e10vq

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-20784

TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of		77-0156584 (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

3408 Garrett Drive,
Santa Clara, California 95054-2803		94304-1030
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(408) 764-8808

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 57,747,786 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of July 31, 2007.

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	March 31,					March 31,
	2007		2006			2007			2006
			(As Restated)(1)						(As Restated)(1)
Revenues	$	60,579	$	44,743		$	200,202		$	118,560
Cost of revenues		30,993		21,953			100,671			57,336

Gross profit		29,586		22,790			99,531			61,224
Operating expenses:
Research and development		11,783		8,627			32,159			24,312
Selling general and administrative		10,366		7,072			35,889			19,043

Total operating expenses		22,149		15,699			68,048			43,355

Income from operations		7,437		7,091			31,483			17,869
Interest income		1,241		604			3,562			1,341
Other income (expense), net		418		(276	)		1,690			(126	)

Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		9,096		7,419			36,735			19,084
Provision for income taxes		3,481		1,831			13,188			2,480

Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		5,615		5,588			23,547			16,604
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—		—			(190	)		1,819

Net income	$	5,615	$	5,588		$	23,357		$	18,423


Net income per share — Basic:
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.10	$	0.10		$	0.41		$	0.31
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—		—			—			0.03

Net income per share — Basic	$	0.10	$	0.10		$	0.41		$	0.34


Net income per share — Diluted:
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.09	$	0.09		$	0.37		$	0.26
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—		—			—			0.03

Net income per share — Diluted	$	0.09	$	0.09		$	0.37		$	0.29


Shares used in computing net income per share — Basic		57,748		56,025			57,599			54,042


Shares used in computing net income per share — Diluted		63,440		63,716			63,346			62,746


(1)		See Note 3, “Restatement of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Special Committee and Company Findings.”

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


	March 31,		June 30,
(In thousands, except par values)	2007		2006 (1)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	134,366	$	103,046
Investments		49,365		49,612
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for sales returns of $518 at March 31, 2007 and $1,475 at June 30, 2006		14,685		4,278
Inventories		14,891		14,641
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		12,387		5,037
Deferred income tax assets		622		622

Total current assets		226,316		177,236

Property and equipment, net		17,927		3,451
Intangible assets, net		14,499		19,190
Other assets		14,404		6,366
Deferred income tax assets		947		947

Total assets	$	274,093	$	207,190

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	23,150	$	19,472
Accrued expenses		23,898		21,332
Income taxes payable		38,457		11,125

Total current liabilities		85,505		51,929
Deferred income tax liabilities		1,425		1,604

Total liabilities		86,930		53,533


Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 500 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—		—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 95,000 shares authorized; 57,748 and 57,206 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively		58		57
Additional paid-in capital		173,218		162,801
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		12,037		(11,320	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,850		2,119

Total stockholders’ equity		187,163		153,657

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	274,093	$	207,190


(1)		Amounts as of June 30, 2006 have been derived from audited financial statements as of that date.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
(In thousands)	2007			2006
				(As Restated)(1)
Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income	$	23,357		$	18,423
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		190			(1,819	)
Stock-based compensation expense		11,140			9,826
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		(855	)		(1,613	)
Depreciation and amortization		1,105			693
Provision for sales returns		(957	)		217
Amortization of intangible assets		4,691			3,945
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		18			—
(Gain) loss on investments		(216	)		510
Minority interests in subsidiaries		—			4
Deferred income taxes		—			(2,142	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(9,451	)		(1,225	)
Inventories		(250	)		(3,900	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		4,504			(1,242	)
Accounts payable		3,678			6,574
Accrued expenses		2,376			7,110
Income taxes payable		6,727			4,156

Net cash provided by operating activities		46,057			39,517

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(15,599	)		(1,482	)
Purchases of stock of privately held companies		(500	)		(1,492	)
Proceeds from sale of stocks of a privately held company		1,228			—
Other assets		—			(493	)
Purchase of minority interests in subsidiaries		—			(58	)

Cash used in investing activities		(14,871	)		(3,525	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to employees		805			8,185
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		855			1,613
Net payments to employees in connection with IRC Section 409A		(1,526	)		—

Cash provided by financing activities		134			9,798

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		31,320			45,790
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		103,046			37,598

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	134,366		$	83,388


(1)		See Note 3, “Restatement of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Special Committee and Company

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements

TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Trident Microsystems, Inc. (“TMI”) and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) designs, develops and markets integrated circuits for video graphics, multimedia and digitally processed television products for the desktop and notebook personal computer (“PC”) market and consumer television market.

Since June 2003, the Company has focused its business primarily in the rapidly growing digitally processed televisions (“DPTV”) market and related areas. Since September 1, 2006, the Company has conducted this business primarily through its subsidiary, Trident Microsystems (Far East) Ltd. (“TMFE”), located in the Cayman Islands, with research and development services relating to existing projects and certain new projects conducted by both Trident and its subsidiary, Trident Multimedia Technologies (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., (“TMT”), located in Shanghai, China. Operations and field application engineering support and certain sales activities are conducted through its subsidiary, Trident Microelectronics Co. Ltd. (“TML”), located in Taiwan and other affiliates. Trident Technologies, Inc., which was 99.9% owned by Trident at March 31, 2007, is in the process of being dissolved.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries after elimination of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions. In the opinion of the Company, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, operating results and cash flows for those periods presented. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not audited. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended June 30, 2006 included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other period or for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2007.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Reclassification

Certain financial statement items have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Applied to the Restatement of Trident’s Consolidated Financial Statements

In calculating the amount of incremental stock-based compensation expense to record relating to the restatement of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, (See Note 3, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements and Special Committee and Company Findings”), the Company had to make certain interpretations and assumptions and draw certain conclusions from and regarding the internal investigation findings. The interpretations and assumptions the Company made and the conclusions it has drawn could be disputed by others. These risks increase where there was incomplete documentation of particular grants. Where the Company had incomplete documentation, the Company considered the guidance provided by the SEC, and used all reasonably available relevant information to form conclusions as to the most likely option granting actions that occurred and the dates on which such actions occurred.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning July 1, 2008. The Company is evaluating the impact of the provisions of this statement on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In June 2006, the FASB published FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognizing, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This interpretation is effective for the Company in fiscal years beginning July 1, 2007. The Company is evaluating the impact of the provisions of this interpretation on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In June 2006, the FASB issued EITF No. 06-02, Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43, Accounting for compensated absences. A sabbatical leave is a benefit provided to employees whereby the employee is entitled to time off with pay, over and above routine vacation time, after working for a specified period of time. EITF 06-02 concluded that an employee’s right to a compensated absence under a sabbatical or similar benefit arrangement does accumulate pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43, Accounting for Compensated Absences and therefore, a liability should be accrued over the service period in which employees earn the right to sabbatical leave. The Company offers up to two sabbatical leaves to full-time U.S. employees upon completion of 15 and 20 years of service, respectively. Each sabbatical leave has duration of four weeks and must be taken at one time. The Company early adopted EITF 06-02 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and recorded a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle totaling $0.2 million.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for our first quarter of fiscal year 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

3. RESTATEMENT OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SPECIAL COMMITTEE AND COMPANY FINDINGS

Special Committee Investigation of Historical Stock Option Grant Practices and Related Issues

In July 2007, the Company completed an independent investigation into its historical stock option grant practices and related issues. This investigation was conducted by a Special Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. In response to a Wall Street Journal article that questioned the stock option practices at Trident and several other companies, published on May 22, 2006, the Board of Directors initiated a preliminary internal review, conducted by its outside legal counsel, into its historical stock option grant practices and related issues. Based upon the preliminary findings of that review, the Board of Directors determined that it was appropriate to conduct a formal and independent investigation of the Company’s historical stock option grant practices and related issues, and on May 26, 2006, formed a Special Committee of the Board of Directors with responsibility for the independent investigation. On June 8, 2006 and June 16, 2006, the Company received grand jury subpoenas from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the Northern District of California, respectively, and the Company received a written request from the SEC on June 21, 2006, requesting information concerning the Company’s historical stock option grant practices and related issues. The grand jury subpoena from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York was subsequently withdrawn.

The investigation was conducted by the Special Committee with the assistance of independent legal counsel and forensic accountants retained by such legal counsel. Throughout the investigation, the Special Committee’s advisers reported directly to the Special Committee. The Special Committee is composed of two independent directors who have not previously served as members of the Compensation Committee, one of whom was newly appointed to the Board of Directors on July 6, 2006 and currently serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee.

Findings

As a result of the investigation and reporting to its Board of Directors, the Board of Directors of the Company determined that the Company used incorrect measurement dates with respect to more than half of the stock options granted during the date of our initial public offering in December 1992 through June 2006 (the “Review Period”). Accordingly, based on information obtained from the Special Committee and additional work conducted by the Company and its advisors, the Company is revising the measurement dates for approximately 57% of the grants made during the Review Period, representing options to acquire approximately 38 million shares. In addition, the Company identified modifications of certain stock options that increased or decreased the number of shares, and these modifications should have been accounted for by applying variable accounting as required by the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, or FIN 44. As a result, revised measurement dates and variable accounting, where applicable, were applied to the affected option grants and the Company has recorded a total of approximately $33.8 million in additional pre-tax, non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for the years 1993 through 2005 and approximately $3.1 million for fiscal 2006.

During the course of the investigation, the Company also adjusted its accounting for all of the options granted by its Taiwanese subsidiary, Trident Technologies, Inc. (“TTI”), and by its Chinese subsidiary, Trident Multimedia Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“TMT”), that should have been accounted for by applying variable accounting as required by the provisions of FIN 44 and the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-23, Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44, or EITF 00-23, either because the exercise price was denominated in a currency other than that of the primary economic environment of TTI or the option holders, the option agreements contained repurchase clauses, or the options were deemed to have been issued in exchange for cancellation of previously issued options or stock purchase plan shares, or the option was modified. The application of FIN 44 and EITF 00-23 resulted in additional compensation expense totaling approximately $24.1 million. The additional expense resulting from the application of EITF 00-23 did not stem from inappropriate stock option administration practices, however, the Company identified approximately 17 instances of modifications to TTI option grants that increased or decreased the number of shares, and these modifications would have required the application of variable accounting for the underlying options in any event.

After related income tax adjustments and minority interest, the restatement resulted in total adjustments of approximately $51.9 million for the years 1993 through 2005 and approximately $3.9 million for fiscal 2006. The additional stock-based compensation expense is being amortized over the service period relating to each option, typically four years. Upon the adoption of SFAS 123(R) in the year ended June 30, 2006 the Company recorded an additional $1.6 million cumulative benefit from change in accounting principle, net of tax, reflecting the net cumulative impact of estimated forfeitures that were previously not included in the determination of historic stock-based compensation expense in periods prior to July 1, 2005.

Accordingly, in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 (“Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K”), the Company included restatements of the following previously filed financial statements and data (and related disclosures): (1) our condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004; (2) our selected condensed consolidated financial data as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002; and (3) our unaudited quarterly financial data for all quarters in fiscal 2005 and 2006. Please see Note 3, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements and Special Committee and Company Findings” to the consolidated financial statements included in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K, and Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations therein, for a detailed discussion of the effect of the restatements and a period-by-period reconciliation of the adjustments. The effects of this restatement on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 are reflected in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

The restatement affected previously filed financial statements. The following schedule represents the stock compensation expense adjustments for the comparative income statement of this filing for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006.


	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	March 31, 2006									March 31, 2006
	(As			Adjustments			(As			(As			Adjustments			(As
(In thousands, except per share data)	Reported)			(Reclassifications)			Restated)			Reported)			(Reclassifications)			Restated)

Revenues	$	44,743		$	—		$	44,743		$	118,561		$	(1	)	$	118,560
Cost of revenues		21,914			39			21,953			57,257			79			57,336

Gross profit		22,829			(39	)		22,790			61,304			(80	)		61,224
Operating expenses:
Research and development expenses		8,644			(17	)		8,627			24,167			145			24,312
Sales, general and administrative expenses		5,612			1,460			7,072			15,527			3,516			19,043

Total operating expenses		14,256			1,443			15,699			39,694			3,661			43,355

Income from operations		8,573			(1,482	)		7,091			21,610			(3,741	)		17,869
Loss on investments		(242	)		242			—			(510	)		510			—
Interest and other income, net		570			(570	)		—			1,724			(1,724	)		—
Interest income		—			604			604			—			1,341			1,341
Other income (expense), net		—			(276	)		(276	)		—			(126	)		(126	)

Income before provision for income taxes		8,901			(1,482	)		7,419			22,824			(3,740	)		19,084
Provision for income taxes		1,919			(88	)		1,831			2,706			(226	)		2,480

Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		6,982			(1,394	)		5,588			20,118			(3,514	)		16,604
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			—			171			1,648			1,819

Net income	$	6,982		$	(1,394	)	$	5,588		$	20,289		$	(1,866	)	$	18,423


Net income per share — Basic:
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.12		$	(0.02	)	$	0.10		$	0.37		$	(0.06	)	$	0.31
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			—			—			0.03			0.03

Net income per share — Basic	$	0.12		$	(0.02	)	$	0.10		$	0.37		$	(0.03	)	$	0.34


Net income per share — Diluted:
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.11		$	(0.02	)	$	0.09		$	0.33		$	(0.07	)	$	0.26
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			—			—			0.03			0.03

Net income per share — Diluted	$	0.11		$	(0.02	)	$	0.09		$	0.33		$	(0.04	)	$	0.29


Shares used in computing netg income per share — Basic		56,025			—			56,025			54,042			—			54,042


Shares used in computing netg income per share — Diluted		62,729			987			63,716			61,446			1,300			62,746

The following schedule represents the stock compensation expense adjustments for the comparative cash flow statement of this filing for the nine months ended March 31, 2006


	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2006
(In thousands)	As Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	20,289		$	(1,866	)	$	18,423
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(171	)		(1,648	)		(1,819	)
Stock-based compensation expense		6,086			3,740			9,826
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation		–			(1,613	)		(1,613	)
Depreciation and amortization		693			—			693
Provision for sales returns		217			—			217
Loss on investments		510			—			510
Amortization of intangible assets		3,945			—			3,945
Minority interests in subsidiaries		4			—			4
Deferred income taxes		(2,158	)		16			(2,142	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,225	)		—			(1,225	)
Inventories		(3,900	)		—			(3,900	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1,242	)		—			(1,242	)
Accounts payable		6,574			—			6,574
Accrued expenses		7,110			—			7,110
Income taxes payable		4,398			(242	)		4,156

Net cash provided by operating activities		41,130			(1,613	)		39,517


Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,482	)		—			(1,482	)
Purchases of stock of privately held companies		(1,492	)		—			(1,492	)
Purchase of minority interests in subsidiary		(58	)		—			(58	)
Other assets		(493	)		—			(493	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(3,525	)		—			(3,525	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock to employees		8,185			—			8,185
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation		—			1,613			1,613

Net cash provided by financing activities		8,185			1,613			9,798

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		45,790			—			45,790
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		37,598			—			37,598

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	83,388		$	—		$	83,388

Impact of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A

In December 2006, certain Company employees subject to taxation in the United States held options that had original exercise prices per share that were less than the fair market value per share of the common stock underlying the option on the option’s grant date. Such options fell into two categories: (i) those that were remeasured for financial accounting purposes as a result of the Company’s investigation into its historical stock option practices, and (ii) those that were originally granted to purchase shares of the Company’s Taiwanese subsidiary, TTI, at a low fixed exercise price, below fair market value, as provided by the terms of the TTI equity plan. In December 2006, and as further described below, the Company allowed these employees to amend such options to potentially meet the requirements of United States Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (“Section 409A”) and avoid unfavorable tax consequences by (i) retroactively increasing the exercise price on such options that vested in calendar 2005 or calendar 2006 and were exercised during calendar 2006, and/or (ii) retaining the same exercise price as to any vested options that were not exercised through December 31, 2006 and unvested options that would vest in calendar 2007 or beyond, provided the exercise of such options was scheduled under a formal plan specifying the year of exercise.

As disclosed previously in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, approximately 237,000 options were held by employees as to which the exercise price was increased due to the modification of measurement dates as a result of the findings of the Company’s internal investigation into its stock option granting practices and related accounting. Accordingly, non-officer employees holding such options became obligated to pay the Company an additional $1 million upon exercise of such options. In the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company paid bonuses to such employees to reimburse and compensate them for such increase in their option exercise price. Approximately $0.7 million of the bonuses paid had already been collected from the employees via share exercise in calendar 2006. The remaining $0.3 million of these bonuses could effectively be repaid to the Company only if and when the remaining options are exercised. In addition, options to purchase approximately 1 million of such shares were voluntarily scheduled to be exercised by employees to meet the requirements of Section 409A.

In addition, approximately 3.2 million options, issued in exchange for options originally granted by TTI, were held by employees who are subject to the unfavorable tax consequences of Section 409A. The original grant of these options at a low fixed exercise price, as provided by the terms of the TTI equity plan, resulted in the options being granted at less than the underlying fair market value per share. The application of Section 409A to these options was not the result of the modification of measurement dates due to the Company’s investigation into its historical stock option granting practices. The Company adjusted the exercise prices for approximately 2.0 million of these options and employees holding such options became obligated to pay the Company an additional $1.6 million upon exercise of such options. In the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company paid bonuses to such employees to reimburse and compensate them for such increase in their option exercise price. Approximately $0.3 million of the bonuses paid had already been collected from the employees via share exercise in calendar 2006. The remaining $1.3 million of these bonuses could effectively be repaid to the Company only if and when the remaining options are exercised. In addition, options to purchase approximately 1.2 million of such shares vesting in 2007 and beyond were voluntarily scheduled to be exercised by employees to meet the requirements of Section 409A.

In aggregate, during the three months ended December 31, 2006, the Company amended options to purchase 2.2 million shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company made aggregate cash payments of $2.4 million to participating employees during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The remaining liability of $0.2 million was included as a component of “Accrued expenses” in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2007. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recorded compensation cost of $0.1 million and $1.5 million as a decrease in additional paid-in capital in connection with Section 409A. In addition, these employees became obligated to pay the Company an additional $2.6 million should they choose to exercise their stock options as to which the exercise price was increased. During the three months ended December 31, 2006, the Company collected approximately $1.0 million from employees following exercises of a portion of these options.

4. INVESTMENTS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In August 1995, the Company invested $49.3 million in United Integrated Circuits Corporation, which was subsequently acquired by United Microelectronics Corporation (“UMC”) on January 3, 2000. UMC is listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. As a result of this merger, the Company received approximately 46.5 million shares of UMC common stock, and has subsequently received approximately 44.4 million additional shares as a result of stock dividends, including 0.8 million shares received in September 2006. During the year ended June 30, 2004, the Company sold 7.3 million shares of UMC common stock for cash of $7.4 million, resulting in a gain of $2.7 million. As of March 31, 2007, the Company held approximately 83.6 million shares of UMC, which are treated as available-for-sale securities and are classified as short-term investments in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.

During the three months ended March 31, 2007, one of the Company’s privately held companies became a public company through an initial public offering. As a result, the Company reclassified this investment totaling $1.2 million from “Other assets” to short-term investments. Accumulated other comprehensive income of $0.3 million represents the decrease in the market value of the Company’s short-term investments in these companies from July 1, 2006 to March 31, 2007. The Company received dividends from UMC in aggregate totaling $1.0 million recorded in “Other income (expense), net” in the Statement of Income during the nine months ended March 31, 2007.

The Company also has investments in privately held companies. These investments are included in “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are primarily carried at cost. In July 2006, the Company made a $0.5 million additional investment in Anchor Semiconductor, Inc. (“Anchor”). Mr. Frank Lin, the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has also made a concurring $0.5 million investment and serves as a director on Anchor’s Board. The combined ownership in Anchor is less than 10% of the total outstanding shares. The Company’s investment is accounted for under the cost method.

In December 2005, the Company entered into an investment agreement (the “Agreement”) with Parade Technologies, Inc. (“Parade”). In accordance with the Agreement, the Company invested $0.5 million in Parade’s Series A Preferred Stock. In September 2006, Mr. Frank Lin, the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, also made a $160,000 investment in Parade’s Series A Preferred Stock. The combined ownership in Parade is less than 10% of the total outstanding shares. The Company’s investment is accounted for under the cost method.

In November 2005, the Company entered into an investment agreement with Nanovata Design Automation, Inc. (“Nanovata”). In accordance with the investment agreement, the Company invested $0.5 million in Nanovata’s Series A Preferred Stock. Mr. Frank Lin, the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Dr. Jung-Herng Chang, the Company’s President, also made indirect investments in Nanovata’s Series A Preferred Stock. Mr. Lin served as a director on Nanovata’s Board. The combined ownership in Nanovata is 13.6% of the total outstanding shares of Nanovata’s common stock. The Company’s investment is accounted for under the cost method.

In March 2005, the Company made a $1.1 million investment in Afa Technologies, Inc. (“Afa”). Dr. Jung-Herng Chang, the Company’s President, also made $150,000 indirect investment in Afa’s common Stock. The combined ownership in Afa is less than 10% of the total outstanding shares of Afa’s common stock. The Company’s investment is accounted for under the cost method. In March 2007, the Company sold its investment in Afa Technologies, Inc. for approximately $1.2 million.

Amortization of developed technologies is recorded in cost of revenues, while the amortization of other acquired intangible assets is included in operating expenses. The following summarizes the amortization expense of acquired intangible assets for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 31,				March 31,
*Reported as:*	2007		2006		2007		2006
Cost of revenues	$	1,484	$	1,383	$	4,256	$	3,739
Selling, general and administrative		167		134		435		206

Total	$	1,651	$	1,517	$	4,691	$	3,945

As of March 31, 2007, the Company estimates the amortization expense of acquired intangible assets for the remaining three months of fiscal year 2007, from fiscal years 2008 to 2011 and thereafter, to be as follows: $1.7 million, $5.6 million, $3.6 million, $2.2 million, $1.2 million and $0.3 million.

7. GUARANTEES

The Company provides for estimated future costs of warranty obligations in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others which requires an entity to disclose and recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes upon issuance of a guarantee. The Company warrants its products against material defects for a period of time, usually between 90 days and one year. The following table reflects the changes in the Company’s accrued product warranty during the nine months ended March 31, 2007:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 31,						March 31,
(In thousands)	2007			2006			2007			2006
Accrued product warranty, at beginning of period	$	636		$	140		$	1,082		$	—
Charged to cost of revenues		790			584			1,017			724
Actual product warranty expenditures		(586	)		(10	)		(1,259	)		(10	)

Accrued product warranty, at end of period	$	840		$	714		$	840		$	714

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments

Lease Commitments

The Company leases facilities under noncancelable operating lease agreements, which expire at various dates through 2011. At March 31, 2007, future minimum lease payments under these non-cancelable operating leases for the remaining three months of fiscal year 2007, from fiscal years 2008 through 2011 were as follows $0.4 million, $0.9 million, $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million. Rental expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively and for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 rental expenses was $1.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively.

Purchase Commitments

At March 31, 2007, the Company had purchase commitments in the amount of $24.8 million which were not included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at that date. Purchase commitments represent a construction contract for our new research and development building in Shanghai, China and unconditional purchase order commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers for wafers and chipsets.

Contingencies

Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Trident has been named as a nominal defendant in several purported shareholder derivative lawsuits concerning the granting of stock options. The federal court cases have been consolidated as In re Trident Microsystems Inc. Derivative Litigation, Master File No. C-06-3440-JF. A case also has been filed in State court, Limke v. Lin et al., No. 1:07-CV-080390. Plaintiffs in all cases allege that certain of the Company’s current or former officers and directors caused it to grant options at less than fair market value, contrary to its public statements (including its financial statements); and that as a result those officers and directors are liable to the Company. No particular amount of damages has been alleged, and by the nature of the lawsuit no damages will be alleged against the Company. The Board of Directors has appointed a Special Litigation Committee (“SLC”) composed solely of independent directors to review and manage any claims that the Company may have relating to the stock option grant practices investigated by the Special Committee. The scope of the SLC’s authority includes the claims asserted in the derivative actions. In federal court, Trident has moved to stay the case pending the assessment by the SLC that was formed to consider nominal plaintiffs’ claims. In State court, Trident moved to stay the case in deference to the federal lawsuit, and the parties have agreed, with the Court’s approval, to take that motion off of the Court’s calendar to await the assessment of the SLC. The Company cannot predict whether these actions are likely to result in any material recovery by or expense to, Trident. The Company expects to continue to incur legal fees in responding to these lawsuits, including expenses for the reimbursement of legal fees of present and former officers and directors under indemnification obligations.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Trident was sued by MIPS Technologies, Inc. in federal court in the Northern District of California for patent infringement, trademark infringement and unfair competition. The case was filed on December 1, 2006 as MIPS Technologies, Inc. v. Trident Microsystems, Inc., Civ. No. 3:06-CV-07377-MMC. The parties reached a confidential business resolution and the case was dismissed with prejudice on April 5, 2007.

From time to time, the Company is involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business. While the Company cannot be certain about the ultimate outcome of any litigation, management does not believe any pending legal proceeding will result in a judgment or settlement that will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

Regulatory Actions

The Department of Justice is currently conducting an investigation of the Company in connection with its investigation into its stock option grant practices and related issues, and the Company is subject to a subpoena from the DOJ. The Company is also subject to a formal investigation from the Securities and Exchange Commission on the same issue. The Company has been cooperating with, and continues to cooperate with, inquiries from the SEC and DOJ. In addition, the Company’s 401(k) plan and its administration are being audited by the Department of Labor as a result of actions taken in response to the findings from the investigation. The Company is unable to predict what consequences, if any, that any investigation by any regulatory agency may have on it. Any regulatory investigation could result in substantial legal and accounting expenses, divert management’s attention from other business concerns and harm the Company’s business. If a regulatory agency were to commence civil or criminal action against the Company, it is possible that the Company could be required to pay significant penalties and/or fines and could become subject to administrative orders, and could result in civil or criminal sanctions against certain of its former officers, directors and/or employees and might result in such sanctions against the Company and/or its current officers, directors and/or employees. Any regulatory action could result in the filing of additional restatements of the Company’s prior financial statements or require that the Company take other actions. If the Company is subject to an adverse finding resulting from the SEC and DOJ investigations, it could be required to pay damages or penalties or have other remedies imposed upon it. The period of time necessary to resolve the investigation by the DOJ and the investigation from the SEC is uncertain, and these matters could require significant management and financial resources which could otherwise be devoted to the operation of its business.

Nasdaq Proceedings

that its securities are, therefore, subject to delisting from the Nasdaq Global Market. The Company received and announced three additional Nasdaq staff determination letters with respect to its failure to timely file its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2007, as well as with respect to its failure to hold an annual meeting of stockholders during fiscal 2007. The Company requested and subsequently attended a hearing before the Listing Panel, which was held on November 16, 2006, to appeal the staff determination and presented a plan to cure the three filing deficiencies and regain compliance. On January 16, 2007, Nasdaq notified the Company that the exception had been granted, and that it would continue to list the Company’s shares on the Nasdaq Global Market, provided that the Company file its Form 10-K for fiscal 2006, its Form 10-Q for the first quarter of fiscal 2007, and all required restatements on or before April 2, 2007. The Company appealed this decision to the Listing Council, which decided to review the decision of the Listing Panel, and stayed the decision to suspend the Company’s securities from trading, pending further action by the Listing Council.

On July 6, 2007, the Company received the decision of the Listing Council concerning its appeal of the Listing Panel’s decision described above. In its decision, the Listing Council exercised its maximum discretionary authority and according to the limits of its authority, under Marketplace Rule 4802(b), granted the Company an extension to demonstrate compliance with all of the Nasdaq continued listing requirements until July 16, 2007. The Company has submitted a request to the Nasdaq Board of Directors for a further extension of time, beyond July 16, 2007, by which it must come into compliance with all of the listing requirements, and requested a continued stay of the decision to delist its common stock. On August 17, 2007, the Nasdaq Board of Directors informed the Company of its decision to provide the Company until September 13, 2007 to file all delinquent periodic reports necessary to regain compliance with the listing requirements. If the Company is unable to meet this extended deadline, the Company’s securities will be suspended at the opening of business on September 17, 2007. As a result of filing this Report and the Quarterly Reports of Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2006, respectively, the Company believes that it has now filed all of its delinquent reports.

The Company has also requested an extension of time from the Listing Panel within which to comply with the requirement to hold an annual meeting of shareholders, to solicit proxies and to provide proxy statements to Nasdaq. The Nasdaq Board of Directors has determined that if the Company regains compliance with its filing requirements, it will remand the matter back to the Listing Panel for further consideration of the extension of time within which to hold an annual meeting of shareholders.

Indemnification Obligations

The Company indemnifies, as permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with its Bylaws, its officers, directors and members of its senior management for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain limits, while they were serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. In this regard, the Company has received, or expects to receive, requests for indemnification by certain current and former officers, directors and employees in connection with the Company’s investigation of its historical stock option grant practices and related issues, and the related governmental inquiries and shareholder derivative litigation. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unknown and potentially unlimited; however, the Company has directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies that enable it to recover a portion of future indemnification claims paid, subject to retentions, conditions and limitations of the policies. At this time, the Company is unable to assess whether the sum of indemnification obligations incurred that are not or may not be recovered will render the net value of such indemnification obligations material.

From time to time, the Company is involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business in which a customer or other third party may assert a right to indemnification. While the Company cannot be certain about the ultimate outcome of any litigation, Company management does not believe any such pending legal proceeding will result in a judgment or settlement that will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

9. EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS

Equity Incentive Plans

Effective July 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to the Company’s employees and directors including stock options based on fair values. The Company’s financial statements for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method. Share-based compensation expense is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 included compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, June 30, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of SFAS 123, and compensation expense for the share-based

payment awards granted subsequent to June 30, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company elected to attribute the value of share-based compensation to expense using the straight-line method, which was previously used for its pro forma information required under SFAS 123.

Upon adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company elected to value its share-based payment awards granted beginning in fiscal year 2006 using the Black-Scholes model, which was previously used for its pro forma information required under SFAS 123 prior to fiscal year 2006. The Black-Scholes model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The Black-Scholes model requires the input of certain assumptions. TMI’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and changes in the assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates.

In the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the fair value of options issued pursuant to the Company’s employee stock-based compensation plans at the grant date were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following assumptions:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 31,						March 31,
Employee Incentive Plans	2007			2006			2007			2006
Expected term (in years)		4.25			5.00			4.25			5.00
Expected volatility		61.75	%		67.28	%		63.38	%		68.92	%
Risk-free interest rate		4.54	%		4.75	%		4.59	%		4.1	%
Expected dividend rate		—			—			—			—
Weighted average fair value at grant date	$	10.77		$	18.38		$	10.51		$	10.32

The expected term of stock options represents the weighted average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. The expected term is based on the observed and expected time to post-vesting exercise and forfeitures of option by employees. Upon the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company continued to use historical volatility in deriving its expected volatility assumption as allowed under SFAS 123(R) and SAB 107 because it believes that future volatility over the expected term of the stock options is not likely to differ from the past. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the expected term of TMI’s stock options. The expected dividend assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend payouts.

As share-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on historical experience. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company adjusted stock-based compensation expense based on its actual forfeitures.

The adoption of SFAS 123(R) resulted in a cumulative benefit from change in accounting principle of $1.8 million, net of tax, for the nine months ended March 31, 2006, reflecting the net cumulative impact of estimated forfeitures that were previously not included in the determination of historic stock-based compensation expense in periods prior to July 1, 2005. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, total share-based compensation expense recognized in income before taxes was $4.0 million and $11.1 million, respectively, and there was no related tax benefit during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 total share-based compensation expense recognized in income before taxes was $3.8 million and $9.8 million, respectively, and there was no related tax benefit. Total compensation cost of options granted but not yet vested as of March 31, 2007 was $29.9 million, which is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.1 years.

The following table summarizes Trident’s stock-based award activities for the nine months ended March 31, 2007:


				Options Outstanding
									Weighted Average
									Remaining
	Shares Available			Number of			Weighted Average		Contractual Term		Aggregate
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	for Grant			Shares			Exercise Price		(In Years)		Intrinsic Value
Balance at June 30, 2006		5,335			9,594		$	4.49
Plan shares expired		(242	)		—			—
Granted		(648	)		648			19.66
Exercised		—			(541	)		1.49
Cancelled, forfeited or expired		592			(592	)		8.68
Restricted stock granted (1)		(324	)		—			—

Balance at March 31, 2007		4,713			9,109		$	5.48		7.02		133,784


Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2007					8,972			5.40		7.00		132,459

Exercisable at March 31, 2007 (2)					4,463		$	3.13		6.19		75,582


(1)		Restricted stock is deducted from shares available for grant under the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”) at a 1 to 1.38 ratio. The grant of these shares of restricted stock is not effective until the Company files a Registration Statement on Form S-8 for the shares issuable under the 2006 Plan.

(2)		Effective at the close of trading on Monday, September 25, 2006, the Company temporarily suspended the ability of optionees to exercise vested options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, until the Company became current in the filing of its periodic reports with the SEC and filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 for the shares issuable under the 2006 Plan. This suspension has continued in effect through the date of the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, which is computed based on the difference between the exercise price and Trident’s closing common stock price of $20.06 as of March 30, 2007, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. The Company did not recognize any tax benefits upon exercise of stock options.

The activity for restricted stock for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 is summarized as follows:


			Weighted Average
			Grant-Date Fair
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	Shares		Value
Nonvested balance at June 30, 2006		50	$	16.11
Granted		185		20.17
Vested		—		—
Forfeited		—		—

Nonvested balance at March 31, 2007		235	$	19.31

As of March 31, 2007, there was $4.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock granted under the Employee Stock Plans. This unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.8 years.

10. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Under SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” any unrealized gains or losses on short-term investments that are classified as available-for-sale equity securities are to be reported as a separate adjustment to equity. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income as of March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively, related to an unrealized gains or losses, net of tax, totaling $1.9 million and $2.1 million on the Company’s investment in UMC. Unrealized losses of $1.7 million and unrealized gains of $3.2 million were recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Unrealized losses of $0.3 million and $1.6 million were recorded in the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Comprehensive income totaled $3.9 million and $8.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Comprehensive income totaled $23.1 million and $16.8 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

11. NET INCOME PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of net basic and diluted net income per share:


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	March 31,				March 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2007		2006		2007		2006
			(As Restated)				(As Restated)
Net income	$	5,615	$	5,588	$	23,357	$	18,423


Basic weighted average shares outstanding		57,748		56,025		57,599		54,042
Dilutive effect of potential common shares		5,692		7,691		5,747		8,704

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		63,440		63,716		63,346		62,746


Net income per share — Basic	$	0.10	$	0.10	$	0.41	$	0.34

Net income per share — Diluted	$	0.09	$	0.09	$	0.37	$	0.29

Dilutive potential common shares consist primarily of stock options. Stock options to purchase approximately 743,000 shares and 118,000 shares were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively because these options were anti-dilutive. Stock options to purchase approximately 567,000 shares and 1,630,000 shares were excluded from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding during the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

12. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS

Segment Information

The Company operates in one reportable segment: Digital media. The Digital media business segment designs, develops and markets integrated circuits for video graphics, multimedia and digitally processed television products for the consumer television market and the desktop and notebook PC market.

The following is a summary of the Company’s revenues by geographic operations:


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	March 31,				March 31,
(In thousands)	2007		2006		2007		2006
*Revenues:*
South Korea	$	28,724	$	13,993	$	78,864	$	36,205
Japan		19,684		17,784		70,786		45,297
China		4,894		6,266		27,768		20,787
Taiwan		3,409		3,332		9,947		9,398
United States		44		66		291		308
Others		3,824		3,302		12,546		6,565

Total	$	60,579	$	44,743	$	200,202	$	118,560

Revenues by region were classified based on the locations of the customers’ headquarters, not the shipping destinations of the products.

Major Customers

The following table shows the percentage of our revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 that was derived from customers who individually accounted for more than 10% of revenues in that year:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 31,						March 31,
*Revenues:*	2007			2006			2007			2006
Customer A		46	%		31	%		38	%		29	%
Customer B		23	%		29	%		26	%		29	%

As of March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2006, Customer A accounted for 96% and 91%, respectively, of total accounts receivable.

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

As a result of the delayed filing of its periodic reports with the SEC, on October 2, 2006, the Company received a Nasdaq staff determination letter indicating that it had failed to comply with the filing requirement for continued listing set forth in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(14), due to its failure to timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2006, and that its securities are, therefore, subject to delisting from the Nasdaq Global Market. The Company received and announced three additional Nasdaq staff determination letters with respect to its failure to timely file its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2007, as well as with respect to its failure to hold an annual meeting of stockholders during fiscal 2007. The Company requested and subsequently attended a hearing before the Listing Panel, which was held on November 16, 2006, to appeal the staff determination and presented a plan to cure the three filing deficiencies and regain compliance. On January 16, 2007, Nasdaq notified the Company that the exception had been granted, and that it would continue to list the Company’s shares on the Nasdaq Global Market, provided that the Company file its Form 10-K for fiscal 2006, its Form 10-Q for the first quarter of fiscal 2007, and all required restatements on or before April 2, 2007. The Company appealed this decision to the Listing Council, which decided to review the decision of the Listing Panel, and stayed the decision to suspend the Company’s securities from trading, pending further action by the Listing Council.

On July 6, 2007, the Company received the decision of the Listing Council concerning its appeal of the Listing Panel’s decision described above. In its decision, the Listing Council exercised its maximum discretionary authority and according to the limits of its authority, under Marketplace Rule 4802(b), granted the Company an extension to demonstrate compliance with all of the Nasdaq continued listing requirements until July 16, 2007. The Company has submitted a request to the Nasdaq Board of Directors for a further extension of time, beyond July 16, 2007, by which it must come into compliance with all of the listing requirements, and requested a continued stay of the decision to delist its common stock. On August 17, 2007, the Nasdaq Board of Directors informed the Company of its decision to provide the Company until September 13, 2007 to file all delinquent periodic reports necessary to regain compliance with the listing requirements. If the Company is unable to meet this extended deadline, the Company’s securities will be suspended at the opening of business on September 17, 2007. As a result of filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Quarterly Reports of Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2006, respectively, the Company believes that it has now filed all of its delinquent reports.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or MD&A, contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 which provides a “safe harbor” for statements about future events, products and future financial performance that are based on the beliefs of, estimates made by and information currently available to the management of Trident Microsystems, Inc. (“we,” “our” or “the Company”). The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the Risk Factors section included below in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as well as in the Risk Factors section included in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 (“Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For this purpose, statements concerning industry or market segment outlook; market acceptance of or transition to new products; revenues, earnings growth, other financial results and any statements using the terms “believe,” “expect,” “expectation,” “anticipate,” “can,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “estimate,” “appear,” “based on,” “may,” “intended,” “potential,” “are emerging” and “possible” or similar statements are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and the outcome and timing of certain events to differ materially from those projected or management’s current expectations. By making forward-looking statements, we have not assumed any obligation to, and you should not expect us to, update or revise those statements because of new information, future events or otherwise.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Our fiscal year ends on June 30 of each year.

Restatement of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Special Committee and Company Findings

Special Committee Investigation of Historical Stock Option Grant Practices and Related Issues

We delayed the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pending completion of a previously announced independent investigation into our historical stock option grant practices and related issues. This investigation was conducted by a Special Committee of our Board of Directors. In response to a Wall Street Journal article that questioned the stock option practices at Trident and several other companies, published on May 22, 2006, the Board of Directors initiated a preliminary internal review, conducted by our outside legal counsel, into our historical stock option grant practices and related issues. Based upon the preliminary findings of that review, the Board of Directors determined that it was appropriate to conduct a formal and independent investigation of our historical stock option grant practices and related issues, and on May 26, 2006, formed a Special Committee of the Board of Directors with responsibility for the independent investigation. On June 8, 2006 and June 16, 2006, we received grand jury subpoenas from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the Northern District of California, respectively, and we received a written request from the SEC on June 21, 2006, requesting information concerning our historical stock option grant practices and related issues. The grand jury subpoena from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York was subsequently withdrawn.

Findings and Remedial Actions

As a result of the investigation and reporting to our Board of Directors, our Board of Directors determined that we used incorrect measurement dates with respect to more than half of the stock options granted during the Review Period. Accordingly, based on information obtained from the Special Committee and additional work conducted by us and our advisors, we are revising the measurement dates for approximately 57% of the grants made during the Review Period, representing options to acquire approximately 38 million shares. In addition, we identified modifications to certain stock

options that increased or decreased the number of shares comprising the grant, and these modifications should have been accounted for by applying variable accounting as required by the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, or FIN 44. As a result, revised measurement dates and variable accounting, where applicable, were applied to the affected option grants and we have recorded a total of approximately $33.8 million in additional pre-tax, non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for the years 1993 through 2005 and approximately $3.1 million for fiscal 2006.

During the course of the investigation, we also adjusted our accounting for all of the options granted by our Taiwanese subsidiary, Trident Technologies, Inc., or TTI, and by our Chinese subsidiary, Trident Multimedia Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., or TMT, that should have been accounted for by applying variable accounting as required by the provisions of FIN 44 and the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-23, Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44, or EITF 00-23, either because the option was modified, the exercise price was denominated in a currency other than that of the primary economic environment of TTI or the option holders, the option agreements contained repurchase clauses, or the options were deemed to have been issued in exchange for cancellation of previously issued options or stock purchase plan shares. This resulted in additional compensation expense totaling approximately $24.1 million. The additional expense resulting from the application of EITF 00-23 did not stem from inappropriate stock option administration practices, however, we identified approximately 17 instances of modifications to TTI option grants that increased or decreased the number of shares, and these modifications would have required the application of variable accounting for the underlying options in any event.

After related income tax adjustments, and minority interest, the restatement resulted in total net adjustments of approximately $51.9 million for the years 1993 through 2005 and approximately $3.9 million for fiscal 2006. The additional stock-based compensation expense is being amortized over the service period relating to each option, typically four years. Upon the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, 123(R) in the year ended June 30, 2006, we recorded an additional $1.6 million cumulative benefit from change in accounting principle, net of tax, reflecting the net cumulative impact of estimated forfeitures that were previously not included in the determination of historic stock-based compensation expense in periods prior to July 1, 2005.

Accordingly, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 (“Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K”), we included restatements of the following previously filed financial statements and data (and related disclosures): (1) our condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2004; (2) our selected condensed consolidated financial data as of and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002; and (3) our unaudited quarterly financial data for all quarters in fiscal 2005 and 2006. Please see Note 3, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements and Special Committee and Company Findings” to the consolidated financial statements included in our Fiscal 2006 Form 10-K, and Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations therein, for a detailed discussion of the effect of the restatements and a period-by-period reconciliation of the adjustments. The effects of this restatement on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006 are reflected in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview of the Business

We design, develop and market integrated circuits for digital media applications, such as digital television, liquid crystal display, or LCD, television and digital set-top boxes. Our system-on-chip semiconductors provide the “intelligence” for these new types of displays by processing and optimizing video and computer graphic signals to produce high-quality and realistic images. Many of the world’s leading manufacturers of consumer electronics and computer display products utilize our technology to enhance image quality and ease of use of their products. Our goal is to provide the best image quality enhanced digital media integrated circuits at competitive prices to users.

We sell our products primarily to digital television original equipment manufacturers in China, South Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Historically, significant portions of our revenue have been generated by sales to a relatively small number of customers. Our top two customers accounted for 64% of our total revenue for the nine months ended March 31, 2007. In the nine months ended March 31, 2007, sales to two customers, Samsung and Midoriya (a distributor for Sony) each accounted for more than 10% of total revenues. Substantially all of our revenue to date has been denominated in U.S. dollars. Our products are manufactured primarily by United Microelectronics Corporation, or UMC, a semiconductor manufacturer located in Taiwan.

Since June 2003, we have focused our business primarily in the rapidly growing DPTV market and related areas. Since September 1, 2006, we have conducted this business primarily through our subsidiary, Trident Microsystems (Far East) Ltd., or TMFE, located in the Cayman Islands, with research and development services relating to existing projects and certain new projects, conducted by both Trident Microsystems, Inc. and its subsidiary, Trident Multimedia Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. or TMT, located in Shanghai, China. Operations and field application engineering support and certain sales activities are conducted through our subsidiary, Trident Microelectronics Co. Ltd., or TML, located in Taiwan and other affiliates. Trident Technologies, Inc., which was 99.99% owned by Trident at June 30.

References to “we,” “our,” “Trident,” or the “Company” in this report refer to Trident Microsystems, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including TMT, TML, TTI and TMFE.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. We periodically review our accounting policies and estimates and make adjustments when facts and circumstances dictate. In addition to the accounting policies that are more fully described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we consider the critical accounting policies described below to be affected by critical accounting estimates. Our critical accounting policies that are affected by accounting estimates include revenue recognition, stock-based compensation expense, investments, allowance for sales returns, inventories, intangible assets, product warranty, income taxes and litigation and other loss contingencies. Such accounting policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Discussion of these critical accounting estimates could be found in the “Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section included in our Form 10-K for fiscal 2006. There have been no changes to these critical accounting policies subsequent to June 30, 2006.

Results of Operations

Financial Data for the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2007 compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2006.

Revenues


	Three Months Ended							Nine Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	March 31,				Percent			March 31,				Percent
Revenues by region	2007		2006		Change			2007		2006		Change
South Korea	$	28.7	$	14.0		105	%	$	78.9	$	36.2		118	%
Japan		19.7		17.8		11	%		70.8		45.3		56	%
China		4.9		6.3		(22	%)		27.8		20.8		34	%
Rest of world		7.3		6.7		9	%		22.7		16.3		39	%

Total revenues	$	60.6	$	44.8		35	%	$	200.2	$	118.6		69	%

The increase in revenues for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily attributed to continued success of our Super Video Processor (“SVP”) family of products in the digital television markets. Our unit sales volume of these products increased by approximately 65% percent in the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006 and increased by approximately 108% in the nine months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2006. However, as is typical with consumer electronics markets, average selling prices decreased by approximately 18% and 19%, respectively, over the same time periods.

Revenues from customers in Asia, primarily South Korea, Japan and China, accounted for 47%, 33% and 8%, respectively, of our revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2007. Revenues from customers in Asia, primarily Japan, South Korea and China, accounted for 40%, 31%, and 14%, respectively, of our revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2006. Revenues from customers in Asia, primarily South Korea ,Japan and China, accounted for 39%, 35%, and 14%, respectively, of our revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2007. Revenues from customers in Asia, primarily Japan, South Korea and China, accounted for 38%, 31%, and 18%, respectively, of our revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2006. Revenues in China decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006 due to intense price competition in that particular market. We expect Asian customers will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenues in future periods.

In the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, revenues from two customers accounted for more than 10% of revenues. In the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, revenues from two customers accounted for more than 10% of revenues. Approximately 46% and 54%, respectively, of our revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were through distributors. Approximately 51% and 52%, respectively, of our revenues in the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were through distributors. Revenues increased in all regions primarily due to continued success of our standalone image process controllers largely in the digital process television markets.

Gross Margin


	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	March 31,						Percent			March 31,						Percent
(Dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
				(As restated)									(As restated)
Gross profit	$	29.6		$	22.8			30	%	$	99.5		$	61.2			63	%
Gross margin		48.8	%		50.9	%					49.7	%		51.6	%

The decline in gross margins for both the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily due to higher ramp-up costs associated with our new product SVP–UX/WX, which was introduced in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and to a lesser extent, due to increased sales of SVP–PX which has a somewhat lower gross margin than some of our previous products and comprised 47% and 55%, respectively, of our total revenues during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007.

During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, revenues from the sale of previously reserved products were $1.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively, or 1.7% and 1.9%, respectively, of total revenues as compared to $0.7 million and $3.3 million or 1.4% and 2.8% of revenues for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006. Due to the previously recorded reserves there was no cost of revenues reflected with respect to these product sales which in effect provided a benefit to the current income statement to the extent of the selling price. At the same time we recorded additional inventory reserves for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 in the amounts of approximately $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively, as compared to approximately $0.5 million and $2.5 million for the same respective three and nine month periods of the previous year.

Sales of previously reserved inventory depend largely on the timing of transitions to newer generations of similar products. When we introduce new products that are designed to enhance or replace our older products, we typically provide inventory reserves on our older products based on the expected timing and volume of customer purchases of the new product. The timing and volume of the new product introduction can be impacted significantly by events out of our control including changes in customer product introduction schedules. Accordingly, we may end up selling more or less of our older fully reserved product until the customer is able to execute on its changeover plan.

We believe that the prices of our products will continue to decline over time as competition increases and new and more advanced products are introduced. We expect average selling prices of existing products to continue to decline, although the average selling prices of our entire product line may remain constant or increase as a result of introductions of new higher-performance products which may have additional functionality. Our strategy is to maintain and optimize gross margins by (1) managing average selling price erosion in pricing negotiations with customers, (2) developing new and more advanced products that can add relative value to the selling price, (3) reducing manufacturing costs by improving production yields, (4) aggressively developing more cost effective products and (5) negotiating with the foundry and other manufacturing partners to receive more competitive pricing. There is no assurance that we will be able to develop and introduce new products on a timely basis or that we can reduce manufacturing costs or improve margins.

Research and Development


	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	March 31,						Percent			March 31,						Percent
(Dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
				(As restated)									(As restated)
Research and development	$	11.8		$	8.6			37	%	$	32.2		$	24.3			32	%
As a percentage of total revenues		19	%		19	%					16	%		21	%

The increase in research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily the result of $1.3 million due to increased research expenditures relating to our SVP-UX/WX, SVP-AX and HiDTV Pro CX/FX products, increased spending on additional personnel of $0.8 million and additional stock-based compensation expense of $0.2 million. The increase in research and development expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily the result of new product development expenditures of $3 million relating to our SVP-LX, SVP-CX, SVP-UX/WX, SVP-AX and HiDTV Pro CX/FX products, increased spending on additional personnel of $2.1 million due to increases in headcount and salaries, increased depreciation expense of 0.8 million due to purchase of additional property equipment and increased stock-based compensation expense of 0.6 million. The decrease in research and development expenses as a percentage of revenues during the nine months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior period was primarily attributable to revenues increasing at a proportionately higher rate than research and development expenses.

We are currently planning to continue development of the next generation DPTV^TM products as well as other advanced products for the digital television market in the United States, Japan, South Korea, China, Taiwan and Europe, and therefore we expect research and development expense to continue to increase.

Selling, General and Administrative


	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	March 31,						Percent			March 31,						Percent
(Dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
				(As restated)									(As restated)
Selling, general and administrative	$	10.4		$	7.1			47	%	$	35.9		$	19.0			88	%
As a percentage of total revenues		17	%		16	%					18	%		16	%

The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was primarily attributed to (i) increased professional fees of $3.8 million, of which $3 million related to the cost of the investigation into our historical stock option practices and the remaining $0.8 million represented legal and accounting professional fees incurred by the Company in connection with its business operations and (ii) it was partially offset by the decrease in salaries and associated personnel expenses of $1.2 million in connection with the resignation of our former Chief Executive Officer and another employee in the quarter prior to the three months ended March 31, 2007.

The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended March 31, 2007 was due to increased (i) professional fees of $14 million, of which $13 million related to the cost of the investigation into our historical stock option practices and the remaining $1 million represented the legal and accounting professional fees incurred by the Company in connection with its business operations and (ii) increased third-party sales representative commission expenses of $2.7 million due to an increase in product sales. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was primarily attributable to increases in professional fees primarily relating to the cost of the investigation into our historical stock option practices. We will continue to monitor and control our selling, general and administrative expenses.

Interest Income


	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	March 31,						Percent			March 31,						Percent
(Dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
Interest income	$	1.2		$	0.6			100	%	$	3.6		$	1.3			177	%
As a percentage of total revenues		2	%		1	%					2	%		1	%

The increase in interest income in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007 was attributable to increases in cash balance and interest rate compared to three and nine months ended March 31, 2006. The amount of interest income we earn varies directly with the amount of our cash and cash equivalents balances and prevailing interest rates.

Provision for Income Taxes


	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	March 31,									March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2007			2006			Change			2007			2006			Change
				(As restated)									(As restated)
Effective income tax rate		38	%		25	%		14	%		36	%		13	%		23	%

A provision for income taxes of $3.5 million and $13.2 million were recorded for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2007, respectively. A provision for income taxes of $1.8 million and $2.5 million was recorded for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. The increase in the effective income tax rates was primarily due to increased profits generated from operations in foreign jurisdictions where we were subject to tax and the amortization of foreign taxes associated with intercompany profit on assets remaining within Trident’s group.

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 31,						March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2007		2006		Change		2007			2006		Change
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle		—		—		—		(190	)		1,819		(110	%)

In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we early-adopted EITF 06-02, which addressed the accounting for sabbatical leave and other similar benefits and recorded a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle totaling $0.2 million. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) resulted in a cumulative benefit from change in accounting principle totaling $1.8 million, net of tax, for the nine months ended March 31, 2006, reflecting the net cumulative impact of estimated forfeitures that were previously not included in the determination of historic stock-based compensation expense in periods prior to July 1, 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our financial condition remains strong. Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments at the end of each period were as follows:


	March 31,		June 30,
(In millions)	2007		2006
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	134.4	$	103.0
Short-term investments		49.4		49.6

Total	$	183.8	$	152.6

Our primary cash inflows and outflows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:


	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
(In millions)	2007			2006
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	46.1		$	39.5
Investing activities		(14.9	)		(3.5	)
Financing activities		0.1			9.8

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	31.3		$	45.8

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities. For the nine months ended March 31, 2007, the largest contributing factors to the significant increase in cash provided by operating activities were due to income generated from operations, decreases in prepaid expenses and other current assets (after excluding a noncash transaction that significantly increased prepaid expenses and other current assets), increases in accounts payable, accrued expenses and income taxes payable, partially offset by increases in accounts receivable. Cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2006 was primarily due to income generated from operations, increases in accounts payable, accrued expenses and income taxes payable, partially offset by the increase in inventories.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, prepaid expenses and other current assets increased as a result of prepaid taxes recorded in connection with intercompany profit on assets remaining within Trident’s group. Excluding this noncash transaction, prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased primarily due to amortization of prepaid software license fees. Accounts payable increased primarily due to the timing of payments to vendors. Accrued expenses increased primarily due to accrued professional fees primarily relating to our investigation into our historical stock option grants. Income taxes payable increased primarily due to the tax provision made for profitable operations during the nine months ended March 31, 2007 and foreign taxes resulting from our restructuring. Accounts receivable increased due to increased sales volume to our customers and timing of collections. During the nine months ended March 31, 2006, accounts payable increased due to increases in inventories and cost of goods sold which related to increased revenues. Accrued expenses increased primarily due to accrued dealer commissions and bonuses largely relating to our increased revenue and to an increase in accrued stock option exercise proceeds due to an increase in employee stock option exercises in the nine months ended March 31, 2006. Income taxes payable increased primarily due to the tax provision made for profitable operations during the nine months ended March 31, 2006.

Investing Activities

During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, $14.9 million of net cash was used by investing activities. $15.6 million of this amount was used for the purchase of property and equipment, of which $13.9 million related to the construction of our new research facility in Shanghai China, which was recorded in Construction in progress and $1.1 million was used for the purchase of research and development equipment, and $0.3 million was used for the purchase of leasehold improvements for our facilities in Taiwan and Japan, and office equipment. We received cash proceeds of $1.2 million from the sale of stocks of a privately held company.

Financing Activities

During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, $0.1 million of net cash was provided by financing activities relating to $0.8 million tax benefit gained from the exercise of the stock options and $0.9 million from the exercise of employee stock options, significantly offset by the net cash of $1.6 million paid to employees related to the Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.

Liquidity

Our liquidity is affected by many factors, some of which result from the normal ongoing operations of our business and some of which arise from uncertainties and conditions in Asia and the global economies. Although our cash requirements will fluctuate as a result of the shifting influences of these factors, we believe our current resources are sufficient to meet our needs for at least the next twelve months. We regularly consider transactions to finance our activities, including debt and equity offerings and new credit facilities or other financing transactions. We believe our current reserves are adequate.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2007 (in millions):


	Payments Due By Period
	Less than 1
(In millions)	Year		1 - 3 Years		3 - 5 Years		Beyond		Total
Operating Leases (1)	$	1.1	$	1.3	$	0.6	$	—	$	3.0
Building construction contract (2)		3.8		—		—		—		3.8
Purchase obligations (3)		19.6		1.3		—		—		20.9

Total	$	24.5	$	2.6	$	0.6	$	—	$	27.7


1)		We lease office space and have entered into other lease commitments in North America as well as various locations in Japan, China and Taiwan. Operating leases include future minimum lease payments under all our non-cancelable operating leases as of March 31, 2007.

(2)		We are currently constructing a new research and development building in Shanghai which we expect to be completed during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

(3)		Purchase obligations primarily represent unconditional purchase order commitments with contract manufacturers and suppliers for wafers and chipsets.

Contingency

Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Trident has been named as a nominal defendant in several purported shareholder derivative lawsuits concerning the granting of stock options. The federal court cases have been consolidated as In re Trident Microsystems Inc. Derivative Litigation, Master File No. C-06-3440-JF. A case also has been filed in State court, Limke v. Lin et al., No. 1:07-CV-080390. Plaintiffs in all cases allege that certain of our current or former officers and directors caused us to grant options at less than fair market value, contrary to our public statements (including our financial statements); and that as a result those officers and directors are liable to us. No particular amount of damages has been alleged, and by the nature of the lawsuit no damages will be alleged against us. Our Board of Directors has appointed a Special Litigation Committee (“SLC”) composed solely of independent directors to review and manage any claims that we may have relating to the stock options practices investigated by the Special Committee. The scope of the SLC’s authority includes the claims asserted in the derivative actions. In federal court, Trident has moved to stay the case pending the assessment by the SLC that was formed to consider nominal plaintiffs’ claims. In State court, Trident moved to stay the case in deference to the federal lawsuit, and the parties have agreed, with the Court’s approval, to take that motion off of the Court’s calendar to await the assessment of the SLC. We cannot predict whether these actions are likely to result in any material recovery by or expense to, Trident. We expect to continue to incur legal fees in responding to these lawsuits, including expenses for the reimbursement of legal fees of present and former officers and directors under indemnification obligations.

Intellectual Property Litigation

From time to time, we are involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. While we cannot be certain about the ultimate outcome of any litigation, management does not believe any pending legal proceeding will result in a judgment or settlement that will have a material adverse effect on our business, our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Regulatory Actions

The Department of Justice is currently conducting an investigation of us in connection with our investigation into our historical stock option grant practices and related issues and we are subject to a subpoena from the DOJ. We are also subject to a formal investigation from the Securities and Exchange Commission on the same issue. We have been cooperating with, and continue to cooperate with, investigations from the SEC and DOJ. In addition, our 401(k) plan and its administration are being audited by the Department of Labor as a result of actions taken in response to the findings from our investigation. We are unable to predict what consequences, if any, that any investigation by any regulatory agency may have on us. Any regulatory investigation could result in substantial legal and accounting expenses, divert management’s attention from other business concerns and harm our business. If a regulatory agency were to commence civil or criminal action against us, it is possible that we could be required to pay significant penalties and/or fines and could become subject to administrative orders, and could result in civil or criminal sanctions against certain of our former officers, directors and/or employees and might result in such sanctions against us and/or our current officers, directors and/or employees. Any regulatory action could result in the filing of additional restatements of our prior financial statements or require that we take other actions. If we are subject to an adverse finding resulting from the SEC and DOJ investigations, we could be required to pay damages or penalties or have other remedies imposed upon us. The period of time necessary to resolve the investigation by the DOJ and the investigation from the SEC is uncertain, and these matters could require significant management and financial resources which could otherwise be devoted to the operation of our business.

Nasdaq Proceedings

As a result of the delayed filing of our periodic reports with the SEC, on October 2, 2006, we received a Nasdaq staff determination letter indicating that we had failed to comply with the filing requirement for continued listing set forth in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4310(c) (14), due to our failure to timely file our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2006, and that our securities are, therefore, subject to delisting from the Nasdaq Global Market. We received and announced three additional Nasdaq staff determination letters with respect to our failure to timely file our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2007, as well as with respect to our failure to hold an annual meeting of stockholders during fiscal 2007. We requested and subsequently attended a hearing before the Listing Panel, which was held on November 16, 2006, to appeal the staff determination and presented a plan to cure the three filing deficiencies and regain compliance. On January 16, 2007, Nasdaq notified us that the exception had been granted, and that it would continue to list our shares on the Nasdaq Global Market, provided that we file our Form 10-K for fiscal 2006, our Form 10-Q for the first quarter of fiscal 2007, and all required restatements on or before April 2, 2007. We appealed this decision to the Listing Council, which decided to review the decision of the Listing Panel, and stayed the decision to suspend our securities from trading, pending further action by the Listing Council.

On July 6, 2007, we received the decision of the Listing Council concerning our appeal of the Listing Panel’s decision described above. In its decision, the Listing Council exercised its maximum discretionary authority and according to the limits of its authority, under Marketplace Rule 4802(b), granted us an extension to demonstrate compliance with all of the Nasdaq continued listing requirements until July 16, 2007. We have submitted a request to the Nasdaq Board of Directors for a further extension of time, beyond July 16, 2007, by which we must come into compliance with all of the listing requirements, and requested a continued stay of the decision to delist our common stock. On August 17, 2007, the Nasdaq Board of Directors informed us of its decision to provide us until September 13, 2007 to file all delinquent periodic reports necessary to regain compliance with the listing requirements. If we are unable to meet this extended deadline, our securities will be suspended at the opening of business on September 17, 2007. As a result of filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2006, respectively, we believe that we have now filed all of our delinquent reports.

We have also requested an extension of time from the Listing Panel within which to comply with the requirement to hold an annual meeting of shareholders, to solicit proxies and to provide proxy statements to Nasdaq. The Nasdaq Board of Directors has determined that if we regain compliance with our filing requirements, it will remand the matter back to the Listing Panel for further consideration of the extension of time within which to hold an annual meeting of shareholders.

Indemnification Obligations

and related issues, and the related governmental inquiries and shareholder derivative litigation described above under Item 3 “Legal Proceedings.” The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unknown and potentially unlimited; however, we have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies that enable us to recover a portion of future indemnification claims paid, subject to retentions, conditions and limitations of the policies. At this time, we are unable to assess whether the sum of indemnification obligations incurred that are not or may not be recovered will render the net value of such indemnification obligations material.

In connection with certain agreements that we have executed in the past, we have on occasion included intellectual property indemnification provisions in our technology related agreements with third parties. Historically, these provisions have not resulted in any material liability for us, however, there can be no assurance that will be the case in the future. In addition, maximum potential future payments cannot be estimated because many of these agreements do not have a maximum stated liability. As such, we have not recorded any liability in our consolidated financial statements for such indemnifications.

From time to time, we are involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business in which a customer or other third party may assert a right to indemnification. While we cannot be certain about the ultimate outcome of any litigation, management does not believe any such pending legal proceeding will result in a judgment or settlement that will have a material adverse effect on our business.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for our fiscal years beginning July 1, 2008. We are evaluating the impact of the provisions of this statement on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In June 2006, the FASB published FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This interpretation is effective for our fiscal years beginning July 1, 2007. We are evaluating the impact of the provisions of this interpretation on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In June 2006, the FASB issued EITF No. 06-02, Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43, Accounting for compensated absences. A sabbatical leave is a benefit provided to employees whereby the employee is entitled to time off with pay, over and above routine vacation time, after working for a specified period of time. EITF 06-02 concluded that an employee’s right to a compensated absence under a sabbatical or similar benefit arrangement does accumulate pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43, Accounting for Compensated Absences and therefore, a liability should be accrued over the service period in which employees earn the right to sabbatical leave. We offer up to two sabbatical leaves to full-time U.S. employees upon completion of 15 years of service and 20 years of service. Each sabbatical leave is four weeks and must be taken at one time. We early-adopted EITF 06-02 in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 and recorded a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle totaling $0.2 million.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for our first quarter of fiscal year 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact that this pronouncement may have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to three primary types of market risks: foreign currency exchange rate risk, interest rate risk and investment risk.

Foreign currency exchange rate risk

We currently have operations in the United States, Taiwan and China. The functional currency of all our operations is the U.S. dollar. However, a portion of our cash is denominated in foreign currencies and could be subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk. Although some expenses are incurred in local currencies by our Taiwan and China operations, substantially all of our transactions are made in U.S. dollars. Therefore, we have minimal exposure to foreign currency rate fluctuations relating to our transactions.

While we expect our international revenues to continue to be denominated primarily in U.S. dollars, an increasing portion of our international revenues may be denominated in foreign currencies in the future. In addition, we plan to continue to expand our overseas operations. As a result, our operating results may become subject to significant fluctuations based upon changes in foreign currency exchange rates of certain currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. We will analyze our exposure to currency fluctuations and may engage in financial hedging techniques in the future to attempt to minimize the effect of these potential fluctuations; however, exchange rate fluctuations may adversely affect our financial results in the future. Since we have a research and development facility in Shanghai, China and sales offices in Beijing and Shenzhen, China, our operating expenses may increase in the future due to the continued appreciation of China’s currency, Renminbi, compared to the U.S. dollar.

Interest rate risk

We currently maintain our cash equivalents primarily in money market funds and highly liquid marketable securities. We do not have any derivative financial instruments. However, a portion of our cash is denominated in foreign currencies and could be subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk. As of March 31, 2007, approximately $134.4 million of our investments matured in less than three months. We will continue to invest a significant portion of our existing cash equivalents in interest bearing, investment grade securities, with maturities of less than three months. We do not believe that our investments, in the aggregate, have significant exposure to interest rate risk.

Investment risk

We are exposed to market risk as it relates to changes in the market value of our investments in public companies. We invest in equity instruments of public companies for business and strategic purposes and we have classified these securities as available-for-sale. These available-for-sale equity investments, primarily in technology companies, are subject to significant fluctuations in fair market value due to the volatility of the stock market and the industries in which these companies participate. As of March 31, 2007, we had available-for-sale equity investments with a fair market value of $49 million. Our objective in managing our exposure to stock market fluctuations is to minimize the impact of stock market declines to our earnings and cash flows. There are, however, a number of factors beyond our control. However, the existence of a number of external factors such as continued market volatility, as well as mergers and acquisitions, have the potential to have a material impact on our results of operations in future periods.

We are also exposed to changes in the value of our investments in privately held companies, including privately-held start-up companies. During the nine months ended March 31, 2007, we invested an additional $0.5 million in one privately-held company. Long-term equity investments in technology companies are subject to significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the industries in which these companies participate and other factors. As of March 31, 2007, the balance of our long-term equity investments in privately held companies was approximately $3.1 million.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

Stock Option Investigation

As discussed in Note 3, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements and Special Committee and Company Findings,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements and in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” we have been engaged in an investigation into our historical stock option grant practices and related issues. As a result of the findings from this investigation, we restated certain previously filed annual and quarterly financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, to record additional stock-based compensation expense.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of March 31, 2007, which included an evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures applicable to the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, as a result of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, as of March 31, 2007, at the reasonable assurance level.

These material weaknesses related to our failure to maintain an effective control environment and maintenance of insufficient controls relating to our stock-based compensation expense, as follows.

Failure to Maintain Effective Control Environment. We did not maintain an effective control environment based on criteria established in the COSO framework. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls, including monitoring and adequate communication, to ensure the accuracy, valuation and presentation of activity related to our stock option granting practices and procedures. Controls were not adequate to prevent or detect instances of misconduct that occurred under the direction or supervision of our former Chief Executive Officer. This lack of an effective control environment permitted circumvention of controls relating to the accounting for our stock option grants and enabled our former Chief Executive Officer to administer our stock option grants in a manner inconsistent with existing policies. This control deficiency also contributed to the following material weakness:

Insufficient controls relating to our stock-based compensation expense. We did not maintain effective controls over the accounting for and disclosure of our stock-based compensation expense. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls to ensure the accuracy, valuation and presentation of our stock-based compensation expense. We determined that each of the deficiencies described below existed:

	•		Effective controls, including monitoring, were not maintained to ensure the proper exercise of authority to grant and administer stock options as well as the existence, completeness, valuation and presentation of our stock-based compensation transactions.

	•		There was insufficient segregation of duties with respect to stock option administration between those who had authority to grant options and those who maintained our stock administration records.

The material weaknesses identified above contributed to the misstatement of our stock-based compensation expense, additional paid-in capital accounts, tax related accounts, and related financial disclosures, and in the restatement of our consolidated financial statements. Specifically, these material weaknesses contributed to the restatement of our consolidated financial statements of annual periods through June 30, 2005 and the first three quarters of fiscal year 2006. Additionally, each of these deficiencies could result in misstatements of the aforementioned accounts and disclosures that each would result in a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. As a result, we determined that these deficiencies resulted in material weaknesses.

Notwithstanding our conclusion that our disclosure controls were not effective as of March 31, 2007, at the reasonable assurance level, as a result of the material weaknesses identified above, we believe our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this Form 10-Q present fairly, in all material respects, the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for all periods presented herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we completed the following changes in our internal control over financial reporting, or in other factors, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


	•		We continued to review our corporate governance practices and considered recommendations for improvements, if any, that might enhance the ability of the Board of Directors to carry out its responsibilities. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee continued to make recommendations for certain improvements in corporate governance policies and procedures that might be implemented by the Board of Directors to enhance corporate governance.

	•		In February 2007, we appointed a new Chief Accounting Officer.

	•		We began reviewing our existing internal controls, together with an independent third party, and commenced evaluating further improvements that might be made to our internal controls in connection with our ongoing effort to improve our control processes and corporate governance.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues within a company are detected. The inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistakes. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

Part II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Trident has been named as a nominal defendant in several purported shareholder derivative lawsuits concerning the granting of stock options. The federal court cases have been consolidated as In re Trident Microsystems Inc. Derivative Litigation, Master File No. C-06-3440-JF. A case also has been filed in State court, Limke v. Lin et al., No. 1:07-CV-080390. Plaintiffs in all cases allege that certain of our current or former officers and directors caused us to grant options at less than fair market value, contrary to our public statements (including our financial statements); and that this represented a breach of their fiduciary duties to us, and that as a result those officers and directors are liable to us. No particular amount of damages has been alleged, and by the nature of the lawsuit no damages will be alleged against us. Our Board of Directors has appointed a Special Litigation Committee (“SLC”) composed solely of independent directors to review and manage any claims that we may have relating to our historical stock option grant practices and related issues investigated by the Special Committee. The scope of the SLC’s authority includes the claims asserted in the derivative actions. In federal court, Trident has moved to stay the case pending the assessment by the SLC that was formed to consider nominal plaintiffs’ claims. In State court, Trident moved to stay the case in deference to the federal lawsuit, and the parties have agreed, with the Court’s approval, to take that motion off of the Court’s calendar to await the assessment of the SLC. We cannot predict whether these actions are likely to result in any material recovery by or expense to, Trident. We expect to continue to incur legal fees in responding to these lawsuits, including expenses for the reimbursement of legal fees of present and former officers and directors under indemnification obligations.

Intellectual Property Litigation

From time to time, we are involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business. While we cannot be certain about the ultimate outcome of any litigation, management does not believe any pending legal proceeding will result in a judgment or settlement that will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operation or cash flows.

Regulatory Actions

Nasdaq Proceedings

We also requested an extension of time from the Listing Panel within which to comply with the requirement to hold an annual meeting of shareholders, to solicit proxies and to provide proxy statements to Nasdaq. The Nasdaq Board of Directors has determined that if we regain compliance with our filing requirements, it will remand the matter back to the Listing Panel for further consideration of the extension of time within which to hold an annual meeting of shareholders.

Indemnification Obligations

We indemnify, as permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with our Bylaws, our officers, directors and members of our senior management for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain limits, while they were serving at our request in such capacity. In this regard, we have received, or expect to receive, requests for indemnification by certain current and former officers, directors and employees in connection with our investigation of our historical stock option grant practices and related issues, and the related governmental inquiries and shareholder derivative litigation described above. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unknown and potentially unlimited; however, we have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policies that enable us to recover a portion of future indemnification claims paid, subject to retentions, conditions and limitations of the policies. At this time, we are unable to assess whether the sum of indemnification obligations incurred that are not or may not be recovered will render the net value of such indemnification obligations material.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to our Risk Factors as previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, other than as follows:

Under the risk entitled “Due to the failure to meet continued listing standards, we may be delisted from the Nasdaq Global Market, which could adversely affect our stock price and our ability to raise capital” we previously disclosed that we had submitted a request to the Nasdaq Board of Directors for a further extension of time, beyond July 16, 2007, by which we must come into compliance with all of the Nasdaq listing requirements, and requested a continued stay of the decision to delist our common stock. We hereby update this risk factor to disclose that on August 17, 2007, the Nasdaq Board of Directors informed us of its decision to provide us until September 13, 2007 to file all delinquent periodic reports necessary to regain compliance with the listing requirements. If we are unable to meet this extended deadline, our securities will be suspended at the opening of business on September 17, 2007. As a result of filing this Report and the Quarterly Reports of Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2006 and March 31, 2007, respectively, we believe that we have now filed all of our delinquent reports.

We also previously disclosed our request for an extension of time from the Listing Panel within which to comply with the requirement to hold an annual meeting of shareholders, to solicit proxies and to provide proxy statements to Nasdaq. We update this information to disclose that the Nasdaq Board of Directors has determined that if we regain compliance with our filing requirements, it will remand the matter back to the Listing Panel for further consideration of the extension of time within which to hold an annual meeting of shareholders.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable


	March 31,		June 30,
(In thousands)	2007		2006
*Inventories:*
Work-in-progress	$	7,091	$	9,566
Finished goods		7,800		5,075

Total inventories	$	14,891	$	14,641


*Accrued expenses:*
Accrued compensation and benefits	$	9,071	$	9,633
Others		14,827		11,699

Total accrued expenses	$	23,898	$	21,332


	March 31, 2007							June 30, 2006
			Accumulated							Accumulated
(In thousands)	Gross		Amortization			Net		Gross		Amortization			Net
Core and developed technologies	$	23,694	$	(10,505	)	$	13,189	$	23,694	$	(6,249	)	$	17,445
Customer relationships		2,120		(810	)		1,310		2,120		(375	)		1,745

Total	$	25,814	$	(11,315	)	$	14,499	$	25,814	$	(6,624	)	$	19,190


Exhibit		Description
3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation.⁽²⁾

3.2		Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation.⁽⁶⁾

3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws.⁽⁵⁾

4.1		Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.

4.2		Specimen Common Stock Certificate.⁽³⁾

4.3		Form of Rights Agreement between the Company and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, LLC, as Rights Agent (including as Exhibit A the form of Certificates of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B the form of Right Certificate, and as Exhibit C the Summary of Terms of Rights Agreement).⁽⁴⁾

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer⁽⁷⁾

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer⁽⁷⁾

32.1		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer⁽⁷⁾

32.2		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer⁽⁷⁾


(1)		Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 25, 2003.

(2)		Incorporated by reference to exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1993.

(3)		Incorporated by reference to exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-53768).

(4)		Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 21, 1998.

(5)		Incorporated by reference to exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated December 31, 2003.

(6)		Incorporated by reference to exhibit of the same number to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated March 31, 2004.

(7)		Filed herewith.


	TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.
	(Registrant)

Dated: August 21, 2007	By:	/s/ John S. Edmunds

		John S. Edmunds
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Duly Authorized Officer and
		Principal Financial Officer)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents


Part I.	Financial Information	3

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income	3

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5

	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	30

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	31

Part II.	Other Information	33

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	33

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	35

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	35

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	35

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	35

Item 5.	Other Information	35

Item 6.	Exhibits	36

Signatures		37

Index to Exhibits
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2