NOTE 20. CATASTROPHE REINSURANCE

Catastrophes and storms are inherent risks of the property and casualty insurance business. These catastrophic events and natural disasters include, without limitation, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, hailstorms, wildfires, high winds and winter storms. Such events result in insured losses that are, and will continue to be, a material factor in the results of operations and financial position of the Company’s property and casualty insurance companies. Further, because the level of these insured losses occurring in any one year cannot be accurately predicted, these losses may contribute to material year-to-year fluctuations in the results of the operations and financial position of these companies. Specific types of catastrophic events are more likely to occur at certain times within the year than others. This factor adds an element of seasonality to property and casualty insurance claims. The Company has adopted the industry-wide catastrophe classifications of storms and other events promulgated by ISO to track and report losses related to catastrophes. ISO classifies a disaster as a catastrophe when the event causes $25.0 million or more in direct losses to property and affects a significant number of policyholders and insurers. ISO-classified catastrophes are assigned a unique serial number recognized throughout the insurance industry. The discussions that follow utilize ISO’s definition of catastrophes.

The Company manages its exposure to catastrophes and other natural disasters through a combination of geographical diversification, restrictions on the amount and location of new business production in such regions, and reinsurance. To limit its exposures to catastrophic events, the Company maintains various catastrophe reinsurance programs for its property and casualty insurance businesses.

NOTE 20. CATASTROPHE REINSURANCE (Continued)

Coverage for each catastrophe reinsurance program effective January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 is provided in various layers as presented below:



DOLLARS IN MILLIONS	Catastrophe Losses and LAE				Percentage of Coverage
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS	In Excess of		Up to		Percentage of Coverage
Kemper Preferred, Kemper Direct and Kemper Specialty Segments:
Retained	$	—	$	50.0	—	%
1st Layer of Coverage	50.0		100.0		65.0
2nd Layer of Coverage	100.0		200.0		95.0
3rd Layer of Coverage	200.0		350.0		90.0
4th Layer of Coverage	350.0		450.0		50.0
Life and Health Segment—Property Insurance Operations:
Retained	$	—	$	8.0	—	%
1st Layer of Coverage	8.0		15.0		70.0
2nd Layer of Coverage	15.0		40.0		70.0

The catastrophe reinsurance program for the Kemper Preferred segment in 2012 also included reinsurance coverage for catastrophe losses in North Carolina at retentions lower than those described above. The catastrophe reinsurance program for the Life and Health Insurance and Kemper Direct segments in 2012 also included reinsurance coverage from FHCF for hurricane losses in Florida at retentions lower than those described above.

Coverage for each catastrophe reinsurance program effective January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 is provided in various layers as presented below:



DOLLARS IN MILLIONS	Catastrophe Losses and LAE				Percentage of Coverage
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS	In Excess of		Up to		Percentage of Coverage
Kemper Preferred Segment:
Retained	$	—	$	50.0	—	%
1st Layer of Coverage	50.0		100.0		65.0
2nd Layer of Coverage	100.0		200.0		95.0
3rd Layer of Coverage	200.0		350.0		90.0
Kemper Direct and Kemper Specialty Segments:
Retained	$	—	$	3.0	—	%
1st Layer of Coverage	3.0		16.0		100.0
Life and Health Segment—Property Insurance Operations:
Retained	$	—	$	8.0	—	%
1st Layer of Coverage	8.0		15.0		70.0
2nd Layer of Coverage	15.0		40.0		100.0

The catastrophe reinsurance program for the Kemper Preferred segment in 2011 also included reinsurance coverage for catastrophe losses in North Carolina at retentions lower than those described above. The catastrophe reinsurance program for the Life and Health Insurance and Kemper Direct segments in 2011 also included reinsurance coverage from FHCF for hurricane losses in Florida at retentions lower than those described above.

NOTE 20. CATASTROPHE REINSURANCE (Continued)

Coverage for each catastrophe reinsurance program effective January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 is provided in various layers as presented below:



DOLLARS IN MILLIONS	Catastrophe Losses and LAE				Percentage of Coverage
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS	In Excess of		Up to		Percentage of Coverage
Kemper Preferred Segment:
Retained	$	—	$	50.0	—	%
1st Layer of Coverage	50.0		100.0		65.0
2nd Layer of Coverage	100.0		200.0		95.0
3rd Layer of Coverage	200.0		350.0		90.0
Kemper Direct and Kemper Specialty Segments:
Retained	$	—	$	3.0	—	%
1st Layer of Coverage	3.0		16.0		100.0
Life and Health Segment—Property Insurance Operations:
Retained	$	—	$	8.0	—	%
1st Layer of Coverage	8.0		15.0		88.5
2nd Layer of Coverage	15.0		40.0		100.0

The catastrophe reinsurance program for the Kemper Preferred segment in 2010 also included reinsurance coverage for catastrophe losses in North Carolina at retentions lower than those described above. The catastrophe reinsurance program for the Life and Health Insurance and Kemper Direct segments in 2010 also included reinsurance coverage from FHCF for hurricane losses in Florida at retentions lower than those described above.

In the event that the Company’s incurred catastrophe losses and LAE covered by any of its catastrophe reinsurance programs presented in the three preceding tables exceed the retention for that particular layer, each of the programs required one reinstatement of such coverage. In such an instance, the Company is required to pay a reinstatement premium to the reinsurers to reinstate the full amount of reinsurance available under such layer. The reinstatement premium is a percentage of the original premium based on the ratio of the losses in excess of the Company’s retention to the reinsurers’ coverage limit.

Reinsurance premiums for the Company’s primary catastrophe reinsurance programs, the Kemper Preferred NC Program and the FHCF Program reduced earned premiums for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 by the following:



DOLLARS IN MILLIONS	2012		2011		2010
Kemper Preferred	$	24.6	$	20.0	$	21.9
Kemper Specialty	0.1		0.1		0.3
Kemper Direct	0.4		0.8		0.8
Life and Health Insurance	2.0		2.3		3.6
Total Ceded Catastrophe Reinsurance Premiums	$	27.1	$	23.2	$	26.6

Catastrophe reinsurance premiums for the year ended December 31, 2011 for the Life and Health Insurance segment in the preceding table includes a reduction of $0.2 million in the Company’s estimated reinsurance reinstatement premiums for prior years. Catastrophe reinsurance premiums for the Life and Health Insurance segment in the preceding table includes reinsurance reinstatement premiums of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to reinstate coverage following certain hurricanes.

NOTE 20. CATASTROPHE REINSURANCE (Continued)

Catastrophe losses and LAE (including development), net of reinsurance recoveries, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 by business segment are presented below.



DOLLARS IN MILLIONS	2012		2011		2010
Kemper Preferred	$	99.2	$	138.7	$	65.2
Kemper Specialty	4.9		3.9		3.0
Kemper Direct	8.0		7.2		2.0
Life and Health Insurance	6.1		7.6		7.9
Total Catastrophe Losses and LAE	$	118.2	$	157.4	$	78.1

Total Catastrophe loss and LAE reserves, net of reinsurance recoverables, developed favorably by $6.3 million, $6.4 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Kemper Preferred segment reported favorable catastrophe reserve development of $6.2 million, $5.5 million and $4.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Life and Health Insurance segment reported adverse catastrophe reserve development of $0.1 million and $3.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2010, respectively and favorable catastrophe reserve development of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

In late October 2012, Superstorm Sandy, at one point a level two hurricane while over the Atlantic Ocean, caused a significant amount of damage in several northeastern states. Catastrophe losses and LAE for the year ended December 31, 2012 include $48.5 million related to Superstorm Sandy, of which $44.0 million is included in the Kemper Preferred segment.

In the second quarter of 2011, the United States experienced a high volume of spring storms, including a record level of tornadoes in April. In the third quarter of 2011, the Company incurred claims related to Hurricane Irene. Catastrophe losses and LAE for the year ended December 31, 2011 include $23.0 million related to Hurricane Irene, of which $22.1 million is included in the Kemper Preferred segment.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to 2009, the Kemper Preferred segment experienced a higher severity of catastrophe losses, due in part to a catastrophe loss of $12.9 million resulting from damage caused by hail in the state of Arizona in the fourth quarter of 2010. No major hurricanes that significantly impacted the Company made landfall in the United States during 2010.

The process of estimating and establishing reserves for catastrophe losses is inherently uncertain and the actual ultimate cost of a claim, net of actual reinsurance recoveries, may vary materially from the estimated amount reserved. The Company’s estimates of direct catastrophe losses are generally based on inspections by claims adjusters and historical loss development experience for areas that have not been inspected or for claims that have not yet been reported. The Company’s estimates of direct catastrophe losses are based on the coverages provided by its insurance policies. The Company’s homeowners and dwellings insurance policies do not provide coverage for losses caused by floods, but generally provide coverage for physical damage caused by wind or wind driven rain. Accordingly, the Company’s estimates of direct losses for homeowners and dwellings insurance do not include losses caused by flood. Depending on the policy, automobile insurance may provide coverage for losses caused by flood. Estimates of the number and severity of claims ultimately reported are influenced by many variables, including, but not limited to, repair or reconstruction costs and determination of cause of loss that are difficult to quantify and will influence the final amount of claim settlements. All these factors, coupled with the impact of the availability of labor and material on costs, require significant judgment in the reserve setting process. A change in any one or more of these factors is likely to result in an ultimate net claim cost different from the estimated reserve. The Company’s estimates of indirect losses from residual market assessments are based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, actual or estimated assessments provided by or received from the assessing entity, insurance industry estimates of losses, and estimates of the Company’s market share in the assessable states. Actual assessments may differ materially from these estimated amounts.