UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 29, 2005

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                          to                         

Commission file number 0-18225

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

California	77-0059951
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

170 West Tasman Drive

San Jose, California 95134

(Address of principal executive office and zip code)

(408) 526-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x  NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES x  NO ¨

As of February 11, 2005, 6,463,952,333 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Cisco Systems, Inc.

FORM 10-Q for the Quarter Ended January 29, 2005

INDEX

Part I.	Financial Information	Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004	5
	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	31
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	64
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	66
Part II.	Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	67
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	67
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	68
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	69
Item 5.	Other Information	69
Item 6.	Exhibits	69
	Signature	70

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Cisco Systems, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions, except per-share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004			January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004
NET SALES:
Product	$	5,106	$	4,550		$	10,139	$	8,813
Service		956		848			1,894		1,686
Total net sales		6,062		5,398			12,033		10,499
COST OF SALES:
Product		1,669		1,425			3,315		2,741
Service		340		275			650		554
Total cost of sales		2,009		1,700			3,965		3,295
GROSS MARGIN		4,053		3,698			8,068		7,204
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research and development		811		770			1,616		1,525
Sales and marketing		1,142		1,110			2,262		2,197
General and administrative		228		210			458		422
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		57		60			117		122
In-process research and development		2		1			14		1
Total operating expenses		2,240		2,151			4,467		4,267
OPERATING INCOME		1,813		1,547			3,601		2,937
Interest income		127		124			257		261
Other income, net		17		136			57		137
Interest and other income, net		144		260			314		398
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE		1,957		1,807			3,915		3,335
Provision for income taxes		557		516			1,119		958
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE		1,400		1,291			2,796		2,377
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—		(567	)		—		(567	)
NET INCOME	$	1,400	$	724		$	2,796	$	1,810
Income per share before cumulative effect of accounting change:
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.19		$	0.43	$	0.34
Diluted	$	0.21	$	0.18		$	0.42	$	0.33
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.11		$	0.43	$	0.26
Diluted	$	0.21	$	0.10		$	0.42	$	0.25
Shares used in per-share calculation:
Basic		6,521		6,874			6,577		6,904
Diluted		6,652		7,110			6,713		7,110

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Cisco Systems, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except par value)

(Unaudited)

	January 29, 2005		July 31, 2004
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,473	$	3,722
Short-term investments		3,291		4,947
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $176 at January 29, 2005 and $179 at July 31, 2004		2,278		1,825
Inventories		1,255		1,207
Deferred tax assets		1,881		1,827
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		792		815
Total current assets		11,970		14,343
Investments		10,761		10,598
Property and equipment, net		3,302		3,290
Goodwill		4,674		4,198
Purchased intangible assets, net		396		325
Other assets		2,722		2,840
TOTAL ASSETS	$	33,825	$	35,594
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	673	$	657
Income taxes payable		1,397		963
Accrued compensation		1,219		1,466
Deferred revenue		3,657		3,527
Other accrued liabilities		2,126		2,090
Total current liabilities		9,072		8,703
Deferred revenue		990		975
Total liabilities		10,062		9,678
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Minority interest		12		90
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value: 5 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—		—
Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.001 par value: 20,000 shares authorized; 6,481 and 6,735 shares issued and outstanding at January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively		22,145		22,450
Retained earnings		1,245		3,164
Accumulated other comprehensive income		361		212
Total shareholders’ equity		23,751		25,826
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	33,825	$	35,594

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Cisco Systems, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	2,796		$	1,810
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—			567
Depreciation and amortization		587			786
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			19
Provision for inventory		111			72
Deferred income taxes		(41	)		120
Tax benefits from employee stock option plans		126			328
In-process research and development		14			1
Net (gains) losses and impairment charges on investments		(74	)		(121	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(446	)		(704	)
Inventories		(157	)		(131	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		73			(2	)
Lease receivables, net		(60	)		(45	)
Accounts payable		8			42
Income taxes payable		424			12
Accrued compensation		(252	)		(70	)
Deferred revenue		146			253
Other accrued liabilities		(7	)		(348	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		3,248			2,589
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of short-term investments		(2,825	)		(6,433	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments		5,478			6,564
Purchases of investments		(7,541	)		(10,501	)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments		6,479			11,636
Acquisition of property and equipment		(290	)		(393	)
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash and cash equivalents		(553	)		(67	)
Change in investments in privately held companies		(110	)		40
Other		93			83
Net cash provided by investing activities		731			929
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of common stock		433			758
Repurchase of common stock		(5,706	)		(4,034	)
Other		45			58
Net cash used in financing activities		(5,228	)		(3,218	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,249	)		300
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		3,722			3,925
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	2,473		$	4,225

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Cisco Systems, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in millions)

(Unaudited)

Six Months Ended January 24, 2004	Shares of Common Stock		Common Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total Shareholders’ Equity
BALANCE AT JULY 26, 2003	6,998		$	21,116		$	6,559		$	354		$	28,029
Net income	—			—			1,810			—			1,810
Change in unrealized gains and (losses) on investments, net of tax	—			—			—			(10	)		(10	)
Other	—			—			—			88			88
Comprehensive income													1,888
Issuance of common stock	71			758			—			—			758
Repurchase of common stock	(187	)		(567	)		(3,467	)		—			(4,034	)
Tax benefits from employee stock option plans	—			328			—			—			328
Purchase acquisitions	—			6			—			—			6
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation	—			87			—			—			87
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax	—			567			—			—			567
Consolidation of variable interest entities	—			7			—			—			7
BALANCE AT JANUARY 24, 2004	6,882		$	22,302		$	4,902		$	432		$	27,636

Six Months Ended January 29, 2005	Shares of Common Stock		Common Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total Shareholders’ Equity
BALANCE AT JULY 31, 2004	6,735		$	22,450		$	3,164		$	212	$	25,826
Net income	—			—			2,796			—		2,796
Change in unrealized gains and (losses) on investments, net of tax	—			—			—			59		59
Other	—			—			—			90		90
Comprehensive income												2,945
Issuance of common stock	42			433			—			—		433
Repurchase of common stock	(296	)		(991	)		(4,715	)		—		(5,706	)
Tax benefits from employee stock option plans	—			126			—			—		126
Purchase acquisitions	—			51			—			—		51
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation	—			76			—			—		76
BALANCE AT JANUARY 29, 2005	6,481		$	22,145		$	1,245		$	361	$	23,751

Supplemental Information

In September 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program. As of January 29, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $35 billion of common stock under this program and the remaining authorized amount under the stock repurchase program was $12.4 billion with no termination date. For additional information regarding stock repurchases, see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The purchase price of shares of common stock repurchased was reflected as a reduction to retained earnings and common stock and additional paid-in capital. Issuance of common stock and the tax benefit related to employee stock option plans are recorded as an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The cumulative stock repurchases pursuant to this program as of January 29, 2005 are summarized in the table below (in millions):

	Shares of Common Stock	Common Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total Shareholders’ Equity
Repurchases of common stock	1,252	$	3,857	$	18,767	$	—	$	22,624

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Cisco Systems, Inc. (the “Company” or “Cisco”) manufactures and sells networking and communications products and provides services associated with that equipment and its use. The Company’s products are installed at corporations, public institutions, telecommunication companies, and commercial businesses, and are also found in personal residences. Cisco provides a broad line of products for transporting data, voice, and video within buildings, across campuses, and around the world.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year is the 52 or 53 weeks ending on the last Saturday in July. Fiscal 2005 is a 52-week fiscal year and fiscal 2004 was a 53-week fiscal year.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial data as of January 29, 2005 and for the three months and six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004 has been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The July 31, 2004 Consolidated Balance Sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments, except as disclosed herein) necessary to present a fair statement of financial position as of January 29, 2005, results of operations for the three and six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, as applicable, have been made. The results of operations for the three and six months ended January 29, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future periods.

Employee Stock Benefit Plans

The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). Under the intrinsic value method, because the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

7

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Pro forma information regarding option grants made to the Company’s employees and directors and common stock issued pursuant to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is based on specified valuation techniques that produce estimated compensation charges. The following table reflects the pro forma information (in millions, except per-share amounts):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004
Net income — as reported	$	1,400		$	724		$	2,796		$	1,810
Compensation expense, net of tax		(257	)		(312	)		(533	)		(639	)
Net income — pro forma	$	1,143		$	412		$	2,263		$	1,171
Basic net income per share — as reported	$	0.21		$	0.11		$	0.43		$	0.26
Diluted net income per share — as reported	$	0.21		$	0.10		$	0.42		$	0.25
Basic net income per share — pro forma	$	0.18		$	0.06		$	0.34		$	0.17
Diluted net income per share — pro forma	$	0.17		$	0.06		$	0.34		$	0.16

The value of each option grant is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion, the existing valuation models do not provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Company’s employee stock options. For additional information regarding this pro forma information, see Note 10.

Computation of Net Income per Share

Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares primarily consist of employee stock options and restricted common stock.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based compensation payments. SFAS 123(R) is effective for all interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 123(R) on its operating results and financial condition. See Note 10 for pro forma information required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.”

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior-period balances in order to conform to the current period’s presentation.

8

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Purchase Acquisitions

During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company completed the following acquisitions:

• Acquisition of Jahi Networks Inc. to add network management appliances aimed at simplifying interfaces for device management, deployment and configuration of networks

• Acquisition of NetSolve, Incorporated to add remote network and IT infrastructure management solutions that are designed to diagnose and solve a range of network and IT infrastructure issues related to LAN/WAN as well as Advanced Technologies such as IP telephony and security

• Acquisition of Perfigo, Inc. to expand the offerings in the Network Admission Control (NAC) program, an industrywide initiative, which is designed to enforce endpoint policy compliance and improve the security of networks

During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company completed the following acquisitions:

• Acquisition of Actona Technologies, Inc. to expand the functionality of its branch office access router portfolio with intelligent network services that are designed to enable WAN-optimized file transfer and access and to extend its solutions for data center storage consolidation to the branch office

• Acquisition of dynamicsoft, Inc. to add Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)-based solutions to its solutions portfolio for the broadband communications market that are designed to allow telecommunications service providers to deliver advanced Internet Protocol (IP) voice, data and multimedia services

• Acquisition of Parc Technologies Limited to add to its planning and optimization tools for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) traffic engineering

• Acquisition of P-Cube Inc. to provide additional control and management capabilities for advanced IP services to service providers

• Acquisition of the intellectual property and select other assets of, and hiring of a majority of the engineering team from, Procket Networks, Inc. to add to its portfolio of intellectual property and to add a team of silicon and software architects

A summary of the acquisitions completed in the first six months of fiscal 2005 is as follows (in millions):

Acquisition	Purchase Consideration		Assumed Liabilities		In-Process R&D Expense		Goodwill		Purchased Intangible Assets
Actona Technologies, Inc.	$	90	$	4	$	4	$	66	$	21
dynamicsoft, Inc.		69		19		2		39		25
Jahi Networks Inc.		14		3		—		12		3
NetSolve, Incorporated		146		6		—		78		31
Parc Technologies Limited		14		5		—		6		6
P-Cube Inc.		213		17		6		150		56
Perfigo, Inc.		73		2		2		49		20
Procket Networks, Inc.		92		10		—		76		26
Total	$	711	$	66	$	14	$	476	$	188

Under the terms of the definitive agreements, the purchase consideration for the acquisitions during the first six months of fiscal 2005 consisted of cash and the fair value of stock options assumed. The purchase consideration

9

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

for the Company’s acquisitions is also allocated to tangible assets and deferred stock-based compensation. Deferred stock-based compensation represents the intrinsic value of the unvested portion of any restricted shares exchanged, options assumed, or options canceled and replaced with the Company’s options and is amortized as compensation expense over the remaining respective vesting periods. The balance for deferred stock-based compensation is reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity.

The following table presents the activity of deferred stock-based compensation for the three and six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004 (in millions):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004
Balance at beginning of period	$	169		$	211		$	153		$	262
Acquisitions		15			1			71			1
Amortization		(36	)		(36	)		(76	)		(87	)
Canceled unvested options		—			(14	)		—			(14	)
Balance at end of period	$	148		$	162		$	148		$	162

The Company’s methodology for allocating the purchase price for purchase acquisitions to in-process research and development (“in-process R&D”) is determined through established valuation techniques in the high-technology communications equipment industry. In-process R&D is expensed upon acquisition because technological feasibility has not been established and no future alternative uses exist. Total in-process R&D expense was $2 million and $14 million for the three and six months ended January 29, 2005, respectively. Total in-process R&D was $1 million for the three and six months ended January 24, 2004.

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the operating results of each business from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of these acquisitions were not material to the Company’s results.

Purchased Intangible Assets

The following table presents details of the purchased intangible assets acquired during the six months ended January 29, 2005 (in millions, except years):

	TECHNOLOGY			CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS			OTHER
Acquisition	Estimated Useful Life (in years)	Amount		Estimated Useful Life (in years)	Amount		Estimated Useful Life (in years)	Amount		Total
Actona Technologies, Inc.	4.5	$	21	—	$	—	—	$	—	$	21
dynamicsoft, Inc.	4.0		17	2.5		6	2.0		2		25
Jahi Networks Inc.	4.0		3	—		—	—		—		3
NetSolve, Incorporated	3.5		24	5.5		7	—		—		31
Parc Technologies Limited	5.5		6	—		—	—		—		6
P-Cube Inc.	4.5		39	2.5		17	—		—		56
Perfigo, Inc.	4.0		14	2.5		6	—		—		20
Procket Networks, Inc.	7.5		22	2.5		3	1.0		1		26
Total		$	146		$	39		$	3	$	188

10

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables present details of the Company’s total purchased intangible assets as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004 (in millions):

January 29, 2005	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Technology	$	773	$	(516	)	$	257
Customer relationships		127		(34	)		93
Trade names		90		(52	)		38
Other		134		(126	)		8
Total	$	1,124	$	(728	)	$	396
July 31, 2004	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Technology	$	627	$	(452	)	$	175
Technology licenses		252		(239	)		13
Customer relationships		88		(20	)		68
Trade names		90		(43	)		47
Other		131		(109	)		22
Total	$	1,188	$	(863	)	$	325

The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets as of January 29, 2005 is as follows (in millions):

Fiscal Year	Amount
2005 (remaining six months)	$	103
2006		130
2007		84
2008		51
2009		18
Thereafter		10
Total	$	396

Goodwill

The following table presents the changes in goodwill allocated to the Company’s reportable segments during the six months ended January 29, 2005 (in millions):

	Balance at July 31, 2004		Acquired		Balance at January 29, 2005
Americas	$	2,716	$	254	$	2,970
EMEA		678		130		808
Asia Pacific		171		50		221
Japan		633		42		675
Total	$	4,198	$	476	$	4,674

11

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Acquisition of BCN Systems, Inc.

BCN Systems, Inc. (“BCN”) was a provider of networking software design. It was acquired by the Company in December 2004, and the Company expects this acquisition to contribute to the continued evolution of the Company’s routing platforms and support ongoing efforts to speed the delivery of next-generation data, voice, and video services over a converged network. The acquisition of BCN was completed for an aggregate purchase value of approximately $45 million, which may be increased by approximately $122 million depending upon the achievement of certain development and product milestones, and will be recorded as compensation expense. During the three months ended January 29, 2005, the Company recorded $3 million of compensation expense. Prior to the acquisition, the Company had consolidated BCN because the Company was the primary beneficiary as defined by FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46(R)”).

Acquisition of Andiamo Systems, Inc.

In April 2001, the Company entered into a commitment to provide convertible debt funding of approximately $84 million to Andiamo Systems, Inc. (“Andiamo”), a privately held storage switch developer. This debt was convertible into approximately 44% of the equity of Andiamo. In connection with this investment, the Company obtained a call option that provided the Company the right to purchase Andiamo. The purchase price under the call option was based on a valuation of Andiamo using a negotiated formula. On August 19, 2002, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Andiamo, which represented the exercise of its rights under the call option. The Company also entered into a commitment to provide nonconvertible debt funding to Andiamo of approximately $100 million through the close of the acquisition. Substantially all of the convertible debt funding of $84 million and nonconvertible debt funding of $100 million has been expensed as research and development costs.

The Company adopted FIN 46(R) effective January 24, 2004. The Company evaluated its debt investment in Andiamo and determined that Andiamo was a variable interest entity under FIN 46(R). The Company concluded that the Company was the primary beneficiary as defined by FIN 46(R) and, therefore, accounted for Andiamo as if the Company had consolidated Andiamo since the Company’s initial investment in April 2001. The consolidation of Andiamo from the date of the Company’s initial investment required accounting for the call option as a repurchase right. Under FASB Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation,” and related interpretations, variable accounting was required for substantially all Andiamo employee stock and options because the ending purchase price was primarily derived from a revenue-based formula.

Effective January 24, 2004, the last day of the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company recorded a noncash cumulative stock compensation charge of $567 million, net of tax (representing the amount of variable compensation from April 2001 through January 2004). This charge was reported as a separate line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax. The charge was based on the value of the Andiamo employee stock and options and their vesting from the adoption of FIN 46(R) pursuant to the formula-based valuation.

On February 19, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of Andiamo, exchanging approximately 23 million shares of the Company’s common stock for Andiamo shares not owned by the Company and assuming approximately 6 million stock options, for a total estimated value of $750 million, primarily derived from the revenue-based formula, which after stock price related adjustments resulted in a total amount recorded of $722 million, as summarized in the table below.

Subsequent to the adoption of FIN 46(R), changes to the value of Andiamo and the continued vesting of the employee stock and options resulted in an adjustment to the noncash stock compensation charge. The Company

12

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

recorded a noncash variable stock compensation adjustment of $58 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to the cumulative stock compensation charge recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 to account for the additional vesting of the Andiamo employee stock and options and changes in the formula-based valuation from January 24, 2004 until February 19, 2004. This noncash adjustment was reported as operating expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, as amortization of deferred stock-based compensation in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and as an increase to additional paid-in capital in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity. In addition, upon completion of the acquisition, deferred stock-based compensation of $90 million was recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets to reflect the unvested portion of the formula-based valuation of the Andiamo employee stock and options. The amount of deferred stock-based compensation was fixed at the date of acquisition and will be amortized over the remaining vesting period of Andiamo employee stock and options of approximately two years.

A summary of the accounting of the initial consolidation under FIN 46(R) and the subsequent purchase of Andiamo, after stock price related adjustments, is as follows (in millions):

	Amount
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax benefit of $5	$	567
Variable stock-based compensation		58
Deferred stock-based compensation		90
Net assets		7
Total	$	722

13

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

4. RESTRUCTURING COSTS AND OTHER SPECIAL CHARGES

On April 16, 2001, the Company announced a restructuring program, which included a worldwide workforce reduction, consolidation of excess facilities, and restructuring of certain business functions. The liability for restructuring costs is recorded in other accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes the activity related to the liability for restructuring costs and other special charges as of January 29, 2005 (in millions):

	Workforce Reduction			Consolidation of Excess Facilities and Other Charges			Impairment of Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets			Total
Initial charge in the third quarter of fiscal 2001	$	397		$	484		$	289		$	1,170
Non-cash charges		(71	)		(141	)		(289	)		(501	)
Cash payments		(265	)		(18	)		—			(283	)
Balance at July 28, 2001		61			325			—			386
Adjustments		(35	)		128			—			93
Cash payments		(26	)		(131	)		—			(157	)
Balance at July 27, 2002		—			322			—			322
Adjustments		—			45			—			45
Cash payments		—			(72	)		—			(72	)
Balance at July 26, 2003		—			295			—			295
Cash payments		—			(230	)		—			(230	)
Balance at July 31, 2004		—			65			—			65
Cash payments		—			(15	)		—			(15	)
Balance at January 29, 2005	$	—		$	50		$	—		$	50

14

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

5. BALANCE SHEET DETAILS

The following tables provide details of selected balance sheet items (in millions):

	January 29, 2005			July 31, 2004
Inventories:
Raw materials	$	68		$	58
Work in process		415			416
Finished goods:
Distributor inventory and deferred cost of sales		379			316
Manufacturing finished goods		175			206
Total finished goods		554			522
Service-related spares		188			177
Demonstration systems		30			34
Total	$	1,255		$	1,207
Property and equipment, net:
Land, buildings, and leasehold improvements	$	3,494		$	3,429
Computer equipment and related software		1,216			1,120
Production, engineering, and other equipment		2,852			2,643
Operating lease assets		111			94
Furniture and fixtures		360			356
		8,033			7,642
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(4,731	)		(4,352	)
Total	$	3,302		$	3,290
Other assets:
Deferred tax assets	$	1,039		$	1,130
Investments in privately held companies		403			354
Income tax receivable		690			690
Lease receivables, net		272			231
Other		318			435
Total	$	2,722		$	2,840
Deferred revenue:
Service	$	3,097		$	3,047
Product		1,550			1,455
Total	$	4,647		$	4,502
Reported as:
Current	$	3,657		$	3,527
Noncurrent		990			975
Total	$	4,647		$	4,502

15

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

6. LEASE RECEIVABLES, NET

Lease receivables represent sales-type and direct-financing leases resulting from the sale of the Company’s and complementary third-party products and services. These lease arrangements typically have terms from two to three years and are generally collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets. The current portion of lease receivables, net, is recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and the noncurrent portion is recorded in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net lease receivables are summarized as follows as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004 (in millions):

	January 29, 2005			July 31, 2004
Gross lease receivables	$	657		$	616
Unearned income and other allowances		(159	)		(170	)
Total	$	498		$	446
Reported as:
Current	$	226		$	215
Noncurrent		272			231
Total	$	498		$	446

Contractual maturities of the gross lease receivables at January 29, 2005 were as follows (in millions):

Fiscal Year	Amount
2005 (remaining six months)	$	153
2006		238
2007		152
2008		81
2009		28
Thereafter		5
Total	$	657

Actual cash collections may differ from the contractual maturities due to early customer buyouts, refinancings, or customer defaults.

16

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

7. INVESTMENTS

The following tables summarize the Company’s investments (in millions):

January 29, 2005	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Fixed income securities:
U.S. government notes and bonds	$	3,960	$	2	$	(26	)	$	3,936
Corporate notes, bonds, and asset-backed securities		8,414		9		(36	)		8,387
Municipal notes and bonds		699		—		(1	)		698
Total fixed income securities		13,073		11		(63	)		13,021
Publicly traded equity securities		611		422		(2	)		1,031
Total	$	13,684	$	433	$	(65	)	$	14,052
Reported as:
Short-term investments								$	3,291
Investments									10,761
Total								$	14,052
July 31, 2004	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Fixed income securities:
U.S. government notes and bonds	$	4,408	$	9	$	(20	)	$	4,397
Corporate notes, bonds, and asset-backed securities		9,333		14		(42	)		9,305
Municipal notes and bonds		710		—		(1	)		709
Total fixed income securities		14,451		23		(63	)		14,411
Publicly traded equity securities		755		387		(8	)		1,134
Total	$	15,206	$	410	$	(71	)	$	15,545
Reported as:
Short-term investments								$	4,947
Investments									10,598
Total								$	15,545

The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of the Company’s fixed income securities at January 29, 2005 (in millions):

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Less than one year	$	3,296	$	3,291
Due in 1 to 2 years		3,757		3,734
Due in 2 to 5 years		5,045		5,020
Due after 5 years		975		976
Total	$	13,073	$	13,021

17

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Actual maturities may differ from the contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to call or prepay certain obligations.

The following table summarizes the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and total investments (in millions):

	January 29, 2005		July 31, 2004
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,473	$	3,722
Fixed income securities		13,021		14,411
Publicly traded equity securities		1,031		1,134
Total	$	16,525	$	19,267

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

The Company leases office space in several U.S. locations, as well as locations elsewhere in the Americas; Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”); Asia Pacific; and Japan. Future annual minimum lease payments under all noncancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year as of January 29, 2005 were as follows (in millions):

Fiscal Year	Amount
2005 (remaining six months)	$	124
2006		205
2007		153
2008		113
2009		91
Thereafter		668
Total	$	1,354

Purchase Commitments with Contract Manufacturers and Suppliers

The Company purchases components from a variety of suppliers and uses several contract manufacturers to provide manufacturing services for its products. During the normal course of business, in order to manage manufacturing lead times and help assure adequate component supply, the Company enters into agreements with contract manufacturers and suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria as defined by the Company or that establish the parameters defining the Company’s requirements. In certain instances, these agreements allow the Company the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust the Company’s requirements based on its business needs prior to firm orders being placed. Consequently, only a portion of the Company’s reported purchase commitments arising from these agreements are firm, noncancelable, and unconditional commitments. As of January 29, 2005, the Company had total purchase commitments for inventory of approximately $953 million, compared with $951 million as of July 31, 2004.

In addition to the above, the Company records a liability for firm, noncancelable, and unconditional purchase commitments for quantities in excess of its future demand forecasts consistent with the Company’s allowance for inventory. As of January 29, 2005, the liability for these firm, noncancelable, and unconditional purchase commitments was $102 million, compared with $141 million as of July 31, 2004, and was included in other accrued liabilities.

18

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Other Commitments

The Company has entered into an agreement to invest approximately $800 million in venture funds managed by SOFTBANK Corp. and its affiliates (“SOFTBANK”) that are required to be funded on demand. The total commitment is to be invested in venture funds and as senior debt with entities as directed by SOFTBANK. The Company’s commitment to fund senior debt is contingent upon the achievement of certain agreed-upon milestones. As of January 29, 2005, the Company had invested $385 million in venture funds pursuant to the commitment, compared with $290 million as of July 31, 2004. In addition, as of January 29, 2005, the Company had invested $49 million in senior debt pursuant to the commitment, of which $34 million and $19 million has been repaid as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively.

The Company provides structured financing to certain qualified customers for the purchase of equipment and other needs through its wholly owned subsidiaries. These loan commitments may be funded over a two- to three-year period, provided that these customers achieve specific business milestones and satisfy certain financial covenants. As of January 29, 2005, the outstanding loan commitments were approximately $39 million, of which approximately $25 million was eligible for draw-down. As of July 31, 2004, the outstanding loan commitments were approximately $61 million, of which approximately $22 million was eligible for draw-down.

As of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, the Company had a commitment of approximately $59 million to purchase the remaining minority interest of Cisco Systems, K.K. (Japan).

The Company also has certain other funding commitments related to its privately held investments that are based on the achievement of certain agreed-upon milestones. The funding commitments were approximately $57 million as of January 29, 2005, compared with approximately $67 million as of July 31, 2004.

Variable Interest Entities

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has investments in privately held companies and provides structured financing to certain customers through its wholly owned subsidiaries, which may be considered to be variable interest entities. The Company has evaluated its investments in privately held companies and structured financings and determined that there were no significant unconsolidated variable interest entities as of January 29, 2005.

As of January 29, 2005, the Company had invested $15 million in Vihana, Inc., a developer of custom ASIC chips. The Company has consolidated Vihana, Inc. because the Company was the primary beneficiary as defined by FIN 46(R). During the first six months ended January 29, 2005, the Company recorded approximately $7 million of compensation expense and the remaining amount of compensation expense that may be recorded in future periods, depending on the achievement of certain milestones, was $23 million.

Guarantees and Product Warranties

FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”), requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must disclose and recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee.

The requirements of FIN 45 are applicable to the Company’s product warranty liability and certain guarantees. The Company’s guarantees issued subject to the recognition and disclosure requirements of FIN 45 as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004 were not material. As of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, the Company’s product warranty liability recorded in other accrued liabilities was $250 million and $239 million, respectively. The

19

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

following table summarizes the activity related to the product warranty liability for the six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004 (in millions):

	Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004
Balance at beginning of period	$	239		$	246
Provision for warranties issued		208			158
Payments		(197	)		(162	)
Balance at end of period	$	250		$	242

The Company accrues for warranty costs as part of its cost of sales based on associated material product costs, technical support labor costs, and associated overhead. The products sold are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to five years, and for some products, the Company provides a limited lifetime warranty.

In the normal course of business to facilitate sales of its products, the Company indemnifies other parties, including customers, lessors, and parties to other transactions with the Company, with respect to certain matters. The Company has agreed to hold the other parties harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations or covenants, or out of intellectual property infringement or other claims made against certain parties. These agreements may limit the time within which an indemnification claim can be made and the amount of the claim. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors, and the Company’s bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations to the Company’s agents.

It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the Company under these agreements have not had a material impact on the Company’s operating results, financial position, or cash flows.

Derivative Instruments

The Company uses derivative instruments to manage exposures to foreign currency, interest rate and equity securities price risk. The Company’s objective in holding derivatives is to minimize the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency, interest rates and equity securities prices. The Company’s derivatives expose the Company to credit risk to the extent that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreement. The Company seeks to minimize such risk by limiting its counterparties to major financial institutions. In addition, the potential risk of loss with any one counterparty resulting from this type of credit risk is monitored. Management does not expect material losses as a result of default by counterparties.

Foreign Currency Derivatives

The Company conducts business on a global basis in several currencies. As such, it is exposed to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain foreign currency receivables, investments, and payables. The gains and losses on the foreign exchange forward contracts offset the transaction gains and losses on certain foreign currency receivables, investments, and payables recognized in earnings.

The Company does not enter into foreign exchange forward contracts for trading purposes. Gains and losses on the contracts are included in other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and offset foreign

20

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

exchange gains or losses from the revaluation of intercompany balances or other current assets, investments, and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the reporting entity. The Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts related to current assets and liabilities generally range from one to three months in original maturity. Additionally, the Company has entered into foreign exchange forward contracts with maturities of up to two years related to long-term customer financings. The foreign exchange contracts related to investments generally have maturities of less than one year.

The Company periodically hedges certain foreign currency forecasted transactions related to certain operating expenses with currency options. These transactions are designated as cash flow hedges. The effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged exposure affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in earnings immediately. These currency option contracts generally have maturities of less than 18 months. The Company does not purchase currency options for trading purposes. Foreign exchange forward and option contracts as of January 29, 2005 are summarized as follows (in millions):

	Notional Amount		Fair Value
Forward contracts:
Purchased	$	1,168	$	(2	)
Sold	$	436	$	(6	)
Option contracts:
Purchased	$	575	$	17
Sold	$	687	$	(2	)

Interest Rate Derivatives

The Company’s primary objective for holding fixed income and debt securities is to maximize its investment return while preserving principal and managing risk. To realize these objectives, the Company may utilize interest rate swaps or other derivatives designated as fair value or cash flow hedges. As of January 29, 2005, the Company had entered into $1 billion of interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges. Under the interest rate swap contracts, the Company makes fixed rate interest payments and receives interest payments based on the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The effect of these swaps is to convert fixed-rate returns to LIBOR-based returns on a portion of the Company’s fixed income portfolio. The gains and losses related to changes in the value of the interest rate swaps are included in other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and offset the changes in fair value of the underlying hedged investment. As of January 29, 2005, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was not material.

Equity Derivatives

The Company maintains a portfolio of publicly traded equity securities which are subject to market price risk. The Company may hold equity securities for strategic purposes or to provide diversification for the Company’s overall investment portfolio. In order to manage its exposure to changes in the value of certain equity securities, the Company may, from time to time, enter into equity derivative contracts. As of January 29, 2005, the Company had entered into forward sale agreements on certain publicly traded equity securities designated as fair value hedges. The gains and losses due to changes in the value of the hedging instruments are included in other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and offset the change in the fair value of the underlying hedged investment. As of January 29, 2005 the notional and fair value amounts of the derivatives were $121.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively.

21

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Legal Proceedings

Beginning on April 20, 2001, a number of purported shareholder class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Cisco and certain of its officers and directors. The lawsuits have been consolidated, and the consolidated action is purportedly brought on behalf of those who purchased the Company’s publicly traded securities between August 10, 1999 and February 6, 2001. Plaintiffs allege that defendants have made false and misleading statements, purport to assert claims for violations of the federal securities laws, and seek unspecified compensatory damages and other relief. Cisco believes the claims are without merit and intends to defend the actions vigorously.

In addition, beginning on April 23, 2001, a number of purported shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and in the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. There is a procedure in place for the coordination of such actions (one of which has been dismissed and is currently on appeal). Two purported derivative suits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and those federal court actions have been consolidated. The consolidated federal court derivative action was dismissed by the court, and plaintiffs have appealed from that decision. The complaints in the various derivative actions include claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, mismanagement, unjust enrichment, and violations of the California Corporations Code; seek compensatory and other damages, disgorgement, and other relief; and are based on essentially the same allegations as the class actions.

With respect to the above-described shareholder litigation, Cisco believes there is no legal basis for liability. However, due to the uncertainty surrounding the litigation process, Cisco is unable to reasonably estimate a range of loss, if any, at this time.

On February 16, 2005, the Company was advised that a purported shareholder derivative lawsuit had been filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, against various officers and directors of the Company and naming the Company as a nominal defendant. The lawsuit includes claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, constructive trust and violations of the California Corporations Code, is based upon allegations of wrongdoing in connection with option grants and compensation to officers and directors, the timing of option grants, and the Company’s share repurchase plan, and seeks unspecified compensation and other damages, rescission of options and other relief.

In addition, the Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, the Company does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Stock Repurchase Program

In September 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program. As of January 29, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $35 billion of common stock under this program. During the first six months of fiscal 2005, the Company repurchased and retired 296 million shares of Cisco common stock at an average price of $19.27 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $5.7 billion. As of January 29, 2005, the Company had repurchased and retired 1.3 billion shares of Cisco common stock at an average price of $18.07 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $22.6 billion since inception of the stock repurchase program, and the remaining authorized amount for stock repurchases under this program was $12.4 billion with no termination date.

The purchase price for the shares of the Company’s common stock repurchased was reflected as a reduction to shareholders’ equity. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 6, “Status of Accounting

22

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Research Bulletins,” the Company is required to allocate the purchase price of the repurchased shares as a reduction to retained earnings and common stock and additional paid-in capital.

Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004
Net income	$	1,400		$	724	$	2,796		$	1,810
Other comprehensive income:
Change in unrealized gains and losses on investments, net of tax		(142	)		18		(19	)		(10	)
Other		28			44		90			88
Other comprehensive income before minority interest		1,286			786		2,867			1,888
Minority interest		116			—		78			—
Total	$	1,402		$	786	$	2,945		$	1,888

The Company consolidates its investment in a venture fund managed by SOFTBANK. During the six months ended January 29, 2005, SOFTBANK’s aggregate minority share of the venture fund decreased by $78 million, from $84 million as of July 31, 2004 to $6 million as of January 29, 2005, as a result of a noncash distribution of the venture fund assets to its partners.

10. EMPLOYEE STOCK BENEFIT PLANS

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which includes its sub plan, the International Employee Stock Purchase Plan (together the “Purchase Plan”), under which 321.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock have been reserved for issuance. Eligible employees may purchase a limited number of shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount of up to 15% of the market value at certain plan-defined dates. The Purchase Plan terminates on January 3, 2010. During the three months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, 9.9 million and 13.1 million shares were issued under the Purchase Plan, respectively. At January 29, 2005, 128.7 million shares were available for issuance under the Purchase Plan.

Employee Stock Option Plans

Stock Option Program Description

The Company has two plans under which it grants options: the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1996 Plan”) and the 1997 Supplemental Stock Incentive Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”).

Stock option grants are designed to reward employees for their long-term contributions to the Company and provide incentives for them to remain with the Company. The number and frequency of stock option grants are based on competitive practices, operating results of the Company, and government regulations. Since the inception of the 1996 Plan, the Company has granted options to virtually all employees, and the majority has been granted to employees below the vice president level. Officers and members of the Company’s Board of Directors are not eligible to participate in the Supplemental Plan.

23

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Distribution and Dilutive Effect of Options

The following table illustrates the grant dilution and exercise dilution (in millions, except percentages):

	Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004
Shares of common stock outstanding	6,481		6,882
Granted and assumed	201		161
Canceled	(31	)	(26	)
Net options granted	170		135
Grant dilution (1)	2.6	%	2.0	%
Exercised	32		59
Exercise dilution (2)	0.5	%	0.9	%

Note 1: The percentage for grant dilution is computed based on net options granted as a percentage of shares of common stock outstanding.

Note 2: The percentage for exercise dilution is computed based on options exercised as a percentage of shares of common stock outstanding.

Basic and diluted shares outstanding for the six months ended January 29, 2005 were 6.6 billion shares and 6.7 billion shares, respectively. Diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive impact of in-the-money options, which is calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the tax-effected proceeds that would be hypothetically received from the exercise of all in-the-money options are assumed to be used to repurchase shares. During the six months ended January 29, 2005, the dilutive impact of in-the-money employee stock options was approximately 135 million shares or 2.1% of the basic shares outstanding based on Cisco’s average share price of $19.12.

The following table summarizes the options granted to the Named Executive Officers during the periods indicated. The Named Executive Officers represent the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly paid executive officers whose salary and bonus for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 and July 26, 2003, respectively, were in excess of $100,000 (in millions, except percentages):

	Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004
Options granted to the Named Executive Officers	3.9		2
Options granted to the Named Executive Officers as a % of net options granted	2.3	%	1.5	%
Options granted to the Named Executive Officers as a % of outstanding shares	0.06	%	0.03	%
Cumulative options held by Named Executive Officers as % of total options outstanding	3.8	%	4.3	%

24

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

General Option Information

A summary of option activity follows (in millions, except per-share amounts). The Company has, in connection with the acquisitions of various companies, assumed the stock option plans of the acquired companies or issued replacement options.

	Options Available for Grant		Options Outstanding
			Number Outstanding		Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share
Balance at July 26, 2003	526		1,303		$	25.29
Granted and assumed	(195	)	195			20.00
Exercised	—		(96	)		10.03
Canceled	52		(52	)		32.33
Additional shares reserved	7		—			—
Balance at July 31, 2004	390		1,350		$	25.34
Granted and assumed	(201	)	201			18.90
Exercised	—		(32	)		8.40
Canceled	31		(31	)		31.08
Additional shares reserved	8		—			—
Balance at January 29, 2005	228		1,488		$	24.71

The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of January 29, 2005 (in millions, except years and per-share amounts):

Range of Exercise Prices	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
	Number Outstanding	Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)	Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Number Exercisable	Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
$  0.01–  9.75	193	3.46	$	7.12	$	2,081	145	$	6.52	$	1,650
9.76–13.04	151	4.70		12.52		812	101		12.33		563
13.05–16.15	173	5.75		15.61		396	102		15.67		227
16.16–18.57	102	5.85		18.16		17	60		18.21		11
18.58–19.18	166	8.47		19.15		—	3		18.74		—
19.19–19.59	151	7.60		19.56		—	38		19.59		—
19.60–26.42	185	5.39		23.13		—	116		24.05		—
26.43–50.38	179	4.43		43.30		—	153		42.89		—
50.39–72.56	188	4.18		57.42		—	180		57.35		—
Total	1,488	5.44	$	24.71	$	3,306	898	$	28.24	$	2,451

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pretax intrinsic value, based on Cisco’s closing stock price of $17.90 as of January 28, 2005, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. The total number of in-the-money options exercisable as of January 29, 2005 was 362 million. As of July 31, 2004, 823 million outstanding options were exercisable, and the weighted average exercise price was $28.09.

25

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the option exercises for the six months ended January 29, 2005, and option values as of that date for the Named Executive Officers (in millions):

	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise	Value Realized		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at January 29, 2005		Intrinsic Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at January 29, 2005
				Exercisable	Unexercisable	Exercisable		Unexercisable
Named Executive Officers	3	$	38	42	14	$	155	$	16

Pro Forma Information

Pro forma information regarding option grants made to the Company’s employees and directors and common stock relating to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is based on specified valuation techniques that produce estimated compensation charges. The following table reflects the pro forma information (in millions, except per-share amounts):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004
Net income — as reported	$	1,400		$	724		$	2,796		$	1,810
Compensation expense, net of tax		(257	)		(312	)		(533	)		(639	)
Net income — pro forma	$	1,143		$	412		$	2,263		$	1,171
Basic net income per share — as reported	$	0.21		$	0.11		$	0.43		$	0.26
Diluted net income per share — as reported	$	0.21		$	0.10		$	0.42		$	0.25
Basic net income per share — pro forma	$	0.18		$	0.06		$	0.34		$	0.17
Diluted net income per share — pro forma	$	0.17		$	0.06		$	0.34		$	0.16

The value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004
Expected dividend	0.0	%	0.0	%	0.0	%	0.0	%
Risk-free interest rate	3.6	%	3.6	%	3.5	%	3.9	%
Expected volatility	39.7	%	40.1	%	39.6	%	40.1	%
Expected life (in years)	3.3		5.4		3.3		5.6

The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility and expected life. The Company is responsible for determining the assumptions for the expected volatility and expected life of its stock options used in estimating the fair value of those options. The Company uses third-party analysis to assist in developing the expected volatility and expected life of its stock options. The expected life and expected volatility of the stock options is based upon historical and other economic data trended into the future. The Company uses an option

26

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

pricing model to indirectly estimate the expected life of the stock options. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion, the existing valuation models do not provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Company’s employee stock options. Under the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the weighted-average estimated values of employee stock options granted during the three and six months ended January 29, 2005 were $6.26 and $6.19, respectively, and for the three and six months ended January 24, 2004 were $10.02 and $8.61 respectively.

11. INCOME TAXES

The Company paid net income taxes of $617 million and $490 million for the six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, respectively. The Company’s income taxes currently payable for federal and state purposes have been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock option transactions. These benefits totaled $126 million and $328 million for the six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, respectively, and were reflected as an increase to additional paid-in capital in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity.

The Company’s federal income tax returns for fiscal years ended July 25, 1998 through July 28, 2001 are under examination, and the Internal Revenue Service has proposed certain adjustments. The Company believes that adequate amounts have been reserved for any adjustments that may ultimately result from these examinations.

On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “ Jobs Creation Act”) was signed into law. The Jobs Creation Act creates a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate accumulated income earned abroad by providing an 85 percent dividends received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations. The deduction is subject to a number of limitations and, as of today, uncertainty remains as to how to interpret numerous provisions of the Jobs Creation Act. Based on the Company’s analysis of the Jobs Creation Act, although not yet finalized, it is reasonably possible that under the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Creation Act the Company may repatriate some amount of earnings between $0 and $1.5 billion, with the respective tax liability between $0 and $150 million. The Company expects to be in a position to finalize its assessment by July 30, 2005.

12. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS

The Company’s operations involve the design, development, manufacturing, marketing, and technical support of networking and communications products and services. Cisco products include routers, switches, Advanced Technologies, and other networking equipment. These products, primarily integrated by Cisco IOS^® Software, link geographically dispersed LANs and WANs.

The Company conducts business globally and is managed geographically. The Company’s management makes financial decisions and allocates resources based on the information it receives from its internal management system.

Sales are attributed to a geographic theater based on the ordering location of the customer. The Company does not allocate research and development, sales and marketing, or general and administrative expenses to its geographic theaters in this internal management system, because management does not currently use the information to measure the performance of the operating segments. Based on established criteria, the Company has four reportable segments: the Americas, EMEA, Asia Pacific, and Japan.

27

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Summarized financial information by theater for the three and six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, as taken from the internal management system, is as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004
Net sales:
Americas	$	3,314	$	2,953	$	6,711	$	5,827
EMEA		1,701		1,525		3,317		2,901
Asia Pacific		623		546		1,189		1,057
Japan		424		374		816		714
Total	$	6,062	$	5,398	$	12,033	$	10,499
Gross margin:
Americas	$	2,168	$	1,992	$	4,412	$	3,937
EMEA		1,184		1,057		2,302		2,015
Asia Pacific		420		371		805		727
Japan		281		278		549		525
Total	$	4,053	$	3,698	$	8,068	$	7,204

The Americas theater included non-U.S. net sales of $304 million and $279 million for the three months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, respectively. The Americas theater included non-U.S. net sales of $571 million and $493 million for the six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, respectively.

The following table presents net sales for groups of similar products and services (in millions):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004
Net sales:
Routers	$	1,329	$	1,426	$	2,580	$	2,700
Switches		2,424		2,094		5,023		4,155
Advanced Technologies		1,153		817		2,118		1,543
Other		200		213		418		415
Product		5,106		4,550		10,139		8,813
Service		956		848		1,894		1,686
Total	$	6,062	$	5,398	$	12,033	$	10,499

The Company refers to some of its products and technologies as Advanced Technologies. The Company has currently identified six Advanced Technologies for particular focus: home networking, IP telephony, optical networking, security, storage area networking, and wireless technology. The Company may identify additional Advanced Technologies for focus and investment in the future, and the Company’s investments in some previously identified Advanced Technologies may be curtailed or eliminated depending on market developments. The Company reclassified net sales for switches and Advanced Technology products in fiscal 2004 to conform to the current period’s presentation related to a refinement in the reporting of certain rebate programs for these products.

28

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The majority of the Company’s assets as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004 were attributable to its U.S. operations. For the three and six months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, no single customer accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s net sales.

Property and equipment information is based on the physical location of the assets. The following table presents property and equipment information for geographic areas (in millions):

	January 29, 2005		July 31, 2004
Property and equipment, net:
United States	$	2,932	$	2,919
International		370		371
Total	$	3,302	$	3,290

13. NET INCOME PER SHARE

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share (in millions, except per-share amounts):

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004			January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	1,400	$	1,291		$	2,796	$	2,377
Cumulative effect of accounting change		—		(567	)		—		(567	)
Net income	$	1,400	$	724		$	2,796	$	1,810
Weighted-average shares — basic		6,521		6,874			6,577		6,904
Effect of dilutive potential common shares		131		236			136		206
Weighted-average shares — diluted		6,652		7,110			6,713		7,110
Income per share before cumulative effect of accounting change:
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.19		$	0.43	$	0.34
Diluted	$	0.21	$	0.18		$	0.42	$	0.33
Per share amount of cumulative effect of accounting change:
Basic	$	—	$	0.08		$	—	$	0.08
Diluted	$	—	$	0.08		$	—	$	0.08
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.21	$	0.11		$	0.43	$	0.26
Diluted	$	0.21	$	0.10		$	0.42	$	0.25

Dilutive potential common shares consist primarily of employee stock options and restricted common stock. Employee stock options to purchase approximately 859 million and 468 million shares for the three months ended January 29, 2005 and January 24, 2004, respectively, and 838 million shares and 511 million shares in the first

29

Cisco Systems, Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

six months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the stock options was greater than the average share price of the common shares, and, therefore, the effect would have been antidilutive.

14. PENDING BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

As of January 29, 2005, the Company announced definitive agreements to acquire Airespace, Inc. and Protego Networks, Inc. for a purchase price of approximately $450 million and $65 million, respectively. The acquisition of Protego Networks, Inc. closed in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and the acquisition of Airespace, Inc. is pending regulatory review.

30

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “continues,” “may,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses (including the potential growth of Advanced Technologies), and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those identified below, under “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere herein. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Overview

Our results for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2005 reflected increases in net sales, net income, and net income per share from the corresponding period of fiscal 2004. Revenue increased in each of our geographic segments. During the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2005, sales of our switches increased by 16% and 21%, respectively. For the three and six month periods, we experienced increased sales of our Advanced Technologies products of 41% and 37%, respectively, reflecting an increase in sales of each of our six Advanced Technologies product categories. Our router revenue decreased by 7% and 4%, respectively, for the same periods. However, our router revenue increased by 6% relative to the first quarter of fiscal 2005. Our gross margins declined from the second quarter and the first six months of last fiscal year largely because of a change in the mix of our product sales. This was primarily due to higher sales of certain lower margin switching products and home networking products and gross margin was also affected by a decline in our service margins related to our continued investment in this portion of our business. Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales have continued to decline year over year. We have continued to encounter price-focused competition, including competitors from Asia, and in particular, China.

During the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2005, we generated cash flows from operations of $1.8 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively. Our cash and cash equivalents and total investments were $16.5 billion at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2005, compared with $19.3 billion at July 31, 2004. We used $2.7 billion of cash to repurchase 140 million shares of our common stock during the quarter. For the first six months of fiscal 2005, we used $5.7 billion of cash to repurchase 296 million shares of our common stock. Regarding accounts receivable, days sales outstanding at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2005 were 34 days, compared with 28 days at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. Our inventory level increased by $48 million from our prior fiscal year end, July 31, 2004, and annualized inventory turns improved to 6.5, compared with 6.4 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Note 2 to the Consolidated

31

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The accounting policies described below are significantly affected by critical accounting estimates. Such accounting policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements, and actual results could differ materially from the amounts reported based on these policies.

Revenue Recognition

Our networking and communications products are integrated with software that is essential to the functionality of the equipment. We provide unspecified software upgrades and enhancements related to the equipment through our maintenance contracts. Accordingly, we account for revenue in accordance with Statement of Position No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” and all related interpretations. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In instances where final acceptance of the product, system, or solution is specified by the customer, revenue is deferred until all acceptance criteria have been met.

Our total deferred revenue for products was $1.55 billion and $1.45 billion as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively. Service revenue is generally deferred and, in most cases, recognized ratably over the period during which the services are to be performed, which is typically from one to three years. Our total deferred revenue for services was $3.1 billion and $3.0 billion as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively.

Contracts, Internet commerce agreements, and customer purchase orders are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. We assess collectibility based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit checks and analysis, as well as the customer’s payment history.

When a sale involves multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair value and recognized when revenue recognition criteria for each element are met. The amount of product and service revenue recognized is impacted by our judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value exists. Changes to the elements in an arrangement and our ability to establish vendor-specific objective evidence for those elements could affect the timing of the revenue recognition.

We make sales to distributors and retail partners and recognize revenue based on a sell-through method using information provided by them. Our distributors and retail partners participate in various cooperative marketing and other programs, and we maintain estimated accruals and allowances for these programs. If actual credits received by our distributors and retail partners for these programs were to deviate significantly from our estimates, which are based on historical experience, our revenue could be adversely affected.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales Returns

Our accounts receivable balance, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, was $2.3 billion and $1.8 billion as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $176 million, or 7.2% of the gross accounts receivable balance, as of January 29, 2005 and $179 million, or 8.9% of the gross accounts receivable balance, as of July 31, 2004. The allowance is based on our assessment of the collectibility of

32

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

customer accounts. We regularly review the allowance by considering factors such as historical experience, credit quality, age of the accounts receivable balances, and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay.

There was no provision for doubtful accounts for the first six months of fiscal 2005. Our provision for doubtful accounts was $19 million for the first six months of fiscal 2004. If a major customer’s creditworthiness deteriorates, or if actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, or if other circumstances arise, our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to us could be overstated, and additional allowances could be required, which could have an adverse impact on our revenue.

A reserve for future sales returns is established based on historical trends in product return rates. The reserve for future sales returns as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004 was $88 million and $74 million, respectively, and was recorded as a reduction of our accounts receivable. If actual future returns were to deviate from the historical data on which the reserve had been established, our revenue could be adversely affected.

Allowance for Inventory

Our inventory balance was $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively. Our inventory allowance was $135 million and $139 million as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively. We provide allowances for inventory based on excess and obsolete inventories determined primarily by future demand forecasts. The allowance is measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and market based upon assumptions about future demand and is charged to the provision for inventory, which is a component of our cost of sales. At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.

Our provision for inventory was $111 million and $72 million for the first six months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. If there were to be a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products, or if there were a higher incidence of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements, we could be required to increase our inventory allowances, and our gross margin could be adversely affected. Inventory management remains an area of focus as we balance the need to maintain strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive lead times and the risk of inventory obsolescence.

Warranty Costs

The liability for product warranties, included in other accrued liabilities, was $250 million as of January 29, 2005, compared with $239 million as of July 31, 2004. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our products are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to five years, and for some products we provide a limited lifetime warranty. We accrue for warranty costs as part of our cost of sales based on associated material costs, technical support labor costs, and associated overhead. Material cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends in the volume of product returns within the warranty period and the cost to repair or replace the equipment. Technical support labor cost is estimated based primarily upon historical trends in the rate of customer cases and the cost to support the customer cases within the warranty period. Overhead cost is applied based on estimated time to support warranty activities.

The provision for product warranties issued for the first six months of fiscal 2005 and 2004 was $208 million and $158 million, respectively. The increase in the provision for product warranties was due to higher shipment volume of our products and an increase in warranty claims. If we continue to experience an increase in warranty claims compared with our historical experience, or if the cost of servicing warranty claims is greater than the expectations on which the accrual has been based, our gross margin could be adversely affected.

33

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Investment Impairments

Our publicly traded equity securities are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at a fair value of $1.0 billion as of January 29, 2005, compared with $1.1 billion as of July 31, 2004. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We recognize an impairment charge when the declines in the fair values of our publicly traded equity securities below their cost basis are judged to be other-than-temporary. The ultimate value realized on these equity securities is subject to market price volatility until they are sold. We consider various factors in determining whether we should recognize an impairment charge, including the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than our cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Our ongoing consideration of these factors could result in additional impairment charges in the future, which could adversely affect our net income. Our impairment charges on investments in publicly held companies were $5 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and the first six months of fiscal 2005. There were no impairment charges on investments in publicly held companies in fiscal 2004.

We also have investments in privately held companies, some of which are in the startup or development stages. As of January 29, 2005, our investments in privately held companies were $403 million, compared with $354 million as of July 31, 2004, and were included in other assets. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We monitor these investments for impairment and make appropriate reductions in carrying values if we determine an impairment charge is required, based primarily on the financial condition and near-term prospects of these companies. These investments are inherently risky because the markets for the technologies or products these companies are developing are typically in the early stages and may never materialize. Our impairment charges on investments in privately held companies were $5 million and $44 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively, and were $23 million and $85 million for the first six months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Goodwill Impairments

Our methodology for allocating the purchase price relating to purchase acquisitions is determined through established valuation techniques in the high-technology communications equipment industry. Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed. We perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances for each reporting unit. The goodwill recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004 was $4.7 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively. In response to changes in industry and market conditions, we could be required to strategically realign our resources and consider restructuring, disposing of, or otherwise exiting businesses, which could result in an impairment of goodwill. We recorded no charges for impairment of goodwill during fiscal 2005 or fiscal 2004.

Income Taxes

We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We establish reserves for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes and interest will be due. These reserves are established when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable, we believe that certain positions are likely to be challenged and may not be sustained on review by tax authorities. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax audit. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and changes to reserves that are considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest.

34

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our effective tax rates differ from the statutory rate primarily due to acquisition-related costs, research and experimentation tax credits, state taxes, and the tax impact of foreign operations. The effective tax rate was 28.5% in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and 28.6% for the first six months of fiscal 2005. The effective tax rate was 28.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 and 28.7% for the first six months of fiscal 2004. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, or by changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. In addition, we are subject to the continuous examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.

Loss Contingencies

We are subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. We consider the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.

Net Sales

We manage our business based on four geographic theaters: the Americas; Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”); Asia Pacific; and Japan. Net sales, which include product and service revenue, for each theater are summarized in the following table (in millions, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			Variance in Dollars		Variance in Percent		January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			Variance in Dollars		Variance in Percent
Net sales:
Americas	$	3,314		$	2,953		$	361	12.2	%	$	6,711		$	5,827		$	884	15.2	%
Percentage of net sales		54.7	%		54.7	%						55.8	%		55.5	%
EMEA		1,701			1,525			176	11.5	%		3,317			2,901			416	14.3	%
Percentage of net sales		28.0	%		28.3	%						27.5	%		27.6	%
Asia Pacific		623			546			77	14.1	%		1,189			1,057			132	12.5	%
Percentage of net sales		10.3	%		10.1	%						9.9	%		10.1	%
Japan		424			374			50	13.4	%		816			714			102	14.3	%
Percentage of net sales		7.0	%		6.9	%						6.8	%		6.8	%
Total	$	6,062		$	5,398		$	664	12.3	%	$	12,033		$	10,499		$	1,534	14.6	%

The following table is a breakdown of net sales between product and service revenue (in millions, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		Variance in Dollars		Variance in Percent		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		Variance in Dollars		Variance in Percent
Net sales:
Product	$	5,106	$	4,550	$	556	12.2	%	$	10,139	$	8,813	$	1,326	15.0	%
Service		956		848		108	12.7	%		1,894		1,686		208	12.3	%
Total	$	6,062	$	5,398	$	664	12.3	%	$	12,033	$	10,499	$	1,534	14.6	%

35

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The increase in net product sales was due to the impact of the continued gradual recovery in the global economic environment coupled with increased information technology-related capital spending in our enterprise, service provider, commercial, and consumer markets. The increase in service revenue was primarily due to increased technical support service contract initiations and renewals associated with higher product sales that have resulted in a larger installed base of equipment being serviced.

Net Product Sales by Theater

The following table is a breakdown of net product sales by theater (in millions, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			Variance in Dollars		Variance in Percent		January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			Variance in Dollars		Variance in Percent
Net product sales:
Americas	$	2,621		$	2,322		$	299	12.9	%	$	5,325		$	4,574		$	751	16.4	%
Percentage of net product sales		51.4	%		51.0	%						52.5	%		51.9	%
EMEA		1,534			1,377			157	11.4	%		2,987			2,608			379	14.5	%
Percentage of net product sales		30.0	%		30.3	%						29.5	%		29.6	%
Asia Pacific		564			502			62	12.4	%		1,076			968			108	11.2	%
Percentage of net product sales		11.0	%		11.0	%						10.6	%		11.0	%
Japan		387			349			38	10.9	%		751			663			88	13.3	%
Percentage of net product sales		7.6	%		7.7	%						7.4	%		7.5	%
Total	$	5,106		$	4,550		$	556	12.2	%	$	10,139		$	8,813		$	1,326	15.0	%

The increase in net product sales occurred across all geographic theaters with the Americas and EMEA theaters contributing 82.0% and 85.2% of the total increase in the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2005, compared with the same periods in fiscal 2004, respectively.

Net product sales in the Americas theater consist of net product sales in the United States and Americas International, which includes Canada, Mexico, and Latin America. The increase in net product sales in the Americas theater was due to an increase in net product sales to all of our customer markets in the United States. Sales increased in all elements of our enterprise market except for sales to the United States federal government, where we experienced weakness in sales due to, we believe, a realignment of spending priorities as funds are being refocused toward geopolitical and Middle East issues.

Net product sales in the EMEA theater increased primarily as a result of continued product deployment by service providers and growth in enterprise markets. The increase in net product sales in the EMEA theater occurred primarily in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Russia.

36

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Net Product Sales by Groups of Similar Products

The following table presents net sales for groups of similar products (in millions, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended											Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			Variance in Dollars			Variance in Percent		January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			Variance in Dollars			Variance in Percent
Net product sales:
Routers	$	1,329		$	1,426		$	(97	)	(6.8	)%	$	2,580		$	2,700		$	(120	)	(4.4	)%
Percentage of net product sales		26.0	%		31.3	%							25.4	%		30.6	%
Switches		2,424			2,094			330		15.8	%		5,023			4,155			868		20.9	%
Percentage of net product sales		47.5	%		46.0	%							49.6	%		47.2	%
Advanced Technologies		1,153			817			336		41.1	%		2,118			1,543			575		37.3	%
Percentage of net product sales		22.6	%		18.0	%							20.9	%		17.5	%
Other		200			213			(13	)	(6.1	)%		418			415			3		0.7	%
Percentage of net product sales		3.9	%		4.7	%							4.1	%		4.7	%
Total	$	5,106		$	4,550		$	556		12.2	%	$	10,139		$	8,813		$	1,326		15.0	%

Routers

The decrease in net product sales related to routers in the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2005 was primarily due to lower sales of high-end routers. Sales of high-end routers, which represent a larger proportion of our total router sales than midrange and low-end routers, decreased by approximately $110 million and $120 million for the second quarter and the first six month periods, respectively. On a sequential basis relative to the first quarter of fiscal 2005, our router sales increased by approximately $80 million primarily due to sales of high-end routers which increased by approximately $50 million as a result of higher sales to service providers. Our high-end router sales are primarily to service providers who tend to make large and sporadic purchases. In addition, our router sales in fiscal 2005 may have been affected by new product introductions and increased competition from price-focused competitors.

Switches

The increase in net product sales related to switches in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 was due to sales of LAN fixed switches, which increased by approximately $230 million, and LAN modular switches, which increased by approximately $110 million. The increase in net product sales related to switches in the first six months of fiscal 2005 was due to sales of LAN fixed switches, which increased by approximately $440 million, and LAN modular switches, which also increased by approximately $440 million. The increase in sales of LAN switches was a result of the continued adoption of new technologies by our customers, resulting in higher sales of our high-end modular switch, the Cisco Catalyst 6500, and fixed switches, including the Cisco Catalyst 3750 and Catalyst 3560 platforms, introduced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and second quarter of fiscal 2004, respectively.

Advanced Technologies

During the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2005, we experienced higher sales in all of our Advanced Technologies, compared to the corresponding periods in fiscal 2004. The increase in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 was due to sales of security products, which increased by approximately $80 million; home networking products, which increased by approximately $70 million; IP telephony products, which increased by

37

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

approximately $70 million; wireless LAN products, which increased by approximately $50 million; optical products, which increased by approximately $40 million; and storage products, which increased by approximately $30 million. The increase in net product sales related to Advanced Technologies in the first six months of fiscal 2005 was due to sales of home networking products, which increased by approximately $150 million; security products, which increased by approximately $130 million; wireless LAN products, which increased by approximately $90 million; IP telephony products, which increased by approximately $90 million; and storage products and optical products, which each increased by approximately $60 million. Increased sales in security products were primarily due to module and line-card sales related to our routers and LAN modular switches as customers continue to emphasize network security. Higher sales of home networking products were related to the growth of our wireless and wired router businesses. The increase in sales of IP telephony products was primarily due to sales of IP phones and associated software as our customers transition from an analog to IP-based infrastructure. Wireless LAN and storage product sales increased primarily due to new customers and continued deployments with existing customers. Increased sales in optical products were due to sales of the Cisco ONS 15454E platform.

Factors That May Impact Net Product Sales

Net product sales may continue to be affected by changes in the geopolitical environment and global economic conditions; competition, including price-focused competitors from Asia, especially China; new product introductions; sales cycles and implementation cycles of our products; changes in the mix of our customers between service provider and enterprise markets; changes in the mix of direct sales and indirect sales; variations in sales channels; and final acceptance criteria of the product, system, or solution as specified by the customer. In addition, sales to the service provider market have been characterized by large and often sporadic purchases, especially relating to our router sales and sales of certain of our Advanced Technologies. In addition, service provider customers typically have longer implementation cycles, require a broader range of services, including design services, and often have acceptance provisions, which can lead to a delay in revenue recognition. To improve customer satisfaction, we continue to focus on managing our manufacturing lead-time performance, which may result in corresponding reductions in order backlog. A decline in backlog levels could result in more variability and less predictability in our quarter-to-quarter net sales and operating results. Net product sales may also be adversely affected by fluctuations in demand for our products, especially with respect to Internet businesses and telecommunications service providers, price and product competition in the communications and networking industries, introduction and market acceptance of new technologies and products, adoption of new networking standards, and financial difficulties experienced by our customers. We may, from time to time, experience manufacturing issues that create a delay in our suppliers’ ability to provide specific components, resulting in delayed shipments. To the extent that manufacturing issues and any related component shortages result in delayed shipments in the future, and particularly in periods when we and our suppliers are operating at higher levels of capacity, it is possible that revenue for a quarter could be adversely affected if such matters are not remediated within the same quarter.

Our distributors and retail partners participate in various cooperative marketing and other programs. In addition, increasing sales to our distributors and retail partners generally results in greater difficulty in forecasting the mix of our products and, to a certain degree, the timing of orders from our customers. We recognize revenue to our distributors and retail partners based on a sell-through method using information provided by them, and we maintain estimated accruals and allowances for all cooperative marketing and other programs.

Net Service Revenue

The increase in net service revenue in the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2005, compared with fiscal 2004 was primarily due to increased technical support service contract initiations and renewals associated with higher product sales that have resulted in a larger installed base of equipment being serviced. Net

38

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

service revenue is generally deferred and, in most cases, recognized ratably over the service period, which is typically one to three years.

Gross Margin

The following table shows the gross margin for each theater (in millions, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
	Amount				Percentage				Amount				Percentage
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004
Gross margin:
Americas	$	2,168	$	1,992	65.4	%	67.5	%	$	4,412	$	3,937	65.7	%	67.6	%
EMEA		1,184		1,057	69.6	%	69.3	%		2,302		2,015	69.4	%	69.5	%
Asia Pacific		420		371	67.4	%	67.9	%		805		727	67.7	%	68.8	%
Japan		281		278	66.3	%	74.3	%		549		525	67.3	%	73.5	%
Total	$	4,053	$	3,698	66.9	%	68.5	%	$	8,068	$	7,204	67.0	%	68.6	%

The following table shows the gross margin for products and services (in millions, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
	Amount				Percentage				Amount				Percentage
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004
Gross margin:
Product	$	3,437	$	3,125	67.3	%	68.7	%	$	6,824	$	6,072	67.3	%	68.9	%
Service		616		573	64.4	%	67.6	%		1,244		1,132	65.7	%	67.1	%
Total	$	4,053	$	3,698	66.9	%	68.5	%	$	8,068	$	7,204	67.0	%	68.6	%

Product Gross Margin

Product gross margin in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 decreased by 1.4%, compared with the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Changes in the mix of products sold decreased product gross margin by approximately 3% primarily due to higher sales of certain lower margin switching products and increased sales of home networking products. Product pricing reductions and sales discounts decreased product gross margin by approximately 1%. However, lower overall manufacturing costs related to lower component costs and value engineering and other manufacturing costs increased product gross margin by approximately 1.5%. Value engineering is the process by which the production costs are reduced through component redesign, board configuration, test processes, and transformation processes. Higher shipment volumes also increased product gross margin by approximately 1%.

Product gross margin for the first six months of fiscal 2005 decreased by 1.6%, compared with the first six months of fiscal 2004. Changes in the mix of products sold decreased product gross margin by approximately 3% primarily due to higher sales of certain lower margin switching products and increased sales of home networking products. Product pricing reductions and sales discounts decreased product gross margin by approximately 1%. In addition, a higher provision for warranty decreased product gross margin by approximately 1% and a higher provision for inventory decreased product gross margin by approximately 0.5%. However, lower overall manufacturing costs increased product gross margin by approximately 2%. Higher shipment volumes also increased product gross margin by less than 2%.

Product gross margin may continue to be adversely affected in the future by: changes in the mix of products sold, including further periods of increased growth of some of our lower-margin products; introduction of new products, including products with price-performance advantages; our ability to reduce production costs; entry into new markets, including markets with different pricing and cost structures; changes in distribution channels;

39

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

price competition, including competitors from Asia and especially China; changes in geographic mix; sales discounts; increases in material or labor costs; excess inventory and obsolescence charges; warranty costs; changes in shipment volume; loss of cost savings due to changes in component pricing; impact of value engineering; inventory holding charges; and how well we execute on our strategy and operating plans.

Service Gross Margin

Service gross margin decreased by 3.2% and 1.4% during the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2005, compared with the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2004, respectively. The decrease in service gross margin was primarily due to increased investments in this portion of our business during fiscal 2005. One specific area of investment is advanced services, comprising highly specialized employees. As we add personnel and resources to support growth in this business, our service margins will typically be adversely affected in the near term. We have also added investments in our technical support business.

Our service gross margin from technical support services is higher than service gross margin from our advanced services. Service gross margin will typically experience some variability over time due to various factors such as the change in mix between technical support services and advanced services, as well as the timing of technical support service contract initiations and renewals and the timing of our adding personnel and resources to support this business. Our revenue from advanced services may increase to a higher proportion of total service revenue due to our continued focus on providing comprehensive support to our customers’ networking devices, applications, and infrastructures.

Research and Development, Sales and Marketing, and General and Administrative Expenses

Research and development (“R&D”), sales and marketing, and general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses are summarized in the following table (in millions, except percentages):

	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			Variance in Dollars		Variance in Percent		January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			Variance in Dollars		Variance in Percent
Research and development	$	811		$	770		$	41	5.3	%	$	1,616		$	1,525		$	91	6.0	%
Percentage of net sales		13.4	%		14.3	%						13.4	%		14.5	%
Sales and marketing		1,142			1,110			32	2.9	%		2,262			2,197			65	3.0	%
Percentage of net sales		18.8	%		20.6	%						18.8	%		20.9	%
General and administrative		228			210			18	8.6	%		458			422			36	8.5	%
Percentage of net sales		3.8	%		3.9	%						3.8	%		4.0	%
Total	$	2,181		$	2,090		$	91	4.4	%	$	4,336		$	4,144		$	192	4.6	%
Percentage of net sales		36.0	%		38.7	%						36.0	%		39.5	%

The majority of the increase in this category was related to R&D and sales and marketing expenses as follows:

R&D expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 increased primarily due to higher headcount-related expenses of $14 million and higher amortization of deferred stock-based compensation expense of $19 million. R&D expenses in the first six months of fiscal 2005 increased primarily due to higher discretionary spending of approximately $40 million, higher headcount-related expenses of $31 million, and higher amortization of deferred stock-based compensation expense of $16 million. The increase in R&D expenses reflects our continued investment in R&D efforts in routers, switches, Advanced Technologies, and other product technologies. We have also continued to purchase or license technology in order to bring a broad range of products to market in a timely fashion. If we believe that we are unable to enter a particular market in a timely manner with internally developed products, we may license technology from other businesses or acquire businesses as an alternative to internal R&D. All of our R&D costs have been expensed as incurred.

40

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Sales and marketing expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 increased due to an increase in sales expenses of $10 million and marketing expenses of $22 million. Sales expenses increased primarily due to the effect of foreign currency fluctuations of approximately $30 million, net of hedging, partially offset by a decrease in headcount-related expenses of $15 million and lower amortization of deferred stock-based compensation of $8 million. The $15 million decrease in headcount-related expense was primarily due to an adjustment in sales commissions of approximately $30 million. Marketing expenses increased primarily due to various marketing programs globally and other marketing investments. Sales and marketing expenses in the first six months of fiscal 2005 increased due to increase in sales expenses of $35 million and marketing expenses of $30 million. Sales expenses increased primarily due to the effect of foreign currency fluctuations of approximately $55 million, net of hedging, an increase in headcount-related expenses of approximately $20 million (including an adjustment of approximately $40 million which reduced sales commissions) partially offset by a decrease in sales program expenses of approximately $30 million. Marketing expenses increased primarily due to various marketing programs globally and other marketing investments.

We have continued to increase our headcount during the quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2005. We expect to incur higher R&D and sales expenses due to additional headcount in connection with our hiring plans and acquisitions scheduled to close. Our headcount increased by 876 employees during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and 1,591 employees during the first six months of fiscal 2005. Approximately 350 and 700 of the additional employees were attributable to our acquisitions completed in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2005, respectively.

Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets

Amortization of purchased intangible assets included in operating expenses was $57 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, compared with $60 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Amortization of purchased intangible assets included in operating expenses was $117 million in the first six months of fiscal 2005, compared with $122 million in the first six months of fiscal 2004. For additional information regarding purchased intangibles, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In-Process Research and Development

Our methodology for allocating the purchase price relating to purchase acquisitions to in-process R&D is determined through established valuation techniques in the high-technology communications equipment industry. In-process R&D expense in the first six months of fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 was $14 million and $1 million, respectively. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the acquisitions completed in the first six months of fiscal 2005 and the in-process R&D recorded for each acquisition. In-process R&D was expensed upon acquisition because technological feasibility had not been established and no future alternative uses existed.

The fair value of the existing purchased technology and patents, as well as the technology under development, is determined using the income approach, which discounts expected future cash flows to present value. The discount rates used in the present value calculations are typically derived from a weighted-average cost of capital analysis and venture capital surveys, adjusted upward to reflect additional risks inherent in the development lifecycle. We consider the pricing model for products related to these acquisitions to be standard within the high-technology communications equipment industry. However, we do not expect to achieve a material amount of expense reductions as a result of integrating the acquired in-process technology. Therefore, the valuation assumptions do not include significant anticipated cost savings.

For purchase acquisitions completed to date, the development of these technologies remains a significant risk due to the remaining efforts to achieve technical viability, rapidly changing customer markets, uncertain standards for

41

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

new products, and significant competitive threats from several companies. The nature of the efforts to develop these technologies into commercially viable products consists primarily of planning, designing, experimenting, and testing activities necessary to determine that the technologies can meet market expectations, including functionality and technical requirements. Failure to bring these products to market in a timely manner could result in a loss of market share or a lost opportunity to capitalize on emerging markets and could have a material adverse impact on our business and operating results.

Interest and Other Income, Net

Interest and other income, net were as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended							Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		Variance in dollars			January 29, 2005		January 24, 2004		Variance in dollars
Interest income	$	127	$	124	$	3		$	257	$	261	$	(4	)
Other income, net		17		136		(119	)		57		137		(80	)
Total	$	144	$	260	$	(116	)	$	314	$	398	$	(84	)

The components of other income, net, are as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004			January 29, 2005			January 24, 2004
Net gains on investments in fixed income and publicly traded equity securities	$	22		$	151		$	80		$	191
Impairment charges on publicly traded equity securities		(5	)		—			(5	)		—
Net gains on investments in privately held companies		18			15			22			15
Impairment charges on investments in privately held companies		(5	)		(44	)		(23	)		(85	)
Net gains and impairment charges on investments		30			122			74			121
Other		(13	)		14			(17	)		16
Total	$	17		$	136		$	57		$	137

Provision for Income Taxes

The effective tax rate was 28.5% for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and 28.6% for the first six months of fiscal 2005. The effective tax rate was 28.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 and 28.7% for the first six months of fiscal 2004. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to acquisition-related costs, research and experimentation tax credits, state taxes, and the tax impact of foreign operations.

Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. In addition, we are subject to the continuous examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.

42

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Creation Act”) was signed into law. The Jobs Creation Act creates a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate accumulated income earned abroad by providing an 85 percent dividends received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations. The deduction is subject to a number of limitations and, as of today, uncertainty remains as to how to interpret numerous provisions of the Jobs Creation Act. Based on our analysis of the Jobs Creation Act, although not yet finalized, it is reasonably possible that under the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Creation Act, we may repatriate some amount of earnings between $0 and $1.5 billion, with the respective tax liability between $0 and $150 million. We expect to be in a position to finalize our assessment by July 30, 2005.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based payments. SFAS 123R is effective for all interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 123(R) on our operating results and financial condition. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for pro forma information required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following sections discuss the effects of changes in our balance sheet and cash flows, contractual obligations, other commitments, and the stock repurchase program on our liquidity and capital resources.

Balance Sheet and Cash Flows

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Total Investments

The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and total investments (in millions):

	January 29, 2005		July 31, 2004		Increase (Decrease)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,473	$	3,722	$	(1,249	)
Fixed income securities		13,021		14,411		(1,390	)
Publicly traded equity securities		1,031		1,134		(103	)
Total	$	16,525	$	19,267	$	(2,742	)

For the six months ended January 29, 2005, the decrease in cash and cash equivalents and total investments was primarily a result of cash used for the repurchase of common stock of $5.7 billion, acquisitions of businesses of $553 million, and capital expenditures of $290 million, partially offset by cash provided by operating activities of $3.2 billion and cash provided by the issuance of common stock of $433 million related to employee stock option exercises and employee stock purchases.

We expect that cash provided by operating activities may fluctuate in future periods as a result of a number of factors, including fluctuations in our operating results, shipment linearity, accounts receivable collections, inventory management, and the timing of tax and other payments. Shipment linearity is a measure of the level of shipments throughout a particular quarter. For additional discussion, see the following section entitled “Risk Factors.”

43

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Accounts Receivable, Net

The following table summarizes our accounts receivable, net (in millions):

	January 29, 2005		July 31, 2004		Increase (Decrease)
Accounts receivable, net	$	2,278	$	1,825	$	453

Days sales outstanding (“DSO”) in accounts receivables as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004 were 34 days and 28 days, respectively. The increase in DSO was due to more billings occurring later in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, primarily due to typical seasonality of renewals of a large number of calendar year-end technical support service contracts that occurred in January 2005.

Our accounts receivable and DSO are primarily impacted by shipment linearity and collections performance. A steady level of shipments and good collections performance will result in reduced DSO compared with a higher level of shipments toward the end of a quarter, which will result in a shorter amount of time to collect the related accounts receivable and increased DSO.

Inventories

The following table summarizes our inventories (in millions):

	January 29, 2005		July 31, 2004		Increase (Decrease)
Raw materials	$	68	$	58	$	10
Work in process		415		416		(1	)
Finished goods:
Distributor inventory and deferred cost of sales		379		316		63
Manufacturing finished goods		175		206		(31	)
Total finished goods		554		522		32
Service-related spares		188		177		11
Demonstration systems		30		34		(4	)
Total	$	1,255	$	1,207	$	48

Annualized inventory turns were 6.5 in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, compared with 6.4 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. Distributor inventory and deferred cost of sales are related to unrecognized revenue on shipments to distributors and retail partners and shipments to enterprise and service provider customers. Manufacturing finished goods consist primarily of build-to-order and build-to-stock products, including home networking products. Service-related spares consist of reusable equipment related to our technical support and warranty activities. All inventories are accounted for at the lower of cost or market.

Inventory management remains an area of focus as we balance the need to maintain strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive lead times against the risk of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements. We may continue to see these higher levels of inventories in the short-term due to the expansion of our product lines and continued need for higher inventory levels of certain high-demand products in order to manage customer lead times.

44

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Deferred Revenue

The breakdown of deferred revenue at January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004 was as follows (in millions):

	January 29, 2005		July 31, 2004		Increase (Decrease)
Deferred revenue:
Service	$	3,097	$	3,047	$	50
Product		1,550		1,455		95
Total	$	4,647	$	4,502	$	145
Reported as:
Current	$	3,657	$	3,527	$	130
Noncurrent		990		975		15
Total	$	4,647	$	4,502	$	145

The increase in deferred service revenue for the six months ended January 29, 2005 reflects a seasonal increase in the volume of technical support contract initiations and renewals, partially offset by the ongoing amortization of deferred service revenue. For the three months ended January 29, 2005, deferred service revenue increased by $212 million due to typical seasonality in renewal of calendar year-end contracts. The increase in deferred product revenue was related to an increase in sales with acceptance criteria as specified by the customer, and the timing of cash collections from our distributors and retail partners.

Contractual Obligations

Operating Leases

We lease office space in several U.S. locations, as well as locations elsewhere in the Americas, EMEA, Asia Pacific, and Japan, and the future minimum lease payments under all our noncancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year as of January 29, 2005 was $1.4 billion. For additional information see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Purchase Commitments with Contract Manufacturers and Suppliers

We purchase components from a variety of suppliers and use several contract manufacturers to provide manufacturing services for our products. During the normal course of business, in order to manage manufacturing lead times and to help assure adequate component supply, we enter into agreements with contract manufacturers and suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria as defined by us or that establish the parameters defining our requirements. In certain instances, these agreements allow us the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust our requirements based on our business needs prior to firm orders being placed. Consequently, only a portion of our reported purchase commitments arising from these agreements are firm, noncancelable, and unconditional commitments. As of January 29, 2005, we had total purchase commitments for inventory of approximately $953 million, compared with $951 million as of July 31, 2004. The purchase commitments for inventory are expected to be fulfilled within one year.

In addition to the above, we record a liability for firm, noncancelable, and unconditional purchase commitments for quantities in excess of our future demand forecasts consistent with our allowance for inventory. As of January 29, 2005, the liability for our firm, noncancelable, and unconditional purchase commitments was $102 million, compared with $141 million as of July 31, 2004. These amounts are included in other accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

45

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Other Commitments

We have entered into an agreement to invest approximately $800 million in venture funds managed by SOFTBANK, which are required to be funded on demand. The total commitment is to be invested in venture funds and senior debt with entities as directed by SOFTBANK. Our commitment to fund the senior debt is contingent upon the achievement of certain agreed-upon milestones. As of January 29, 2005, we have invested $385 million in the venture funds, compared with $290 million as of July 31, 2004. In addition, as of January 29, 2005, we had invested $49 million in the senior debt, of which $34 million and $19 million has been repaid as of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, respectively.

We provide structured financing to certain qualified customers for the purchase of equipment and other needs through our wholly owned subsidiaries. These loan commitments may be funded over a two- to three-year period, provided that these customers achieve specific business milestones and satisfy certain financial covenants. As of January 29, 2005, our outstanding loan commitments were approximately $39 million, of which approximately $25 million was eligible for draw-down. As of July 31, 2004, our outstanding loan commitments were approximately $61 million, of which approximately $22 million was eligible for draw-down.

As of January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004, we had a commitment of approximately $59 million to purchase the remaining portion of the minority interest of Cisco Systems, K.K. (Japan), and the payment under this commitment is based on a put option held by the minority shareholders.

We also have certain other funding commitments related to our privately held investments that are based on the achievement of certain agreed-upon milestones. The funding commitments were approximately $57 million as of January 29, 2005, compared with approximately $67 million as of July 31, 2004.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We consider our investments in unconsolidated variable interest entities to be off-balance sheet arrangements. In the ordinary course of business, we have investments in privately held companies and provide structured financing to certain customers through our wholly owned subsidiaries, which may be considered to be variable interest entities. We have evaluated our investments in these privately held companies and structured financings and have determined that there were no significant unconsolidated variable interest entities as of January 29, 2005.

Certain events can require a reassessment of our investments in privately held companies or structured financings to determine if they are variable interest entities and if we would be regarded as the primary beneficiary. As a result of such events, we may be required to make additional disclosures or consolidate these entities. As we may not control these entities, we may not have the ability to influence these events.

Stock Repurchase Program

In September 2001, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program. As of January 29, 2005, our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $35 billion of common stock under this program. During the first six months of fiscal 2005, we repurchased and retired 296 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $19.27 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $5.7 billion. As of January 29, 2005, we had repurchased and retired 1.3 billion shares of our common stock at an average price of $18.07 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $22.6 billion since inception of the stock repurchase program, and the remaining authorized amount under the stock repurchase program was $12.4 billion with no termination date.

The purchase price for the shares of our common stock repurchased was reflected as a reduction to shareholders’ equity. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 6, “Status of Accounting Research

46

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Bulletins,” we are required to allocate the purchase price of the repurchased shares as a reduction to retained earnings and common stock and additional paid-in capital. Issuance of common stock and the tax benefit related to employee stock option plans are recorded as an increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. As a result of future repurchases, we may be required to report an accumulated deficit included in shareholders’ equity in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements

Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash generated from operations will satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures, investment requirements, stock repurchases, contractual obligations, commitments (see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), future customer financings, and other liquidity requirements associated with our operations through at least the next 12 months. We believe that the most strategic uses of our cash resources include repurchase of shares, strategic investments to gain access to new technologies, acquisitions, financing activities, and working capital. There are no transactions, arrangements, and other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons that are reasonably likely to materially affect liquidity or the availability of our requirements for capital resources.

47

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

Set forth below and elsewhere in this report and in other documents we file with the SEC are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE IN FUTURE PERIODS, WHICH MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR STOCK PRICE

Our operating results have been in the past, and will continue to be, subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations as a result of numerous factors. These factors include:

• Fluctuations in demand for our products and services, especially with respect to Internet businesses and telecommunications service providers, in part due to the changing global economic environment

• Changes in sales and implementation cycles for our products and reduced visibility into our customers’ spending plans and associated revenue

• Our ability to maintain appropriate inventory levels and purchase commitments

• Price and product competition in the communications and networking industries, which can change rapidly due to technological innovation

• The overall movement toward industry consolidation among both our competitors and our customers

• The introduction and market acceptance of new technologies and products and our success in new markets, including Advanced Technologies, as well as the adoption of new networking standards

• Variations in sales channels, product costs, or mix of products sold

• The timing, size, and mix of orders from customers

• Manufacturing lead times

• Fluctuations in our gross margins, and the factors that contribute to this as described below

• Our ability to achieve targeted cost reductions

• The ability of our customers, channel partners, and suppliers to obtain financing or to fund capital expenditures

• The timing and amount of employer payroll tax to be paid on our employees’ gains on stock options exercised

• Actual events, circumstances, outcomes, and amounts differing from judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in determining the values of certain assets (including the amounts of related valuation allowances), liabilities, and other items reflected in our Consolidated Financial Statements

• How well we execute on our strategy and operating plans

• Changes in accounting rules, such as recording expenses for employee stock option grants

As a consequence, operating results for a particular future period are difficult to predict, and, therefore, prior results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods. Any of the foregoing factors, or any other factors discussed elsewhere herein, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition that could adversely affect our stock price.

48

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY UNFAVORABLE ECONOMIC AND MARKET CONDITIONS AND THE UNCERTAIN GEOPOLITICAL ENVIRONMENT

Economic conditions worldwide have contributed to recent slowdowns in the communications and networking industries and may continue to impact our business, resulting in:

• Reduced demand for our products as a result of continued constraints on information technology-related capital spending by our customers, particularly service providers

• Increased price competition for our products, not only from our competitors but also as a consequence of customers disposing of unutilized products

• Risk of excess and obsolete inventories

• Excess facilities and manufacturing capacity

• Higher overhead costs as a percentage of revenue

Recent turmoil in the geopolitical environment in many parts of the world, including terrorist activities and military actions, particularly the continuing tension in and surrounding Iraq, may continue to put pressure on global economic conditions. If the economic and market conditions in the United States and globally do not improve, or if they deteriorate, we may experience material impacts on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

OUR REVENUE FOR A PARTICULAR PERIOD IS DIFFICULT TO PREDICT, AND A SHORTFALL IN REVENUE MAY HARM OUR OPERATING RESULTS

As a result of a variety of factors discussed in this report, our revenue for a particular quarter is difficult to predict. Our net sales may grow at a slower rate than in past periods, or may decline. Our ability to meet financial expectations could also be adversely affected if the nonlinear sales pattern seen in some of our past quarters recurs in future periods. We have experienced periods of time during which shipments have exceeded net bookings, or manufacturing issues have delayed shipments, leading to nonlinearity in shipping patterns. In addition to making it difficult to predict revenue for a particular period, nonlinearity in shipping can increase costs, because irregular shipment patterns result in periods of underutilized capacity and periods in which overtime expenses may be incurred, as well as leading to additional costs arising out of inventory management. In addition, to the extent that manufacturing issues and any related component shortages result in delayed shipments in the future, and particularly in periods in which we and our contract manufacturers are operating at higher levels of capacity, it is possible that revenue for a quarter could be adversely affected if such matters occur and are not remediated within the same quarter.

In addition, to improve customer satisfaction, we continue to attempt to improve our manufacturing lead-time performance, which may result in corresponding reductions in order backlog. A decline in backlog levels could result in more variability and less predictability in our quarter-to-quarter net sales and operating results. Long manufacturing lead times have caused our customers in the past to place the same order multiple times within our various sales channels and to cancel the duplicative orders upon receipt of the product, or to place orders with other vendors with shorter manufacturing lead times. Such multiple ordering (along with other factors) may cause difficulty in predicting our sales and, as a result, could impair our ability to manage parts inventory effectively.

We plan our operating expense levels based primarily on forecasted revenue levels. These expenses and the impact of long-term commitments are relatively fixed in the short term. A shortfall in revenue could lead to

49

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

operating results being below expectations because we may not be able to quickly reduce these fixed expenses in response to short term business changes.

Any of the above factors could have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial results.

WE EXPECT GROSS MARGIN TO VARY OVER TIME, AND OUR RECENT LEVEL OF PRODUCT GROSS MARGIN MAY NOT BE SUSTAINABLE

Our recent level of product gross margins may not be sustainable and may continue to be adversely affected by numerous factors, including:

• Changes in customer, geographic, or product mix, including mix of configurations within each product group

• Introduction of new products, including products with price-performance advantages

• Our ability to reduce production costs

• Entry into new markets, including markets with different pricing and cost structures

• Sales discounts

• Increases in material or labor costs

• Excess inventory and inventory holding charges

• Obsolescence charges

• Changes in shipment volume

• Loss of cost savings due to changes in component pricing or charges incurred due to inventory holding periods if parts ordering does not correctly anticipate product demand

• Lower than expected benefits from value engineering

• Increased price competition, including competitors from Asia, especially China

• Changes in distribution channels

• Increased warranty costs

• How well we execute on our strategy and operating plans

Changes in service gross margin may result from various factors such as changes in the mix between technical support services and advanced services, as well as the timing of technical support service contract initiations and renewals and the addition of personnel and other resources to support higher levels of service business in future periods.

DISRUPTION OF OR CHANGES IN OUR DISTRIBUTION MODEL COULD HARM OUR SALES AND MARGINS

If we fail to manage distribution of our products and services properly, or if our distributors’ financial condition or operations weaken, our revenue and gross margins could be adversely affected.

A substantial portion of our products and services is sold through our channel partners and the remainder is sold through direct sales. Our channel partners include system integrators, service providers, other resellers,

50

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

distributors, and retail partners. System integrators and service providers typically sell directly to end-users and often provide system installation, technical support, professional services, and other support services in addition to network equipment sales. System integrators also typically integrate our products into an overall solution, and a number of service providers are also system integrators. Distributors stock inventory and typically sell to system integrators, service providers, and other resellers. In addition, with the acquisition of the Linksys business, home networking products are generally sold through distributors and retail partners. We refer to sales through distributors and retail partners as our two-tier system of sales to the end customer. Revenue from distributors and retail partners is recognized based on a sell-through method using information provided by them. These distributors and retail partners are generally given business terms that allow them to return a portion of inventory, receive credits for changes in selling prices, and participate in various cooperative marketing programs. If sales through indirect channels increase, this may lead to greater difficulty in forecasting the mix of our products and, to a degree, the timing of orders from our customers.

Historically, we have seen fluctuations in our gross margins based on changes in the balance of our distribution channels. Although variability to date has not been significant, there can be no assurance that changes in the balance of our distribution model in future periods would not have an adverse effect on our gross margins and profitability.

Some factors could result in disruption of or changes in our distribution model, which could harm our sales and margins, including the following:

• We compete with some of our channel partners through our direct sales, which may lead these channel partners to use other suppliers that do not directly sell their own products

• Some of our channel partners may demand that we absorb a greater share of the risks that their customers may ask them to bear

• Some of our channel partners may have insufficient financial resources and may not be able to withstand changes in business conditions

OUR INVENTORY MANAGEMENT RELATING TO OUR SALES TO OUR TWO-TIER DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL IS COMPLEX, AND EXCESS INVENTORY MAY HARM OUR GROSS MARGINS

We must manage our inventory relating to sales to our distributors and retail partners effectively, because inventory held by them could affect our results of operations. Our distributors and retail partners may increase orders during periods of product shortages, cancel orders if their inventory is too high, or delay orders in anticipation of new products. They also may adjust their orders in response to the supply of our products and the products of our competitors that are available to them and in response to seasonal fluctuations in end-user demand. Revenue to our distributors and retail partners is recognized based on a sell-through method using information provided by them, and they are generally given business terms that allow them to return a portion of inventory, receive credits for changes in selling price, and participate in various cooperative marketing programs. In addition, due to the expansion of our product line breadth and our continued need for higher inventory levels of certain subassemblies of high-demand products in order to manage customer lead times, our inventory levels have increased in recent periods. We may continue to see these higher inventories in the shorter term. Inventory management remains an area of focus as we balance the need to maintain strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive lead times against the risk of inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements. If we ultimately determine that we have excess inventory, we may have to reduce our prices and write-down inventory, which in turn could result in lower gross margins.

51

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

SALES TO THE SERVICE PROVIDER MARKET ARE ESPECIALLY VOLATILE, AND CONTINUED WEAKNESS IN SALES ORDERS FROM THIS INDUSTRY MAY HARM OUR OPERATING RESULTS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

Sales to the service provider market have been characterized by large and often sporadic purchases, especially relating to our router sales and sales of certain of our Advanced Technologies, in addition to longer sales cycles. We have experienced significant weakness in sales to service providers as market conditions have changed. Sales activity in this industry depends upon the stage of completion of expanding network infrastructures; the availability of funding; and the extent to which service providers are affected by regulatory, economic, and business conditions in the country of operations. Although some service providers may be increasing capital expenditures over the depressed levels that have prevailed over the last few years, continued weakness in orders from this industry could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. The recent slowdown in the general economy, overcapacity, changes in the service provider market, and constraints on capital availability have had a material adverse effect on many of our service provider customers, with many of these customers going out of business or substantially reducing their expansion plans. These conditions have materially harmed our business and operating results, and we expect that some or all of these conditions may continue for the foreseeable future. Finally, service provider customers typically have longer implementation cycles; require a broader range of service including design services; demand that vendors take on a larger share of risks; often require acceptance provisions, which can lead to a delay in revenue recognition; and expect financing from vendors. All these factors can add further risk to business conducted with service providers.

A SHORTAGE OF ADEQUATE COMPONENT SUPPLY OR MANUFACTURING CAPACITY COULD INCREASE OUR COSTS OR CAUSE A DELAY IN OUR ABILITY TO FULFILL ORDERS, AND OUR FAILURE TO ESTIMATE CUSTOMER DEMAND PROPERLY MAY RESULT IN EXCESS OR OBSOLETE COMPONENT SUPPLY, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR GROSS MARGINS

Our growth and ability to meet customer demands depend in part on our ability to obtain timely deliveries of parts from our suppliers and contract manufacturers. We have experienced component shortages in the past, including shortages caused by manufacturing process issues, that have affected our operations. We may in the future experience a shortage of certain component parts as a result of our own manufacturing issues, manufacturing issues at our suppliers or contract manufacturers, capacity problems experienced by our suppliers or contract manufacturers, or strong demand in the industry for those parts, especially if the economy grows. Growth in the economy is likely to create greater pressures on us and our suppliers to accurately project overall component demand and component demands within specific product categories and to establish optimal component levels. If shortages or delays persist, the price of these components may increase, or the components may not be available at all, and we may also encounter shortages if we do not accurately anticipate our needs. We may not be able to secure enough components at reasonable prices or of acceptable quality to build new products in a timely manner in the quantities or configurations needed. Accordingly, our revenue and gross margins could suffer until other sources can be developed. Our operating results would also be adversely affected if, anticipating greater demand than actually develops, we commit to the purchase of more components than we need. There can be no assurance that we will not encounter these problems in the future. Although in many cases we use standard parts and components for our products, certain components are presently available only from a single source or limited sources. We may not be able to diversify sources in a timely manner, which could harm our ability to deliver products to customers and seriously impact present and future sales.

52

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

We believe that we may be faced with the following challenges in the future:

• New markets in which we participate may grow quickly, which may make it difficult to quickly obtain significant component capacity

• As we acquire companies and new technologies, we may be dependent, at least initially, on unfamiliar supply chains or relatively small supply partners

• We face competition for certain components, which are supply-constrained, from existing competitors and companies in other markets

Manufacturing capacity and component supply constraints could be significant issues for us. We purchase components from a variety of suppliers and use several contract manufacturers to provide manufacturing services for our products. During the normal course of business, in order to improve manufacturing lead time performance and to help assure adequate component supply, we enter into agreements with contract manufacturers and suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria as defined by us or that establish the parameters defining our requirements. In certain instances, these agreements allow us the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust our requirements based on our business needs prior to firm orders being placed. If we fail to anticipate customer demand properly, an oversupply of parts could result in excess or obsolete components that could adversely affect our gross margins. For additional information regarding our purchase commitments, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. A reduction or interruption in supply; a significant increase in the price of one or more components; a failure to adequately authorize procurement of inventory by our contract manufacturers; a failure to appropriately cancel, reschedule, or adjust our requirements based on our business needs; or a decrease in demand for products could materially adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition and could materially damage customer relationships. Furthermore, as a result of binding price or purchase commitments with suppliers, we may be obligated to purchase components at prices that are higher than those available in the current market. In the event that we become committed to purchase components at prices in excess of the current market price when the components are actually used, our gross margins could decrease.

The fact that we do not own the bulk of our manufacturing facilities could have an adverse impact on the supply of our products and on operating results. Financial problems of contract manufacturers on whom we rely, or reservation of manufacturing capacity by other companies, inside or outside of our industry, could either limit supply or increase costs.

THE MARKETS IN WHICH WE COMPETE ARE INTENSELY COMPETITIVE, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR REVENUE GROWTH

We compete in the networking and communications equipment markets, providing products and services for transporting data, voice, and video traffic across intranets, extranets, and the Internet. These markets are characterized by rapid change, converging technologies, and a migration to networking solutions that offer superior advantages. These market factors represent both an opportunity and a competitive threat to us. We compete with numerous vendors in each product category. The overall number of our competitors providing niche product solutions may increase. Also, the identity and composition of competitors may change as we increase our activity in our Advanced Technology markets. As we continue to expand our sales globally, we may see new competition in different geographic regions. In particular, we are seeing price-focused competitors from Asia, especially China, and we anticipate this will continue.

Our competitors include 3Com; Alcatel; Avaya; Avici Systems; Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.; Check Point Software Technologies; Ciena; D-Link Corporation.; Dell; Enterasys Networks; Extreme Networks;

53

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

Force10 Networks, Inc.; Foundry Networks; Fujitsu; Hewlett-Packard Company; Huawei Technologies; Juniper Networks; Lucent Technologies; McDATA Corporation; NETGEAR, Inc.; Nokia; Nortel Networks; Redback Networks; Siemens AG; Sycamore Networks; and Symbol Technologies, Inc., among others.

Some of these companies compete across many of our product lines, whereas others are primarily focused in a specific product area.

Barriers to entry are relatively low, and new ventures to create products that do or could compete with our products are regularly formed. In addition, some of our competitors may have greater resources, including technical and engineering resources, than we do. As we expand into new markets, we will face competition not only from our existing competitors but also from other competitors, including existing companies with strong technological, marketing, and sales positions in those markets. We also sometimes face competition from resellers and distributors of our products.

The principal competitive factors in the markets in which we presently compete and may compete in the future include:

• The ability to provide a broad range of networking products and services

• Product performance

• Price

• The ability to introduce new products, including products with price-performance advantages

• The ability to reduce production costs

• The ability to provide value-added features such as security, reliability, and investment protection

• Conformance to standards

• Market presence

• The ability to provide financing

We also face competition from customers to whom we license or supply technology and suppliers from whom we transfer technology. The inherent nature of networking requires interoperability. As such, we must cooperate and at the same time compete with many companies. Any inability to effectively manage these complicated relationships with customers and suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition and accordingly affect our chances of success.

WE DEPEND UPON THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS AND ENHANCEMENTS TO EXISTING PRODUCTS, AND IF WE FAIL TO PREDICT AND RESPOND TO EMERGING TECHNOLOGICAL TRENDS AND CUSTOMERS’ CHANGING NEEDS, OUR OPERATING RESULTS AND MARKET SHARE MAY SUFFER

The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, new product introductions, and evolving methods of building and operating networks. Our operating results depend on our ability to develop and introduce new products into existing and emerging markets and to reduce the production costs of existing products. We believe that the Internet and the various networks associated with it, including corporate intranets, cable, broadband and dialup networks, and voice and video networks will evolve to include embedded resources and the virtualization of applications and services to produce an integrated, intelligent system, or as we refer to it, an Intelligent Information Network. This is our vision for the evolution of

54

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

networking from connectivity products to intelligent systems. As such, many of our strategic initiatives and investments are aimed at meeting the requirements that an Intelligent Information Network would demand. The process of developing new technology is complex and uncertain, and if we fail to accurately predict customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends, our business could be harmed. We must commit significant resources to developing new products before knowing whether our investments will result in products the market will accept. In particular, if our model of the evolution of networking from connectivity products to intelligent systems does not emerge as we believe it will, many of our strategic initiatives and investments may be of no or limited value. Furthermore, we may not execute successfully on that vision because of errors in product planning or timing, technical hurdles that we fail to overcome in a timely fashion, or a lack of appropriate resources. This could result in competitors providing those solutions before we do and loss of market share, net sales and earnings. The success of new products depends on several factors, including proper new product definition, component costs, timely completion and introduction of these products, differentiation of new products from those of our competitors, and market acceptance of these products. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify new product opportunities, develop and bring new products to market in a timely manner, or achieve market acceptance of our products or that products and technologies developed by others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive. Specifically, the products and technologies that we have identified as “Advanced Technologies” may not prove to have the market success we anticipate, and we may not successfully identify and invest in other advanced technologies.

OUR BUSINESS SUBSTANTIALLY DEPENDS UPON THE CONTINUED GROWTH OF THE INTERNET AND INTERNET-BASED SYSTEMS

A substantial portion of our business and revenue depends on growth of the Internet and on the deployment of our products by customers who depend on the continued growth of the Internet. As a result of the recent economic slowdown and reduction in capital spending, which have particularly affected telecommunications service providers, spending on Internet infrastructure declined, which has materially harmed our business. To the extent that the economic slowdown and reduction in capital spending continue to adversely affect spending on Internet infrastructure, we could continue to experience material harm to our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Because of the rapid introduction of new products and changing customer requirements related to matters such as cost-effectiveness and security, we believe that there could be certain performance problems with Internet communications in the future, which could receive a high degree of publicity and visibility. Because we are a large supplier of networking products, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be materially adversely affected, regardless of whether or not these problems are due to the performance of our own products. Such an event could also result in a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock independent of direct effects on our business.

CHANGES IN INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND MARKET CONDITIONS COULD LEAD TO CHARGES RELATED TO DISCONTINUANCES OF CERTAIN OF OUR PRODUCTS OR BUSINESSES AND ASSET IMPAIRMENTS

In response to changes in industry and market conditions, we may be required to strategically realign our resources and consider restructuring, disposing of, or otherwise exiting businesses. Any decision to limit investment in or dispose of or otherwise exit businesses may result in the recording of special charges, such as inventory and technology-related write-offs, workforce reduction costs, charges relating to consolidation of excess facilities, or claims from third parties who were resellers or users of discontinued products. Our estimates with respect to the useful life or ultimate recoverability of our carrying basis of assets, including purchased

55

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

intangible assets, could change as a result of such assessments and decisions. Further, our estimates relating to the liabilities for excess facilities are affected by changes in real estate market conditions. Additionally, we are required to perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances, and future goodwill impairment tests may result in a charge to earnings.

WE HAVE MADE AND EXPECT TO CONTINUE TO MAKE ACQUISITIONS THAT COULD DISRUPT OUR OPERATIONS AND HARM OUR OPERATING RESULTS

Our growth depends upon market growth, our ability to enhance our existing products, and our ability to introduce new products on a timely basis. We intend to continue to address the need to develop new products and enhance existing products through acquisitions of other companies, product lines, technologies, and personnel. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following:

• Difficulties in integrating the operations, technologies, products, and personnel of the acquired companies

• Diversion of management’s attention from normal daily operations of the business

• Potential difficulties in completing projects associated with in-process research and development

• Difficulties in entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior experience and where competitors in such markets have stronger market positions

• Initial dependence on unfamiliar supply chains or relatively small supply partners

• Insufficient revenue to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions

• The potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies

Acquisitions may also cause us to:

• Issue common stock that would dilute our current shareholders’ percentage ownership

• Assume liabilities

• Record goodwill and nonamortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges

• Incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets

• Incur large and immediate write-offs and restructuring and other related expenses

• Become subject to intellectual property or other litigation

Mergers and acquisitions of high-technology companies are inherently risky, and no assurance can be given that our previous or future acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results, or financial condition. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions could materially harm our business and operating results. Prior acquisitions have resulted in a wide range of outcomes, from successful introduction of new products and technologies to an inability to do so. Even when an acquired company has already developed and marketed products, there can be no assurance that product enhancements will be made in a timely fashion or that preacquisition due diligence will have identified all possible issues that might arise with respect to such products.

From time to time, we have made acquisitions that resulted in in-process research and development expenses being charged in an individual quarter. These charges may occur in any particular quarter, resulting in variability in our quarterly earnings.

56

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

Risks related to new product development also apply to acquisitions. Please see the risk factor above entitled “We depend upon the development of new products and enhancements to existing products, and if we fail to predict and respond to emerging technological trends and customers’ changing needs, our operating results and market share may suffer” for additional information.

ENTRANCE INTO NEW OR DEVELOPING MARKETS EXPOSES US TO ADDITIONAL COMPETITION AND WILL LIKELY INCREASE DEMANDS ON OUR SERVICE AND SUPPORT OPERATIONS

As we focus on new market opportunities—for example, storage; wireless; security; and transporting data, voice, and video traffic across the same network—we will increasingly compete with large telecommunications equipment suppliers as well as startup companies. Several of our competitors may have greater resources, including technical and engineering resources, than we do. Additionally, as customers in these markets complete infrastructure deployments, they may require greater levels of service, support, and financing than we have provided in the past. Demand for these types of service or financing contracts may increase in the future. There can be no assurance that we can provide products, service, support, and financing to effectively compete for these market opportunities. Further, provision of greater levels of services by us may result in a delay in the timing of revenue recognition. In addition, entry into other markets, including our recent entry into the consumer market, has subjected and will subject us to additional risks, particularly to those markets, including the effects of general market conditions and reduced consumer confidence.

PRODUCT QUALITY PROBLEMS COULD LEAD TO REDUCED REVENUE, GROSS MARGINS, AND NET INCOME

We produce highly complex products that incorporate leading-edge technology, including both hardware and software. Software typically contains bugs that can unexpectedly interfere with expected operations. There can be no assurance that our preshipment testing programs will be adequate to detect all defects, either ones in individual products or ones that could affect numerous shipments, which might interfere with customer satisfaction, reduce sales opportunities, or affect gross margins. In the past, we have had to replace certain components and provide remediation in response to the discovery of defects or bugs in products that we had shipped. Although the cost of such remediation has not been material in the past, there can be no assurance that such a remediation, depending on the product involved, would not have a material impact. An inability to cure a product defect could result in the failure of a product line, temporary or permanent withdrawal from a product or market, damage to our reputation, inventory costs, or product reengineering expenses, any of which could have a material impact on revenue, margins, and net income.

INDUSTRY CONSOLIDATION MAY LEAD TO INCREASED COMPETITION AND MAY HARM OUR OPERATING RESULTS

There has been a trend toward industry consolidation in our markets for several years. We expect this trend to continue as companies attempt to strengthen or hold their market positions in an evolving industry and as companies are acquired or are unable to continue operations. We believe that industry consolidation may result in stronger competitors that are better able to compete as sole-source vendors for customers. This could lead to more variability in operating results and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. Furthermore, particularly in the service provider market, rapid consolidation will lead to fewer customers, with the effect that loss of a major customer could have a material impact on results not anticipated in a customer marketplace composed of more numerous participants.

57

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

DUE TO THE GLOBAL NATURE OF OUR OPERATIONS, POLITICAL OR ECONOMIC CHANGES OR OTHER FACTORS IN A SPECIFIC COUNTRY OR REGION COULD HARM OUR COSTS, EXPENSES, AND FINANCIAL CONDITION

We conduct significant sales and customer support operations in countries outside of the United States and also depend on non-U.S. operations of our contract manufacturers and our distribution partners. For the first six months of fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, we derived 49.0% and 49.2% of our net sales, respectively, from sales outside the United States. Accordingly, our future results could be materially adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors, including, among others, foreign currency exchange rates; political or social unrest, economic instability or natural disasters in a specific country or region; trade protection measures and other regulatory requirements, which may affect our ability to import or export our products from various countries; political considerations that affect service provider and government spending patterns; health or similar issues, such as the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in Asia; difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; and adverse tax consequences, including imposition of withholding or other taxes on payments by subsidiaries. Any or all of these factors could have a material adverse impact on our costs, expenses, and financial condition.

WE ARE EXPOSED TO FLUCTUATIONS IN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES THAT COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS AND CASH FLOWS

Because a significant portion of our business is conducted outside the United States, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve, and they could have a material adverse impact on our financial results and cash flows. Historically, our primary exposures have related to nondollar-denominated sales in Japan, Canada, and Australia and certain nondollar-denominated operating expenses in Europe, Latin America, and Asia, where we sell primarily in U.S. dollars. Additionally, we have exposures to emerging market currencies, which can have extreme currency volatility. An increase in the value of the dollar could increase the real cost to our customers of our products in those markets outside the United States where we sell in dollars, and a weakened dollar could increase the cost of local operating expenses and procurement of raw materials to the extent that we must purchase components in foreign currencies.

Currently, we enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on certain foreign currency receivables, investments, and payables. In addition, we periodically hedge anticipated foreign currency cash flows. Our attempts to hedge against these risks may not be successful, resulting in an adverse impact on our net income.

WE ARE EXPOSED TO THE CREDIT RISK OF SOME OF OUR CUSTOMERS AND TO CREDIT EXPOSURES IN WEAKENED MARKETS, WHICH COULD RESULT IN MATERIAL LOSSES

Most of our sales are on an open credit basis, with typical payment terms of 30 days in the United States and, because of local customs or conditions, longer in some markets outside the United States. We monitor individual customer payment capability in granting such open credit arrangements, seek to limit such open credit to amounts we believe the customers can pay, and maintain reserves we believe are adequate to cover exposure for doubtful accounts. Beyond our open credit arrangements, we have also experienced demands for customer financing and facilitation of leasing arrangements. We expect demand for customer financing to continue. We believe customer financing is a competitive factor in obtaining business, particularly in supplying customers involved in significant infrastructure projects. Our loan financing arrangements may include not only financing the acquisition of our products and services but also providing additional funds for other costs associated with

58

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

network installation and integration of our products and services and for working capital purposes. We do not recognize revenue on structured loan financing arrangements until cash payments are received.

Because of the recent slowdown in the global economy, our exposure to the credit risks relating to our financing activities described above may increase. Although we have programs in place that are designed to monitor and mitigate the associated risk, including monitoring of particular risks in certain geographic areas, there can be no assurance that such programs will be effective in reducing our credit risks. There have been significant bankruptcies among customers both on open credit and with loan or lease financing arrangements, particularly among Internet businesses and service providers, causing us to incur economic or financial losses. There can be no assurance that additional losses will not be incurred. Although these losses have not been material to date, future losses, if incurred, could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. A portion of our sales is derived through our distributors and retail partners. These distributors and retail partners are generally given business terms that allow them to return a portion of inventory, receive credits for changes in selling prices, and participate in various cooperative marketing programs. We maintain estimated accruals and allowances for such business terms. However, distributors tend to have more limited financial resources than other resellers and end-user customers and therefore represent potential sources of increased credit risk because they may be more likely to lack the reserve resources to meet payment obligations.

OUR PROPRIETARY RIGHTS MAY PROVE DIFFICULT TO ENFORCE

We generally rely on patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secret laws to establish and maintain proprietary rights in our technology and products. Although we have been issued numerous patents and other patent applications are currently pending, there can be no assurance that any of these patents or other proprietary rights will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented or that our rights will, in fact, provide competitive advantages to us. Furthermore, many key aspects of networking technology are governed by industrywide standards, which are usable by all market entrants. In addition, there can be no assurance that patents will be issued from pending applications or that claims allowed on any patents will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. The outcome of any actions taken in these foreign countries may be different than if such actions were determined under the laws of the United States. Although we are not dependent on any individual patents or group of patents for particular segments of the business for which we compete, if we are unable to protect our proprietary rights to the totality of the features (including aspects of products protected other than by patent rights) in a market, we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage to others who need not incur the substantial expense, time, and effort required to create the innovative products that have enabled us to be successful.

WE MAY BE FOUND TO INFRINGE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OF OTHERS

Third parties, including customers, have in the past and may in the future assert claims or initiate litigation related to exclusive patent, copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property rights to technologies and related standards that are relevant to us. These assertions have increased over time as a result of our growth and the general increase in the pace of patent claims assertions, particularly in the United States. Because of the existence of a large number of patents in the networking field, the secrecy of some pending patents, and the rapid rate of issuance of new patents, it is not economically practical or even possible to determine in advance whether a product or any of its components infringes or will infringe on the patent rights of others. The asserted claims and/or initiated litigation can include claims against us or our manufacturers, suppliers, or customers, alleging infringement of their proprietary rights with respect to our existing or future products or components of those

59

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

products. Regardless of the merit of these claims, they can be time-consuming, result in costly litigation and diversion of technical and management personnel, or require us to develop a non-infringing technology or enter into license agreements. Where claims are made by customers, resistance even to unmeritorious claims could damage customer relationships. There can be no assurance that licenses will be available on acceptable terms and conditions, if at all, or that our indemnification by our suppliers will be adequate to cover our costs if a claim were brought directly against us or our customers. Furthermore, because of the potential for high court awards that are not necessarily predictable, it is not unusual to find even arguably unmeritorious claims settled for significant amounts. If any infringement or other intellectual property claim made against us by any third party is successful, or if we fail to develop non-infringing technology or license the proprietary rights on commercially reasonable terms and conditions, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Our exposure to risks associated with the use of intellectual property may be increased as a result of acquisitions, as we have a lower level of visibility into the development process with respect to such technology or the care taken to safeguard against infringement risks. Further, in the past, third parties have made infringement and similar claims after we have acquired technology that had not been asserted prior to our acquisition.

WE RELY ON THE AVAILABILITY OF THIRD-PARTY LICENSES

Many of our products are designed to include software or other intellectual property licensed from third parties. It may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of these products. There can be no assurance that the necessary licenses would be available on acceptable terms, if at all. The inability to obtain certain licenses or other rights or to obtain such licenses or rights on favorable terms, or the need to engage in litigation regarding these matters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. Moreover, the inclusion in our products of software or other intellectual property licensed from third parties on a nonexclusive basis could limit our ability to protect our proprietary rights in our products.

OUR OPERATING RESULTS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS COULD BE MATERIALLY HARMED BY UNCERTAINTIES OF REGULATION OF THE INTERNET

Currently, few laws or regulations apply directly to access or commerce on the Internet. We could be materially adversely affected by regulation of the Internet and Internet commerce in any country where we operate. Such regulations could include matters such as voice over the Internet or using IP, encryption technology, sales taxes on Internet product sales, and access charges for Internet service providers. The adoption of regulation of the Internet and Internet commerce could decrease demand for our products and, at the same time, increase the cost of selling our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

CHANGES IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION AND TARIFFS COULD HARM OUR PROSPECTS AND FUTURE SALES

Changes in telecommunications requirements in the United States or other countries could affect the sales of our products. In particular, we believe that there may be future changes in U.S. telecommunications regulations that could slow the expansion of the service providers’ network infrastructures and materially adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. Future changes in tariffs by regulatory agencies or application of tariff requirements to currently untariffed services could affect the sales of our products for certain

60

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

classes of customers. Additionally, in the United States, our products must comply with various Federal Communications Commission requirements and regulations. In countries outside of the United States, our products must meet various requirements of local telecommunications authorities. Changes in tariffs or failure by us to obtain timely approval of products could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

FAILURE TO RETAIN AND RECRUIT KEY PERSONNEL WOULD HARM OUR ABILITY TO MEET KEY OBJECTIVES

Our success has always depended in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled technical, managerial, sales, and marketing personnel. In spite of the recent economic slowdown, competition for these personnel is intense, especially in the Silicon Valley area of Northern California. Volatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price may also adversely affect our ability to retain key employees, virtually all of who have been granted stock options. The loss of services of any of our key personnel, the inability to retain and attract qualified personnel in the future, or delays in hiring required personnel, particularly engineering and sales personnel, could make it difficult to meet key objectives, such as timely and effective product introductions. In addition, companies in the networking industry whose employees accept positions with competitors frequently claim that competitors have engaged in improper hiring practices. We have received these claims in the past and may receive additional claims to this effect in the future.

ADVERSE RESOLUTION OF LITIGATION MAY HARM OUR OPERATING RESULTS OR FINANCIAL CONDITION

We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution of a particular lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition. For additional information regarding certain of the lawsuits in which we are involved, see Item 1, “Legal Proceedings,” contained in Part II of this report.

CHANGES IN EFFECTIVE TAX RATES OR ADVERSE OUTCOMES RESULTING FROM EXAMINATION OF OUR INCOME TAX RETURNS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR RESULTS

Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. In addition, we are subject to the continuous examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these continuous examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS ARE ESPECIALLY SUBJECT TO THE RISKS OF EARTHQUAKES, FLOODS, AND OTHER NATURAL CATASTROPHIC EVENTS

Our corporate headquarters, including certain of our research and development operations and our manufacturing facilities, are located in the Silicon Valley area of Northern California, a region known for seismic activity. Additionally, a certain number of our facilities, including one of our manufacturing facilities, are located near

61

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

rivers that have experienced flooding in the past. A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake or a flood, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

MANMADE PROBLEMS SUCH AS COMPUTER VIRUSES OR TERRORISM MAY DISRUPT OUR OPERATIONS AND HARM OUR OPERATING RESULTS

Despite our implementation of network security measures, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins, and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition, the continued threat of terrorism and heightened security and military action in response to this threat, or any future acts of terrorism, may cause further disruptions to the economies of the U.S. and other countries and create further uncertainties or otherwise materially harm our business, operating results, and financial condition. Similarly, events such as widespread blackouts could have similar negative impacts. To the extent that such disruptions or uncertainties result in delays or cancellations of customer orders or the manufacture or shipment of our products, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

WE ARE EXPOSED TO FLUCTUATIONS IN THE MARKET VALUES OF OUR PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND IN INTEREST RATES; IMPAIRMENT OF OUR INVESTMENTS COULD HARM OUR EARNINGS

We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types, and maturities. These securities are generally classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. Part of this portfolio includes equity investments in publicly traded companies, the values of which are subject to market price volatility. The recent economic downturn and other factors have adversely affected the public equities market, and general economic conditions may worsen. As a result, we may recognize in earnings the decline in fair value of our publicly traded equity investments below the cost basis when the decline is judged to be other-than-temporary. For information regarding the sensitivity of and risks associated with the market value of portfolio investments and interest rates, refer to the section titled “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” included in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004. Our investments in private companies are subject to risk of loss of investment capital. These investments are inherently risky because the markets for the technologies or products they have under development are typically in the early stages and may never materialize. We could lose our entire investment in these companies.

IF WE DO NOT SUCCESSFULLY MANAGE OUR STRATEGIC ALLIANCES, WE MAY EXPERIENCE INCREASED COMPETITION OR DELAYS IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

We have several strategic alliances with large and complex organizations and other companies with whom we work to offer complementary products and services. These arrangements are generally limited to specific projects, the goal of which is generally to facilitate product compatibility and adoption of industry standards. If successful, these relationships may be mutually beneficial and result in industry growth. However, these alliances carry an element of risk because, in most cases, we must compete in some business areas with a company with which we have a strategic alliance and, at the same time, cooperate with that company in other business areas. Also, if these companies fail to perform or if these relationships fail to materialize as expected, we could suffer delays in product development or other operational difficulties.

62

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RISK FACTORS

OUR STOCK PRICE MAY CONTINUE TO BE VOLATILE

Our common stock has experienced substantial price volatility, particularly as a result of variations between our actual financial results and the published expectations of analysts and as a result of announcements by our competitors and us. Furthermore, speculation in the press or investment community about our strategic position, financial condition, results of operations, business, or significant transactions can cause changes in our stock price. In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many technology companies, in particular, and that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These factors, as well as general economic and political conditions, may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock in the future. Additionally, volatility or a lack of positive performance in our stock price may adversely affect our ability to retain key employees, all of whom are compensated in part based on the performance of our stock price.

63

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Investments

We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types, and maturities. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These securities are generally classified as available-for-sale and consequently are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.

Fixed Income Securities

At any time, a sharp rise in interest rates could have a material adverse impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. Conversely, declines in interest rates could have a material impact on interest earnings for our investment portfolio. These instruments are not leveraged as of January 29, 2005, and are held for purposes other than trading.

Publicly Traded Equity Securities

The values of our equity investments in several publicly traded companies are subject to market price volatility. The following tables present the hypothetical changes in fair value of publicly traded equity securities, excluding the effects of hedging, held at January 29, 2005 and July 31, 2004 that are sensitive to changes in market price (in millions):

	Valuation of Securities Given an X% Decrease in Each Stock’s Price						Fair Value As of January 29, 2005		Valuation of Securities Given an X% Increase in Each Stock’s Price
	(75%)		(50%)		(25%)				25%		50%		75%
Publicly traded equity securities	$	258	$	516	$	773	$	1,031	$	1,289	$	1,547	$	1,804
	Valuation of Securities Given an X% Decrease in Each Stock’s Price						Fair Value As of July 31, 2004		Valuation of Securities Given an X% Increase in Each Stock’s Price
	(75%)		(50%)		(25%)				25%		50%		75%
Publicly traded equity securities	$	284	$	567	$	851	$	1,134	$	1,418	$	1,701	$	1,985

Our equity portfolio consists of securities with characteristics that most closely match the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index or Nasdaq Composite Index. These equity securities are held for purposes other than trading. The modeling technique used measures the change in fair values arising from selected hypothetical changes in each stock’s price. Stock price fluctuations of plus or minus 25%, 50%, and 75% were selected based on the probability of their occurrence. Our impairment charges on investments in publicly held companies were $5 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and the first six months of fiscal 2005. There were no impairment charges on investments in publicly held companies in fiscal 2004.

Investments in Privately Held Companies

We have invested in privately held companies, some of which are in the startup or development stages. These investments are inherently risky because the markets for the technologies or products these companies are developing are typically in the early stages and may never materialize. We could lose our entire initial investment in these companies. These investments are primarily carried at cost, which as of January 29, 2005 was $403 million, compared with $354 million at July 31, 2004, and are recorded in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our impairment charges on investments in privately held companies were $5 million and $44 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively, and were $23 million and $85 million for the first six months of fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively.

64

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our evaluation of equity investments in private and public companies is based on the fundamentals of the businesses, including, among other factors, the nature of their technologies and potential for financial return to us.

Derivative Instruments

Foreign Currency Derivatives

We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on receivables, investments, and payables, primarily denominated in Australian, Canadian, Japanese, and several European currencies, including the euro and British pound. Our market risks associated with our foreign currency receivables, investments, and payables relate primarily to variances from our forecasted foreign currency transactions and balances.

Approximately 75% of our operating expenses are U.S.-dollar denominated. In order to reduce variability in operating expenses caused by the remaining non-U.S.-dollar-denominated operating expenses, we periodically hedge certain foreign currency forecasted transactions with currency options with maturities up to 18 months. These hedging programs are not designed to provide foreign currency protection over longer time horizons. In designing a specific hedging approach, we consider several factors, including offsetting exposures, significance of exposures, costs associated with entering into a particular hedge instrument, and potential effectiveness of the hedge. The gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts mitigate the variability in operating expenses associated with currency movements. Due primarily to our limited currency exposure to date, the impact of foreign currency fluctuations has not been material to our Consolidated Financial Statements. In the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2005, the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, net of hedging, increased total research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses by approximately 2%, compared with the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal 2004. The impact of foreign currency fluctuations on sales has not been material because our sales are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars.

Foreign exchange forward and option contracts as of January 29, 2005 are summarized as follows (in millions):

	Notional Amount		Fair Value
Forward contracts:
Purchased	$	1,168	$	(2	)
Sold	$	436	$	(6	)
Option contracts:
Purchased	$	575	$	17
Sold	$	687	$	(2	)

Our foreign exchange forward contracts related to current assets and liabilities generally range from one to three months in original maturity. Additionally, we have entered into foreign exchange forward contracts related to long-term customer financings with maturities of up to two years. The foreign exchange forward contracts related to investments generally have maturities of less than one year. Currency option contracts generally have maturities of less than 18 months. We do not enter into foreign exchange forward and option contracts for trading purposes. We do not expect gains or losses on these derivative instruments to have a material impact on our financial results. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

65

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Derivatives

Our primary objective for holding fixed income and debt securities is to maximize our investment return while preserving principal and managing risk. To realize these objectives, we may utilize interest rate swaps or other derivatives designated as fair value or cash flow hedges. As of January 29, 2005, we had entered into $1 billion of interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges. Under the interest rate swap contracts, we make fixed rate interest payments and receive interest payments based on the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The effect of these swaps is to convert fixed-rate returns to LIBOR-based returns on a portion of our fixed income portfolio. The gains and losses related to changes in the value of the interest rate swaps are included in other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and offset the changes in fair value of the underlying hedged investment. As of January 29, 2005, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was not material.

Equity Derivatives

We maintain a portfolio of publicly traded equity securities which are subject to market price risk. We may hold equity securities for strategic purposes or to provide diversification for our overall investment portfolio. In order to manage our exposure to changes in the value of certain equity securities, we may, from time to time, enter into equity derivative contracts. As of January 29, 2005, we had entered into forward sale agreements on certain publicly traded equity securities designated as fair value hedges. The gains and losses due to changes in the value of the hedging instruments are included in other income, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and offset the change in the fair value of the underlying hedged investment. As of January 29, 2005 the notional and fair value amounts of the derivatives were $121.9 million and $2.7 million respectively.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on our management’s evaluation (with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our second quarter of fiscal 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

66

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Beginning on April 20, 2001, a number of purported shareholder class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against us and certain of our officers and directors. The lawsuits have been consolidated, and the consolidated action is purportedly brought on behalf of those who purchased our publicly traded securities between August 10, 1999 and February 6, 2001. Plaintiffs allege that defendants have made false and misleading statements, purport to assert claims for violations of the federal securities laws, and seek unspecified compensatory damages and other relief. We believe the claims are without merit and intend to defend the actions vigorously.

In addition, beginning on April 23, 2001, a number of purported shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara and in the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. There is a procedure in place for the coordination of such actions (one of which has been dismissed and is currently on appeal). Two purported derivative suits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and those federal court actions have been consolidated. The consolidated federal court derivative action was dismissed by the court, and plaintiffs have appealed from that decision. The complaints in the various derivative actions include claims for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, mismanagement, unjust enrichment, and violations of the California Corporations Code; seek compensatory and other damages, disgorgement, and other relief; and are based on essentially the same allegations as the class actions.

On February 16, 2005, we were advised that a purported shareholder derivative lawsuit had been filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, against various of our officers and directors and naming us as a nominal defendant. The lawsuit includes claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, constructive trust and violations of the California Corporations Code, is based upon allegations of wrongdoing in connection with option grants and compensation to officers and directors, the timing of option grants, and our share repurchase plan, and seeks unspecified compensation and other damages, rescission of options and other relief.

In addition, we are subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) From November 22, 2004 through January 20, 2005, we issued 104,855 shares of our common stock following the exercise by thirteen former employees and ten former consultants of P-Cube Inc. at exercise prices ranging from $0.11 to $14.19 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $252,900.69, under options that were assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of P-Cube Inc. All such sales of our common stock made by us pursuant to the exercise of these stock options were effected without registration in reliance on the exemption afforded by Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act. In addition, from January 14, 2005 through January 19, 2005, we issued 33,071 shares of our common stock following the exercise by four entities that were formerly consultants to P-Cube Inc. at exercise prices ranging from $1.44 to $10.29 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $56,224.44, under options that were assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of P-Cube Inc. All such sales of our common stock made by us pursuant to the exercise of these stock options were effected without registration as a private placement to those four entities in reliance on the exemption afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

(b) None.

67

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (in millions, except per-share amounts)

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
October 31, 2004 to November 27, 2004	34	$	19.20	34	$	14,426
November 28, 2004 to December 25, 2004	76	$	19.44	76	$	12,951
December 26, 2004 to January 29, 2005	30	$	19.04	30	$	12,380
Total	140	$	19.30	140	$	12,380

⁽¹⁾ In September 2001, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program. As of January 29, 2005, our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $35 billion of common stock under this program. During the first six months of fiscal 2005, we repurchased and retired 296 million shares of our common stock at an average price of $19.27 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $5.7 billion. As of January 29, 2005, we had repurchased and retired 1.3 billion shares of our common stock at an average price of $18.07 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $22.6 billion since inception of the stock repurchase program, and the remaining authorized amount for stock repurchases under this program was $12.4 billion with no termination date.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

68

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

We held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on November 18, 2004. At the meeting, our shareholders voted on the following three proposals and cast their votes as follows:

Proposal 1: To elect the following nominees as directors:

Nominee	For	Withhold
Carol A. Bartz	5,433,736,173	298,490,434
M. Michele Burns	5,400,731,586	331,495,021
Larry R. Carter	5,566,234,241	165,992,366
John T. Chambers	5,585,169,873	147,056,734
Dr. James F. Gibbons	5,417,648,320	314,578,287
Dr. John L. Hennessy	5,630,193,792	102,032,815
Roderick C. McGeary	5,416,694,544	315,532,063
James C. Morgan	5,469,188,420	263,038,187
John P. Morgridge	5,559,474,371	172,752,236
Donald T. Valentine	5,577,991,095	154,235,512
Steven M. West	5,306,781,660	425,444,947
Jerry Yang	5,052,537,867	679,688,740

Proposal 2: To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 30, 2005:

For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-votes
5,260,747,787	435,073,553	36,394,266	11,001

Proposal 3: A shareholder proposal that our Board’s Compensation Committee initiate a review of our company’s executive compensation policies and make available, upon request, a report by January 1, 2005, comparing total compensation of our top executives and our lowest paid workers in the United States as of specific dates:

For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-votes
417,326,475	3,394,370,051	232,900,737	1,687,629,344

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer

69

Signature

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Cisco Systems, Inc.
Date: February 18, 2005	By	/s/    DENNIS D. POWELL
		Dennis D. Powell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal financial officer and duly authorized signatory)

70

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO.
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer

71