partner companies participate decline.

Our strategy involves creating value for our shareholders by helping our partner companies build value and, if appropriate, accessing the public and private capital markets. Therefore, our success is dependent on the value of our partner companies as determined by the public and private capital markets. Many factors, including reduced market interest, may cause the market value of our publicly traded partner companies to decline. If valuations in the market sectors in which our partner companies participate decline, their access to the public and private capital markets on terms acceptable to them may be limited.

Our partner companies could make business decisions that are not in our best interests or with which we do not agree, which could impair the value of our holdings.

Although we may seek a controlling equity interest and participation in the management of our partner companies, we may not be able to control the significant business decisions of our partner companies. We may have shared control or no control over some of our partner companies. In addition, although we currently own a controlling interest in some of our partner companies, we may not maintain this controlling interest. Acquisitions of interests in partner companies in which we share or have no control, and the dilution of our interests in or loss of control of partner companies, will involve additional risks that could cause the performance of our interests and our operating results to suffer, including:

	§		the management of a partner company having economic or business interests or objectives that are different than ours; and

	§		partner companies not taking our advice with respect to the financial or operating difficulties they may encounter.

Our inability to adequately control our partner companies also could prevent us from assisting them, financially or otherwise, or could prevent us from liquidating our interests in them at a time or at a price that is favorable to us. Additionally, our partner companies may not act in ways that are consistent with our business strategy. These factors could hamper our ability to maximize returns on our interests and cause us to recognize losses on our interests in these partner companies.

We may have to buy, sell or retain assets when we would otherwise not wish to do so in order to avoid registration under the Investment Company Act.

The Investment Company Act of 1940 regulates companies which are engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities. Under the Investment Company Act, a company may be deemed to be an investment company if it owns investment securities with a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (excluding government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, unless an exemption or safe harbor applies. We refer to this test as the “40% Test.” Securities issued by companies other than majority-owned subsidiaries, depending upon the size of our ownership position and factors, may be considered “investment securities” for purpose of the Investment Company Act. We are a company that partners with revenue-stage information technology and life sciences companies to build value; we are not engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. We are in compliance with the 40% Test. Consequently, we do not believe that we are an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

We monitor our compliance with the 40% Test and seek to conduct our business activities to comply with this test. It is not feasible for us to be regulated as an investment company because the Investment Company Act rules are inconsistent with our strategy of actively helping our partner companies in their efforts to build value. In order to continue to comply with

the 40% Test, we may need to take various actions which we would otherwise not pursue. For example, we may need to retain a majority interest in a partner company that we no longer consider strategic, we may not be able to acquire an interest in a company unless we are able to obtain majority ownership interest in the company, or we may be limited in the manner or timing in which we sell our interests in a partner company. Our ownership levels may also be affected if our partner companies are acquired by third parties or if our partner companies issue stock which dilutes our majority ownership. The actions we may need to take to address these issues while maintaining compliance with the 40% Test could adversely affect our ability to create and realize value at our partner companies.

Risks Related to Our Partner Companies

Many of our partner companies have a history of operating losses or limited operating history and may never be profitable.

Many of our partner companies have a history of operating losses or limited operating history, have significant historical losses and may never be profitable. Many have incurred substantial costs to develop and market their products, have incurred net losses and cannot fund their cash needs from operations. We expect that the operating expenses of certain of our partner companies will increase substantially in the foreseeable future as they continue to develop products and services, increase sales and marketing efforts and expand operations.

Our partner companies face intense competition, which could adversely affect their business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects for growth.

There is intense competition in the information technology and life sciences marketplaces, and we expect competition to intensify in the future. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects for growth will be materially adversely affected if our partner companies are not able to compete successfully. Many of the present and potential competitors may have greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than those of our partner companies. This may place our partner companies at a disadvantage in responding to the offerings of their competitors, technological changes or changes in client requirements. Also, our partner companies may be at a competitive disadvantage because many of their competitors have greater name recognition, more extensive client bases and a broader range of product offerings. In addition, our partner companies may compete against one another.

Our partner companies may fail if they do not adapt to the rapidly changing information technology and life sciences marketplaces.

If our partner companies fail to adapt to rapid changes in technology and customer and supplier demands, they may not become or remain profitable. There is no assurance that the products and services of our partner companies will achieve or maintain market penetration or commercial success, or that the businesses of our partner companies will be successful.

The information technology and life sciences marketplaces are characterized by:

	§		rapidly changing technology;

	§		evolving industry standards;

	§		frequent new products and services;

	§		shifting distribution channels;

	§		evolving government regulation;

	§		frequently changing intellectual property landscapes; and

	§		changing customer demands.

Our future success will depend on our partner companies’ ability to adapt to this rapidly evolving marketplace. They may not be able to adequately or economically adapt their products and services, develop new products and services or establish and maintain effective distribution channels for their products and services. If our partner companies are unable to offer competitive products and services or maintain effective distribution channels, they will sell fewer products and services and forego potential revenue, possibly causing them to lose money. In addition, we and our partner companies may not be able to respond to the rapid technology changes in an economically efficient manner, and our partner companies may become or remain unprofitable.

Many of our partner companies may grow rapidly and may be unable to manage their growth.

We expect some of our partner companies to grow rapidly. Rapid growth often places considerable operational, managerial and financial strain on a business. To successfully manage rapid growth, our partner companies must, among other things:

	§		rapidly improve, upgrade and expand their business infrastructures;

	§		scale-up production operations;

	§		develop appropriate financial reporting controls;

	§		attract and maintain qualified personnel; and

	§		maintain appropriate levels of liquidity.

If our partner companies are unable to manage their growth successfully, their ability to respond effectively to competition and to achieve or maintain profitability will be adversely affected.

Our partner companies may need to raise additional capital to fund their operations, which we may not be able to fund or which may not be available from third parties on acceptable terms, if at all.

Our partner companies may need to raise additional funds in the future and we cannot be certain that they will be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all. Because our resources and our ability to raise capital are limited, we may not be able to provide our partner companies with sufficient capital resources to enable them to reach a cash flow positive position. If our partner companies need to, but are not able to raise capital from other outside sources, then they may need to cease or scale back operations.

Some of our partner companies may be unable to protect their proprietary rights and may infringe on the proprietary rights of others.

Our partner companies assert various forms of intellectual property protection. Intellectual property may constitute an important part of our partner companies’ assets and competitive strengths. Federal law, most typically, copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret, generally protects intellectual property rights. Although we expect that our partner companies will take reasonable efforts to protect the rights to their intellectual property, the complexity of international trade secret, copyright, trademark and patent law, coupled with the limited resources of these partner companies and the demands of quick delivery of products and services to market, create a risk that their efforts will prove inadequate to prevent misappropriation of our partner companies’ technology, or third parties may develop similar technology independently.

Some of our partner companies also license intellectual property from third parties and it is possible that they could become subject to infringement actions based upon their use of the intellectual property licensed from those third parties. Our partner companies generally obtain representations as to the origin and ownership of such licensed intellectual property; however, this may not adequately protect them. Any claims against our partner companies’ proprietary rights, with or without merit, could subject our partner companies to costly litigation and the diversion of their technical and management personnel from other business concerns. If our partner companies incur costly litigation and their personnel are not effectively deployed, the expenses and losses incurred by our partner companies will increase and their profits, if any, will decrease.

Third parties may assert infringement or other intellectual property claims against our partner companies based on their patents or other intellectual property claims. Even though we believe our partner companies’ products do not infringe any third party’s patents, they may have to pay substantial damages, possibly including treble damages, if it is ultimately determined that they do. They may have to obtain a license to sell their products if it is determined that their products infringe another person’s intellectual property. Our partner companies might be prohibited from selling their products before they obtain a license, which, if available at all, may require them to pay substantial royalties. Even if infringement claims against our partner companies are without merit, defending these types of lawsuits take significant time, may be expensive and may divert management attention from other business concerns.

Certain of our partner companies could face legal liabilities from claims made against their operations, products or work.

The manufacture and sale of certain of our partner companies’ products entails an inherent risk of product liability. Certain of our partner companies maintain product liability insurance. Although none of our partner companies to date have experienced any material losses, there can be no assurance that they will be able to maintain or acquire adequate product liability insurance in the future and any product liability claim could have a material adverse effect on our partner companies’ revenues and income. In addition, many of the engagements of our partner companies involve projects that are critical to the operation of their clients’ businesses. If our partner companies fail to meet their contractual obligations, they could be subject to legal liability, which could adversely affect their business, operating results and financial condition. The provisions our partner companies typically include in their contracts, which are designed to limit their exposure to legal claims relating to their services and the applications they develop, may not protect our partner companies or may not be enforceable. Also as consultants, some of our partner companies depend on their relationships with their clients and their reputation for high quality services and integrity to retain and attract clients. As a result, claims made against our partner companies’ work may damage their reputation, which in turn, could impact their ability to compete for new work and negatively impact their revenues and profitability.

Our partner companies are subject to the impact of economic downturns.

The results of operations of our partner companies are affected by the level of business activity of their clients, which in turn is affected by the levels of economic activity in the industries and markets that they serve. In addition, the businesses of certain of our information technology companies may lag behind economic cycles in an industry. Any significant downturn in the economic environment, which could include labor disputes in these industries, could result in reduced demand for the products and services offered by our partner companies which could negatively impact their revenues and profitability. In addition, an economic downturn could cause increased pricing pressure which also could have a material adverse impact on the revenues and profitability of our partner companies.

Our partner companies’ success depends on their ability to attract and retain qualified personnel.

Our partner companies are dependent upon their ability to attract and retain senior management and key personnel, including trained technical and marketing personnel. Our partner companies will also need to continue to hire additional personnel as they expand. Some of our partner companies have employees represented by labor unions. Although these partner companies have not been the subject of a work stoppage, any future work stoppage could have a material adverse effect on their respective operations. A shortage in the availability of the requisite qualified personnel or work stoppage would limit the ability of our partner companies to grow, to increase sales of their existing products and services and to launch new products and services.

Government regulations and legal uncertainties may place financial burdens on the businesses of our partner companies.

Failure to comply with applicable requirements of the FDA or comparable regulation in foreign countries can result in fines, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, withdrawal of existing product approvals or clearances, refusal to approve or clear new applications or notices and criminal prosecution. Manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medical diagnostic devices and operators of laboratory facilities are subject to strict federal and state regulation regarding validation and the quality of manufacturing and laboratory facilities. Failure to comply with these quality regulation systems requirements could result in civil or criminal penalties or enforcement proceedings, including the recall of a product or a “cease distribution” order. The enactment of any additional laws or regulations that affect healthcare insurance policy and reimbursement (including Medicare reimbursement) could negatively affect our partner companies. If Medicare or private payors change the rates at which our partner companies or their customers are reimbursed by insurance providers for their products, such changes could adversely impact our partner companies.

If either the USA PATRIOT Act or the Basel Capital Accord are repealed, the demand for services and/or products of certain of our partner companies may be negatively impacted.

Some of our partner companies are subject to significant environmental, health and safety regulation.

Some of our partner companies are subject to licensing and regulation under federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health and safety, including laws and regulations relating to the handling, transportation and disposal of medical specimens, infectious and hazardous waste and radioactive materials as

well as to the safety and health of manufacturing and laboratory employees. In addition, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration has established extensive requirements relating to workplace safety.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to equity price risks on the marketable portion of our securities. These securities include equity positions in partner companies, many of which have experienced significant volatility in their stock prices. Historically, we have not attempted to reduce or eliminate our market exposure on securities. Based on closing market prices at June 30, 2006, the fair market value of our holdings in public securities was approximately $37.4 million. A 20% decrease in equity prices would result in an approximate $7.4 million decrease in the fair value of our publicly traded securities. At June 30, 2006, the value of the collateral securing the Musser loan included $0.6 million of publicly traded securities. A 20% decrease in the fair value of these securities would result in a decline in value of approximately $0.1 million.

In February 2004, we completed the issuance of $150 million of fixed rate notes with a stated maturity of March 2024. Interest payments of approximately $2.0 million are due March and September of each year starting in September 2004. The holders of the 2024 Debentures may require repurchase of the notes on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or March 20, 2019 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their respective amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. On October 8, 2004, we utilized approximately $16.7 million of the proceeds from the CompuCom sale to escrow interest payments due through March 15, 2009.


	Remainder
	of									After			Fair Market Value
Liabilities	2006			2007			2008			2008			at 6/30/06
Convertible Senior Notes due by year (in millions)		—			—			—		$	145.0		$	112.7
Fixed Interest Rate		2.625	%		2.625	%		2.625	%		2.625	%		2.625	%
Interest Expense (in millions)	$	1.9		$	3.8		$	3.8		$	60.0			N/A

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our business strategy involves the acquisition of new businesses on an on-going basis, most of which are young, growing companies. Typically, these companies have not historically had all of the controls and procedures they would need to comply with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder. These companies also frequently develop new products and services. Following an acquisition, or the launch of a new product or service, we work with the company’s management to implement all necessary controls and procedures.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We and Warren V. Musser, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, were named as defendants in putative class action and related cases filed in 2001 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the “District Court”). Among other things, the plaintiffs alleged that we failed to disclose certain information regarding allegedly manipulative margin trading by Mr. Musser and a loan and guarantee extended by us to Mr. Musser. These cases were known as “In Re: Safeguard Scientifics Securities Litigation”. In 2003, the District Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. In November 2004, the District Court granted summary judgment in favor of us and Mr. Musser with respect to all claims asserted. In December 2004, the plaintiffs appealed the District Court’s orders. In April 2006, the District Court approved a final settlement of these cases. In the settlement, the twelve individual plaintiffs who sued us and Mr. Musser are released and dismissed with prejudice all claims and actions against us and Mr. Musser in exchange for an immaterial settlement amount which was paid by Safeguard’s insurer. The settlement was not a class action settlement, and provided no payments to shareholders other than these twelve plaintiffs’. The final dismissal of these cases occurred on June 27, 2006. In the settlement, neither Safeguard nor Mr. Musser have admitted any wrongdoing.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from the information set forth above under the heading “Factors That May Affect Future Results” and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

The identity of our partner companies and the nature of our interests in them could vary widely from period to period.

Our consolidated financial results may also vary significantly based upon the partner companies that are included in our financial statements. For example:

	§		For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, we consolidated the results of operations of Acsis, Alliance Consulting, Clarient, Laureate Pharma, Mantas and Pacific Title.

	§		In December 2005, we completed the purchase of Acsis and we have consolidated the results of operations of the acquired business from the date of the transaction.

Fluctuations in the price of the common stock of our publicly traded partner companies may affect the price of our common stock.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we

currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

The shareholders of the Company voted on two items of business at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 24, 2006:

	1.		The election of eight directors and

	2.		A proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.

The nominees for director were elected based upon the following votes:


NOMINEE	VOTES FOR		VOTES WITHHELD
Peter J. Boni		109,711,670		2,266,478
Julie A. Dobson		107,213,873		4,764,275
Robert E. Keith, Jr.		109,532,799		2,445,349
Andrew E. Lietz		106,889,209		5,088,939
George MacKenzie		109,403,993		2,574,155
Jack L. Messman		106,074,889		5,903,259
John W. Poduska, Sr.		109,677,935		2,300,213
John J. Roberts		107,147,025		4,831,123

The proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 received the following votes:

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits.

The following is a list of exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K filed as part of this Report. For exhibits that previously have been filed, the Registrant incorporates those exhibits herein by reference. The exhibit table below includes the Form Type and Filing Date of the previous filing and the location of the exhibit in the previous filing which is being incorporated by reference herein. Documents which are incorporated by reference to filings by parties other than the Registrant are identified in a footnote to this table.


		Incorporated Filing
		Reference
			Original
Number		Form Type	& Exhibit
Exhibit	Description	Filing Date	Number
10.1 †	Seventh Amendment dated as of May 4, 2006 to Loan Agreement dated as of May 10, 2002, as amended, by and between Comerica Bank, Safeguard Delaware, Inc. and Safeguard Scientifics (Delaware), Inc.	—	—

31.1 †	Certification of Peter J. Boni pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	—	—

31.2 †	Certification of Christopher J. Davis pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	—	—

32.1 †	Certification of Peter J. Boni pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	—	—

32.2 †	Certification of Christopher J. Davis pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	—	—


†		Filed herewith


	Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets – June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005		3

Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) — Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005		4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) — Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005		5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		24

Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		55

Item 4 - Controls and Procedures		55

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 – Legal Proceedings		56

Item 1A – Risk Factors		56

Item 4 – Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		57

Item 6 – Exhibits		58

Signatures		59
Seventh Amendment dated as of May 4, 2006 to Loan Agreement
Certification of Peter J. Boni
Certification of Christopher J. Davis
Certification of Peter J. Boni pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Certification of Christopher J. Davis pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


		SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.

Date: August 4, 2006		PETER J. BONI
		Peter J. Boni
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 4, 2006		CHRISTOPHER J. DAVIS
		Christopher J. Davis
		Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative and Financial Officer


		SAFEGUARD DELAWARE, INC.

		By: Title:		/s/ Christopher J. Davis Vice President

		SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS
		(DELAWARE), INC.

		By: Title:		/s/ Christopher J. Davis Vice President

		COMERICA BANK

		By: Title:		/s/ Mark L. Horn Senior Vice President

		TO: COMERICA BANK

		FROM: SAFEGUARD DELAWARE, INC., SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS (DELAWARE), INC.


Reporting Covenant	Required		Complies
Guarantor:
10Q	Quarterly within 45 days (excluding fye)	Yes	No
10K	FYE within 90 days	Yes	No

Borrowers:
Quarterly consolidating financials	Quarterly within 45 days (excluding fye)	Yes	No
FYE consolidating financials	FYE within 90 days	Yes	No


Financial Covenant	Required	Actual		Complies
Minimum unrestricted cash at Bank (continuous)	100% of Outstanding Credit Extensions	$___	Yes	No
Maximum Private Partner Company impairment charges	$50,000,000 over term of Agreement	$___	Yes	No


Comments Regarding Exceptions: See attached





Sincerely,

SIGNATURE

TITLE

DATE


BANK USE ONLY

Received by:

	AUTHORIZED SIGNER

Date:


Verified:

	AUTHORIZED SIGNER

Date:

Compliance Status	Yes	No

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.;

2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.		The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:

a)		designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)		designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)		evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)		disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

a)		all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)		any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

1.		The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and

2.		The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Safeguard.